IR 05000390/2014007: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| issue date = 02/10/2015 | | issue date = 02/10/2015 | ||
| title = IR 05000390/2014007 and 05000390/2015405, Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Problem Identification and Resolution | | title = IR 05000390/2014007 and 05000390/2015405, Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Problem Identification and Resolution | ||
| author name = Masters A | | author name = Masters A | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-II/DRP/RPB7 | | author affiliation = NRC/RGN-II/DRP/RPB7 | ||
| addressee name = Shea J | | addressee name = Shea J | ||
| addressee affiliation = Tennessee Valley Authority | | addressee affiliation = Tennessee Valley Authority | ||
| docket = 05000390 | | docket = 05000390 | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter | {{#Wiki_filter:February 10, 2015 | ||
==SUBJECT:== | |||
WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 1 - U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION AND RESOLUTION INSPECTION REPORTS 05000390/2014007 AND 05000390/2015405 | |||
==Dear Mr. Shea:== | |||
On December 18, 2014, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at your Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 1. The enclosed report documents the inspection findings that were discussed on December 18, 2014, with Mr. Walsh and other members of your staff. A re-exit was conducted with Mr. Charlton via telephone on January 22, 2015. An additional re-exit was conducted via telephone on February 3, 2015, to discuss the final results of the inspection. | |||
Based on the inspection sample, the inspectors determined that your staffs implementation of the corrective action program (CAP) supported nuclear safety. In reviewing your CAP, the inspectors assessed how well your staff identified problems at a low threshold, your staffs implementation of the stations process for prioritizing and evaluating these problems, and the effectiveness of corrective actions taken by the station to resolve these problems. In each of these areas, the inspectors determined that your staffs performance was adequate to support nuclear safety. | |||
The inspectors also evaluated other processes your staff used to identify issues for resolution. | |||
These included your use of audits and self-assessments to identify latent problems, and your incorporation of lessons learned from industry operating experience into station programs, processes, and procedures. The inspectors determined that your stations performance in each of these areas supported nuclear safety. Finally, the inspectors determined that your stations management maintains a safety-conscious work environment adequate to support nuclear safety. Based on the inspectors observations, your employees are willing to raise concerns related to nuclear safety through at least one of the several means available. | |||
There was one Green finding identified which was determined to be a violation of NRC requirements. However, because of the very low safety-significance, and because it was entered in your CAP, the NRC is treating this finding as a non-cited violation (NCV), consistent with the NRC Enforcement Policy. | There was one Green finding identified which was determined to be a violation of NRC requirements. However, because of the very low safety-significance, and because it was entered in your CAP, the NRC is treating this finding as a non-cited violation (NCV), consistent with the NRC Enforcement Policy. | ||
If you contest the NCV, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: | If you contest the NCV, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington DC 20555-001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, RII; the Director, Office of Enforcement, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; and the NRC Senior Resident Inspector at the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 1. | ||
If you disagree with the crosscutting aspect assigned to the finding in the attached report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report (IR), with the basis for your disagreement to the Regional Administrator, RII, and the NRC Senior Resident Inspector at the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 1. | |||
In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, Public inspections, exemptions, requests for withholding, of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room, or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS); accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). | |||
However, the material enclosed herein contains Security-Related Information in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(d)(1), and its disclosure to unauthorized individuals could present a security vulnerability. Therefore, the material in the Enclosure will not be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room, or from the PARS components of NRCs ADAMS. If you choose to provide a response, and Security-Related Information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please mark your entire response Security-Related Information - Withhold from public disclosure under 10 CFR 2.390, in accordance with CFR 2.390(d)(1), and follow the instructions for withholding in 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1). In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1)(ii), the NRC is waiving the affidavit requirements for your response. | |||
Sincerely, | |||
/RA/ | |||
Anthony D. Masters, Chief | |||
Reactor Projects Branch 7 | |||
Division of Reactor Projects | |||
Docket No. 50-390 License No. NPF-90 | |||
Enclosure: | |||
NRC IRs 05000390/2014007 and 05000390/2015405 w/Attachment: | |||
Supplementary Information (OUO) | |||
cc: Distribution via Listserv | |||
SUNSI REVIEW COMPLETE FORM 665 ATTACHED OFFICE RII:DRP/BR7 RII:DRP/BR7 RII:DRP/BR7 RII:DRP/BR6 RII:DRS/PSB2 RII:DRP/BR6 RII:DRP/BR7 SIGNATURE NLS2 RCT1 RRR1 CRK1 JCS3 for BBD MFK1 ADM2 NAME N. Staples R. Taylor R. Rodriguez C. Kontz B. Desai M. King A. Masters DATE 2/ 10 /2015 2/ 5 /2015 2/ 10 /2015 2/ 5 /2015 2/ 3 /2015 2/ 9 /2015 2/ 10 /2015 E-MAIL COPY YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO cc: | |||
Mr. Kevin Walsh Site Vice President Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority P. O. Box 2000, ADM 1V-WBN Spring City, TN 37381 | |||
Michael D. Skaggs Tennessee Valley Authority 6A Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 | |||
Mark Fencl Director, Security Operations Tennessee Valley Authority 1101 Market Street, EB 10B-C Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 | |||
Steve Fisher Manager, Site Security Operations Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority P.O. Box 2000, ADM 1S-WBN Spring City, TN 37381-200 | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 14:28, 10 January 2025
| ML15041A692 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Watts Bar |
| Issue date: | 02/10/2015 |
| From: | Masters A Reactor Projects Branch 7 |
| To: | James Shea Tennessee Valley Authority |
| Linda K. Gruhler 404-997-4633 | |
| References | |
| IR 2014007, IR 2015407 | |
| Download: ML15041A692 (5) | |
Text
February 10, 2015
SUBJECT:
WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 1 - U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION AND RESOLUTION INSPECTION REPORTS 05000390/2014007 AND 05000390/2015405
Dear Mr. Shea:
On December 18, 2014, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at your Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 1. The enclosed report documents the inspection findings that were discussed on December 18, 2014, with Mr. Walsh and other members of your staff. A re-exit was conducted with Mr. Charlton via telephone on January 22, 2015. An additional re-exit was conducted via telephone on February 3, 2015, to discuss the final results of the inspection.
Based on the inspection sample, the inspectors determined that your staffs implementation of the corrective action program (CAP) supported nuclear safety. In reviewing your CAP, the inspectors assessed how well your staff identified problems at a low threshold, your staffs implementation of the stations process for prioritizing and evaluating these problems, and the effectiveness of corrective actions taken by the station to resolve these problems. In each of these areas, the inspectors determined that your staffs performance was adequate to support nuclear safety.
The inspectors also evaluated other processes your staff used to identify issues for resolution.
These included your use of audits and self-assessments to identify latent problems, and your incorporation of lessons learned from industry operating experience into station programs, processes, and procedures. The inspectors determined that your stations performance in each of these areas supported nuclear safety. Finally, the inspectors determined that your stations management maintains a safety-conscious work environment adequate to support nuclear safety. Based on the inspectors observations, your employees are willing to raise concerns related to nuclear safety through at least one of the several means available.
There was one Green finding identified which was determined to be a violation of NRC requirements. However, because of the very low safety-significance, and because it was entered in your CAP, the NRC is treating this finding as a non-cited violation (NCV), consistent with the NRC Enforcement Policy.
If you contest the NCV, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington DC 20555-001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, RII; the Director, Office of Enforcement, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; and the NRC Senior Resident Inspector at the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 1.
If you disagree with the crosscutting aspect assigned to the finding in the attached report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report (IR), with the basis for your disagreement to the Regional Administrator, RII, and the NRC Senior Resident Inspector at the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 1.
In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, Public inspections, exemptions, requests for withholding, of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room, or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS); accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
However, the material enclosed herein contains Security-Related Information in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(d)(1), and its disclosure to unauthorized individuals could present a security vulnerability. Therefore, the material in the Enclosure will not be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room, or from the PARS components of NRCs ADAMS. If you choose to provide a response, and Security-Related Information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please mark your entire response Security-Related Information - Withhold from public disclosure under 10 CFR 2.390, in accordance with CFR 2.390(d)(1), and follow the instructions for withholding in 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1). In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1)(ii), the NRC is waiving the affidavit requirements for your response.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Anthony D. Masters, Chief
Reactor Projects Branch 7
Division of Reactor Projects
Docket No. 50-390 License No. NPF-90
Enclosure:
NRC IRs 05000390/2014007 and 05000390/2015405 w/Attachment:
Supplementary Information (OUO)
cc: Distribution via Listserv
SUNSI REVIEW COMPLETE FORM 665 ATTACHED OFFICE RII:DRP/BR7 RII:DRP/BR7 RII:DRP/BR7 RII:DRP/BR6 RII:DRS/PSB2 RII:DRP/BR6 RII:DRP/BR7 SIGNATURE NLS2 RCT1 RRR1 CRK1 JCS3 for BBD MFK1 ADM2 NAME N. Staples R. Taylor R. Rodriguez C. Kontz B. Desai M. King A. Masters DATE 2/ 10 /2015 2/ 5 /2015 2/ 10 /2015 2/ 5 /2015 2/ 3 /2015 2/ 9 /2015 2/ 10 /2015 E-MAIL COPY YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO cc:
Mr. Kevin Walsh Site Vice President Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority P. O. Box 2000, ADM 1V-WBN Spring City, TN 37381
Michael D. Skaggs Tennessee Valley Authority 6A Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801
Mark Fencl Director, Security Operations Tennessee Valley Authority 1101 Market Street, EB 10B-C Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801
Steve Fisher Manager, Site Security Operations Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority P.O. Box 2000, ADM 1S-WBN Spring City, TN 37381-200