ML11178A068: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML11178A068 | | number = ML11178A068 | ||
| issue date = 06/23/2011 | | issue date = 06/23/2011 | ||
| title = | | title = Meeting Slides, Turkey Point Nuclear Plant, Units 3 and 4, Extended Power Uprate (Epu), NRC and FPL Public Meeting | ||
| author name = | | author name = | ||
| author affiliation = Florida Power & Light Co | | author affiliation = Florida Power & Light Co | ||
| addressee name = Paige J | | addressee name = Paige J | ||
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-2 | | addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-2 | ||
| docket = 05000250, 05000251 | | docket = 05000250, 05000251 | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:Opening Purpose EPU License Amendment Request (LAR) Review Summary Proposed Technical Specification Changes Mechanical and Civil Outstanding Questions Nuclear Performance and Code Review -Boron Precipitation Analysis Discussion Containment and Ventilation EPITOME Analysis Reactor Systems Branch Questions Questions Closing I=PL. 2 Turkey Point --Opening Appreciate the Staff's support and participation today Significant progress made to date FPL seeks clarification and understanding of remaining Staff questions Encourage open and active dialogue to address open items from the Staff's review a=pL. 3 Turkey Point --Review status of Requests for Additional Information (RAls) Discuss remaining questions and/or open items Discuss "to go" plan for final draft safety evaluation (SE) to Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) 8 I=PL. 4 EPU LAR Review 6 draft SEs are complete for the 17 branches 4 draft SEs are in branch concurrence Draft Environmental Assessment scheduled for 7/15/1 Focus today is to resolve any questions and/or open items remaining | {{#Wiki_filter:Agenda | ||
-Technical Specifications | * Opening | ||
-Confirm no questions or comments on proposed Technical Specifications | * Purpose | ||
* EPU License Amendment Request (LAR) Review Summary | |||
-Follow-up questions | * Proposed Technical Specification Changes | ||
-Nuclear Performance and Code -PHOENIX-P/ANC benchmarking and boron precipitation | * Mechanical and Civil Outstanding Questions | ||
-Containment and Ventilation | * Nuclear Performance and Code Review | ||
-EPITOME issue -Reactor Systems -outstanding RAls and RETRAN deck F=PL , 5 | - Boron Precipitation Analysis Discussion | ||
* Containment and Ventilation EPITOME Analysis | |||
* Received 6 follow-up RAls on 6/20/11 -Spent Fuel Pool Cooling and Component Cooling Water modification design information | * Reactor Systems Branch Questions | ||
-Normal containment cooler modification design information | * Questions | ||
-Containment penetration anchor margins -Use of actual material properties for reactor vessel supports -Allowable stresses for control rod drive mechanisms | * Closing I=PL. | ||
-Steam Generator fluid steam mixture velocity information | 2 | ||
Turkey Point -- Opening | |||
* Appreciate the Staff's support and participation today | |||
* Significant progress made to date | |||
* FPL seeks clarification and understanding of remaining Staff questions | |||
* Encourage open and active dialogue to address open items from the Staff's review a=pL. | |||
3 | |||
Turkey Point -- Purpose | |||
* Review status of Requests for Additional Information (RAls) | |||
* Discuss remaining questions and/or open items | |||
* Discuss "to go" plan for final draft safety evaluation (SE) to Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) 8 I=PL. | |||
4 | |||
EPU LAR Review Summary | |||
* 6 draft SEs are complete for the 17 branches | |||
* 4 draft SEs are in branch concurrence | |||
* Draft Environmental Assessment scheduled for 7/15/1 | |||
* Focus today is to resolve any questions and/or open items remaining | |||
- Technical Specifications - Confirm no questions or comments on proposed Technical Specifications Mechanical and Civil Engineering - Follow-up questions | |||
- Nuclear Performance and Code - PHOENIX-P/ANC benchmarking and boron precipitation | |||
- Containment and Ventilation - EPITOME issue | |||
- Reactor Systems - outstanding RAls and RETRAN deck F=PL, 5 | |||
e: | |||
+' ° ca U | |||
II U(1),... | |||
c.:::::s UJO | |||
_-C cue: | |||
ucu | |||
-c J: | |||
.c:(1) | |||
(.)(1) | |||
(1)UJ | |||
~I tn (l)Q) tnc) 0e: | |||
c.cu eJ: | |||
D..O | |||
<0 | |||
-C | |||
Mechanical and Civil Engineering | |||
* Received 6 follow-up RAls on 6/20/11 | |||
- Spent Fuel Pool Cooling and Component Cooling Water modification design information | |||
- Normal containment cooler modification design information | |||
- Containment penetration anchor margins | |||
- Use of actual material properties for reactor vessel supports | |||
- Allowable stresses for control rod drive mechanisms | |||
- Steam Generator fluid steam mixture velocity information | |||
* Clarification discussion today | * Clarification discussion today | ||
* Preparing responses with a target of mid July 2011 I=PL. 7 Nuclear Performance and Code Providing additional information regarding PHOENIX-PlANe benchmarking | * Preparing responses with a target of mid July 2011 I=PL. | ||
-Target early July Boric Acid Precipitation | 7 | ||
-Status of NRC confirmatory analysis | |||
--Provide at least 1 hour of margin between lineup for hot leg injection and the onset of boron precipitation | Nuclear Performance and Code Review | ||
--Other actions? FPL. 8 Nuclear Performance and Code Boric Acid Precipitation | * Providing additional information regarding PHOENIX-PlANe benchmarking - Target early July | ||
:s:: a u.. Cf) Injection Mode 1 RHR Pump , 2 HHSI Pumps / Injection Mode 2 HHSI Pumps.j 1 hour and 10 minutes 1 Hot Leg Recircu ation Mode 2 HHSI Pumps 2 HHSI P umps Cold Leg | * Boric Acid Precipitation | ||
-Analysis EPITOME code error involves LOCA mass and energy release calculation Turkey Point containment analysis is impacted Plant operability has been addressed | - Status of NRC confirmatory analysis Discuss and reach agreement on anticipated FPL actions based on lessons learned from the Point Beach EPU | ||
* EPU LOCA and MSLB analyses performed | -- Summarize conservatisms in the analysis | ||
-- Provide additional discussion on operational considerations for small break LOCAs | |||
-- Confirmation that charging pumps trip on safety injection | |||
-EPITOME Analysis | -- Provide at least 1 hour of margin between lineup for hot leg injection and the onset of boron precipitation | ||
* Other changes | -- Other actions? | ||
FPL. | |||
* Draft Results 11 I=PL Containment and Ventilation | 8 | ||
-EPITOME LOCA Draft Results ---Containment Pressure. | |||
OEPS MINSI -----Containment Pressure, OEPS MINSI Rev | Nuclear Performance and Code Review Boric Acid Precipitation Timeline | ||
.... ...... | :s:: | ||
........ ... | a u.. | ||
OEPS MINSI -----Containment Temperoture, OEPS MINSI Revised | Cf) | ||
...................... ........ . : ..... , .. : .. ..... | Injection Mode 1 RHR Pump, 2 HHSI Pumps | ||
................ -........... | / | ||
...... I 11111111 1111111 1111111 1111111 11111111 11111111 11111111 11111111 100 I I I I I I I 1 2 j 4 6 7 a 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Time (s) FPL | Injection Mode 2 HHSI Pumps | ||
.j 1 hour and 10 minutes 1 | |||
-MSLB Draft Containment Pressure . 1*0 sq ft ----. Co n tainment Pressure. | Hot Leg Recircu ation Mode 2 HHSI Pumps 2 HHSI P umps Cold Leg Red,,"',,'oO Mode I.. | ||
1.0 sq ft Split 60-'-'--------------------, 50 .12' 40 '---./ 30 :::::s (J) (J) Q) ct 20 | *1 Time After LOCA H DelaY1 LT - RWST Low Low Level z | ||
30 % Power DER | Tl - RWST Low Level To - Event Initiation Tl - 15 minutes T - 45 minutes z | ||
HZP DER MSCV Revised 3511 300 | To-Event Initation T3 - 5 hours, 30 minutes T. - 6 hours, 40 minutes DelaYl - 2 minutes (EPU) | ||
Containment and Ventilation | Delay T. - Incipient Boric Acid z l Precipitation Without Hot Leg Recirculation T3 - HLSO Initiation Delay - 3 minutes (EPU) z I=PL. | ||
9 | |||
* Determined to be acceptable | Containment and Ventilation - EPITOME Analysis | ||
Containment and Ventilation | * EPITOME code error involves LOCA mass and energy release calculation | ||
* Turkey Point containment analysis is impacted | |||
* Plant operability has been addressed | |||
-- | * EPU LOCA and MSLB analyses performed EPITOME code error correction Range for containment free volume | ||
* Technical specification change proposed to lower limit on normal operating containment pressure from 3 psig to. | |||
1 psig Include ITS improvement for administrative control of instrument air bleed 10 I=PL. | |||
Containment and Ventilation - EPITOME Analysis | |||
* Other changes Modify the Emergency Containment Cooler (ECC) Start Logic to ensure 2 ECCs operate (new commitment) | |||
Reduce upper operating band on Tav9 from 3°F to 1.soF Other input changes | |||
* Draft Results 11 I=PL. | |||
Containment and Ventilation - EPITOME LOCA Draft Results | |||
--- Containment Pressure. OEPS MINSI | |||
----- Containment Pressure, OEPS MINSI Rev ised r--... | |||
(f) | |||
D.. | |||
"-/ | |||
:J D1 IJ) | |||
OJ OO~I----------------------------------~ | |||
5{) | |||
.Q' 40 | |||
~ YJ n=20 | |||
..... :....//.-:\\\\...... :........ :........:........ :........ | |||
* \\ | |||
* \\ | |||
.......*......... :........ :.l.\\... :........ :........ :........ :........ | |||
* \\ | |||
: \\ | |||
\\ | |||
.....*.. :........ :........ :.... '\\i ' ~:'.\\'... :........ :........ :........ | |||
..*................................ :.. \\, '.'\\:........ :........:........ | |||
\\.... | |||
. \\ X ***** ** *** *** ** ** | |||
* 1Q1'.......................................... :...,,, ~. | |||
oI | |||
: 1111111, 11 11 1", | |||
I! II''', | |||
I I ""'I | |||
'I ""', | |||
! '"1111 f IIII!I, 111""1 | |||
~ | |||
1 2 | |||
J | |||
~ | |||
5 | |||
~ | |||
7 8 | |||
10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Time (3) 12 Contoinment Temperature. OEPS MINSI | |||
----- Containment Temperoture, OEPS MINSI Revised jOO~I------------------------------------~ | |||
~ | |||
2 1;/\\ | |||
-.IlJ | |||
\\. -...;' "...*....***...*. *.*.... *.*.., *** | |||
l.L d | |||
~, | |||
'f 40 | |||
~ | |||
~ | |||
..2 | |||
~ 200 1.....*...................................~~....... :.....,.. :.......* | |||
~ | |||
E OJ f-150-.......................,............................ -.................. | |||
I 11111111 1111111 1111111 1111111 11111111 11111111 11111111 11111111 100 I | |||
I I | |||
I I | |||
I I | |||
~ | |||
1 2 | |||
j 4 | |||
~ | |||
6 7 | |||
a 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Time (s) | |||
FPL. | |||
Containment and Ventilation - EPITOME MSLB Draft Results Containment Pressure. 1*0 sq ft Split | |||
----. Co n tainment Pressure. 1.0 sq ft Split Revised 60-'-'--------------------, | |||
50 | |||
~ | |||
.12' 40 (J) | |||
Q | |||
'---./ | |||
~ 30 | |||
:::::s (J) | |||
(J) | |||
Q) ct 20 10 O +I~~~~~~~~~~~-L~~~~_.~--L-~ | |||
o 200 400 600 800 1000 Transient Time (sec) | |||
Con tai nmen t Temperature. 30 % Power DER MSCV | |||
----. Containment Temperature. HZP DER MSCV Revised 3511 ~\\ | |||
300 | |||
/"'. 250 LL | |||
~ | |||
:::J 200 | |||
+-' | |||
0 L | |||
~ 150 E | |||
Q) | |||
I 100 50 0 | |||
0 200 400 600 BOD 1000 Transient Time (sec) 13 FPL. | |||
Containment and Ventilation - EPITOME | |||
* Areas requiring revised analysis (applicable LAR sections in parentheses) | |||
Component Cooling Water Systems (2.5.4.3) | |||
Primary Containment Functional Design (2.6.1) | |||
Mass and Energy Release (2.6.3) | |||
Containment Heat Removal (2.6.5) | |||
* Determined to be acceptable 14 FPL. | |||
Containment and Ventilation - EPITOME | |||
* Other areas reviewed and determined no impact (applicable LAR sections in parentheses) | |||
Protective Coating Systems (2.1.7) | |||
Balance of Plant Piping, Components and Supports (2.2.2.2) | |||
Safety-Related Valves and Pumps (2.2.4) | |||
Environmental Qualification of Electrical Equipment (2.3.1) | |||
Pressure Analysis for ECCS Performance Capability (2.6.6) | |||
Containment Ventilation System (2.7.7) | |||
ECCS and Loss-of-Coolant Accidents (2.8.5.6.3) | |||
Radiological Consequences Analyses Using AST (2.9.2) | |||
* No change to LAR section conclusions for impact of EPU 15 FPL. | |||
w | |||
:E 0 | |||
I-a.. | |||
w I | |||
c: | |||
0 CO - | |||
c: | |||
(1) > | |||
-c c: | |||
ca c | |||
(1) | |||
E c | |||
ca c: | |||
0 0 | |||
::l 0 | |||
"'C c: | |||
ca | |||
.c: | |||
(1) | |||
(1) | |||
(f) | |||
I L. | |||
(1) | |||
(1) | |||
..J (1) tn c: | |||
0 c. | |||
tn (1) a:::: | |||
'to0 (1).t:-..... | |||
::l 0 | |||
j ea | |||
<D | |||
Reactor Systems Branch Questions | Reactor Systems Branch Questions | ||
* Received | * Received 31 non-LOCA RAls on 6/10/11 Conducted clarification call on 6/20/11 Preparing responses with a target issue of mid-July 2011 | ||
* Further discussion on the following: | |||
NUREG 0800 requirement regarding credited reactor trips for loss of load analysis | |||
* Further discussion on the following: | - Analysis of credible main steam line breaks | ||
- | - eves malfunction in Modes 3, 4, and 5 (j | ||
17 I=PL. | |||
Reactor Systems Branch Questions | Reactor Systems Branch Questions | ||
* RETRAN Deck | * Received additional RAls: | ||
10on6/14/11 | |||
- 7on6/17/11 | |||
- Anticipate remaining questions by 6/23/11 | |||
- Clarification discussion today Preparing responses with a target of mid July 2011 | |||
* Further discussion on the following: | |||
Inadvertent opening of a PORV | |||
- Additional information regarding LBLOCA nodalization 18 FPL.. | |||
Reactor Systems Branch Questions | |||
* RETRAN Deck Modified Turkey Point base deck to be compatible with RETRAN3D | |||
- Westinghouse transmitted to NRC on 6/21/11 Personnel available today to assist the Staff with running RETRAN with the modified base deck to ensure its compatibility with Staff software 19 F=PL. | |||
3: | |||
Cl) | |||
Cl) | |||
Cl) | |||
..s::... | |||
0 0 | |||
tn tn C | |||
Cl) 0 (J | |||
~ | |||
c tn G) :s..c'" | |||
Cl) a.c... | |||
I 0 | |||
E c | |||
0 | |||
.-o....s- | |||
: n. | |||
tn c 0 | |||
~.- (""'- | |||
G) | |||
.... tn tn", | |||
~ Cl)Cl) | |||
::s ' | |||
:s Oca N | |||
~ | |||
0 | |||
Turkey Point - Closing | |||
* FPL respond to remaining RAls and clarification requests | |||
* Staff to complete remaining draft SE input | |||
* Draft SE to ACRS Subcommittee in August | |||
* Prepare for ACRS Subcommittee meeting in September and ACRS Full Committee meeting in October 21 I=PL.}} | |||
Latest revision as of 05:41, 13 January 2025
| ML11178A068 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point |
| Issue date: | 06/23/2011 |
| From: | Florida Power & Light Co |
| To: | Jason Paige Plant Licensing Branch II |
| Shared Package | |
| ML11195A170 | List: |
| References | |
| TAC ME4907, TAC ME4908 | |
| Download: ML11178A068 (21) | |
Text
Agenda
- Opening
- Purpose
- Proposed Technical Specification Changes
- Mechanical and Civil Outstanding Questions
- Nuclear Performance and Code Review
- Boron Precipitation Analysis Discussion
- Containment and Ventilation EPITOME Analysis
- Reactor Systems Branch Questions
- Questions
- Closing I=PL.
2
Turkey Point -- Opening
- Appreciate the Staff's support and participation today
- Significant progress made to date
- FPL seeks clarification and understanding of remaining Staff questions
- Encourage open and active dialogue to address open items from the Staff's review a=pL.
3
Turkey Point -- Purpose
- Review status of Requests for Additional Information (RAls)
- Discuss remaining questions and/or open items
- Discuss "to go" plan for final draft safety evaluation (SE) to Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) 8 I=PL.
4
- 6 draft SEs are complete for the 17 branches
- 4 draft SEs are in branch concurrence
- Draft Environmental Assessment scheduled for 7/15/1
- Focus today is to resolve any questions and/or open items remaining
- Technical Specifications - Confirm no questions or comments on proposed Technical Specifications Mechanical and Civil Engineering - Follow-up questions
- Nuclear Performance and Code - PHOENIX-P/ANC benchmarking and boron precipitation
- Containment and Ventilation - EPITOME issue
- Reactor Systems - outstanding RAls and RETRAN deck F=PL, 5
e:
+' ° ca U
II U(1),...
c.:::::s UJO
_-C cue:
ucu
-c J:
.c:(1)
(.)(1)
(1)UJ
~I tn (l)Q) tnc) 0e:
c.cu eJ:
D..O
<0
-C
Mechanical and Civil Engineering
- Received 6 follow-up RAls on 6/20/11
- Spent Fuel Pool Cooling and Component Cooling Water modification design information
- Normal containment cooler modification design information
- Containment penetration anchor margins
- Use of actual material properties for reactor vessel supports
- Allowable stresses for control rod drive mechanisms
- Steam Generator fluid steam mixture velocity information
- Clarification discussion today
- Preparing responses with a target of mid July 2011 I=PL.
7
Nuclear Performance and Code Review
- Providing additional information regarding PHOENIX-PlANe benchmarking - Target early July
- Boric Acid Precipitation
- Status of NRC confirmatory analysis Discuss and reach agreement on anticipated FPL actions based on lessons learned from the Point Beach EPU
-- Summarize conservatisms in the analysis
-- Provide additional discussion on operational considerations for small break LOCAs
-- Confirmation that charging pumps trip on safety injection
-- Provide at least 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> of margin between lineup for hot leg injection and the onset of boron precipitation
-- Other actions?
FPL.
8
Nuclear Performance and Code Review Boric Acid Precipitation Timeline
- s::
a u..
Cf)
Injection Mode 1 RHR Pump, 2 HHSI Pumps
/
Injection Mode 2 HHSI Pumps
.j 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> and 10 minutes 1
Hot Leg Recircu ation Mode 2 HHSI Pumps 2 HHSI P umps Cold Leg Red,,"',,'oO Mode I..
Tl - RWST Low Level To - Event Initiation Tl - 15 minutes T - 45 minutes z
To-Event Initation T3 - 5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br />, 30 minutes T. - 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />, 40 minutes DelaYl - 2 minutes (EPU)
Delay T. - Incipient Boric Acid z l Precipitation Without Hot Leg Recirculation T3 - HLSO Initiation Delay - 3 minutes (EPU) z I=PL.
9
Containment and Ventilation - EPITOME Analysis
- EPITOME code error involves LOCA mass and energy release calculation
- Turkey Point containment analysis is impacted
- Plant operability has been addressed
- EPU LOCA and MSLB analyses performed EPITOME code error correction Range for containment free volume
- Technical specification change proposed to lower limit on normal operating containment pressure from 3 psig to.
1 psig Include ITS improvement for administrative control of instrument air bleed 10 I=PL.
Containment and Ventilation - EPITOME Analysis
- Other changes Modify the Emergency Containment Cooler (ECC) Start Logic to ensure 2 ECCs operate (new commitment)
Reduce upper operating band on Tav9 from 3°F to 1.soF Other input changes
- Draft Results 11 I=PL.
Containment and Ventilation - EPITOME LOCA Draft Results
--- Containment Pressure. OEPS MINSI
Containment Pressure, OEPS MINSI Rev ised r--...
(f)
D..
"-/
- J D1 IJ)
OJ OO~I----------------------------------~
5{)
.Q' 40
~ YJ n=20
..... :....//.-:\\\\...... :........ :........:........ :........
- \\
- \\
.......*......... :........ :.l.\\... :........ :........ :........ :........
- \\
- \\
\\
.....*.. :........ :........ :.... '\\i ' ~:'.\\'... :........ :........ :........
..*................................ :.. \\, '.'\\:........ :........:........
\\....
. \\ X ***** ** *** *** ** **
- 1Q1'.......................................... :...,,, ~.
oI
- 1111111, 11 11 1",
I! II,
I I ""'I
'I ""',
! '"1111 f IIII!I, 111""1
~
1 2
J
~
5
~
7 8
10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Time (3) 12 Contoinment Temperature. OEPS MINSI
Containment Temperoture, OEPS MINSI Revised jOO~I------------------------------------~
~
2 1;/\\
-.IlJ
\\. -...;' "...*....***...*. *.*.... *.*.., ***
l.L d
~,
'f 40
~
~
..2
~ 200 1.....*...................................~~....... :.....,.. :.......*
~
E OJ f-150-.......................,............................ -..................
I 11111111 1111111 1111111 1111111 11111111 11111111 11111111 11111111 100 I
I I
I I
I I
~
1 2
j 4
~
6 7
a 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Time (s)
FPL.
Containment and Ventilation - EPITOME MSLB Draft Results Containment Pressure. 1*0 sq ft Split
. Co n tainment Pressure. 1.0 sq ft Split Revised 60-'-'--------------------,
50
~
.12' 40 (J)
Q
'---./
~ 30
- s (J)
(J)
Q) ct 20 10 O +I~~~~~~~~~~~-L~~~~_.~--L-~
o 200 400 600 800 1000 Transient Time (sec)
Con tai nmen t Temperature. 30 % Power DER MSCV
. Containment Temperature. HZP DER MSCV Revised 3511 ~\\
300
/"'. 250 LL
~
- J 200
+-'
0 L
~ 150 E
Q)
I 100 50 0
0 200 400 600 BOD 1000 Transient Time (sec) 13 FPL.
Containment and Ventilation - EPITOME
- Areas requiring revised analysis (applicable LAR sections in parentheses)
Component Cooling Water Systems (2.5.4.3)
Primary Containment Functional Design (2.6.1)
Mass and Energy Release (2.6.3)
Containment Heat Removal (2.6.5)
- Determined to be acceptable 14 FPL.
Containment and Ventilation - EPITOME
- Other areas reviewed and determined no impact (applicable LAR sections in parentheses)
Protective Coating Systems (2.1.7)
Balance of Plant Piping, Components and Supports (2.2.2.2)
Safety-Related Valves and Pumps (2.2.4)
Environmental Qualification of Electrical Equipment (2.3.1)
Pressure Analysis for ECCS Performance Capability (2.6.6)
Containment Ventilation System (2.7.7)
ECCS and Loss-of-Coolant Accidents (2.8.5.6.3)
Radiological Consequences Analyses Using AST (2.9.2)
w
- E 0
I-a..
w I
c:
0 CO -
c:
(1) >
-c c:
ca c
(1)
E c
ca c:
0 0
- l 0
"'C c:
ca
.c:
(1)
(1)
(f)
I L.
(1)
(1)
..J (1) tn c:
0 c.
tn (1) a::::
'to0 (1).t:-.....
- l 0
j ea
<D
Reactor Systems Branch Questions
- Received 31 non-LOCA RAls on 6/10/11 Conducted clarification call on 6/20/11 Preparing responses with a target issue of mid-July 2011
- Further discussion on the following:
NUREG 0800 requirement regarding credited reactor trips for loss of load analysis
- Analysis of credible main steam line breaks
- eves malfunction in Modes 3, 4, and 5 (j
17 I=PL.
Reactor Systems Branch Questions
- Received additional RAls:
10on6/14/11
- 7on6/17/11
- Anticipate remaining questions by 6/23/11
- Clarification discussion today Preparing responses with a target of mid July 2011
- Further discussion on the following:
Inadvertent opening of a PORV
- Additional information regarding LBLOCA nodalization 18 FPL..
Reactor Systems Branch Questions
- RETRAN Deck Modified Turkey Point base deck to be compatible with RETRAN3D
- Westinghouse transmitted to NRC on 6/21/11 Personnel available today to assist the Staff with running RETRAN with the modified base deck to ensure its compatibility with Staff software 19 F=PL.
3:
Cl)
Cl)
Cl)
..s::...
0 0
tn tn C
Cl) 0 (J
~
c tn G) :s..c'"
Cl) a.c...
I 0
E c
0
.-o....s-
- n.
tn c 0
~.- (""'-
G)
.... tn tn",
~ Cl)Cl)
- s '
- s Oca N
~
0
Turkey Point - Closing
- FPL respond to remaining RAls and clarification requests
- Staff to complete remaining draft SE input