ML071300536: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1L!LamesNoggle-R 1.109 dose calc on Roseton fish RgoPage J1i From: "Sa)'ike, Steven Richard" <SSandik@entergy.com>
{{#Wiki_filter:1L!LamesNoggle-R     1.109 dose calc on Roseton fish                             RgoPage J1i From:                   "Sa)'ike, Steven Richard" <SSandik@entergy.com>
To: <jdn@nrc.gov>
To:                     <jdn@nrc.gov>
Date: Wed, Jan 17, 2007 4:43 PM  
Date:                   Wed, Jan 17, 2007 4:43 PM


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Rg 1.109 dose calc on Roseton fish Jim....This simple eval does not account or discuss any of the finer elements of error propogation, critical level, environmental BKGD or constants for non-random error, and other improvements we are discussing with labs... but simply chugging through the RG 1.109 model I get:> With 25 pCi/kg of Sr-90 in fish, and ONLY looking at fish, we just> multiply this by RG 1.109 ingestion dose factors in mrem/pCi, and> usage factors, in kg/yr.> //---- RG 1.109=ODCM  
Rg 1.109 dose calc on Roseton fish Jim....
-------\> Field mrem/pCi kg/yr> expected human dose term, annually,> conc dose factor usage factor to> the BONE, critical organ.> Adult 25
This simple eval does not account or discuss any of the finer elements of error propogation, critical level, environmental BKGD or constants for non-random error, and other improvements we are discussing with labs... but simply chugging through the RG 1.109 model I get:
            > With 25 pCi/kg of Sr-90 in fish, and ONLY looking at fish, we just
            > multiply this by RG 1.109 ingestion dose factors in mrem/pCi, and
            > usage factors, in kg/yr.
            >                         //----RG 1.109=ODCM ------- \
            >               Field       mrem/pCi       kg/yr
            > expected human dose term, annually,
            >               conc     dose factor usage factor             to
            > the BONE, critical organ.
            > Adult 25
* 7.58E-3
* 7.58E-3
* 21 = 3.98 mrem in a year>39.8% \> Teen 25
* 21         =     3.98 mrem in a year
            >39.8%         \
            > Teen 25
* 8.30E-3
* 8.30E-3
* 16 = 3.32 mrem in a year> 33.2 % Annual Limit> Child .25
* 16       =     3.32 mrem in a year
            > 33.2 %         Annual Limit
            > Child .25
* 1.70E-2
* 1.70E-2
* 6.9 = 2.93 mrem in a year>29.3% /> Infant 25
* 6.9       =     2.93 mrem in a year
            >29.3%         /
            > Infant             25
* 1.85E-2
* 1.85E-2
* 0 = 0 (IPEC uses these numbers in the ODCM... standard RG 1.109 values, nothing site specific here....)> This indicates to me that the 25 pCi/kg at Roseton, if consumed like> our ODCM says for our critical receptor, would result in less than 40%> of the annual limits." 'Or we could say that about 62.5 pCi/kg = the 1OCFR50 human dose> limit for bone dose of 10 mrem.Clearly all the other assumptions of the model make this very conservative, but it's a starting point.I hope this is in the ball field of what you were looking for.... We have a lot more work to do with the lab, including sending some blanks, splits, spikes, from OUR chem lab and working out an INTERLAB program form someone. Adding some degree of Reg Guide 4.15 to GW is in our corrective action program due in March, but of course we are working on it now.> Steve Sandike> Effluents  
* 0     =       0 (IPEC uses these numbers in the ODCM... standard RG 1.109 values, nothing site specific here....)
/ RMS> ENN Indian Point Energy Center> Buchanan, NY 10511-0308
            > This indicates to me that the 25 pCi/kg at Roseton, ifconsumed like
> phone: 914-736-8455
            > our ODCM says for our critical receptor, would result in less than 40%
> fax: 914-734-6010
            > of the annual limits.
> email: ssandik@entergy.com 11 James Nocicile -RQ 1. 109 dose calc on Roseton f ish Pacie 2 11-ame Nojl c .0 oecico oeo ihPq 1 N> CONFIDENTIALI NOTICE: This elec nic message contains information
            "         'Or we could say that about 62.5 pCi/kg = the 10CFR50 human dose
> which may be legall onfidential and/ privileged and does not in> any case represent a fi ENERGY OMMODITY bid or offer relating> thereto which binds the se er wit out an additional express written> confirmation to that effect. Th ' ormation is intended solely for> the individual or entity named o and access by anyone else is> unauthorized.
            > limit for bone dose of 10 mrem.
If you are not t inten d recipient, any disclosure,> copying, distribution, or us of the conte s of this information is> prohibited and may be u awful. If you hav eceived this electronic
Clearly all the other assumptions of the model make this very conservative, but it's a starting point.
> transmission in error, ease reply immediatelto the sender that you> have received the ssage in error, and delete Thank you. Have a> pleasant day.CC: "Donahue, Patrick J" <PDonahu@entergy.com>, "Hinrichs, Gary H"<ghinric@entergy.com>, "Lavera, Ronald" <RLavera@entergy.com>}}
I hope this is in the ball field of what you were looking for.... We have a lot more work to do with the lab, including sending some blanks, splits, spikes, from OUR chem lab and working out an INTERLAB program form someone. Adding some degree of Reg Guide 4.15 to GW is in our corrective action program due in March, but of course we are working on it now.
            > Steve Sandike
            > Effluents / RMS
            > ENN Indian Point Energy Center
            > Buchanan, NY 10511-0308
            > phone: 914-736-8455
            > fax:       914-734-6010
            > email: ssandik@entergy.com
 
11 James Nocicile - RQ 1. 109 dose calc on Roseton f ish                                           Pacie 2111
  -ame Nojl       c .0     oecico       oeo     ihPq N
              > CONFIDENTIALI         NOTICE: This elec nic message contains information
              > which may be legall onfidential and/ privileged and does not in
              > any case represent a fi     ENERGY OMMODITY bid or offer relating
              > thereto which binds the se er wit out an additional express written
              > confirmation to that effect. Th ' ormation is intended solely for
              > the individual or entity named o and access by anyone else is
              > unauthorized. If you are not t inten d recipient, any disclosure,
              > copying, distribution, or us of the conte s of this information is
              > prohibited and may be u awful. If you hav eceived this electronic
              > transmission in error, ease reply immediatelto the sender that you
              > have received the     ssage in error, and delete Thank you. Have a
              > pleasant day.
CC:                 "Donahue, Patrick J" <PDonahu@entergy.com>, "Hinrichs, Gary H"
              <ghinric@entergy.com>, "Lavera, Ronald" <RLavera@entergy.com>}}

Revision as of 06:23, 23 November 2019

E-Mail from S. Sandike of Entergy to J. Noggle of USNRC, Regarding RG-1.109 Dose Calc on Roseton Fish
ML071300536
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 01/17/2007
From: Sandike S
Entergy Nuclear Operations
To: Noggle J
NRC/RGN-I/DRS/PSB2
References
FOIA/PA-2007-0166, RG-1.109
Download: ML071300536 (2)


Text

1L!LamesNoggle-R 1.109 dose calc on Roseton fish RgoPage J1i From: "Sa)'ike, Steven Richard" <SSandik@entergy.com>

To: <jdn@nrc.gov>

Date: Wed, Jan 17, 2007 4:43 PM

Subject:

Rg 1.109 dose calc on Roseton fish Jim....

This simple eval does not account or discuss any of the finer elements of error propogation, critical level, environmental BKGD or constants for non-random error, and other improvements we are discussing with labs... but simply chugging through the RG 1.109 model I get:

> With 25 pCi/kg of Sr-90 in fish, and ONLY looking at fish, we just

> multiply this by RG 1.109 ingestion dose factors in mrem/pCi, and

> usage factors, in kg/yr.

> //----RG 1.109=ODCM ------- \

> Field mrem/pCi kg/yr

> expected human dose term, annually,

> conc dose factor usage factor to

> the BONE, critical organ.

> Adult 25

  • 7.58E-3
  • 21 = 3.98 mrem in a year

>39.8% \

> Teen 25

  • 8.30E-3
  • 16 = 3.32 mrem in a year

> 33.2 % Annual Limit

> Child .25

  • 1.70E-2
  • 6.9 = 2.93 mrem in a year

>29.3% /

> Infant 25

  • 1.85E-2
  • 0 = 0 (IPEC uses these numbers in the ODCM... standard RG 1.109 values, nothing site specific here....)

> This indicates to me that the 25 pCi/kg at Roseton, ifconsumed like

> our ODCM says for our critical receptor, would result in less than 40%

> of the annual limits.

" 'Or we could say that about 62.5 pCi/kg = the 10CFR50 human dose

> limit for bone dose of 10 mrem.

Clearly all the other assumptions of the model make this very conservative, but it's a starting point.

I hope this is in the ball field of what you were looking for.... We have a lot more work to do with the lab, including sending some blanks, splits, spikes, from OUR chem lab and working out an INTERLAB program form someone. Adding some degree of Reg Guide 4.15 to GW is in our corrective action program due in March, but of course we are working on it now.

> Steve Sandike

> Effluents / RMS

> ENN Indian Point Energy Center

> Buchanan, NY 10511-0308

> phone: 914-736-8455

> fax: 914-734-6010

> email: ssandik@entergy.com

11 James Nocicile - RQ 1. 109 dose calc on Roseton f ish Pacie 2111

-ame Nojl c .0 oecico oeo ihPq N

> CONFIDENTIALI NOTICE: This elec nic message contains information

> which may be legall onfidential and/ privileged and does not in

> any case represent a fi ENERGY OMMODITY bid or offer relating

> thereto which binds the se er wit out an additional express written

> confirmation to that effect. Th ' ormation is intended solely for

> the individual or entity named o and access by anyone else is

> unauthorized. If you are not t inten d recipient, any disclosure,

> copying, distribution, or us of the conte s of this information is

> prohibited and may be u awful. If you hav eceived this electronic

> transmission in error, ease reply immediatelto the sender that you

> have received the ssage in error, and delete Thank you. Have a

> pleasant day.

CC: "Donahue, Patrick J" <PDonahu@entergy.com>, "Hinrichs, Gary H"

<ghinric@entergy.com>, "Lavera, Ronald" <RLavera@entergy.com>