ML20216F582: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:e     .d
{{#Wiki_filter:e
    ,a AF61     /
.d
,a AF61
/
fg..:
fg..:
'O f'            A                               uwerso sTAvas                                 reA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHH6GTON. L .t,. **: aeot March 10, 1997
'O A
              -MEMORANDUM TO:         Thomas Martin, ' Chief Regulatory Development Branch Division of Regulatory             11 cations Off ce of Nuc ear R             ory Research
uwerso sTAvas reA f'
                                                      ~    '
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHH6GTON. L.t,.
              -FROM:
**: aeot March 10, 1997
                                                  .-                e
-MEMORANDUM TO:
                                    /1nformation-and Records Management Branch Office of Information Resources Management
Thomas Martin, ' Chief Regulatory Development Branch Division of Regulatory 11 cations Off ce of Nuc ear R ory Research
-FROM:
~
e
/1nformation-and Records Management Branch Office of Information Resources Management


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
10 CFR 55 INITIAL LICENSED OPERATOR EXAMINATION REQUIREMENTS, PROPOSED RULE We have reviewed the subject proposed rule for compliance with the Paperwork                   -
10 CFR 55 INITIAL LICENSED OPERATOR EXAMINATION REQUIREMENTS, PROPOSED RULE We have reviewed the subject proposed rule for compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) and concur in the rule provided that the following change is made:
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) and concur in the rule provided that the following change is made:
I Replace the 555.8, "Information Collection Requirements: 0MB Approval" section with Attachment 1).
I Replace the 555.8, "Information Collection Requirements: 0MB Approval" section with Attachment 1).
In our January 22, 1997, memorandum to you, we sug collection indicated in the preamble to the Ifrule,                    gested a facility     that the information licensee
collection indicated in the preamble to the rule, gested that the information In our January 22, 1997, memorandum to you, we sug If a facility licensee
              ' proposes to deviate from the specific guidance contained in NUREG 1021, it should obtain NRC staff approval of the deviations," be added to the rule.
' proposes to deviate from the specific guidance contained in NUREG 1021, it should obtain NRC staff approval of the deviations," be added to the rule.
This information collection has not been included and therefore cannot be considered a licensee requirement.
This information collection has not been included and therefore cannot be considered a licensee requirement.
Our. staff is continuing to work with the Operator Licensing Branch (OLB) to develop an OMB clearance package for the proposed rule. Publication of the rule is on hold with the Office of Administration pending IRM's approval of the clearance package and inclusion of the attached change to section 55.8.
Our. staff is continuing to work with the Operator Licensing Branch (OLB) to develop an OMB clearance package for the proposed rule. Publication of the rule is on hold with the Office of Administration pending IRM's approval of the clearance package and inclusion of the attached change to section 55.8.
Line 39: Line 44:


==Attachment:==
==Attachment:==
 
As stated cci FN IT 6 massian, REST '
As stated a    '          cci FN IT 6 massian, REST '
a N. Lesar.lADM R. I ran, NRR D.:
N. Lesar.lADM R. I ran, NRR D.:   ain _NRR 7]91 7 4.970904       PDR;
ain _NRR 7]91 7 4.970904
    ' fSS 62FR,42426                     m 1
' fSS 62FR,42426 PDR; m
1


l In section 55.8. modify paragraph (b) as follows:
l In section 55.8. modify paragraph (b) as follows:
(b)- The approved information collection requirements contained in this part appear in $555.40, 55.45, 55.53, and 55.59.
(b)-
The approved information collection requirements contained in this part appear in $555.40, 55.45, 55.53, and 55.59.
(This change is in lieu of the change to 55.8(c)(4) requested in our January
(This change is in lieu of the change to 55.8(c)(4) requested in our January
: 22. 1997, memorandum, based on a decision reached with NRR to clear this collection under Part 55 instead of under the separate R0 and SRO clearance package.)
: 22. 1997, memorandum, based on a decision reached with NRR to clear this collection under Part 55 instead of under the separate R0 and SRO clearance package.)
Attachment I}}
Attachment I}}

Latest revision as of 10:23, 3 December 2024

Concurs W/Proposed Rule 10CFR55, Initial Licensed Operator Exam Requirements
ML20216F582
Person / Time
Issue date: 03/10/1997
From: Shelton B
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
To: Martin T
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH (RES)
Shared Package
ML20216F483 List:
References
FRN-62FR42426, RULE-PR-55 AF62-1-010, AF62-1-10, NUDOCS 9709120024
Download: ML20216F582 (2)


Text

e

.d

,a AF61

/

fg..:

'O A

uwerso sTAvas reA f'

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHH6GTON. L.t,.

    • aeot March 10, 1997

-MEMORANDUM TO:

Thomas Martin, ' Chief Regulatory Development Branch Division of Regulatory 11 cations Off ce of Nuc ear R ory Research

-FROM:

~

e

/1nformation-and Records Management Branch Office of Information Resources Management

SUBJECT:

10 CFR 55 INITIAL LICENSED OPERATOR EXAMINATION REQUIREMENTS, PROPOSED RULE We have reviewed the subject proposed rule for compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) and concur in the rule provided that the following change is made:

I Replace the 555.8, "Information Collection Requirements: 0MB Approval" section with Attachment 1).

collection indicated in the preamble to the rule, gested that the information In our January 22, 1997, memorandum to you, we sug If a facility licensee

' proposes to deviate from the specific guidance contained in NUREG 1021, it should obtain NRC staff approval of the deviations," be added to the rule.

This information collection has not been included and therefore cannot be considered a licensee requirement.

Our. staff is continuing to work with the Operator Licensing Branch (OLB) to develop an OMB clearance package for the proposed rule. Publication of the rule is on hold with the Office of Administration pending IRM's approval of the clearance package and inclusion of the attached change to section 55.8.

Should you require ~ further assistance, pluse contact Beth St. Mary on 415 5878 or e mail-BCS,

Attachment:

As stated cci FN IT 6 massian, REST '

a N. Lesar.lADM R. I ran, NRR D.:

ain _NRR 7]91 7 4.970904

' fSS 62FR,42426 PDR; m

1

l In section 55.8. modify paragraph (b) as follows:

(b)-

The approved information collection requirements contained in this part appear in $555.40, 55.45, 55.53, and 55.59.

(This change is in lieu of the change to 55.8(c)(4) requested in our January

22. 1997, memorandum, based on a decision reached with NRR to clear this collection under Part 55 instead of under the separate R0 and SRO clearance package.)

Attachment I