ML18330A081: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:SeabrookLANPEm Resource
{{#Wiki_filter:1
From:                           R1DRSMAIL RESOURCE
SeabrookLANPEm Resource
Sent:                           Wednesday, November 14, 2018 7:55 AM
From:
To:                             Poole, Justin
R1DRSMAIL RESOURCE
Subject:                         SEABROOK STATION, UNIT NO. 1: INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT
Sent:
                                05000443/2018003
Wednesday, November 14, 2018 7:55 AM
Attachments:                     SB IR18003_FINAL .pdf
To:
SEABROOK STATION, UNIT NO. 1: INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT 05000443/2018003
Poole, Justin
ADAMS ACCESSION NO. ML18318A009
Subject:
---
SEABROOK STATION, UNIT NO. 1: INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT  
The attached document is being sent to you per your request to receive electronic
05000443/2018003
mailings, if you wish to be removed follow the instructions below. The document
Attachments:
is publicly available and will be accessible via the public web site Electronic
SB IR18003_FINAL .pdf
Reading Room in the Agency Document Access and Management System (ADAMS),
SEABROOK STATION, UNIT NO. 1: INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT 05000443/2018003  
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html , generally within six days. To access
ADAMS ACCESSION NO. ML18318A009  
this document use the ADAMS number provided in this email.
---  
Documents containing proprietary or safeguards information are not publicly
The attached document is being sent to you per your request to receive electronic
available and will not be sent using the electronic mailing system.
mailings, if you wish to be removed follow the instructions below. The document
You are currently subscribed to seabrook as: justin.poole@nrc.gov .
is publicly available and will be accessible via the public web site Electronic
To unsubscribe: Please go to the NRC's public website
Reading Room in the Agency Document Access and Management System (ADAMS),
http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver/plants-by-region.html
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html , generally within six days. To access
Once at the site, type in your e-mail address in the space provided and check the box(es) that correspond to the
this document use the ADAMS number provided in this email.
list(s) you would like to unsubscribe from. Then click the Unsubscribe button.
Documents containing proprietary or safeguards information are not publicly
or send an email to lyris@nrc.gov with the following information in the subject line
available and will not be sent using the electronic mailing system.  
unsubscribe seabrook justin.poole@nrc.gov
You are currently subscribed to seabrook as: justin.poole@nrc.gov .  
                                                          1
To unsubscribe: Please go to the NRC's public website
http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver/plants-by-region.html
Once at the site, type in your e-mail address in the space provided and check the box(es) that correspond to the  
list(s) you would like to unsubscribe from. Then click the Unsubscribe button.  
or send an email to lyris@nrc.gov with the following information in the subject line  
unsubscribe seabrook justin.poole@nrc.gov  


Hearing Identifier:     Seabrook_LA_NonPublic
Email Number:           1527
Mail Envelope Properties       (LYRIS-198844-365739-2018.11.14-07.58.16--justin.poole#nrc.gov)
Hearing Identifier:
Subject:                 SEABROOK STATION, UNIT NO. 1: INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT
Seabrook_LA_NonPublic
05000443/2018003
Email Number:
Sent Date:               11/14/2018 7:54:57 AM
1527
Received Date:           11/14/2018 7:59:10 AM
From:                   R1DRSMAIL RESOURCE
Mail Envelope Properties   (LYRIS-198844-365739-2018.11.14-07.58.16--justin.poole#nrc.gov)
Created By:             R1DRSMAIL.RESOURCE@nrc.gov
Recipients:
Subject:
"Poole, Justin" <Justin.Poole@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None
SEABROOK STATION, UNIT NO. 1: INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT  
Post Office:             listmgr.nrc.gov
05000443/2018003
Files                             Size                 Date & Time
Sent Date:
MESSAGE                           1318                 11/14/2018 7:59:10 AM
SB IR18003_FINAL .pdf                         301073
11/14/2018 7:54:57 AM
Options
Received Date:
Priority:                         Standard
11/14/2018 7:59:10 AM
Return Notification:             No
From:  
Reply Requested:                 No
Sensitivity:                     Normal
R1DRSMAIL RESOURCE  
Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:
Created By:
R1DRSMAIL.RESOURCE@nrc.gov  
Recipients:
 
"Poole, Justin" <Justin.Poole@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None  
Post Office:
listmgr.nrc.gov
Files  
Size
  Date & Time
MESSAGE
1318  
  11/14/2018 7:59:10 AM
SB IR18003_FINAL .pdf
301073
Options
Priority:  
Standard  
Return Notification:  
No  
Reply Requested:  
No  
Sensitivity:  
Normal
Expiration Date:  
 
Recipients Received:  
 
 
 
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION I
2100 RENAISSANCE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100
KING OF PRUSSIA, PA  19406-2713
November 13, 2018
Mr. Mano Nazar
President and Chief Nuclear Officer
Nuclear Division
NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC
Mail Stop: EX/JB
700 Universe Blvd.
Juno Beach, FL  33408
SUBJECT:
SEABROOK STATION, UNIT NO. 1 - INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT
05000443/2018003
Dear Mr. Nazar:
On September 30, 2018, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an
inspection at Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1 (Seabrook).  On October 25, 2018, the NRC
inspectors discussed the results of this inspection with Mr. Eric McCartney, Vice President -
Northern Region and other members of your staff.  The results of this inspection are
documented in the enclosed report.
NRC inspectors documented one Severity Level IV violation with no associated finding in this
report.  The NRC is treating the violation as a non-cited violation (NCV) consistent with
Section 2.3.2.a of the Enforcement Policy. 
If you contest the violation or significance of the NCV, you should provide a response within
30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, ATTN:  Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555-0001; with
copies to the Regional Administrator, Region I; the Director, Office of Enforcement; and the NRC
Resident Inspector at Seabrook. 
This letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be made available for public inspection
and copying at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and the NRC Public Document Room
in accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, Public
Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding.
Sincerely,
      /RA/
Fred L. Bower, Chief
Reactor Projects Branch 3
Division of Reactor Projects
Docket No.
50-443
License No.
NPF-86
Enclosure:
Inspection Report 05000443/2008003
cc w/encl:
Distribution via ListServ


                                        UNITED STATES
                            NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
                                              REGION I
                              2100 RENAISSANCE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100
                                    KING OF PRUSSIA, PA 19406-2713
                                        November 13, 2018
Mr. Mano Nazar
President and Chief Nuclear Officer
Nuclear Division
NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC
Mail Stop: EX/JB
700 Universe Blvd.
Juno Beach, FL 33408
SUBJECT:          SEABROOK STATION, UNIT NO. 1 - INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT
                  05000443/2018003
Dear Mr. Nazar:
On September 30, 2018, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an
inspection at Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1 (Seabrook). On October 25, 2018, the NRC
inspectors discussed the results of this inspection with Mr. Eric McCartney, Vice President -
Northern Region and other members of your staff. The results of this inspection are
documented in the enclosed report.
NRC inspectors documented one Severity Level IV violation with no associated finding in this
report. The NRC is treating the violation as a non-cited violation (NCV) consistent with
Section 2.3.2.a of the Enforcement Policy.
If you contest the violation or significance of the NCV, you should provide a response within
30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555-0001; with
copies to the Regional Administrator, Region I; the Director, Office of Enforcement; and the NRC
Resident Inspector at Seabrook.
This letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be made available for public inspection
and copying at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and the NRC Public Document Room
in accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, Public
Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding.
                                                      Sincerely,
                                                      /RA/
                                                      Fred L. Bower, Chief
                                                      Reactor Projects Branch 3
                                                      Division of Reactor Projects
Docket No.        50-443
License No.      NPF-86
Enclosure:
Inspection Report 05000443/2008003
cc w/encl:        Distribution via ListServ


  ML18318A009 
;
SUNSI Review
;
Non-Sensitive
Sensitive
;
Publicly Available
Non-Publicly Available
OFFICE
RI/DRP
RI/DRP
RI/DRP
NAME
PCataldo/SE
SElkhiamy
FBower
DATE
11/13/2018
11/13/2018
11/13/2018


ML18318A009
1
  ;          SUNSI Review        ; Non-Sensitive                        ;  Publicly Available
Enclosure
                                        Sensitive                            Non-Publicly Available
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION  
OFFICE        RI/DRP          RI/DRP              RI/DRP
Inspection Report  
NAME          PCataldo/SE      SElkhiamy            FBower
DATE          11/13/2018      11/13/2018          11/13/2018
                             
Docket Number:
                                                1
50-443  
                          U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
                                        Inspection Report
Docket Number:         50-443
License Number:  
License Number:       NPF-86
NPF-86  
Report Number:         05000443/2018003
Enterprise Identifier: I-2018-003-0067
Licensee:             NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC (NextEra)
Report Number:  
Facility:             Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1 (Seabrook)
05000443/2018003  
Location:             Seabrook, NH
Inspection Dates:     July 1, 2018 to September 30, 2018
Inspectors:           P. Cataldo, Senior Resident Inspector
Enterprise Identifier: I-2018-003-0067  
                      P. Meier, Resident Inspector
                      E. Burket, Reactor Inspector
                      J. Furia, Senior Health Physicist
Licensee:  
                      N. Floyd, Senior Reactor Inspector
NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC (NextEra)  
Approved By:           Fred Bower, Chief
                      Reactor Projects Branch 3
                      Division of Reactor Projects
Facility:  
                                                              Enclosure
Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1 (Seabrook)  
Location:  
Seabrook, NH  
Inspection Dates:  
July 1, 2018 to September 30, 2018  
Inspectors:  
P. Cataldo, Senior Resident Inspector  
P. Meier, Resident Inspector  
E. Burket, Reactor Inspector  
J. Furia, Senior Health Physicist  
N. Floyd, Senior Reactor Inspector  
Approved By:  
Fred Bower, Chief  
Reactor Projects Branch 3  
Division of Reactor Projects  


                                                  2
2  
                                              SUMMARY
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) continued monitoring NextEras performance
at Seabrook by conducting the baseline inspections described in this report in accordance with
the Reactor Oversight Process. The Reactor Oversight Process is the NRCs program for
SUMMARY  
overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors. Refer to
https://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/oversight.html for more information. A self-revealing
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) continued monitoring NextEras performance  
finding is summarized in the table below.
at Seabrook by conducting the baseline inspections described in this report in accordance with  
                                  List of Findings and Violations
the Reactor Oversight Process. The Reactor Oversight Process is the NRCs program for  
  Pressurizer Safety Valve Outside of Technical Specification Limits
overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors. Refer to  
  Cornerstone           Severity                                 Cross-Cutting       Inspection
https://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/oversight.html for more information. A self-revealing  
                                                                  Aspect              Results
finding is summarized in the table below.  
                                                                                        Section
  Not Applicable       Severity Level (SL) IV                   Not Applicable      71153
List of Findings and Violations  
                        NCV 05000443/2018003-01                                       Follow-up of
                        Opened/Closed                                                  Events and
Pressurizer Safety Valve Outside of Technical Specification Limits  
                                                                                        Notices of
Cornerstone  
                                                                                        Enforcement
Severity  
                                                                                        Discretion
Cross-Cutting  
  A self-revealing SL IV non-cited violation of Technical Specification (TS) 3.4.2.2, All
Aspect
  pressurizer code safety valves shall be OPERABLE with a lift setting of 2485 psig +/- 3%, was
Inspection  
  identified when one of the pressurizer code safety valves failed as-found set point testing.
Results  
  Specifically, it was determined that the safety valve had a high as-found set point pressure
Section  
  after the valve was removed from service during the previous refueling outage in April, 2017
Not Applicable  
  (OR18) and the inoperable condition existed for a period of time longer than the allowed TS
Severity Level (SL) IV  
  ACTION time.
NCV 05000443/2018003-01
                                    Additional Tracking Items
Opened/Closed
  Type     Issue number               Title                           Inspection     Status
Not Applicable
                                                                        Report
71153 
                                                                        Section
Follow-up of  
  LER       05000443/2018-001-00       Pressurizer Safety Valve       71153          Closed
Events and  
                                        Outside of Technical
Notices of  
                                        Specification Limits
Enforcement  
                                        Discovered During As-Found
Discretion  
                                        Set Point Testing
A self-revealing SL IV non-cited violation of Technical Specification (TS) 3.4.2.2, All  
pressurizer code safety valves shall be OPERABLE with a lift setting of 2485 psig +/- 3%, was  
identified when one of the pressurizer code safety valves failed as-found set point testing.
Specifically, it was determined that the safety valve had a high as-found set point pressure  
after the valve was removed from service during the previous refueling outage in April, 2017  
(OR18) and the inoperable condition existed for a period of time longer than the allowed TS  
ACTION time.  
Additional Tracking Items  
Type  
Issue number  
Title  
Inspection  
Report  
Section  
Status
LER  
05000443/2018-001-00  
Pressurizer Safety Valve  
Outside of Technical  
Specification Limits  
Discovered During As-Found  
Set Point Testing  
71153
Closed


                                                3
3  
PLANT STATUS
Seabrook Station began the inspection period operating at 100 percent rated thermal power and
on September 30, 2018, operators commenced a shutdown, from 93 percent power, for planned
PLANT STATUS  
refueling and maintenance outage 19 (RFO19) that commenced on October 1, 2018.
INSPECTION SCOPES
Seabrook Station began the inspection period operating at 100 percent rated thermal power and  
Inspections were conducted using the appropriate portions of the inspection procedures in effect
on September 30, 2018, operators commenced a shutdown, from 93 percent power, for planned  
at the beginning of the inspection unless otherwise noted. Currently approved inspection
refueling and maintenance outage 19 (RFO19) that commenced on October 1, 2018.  
procedures with their attached revision histories are located on the public website at
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/insp-manual/inspection-procedure/index.html.
INSPECTION SCOPES  
Samples were declared complete when the inspection procedure requirements most
appropriate to the inspection activity were met consistent with Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC)
Inspections were conducted using the appropriate portions of the inspection procedures in effect  
2515, Light-Water Reactor Inspection Program - Operations Phase. The inspectors performed
at the beginning of the inspection unless otherwise noted. Currently approved inspection  
plant status activities described in IMC 2515 Appendix D, Plant Status and conducted routine
procedures with their attached revision histories are located on the public website at  
reviews using IP 71152, Problem Identification and Resolution. The inspectors reviewed
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/insp-manual/inspection-procedure/index.html.
selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel to assess
Samples were declared complete when the inspection procedure requirements most  
NextEras performance and compliance with Commission rules and regulations, license
appropriate to the inspection activity were met consistent with Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC)  
conditions, site procedures, and standards.
2515, Light-Water Reactor Inspection Program - Operations Phase. The inspectors performed  
REACTOR SAFETY
plant status activities described in IMC 2515 Appendix D, Plant Status and conducted routine  
71111.01 - Adverse Weather Protection
reviews using IP 71152, Problem Identification and Resolution. The inspectors reviewed  
    Seasonal Extreme Weather (1 Sample)
selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel to assess  
    The inspectors evaluated readiness for seasonal extreme weather conditions prior to the
NextEras performance and compliance with Commission rules and regulations, license  
    sustained high temperatures during the week of July 2nd.
conditions, site procedures, and standards.  
71111.04 - Equipment Alignment
    Partial Walkdown (4 Samples)
REACTOR SAFETY  
    The inspectors evaluated system configurations during partial walkdowns of the following
    systems/trains:
71111.01 - Adverse Weather Protection  
    (1) A emergency diesel generator return-to-service on July 9
    (2) B service water system during planned maintenance on the A service water system on
Seasonal Extreme Weather (1 Sample)  
        August 16
    (3) A residual heat removal system before a B residual heat removal pump and valve
The inspectors evaluated readiness for seasonal extreme weather conditions prior to the  
        surveillance on August 28
sustained high temperatures during the week of July 2nd.  
    (4) A service water and cooling water systems before a B cooling water tower pump
        surveillance on August 30
71111.04 - Equipment Alignment  
Partial Walkdown (4 Samples)  
The inspectors evaluated system configurations during partial walkdowns of the following  
systems/trains:  
(1) A emergency diesel generator return-to-service on July 9  
(2) B service water system during planned maintenance on the A service water system on  
August 16  
(3) A residual heat removal system before a B residual heat removal pump and valve  
surveillance on August 28  
(4) A service water and cooling water systems before a B cooling water tower pump  
surveillance on August 30  


                                                    4
4  
71111.05AQ - Fire Protection Annual/Quarterly
  Quarterly Inspection (5 Samples)
  The inspectors evaluated fire protection program implementation in the following selected
71111.05AQ - Fire Protection Annual/Quarterly  
  areas:
  (1) A essential switchgear (CB-F-1A-A) on September 13
Quarterly Inspection (5 Samples)  
  (2) Turbine building ground floor (TB-F-1A-Z, TB-F-1-0) on September 13
  (3) B residual heat removal vault, all levels (RHR-F-4A-Z) on September 17
The inspectors evaluated fire protection program implementation in the following selected  
  (4) B residual heat removal vault, all levels (RHR-F-1A-Z, RHR-F-2A-Z, RHR-F-3A-Z,
areas:  
      RHR-F-1C-Z) on September 17
  (5) Fire pump rooms (FPH-F-1A-A, FPH-F-1B-A, FPH-F-1C-A) on September 19
(1) A essential switchgear (CB-F-1A-A) on September 13  
71111.06 - Flood Protection Measures
(2) Turbine building ground floor (TB-F-1A-Z, TB-F-1-0) on September 13  
  Internal Flooding (1 Sample)
(3) B residual heat removal vault, all levels (RHR-F-4A-Z) on September 17  
  The inspectors evaluated internal flooding mitigation protections in the primary auxiliary
(4) B residual heat removal vault, all levels (RHR-F-1A-Z, RHR-F-2A-Z, RHR-F-3A-Z,
  building, 25' elevation, on September 13.
71111.07 - Heat Sink Performance (1 Sample)
RHR-F-1C-Z) on September 17  
  The inspectors evaluated NextEras monitoring and maintenance of B emergency diesel
(5) Fire pump rooms (FPH-F-1A-A, FPH-F-1B-A, FPH-F-1C-A) on September 19  
  generator heat exchanger thermal performance test.
71111.11 - Licensed Operator Requalification Program and Licensed Operator Performance
71111.06 - Flood Protection Measures  
  Operator Requalification (1 Sample)
  The inspectors observed and evaluated requalification training in the simulator on August 27.
Internal Flooding (1 Sample)  
  This training involved lessons learned from previous steam generator level control issues, most
  notably the level control issues that resulted in the April 2017 reactor trip.
The inspectors evaluated internal flooding mitigation protections in the primary auxiliary  
  Operator Performance (1 Sample)
building, 25' elevation, on September 13.  
  The inspectors observed and evaluated activities associated with the following licensed
  operator performance in the control room:
71111.07 - Heat Sink Performance (1 Sample)  
  (1) Alarm response and various instrumentation and control maintenance activities on July 19
  (2) Various alarm response to ongoing maintenance, and coordination with fire protection
The inspectors evaluated NextEras monitoring and maintenance of B emergency diesel  
      for entry into technical requirements manual due to fire door inoperability on August 29
generator heat exchanger thermal performance test.  
  (3) Alarm response and the swap from ocean service water to the cooling water tower in
      preparation for the cooling water tower pump surveillance on August 30
71111.11 - Licensed Operator Requalification Program and Licensed Operator Performance  
  (4) Fast start surveillance of the A emergency diesel generator, deboration of reactor
      coolant system to maintain power, and control room maintenance activities associated
Operator Requalification (1 Sample)  
      with instrumentation and control equipment on September 10
  (5) Shutdown activities and entry into refueling outage 19 on September 30
The inspectors observed and evaluated requalification training in the simulator on August 27.
This training involved lessons learned from previous steam generator level control issues, most  
notably the level control issues that resulted in the April 2017 reactor trip.  
Operator Performance (1 Sample)  
The inspectors observed and evaluated activities associated with the following licensed  
operator performance in the control room:  
(1) Alarm response and various instrumentation and control maintenance activities on July 19  
(2) Various alarm response to ongoing maintenance, and coordination with fire protection  
for entry into technical requirements manual due to fire door inoperability on August 29  
(3) Alarm response and the swap from ocean service water to the cooling water tower in  
preparation for the cooling water tower pump surveillance on August 30  
(4) Fast start surveillance of the A emergency diesel generator, deboration of reactor  
coolant system to maintain power, and control room maintenance activities associated  
with instrumentation and control equipment on September 10  
(5) Shutdown activities and entry into refueling outage 19 on September 30  


                                                  5
5  
71111.12 - Maintenance Effectiveness
  Routine Maintenance Effectiveness (2 Samples)
  The inspectors evaluated the effectiveness of routine maintenance activities associated
71111.12 - Maintenance Effectiveness  
  with the following equipment and/or safety significant functions:
  (1) Atmospheric steam dump valve maintenance to address nitrogen leaks, in August and
Routine Maintenance Effectiveness (2 Samples)  
      September 2018.
  (2) Troubleshooting activities associated with recurrent electrical grounds on the electrical
The inspectors evaluated the effectiveness of routine maintenance activities associated  
      distribution system, which have occurred throughout the operating cycle.
with the following equipment and/or safety significant functions:  
71111.13 - Maintenance Risk Assessments and Emergent Work Control (5 Samples)
  The inspectors evaluated the risk assessments for the following planned and emergent
(1) Atmospheric steam dump valve maintenance to address nitrogen leaks, in August and  
  work activities:
September 2018.  
  (1) Risk associated with battery charger C testing, vital inverter 1E issues, and A cooling
      water tower valve maintenance and surveillance from July 10-17
(2) Troubleshooting activities associated with recurrent electrical grounds on the electrical  
  (2) Emergent work and risk associated with ground on busses supplied by vital inverter 1E
distribution system, which have occurred throughout the operating cycle.  
      (A train) during a B train work week from August 6-9
  (3) Risk associated with A service water system inoperability for planned valve
71111.13 - Maintenance Risk Assessments and Emergent Work Control (5 Samples)  
      maintenance on August 16
  (4) Risk associated with the supplemental emergency power supply planned maintenance
The inspectors evaluated the risk assessments for the following planned and emergent  
      outage from August 20-23
work activities:  
  (5) Risk associated with aligning for the B cooling water tower system from the B service
      water system on August 30
(1) Risk associated with battery charger C testing, vital inverter 1E issues, and A cooling  
71111.15 - Operability Determinations and Functionality Assessments (4 Samples)
water tower valve maintenance and surveillance from July 10-17  
  The inspectors evaluated the following operability determinations and functionality
(2) Emergent work and risk associated with ground on busses supplied by vital inverter 1E  
  assessments:
(A train) during a B train work week from August 6-9  
  (1) Unit auxiliary transformer 2A liquid flow loss (AR2272500) on July 5
(3) Risk associated with A service water system inoperability for planned valve  
  (2) Vital inverter 1E issues (AR2281601) on July 10
maintenance on August 16  
  (3) Containment enclosure emergency exhaust switch low flow alarm (AR2272500) on
(4) Risk associated with the supplemental emergency power supply planned maintenance  
      July 18
outage from August 20-23  
  (4) Structural evaluation of the mechanical penetration area north and south wall on
(5) Risk associated with aligning for the B cooling water tower system from the B service  
      September 13
water system on August 30  
71111.17T - Evaluations of Changes, Tests and Experiments (25 Samples)
  The inspectors evaluated the following from June 18, 2018 to August 17, 2018:
71111.15 - Operability Determinations and Functionality Assessments (4 Samples)  
  10 CFR 50.59 Evaluations
  (1) Eval 15-002, SSPS Circuit Board Replacement, dated 3/9/15
The inspectors evaluated the following operability determinations and functionality  
  (2) Eval 15-003, EC 282582, New Service Water Pump House Barrier 1 Missile Barrier,
assessments:  
            Revision 1
  (3) Eval 15-004, Seabrook Cycle 18 Reload, dated 9/18/15
(1) Unit auxiliary transformer 2A liquid flow loss (AR2272500) on July 5  
(2) Vital inverter 1E issues (AR2281601) on July 10  
(3) Containment enclosure emergency exhaust switch low flow alarm (AR2272500) on  
July 18  
(4) Structural evaluation of the mechanical penetration area north and south wall on  
September 13  
71111.17T - Evaluations of Changes, Tests and Experiments (25 Samples)  
The inspectors evaluated the following from June 18, 2018 to August 17, 2018:  
10 CFR 50.59 Evaluations  
(1) Eval 15-002, SSPS Circuit Board Replacement, dated 3/9/15  
(2) Eval 15-003, EC 282582, New Service Water Pump House Barrier 1 Missile Barrier,  
Revision 1  
(3) Eval 15-004, Seabrook Cycle 18 Reload, dated 9/18/15  


                                                6
6  
  (4) Eval 16-002, Temporary Jumper Across 1-EDE-B-1-A Cell #43, dated 11/4/16
  (5) Eval 16-004, Change to OS1023.10, Service Water Pump House Ventilation System
            Operation, to Allow Manual Control of the Pump House Ventilation System,
(4) Eval 16-002, Temporary Jumper Across 1-EDE-B-1-A Cell #43, dated 11/4/16  
            Revision 0
(5) Eval 16-004, Change to OS1023.10, Service Water Pump House Ventilation System  
  (6) Eval 18-001, Containment Model Update for NSAL-11-5 and NSAL-14-2, dated 3/12/18
Operation, to Allow Manual Control of the Pump House Ventilation System,  
  10 CFR 50.59 Screening/Applicability Determinations
Revision 0  
  (1) BC16-01, Correct DNBR Value in TS 3/4.4.1 RCS Bases Section, dated 1/17/17
(6) Eval 18-001, Containment Model Update for NSAL-11-5 and NSAL-14-2, dated 3/12/18  
  (2) EC 283978, Risk Informed Frequency Change for DG-ESFAS Integrated Test, dated
            8/20/15
10 CFR 50.59 Screening/Applicability Determinations  
  (3) EC 284280, Increase in RCS Loop Tavg to Average Tavg Deviation Alarm Setpoint,
            dated 9/15/15
(1)   BC16-01, Correct DNBR Value in TS 3/4.4.1 RCS Bases Section, dated 1/17/17  
  (4) EC 287106, Condensate Storage Tank Approaching Level Low, dated 10/20/16
(2)   EC 283978, Risk Informed Frequency Change for DG-ESFAS Integrated Test, dated  
  (5) EC 287319, 345 kV SF6 Bus 1 Upgrade and GS11 Removal, dated 9/18/16
8/20/15  
  (6) EC 288116, Replace SW-P-41-A Motor with Rewound Motor, dated 5/18/17
(3)   EC 284280, Increase in RCS Loop Tavg to Average Tavg Deviation Alarm Setpoint,  
  (7) EC 288964, SW Pump Motor Current Instantaneous Trip Setpoint Increase, dated
dated 9/15/15  
            10/17/17
(4)   EC 287106, Condensate Storage Tank Approaching Level Low, dated 10/20/16  
  (8) EC 289531, Permanent Installation of Seismic Temporary Structures, dated 10/19/17
(5)   EC 287319, 345 kV SF6 Bus 1 Upgrade and GS11 Removal, dated 9/18/16  
  (9) EC 289886, Update UFSAR Section 9.4 for CBA Heat Load, dated 10/5/17
(6)   EC 288116, Replace SW-P-41-A Motor with Rewound Motor, dated 5/18/17  
  (10) EC 290437, RC-V-23 MOV Motor Replacement, dated 2/20/18
(7)   EC 288964, SW Pump Motor Current Instantaneous Trip Setpoint Increase, dated  
  (11) EC 290933, P-9 Setpoint Revision in Support of EOC Cycle 19 Coastdown, dated
10/17/17  
          4/6/18
(8)   EC 289531, Permanent Installation of Seismic Temporary Structures, dated 10/19/17  
  (12) PCR 1903625, Reserve Auxiliary Transformer Auxiliaries Operation, dated 5/26/16
(9)   EC 289886, Update UFSAR Section 9.4 for CBA Heat Load, dated 10/5/17  
  (13) PCR 2036771, Operability Testing of IST Valves, dated 4/1/15
(10) EC 290437, RC-V-23 MOV Motor Replacement, dated 2/20/18  
  (14) PCR 2053030, Diesel Generator 1B 18 Month Operability Surveillance, dated 6/9/15
(11) EC 290933, P-9 Setpoint Revision in Support of EOC Cycle 19 Coastdown, dated
  (15) PCR 2072219, Loop 1 Delta T/Tavg 7300 NTC Card Relay Testing, dated 2/18/16
  (16) PCR 2075330, Power Increase, dated 9/24/15
    4/6/18  
  (17) PCR 2178140, Operation at Power, dated 1/5/17
(12) PCR 1903625, Reserve Auxiliary Transformer Auxiliaries Operation, dated 5/26/16  
  (18) PCR 2208297, SW-P-110 Pump Head Curve Verification, dated 7/12/17
(13) PCR 2036771, Operability Testing of IST Valves, dated 4/1/15  
  (19) PCR 2252508, Response to Natural Phenomena Affecting Plant Operations, dated
(14) PCR 2053030, Diesel Generator 1B 18 Month Operability Surveillance, dated 6/9/15  
          3/6/18
(15) PCR 2072219, Loop 1 Delta T/Tavg 7300 NTC Card Relay Testing, dated 2/18/16  
71111.18 - Plant Modifications (1 Sample)
(16) PCR 2075330, Power Increase, dated 9/24/15  
  The inspectors evaluated the following temporary or permanent modifications:
(17) PCR 2178140, Operation at Power, dated 1/5/17  
  (1) Modification of service water pipe support (EC 286395) in July
(18) PCR 2208297, SW-P-110 Pump Head Curve Verification, dated 7/12/17  
71111.19 - Post Maintenance Testing (5 Samples)
(19) PCR 2252508, Response to Natural Phenomena Affecting Plant Operations, dated
  The inspectors evaluated post maintenance testing for the following maintenance/repair
  activities:
    3/6/18  
  (1) Cooling water tower spray bypass valve SW-V-139 maintenance on July 12
  (2) B vital DC battery replacement from July 22 through August 7
71111.18 - Plant Modifications (1 Sample)  
  (3) Leading edge flow meter calibration and repair on August 10
  (4) Supplemental emergency power supply maintenance from August 20-23
The inspectors evaluated the following temporary or permanent modifications:  
  (5) A atmospheric steam dump valve maintenance on August 31
(1) Modification of service water pipe support (EC 286395) in July
71111.19 - Post Maintenance Testing (5 Samples)  
The inspectors evaluated post maintenance testing for the following maintenance/repair  
activities:  
(1) Cooling water tower spray bypass valve SW-V-139 maintenance on July 12
(2) B vital DC battery replacement from July 22 through August 7  
(3) Leading edge flow meter calibration and repair on August 10
(4) Supplemental emergency power supply maintenance from August 20-23  
(5) A atmospheric steam dump valve maintenance on August 31  


                                                  7
7  
71111.22 - Surveillance Testing
  The inspectors evaluated the following surveillance tests:
  Routine (3 Samples)
71111.22 - Surveillance Testing  
  (1) C vital battery charger capacity test from July 10-16
  (2) Refueling water storage tank trip actuating device operability test on July 16
The inspectors evaluated the following surveillance tests:  
  (3) Moderator temperature coefficient surveillance on July 17
  In-service (1 Sample)
Routine (3 Samples)  
  (1) A service water isolation valve to secondary loads, SW-V-4, following thermal overload
      replacement on August 16
(1) C vital battery charger capacity test from July 10-16  
RADIATION SAFETY
(2) Refueling water storage tank trip actuating device operability test on July 16  
71124.08 - Radioactive Solid Waste Processing and Radioactive Material Handling, Storage,
(3) Moderator temperature coefficient surveillance on July 17  
and Transportation
  Radioactive Material Storage (1 sample)
In-service (1 Sample)  
  The inspectors observed radioactive waste container storage areas and verified the postings
  and controls and that NextEra had established a process for monitoring the impact of long-
(1) A service water isolation valve to secondary loads, SW-V-4, following thermal overload  
  term storage of the waste.
replacement on August 16  
  Radioactive Waste System Walkdown (1 sample)
  The inspectors walked down: accessible portions of liquid and solid radioactive waste
RADIATION SAFETY  
  processing systems; abandoned-in-place radioactive waste processing equipment; and,
  current methods and procedures for dewatering waste.
71124.08 - Radioactive Solid Waste Processing and Radioactive Material Handling, Storage,  
  Waste Characterization and Classification (1 sample)
and Transportation  
  The inspectors identified radioactive waste streams and reviewed radio-chemical sample
  analysis results to support radioactive waste characterization. The inspectors reviewed the
Radioactive Material Storage (1 sample)  
  use of scaling factors and calculations to account for difficult-to-measure radionuclides.
  Shipment Preparation (1 sample)
The inspectors observed radioactive waste container storage areas and verified the postings  
  The inspectors reviewed the records of shipment packaging, surveying, labeling, marking,
and controls and that NextEra had established a process for monitoring the impact of long-
  placarding, vehicle checks, emergency instructions, disposal manifest, shipping papers
term storage of the waste.  
  provided to the driver, and NextEra verification of shipment readiness.
  Shipping Records (1 sample)
Radioactive Waste System Walkdown (1 sample)  
  The inspectors reviewed selected non-excepted package shipment records.
The inspectors walked down: accessible portions of liquid and solid radioactive waste  
processing systems; abandoned-in-place radioactive waste processing equipment; and,  
current methods and procedures for dewatering waste.  
Waste Characterization and Classification (1 sample)  
The inspectors identified radioactive waste streams and reviewed radio-chemical sample  
analysis results to support radioactive waste characterization. The inspectors reviewed the  
use of scaling factors and calculations to account for difficult-to-measure radionuclides.  
Shipment Preparation (1 sample)  
The inspectors reviewed the records of shipment packaging, surveying, labeling, marking,  
placarding, vehicle checks, emergency instructions, disposal manifest, shipping papers  
provided to the driver, and NextEra verification of shipment readiness.  
Shipping Records (1 sample)  
The inspectors reviewed selected non-excepted package shipment records.  


                                                  8
8  
OTHER ACTIVITIES - BASELINE
71151 - Performance Indicator Verification (3 Samples)
    The inspectors verified NextEras performance indicators submittals listed below for the
OTHER ACTIVITIES - BASELINE  
    period from July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018:
    (1)   Emergency AC power systems
71151 - Performance Indicator Verification (3 Samples)  
    (2)   High pressure injection systems
    (3)   Heat removal systems
The inspectors verified NextEras performance indicators submittals listed below for the  
71152 - Problem Identification and Resolution
period from July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018:  
    Annual Follow-up of Selected Issues (2 Samples)
    The inspectors reviewed the NextEras implementation of its corrective action program
(1)  
    related to the following issues:
Emergency AC power systems  
    (1) Various issues related to the meteorological tower
(2)  
    (2) Review of alkali-silica reaction impact on concrete structures
High pressure injection systems  
71153 - Follow-up of Events and Notices of Enforcement Discretion
(3)  
    Licensee Event Reports (1 Sample)
Heat removal systems  
    The inspectors evaluated the following licensee event reports (LERs):
    (1) LER 05000443/2018-001-00, Pressurizer Safety Valve Outside of Technical
71152 - Problem Identification and Resolution  
        Specification Limits Discovered During As-Found Set Point Testing (ADAMS accession:
        ML18095A683). The circumstances surrounding this licensee event report are
Annual Follow-up of Selected Issues (2 Samples)  
        documented in report section Inspection Results.
INSPECTION RESULTS
The inspectors reviewed the NextEras implementation of its corrective action program  
                                Observation                             71152(1) Annual Follow-
related to the following issues:  
                                                                            up of Selected Issues
The inspectors selected for follow-up, a negative trend of issues related to the meteorological
(1) Various issues related to the meteorological tower  
tower (MET Tower) since it is important for emergency planning dose assessment and used to
(2) Review of alkali-silica reaction impact on concrete structures
implement protective action recommendations. Specifically, NextEra identified decreasing
availability and reliability of the MET tower at the beginning of 2018. Despite the negative
71153 - Follow-up of Events and Notices of Enforcement Discretion  
trend, the redundancy incorporated into the design and the availability of the back-up MET
tower ensured that the emergency plan could be implemented throughout the time it took to
Licensee Event Reports (1 Sample)  
address the concerns.
  The inspectors noted that the decreasing trend began following upgrades to the MET tower
The inspectors evaluated the following licensee event reports (LERs):  
components in 2014. The most evident recurring issues were related to temperature
fluctuations and reliability. Upon further investigation, NextEra determined loose junction box
(1) LER 05000443/2018-001-00, Pressurizer Safety Valve Outside of Technical  
connections were a significant contributor. In addition, based on vendor recommendations,
Specification Limits Discovered During As-Found Set Point Testing (ADAMS accession:  
certain preventative maintenance practices were improved. These two corrective actions
ML18095A683). The circumstances surrounding this licensee event report are  
increased the towers reliability with respect to temperature indications.
documented in report section Inspection Results.  
INSPECTION RESULTS  
Observation  
71152(1) Annual Follow-
up of Selected Issues  
The inspectors selected for follow-up, a negative trend of issues related to the meteorological  
tower (MET Tower) since it is important for emergency planning dose assessment and used to  
implement protective action recommendations. Specifically, NextEra identified decreasing  
availability and reliability of the MET tower at the beginning of 2018. Despite the negative  
trend, the redundancy incorporated into the design and the availability of the back-up MET  
tower ensured that the emergency plan could be implemented throughout the time it took to  
address the concerns.  
   
The inspectors noted that the decreasing trend began following upgrades to the MET tower  
components in 2014. The most evident recurring issues were related to temperature  
fluctuations and reliability. Upon further investigation, NextEra determined loose junction box  
connections were a significant contributor. In addition, based on vendor recommendations,  
certain preventative maintenance practices were improved. These two corrective actions  
increased the towers reliability with respect to temperature indications.  


                                                9
9  
In the winter of 2017 and 2018, NextEra noted that the wind vane, which is used to determine
the wind direction, stopped working following significant storms. The wind speed indicator also
stopped working following a more recent winter storm in 2018. Each time NextEra promptly
repaired the components, however, NextEra recognized this negative trend, as these
In the winter of 2017 and 2018, NextEra noted that the wind vane, which is used to determine  
components are designed for significant winter storms. The inspectors noted that measures to
the wind direction, stopped working following significant storms. The wind speed indicator also  
investigate and to prevent the issues from recurring are ongoing. Although the exact causes
stopped working following a more recent winter storm in 2018. Each time NextEra promptly  
remain to be determined, NextEra is working with the MET tower vendor to ensure the quality
repaired the components, however, NextEra recognized this negative trend, as these  
control of the replacement parts are as expected.
components are designed for significant winter storms. The inspectors noted that measures to  
Preventive maintenance is performed every 6 months and includes calibrations, inspections,
investigate and to prevent the issues from recurring are ongoing. Although the exact causes  
and parts replacement as required. In addition, routine checks and calibrations are performed
remain to be determined, NextEra is working with the MET tower vendor to ensure the quality  
on a bi-weekly and the control room operators monitor the MET tower indications each shift.
control of the replacement parts are as expected.  
The inspectors concluded that NextEra properly identified and evaluated issues found by these
regular checks in accordance with the stations corrective action program. The inspectors
Preventive maintenance is performed every 6 months and includes calibrations, inspections,  
assessed that corrective actions to fix issues with the MET tower are performed in a timely
and parts replacement as required. In addition, routine checks and calibrations are performed  
manner commensurate with the safety significance of the issue and no issues of concern with
on a bi-weekly and the control room operators monitor the MET tower indications each shift.
problem identification and resolution were identified.
The inspectors concluded that NextEra properly identified and evaluated issues found by these  
                            Observation                               71152(2) Annual Follow-up
regular checks in accordance with the stations corrective action program. The inspectors  
                                                                          of Selected Issues
assessed that corrective actions to fix issues with the MET tower are performed in a timely  
The NRC performed a periodic site visit to Seabrook Station to review NextEras monitoring of
manner commensurate with the safety significance of the issue and no issues of concern with  
alkali-silica reaction (ASR) on affected reinforced concrete structures, per their 10 CFR 50.65
problem identification and resolution were identified.  
Maintenance Rule Structures Monitoring Program and corrective action program. The
inspectors verified on a sampling basis that significant changes, if any or different
Observation  
presentations of ASR on the affected structures were appropriately considered for impact on
71152(2) Annual Follow-up  
the applicable Seabrook prompt operability determinations. In addition, the inspectors
of Selected Issues  
performed independent walkdowns of ASR-affected areas and reviewed reports of recently
The NRC performed a periodic site visit to Seabrook Station to review NextEras monitoring of  
alkali-silica reaction (ASR) on affected reinforced concrete structures, per their 10 CFR 50.65  
Maintenance Rule Structures Monitoring Program and corrective action program. The  
inspectors verified on a sampling basis that significant changes, if any or different  
presentations of ASR on the affected structures were appropriately considered for impact on  
the applicable Seabrook prompt operability determinations. In addition, the inspectors  
performed independent walkdowns of ASR-affected areas and reviewed reports of recently  
collected measurement data, including combined crack index, in-plane expansion, through-
collected measurement data, including combined crack index, in-plane expansion, through-
wall expansion, and building deformation monitoring elements, to verify that the structures
wall expansion, and building deformation monitoring elements, to verify that the structures  
were within the established, acceptable monitoring parameters.
were within the established, acceptable monitoring parameters.  
NextEra staff continued to complete structural calculations to evaluate the future impact of
ASR on the reinforced concrete structures in accordance with the structures monitoring
NextEra staff continued to complete structural calculations to evaluate the future impact of  
program. The Mechanical Penetration Area North and South exterior walls were identified to
ASR on the reinforced concrete structures in accordance with the structures monitoring  
not qualify in accordance with ACI 318-71 structural design code when predicted ASR loading
program. The Mechanical Penetration Area North and South exterior walls were identified to  
was applied using NextEras methodology document. The methodology for evaluating
not qualify in accordance with ACI 318-71 structural design code when predicted ASR loading  
ASR-affected concrete is currently under review by the NRC staff, as part of the August 1,
was applied using NextEras methodology document. The methodology for evaluating  
2016, License Amendment Request (16-03). The remainder of the structure met the structural
ASR-affected concrete is currently under review by the NRC staff, as part of the August 1,  
design code with predicted ASR loading applied. The Mechanical Penetration Area houses
2016, License Amendment Request (16-03). The remainder of the structure met the structural  
various safety-related systems and components, including piping and valves between the
design code with predicted ASR loading applied. The Mechanical Penetration Area houses  
containment structure and surrounding buildings. NextEra staff wrote a condition report to
various safety-related systems and components, including piping and valves between the  
address the non-conformance of the Mechanical Penetration Area, which included a separate
containment structure and surrounding buildings. NextEra staff wrote a condition report to  
prompt operability determination.
address the non-conformance of the Mechanical Penetration Area, which included a separate  
The inspectors performed a review of the prompt operability determination and corrective
prompt operability determination.
actions for the Mechanical Penetration Area. The inspectors also performed an independent
walkdown of the structure and did not observe any indications of loading distress or other
The inspectors performed a review of the prompt operability determination and corrective  
structural integrity issues as evident by the absence of structural flexure cracks. The
actions for the Mechanical Penetration Area. The inspectors also performed an independent  
inspectors noted areas where lateral displacement of the North and South exterior walls, due
walkdown of the structure and did not observe any indications of loading distress or other  
to ASR expansion in the concrete backfill, caused some distortion of platform and steel
structural integrity issues as evident by the absence of structural flexure cracks. The  
inspectors noted areas where lateral displacement of the North and South exterior walls, due  
to ASR expansion in the concrete backfill, caused some distortion of platform and steel  


                                                10
10  
walkways and verified that adjacent equipment was not impacted. NextEra staff planned to
perform more frequent inspections of the Mechanical Penetration Area North and South walls
to monitor lateral displacement. Based on discussions with NextEra staff, the inspectors noted
walkways and verified that adjacent equipment was not impacted. NextEra staff planned to  
that a planned modification is being developed as a long-term corrective action to restore
perform more frequent inspections of the Mechanical Penetration Area North and South walls  
compliance with the design code and Seabrooks methodology document. The inspectors
to monitor lateral displacement. Based on discussions with NextEra staff, the inspectors noted  
determined that NextEras conclusions that the structure is capable of performing its intended
that a planned modification is being developed as a long-term corrective action to restore  
functions was technically supported.
compliance with the design code and Seabrooks methodology document. The inspectors  
During review of the prompt operability determination for the Mechanical Penetration North
determined that NextEras conclusions that the structure is capable of performing its intended  
and South exterior walls, the NRC inspectors identified that the document contained incorrect
functions was technically supported.  
information for maintaining the operability of the structure. Specifically, the established
threshold monitoring limits for lateral displacement of the north and south walls was incorrect.
During review of the prompt operability determination for the Mechanical Penetration North  
The operability determination stated an increase of 50 percent above baseline measurements
and South exterior walls, the NRC inspectors identified that the document contained incorrect  
was acceptable; however, the associated structural evaluation supported a limit of 20 percent
information for maintaining the operability of the structure. Specifically, the established  
increase above baseline. NextEra staff generated a condition report, AR 02280269, to revise
threshold monitoring limits for lateral displacement of the north and south walls was incorrect.
the prompt operability determination with the correct value. The documentation error was
The operability determination stated an increase of 50 percent above baseline measurements  
determined to be minor because the current deformation remains well below the acceptable
was acceptable; however, the associated structural evaluation supported a limit of 20 percent  
limit with margin, and the walls are being monitoring on a two-month frequency. In addition,
increase above baseline. NextEra staff generated a condition report, AR 02280269, to revise  
the inspectors noted that the contractor performing the measurements uses the limits from the
the prompt operability determination with the correct value. The documentation error was  
structural evaluation (i.e., 20 percent) when reporting the monitoring results, such that this
determined to be minor because the current deformation remains well below the acceptable  
criteria would have been highlighted for evaluation.
limit with margin, and the walls are being monitoring on a two-month frequency. In addition,  
The inspectors discussed the status of the Containment Enclosure Ventilation Area (CEVA)
the inspectors noted that the contractor performing the measurements uses the limits from the  
modification with NextEra staff. This structure was previously identified as not conforming with
structural evaluation (i.e., 20 percent) when reporting the monitoring results, such that this  
the structural design code utilizing the Seabrook methodology document (discussed in NRC
criteria would have been highlighted for evaluation.  
Inspection Report 05000443/2017004; ADAMS Accession Number ML18043A821). The
inspectors noted that NextEra staff completed the engineering change package that described
The inspectors discussed the status of the Containment Enclosure Ventilation Area (CEVA)  
the planned repairs to the wall, but had not started physical implementation of the structural
modification with NextEra staff. This structure was previously identified as not conforming with  
modification. The inspectors reviewed the lateral displacement measurements from March
the structural design code utilizing the Seabrook methodology document (discussed in NRC  
and June 2018 to verify the structure maintained its structural stability and noted there had
Inspection Report 05000443/2017004; ADAMS Accession Number ML18043A821). The  
been no apparent changes in the displacement since the previous measurements, in October
inspectors noted that NextEra staff completed the engineering change package that described  
2017.
the planned repairs to the wall, but had not started physical implementation of the structural  
NextEra staff completed its delamination validation study as part of preparations for the CEVA
modification. The inspectors reviewed the lateral displacement measurements from March  
North wall modification. The study was in response to NRC inspector questions during a
and June 2018 to verify the structure maintained its structural stability and noted there had  
previous inspection in November 2017, to verify that delamination was only occurring in the
been no apparent changes in the displacement since the previous measurements, in October  
cover concrete (discussed in NRC Inspection Report 05000443/2017004; ADAMS Accession
2017.  
Number ML18043A821). NextEra conducted a sample of concrete bore holes, exposed a
local area of rebar, and performed impact-echo testing, a non-destructive test method that
NextEra staff completed its delamination validation study as part of preparations for the CEVA  
uses sound waves to detect flaws within the concrete. NextEra staff confirmed that the
North wall modification. The study was in response to NRC inspector questions during a  
delaminations on the CEVA North wall were limited to the cover concrete layer (near surface)
previous inspection in November 2017, to verify that delamination was only occurring in the  
and were a result of loading on the wall. The inspectors discussed the results with NextEra
cover concrete (discussed in NRC Inspection Report 05000443/2017004; ADAMS Accession  
staff and independently observed the conditions of the core bores and rebar with no anomalies
Number ML18043A821). NextEra conducted a sample of concrete bore holes, exposed a  
identified.
local area of rebar, and performed impact-echo testing, a non-destructive test method that  
The inspectors concluded that NextEra staff monitored reinforced concrete structures in
uses sound waves to detect flaws within the concrete. NextEra staff confirmed that the  
accordance with Seabrook procedures, the structures remained capable of performing their
delaminations on the CEVA North wall were limited to the cover concrete layer (near surface)  
safety function by meeting the established monitoring limits, and issues were appropriately
and were a result of loading on the wall. The inspectors discussed the results with NextEra  
identified and evaluated in accordance with the corrective action program; therefore, no issues
staff and independently observed the conditions of the core bores and rebar with no anomalies  
of concern were identified.
identified.  
The inspectors concluded that NextEra staff monitored reinforced concrete structures in  
accordance with Seabrook procedures, the structures remained capable of performing their  
safety function by meeting the established monitoring limits, and issues were appropriately  
identified and evaluated in accordance with the corrective action program; therefore, no issues  
of concern were identified.  


                                                11
11  
Pressurizer Safety Valve Outside of Technical Specification Limits
Cornerstone       Severity                           Cross-cutting Aspect           Report
                                                                                      Section
Pressurizer Safety Valve Outside of Technical Specification Limits  
Not Applicable Severity Level IV                     Not Applicable                  71153
Cornerstone  
                  NCV 05000443/2018-003-01                                           Follow-up of
Severity  
                  Closed                                                            Events and
Cross-cutting Aspect  
                                                                                      Notices of
Report  
                                                                                      Enforcement
Section  
                                                                                      Discretion
Not Applicable  
A self-revealing Severity Level IV NCV of Technical Specifications 3.4.2.2, All pressurizer
Severity Level IV  
code safety valves shall be OPERABLE with a lift setting of 2485 psig +/- 3%, was identified
NCV 05000443/2018-003-01
when one of the pressurizer code safety valves failed as-found set point testing. Specifically,
Closed
it was determined that the safety valve had a high as-found set point pressure after the valve
Not Applicable
was removed from service during the previous refueling outage in April, 2017 (OR18) and the
71153
inoperable condition existed for a period of time longer than the allowed T.S. ACTION time.
Follow-up of  
Description: Seabrook Station reported the failure of a pressurizer code safety valve on
Events and  
April 5, 2018 in LER 2018-001-01 (ML18095A683). The valve was tested and failed the
Notices of  
applicable acceptance criteria on February 6, 2018. It was installed in the plant from
Enforcement  
October 17, 2015 until April 8, 2017. The as-found set point pressure was 6.1 percent, which
Discretion  
is greater than the technical specifications limiting condition for operation of 3 percent.
A self-revealing Severity Level IV NCV of Technical Specifications 3.4.2.2, All pressurizer  
Pressurizer code safety valves cannot be tested on line. Therefore, they are normally
code safety valves shall be OPERABLE with a lift setting of 2485 psig +/- 3%, was identified  
removed from service during a refueling outage and replaced with a different set of valves
when one of the pressurizer code safety valves failed as-found set point testing. Specifically,  
that were previously tested, inspected, and adjusted in accordance with established
it was determined that the safety valve had a high as-found set point pressure after the valve  
maintenance procedures. The removed valves are sent to a qualified offsite vendor for
was removed from service during the previous refueling outage in April, 2017 (OR18) and the  
completion of the technical specification surveillance testing at a later date. Although the
inoperable condition existed for a period of time longer than the allowed T.S. ACTION time.  
identical pressurizer code safety valve failed testing after removal, it is assumed the condition
Description: Seabrook Station reported the failure of a pressurizer code safety valve on  
existed prior to the as-found testing. Since it was installed and in service on a fully
April 5, 2018 in LER 2018-001-01 (ML18095A683). The valve was tested and failed the  
operational plant for over a year (October 17, 2015, through April 8, 2017) it is assumed the
applicable acceptance criteria on February 6, 2018. It was installed in the plant from  
valve was inoperable for greater than the allowed action statement time of 15 minutes for one
October 17, 2015 until April 8, 2017. The as-found set point pressure was 6.1 percent, which  
inoperable pressurizer code safety valve, after which the plant must be in HOT STANDBY
is greater than the technical specifications limiting condition for operation of 3 percent.  
within 6 hours, and in at least HOT SHUTDOWN within the following 6 hours. Therefore,
TS 3.4.2.2 was violated since these actions were not completed.
Pressurizer code safety valves cannot be tested on line. Therefore, they are normally  
Corrective Actions: NextEra performed an investigation to determine the cause of the failed
removed from service during a refueling outage and replaced with a different set of valves  
pressurizer code safety valve and excessive set point drift, however, nothing conclusive was
that were previously tested, inspected, and adjusted in accordance with established  
determined. NextEra found some spring characteristics had changed, but were still within
maintenance procedures. The removed valves are sent to a qualified offsite vendor for  
specifications. However, the spring was replaced with a new one. Additionally, the
completion of the technical specification surveillance testing at a later date. Although the  
corresponding valve maintenance procedure was revised to add more conservative
identical pressurizer code safety valve failed testing after removal, it is assumed the condition  
thresholds and evaluation criteria to determine if subsequent springs are suitable for future
existed prior to the as-found testing. Since it was installed and in service on a fully  
service. The resident inspectors validated the procedure changes.
operational plant for over a year (October 17, 2015, through April 8, 2017) it is assumed the  
Corrective Action References: AR 2248447
valve was inoperable for greater than the allowed action statement time of 15 minutes for one  
Performance Assessment:
inoperable pressurizer code safety valve, after which the plant must be in HOT STANDBY  
The inspectors determined the violation was not reasonably foreseeable and preventable by
within 6 hours, and in at least HOT SHUTDOWN within the following 6 hours. Therefore,  
NextEra and therefore is not a performance deficiency.
TS 3.4.2.2 was violated since these actions were not completed.  
Enforcement:
Corrective Actions: NextEra performed an investigation to determine the cause of the failed  
pressurizer code safety valve and excessive set point drift, however, nothing conclusive was  
determined. NextEra found some spring characteristics had changed, but were still within  
specifications. However, the spring was replaced with a new one. Additionally, the  
corresponding valve maintenance procedure was revised to add more conservative  
thresholds and evaluation criteria to determine if subsequent springs are suitable for future  
service. The resident inspectors validated the procedure changes.
Corrective Action References: AR 2248447  
Performance Assessment:  
The inspectors determined the violation was not reasonably foreseeable and preventable by  
NextEra and therefore is not a performance deficiency.  
Enforcement:  


                                                  12
12  
  This is a violation of technical specifications and, therefore, must be evaluated using
  traditional enforcement.
  Violation: Technical Specification 3.4.2.2 requires that all pressurizer code safety valves shall
This is a violation of technical specifications and, therefore, must be evaluated using  
  be OPERABLE with a lift setting of 2485 psig +/- 3 percent in Modes 1, 2, and 3. With one
traditional enforcement.  
  pressurizer code safety valve inoperable, either restore the inoperable valve to OPERABLE
  status within 15 minutes or be in at least HOT STANDBY within 6 hours and in at least HOT
Violation: Technical Specification 3.4.2.2 requires that all pressurizer code safety valves shall  
  SHUTDOWN within the following 6 hours.
be OPERABLE with a lift setting of 2485 psig +/- 3 percent in Modes 1, 2, and 3. With one  
  Contrary to the above, from October 17, 2015, to April 8, 2017, NextEra operated in mode 1
pressurizer code safety valve inoperable, either restore the inoperable valve to OPERABLE  
  with an inoperable pressurizer code safety valve greater than the allowed action time.
status within 15 minutes or be in at least HOT STANDBY within 6 hours and in at least HOT  
  Severity: Severity Level IV
SHUTDOWN within the following 6 hours.  
  Disposition: This violation is being treated as a Non-Cited Violation, consistent with
  Section 2.3.2 of the Enforcement Policy.
Contrary to the above, from October 17, 2015, to April 8, 2017, NextEra operated in mode 1  
  The disposition of this violation closes LER 05000293/2018-001-00.
with an inoperable pressurizer code safety valve greater than the allowed action time.  
EXIT MEETINGS AND DEBRIEFS
The inspectors verified no proprietary information was retained or documented in this report.
Severity: Severity Level IV  
x   On June 21, 2018, the inspectors presented the initial results of the IP 71111.17T inspection
    to Mr. Chris Domingos, Site Director, and other members of NextEra staff.
Disposition: This violation is being treated as a Non-Cited Violation, consistent with  
x   On July 25, 2018, the inspectors presented the updated results of the IP 71111.17T
Section 2.3.2 of the Enforcement Policy.  
    inspection to Mr. Kenneth Brown, Licensing Manager, and other members of NextEra staff.
x   On August 24, 2018, the inspectors presented the radiation safety inspection results to
The disposition of this violation closes LER 05000293/2018-001-00.  
    Mr. Dennis Hickey, Radiation Protection Operations Supervisor, and other members of
    NextEra staff.
EXIT MEETINGS AND DEBRIEFS  
x   On September 6, 2018, the inspectors presented the final IP 71111.17T inspection results to
    Mr. Kenneth Brown, Licensing Manager, and other members of NextEra staff.
The inspectors verified no proprietary information was retained or documented in this report.
x   On September 13, 2018, the inspectors presented the Problem Identification and Resolution
    annual sample inspection results to Mr. Eric McCartney, Vice President - Northern Region,
x  
    and other members of NextEra staff.
On June 21, 2018, the inspectors presented the initial results of the IP 71111.17T inspection  
x   On October 25, 2018, the inspectors presented the quarterly resident inspector inspection
to Mr. Chris Domingos, Site Director, and other members of NextEra staff.  
    results to Mr. Eric McCartney, Vice President - Northern Region, and other members of the
    NextEra staff.
x  
On July 25, 2018, the inspectors presented the updated results of the IP 71111.17T  
inspection to Mr. Kenneth Brown, Licensing Manager, and other members of NextEra staff.  
x  
On August 24, 2018, the inspectors presented the radiation safety inspection results to  
Mr. Dennis Hickey, Radiation Protection Operations Supervisor, and other members of  
NextEra staff.  
x  
On September 6, 2018, the inspectors presented the final IP 71111.17T inspection results to  
Mr. Kenneth Brown, Licensing Manager, and other members of NextEra staff.  
x  
On September 13, 2018, the inspectors presented the Problem Identification and Resolution  
annual sample inspection results to Mr. Eric McCartney, Vice President - Northern Region,  
and other members of NextEra staff.  
x  
On October 25, 2018, the inspectors presented the quarterly resident inspector inspection  
results to Mr. Eric McCartney, Vice President - Northern Region, and other members of the  
NextEra staff.  


                                              13
13  
DOCUMENTS REVIEWED
71111.17T
Procedures
EN-AA-203-1201, 10 CFR Applicability and 10 CFR 50.59 Screening Reviews, Revision 12
DOCUMENTS REVIEWED  
EN-AA-203-1202, 10 CFR 50.59 Evaluation, Revision 1
Condition Reports
71111.17T  
2065342       2164482       2172149       2175451         2181667       2209312
2218253       2227537       2257560       2257562         2257565       2257571
Procedures  
2261721       2262171
EN-AA-203-1201, 10 CFR Applicability and 10 CFR 50.59 Screening Reviews, Revision 12  
Calculations
EN-AA-203-1202, 10 CFR 50.59 Evaluation, Revision 1  
9763-3-ED-00-14-F, Calculation of 2 Hour Loss of AC Load Profile for 58 Cell Configuration for
    Battery 1-EDE-B-1-A, Revision 18
Condition Reports  
C-S-1-5003, I&C Heat Load Calculation, Revision 6
2065342  
SBK-1FJF-18-150, Seabrook High Burnup AST Verification - Cycle 18 NDR and Cycle 19 NDR,
2164482  
      Revision 0
2172149  
Engineering Evaluation
2175451  
Probabilistic Evaluation of Barrier 1 Tornado Missile Barrier Gap Area at Service Water Pump
2181667  
  House Southeast Alcove, dated 4/18/16
2209312  
Miscellaneous
2218253  
MTF 17-006, Material Transfer Form for Cycle 18 Offload, dated 3/22/17
2227537  
ML18158A220, Interim Guidance for Dispositioning Severity Level IV Violations with No
2257560  
2257562  
2257565  
2257571  
2261721  
2262171  
Calculations  
9763-3-ED-00-14-F, Calculation of 2 Hour Loss of AC Load Profile for 58 Cell Configuration for  
Battery 1-EDE-B-1-A, Revision 18  
C-S-1-5003, I&C Heat Load Calculation, Revision 6  
SBK-1FJF-18-150, Seabrook High Burnup AST Verification - Cycle 18 NDR and Cycle 19 NDR,  
Revision 0  
Engineering Evaluation  
Probabilistic Evaluation of Barrier 1 Tornado Missile Barrier Gap Area at Service Water Pump  
House Southeast Alcove, dated 4/18/16  
Miscellaneous  
MTF 17-006, Material Transfer Form for Cycle 18 Offload, dated 3/22/17  
ML18158A220, Interim Guidance for Dispositioning Severity Level IV Violations with No  
Associated Performance Deficiency, dated 6/15/18
Associated Performance Deficiency, dated 6/15/18
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 09:06, 5 January 2025

La - Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1: Integrated Inspection Report 05000443/2018003
ML18330A081
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/14/2018
From:
NRC
To:
References
17-953-02-LA-BD01
Download: ML18330A081 (17)


See also: IR 05000443/2018003

Text

1

SeabrookLANPEm Resource

From:

R1DRSMAIL RESOURCE

Sent:

Wednesday, November 14, 2018 7:55 AM

To:

Poole, Justin

Subject:

SEABROOK STATION, UNIT NO. 1: INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT

05000443/2018003

Attachments:

SB IR18003_FINAL .pdf

SEABROOK STATION, UNIT NO. 1: INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT 05000443/2018003

ADAMS ACCESSION NO. ML18318A009

---

The attached document is being sent to you per your request to receive electronic

mailings, if you wish to be removed follow the instructions below. The document

is publicly available and will be accessible via the public web site Electronic

Reading Room in the Agency Document Access and Management System (ADAMS),

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html , generally within six days. To access

this document use the ADAMS number provided in this email.

Documents containing proprietary or safeguards information are not publicly

available and will not be sent using the electronic mailing system.

You are currently subscribed to seabrook as: justin.poole@nrc.gov .

To unsubscribe: Please go to the NRC's public website

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver/plants-by-region.html

Once at the site, type in your e-mail address in the space provided and check the box(es) that correspond to the

list(s) you would like to unsubscribe from. Then click the Unsubscribe button.

or send an email to lyris@nrc.gov with the following information in the subject line

unsubscribe seabrook justin.poole@nrc.gov

Hearing Identifier:

Seabrook_LA_NonPublic

Email Number:

1527

Mail Envelope Properties (LYRIS-198844-365739-2018.11.14-07.58.16--justin.poole#nrc.gov)

Subject:

SEABROOK STATION, UNIT NO. 1: INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT

05000443/2018003

Sent Date:

11/14/2018 7:54:57 AM

Received Date:

11/14/2018 7:59:10 AM

From:

R1DRSMAIL RESOURCE

Created By:

R1DRSMAIL.RESOURCE@nrc.gov

Recipients:

"Poole, Justin" <Justin.Poole@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None

Post Office:

listmgr.nrc.gov

Files

Size

Date & Time

MESSAGE

1318

11/14/2018 7:59:10 AM

SB IR18003_FINAL .pdf

301073

Options

Priority:

Standard

Return Notification:

No

Reply Requested:

No

Sensitivity:

Normal

Expiration Date:

Recipients Received:

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION I

2100 RENAISSANCE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100

KING OF PRUSSIA, PA 19406-2713

November 13, 2018

Mr. Mano Nazar

President and Chief Nuclear Officer

Nuclear Division

NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC

Mail Stop: EX/JB

700 Universe Blvd.

Juno Beach, FL 33408

SUBJECT:

SEABROOK STATION, UNIT NO. 1 - INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT

05000443/2018003

Dear Mr. Nazar:

On September 30, 2018, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an

inspection at Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1 (Seabrook). On October 25, 2018, the NRC

inspectors discussed the results of this inspection with Mr. Eric McCartney, Vice President -

Northern Region and other members of your staff. The results of this inspection are

documented in the enclosed report.

NRC inspectors documented one Severity Level IV violation with no associated finding in this

report. The NRC is treating the violation as a non-cited violation (NCV) consistent with

Section 2.3.2.a of the Enforcement Policy.

If you contest the violation or significance of the NCV, you should provide a response within

30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the U.S. Nuclear

Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555-0001; with

copies to the Regional Administrator, Region I; the Director, Office of Enforcement; and the NRC

Resident Inspector at Seabrook.

This letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be made available for public inspection

and copying at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and the NRC Public Document Room

in accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, Public

Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Fred L. Bower, Chief

Reactor Projects Branch 3

Division of Reactor Projects

Docket No.

50-443

License No.

NPF-86

Enclosure:

Inspection Report 05000443/2008003

cc w/encl:

Distribution via ListServ

ML18318A009

SUNSI Review

Non-Sensitive

Sensitive

Publicly Available

Non-Publicly Available

OFFICE

RI/DRP

RI/DRP

RI/DRP

NAME

PCataldo/SE

SElkhiamy

FBower

DATE

11/13/2018

11/13/2018

11/13/2018

1

Enclosure

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Inspection Report

Docket Number:

50-443

License Number:

NPF-86

Report Number:

05000443/2018003

Enterprise Identifier: I-2018-003-0067

Licensee:

NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC (NextEra)

Facility:

Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1 (Seabrook)

Location:

Seabrook, NH

Inspection Dates:

July 1, 2018 to September 30, 2018

Inspectors:

P. Cataldo, Senior Resident Inspector

P. Meier, Resident Inspector

E. Burket, Reactor Inspector

J. Furia, Senior Health Physicist

N. Floyd, Senior Reactor Inspector

Approved By:

Fred Bower, Chief

Reactor Projects Branch 3

Division of Reactor Projects

2

SUMMARY

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) continued monitoring NextEras performance

at Seabrook by conducting the baseline inspections described in this report in accordance with

the Reactor Oversight Process. The Reactor Oversight Process is the NRCs program for

overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors. Refer to

https://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/oversight.html for more information. A self-revealing

finding is summarized in the table below.

List of Findings and Violations

Pressurizer Safety Valve Outside of Technical Specification Limits

Cornerstone

Severity

Cross-Cutting

Aspect

Inspection

Results

Section

Not Applicable

Severity Level (SL) IV

NCV 05000443/2018003-01

Opened/Closed

Not Applicable

71153

Follow-up of

Events and

Notices of

Enforcement

Discretion

A self-revealing SL IV non-cited violation of Technical Specification (TS) 3.4.2.2, All

pressurizer code safety valves shall be OPERABLE with a lift setting of 2485 psig +/- 3%, was

identified when one of the pressurizer code safety valves failed as-found set point testing.

Specifically, it was determined that the safety valve had a high as-found set point pressure

after the valve was removed from service during the previous refueling outage in April, 2017

(OR18) and the inoperable condition existed for a period of time longer than the allowed TS

ACTION time.

Additional Tracking Items

Type

Issue number

Title

Inspection

Report

Section

Status

LER 05000443/2018-001-00

Pressurizer Safety Valve

Outside of Technical

Specification Limits

Discovered During As-Found

Set Point Testing

71153

Closed

3

PLANT STATUS

Seabrook Station began the inspection period operating at 100 percent rated thermal power and

on September 30, 2018, operators commenced a shutdown, from 93 percent power, for planned

refueling and maintenance outage 19 (RFO19) that commenced on October 1, 2018.

INSPECTION SCOPES

Inspections were conducted using the appropriate portions of the inspection procedures in effect

at the beginning of the inspection unless otherwise noted. Currently approved inspection

procedures with their attached revision histories are located on the public website at

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/insp-manual/inspection-procedure/index.html.

Samples were declared complete when the inspection procedure requirements most

appropriate to the inspection activity were met consistent with Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 2515, Light-Water Reactor Inspection Program - Operations Phase. The inspectors performed

plant status activities described in IMC 2515 Appendix D, Plant Status and conducted routine

reviews using IP 71152, Problem Identification and Resolution. The inspectors reviewed

selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel to assess

NextEras performance and compliance with Commission rules and regulations, license

conditions, site procedures, and standards.

REACTOR SAFETY

71111.01 - Adverse Weather Protection

Seasonal Extreme Weather (1 Sample)

The inspectors evaluated readiness for seasonal extreme weather conditions prior to the

sustained high temperatures during the week of July 2nd.

71111.04 - Equipment Alignment

Partial Walkdown (4 Samples)

The inspectors evaluated system configurations during partial walkdowns of the following

systems/trains:

(1) A emergency diesel generator return-to-service on July 9

(2) B service water system during planned maintenance on the A service water system on

August 16

(3) A residual heat removal system before a B residual heat removal pump and valve

surveillance on August 28

(4) A service water and cooling water systems before a B cooling water tower pump

surveillance on August 30

4

71111.05AQ - Fire Protection Annual/Quarterly

Quarterly Inspection (5 Samples)

The inspectors evaluated fire protection program implementation in the following selected

areas:

(1) A essential switchgear (CB-F-1A-A) on September 13

(2) Turbine building ground floor (TB-F-1A-Z, TB-F-1-0) on September 13

(3) B residual heat removal vault, all levels (RHR-F-4A-Z) on September 17

(4) B residual heat removal vault, all levels (RHR-F-1A-Z, RHR-F-2A-Z, RHR-F-3A-Z,

RHR-F-1C-Z) on September 17

(5) Fire pump rooms (FPH-F-1A-A, FPH-F-1B-A, FPH-F-1C-A) on September 19

71111.06 - Flood Protection Measures

Internal Flooding (1 Sample)

The inspectors evaluated internal flooding mitigation protections in the primary auxiliary

building, 25' elevation, on September 13.

71111.07 - Heat Sink Performance (1 Sample)

The inspectors evaluated NextEras monitoring and maintenance of B emergency diesel

generator heat exchanger thermal performance test.

71111.11 - Licensed Operator Requalification Program and Licensed Operator Performance

Operator Requalification (1 Sample)

The inspectors observed and evaluated requalification training in the simulator on August 27.

This training involved lessons learned from previous steam generator level control issues, most

notably the level control issues that resulted in the April 2017 reactor trip.

Operator Performance (1 Sample)

The inspectors observed and evaluated activities associated with the following licensed

operator performance in the control room:

(1) Alarm response and various instrumentation and control maintenance activities on July 19

(2) Various alarm response to ongoing maintenance, and coordination with fire protection

for entry into technical requirements manual due to fire door inoperability on August 29

(3) Alarm response and the swap from ocean service water to the cooling water tower in

preparation for the cooling water tower pump surveillance on August 30

(4) Fast start surveillance of the A emergency diesel generator, deboration of reactor

coolant system to maintain power, and control room maintenance activities associated

with instrumentation and control equipment on September 10

(5) Shutdown activities and entry into refueling outage 19 on September 30

5

71111.12 - Maintenance Effectiveness

Routine Maintenance Effectiveness (2 Samples)

The inspectors evaluated the effectiveness of routine maintenance activities associated

with the following equipment and/or safety significant functions:

(1) Atmospheric steam dump valve maintenance to address nitrogen leaks, in August and

September 2018.

(2) Troubleshooting activities associated with recurrent electrical grounds on the electrical

distribution system, which have occurred throughout the operating cycle.

71111.13 - Maintenance Risk Assessments and Emergent Work Control (5 Samples)

The inspectors evaluated the risk assessments for the following planned and emergent

work activities:

(1) Risk associated with battery charger C testing, vital inverter 1E issues, and A cooling

water tower valve maintenance and surveillance from July 10-17

(2) Emergent work and risk associated with ground on busses supplied by vital inverter 1E

(A train) during a B train work week from August 6-9

(3) Risk associated with A service water system inoperability for planned valve

maintenance on August 16

(4) Risk associated with the supplemental emergency power supply planned maintenance

outage from August 20-23

(5) Risk associated with aligning for the B cooling water tower system from the B service

water system on August 30

71111.15 - Operability Determinations and Functionality Assessments (4 Samples)

The inspectors evaluated the following operability determinations and functionality

assessments:

(1) Unit auxiliary transformer 2A liquid flow loss (AR2272500) on July 5

(2) Vital inverter 1E issues (AR2281601) on July 10

(3) Containment enclosure emergency exhaust switch low flow alarm (AR2272500) on

July 18

(4) Structural evaluation of the mechanical penetration area north and south wall on

September 13

71111.17T - Evaluations of Changes, Tests and Experiments (25 Samples)

The inspectors evaluated the following from June 18, 2018 to August 17, 2018:

10 CFR 50.59 Evaluations

(1) Eval 15-002, SSPS Circuit Board Replacement, dated 3/9/15

(2) Eval 15-003, EC 282582, New Service Water Pump House Barrier 1 Missile Barrier,

Revision 1

(3) Eval 15-004, Seabrook Cycle 18 Reload, dated 9/18/15

6

(4) Eval 16-002, Temporary Jumper Across 1-EDE-B-1-A Cell #43, dated 11/4/16

(5) Eval 16-004, Change to OS1023.10, Service Water Pump House Ventilation System

Operation, to Allow Manual Control of the Pump House Ventilation System,

Revision 0

(6) Eval 18-001, Containment Model Update for NSAL-11-5 and NSAL-14-2, dated 3/12/18

10 CFR 50.59 Screening/Applicability Determinations

(1) BC16-01, Correct DNBR Value in TS 3/4.4.1 RCS Bases Section, dated 1/17/17

(2) EC 283978, Risk Informed Frequency Change for DG-ESFAS Integrated Test, dated

8/20/15

(3) EC 284280, Increase in RCS Loop Tavg to Average Tavg Deviation Alarm Setpoint,

dated 9/15/15

(4) EC 287106, Condensate Storage Tank Approaching Level Low, dated 10/20/16

(5) EC 287319, 345 kV SF6 Bus 1 Upgrade and GS11 Removal, dated 9/18/16

(6) EC 288116, Replace SW-P-41-A Motor with Rewound Motor, dated 5/18/17

(7) EC 288964, SW Pump Motor Current Instantaneous Trip Setpoint Increase, dated

10/17/17

(8) EC 289531, Permanent Installation of Seismic Temporary Structures, dated 10/19/17

(9) EC 289886, Update UFSAR Section 9.4 for CBA Heat Load, dated 10/5/17

(10) EC 290437, RC-V-23 MOV Motor Replacement, dated 2/20/18

(11) EC 290933, P-9 Setpoint Revision in Support of EOC Cycle 19 Coastdown, dated

4/6/18

(12) PCR 1903625, Reserve Auxiliary Transformer Auxiliaries Operation, dated 5/26/16

(13) PCR 2036771, Operability Testing of IST Valves, dated 4/1/15

(14) PCR 2053030, Diesel Generator 1B 18 Month Operability Surveillance, dated 6/9/15

(15) PCR 2072219, Loop 1 Delta T/Tavg 7300 NTC Card Relay Testing, dated 2/18/16

(16) PCR 2075330, Power Increase, dated 9/24/15

(17) PCR 2178140, Operation at Power, dated 1/5/17

(18) PCR 2208297, SW-P-110 Pump Head Curve Verification, dated 7/12/17

(19) PCR 2252508, Response to Natural Phenomena Affecting Plant Operations, dated

3/6/18

71111.18 - Plant Modifications (1 Sample)

The inspectors evaluated the following temporary or permanent modifications:

(1) Modification of service water pipe support (EC 286395) in July

71111.19 - Post Maintenance Testing (5 Samples)

The inspectors evaluated post maintenance testing for the following maintenance/repair

activities:

(1) Cooling water tower spray bypass valve SW-V-139 maintenance on July 12

(2) B vital DC battery replacement from July 22 through August 7

(3) Leading edge flow meter calibration and repair on August 10

(4) Supplemental emergency power supply maintenance from August 20-23

(5) A atmospheric steam dump valve maintenance on August 31

7

71111.22 - Surveillance Testing

The inspectors evaluated the following surveillance tests:

Routine (3 Samples)

(1) C vital battery charger capacity test from July 10-16

(2) Refueling water storage tank trip actuating device operability test on July 16

(3) Moderator temperature coefficient surveillance on July 17

In-service (1 Sample)

(1) A service water isolation valve to secondary loads, SW-V-4, following thermal overload

replacement on August 16

RADIATION SAFETY

71124.08 - Radioactive Solid Waste Processing and Radioactive Material Handling, Storage,

and Transportation

Radioactive Material Storage (1 sample)

The inspectors observed radioactive waste container storage areas and verified the postings

and controls and that NextEra had established a process for monitoring the impact of long-

term storage of the waste.

Radioactive Waste System Walkdown (1 sample)

The inspectors walked down: accessible portions of liquid and solid radioactive waste

processing systems; abandoned-in-place radioactive waste processing equipment; and,

current methods and procedures for dewatering waste.

Waste Characterization and Classification (1 sample)

The inspectors identified radioactive waste streams and reviewed radio-chemical sample

analysis results to support radioactive waste characterization. The inspectors reviewed the

use of scaling factors and calculations to account for difficult-to-measure radionuclides.

Shipment Preparation (1 sample)

The inspectors reviewed the records of shipment packaging, surveying, labeling, marking,

placarding, vehicle checks, emergency instructions, disposal manifest, shipping papers

provided to the driver, and NextEra verification of shipment readiness.

Shipping Records (1 sample)

The inspectors reviewed selected non-excepted package shipment records.

8

OTHER ACTIVITIES - BASELINE

71151 - Performance Indicator Verification (3 Samples)

The inspectors verified NextEras performance indicators submittals listed below for the

period from July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018:

(1)

Emergency AC power systems

(2)

High pressure injection systems

(3)

Heat removal systems

71152 - Problem Identification and Resolution

Annual Follow-up of Selected Issues (2 Samples)

The inspectors reviewed the NextEras implementation of its corrective action program

related to the following issues:

(1) Various issues related to the meteorological tower

(2) Review of alkali-silica reaction impact on concrete structures

71153 - Follow-up of Events and Notices of Enforcement Discretion

Licensee Event Reports (1 Sample)

The inspectors evaluated the following licensee event reports (LERs):

(1) LER 05000443/2018-001-00, Pressurizer Safety Valve Outside of Technical

Specification Limits Discovered During As-Found Set Point Testing (ADAMS accession:

ML18095A683). The circumstances surrounding this licensee event report are

documented in report section Inspection Results.

INSPECTION RESULTS

Observation

71152(1) Annual Follow-

up of Selected Issues

The inspectors selected for follow-up, a negative trend of issues related to the meteorological

tower (MET Tower) since it is important for emergency planning dose assessment and used to

implement protective action recommendations. Specifically, NextEra identified decreasing

availability and reliability of the MET tower at the beginning of 2018. Despite the negative

trend, the redundancy incorporated into the design and the availability of the back-up MET

tower ensured that the emergency plan could be implemented throughout the time it took to

address the concerns.

The inspectors noted that the decreasing trend began following upgrades to the MET tower

components in 2014. The most evident recurring issues were related to temperature

fluctuations and reliability. Upon further investigation, NextEra determined loose junction box

connections were a significant contributor. In addition, based on vendor recommendations,

certain preventative maintenance practices were improved. These two corrective actions

increased the towers reliability with respect to temperature indications.

9

In the winter of 2017 and 2018, NextEra noted that the wind vane, which is used to determine

the wind direction, stopped working following significant storms. The wind speed indicator also

stopped working following a more recent winter storm in 2018. Each time NextEra promptly

repaired the components, however, NextEra recognized this negative trend, as these

components are designed for significant winter storms. The inspectors noted that measures to

investigate and to prevent the issues from recurring are ongoing. Although the exact causes

remain to be determined, NextEra is working with the MET tower vendor to ensure the quality

control of the replacement parts are as expected.

Preventive maintenance is performed every 6 months and includes calibrations, inspections,

and parts replacement as required. In addition, routine checks and calibrations are performed

on a bi-weekly and the control room operators monitor the MET tower indications each shift.

The inspectors concluded that NextEra properly identified and evaluated issues found by these

regular checks in accordance with the stations corrective action program. The inspectors

assessed that corrective actions to fix issues with the MET tower are performed in a timely

manner commensurate with the safety significance of the issue and no issues of concern with

problem identification and resolution were identified.

Observation

71152(2) Annual Follow-up

of Selected Issues

The NRC performed a periodic site visit to Seabrook Station to review NextEras monitoring of

alkali-silica reaction (ASR) on affected reinforced concrete structures, per their 10 CFR 50.65

Maintenance Rule Structures Monitoring Program and corrective action program. The

inspectors verified on a sampling basis that significant changes, if any or different

presentations of ASR on the affected structures were appropriately considered for impact on

the applicable Seabrook prompt operability determinations. In addition, the inspectors

performed independent walkdowns of ASR-affected areas and reviewed reports of recently

collected measurement data, including combined crack index, in-plane expansion, through-

wall expansion, and building deformation monitoring elements, to verify that the structures

were within the established, acceptable monitoring parameters.

NextEra staff continued to complete structural calculations to evaluate the future impact of

ASR on the reinforced concrete structures in accordance with the structures monitoring

program. The Mechanical Penetration Area North and South exterior walls were identified to

not qualify in accordance with ACI 318-71 structural design code when predicted ASR loading

was applied using NextEras methodology document. The methodology for evaluating

ASR-affected concrete is currently under review by the NRC staff, as part of the August 1,

2016, License Amendment Request (16-03). The remainder of the structure met the structural

design code with predicted ASR loading applied. The Mechanical Penetration Area houses

various safety-related systems and components, including piping and valves between the

containment structure and surrounding buildings. NextEra staff wrote a condition report to

address the non-conformance of the Mechanical Penetration Area, which included a separate

prompt operability determination.

The inspectors performed a review of the prompt operability determination and corrective

actions for the Mechanical Penetration Area. The inspectors also performed an independent

walkdown of the structure and did not observe any indications of loading distress or other

structural integrity issues as evident by the absence of structural flexure cracks. The

inspectors noted areas where lateral displacement of the North and South exterior walls, due

to ASR expansion in the concrete backfill, caused some distortion of platform and steel

10

walkways and verified that adjacent equipment was not impacted. NextEra staff planned to

perform more frequent inspections of the Mechanical Penetration Area North and South walls

to monitor lateral displacement. Based on discussions with NextEra staff, the inspectors noted

that a planned modification is being developed as a long-term corrective action to restore

compliance with the design code and Seabrooks methodology document. The inspectors

determined that NextEras conclusions that the structure is capable of performing its intended

functions was technically supported.

During review of the prompt operability determination for the Mechanical Penetration North

and South exterior walls, the NRC inspectors identified that the document contained incorrect

information for maintaining the operability of the structure. Specifically, the established

threshold monitoring limits for lateral displacement of the north and south walls was incorrect.

The operability determination stated an increase of 50 percent above baseline measurements

was acceptable; however, the associated structural evaluation supported a limit of 20 percent

increase above baseline. NextEra staff generated a condition report, AR 02280269, to revise

the prompt operability determination with the correct value. The documentation error was

determined to be minor because the current deformation remains well below the acceptable

limit with margin, and the walls are being monitoring on a two-month frequency. In addition,

the inspectors noted that the contractor performing the measurements uses the limits from the

structural evaluation (i.e., 20 percent) when reporting the monitoring results, such that this

criteria would have been highlighted for evaluation.

The inspectors discussed the status of the Containment Enclosure Ventilation Area (CEVA)

modification with NextEra staff. This structure was previously identified as not conforming with

the structural design code utilizing the Seabrook methodology document (discussed in NRC

Inspection Report 05000443/2017004; ADAMS Accession Number ML18043A821). The

inspectors noted that NextEra staff completed the engineering change package that described

the planned repairs to the wall, but had not started physical implementation of the structural

modification. The inspectors reviewed the lateral displacement measurements from March

and June 2018 to verify the structure maintained its structural stability and noted there had

been no apparent changes in the displacement since the previous measurements, in October

2017.

NextEra staff completed its delamination validation study as part of preparations for the CEVA

North wall modification. The study was in response to NRC inspector questions during a

previous inspection in November 2017, to verify that delamination was only occurring in the

cover concrete (discussed in NRC Inspection Report 05000443/2017004; ADAMS Accession

Number ML18043A821). NextEra conducted a sample of concrete bore holes, exposed a

local area of rebar, and performed impact-echo testing, a non-destructive test method that

uses sound waves to detect flaws within the concrete. NextEra staff confirmed that the

delaminations on the CEVA North wall were limited to the cover concrete layer (near surface)

and were a result of loading on the wall. The inspectors discussed the results with NextEra

staff and independently observed the conditions of the core bores and rebar with no anomalies

identified.

The inspectors concluded that NextEra staff monitored reinforced concrete structures in

accordance with Seabrook procedures, the structures remained capable of performing their

safety function by meeting the established monitoring limits, and issues were appropriately

identified and evaluated in accordance with the corrective action program; therefore, no issues

of concern were identified.

11

Pressurizer Safety Valve Outside of Technical Specification Limits

Cornerstone

Severity

Cross-cutting Aspect

Report

Section

Not Applicable

Severity Level IV

NCV 05000443/2018-003-01

Closed

Not Applicable

71153

Follow-up of

Events and

Notices of

Enforcement

Discretion

A self-revealing Severity Level IV NCV of Technical Specifications 3.4.2.2, All pressurizer

code safety valves shall be OPERABLE with a lift setting of 2485 psig +/- 3%, was identified

when one of the pressurizer code safety valves failed as-found set point testing. Specifically,

it was determined that the safety valve had a high as-found set point pressure after the valve

was removed from service during the previous refueling outage in April, 2017 (OR18) and the

inoperable condition existed for a period of time longer than the allowed T.S. ACTION time.

Description: Seabrook Station reported the failure of a pressurizer code safety valve on

April 5, 2018 in LER 2018-001-01 (ML18095A683). The valve was tested and failed the

applicable acceptance criteria on February 6, 2018. It was installed in the plant from

October 17, 2015 until April 8, 2017. The as-found set point pressure was 6.1 percent, which

is greater than the technical specifications limiting condition for operation of 3 percent.

Pressurizer code safety valves cannot be tested on line. Therefore, they are normally

removed from service during a refueling outage and replaced with a different set of valves

that were previously tested, inspected, and adjusted in accordance with established

maintenance procedures. The removed valves are sent to a qualified offsite vendor for

completion of the technical specification surveillance testing at a later date. Although the

identical pressurizer code safety valve failed testing after removal, it is assumed the condition

existed prior to the as-found testing. Since it was installed and in service on a fully

operational plant for over a year (October 17, 2015, through April 8, 2017) it is assumed the

valve was inoperable for greater than the allowed action statement time of 15 minutes for one

inoperable pressurizer code safety valve, after which the plant must be in HOT STANDBY

within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />, and in at least HOT SHUTDOWN within the following 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />. Therefore,

TS 3.4.2.2 was violated since these actions were not completed.

Corrective Actions: NextEra performed an investigation to determine the cause of the failed

pressurizer code safety valve and excessive set point drift, however, nothing conclusive was

determined. NextEra found some spring characteristics had changed, but were still within

specifications. However, the spring was replaced with a new one. Additionally, the

corresponding valve maintenance procedure was revised to add more conservative

thresholds and evaluation criteria to determine if subsequent springs are suitable for future

service. The resident inspectors validated the procedure changes.

Corrective Action References: AR 2248447

Performance Assessment:

The inspectors determined the violation was not reasonably foreseeable and preventable by

NextEra and therefore is not a performance deficiency.

Enforcement:

12

This is a violation of technical specifications and, therefore, must be evaluated using

traditional enforcement.

Violation: Technical Specification 3.4.2.2 requires that all pressurizer code safety valves shall

be OPERABLE with a lift setting of 2485 psig +/- 3 percent in Modes 1, 2, and 3. With one

pressurizer code safety valve inoperable, either restore the inoperable valve to OPERABLE

status within 15 minutes or be in at least HOT STANDBY within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in at least HOT

SHUTDOWN within the following 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />.

Contrary to the above, from October 17, 2015, to April 8, 2017, NextEra operated in mode 1

with an inoperable pressurizer code safety valve greater than the allowed action time.

Severity: Severity Level IV

Disposition: This violation is being treated as a Non-Cited Violation, consistent with

Section 2.3.2 of the Enforcement Policy.

The disposition of this violation closes LER 05000293/2018-001-00.

EXIT MEETINGS AND DEBRIEFS

The inspectors verified no proprietary information was retained or documented in this report.

x

On June 21, 2018, the inspectors presented the initial results of the IP 71111.17T inspection

to Mr. Chris Domingos, Site Director, and other members of NextEra staff.

x

On July 25, 2018, the inspectors presented the updated results of the IP 71111.17T

inspection to Mr. Kenneth Brown, Licensing Manager, and other members of NextEra staff.

x

On August 24, 2018, the inspectors presented the radiation safety inspection results to

Mr. Dennis Hickey, Radiation Protection Operations Supervisor, and other members of

NextEra staff.

x

On September 6, 2018, the inspectors presented the final IP 71111.17T inspection results to

Mr. Kenneth Brown, Licensing Manager, and other members of NextEra staff.

x

On September 13, 2018, the inspectors presented the Problem Identification and Resolution

annual sample inspection results to Mr. Eric McCartney, Vice President - Northern Region,

and other members of NextEra staff.

x

On October 25, 2018, the inspectors presented the quarterly resident inspector inspection

results to Mr. Eric McCartney, Vice President - Northern Region, and other members of the

NextEra staff.

13

DOCUMENTS REVIEWED

71111.17T

Procedures

EN-AA-203-1201, 10 CFR Applicability and 10 CFR 50.59 Screening Reviews, Revision 12

EN-AA-203-1202, 10 CFR 50.59 Evaluation, Revision 1

Condition Reports

2065342

2164482

2172149

2175451

2181667

2209312

2218253

2227537

2257560

2257562

2257565

2257571

2261721

2262171

Calculations

9763-3-ED-00-14-F, Calculation of 2 Hour Loss of AC Load Profile for 58 Cell Configuration for

Battery 1-EDE-B-1-A, Revision 18

C-S-1-5003, I&C Heat Load Calculation, Revision 6

SBK-1FJF-18-150, Seabrook High Burnup AST Verification - Cycle 18 NDR and Cycle 19 NDR,

Revision 0

Engineering Evaluation

Probabilistic Evaluation of Barrier 1 Tornado Missile Barrier Gap Area at Service Water Pump

House Southeast Alcove, dated 4/18/16

Miscellaneous

MTF 17-006, Material Transfer Form for Cycle 18 Offload, dated 3/22/17

ML18158A220, Interim Guidance for Dispositioning Severity Level IV Violations with No

Associated Performance Deficiency, dated 6/15/18