ML18121A102: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 04/26/2018
| issue date = 04/26/2018
| title = 2018 Fermi Ile Proposed Files Form ES-301-4
| title = 2018 Fermi Ile Proposed Files Form ES-301-4
| author name = Zoia C D
| author name = Zoia C
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 9: Line 9:
| docket = 05000341
| docket = 05000341
| license number = NPF-043
| license number = NPF-043
| contact person = Zoia C D
| contact person = Zoia C
| package number = ML17164A403
| package number = ML17164A403
| document type = License-Operator, Part 55 Examination Related Material
| document type = License-Operator, Part 55 Examination Related Material
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facilit y: Fermi 2 Date of Exam: 2/26/2018 Scena r io Numbers: 1/2/3 Operating Test No.: 2018-1 QUALITATIV E ATTRI B UT E S In itia l s a b* c# 1. T he initial condit i ons are rea l istic , i n that some equipment and/or in strumentation may be out of service, SMS (lar-but it does not cue the operators i nto expecte d events. 2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. SMS ro-3. Each event descr i ption consists of SMS
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: Fermi 2 Date of Exam: 2/26/2018 Scenario Numbers: 1/2/3 Operating Test No.: 2018-1 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a
* the point in the scenario when it i s to be in i tia t ed f-v-* th e ma l function(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event
b*
* the symptoms/c ues that will be visible to the crew
c#
* the expected operator act ion s (by shift posi t ion)
: 1.
* the even t termination point (if applicable)
The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, SMS (lar-but it does not cue the operators into expected events.  
: 4. T he events are va l id with r egard to physics a n d t h ermodynamics.
~
SMS f.-5. Sequencing and timing of even t s is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obta i n comp l ete SMS I\--l:!L evaluation results commens ur ate with t h e scenario ob j ectives. 6. I f t ime compression t ech n iques are u sed, the scenar i o summary c l ear l y so indicates.
: 2.
NIA If/A-tl//4 Operators have sufficient time t o carry out expected activ i ties without undue time const r aints. Cues are given. 7. The si m ulator m o de l ing i s not altered. SMS 8. Th e scena r ios h ave been va l idated. P u r suant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simu l ator performance SMS deficienc i es or dev i ations from t he referenced plan t have been eva l uated to ensure that f unctio n al r....... fide l ity is maintained while running the p l a n ned scenar i os. 9. Every operator will be evaluated using at l east one new or significantly modi fi ed scenario. All o t her scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301. SMS 10. Al l individual operator competenc ie s can be evaluated , as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the SMS form a l ong with the s i mulator scenarios). 11. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applica n t to be evaluated in each o f th e app l icable SMS b rating factors. (Competency Rating factors as described on forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.) 12. Each applicant will be sign ifi cantly involved in the m i nimum numbe r of t r ansients and events specified SMS rv-b_ o n Form E S-30 1-5 (submit the form with t h e simulator scenarios). 13. The l eve l of difficulty i s appropria t e to su p port l i censing decis i ons fo r each c r ew pos i tion. SMS f"" Target Quantita t ive Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d) Actual Attr i butes ------1. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 3/ 3 12 SMS """" 2. Abnormal events (2-4) 4 1 4 12 SMS P-3. Majo r transients (1-2) 1 I 2 / 1 SMS l"-4. EOPs entered/requi r ing substantive actions (1-2) 2 1 2 12 SMS r----5. EO P contingenc i es req u i r ing substant i ve actions (0-2) 1 I 1 / 1 SMS 6. E O P based Crit i ca l tasks (2-3) 3/ 2 12 SMS "?'? NOTE:
The scenarios consist mostly of related events.
* The facility signature is not applicab l e for NRG-developed tests. # Independent N RC r eviewe r in i t i a l i tems in Column "c"; ch i ef exam i ner concurrence required.
SMS ro- ~
SMS -Scott M. Schmus /s/, D T E Energy, Senior Nuclear Instructor  
: 3.
-Opera tions.}}
Each event description consists of SMS the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated f-v-the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event  
~
the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)
: 4.
The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.
SMS f.- ~
: 5.
Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete SMS I\\-- l:!L evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
: 6.
If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.
NIA If/A-tl//4 Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.  
~
Cues are given.
: 7.
The simulator modeling is not altered.
SMS  
~ ~
: 8.
The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance SMS deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional r....... ~
fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
: 9.
Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301.
SMS ~
~
: 10. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301 -6 (submit the SMS form along with the simulator scenarios).  
~
l~I
: 11. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable SMS ~ b rating factors. (Competency Rating factors as described on forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)
: 12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified SMS rv-b_
on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
: 13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.
SMS f"" ~
Target Quantitat ive Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d)
Actual Attributes
: 1.
Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 3/ 3 12 SMS  
"""" ~
: 2.
Abnormal events (2-4) 4 1 4 12 SMS P- ~
: 3.
Major transients (1-2) 1 I 2 / 1 SMS l"- ~
: 4.
EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2 1 2 12 SMS r---- ~
: 5.
EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 1 I 1 / 1 SMS  
~ ~
: 6.
EOP based Critical tasks (2-3) 3 / 2 12 SMS  
~"" "?'?
NOTE:
* The facility signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests.  
# Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
SMS - Scott M. Schmus /s/, DTE Energy, Senior Nuclear Instructor - Operations.}}

Latest revision as of 23:11, 5 January 2025

2018 Fermi Ile Proposed Files Form ES-301-4
ML18121A102
Person / Time
Site: Fermi DTE Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/26/2018
From: Chuck Zoia
Division of Reactor Safety III
To:
Detroit Edison, Co
Zoia C
Shared Package
ML17164A403 List:
References
Download: ML18121A102 (1)
v • d • e


Text

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: Fermi 2 Date of Exam: 2/26/2018 Scenario Numbers: 1/2/3 Operating Test No.: 2018-1 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a

b*

c#

1.

The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, SMS (lar-but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

~

2.

The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

SMS ro- ~

3.

Each event description consists of SMS the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated f-v-the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event

~

the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)

4.

The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.

SMS f.- ~

5.

Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete SMS I\\-- l:!L evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

6.

If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

NIA If/A-tl//4 Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

~

Cues are given.

7.

The simulator modeling is not altered.

SMS

~ ~

8.

The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance SMS deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional r....... ~

fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

9.

Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301.

SMS ~

~

10. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301 -6 (submit the SMS form along with the simulator scenarios).

~

l~I

11. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable SMS ~ b rating factors. (Competency Rating factors as described on forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)
12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified SMS rv-b_

on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

SMS f"" ~

Target Quantitat ive Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d)

Actual Attributes

1.

Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 3/ 3 12 SMS

"""" ~

2.

Abnormal events (2-4) 4 1 4 12 SMS P- ~

3.

Major transients (1-2) 1 I 2 / 1 SMS l"- ~

4.

EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2 1 2 12 SMS r---- ~

5.

EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 1 I 1 / 1 SMS

~ ~

6.

EOP based Critical tasks (2-3) 3 / 2 12 SMS

~"" "?'?

NOTE:

  • The facility signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests.
  1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

SMS - Scott M. Schmus /s/, DTE Energy, Senior Nuclear Instructor - Operations.

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML18121A102&oldid=4996213"