ML093080803: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:,Gray, Harold From: | {{#Wiki_filter:,Gray, Harold From: | ||
To: | John White Sent: | ||
Friday, May 15, 2009 8:13 AM To: | |||
Neil Sheehan Cc: | |||
Ronald Nimitz; Harold Gray; John Richmond | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
| Line 23: | Line 26: | ||
The leaking pipes were CS-24 (10" carbon steel associated with hotwell level control) and CS-25 (8" carbon steel associated with hotwell level control. They were not selected for prior inspection. | The leaking pipes were CS-24 (10" carbon steel associated with hotwell level control) and CS-25 (8" carbon steel associated with hotwell level control. They were not selected for prior inspection. | ||
From: Neil Sheehan Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 4:06 PM | From: Neil Sheehan Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 4:06 PM | ||
'To: John White | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Latest revision as of 08:27, 14 January 2025
| ML093080803 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oyster Creek |
| Issue date: | 05/15/2009 |
| From: | Jason White NRC/RGN-I/DRS/PSB2 |
| To: | Neil Sheehan NRC Region 1 |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2009-0214 | |
| Download: ML093080803 (1) | |
Text
,Gray, Harold From:
John White Sent:
Friday, May 15, 2009 8:13 AM To:
Neil Sheehan Cc:
Ronald Nimitz; Harold Gray; John Richmond
Subject:
RE: Question re: Oyster Creek inspections A 6" aluminum pipe (A-4, condensate pumps to turbine building) in the same area was inspected previously.
The leaking pipes were CS-24 (10" carbon steel associated with hotwell level control) and CS-25 (8" carbon steel associated with hotwell level control. They were not selected for prior inspection.
From: Neil Sheehan Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 4:06 PM
'To: John White
Subject:
Question re: Oyster Creek inspections Can you refresh my memory on this?
Neil:
RE: Al. At least one of them was inspected by Exelon but it looks like in a different spot.'
Were one or both pipes with leaks inspected before the plant's license was renewed and, if so, where and when and what were the results?
Thanks.
Todd