ML093080803: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:,Gray, Harold From: John White Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 8:13 AM , -To: Neil Sheehan Cc: Ronald Nimitz; Harold Gray; John Richmond  
{{#Wiki_filter:,Gray, Harold From:
John White Sent:
Friday, May 15, 2009 8:13 AM To:
Neil Sheehan Cc:
Ronald Nimitz; Harold Gray; John Richmond


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
RE: Question re: Oyster Creek inspections A 6" aluminum pipe (A-4, condensate pumps to turbine building) in the same area was inspected previously.
RE: Question re: Oyster Creek inspections A 6" aluminum pipe (A-4, condensate pumps to turbine building) in the same area was inspected previously.
The leaking pipes were CS-24 (10" carbon steel associated with hotwell level control) and CS-25 (8" carbon steel associated with hotwell level control. They were not selected for prior inspection.
The leaking pipes were CS-24 (10" carbon steel associated with hotwell level control) and CS-25 (8" carbon steel associated with hotwell level control. They were not selected for prior inspection.
From: Neil Sheehan Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 4:06 PM'To: John White  
From: Neil Sheehan Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 4:06 PM
'To: John White


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Question re: Oyster Creek inspections Can you refresh my memory on this?Neil: RE: Al. At least one of them was inspected by Exelon but it looks like in a different spot.'Were one or both pipes with leaks inspected before the plant's license was renewed and, if so, where and when and what were the results?Thanks.Todd}}
Question re: Oyster Creek inspections Can you refresh my memory on this?
Neil:
RE: Al. At least one of them was inspected by Exelon but it looks like in a different spot.'
Were one or both pipes with leaks inspected before the plant's license was renewed and, if so, where and when and what were the results?
Thanks.
Todd}}

Latest revision as of 08:27, 14 January 2025

E-mail from J. White to N. Sheehan, Question Related to Oyster Creek Inspections
ML093080803
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 05/15/2009
From: Jason White
NRC/RGN-I/DRS/PSB2
To: Neil Sheehan
NRC Region 1
References
FOIA/PA-2009-0214
Download: ML093080803 (1)


Text

,Gray, Harold From:

John White Sent:

Friday, May 15, 2009 8:13 AM To:

Neil Sheehan Cc:

Ronald Nimitz; Harold Gray; John Richmond

Subject:

RE: Question re: Oyster Creek inspections A 6" aluminum pipe (A-4, condensate pumps to turbine building) in the same area was inspected previously.

The leaking pipes were CS-24 (10" carbon steel associated with hotwell level control) and CS-25 (8" carbon steel associated with hotwell level control. They were not selected for prior inspection.

From: Neil Sheehan Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 4:06 PM

'To: John White

Subject:

Question re: Oyster Creek inspections Can you refresh my memory on this?

Neil:

RE: Al. At least one of them was inspected by Exelon but it looks like in a different spot.'

Were one or both pipes with leaks inspected before the plant's license was renewed and, if so, where and when and what were the results?

Thanks.

Todd