ML19256F086: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML19256F086 | | number = ML19256F086 | ||
| issue date = 10/15/1979 | | issue date = 10/15/1979 | ||
| title = Responds to NRC | | title = Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-293/79-16.Corrective Actions:Station Procedure 1.5.3 Revised & Tagging Procedure 1.4.5 to Be Reviewed | ||
| author name = Andognini G | | author name = Andognini G | ||
| author affiliation = BOSTON EDISON CO. | | author affiliation = BOSTON EDISON CO. | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| contact person = | | contact person = | ||
| document report number = 79-202, NUDOCS 7911210335 | | document report number = 79-202, NUDOCS 7911210335 | ||
| title reference date = 09-14-1979 | |||
| package number = ML19256F085 | | package number = ML19256F085 | ||
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC | | document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC | ||
| Line 19: | Line 20: | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:' | {{#Wiki_filter:' | ||
W- | W- | ||
~ | |||
~ | |||
BOSTON EDISDN COMPANY GENERAL orrects 80o BovtsTQM STREET BOSTON M AssAcNusETTs 02199 G. CAnL ANDOGNINI S U PENINTEND ENT NUCLEAN OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT October 15,1979 BECo Ltr. # 79-202 Mr. Eldon J. Brunner, Chief Reactor Operar. ions and Nuclear Support Branch Office of Inspection and Enforcement Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pa | BOSTON EDISDN COMPANY GENERAL orrects 80o BovtsTQM STREET BOSTON M AssAcNusETTs 02199 G. CAnL ANDOGNINI S U PENINTEND ENT NUCLEAN OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT October 15,1979 BECo Ltr. # 79-202 Mr. Eldon J. Brunner, Chief Reactor Operar. ions and Nuclear Support Branch Office of Inspection and Enforcement Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pa 19406 License no. DPR-35 Docket No. 50-293 Response to IE Inspection No. 79-16 | ||
==Dear Sir:== | ==Dear Sir:== | ||
Inspection No. 79-16, dated September 14, 1979, contained one item of non-compliance. | |||
Inspection No. 79-16, dated September 14, 1979, contained one item of non-compliance. Boston | Boston Edison Company's response to that item is presented as follows: | ||
Infraction: | Infraction: | ||
Technical Specification 3.7.A.2 states in part: " Primary Containment integrity shall be maintained a" all times when the reactor is critical..." | Technical Specification 3.7.A.2 states in part: | ||
" Primary Containment integrity shall be maintained a" all times when the reactor is critical..." | |||
Contrary to the above, primary containment integrity was violated on June 12, 1979, when, with the reactor critical at full power, the torus was opened to the reactor building atmosphere by disassembling the Core Sp.ay A Full Flow Test Check Valve (No. 1400-35). | Contrary to the above, primary containment integrity was violated on June 12, 1979, when, with the reactor critical at full power, the torus was opened to the reactor building atmosphere by disassembling the Core Sp.ay A Full Flow Test Check Valve (No. 1400-35). | ||
Responst:; | Responst:; | ||
Although Procedural and Management Controls in effect at the time should have prevented this occurence, it was concluded that these controls were vague. Therefore, to prevent a recurrence, station procedure 1.5.3 has been revised. This revision provides more specific direction for respon-sibile management personnel to ensure that adequate reviews, to prevent violations of limiting conditions of operation, are conducted prior to approval for maintenance activities to commence. A station organizational change which involved the creation of the position entitled, Assistant Station Manager, has served to further enhance overall Station management controls. | Although Procedural and Management Controls in effect at the time should have prevented this occurence, it was concluded that these controls were vague. Therefore, to prevent a recurrence, station procedure 1.5.3 has been revised. | ||
300 | This revision provides more specific direction for respon-sibile management personnel to ensure that adequate reviews, to prevent violations of limiting conditions of operation, are conducted prior to approval for maintenance activities to commence. A station organizational change which involved the creation of the position entitled, Assistant Station Manager, has served to further enhance overall Station management controls. | ||
300 2 | |||
7911210 3 3 5 | |||
T30sIdN EDISDN COMPANY Mr.bidonJ.Brunner, Chief October 15, 1979 Page 2 Also, the PNPS Tagging Procedure 1.4.5 will be reviewed during the next Operator Requalification Program to ensure that all operations personnel are aware of the requirements. Particular emphasis will be placed on the safety significance associated with this occurrence. | T30sIdN EDISDN COMPANY Mr.bidonJ.Brunner, Chief October 15, 1979 Page 2 Also, the PNPS Tagging Procedure 1.4.5 will be reviewed during the next Operator Requalification Program to ensure that all operations personnel are aware of the requirements. Particular emphasis will be placed on the safety significance associated with this occurrence. | ||
We will be in full compliance in this area by November 1, 1979. | We will be in full compliance in this area by November 1, 1979. | ||
We believe that this letter is responsive to your concerns. However, should you have any further questions, please contact us. | We believe that this letter is responsive to your concerns. However, should you have any further questions, please contact us. | ||
Very truly yours, F( | Very truly yours, Y | ||
F( | |||
tb 4b}f* | |||
/ | |||
/ | |||
1580 133}} | 1580 133}} | ||
Latest revision as of 00:22, 4 January 2025
| ML19256F086 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Pilgrim |
| Issue date: | 10/15/1979 |
| From: | Andognini G BOSTON EDISON CO. |
| To: | Brunner E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19256F085 | List: |
| References | |
| 79-202, NUDOCS 7911210335 | |
| Download: ML19256F086 (2) | |
Text
'
W-
~
~
BOSTON EDISDN COMPANY GENERAL orrects 80o BovtsTQM STREET BOSTON M AssAcNusETTs 02199 G. CAnL ANDOGNINI S U PENINTEND ENT NUCLEAN OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT October 15,1979 BECo Ltr. # 79-202 Mr. Eldon J. Brunner, Chief Reactor Operar. ions and Nuclear Support Branch Office of Inspection and Enforcement Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pa 19406 License no. DPR-35 Docket No. 50-293 Response to IE Inspection No. 79-16
Dear Sir:
Inspection No. 79-16, dated September 14, 1979, contained one item of non-compliance.
Boston Edison Company's response to that item is presented as follows:
Infraction:
Technical Specification 3.7.A.2 states in part:
" Primary Containment integrity shall be maintained a" all times when the reactor is critical..."
Contrary to the above, primary containment integrity was violated on June 12, 1979, when, with the reactor critical at full power, the torus was opened to the reactor building atmosphere by disassembling the Core Sp.ay A Full Flow Test Check Valve (No. 1400-35).
Responst:;
Although Procedural and Management Controls in effect at the time should have prevented this occurence, it was concluded that these controls were vague. Therefore, to prevent a recurrence, station procedure 1.5.3 has been revised.
This revision provides more specific direction for respon-sibile management personnel to ensure that adequate reviews, to prevent violations of limiting conditions of operation, are conducted prior to approval for maintenance activities to commence. A station organizational change which involved the creation of the position entitled, Assistant Station Manager, has served to further enhance overall Station management controls.
300 2
7911210 3 3 5
T30sIdN EDISDN COMPANY Mr.bidonJ.Brunner, Chief October 15, 1979 Page 2 Also, the PNPS Tagging Procedure 1.4.5 will be reviewed during the next Operator Requalification Program to ensure that all operations personnel are aware of the requirements. Particular emphasis will be placed on the safety significance associated with this occurrence.
We will be in full compliance in this area by November 1, 1979.
We believe that this letter is responsive to your concerns. However, should you have any further questions, please contact us.
Very truly yours, Y
F(
tb 4b}f*
/
/
1580 133