ML062130054: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML062130054
| number = ML062130054
| issue date = 07/05/2006
| issue date = 07/05/2006
| title = 2006/07/05-Email: (PA) Quality Assurance for Aging Management of NSR Components
| title = Email: (PA) Quality Assurance for Aging Management of NSR Components
| author name = Davis J
| author name = Davis J
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DRIP
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DRIP
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:James Davis - Re: Quality Assurance for aging management of NSR components                                           Pag Pacje 1e 1I James Davis Re: Quality Assurance for aging management of NSR components
{{#Wiki_filter:James Davis - Re: Quality Assurance for aging management of NSR components Pag 1e James Davis - Re: Quality Assurance for aging management of NSR components Pacje 1 I From:
            -
James Davis To:
From:             James Davis To:               erachp@comcast.net Date:             07/05/2006 3:11:07 PM
erachp@comcast.net Date:
07/05/2006 3:11:07 PM


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Re: Quality Assurance for aging management of NSR components Erach, Attached is the writeup for the corrective action plan.
Re: Quality Assurance for aging management of NSR components
: Erach, Attached is the writeup for the corrective action plan.
Jim
Jim
            >>> <erachp@comcast.net> 07/05/2006 1:21 PM >>>
>>> <erachp@comcast.net> 07/05/2006 1:21 PM >>>
Hi, In each of the AMR sections in the SRP, under AMR results for which further evaluation is recommended, we need to address how the applicant has applied their Corrective Action program to non-safety related components. This is intended to address elements 7-9 in the AMPs.
Hi, In each of the AMR sections in the SRP, under AMR results for which further evaluation is recommended, we need to address how the applicant has applied their Corrective Action program to non-safety related components. This is intended to address elements 7-9 in the AMPs.
These sections in the SRP are:
These sections in the SRP are:
Line 31: Line 33:
Jim Davis and I discussed this today, and here is how we will address it.
Jim Davis and I discussed this today, and here is how we will address it.
In the Audit and review report, in the above listed sections, please make the following statement:
In the Audit and review report, in the above listed sections, please make the following statement:
3.1.2.2.15 (etc.) Quality Assurance for Aging Management of Non-                       Safety Related Components The applicant referenced LRA Section B.0.3. The project team's evaluation of Section B.0.3 is provided in Section 3.0.4 of this audit and review report.
3.1.2.2.15 (etc.) Quality Assurance for Aging Management of Non-Safety Related Components The applicant referenced LRA Section B.0.3. The project team's evaluation of Section B.0.3 is provided in Section 3.0.4 of this audit and review report.
I will create a new Section 3.0.4 in the AMP part of the audit and review report. Jim Davis reviewed the PNPS Corrective Action program and will provide me the appropriate words to include in this section.
I will create a new Section 3.0.4 in the AMP part of the audit and review report. Jim Davis reviewed the PNPS Corrective Action program and will provide me the appropriate words to include in this section.
Ifyou have any questions, please call me or e-mail me.
If you have any questions, please call me or e-mail me.
erach
erach


c:\temD\GMtO0001 .TMP                                                                                   Paae 11 Pame c:\temD\GWIOOOO1 .TMP Mail Envelope Properties       (44ACOECB.86E: 22 : 35346)
c:\\temD\\GMtO0001.TMP Pame 1 c:\\temD\\GWIOOOO1.TMP Paae 1 Mail Envelope Properties (44ACOECB.86E: 22 : 35346)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Re: Quality Assurance for aging management of NSR components Creation Date            07/05/2006 3:11:07 PM From:                    James Davis Created By:              JAD @nrc.gov Recipients                                         Action               Date & Time comcast.net                                        Transferred          07/05/2006 3:11:29 PM erachp (erachp@comcast.net)
Creation Date From:
Post Office                                         Delivered           Route comcast.net Files                             Size               Date & Time MESSAGE                            2065              07/05/2006 3:11:07 PM project staff review - corrective action plan.wpd    2277               07/05/2006 3:09:02 PM Options Auto Delete:                       No Expiration Date:                   None Notify Recipients:                 Yes Priority:                         Standard ReplyRequested:                   No Return Notification:               None Concealed  
Created By:
Re: Quality Assurance for aging management of NSR components 07/05/2006 3:11:07 PM James Davis JAD @nrc.gov Recipients comcast.net PM erachp (erachp@comcast.net)
Action Transferred Date & Time 07/05/2006 3:11:29 Post Office Delivered Route comcast.net Files Size MESSAGE 2065 project staff review - corrective action plan.wpd PM Date & Time 07/05/2006 3:11:07 PM 2277 07/05/2006 3:09:02 Options Auto Delete:
Expiration Date:
Notify Recipients:
Priority:
ReplyRequested:
Return Notification:
Concealed  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
No Security:                         Standard To Be Delivered:                 Immediate Status Tracking:                 Delivered & Opened
Security:
To Be Delivered:
Status Tracking:
No None Yes Standard No None No Standard Immediate Delivered & Opened


James Davis - project staff review - corrective action plan.wpd                                           Paqei1I 5
James Davis - project staff review - corrective action plan.wpd Paqei 1I 5
The project staff reviewed the applicant's corrective action procedure and found it to be acceptable. The corrective action procedure is reviewed on a routine basis by the regional inspection teams and has been found to be acceptable during past inspections.}}
The project staff reviewed the applicant's corrective action procedure and found it to be acceptable. The corrective action procedure is reviewed on a routine basis by the regional inspection teams and has been found to be acceptable during past inspections.}}

Latest revision as of 07:40, 15 January 2025

Email: (PA) Quality Assurance for Aging Management of NSR Components
ML062130054
Person / Time
Site: Pilgrim
Issue date: 07/05/2006
From: Jennifer Davis
Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs
To:
- No Known Affiliation
References
%dam200612, TAC MC9669
Download: ML062130054 (3)


Text

James Davis - Re: Quality Assurance for aging management of NSR components Pag 1e James Davis - Re: Quality Assurance for aging management of NSR components Pacje 1 I From:

James Davis To:

erachp@comcast.net Date:

07/05/2006 3:11:07 PM

Subject:

Re: Quality Assurance for aging management of NSR components

Erach, Attached is the writeup for the corrective action plan.

Jim

>>> <erachp@comcast.net> 07/05/2006 1:21 PM >>>

Hi, In each of the AMR sections in the SRP, under AMR results for which further evaluation is recommended, we need to address how the applicant has applied their Corrective Action program to non-safety related components. This is intended to address elements 7-9 in the AMPs.

These sections in the SRP are:

3.1.2.2.18, 3.2.2.2.10, 3.3.2.2.15, 3.4.2.2.10, 3.5.2.2.3, and 3.6.2.2.4.

Jim Davis and I discussed this today, and here is how we will address it.

In the Audit and review report, in the above listed sections, please make the following statement:

3.1.2.2.15 (etc.) Quality Assurance for Aging Management of Non-Safety Related Components The applicant referenced LRA Section B.0.3. The project team's evaluation of Section B.0.3 is provided in Section 3.0.4 of this audit and review report.

I will create a new Section 3.0.4 in the AMP part of the audit and review report. Jim Davis reviewed the PNPS Corrective Action program and will provide me the appropriate words to include in this section.

If you have any questions, please call me or e-mail me.

erach

c:\\temD\\GMtO0001.TMP Pame 1 c:\\temD\\GWIOOOO1.TMP Paae 1 Mail Envelope Properties (44ACOECB.86E: 22 : 35346)

Subject:

Creation Date From:

Created By:

Re: Quality Assurance for aging management of NSR components 07/05/2006 3:11:07 PM James Davis JAD @nrc.gov Recipients comcast.net PM erachp (erachp@comcast.net)

Action Transferred Date & Time 07/05/2006 3:11:29 Post Office Delivered Route comcast.net Files Size MESSAGE 2065 project staff review - corrective action plan.wpd PM Date & Time 07/05/2006 3:11:07 PM 2277 07/05/2006 3:09:02 Options Auto Delete:

Expiration Date:

Notify Recipients:

Priority:

ReplyRequested:

Return Notification:

Concealed

Subject:

Security:

To Be Delivered:

Status Tracking:

No None Yes Standard No None No Standard Immediate Delivered & Opened

James Davis - project staff review - corrective action plan.wpd Paqei 1I 5

The project staff reviewed the applicant's corrective action procedure and found it to be acceptable. The corrective action procedure is reviewed on a routine basis by the regional inspection teams and has been found to be acceptable during past inspections.