ML19256F086: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:'
{{#Wiki_filter:'
        .
'
W-
W-
           ~
           ~
                    .
            '
                       ~
                       ~
BOSTON EDISDN COMPANY GENERAL orrects 80o BovtsTQM STREET BOSTON M AssAcNusETTs 02199 G. CAnL ANDOGNINI S U PENINTEND ENT NUCLEAN OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT October 15,1979 BECo Ltr. # 79-202 Mr. Eldon J. Brunner, Chief Reactor Operar. ions and Nuclear Support Branch Office of Inspection and Enforcement Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pa    19406 License no. DPR-35 Docket No. 50-293 Response to IE Inspection No. 79-16
BOSTON EDISDN COMPANY GENERAL orrects 80o BovtsTQM STREET BOSTON M AssAcNusETTs 02199 G. CAnL ANDOGNINI S U PENINTEND ENT NUCLEAN OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT October 15,1979 BECo Ltr. # 79-202 Mr. Eldon J. Brunner, Chief Reactor Operar. ions and Nuclear Support Branch Office of Inspection and Enforcement Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pa    19406 License no. DPR-35 Docket No. 50-293 Response to IE Inspection No. 79-16
Line 37: Line 33:
300      !  2 7911210 3 3 5
300      !  2 7911210 3 3 5


,
T30sIdN EDISDN COMPANY Mr.bidonJ.Brunner, Chief October 15, 1979 Page 2 Also, the PNPS Tagging Procedure 1.4.5 will be reviewed during the next Operator Requalification Program to ensure that all operations personnel are aware of the requirements. Particular emphasis will be placed on the safety significance associated with this occurrence.
T30sIdN EDISDN COMPANY Mr.bidonJ.Brunner, Chief October 15, 1979 Page 2 Also, the PNPS Tagging Procedure 1.4.5 will be reviewed during the next Operator Requalification Program to ensure that all operations personnel are aware of the requirements. Particular emphasis will be placed on the safety significance associated with this occurrence.
We will be in full compliance in this area by November 1, 1979.
We will be in full compliance in this area by November 1, 1979.

Revision as of 23:18, 1 February 2020

Responds to NRC 790914 Ltr Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-293/79-16.Corrective Actions:Station Procedure 1.5.3 Revised & Tagging Procedure 1.4.5 to Be Reviewed
ML19256F086
Person / Time
Site: Pilgrim
Issue date: 10/15/1979
From: Andognini G
BOSTON EDISON CO.
To: Brunner E
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
Shared Package
ML19256F085 List:
References
79-202, NUDOCS 7911210335
Download: ML19256F086 (2)


Text

'

W-

~

~

BOSTON EDISDN COMPANY GENERAL orrects 80o BovtsTQM STREET BOSTON M AssAcNusETTs 02199 G. CAnL ANDOGNINI S U PENINTEND ENT NUCLEAN OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT October 15,1979 BECo Ltr. # 79-202 Mr. Eldon J. Brunner, Chief Reactor Operar. ions and Nuclear Support Branch Office of Inspection and Enforcement Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pa 19406 License no. DPR-35 Docket No. 50-293 Response to IE Inspection No. 79-16

Dear Sir:

Inspection No. 79-16, dated September 14, 1979, contained one item of non-compliance. Boston Edison Company's response to that item is presented as follows:

Infraction:

Technical Specification 3.7.A.2 states in part: " Primary Containment integrity shall be maintained a" all times when the reactor is critical..."

Contrary to the above, primary containment integrity was violated on June 12, 1979, when, with the reactor critical at full power, the torus was opened to the reactor building atmosphere by disassembling the Core Sp.ay A Full Flow Test Check Valve (No. 1400-35).

Responst:;

Although Procedural and Management Controls in effect at the time should have prevented this occurence, it was concluded that these controls were vague. Therefore, to prevent a recurrence, station procedure 1.5.3 has been revised. This revision provides more specific direction for respon-sibile management personnel to ensure that adequate reviews, to prevent violations of limiting conditions of operation, are conducted prior to approval for maintenance activities to commence. A station organizational change which involved the creation of the position entitled, Assistant Station Manager, has served to further enhance overall Station management controls.

300  ! 2 7911210 3 3 5

T30sIdN EDISDN COMPANY Mr.bidonJ.Brunner, Chief October 15, 1979 Page 2 Also, the PNPS Tagging Procedure 1.4.5 will be reviewed during the next Operator Requalification Program to ensure that all operations personnel are aware of the requirements. Particular emphasis will be placed on the safety significance associated with this occurrence.

We will be in full compliance in this area by November 1, 1979.

We believe that this letter is responsive to your concerns. However, should you have any further questions, please contact us.

Very truly yours, F(Y tb 4b}f*

/ / ,

1580 133