ML062130054: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:James Davis -Re: Quality Assurance for aging management of NSR components Pag 1e James Davis | {{#Wiki_filter:James Davis - Re: Quality Assurance for aging management of NSR components Pag Pacje 1e 1I James Davis Re: Quality Assurance for aging management of NSR components | ||
- | |||
From: James Davis To: erachp@comcast.net Date: 07/05/2006 3:11:07 PM | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Re: Quality Assurance for aging management of NSR components Erach, Attached is the writeup for the corrective action plan.Jim>>> <erachp@comcast.net> | Re: Quality Assurance for aging management of NSR components Erach, Attached is the writeup for the corrective action plan. | ||
07/05/2006 1:21 PM >>>Hi, In each of the AMR sections in the SRP, under AMR results for which further evaluation is recommended, we need to address how the applicant has applied their Corrective Action program to non-safety related components. | Jim | ||
This is intended to address elements 7-9 in the AMPs.These sections in the SRP are: 3.1.2.2.18, 3.2.2.2.10, 3.3.2.2.15, 3.4.2.2.10, 3.5.2.2.3, and 3.6.2.2.4. | >>> <erachp@comcast.net> 07/05/2006 1:21 PM >>> | ||
Jim Davis and I discussed this today, and here is how we will address it.In the Audit and review report, in the above listed sections, please make the following statement: | Hi, In each of the AMR sections in the SRP, under AMR results for which further evaluation is recommended, we need to address how the applicant has applied their Corrective Action program to non-safety related components. This is intended to address elements 7-9 in the AMPs. | ||
3.1.2.2.15 (etc.) Quality Assurance for Aging Management of Non- Safety Related Components The applicant referenced LRA Section B.0.3. The project team's evaluation of Section B.0.3 is provided in Section 3.0.4 of this audit and review report.I will create a new Section 3.0.4 in the AMP part of the audit and review report. Jim Davis reviewed the PNPS Corrective Action program and will provide me the appropriate words to include in this section. | These sections in the SRP are: | ||
22 : 35346) | 3.1.2.2.18, 3.2.2.2.10, 3.3.2.2.15, 3.4.2.2.10, 3.5.2.2.3, and 3.6.2.2.4. | ||
Jim Davis and I discussed this today, and here is how we will address it. | |||
In the Audit and review report, in the above listed sections, please make the following statement: | |||
3.1.2.2.15 (etc.) Quality Assurance for Aging Management of Non- Safety Related Components The applicant referenced LRA Section B.0.3. The project team's evaluation of Section B.0.3 is provided in Section 3.0.4 of this audit and review report. | |||
I will create a new Section 3.0.4 in the AMP part of the audit and review report. Jim Davis reviewed the PNPS Corrective Action program and will provide me the appropriate words to include in this section. | |||
Ifyou have any questions, please call me or e-mail me. | |||
erach | |||
c:\temD\GMtO0001 .TMP Paae 11 Pame c:\temD\GWIOOOO1 .TMP Mail Envelope Properties (44ACOECB.86E: 22 : 35346) | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Re: Quality Assurance for aging management of NSR components Creation Date 07/05/2006 3:11:07 PM From: James Davis Created By: JAD @nrc.gov Recipients Action Date & Time comcast.net Transferred 07/05/2006 3:11:29 PM erachp (erachp@comcast.net) | |||
Post Office Delivered Route comcast.net Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2065 07/05/2006 3:11:07 PM project staff review - corrective action plan.wpd 2277 07/05/2006 3:09:02 PM Options Auto Delete: No Expiration Date: None Notify Recipients: Yes Priority: Standard ReplyRequested: No Return Notification: None Concealed | |||
Priority: ReplyRequested: | |||
Return Notification: | |||
Concealed | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Security: To Be Delivered: | No Security: Standard To Be Delivered: Immediate Status Tracking: Delivered & Opened | ||
Status Tracking: | |||
& Opened James Davis -project staff review -corrective action plan.wpd | James Davis - project staff review - corrective action plan.wpd Paqei1I 5 | ||
The corrective action procedure is reviewed on a routine basis by the regional inspection teams and has been found to be acceptable during past inspections.}} | The project staff reviewed the applicant's corrective action procedure and found it to be acceptable. The corrective action procedure is reviewed on a routine basis by the regional inspection teams and has been found to be acceptable during past inspections.}} | ||
Revision as of 15:43, 23 November 2019
| ML062130054 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Pilgrim |
| Issue date: | 07/05/2006 |
| From: | Jennifer Davis Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs |
| To: | - No Known Affiliation |
| References | |
| %dam200612, TAC MC9669 | |
| Download: ML062130054 (3) | |
Text
James Davis - Re: Quality Assurance for aging management of NSR components Pag Pacje 1e 1I James Davis Re: Quality Assurance for aging management of NSR components
-
From: James Davis To: erachp@comcast.net Date: 07/05/2006 3:11:07 PM
Subject:
Re: Quality Assurance for aging management of NSR components Erach, Attached is the writeup for the corrective action plan.
Jim
>>> <erachp@comcast.net> 07/05/2006 1:21 PM >>>
Hi, In each of the AMR sections in the SRP, under AMR results for which further evaluation is recommended, we need to address how the applicant has applied their Corrective Action program to non-safety related components. This is intended to address elements 7-9 in the AMPs.
These sections in the SRP are:
3.1.2.2.18, 3.2.2.2.10, 3.3.2.2.15, 3.4.2.2.10, 3.5.2.2.3, and 3.6.2.2.4.
Jim Davis and I discussed this today, and here is how we will address it.
In the Audit and review report, in the above listed sections, please make the following statement:
3.1.2.2.15 (etc.) Quality Assurance for Aging Management of Non- Safety Related Components The applicant referenced LRA Section B.0.3. The project team's evaluation of Section B.0.3 is provided in Section 3.0.4 of this audit and review report.
I will create a new Section 3.0.4 in the AMP part of the audit and review report. Jim Davis reviewed the PNPS Corrective Action program and will provide me the appropriate words to include in this section.
Ifyou have any questions, please call me or e-mail me.
erach
c:\temD\GMtO0001 .TMP Paae 11 Pame c:\temD\GWIOOOO1 .TMP Mail Envelope Properties (44ACOECB.86E: 22 : 35346)
Subject:
Re: Quality Assurance for aging management of NSR components Creation Date 07/05/2006 3:11:07 PM From: James Davis Created By: JAD @nrc.gov Recipients Action Date & Time comcast.net Transferred 07/05/2006 3:11:29 PM erachp (erachp@comcast.net)
Post Office Delivered Route comcast.net Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2065 07/05/2006 3:11:07 PM project staff review - corrective action plan.wpd 2277 07/05/2006 3:09:02 PM Options Auto Delete: No Expiration Date: None Notify Recipients: Yes Priority: Standard ReplyRequested: No Return Notification: None Concealed
Subject:
No Security: Standard To Be Delivered: Immediate Status Tracking: Delivered & Opened
James Davis - project staff review - corrective action plan.wpd Paqei1I 5
The project staff reviewed the applicant's corrective action procedure and found it to be acceptable. The corrective action procedure is reviewed on a routine basis by the regional inspection teams and has been found to be acceptable during past inspections.