ML16174A315: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Davis-Besse Nuclear Power StationAnnual Assessment Meeting Open House June 21, 20162015 Reactor Oversight ProcessNuclear Regulatory Commission -Region III Our MissionTo license and regulate the nation's civilian use of byproduct, source, and special nuclear materials to ensure adequate protection of public health and safety, promote the common defense and security, and protect the environment.
{{#Wiki_filter:Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Annual Assessment Meeting Open House June 21, 2016 2015 Reactor Oversight Process Nuclear Regulatory Commission - Region III
2 Materials ReactorsWasteWhat We Regulate Radon Military X-RaysWhat We Don't Regulate Some Nuclear Facts                                   
*100 nuclear power plants supply about 20 percent of the electricity in the U.S.
*Nuclear materials are used in medicine for diagnosis and cancer treatment.
*Nuclear materials are widely used in industry, such as in density gauges, flow measurement devices, radiography devices, and irradiators.
5 NRC Performance GoalsSafety-Ensure adequate protection of public health and safety and the environmentSecurity-Ensure adequate protection in the secure use and management of radioactive materials 6 How We Regulate Regulatory FrameworkNRC's Safety Mission Strategic Performance Areas Cornerstones Cross-Cutting AreasHuman Performance--Safety Conscious Work Environment--Problem Identification &
Resolution Reactor Oversight Process 9SafetyCornerstonesBaseline Inspection ResultsSignificance ThresholdAction MatrixSignificance ThresholdPerformance IndicatorResultsRegulatory ResponseStrategicPerformance AreasSafetyCornerstonesBaseline Inspection ResultsSignificance ThresholdAction MatrixSignificance ThresholdPerformance IndicatorResultsRegulatory ResponseStrategicPerformance Areas Significance ThresholdIncreasing Safety Significance Green WhiteYellow Red Performance Indicators Inspection Findings Green WhiteYellow RedIncreasing Safety Significance Action Matrix Columns Increasing
*Safety Significance
*Inspection
*Management Involvement
*Regulatory Action Licensee Response Regulatory Response Degraded Multiple/Repetitive Degraded Unacceptable


Performance 12National Summary of Plant PerformanceStatus as of 02/22/2016Licensee Response  90 Regulatory Response  7 Degraded Cornerstone  0 Multiple/Repetitive Deg. Cornerstone3 Unacceptable  0 IMC 0350 Oversight0 Total100 13National Summary 
Our Mission To license and regulate the nations civilian use of byproduct, source, and special nuclear materials to ensure adequate protection of public health and safety, promote the common defense and security, and protect the environment.
*Performance Indicator Results for 2015*
2
-Green 6686-White12-Yellow 0-Red 0*PIs are counted per plant per quarter
*Total Inspection Findings in 2015
#-Green 782-White8-Yellow 0-Red 0# Finding data current as of 2/22/2016 NRC Annual Assessment SummaryFirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company operated the station safely and in a manner that preserved the public health and safety and protected the environment.Davis-Bessewas in the Licensee Response Column of the NRC's Action Matrix in the third quarter of 2015Davis-Bessewas in the Regulatory Response Column in first, second, and fourth quarters of 2015 due to one or more Greater-than-Green violations associated with the Physical Protection cornerstone No Cross-Cutting Themes were identifiedDavis-BesseNuclear Power Station 14 14 NRC Inspection Activities5761 total hours expended by NRC on Reactor Oversight Process activities2429 inspector hours of direct inspection activity638 inspector hours reviewing and observing plant operating status1500 inspector hours of preparation for and documentation of inspection activities 1194 hours for other Reactor Oversight Process elements (e.g., assessments and communications) 15Davis-Besse2015 NRC Inspection Activities2 resident inspectors on site -residents produced four quarterly inspection reports and walked through the plant daily24 other inspectors participated in various inspections3major team inspectionsSupplemental Inspection for a Regulatory Response column entryComponent Design Basis InspectionBiennial Problem Identification and Resolution


InspectionDavis-BesseNuclear Power Station for 2015 16 Significance ThresholdGreen Baseline InspectionWhiteRequires additional NRC oversightYellowRequires more NRC oversightRedRequires most NRC oversightPerformance Indicators Inspection FindingsGreenVery low safety issueWhiteLow to moderate safety issueYellowSubstantial safety issueRedHigh safety issue 17 Davis-BessePIs and FindingsAll Green Performance Indicators9 Green/Severity Level IV Inspection Findings1 or more Greater-Than-Green Inspection Findings associated with the Security CornerstoneJanuary 1 through December 31, 2015 18 Safety Significant FindingsOne or more Greater-Than-Green Findings carryover from 2014Corrective Actions Found Sufficient during Inspection in Second Quarter of 2015Davis-Bessetransitioned to Licensee Response Column at beginning of third quarter 2015 One or more Greater-Than-Green Findings in fourth quarter of 2015Davis-Bessetransitioned to Regulatory Response Column at beginning of fourth quarter 2015 Davis-BesseNuclear Power Station NRC Inspection FindingsFailure to maintain Flow-Accelerated Corrosion Computer Model results in a non-safety piping failureFailure to install and control reactor coolant pump seal vent flexible hoses per design analysesFailure to request and obtain a license amendment for use of an unreviewedmethod of analysis for the capability of the shield buildingDavis-BesseNuclear Power StationSome Examples of Green Findings 20 NRC Inspection Plans for 2016NRC Plans Baseline Inspections for 2016   This includes the following major team inspections:Post License Renewal Inspection (completed)Triennial Fire Protection InspectionInitial Reactor Operator License ExaminationsSupplemental Inspection for one or more         Greater-Than-Green inspection findings 21Davis-BesseNuclear Plant 22Mitigating Strategies (MS) & Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (SFPI) Order
What We Regulate Reactors Materials Waste
*MS Order requires strategies to cope with a long term loss of safety systems
 
*SFPI Order requires plants to be able to tell if water is at or above certain levels
What We Dont Regulate Military              Radon X-Rays
*Site Audit was performed in November 2015
 
*Site Safety Evaluation scheduled to be issued after the NRC receives the site compliance letter
Some Nuclear Facts
*Regional inspection of MS inspection (TI 191, Rev 1) will be performed after Safety Evaluation issuedDavis-BesseFukushimaRecommendations Status Davis-BesseFukushima Flooding Response Status
* 100 nuclear power plants supply about 20 percent of the electricity in the U.S.
*Flooding Hazard Reevaluations
* Nuclear materials are used in medicine for diagnosis and cancer treatment.
-Reevaluate Hazards using present-Day information
* Nuclear materials are widely used in industry, such as in density gauges, flow measurement devices, radiography devices, and irradiators.
-Flooding Was Submitted March 2015
5
-Staff assessments will be issued by December 2016
 
-Inspectors completed TI-190 which verified a licensee's interim actions were appropriate to mitigate the reevaluated flood levels.
NRC Performance Goals Safety - Ensure adequate protection of public health and safety and the environment Security - Ensure adequate protection in the secure use and management of radioactive materials 6
*Licensees will address the reevaluated flood heights as part of their Mitigating Strategies Assessment, and if impacted take one of four potential paths:1) No change; 2) procedural change; 3) physical modifications;4) Revised Mitigating Strategies 23 24*Seismic Walkdowns
 
-Verify that the site can meet its current requirements for hazard protection
How We Regulate Regulatory Framework NRCs Safety Mission Strategic Performance Areas Cornerstones Cross-Cutting Areas Human Performance--Safety Conscious Work Environment--Problem Identification &
-Walkdownsare complete; Staff assessments issued  
Resolution
*Seismic Hazard Reevaluations
 
-Reevaluate Hazards using present-Day information
Reactor Oversight Process Strategic Performance Areas Safety Cornerstones Baseline Inspection                    Performance Indicator Results                                Results Significance                    Significance Threshold                      Threshold Action Matrix Regulatory Response 9
-Seismic Reevaluations submitted March 31, 2014  
 
-NRC assessment of the licensee submittal was issued on August 25, 2015
Significance Threshold Performance Indicators Green    White    Yellow    Red Increasing Safety Significance Inspection Findings Green    White    Yellow    Red Increasing Safety Significance
-NRC assessment in letter dated October 27, 2015, stated that a full seismic risk evaluation was not required  
 
*Sites will evaluate the impacts of the updated Seismic hazards as part of their mitigating strategies assessment.Davis-BesseFukushima Seismic Response Status Actions in Response to the Japan Nuclear Accident
Action Matrix Columns Licensee Regulatory Degraded Multiple/Repetitive Unacceptable Response Response                Degraded      Performance Increasing
*Actions in response to Japan Nuclear Accident: http://www.nrc.gov/japan/japan-info.html*Mailbox for comments on staff actions: JLD_Public.Resource@nrc.gov
* Safety Significance
*Office of Public Affairs Point of Contact: OPA.resource@nrc.gov or 301-415-8200 25 NRC Social Media Channels*Blog:http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov/
* Inspection
*Flickr:http://www.flickr.com/photos/nrcgov/
* Management Involvement
*Twitter:https://twitter.com/#!/nrcgov
* Regulatory Action
*YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/NRCgov
 
*RSS:http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html#rss 26 27Reference Sources
National Summary of Plant Performance Status as of 02/22/2016 Licensee Response                    90 Regulatory Response                    7 Degraded Cornerstone                  0 Multiple/Repetitive Deg. Cornerstone  3 Unacceptable                          0 IMC 0350 Oversight                    0 Total                                100 12
*Reactor Oversight Process
 
-http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.html
National Summary
*Public Electronic Reading Room
* Performance Indicator Results for 2015*
-http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm.html
  - Green          6686
*Public Document Room 800-397-4209 (Toll Free)}}
  - White          12
  - Yellow        0
  - Red            0
  *PIs are counted per plant per quarter
* Total Inspection Findings in 2015#
  - Green          782
  - White          8
  - Yellow        0
  - Red            0
  # Finding data current as of 2/22/2016 13
 
NRC Annual Assessment Summary Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company operated the station safely and in a manner that preserved the public health and safety and protected the environment.
Davis-Besse was in the Licensee Response Column of the NRCs Action Matrix in the third quarter of 2015 Davis-Besse was in the Regulatory Response Column in first, second, and fourth quarters of 2015 due to one or more Greater-than-Green violations associated with the Physical Protection cornerstone No Cross-Cutting Themes were identified 14 14
 
NRC Inspection Activities Davis-Besse 2015 5761 total hours expended by NRC on Reactor Oversight Process activities 2429 inspector hours of direct inspection activity 638 inspector hours reviewing and observing plant operating status 1500 inspector hours of preparation for and documentation of inspection activities 1194 hours for other Reactor Oversight Process elements (e.g., assessments and communications) 15
 
NRC Inspection Activities Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station for 2015 2 resident inspectors on site - residents produced four quarterly inspection reports and walked through the plant daily 24 other inspectors participated in various inspections 3 major team inspections Supplemental Inspection for a Regulatory Response column entry Component Design Basis Inspection Biennial Problem Identification and Resolution Inspection 16
 
Significance Threshold Performance Indicators Green  Baseline Inspection White  Requires additional NRC oversight Yellow  Requires more NRC oversight Red    Requires most NRC oversight Inspection Findings Green  Very low safety issue White  Low to moderate safety issue Yellow  Substantial safety issue Red    High safety issue 17
 
Davis-Besse PIs and Findings January 1 through December 31, 2015 All Green Performance Indicators 9 Green/Severity Level IV Inspection Findings 1 or more Greater-Than-Green Inspection Findings associated with the Security Cornerstone 18
 
Safety Significant Findings Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station One or more Greater-Than-Green Findings carryover from 2014 Corrective Actions Found Sufficient during Inspection in Second Quarter of 2015 Davis-Besse transitioned to Licensee Response Column at beginning of third quarter 2015 One or more Greater-Than-Green Findings in fourth quarter of 2015 Davis-Besse transitioned to Regulatory Response Column at beginning of fourth quarter 2015
 
NRC Inspection Findings Some Examples of Green Findings Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Failure to maintain Flow-Accelerated Corrosion Computer Model results in a non-safety piping failure Failure to install and control reactor coolant pump seal vent flexible hoses per design analyses Failure to request and obtain a license amendment for use of an unreviewed method of analysis for the capability of the shield building 20
 
NRC Inspection Plans for 2016 Davis-Besse Nuclear Plant NRC Plans Baseline Inspections for 2016 This includes the following major team inspections:
Post License Renewal Inspection (completed)
Triennial Fire Protection Inspection Initial Reactor Operator License Examinations Supplemental Inspection for one or more Greater-Than-Green inspection findings 21
 
Davis-Besse Fukushima Recommendations Status Mitigating Strategies (MS) & Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (SFPI) Order
* MS Order requires strategies to cope with a long term loss of safety systems
* SFPI Order requires plants to be able to tell if water is at or above certain levels
* Site Audit was performed in November 2015
* Site Safety Evaluation scheduled to be issued after the NRC receives the site compliance letter
* Regional inspection of MS inspection (TI 191, Rev 1) will be performed after Safety Evaluation issued 22
 
Davis-Besse Fukushima Flooding Response Status
* Flooding Hazard Reevaluations
    - Reevaluate Hazards using present-Day information
    - Flooding Was Submitted March 2015
    - Staff assessments will be issued by December 2016
    - Inspectors completed TI-190 which verified a licensees interim actions were appropriate to mitigate the reevaluated flood levels.
* Licensees will address the reevaluated flood heights as part of their Mitigating Strategies Assessment, and if impacted take one of four potential paths:
: 1) No change; 2) procedural change;
: 3) physical modifications; 4) Revised Mitigating Strategies 23
 
Davis-Besse Fukushima Seismic Response Status
* Seismic Walkdowns
    - Verify that the site can meet its current requirements for hazard protection
    - Walkdowns are complete; Staff assessments issued
* Seismic Hazard Reevaluations
    - Reevaluate Hazards using present-Day information
    - Seismic Reevaluations submitted March 31, 2014
    - NRC assessment of the licensee submittal was issued on August 25, 2015
    - NRC assessment in letter dated October 27, 2015, stated that a full seismic risk evaluation was not required
* Sites will evaluate the impacts of the updated Seismic hazards as part of their mitigating strategies assessment.
24
 
Actions in Response to the Japan Nuclear Accident
* Actions in response to Japan Nuclear Accident: http://www.nrc.gov/japan/japan-info.html
* Mailbox for comments on staff actions:
JLD_Public.Resource@nrc.gov
* Office of Public Affairs Point of Contact:
OPA.resource@nrc.gov or 301-415-8200 25
 
NRC Social Media Channels
* Blog:     http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov/
* Flickr:   http://www.flickr.com/photos/nrcgov/
* Twitter: https://twitter.com/#!/nrcgov
* YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/NRCgov
* RSS:   http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html#rss 26
 
Reference Sources
* Reactor Oversight Process
  - http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.html
* Public Electronic Reading Room
  - http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm.html
* Public Document Room 800-397-4209 (Toll Free) 27}}

Revision as of 17:29, 30 October 2019

Annual Assessment Meeting Open House June 21, 2016
ML16174A315
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse Cleveland Electric icon.png
Issue date: 06/21/2016
From:
NRC/RGN-III
To:
References
Download: ML16174A315 (27)
v • d • e


Text

Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Annual Assessment Meeting Open House June 21, 2016 2015 Reactor Oversight Process Nuclear Regulatory Commission - Region III

Our Mission To license and regulate the nations civilian use of byproduct, source, and special nuclear materials to ensure adequate protection of public health and safety, promote the common defense and security, and protect the environment.

2

What We Regulate Reactors Materials Waste

What We Dont Regulate Military Radon X-Rays

Some Nuclear Facts

  • 100 nuclear power plants supply about 20 percent of the electricity in the U.S.
  • Nuclear materials are used in medicine for diagnosis and cancer treatment.
  • Nuclear materials are widely used in industry, such as in density gauges, flow measurement devices, radiography devices, and irradiators.

5

NRC Performance Goals Safety - Ensure adequate protection of public health and safety and the environment Security - Ensure adequate protection in the secure use and management of radioactive materials 6

How We Regulate Regulatory Framework NRCs Safety Mission Strategic Performance Areas Cornerstones Cross-Cutting Areas Human Performance--Safety Conscious Work Environment--Problem Identification &

Resolution

Reactor Oversight Process Strategic Performance Areas Safety Cornerstones Baseline Inspection Performance Indicator Results Results Significance Significance Threshold Threshold Action Matrix Regulatory Response 9

Significance Threshold Performance Indicators Green White Yellow Red Increasing Safety Significance Inspection Findings Green White Yellow Red Increasing Safety Significance

Action Matrix Columns Licensee Regulatory Degraded Multiple/Repetitive Unacceptable Response Response Degraded Performance Increasing

  • Safety Significance
  • Inspection
  • Management Involvement
  • Regulatory Action

National Summary of Plant Performance Status as of 02/22/2016 Licensee Response 90 Regulatory Response 7 Degraded Cornerstone 0 Multiple/Repetitive Deg. Cornerstone 3 Unacceptable 0 IMC 0350 Oversight 0 Total 100 12

National Summary

  • Performance Indicator Results for 2015*

- Green 6686

- White 12

- Yellow 0

- Red 0

  • PIs are counted per plant per quarter
  • Total Inspection Findings in 2015#

- Green 782

- White 8

- Yellow 0

- Red 0

  1. Finding data current as of 2/22/2016 13

NRC Annual Assessment Summary Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company operated the station safely and in a manner that preserved the public health and safety and protected the environment.

Davis-Besse was in the Licensee Response Column of the NRCs Action Matrix in the third quarter of 2015 Davis-Besse was in the Regulatory Response Column in first, second, and fourth quarters of 2015 due to one or more Greater-than-Green violations associated with the Physical Protection cornerstone No Cross-Cutting Themes were identified 14 14

NRC Inspection Activities Davis-Besse 2015 5761 total hours expended by NRC on Reactor Oversight Process activities 2429 inspector hours of direct inspection activity 638 inspector hours reviewing and observing plant operating status 1500 inspector hours of preparation for and documentation of inspection activities 1194 hours0.0138 days <br />0.332 hours <br />0.00197 weeks <br />4.54317e-4 months <br /> for other Reactor Oversight Process elements (e.g., assessments and communications) 15

NRC Inspection Activities Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station for 2015 2 resident inspectors on site - residents produced four quarterly inspection reports and walked through the plant daily 24 other inspectors participated in various inspections 3 major team inspections Supplemental Inspection for a Regulatory Response column entry Component Design Basis Inspection Biennial Problem Identification and Resolution Inspection 16

Significance Threshold Performance Indicators Green Baseline Inspection White Requires additional NRC oversight Yellow Requires more NRC oversight Red Requires most NRC oversight Inspection Findings Green Very low safety issue White Low to moderate safety issue Yellow Substantial safety issue Red High safety issue 17

Davis-Besse PIs and Findings January 1 through December 31, 2015 All Green Performance Indicators 9 Green/Severity Level IV Inspection Findings 1 or more Greater-Than-Green Inspection Findings associated with the Security Cornerstone 18

Safety Significant Findings Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station One or more Greater-Than-Green Findings carryover from 2014 Corrective Actions Found Sufficient during Inspection in Second Quarter of 2015 Davis-Besse transitioned to Licensee Response Column at beginning of third quarter 2015 One or more Greater-Than-Green Findings in fourth quarter of 2015 Davis-Besse transitioned to Regulatory Response Column at beginning of fourth quarter 2015

NRC Inspection Findings Some Examples of Green Findings Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Failure to maintain Flow-Accelerated Corrosion Computer Model results in a non-safety piping failure Failure to install and control reactor coolant pump seal vent flexible hoses per design analyses Failure to request and obtain a license amendment for use of an unreviewed method of analysis for the capability of the shield building 20

NRC Inspection Plans for 2016 Davis-Besse Nuclear Plant NRC Plans Baseline Inspections for 2016 This includes the following major team inspections:

Post License Renewal Inspection (completed)

Triennial Fire Protection Inspection Initial Reactor Operator License Examinations Supplemental Inspection for one or more Greater-Than-Green inspection findings 21

Davis-Besse Fukushima Recommendations Status Mitigating Strategies (MS) & Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (SFPI) Order

  • MS Order requires strategies to cope with a long term loss of safety systems
  • SFPI Order requires plants to be able to tell if water is at or above certain levels
  • Site Audit was performed in November 2015
  • Site Safety Evaluation scheduled to be issued after the NRC receives the site compliance letter
  • Regional inspection of MS inspection (TI 191, Rev 1) will be performed after Safety Evaluation issued 22

Davis-Besse Fukushima Flooding Response Status

  • Flooding Hazard Reevaluations

- Reevaluate Hazards using present-Day information

- Flooding Was Submitted March 2015

- Staff assessments will be issued by December 2016

- Inspectors completed TI-190 which verified a licensees interim actions were appropriate to mitigate the reevaluated flood levels.

  • Licensees will address the reevaluated flood heights as part of their Mitigating Strategies Assessment, and if impacted take one of four potential paths:
1) No change; 2) procedural change;
3) physical modifications; 4) Revised Mitigating Strategies 23

Davis-Besse Fukushima Seismic Response Status

  • Seismic Walkdowns

- Verify that the site can meet its current requirements for hazard protection

- Walkdowns are complete; Staff assessments issued

  • Seismic Hazard Reevaluations

- Reevaluate Hazards using present-Day information

- Seismic Reevaluations submitted March 31, 2014

- NRC assessment of the licensee submittal was issued on August 25, 2015

- NRC assessment in letter dated October 27, 2015, stated that a full seismic risk evaluation was not required

  • Sites will evaluate the impacts of the updated Seismic hazards as part of their mitigating strategies assessment.

24

Actions in Response to the Japan Nuclear Accident

  • Mailbox for comments on staff actions:

JLD_Public.Resource@nrc.gov

  • Office of Public Affairs Point of Contact:

OPA.resource@nrc.gov or 301-415-8200 25

NRC Social Media Channels

Reference Sources

  • Reactor Oversight Process

- http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.html

  • Public Electronic Reading Room

- http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm.html

  • Public Document Room 800-397-4209 (Toll Free) 27
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML16174A315&oldid=2019282"