ML20008F843: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:, , ,
{{#Wiki_filter:...
                                                                                                        ~y           ,.
~y g
g                                                                                                ;y             ...
;y ROCHE*TER GA5 sc ELECTRIC CCRPORsT:CN D EsiT A4iSUE, RCCHE:TER. M 12:in e
ROCHE*TER GA5 sc ELECTRIC CCRPORsT:CN               e D EsiT A4iSUE, RCCHE:TER. M 12:in
i~;-l'::
:'          i~;-l'::
May 4,1981 Docket No. 50-244 LS05-81-04-001 f 'D United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission 0)'
May 4,1981 Docket No. 50-244 LS05-81-04-001 f 'D United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission                                                                 0)
Dennis M. Crutchfield, Chief
Dennis M. Crutchfield, Chief                                                 ,9 Operating Reactor Branch #5                                               _        /,fg Division of Licensing                                                             *,4                             h.
,9 Operating Reactor Branch #5
27 g Washington, D.C 20555                                                     t[                                       >
/,fg h.
Division of Licensing
*,4 27 Washington, D.C 20555 t[
g


==Dear Mr. Crutchfield,==
==Dear Mr. Crutchfield,==
f:
f:
In response to your letter of April 1,1981, please find enclose                                   e revised R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant, Security Training and Qualification Plan and our response to the NRC comments on the original plan submittal.
In response to your letter of April 1,1981, please find enclose e
As a result of the NRC's initial review of our plan the document has been substantially revised to include information and commitments responsive to the NRC comments. In order to facilitate your further review of this plan we have also enclosed a document entitled, "RG&E Responses to the NRC Comments on the Training and Qualification Plan."             The RG&E Response document should be used as a reference source to locate additional information and commitments now incorporated in the revised plan.
revised R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant, Security Training and Qualification Plan and our response to the NRC comments on the original plan submittal.
As a result of the NRC's initial review of our plan the document has been substantially revised to include information and commitments responsive to the NRC comments.
In order to facilitate your further review of this plan we have also enclosed a document entitled, "RG&E Responses to the NRC Comments on the Training and Qualification Plan."
The RG&E Response document should be used as a reference source to locate additional information and commitments now incorporated in the revised plan.
In additica to the revisions precipitated by NRC review, other sections of the plan have been placed in a new format in order to simiplify implementation.
In additica to the revisions precipitated by NRC review, other sections of the plan have been placed in a new format in order to simiplify implementation.
The responsibility Matrix (Task and Duty Summary) showing ten (10) shift assignments has been consolidated into four (4) duty positions for qualification and compared to the same crucial tasks. The history of Tasks, Conditions, and Standards has been numbered sequentially and placed in a paragraph format providing the additional information requested.
The responsibility Matrix (Task and Duty Summary) showing ten (10) shift assignments has been consolidated into four (4) duty positions for qualification and compared to the same crucial tasks. The history of Tasks, Conditions, and Standards has been numbered sequentially and placed in a paragraph format providing the additional information requested.
In accordance with the provisions of Title 10 Part 2.790(d) the information contained in the " Security Training and Qualification Plan is deemed to be proprietary and should be withheld for public disclosure.
In accordance with the provisions of Title 10 Part 2.790(d) the information contained in the " Security Training and Qualification Plan is deemed to be proprietary and should be withheld for public disclosure.
Very truly yours, x        L(,(   ~
Very truly yours, L(,(
Mr.'3ohn E. Maier JEM/sjs 810s220/f9 F
~
                          ., -  ...      . . . _ ,            .-            .,                --}}
x Mr.'3ohn E. Maier JEM/sjs 810s220/f9 F
--}}

Latest revision as of 02:19, 23 December 2024

Forwards Revised Security Training & Qualification Plan & Response to NRC Comments on Original Plan.Plan & Response Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790)
ML20008F843
Person / Time
Site: Ginna Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 05/04/1981
From: Maier J
ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP.
To: Crutchfield D
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
LSO5-81-04-001, LSO5-81-4-1, NUDOCS 8105120149
Download: ML20008F843 (2)


Text

...

~y g

y ROCHE*TER GA5 sc ELECTRIC CCRPORsT
CN D EsiT A4iSUE, RCCHE:TER. M 12:in e

i~;-l'::

May 4,1981 Docket No. 50-244 LS05-81-04-001 f 'D United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission 0)'

Dennis M. Crutchfield, Chief

,9 Operating Reactor Branch #5

/,fg h.

Division of Licensing

g

Dear Mr. Crutchfield,

f:

In response to your letter of April 1,1981, please find enclose e

revised R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant, Security Training and Qualification Plan and our response to the NRC comments on the original plan submittal.

As a result of the NRC's initial review of our plan the document has been substantially revised to include information and commitments responsive to the NRC comments.

In order to facilitate your further review of this plan we have also enclosed a document entitled, "RG&E Responses to the NRC Comments on the Training and Qualification Plan."

The RG&E Response document should be used as a reference source to locate additional information and commitments now incorporated in the revised plan.

In additica to the revisions precipitated by NRC review, other sections of the plan have been placed in a new format in order to simiplify implementation.

The responsibility Matrix (Task and Duty Summary) showing ten (10) shift assignments has been consolidated into four (4) duty positions for qualification and compared to the same crucial tasks. The history of Tasks, Conditions, and Standards has been numbered sequentially and placed in a paragraph format providing the additional information requested.

In accordance with the provisions of Title 10 Part 2.790(d) the information contained in the " Security Training and Qualification Plan is deemed to be proprietary and should be withheld for public disclosure.

Very truly yours, L(,(

~

x Mr.'3ohn E. Maier JEM/sjs 810s220/f9 F

--