IR 05000483/2009008: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 08/17/2009
| issue date = 08/17/2009
| title = IR 05000483-09-008 on 06/22/09 & 06/26/09 for Callaway Plant, Radiation Safety Team Inspection
| title = IR 05000483-09-008 on 06/22/09 & 06/26/09 for Callaway Plant, Radiation Safety Team Inspection
| author name = Werner G E
| author name = Werner G
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-IV/DRS/PSB-2
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-IV/DRS/PSB-2
| addressee name = Heflin A C
| addressee name = Heflin A
| addressee affiliation = AmerenUE
| addressee affiliation = AmerenUE
| docket = 05000483
| docket = 05000483
Line 19: Line 19:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:- 1 -August 17, 2009 Mr. Adam C. Heflin, Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer AmerenUE P. O. Box 620 Fulton, MO 65251
{{#Wiki_filter:August 17, 2009


SUBJECT: CALLAWAY PLANT- NRC RADIATION SAFETY TEAM INSPECTION REPORT 000483/2009008
==SUBJECT:==
CALLAWAY PLANT-NRC RADIATION SAFETY TEAM INSPECTION REPORT 000483/2009008


==Dear Mr. Heflin:==
==Dear Mr. Heflin:==
On June 26, 2009, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at your Callaway Plant. The enclosed Radiation Safety Team inspection report documents the inspection findings which were discussed with you and other members of your staff. A subsequent telephone exit was conducted on July 13, 2009, with Mr. D. Trokey, Licensing Representative, and other members of your staff to recharacterize several issues based upon additional information we received after the onsite inspection period.
On June 26, 2009, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at your Callaway Plant. The enclosed Radiation Safety Team inspection report documents the inspection findings which were discussed with you and other members of your staff. A subsequent telephone exit was conducted on July 13, 2009, with Mr. D. Trokey, Licensing Representative, and other members of your staff to recharacterize several issues based upon additional information we received after the onsite inspection period.


The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.
The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.


The team reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel. Specifically, the team evaluated the inspection areas within the Radiation Protection Strategic Performance Area that are scheduled for review every two years. These areas are:  
The team reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel. Specifically, the team evaluated the inspection areas within the Radiation Protection Strategic Performance Area that are scheduled for review every two years. These areas are:  
* Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation * Radioactive Gaseous and Liquid Effluent Treatment and Monitoring Systems * Radioactive Material Processing and Transportation  
* Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation  
* Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program and Radioactive Material Control Program Based on the results of this inspection, no findings of significance were identified. AmerenUE - 2 -
*
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Radioactive Gaseous and Liquid Effluent Treatment and Monitoring Systems  
*
Radioactive Material Processing and Transportation  
*
Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program and Radioactive Material Control Program  


Sincerely,/RA/
Based on the results of this inspection, no findings of significance were identified.
Gregory E. Werner, Chief Plant Support Branch 2 Division of Reactor Safety Docket No. 50-483 License No. NPF-30  
 
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION R E GI ON I V 612 EAST LAMAR BLVD, SUITE 400 ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011-4125
 
AmerenUE
- 2 -
 
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
 
Sincerely,
/RA/  
 
Gregory E. Werner, Chief  
 
Plant Support Branch 2  
 
Division of Reactor Safety  
 
Docket No. 50-483 License No. NPF-30  


===Enclosure:===
===Enclosure:===
NRC Inspection Report No. 05000483/2009008  
NRC Inspection Report No. 05000483/2009008 w/Attachment: Supplemental Information
 
REGION IV==
Docket:
05000483
 
License:
NPF-30
 
Report:
05000483/2009008
 
Licensee:
AmerenUE


===w/Attachment:===
Facility:
Supplemental Information
Callaway Plant


cc w/enclosure: Mr. Luke H. Graessle Director, Operations Support AmerenUE P.O. Box 620 Fulton, MO 65251 E. Hope Bradley Manager, Protective Services AmerenUE P.O. Box 620 Fulton, MO 65251 Mr. Scott Sandbothe, Manager Regulatory Affairs AmerenUE P.O. Box 620 Fulton, MO 65251 R. E. Farnam Assistant Manager, Technical Training AmerenUE P.O. Box 620 Fulton, MO 65251
Location:
Junction of Highway CC and Highway O Fulton, MO  


AmerenUE - 3 -
Dates:
J. S. Geyer Radiation Protection Manager AmerenUE P.O. Box 620 Fulton, MO 65251 John O'Neill, Esq. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP 2300 N. Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20037 Missouri Public Service Commission P.O. Box 360 Jefferson City, MO 65102-0360
June 22 - 26, 2009


Deputy Director for Policy Department of Natural Resources P.O. Box 176 Jefferson City, MO 65102-0176
Inspectors:
D. Stearns, Health Physicist, Team Leader L. Carson II, Senior Health Physicist D. Graves, Health Physicist L. Ricketson, P.E., Senior Health Physicist


Mr. Rick A. Muench, President and Chief Executive officer Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation P.O. Box 411 Burlington, KS 66839 Mr. Lee Fritz, Presiding Commissioner Callaway County Courthouse 10 East Fifth Street Fulton, MO 65251 Director, Missouri State Emergency Management Agency P.O. Box 116 Jefferson City, MO 65102-0116 Mr. Scott Clardy, Administrator Section for Disease Control Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services P.O. Box 570 Jefferson City, MO 65102-0570 Chief, Technological Hazards Branch FEMA Region VII 9221 Ward Parkway, Suite 300 Kansas City, MO 64114-3372 AmerenUE - 4 -
Accompanied By:
Kathleen Logan Smith, Executive Director, and Kay Drey, Representative, Board of Directors Missouri Coalition for the Environment 6267 Derlmar Boulevard, Suite 2E St. Louis, MO 63130 Certrec Corporation 4200 South Hulen, Suite 422 Fort Worth, TX 76109 Mr. Keith G. Henke, Planner II Division of Community and Public Health Office of Emergency Coordination Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services 930 Wildwood Drive P.O. Box 570 Jefferson City, MO 65102
N. Greene, Health Physicist Approved By:
Gregory E. Werner, Chief Plant Support Branch Division of Reactor Safety


AmerenUE - 5 -
- 2 -  
Electronic distribution by RIV: Regional Administrator (Elmo.Collins@nrc.gov) Deputy Regional Administrator (Chuck.Casto@nrc.gov)
DRP Director (Dwight.Chamberlain@nrc.gov) DRP Deputy Director (Anton.Vegel@nrc.gov) DRS Director (Roy.Caniano@nrc.gov) DRS Deputy Director (Troy.Pruett@nrc.gov) Senior Resident Inspector (David.Dumbacher@nrc.gov)
Resident Inspector (Jeremy.Groom@nrc.gov) Branch Chief, DRP/B (Vincent.Gaddy@nrc.gov) Senior Project Engineer, DRP/B (Rick.Deese@nrc.gov) CWY Site Secretary (Dawn.Yancey@nrc.gov) Public Affairs Officer (Victor.Dricks@nrc.gov) Team Leader, DRP/TSS (Chuck.Paulk@nrc.gov) RITS Coordinator (Marisa.Herrera@nrc.gov)
Regional Counsel (Karla.Fuller@nrc.gov) Congressional Affairs Officer (Jenny.Weil@nrc.gov) OEMail Resource DRS STA (Dale.Powers@nrc.gov) OEDO RIV Coordinator (Leigh.Trocine@nrc.gov)
ROPreports


File located: R:_REACTORS\CW\CW2009-008RP-DLS  ML SUNSI Rev Compl. Yes No ADAMS Yes No Reviewer Initials DLS Publicly Avail Yes No Sensitive Yes No Sens. Type Initials DLS RIV:DRS/PSB2 RI:DRS/PSB RI:DRS/PSB2 RI:DRS/ C:DRP/B DLStearns LTRicketson DCGraves LCCarsonII VGGaddy
Enclosure  
/RA/ /RA/ /R A//RA//RA/ 8/4/09 8/6/09 8/7/09 8/12/09 8/11/09 D:DRS/PSB2 GEWerner
/RA/ 8/14/09 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY T=Telephone E=E-mail F=Fax Enclosure U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSI0N REGION IV Docket: 05000483 License: NPF-30 Report: 05000483/2009008 Licensee: AmerenUE Facility: Callaway Plant Location: Junction of Highway CC and Highway O Fulton, MO Dates: June 22 - 26, 2009 Inspectors: D. Stearns, Health Physicist, Team Leader L. Carson II, Senior Health Physicist D. Graves, Health Physicist L. Ricketson, P.E., Senior Health Physicist Accompanied By: N. Greene, Health Physicist Approved By: Gregory E. Werner, Chief Plant Support Branch Division of Reactor Safety Enclosure  


=SUMMARY OF FINDINGS=
=SUMMARY OF FINDINGS=
IR 05000483/2009008; 06/22/2009 - 06/26/2009; AmerenUE; Callaway Plant; Radiation Safety Team Inspection 
IR 05000483/2009008; 06/22/2009 - 06/26/2009; AmerenUE; Callaway Plant; Radiation Safety  


The report covered a five-day period of inspection on site by a team of five region-based health physics inspectors. The NRC's program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, "Reactor Oversight Process," Revision 4, dated December 2006.
Team Inspection


===A. NRC-Identified and Self-Revealing Findings===
The report covered a five-day period of inspection on site by a team of five region-based health physics inspectors. The NRC's program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, Reactor Oversight Process, Revision 4, dated December 2006.


===NRC-Identified and Self-Revealing Findings===
No findings of significance were identified.
No findings of significance were identified.


===B. Licensee-Identified Violations===
===Licensee-Identified Violations===
 
None
None


Line 79: Line 110:


==RADIATION SAFETY==
==RADIATION SAFETY==
Cornerstones: Occupational Radiation Safety [OS] and Public Radiation Safety [PS]
Cornerstones: Occupational Radiation Safety [OS] and Public Radiation Safety  
[PS]
2OS3 Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation and Protective Equipment (71121.03)
2OS3 Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation and Protective Equipment (71121.03)


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
This area was inspected to determine the accuracy and operability of radiation monitoring instruments that are used for the protection of occupational workers and the adequacy of the program to provide self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) to workers. The team used the requirements in 10 CFR Part 20 and the licensee's procedures required by technical specifications as criteria for determining compliance.
This area was inspected to determine the accuracy and operability of radiation monitoring instruments that are used for the protection of occupational workers and the adequacy of the program to provide self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) to workers. The team used the requirements in 10 CFR Part 20 and the licensees procedures required by technical specifications as criteria for determining compliance.


The team interviewed licensee personnel and reviewed:
The team interviewed licensee personnel and reviewed:
Line 93: Line 125:
* Licensee action in cases of repetitive deficiencies or significant individual deficiencies
* Licensee action in cases of repetitive deficiencies or significant individual deficiencies
* Calibration expiration and source response check currency on radiation detection instruments staged for use
* Calibration expiration and source response check currency on radiation detection instruments staged for use
* The licensee's capability for refilling and transporting SCBA air bottles to and from the control room and operations support center during emergency conditions, status of SCBA staged and ready for use in the plant and associated surveillance records, and personnel qualification and training
* The licensees capability for refilling and transporting SCBA air bottles to and from the control room and operations support center during emergency conditions, status of SCBA staged and ready for use in the plant and associated surveillance records, and personnel qualification and training
* Qualification documentation for onsite personnel designated to perform maintenance on the vendor-designated vital components, and the vital component maintenance records for SCBA units Specific documents reviewed during this inspection are listed in the attachment.
* Qualification documentation for onsite personnel designated to perform maintenance on the vendor-designated vital components, and the vital component maintenance records for SCBA units  
 
Specific documents reviewed during this inspection are listed in the attachment.


Either because the conditions did not exist or an event had not occurred, no opportunities were available to review the following items:
Either because the conditions did not exist or an event had not occurred, no opportunities were available to review the following items:
* Licensee event reports or special reports These activities constitute completion of nine of the required nine samples as defined in Inspection Procedure
* Licensee event reports or special reports  


==71121.03 - 05.==
These activities constitute completion of nine of the required nine samples as defined in Inspection Procedure 71121.03-05.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
Line 110: Line 144:
: (1) ensure that the gaseous and liquid effluent processing systems are maintained so that radiological discharges are properly mitigated, monitored, and evaluated with respect to public exposure;
: (1) ensure that the gaseous and liquid effluent processing systems are maintained so that radiological discharges are properly mitigated, monitored, and evaluated with respect to public exposure;
: (2) ensure that abnormal radioactive gaseous or liquid discharges and conditions, when effluent radiation monitors are out of service, are controlled in accordance with the applicable regulatory requirements and licensee procedures;
: (2) ensure that abnormal radioactive gaseous or liquid discharges and conditions, when effluent radiation monitors are out of service, are controlled in accordance with the applicable regulatory requirements and licensee procedures;
: (3) verify that the licensee
: (3) verify that the licensee=s quality control program ensures that the radioactive effluent sampling and analysis requirements are satisfied so that discharges of radioactive materials are adequately quantified and evaluated; and
=s quality control program ensures that the radioactive effluent sampling and analysis requirements are satisfied so that discharges of radioactive materials are adequately quantified and evaluated; and
: (4) verify the adequacy of public dose projections resulting from radioactive effluent discharges. The team used the requirements in 10 CFR Part 20; 10 CFR Part 50, Appendices A and I; 40 CFR Part 190; the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM), and licensee procedures required by the technical specifications as criteria for determining compliance.
: (4) verify the adequacy of public dose projections resulting from radioactive effluent discharges. The team used the requirements in 10 CFR Part 20; 10 CFR Part 50, Appendices A and I; 40 CFR Part 190; the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM), and licensee procedures required by the technical specifications as criteria for determining compliance.


Line 120: Line 153:
* Changes, if any, to the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual made by the licensee since the last inspection
* Changes, if any, to the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual made by the licensee since the last inspection
* The annual effluent release reports since the previous inspection
* The annual effluent release reports since the previous inspection
* The correlation between the effluent doses and the environmental monitoring results The team conducted an onsite inspection which included interviewing cognizant licensee personnel, performing walkdowns of facilities and equipment, and observing licensee activities to review:
* The correlation between the effluent doses and the environmental monitoring results  
 
The team conducted an onsite inspection which included interviewing cognizant licensee personnel, performing walkdowns of facilities and equipment, and observing licensee activities to review:
* The gaseous and liquid discharge system configuration
* The gaseous and liquid discharge system configuration
* Selected point of discharge effluent radiation monitoring systems and flow measurement devices
* Selected point of discharge effluent radiation monitoring systems and flow measurement devices
Line 131: Line 166:
* A selection of monthly, quarterly, and annual dose calculations
* A selection of monthly, quarterly, and annual dose calculations
* Records of abnormal gaseous or liquid discharges, if any, including the evaluation and analysis of events involving spills or discharges, dose assessments to members of the public, required (or voluntary) offsite notifications, and assessments and reporting of abnormal discharges in the Annual Radiological Effluent Release Report
* Records of abnormal gaseous or liquid discharges, if any, including the evaluation and analysis of events involving spills or discharges, dose assessments to members of the public, required (or voluntary) offsite notifications, and assessments and reporting of abnormal discharges in the Annual Radiological Effluent Release Report
* Effluent sampling records The team reviewed the licensee's program of problem identification and resolution including:
* Effluent sampling records  
 
The team reviewed the licensees program of problem identification and resolution including:
* Placement of problems identified through audits, self-assessments, and monitoring results into the corrective action program and adequacy of immediate and long term corrective actions
* Placement of problems identified through audits, self-assessments, and monitoring results into the corrective action program and adequacy of immediate and long term corrective actions
* Problem identification and resolution follow-up activities
* Problem identification and resolution follow-up activities
* Identification of repetitive deficiencies or significant individual deficiencies in problem identification and resolution identified by the licensee
* Identification of repetitive deficiencies or significant individual deficiencies in problem identification and resolution identified by the licensee=s self-assessment activities  
=s self-assessment activities Specific documents reviewed during this inspection are listed in the attachment.


These activities constitute completion of three of the required three samples as defined in Inspection Procedure
Specific documents reviewed during this inspection are listed in the attachment.


==71122.01 - 05.==
These activities constitute completion of three of the required three samples as defined in Inspection Procedure 71122.01-05.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
Line 147: Line 183:


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
This area was inspected to verify that the licensee
This area was inspected to verify that the licensee=s radioactive material processing and transportation program complies with the requirements of 10 CFR Parts 20, 61, and 71 and Department of Transportation regulations contained in 49 CFR Parts 171-180. The team interviewed licensee personnel and reviewed:
=s radioactive material processing and transportation program complies with the requirements of 10 CFR Parts 20, 61, and 71 and Department of Transportation regulations contained in 49 CFR Parts 171-180. The team interviewed licensee personnel and reviewed:
* The radioactive waste system description, recent radiological effluent release reports, and the scope of the licensee=s audit program
* The radioactive waste system description, recent radiological effluent release reports, and the scope of the licensee
=s audit program
* Liquid and solid radioactive waste processing systems configurations, the status and control of any radioactive waste process equipment that is not operational or is abandoned in place, changes made to the radioactive waste processing systems since the last inspection, and current processes for transferring radioactive waste resin and sludge discharges
* Liquid and solid radioactive waste processing systems configurations, the status and control of any radioactive waste process equipment that is not operational or is abandoned in place, changes made to the radioactive waste processing systems since the last inspection, and current processes for transferring radioactive waste resin and sludge discharges
* Radio-chemical sample analysis results for radioactive waste streams and use of scaling factors and calculations to account for difficult-to-measure radionuclides
* Radio-chemical sample analysis results for radioactive waste streams and use of scaling factors and calculations to account for difficult-to-measure radionuclides
* Shipping records for non-excepted package shipments
* Shipping records for non-excepted package shipments
* Licensee event reports, special reports, audits, state agency reports, self-assessments and corrective action reports performed since the last inspection, if any Specific documents reviewed during this inspection are listed in the attachment.
* Licensee event reports, special reports, audits, state agency reports, self-assessments and corrective action reports performed since the last inspection, if any  
 
Specific documents reviewed during this inspection are listed in the attachment.


Either because the conditions did not exist or an event had not occurred, no opportunities were available to review the following items:
Either because the conditions did not exist or an event had not occurred, no opportunities were available to review the following items:
* Shipment packaging, surveying, labeling, marking, placarding, vehicle checking, driver instructing, and disposal manifesting These activities constitute completion of six of the required six samples as defined in Inspection Procedure
* Shipment packaging, surveying, labeling, marking, placarding, vehicle checking, driver instructing, and disposal manifesting  


==71122.02 - 04.==
These activities constitute completion of six of the required six samples as defined in Inspection Procedure 71122.02-04.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
Line 167: Line 203:


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
This area was inspected to ensure that the radiological environmental monitoring program verifies the impact of radioactive effluent releases to the environment and sufficiently validates the integrity of the radioactive gaseous and liquid effluent release program and that the licensee's surveys and controls are adequate to prevent the inadvertent release of licensed materials into the public domain. The team used the requirements in 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix I of 10 CFR Part 50, the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual, and the licensee's procedures required by technical specifications as criteria for determining compliance. The team interviewed licensee personnel and reviewed:
This area was inspected to ensure that the radiological environmental monitoring program verifies the impact of radioactive effluent releases to the environment and sufficiently validates the integrity of the radioactive gaseous and liquid effluent release program and that the licensees surveys and controls are adequate to prevent the inadvertent release of licensed materials into the public domain. The team used the requirements in 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix I of 10 CFR Part 50, the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual, and the licensees procedures required by technical specifications as criteria for determining compliance. The team interviewed licensee personnel and reviewed:
* Annual environmental monitoring reports and licensee event reports
* Annual environmental monitoring reports and licensee event reports
* Selected air sampling and thermoluminescence dosimeter monitoring stations
* Selected air sampling and thermoluminescence dosimeter monitoring stations
Line 177: Line 213:
* Locations where the licensee monitors potentially contaminated material leaving the radiological controlled area [or controlled access area] and the methods used for control, survey, and release from these areas
* Locations where the licensee monitors potentially contaminated material leaving the radiological controlled area [or controlled access area] and the methods used for control, survey, and release from these areas
* Type of radiation monitoring instrumentation used to monitor items released, survey and release criteria of potentially contaminated material, radiation detection sensitivities, procedural guidance, and material release records
* Type of radiation monitoring instrumentation used to monitor items released, survey and release criteria of potentially contaminated material, radiation detection sensitivities, procedural guidance, and material release records
* Audits, self-assessments, corrective action documents and licensee event reports or special reports, if any were required, since the previous inspection Specific documents reviewed during this inspection are listed in the attachment.
* Audits, self-assessments, corrective action documents and licensee event reports or special reports, if any were required, since the previous inspection  
 
Specific documents reviewed during this inspection are listed in the attachment.


Either because the conditions did not exist or an event had not occurred, no opportunities were available to review the following items:
Either because the conditions did not exist or an event had not occurred, no opportunities were available to review the following items:
* Licensee event reports or special reports These activities constitute completion of ten of the required ten samples as defined in Inspection Procedure
* Licensee event reports or special reports  


==71122.03 - 04.==
These activities constitute completion of ten of the required ten samples as defined in Inspection Procedure 71122.03-04.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
Line 189: Line 227:
==OTHER ACTIVITIES==
==OTHER ACTIVITIES==
{{a|4OA2}}
{{a|4OA2}}
==4OA2 Problem Identification and Resolution==
==4OA2 Problem Identification and Resolution==
Annual Sample Review
Annual Sample Review


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The team evaluated the effectiveness of the licensee's problem identification and resolution process with respect to the following inspection areas:
The team evaluated the effectiveness of the licensees problem identification and resolution process with respect to the following inspection areas:
* Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation (Section 2OS3)
* Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation (Section 2OS3)
* Radioactive Gaseous and Liquid Effluent Treatment and Monitoring Systems (Section 2PS1)
* Radioactive Gaseous and Liquid Effluent Treatment and Monitoring Systems (Section 2PS1)
Line 201: Line 239:


====b. Findings and Observations====
====b. Findings and Observations====
No findings of significance were identified. However, during the inspection of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program, the team noted that the licensee had not resolved a continuing problem with the S-02 Portland River composite sampler. The S-02 Portland River composite sampler serves to assure representative sampling downstream of the plant discharge. The licensee's corrective action and trending program from 2005 through 2008 identified longstanding operability and reliability concerns with the sampler. This issue was also documented in a 1996 NRC Inspection report which stated that reliability of the sampler had been a concern since 1989. The team determined the licensee's Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program staff, maintenance department, and system engineers had made considerable efforts to maintain Sampler S-02 operable in accordance with the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual. The team noted that licensee management had not corrected this longstanding condition. Design Change Package 2003021 was developed to increase the reliability of the sampler. The licensee's Unit Reliability Team evaluated this design change to have a low priority and therefore, implementation of the design change has been delayed to 2014.  
No findings of significance were identified. However, during the inspection of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program, the team noted that the licensee had not resolved a continuing problem with the S-02 Portland River composite sampler. The S-02 Portland River composite sampler serves to assure representative sampling downstream of the plant discharge. The licensees corrective action and trending program from 2005 through 2008 identified longstanding operability and reliability concerns with the sampler. This issue was also documented in a 1996 NRC Inspection report which stated that reliability of the sampler had been a concern since 1989. The team determined the licensees Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program staff, maintenance department, and system engineers had made considerable efforts to maintain Sampler S-02 operable in accordance with the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual. The team noted that licensee management had not corrected this longstanding condition. Design Change Package 2003021 was developed to increase the reliability of the sampler. The licensees Unit Reliability Team evaluated this design change to have a low priority and therefore, implementation of the design change has been delayed to 2014.
 
{{a|4OA5}}
{{a|4OA5}}
==4OA5 Other Activities==
==4OA5 Other Activities==
 
===.1 (Closed) Temporary Instruction 2515/173, Review of the Implementation of the Industry===
===.1 (Closed) Temporary Instruction 2515/173, "Review of the Implementation of the Industry Groundwater Protection Voluntary Initiative"===
Groundwater Protection Voluntary Initiative


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
An NRC assessment was performed of the licensee's groundwater protection program to determine whether the licensee implemented the voluntary Industry Groundwater Protection Initiative dated August 2007 (Nuclear Energy Institute 07-07, ADAMS Accession Number ML072610036). Inspectors interviewed personnel, performed walkdowns of selected areas, and reviewed the following items:
An NRC assessment was performed of the licensees groundwater protection program to determine whether the licensee implemented the voluntary Industry Groundwater Protection Initiative dated August 2007 (Nuclear Energy Institute 07-07, ADAMS Accession Number ML072610036). Inspectors interviewed personnel, performed walkdowns of selected areas, and reviewed the following items:
* Records of the site characterization of geology and hydrology
* Records of the site characterization of geology and hydrology
* Evaluations of systems, structures, and or components that contain or could contain licensed material and evaluations of work practices that involve licensed material for which there is a credible mechanism for the licensed material to reach the groundwater
* Evaluations of systems, structures, and or components that contain or could contain licensed material and evaluations of work practices that involve licensed material for which there is a credible mechanism for the licensed material to reach the groundwater
* Implementation of an onsite groundwater monitoring program to monitor for potential licensed radioactive leakage into groundwater
* Implementation of an onsite groundwater monitoring program to monitor for potential licensed radioactive leakage into groundwater
* Procedures for the decision making process for potential remediation of leaks and spills, including consideration of the long term decommissioning impacts
* Procedures for the decision making process for potential remediation of leaks and spills, including consideration of the long term decommissioning impacts
* Records of leaks and spills recorded, if any, in the licensee's decommissioning files in accordance with 10 CFR 50.75(g)
* Records of leaks and spills recorded, if any, in the licensees decommissioning files in accordance with 10 CFR 50.75(g)
* Licensee briefings of local and state officials on the licensee's groundwater protection initiative
* Licensee briefings of local and state officials on the licensees groundwater protection initiative
* Protocols for notification to the local and state officials and to the NRC regarding detection of leaks and spills
* Protocols for notification to the local and state officials and to the NRC regarding detection of leaks and spills
* Protocols and/or procedures for 30-day reports if an onsite groundwater sample exceeds the criteria in the radiological environmental monitoring program
* Protocols and/or procedures for 30-day reports if an onsite groundwater sample exceeds the criteria in the radiological environmental monitoring program
Line 228: Line 268:


{{a|4OA6}}
{{a|4OA6}}
==4OA6 Management Meetings==
==4OA6 Management Meetings==
===Exit Meeting Summary===
===Exit Meeting Summary===
On June 26, 2009, the team presented the inspection results to Mr. A. Heflin, Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer, and other members of the licensee staff who acknowledged the findings. On July 13, 2009, a re-exit was performed by telephone


On June 26, 2009, the team presented the inspection results to Mr. A. Heflin, Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer, and other members of the licensee staff who acknowledged the findings. On July 13, 2009, a re-exit was performed by telephone with Mr. D. Trokey, Licensing Representative, and other members of the plant staff due to additional information received after the onsite inspection period. The team confirmed that proprietary information was not provided or examined during the inspection.
with Mr. D. Trokey, Licensing Representative, and other members of the plant staff due to additional information received after the onsite inspection period. The team confirmed that proprietary information was not provided or examined during the inspection.


ATTACHMENT:
ATTACHMENT:  


=SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION=
=SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION=


==KEY POINTS OF CONTACT==
==KEY POINTS OF CONTACT==
===Licensee personnel===
===Licensee personnel===
: [[contact::S. Abraham]], Systems Engineer, Groundwater Protection  
: [[contact::S. Abraham]], Systems Engineer, Groundwater Protection  
Line 245: Line 285:
: [[contact::P. Bott]], Systems Engineer/Meteorological Monitoring  
: [[contact::P. Bott]], Systems Engineer/Meteorological Monitoring  
: [[contact::C. Emerson]], Countroom/Dosimetry Engineer  
: [[contact::C. Emerson]], Countroom/Dosimetry Engineer  
: [[contact::L. Franks]], Associate Engineer, Engineering
: [[contact::L. Franks]], Associate Engineer, Engineering  
: [[contact::J. Geyer]], Manager, Radiation Protection  
: [[contact::J. Geyer]], Manager, Radiation Protection  
: [[contact::C. Graham II]], Consulting Health Physicist, Radiation Protection  
: [[contact::C. Graham II]], Consulting Health Physicist, Radiation Protection  
Line 252: Line 292:
: [[contact::D. Thompson]], Senior Health Physicist, Instruments  
: [[contact::D. Thompson]], Senior Health Physicist, Instruments  
: [[contact::D. Trokey]], Regional Regulatory Affairs Specialist  
: [[contact::D. Trokey]], Regional Regulatory Affairs Specialist  
: [[contact::R. Wishau]], Senior Health Physicist
: [[contact::R. Wishau]], Senior Health Physicist  
NRC
 
NRC  
: [[contact::D. Dumbacher]], Senior Resident Inspector  
: [[contact::D. Dumbacher]], Senior Resident Inspector  
: [[contact::J. Groom]], Resident Inspector  
: [[contact::J. Groom]], Resident Inspector  


==LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED==
==LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED==
===Opened===
===Opened===
None  
None  


===Opened and Closed===
===Opened and Closed===
 
None  
None  


===Closed===
===Closed===
: None  
None  


===Discussed===
===Discussed===
None  
None  


Attachment
==LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED==
==LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED==
==Section 2OS3: Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation and Protective Equipment==
: PROCEDURES
: NUMBER TITLE REVISION A P A-ZZ-00220 Records Management 19
: HDP-ZZ-01301 Whole Body Counting Quality Control Program 8
: HDP-ZZ-04000 Radiation Protection Instrumentation Program 22
: HTP-ZZ-04102 Eberline
: RO-2 Survey Meter Calibration 1
: HTP-ZZ-4131 Operation of the Shepherd Model 89 Calibrator 1
: HTP-ZZ-04240 Calibration of the Air Systems International Model
: CO-91 Carbon Monoxide Monitor
: HTP-ZZ-04528 Whole Body Counter Calibration Using the ND6000 WBC Chair 6
: HTP-ZZ-04542 Whole Body Counter Calibration Using the Canberra Fastscan 1
: HTP-ZZ-08501 Testing of Breathing Air 1
: HTP-ZZ-08503 Operation of Model C4-22E, 20 CFM Breathing Air Compressor and Breathing Air Cascade System
: AUDITS,
: SELF-ASSESSMENTS, AND SURVEILLANCES
: NUMBER TITLE DATE AP09-003 Quality Assurance Audit of Radiation Protection March 9, 2009 SA07-PE-SO2 Process Radiation Monitoring Self-Assessment January 27, 2007
: CALLAWAY ACTION REQUEST
: 200706426
: 200706617
: 200706937
: 200707028
: 200707455
: 200707482
: 200707814
: 200707886
: 200711522
: 200802899
: 200808279
: 200810982
: 200904669
: 200904670
: 200904671
: 200904680   
: Attachment CALIBRATION RECORDS
: NUMBER TITLE DATE ND6000 Whole body counter February 14, 2008 ND6000 Whole body counter May 15, 2009 Fastscan Whole body counter February 14, 2008 Fastscan Whole body counter May 15, 2009
: NRM-4020-HP
: ASP-1 Neutron detection instrument
: January 5, 2007 andApril 24, 2008
: NRM-4021-HP
: ASP-1 Neutron detection instrument August 14, 2007 andApril 24, 2008
: PCM-1B-4015-HP Personnel contamination monitor August 18, 2006 andAugust 30, 2007
: PCM-1B-4017-HP Personnel contamination monitor August 26, 2009
: CAM-4012-HP Continuous air monitor August 29, 2009
: CAM-4022-HP Continuous air monitor August 5, 2009
: GT-00R59 Containment high range monitor October 11, 2008
: GT-00R60 Containment high range monitor October 11, 2008
==Section 2PS1: Radioactive Gaseous and Liquid Effluent Treatment and Monitoring Systems==
: PROCEDURES
: NUMBER TITLE REVISION A P A-ZZ-01003 Callaway Plant Off-Site Dose Calculation Manual 18
: A P A-ZZ-01011 Process Control Program (PCP) 9
: HSP-ZZ-00003 Dose Assessment from Liquid Effluents 11
: HSP-ZZ-00006 Dose Assessment from Noble Gases 11
: HTP-ZZ-06020 Count Room Analytic and Quality Control Calculations and Methods 17
: HDP-ZZ-04700 Count Room Quality Control Program 15
: Attachment
: AUDITS,
: SELF-ASSESSMENTS, AND SURVEILLANCES
: NUMBER TITLE DATE AP08-007 Quality Assurance Audit of Effluent and Environmental Monitoring July 31, 2008 SA07-PE-S02 Process Radiation Monitoring Self-Assessment July 27, 2007
: CALLAWAY ACTION REQUEST
: 200706806
: 200706861
: 200706937
: 200707028
: 200707814
: 200800824
: 200802899
: 200804107
: 200804209
: 200806462
: 200808279
: 200809448
: 200810387
: 200901557
: 200902121
: 200903713
: 200904291   
: RELEASE PERMITS
: RP09-2007-L0083;1 RP10-2008-L0037;1 RP09-2009-L009 RP10-2009-L0010 RP15-2007-G0032;12 RP13-2007-G0006;30 RP12-2008-G0001;1 RP13-2008-G0002;1 UR03-2008-G0003;23 RP12-2009-G001;8 RP13-2009-G0002;10 
: CALIBRATION RECORDS
: NUMBER TITLE DATE
: GT-RE-21A Unit Vent Effluent Radiation Monitor March 31, 2008
: GT-RE-21B Unit Vent Effluent Radiation Monitor (Wide Range Gas) February 21, 2008GH-RE-10 Radwaste Building Vent Monitor May 20, 2008
: HB-RE-18 Liquid Radwaste Discharge Monitor February 13, 2008
==Section 2PS2: Radioactive Material Processing and Transportation==
: PROCEDURES
: NUMBER TITLE REVISION A P A-ZZ-01011 Process Control Program (PCP) 9
: HTP-HC-09002 10CFR61 Sampling Program 2
: RTN-HC-01100 Shipment of Radioactive Materials 24
: RTS-HC-01160 Shipment of Radioactive Wastes 22
: RTS-ZZ-CH040 Handling of Transport Cask Model 14-215 1 
: Attachment PROCEDURES
: NUMBER TITLE REVISION
: HDP-ZZ-0300 Radiological Survey Program 32
: AUDITS,
: SELF-ASSESSMENTS, AND SURVEILLANCES
: NUMBER TITLE DATE AP08-014 Quality Assurance Audit of Radioactive Waste December 11, 2008SA07-RW-S02 Simple Self-Assessment Report, Radioactive Liquid Waste Management November 29, 2007SA08-RW-C01 Benchmark Report, Radwaste Operations February 20, 2008SA09-RP-S02 Simple Self-Assessment, Radioactive Waste Long Range Plan April 3, 2009
: Callaway Action Request
: 200705820
: 200705823
: 200707025
: 200707350
: 200707387
: 200708541
: 200708770
: 200708932
: 200709235
: 200709415
: 200709631
: 200709640
: 200709858
: 200711019
: 200711406
: 200801135
: 200801333
: 200801335
: 200802079
: 200802879
: 200803498
: 200803793
: 200804395
: 200805873
: 200809121
: 200900326
: 200901722   
: RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL SHIPMENTS
: NUMBER TITLE DATE 08-0009 Waste A
: LSA-II March 7, 2008 08-0012 Waste Type B March 27, 2008 08-0049 Waste A
: LSA-I November 13, 200808-0052 A-SCO-II December 11, 200809-0006 Waste A
: LSA-I February 17, 2009
: Attachment WASTE STREAM REPORTS
: TITLE DATE ALPS Anion, Liquid Waste Processing October 17, 2007 DAW, Plant Operations June 7, 2008 RCS Filter June 9, 2008


==Section 2PS3: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program and Radioactive Material Control Program==
: PROCEDURES
: NUMBER TITLE REVISION
: HTP-ZZ-07001 Collection and Shipping of Environmental Samples 53
: HTP-ZZ-07101 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program 13
: HTP-ZZ-07101
: REMP Sample Locations 14
: HTP-ZZ-07107 REMP Sample Locations and Analysis Schedule 0
: HTP-ZZ-04143 Operation of Collins Model 42 River Water Composite Sampler 20
: HTP-ZZ-04123 Calibration of the F&J
: LV-2T Environmental Air Sampling Skid 3
: HTP-ZZ-02023 Unconditional Release of Material from Radiological Controls 11
: HTP-ZZ-03000 Radioactive Material Shipment Surveys 4
: HTP-ZZ-02004 Control of Radioactive Sources 28
: A P A-ZZ-01000 Control of Radioactive Material 6
: EDP-ZZ-01136 Ground Water Protection Program 1
: AUDITS,
: SELF-ASSESSMENTS, AND SURVEILLANCES
: NUMBER TITLE DATE AP08-001 Quality Assurance Audit of Radiation Protection February 28, 2008SP08-003 Quality Assurance Surveillance Report March 3, 2008
: AP08-007 Quality Assurance Audit of Effluent and Environmental Monitoring July 31, 2008
: AP09-003 Quality Assurance Audit of Radiation Protection March 3, 2009 SP09-013 Simple Surveillance Report May 12, 2009 SP08-003 Quality Assurance Surveillance Report March 3, 2008 
: Attachment
: AUDITS,
: SELF-ASSESSMENTS, AND SURVEILLANCES
: NUMBER TITLE DATE
: SR 2008-039
: Audit Report for Environmental Incorporated., Midwest Laboratory October 10, 2008
: CALLAWAY ACTION REQUEST
: 200710921
: 200711591
: 200803195
: 200807879
: 200708753
: 200705770
: 200706619
: 200800240
: 200800353
: 200800586
: 200801233
: 200801736
: 200803688
: 200803945
: 200804139
: 200807612
: 200809572
: 200903137
: 200903741
: 200706738
: 200707387
: 200707942
: 200800632
: 200802003
: 200803744
: 200803793
: 200900181
: 200807458
: 200902068
: 200705852
: 200900126
: 200900426
: 200708541
: 200709415
: 200711019
: 200801135
: 200803498   
: MISCELLANEOUS DOCUMENTS
: NUMBER TITLE DATE 2007 Annual Radiological Environmental Report April 30, 2008 2008 Annual Radiological Environmental Report April 20, 2009 Modification Package 04-1020; 10
: CFR 50.59 Applicability and Screening for Onsite Meteorological Tower October 2007
: Section 4OA5
: Temporary Instruction 2515/173
: PROCEDURES
: NUMBER TITLE REVISION A P A-ZZ-00153 Unit Reliability Team 2
: EDP-ZZ-01136 Ground Water Protection Program 1
: CALLAWAY ACTION REQUEST
: 200812093
: 200812146
: 200812148
: 200903671 
: Attachment MISCELLANEOUS DOCUMENTS
: TITLE
: REVISION/DATECallaway Nuclear Energy Institute 07-07 Self - Assessment December 2008
: Groundwater Hydrologic Rizzo Report 06-3624 October 2008
: RP-DTI-Environmental-SPILLRESP Response to Spills or Leaks of
: Radioactive Material Revision 6
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 09:50, 14 January 2025

IR 05000483-09-008 on 06/22/09 & 06/26/09 for Callaway Plant, Radiation Safety Team Inspection
ML092290709
Person / Time
Site: Callaway Ameren icon.png
Issue date: 08/17/2009
From: Greg Werner
NRC/RGN-IV/DRS/PSB-2
To: Heflin A
AmerenUE
References
FOIA/PA-2010-0209 IR-09-008
Download: ML092290709 (24)


Text

August 17, 2009

SUBJECT:

CALLAWAY PLANT-NRC RADIATION SAFETY TEAM INSPECTION REPORT 000483/2009008

Dear Mr. Heflin:

On June 26, 2009, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at your Callaway Plant. The enclosed Radiation Safety Team inspection report documents the inspection findings which were discussed with you and other members of your staff. A subsequent telephone exit was conducted on July 13, 2009, with Mr. D. Trokey, Licensing Representative, and other members of your staff to recharacterize several issues based upon additional information we received after the onsite inspection period.

The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.

The team reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel. Specifically, the team evaluated the inspection areas within the Radiation Protection Strategic Performance Area that are scheduled for review every two years. These areas are:

  • Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation

Radioactive Gaseous and Liquid Effluent Treatment and Monitoring Systems

Radioactive Material Processing and Transportation

Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program and Radioactive Material Control Program

Based on the results of this inspection, no findings of significance were identified.

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION R E GI ON I V 612 EAST LAMAR BLVD, SUITE 400 ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011-4125

AmerenUE

- 2 -

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA/

Gregory E. Werner, Chief

Plant Support Branch 2

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket No. 50-483 License No. NPF-30

Enclosure:

NRC Inspection Report No. 05000483/2009008 w/Attachment: Supplemental Information

REGION IV==

Docket:

05000483

License:

NPF-30

Report:

05000483/2009008

Licensee:

AmerenUE

Facility:

Callaway Plant

Location:

Junction of Highway CC and Highway O Fulton, MO

Dates:

June 22 - 26, 2009

Inspectors:

D. Stearns, Health Physicist, Team Leader L. Carson II, Senior Health Physicist D. Graves, Health Physicist L. Ricketson, P.E., Senior Health Physicist

Accompanied By:

N. Greene, Health Physicist Approved By:

Gregory E. Werner, Chief Plant Support Branch Division of Reactor Safety

- 2 -

Enclosure

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

IR 05000483/2009008; 06/22/2009 - 06/26/2009; AmerenUE; Callaway Plant; Radiation Safety

Team Inspection

The report covered a five-day period of inspection on site by a team of five region-based health physics inspectors. The NRC's program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, Reactor Oversight Process, Revision 4, dated December 2006.

NRC-Identified and Self-Revealing Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

Licensee-Identified Violations

None

REPORT DETAILS

RADIATION SAFETY

Cornerstones: Occupational Radiation Safety [OS] and Public Radiation Safety

[PS]

2OS3 Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation and Protective Equipment (71121.03)

a. Inspection Scope

This area was inspected to determine the accuracy and operability of radiation monitoring instruments that are used for the protection of occupational workers and the adequacy of the program to provide self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) to workers. The team used the requirements in 10 CFR Part 20 and the licensees procedures required by technical specifications as criteria for determining compliance.

The team interviewed licensee personnel and reviewed:

  • Calibration of area radiation monitors associated with transient high and very high radiation areas and post-accident monitors used for remote emergency assessment
  • Calibration of portable radiation detection instrumentation, electronic alarming dosimetry, and continuous air monitors used for job coverage
  • Calibration of whole body counting equipment and radiation detection instruments utilized for personnel and material release from the radiologically controlled area
  • Audits and self-assessments; licensee event reports or special reports if any were required since the previous inspection
  • Corrective action program reports since the last inspection
  • Licensee action in cases of repetitive deficiencies or significant individual deficiencies
  • Calibration expiration and source response check currency on radiation detection instruments staged for use
  • The licensees capability for refilling and transporting SCBA air bottles to and from the control room and operations support center during emergency conditions, status of SCBA staged and ready for use in the plant and associated surveillance records, and personnel qualification and training
  • Qualification documentation for onsite personnel designated to perform maintenance on the vendor-designated vital components, and the vital component maintenance records for SCBA units

Specific documents reviewed during this inspection are listed in the attachment.

Either because the conditions did not exist or an event had not occurred, no opportunities were available to review the following items:

  • Licensee event reports or special reports

These activities constitute completion of nine of the required nine samples as defined in Inspection Procedure 71121.03-05.

b. Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

2PS1 Radioactive Gaseous And Liquid Effluent Treatment And Monitoring Systems (71122.01)

a. Inspection Scope

This area was inspected to

(1) ensure that the gaseous and liquid effluent processing systems are maintained so that radiological discharges are properly mitigated, monitored, and evaluated with respect to public exposure;
(2) ensure that abnormal radioactive gaseous or liquid discharges and conditions, when effluent radiation monitors are out of service, are controlled in accordance with the applicable regulatory requirements and licensee procedures;
(3) verify that the licensee=s quality control program ensures that the radioactive effluent sampling and analysis requirements are satisfied so that discharges of radioactive materials are adequately quantified and evaluated; and
(4) verify the adequacy of public dose projections resulting from radioactive effluent discharges. The team used the requirements in 10 CFR Part 20; 10 CFR Part 50, Appendices A and I; 40 CFR Part 190; the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM), and licensee procedures required by the technical specifications as criteria for determining compliance.

The team conducted in-office inspection and reviewed:

  • Appropriate program documents, procedures, and evaluations related to the radiological effluent controls program listed in the attachment to this report
  • The implementation of the Radiological Effluent Controls Program requirements as described in Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications
  • The annual effluent release reports since the previous inspection
  • The correlation between the effluent doses and the environmental monitoring results

The team conducted an onsite inspection which included interviewing cognizant licensee personnel, performing walkdowns of facilities and equipment, and observing licensee activities to review:

  • The gaseous and liquid discharge system configuration
  • Selected point of discharge effluent radiation monitoring systems and flow measurement devices
  • The observation of selected portions of the routine processing and discharge of radioactive gaseous and liquid effluent (sample collection and analysis) including a selection of radioactive gaseous and liquid waste effluent discharge permits
  • Effluent discharges made with inoperable (declared out of service) effluent radiation monitors including the projected doses to members of the public
  • Surveillance test results on non-safety related ventilation and gaseous discharge systems (HEPA and charcoal filtration) including the methodology to determine the stack and vent flow rates
  • The identification of nonradioactive systems that have become contaminated, if applicable
  • Effluent monitoring instrument (installed and counting room) maintenance, quality control, and calibration
  • The methods used to determine the isotopes in the plant source term
  • A selection of monthly, quarterly, and annual dose calculations
  • Records of abnormal gaseous or liquid discharges, if any, including the evaluation and analysis of events involving spills or discharges, dose assessments to members of the public, required (or voluntary) offsite notifications, and assessments and reporting of abnormal discharges in the Annual Radiological Effluent Release Report
  • Effluent sampling records

The team reviewed the licensees program of problem identification and resolution including:

  • Placement of problems identified through audits, self-assessments, and monitoring results into the corrective action program and adequacy of immediate and long term corrective actions
  • Problem identification and resolution follow-up activities
  • Identification of repetitive deficiencies or significant individual deficiencies in problem identification and resolution identified by the licensee=s self-assessment activities

Specific documents reviewed during this inspection are listed in the attachment.

These activities constitute completion of three of the required three samples as defined in Inspection Procedure 71122.01-05.

b. Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

2PS2 Radioactive Material Processing and Transportation (71122.02)

a. Inspection Scope

This area was inspected to verify that the licensee=s radioactive material processing and transportation program complies with the requirements of 10 CFR Parts 20, 61, and 71 and Department of Transportation regulations contained in 49 CFR Parts 171-180. The team interviewed licensee personnel and reviewed:

  • The radioactive waste system description, recent radiological effluent release reports, and the scope of the licensee=s audit program
  • Liquid and solid radioactive waste processing systems configurations, the status and control of any radioactive waste process equipment that is not operational or is abandoned in place, changes made to the radioactive waste processing systems since the last inspection, and current processes for transferring radioactive waste resin and sludge discharges
  • Radio-chemical sample analysis results for radioactive waste streams and use of scaling factors and calculations to account for difficult-to-measure radionuclides
  • Shipping records for non-excepted package shipments
  • Licensee event reports, special reports, audits, state agency reports, self-assessments and corrective action reports performed since the last inspection, if any

Specific documents reviewed during this inspection are listed in the attachment.

Either because the conditions did not exist or an event had not occurred, no opportunities were available to review the following items:

  • Shipment packaging, surveying, labeling, marking, placarding, vehicle checking, driver instructing, and disposal manifesting

These activities constitute completion of six of the required six samples as defined in Inspection Procedure 71122.02-04.

b. Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

2PS3 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program And Radioactive Material Control Program (71122.03)

a. Inspection Scope

This area was inspected to ensure that the radiological environmental monitoring program verifies the impact of radioactive effluent releases to the environment and sufficiently validates the integrity of the radioactive gaseous and liquid effluent release program and that the licensees surveys and controls are adequate to prevent the inadvertent release of licensed materials into the public domain. The team used the requirements in 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix I of 10 CFR Part 50, the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual, and the licensees procedures required by technical specifications as criteria for determining compliance. The team interviewed licensee personnel and reviewed:

  • Annual environmental monitoring reports and licensee event reports
  • Selected air sampling and thermoluminescence dosimeter monitoring stations
  • Collection and preparation of environmental samples
  • Operability, calibration, and maintenance of meteorological instruments
  • Each event documented in the Annual Environmental Monitoring Report which involved a missed sample, inoperable sampler, lost thermoluminescence dosimeter, or anomalous measurement
  • Significant changes made by the licensee to the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual as the result of changes to the land census or sampler station modifications since the last inspection
  • Calibration and maintenance records for air samplers, composite water samplers, and environmental sample radiation measurement instrumentation, quality control program, interlaboratory comparison program results, and vendor audits
  • Locations where the licensee monitors potentially contaminated material leaving the radiological controlled area [or controlled access area] and the methods used for control, survey, and release from these areas
  • Type of radiation monitoring instrumentation used to monitor items released, survey and release criteria of potentially contaminated material, radiation detection sensitivities, procedural guidance, and material release records
  • Audits, self-assessments, corrective action documents and licensee event reports or special reports, if any were required, since the previous inspection

Specific documents reviewed during this inspection are listed in the attachment.

Either because the conditions did not exist or an event had not occurred, no opportunities were available to review the following items:

  • Licensee event reports or special reports

These activities constitute completion of ten of the required ten samples as defined in Inspection Procedure 71122.03-04.

b. Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

OTHER ACTIVITIES

4OA2 Problem Identification and Resolution

Annual Sample Review

a. Inspection Scope

The team evaluated the effectiveness of the licensees problem identification and resolution process with respect to the following inspection areas:

  • Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation (Section 2OS3)
  • Radioactive Gaseous and Liquid Effluent Treatment and Monitoring Systems (Section 2PS1)
  • Radioactive Material Processing and Transportation (Section 2PS2)
  • Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program and Radioactive Material Control Program (Section 2PS3)

b. Findings and Observations

No findings of significance were identified. However, during the inspection of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program, the team noted that the licensee had not resolved a continuing problem with the S-02 Portland River composite sampler. The S-02 Portland River composite sampler serves to assure representative sampling downstream of the plant discharge. The licensees corrective action and trending program from 2005 through 2008 identified longstanding operability and reliability concerns with the sampler. This issue was also documented in a 1996 NRC Inspection report which stated that reliability of the sampler had been a concern since 1989. The team determined the licensees Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program staff, maintenance department, and system engineers had made considerable efforts to maintain Sampler S-02 operable in accordance with the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual. The team noted that licensee management had not corrected this longstanding condition. Design Change Package 2003021 was developed to increase the reliability of the sampler. The licensees Unit Reliability Team evaluated this design change to have a low priority and therefore, implementation of the design change has been delayed to 2014.

4OA5 Other Activities

.1 (Closed) Temporary Instruction 2515/173, Review of the Implementation of the Industry

Groundwater Protection Voluntary Initiative

a. Inspection Scope

An NRC assessment was performed of the licensees groundwater protection program to determine whether the licensee implemented the voluntary Industry Groundwater Protection Initiative dated August 2007 (Nuclear Energy Institute 07-07, ADAMS Accession Number ML072610036). Inspectors interviewed personnel, performed walkdowns of selected areas, and reviewed the following items:

  • Records of the site characterization of geology and hydrology
  • Evaluations of systems, structures, and or components that contain or could contain licensed material and evaluations of work practices that involve licensed material for which there is a credible mechanism for the licensed material to reach the groundwater
  • Implementation of an onsite groundwater monitoring program to monitor for potential licensed radioactive leakage into groundwater
  • Procedures for the decision making process for potential remediation of leaks and spills, including consideration of the long term decommissioning impacts
  • Records of leaks and spills recorded, if any, in the licensees decommissioning files in accordance with 10 CFR 50.75(g)
  • Licensee briefings of local and state officials on the licensees groundwater protection initiative
  • Protocols for notification to the local and state officials and to the NRC regarding detection of leaks and spills
  • Protocols and/or procedures for 30-day reports if an onsite groundwater sample exceeds the criteria in the radiological environmental monitoring program
  • Groundwater monitoring results as reported in the annual effluent and/or environmental monitoring report
  • Licensee and industry assessments of implementation of the groundwater protection initiative

b. Findings

No findings of significance were identified. Implementation of the Groundwater Protection Initiative is voluntary. Under the final initiative, each site was to have developed and implemented an effective, technically sound Groundwater Protection Program by August 2008. The licensee completed its Groundwater Protection Initiative self-assessment in November 2008 and issued the report on December 22, 2008. The self-assessment identified the licensee had weaknesses in the following areas:

(1) its hydrological study,
(2) identification of potential enhancements to leak or spill detection mechanisms,
(3) groundwater well maintenance and sampling program, an
(4) procedures for the decision making process for potential remediation of leaks and spills. The NRC team confirmed the findings of the self-assessment were entered into the corrective action program. At the time of the inspection, the licensee had corrected all actions identified in the self-assessment. The Nuclear Energy Institute assessment is currently on-going.

4OA6 Management Meetings

Exit Meeting Summary

On June 26, 2009, the team presented the inspection results to Mr. A. Heflin, Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer, and other members of the licensee staff who acknowledged the findings. On July 13, 2009, a re-exit was performed by telephone

with Mr. D. Trokey, Licensing Representative, and other members of the plant staff due to additional information received after the onsite inspection period. The team confirmed that proprietary information was not provided or examined during the inspection.

ATTACHMENT:

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

KEY POINTS OF CONTACT

Licensee personnel

S. Abraham, Systems Engineer, Groundwater Protection
J. Barbour, Systems Engineer
P. Bott, Systems Engineer/Meteorological Monitoring
C. Emerson, Countroom/Dosimetry Engineer
L. Franks, Associate Engineer, Engineering
J. Geyer, Manager, Radiation Protection
C. Graham II, Consulting Health Physicist, Radiation Protection
J. Houston, Senior Health Physicist, Shipping
J. Nurrenbern, Consulting Engineer/Shipper
D. Thompson, Senior Health Physicist, Instruments
D. Trokey, Regional Regulatory Affairs Specialist
R. Wishau, Senior Health Physicist

NRC

D. Dumbacher, Senior Resident Inspector
J. Groom, Resident Inspector

LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED

Opened

None

Opened and Closed

None

Closed

None

Discussed

None

LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED