IR 05000390/2014007: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 02/10/2015
| issue date = 02/10/2015
| title = IR 05000390/2014007 and 05000390/2015405, Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Problem Identification and Resolution
| title = IR 05000390/2014007 and 05000390/2015405, Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Problem Identification and Resolution
| author name = Masters A D
| author name = Masters A
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-II/DRP/RPB7
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-II/DRP/RPB7
| addressee name = Shea J W
| addressee name = Shea J
| addressee affiliation = Tennessee Valley Authority
| addressee affiliation = Tennessee Valley Authority
| docket = 05000390
| docket = 05000390
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:
{{#Wiki_filter:February 10, 2015
[[Issue date::February 10, 2015]]


Mr. Joseph Shea Vice President, Nuclear Licensing Tennessee Valley Authority 1101 Market Street, LP 3D-C Chattanooga, TN  37402-2801
==SUBJECT:==
WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 1 - U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION AND RESOLUTION INSPECTION REPORTS 05000390/2014007 AND 05000390/2015405


SUBJECT:   WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 1 - U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION AND RESOLUTION INSPECTION REPORTS 05000390/2014007 AND 05000390/2015405
==Dear Mr. Shea:==
On December 18, 2014, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at your Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 1. The enclosed report documents the inspection findings that were discussed on December 18, 2014, with Mr. Walsh and other members of your staff. A re-exit was conducted with Mr. Charlton via telephone on January 22, 2015. An additional re-exit was conducted via telephone on February 3, 2015, to discuss the final results of the inspection.


==Dear Mr. Shea:==
Based on the inspection sample, the inspectors determined that your staffs implementation of the corrective action program (CAP) supported nuclear safety. In reviewing your CAP, the inspectors assessed how well your staff identified problems at a low threshold, your staffs implementation of the stations process for prioritizing and evaluating these problems, and the effectiveness of corrective actions taken by the station to resolve these problems. In each of these areas, the inspectors determined that your staffs performance was adequate to support nuclear safety.
On December 18, 2014, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at your Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 1. The enclosed report documents the inspection findings that were discussed on December 18, 2014, with Mr. Walsh and other members of your staff. A re-exit was conducted with Mr. Charlton via telephone on January 22, 2015. An additional re-exit was conducted via telephone on February 3, 2015,  to discuss the final results of the inspection.


Based on the inspection sample, the inspectors determined that your staff's implementation of the corrective action program (CAP) supported nuclear safety. In reviewing your CAP, the inspectors assessed how well your staff identified problems at a low threshold, your staff's implementation of the station's process for prioritizing and evaluating these problems, and the effectiveness of corrective actions taken by the station to resolve these problems. In each of these areas, the inspectors determined that your staff's performance was adequate to support nuclear safety.
The inspectors also evaluated other processes your staff used to identify issues for resolution.


The inspectors also evaluated other processes your staff used to identify issues for resolution. These included your use of audits and self-assessments to identify latent problems, and your incorporation of lessons learned from industry operating experience into station programs, processes, and procedures. The inspectors determined that your station's performance in each of these areas supported nuclear safety.Finally, the inspectors determined that your station's management maintains a safety-conscious work environment adequate to support nuclear safety. Based on the inspectors' observations, your employees are willing to raise concerns related to nuclear safety through at least one of the several means available.
These included your use of audits and self-assessments to identify latent problems, and your incorporation of lessons learned from industry operating experience into station programs, processes, and procedures. The inspectors determined that your stations performance in each of these areas supported nuclear safety. Finally, the inspectors determined that your stations management maintains a safety-conscious work environment adequate to support nuclear safety. Based on the inspectors observations, your employees are willing to raise concerns related to nuclear safety through at least one of the several means available.


There was one Green finding identified which was determined to be a violation of NRC requirements. However, because of the very low safety-significance, and because it was entered in your CAP, the NRC is treating this finding as a non-cited violation (NCV), consistent with the NRC Enforcement Policy.
There was one Green finding identified which was determined to be a violation of NRC requirements. However, because of the very low safety-significance, and because it was entered in your CAP, the NRC is treating this finding as a non-cited violation (NCV), consistent with the NRC Enforcement Policy.


If you contest the NCV, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington DC 20555-001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, RII; the Director, Office of Enforcement, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; and the NRC Senior Resident Inspector at the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 1.
If you contest the NCV, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington DC 20555-001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, RII; the Director, Office of Enforcement, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; and the NRC Senior Resident Inspector at the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 1.
 
If you disagree with the crosscutting aspect assigned to the finding in the attached report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report (IR), with the basis for your disagreement to the Regional Administrator, RII, and the NRC Senior Resident Inspector at the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 1.
 
In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, Public inspections, exemptions, requests for withholding, of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room, or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS); accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
 
However, the material enclosed herein contains Security-Related Information in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(d)(1), and its disclosure to unauthorized individuals could present a security vulnerability. Therefore, the material in the Enclosure will not be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room, or from the PARS components of NRCs ADAMS. If you choose to provide a response, and Security-Related Information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please mark your entire response Security-Related Information - Withhold from public disclosure under 10 CFR 2.390, in accordance with CFR 2.390(d)(1), and follow the instructions for withholding in 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1). In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1)(ii), the NRC is waiving the affidavit requirements for your response.
 
Sincerely,
/RA/
 
Anthony D. Masters, Chief
 
Reactor Projects Branch 7
 
Division of Reactor Projects
 
Docket No. 50-390 License No. NPF-90
 
Enclosure:
NRC IRs 05000390/2014007 and 05000390/2015405 w/Attachment:
Supplementary Information (OUO)
 
cc: Distribution via Listserv


If you disagree with the crosscutting aspect assigned to the finding in the attached report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report (IR), with the basis for your disagreement to the Regional Administrator, RII, and the NRC Senior Resident Inspector at the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 1. In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, "Public inspections, exemptions, requests for withholding," of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy  of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room, or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS); accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
SUNSI REVIEW COMPLETE FORM 665 ATTACHED OFFICE RII:DRP/BR7 RII:DRP/BR7 RII:DRP/BR7 RII:DRP/BR6 RII:DRS/PSB2 RII:DRP/BR6 RII:DRP/BR7 SIGNATURE NLS2 RCT1 RRR1 CRK1 JCS3 for BBD MFK1 ADM2 NAME N. Staples R. Taylor R. Rodriguez C. Kontz B. Desai M. King A. Masters DATE 2/ 10 /2015 2/ 5 /2015 2/ 10 /2015 2/ 5 /2015 2/ 3 /2015 2/ 9 /2015 2/ 10 /2015 E-MAIL COPY YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO cc:


However, the material enclosed herein contains Security-Related Information in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(d)(1), and its disclosure to unauthorized individuals could present a security vulnerability. Therefore, the material in the Enclosure will not be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room, or from the PARS components of NRC's ADAMS. If you choose to provide a response, and Security-Related Information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please mark your entire response "Security-Related Information - Withhold from public disclosure under 10 CFR 2.390," in accordance withCFR 2.390(d)(1), and follow the instructions for withholding in 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1). In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1)(ii), the NRC is waiving the affidavit requirements for your response.
Mr. Kevin Walsh Site Vice President Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority P. O. Box 2000, ADM 1V-WBN Spring City, TN 37381


Sincerely,/RA/        Anthony D. Masters, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 7  Division of Reactor Projects Docket No. 50-390 License No. NPF-90
Michael D. Skaggs Tennessee Valley Authority 6A Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801


===Enclosure:===
Mark Fencl Director, Security Operations Tennessee Valley Authority 1101 Market Street, EB 10B-C Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801
NRC IRs 05000390/2014007 and    05000390/2015405


===w/Attachment:===
Steve Fisher Manager, Site Security Operations Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority P.O. Box 2000, ADM 1S-WBN Spring City, TN 37381-200
Supplementary Information (OUO)
cc:  Distribution via Listserv
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 14:28, 10 January 2025

IR 05000390/2014007 and 05000390/2015405, Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Problem Identification and Resolution
ML15041A692
Person / Time
Site: Watts Bar Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 02/10/2015
From: Masters A
Reactor Projects Branch 7
To: James Shea
Tennessee Valley Authority
Linda K. Gruhler 404-997-4633
References
IR 2014007, IR 2015407
Download: ML15041A692 (5)


Text

February 10, 2015

SUBJECT:

WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 1 - U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION AND RESOLUTION INSPECTION REPORTS 05000390/2014007 AND 05000390/2015405

Dear Mr. Shea:

On December 18, 2014, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at your Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 1. The enclosed report documents the inspection findings that were discussed on December 18, 2014, with Mr. Walsh and other members of your staff. A re-exit was conducted with Mr. Charlton via telephone on January 22, 2015. An additional re-exit was conducted via telephone on February 3, 2015, to discuss the final results of the inspection.

Based on the inspection sample, the inspectors determined that your staffs implementation of the corrective action program (CAP) supported nuclear safety. In reviewing your CAP, the inspectors assessed how well your staff identified problems at a low threshold, your staffs implementation of the stations process for prioritizing and evaluating these problems, and the effectiveness of corrective actions taken by the station to resolve these problems. In each of these areas, the inspectors determined that your staffs performance was adequate to support nuclear safety.

The inspectors also evaluated other processes your staff used to identify issues for resolution.

These included your use of audits and self-assessments to identify latent problems, and your incorporation of lessons learned from industry operating experience into station programs, processes, and procedures. The inspectors determined that your stations performance in each of these areas supported nuclear safety. Finally, the inspectors determined that your stations management maintains a safety-conscious work environment adequate to support nuclear safety. Based on the inspectors observations, your employees are willing to raise concerns related to nuclear safety through at least one of the several means available.

There was one Green finding identified which was determined to be a violation of NRC requirements. However, because of the very low safety-significance, and because it was entered in your CAP, the NRC is treating this finding as a non-cited violation (NCV), consistent with the NRC Enforcement Policy.

If you contest the NCV, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington DC 20555-001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, RII; the Director, Office of Enforcement, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; and the NRC Senior Resident Inspector at the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 1.

If you disagree with the crosscutting aspect assigned to the finding in the attached report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report (IR), with the basis for your disagreement to the Regional Administrator, RII, and the NRC Senior Resident Inspector at the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 1.

In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, Public inspections, exemptions, requests for withholding, of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room, or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS); accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

However, the material enclosed herein contains Security-Related Information in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(d)(1), and its disclosure to unauthorized individuals could present a security vulnerability. Therefore, the material in the Enclosure will not be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room, or from the PARS components of NRCs ADAMS. If you choose to provide a response, and Security-Related Information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please mark your entire response Security-Related Information - Withhold from public disclosure under 10 CFR 2.390, in accordance with CFR 2.390(d)(1), and follow the instructions for withholding in 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1). In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1)(ii), the NRC is waiving the affidavit requirements for your response.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Anthony D. Masters, Chief

Reactor Projects Branch 7

Division of Reactor Projects

Docket No. 50-390 License No. NPF-90

Enclosure:

NRC IRs 05000390/2014007 and 05000390/2015405 w/Attachment:

Supplementary Information (OUO)

cc: Distribution via Listserv

SUNSI REVIEW COMPLETE FORM 665 ATTACHED OFFICE RII:DRP/BR7 RII:DRP/BR7 RII:DRP/BR7 RII:DRP/BR6 RII:DRS/PSB2 RII:DRP/BR6 RII:DRP/BR7 SIGNATURE NLS2 RCT1 RRR1 CRK1 JCS3 for BBD MFK1 ADM2 NAME N. Staples R. Taylor R. Rodriguez C. Kontz B. Desai M. King A. Masters DATE 2/ 10 /2015 2/ 5 /2015 2/ 10 /2015 2/ 5 /2015 2/ 3 /2015 2/ 9 /2015 2/ 10 /2015 E-MAIL COPY YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO cc:

Mr. Kevin Walsh Site Vice President Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority P. O. Box 2000, ADM 1V-WBN Spring City, TN 37381

Michael D. Skaggs Tennessee Valley Authority 6A Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801

Mark Fencl Director, Security Operations Tennessee Valley Authority 1101 Market Street, EB 10B-C Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801

Steve Fisher Manager, Site Security Operations Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority P.O. Box 2000, ADM 1S-WBN Spring City, TN 37381-200