NMP2L2671, Submittal of 2017 Annual Environmental Operating Report
| ML18128A194 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Nine Mile Point  |
| Issue date: | 04/19/2018 |
| From: | Orphanos P Exelon Generation Co |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NMP2L2671 | |
| Download: ML18128A194 (4) | |
Text
(,
L NMP2L2671 April 19, 2018 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn:
Document Control D13sk Washington, DC 20555-0001
Subject:
Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2 Renewed Fac;:ility Operating License No. NPF-69 Docket No. 50-41 O 2017 Annual Environmental Operating Report Appendix B In accordance with Appe11dix B, Environmental Protection Plan, of the Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF-69 for Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2, attached is the 2017 Annual Environmental Operating Report for the period of Jam,iary 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017.
This submittal does not contain any new regulatory commitments.
Should yo~ have questions regarding the information in this submittal, please contact Dennis Moore, Site Regulatory Ass1,1rance Manager, at (315) 349-5219. I Sincerely, Peter M. Orphanos Site Vice President, Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Exelori Generation Company, LLC PMO/JTR
Enclosure:
Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2 l~-
2017 Annual Environmental Operating Report cc:
NRC Regional Administrator, Region I NRC Project Manag~r NRC Resident Inspector
,-£-£2-?_-,_
µI({(_
Enclosure Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2 2017 Annual Environmental Operating Report
ATTACHMENT NMPNS UNIT 2 2017 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT Subsection 5.4.1 of the Environmental Protection Plan (EPP), as contained in Appendix B of the Renewed Operating License for the Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Unit 2, requires that an Annual Environmental Operating Report be submitted to the Commission prior to May 1 of each year. The following addresses the requirements found in Subsection 5.4.1 of the EPP for the submittal of the Annual Environmental Operating Report:
- 1. Provide summaries and analyses of the results of the environmental protection activities required by Subsection 4.2 (if any) of the EPP for the report period, including a comparison with related preoperational studies, operational controls (as appropriate), and previous non-radiological environmental monitoring reports, and an assessment of the observed impacts of the plant operation on the environment. If harmful effects or evidence of trends towards irreversible damage to the environment are observed, a detailed analysis of the data and a proposed course of mitigating action shall be provided.
Subsection 4.2 of the EPP denotes three areas of environmental monitoring:
Subsection 4.2.1 (Aquatic Monitoring) has no specific monitoring requirements although it is noted that the Commission will rely on the decisions made by tbe State of New York under the authority of the Clean Water Act for any requirements. Aquatic monitoring is specified in the station's State Pollutant Discharge Elimination Systerµ Permit (SPDES Permit) which is a site permit applicable to Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Unit 1 and Unit 2. The SPDES Permit requires a limited Aquatic ~onitoring Program (referred to in the permit as Biological Monitoring Requirements) wnich, at the present time, is only applicable to Unit 1.
Unit 2 is in compliance.
Therefore, no Aquatic Monitoring Program is presently required for Unit 2.
Subsection 4.2.2 (Terrestrial Monitoring) does not contain any monitoring requirements.
Subsection 4.2.3 (Noise Monitoring) does not contain any monitoring requirements.
- 2. Provide a list of EPP non-compliances and corrective actions taken to remedy them.
A review of the EPP requirements and plant records showed that there wery no non-compliances with the EPP requirements during 2017.
- 3. Provide a list of all changes in station desigff or operation, tests, and experiments made in accordance with EPP Subsection 3.1 which involved a potentially si~nificant unreviewed environmental question (non-radiological).
A review of plant records, including environmental evaluations,.showed that there were no changes in station design/operation, tests, or experiments during 2017 that c;ould have involved a potentially significant unreviewed environmental question (non-radiological).
Page 1 of2
- 4.
List all non-routine reports submitted in accordance with Subsection 5.4.2 of the EPP.
During 2017, there were no non-routine reports submitted to the Commission in accordance with Subsection 5.4.2 of the EPP.
Page 2 of2