ML16174A315: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML16174A315
| number = ML16174A315
| issue date = 06/21/2016
| issue date = 06/21/2016
| title = Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Annual Assessment Meeting Open House June 21, 2016
| title = Annual Assessment Meeting Open House June 21, 2016
| author name =  
| author name =  
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Davis-BesseNuclear Power StationAnnual Assessment MeetingOpen HouseJune 21, 20162015 Reactor Oversight ProcessNuclear Regulatory Commission -Region III Our MissionTo license and regulate the nation's civilian use of byproduct, source, and special nuclear materials to ensure adequate protection of public health and safety, promote the common defense and security, and protect the environment.2 MaterialsReactorsWasteWhat We Regulate RadonMilitaryX-RaysWhat We Don't Regulate Some Nuclear Facts                                   *100 nuclear power plants supply about 20 percent of the electricity in the U.S.*Nuclear materials are used in medicine for diagnosis and cancer treatment.*Nuclear materials are widely used in industry, such as in density gauges, flow measurement devices, radiography devices, and irradiators.5 NRC Performance GoalsSafety-Ensure adequate protection of public health and safety and the environmentSecurity-Ensure adequate protection in the secure use and management of radioactive materials6 How We Regulate Regulatory FrameworkNRC's Safety Mission Strategic Performance AreasCornerstonesCross-Cutting AreasHuman Performance--Safety Conscious Work Environment--Problem Identification & Resolution Reactor Oversight Process9SafetyCornerstonesBaseline Inspection ResultsSignificance ThresholdAction MatrixSignificance ThresholdPerformance IndicatorResultsRegulatory ResponseStrategicPerformance AreasSafetyCornerstonesBaseline Inspection ResultsSignificance ThresholdAction MatrixSignificance ThresholdPerformance IndicatorResultsRegulatory ResponseStrategicPerformance Areas Significance ThresholdIncreasing Safety SignificanceGreenWhiteYellowRedPerformance IndicatorsInspection FindingsGreenWhiteYellowRedIncreasing Safety Significance Action Matrix ColumnsIncreasing*Safety Significance*Inspection *Management Involvement*Regulatory ActionLicensee ResponseRegulatoryResponseDegradedMultiple/RepetitiveDegradedUnacceptable Performance 12National Summary of Plant PerformanceStatus as of 02/22/2016Licensee Response 90 Regulatory Response   7 Degraded Cornerstone   0 Multiple/Repetitive Deg. Cornerstone3 Unacceptable 0 IMC 0350 Oversight0 Total100 13National Summary *Performance Indicator Results for 2015*-Green6686-White12-Yellow0-Red0*PIs are counted per plant per quarter*Total Inspection Findings in 2015#-Green782-White8-Yellow0-Red0# Finding data current as of 2/22/2016 NRC Annual Assessment SummaryFirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company operated the station safely and in a manner that preserved the public health and safety and protected the environment.Davis-Bessewas in the Licensee Response Column of the NRC's Action Matrix in the third quarter of 2015Davis-Bessewas in the Regulatory Response Column in first, second, and fourth quarters of 2015 due to one or more Greater-than-Green violations associated with the Physical Protection cornerstone No Cross-Cutting Themes were identifiedDavis-BesseNuclear Power Station1414 NRC Inspection Activities5761 total hours expended by NRC on Reactor Oversight Process activities2429 inspector hours of direct inspection activity638 inspector hours reviewing and observing plant operating status1500 inspector hours of preparation for and documentation of inspection activities 1194 hours for other Reactor Oversight Process elements (e.g., assessments and communications)15Davis-Besse2015 NRC Inspection Activities2 resident inspectors on site -residents produced four quarterly inspection reports and walked through the plant daily24 other inspectors participated in various inspections3major team inspectionsSupplemental Inspection for a Regulatory Response column entryComponent Design Basis InspectionBiennial Problem Identification and Resolution InspectionDavis-BesseNuclear Power Station for 201516 Significance ThresholdGreenBaseline InspectionWhiteRequires additional NRC oversightYellowRequires more NRC oversightRedRequires most NRC oversightPerformance IndicatorsInspection FindingsGreenVery low safety issueWhiteLow to moderate safety issueYellowSubstantial safety issueRedHigh safety issue17 Davis-BessePIs and FindingsAll Green Performance Indicators9 Green/Severity Level IV Inspection Findings1 or more Greater-Than-Green Inspection Findings associated with the Security CornerstoneJanuary 1 through December 31, 201518 Safety Significant FindingsOne or more Greater-Than-Green Findings carryover from 2014Corrective Actions Found Sufficient during Inspection in Second Quarter of 2015Davis-Bessetransitioned to Licensee Response Column at beginning of third quarter 2015 One or more Greater-Than-Green Findings in fourth quarter of 2015Davis-Bessetransitioned to Regulatory Response Column at beginning of fourth quarter 2015 Davis-BesseNuclear Power Station NRC Inspection FindingsFailure to maintain Flow-Accelerated Corrosion Computer Model results in a non-safety piping failureFailure to install and control reactor coolant pump seal vent flexible hoses per design analysesFailure to request and obtain a license amendment for use of an unreviewedmethod of analysis for the capability of the shield buildingDavis-BesseNuclear Power StationSome Examples of Green Findings20 NRC Inspection Plans for 2016NRC Plans Baseline Inspections for 2016   This includes the following major team inspections:Post License Renewal Inspection (completed)Triennial Fire Protection InspectionInitial Reactor Operator License ExaminationsSupplemental Inspection for one or more         Greater-Than-Green inspection findings 21Davis-BesseNuclear Plant 22Mitigating Strategies (MS) & Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (SFPI) Order*MS Order requires strategies to cope with a long term loss of safety systems*SFPI Order requires plants to be able to tell if water is at or above certain levels*Site Audit was performed in November 2015*Site Safety Evaluation scheduled to be issued after the NRC receives the site compliance letter *Regional inspection of MS inspection (TI 191, Rev 1) will be performed after Safety Evaluation issuedDavis-BesseFukushimaRecommendations Status Davis-BesseFukushima Flooding Response Status*Flooding Hazard Reevaluations-Reevaluate Hazards using present-Day information-Flooding Was Submitted March 2015-Staff assessments will be issued by December 2016-Inspectors completed TI-190 which verified a licensee's interim actions were appropriate to mitigate the reevaluated flood levels.*Licensees will address the reevaluated flood heights as part of their Mitigating Strategies Assessment, and if impacted take one of four potential paths:1) No change; 2) procedural change; 3) physical modifications;4) Revised Mitigating Strategies23 24*Seismic Walkdowns-Verify that the site can meet its current requirements for hazard protection-Walkdownsare complete; Staff assessments issued *Seismic Hazard Reevaluations-Reevaluate Hazards using present-Day information-Seismic Reevaluations submitted March 31, 2014 -NRC assessment of the licensee submittal was issued on August 25, 2015-NRC assessment in letter dated October 27, 2015, stated that a full seismic risk evaluation was not required *Sites will evaluate the impacts of the updated Seismic hazards as part of their mitigating strategies assessment.Davis-BesseFukushima Seismic Response Status Actions in Response to the Japan Nuclear Accident*Actions in response to Japan Nuclear Accident: http://www.nrc.gov/japan/japan-info.html*Mailbox for comments on staff actions: JLD_Public.Resource@nrc.gov*Office of Public Affairs Point of Contact: OPA.resource@nrc.govor 301-415-820025 NRC Social Media Channels*Blog:http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov/*Flickr:http://www.flickr.com/photos/nrcgov/*Twitter:https://twitter.com/#!/nrcgov*YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/NRCgov*RSS:http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html#rss26 27Reference Sources*Reactor Oversight Process-http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.html*Public Electronic Reading Room-http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm.html*Public Document Room-1-800-397-4209 (Toll Free)  
{{#Wiki_filter:Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Annual Assessment Meeting Open House June 21, 2016 2015 Reactor Oversight Process Nuclear Regulatory Commission - Region III
}}
 
Our Mission To license and regulate the nations civilian use of byproduct, source, and special nuclear materials to ensure adequate protection of public health and safety, promote the common defense and security, and protect the environment.
2
 
Materials Reactors Waste What We Regulate
 
Radon Military X-Rays What We Dont Regulate
 
Some Nuclear Facts 100 nuclear power plants supply about 20 percent of the electricity in the U.S.
Nuclear materials are used in medicine for diagnosis and cancer treatment.
Nuclear materials are widely used in industry, such as in density gauges, flow measurement devices, radiography devices, and irradiators.
5
 
NRC Performance Goals Safety - Ensure adequate protection of public health and safety and the environment Security - Ensure adequate protection in the secure use and management of radioactive materials 6
 
How We Regulate
 
Regulatory Framework NRCs Safety Mission Strategic Performance Areas Cornerstones Cross-Cutting Areas Human Performance--Safety Conscious Work Environment--Problem Identification &
Resolution
 
Reactor Oversight Process 9
Safety Cornerstones Baseline Inspection Results Significance Threshold Action Matrix Significance Threshold Performance Indicator Results Regulatory Response Strategic Performance Areas Safety Cornerstones Baseline Inspection Results Significance Threshold Action Matrix Significance Threshold Performance Indicator Results Regulatory Response Strategic Performance Areas
 
Significance Threshold Increasing Safety Significance Green White Yellow Red Performance Indicators Inspection Findings Green White Yellow Red Increasing Safety Significance
 
Action Matrix Columns Increasing Safety Significance Inspection Management Involvement Regulatory Action Licensee
 
===Response===
Regulatory
 
===Response===
Degraded Multiple/Repetitive Degraded Unacceptable Performance
 
12 National Summary of Plant Performance Status as of 02/22/2016 Licensee Response 90 Regulatory Response 7
Degraded Cornerstone 0
Multiple/Repetitive Deg. Cornerstone 3
Unacceptable 0
IMC 0350 Oversight 0
Total 100
 
13 National Summary
* Performance Indicator Results for 2015*
- Green 6686
- White 12
- Yellow 0
- Red 0
*PIs are counted per plant per quarter
* Total Inspection Findings in 2015#
- Green 782
- White 8
- Yellow 0
- Red 0
# Finding data current as of 2/22/2016
 
NRC Annual Assessment Summary FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company operated the station safely and in a manner that preserved the public health and safety and protected the environment.
Davis-Besse was in the Licensee Response Column of the NRCs Action Matrix in the third quarter of 2015 Davis-Besse was in the Regulatory Response Column in first, second, and fourth quarters of 2015 due to one or more Greater-than-Green violations associated with the Physical Protection cornerstone No Cross-Cutting Themes were identified Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station 14 14
 
NRC Inspection Activities 5761 total hours expended by NRC on Reactor Oversight Process activities 2429 inspector hours of direct inspection activity 638 inspector hours reviewing and observing plant operating status 1500 inspector hours of preparation for and documentation of inspection activities 1194 hours for other Reactor Oversight Process elements (e.g., assessments and communications) 15 Davis-Besse 2015
 
NRC Inspection Activities 2 resident inspectors on site - residents produced four quarterly inspection reports and walked through the plant daily 24 other inspectors participated in various inspections 3 major team inspections Supplemental Inspection for a Regulatory Response column entry Component Design Basis Inspection Biennial Problem Identification and Resolution Inspection Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station for 2015 16
 
Significance Threshold Green Baseline Inspection White Requires additional NRC oversight Yellow Requires more NRC oversight Red Requires most NRC oversight Performance Indicators Inspection Findings Green Very low safety issue White Low to moderate safety issue Yellow Substantial safety issue Red High safety issue 17
 
Davis-Besse PIs and Findings All Green Performance Indicators 9 Green/Severity Level IV Inspection Findings 1 or more Greater-Than-Green Inspection Findings associated with the Security Cornerstone January 1 through December 31, 2015 18
 
Safety Significant Findings One or more Greater-Than-Green Findings carryover from 2014 Corrective Actions Found Sufficient during Inspection in Second Quarter of 2015 Davis-Besse transitioned to Licensee Response Column at beginning of third quarter 2015 One or more Greater-Than-Green Findings in fourth quarter of 2015 Davis-Besse transitioned to Regulatory Response Column at beginning of fourth quarter 2015 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station
 
NRC Inspection Findings Failure to maintain Flow-Accelerated Corrosion Computer Model results in a non-safety piping failure Failure to install and control reactor coolant pump seal vent flexible hoses per design analyses Failure to request and obtain a license amendment for use of an unreviewed method of analysis for the capability of the shield building Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Some Examples of Green Findings 20
 
NRC Inspection Plans for 2016 NRC Plans Baseline Inspections for 2016 This includes the following major team inspections:
Post License Renewal Inspection (completed)
Triennial Fire Protection Inspection Initial Reactor Operator License Examinations Supplemental Inspection for one or more Greater-Than-Green inspection findings 21 Davis-Besse Nuclear Plant
 
22 Mitigating Strategies (MS) & Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (SFPI) Order
* MS Order requires strategies to cope with a long term loss of safety systems
* SFPI Order requires plants to be able to tell if water is at or above certain levels
* Site Audit was performed in November 2015
* Site Safety Evaluation scheduled to be issued after the NRC receives the site compliance letter
* Regional inspection of MS inspection (TI 191, Rev 1) will be performed after Safety Evaluation issued Davis-Besse Fukushima Recommendations Status
 
Davis-Besse Fukushima Flooding Response Status Flooding Hazard Reevaluations
- Reevaluate Hazards using present-Day information
- Flooding Was Submitted March 2015
- Staff assessments will be issued by December 2016
- Inspectors completed TI-190 which verified a licensees interim actions were appropriate to mitigate the reevaluated flood levels.
Licensees will address the reevaluated flood heights as part of their Mitigating Strategies Assessment, and if impacted take one of four potential paths:
: 1) No change; 2) procedural change;
: 3) physical modifications; 4) Revised Mitigating Strategies 23
 
24
* Seismic Walkdowns
- Verify that the site can meet its current requirements for hazard protection
- Walkdowns are complete; Staff assessments issued
* Seismic Hazard Reevaluations
- Reevaluate Hazards using present-Day information
- Seismic Reevaluations submitted March 31, 2014  
- NRC assessment of the licensee submittal was issued on August 25, 2015
- NRC assessment in {{letter dated|date=October 27, 2015|text=letter dated October 27, 2015}}, stated that a full seismic risk evaluation was not required
* Sites will evaluate the impacts of the updated Seismic hazards as part of their mitigating strategies assessment.
Davis-Besse Fukushima Seismic Response Status
 
Actions in Response to the Japan Nuclear Accident
* Actions in response to Japan Nuclear Accident: http://www.nrc.gov/japan/japan-info.html
* Mailbox for comments on staff actions:
JLD_Public.Resource@nrc.gov
* Office of Public Affairs Point of
 
==Contact:==
OPA.resource@nrc.gov or 301-415-8200 25
 
NRC Social Media Channels
* Blog:
http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov/
* Flickr:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/nrcgov/
* Twitter:
https://twitter.com/#!/nrcgov
* YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/NRCgov
* RSS:
http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html#rss 26
 
27 Reference Sources
* Reactor Oversight Process
- http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.html Public Electronic Reading Room
- http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm.html Public Document Room 800-397-4209 (Toll Free)}}

Latest revision as of 22:08, 9 January 2025

Annual Assessment Meeting Open House June 21, 2016
ML16174A315
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse Cleveland Electric icon.png
Issue date: 06/21/2016
From:
NRC/RGN-III
To:
References
Download: ML16174A315 (27)


Text

Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Annual Assessment Meeting Open House June 21, 2016 2015 Reactor Oversight Process Nuclear Regulatory Commission - Region III

Our Mission To license and regulate the nations civilian use of byproduct, source, and special nuclear materials to ensure adequate protection of public health and safety, promote the common defense and security, and protect the environment.

2

Materials Reactors Waste What We Regulate

Radon Military X-Rays What We Dont Regulate

Some Nuclear Facts 100 nuclear power plants supply about 20 percent of the electricity in the U.S.

Nuclear materials are used in medicine for diagnosis and cancer treatment.

Nuclear materials are widely used in industry, such as in density gauges, flow measurement devices, radiography devices, and irradiators.

5

NRC Performance Goals Safety - Ensure adequate protection of public health and safety and the environment Security - Ensure adequate protection in the secure use and management of radioactive materials 6

How We Regulate

Regulatory Framework NRCs Safety Mission Strategic Performance Areas Cornerstones Cross-Cutting Areas Human Performance--Safety Conscious Work Environment--Problem Identification &

Resolution

Reactor Oversight Process 9

Safety Cornerstones Baseline Inspection Results Significance Threshold Action Matrix Significance Threshold Performance Indicator Results Regulatory Response Strategic Performance Areas Safety Cornerstones Baseline Inspection Results Significance Threshold Action Matrix Significance Threshold Performance Indicator Results Regulatory Response Strategic Performance Areas

Significance Threshold Increasing Safety Significance Green White Yellow Red Performance Indicators Inspection Findings Green White Yellow Red Increasing Safety Significance

Action Matrix Columns Increasing Safety Significance Inspection Management Involvement Regulatory Action Licensee

Response

Regulatory

Response

Degraded Multiple/Repetitive Degraded Unacceptable Performance

12 National Summary of Plant Performance Status as of 02/22/2016 Licensee Response 90 Regulatory Response 7

Degraded Cornerstone 0

Multiple/Repetitive Deg. Cornerstone 3

Unacceptable 0

IMC 0350 Oversight 0

Total 100

13 National Summary

  • Performance Indicator Results for 2015*

- Green 6686

- White 12

- Yellow 0

- Red 0

  • PIs are counted per plant per quarter
  • Total Inspection Findings in 2015#

- Green 782

- White 8

- Yellow 0

- Red 0

  1. Finding data current as of 2/22/2016

NRC Annual Assessment Summary FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company operated the station safely and in a manner that preserved the public health and safety and protected the environment.

Davis-Besse was in the Licensee Response Column of the NRCs Action Matrix in the third quarter of 2015 Davis-Besse was in the Regulatory Response Column in first, second, and fourth quarters of 2015 due to one or more Greater-than-Green violations associated with the Physical Protection cornerstone No Cross-Cutting Themes were identified Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station 14 14

NRC Inspection Activities 5761 total hours expended by NRC on Reactor Oversight Process activities 2429 inspector hours of direct inspection activity 638 inspector hours reviewing and observing plant operating status 1500 inspector hours of preparation for and documentation of inspection activities 1194 hours0.0138 days <br />0.332 hours <br />0.00197 weeks <br />4.54317e-4 months <br /> for other Reactor Oversight Process elements (e.g., assessments and communications) 15 Davis-Besse 2015

NRC Inspection Activities 2 resident inspectors on site - residents produced four quarterly inspection reports and walked through the plant daily 24 other inspectors participated in various inspections 3 major team inspections Supplemental Inspection for a Regulatory Response column entry Component Design Basis Inspection Biennial Problem Identification and Resolution Inspection Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station for 2015 16

Significance Threshold Green Baseline Inspection White Requires additional NRC oversight Yellow Requires more NRC oversight Red Requires most NRC oversight Performance Indicators Inspection Findings Green Very low safety issue White Low to moderate safety issue Yellow Substantial safety issue Red High safety issue 17

Davis-Besse PIs and Findings All Green Performance Indicators 9 Green/Severity Level IV Inspection Findings 1 or more Greater-Than-Green Inspection Findings associated with the Security Cornerstone January 1 through December 31, 2015 18

Safety Significant Findings One or more Greater-Than-Green Findings carryover from 2014 Corrective Actions Found Sufficient during Inspection in Second Quarter of 2015 Davis-Besse transitioned to Licensee Response Column at beginning of third quarter 2015 One or more Greater-Than-Green Findings in fourth quarter of 2015 Davis-Besse transitioned to Regulatory Response Column at beginning of fourth quarter 2015 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station

NRC Inspection Findings Failure to maintain Flow-Accelerated Corrosion Computer Model results in a non-safety piping failure Failure to install and control reactor coolant pump seal vent flexible hoses per design analyses Failure to request and obtain a license amendment for use of an unreviewed method of analysis for the capability of the shield building Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Some Examples of Green Findings 20

NRC Inspection Plans for 2016 NRC Plans Baseline Inspections for 2016 This includes the following major team inspections:

Post License Renewal Inspection (completed)

Triennial Fire Protection Inspection Initial Reactor Operator License Examinations Supplemental Inspection for one or more Greater-Than-Green inspection findings 21 Davis-Besse Nuclear Plant

22 Mitigating Strategies (MS) & Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (SFPI) Order

  • MS Order requires strategies to cope with a long term loss of safety systems
  • SFPI Order requires plants to be able to tell if water is at or above certain levels
  • Site Audit was performed in November 2015
  • Site Safety Evaluation scheduled to be issued after the NRC receives the site compliance letter
  • Regional inspection of MS inspection (TI 191, Rev 1) will be performed after Safety Evaluation issued Davis-Besse Fukushima Recommendations Status

Davis-Besse Fukushima Flooding Response Status Flooding Hazard Reevaluations

- Reevaluate Hazards using present-Day information

- Flooding Was Submitted March 2015

- Staff assessments will be issued by December 2016

- Inspectors completed TI-190 which verified a licensees interim actions were appropriate to mitigate the reevaluated flood levels.

Licensees will address the reevaluated flood heights as part of their Mitigating Strategies Assessment, and if impacted take one of four potential paths:

1) No change; 2) procedural change;
3) physical modifications; 4) Revised Mitigating Strategies 23

24

  • Seismic Walkdowns

- Verify that the site can meet its current requirements for hazard protection

- Walkdowns are complete; Staff assessments issued

  • Seismic Hazard Reevaluations

- Reevaluate Hazards using present-Day information

- Seismic Reevaluations submitted March 31, 2014

- NRC assessment of the licensee submittal was issued on August 25, 2015

- NRC assessment in letter dated October 27, 2015, stated that a full seismic risk evaluation was not required

  • Sites will evaluate the impacts of the updated Seismic hazards as part of their mitigating strategies assessment.

Davis-Besse Fukushima Seismic Response Status

Actions in Response to the Japan Nuclear Accident

  • Mailbox for comments on staff actions:

JLD_Public.Resource@nrc.gov

  • Office of Public Affairs Point of

Contact:

OPA.resource@nrc.gov or 301-415-8200 25

NRC Social Media Channels

  • Blog:

http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov/

  • Flickr:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/nrcgov/

  • Twitter:

https://twitter.com/#!/nrcgov

  • RSS:

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html#rss 26

27 Reference Sources

  • Reactor Oversight Process

- http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.html Public Electronic Reading Room

- http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm.html Public Document Room 800-397-4209 (Toll Free)