ML20080K461

Procedure QAS-1402-PNPP Housekeeping & Storage of Items & Matls. Related Info Encl

ML20080K461
Person / Time
Site:	Perry
Issue date:	08/15/1980
From:	Jackie Jones JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC.
To:
Shared Package
ML20079G896	List: ML20080K266 ML20080K277 ML20080K281 ML20080K287 ML20080K302 ML20080K318 ML20080K332 ML20080K342 ML20080K357 ML20080K361 ML20080K422 ML20080K457 ML20080K461
References
FOIA-83-199 QAS-1402-PNPP, NUDOCS 8309290164
Download: ML20080K461 (26)

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:g SECD I h GJ.TI. Procedure fic. Submittal 1;o. Rev. j g OAS-1402-PNPP f Issued By: Date: 6 J. Jones August 15, 1980 s 8 u wxSEXEEPEC 6 SKRAE OF DES & !WTEWLS 2 2 2 e ma 5 ).!OO[\\![.@C1!;[DC(Dy g s =B . _m

0R REFERENCE ONLY w

b E e e v 5 5 D 6 CJ l s s 6 m s ~ cn i1 N g g eN<h k E N' / e E 8" A EI' b E Qh 8309290164 830622 l) 5 cx PDR FOIA P' HIATT83-199 PDR

a J OH!;E 01; CC1:7 EOLE, 3fic. SECD Th0CEDUKE Issued by:

• Date:

Frocedure No. .ONTRACT: 8243-0001 Ecference: Pern Nuclear Pcwer Plant J. Jones August 15, 1980 OAS-1402-PIPP IDUSDEEPIIG RO SIORAGE OF ITD S AND thTERIALS PAGE CONTROL OF REVISIONS THIS PAGE l ISSUE REVIEED AFPPOVAL j PAGE NO. DESCRIPTION EEV. DATE X INITIALS 1 Text 08/15/80 2 Text f 08/15/80 3 Text E 08/25/80 4 Text E 08/15/80 5 Text f 08/15/80 6 Text E 08/15/80 7 Text E C8/15/80 8 Text E 08/15/80 9 Text 9 08/15/80 l 10 'Ibxt 9 08/15/80 11 Zone D2signations 9 08/15/80 12 Inspection / Surveillance Report 5 08/15/80 13 Plant Storage reintenance ~~ 9 08/15/80 ~ l 15 Storage Checklist 08/15/80 B l l ~ - - - - _ _. _ _ ~ _ _ _ -

Fi VI S10!; f Page 1 of 14 . ~. HOUSD:EEPING NO SIORAGE OF ITUG & f%TERIALS 1.0 PURPOSE 'Ib establish the require:ents and nethods for cleanliness, housekeeping and for the control and storage of naterials and/or items to prevent da: rage, deterioration and loss. 2.0 SCDPE 'Ihis procedure describes the control of work conditions and enviroment, the control, inspection and naintenance requireTents for storage of safety related naterial and/or itens to be used for fabrication and installation at the Perry Nuc1 car Station. 3.0 RLucES 3.1 SFID QA Fant31 3.2 Project A:ininistration 0206 3.3 ANSI N45.2 3.4 R;SI N45.2.3 k 3.5 SP-709 j 3.6 SP-90 3.7 USNRC Reg. Guide 1.39 3.8 Q?S-3 601-PNPP l C0 GH;EPAL i 4.1 Definitions / Abbreviations t 4.1.1 Cuner - Utility and/or agent (s) building a nuclear pcrer plant, in this case, Cleveland Electric Illuminating Ccmpany/Giltert Associates, Inc. l i l l

= _ _. Pap' 2 of 14 e JL5V. IS10N f ~ 4.1.2 SIID Systens Engineering and Constmetion Division of Johnson Controls, Inc. 4.1.3 IPI - In-Process Inspector i i 4.1.4 ISE - Field Storage Paintenance RequireTents 4.1.5 Storage-in bace - EquipTent is considered to be " stored-in-place" when it is installed in its final location. 4.1.6 Temporary Field Storage - If field issued plant equipTent is not " stored-in-place", then it will be considered in "terporary field storage". 4.1.7 RI - Receiving Inspector 4.1.8 Cbnstruction Phase - The period of tine beginning with the start of construction activity and ending as each plant area is turned over to the plant operator. 4.2 Pesponsibilities 4.2.1 Tne Project Panager is responsible for the adherence to the housekeeping cleanliness standards by zone ard t1e proper storage of naterials and iters in accordance with applicable suggested nanufacturer's instructions and the rcqaireTents i of this procedure. y 4.2.2 Tne Oaality Assurance Fanager is responsible for verification by inspaction and audit that the houseikeeping cicanliness standard and the storage activities describad in this procedure are effective. 5.0 PRCGDLEE l 5.1 Housekeeping i 5.1.1 Tre CA.er shall designate and identify 1rmsekeeping cleanliness standard by zone. For zone 6esignation, see illustration page.11 of 14r i 5.1.2 Personnel entrance onto the job site is controlled by the CAmer. 5.1.3 Tne ccntrol and accountability of all perscnnel in tha controlled j zones will bs by the CAmer. 5.1.4 Caner anS srCD furnished equiptent will be raintained and protected ~ par para. 5.3 ard 5.4 respectively of this procedure. 5.2 Contml of ncilities i 5.2.1 Work arcas will be kept sufficiently clean and orderly, so that l constructicn activities can proceed in an efficient iranner. 5.2.2 Chrbage, tresh, scrap, litter ard othar excess iraterials generated by JCI personnel shall te col]ected and reloved frcm the work area.. l r

0 Pa;:e 3 of 34 REVISICG f Excess naterials at the cmpletion of tM I/F Package shall be retumed to the SECD Warehouse, all other litter and trash will be removed to the disposal area designated by the a ner. 5.2.3 During the course of the constniction phase, form and scrap Itr:ber with protmding nails and all other debris, shall be kept cleared fran work areas, passageways, and stairs, in and around buildings or otkr structures. J 5.2.4 Eating or the use of tobacco are not permitted in posted areas. 5.2.5 'Ibe use, locaticn and deploynent of construction tools, supplies and equipient shall be regulat,ed by the Project Panager to keep access and work areas cicar, and to prevent conditions that will adversely affect quality. 5.3 Storage and mintenance of aner-Furnished Itans 5.3.1 amer-furmshed iters shall be naintained while in the custody of SEED fran time of receipt to Oaner acceptance of insta11aticn. 5.3.2 Faintenance and inspection of owner-furnished itens shall be in accordance with the Field Storage F,aintenance Requireients (PSG) sheets attached to the items, and shall be dconented on the Storage Faintenance Record, (Illustration, page 13 ). 5.3.3 When owner-furnished iters are received, they will norrally be transferred to their assigned plant location and " stored-in-place". If conditions prevent im:ediate installation, a suitabic alternate Jocation will b3 selected which affords the sam level of storage enviros ent as indicated on the S'E sheet, and the cquip ent will be in"te:qorary field storage'. Ite-s thus stored will be kept off tha f1cer ty the use of cribbing. For equipvent placed telow g ade level (620' elev-ation), at ] cast a 4" cicarance fron. the f]cor will b3 raintained. 5.3.4 Protection of owner-furnished itens received shall be in accord-ance with the follcuing: Construction _ Activity in th? Area Protection Pecuired

1) Op2n area imdiately adjacent Place fla e-resistant 12 oz.

to equip ent, and ro overhaad olive drab 6uck, or eqaiva-- work. 2cnt, over equip:ent and se. cure. r NOTE: REX %RDING TARPAULIJJS_;. 'Farps shall be supported in such a ranner as to allcw air to circulate about the equip ent, thus nanisrizing condensation probicas. Tnis may necessitate erecting a space fram (rade of angle iron, woods, retal scaffolding, etc.) to support the i tarp, tlereby providing an air space. .s

Fage 4 of 14 REVISION f ~ Construction Activity in the Area Protection Rmuired

2) Heavy construction activity, re-Erect fire retardent wooded stricted work area, and heavy over-housing over equipTent h3ad work in progress, such as pipe erection, concrete place: rent, etc.

~ 5.3.5 Any problems which arise during the conduct of neintenance shall be doc.rrented in accordance with OAS-1601-PNPP, Non- ^ confonrance Control. 'Tnis incitx3es daTaged equipTent. In no case will any equiprent be disasserbled without first acquiring Site Organization approval. 5.4 Storage of SEED Its s 5.4.1 This procedure defines the storage requirenents to be used to ntinimize the possibility of damage to, or losering the quality of, traterials and iters received due to corrosicn, contamination, deterioration or physimi darage fran the tine the itors and raterials are placed in storage until their release for fabrication or installation. 5.4.2 All items and naterial will be assigned the pmper level (A,B,C or D) of storage by the Receiving Inspector (RI) as tranufacturer instructions nay indicate, or as detennined from the catagories of itens listed in paragraph 5.5.4 b2 low 5.5 Classification of Items and Faterials 5.5.1 levels of storage are divi 6ed into four levels with respect to protective reasures to prevent daTage, deterioration or contamin. ation of the iten, based upon the inportant physical character-istics, and not upon the irportant functional characteristics of the item with resp =ct to safety, reliability and operation. 5.5.2 Ite s shall not be classified according to the requirem2nts of one level, then stored amording to a level of a Joer grade. Any package unit or asseTbly rade up of items of different levels shall be classified to the highest level designated for any of the respective parts. 5.5.3 Owner-furnished ite~s and raterials will traintain that IcVel of storage as established by the C%mer. 5.5.4 Items and raterials covered by this procedure shall ba categorized l under the follodng levels: 5.5.4.1 Icvel A - Itats classified to Level A are those that are exceptior. ally sensitive Eo environmental conditions and rcquire sprial reasures for protection from one or nore of the follodng effects: temperatures outside required I limits, sudden tarparature changes, htrnidity and vapors, gravitational (g) forces, physical darage and airborne contamination (e.g. rain, snow, dust, dirt, salt spray, futes).

IdYISICG E g A) Tne following shall be used as a guide for-classifying itens intende3 for this IcVel classification: 1) Special electronic equiprent and instru-rientation. 2) Special traterials, such as chenicals that are sensitive to environtrent. ~ 3) Special nuclear traterial (fuel) and sources. 5.5.4.2 Invel B - Items classified to level B are those that are sensitive to envitementat1 conditions and re-quire treasures for protection fran the effects of tedperature extrenes, humidity and vapors, g forces, physical darrage and airborhe contamination and should not require special protection required for Level A iters. A) 'Ibe following shall be used as a guide for class-ifying itens intended for this level classification: 1) Instnnentation 2) Electrical p2netrations 3) Batteries m 4) Welding electro 5es and wire 5) Ibtor control centers, switchgear aid control i panels. 6) Ibtors and generators 7) Precision trachined parts 8) Frection spares, such as garkets, "O" rings

9) Air handling filters 10)

Caquters 5.5.4.3 Level C - Itens classified to Invel C are those that require protection from exposure to the envirorrent, i airtorne contamir, ants, g forces ard physical darrage. Protection fran water. vapor ard condensation is not so ifrfortant as that-for IcVel B items. A) Tm follo -ing shall be used as a guide for class-ifying iters intended for this level classification: w-w ,--e w -r-i-v --g--- ,vww-y-myww-mvwiy. gggawg gy,gggr gg g-yg gr-e+-- v-- e'i.T w --'Y

REVlslot; j'

1) Pmps

2) Valves 3)

Fluid filters

4) Ompressors

5) Auxiliary Turbines 6)

Instrument cable

7) !!efueling equ2pmnt

8) Tnermal insulation

9) Fans and blowers i

10) Pipino./hibing 5.5.4'.4 1evel D - ItcIN classified to Level D are those

~~ that are less sensitive to the environnent than IcVel C. These itens require protection against the elcnents, airborne contamination, and physical da.Tage. A) Tne follo.-ing shall be used as a guide for class- ) ifying itene intended for this level classification:

1) Tanks l

2) Heat exchangers and parts

3) Acctrrulators 4)

Der.ineralizers 5) D.aporators 1 4 1 6) Electrical cable 7) Stmetural itens f 8) Reinfcsrcing steel 5.6 Invels of storage 5.6.1 Envirorcental cxrrlitio.ns for itcrs and material classified ~ as Is.tel A, B, C and D described in 5.5.4 of this procedure j shall neet the rcquirccents as describad in the follcMng paragraphs. i n-.- m

rege i a: 14 REVISION,9 A) ' level A itens shall be stored undar special conditions similar to those described for level B itms but with additional requirenents such as temperature and hirnidity control within spec-ified limits, a ventilation systen with filters to provide an atmosphere free of dust and harmful vapors and any other appropriate requirenents. B) IcVel B ite7s shall be stored with a fire resistant, tear resistant, weathertight, and well ventilated ~ building or oguivalent enclosure. Precautions shall be taken against vandalism. This area shall be sit-uated and aristructed so that it will not be sub-j ject to flooding. The floor shall be paved or equal and well drained. Itens shall be placed on pallets or shoring to permit air circulation. The area shall be provided with uniform heating and te:p3rature con-trol or its equivalent to prevent condensation and corrosion. Minimum temperature shall be 400 F and 0 F (or less, if so maxinun tenperature shall be 140 stipulated by a manufacturer). C) Level C itens shall be stored indoors or equivalent with all provisions and requirerents as set forth for IcVel B items except that heat and teiparature control is not rcquired. D) level D items tray be stored cutdoors in an area marked ~ ' and designated for storage, which is well drained, I preferably gravel covered or paved and reasonably retoved from the actual constnetion area and traffic so that the possibility of daTage fran construction equipaant is munmized. Iters shall be stored on cribbing or equivalent to alloe for air circulaticn and to avoid trapping water. 5.7 Storage Arcas 5.7.1 bbnthly inspections by the In-Process Inspector (IPI) ;shall be perfonaM and docmented on an Insyection Surveillance Report (Illustration, page 12 ) to assure that storage a cas are being rraintained in accordance with tle follocing regaire-nents: A) Access to safety-related storage arcas shall be controlle6 - and limited only to personnel designated by the Project Manager. B) Cleanl ess ard gc x5 inusekeeping practices shall be enforced at all tines in the storage ' areas. Tie storage areas shall be cleaned as required, to avoid the acortr-nulation of trash, discarded packaging traterials and other detrirental soil.

.~

J.

^ a s REVISION E 3 C) Fire protection cornensurate with the type of' storage area and the traterial involved, shall be pro-vided and traintained. D) The use or st'orage of food, drinks and salt tablet dispensers in any storage area shall not be permitted. E) Feasures shall be taken to prevent the entrance of rodents and other annals into inSoor storage areas or cquiptent, to minunize possible contaTination and e. nechanical daTage to stored rretcrial. F) A floor plan of the SEED Storage Warehcuse will be posted in the warehouse shcsing the locations and levels of storage of controlled storage areas, and the location of uncantrolled storage areas and shop area. IOrE: SECD at Perry Nuclear Pcuer Plant has no plans to store equipTent outdoors or on a long-term basis, or to ship any equiptent from our storage area. If thase requirenents should becme nec-essary, appropriate procedures will be written and subnitted for approval. 5.8 Storage Fethods 5.8.1 Storage nethcas shall conply with the requirenents of this procedure as described in the follow-ing paragraphs: A) All items shall b2 stored in such a tranner as to pant.it ready access for inspection or traintenance without ex-cessive handling, to minmdze risk of darrage. B) Items stacked for storage shall ha arranged so tlat racks, cribbing or crates are b2aring the full weight, without distortion of the item. C) Hazardous chemicals, paints, solvents, and other traterials-of a like nature shall b3 stored in well-ventilate'd areas, ~ which are not in close proximity to important nuclear plant items. D) All items or their containers shall be plainly narked, so that they are casily identified without excessive handling or unnecessary opaning of crates and toxes. E) Itens of different traterial cargositioni i.e., carbon steel and stainless steel shall be segregated. 5.9 Care of Itens 5.9.1 Care of items in storage shall be exercised in accordance with the following: A) Items in storage shall have all covers, caps, plugs or

Pace 9 o! 14 REUISION 5 other closures intact. Covers renoved for internal access at any time for any reasco shall be.umediately replaced after completion of the purpose. B) 'Ibuporary pre'servatives shall be left intact during storage. Should reapplication of preservatives be required, only those previously approved shall be i used. C) Other traintenan requireTents specified by the tran-iifacturer's instruction for the iten shall be per-formed. 5.10 Control of Itans in storage 5.10.1 Ftnthly inspections shall be performed on store 3 items, and (betnented cn a Storage Checklist (Illustration, page 14 ) to assure that the integrity of the iten and container are being maintained. Deficiencies noted shall be docunented ' utilizing the Inspectica/ Surveillance Report, Form 1869 (Illustration, page ). As a mininun, the following characteristics shall be verified during this inspection: A) Identification and Marking B) Protective Covers and Seals C) Coating and Preservatives D) Desiccant and Inert Gas Bla%et E) Physical Darrage and Cleanliness 5.11 Renoval of Items From Storage 5.11.1 only items which have been inspected and am considered ace-eptable (If accept tag is attached) for installatior, shall be reoved from storage. IDIE: Precautions will be taken against vandalis:n. Storage areas will be secared at any tine the persons responsible are not physically in that area. 6.0 DO E E HATION 6.1 One copy of the Plant Storage Maintenance Record wil? be kept with tha equipTent in a protective envelope. 6.2 'Ihe FSR shaet will be kept in the envelope with the Plant Storage Maintenance Fecord.

e U v. 2.,

ec R D 7IS1 0 ; E 6.3 The original Plant Storage Maintenance Record will be kept in the SECD record fi,les.

Every six months, or when a record is empletely filled, whichever occurs first, the originals will'be transmitted to the Contract Administrator. 6.4 A copy of the FSMR, the Plant Storage Faintenance Record, all ISR's and Storage Cnecklists will be on file and available for review by the CAmer, Authorized Inspector for Code Doc-trrents and/or Regulatory Agencies. M D g e O t 5

vs u s a.. t Zone Desirnations ANSI N45.2.3-1973 Cleanness requirements for housekeeping activities shall be established on the basis of the following zone designations. Time for imple=entation of the zcne desiEnations shall be as required by the construction progress. Zone 1 - Areas requiring the highest order of cleanness and shall be equipped with a clean clothing change facility at the vestibule or' entrance, preferably with toilet facilities ic=ediately adjacent so that per-setnel working in the~ controlled area do not have to wear the special clothing in other areas. Such areas shall pr6 vide for cocplete outer change of clothing by personnel, including use of shoe covers, head covers, and gloves to protect all equipment surfaces fro = outside contacination. Material entering this zone shall have been appro-priately cleaned prior to entry as specified in ANSI F45'.2.1. Zone II - Intercediate cleanness requirements less restrictive than Zone I but viere forei n catter cay have detrimental effects. E Zone III - Areas less restrictive than Zones I and II but requiring access con-trol over personnel and caterials. Zene IV - Areas vbere it is desired to regulate the use of tobacco and eating for caterial and equipnent protection or for health and fire bazards. Zone V - Unrestricted construction areas requiring good constructicn site housekeeping practices enly. For Zones I, II and III, a written record of the entry and exit of all personnel and caterial shall be established and caintained. 2Cnes Festriction list I II 111 IV V Clothing change -'Yes No No No N4 C]ean gloves, shoe covers, head cevering Yes Yes No No No Tiltered air Yes No No No No Material precleaning Yes No No No No Material accountability Yes Tes Yes .No No Fersonnel accountability Yes Yes Yes No No No use of tobacco or eating Yes Yes Yes Yes No 9 m e g* e ,,,e 4

- - Pee 12 of 1f~ ~ R EISICN f NO i INSPECTION / SURVEILLANCE REPORT f Johnson Controls. Inc. - SECD ept,Jart c o s t s. a c i h o ur r on oocuut NTS DATE Irnalerse's, w or k manship, testing. N ATURE OF INSPECTIONfSURVEILL ANCE: dacumentation. system no..etc.! DE SCRIPTION OF FINDING: FINDING: SATISFAClORY O UNS ATISF ACTORY O (Describe Recern nended Action) COPY TO. O OMS O O Frefert Mgr. gg O Auth. Irisnector O I r.sne cio. A ud't o'. t-COPY C O*/.ta E NT S: 10 T O: e (s) Date i 1 FIN AL D!SPOSITION' j i i j (s) Date C OP Y T O. (s) Date O rro,ect u gr. CIJa11ef Assur.143r. 851 O Auin. inspenor go,n,,,,,,,,, O

,gs j c ] v, p eO I~ l *. "O I-) y <d t> < -u wo ,a ~m em A [4 ..s G o jE ^ o d o ~= f R =m 8 i A ~ s. i3 O .d e b tu g m o V 4 n o -h k U 8 d = =i g O %O [4 H v U E-* r-2 6 i S ~ b M m-a o 4A [ g m ~

• 4

[ D ~_ ~ f ~ g e . g 9 R - -a .g m 144. 9 ~ = O.a L l 4.f3 S O r4 v ZC E9 y cs 3 l 9H an a ta = La< m n

3Et J4 C3 l S'. L iaGE GEt i.E1ET T.E'll E 10:; f I!;I ?ECT IC!: OF ITEP.S 1:. E70TAGE I!;SPECT10:; CH.UACTERISTICE, A. ( a c, ff! ! f/g [l l/ i & g g

• [

g 8 TS: msnmica twm O e S ~ O 9 h 4 N 'MW s

d (ENCLOSURE 1) Q., SP-90-4549-00 / yj 1-12-77 q,' %g {* h A: $$ 3:05.3 4. Upon completion of physical installation the CONTRACTOR shall (d. (Cent'd) submit final installation drawings to the ENGINEER. Final y,jk ' . drawings shall illustrate the actual installation and in addition e 3.sii+ ,to the information on the initial drawings of 5:05.3a shall III s ,^/ f 'k,(. include all fittings, slope, weld identification, and material A t.ht., - heat numbers.. Final drawings shall reference the latest revision d "ic gp of the ENGINEER's design drawings and shall be signed off by the P

qq,0W.Q CONTRACTOR's ciignizant engineer or his authorized representative.

(810 9 T 4413 4 , !.kf.Y $:06 - Applicable Codes and Standards N' 3

f V;;f i ;

,S' yW Y,y E',ETE';' conform to applicable sections of the following codes and standards: The equipment, material, and services supplied by the CONTRACTOR shall s,, n'.p"l6. . Y C.. 1. American National Standards Institute (ANSI): N. >; lT QE a. N45.2.2-1972, " Packaging, Shipping, Receiving, Storage, s . i',:t T,n and Handling of Items for Nuclear Power g.) ".,... Plants (During the Construction Phase)." d:..g ', ; QM $. ~ h' b. B31.1-1973 and addenda to Summer 1975, " Power Piping." b e.., 4 'yy ' [@.5 c. N45.2.11-1974, " Quality Assbrance Requirements for the Design hc.M;- of Nuclear Power Plants." \\dg@ [2+ E At 5 f ! j([ M. 2. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME): 4 g:A N a. Boiler and' Pressure Vessel Code, Section III,1974 and d pM,y// Addenda to Winter 1975,'" Nuclear Power Plant Components." III Wf feci { gh L;g.y $yRc7'. b. Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section IX, 1974 and Addenda to Winter 1975, " Welding and Brazing Qualifications." v.. i,::: a. + 5 h c. .ASME Code Case; Case N-174 (1812) Size of Fillet Welds for sN1 iff[3

b.,

Socket Welding of Piping Section III, Division 1. (See M ECNO g I 1- .,w.igure NC-4427-1 M W) sc/03-1 Agash Ws a M F 2 es. .g c ga w lM-N.x, ' 3 38 a n.,g o tc p i m sq 334. uas d. og 4 nc o x paa, a. L M, e

jg g.

3. American Societ For Festing and Materials (ASTM), A 36-g' Spec. Y .G for Structural Steel." y gL. ~ I ~ ' 3 [J ' tI -(([ 4. ' American Welding Society (AWS) D1.'l-75 with Rev. 1-76 and Rev. 2-77, " Structural Welding Code." _. ? ':b.. w ; a.. y 9 3 ? 'q.Y - 5. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE): l ~ h.,..;: 4. ...gg,, - IEEE 336-1971, " Installation, Inspection, and Testing @J 3..Eli;/;' '. Equipment During the Construction of Nuclear Power Requirements for Instrumentation and Electric l V

3,

Generating Stations " . ye III 6. DELETED c c.n a ecW73W t #g W A yp?a c. a 2::iw yise A Gao R .o QQ ' odds 7.fM s. t hd.h"I'd/.(16"

N Tcg47392.A h{?

AUb 'lb

j s

!. p e / 12-17-80 V-5 &$ W'A' U.9.' .-,e ,y . - - +.

PNPPORCAN!h.ATIONCHART (ENCLOSURE-1) l PEEy[f1EPLT I EXEClihUE VIC E-]JS LDEffI-- } VICE-PRESIDENT VIC E-PRES IDt.NI - DMINISTRATIVE SYSTDt-ENGINEERINC i SERVICES & CONSTRUCTION PURCHASING DEPARTMENT t u_MANACER HOME OFFICE PROJECTf NUCLEAR ENGINEERING HJEL 50YINGl SECTION I AND CONSTRUCTION DTVf MYON MAMCEg__ PERRY PLANT NUCLEAR ENGINEERING NUCLEAR CONSTRUCTION' NUCLEAR QUA.ITY ASSURANCEj PERRY PkOJECT DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT MANACER DEPAR1hENT MANAGER I DEPARTMENT MANAGER I SERVICES DEPARTMENT j MAncn I 1 1 MABACER NU EAR NUCLEAR ADMINIS-NUCLEAR KEA PRUJEGI NUCEC' ME CUNb ERuc-YRU TRA HING/ UON5TRUCTION DESIGN & LICENS-TRATION CONSTRUC-MANAGEMENT / CONSTRUC-TEST TION QUAL, QUALITY ADMINIS'- AUDITING ANALYSIS ING & & SPEC. TION "--FIELD TION ENCI-SECTION SECTION iSECTION TRATION SECTION FUEL HCHT PROJECT 1 ~SECTION CONSTRUCTION NEERINC SECTION SECTION $EC} ION SECTIQN SECTION ADMINIS- . CIVIL / OPERA-i 'ESIGN COtTTROLS J -TRATION & -STRUCTURAL TIONAL riON-DE-

'9

-PROGRAM LICENS-COST -CNCINEER-AREA SUPER-ELECTRICAI SCHEDULINC JNIT -QUALITY ~STRUCTIVE

3EVELOP,

- ING & -ADMINIS-lINC UNIT -INTENDENT & -I&C/ CIVIL CONTROL EXAMINA-PERMITS TRATION COORDINATION STRUCTURAI. %CHANICAL PROGRAM UNIT IION LICENS-UNIT CONTRACTS [ REST -& RECORDS -ING NUCLEAR * .ADMINIS- _, INDUSTRIAL _HECHAN. ELECTRICAL COOR- _IRATION/ PIPING / lWTT IURNOVER ADMINIS-SUP PORT -FUEL OPERA-TRATION RE' ATIONS MCMT. TIONAL UNIT e -AND I&C HECHANICAL ~DINATION AUDIT COORD./ FUTD W REVIEW WAREHOUS-CAI TEST -/PIPINC UNIT NRC ACTIVITIES -! ION _SPECIAL UN(T. j _,ING _. 1-DESIGN JNIT GENERA-PROJECTS TEAM... 4 TURNOVER l SYSTEM PROCUREMENT STUDY PROCE-HANGER / ELECTRICAL ENGINEER-UNIT lUALITY ' QUALITY rFAM -DURES FIELD .INC UNIT PIPING ,/I&C UNIT i UNIT i _3PECIAL SERVICES QUALITY PROJECTS kECORDS 3PERA- -RECORDS -MCMt. TIONAL

• ' UNIT lUNIT

]UALITY SYSTDiS ' PROGRAM @I/QAD] CONFICURATION ]EVEL. I& SPECIALTY UNIT hies / PSI l PNCINEERING ' FEI/QC l l 1 I I I i RADIATION TECHNICAL OPERATIONS MAINTENANCE NUCLEAR CONSTRUCTION DATA FACILITIES l PERSONNEL] NUCLEAR PROTECTION SECTION_ SECTI9t{, SECTION SERVICES BUYING SYSTEMS & SERVICES PROJECT _S ECI.10!!_ SECTION SECTIQ L SECTION TRAINING ) SECTION ADMINIS-EQUIPMENT REPR06UCTION TRATIVE ~~ SERVICES ._BUYINC__ . UNIT Q UNIT _ INFORMATION [ CQNTROL.UNLTJ SECURITY

• LOCATED AT HOME UNIT

~ iOFFICE, SERVICES l g* OFFICE l TRAINING

105,

/kf IUNIT "g RECORDS CONIRO (i j NIT

t i' (ENCLOSURE 1) 10-22-82 CONSTRUCTION QUALITY SECTION CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ALOITINC Ceneral Supervisor Supe rvisor E. Riley H. A. Brown Secretary D. Muzik Secretary ' P. Rainey; i i i 1 CIVIL / STRUCTURAL PROGRAM & RECORDS MECHANICAL /PIPINC ELECTRICAL /I&C Unit _ Supervisor Unit Supervisor Unit Supervisor Unit Stipervisor Audit Coordinator D. Kritzer J. J. Connelly E. F. Parker J. S. Kerr M. A. Brown Clerk / Typist _ Clerk / Typists Clerk / Typist _ Clerk / Typist Lead Auditors B. Lucrezi D. McCandless. L. Cunningham F. Louden C. Nichols R. Hollenbeck E. Condo I -l T. Solomon N J. Holmes Lead Insp. Lead QE MECHANICAL PIPING Lead QE -B. E. Thompson S. P. Tulk Lead QE Lead QE - J. Furness J. A. Musser M. J. Brisan R. A. Sheer - R. B. Matthys R. E. Chenoweth J. E. Bowser R. A. Fobell R. J. Czyzewski C. J. Fennell K. J. Cimorelli J. J. Johansen L. Morin S. L. Dellaverson P. C. Davies D. P. Callagher P. C. Barrios M. R. Palmer J. S. Cilstrap W. J. Clemens J. L. Lesnick R. W. McCoy J. F. Spence R. O. Ledbetter C. E. Everett J. R. Novak a J. R. Parce11 J. R. Winkler T. B. Metcalf L. J. Erbacker R. B. Peters J. E. Orick D. E. Siedlarczyk " '7m i D. Lacey M. T. Spencer A. Akbar R. C. Birchell C. A. Osborne J. M. Carey I Lead QE - E. A. Shambaugh R. E. Reifsnyder HANGERS R. C. Cannon Lead Insp. Lead Insp. Lead Insp. M. A. Culiano - J. Crawford C. M. Daderko P. Cavarnos G. Thomas R. R. Antonucci ~ C. E. Cayton C. R. Bailey R. A. Spencer R. A. Varner C. F. Hubbuch T. L. Chaney S. M. Clemens J. L. Coese J. E. Hughes W. R. Crosby W. C. Morris C. J. Dille K. L. Mackey T. B. Franchuk Seismic Lead Inspector M. C. Franchuk J. W. Messenger C. J. Miller F. R. Manno ]3 Construction Quality Section and \\ Construction Quality Auditing y Sheet No. 230 DW35/V/1.d1 ) g s*

(ENCLOSURE 1) i o 'i[- ....:,. : r... '. - r- ., -., E. I..'... !,. l'. f '. ' !. ! t, l'. t I h e t t E. '. h ' Lt.i t:...

i. d

. 6 J P.O. BOX 97 a P ERRY, OHIO 44081 a TEL EPHON E (216) 259-3737 5 ADDRESS-10 CENTER RO AD 'F Serving The Best location in the Nation PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT u April 18, 1983 PY-S/ CON 6084 QA i Johnson Controls, Inc. 10 Center Road Perry, Ohio 44081 Attention: Mr. Steve Young RE: Storage Maintenance of Site Supplied Small Bore Valves

Dear Steve:

Per discussion with Site Organization Engineering and Perry Plant Department Maintenance, Johnson Controls Inc. is not responsible for, m_aintenance of Safety Related valves that are supplied by Site Organization. Thank You, R. B. Matthys REM / pod cc: R. Bowman SB201 l J. Carey A. Bolesic W140 D. Lockwood W260 B. Christenson JCI 300.204.2 303.090.2.1

D E, @ LF, D W 2 *

~ n APR Ifl1983 JOHNSON CONTROLS \\> .~7d'.,-~-.[ --.-e '*-m-7-- e g. -,,.., _ - ~ -

F~ 065 toZ. r Nw ~ (ENCLOSURE 1) .mr3510N 6 Pags 1 of 19 4 L,7 t,4 ]~~ i ,i

~e RECEIVING INSPECTION

?' [.' l.f 1.0 PIRPOSE ~ J-7b establish a controlled system'to assure that the receiving of items and traterials is accomplished and docunented in accordance with applicable quality ~ standards. ^ 1 A.'. 5 .3 '.0L S00PE 2 i,d i. .~ , 4 ,.2.1 1his procedure describes methods for receiving inspection of safety-- !j .. '.. related itens and Iraterials to be used at the Perry Nuclear Station. .ii u e j .:y )'30' REFERENCES J$ J.& ' 3.1 < SECD OA Panual

)

Sd '?- ' ' 3.2 J ANSI N45.2 l! ~ .i 3.3 SP-90 3.4 OAS-1402-PNPP, ~ 3.5 QAS-1601-PNPP 3.6 TE-709 3.7 ANSI Nr.5.2.2 ? 3.8 OAS-1301-PNPP I e', t 3.9 0AS-803-PNPP 3.10 QAS-501-PNPP a i.! >s I 4.0 GE!ERAL p l0 4.1 Definitions / Abbreviations 4.1.1 Chmer - Utility and/or agent (s) building a Nuclear Power Plant; ~ in this case, Cleveland Electric Illuminating / Gilbert Associates, Inc. j,- 0

- 4 (ENCL.0SURE 1)- 70R REFERENCE ONLY PUROIASE ORDER DEFICIENCY LIST 49 sO 4 BURO!ASE ORDER No. [oW9 / 94 5- /L o/ i D DEFICIENCY sureavhog DATE DATE l VERIFIED DESCRIPTION DISPOSITION RESPONSIBLE ~ REQUIRED' CLOSED BY . D N vme%Cles t-l \\ us n.y oOA M t. h . kiskd in A ve570 (kca. )webe o ti + Int of frocor % e. f l , l' e na c.wn's l l @ wlwakm~wwe vgas d h N fvtl-45* Pk j l l t i i I i I l h M'd7 8%f w wkops.C M a,np~w,wasn. ~aua fus A MU'ef k pwked - g l s 3 @). St< tt-be Go9 C kLes ucap.~ 5 j tk rl M %+ <<ga.ws of s = /M M 23- (rt'N e/, r# 7foO $A 36 l I

l! ..II .i: i e 0 e ' l l!. I !i i l h I Ii 1Il : D E I FY I IB N R O E V EC D B EE TS 1 -e R AO E DL F C .. E R 9 R . D E O ER F TI AU DQ E R i i EL B gI oS iN s vO rP T_ eS S rE uR I s L e Y CNE I C I F NO E I . D T I R S R O D P R S O I D ESA O RU P m. '.,a ~~ O u G f h n-l m YN e h CO C a NI (p EP mA IP CI o IR r FC N ES es DE c R D (a o B Mm uu d b. E o S n A O .hw t! i l. m yr~ R J

imber gg mi, g wi i ~., - m _~. s .i ASMEi: YES V NO FOR ""N11drS,1-,.*. c o"m. ODNCERN IULUIREMENT REFERENCE ACC REJ N/A I O Purchase Order i A. Was the vendor active (for SECD QA Manual Sec. 5 %d 'dW h i the applicable service) on para 4.2. the A.V.L. Bef: Ilistoric A..V.L W fd 4-o'>tt 'B. If Code Material, 'is the Spec. 90.4549.00 correct Edition and Addenda para 5.06 42

• of the Code referenced.

C. Is the material' called out SECD QA Manual e properly to identify the Section 5 [ l material sufficiently. D. If Code material, is the ASME Section III W material permitted for use by NX-2121 4 tS"' 1 the applicable Subsection of i the Code. i f E. lias the PO been signed by an SECD QA Manual HW Section 5 authorized party. a F. Ilas the PO been signed and SECD QA Manual dated by the QA Mgr. to Section 5 9.z u r-indicate his approval. (Ccrnpare dates signed) G. Does the PO require -that SECD QA Manual PM appropriate quality assurance Section 5 para 3 lc gg.sv requirements are incorporated in subtier procurennnt docu-nunts. F Are the provisions of 10CFR21 SECD' QA Manual'. i. gp imposed by the purchase order, Section 5 para 3.ld I. Are the provisions of source ~SECD QA Manual h testing, inspection and/or Section 5 para 3.2a M2rt-audit stipulated. - i J. Are all documents and/or SECD QA Manual y "'1 Certificated required to be Section 5 para 3.2a furnished identified on the PO.

PURCl!ASE ORDER FINAT) REVIB1 l 'i 30 Ninnber-l ASbEi 'YES NO lit.3 PESC[E3,P Oi? O Sfl' ?.[ ' 00btEN'IS"'\\' h' b &NCERN REOUIREMENI' REFERENCE ACC REJ N/A <;ce. c N,o w (T< e I K. If AShE naterial, dces the ASME Section III mrtification required on the NA 3764.4 and NA3700 (OA 4#" PO sufficient to conply with program requirements) ASME requirements.(See Note 1) { . luceiving Inspect Report (RIR) A. Are all quantities ordered by Purchase Order the PO reflected on a RIR as 9 20

• accepted.

B. Is the RIR stamped with the OAS-802 para 5.3.2.4b I words " Nuclear Safety Related'.' C. Is the RIR filled out properly.QAS-802-see " Instructions for Completing RIR When ,g Receiving Vendor Suppliec t Material" D. If the material was rejected, OAS-802 para 5.3.2.5.2 g p<-

,[ g my egM was a NR.in.ttiated, processed gj.g, and closed in accordance with QAS-1602.

E. If material was on hold, was OAS-802 para 5.3.2.6 l the reason explain'ed under Mi* renarks column of the RIR and a hold tag issued. i, F. Was the Receiving Inspector 0AS-201 para 5.3.11; Opv E dc/<'cW l*' I ~ indoctrinated to the current GA Manual Section 2 9,2% revision of CAS-802, OAS-902, para 2.2.3 and 0AS-1601 (if NR is prbces-sed) that was in effect at the l time of receival. J..roctanentation I A. Vendor's 63rtificate of Corpliance/Conformance. 'I 1 Is the Cof C in compliance Purchase Order .s r., with all the requirarents of the Purchase Order. liS * '% III cec,dehc6v( 2 If Code material, does the ASME Section,nnn nn vinn ene,n e.,,r e,

i '- ASMS:, Y<L8!s R@ I" l 30 Nunher i CONCERN REQUIREMENT REFERENCE ACC REJ N/A COMMLWIS IL. Documentation (continued) C. Manufacturers' Certified Material Test Report (cont'd)' (({;g g}

3. Is the identification of General the material manufacturers choan.

4. If Code Material, is the ASME Section III i

QSC nuaber and expiration NA 3767.6 date shoan on the 04TR (if 1 not a OSC holder, QAprogram ,I revision and/or date) l

OTE: A Material Manufacturers' Certj ficate of Compliance may be provj ded in lieu o.f a 04TR for material 3/4" noninal pipe size and less (pipe, fitti ngs, flanges, materials for valves and "mbes e < cept heat exchanger tubes): and for bolting material 1" ncmina: diameter and less (Bef: ASME IIJ NA 3767.4b) A Paterial Manufacturers' Certificate of Canpliance is also alloaed j or material used for component si pports that a :e not one of the following: Class 1 plate and shell supports, Clast.1 liner supports and material fc r supports wh. ire impact testing is required.

(Bef: NF 2130) 9 0 i 'e t 9 e - m. u

e ~ T H E C ' E V E L A f; D E L E C T k l C i t ! U U !!. u ii: C C b !! ' ' ' '. o so -.

c., m o c -..,, m. o a...... ~. -, -. m.c -

Tr e v.,t a v ~. u r o-pwynR Davxison s ca sw.e t rei. e r.u s au..%a c ca.vavu aos February 18, 1982 Mr. Jamee C. Keppler Regional Adseinistrator Nuclear Regtiatery Commission Region 111 799 Roessvelt Pued Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 De:r Mr. Keppler: 1 On February 10, 1982, a mootlog wasl heli et the analeer negolatory assional Boein-quarters le clee Ellyn, litisets, to diemuse:the tiediese free resent inspectione of work betes performed-by the W. Eicsestesh Carperstles et the perry p1_est constructies site. a During this meetles.- sonneses some empenesed regardist sereste.maneggeset espects., icvolvies the implementaties' of the. Asessesse Pospes e4 Slessy.E Based 'em our discuestees of-these eneseems,De Il M. hee Gattisted the followles estieans. g 1.

N

.m 1. An eve 7 'ge[ 3 ' { o ,f any, which seed tossessed. ' swedes ~ ~ t to these meetbly easteenisse'et teless ? made. This eveneettee'of' ell ^ l by March 1,1982. - t v i _, m s. rp n?- 7, J; x + "n ,C J '.:, s Upon completten et 'esek seriewskyL ~ Sksw.C:Leuelesties " 9-ts will be reviewed. $se say ty lof'gestity. Assurance and by the,a.a.y a=a* ~4eensesAs essetetee'. - This ' overview will be _eengleted;by M1

1. J r P m f.. ' "yl#

y yv yglRg 2. Based on the eveleetles'efisefety=seteted esp y7 ~ 4 and while the messessent earleslte'endeceny,t 1~ s EdgIslaagdand 1 tho' comer.ct.re where areas i -at-a= m test seen da ac The ochedule dates. forfeesplet af~theJoseys to es e W 84 te?sespleted by Marsh 31. 1983. Asy!adettises or chsesse to these egen esfeeisett ~ ' of the edxN_ management reviews will te refloseed inj progrene for each centreeter by April 30, 1998. ' T v 10 6 D 'o M - R* *

• BE

1, - - +e ,.. g n ; w a,,,,, m s 4 m i 1 i. t - t ?. [, o p ly.; c n y3rw of the nyn_ ion:95rg.,nge y t. $t.ted < r. Trbtvarf 15 Nu nc on f o rma tu r Tr f>3 rl ~ D;r r., O This revatw wall f o< u a on the use of the t% fic: Queatson farr, the fsold Wrsance Aut horizat ton. Audtt Action kequi s t and f o r t r e. t a v e A< t ion Rrqu es t. Tbc objective of this review ts to assure that threr dm unr.ita have ( t rar dria nitions is to purpote, t h.t t Site pe r m an ne l understand the purpone and the sorrect use o f e a c h d oc umen t, that each ha. l

b. c n used correctly in the past and is being dispositioned in a correct and tavly r.a nn e r. Thim review will be turnplet ed and any requi red correct is e a t ion dm ument ed tey Marc h 31, 1982.

I The Site Tek Fo rc e recent ly chartered to analyze docueentation and records l l as soc ia ted with equipment installed by L. K. Comstock will coorplete its review to a point sufficient to identify needed changes in this area by March 1, 1982. L'= i ng the knowledge gained in this effort, agilarrevirvt_.WillhLunder-taken f or all other safety-related contractors in the order of priority dricresined by the Quality Assurance Manager i. At the present time, 78, m te_sp_have been turned over from the contractor to the Nuclear Test Section for testing. The status of those systems which asfety-relat d, or partially safety related, will be re-evaluated to are neaure that required Nonconformance Reports are readily available, that needed documentation is present and retrievalle, and that any work remainir.g to be donc is identified. This evaluation will be coupleted by March 31, 1962. further step in our management review, the Quality Assurance Advisory Corarittee in a ibach provides an independent overview of quality activities at Ferry, will revE', be ren.ults of the activities listed above. They will, based on this review, ic^U4mInc if tE re is a need to improve our existing program or the menner in 9hich ~ har program is being implemented. Their assessment will be completed May 1. 1982. f you have any qucation*, plemac call sie. Sincerely, 4/ Dalwy Davidson Vice President System Engineering and Cot struction mD/11p

~,-;. -;, - >; + ; m =? '.. ~~m, ,_ m :; sf-L o, e ? Pi..I.-{.ts-o'p ri, ,t y ! ? s f'. ; 4 .t w t 4s q;,w e a_ s t s % f 6, 182 1.CLU TJ OM g g ) Cw < < , '($b R O._. y Mr Jec s G. Zeppler i R eg ic.nal Admi ni st r a t or, Region III f;urlaar Ht gul at ory Comi ssion l'19 Roosevel t Hoad Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 D. a r Mr. Keppler: On February 18, 1982, I sent a letter to the Nuclear Regulatory Comission, Region 111, identifying actions The Cleveland Electric lliuminating Company had initiated as a r e a.u l t of discussions held on February 10, 1982, at the NRC Headquarters in (.len hil yn, Illinois. These actions have been completed and evaluated by a special sube m ait t ce of the Quality Assurance Advisory Cornit t ec and our ranagement. The f olla sing act ions were taken: 1. An ( valuation of the quality perforr.ance of each safety-related contractos ha s b( e n c onpl e t ed. TL-se evaluations showed that all safety related contractors have adequate Quality Assurance programs. Areas for improvement have been identified and are being pursued. There has been no loss of control over contractor per for mance or over related activities of the Project Organization. 2. A progran has been established for each safety related contractor as well the Project Organization in areas that were identified as needing as inprovement. This act ion will further improve the program and reinforce the training empha iting the roles and responsibilities of the Project and contractor organarations. 3. A r eview of the nonconformance system has been completed. This included review of the adequacy and use of Nonconformance Reports, Field a Questions, Field Variance Authorizations, Audit Action Requests, and corrective Action Requests. Contractor and Project personnel interviews were conducted to determine the level of understanding of the purpose and correct use of each doeurent This assessment confirmed that the nonconformance system identifies and corrects nonconforming items. No evidence of any attempt to avoid une of this sy st em wa s identified. Tbc evaluation resulted in the initiation yt evement s bot h in the program and training. IOR I 2 1582 8206130249 G20610 PD9 ADOCR 05000 440 4 son

l 1I k a 6 i i tI e ' e r, t i f ;

• 1: 1

' + It a 1. 1-s. ' 'I I-

t are !riDi IPf l * ' '- n t e d 'f b E E~t*

e .i t i > n. !! +

' a

t l a l l y safety rela:e?

3. y (t4 ca atu-of saft t,- r el at rJ a r,.

b. n 1. t n e d ov e t from the contractor to the Sutirat Trst f

• t t ivn i...

1.

• t e s. t i n g 1 -. s been evaluated.

were reviewed, the safety Ai1 ju. isdic t 'oril t r ansfers of (quiprent wa= reaffirred, rec ord s.and dm ment it ion c l a s si f ic at ion of epipment wcic also ri viewed to be sure they were satisfactory. Discrepancies or work rcraininF to be done were checked against the Master Defit i.ncy its address and correction.

1. i s t to ase.ure Ih t.. val iat ion resulted in irproverents in the definition and s t at us 01

5. y <, t e m s turned over for te.t.

Actions have also t,e e n initiated to clarify -ind sirplify the turnover process. concerns were expressed by the NRC telating to the i r,-

p. st -in a cc t ion meet ings,

in the elect rical disc ipline. These conserns At e at ion of t he quality program In addit ion, the

1.-

n n dm m wnt ed, evaluat ed, and appropriately addressed. Organisation has taken actions including the formation of the Construction have bri of L. K. Constock. The i' r o j e c tGr oup which is now completing an in-depth audit coupled with actions previously identified, will serve as Andat ic ults of this audit, ite 't a s i s for sontinued improvement of the L. K. Constock program, i t.e attions taken since the meeting on February 10, 1982, in Glen Ellyn, to react c onc er ns expr e ssed, demons t rate cornnit ment on the part of ranay. wnt at all 'o the and viable Quality Assurance Program. le vels to an atti e . v.. ! n. i t i o n i, odicate a progr am that is effective, but (onplex in s ur-e areae. Pr ogr.m and pl..nned f ocus on sicpli f ying the Qualit y Assur anc e 1.atly tih nt if ying the roles and accountalcility of responsible organizations

• r0..

-nts i individonis. this tveiluation IL. , st r at ed c apabslity of ti e Project Organization to perform t i ng day-t v -day r e spo"s i' lifies is evihni c of a high level of rtr ; e t. nc e "tir !ation.

• t ur i t y within the Pro j e(

~

g.a w- .. ~ . u ; y >ic._ < g. 4 :*.n - ';, - + . n. ~T '.5- ^ - ' r,:l' "~ - y w v --M" - "J'~'-~-~"'"" w .w ; . n..,- ~ ? ^ "~ >4. -cj; ^ - e, n f 1, ..e s ..n. Lu 66 + ^ <

• s

- +- M - 14, -- ,e-- 4 5.. -.;, .o 3 d *4 ' g s.

. A :2:am.fiM Eba.hs :

N. +u as i- -*- 4 4 .'i -,, 4 : lin ti, ati - e ~ s s .r., p1,ase all :- ( 5:n,ri y, / 'Y ,, t r' Nrt h Palw R. Davidson Vit e P r e s i di-n t Sy s t m Enginee r ing a r d curis t r uc t ic,n I + r., 1 1 >I t t c Mr. M. L. Cildner N4C Site Offire har.rtor of f i< c of Inspec t ion and Enforce ment l' S. Nuclear Ecgulatory Comiss ion va Jionton, D. C. 20555 'h,< l e a r R. i < l at o r y Comi s e, ion U. , lo M 4a. nt M.i n a g er.c n t Brz.nch wa.a. i ng t on, D. C. 20555 i e ne

,3 ; 4. .. g r. - pd ,. ( h .w ( g, 3. g. ; f t ..w .t

• v,,..

., a

1..._.

. ',..... gf _c m,..M.t c.- s ,,.; _ g. .a,.. suf7. 7,j y g ..a Y? !.'. c ---...m ., re. -n4 r, vo n s e r- .i.':. g '.s l . t. N. .j. m.,. x., s t o.. n p ex.; mag (}0. E..

it e =

L cm.m x ro-:i<~

.r.

.is: -: m e. . -. e...c c- ~ M' ...,1 ? C2. c:cn .t : y<se ..,:e . e c. "r. m'.- w 0 op; le r .m1 ' Sints:cator. asion III - y 3 f : sp.3::t:n a-d E-forcc e.t .c. Fe3. r:

c. -:

-is* ion .>;t 3y3 r .2 ..3 s .m RE: Terry 'It.cicar ?c er Plant 3cche: Nes. M-G0; 50 ' 41 4 .tesponse to I.E. Report - a: '*r.

• 07;1c c:

~.e: cc ;s :v a c.. :.c'.41 ;a t a v. i;: f Insp ec:'.: : Varec: ':u-ber 50- O/ ':-u!'i'. '.? a :n-hed to ye r letter da ted Sep:ctier 2 7, 1952. Pils 'I i:..f t es ste ts extriaad by es srs. C . Eraund, h* R. Naldo, C. H.

0;.::

le i l.nd C. C. :11114 5 cf four staff during :'.eir investigation conducted c: wr 27, 1981, :Stot.f. " arch 10 1 52.

• i? n: A :c :.is '.+::tr ;s our as;onse to :he six (t) Severity I.evel IV 2nd :%

4 (3) S r.erity *.s. si V Vic'.ati.:ns described in the Notice of Violatien. X, r e s.3 c.s e i s ir. s e c o r d s a ce vi t'.i :he previel:ns of Section 2.201 of t'he

-'s "rulis of se: ice," Part 2. Title 10. Oc de of Tcdorst Peaulations.

In . 11: n.. :. : :.i c':. e : : 3 'ntia tes inf e r: At ion in resp:.se to the t'cresolved s :* t ere iden: t fied 11 this report. 'est: ate to call. If :' t re are ad d L: te.si uestions, please do no: S Sincerely J xd .veedL c talvyn R. Oavidson Vice President Sys t ar: Engineering and Construction ~ ^'s 1 1 1 1 l l =. q l l IQO2040366 030129

( (- ATTACHMENT A I RESPONSE TO ENTORCEMENT ITEM Below is our response to the Notice of Violation appended to United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission I.E. Report 50-440/81-19; 50-441/81-19. I. Noncoepitance 440/81-19-16; 441/81-19-16 A. Severity level IV Violation 10CFR50. Appendix 5,- Criterion III, states in part, "The design control measures shall provide for verifying or checking the adequacy of design, such.a6 by 'the perfossance of design reviews... performed by individuals or groups other theat those who performed the original design..."- CEI Corporate.Qulity Assuranse Progra:n Section 0300 states in pect, "CEI perfor s a destge'seordiastion_ function consisting of selected reviews and design cesarc1 mealtering'pr.egras...These procedures ~ shall assure that...Destga at;tivities are eenducted in a planned and sysr.amatic nannet... Perry Safety?Amalyste gepert requirements have been app rop r is sely ' addesseed; La desige ' doeuamat s... Des Lga requ t rement s l can be controlled.ani-lasp*cted and/or tested to specified accertance j criteria.".

y..

z c f CEl-Specification Electrical IastSDattees, requires compliance 1 E vith the 'AUS D1.~1 Codes. - 4 . ;o m, Contrary to tho'abovei Gilbert Assestatesitha Arabitect Engineer) fatled'to'adequetety review Gould Inc. StartageLg-35-51-958 E231 and E233, in:tha the;revtow-falleditofdeteratae,that the "plus veld" l epecified:to wold 7/14" diameter hetes ;te;the emisshoest did not i i meet the AWS K.1 Code eequ eesats'.i1hte-resulted.ta melh being j nade which did not meet ' the specified'eede requirements. 4 j B.

Response

tij Action Request 8457 was,writtes _ to'decument this esseera. This action request.hes been etened'est and verified. Subsequently the (S equipment was walded deva using fittet unide. et the frame, and the ] original " plug" welds were =ba=d==ad ta piece.. The'destga engineet and switchgear vender have approved the revised design. A temorandu-vas issued by Gilbert -Associates to all petry Project l electcLeal a.d struc: ural depart ents reiterating the correct pro-cedure for coating and re.-tew of vender desvings. This 1:.- ;. cens Me rd te ?e resolved. I t f 1 i

( ( k II. Eonconpliance 440/82-10-01; 441/82-19-0' i A. Severity level IV Violation 10CFR50, Appendix B, Critecton V, states in part, " Activities l affecting (;ality shall be prescribed by documented instructions. [l procedures, and drawings of a type appropriate to the circunstances... t ar.d shall be acceeplished in accordance with these instructions. procedures..," l 1 4 4 Gilbert Associates, Incorporated, Drawing Dv215-001, Revision J. Criterien 13, states in part, "The total ol' all bends between fi pulling points in any run of conduit shall not exceed 270*; b suf fletent pull boxes are shown on drawings to meet this critetta." f Further, CEI letter PY-50/33-5357, to L. K. Constock, dated January 20, 1981, instructs Coesteck to use the pull boxes as b pulling points. N E Contrary to the above, the instructions vara not incorporated d into the procedure and on Nove:bar 16, 1981, the inspectors observed cable being pulled through a conduit with bends totalir.3 jll nore than 270' (by at least 160') without using the installed pull boxes as pulling points. 7 5. Paragraph 3.2.24 of L. K. Cocutock Procedure No. 4.3.3 states in i part, " Care shall be exercised in supporting coils to prevent kinking or exceeding the minteun bend training radius..." } Contrary to the above, LKC Cable Pulling Procedure 4.3.3 was not appropriate to the circunstances in that it did not prescribe alternate cethods to store partially pulled cables to preclude violating the established minicun bending radii. As a result, j the inspectors observed cables identified as 1M32R85,1K32R93, and 11432R113 coiled, and suspended oy a single tie wrap in such y a canner that the band radit of the inner turns of subject cables were less than the minimun bend radii established by the manufacturer. l Pa ragraph 5.2.6 of the L. K. Coustock Procedure No. 4.11.1, e. Nonennfor.ance Items and Corrective Action, states in part, "Initfated NRs may be voided by the QA F.anager or his designac..." Contetry :o the above. '. K. Constock Nonconformance Reports No. 531 and No. 154. (da:ed February 25. 1981, and Nove=ber 21, I MO. ren ectivelyi were ecidad by QC inspectors who were not a wetred :: do se. 'w-. . ' :- s : c ek : :.: a te 'h.a' L y Assurance *:anual requires

• + tet: *

':L-s 9 : a ?; 'a ye r' nd 1 OC Supervisor. ' ' :rs:

e e a.

fr.-- A;ril l'i' antil February 1 1952 e

.:. c he rest:i.n :f :;/2C Supervisor.45

-a -,g: n,,,c:;,s.:,

, c,.

' ~~ : c 's 7: r .6

The canufacturer of ' cable tray hardware caterials, in their e. letter dated December 20, 1978, specified a maximum allevable torque of 45 f t. Ibs. to tighten 3/8"-16 3/4" rib neck carriage bol:s supplied for the cable tray splice joints. Contrary to t.he above, L. K. Constock's applicable cable and conduit installation procedures vers. not appropriate to the circumstancas in that this torque requirement was not incor- ~ potated, Additionally, fur 2her ins >ectiocadaa*1=> ehare verL 'no records to Indicate that thi_s requirement-vss ret for ant, cable : cay ins:stles prior t_of _}is inspection (examples of i=pecperly cocqued bolts age discussed in paragraph 3.C below). Responsh, - B. a -y a. L. K. Coss:ock procedura.4.3.3 hasibeen revised to incorporate i the Engineering request 3et use; bf) pull poicts. ;The cable concern was documen:ed 'on Noncenforsance Report LKC 'd10 and the ' O cable was deter::ined act to be War :ensioned.- T l i[ The 270* conduit criteria:is act directly related to cable pulling, but -is ratherJa,cetteria for conduit. Laa:alla:Lon..eTo. ensure - the. cable 4 ins :allation) is Lsatisfaatory; cthle. pulling 1 tensions are continucusly sonitstad_-during the cable pull. The - q criterta- (as definedfon' draving1215-001,- Xev'.iJ);were~ met for j

he conduit. installation.

~ y g ~ q 'Craf t and inspector' training-;has been perfetmed to the revned a procedure, j This itan is considered-to be - resolv)d. 1 da b. L. K. Cces:cet procedure 4.3,3.;peragraph 3.2.25 has been, a revised to requite two~ points t to. susp%; cetted 'cablis6 and on' i S Januar/ 3.1982..to_ change'" training *!to " bending!'. - Tha : cables j observed and all. other Class :1f. cables ~ utilise' sumpeaston s cathoda,in accordsace with' the rewtsed pycedure. The Project -j utganiza:Lon nas" Wu ap..ntly verts;4 w a g @ ling'eables is l l namefacturers that the utt11:stion of training radius for cei j acceptabis. ji Training of Quality Con:ro1 ~and craf t personnel has been >:on-ducted a.d docunented. Additionally, Engineerin5 (SCE5) has added personnel to provide e.phasis on procedure review. l This 1:a-is cons ide ceL :n-he-emi.- A :;e. teques: t-H.as ;enart:td f Cens: rue: ion Qualt:y f Ing ?.ecting and Vs s;nce been cer* fied and closed out. The '.. K. 2.s:ack :na'.'.:- ~c.:::. "t.yer has s;gned. reviewed, and er;'Les :he previcus ; preper;7

c. ided Sen.:enf orstnce repor:5.

U/;; h ally. L. E. ".: ? : ?ck r t::e d are.'.1;.1 ".de been revis ed '. 2 - 'e --;i. : n : _. - > e-:..

( Trainin5 to revised procedure has been conducted and documented. The ites is considered to be resolved. d. Corrective action for this condition was reviewed by the inspector l as discussed on Page 65 of this I.E. Report and no additional response is required. e. The lack of torquing require:ents was initiated by Nonconformance Report 0;C 2344 da:ed 9-11-31 and.:n DAR 068 as a potential signifLcant deficiency. The usa of electric 1: pact vrenches was discontinued and calibrated =anual torque vrenches subs tituted. LKC Procedure 4.3.1 has ~ been revised to incorporate torquing criteria of 35115 f t. Ibs. These criteria were developed in conjunction with our corrective action relative to the Final 10C7R50.55(e) Report (RDC 37(81)) dated January 15, 1982. This ite: is considered to ba resolved. III. Nonco :pitance 41-3/31-19-23::!.*1/S1-19-23 A. Severity level V Ytolation 10CFR50, Ap;endix 3. Criterion VI, 'sta:es in part, "Massares shall ts established 'to contro11the tissuance of docuzents, such as... drawings, including changes thereto. which prescribe all activities affeeting quality..." L. K. Co:ste:k Proce_ dure No. 4.2.1, Craving and Specification Document Control, sta:es,- in part, 'in Paragraph 3.5.4,." Returning void drawings, the recipient shall sign the Field Drewing Transmittal (For:s $2A - ioid Issue Returned Line) an?.sturf it with.the void druings to S the Docu:ent Control Coordinator,"- and in Paragraph 3.6, " Void drawings will be returned by recipients > #com-the field by the General Toreman within two (2) vorking days of the issuance date noted on the Field Drawing Transmittal Fors." Contrary to the above, L. K. Coastock Coe:pany failed to return the ~ voided ceptes of eix drawings (Cilbert Associates Inc., Nos. 4549-53-027; 454c.53-028; 4549-55-030; 4549-58-031; 4549-58-032; and l 1549-53-033). Revision 1 of each of t'.ese drawings was found at an '. K. Ce s:::k fore an's work area on :he 620' elevation of the Control Oce;1ex ins: cad of :he ecst recent 'evision (Revision 4). 2.evisun I was issued Ln 197 7 and Te etsi:n 4 was issued Ln 1981.

e n:nse

- ne.c4 :.;t:. n cf $.a ;rd:e re 2.~.e d : u: sli tur tsions of c'ie

a -i " w * : 'per') h d :* :~ e ! a M y L. 5:. Cc s:Ock Docueen:

- :n:.. ' t der. P.; s:a:us e d i: ' :e :.a: f leid ; e se.nel we re in N tep:-s previ, sly .et : v.,y. ---te: -s - 2

e cf-re ac:

s..-

=c

2 ;-

f( w yg %.- y, # e-gp 5, a,. -+ .4 .o n, L. K. Coastock has completc.t an inventory on all. vendor prints and 1 ^ all drawings.have been brought up to date. An Engineettos revie(of - ii the drawings in<licated that -the revistons did not affeet the-equipment j inseallatton, .,{ i3 Construction quality-Engineerin6lperfecsed Audit 1635 and addition.a1 il l stiNet11cnces'andfdetermined that chts is not a geekric problem. Q '3 This item is considered ;to be 'tasolved, t- .k e r +: 440/91-19 19F 441/81419-19.. <d A W.

• • oncompitance ~

.<' n .? ,a 4 -i.

n..

.7 ~ ] A. Severttt 1.evel 17 Vialalt48 m (,~, 4 l

~V

g

? ~. = , m:a, a } <~ .R i f. <?- w 9 7 's..... C ~10c11t30 AppetAts)shCetoestaCF84y' tasAslta1paet'. "llanes;tes-e 4-5e established for thth 'gengestief: sintestaler.M%@y } Ght49[thtiM10eb N Potts y.,~eseedliesh $$$a (( isette!! s V M 2 N d ~ of{the Aten}.Saj Q i "{ f 4 g e b e t @ 0 glie,! en reefee5 M M.g 4">

4t$'p% VM 7 ' Rd Wg(fdrtesd aa2.ste

-ttaceableytsha(dRnubetJos:64tiet! M / 7thyg & W D55 h;f f k f S !ff @l M f'

• W?v inet411stle k en

' ~

• j L

lTheCEleCedgeschj;$f & $&s? jgg l ~ MM6? J9ntagtaptnd X i 'y[WW8A9M,d 'implemenn k" $is l nateclis1C .~ ,. w p I 40 m MA;. * .asseabitog3 f = orc _defectisgif f?wdeggB2fWL y M* NMW MgwVm W v$ ibrWbaM%w;1&s9@y@ / 6@F m

Contegry;t.e:

m. i gw Corporeti. gesa y;"ngr ~@p@W:";

m e .om purchsee433fif fed DN ~ 3g%wMh 'could. hee W~, '.' TEy;pWpag(tow U?OWNiMN% storelt...w. netimes

ptecludefthejamiloff p[

,.fQ&Q WQlQ QQif%w:n&ggj&yegvfQgQp?*[QM \\ } ~n.xx ymma v.. ~ . m.. w n 9.; n.. .se: '. y.g g W.gg;g fy p, ggg{pgp,/ g:n tVg. Mypg.,p - Q p-g my I ' e L..K.cCo w teekigssitty %segge{a i ; e4 4-Opp n sit to e de64 g W%7vJPi .jCARJ $2 Muse quiridestd@respeedg4 : gef. g g e y e s i e s C 7 ~' n / traceabL1. thodelegMwith,tafthe % Coasteik) traceability. .h ' v cl M.t r w %r, %W 3.. 9-2 evatustad as a table. ~ - = ', - j ; y! d...,._ "* ' ' N ( s s .mc., g y* L. >g Jy c% ^ ,i L. K. Cons:eck, reergah 4ed u d rece.ftshredithett:vesshouse'i ol, - [~ t clearly segregand c:hm1 :-atettalt.< ' A Comitkudties1Quh11ty _ a

none.au.pn:.as ::nn%d o majjf. rsanstw.factt.aer and n?JMdi'gs xere (sn;ed rehQe ::; _ ::.e above-concern.1 4}

/ w ue u m o ue,ee :.- e ro c..,...s L

---

,-~-

_ _ __,wm_ ( ( V. Noncompitance 440/81-19-03; 441/81-19-03 A. Severity t.evel IV Viots.tton 10CFMO, Appendix B, Criterien X, s tates, in part, "A prograss for icapection of : activities affecting quality shall be estabitshed and eAccuted by.or foc the oqanization performing the activity to verify confornance with the decirtented instructions, procedures, and dra* ings ~ for.accerplishing the acttvity " s.- CEI Cor; crate.Nuc1 car Quality;Assuranca Program. Section 1000 Paragraph I.11 states Jin part.fA' proEraa for inspection shast be j ustablisS.ed by. CET to ensure' that ill safety-related componen:s..i ) i affecting ihedelitensi. cat the required quality' standards."- 3 j 3 v Contrary to the-above:. 0s 4 A ~ 4 i . 1). ;The elbrINeallcosteaccocifallM Sto.tespect the 'inalde j . diamaiaefef lthe ;cshtiineenikas sel noitlei and; the'ec5cce te 1 -:C I Jshid1d xall> ;ctiefratioWto:ver'.fy that-can;:ehtitetty and/oc-i d i ;e n sion kist 61e canie's nreivi thin ~ the : l te t t* es tablished ; b'y' 9 T ^W.' 'M fth'e ainstad drar M N, % y[.l.."w a y ~ ~ .,'x ^ j7 _'s ; j ') i i ?- ON. , ; ;i.

2) :An N aspecti.on~ program.to?verifn W radequatr of insts11ation4 4

qofMlE%160ivcit/430 ivoltMtchgear? add.?th"a 380 voit totor A iconh o W enties3(ideludinsfl % 3so dnee% Masseisl'jsuch as,c M F y l ah't -ihMtoc4 sing hfMitsHfUhpiadyefding) vas not J ~ 3' 4 es'tiblishiedeud5theraf,dreinstf perfortek :, m. Q< b}}; 13 2 ,a e m; + sg c,. - =. phe # elic nical[ cont'raiteh. 4,.<sd Le M Ccw cockT Cable Pu111'ngi t x w ,s ~o ( .be - ?roceduias. Seition%b3 sti!OErniiGesfyerificaQ9ni hat' t raceyrys stif cleXnV.Wf rea'!!tc; dWs15csSadishochjed gpsyhich( j tight? causeJ. ca'olandange,agttagl cable 7 betal1at Loo.a 3 ~ a -- -. m _ _., il - N... 'W \\, *. ~, L$ ^ ~ ~ . ;.y y' ~ Con'e ra cyr t vi che i mb 0v e Echej nCithspe c cd rs 1 atni biccQinf tha(f611citirpcah1Rtrayss ' chservedisharp edges 4 - ' ' ~ c z Tray?31313'felevation[600.7 . ' Trey $,1303Celevicien 570.' ~ Tray 31324.Wlahiadida ~620k ~ . Tray A302), elevstibn-p20'; ] s s i Severt11 safety-rela:ed. cabins hai; Teen,tnstallads in ; cable trays. l 3132!. a d ?1303, 1 .. R. C: s:::k's Cable i! ay ) Ins:adzUeniInspecci n Checklist c. Toce.. "17, -;I:en 1.6. requires ve rificatten thit holcs are 'tinh~t l' cr. 911. 5 3 b: 5. en e h

( ( j Contrary to the above. the following cable trays contained itnproperly seated bolts:

1) Cable tray A1699 located at Colu n Line D-11 at elevation 599' in the Auxiliary Building.

Three out of eit e splice h bolts observed were not properly seated. This cable tray con:atns cables.

2) Cable tray 1E21H1A located at Column Line F-8 at elevation 579' in Roo:n No. 2 of the Auxiliary Building. heo out of eight splice bolts observed were not pc,operly seated.

3. .asponse a. 1) L. K. Co:ssteck Frocedure 4.3.10. has been-revised to clarify ,j i penetration installation inspection' criteria. Per tevised k*estinghouse installation instructions,.the: installation "q di ensions and tenerances documented on Field Questicas 12139, 12173 K 12230,s12249, and~12295 wer's evaluated and~ .f ~ deta ruinedl to' he ' acceptable (by Noclesc; Caestruetion' angi ! - 'j neeringf5ectioni(5Cag).QA4 plan was developed - to' address, the:. adequay of taspecties'.for' the Unit 11' penetrattees. Training ?q to the1 revised preamenwe has been'cocpleted.and-decumented.' 1 ~ l.., ~ 1 _7e A Penetratton inspectieefrecords have been tevieund;by the ~ Q Froject Organisaties; Engineering l Group.<ithe reasses:see ',m 2 j! Incempletc and tFefseettester?te,1mi he processfefjeeW iettag-j t . the reestds. ;Ttilsiitem will bel tesolved by'Deessbet 1SL1982. a D ':l~9 ~ .7 I~ Unit,2 penettaeions:are'being'installedito revised Procedure _Q 4.3.1a ; ~ g ~ 2) L. K. Coustock:Procedere 4.3.4Ehee beenJearteednae'analife 'W f k the equipment inetallation teameet aa'arieerie.f Ad41steme11F.t S g

1. wscams-nave casa-estantish.a4to;,getgy:

a teste11stian ' J inspections ~ ~of : r.heJ414041:/480 volt 7ewieshoest.tthe:;400'. 1 vol: motor centrol'centerei(MCC) and 480 vent mait'embAstions j (including the saquence:af assembly such as entantes. t'erguias - N of bolts, fitup andlve141ag). The status of [the coverificatten progrese related to in- ~ "^ process inspection are'as' follows: Svi:chgeat Installation - All ite as complete eseept for switch. gear veld rework verifiestion. ~ li 'Jn ;: Subs:ation Installation - All ite-s complete. except f fer ;:Ad center.vid rework verification. "0: r ::::calken:re Ins: 41is:*cr. - All " tees complete evalaa:bn and disp;pi:ar. ef 5:ot velds for shi s. eu j l

w (_. k {- 1-Any subsequent equipment installation will be perfoceed in accordance'with the revised procedure. This ites will be resolved by January 14. 1984.- g i 1 b. L. K. Co= stock Nonconformance Report 1070 was tenerated to document 'the specific. cable trays in question. Af_eer ceinanae-tion, these trays were evaluated to be acceptable. 1,. n. Cces:ock Procedure 4.3..$ was evaluated in order to determine ~ whe: hor or not proceduce revision was necessary. As part of the-evaluation. a :ceview ef Nanconforsance Repolts. wee done~ to ~ deteraIne if aey Class 1E cables had been previanely damaged-due p

o sharp edtee. Twenty-two ;(22):1,.' K..Cose_tock Nenconfermance'

. Reporto written in 1941' es esble and' wire were revLewed-and eene ) ~ were teleted; to sheep edgestotjborre'en cablef tray.- Thee, beoed 0 ( on :the feet that'ee: 'sLeeltreadLeem14 "so identified to this. L ~ [ area;-it was detessi

thet!e. procedure revision was est tequires.. j c

w t S This-itesisceasidere4IMbbesolved. ~

e. ~ Aniinspestieef pIsostenies' :donateped Lse 'revettfy ee' e -

e1s ~ [ s i Lhasis the' jef testellettenfet the belte.; the~~ time s ; [ hee besef 'tedJaet4the:ertstest38;(Coc 23u)*reetest. HTheR f' { diepeettiee]deesseets;35e!esioept& titty fef )the}{sistellettee., K 3, CQC.23M 1haei ese etteed., # ' fJ; A ~ j-t j .,, ?? x+ w 'L. a d! [ .leepecttone.ese postoseedfiefesseedence~ wit %ltortsed k,R.:Cometeak3i i Sj Precedure f.341. $ 4

• =. rm -.

+ , g:, i a <w . This.ite La eeeeidered telbe'tesolved. ~ ,1'- 2 ~ 4< 4 3 il ESPtaMamma M0/31.MS-N ~ j' VI. N g w w s A. Sevecity Level'IV Violattaa u f , J, ~ locrR50,s Ap>endte,s.) criteitos mig, statee, te poet. 'teesentes j. c, shall' be established to'eentret 2the headitag.? eteem tag,; - j cleaninemed>presesvantam=offesteetet"endi

to

..j with week and inspeettee teetreettone ~tel W :se:decerteretten; ,4 i .a CE1CenstruetLee'qualityasenesses:precedese'Sk21308se-a. Paratraph 1.2.3 states te past.:"Menitet basesheepteg:ee"e.- l continual basis while performing statage'and estatenesee topet-tions. Teruaed any deviatten seted-on an Asties Request; 4 s ' J o Project !4fety Supervisor." Con:rity :s : e abcve. :he ~ Inspectors.chse' tvd t ut the protec-

ve

e:4cs on :Fe Fe.c:or Core :sciati:*. Ce.. P.g and Residual

,anels nad fe:et;:tated and t'te s:orage %n: k - C. Ms:cs 2n: an? a;.: 47:e ins e:: ion had.-: ; &.:;*;ed this cendi:Lon priot :: de ':R:' i. spec: inn.

p. ( e a b, CEI Specification No. SP-33-:549. Procurecent Specification for Electrical Installations, paragraph no. 2:16.1, states in part, "The contractor shall keep the pre _ises clean at all times during the progress of :he work and shall recove dirt and rubbish as directed by the Site Organization..." Contrary to the above, on Dece:ber '. 1981, the inspectors observed potential fire hazards, consisting of large a:nounts of paper and other cocbus:ible eaterials, on the scaf folding in the Unt: I annulus at eleva: ion 6".9'. CEI was notified of this po:en:141 fire hazard on Dece bar '., '<81.,1.icensee personnel advised Region III the hazard would be renoved by December 7, 1981. On Dece:bar 10. 1981, Regice !It personnel reinspected this sa::e area and found 'a fire had occurred. Interviews, revealed : hat the licensee-did net inor when the fire started ot. when it was estinguished. There was no damage to-safety-related 2 equip -en: as a result of thef f tre. 3. Rosponse . Audit 61-vas perfor=edjy [the *.1:e see and two' (2) findings a. were issu c.gsr1rt'sefinson Contrais. Inc, (JCI)'. The panel ..discussei above.vas;addcessed in) one of the findings... Pamele, under JCI jurisdiction were ' ins;eited 'and naistenance documen- ~ tation reviewed. All deficiencies. vere corrected;by Jammety: 28, ~ g 1982. . 2 ? Project Ad.inistratten Procedure ?A? 32061has been re-reviewed j ? and de:er=ined ts ade uately address program requirements for - .j i huus d eeping. These areas wil19.e centic2ed to,be-:noottered per. j this pro:edure. This ites 19 considered to be resolved.. 1 S b. Action Request:3f? was issued agains: tlie Xocleet Constructies' Section (NCS). In response to the AR, 'the Reacter teilding j { composite crew was co..zitted to. checking and ~ cleaning the staa on a daily basis. ~ Project Adminiettettee Pseceduce PAP.0206 hee;been re-reviewed and dietetutaed te' adequately address prestan teguiremente fet ~ 1 housekeeping. Incr' eased surveillance and an' improved ehecklist have Sesa institu:ed by the Cens: cue: ton Quality' Secties. This (te-is ce s Mered :n te case

• red.

J i i __-._---,_,,.-.._,____n-___.,_ ,._.,,..,,.._uny ,._,_,,.,_n,.,,-. ,,,,..--._-.,._,._n

t ( '.' I I. Nonco pitance 440/81-19-11; 441/81-19-11 (Page 79) A. Severi:y Level V Violation 10CFR50 Appendix B, Criterion XV, states, in part, " Measures shall be established to control... parts, or cceponents which do not conform to requirements in order to prevent thetc inadvertent use or installation: These near.utes shall include, as appropriate, proce-dures for identification, documentation....and notification to affected orgsntzations. Nonconforming itets shall be reviewed and accep ted, t sj ected....in accordance with docu e,nted procedures." CEI Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program, Section 1500, Reviston 2. Paragraph 1.1, states in part, "Nonconformance Reports shall be used to identify eaterials, parts, cocponents, structures or systems which are not in compliance to the requirements of speciflcations, cedes, drawings, and detailed Lnstallation or manu-facturing program requitecants." L. K. Cces:ock Procedure No.,4.11.1, ';cnc:nfornance Itecs and ' Corrective Action, paragraph 5.5.1, s:ates in part, "...Monconf o rming Itees are either segregated < earked, or identified with a Hold Tag (Attachment No. 7), to indicate their status and prevent inadve rtent use or installation." Contrary to the above. 4.16 KV switchs sr with hold down welds known

o be nonconfor=ing by the licee.see vere act identifled and controlled with. Hold Tags.

E.

Response

Tags were subsequan ly placed by Project 'eganization (initially responslhle for the tag) on switchgear to identify the nonconformance s in the field. Also, the utilization of hold tags has been clarified with the development of Quality Tagging ?cocedure (PAP 1404) which note clearly describes the quality tagging requirements. Proper tagging per Project Admintstration Procedure 1(04 v111 ensure chat the organization (s) af fected are aware cf the emition, Training, to the new procedure has been co pleted and documented. This ite is considered to be resolved.

ncenp.tanc e a;0 /31-19-;;; ;el/91-19-11 (Fa;e 70)

Secerity *.evel IV r.cla:Len 743. ir;endix F, r. t e r '. c n */. ste:es.- tatt. "Activitle-if'ect:-~ --s1':y s ai. e -re 4: r '. e : i : _ e-:ed ;qstracti'qs.

e circu stances...

-c.

\\r: :fr.-L ;s :t 6 v:e e.::

.ic ed.- 1

:a.,

c.e.ns:cac: lens.

ni

...~ m. o ~ .- m ( 1 I a. CEI Electrical Installation Specification SP-33-4549-00 requires i a one inch cinimum separation between conduits containing Class 1E circuits and conduits containing on-Class IE ctreuits. Contrary to thu above: 1) Installed Class.1E conduit.1R331024A and Non-Class-1E conduit 1021R36X, did not eest the one inch separation je require =ent. j 4

2) Class 1E conduit 1R33R516A vas separated by.1/2 of aa; inch.

j fro: ::en~-Class IE conduit 115279tX located.atLelevation $48': in :he Auxiliary Buildies ab' ave !the RCIC ' instrument /pamelf y .1520-?017.; ~ ~ ' ~ ' ~ "4 m 4

• s

..;, 4 CEI Electricatilastellation 5pec.tfisettee SP-334S49-00dr_equireel e Q b. j a =tni.xs h'otteestalf and: vertLaaL separationieff atalisteej $ i betvosveenduits et different diitetenegiveablej spr.eedtegi _ M, +, A - e,;q r oc.s.. a. n _w .~ .. s + .a contrary'to?the,ahever - e er T S W:O.. n. .$[, ' ' ' (.- ..: 3; ,. r o b a,. L.--,.. 7 J) ?Divisten13feoedetL1R334129C ese tes'talled'oeparatedital M M F 2-1/2;tscheslfesaDivisiesi214 emes 6te18$3RS841endil <st elevettee 439hiaitheisabteispegattagisees. ? i $$3 . m A. a m -m m Acig#- w. ..+ san, ~ c ?.. d. @%g SN L - -<..t _ c3

• i

~.

P ;

~,

1 ' 2),Divistenf8Jeeedetts ISS3t?$85,;^ t@3=&p3 tenes. ?lar in $ $$8Eeedi L-inetaltedi ~ te4t[l*1/2ito eschica1183_deeditt3M3973Cist elseettsei ' cab',e.spreedtseitsen W 6 2 m .." l % ' 2 7 Q 2 i .., ; 3, n,; - y ;c w,no >, 7 m w .., :). u y .,.. n 8

3) D1vis:ss: 3; conduits in33892 W and 4833C34838 were'esposa M.

by 3-1/2 taches;ftorn 9tv&oleeLA,ealdelsefit3M7tCA ** i i 8 g 1R31;2f14C. 'andi1RJ141298 leestadiet elsettles:4W taiste? '8 P.e i ~ "i k i .s 'y - %y/ );. eah*.e spreading reesc 1. g. i , _ C.'k "E .2 '];t 5 ~ 1 _? ; _;_-F_ 'I

4) Divisten' 2 eendelt-l'93373295:see[sayscated by:l t/2 taees f

f re: 3tvisteel3 '.eendettint33t33W teesseeTottetevessee'430'l in :helechtelepreadtag seest 7 ~ -

5) bivision'2t esadett 1R33t3290 eeslseparatedM Set /4:$ades ~

3 7 fre. Divtotem 3fconduit IR33C2914 located'at elevetles:6Wc

ij in :he cable' spreading rose.

+ ^ ld e c. Ctt 3:14 ::rt:a1 .s:411a: ton Speciftcation SP-33-4549-00 requitee 1 t h4 t t * * -in t :u: s c; a ra : ton t ay ) *.ie ' reduced 4e enei tsch for: 4 i, ee W i:s ef edunit : dtviste.s vhh irouted thtmagh> well, sad : -i f > r : t.e : ra t ices. 5eb:.2 .ivls.- '. : ~.e.:1: IR3301093A was separ.2 e4 'm:ste f 4-M:h f er - 2 bis.:. } cr.i:i: 1;3M3MC through a j.r-- a e:r4*'sn a: e'.evstt-- - 9' .-4-* -f : 3e Auxiliary i l 1 --n --.-- - -. -- ----+ -...-.,--, -- .,-.-..-,--,--------,-.~,e .,.,-----.,..-,.,y,- ..w ,-,mr.-----,,-v,

~- ( B. Rasponso a. Separation criteria violations where Class 1E and Non-Class 1E conduit did not meet the one (1) inch separa*. ion requitecent, were documented on L. K. Comstock Ndhconformance P.eports 1193 and 1323. Inspectors will continue to use the electrical ins:allation specification SP-33-1549-00 for separation cetteria along with required D-215 drawings and :o document nonconforming conditions as requ* ad. Cons: rue:Lon Quality Engineering Audit 717 was perfor=ed to evaluate _ LKC compliance with separatfou eriteria. As a result, retraining was conducted for LKC QA Inspectors and craf t to assure understanding ~of separation requiteents including the identificattom of viola:Lons. This ite-is ' considered to be resolved. b. These 1: ens were evalua:ed by the P[oject Organisation and deterr.ined to be in accordance with the Specification. Section 3:08.10.1 of SP33 requirea 6" minimum separation between divisions, but'is prefaced by "unless'etheswise indicated on engineer-approved drauings..." ~ The twtallation ebserved is in accordance with the applicable condutt' layout drawings. 1 Tot general plant areas.. $P33 inc19 des a paragraph ~ allowing for a reduction to 1" separation if shown on the layout drawing.. Te clarify this requirement ECK 8426-33-1999 was:Isomed. In addition, L. ~ K. Cons:ock Frocecure-4.2.I was revised to reflect this specific criteria. S These iters are considered to'be tuselved, c.

R LKC 1329 was written to document this violation.

This WR has been closed.out and verified. .., Construction Quality Engineering Audit 717,ues perfossed tJ evalg te LEC compliance with separatten criteria. As a result, retraining was conducted for LEC Q4 Inspectors and craf t 'te assure unders:anding of separation requirements including the iden:if; a:Len of viols lens. Thie i:e-is considated :o be resolved.

. __ e c-- ; ; t.c e..!!-19-0?:.a!'21-19-05 vieli:;--

e.wr;:e

_t 1. I' ? ~:

• ir :-t'x 9

'r;;er;cn TVI. 5:a:es ;, pa r:. ""casure= shall .e .<-sf

- usure :u: c -d;:t-s d te rse :3 qual *:y. such

- :s it, r- -1 -d correc:r!.

L ~ ( CEI Corporate Nuclear Quality As wrance Progran, Section 1600 Paragraph 1.2.b states in part, " Requests for corrective action shall include address of the action required to ccerect the adverse condition and to preclude continuation or recurrence...The NQAD shall verify compliance to corrective action neasures through audit, surveillance and inspection of project organizations and other QA evaluation and control techniques such as nonconformance trend analyses." Contrity :o the above, eight L. K. Constock Nonconformance Reports er t::en ducir.g the period Augus t 14 - November 20, 1981, indicated

he reason for :he nonconforcances was inadequate attention to ins:allation details by L. K. Constock personnel.

These Nonconfornance Reports were not teviewed to trend the reason (s) for the ina:tention ta installation details. Pronpt corrective ac: ton was not taken. 5.

Response

l ts described ;n Cons:cuction Quality Sec: ton Procedure 2-1602, the l rced for a f real : rend analysis is determined during the courte of .:ncenf orcance reviews and :he Quality Engineer had de:ereined that j cn the basis of the cagni:ude and scope of the electrical installation (overall), there was no: significan: repetition to warrant performance of a : rend analysis. Subsequen: to the concern expressed by the Nuclear Regulatory C:n:*ssion, the centractor genera:ed an internal CAR regarding i vo r*-::anship p roble -s. Extensive training programs were developed and ' ple.ented :c address these problems. The effectiveness of l this P.as been confir ed by Construction Quall'.y Engineering Audt: 723 cn raceway installation. i T.e con:inued Leple:en:ation of :he L. K. Coes:ock inspection p r ogram, with i.1 overviev b; ';or.s:ruction Quality Engineeri g S

ncluding daily surveillances and in-peccess audt

s, vill malatain cur philosophy of resolving concerns as the work is being perforced.

l This ite: is considered to be resol /ed. l

f \\ i ATTACRMENT S RESPONSE TO 1*NRESOLVED ITE_MS The following information is provided to assist with resolution of the con-ditions set forth for future review:

• 'ncesolved Item 440/81-19-02; 441/81-19-02 s

~. e re:;utteent for end caps on conduits was-remevaluated by Engineering. To res,-Ive the iden:Lf Led inconsistency, ECN a075-33-2006 has been issued to

larify the require:ent for the need to install and caps for. above ground comSit runs.

'Jnres:1ved Item 440/SI-19-04; 441/bl-19-04 i L. M. Comstock Proceduce No. 4.3.10rInsta11atton of Electrical Penetratiosys, has been revised to provide specific accept [ceject critecta for containnsnt : vesse'. elec:rical pene: ration-essemblies,' tactudtag a de,atled checklist where ea:5 i:e. has a separate Contiactot QC sigaoff line. Revtsica 4_gf the Westing hecia Instruction canual contains specifle critects for acceptance, which'will be used for the Unit 2 installation. A pla. vas developed :s confirm the adequacy 'of the' Unit 1 insta11atten. As indicated in.the response to Noncompliance 440/91-19-03; 441/81-19-03. the

e.ottation documentation. review.will be completed by December 15 1982.

'J.res:1ved ! tem 440/81-19-05; 441/81-19-45 A r eupe:: ion for hole verificattor. on electrical. penetration numbers 1R72-5:l'. 17.72-5017, 1R72-5027. and.1K72-5024 was perfossed and the alignment of. ee

1: nales was veri! Led to be correct.

"n cq:1re:: : tem 440/81-19-06; 441/81-19-06 Field Ques: tons 12159,12173.12230,12249 and 12295 concerning installation of " nit 1 '.*estinghouse penetrations have been revised.to tec1mde an Ingineering evales:Lon of the acceptance of the Unit 'l penettettees. As indicated in the

e<pcesa :o Noneompitance 440/$1-19-03; 441/$1-19-03, the peneaeaeton documentatton revtea vill he completed by December 15, 1982.

s o lve". m 440/51-19-07; 441/91-19-07 " :s:-;;9' has bee. disposttiered 5y :he Ecst seer and revleved by the Quality

' -nor.

In part. :'e Engineer's disposttion stated that the S0' te 140*F ., - - e r uu - li.1: 4p; ~.Les :s all 4-5 b* st te peratures inside the MCCs except ~ > surf ace of :he heater strips. In addt:lon. the Engineer performed a . : #. '. ; a p e,::: (. :f :Se "COs a: :'a: time al deterrired th.i: no da. age was "T*

• e ;1st :rer'et:ltc.

1 -~ rn,--. ,,--..n g-,-,---a ,.c., ,-,-m- ,,. --,n,, ,.-n-.--., -,. -~

= c.. L In addition, in March of 1982, the FSMR vas revised to disconnect the heaters and use light bulbs for heat. No additional te perature problems have been experienced. Unresolved Item 440/81-19-09; 441/81-19-09 o s:reng: hen their Audit Program, L. K. Comstock has extensively revised

heir Procedure 4.14.1, " Internal Audit Procedure," and initteted a new LKC Procedure 4.14.2, "The-Qualification Certification, and Training of Auditors."

I ple en:a:Lon of these procedures was the subject, in part, of Construction Os!':y Audit 722 and good progress has been nada in resolution of this concern. A ;ual*:y Ingineer has been added _to the corporate staff And is cuccently assignv :o the Perry site on a full-time basis. nrescived

ea !.40/81-19-12; 441/81-19-12

1). ~he use of a com:en support for Class 1E and Non-Class 1E conduits has bne. evalua:ed by ' the Design Engineer and deteruined to be acceptable.

2: ~he a:ceptabilt:y of the_ RPS ctreui: In the Turbine Building is addressed ~ in D.e ISAR, Section 7.2.1.2(g). ' Clarification of this coquirement was

ans ::.:ted :o I..~ K. Coastock by ECN 8929-33-1986.

7ntes 1 red ::ac !.40/51-19-13 441/81-19-13 5733, See:i:n 5:08.9.2, states, "...*stataua~ separation 'of 14 inches, except as. a:letvise indicated on cable' tray layout-drawiego.._." ~ i Oravings applicable :o thesidentified concerne _were reviewed t_o assure that

he installa:ica is in accordance with the drawings and that barriers, to be

~ ~ i J .ns:411ed la:er, are shownlon the drawings 1ss required.by IEEE Std. 384.. Unresolved Itera 440/81-19-14; !.41/81-19-14 Ecs h 01-33-1932 was issued to clarify Paragraph 5:08.13.6, and L. E. Cometock Precedure 4.3.3 was revised to address the ~ criteria for Laspection and subsequent nc:ification :o Engineering of cable-fill in safety-related installations. i 7 res:1ved ::e-1.40/51-19-151 441/81-19-15 Revisions to Site and Contractor turnover procedures have been issued to address :his concern. 1 r+s:Deai ::e-J. 0/51-19-17; f.l.1/91-19-17

rte:ers '.spe::lon reper: da:ed 12-30-31 was incorrectly written in

. *:.: --: ?ce addressed :he vreng section of SP33, but also failed :o +. . t: H'd ::=s no: apply :: u.er fur.;shed equip-en:. A second i - et::::.as ;ssued e-;ch reflec:ed Pe ac:mi accep:able condition, i I

7 7 J g y "nresclved Item 440/91-19-13; 451/S1-19-l^ A p! ?.; developed to address this concern is new closed out. An evaluation was perf orced by the Architect-Engineer and the linited usage of such =aterials was analyzed to be acceptable. The "nstallation is in accordance with industry standards as referenced in the j ^ Final Safety Analysis Report. L'ere solved ::e: L'0/31-19-20; 441/31-19-20

*s ::ncern was analyzed by :he Archi:ect-Engineer. Af ter an evalua:Lon of f a u '. : :urran:s and relay se: tings, :he AE de:ersined : hat a 5 kV breaker n'.ss;e as not a credible esent for Perry and :ha: :he comnittents to Section's 3.5.3 ani 3.3.1.4.1.1 ef the FSAR have been ne:.

t 7.'nte selve d ::en 440/31-19-21; 441/81-19-21

e::ive ic:icn Reques: 3 -09 was.et: ten to docunent this concern.

In

ss : ae, :he Architect-Engineer re-evalua:ed traceability of materials for 76t:/ ens:cuc:Icn cen:rsc:s.

The re-evalue:lon concludes that the current

c;ti s. subject

o sa:;sf ac:ory impler,en:a:Lon, are acceptable.

4 "nres:1ved

en 4 C/91-19-22; 441/51-19-22 Ire '.an3er was cut out and scrapped per the NRC Inspectors recommended corree-

te tc

1cn. Training sessions have been performed for the applicable Johnson

~ ::rels, !nc., personnel, and the drawing has been revised. i l J s<:!ved ::ec ~40/il-1 -24; 441/61-19-24 l T

e

.'.! assessnen: ef :he contemetors' Quality Assurance Programe has been c:--leted as described in the May 6,1982, letter from D. R. Davidson to " r. .;p ie r. That assessnent resulted la the determin4:Lon that the concerns Re-N;fied by the SRC and analyzed by the licensee do not represent a signif t-A progra= breakdown for either L. K. Constock (LKC) or the Project In: O rg t- ;:a t ion. r e::;ve Ac:len s:eps vere being implenen:ed on a priority 'assis. Some i delays in 1 ple en:a:Lon had occurred at:ributable to :he Owners philosophy of surve;11ance which.af fords the contractor the opportunity to correct his --:'es. t:, L. v. :: s:3c'. ;-.- n'u-::;en wi:S :he Ptnjee: Organization, has

. - - * '-11:. g ac:i ns:

erse-e'.

- i : n

-.r-c r; ora:e and LRC si:e s:sf fs. i-...;:

; -ra:, a-d L T s;:e staf f s and

~ --:. c. l 3:;.c:;,n Quali:y Ac:ien u e rs:,-:;ilit. r-r -, ;, ;.., .-. eve!. t

THE CLEVEL AND El J i U M. N /i T ! N G C O M P A fi Y . -.m m. <. a s,..so o..o. .,s.... .m..

• • . :;. e a o S:,
• e e

t; ewyn n Davidson -m'w Novembe r 10, 198. .v. j Hr. Jamen C. Keppler Pegional Administrator, Region !!! Of fice of Inspection and Enforcement U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Corusission 199 RooseveIt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinoin 60137 Perry Nuclear Power Plant Docket Nos. 50-440; 50-441 Response to I.E. Report 50-440/81-19; 50-441/81-19 Transmitted Septessber 27, 1982

Dear P.r. Keppler:

Please re fer to Page 8 of Attachment A to our letter dated October 27, 1982, responding to I.E. Report 50-440/81-19; 50-441/81-19. It has to my attention that additional information is necessary to clarify come our response to Noncompliante 440/81-09-03; 441/81-19-03. Paragraph 2(b) reads in part as follows: "I. K. Comstock Nonconformance Report 1070 was genera-ted to document the specific cable trays in question to be acceptable." This paragraph.hould read: "L. K. Comstock NR 1070 was Fenerated to document the condition of _ cable tray B1324. Other cable trays in ques tion were documented on L. K. Coms tock and Project organization (Construction Quality Section) inspection reports and evaluated to be acceptable." L. K. Cores tock Procedure 4.1. 3 w as evaluated in order to determine its ath quacy. ?:o procedure revi. ion was necessary. l / f

~ - Mr. Janss G. Keppler Noverd r 10, 1982 i In addition, as a part of the evaluation, Nonconformance Reports written to document damage to cablem were reviewed. None were related to sharp edges or burrs on cabic trays. Based on the fact ' hat no negative trend could be identified in this area, this condition is not considered to be generic, but represents an isolated case. 3 If there are additional qinestions, please' do not hesit ste to es11. ,j i Since rely, 1 /1 1 , ~ -i' .3 $fdW i, / g/

4 Dalwyn R. Davidson-Vice-President

~ %U System Engineering and Construction' d 4 DRD: 11p ~'j ', X, s. ~ cca Mr. M. L. Gildner 3 j NRC 1[ite Office c - s '".i + A ,rn U. 8. IIuclear Reguistory Commission r i;j c/o Document Managesent Branch ] Washington, D. C. 20555 _ 3 .5

s. ?

.3 .f k 1 1 s i '6

e P O fos '400 CCwitA40 oH O 4410' TEti m oNE (216: 6N 96M et t o*N Af e%G tk DG % PUEk *C 500AM a ? > e tivs t un w tre hation MUMAY R. EDEMAN Janua ry 21, 1983 v'CE 8tstS8o8887 asuCL4AA Mr. James G. Keppler Regional Administrator. Region III Of fice of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 799 Roosevelt Road Clen Ellyn Illinois 60137 RE: Perry Nuclear Power Plant Docket Nos. 50-440; 50-441 - 4 Response to I.E. Report 50-440/81-19; 50-44t/81-19 Treessitted September 27, 1982 h Dear Mr. Keppler i. 1 Please refer to pages 7 and 8 of Attachneet A to eur latter dated October 27 j h 1982. responding to I.E. Report 3M40/81-19; 5H41/81-19.. It has cean to'ay 1 attention that addittamal information is eseeemary to update' ear response. to Noncompliance 440/81-19-03;-441/81-19-03, example a.. 1 Mr. V. Higaks of he Clevolaed Electrie 111emmismiing Compesy discussed this matter with Mr. H. Wescott of yosr office on Jammary 14, 1983. 5 k Paragraph a.(l) states la parts j l " Penetration inspection records beve been revleued by the' project Orgseisation Engineering Croup. h e records are secomplateland[the centractor is le the { process of completing the records.. His.iten v111'be resolved by December -15, 1982." In accordance with this respoese, Project Orgestantion Engineering Creep did review the penetration inspection records.. Ie' response to Regieseriag's question, Pu11esa Power.auppiled L. K. Coastock"witie the'decessestation to address Project Organization Engineering. ~ %1s une acceeplished by the December 15, 1982, deadline. However, during the L. K. Comstock receipt and review of this esterial, a ntnber of questions have arisen that require further discussion. Fullene and L. K. Coastock will be meeting in the near future. It is anticipated that resolution will be achieved by March 15. 1983. j(h EN"QLt?*egoat4

p dr. James C. Keppler Jcnuary 21, 1983 Addit ionally, our response a. (2) on page 7 and 8 states that reverification pr^ grams for the Switchgear, Unit Substation and Motor Control Centers were in progress and that the reverification will be completed by January 14, 1983. This activity has been accoeplished. At a result of the reverificat ion. l d isposit ions to several Nonconformance Reports are awaiting vendor concurrence and are the last outstanding items requiring address for response 4.(2). If there are additional questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely. Murray R. Edelman Vice l';esident Nuclear Croup MRE:pah 1 I l cc: Mr. M. L. Gildner NRC Site Office U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission c/o Document Management Branch j Washington, D.C. 20555 i i. /

I j 9 ) d e r r. 7CC $ $ ^ l ? bocket No. 50-440 Docket No. 50-441 The Cisveleod Electric Illuminating Company 4 ATTM Mr. Hurrey R. Edelman j Vice Preeldent - Nuclear Group { Poet Offias Bos 5000 1 Cleveleed, ott 44101 i { Gent 1==== i Theek you for your laster desed Jammary 21. 1983 informing um cf the i seditional stape you sse" estdag to'eersest senesepliances 30-441/41-19-03 ~ ~ i and 30 441/41-194b3 uhtak en beoedt-te year ata==*h in Inspoettaa ~ Depart Nee. 30444/81-19 and 50-441/81-19.- We will asemise theen==**=no j darias a N taapestaan. t I Your esoperanta= with'us to' appreciated. i s h anely. xor}g1nal $17.uf ':j C.'. ';s d ;u " i M_Itt C E. brel:us"

c. s; meselius, streeter Divistem of Pse$eet and neeldest peessene J. Waldron, Plant Menspor cc:

L. Beek, General Seposvisor Licensing and Fuels Management cc w/itt dtd 1/21/83: DHS/Decument Centrol Desk (Rips) a-ehe Imepeeter RIII Harold W. Netsi. Power Sitias Ceemisetae Daniel D. Wilt. Attorney Helen W. Evene. State of Ohio Robert M. Quillia, Ohio Department of Health 930218 930214 PDR M 0S000440 0 PDR Rill,s RIII d g;'t RIII f ( RIJ

((

e Wescott/rl Konklin-Knop", Ndfe ) uni /83 d gi/7 ,}}