IR 05000219/2014007: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION I 2100 RENAISSANCE BLVD., SUITE 100 KING OF PRUSSIA, PA 19406-2713 May 5, 2014 Mr. Michael Senior Vice President, Exelon Generation Company, LLC President and Chief Nuclear Officer, Exelon Nuclear 4300 Winfield Rd.
{{#Wiki_filter:May 5, 2014


Warrenville, IL 60555 SUBJECT: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION  
==SUBJECT:==
- NRC TRIENNIAL FIRE PROTECTION INSPECTION REPORT 05000219/201 4007
OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION - NRC TRIENNIAL FIRE PROTECTION INSPECTION REPORT 05000219/2014007


==Dear Mr. Pacilio:==
==Dear Mr. Pacilio:==
On April 11, 2014, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a triennial fire protection inspection at the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on April 11, 2014, with Mr. R. Peak and other members of your staff.
On April 11, 2014, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a triennial fire protection inspection at the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on April 11, 2014, with Mr. R. Peak and other members of your staff.


The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations
The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations, and with the conditions of your license. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed station personnel. The inspectors also reviewed mitigation strategies for addressing large fires and explosions.
, and with the conditions of your license. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed station personnel.
 
The inspectors also reviewed mitigation strategies for addressing large fires and explosions.


Based on the results of this inspection, no findings were identified.
Based on the results of this inspection, no findings were identified.


In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records System (PARS) component of the NRC's document system, Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records System (PARS)
component of the NRC's document system, Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).


Sincerely,
Sincerely,
/RA/ John F. Rogge, Chief Engineering Branch 3 Division of Reactor Safety
/RA/
 
John F. Rogge, Chief Engineering Branch 3 Division of Reactor Safety Docket No: 50-219 License No: DPR-16
Docket No:
50-219 License No:
DPR-16  


===Enclosure:===
===Enclosure:===
Line 46: Line 41:


REGION I==
REGION I==
Docket No:
Docket No: 50-219 License No: DPR-16 Report No: 05000219/2014007 Licensee: Exelon Generation Company, LLC Facility: Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Location: P.O. Box 388 Forked River, NJ 08731 Dates: March 24 - 28 and April 7 -11, 2014 Inspectors: R. Fuhrmeister, Senior Reactor Inspector (Team Leader)
50-219 License No:
C. Cahill, Senior Reactor Analyst K. Young, Senior Reactor Inspector J. Richmond, Reactor Inspector J. Rady, Reactor Inspector L. DuMont, Reactor Inspector Approved by: John F. Rogge, Chief Engineering Branch 3 Division of Reactor Safety
DPR-16 Report No:
05000219/2014007
 
Licensee: Exelon Generation Company, LLC Facility: Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station
 
Location: P.O. Box 388 Forked River, NJ 08731 Dates: March 24 - 28 and April 7-11, 2014 Inspectors:
R. Fuhrmeister, Senior Reactor Inspector (Team Leader) C. C ahill, Senior Reactor Analyst K. Young, Senior Reactor Inspector J. Richmond, Reactor Inspector J. Rady, Reactor Inspector L. DuMont, Reactor Inspector
 
Approved by:
John F. Rogge, Chief Engineering Branch 3 Division of Reactor Safety


=SUMMARY=
=SUMMARY=
IR 05000219/2014007
IR 05000219/2014007; 03/24-28/2014 and 04/07-11/2014; Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating


; 03/24-28/2014 and 04/07
Station; Triennial Fire Protection Inspection.
-11/2014; Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station; Triennial Fire Protection Inspection.


This report cover ed a two week on-site triennial fire protection team inspection by specialist inspectors. The NRC's program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG
This report covered a two week on-site triennial fire protection team inspection by specialist inspectors. The NRC's program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, "Reactor Oversight Process," Revision 4, dated December 2006.
-1649, "Reactor Oversight Process," Revision 4, dated December 2006.


No Findings were identified.
No Findings were identified.
Line 72: Line 55:
=REPORT DETAILS=
=REPORT DETAILS=


Background This report presents the results of a triennial fire protection inspection conducted in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure (IP) 71111.05T, "Fire Protection." The objective of the inspection was to assess whether Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelo n) ha d implemented an adequate fire protection program and whether post-fire safe shutdown capabilities ha d been established and were properly maintained at Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station (Oyster Creek). The following fire areas (FAs) and associated fire zones (FZs) were selected for detailed review based on prior inspection results and risk insights from the Oyster Creek Individual Plant Examination of External Events (IPEEE): Fire Areas (Fire Zones)
Background This report presents the results of a triennial fire protection inspection conducted in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure (IP) 71111.05T, "Fire Protection." The objective of the inspection was to assess whether Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon) had implemented an adequate fire protection program and whether post-fire safe shutdown capabilities had been established and were properly maintained at Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station (Oyster Creek). The following fire areas (FAs) and associated fire zones (FZs) were selected for detailed review based on prior inspection results and risk insights from the Oyster Creek Individual Plant Examination of External Events (IPEEE):
TB-FZ-11D RB-FZ-1F3 OB-FZ-22A Inspection of these fire areas/zones fulfill ed the inspection procedure requirement to inspect a minimum of three samples.
Fire Areas (Fire Zones)
* TB-FZ-11D
* RB-FZ-1F3
* OB-FZ-22A Inspection of these fire areas/zones fulfilled the inspection procedure requirement to inspect a minimum of three samples.


The inspection team evaluated Exelon's fire protection program (FPP) against applicable requirements which included Operating License Condition
The inspection team evaluated Exelon's fire protection program (FPP) against applicable requirements which included Operating License Condition, NRC Safety Evaluation Reports (SERs), 10 CFR 50.48, and 10 CFR 50, Appendix R. The team also reviewed related documents that included the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR), Section 9.5.1, fire protection plan, fire hazards analysis (FHA), and post-fire safe shutdown analyses.
, NRC Safety Evaluation Report s (SERs), 10 CFR 50.48, and 10 CFR 50, Appendix R
. The team also reviewed related documents that included the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR), Section 9.5.1 , fire protection plan, fire hazards analys is (FHA), and post-fire safe shutdown analys e s. The team evaluated aspects of five mitigating strategies for responding to large fires and explosions
, as required by Operating License Condition 2.C.17 and 10 CFR 50.54(hh)(2). The team also reviewed related documents that included NEI 06
-12, "B.5.b Phases 2 & 3 Submittal Guidance," Revision 2 (ML070090060). Inspection of the se strategies fulfills the inspection procedure requirement to inspect a minimum of one sample.


Specific documents reviewed by the team are listed in the attachment to this report
The team evaluated aspects of five mitigating strategies for responding to large fires and explosions, as required by Operating License Condition 2.C.17 and 10 CFR 50.54(hh)(2). The team also reviewed related documents that included NEI 06-12, "B.5.b Phases 2 & 3 Submittal Guidance," Revision 2 (ML070090060). Inspection of these strategies fulfills the inspection procedure requirement to inspect a minimum of one sample.
 
Specific documents reviewed by the team are listed in the attachment to this report.


==REACTOR SAFETY==
==REACTOR SAFETY==
Cornerstone s: Initiating Events, Mitigating Systems, and Barrier Integrity
Cornerstones: Initiating Events, Mitigating Systems, and Barrier Integrity


{{a|1R05}}
{{a|1R05}}
==1R05 Fire Protection==
==1R05 Fire Protection (IP 71111.05T)==
 
(IP 71111.05T)


===.1 Protection of Safe Shutdown Capabilities===
===.1 Protection of Safe Shutdown Capabilities===


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The team reviewed the FHA, safe shutdown analyses, and supporting drawings and documentation to verify that post
The team reviewed the FHA, safe shutdown analyses, and supporting drawings and documentation to verify that post-fire safe shutdown capabilities were properly protected.
-fire safe shutdown capabilities were properly protected. The team ensured that applicable separation requirements of Section III.G of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix R, and the licensee's design and licensing bases were maintained for the credited safe shutdown equipment and their supporting power, control, and instrumentation cables. This review included an assessment of the adequacy of the selected systems for reactivity control, reactor coolant makeup, reactor heat removal, process monitoring and associated support system functions.
 
The team ensured that applicable separation requirements of Section III.G of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix R, and the licensees design and licensing bases were maintained for the credited safe shutdown equipment and their supporting power, control, and instrumentation cables. This review included an assessment of the adequacy of the selected systems for reactivity control, reactor coolant makeup, reactor heat removal, process monitoring and associated support system functions.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
Line 105: Line 88:
The team walked down accessible portions of the selected fire areas to evaluate whether the material conditions of the fire area boundaries were adequate for the fire hazards in the area. The team compared the fire area boundaries including walls, ceilings, floors, fire doors, fire dampers, penetration seals, electrical raceway and conduit fire barriers, and redundant equipment fire barriers and radiant energy heat barriers to the design and licensing basis requirements, industry standards, and the OCNGS FPP, as approved by the NRC, to identify any potential degradation or non-conformances.
The team walked down accessible portions of the selected fire areas to evaluate whether the material conditions of the fire area boundaries were adequate for the fire hazards in the area. The team compared the fire area boundaries including walls, ceilings, floors, fire doors, fire dampers, penetration seals, electrical raceway and conduit fire barriers, and redundant equipment fire barriers and radiant energy heat barriers to the design and licensing basis requirements, industry standards, and the OCNGS FPP, as approved by the NRC, to identify any potential degradation or non-conformances.


The team reviewed selected engineering evaluations and qualification records for a sample of penetration seals to determine whether the fill material was properly installed and whether the as
The team reviewed selected engineering evaluations and qualification records for a sample of penetration seals to determine whether the fill material was properly installed and whether the as-left configuration satisfied design requirements for the intended fire rating. The team also reviewed similar records for selected fire protection wraps to verify whether the material and configuration was appropriate for the required fire rating and conformed to the engineering design.
-left configuration satisfied design requirements for the intended fire rating. The team also reviewed similar records for selected fire protection wraps to verify whether the material and configuration was appropriate for the required fire rating and conformed to the engineering design.


The team also reviewed recent inspection and test records for fire dampers and the inspection records for penetration seals and fire barriers to verify whether the inspection and testing was adequately conducted, the acceptance criteria were met, and any potential performance degradation was identified.
The team also reviewed recent inspection and test records for fire dampers and the inspection records for penetration seals and fire barriers to verify whether the inspection and testing was adequately conducted, the acceptance criteria were met, and any potential performance degradation was identified.
Line 118: Line 100:
The team evaluated manual and automatic fire suppression and detection systems in the selected fire areas to determine whether they were installed, tested, maintained and operated in accordance with NRC requirements, National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) codes of record and the OCNGS FPP. The team also assessed whether the suppression systems capabilities were adequate to control and/or extinguish fires associated with the hazards in the selected areas.
The team evaluated manual and automatic fire suppression and detection systems in the selected fire areas to determine whether they were installed, tested, maintained and operated in accordance with NRC requirements, National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) codes of record and the OCNGS FPP. The team also assessed whether the suppression systems capabilities were adequate to control and/or extinguish fires associated with the hazards in the selected areas.


The team reviewed the as
The team reviewed the as-built capability of the fire water supply system to verify whether the design and licensing basis and NFPA code of record requirements were satisfied and to assess whether those capabilities were adequate for the hazards involved. The team reviewed the fire water system design and hydraulic analysis to assess the adequacy of the system to supply the largest single hydraulic load on the fire water system plus concurrent fire hose usage with one fire pump out of service. The team evaluated fire pump performance tests to assess the adequacy of the test acceptance criteria for pump minimum discharge pressure at the required flow rate to verify whether the criteria was adequate to ensure that the design basis requirements were satisfied. The team also evaluated the underground fire loop flow tests and flushes to verify whether the combination of the tests and flushes adequately demonstrated that the flow distribution circuits were able to meet design basis requirements. In addition, the team reviewed recent pump and loop flow test results to verify whether the testing was adequately conducted, the acceptance criteria were met and any potential performance degradation was identified.
-built capability of the fire water supply system to verify whether the design and licensing basis and NFPA code of record requirements were satisfied and to assess whether those capabilities were adequate for the hazards involved. The team reviewed the fire water system design and hydraulic analysis to assess the adequacy of the system to supply the largest single hydraulic load on the fire water system plus concurrent fire hose usage with one fire pump out of service. The team evaluated fire pump performance tests to assess the adequacy of the test acceptance criteria for pump minimum discharge pressure at the required flow rate to verify whether the criteria was adequate to ensure that the design basis requirements were satisfied. The team also evaluated the underground fire loop flow tests and flushes to verify whether the combination of the tests and flushes adequately demonstrated that the flow distribution circuits were able to meet design basis requirements. In addition, the team reviewed recent pump and loop flow test results to verify whether the testing was adequately conducted, the acceptance criteria were met and any potential performance degradation was identified.


The team walked down accessible portions of the detection and water suppression systems in the selected areas and major portions of the fire water supply system, including the motor and two diesel driven fire pumps, interviewed system and program engineers, and reviewed selected issue reports (IRs) to independently assess the material condition of the systems and components. In addition, the team reviewed recent test results for the fire detection and suppression systems for the selected fire areas to verify whether the testing was adequately conducted, the acceptance criteria were met and any potential performance degradation was identified.
The team walked down accessible portions of the detection and water suppression systems in the selected areas and major portions of the fire water supply system, including the motor and two diesel driven fire pumps, interviewed system and program engineers, and reviewed selected issue reports (IRs) to independently assess the material condition of the systems and components. In addition, the team reviewed recent test results for the fire detection and suppression systems for the selected fire areas to verify whether the testing was adequately conducted, the acceptance criteria were met and any potential performance degradation was identified.


The team assessed the fire brigade capabilities by reviewing training, qualification, and drill critique records. The team also reviewed Exelon's firefighting strategies (i.e., pre
The team assessed the fire brigade capabilities by reviewing training, qualification, and drill critique records. The team also reviewed Exelon's firefighting strategies (i.e., pre-fire plans) and smoke removal plans for the selected fire areas to determine if appropriate information was provided to fire brigade members and plant operators to identify safe shutdown equipment and instrumentation, and to facilitate suppression of a fire that could impact post-fire safe shutdown capability. The team independently inspected the fire brigade equipment, including personnel protective gear (e.g., turnout gear) and smoke removal equipment, to determine operational readiness for firefighting.
-fire plans) and smoke removal plans for the selected fire areas to determine if appropriate information was provided to fire brigade members and plant operators to identify safe shutdown equipment and instrumentation, and to facilitate suppression of a fire that could impact post
-fire safe shutdown capability. The team independently inspected the fire brigade equipment, including personnel protective gear (e.g., turnout gear) and smoke removal equipment, to determine operational readiness for firefighting.


In addition, the team reviewed Exelon's fire brigade equipment inventory and inspection procedure and recent inspection and inventory results to verify whether adequate equipment was available, and whether any potential material deficiencies were identified.
In addition, the team reviewed Exelon's fire brigade equipment inventory and inspection procedure and recent inspection and inventory results to verify whether adequate equipment was available, and whether any potential material deficiencies were identified.
Line 135: Line 114:


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The team performed document reviews and plant walkdowns to determine whether redundant trains of systems required for post
The team performed document reviews and plant walkdowns to determine whether redundant trains of systems required for post-fire safe shutdown, located in the same or adjacent fire areas, were subject to damage from fire suppression activities or from the rupture or inadvertent operation of fire suppression systems. Specifically, the team evaluated whether:
-fire safe shutdown, located in the same or adjacent fire areas, were subject to damage from fire suppression activities or from the rupture or inadvertent operation of fire suppression systems. Specifically, the team evaluated whether:
* A fire in one of the selected fire areas would release smoke, heat or hot gases that could cause unintended activation of suppression systems in adjacent fire areas which could potentially damage all redundant safe shutdown trains or
A fire in one of the selected fire areas would release smoke, heat or hot gases that could cause unintended activation of suppression systems in adjacent fire areas which could potentially damage all redundant safe shutdown trains or A fire suppression system rupture, inadvertent actuation or actuation due to a fire, in one of the selected fire areas, could directly damage all redundant trains (e.g.
* A fire suppression system rupture, inadvertent actuation or actuation due to a fire, in one of the selected fire areas, could directly damage all redundant trains (e.g.


sprinkler caused flooding of other than the locally affected train) and Adequate drainage was provided in areas protected by water suppression systems
sprinkler caused flooding of other than the locally affected train) and
* Adequate drainage was provided in areas protected by water suppression systems


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
Line 147: Line 127:


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The team reviewed the safe shutdown analysis, operating procedures, piping and instrumentation drawings (P&lDs), electrical drawings, the UFSAR, and other supporting documents for the selected fire areas to verify whether Exelon had properly identified the systems and components necessary to achieve and maintain post
The team reviewed the safe shutdown analysis, operating procedures, piping and instrumentation drawings (P&lDs), electrical drawings, the UFSAR, and other supporting documents for the selected fire areas to verify whether Exelon had properly identified the systems and components necessary to achieve and maintain post-fire safe shutdown conditions. The team evaluated selected systems and components credited by the safe shutdown analysis for reactor pressure control, reactivity control, reactor coolant makeup, decay heat removal, process monitoring, and support system functions to assess the adequacy of Exelon's alternative shutdown methodology. The team also assessed whether alternative post-fire shutdown could be performed both with and without the availability of off-site power. The team walked down selected plant configurations to verify whether they were consistent with the assumptions and descriptions in the safe shutdown and fire hazards analyses. In addition, the team evaluated whether the systems and components credited for use during post-fire safe shutdown would remain free from fire damage.
-fire safe shutdown conditions. The team evaluated selected systems and components credited by the safe shutdown analysis for reactor pressure control, reactivity control, reactor coolant makeup, decay heat removal, process monitoring, and support system functions to assess the adequacy of Exelon's alternative shutdown methodology. The team also assessed whether alternative post
-fire shutdown could be performed both with and without the availability of of f-site power. The team walked down selected plant configurations to verify whether they were consistent with the assumptions and descriptions in the safe shutdown and fire hazards analyses. In addition, the team evaluated whether the systems and components credited for use during post
-fire safe shutdown would remain free from fire damage.


The team reviewed the training program for licensed and non
The team reviewed the training program for licensed and non-licensed operators to verify whether it included alternative shutdown capability. The team also verified whether personnel required for post-fire safe shutdown, using either the normal or alternative shutdown methods, were trained and available on-site at all times, exclusive of those assigned as fire brigade members.
-licensed operators to verify whether it included alternative shutdown capability. The team also verified whether personnel required for post
-fire safe shutdown, using either the normal or alternative shutdown methods, were trained and available on
-site at all times, exclusive of those assigned as fire brigade members.


The team reviewed the adequacy of procedures utilized for post
The team reviewed the adequacy of procedures utilized for post-fire shutdown and performed an independent walk through of procedure steps (i.e., a procedure tabletop)to assess the adequacy of implementation and human factors within the procedures.
-fire shutdown and performed an independent walk through of procedure steps (i.e., a procedure tabletop) to assess the adequacy of implementation and human factors within the procedures. The team also evaluated the time required to perform specific actions to verify whether operators could reasonably be expected to perform those actions within sufficient time to maintain plant parameters within specified limits.


Specific procedures reviewed for normal and alternative post
The team also evaluated the time required to perform specific actions to verify whether operators could reasonably be expected to perform those actions within sufficient time to maintain plant parameters within specified limits.
-fire shutdown included:
ABN-30, Control Room Evacuation, Rev. 25 FSP-TB11D, Turbine Building Basement Fire Support Procedure, Rev. 8 FSP-RB1F3, Reactor Building Elev.


-19 Foot, Rev. 3 The team reviewed selected operator manual actions to verify whether they had been properly reviewed and approved and whether the actions could be implemented in accordance with plant procedures in the time necessary to support the safe shutdown method for each fire area. The team also reviewed the periodic testing of the alternative shutdown transfer and isolation capability, and instrumentation and control functions, to evaluate whether the tests were adequate to ensure the functionality of the alternative shutdown capability.
Specific procedures reviewed for normal and alternative post-fire shutdown included:
* ABN-30, Control Room Evacuation, Rev. 25
* FSP-TB11D, Turbine Building Basement Fire Support Procedure, Rev. 8
* FSP-RB1F3, Reactor Building Elev. -19 Foot, Rev. 3 The team reviewed selected operator manual actions to verify whether they had been properly reviewed and approved and whether the actions could be implemented in accordance with plant procedures in the time necessary to support the safe shutdown method for each fire area. The team also reviewed the periodic testing of the alternative shutdown transfer and isolation capability, and instrumentation and control functions, to evaluate whether the tests were adequate to ensure the functionality of the alternative shutdown capability.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
No findings were identified.
No findings were identified.


===.6 Circuit Analys===
===.6 Circuit Analysis===


is
====a. Inspection Scope====
The team reviewed Exelon's post-fire safe shutdown analysis for the selected fire areas to determine whether the analysis identified both required and associated electrical circuits and cables for the systems and components necessary to achieve and maintain safe shutdown. The team reviewed electrical schematics and cable routing data for power, control, and instrument cables associated with selected components.


====a. Inspection Scope====
Specifically, the team evaluated the selected circuits and cables to determine whether they were
The team reviewed Exelon's post-fire safe shutdown analysis for the selected fire areas to determine whether the analysis identified both required and associated electrical circuits and cable s for the systems and components necessary to achiev e and maintain safe shutdown. The team reviewed electrical schematics and cable routing data for power , control, and instrument cables associated with selected components. Specifically, the team evaluated the selected circuits and cables to determine whether they were
: (a) adequately protected from potential fire damage, or
: (a) adequately protected from potential fire damage, or
: (b) analyzed to show that fire-induced faults (e.g., hot shorts, open circuits, and shorts to ground) would not prevent safe shutdown, or
: (b) analyzed to show that fire-induced faults (e.g., hot shorts, open circuits, and shorts to ground) would not prevent safe shutdown, or
: (c) analyzed to show that potential damage could be mitigated with approved operator manual actions, in order to verify whether fire
: (c) analyzed to show that potential damage could be mitigated with approved operator manual actions, in order to verify whether fire-induced faults could adversely impact safe shutdown capabilities. The team's evaluations considered credible fire scenarios, cable insulation attributes, cable failure modes, cable routing, and common power supply or electrical bus configurations.
-induced faults could adversely impact safe shutdown capabilities. The team's evaluations considered credible fire scenarios, cable insulation attributes, cable failure modes, cable routing, and common power supply or electrical bus configurations.


In addition, the team reviewed cable raceway drawings and cable routing database s for a sample of components required for post
In addition, the team reviewed cable raceway drawings and cable routing databases for a sample of components required for post-fire safe shutdown to determine whether those cables were routed as described in the safe shutdown analysis. The team also reviewed equipment important to safe shutdown, but not part of the success path, to assess whether Exelon's safe shutdown methodologies were appropriate, conformed to design and licensing basis requirements, and appropriately considered the guidance in NRC Regulatory Guide 1.189, "Fire Protection for Nuclear Power Plants," revision 2.
-fire safe shutdown to determine whether those cables were routed as described in the safe shutdown analysis. The team also reviewed equipment important to safe shutdown, but not part of the success path, to assess whether Exelon's safe shutdown methodologies were appropriate
, conformed to design and licensing basis requirements
, and appropriately considered the guidance in NRC Regulatory Guide 1.189, "Fire Protection for Nuclear Power Plants," revision 2.


Cable failure modes were reviewed for the following components:
Cable failure modes were reviewed for the following components:
P-15-1B 'B' Control Rod Drive Pump P-5-2   RBCCW Pump V-14-30   Steam Line Valve  
* P-15-1B                 B Control Rod Drive Pump
- Train 'A' (AC)
* P-5-2                   RBCCW Pump
V-14-31 Steam Line Valve  
* V-14-30                 Steam Line Valve - Train A (AC)
- Train 'A' (DC)
* V-14-31                 Steam Line Valve - Train A (DC)
V-14-34 Condensate Valve  
* V-14-34                 Condensate Valve - Train A (DC)
- Train 'A' (DC)
* V-14-36                 Condensate Valve - Train A (AC)
V-14-36 Condensate Valve  
* LI-IG07A               A Isolation Condenser Shell Water Level The team reviewed a sample of circuit breaker and over-current protection coordination studies to determine whether equipment needed for post-fire safe shutdown activities could be adversely affected due to a lack of coordination that could result in a common power supply or common electrical bus concern. The team also evaluated whether coordination studies appropriately considered multiple faults due to fire. In addition, the team reviewed a sample of circuit breaker maintenance records, for components required for safe shutdown, to determine whether the breakers were properly maintained.
- Train 'A' (AC)
LI-IG07A 'A' Isolation Condenser Shell Water Level The team reviewed a sample of circuit breaker and over-current protection coordination studies to determine whether equipment needed for post
-fire safe shutdown activities could be adversely affected due to a lack of coordination that could result in a common power supply or common electrical bus concern.


The team also evaluated whether coordination studies appropriately considered multiple faults due to fire. In addition, the team reviewed a sample of circuit breaker maintenance records, for components required for safe shutdown, to determine whether the breakers were properly maintained.
The team assessed the transfer of control from the control room to the alternative shutdown locations to determine whether it would be affected by fire-induced circuit faults (e.g., by the provision of separate fuses and power supplies for alternative shutdown control circuits).
 
The team assessed the transfer of control from the control room to the alternative shutdown locations to determine whether it would be affected by fire
-induced circuit faults (e.g., by the provision of separate fuses and power supplies for alternative shutdown control circuits).


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
No findings were identified
No findings were identified.
.


===.7 Communications===
===.7 Communications===


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The team reviewed safe shutdown procedures, the safe shutdown analysis, and associated documents to verify whether an adequate method of communications would be available to plant operators following a fire. Specifically, the team evaluated whether plant telephones, page systems, and portable radios would be available for use and were properly maintained.
The team reviewed safe shutdown procedures, the safe shutdown analysis, and associated documents to verify whether an adequate method of communications would be available to plant operators following a fire. Specifically, the team evaluated whether plant telephones, page systems, and portable radios would be available for use and were properly maintained. During this review, the team considered the effects of ambient noise levels, clarity of reception, reliability, and coverage patterns. The team inspected selected emergency storage lockers to independently verify whether portable communication equipment was available for the fire brigade and plant operators. In addition, the team evaluated whether radio or phone repeaters, transmitters, and power supplies would be reasonably unaffected by a fire.
 
During this review, the team considered the effects of ambient noise levels, clarity of reception, reliability, and coverage patterns. The team inspected selected emergency storage lockers to independently verify whether portable communication equipment was available for the fire brigade and plant operators. In addition, the team evaluated whether radio or phone repeaters , transmitters, and power supplies would be reasonably unaffected by a fire.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
No findings were identified
No findings were identified.
.


===.8 Emergency Lighting===
===.8 Emergency Lighting===


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The team walked down the emergency lights in the selected fire areas to independently evaluate the placement and coverage areas of the lights. The team assessed whether the lights provided adequate illumination on local equipment and instrumentation required for post
The team walked down the emergency lights in the selected fire areas to independently evaluate the placement and coverage areas of the lights. The team assessed whether the lights provided adequate illumination on local equipment and instrumentation required for post-fire safe shutdown, to ensure local operations could be reliably performed under expected post-fire conditions. In addition, emergency light placement was also evaluated to determine adequate illumination of local area access and egress pathways.
-fire safe shutdown, to ensure local operations could be reliably performed under expected post
 
-fire conditions. In addition, emergency light placement was also evaluated to determine adequate illumination of local area access and egress pathways. The team verified whether the emergency light batteries were rated for at least an eight-hour capacity. The team interviewed system engineers and technical staff to evaluate the adequacy and the performance of the Emergency lighting Units (ELUs). Preventive maintenance procedures, the vendor manual, conductance tests, and battery replacement practices were also reviewed to evaluate whether the ELUs had been maintained in a manner that would ensure reliable operation.
The team verified whether the emergency light batteries were rated for at least an eight-hour capacity. The team interviewed system engineers and technical staff to evaluate the adequacy and the performance of the Emergency lighting Units (ELUs).
 
Preventive maintenance procedures, the vendor manual, conductance tests, and battery replacement practices were also reviewed to evaluate whether the ELUs had been maintained in a manner that would ensure reliable operation.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
Line 230: Line 192:


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The team reviewed Exelon's dedicated repair procedures, for components which might be damaged by fire and were required to achieve post
The team reviewed Exelon's dedicated repair procedures, for components which might be damaged by fire and were required to achieve post-fire cold shutdown. The team evaluated selected cold shutdown repairs to determine whether they could be achieved within the time frames assumed in the design and licensing bases. In addition, the team verified whether the necessary repair equipment, tools, and materials (e.g., pre-cut cables with prepared attachment lugs) were available and accessible on site.
-fire cold shutdown. The team evaluated selected cold shutdown repairs to determine whether they could be achieved within the time frames assumed in the design and licensing bases. In addition, the team verified whether the necessary repair equipment, tools, and materials (e.g., pre
-cut cables with prepared attachment lugs) were available and accessible on site.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
Line 240: Line 200:


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The team verified whether compensatory measures were in place for out
The team verified whether compensatory measures were in place for out-of-service, degraded, or inoperable fire protection and post-fire safe shutdown equipment, systems, or features (e.g., detection and suppression systems and equipment, passive fire barriers, pumps, valves, or electrical devices providing safe shutdown functions or capabilities). The team evaluated whether the short term compensatory measures adequately compensated for the degraded function or feature until appropriate corrective action could be taken and whether Exelon was effective in returning the equipment to service in a reasonable period of time.
-of-service, degraded, or inoperable fire protection and post-fire safe shutdown equipment, systems, or features (e.g., detection and suppression systems and equipment, passive fire barriers, pumps, valves, or electrical devices providing safe shutdown functions or capabilities). The team evaluated whether the short term compensatory measures adequately compensated for the degraded function or feature until appropriate corrective action could be taken and whether Exelon was effective in returning the equipment to service in a reasonable period of time.


The team reviewed selected compensatory measures in the form of operator manual actions for 10 CFR 50 Appendix R, Section III.G.2 areas to evaluate whether those actions could be reasonably accomplished. Specific attributes reviewed included availability of diagnostic instrumentation, expected environmental conditions, minimum staffing, communications, equipment availability, training, procedures, and verification and validation.
The team reviewed selected compensatory measures in the form of operator manual actions for 10 CFR 50 Appendix R, Section III.G.2 areas to evaluate whether those actions could be reasonably accomplished. Specific attributes reviewed included availability of diagnostic instrumentation, expected environmental conditions, minimum staffing, communications, equipment availability, training, procedures, and verification and validation.
Line 248: Line 207:
No findings were identified.
No findings were identified.


===.11 Review and Documentation of FPP Chang===
===.11 Review and Documentation of FPP Changes===
 
es


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
Line 270: Line 227:
====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The team reviewed selected mitigation strategies intended to maintain or restore core cooling, containment integrity, and spent fuel pool cooling capabilities under the circumstances associated with loss of large areas of the plant due to large fires or explosions. The team assessed whether Exelon continued to meet the requirements of license condition 2.C.17. The team reviewed five mitigation strategies:
The team reviewed selected mitigation strategies intended to maintain or restore core cooling, containment integrity, and spent fuel pool cooling capabilities under the circumstances associated with loss of large areas of the plant due to large fires or explosions. The team assessed whether Exelon continued to meet the requirements of license condition 2.C.17. The team reviewed five mitigation strategies:
Operation of the electro
* Operation of the electro-magnetic relief valves using the portable power supply;
-magnetic relief valves using the portable power supply; Manual operation of the isolation condenser for B.5.b events; External makeup to the isolation condensers using the portable pump; External makeup to the fuel pool using the B.5.b pump and, Manually opening containment vent valves in a B.5.b event The team's review included: a detailed assessment of the procedural guidance; a walkdown of the strategy with a trained operator to assess the feasibility of the strategy and operator familiarity; a review of maintenance and surveillance test records for the strategy equipment; and an independent inventory check of the strategy equipment, materials, and tools to ensure the appropriateness of equipment storage and availability.
* Manual operation of the isolation condenser for B.5.b events;
* External makeup to the isolation condensers using the portable pump;
* External makeup to the fuel pool using the B.5.b pump and,
* Manually opening containment vent valves in a B.5.b event The team's review included: a detailed assessment of the procedural guidance; a walkdown of the strategy with a trained operator to assess the feasibility of the strategy and operator familiarity; a review of maintenance and surveillance test records for the strategy equipment; and an independent inventory check of the strategy equipment, materials, and tools to ensure the appropriateness of equipment storage and availability.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
Line 278: Line 238:
==OTHER ACTIVITIES==
==OTHER ACTIVITIES==
{{a|4OA2}}
{{a|4OA2}}
==4OA2 Identification and Resolution of Problems==
==4OA2 Identification and Resolution of Problems (IP 71152)==
 
  (IP 71152)


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The team reviewed a sample of issue reports and action requests associated with the fire protection program
The team reviewed a sample of issue reports and action requests associated with the fire protection program, post-fire safe shutdown issues, and mitigation strategy issues to determine whether Exelon was appropriately identifying, characterizing, and correcting problems associated with these areas and whether the planned or completed corrective actions were appropriate. The condition reports reviewed are listed in the attachment.
, post-fire safe shutdown issues, and mitigation strategy issues to determine whether Exelon was appropriately identifying, characterizing, and correcting problems associated with these areas and whether the planned or completed corrective actions were appropriate. The condition reports reviewed are listed in the attachment
.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
No findings were identified
No findings were identified.
.
 
{{a|4OA6}}
{{a|4OA6}}
==4OA6 Meetings, including Exit==
==4OA6 Meetings, including Exit==


The team presented the inspection results to Mr. R. Peak , Plant Manager , and other members of Exelon 's staff on April 11, 2014. The team verified that this report does not contain proprietary information
The team presented the inspection results to Mr. R. Peak, Plant Manager, and other members of Exelon 's staff on April 11, 2014. The team verified that this report does not contain proprietary information.
.


=SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION=
=SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION=


KEY POINTS OF CONTACT
KEY POINTS OF CONTACT
===Licensee Personnel===
===Licensee Personnel===
: [[contact::N. Onuorah]], Fire Protection Engineer
: [[contact::N. Onuorah]], Fire Protection Engineer
Line 314: Line 268:
: [[contact::T. Cannon]], Electrical Technician
: [[contact::T. Cannon]], Electrical Technician
: [[contact::R. Wojcik]], Electrical Technician
: [[contact::R. Wojcik]], Electrical Technician
===NRC Personnel===
===NRC Personnel===
: [[contact::J. Kulp]], Senior Resident Inspector
: [[contact::J. Kulp]], Senior Resident Inspector
Line 321: Line 274:
LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED AND DISCUSSED
LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED AND DISCUSSED
Opened
Opened
None Opened and Closed
None
None Closed None
Opened and Closed
None
Closed
None
 
LIST OF DOUCMENTS REVIEWED
LIST OF DOUCMENTS REVIEWED
Fire Protection Licensing and Design Basis Documents 990-1746 Fire Hazard Analysis Report, Revision 17
Fire Protection Licensing and Design Basis Documents
SP-1302-06-013, Augmented Quality Fire Protection Specification for Post
990-1746 Fire Hazard Analysis Report, Revision 17
-Fire Safe Shutdown
SP-1302-06-013, Augmented Quality Fire Protection Specification for Post-Fire Safe Shutdown
Requirements
Requirements at Oyster Creek Generating Station, Rev. 5
at Oyster Creek Generating Station, Rev. 5 Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station UFSAR, Section 9.5.1, Fire Protection, Rev. 18
Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station UFSAR, Section 9.5.1, Fire Protection, Rev. 18
Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station UFSAR, Section A.1.20, Fire Water System
Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station UFSAR, Section A.1.20, Fire Water System
  (Aging Management), Rev. 18
(Aging Management), Rev. 18
Oyster Creek Nuclear Power Plant Technical Specifications, 8/8/00
Oyster Creek Nuclear Power Plant Technical Specifications, 8/8/00
OCNGS SER, Fire Protection 3/3/78
OCNGS SER, Fire Protection 3/3/78
OCNGS SER, Fire Protection Supplement No. 2, 11/13/79
OCNGS SER, Fire Protection Supplement No. 2, 11/13/79
OCNGS SER, Fire Protection
OCNGS SER, Fire Protection Supplement No. 3, 8/25/80
Supplement No. 3, 8/25/80
Letter Dated March 24, 1986, Exemption from Requirements of Appendix R to 10 CFR Part 50,
Letter Dated March 24, 1986, Exemption from Requirements of Appendix R to 10 CFR Part 50,   Section III.G.2 and the Post
Section III.G.2 and the Post-Fire Safe Shutdown Capability
-Fire Safe Shutdown Capability
Letter Dated June 25, 1990, Exemption from Certain Technical Requirements Contained in
Letter Dated June 25, 1990, Exemption from Certain Technical Requirements Contained in
Section III.G if Appendix R to 10 CFR Part 50
Section III.G if Appendix R to 10 CFR Part 50
SP-1302-06-013, Specification for Post
SP-1302-06-013, Specification for Post-Fire Shutdown Program Requirements at OCNGS,
-Fire Shutdown
Rev. 4
Program Requirements at OCNGS,   Rev. 4 Calculations, Analysis, and Engineering Evaluations
Calculations, Analysis, and Engineering Evaluations
BR Report 3731
BR Report 3731-042, Tripping Feedwater Pumps from Control Room for Fire Outside
-042, Tripping Feedwater Pumps from Control Room for Fire Outside
the Control Room Complex, Rev. 2
the Control Room Complex, Rev. 2
C-1302-911-E120-001, Fire Area OB
C-1302-911-E120-001, Fire Area OB-FA-5 Safe Shutdown Analysis, Rev. 0
-FA-5 Safe Shutdown Analysis, Rev. 0
C-1302-911-E120-004, Fire Zone TB-FZ-11D Safe Shutdown Analysis, Rev. 0
C-1302-911-E120-004, Fire Zone TB
C-1302-911-E120-015, Fire Zone RB-FZ-1F3 Safe Shutdown Analysis, Rev. 0
-FZ-11D Safe Shutdown Analysis, Rev. 0
C-1302-911-E120-015, Fire Zone RB
-FZ-1F3 Safe Shutdown Analysis, Rev. 0
TDR 612, Appendix R Reactor Water Inventory Study, Rev. 0
TDR 612, Appendix R Reactor Water Inventory Study, Rev. 0
AR 673565-37, Evaluation of Operator Manual Actions in 4160 Switchgear Rooms
AR 673565-37, Evaluation of Operator Manual Actions in 4160 Switchgear Rooms
during a Fire in the Turbine Building Basement, performed 06/04/08
during a Fire in the Turbine Building Basement, performed 06/04/08
748-41, BISCO Report, Three Hour Rated Fire Seal Utilizing BISCO SF
748-41, BISCO Report, Three Hour Rated Fire Seal Utilizing BISCO SF-20 Silicone Foam,
-20 Silicone Foam,   4/17/81 748-134, BISCO Test Report, Fire Test Utilizing BISCO SF
4/17/81
-20 and SE-Foam, 5/14/84
748-134, BISCO Test Report, Fire Test Utilizing BISCO SF-20 and SE-Foam, 5/14/84
1042-01, BISCO Test Report, Qualification, Fire and Hose Stream Tests, 2/78
1042-01, BISCO Test Report, Qualification, Fire and Hose Stream Tests, 2/78
3001-01, Fire Test Configuration for BISCO Block Out Reduction System  
3001-01, Fire Test Configuration for BISCO Block Out Reduction System - Wall Openings
- Wall Openings
with Inner Lagging Attachment Supports, 7/3/79
with Inner Lagging Attachment Supports, 7/3/79
375645, Biodiesel Blend Fuel Oil Evaluation, 5/21/09
375645, Biodiesel Blend Fuel Oil Evaluation, 5/21/09
BM-TE-01, Mecatiss MPF
BM-TE-01, Mecatiss MPF-60 Fire Barriers, Rev. 0
-60 Fire Barriers, Rev. 0
C-1302-811-E310-043, OCNGS Fire Protection Hydraulic Model Margin Analysis, Rev. 0
C-1302-811-E310-043, OCNGS Fire Protection Hydraulic Model Margin Analysis, Rev. 0
CTP-1198, Fire Endurance Test of 3M Interam Mat Fire Protective Envelopes  
CTP-1198, Fire Endurance Test of 3M Interam Mat Fire Protective Envelopes
  (24 in. and 6 in. Cable Trays, 5", 3", 2", and 1" Conduits, 2" Air Drop and a 12" x 12" x 8"
(24 in. and 6 in. Cable Trays, 5, 3, 2, and 1 Conduits, 2 Air Drop and a 12 x 12 x 8
Junction Box), 11/9/95
Junction Box), 11/9/95
CTP-1199, Fire Endurance
CTP-1199, Fire Endurance Test of 3M Interam Mat Fire Protective Envelopes
Test of 3M Interam Mat Fire Protective Envelopes  
(24 Cable Tray, 5 and 1 Conduits, and 2 Air Drop into the Tray Center), 9/18/95
  (24" Cable Tray, 5" and 1" Conduits, and 2" Air Drop into the Tray Center), 9/18/95
CTP-2004, ASTM E136-94 Behavior of Materials in a Vertical Tube Furnace at 750oC,
CTP-2004, ASTM E136
3M E-50 Interam Series Mat, 1/17/95x 30 Deep Large Box Design, 11/10/98
-94 Behavior of Materials in a Vertical Tube Furnace at 750
CTP-2009, Fire Endurance Test of 3M Interam Fire Wrap Fire Protective Envelope, 5/19/98
oC,    3M E-50 Interam
Series Mat, 1/17/95x 30" Deep Large Box Design, 11/10/98
CTP-2009, Fire Endurance Test of 3M Interam Fire Wrap Fire Protective Envelope, 5/19/98  


CTP-2011, Fire Endurance Test of 3M Interam Fire Wrap 75" Wide x 56" High
CTP-2011, Fire Endurance Test of 3M Interam Fire Wrap 75 Wide x 56 High
CTP-2037, Fire Endurance Test Report of a Heat Transfer Study on Heavy Steel Support
CTP-2037, Fire Endurance Test Report of a Heat Transfer Study on Heavy Steel Support
Elements protected with 3M E
Elements protected with 3M E-50 Series E 54A Interam, 10/12/06
-50 Series E 54A Interam, 10/12/06
C312252, Thermo-Lag Raceway Cable Upgrades Modification, Rev. 0
C312252, Thermo
C312257, Thermo-Lag Raceway Cable Upgrades Modification, Rev. 0
-Lag Raceway Cable Upgrades Modification, Rev. 0
C312257, Thermo
-Lag Raceway Cable Upgrades Modification, Rev. 0
EC ECR A2014648, Evaluate Penetration Seal #435, 10/21/05
EC ECR A2014648, Evaluate Penetration Seal #435, 10/21/05
ECR A2161442, Evaluation of 3M Interam Installation for Conduit 86
ECR A2161442, Evaluation of 3M Interam Installation for Conduit 86-71, 9/7/12
-71, 9/7/12
GL 86-10 Evaluation (AR 00732552-02), Sprinkler System #9 Turbine Basement, South
GL 86-10 Evaluation (AR 00732552
GL 86-10 Evaluation (AR 00732559-02), Sprinkler System #15 Upper Cable Spreading Room
-02), Sprinkler System #9 Turbine Basement, South
GL 86-10 Evaluation (AR 00732559
-02), Sprinkler System #15 Upper Cable Spreading Room
Test Deck #1, UL Report, Raceway Fire Barriers for Aluminum Cable Tray & Aluminum
Test Deck #1, UL Report, Raceway Fire Barriers for Aluminum Cable Tray & Aluminum
Conduit Systems, 2/5/96
Conduit Systems, 2/5/96
Line 400: Line 341:
Box and Aluminum Conduit Systems, 2/9/96
Box and Aluminum Conduit Systems, 2/9/96
06-00797, Appendix R Evaluation of Electrical Protective Device Coordination, Rev. 0
06-00797, Appendix R Evaluation of Electrical Protective Device Coordination, Rev. 0
C-1302-911-E120-001, Fire Area/Zone
C-1302-911-E120-001, Fire Area/Zone OB-FA-5 Fire Safe Shutdown Analysis, Rev. 2
OB-FA-5 Fire Safe Shutdown Analysis, Rev. 2
C-1302-911-E120-004, Fire Area/Zone TB-FZ-11D Fire Safe Shutdown Analysis, Rev. 4
C-1302-911-E120-004, Fire Area/Zone TB
C-1302-911-E120-015, Fire Area/Zone RB-FZ-1F3 Fire Safe Shutdown Analysis, Rev. 3
-FZ-11D Fire Safe Shutdown Analysis, Rev. 4
OC-PRA-21.06, Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Fire Probabilistic Risk Assessment,
C-1302-911-E120-015, Fire Area/Zone RB
Summary and Quantification Notebook
-FZ-1F3 Fire Safe Shutdown Analysis, Rev. 3
OC-PRA-21.06, Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Fire Probabilistic Risk Assessment,   Summary and Quantification Notebook
OC-PSA-012, Internal Flood Evaluation Summary and Notebook, Oyster Creek Nuclear
OC-PSA-012, Internal Flood Evaluation Summary and Notebook, Oyster Creek Nuclear
Generating Station, Rev. 1
Generating Station, Rev. 1
6-1302-104-5320-013, Design Of Support 1B for 3"
6-1302-104-5320-013, Design Of Support 1B for 3 Dia and 4 Dia Lines of Fire Protec. Sys.
Dia and 4" Dia Lines of Fire Protec. Sys.
N.C.S.R. O.C. Stn.
N.C.S.R. O.C. Stn.
13432.30-105, New CSR Floor Drain Line Sizing, Rev. 0
13432.30-105, New CSR Floor Drain Line Sizing, Rev. 0
ECR OC 11-0507 002, Replace Deluge Valve for System #6
ECR OC 11-0507 002, Replace Deluge Valve for System #6
ECR OC 13-00350 001, Replace Fire Detectors on RB 95'
ECR OC 13-00350 001, Replace Fire Detectors on RB 95
Drawings and Wiring Diagrams
Drawings and Wiring Diagrams
23-56751-43, Auto Depressurization System Connection Diagram, Rev. 7
23-56751-43, Auto Depressurization System Connection Diagram, Rev. 7
29E182 Sht. 5, Auto Depressurization System Elementary Diagram, Rev. 4
29E182 Sht. 5, Auto Depressurization System Elementary Diagram, Rev. 4
Line 424: Line 361:
BR 2192, Sht.1, Composite Yard Piping Key Plan, Rev. 12
BR 2192, Sht.1, Composite Yard Piping Key Plan, Rev. 12
BR 2192, Sht. 2, Composite Yard Piping Key Plan, Rev. 0
BR 2192, Sht. 2, Composite Yard Piping Key Plan, Rev. 0
DJP FBS TB
DJP FBS TB-FZ-11D-03, Isometric, Fire Barrier (Mecatiss), Rev. 0
-FZ-11D-03, Isometric, Fire Barrier (Mecatiss), Rev. 0
DJP FBS TB-FZ-11D-03, Isometric, Fire Barrier (Mecatiss), Rev. 1
DJP FBS TB
DJP 3E-811-17-1001, Fire Protection Water System, Electrical Elementary Diagram,
-FZ-11D-03, Isometric, Fire Barrier (Mecatiss), Rev. 1
Fire Diesel Pump #1, Rev. 2
DJP 3E-811-17-1001, Fire Protection Water System, Electrical Elementary Diagram,   Fire Diesel Pump #1, Rev. 2
GU 3D-911-01-001, Fire Area Layout Site Plan, Rev. 7
GU 3D-911-01-001, Fire Area Layout Site Plan, Rev. 7
GU 3D-911-02-002, Fire Area Layout Turbine Building Basement Floor Plan, Rev. 5
GU 3D-911-02-002, Fire Area Layout Turbine Building Basement Floor Plan, Rev. 5
GU 3D-911-02-006, Fire Area Layout Turbine Building Operating Floor, Rev. 8
GU 3D-911-02-006, Fire Area Layout Turbine Building Operating Floor, Rev. 8
GU 3D-911-02-007, Fire Area Layout Turbine Building Sections "A
GU 3D-911-02-007, Fire Area Layout Turbine Building Sections A-A & B-B, Rev. 3
-A" & "B-B", Rev. 3


GU 3D-911-02-008, Fire Area Layout Turbine Building Sections "C
GU 3D-911-02-008, Fire Area Layout Turbine Building Sections C-C & D-D, Rev. 2
-C" & "D-D", Rev. 2 GU 3D-911-02-009, Fire Area Layout Turbine Building Sections "E
GU 3D-911-02-009, Fire Area Layout Turbine Building Sections E-E & F-F, Rev. 3
-E" & "F-F", Rev. 3
GU 3D-911-02-011, Fire Area Layout Office Building Third Floor, Rev. 8
GU 3D-911-02-011, Fire Area Layout Office Building Third Floor, Rev. 8
GU 3D-911-02-012, Fire Area Layout EDG Vaults, Rev. 7
GU 3D-911-02-012, Fire Area Layout EDG Vaults, Rev. 7
GU 3D-911-02-013, Fire Area Layout Reactor Building EL.  
GU 3D-911-02-013, Fire Area Layout Reactor Building E
-19'6", -6'-5" & -1'-11", Rev. 3
: [[contact::L. -196]], -6-5 & -1-11, Rev. 3
GU 3D-911-02-030, Fire Area Layout Fresh Water Pump House & Redundant Fire Protection
GU 3D-911-02-030, Fire Area Layout Fresh Water Pump House & Redundant Fire Protection
Pump House & Tank, Rev. 3
Pump House & Tank, Rev. 3
Line 448: Line 382:
Dia., Rev. 5
Dia., Rev. 5
4092, Turbine Building Floor Plan @ E
4092, Turbine Building Floor Plan @ E
: [[contact::L. 23'6"]], 27' & 36', Beam and Slab Schedules, Rev. 10
: [[contact::L. 236]], 27 & 36, Beam and Slab Schedules, Rev. 10
13432.02-M-03, Redundant Fire Protection System Underground Piping Phase I, Rev. 3
13432.02-M-03, Redundant Fire Protection System Underground Piping Phase I, Rev. 3
103D5244, Connection Diagram Metal Clad Switchgear Unit A1 Bus 1A, Rev. 24
103D5244, Connection Diagram Metal Clad Switchgear Unit A1 Bus 1A, Rev. 24
103D5287, Sht. 2, Metal Clad Switchgear Interconnection Diagram, Rev. 26
103D5287, Sht. 2, Metal Clad Switchgear Interconnection Diagram, Rev. 26
104D2511, Sht. 2, Emergency Diesel Generator 1 Connection Diagram, Rev. 7
104D2511, Sht. 2, Emergency Diesel Generator 1 Connection Diagram, Rev. 7
2C3714, Sht. 4, Connection Diagram
2C3714, Sht. 4, Connection Diagram for Panel 13R, Rev. 21
for Panel 13R, Rev. 21
3C-733-11-006, 120Vac Vital Power System Panel Schedule IP-4, Rev. 6
3C-733-11-006, 120Vac Vital Power System Panel Schedule IP
3D-211-18-006, Sht. 1, Emergency Condenser System Wiring Diagram Valve V-14-0030,
-4, Rev. 6 3D-211-18-006, Sht. 1, Emergency Condenser System Wiring Diagram Valve V
Rev. 2
-14-0030,   Rev. 2 3D-211-18-006, Sht. 2, Emergency Condenser System Wiring Diagram Valve
3D-211-18-006, Sht. 2, Emergency Condenser System Wiring Diagram Valve V-14-0031,
V-14-0031,   Rev. 1 3D-211-18-006, Sht. 5, Emergency Condenser System Wiring Diagram Valve V
Rev. 1
-14-0034,   Rev. 1 3D-211-18-006, Sht. 5, Emergency Condenser System Wiring Diagram Valve V
3D-211-18-006, Sht. 5, Emergency Condenser System Wiring Diagram Valve V-14-0034,
-14-0034,   Rev. 1 BR3000, Electrical Power System Key One Line Diagram, Rev. 14 BR3001, Sht. 1, Main One Line Diagram, Auxiliary Startup, Main Transformer and
Rev. 1
3D-211-18-006, Sht. 5, Emergency Condenser System Wiring Diagram Valve V-14-0034,
Rev. 1
BR3000, Electrical Power System Key One Line Diagram, Rev. 14
BR3001, Sht. 1, Main One Line Diagram, Auxiliary Startup, Main Transformer and
Main Generator, Rev. 16
Main Generator, Rev. 16
BR3001, Sht. 2, One Line Diagram Emergency Diesel Generators, Rev. 4
BR3001, Sht. 2, One Line Diagram Emergency Diesel Generators, Rev. 4
Line 466: Line 404:
BR3001C, 4160V System One Line Diagram Emergency Switchgear Bus 1C and 1D, Rev. 1
BR3001C, 4160V System One Line Diagram Emergency Switchgear Bus 1C and 1D, Rev. 1
BR3002, Sht. 2, 480V System One Line Diagram Unit Substation 1A2 and 1B2, Rev. 13
BR3002, Sht. 2, 480V System One Line Diagram Unit Substation 1A2 and 1B2, Rev. 13
BR3028, Sht. 1, 125V Station Dc System One Line Diagram, MCC DC
BR3028, Sht. 1, 125V Station Dc System One Line Diagram, MCC DC-1, Rev. 20
-1, Rev. 20
E1101, Elementary Diagram Remote Shutdown Panel Transfer Scheme, Rev. 6
E1101, Elementary Diagram Remote Shutdown Panel Transfer Scheme, Rev. 6
E1108, Elementary Diagram Remote Shutdown Panel Transfer Scheme, Rev. 16
E1108, Elementary Diagram Remote Shutdown Panel Transfer Scheme, Rev. 16
E1126, Elementary Diagram Reactor Building Closed Cooling Water Pump 1
E1126, Elementary Diagram Reactor Building Closed Cooling Water Pump 1-2, Rev. 12
-2, Rev. 12
GE103D5270, Sht. 1, 4160V System Electrical Connection Diagram, Rev. 27
GE103D5270, Sht. 1, 4160V System Electrical Connection Diagram, Rev. 27
GE106D9510, Sht. 1, Emergency Diesel Generator 2 Connection Diagram Switchgear Unit 1
GE106D9510, Sht. 1, Emergency Diesel Generator 2 Connection Diagram Switchgear Unit 1
and 3, Rev. 17
and 3, Rev. 17
GE112C2248, Sht. 2, Connection Diagram Panel 11F, Rev. 46
GE112C2248, Sht. 2, Connection Diagram Panel 11F, Rev. 46
GE116B8328, Sht. 17, 480V System Electrical Elementary Diagram 480V USS 1B2 Unit 041B,   Rev. 13 GE148F912, Sht. 3, Electrical Elementary Diagram Process Instrumentation, Rev. 17
GE116B8328, Sht. 17, 480V System Electrical Elementary Diagram 480V USS 1B2 Unit 041B,
GE157B6350, Sht. 151B, Emergency Condenser System Wiring Diagram Valve V
Rev. 13
-14-0032,   Rev. 11 GE157B6350, Sht. 152A, Emergency Condenser System Electrical Elementary Diagram Valve
GE148F912, Sht. 3, Electrical Elementary Diagram Process Instrumentation, Rev. 17
GE157B6350, Sht. 151B, Emergency Condenser System Wiring Diagram Valve V-14-0032,
Rev. 11
GE157B6350, Sht. 152A, Emergency Condenser System Electrical Elementary Diagram Valve
V-14-0036, Rev. 4
V-14-0036, Rev. 4


GE157B6397, Sht. 15, Emergency Condenser System Electrical Elementary Diagram Valve
GE157B6397, Sht. 15, Emergency Condenser System Electrical Elementary Diagram Valve
V-14-0034, Rev. 31
V-14-0034, Rev. 31
GE223R0173, Sht. 1A, 4160V System Electrical Elementary Diagram Switchgear 1A Unit A1,   Rev. 27 GE237E901, Sht. 2, Containment Spray Logic Electrical Elementary Diagram, Rev. 21
GE223R0173, Sht. 1A, 4160V System Electrical Elementary Diagram Switchgear 1A Unit A1,
Rev. 27
GE237E901, Sht. 2, Containment Spray Logic Electrical Elementary Diagram, Rev. 21
GE719E202, Sht. 1, Electrical Connection Diagram Panel ER8A, Rev. 17
GE719E202, Sht. 1, Electrical Connection Diagram Panel ER8A, Rev. 17
GE719E203, Sht. 1, Electrical Connection Diagram Panel ER8B, Rev. 18
GE719E203, Sht. 1, Electrical Connection Diagram Panel ER8B, Rev. 18
GE719E211, Sht. 10, Main Control
GE719E211, Sht. 10, Main Control Room Panel 1F/2F, Rev. 8
Room Panel 1F/2F, Rev. 8
GE719E211, Sht. 4, Main Control Room Panel 1F/2F, Rev. 32
GE719E211, Sht. 4, Main Control Room Panel 1F/2F, Rev. 32
GE719E211, Sht. 7, Main Control Room Panel 1F/2F, Rev. 19
GE719E211, Sht. 7, Main Control Room Panel 1F/2F, Rev. 19
Line 495: Line 435:
GE237E901, Sht. 1, Containment Spray Logic Electrical Elementary Diagram, Rev 35
GE237E901, Sht. 1, Containment Spray Logic Electrical Elementary Diagram, Rev 35
Piping and Instrumentation Diagrams
Piping and Instrumentation Diagrams
148F262 Sht. 1, Emergency Condenser, Rev. 55
148F262 Sht. 1, Emergency Condenser, Rev. 55
148F740, Containment Spray System, Rev. 44
148F740, Containment Spray System, Rev. 44
Line 502: Line 441:
JC 19479, Sht. 1, Fire Protection Water System Flow Diagram, Rev. 40
JC 19479, Sht. 1, Fire Protection Water System Flow Diagram, Rev. 40
JC 19479, Sht. 2, Fire Protection Water System Flow Diagram, Rev. 42
JC 19479, Sht. 2, Fire Protection Water System Flow Diagram, Rev. 42
JC 19479, Sht. 3, Fire Protection Water System Flow Diagram, Rev. 68 JC 19479, Sht. 4, Fire Protection Water System Flow Diagram, Rev. 30
JC 19479, Sht. 3, Fire Protection Water System Flow Diagram, Rev. 68
JC 19479, Sht. 4, Fire Protection Water System Flow Diagram, Rev. 30
GE148F262, Sht. 1, Emergency Condenser Flow Diagram, Rev. 55
GE148F262, Sht. 1, Emergency Condenser Flow Diagram, Rev. 55
Large Fires and Explosions Mitigation Strategies Documents
Large Fires and Explosions Mitigation Strategies Documents
EDMG-01, Extensive Damage Mitigation Guidelines, Rev. 6
EDMG-01, Extensive Damage Mitigation Guidelines, Rev. 6
EDMG-SPX1, Operation of the B.5.b Portable Pump, Rev. 13
EDMG-SPX1, Operation of the B.5.b Portable Pump, Rev. 13
Line 514: Line 453:
EDMG-SPX9, Manually Opening Containment Vent Valves in a B.5.b Event, Rev. 4
EDMG-SPX9, Manually Opening Containment Vent Valves in a B.5.b Event, Rev. 4
Fire Protection Evaluations of Modifications and Design Changes
Fire Protection Evaluations of Modifications and Design Changes
ECR 11-00171, "A" CRD Pump Bypass Switch, Rev. 0
ECR 11-00171, "A" CRD Pump Bypass Switch, Rev. 0
ECR OC 13-00362 000, Replace Fire Alarm Master Panel In Control Room
ECR OC 13-00362 000, Replace Fire Alarm Master Panel In Control Room
Design Changes
Design Changes
ECR 07-00428, Mecatiss Fire Barrier Replacement to 3M Interam, Rev.1
ECR 07-00428, Mecatiss Fire Barrier Replacement to 3M Interam, Rev.1
ECR 13-00362, Replace Fire Alarm Master
ECR 13-00362, Replace Fire Alarm Master Panel in Control Room, Rev. 0
Panel in Control Room, Rev. 0


Quality Assurance Audits and Self Assessments
Quality Assurance Audits and Self Assessments
NOSA-OYS-12-10, Oyster Creek Fire Protection Audit Report, 9/19/12
NOSA-OYS-12-10, Oyster Creek Fire Protection Audit Report, 9/19/12
01554310, Oyster Creek Pre
01554310, Oyster Creek Pre-NRC Triennial Fire Protection Inspection Self-Assessment,
-NRC Triennial Fire Protection Inspection Self
2/3/13
-Assessment, 12/3/13 Oyster Creek P
Oyster Creek Pre-NRC Triennial Fire Protection Inspection Self-Assessment
re-NRC Triennial Fire Protection Inspection Self
-Assessment
System Health Reports
System Health Reports
Emergency Lighting (Appendix R) Q3
Emergency Lighting (Appendix R) Q3-2013
-2013 Emergency Lighting (Appendix R) Q4
Emergency Lighting (Appendix R) Q4-2013
-2013 Oyster Creek Fire Protection/Fire Safe Shutdown Program, 3
Oyster Creek Fire Protection/Fire Safe Shutdown Program, 3rd Quarter 2013
rd Quarter 2013
Oyster Creek Fire Protection/Fire Safe Shutdown Program, 4th Quarter 2013
Oyster Creek Fire Protection/Fire Safe Shutdown Program, 4
Oyster Creek System Health Report, 655-Fire Protection Detection Systems, 3rd Quarter 2013
th Quarter 2013
Oyster Creek System Health Report, 655-Fire Protection Detection Systems, 4rd Quarter 2013
Oyster Creek System Health Report, 655
Oyster Creek System Health Report, 813-Fire Protection Suppression Systems, 3rd Quarter
-Fire Protection Detection Systems, 3
2013
rd Quarter 2013
Oyster Creek System Health Report, 813-Fire Protection Suppression Systems, 4rd
Oyster Creek System Health Report, 655
Quarter 2013
-Fire Protection Detection Systems, 4
Oyster Creek System Health Report, 814-Fire Barriers, 3rd Quarter 2013
rd Quarter 2013
Oyster Creek System Health Report, 814-Fire Barriers, 4th Quarter 2013
Oyster Creek System Health Report, 813
25Vdc, 3rd and 4th Qtrs. 2013
-Fire Protection Suppression Systems, 3
4160Vac, 3rd and 4th Qtrs. 2013
rd Quarter    2013 Oyster Creek System Health Report, 813
480Vac, 3rd and 4th Qtrs. 2013
-Fire Protection Suppression Systems, 4
Emergency Diesel Generator, 3rd and 4th Qtrs. 2013
rd    Quarter 2013
Oyster Creek System Health Report, 814
-Fire Barriers, 3
rd Quarter 2013
Oyster Creek System Health Report, 814
-Fire Barriers, 4
th Quarter 2013
25Vdc, 3 rd and 4 th Qtrs. 2013
4160Vac, 3
rd and 4 th Qtrs. 2013
480Vac, 3 rd and 4 th Qtrs. 2013
Emergency Diesel Generator, 3
rd and 4 th Qtrs. 2013
Procedures
Procedures
101.2, Oyster Creek Site Fire Protection Program, Rev. 70
101.2, Oyster Creek Site Fire Protection Program, Rev. 70
101.2-3, Oyster Creek Site Fire Protection Program, Technical Requirements, Rev. 70
101.2-3, Oyster Creek Site Fire Protection Program, Technical Requirements, Rev. 70
Line 583: Line 504:
2400-SME-3915.01, Motor Control Center Preventive Maintenance, Rev. 17
2400-SME-3915.01, Motor Control Center Preventive Maintenance, Rev. 17
635.2.001, 4160V Switchgear Buses and Circulating Water Pump Protective Relay Surveillance,
635.2.001, 4160V Switchgear Buses and Circulating Water Pump Protective Relay Surveillance,
Rev. 66 CC-AA-206, Fuse Control, Rev. 8 CC-OC-206-1000, Fuse Replacement, Rev. 0
Rev. 66
CC-AA-206, Fuse Control, Rev. 8
CC-OC-206-1000, Fuse Replacement, Rev. 0
658.4.002, Fire Brigade and Safe Shutdown Radio Test, Rev. 36
658.4.002, Fire Brigade and Safe Shutdown Radio Test, Rev. 36
658.4.002, Fire Brigade and Safe Shutdown Radio Test, Rev. 37
658.4.002, Fire Brigade and Safe Shutdown Radio Test, Rev. 37
658.4.002, Fire Brigade and Safe Shutdown Radio Test, Rev. 38
658.4.002, Fire Brigade and Safe Shutdown Radio Test, Rev. 38
Operating Experience (OPEX) Evaluations
Operating Experience (OPEX) Evaluations
OPEX Review of NRC IN 2005
OPEX Review of NRC IN 2005-03, Seismic Gap Fire Barriers, 5/25/05
-03, Seismic Gap Fire Barriers, 5/25/05
OPEX Review of NRC IN 2006-22, New Ultra-Low-Sulfur Diesel Fuel Oil Could Adversely
OPEX Review of NRC IN 2006
-22, New Ultra-Low-Sulfur Diesel Fuel Oil Could Adversely
Impact Diesel Engine Performance, 10/8/06
Impact Diesel Engine Performance, 10/8/06
OPEX Review of NRC IN 2009
OPEX Review of NRC IN 2009-02, Biodiesel Fuel could Adversely Impact Diesel Engine
-02, Biodiesel Fuel could Adversely Impact Diesel Engine
Performance, 6/22/09
Performance, 6/22/09
OPEX Review of NRC IN 2009
OPEX Review of NRC IN 2009-29, Potential Failure of Water Supply Pumps to Automatically
-29, Potential Failure of Water Supply Pumps to Automatically Start due to a Fire, 2/3/10
Start due to a Fire, 2/3/10
TP 461/2, Appendix R Emergency Lighting Test, Rev. o
TP 461/2, Appendix R Emergency Lighting Test, Rev. o
Operations Procedures
Operations Procedures
307, Isolation Condenser System, Rev. 124
307, Isolation Condenser System, Rev. 124
346, Remote and Local Shutdown Panels Operation, Rev. 21
346, Remote and Local Shutdown Panels Operation, Rev. 21
Line 606: Line 525:
ABN-29, Plant Fires, Rev. 27
ABN-29, Plant Fires, Rev. 27
ABN-30, Control Room Evacuation, Rev. 25
ABN-30, Control Room Evacuation, Rev. 25
EMG-3200.01A Attachment 1, RPV Control EOP Flowchart, Rev. 8 EMG-SP11, Alternate Pressure Control Systems  
EMG-3200.01A Attachment 1, RPV Control EOP Flowchart, Rev. 8
- Isolation Condensers, Rev. 1
EMG-SP11, Alternate Pressure Control Systems - Isolation Condensers, Rev. 1
FSP-RB1F3, Reactor Building 19 Foot Elevation Fire Support Procedure, Rev. 3
FSP-RB1F3, Reactor Building 19 Foot Elevation Fire Support Procedure, Rev. 3
FSP-TB11D, Turbine Building Basement Fire Support Procedure, Rev. 8
FSP-TB11D, Turbine Building Basement Fire Support Procedure, Rev. 8
Operator Safe Shutdown Traini
Operator Safe Shutdown Training
ng
Scenario 2612.885.0.TBB, Fire Response in Turbine Building Basement, dated 7/17/12
Scenario 2612.885.0.TBB, Fire Response in Turbine Building Basement, dated 7/17/12
TQ-AA-223-F010, Training Material Approval Process, Rev. 6
TQ-AA-223-F010, Training Material Approval Process, Rev. 6
Line 617: Line 535:
JPM 308.01, Setup Remote Shutdown Panel upon Control Room Evacuation, dated 5/24/10
JPM 308.01, Setup Remote Shutdown Panel upon Control Room Evacuation, dated 5/24/10
Scenario 2621.RECIRCOPS.01, Recirculation Operations, dated 9/3/13
Scenario 2621.RECIRCOPS.01, Recirculation Operations, dated 9/3/13
JPM 308.02, Operate EDG #2 from LSP
JPM 308.02, Operate EDG #2 from LSP-DG2, dated 5/18/11
-DG2, dated 5/18/11
Scenario 2621.885.0.054C, Control Room Evacuation, dated 2/20/14
Scenario 2621.885.0.054C, Control Room Evacuation, dated 2/20/14
Fire Fighting Strategies (i.e., Pre
Fire Fighting Strategies (i.e., Pre-Fire Plans)
-Fire Plans)
OP-OC-201-008-1010, Oyster Creek Generating Station Pre-Fire Plan,
OP-OC-201-008-1010, Oyster Creek Generating Station Pre
(Fire Area/Zone RB-FZ-1F3), Rev. 0
-Fire Plan,   (Fire Area/Zone RB
OP-OC-201-008-1019, Oyster Creek Generating Station Pre-Fire Plan,
-FZ-1F3), Rev. 0
(Fire Area/Zone OB-FZ-22A), Rev. 0
OP-OC-201-008-1019, Oyster Creek Generating Station Pre
-Fire Plan,   (Fire Area/Zone OB
-FZ-22A), Rev. 0


O P-OC-201-008-1027, Oyster Creek Generating Station Pre
OP-OC-201-008-1027, Oyster Creek Generating Station Pre-Fire Plan,
-Fire Plan,   (Fire Area/Zone TB
(Fire Area/Zone TB-FZ-11D), Rev. 5
-FZ-11D), Rev. 5
Fire Brigade Documents
Fire Brigade Documents
2012 Fire Brigade End of Year Fire Drill Review, 1/2/13
2012 Fire Brigade End of Year Fire Drill Review, 1/2/13
Line 644: Line 557:
2012 Off-Site Fire Department Training, 9/11/12
2012 Off-Site Fire Department Training, 9/11/12
Fire Brigade Drills and Critiques
Fire Brigade Drills and Critiques
Rx Building 23' Elevation, North, MCC1A B2 Breaker, 8/28/12
Rx Building 23 Elevation, North, MCC1A B2 Breaker, 8/28/12
Site Emergency Building (SEB
Site Emergency Building (SEB-1 Electrical Room, Utility/Transformer Room, 2/11/14
-1 Electrical Room, Utility/Transformer Room, 2/11/14
SEB-1 Utility Room, 3/5/14
SEB-1 Utility Room, 3/5/14
SEB-1 Utility Room  
SEB-1 Utility Room - Battery Room, 3/13/14
- Battery Room, 3/13/14
Main Control Room - Panel 4-F, Announced, 1/16/14
Main Control Room  
Main Control Room - Panel 4-F, Announced, 3/21/14
- Panel 4-F, Announced, 1/16/14
Main Control Room  
- Panel 4-F, Announced, 3/21/14
MOB-3 Communications Room, 1/26/14
MOB-3 Communications Room, 1/26/14
Transient Combustible Permits and Evaluations
Transient Combustible Permits and Evaluations
 
13-011, Fire Zone TB-FZ-11A, Lube Oil Equipment, 3/23/14
13-011, Fire Zone TB
14-004, Fire Zone TB-FZ-11D, Turbine Building South-Air Compressor Area, 2/19/14
-FZ-11A, Lube Oil Equipment, 3/23/14
14-004, Fire Zone TB
-FZ-11D, Turbine Building South
-Air Compressor Area, 2/19/14
14-005, Fire Zone TB-FZ-11D, Heat Exchangers, 3/1/14
14-005, Fire Zone TB-FZ-11D, Heat Exchangers, 3/1/14
14-008, Fire Zone TB
14-008, Fire Zone TB-FZ-11G, Turbine Building Mezzanine-Cart, 3/23/13
-FZ-11G, Turbine Building Mezzanine
-Cart, 3/23/13
2014 Transient Combustible Log, 3/27/14
2014 Transient Combustible Log, 3/27/14
Hot Work and Ignition Source Permits
Hot Work and Ignition Source Permits
 
C2030965, TB 3 Air Compressor Receivers/Dryers 1-1 Air Receiver Repair/ Replace Valve
C2030965, TB 3' Air Compressor Receivers/Dryers 1
C2031632, ORW 23 Pre-Coat Pump NV-24
-1 Air Receiver Repair/ Replace Valve
Completed Tests and Surveillances
C2031632, ORW 23' Pre
645.3.037, Fire Pump Diesel 1-2 Controller Check and Component Calibration, Rev. 2,
-Coat Pump NV
Completed 8/29/13
-24 Completed Tests and Surveillances
645.3.038, Fire Pump Diesel 1-1 Controller Check and Component Calibration, Rev. 2,
645.3.037, Fire Pump Diesel 1
Completed 8/9/13
-2 Controller Check and Component Calibration, Rev. 2,   Completed 8/29/13
645.3.038, Fire Pump Diesel 1
-1 Controller Check and Component Calibration, Rev. 2,   Completed 8/9/13
645.4.001, Fire Pump #1 Operability Test, Rev. 71, Completed 1/10/14 & 2/6/14
645.4.001, Fire Pump #1 Operability Test, Rev. 71, Completed 1/10/14 & 2/6/14


645.4.012, Fire Pump Functional Test, Rev. 10, Completed 12/28/11 & 2/26/13 645.4.012, Fire Pump Functional Test, Rev. 11, Completed 12/5/13
645.4.012, Fire Pump Functional Test, Rev. 10, Completed 12/28/11 & 2/26/13
645.4.019, Redundant Fire Protection Water Supply Pump Operability Test, Rev. 20,   Completed 2/6/14 & 3/7/14
645.4.012, Fire Pump Functional Test, Rev. 11, Completed 12/5/13
645.4.020, Redundant Fire Protection Water Supply Pump Functional Test, Rev.
645.4.019, Redundant Fire Protection Water Supply Pump Operability Test, Rev. 20,
5,   Completed 10/9/12 & 5/30/13
Completed 2/6/14 & 3/7/14
645.4.020, Redundant Fire Protection Water Supply Pump Functional Test, Rev. 5,
Completed 10/9/12 & 5/30/13
645.4.036, Fire Pump #2 Operability Test. Rev. 23, Completed 12/31/13 & 3/7/14
645.4.036, Fire Pump #2 Operability Test. Rev. 23, Completed 12/31/13 & 3/7/14
645.6.003, Fire Hose Station, Hose House and Fire Hydrant Inspection. Rev. 22,   Completed 1/14/14
645.6.003, Fire Hose Station, Hose House and Fire Hydrant Inspection. Rev. 22,
645.6.003, Fire Hose Station, Hose House and Fire Hydrant Inspection. Rev. 23,   Completed 2/12/14
Completed 1/14/14
645.6.003, Fire Hose Station, Hose House and Fire Hydrant Inspection. Rev. 23,
Completed 2/12/14
645.6.007, Fire Protection Flush, Rev. 21, Completed 10/12/11 & 12/3/12
645.6.007, Fire Protection Flush, Rev. 21, Completed 10/12/11 & 12/3/12
645.6.008, Fire Hose Re
645.6.008, Fire Hose Re-Rack & Blockage Check, Rev. 13, Completed 12/7/11 & 6/2/13
-Rack & Blockage Check, Rev. 13, Completed 12/7/11 & 6/2/13
645.6.017, Fire Barrier Penetration Surveillance, Rev. 14, Completed 6/9/09 & 6/25/09
645.6.017, Fire Barrier Penetration Surveillance, Rev. 14, Completed 6/9/09 & 6/25/09
645.6.017, Fire Barrier Penetration Surveillance, Rev. 18, Completed 10/13/11
645.6.017, Fire Barrier Penetration Surveillance, Rev. 18, Completed 10/13/11
645.6.017, Fire Barrier Penetration Surveillance, Rev. 19, Completed 11/28/11 & 2/28/12
645.6.017, Fire Barrier Penetration Surveillance, Rev. 19, Completed 11/28/11 & 2/28/12
645.6.023, Fire Suppression Water Underground Flow Test, Rev. 14, Completed 4/15/10
645.6.023, Fire Suppression Water Underground Flow Test, Rev. 14, Completed 4/15/10
and 8/30/13 645.6.028, Thermo
and 8/30/13
-Lag and Mecatiss (and 3M Interam) Envelope System Fire Barriers,   Rev. 10, Completed 6/22/11 & 2/25/13
645.6.028, Thermo-Lag and Mecatiss (and 3M Interam) Envelope System Fire Barriers,
Rev. 10, Completed 6/22/11 & 2/25/13
645.6.032, Fire Detection System Alarm Circuitry Test for Turbine Building & 4160V
645.6.032, Fire Detection System Alarm Circuitry Test for Turbine Building & 4160V
Switchgear Room, Rev. 20, Completed 2/28/11
Switchgear Room, Rev. 20, Completed 2/28/11
Line 704: Line 608:
645.6.033, Fire Detection System Alarm Circuitry Test for Control Room & Upper and
645.6.033, Fire Detection System Alarm Circuitry Test for Control Room & Upper and
Lower Cable & Upper and Lower Cable Spreading Room, Rev. 5, Completed 6/5/12
Lower Cable & Upper and Lower Cable Spreading Room, Rev. 5, Completed 6/5/12
645.6.037, Fire Detection System Alarm Circuitry Test for Reactor Building 75', 95', 119'
645.6.037, Fire Detection System Alarm Circuitry Test for Reactor Building 75, 95, 119
and -19', Rev. 0, Completed 11/14/11 & 12/18/12
and -19, Rev. 0, Completed 11/14/11 & 12/18/12
680.4.002, Local Shutdown Panel LSP
680.4.002, Local Shutdown Panel LSP-1AB2 Functional Test, Rev. 6, Completed 11/18/12
-1AB2 Functional Test, Rev. 6, Completed 11/18/12 680.4.003, Local Shutdown Panel LSP
680.4.003, Local Shutdown Panel LSP-1B3 Functional Test, Rev. 12, Completed 4/25/12
-1B3 Functional Test, Rev. 12, Completed 4/25/12
and 11/10/12
and 11/10/12
680.4.004, Local Shutdown Panel LSP
680.4.004, Local Shutdown Panel LSP-1A2 Functional Test, Rev. 18, Completed 11/18/12
-1A2 Functional Test, Rev. 18, Completed 11/18/12
680.4.006, Remote Shutdown Panel Functional Test - Train B, Rev. 18, Completed 3/1/12
680.4.006, Remote Shutdown Panel Functional Test  
- Train B, Rev. 18, Completed 3/1/12
and 11/18/12
and 11/18/12
680.4.011, Local Shutdown Panel LSP
680.4.011, Local Shutdown Panel LSP-1D Functional Test, Rev. 8, Completed 11/11/12
-1D Functional Test, Rev. 8, Completed 11/11/12
Issue Reports (* denotes NRC identified during this inspection)
Issue Reports (* denotes NRC identified during this inspection)
AR 01645241*
AR 01645241*         AR01645668*           IR01646051*         1187591
AR01645668*
1582441               1639352*               0527339             00931459
IR01646051*
00935317             01181818               01348120             01349405
1187591 1582441 1639352* 0527339 00931459 00935317 01181818 01348120 01349405 01406356 01410451 01414079 01466438 01448363 01593476 01598001 01629862 01629864 01632532* 01632800 01633052 01638726* 01644466 01644531 01645106* 01645125* 01645693* 01173474 01176224
01406356             01410451               01414079             01466438
01267338  01298893 01302134 01522732 01606938 01632238 01638171* 01638631* 01639317* 01639330* 01644668* AR01500766
01448363             01593476               01598001             01629862
01629864             01632532*             01632800             01633052
01638726*             01644466               01644531             01645106*
01645125*             01645693*             01173474             01176224
 
267338              01298893             01302134             01522732
01606938             01632238             01638171*           01638631*
01639317*             01639330*             01644668*           AR01500766
Work Orders
Work Orders
R2225828 R2225962 R2223472 R2218408 R2232003 R2232769 R2232794 R2233916 R2234017 R2209149 C2026742 A2346341 A2347715 A2348891 A2350251 C2026068 C2031632 R2219129 R2229838 R2233122 R2235981 C2026467 R2071783 R2092061 R2102792 R2110006 R2142334 R2166849 R2166875 R2171970 R2171971 R2171980 R2172146 R2172433 R2178096 R2186456 R2186457 R2190874 R2194398 R2218884 R2223923 R2228088 R2224209 R2234000 R21960778 R220714 R2226702 Vendor Manuals
R2225828             R2225962             R2223472             R2218408
 
R2232003             R2232769             R2232794             R2233916
VM-OC-2785 Vendor Technical Manual, Revision 2
R2234017             R2209149             C2026742             A2346341
A2347715             A2348891             A2350251             C2026068
C2031632             R2219129             R2229838             R2233122
R2235981             C2026467             R2071783             R2092061
R2102792             R2110006             R2142334             R2166849
R2166875             R2171970             R2171971             R2171980
R2172146             R2172433             R2178096             R2186456
R2186457             R2190874             R2194398             R2218884
R2223923             R2228088             R2224209             R2234000
R21960778             R220714               R2226702
Vendor Manuals
VM-OC-2785 Vendor Technical Manual, Revision 2
Industry Standards
Industry Standards
 
EPRI-TR-106826 Battery Performance Monitoring by Internal Ohmic Measurements -
EPRI-TR-106826 Battery Performance Monitoring by Internal Ohmic
Emergency Lighting Unit Batteries, December 1996
Measurements  
NFPA Fire Protection Handbook, 14th Edition, Section 11, Chapter 5, Test of Water Supplies
-Emergency Lighting Unit Batteries, December 1996
NFPA Fire Protection Handbook, 14
th Edition, Section 11, Chapter 5, Test of Water Supplies
Miscellaneous Documents
Miscellaneous Documents
Exelon Letter of Agreement, Bayville Fire Department, 1/15/14
Exelon Letter of Agreement, Bayville Fire Department, 1/15/14
Exelon Letter of Agreement, Forked River Volunteer Fire Company, 1/15/14
Exelon Letter of Agreement, Forked River Volunteer Fire Company, 1/15/14
Exelon Letter of Agreement, Lanoka Harbor Fire Department, 1/15/14
Exelon Letter of Agreement, Lanoka Harbor Fire Department, 1/15/14
Fire Impairment Log, 3/21/14
Fire Impairment Log, 3/21/14
Training Module 6231
Training Module 6231-PGD-2685, Course Code 792.0.0007, B.5.b and EDMG Overview, Rev.3
-PGD-2685, Course Code 792.0.0007, B.5.b and EDMG Overview, Rev.3
Training Module 6231-PGD-2685, Course Code 792.0.0008, Startup, Operation and
Training Module 6231
-PGD-2685, Course Code 792.0.0008, Startup, Operation and
Shutdown of the Godwin Portable Pump, Rev.2
Shutdown of the Godwin Portable Pump, Rev.2
Training Module 6231
Training Module 6231-PGD-2685, Course Code 792.0.0009, B.5.b and EDMG Walkthrough,
-PGD-2685, Course Code 792.0.0009, B.5.b and EDMG Walkthrough,   Rev.2 OCNGS Fire Protection  
Rev.2
- Comparison to Standard Review Plan 9.5.1, Appendix A, 12/3/76
OCNGS Fire Protection - Comparison to Standard Review Plan 9.5.1, Appendix A, 12/3/76
PES-P-006, Procurement Standard for Diesel Fuel Oil, Rev. 10
PES-P-006, Procurement Standard for Diesel Fuel Oil, Rev. 10
Analysis of Diesel Fuel Oil, 1/16/14
Analysis of Diesel Fuel Oil, 1/16/14
Line 753: Line 665:


LIST OF ACRONYMS
LIST OF ACRONYMS
ADAMS Agencywide Documents Access and Management System AC Alternating Current
ADAMS Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
AC   Alternating Current
APCSB [NRC] Auxiliary and Power Conversion Systems Branch
APCSB [NRC] Auxiliary and Power Conversion Systems Branch
ASME  American Society of Mechanical Engineers
ASME  American Society of Mechanical Engineers
ASSS  Alternate Safe Shutdown System
ASSS  Alternate Safe Shutdown System
BTP Branch Technical Position
BTP   Branch Technical Position
CCW Component Cooling Water
CCW   Component Cooling Water
CDF Core Damage Frequency CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CDF   Core Damage Frequency
CFR   Code of Federal Regulations
CMEB  [NRC] Chemical Engineering Branch
CMEB  [NRC] Chemical Engineering Branch
CO 2  Carbon Dioxide
CO2  Carbon Dioxide
DC Direct Current
DC   Direct Current
ELU Emergency Lighting Unit
ELU   Emergency Lighting Unit
FA Fire Area FHA Fire Hazards Analysis
FA   Fire Area
FPP Fire Protection Program
FHA   Fire Hazards Analysis
FW Feedwater FZ Fire Zone HRR Heat Release Rate
FPP   Fire Protection Program
IN [NRC] Information Notice
FW   Feedwater
IP [NRC] Inspection Procedure
FZ   Fire Zone
IPEEE Individual Plant Examination of External Events
HRR   Heat Release Rate
IR [NRC] Inspection Report
IN   [NRC] Information Notice
IR [Exelon] Issue Report
IP   [NRC] Inspection Procedure
kV kilo-Volt LOCA  Loss of Coolant Accident
IPEEE Individual Plant Examination of External Events
MOV Motor Operated Valve
IR   [NRC] Inspection Report
MSO Multiple Spurious Operation
IR   [Exelon] Issue Report
NEI Nuclear Energy Institute
kV   kilo-Volt
LOCA  Loss of Coolant Accident
MOV   Motor Operated Valve
MSO   Multiple Spurious Operation
NEI   Nuclear Energy Institute
NFPA  National Fire Protection Association
NFPA  National Fire Protection Association
NCV Non-Cited Violation
NCV   Non-Cited Violation
NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission
NRC   Nuclear Regulatory Commission
OCNGS Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station
OCNGS Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station
PAR S Publicly Available Records
PARS Publicly Available Records System
System P&ID  Piping and Instrumentation Drawing
P&ID  Piping and Instrumentation Drawing
PRA Probabilistic Risk Assessment
PRA   Probabilistic Risk Assessment
RBCCW Reactor Building Closed Cooling Water
RBCCW Reactor Building Closed Cooling Water
RG [NRC] Regulatory Guide
RG   [NRC] Regulatory Guide
SCBA  Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus
SCBA  Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus
SDP [NRC] Significance Determination Process
SDP   [NRC] Significance Determination Process
SER [NRC] Safety Evaluation Report SSC Structures, Systems and Components
SER   [NRC] Safety Evaluation Report
SW Service Water
SSC   Structures, Systems and Components
SW   Service Water


TRM Technical Requirements Manual
TRM   Technical Requirements Manual
UFSAR Updated Final Safety Analysis Report
UFSAR Updated Final Safety Analysis Report
V Volts Vac Voltage Alternating Current
V     Volts
Vdc Voltage Direct Current
Vac   Voltage Alternating Current
Vdc   Voltage Direct Current
Attachment
}}
}}

Revision as of 05:05, 4 November 2019

IR 05000219-14-007, on 03/24-28/2014 and 04/07-11/2014, Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station, Triennial Fire Protection Inspection
ML14125A004
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 05/05/2014
From: Rogge J
Engineering Region 1 Branch 3
To: Pacilio M
Exelon Generation Co, Exelon Nuclear
Rogge J
References
IR-14-007
Download: ML14125A004 (26)


Text

May 5, 2014

SUBJECT:

OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION - NRC TRIENNIAL FIRE PROTECTION INSPECTION REPORT 05000219/2014007

Dear Mr. Pacilio:

On April 11, 2014, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a triennial fire protection inspection at the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on April 11, 2014, with Mr. R. Peak and other members of your staff.

The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations, and with the conditions of your license. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed station personnel. The inspectors also reviewed mitigation strategies for addressing large fires and explosions.

Based on the results of this inspection, no findings were identified.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records System (PARS)

component of the NRC's document system, Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA/

John F. Rogge, Chief Engineering Branch 3 Division of Reactor Safety Docket No: 50-219 License No: DPR-16

Enclosure:

Inspection Report 05000219/2014007 w/Attachment: Supplemental Information

REGION I==

Docket No: 50-219 License No: DPR-16 Report No: 05000219/2014007 Licensee: Exelon Generation Company, LLC Facility: Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Location: P.O. Box 388 Forked River, NJ 08731 Dates: March 24 - 28 and April 7 -11, 2014 Inspectors: R. Fuhrmeister, Senior Reactor Inspector (Team Leader)

C. Cahill, Senior Reactor Analyst K. Young, Senior Reactor Inspector J. Richmond, Reactor Inspector J. Rady, Reactor Inspector L. DuMont, Reactor Inspector Approved by: John F. Rogge, Chief Engineering Branch 3 Division of Reactor Safety

SUMMARY

IR 05000219/2014007; 03/24-28/2014 and 04/07-11/2014; Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating

Station; Triennial Fire Protection Inspection.

This report covered a two week on-site triennial fire protection team inspection by specialist inspectors. The NRC's program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, "Reactor Oversight Process," Revision 4, dated December 2006.

No Findings were identified.

REPORT DETAILS

Background This report presents the results of a triennial fire protection inspection conducted in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure (IP) 71111.05T, "Fire Protection." The objective of the inspection was to assess whether Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon) had implemented an adequate fire protection program and whether post-fire safe shutdown capabilities had been established and were properly maintained at Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station (Oyster Creek). The following fire areas (FAs) and associated fire zones (FZs) were selected for detailed review based on prior inspection results and risk insights from the Oyster Creek Individual Plant Examination of External Events (IPEEE):

Fire Areas (Fire Zones)

  • TB-FZ-11D
  • RB-FZ-1F3
  • OB-FZ-22A Inspection of these fire areas/zones fulfilled the inspection procedure requirement to inspect a minimum of three samples.

The inspection team evaluated Exelon's fire protection program (FPP) against applicable requirements which included Operating License Condition, NRC Safety Evaluation Reports (SERs), 10 CFR 50.48, and 10 CFR 50, Appendix R. The team also reviewed related documents that included the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR), Section 9.5.1, fire protection plan, fire hazards analysis (FHA), and post-fire safe shutdown analyses.

The team evaluated aspects of five mitigating strategies for responding to large fires and explosions, as required by Operating License Condition 2.C.17 and 10 CFR 50.54(hh)(2). The team also reviewed related documents that included NEI 06-12, "B.5.b Phases 2 & 3 Submittal Guidance," Revision 2 (ML070090060). Inspection of these strategies fulfills the inspection procedure requirement to inspect a minimum of one sample.

Specific documents reviewed by the team are listed in the attachment to this report.

REACTOR SAFETY

Cornerstones: Initiating Events, Mitigating Systems, and Barrier Integrity

1R05 Fire Protection (IP 71111.05T)

.1 Protection of Safe Shutdown Capabilities

a. Inspection Scope

The team reviewed the FHA, safe shutdown analyses, and supporting drawings and documentation to verify that post-fire safe shutdown capabilities were properly protected.

The team ensured that applicable separation requirements of Section III.G of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix R, and the licensees design and licensing bases were maintained for the credited safe shutdown equipment and their supporting power, control, and instrumentation cables. This review included an assessment of the adequacy of the selected systems for reactivity control, reactor coolant makeup, reactor heat removal, process monitoring and associated support system functions.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

.2 Passive Fire Protection

a. Inspection Scope

The team walked down accessible portions of the selected fire areas to evaluate whether the material conditions of the fire area boundaries were adequate for the fire hazards in the area. The team compared the fire area boundaries including walls, ceilings, floors, fire doors, fire dampers, penetration seals, electrical raceway and conduit fire barriers, and redundant equipment fire barriers and radiant energy heat barriers to the design and licensing basis requirements, industry standards, and the OCNGS FPP, as approved by the NRC, to identify any potential degradation or non-conformances.

The team reviewed selected engineering evaluations and qualification records for a sample of penetration seals to determine whether the fill material was properly installed and whether the as-left configuration satisfied design requirements for the intended fire rating. The team also reviewed similar records for selected fire protection wraps to verify whether the material and configuration was appropriate for the required fire rating and conformed to the engineering design.

The team also reviewed recent inspection and test records for fire dampers and the inspection records for penetration seals and fire barriers to verify whether the inspection and testing was adequately conducted, the acceptance criteria were met, and any potential performance degradation was identified.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

.3 Active Fire Protection

a. Inspection Scope

The team evaluated manual and automatic fire suppression and detection systems in the selected fire areas to determine whether they were installed, tested, maintained and operated in accordance with NRC requirements, National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) codes of record and the OCNGS FPP. The team also assessed whether the suppression systems capabilities were adequate to control and/or extinguish fires associated with the hazards in the selected areas.

The team reviewed the as-built capability of the fire water supply system to verify whether the design and licensing basis and NFPA code of record requirements were satisfied and to assess whether those capabilities were adequate for the hazards involved. The team reviewed the fire water system design and hydraulic analysis to assess the adequacy of the system to supply the largest single hydraulic load on the fire water system plus concurrent fire hose usage with one fire pump out of service. The team evaluated fire pump performance tests to assess the adequacy of the test acceptance criteria for pump minimum discharge pressure at the required flow rate to verify whether the criteria was adequate to ensure that the design basis requirements were satisfied. The team also evaluated the underground fire loop flow tests and flushes to verify whether the combination of the tests and flushes adequately demonstrated that the flow distribution circuits were able to meet design basis requirements. In addition, the team reviewed recent pump and loop flow test results to verify whether the testing was adequately conducted, the acceptance criteria were met and any potential performance degradation was identified.

The team walked down accessible portions of the detection and water suppression systems in the selected areas and major portions of the fire water supply system, including the motor and two diesel driven fire pumps, interviewed system and program engineers, and reviewed selected issue reports (IRs) to independently assess the material condition of the systems and components. In addition, the team reviewed recent test results for the fire detection and suppression systems for the selected fire areas to verify whether the testing was adequately conducted, the acceptance criteria were met and any potential performance degradation was identified.

The team assessed the fire brigade capabilities by reviewing training, qualification, and drill critique records. The team also reviewed Exelon's firefighting strategies (i.e., pre-fire plans) and smoke removal plans for the selected fire areas to determine if appropriate information was provided to fire brigade members and plant operators to identify safe shutdown equipment and instrumentation, and to facilitate suppression of a fire that could impact post-fire safe shutdown capability. The team independently inspected the fire brigade equipment, including personnel protective gear (e.g., turnout gear) and smoke removal equipment, to determine operational readiness for firefighting.

In addition, the team reviewed Exelon's fire brigade equipment inventory and inspection procedure and recent inspection and inventory results to verify whether adequate equipment was available, and whether any potential material deficiencies were identified.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

.4 Protection from Damage from Fire Suppression Activities

a. Inspection Scope

The team performed document reviews and plant walkdowns to determine whether redundant trains of systems required for post-fire safe shutdown, located in the same or adjacent fire areas, were subject to damage from fire suppression activities or from the rupture or inadvertent operation of fire suppression systems. Specifically, the team evaluated whether:

  • A fire in one of the selected fire areas would release smoke, heat or hot gases that could cause unintended activation of suppression systems in adjacent fire areas which could potentially damage all redundant safe shutdown trains or
  • A fire suppression system rupture, inadvertent actuation or actuation due to a fire, in one of the selected fire areas, could directly damage all redundant trains (e.g.

sprinkler caused flooding of other than the locally affected train) and

  • Adequate drainage was provided in areas protected by water suppression systems

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

.5 Alternative Shutdown Capability

a. Inspection Scope

The team reviewed the safe shutdown analysis, operating procedures, piping and instrumentation drawings (P&lDs), electrical drawings, the UFSAR, and other supporting documents for the selected fire areas to verify whether Exelon had properly identified the systems and components necessary to achieve and maintain post-fire safe shutdown conditions. The team evaluated selected systems and components credited by the safe shutdown analysis for reactor pressure control, reactivity control, reactor coolant makeup, decay heat removal, process monitoring, and support system functions to assess the adequacy of Exelon's alternative shutdown methodology. The team also assessed whether alternative post-fire shutdown could be performed both with and without the availability of off-site power. The team walked down selected plant configurations to verify whether they were consistent with the assumptions and descriptions in the safe shutdown and fire hazards analyses. In addition, the team evaluated whether the systems and components credited for use during post-fire safe shutdown would remain free from fire damage.

The team reviewed the training program for licensed and non-licensed operators to verify whether it included alternative shutdown capability. The team also verified whether personnel required for post-fire safe shutdown, using either the normal or alternative shutdown methods, were trained and available on-site at all times, exclusive of those assigned as fire brigade members.

The team reviewed the adequacy of procedures utilized for post-fire shutdown and performed an independent walk through of procedure steps (i.e., a procedure tabletop)to assess the adequacy of implementation and human factors within the procedures.

The team also evaluated the time required to perform specific actions to verify whether operators could reasonably be expected to perform those actions within sufficient time to maintain plant parameters within specified limits.

Specific procedures reviewed for normal and alternative post-fire shutdown included:

  • ABN-30, Control Room Evacuation, Rev. 25
  • FSP-TB11D, Turbine Building Basement Fire Support Procedure, Rev. 8
  • FSP-RB1F3, Reactor Building Elev. -19 Foot, Rev. 3 The team reviewed selected operator manual actions to verify whether they had been properly reviewed and approved and whether the actions could be implemented in accordance with plant procedures in the time necessary to support the safe shutdown method for each fire area. The team also reviewed the periodic testing of the alternative shutdown transfer and isolation capability, and instrumentation and control functions, to evaluate whether the tests were adequate to ensure the functionality of the alternative shutdown capability.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

.6 Circuit Analysis

a. Inspection Scope

The team reviewed Exelon's post-fire safe shutdown analysis for the selected fire areas to determine whether the analysis identified both required and associated electrical circuits and cables for the systems and components necessary to achieve and maintain safe shutdown. The team reviewed electrical schematics and cable routing data for power, control, and instrument cables associated with selected components.

Specifically, the team evaluated the selected circuits and cables to determine whether they were

(a) adequately protected from potential fire damage, or
(b) analyzed to show that fire-induced faults (e.g., hot shorts, open circuits, and shorts to ground) would not prevent safe shutdown, or
(c) analyzed to show that potential damage could be mitigated with approved operator manual actions, in order to verify whether fire-induced faults could adversely impact safe shutdown capabilities. The team's evaluations considered credible fire scenarios, cable insulation attributes, cable failure modes, cable routing, and common power supply or electrical bus configurations.

In addition, the team reviewed cable raceway drawings and cable routing databases for a sample of components required for post-fire safe shutdown to determine whether those cables were routed as described in the safe shutdown analysis. The team also reviewed equipment important to safe shutdown, but not part of the success path, to assess whether Exelon's safe shutdown methodologies were appropriate, conformed to design and licensing basis requirements, and appropriately considered the guidance in NRC Regulatory Guide 1.189, "Fire Protection for Nuclear Power Plants," revision 2.

Cable failure modes were reviewed for the following components:

  • V-14-30 Steam Line Valve - Train A (AC)
  • V-14-31 Steam Line Valve - Train A (DC)
  • V-14-34 Condensate Valve - Train A (DC)
  • V-14-36 Condensate Valve - Train A (AC)
  • LI-IG07A A Isolation Condenser Shell Water Level The team reviewed a sample of circuit breaker and over-current protection coordination studies to determine whether equipment needed for post-fire safe shutdown activities could be adversely affected due to a lack of coordination that could result in a common power supply or common electrical bus concern. The team also evaluated whether coordination studies appropriately considered multiple faults due to fire. In addition, the team reviewed a sample of circuit breaker maintenance records, for components required for safe shutdown, to determine whether the breakers were properly maintained.

The team assessed the transfer of control from the control room to the alternative shutdown locations to determine whether it would be affected by fire-induced circuit faults (e.g., by the provision of separate fuses and power supplies for alternative shutdown control circuits).

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

.7 Communications

a. Inspection Scope

The team reviewed safe shutdown procedures, the safe shutdown analysis, and associated documents to verify whether an adequate method of communications would be available to plant operators following a fire. Specifically, the team evaluated whether plant telephones, page systems, and portable radios would be available for use and were properly maintained. During this review, the team considered the effects of ambient noise levels, clarity of reception, reliability, and coverage patterns. The team inspected selected emergency storage lockers to independently verify whether portable communication equipment was available for the fire brigade and plant operators. In addition, the team evaluated whether radio or phone repeaters, transmitters, and power supplies would be reasonably unaffected by a fire.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

.8 Emergency Lighting

a. Inspection Scope

The team walked down the emergency lights in the selected fire areas to independently evaluate the placement and coverage areas of the lights. The team assessed whether the lights provided adequate illumination on local equipment and instrumentation required for post-fire safe shutdown, to ensure local operations could be reliably performed under expected post-fire conditions. In addition, emergency light placement was also evaluated to determine adequate illumination of local area access and egress pathways.

The team verified whether the emergency light batteries were rated for at least an eight-hour capacity. The team interviewed system engineers and technical staff to evaluate the adequacy and the performance of the Emergency lighting Units (ELUs).

Preventive maintenance procedures, the vendor manual, conductance tests, and battery replacement practices were also reviewed to evaluate whether the ELUs had been maintained in a manner that would ensure reliable operation.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

.9 Cold Shutdown Repairs

a. Inspection Scope

The team reviewed Exelon's dedicated repair procedures, for components which might be damaged by fire and were required to achieve post-fire cold shutdown. The team evaluated selected cold shutdown repairs to determine whether they could be achieved within the time frames assumed in the design and licensing bases. In addition, the team verified whether the necessary repair equipment, tools, and materials (e.g., pre-cut cables with prepared attachment lugs) were available and accessible on site.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

.10 Compensatory Measures

a. Inspection Scope

The team verified whether compensatory measures were in place for out-of-service, degraded, or inoperable fire protection and post-fire safe shutdown equipment, systems, or features (e.g., detection and suppression systems and equipment, passive fire barriers, pumps, valves, or electrical devices providing safe shutdown functions or capabilities). The team evaluated whether the short term compensatory measures adequately compensated for the degraded function or feature until appropriate corrective action could be taken and whether Exelon was effective in returning the equipment to service in a reasonable period of time.

The team reviewed selected compensatory measures in the form of operator manual actions for 10 CFR 50 Appendix R, Section III.G.2 areas to evaluate whether those actions could be reasonably accomplished. Specific attributes reviewed included availability of diagnostic instrumentation, expected environmental conditions, minimum staffing, communications, equipment availability, training, procedures, and verification and validation.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

.11 Review and Documentation of FPP Changes

a. Inspection Scope

The team reviewed recent changes to the approved fire protection program to assess whether those changes had an adverse effect on the ability to safely shutdown.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

.12 Control of Transient Combustibles and Ignition Sources

a. Inspection Scope

The team reviewed Exelon's procedures and programs for the control of ignition sources and transient combustibles to assess their effectiveness in preventing fires and in controlling combustible loading within limits established in the FHA. A sample of hot work and transient combustible control permits were reviewed to assess the adequacy of Exelon's fire protection program administrative controls. The team performed plant walkdowns to independently verify whether transient combustibles and ignition sources were being properly controlled in accordance with the administrative controls.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

.13 Large Fires and Explosions Mitigation Strategies

a. Inspection Scope

The team reviewed selected mitigation strategies intended to maintain or restore core cooling, containment integrity, and spent fuel pool cooling capabilities under the circumstances associated with loss of large areas of the plant due to large fires or explosions. The team assessed whether Exelon continued to meet the requirements of license condition 2.C.17. The team reviewed five mitigation strategies:

  • Operation of the electro-magnetic relief valves using the portable power supply;
  • Manual operation of the isolation condenser for B.5.b events;
  • External makeup to the isolation condensers using the portable pump;
  • External makeup to the fuel pool using the B.5.b pump and,
  • Manually opening containment vent valves in a B.5.b event The team's review included: a detailed assessment of the procedural guidance; a walkdown of the strategy with a trained operator to assess the feasibility of the strategy and operator familiarity; a review of maintenance and surveillance test records for the strategy equipment; and an independent inventory check of the strategy equipment, materials, and tools to ensure the appropriateness of equipment storage and availability.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

OTHER ACTIVITIES

4OA2 Identification and Resolution of Problems (IP 71152)

a. Inspection Scope

The team reviewed a sample of issue reports and action requests associated with the fire protection program, post-fire safe shutdown issues, and mitigation strategy issues to determine whether Exelon was appropriately identifying, characterizing, and correcting problems associated with these areas and whether the planned or completed corrective actions were appropriate. The condition reports reviewed are listed in the attachment.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

4OA6 Meetings, including Exit

The team presented the inspection results to Mr. R. Peak, Plant Manager, and other members of Exelon 's staff on April 11, 2014. The team verified that this report does not contain proprietary information.

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

KEY POINTS OF CONTACT

Licensee Personnel

N. Onuorah, Fire Protection Engineer
T. Prosser, Fire Marshall
T. Trettel, Fire Protection System Engineer
J. Chrisley, Senior Regulatory Specialist
D. Brown, ELU System Engineer
A. Bready, PRA Engineer
M. Carlson, Fire Protection Safe Shutdown Engineer
C. Pragman, Exelon Corp. Fire Protection Manager
Z. Demeke, License Renewal Engineer
S. Rios, Senior Reactor Operator
M. Rossi, Licensed Operator Training Instructor
T. Cannon, Electrical Technician
R. Wojcik, Electrical Technician

NRC Personnel

J. Kulp, Senior Resident Inspector
A. Patel, Resident Inspector
J. Schoppy, Senior Reactor Inspector

LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED AND DISCUSSED

Opened

None

Opened and Closed

None

Closed

None

LIST OF DOUCMENTS REVIEWED

Fire Protection Licensing and Design Basis Documents

990-1746 Fire Hazard Analysis Report, Revision 17

SP-1302-06-013, Augmented Quality Fire Protection Specification for Post-Fire Safe Shutdown

Requirements at Oyster Creek Generating Station, Rev. 5

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station UFSAR, Section 9.5.1, Fire Protection, Rev. 18

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station UFSAR, Section A.1.20, Fire Water System

(Aging Management), Rev. 18

Oyster Creek Nuclear Power Plant Technical Specifications, 8/8/00

OCNGS SER, Fire Protection 3/3/78

OCNGS SER, Fire Protection Supplement No. 2, 11/13/79

OCNGS SER, Fire Protection Supplement No. 3, 8/25/80

Letter Dated March 24, 1986, Exemption from Requirements of Appendix R to 10 CFR Part 50,

Section III.G.2 and the Post-Fire Safe Shutdown Capability

Letter Dated June 25, 1990, Exemption from Certain Technical Requirements Contained in

Section III.G if Appendix R to 10 CFR Part 50

SP-1302-06-013, Specification for Post-Fire Shutdown Program Requirements at OCNGS,

Rev. 4

Calculations, Analysis, and Engineering Evaluations

BR Report 3731-042, Tripping Feedwater Pumps from Control Room for Fire Outside

the Control Room Complex, Rev. 2

C-1302-911-E120-001, Fire Area OB-FA-5 Safe Shutdown Analysis, Rev. 0

C-1302-911-E120-004, Fire Zone TB-FZ-11D Safe Shutdown Analysis, Rev. 0

C-1302-911-E120-015, Fire Zone RB-FZ-1F3 Safe Shutdown Analysis, Rev. 0

TDR 612, Appendix R Reactor Water Inventory Study, Rev. 0

AR 673565-37, Evaluation of Operator Manual Actions in 4160 Switchgear Rooms

during a Fire in the Turbine Building Basement, performed 06/04/08

748-41, BISCO Report, Three Hour Rated Fire Seal Utilizing BISCO SF-20 Silicone Foam,

4/17/81

748-134, BISCO Test Report, Fire Test Utilizing BISCO SF-20 and SE-Foam, 5/14/84

1042-01, BISCO Test Report, Qualification, Fire and Hose Stream Tests, 2/78

3001-01, Fire Test Configuration for BISCO Block Out Reduction System - Wall Openings

with Inner Lagging Attachment Supports, 7/3/79

375645, Biodiesel Blend Fuel Oil Evaluation, 5/21/09

BM-TE-01, Mecatiss MPF-60 Fire Barriers, Rev. 0

C-1302-811-E310-043, OCNGS Fire Protection Hydraulic Model Margin Analysis, Rev. 0

CTP-1198, Fire Endurance Test of 3M Interam Mat Fire Protective Envelopes

(24 in. and 6 in. Cable Trays, 5, 3, 2, and 1 Conduits, 2 Air Drop and a 12 x 12 x 8

Junction Box), 11/9/95

CTP-1199, Fire Endurance Test of 3M Interam Mat Fire Protective Envelopes

(24 Cable Tray, 5 and 1 Conduits, and 2 Air Drop into the Tray Center), 9/18/95

CTP-2004, ASTM E136-94 Behavior of Materials in a Vertical Tube Furnace at 750oC,

3M E-50 Interam Series Mat, 1/17/95x 30 Deep Large Box Design, 11/10/98

CTP-2009, Fire Endurance Test of 3M Interam Fire Wrap Fire Protective Envelope, 5/19/98

CTP-2011, Fire Endurance Test of 3M Interam Fire Wrap 75 Wide x 56 High

CTP-2037, Fire Endurance Test Report of a Heat Transfer Study on Heavy Steel Support

Elements protected with 3M E-50 Series E 54A Interam, 10/12/06

C312252, Thermo-Lag Raceway Cable Upgrades Modification, Rev. 0

C312257, Thermo-Lag Raceway Cable Upgrades Modification, Rev. 0

EC ECR A2014648, Evaluate Penetration Seal #435, 10/21/05

ECR A2161442, Evaluation of 3M Interam Installation for Conduit 86-71, 9/7/12

GL 86-10 Evaluation (AR 00732552-02), Sprinkler System #9 Turbine Basement, South

GL 86-10 Evaluation (AR 00732559-02), Sprinkler System #15 Upper Cable Spreading Room

Test Deck #1, UL Report, Raceway Fire Barriers for Aluminum Cable Tray & Aluminum

Conduit Systems, 2/5/96

Test Deck #3, UL Report, Raceway Fire Barriers for Aluminum Cable Tray and Aluminum

Conduit Systems, 2/7/96

Test Deck #5, UL Report, Raceway Fire Barriers for Aluminum Cable Tray, Aluminum Junction

Box and Aluminum Conduit Systems, 2/9/96

06-00797, Appendix R Evaluation of Electrical Protective Device Coordination, Rev. 0

C-1302-911-E120-001, Fire Area/Zone OB-FA-5 Fire Safe Shutdown Analysis, Rev. 2

C-1302-911-E120-004, Fire Area/Zone TB-FZ-11D Fire Safe Shutdown Analysis, Rev. 4

C-1302-911-E120-015, Fire Area/Zone RB-FZ-1F3 Fire Safe Shutdown Analysis, Rev. 3

OC-PRA-21.06, Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Fire Probabilistic Risk Assessment,

Summary and Quantification Notebook

OC-PSA-012, Internal Flood Evaluation Summary and Notebook, Oyster Creek Nuclear

Generating Station, Rev. 1

6-1302-104-5320-013, Design Of Support 1B for 3 Dia and 4 Dia Lines of Fire Protec. Sys.

N.C.S.R. O.C. Stn.

13432.30-105, New CSR Floor Drain Line Sizing, Rev. 0

ECR OC 11-0507 002, Replace Deluge Valve for System #6

ECR OC 13-00350 001, Replace Fire Detectors on RB 95

Drawings and Wiring Diagrams

23-56751-43, Auto Depressurization System Connection Diagram, Rev. 7

29E182 Sht. 5, Auto Depressurization System Elementary Diagram, Rev. 4

E1132, CRD Pump Elementary Diagram, Rev. 10

23R0173 Sht. 7, Feedwater System Elementary Diagram, Rev. 15

157B6350 Sht. 184A, Feedwater System Elementary Diagram, Rev. 2

BR 2192, Sht.1, Composite Yard Piping Key Plan, Rev. 12

BR 2192, Sht. 2, Composite Yard Piping Key Plan, Rev. 0

DJP FBS TB-FZ-11D-03, Isometric, Fire Barrier (Mecatiss), Rev. 0

DJP FBS TB-FZ-11D-03, Isometric, Fire Barrier (Mecatiss), Rev. 1

DJP 3E-811-17-1001, Fire Protection Water System, Electrical Elementary Diagram,

Fire Diesel Pump #1, Rev. 2

GU 3D-911-01-001, Fire Area Layout Site Plan, Rev. 7

GU 3D-911-02-002, Fire Area Layout Turbine Building Basement Floor Plan, Rev. 5

GU 3D-911-02-006, Fire Area Layout Turbine Building Operating Floor, Rev. 8

GU 3D-911-02-007, Fire Area Layout Turbine Building Sections A-A & B-B, Rev. 3

GU 3D-911-02-008, Fire Area Layout Turbine Building Sections C-C & D-D, Rev. 2

GU 3D-911-02-009, Fire Area Layout Turbine Building Sections E-E & F-F, Rev. 3

GU 3D-911-02-011, Fire Area Layout Office Building Third Floor, Rev. 8

GU 3D-911-02-012, Fire Area Layout EDG Vaults, Rev. 7

GU 3D-911-02-013, Fire Area Layout Reactor Building E

L. -196, -6-5 & -1-11, Rev. 3

GU 3D-911-02-030, Fire Area Layout Fresh Water Pump House & Redundant Fire Protection

Pump House & Tank, Rev. 3

GU 3D-911-02-039, Fire Area Layout Legend and Notes, Rev. 6

GU 3E-811-17-1000, Fire Protection Water System, Diesel Fire Pump #2, Electrical Elementary

Dia., Rev. 5

4092, Turbine Building Floor Plan @ E

L. 236, 27 & 36, Beam and Slab Schedules, Rev. 10

13432.02-M-03, Redundant Fire Protection System Underground Piping Phase I, Rev. 3

103D5244, Connection Diagram Metal Clad Switchgear Unit A1 Bus 1A, Rev. 24

103D5287, Sht. 2, Metal Clad Switchgear Interconnection Diagram, Rev. 26

104D2511, Sht. 2, Emergency Diesel Generator 1 Connection Diagram, Rev. 7

2C3714, Sht. 4, Connection Diagram for Panel 13R, Rev. 21

3C-733-11-006, 120Vac Vital Power System Panel Schedule IP-4, Rev. 6

3D-211-18-006, Sht. 1, Emergency Condenser System Wiring Diagram Valve V-14-0030,

Rev. 2

3D-211-18-006, Sht. 2, Emergency Condenser System Wiring Diagram Valve V-14-0031,

Rev. 1

3D-211-18-006, Sht. 5, Emergency Condenser System Wiring Diagram Valve V-14-0034,

Rev. 1

3D-211-18-006, Sht. 5, Emergency Condenser System Wiring Diagram Valve V-14-0034,

Rev. 1

BR3000, Electrical Power System Key One Line Diagram, Rev. 14

BR3001, Sht. 1, Main One Line Diagram, Auxiliary Startup, Main Transformer and

Main Generator, Rev. 16

BR3001, Sht. 2, One Line Diagram Emergency Diesel Generators, Rev. 4

BR3001A, 4160V System One Line Diagram Switchgear Bus 1A, Rev. 11

BR3001C, 4160V System One Line Diagram Emergency Switchgear Bus 1C and 1D, Rev. 1

BR3002, Sht. 2, 480V System One Line Diagram Unit Substation 1A2 and 1B2, Rev. 13

BR3028, Sht. 1, 125V Station Dc System One Line Diagram, MCC DC-1, Rev. 20

E1101, Elementary Diagram Remote Shutdown Panel Transfer Scheme, Rev. 6

E1108, Elementary Diagram Remote Shutdown Panel Transfer Scheme, Rev. 16

E1126, Elementary Diagram Reactor Building Closed Cooling Water Pump 1-2, Rev. 12

GE103D5270, Sht. 1, 4160V System Electrical Connection Diagram, Rev. 27

GE106D9510, Sht. 1, Emergency Diesel Generator 2 Connection Diagram Switchgear Unit 1

and 3, Rev. 17

GE112C2248, Sht. 2, Connection Diagram Panel 11F, Rev. 46

GE116B8328, Sht. 17, 480V System Electrical Elementary Diagram 480V USS 1B2 Unit 041B,

Rev. 13

GE148F912, Sht. 3, Electrical Elementary Diagram Process Instrumentation, Rev. 17

GE157B6350, Sht. 151B, Emergency Condenser System Wiring Diagram Valve V-14-0032,

Rev. 11

GE157B6350, Sht. 152A, Emergency Condenser System Electrical Elementary Diagram Valve

V-14-0036, Rev. 4

GE157B6397, Sht. 15, Emergency Condenser System Electrical Elementary Diagram Valve

V-14-0034, Rev. 31

GE223R0173, Sht. 1A, 4160V System Electrical Elementary Diagram Switchgear 1A Unit A1,

Rev. 27

GE237E901, Sht. 2, Containment Spray Logic Electrical Elementary Diagram, Rev. 21

GE719E202, Sht. 1, Electrical Connection Diagram Panel ER8A, Rev. 17

GE719E203, Sht. 1, Electrical Connection Diagram Panel ER8B, Rev. 18

GE719E211, Sht. 10, Main Control Room Panel 1F/2F, Rev. 8

GE719E211, Sht. 4, Main Control Room Panel 1F/2F, Rev. 32

GE719E211, Sht. 7, Main Control Room Panel 1F/2F, Rev. 19

GE719E211, Sht. 8, Main Control Room Panel 1F/2F, Rev. 7

GE719E251, Sht. 1, Panel ER18A, Rev. 30

GE719E252, Sht. 1, Panel ER18B, Rev. 28

GE237E901, Sht. 1, Containment Spray Logic Electrical Elementary Diagram, Rev 35

Piping and Instrumentation Diagrams

148F262 Sht. 1, Emergency Condenser, Rev. 55

148F740, Containment Spray System, Rev. 44

2003, Condensate & Feed System, Rev. 95

2004, Condensate & Feed System, Rev. 100

JC 19479, Sht. 1, Fire Protection Water System Flow Diagram, Rev. 40

JC 19479, Sht. 2, Fire Protection Water System Flow Diagram, Rev. 42

JC 19479, Sht. 3, Fire Protection Water System Flow Diagram, Rev. 68

JC 19479, Sht. 4, Fire Protection Water System Flow Diagram, Rev. 30

GE148F262, Sht. 1, Emergency Condenser Flow Diagram, Rev. 55

Large Fires and Explosions Mitigation Strategies Documents

EDMG-01, Extensive Damage Mitigation Guidelines, Rev. 6

EDMG-SPX1, Operation of the B.5.b Portable Pump, Rev. 13

EDMG-SPX2, External Makeup to the Fuel Pool Using the B.5.b Portable Pump, Rev. 10

EDMG-SPX4, Manual Operation of the Isolation Condensers for a B.5.b Event, Rev. 3

EDMG-SPX5, External Makeup to the Isolation Condensers Using the Portable Pump, Rev. 10

EDMG-SPX8, Operation of the EMRVs using the Portable Power Supply, Rev.10

EDMG-SPX9, Manually Opening Containment Vent Valves in a B.5.b Event, Rev. 4

Fire Protection Evaluations of Modifications and Design Changes

ECR 11-00171, "A" CRD Pump Bypass Switch, Rev. 0

ECR OC 13-00362 000, Replace Fire Alarm Master Panel In Control Room

Design Changes

ECR 07-00428, Mecatiss Fire Barrier Replacement to 3M Interam, Rev.1

ECR 13-00362, Replace Fire Alarm Master Panel in Control Room, Rev. 0

Quality Assurance Audits and Self Assessments

NOSA-OYS-12-10, Oyster Creek Fire Protection Audit Report, 9/19/12

01554310, Oyster Creek Pre-NRC Triennial Fire Protection Inspection Self-Assessment,

2/3/13

Oyster Creek Pre-NRC Triennial Fire Protection Inspection Self-Assessment

System Health Reports

Emergency Lighting (Appendix R) Q3-2013

Emergency Lighting (Appendix R) Q4-2013

Oyster Creek Fire Protection/Fire Safe Shutdown Program, 3rd Quarter 2013

Oyster Creek Fire Protection/Fire Safe Shutdown Program, 4th Quarter 2013

Oyster Creek System Health Report, 655-Fire Protection Detection Systems, 3rd Quarter 2013

Oyster Creek System Health Report, 655-Fire Protection Detection Systems, 4rd Quarter 2013

Oyster Creek System Health Report, 813-Fire Protection Suppression Systems, 3rd Quarter

2013

Oyster Creek System Health Report, 813-Fire Protection Suppression Systems, 4rd

Quarter 2013

Oyster Creek System Health Report, 814-Fire Barriers, 3rd Quarter 2013

Oyster Creek System Health Report, 814-Fire Barriers, 4th Quarter 2013

25Vdc, 3rd and 4th Qtrs. 2013

4160Vac, 3rd and 4th Qtrs. 2013

480Vac, 3rd and 4th Qtrs. 2013

Emergency Diesel Generator, 3rd and 4th Qtrs. 2013

Procedures

101.2, Oyster Creek Site Fire Protection Program, Rev. 70

101.2-3, Oyster Creek Site Fire Protection Program, Technical Requirements, Rev. 70

2400-APR-3214.01, Appendix R Containment Spray Pump Temporary Cable Installation &

Control Cable Repair, Rev. 10

2400-APR-3228.01, Appendix R Temporary Torus Water Level Instrument, Rev. 9

2400-APR-3411.02, Appendix R Temporary EMRV Control & Indication, Rev. 10

2400-APR-3900.01, Appendix R Repair Kit Annual Inspection, Rev. 20

CC-AA-211, Fire Protection Program, Rev. 5

OP-OC-102-106-1001, Control of Time Critical Operator Actions, Rev. 1

OP-AA-201-002, Fire Event Reports, Rev. 5

OP-AA-201-003, Fire Drill Performance, Rev. 13

OP-AA-201-004, Fire Prevention for Hot Work, Rev. 11

OP-AA-201-005, Fire Brigade Qualification, Rev. 8

OP-AA-201-006, Control of Temporary Heat Sources, Rev. 6

OP-MA-201-007, Fire Protection System Impairment Control, Rev. 6

OP-MA-201-008, Pre-Fire Plan Manual, Rev. 3

OP-MA-201-009, Control of Transient Combustible Material, Rev. 12

TQ-AA-173, Emergency Services Training Programs, Rev. 1

645.6.026, Fire Damper Inspector, Rev. 13

2400-SME-3915.01, Motor Control Center Preventive Maintenance, Rev. 17

635.2.001, 4160V Switchgear Buses and Circulating Water Pump Protective Relay Surveillance,

Rev. 66

CC-AA-206, Fuse Control, Rev. 8

CC-OC-206-1000, Fuse Replacement, Rev. 0

658.4.002, Fire Brigade and Safe Shutdown Radio Test, Rev. 36

658.4.002, Fire Brigade and Safe Shutdown Radio Test, Rev. 37

658.4.002, Fire Brigade and Safe Shutdown Radio Test, Rev. 38

Operating Experience (OPEX) Evaluations

OPEX Review of NRC IN 2005-03, Seismic Gap Fire Barriers, 5/25/05

OPEX Review of NRC IN 2006-22, New Ultra-Low-Sulfur Diesel Fuel Oil Could Adversely

Impact Diesel Engine Performance, 10/8/06

OPEX Review of NRC IN 2009-02, Biodiesel Fuel could Adversely Impact Diesel Engine

Performance, 6/22/09

OPEX Review of NRC IN 2009-29, Potential Failure of Water Supply Pumps to Automatically

Start due to a Fire, 2/3/10

TP 461/2, Appendix R Emergency Lighting Test, Rev. o

Operations Procedures

307, Isolation Condenser System, Rev. 124

346, Remote and Local Shutdown Panels Operation, Rev. 21

ABN-1, Reactor Scram, Rev. 13

ABN-29, Plant Fires, Rev. 27

ABN-30, Control Room Evacuation, Rev. 25

EMG-3200.01A Attachment 1, RPV Control EOP Flowchart, Rev. 8

EMG-SP11, Alternate Pressure Control Systems - Isolation Condensers, Rev. 1

FSP-RB1F3, Reactor Building 19 Foot Elevation Fire Support Procedure, Rev. 3

FSP-TB11D, Turbine Building Basement Fire Support Procedure, Rev. 8

Operator Safe Shutdown Training

Scenario 2612.885.0.TBB, Fire Response in Turbine Building Basement, dated 7/17/12

TQ-AA-223-F010, Training Material Approval Process, Rev. 6

TQ-JA-155-01, SEG Development Job Aid, Rev. 1

JPM 308.01, Setup Remote Shutdown Panel upon Control Room Evacuation, dated 5/24/10

Scenario 2621.RECIRCOPS.01, Recirculation Operations, dated 9/3/13

JPM 308.02, Operate EDG #2 from LSP-DG2, dated 5/18/11

Scenario 2621.885.0.054C, Control Room Evacuation, dated 2/20/14

Fire Fighting Strategies (i.e., Pre-Fire Plans)

OP-OC-201-008-1010, Oyster Creek Generating Station Pre-Fire Plan,

(Fire Area/Zone RB-FZ-1F3), Rev. 0

OP-OC-201-008-1019, Oyster Creek Generating Station Pre-Fire Plan,

(Fire Area/Zone OB-FZ-22A), Rev. 0

OP-OC-201-008-1027, Oyster Creek Generating Station Pre-Fire Plan,

(Fire Area/Zone TB-FZ-11D), Rev. 5

Fire Brigade Documents

2012 Fire Brigade End of Year Fire Drill Review, 1/2/13

2012 Fire Drill Log, Quarterly Review, 3/29/12, 7/11/12, 9/30/12, 1/3/13

2013 Fire Brigade End of Year Fire Drill Review, 2/13/13

2013 Fire Drill Log, Quarterly Review, 3/29/13, 7/15/13, 9/30/13, 12/10/13

Fire Brigade Training

Fire Brigade Learning Management System (LMS) Qualification Structure, 3/27/14

Fire Brigade Oyster Creek Qualification Status Report, 3/27/14

2011 Off-Site Fire Department Training, 5/9/11

2011 Off-Site Fire Department Drill, 11/7/11

2012 Off-Site Fire Department Training, 9/11/12

Fire Brigade Drills and Critiques

Rx Building 23 Elevation, North, MCC1A B2 Breaker, 8/28/12

Site Emergency Building (SEB-1 Electrical Room, Utility/Transformer Room, 2/11/14

SEB-1 Utility Room, 3/5/14

SEB-1 Utility Room - Battery Room, 3/13/14

Main Control Room - Panel 4-F, Announced, 1/16/14

Main Control Room - Panel 4-F, Announced, 3/21/14

MOB-3 Communications Room, 1/26/14

Transient Combustible Permits and Evaluations13-011, Fire Zone TB-FZ-11A, Lube Oil Equipment, 3/23/14

14-004, Fire Zone TB-FZ-11D, Turbine Building South-Air Compressor Area, 2/19/14

14-005, Fire Zone TB-FZ-11D, Heat Exchangers, 3/1/14

14-008, Fire Zone TB-FZ-11G, Turbine Building Mezzanine-Cart, 3/23/13

2014 Transient Combustible Log, 3/27/14

Hot Work and Ignition Source Permits

C2030965, TB 3 Air Compressor Receivers/Dryers 1-1 Air Receiver Repair/ Replace Valve

C2031632, ORW 23 Pre-Coat Pump NV-24

Completed Tests and Surveillances

645.3.037, Fire Pump Diesel 1-2 Controller Check and Component Calibration, Rev. 2,

Completed 8/29/13

645.3.038, Fire Pump Diesel 1-1 Controller Check and Component Calibration, Rev. 2,

Completed 8/9/13

645.4.001, Fire Pump #1 Operability Test, Rev. 71, Completed 1/10/14 & 2/6/14

645.4.012, Fire Pump Functional Test, Rev. 10, Completed 12/28/11 & 2/26/13

645.4.012, Fire Pump Functional Test, Rev. 11, Completed 12/5/13

645.4.019, Redundant Fire Protection Water Supply Pump Operability Test, Rev. 20,

Completed 2/6/14 & 3/7/14

645.4.020, Redundant Fire Protection Water Supply Pump Functional Test, Rev. 5,

Completed 10/9/12 & 5/30/13

645.4.036, Fire Pump #2 Operability Test. Rev. 23, Completed 12/31/13 & 3/7/14

645.6.003, Fire Hose Station, Hose House and Fire Hydrant Inspection. Rev. 22,

Completed 1/14/14

645.6.003, Fire Hose Station, Hose House and Fire Hydrant Inspection. Rev. 23,

Completed 2/12/14

645.6.007, Fire Protection Flush, Rev. 21, Completed 10/12/11 & 12/3/12

645.6.008, Fire Hose Re-Rack & Blockage Check, Rev. 13, Completed 12/7/11 & 6/2/13

645.6.017, Fire Barrier Penetration Surveillance, Rev. 14, Completed 6/9/09 & 6/25/09

645.6.017, Fire Barrier Penetration Surveillance, Rev. 18, Completed 10/13/11

645.6.017, Fire Barrier Penetration Surveillance, Rev. 19, Completed 11/28/11 & 2/28/12

645.6.023, Fire Suppression Water Underground Flow Test, Rev. 14, Completed 4/15/10

and 8/30/13

645.6.028, Thermo-Lag and Mecatiss (and 3M Interam) Envelope System Fire Barriers,

Rev. 10, Completed 6/22/11 & 2/25/13

645.6.032, Fire Detection System Alarm Circuitry Test for Turbine Building & 4160V

Switchgear Room, Rev. 20, Completed 2/28/11

645.6.032, Fire Detection System Alarm Circuitry Test for Turbine Building & 4160V

Switchgear Room, Rev. 21, Completed 3/8/12 & 3/29/12

645.6.032, Fire Detection System Alarm Circuitry Test for Turbine Building & 4160V

Switchgear Room, Rev. 22, Completed 8/2/13

645.6.033, Fire Detection System Alarm Circuitry Test for Control Room & Upper and

Lower Cable & Upper and Lower Cable Spreading Room, Rev. 5, Completed 6/5/12

645.6.037, Fire Detection System Alarm Circuitry Test for Reactor Building 75, 95, 119

and -19, Rev. 0, Completed 11/14/11 & 12/18/12

680.4.002, Local Shutdown Panel LSP-1AB2 Functional Test, Rev. 6, Completed 11/18/12

680.4.003, Local Shutdown Panel LSP-1B3 Functional Test, Rev. 12, Completed 4/25/12

and 11/10/12

680.4.004, Local Shutdown Panel LSP-1A2 Functional Test, Rev. 18, Completed 11/18/12

680.4.006, Remote Shutdown Panel Functional Test - Train B, Rev. 18, Completed 3/1/12

and 11/18/12

680.4.011, Local Shutdown Panel LSP-1D Functional Test, Rev. 8, Completed 11/11/12

Issue Reports (* denotes NRC identified during this inspection)

AR 01645241* AR01645668* IR01646051* 1187591

1582441 1639352* 0527339 00931459

00935317 01181818 01348120 01349405

01406356 01410451 01414079 01466438

01448363 01593476 01598001 01629862

01629864 01632532* 01632800 01633052

01638726* 01644466 01644531 01645106*

01645125* 01645693* 01173474 01176224

267338 01298893 01302134 01522732

01606938 01632238 01638171* 01638631*

01639317* 01639330* 01644668* AR01500766

Work Orders

R2225828 R2225962 R2223472 R2218408

R2232003 R2232769 R2232794 R2233916

R2234017 R2209149 C2026742 A2346341

A2347715 A2348891 A2350251 C2026068

C2031632 R2219129 R2229838 R2233122

R2235981 C2026467 R2071783 R2092061

R2102792 R2110006 R2142334 R2166849

R2166875 R2171970 R2171971 R2171980

R2172146 R2172433 R2178096 R2186456

R2186457 R2190874 R2194398 R2218884

R2223923 R2228088 R2224209 R2234000

R21960778 R220714 R2226702

Vendor Manuals

VM-OC-2785 Vendor Technical Manual, Revision 2

Industry Standards

EPRI-TR-106826 Battery Performance Monitoring by Internal Ohmic Measurements -

Emergency Lighting Unit Batteries, December 1996

NFPA Fire Protection Handbook, 14th Edition, Section 11, Chapter 5, Test of Water Supplies

Miscellaneous Documents

Exelon Letter of Agreement, Bayville Fire Department, 1/15/14

Exelon Letter of Agreement, Forked River Volunteer Fire Company, 1/15/14

Exelon Letter of Agreement, Lanoka Harbor Fire Department, 1/15/14

Fire Impairment Log, 3/21/14

Training Module 6231-PGD-2685, Course Code 792.0.0007, B.5.b and EDMG Overview, Rev.3

Training Module 6231-PGD-2685, Course Code 792.0.0008, Startup, Operation and

Shutdown of the Godwin Portable Pump, Rev.2

Training Module 6231-PGD-2685, Course Code 792.0.0009, B.5.b and EDMG Walkthrough,

Rev.2

OCNGS Fire Protection - Comparison to Standard Review Plan 9.5.1, Appendix A, 12/3/76

PES-P-006, Procurement Standard for Diesel Fuel Oil, Rev. 10

Analysis of Diesel Fuel Oil, 1/16/14

Electrical Cable and Conduit Routing Information

LIST OF ACRONYMS

ADAMS Agencywide Documents Access and Management System

AC Alternating Current

APCSB [NRC] Auxiliary and Power Conversion Systems Branch

ASME American Society of Mechanical Engineers

ASSS Alternate Safe Shutdown System

BTP Branch Technical Position

CCW Component Cooling Water

CDF Core Damage Frequency

CFR Code of Federal Regulations

CMEB [NRC] Chemical Engineering Branch

CO2 Carbon Dioxide

DC Direct Current

ELU Emergency Lighting Unit

FA Fire Area

FHA Fire Hazards Analysis

FPP Fire Protection Program

FW Feedwater

FZ Fire Zone

HRR Heat Release Rate

IN [NRC] Information Notice

IP [NRC] Inspection Procedure

IPEEE Individual Plant Examination of External Events

IR [NRC] Inspection Report

IR [Exelon] Issue Report

kV kilo-Volt

LOCA Loss of Coolant Accident

MOV Motor Operated Valve

MSO Multiple Spurious Operation

NEI Nuclear Energy Institute

NFPA National Fire Protection Association

NCV Non-Cited Violation

NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission

OCNGS Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station

PARS Publicly Available Records System

P&ID Piping and Instrumentation Drawing

PRA Probabilistic Risk Assessment

RBCCW Reactor Building Closed Cooling Water

RG [NRC] Regulatory Guide

SCBA Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus

SDP [NRC] Significance Determination Process

SER [NRC] Safety Evaluation Report

SSC Structures, Systems and Components

SW Service Water

TRM Technical Requirements Manual

UFSAR Updated Final Safety Analysis Report

V Volts

Vac Voltage Alternating Current

Vdc Voltage Direct Current

Attachment