ML23024A136
| ML23024A136 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 15000041 |
| Issue date: | 02/02/2023 |
| From: | Mary Muessle NRC/RGN-IV/DRSS |
| To: | Swindell J Radiation Safety Services LLC |
| References | |
| EA-22-051, 4-2021-010 IR 2021001 | |
| Download: ML23024A136 (7) | |
See also: IR 015000041/2021001
Text
February 2, 2023
Joshua Swindell
Radiation Safety Officer
Radiation Safety Services, LLC
1741 Triangle Park Drive
Maryville, TN 37801
SUBJECT:
RADIATION SAFETY SERVICES, LLC - NRC INSPECTION REPORT
150-00041/2021-001 AND INVESTIGATION REPORT 4-2021-010
Dear Joshua Swindell:
This letter refers to the investigation completed on May 27, 2022, by the U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations at Radiation Safety Services, LLC, in
Knoxville, Tennessee. The investigation was conducted to determine whether employees of
Radiation Safety Services, LLC, while working under reciprocity in NRC jurisdiction, willfully
transferred byproduct material to an NRC licensee without verifying that it was authorized to
receive and possess the material. The NRCs investigation results were discussed with you
during a telephonic exit on January 20, 2023.
Based on the information acquired during the investigation and in-office review by the inspection
staff, one apparent violation was identified and is being considered for escalated enforcement
action in accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy. The current Enforcement Policy is
included on the NRCs website at http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/regulatory/enforcement/enforce-
pol.html. The apparent violation involves the transfer of byproduct material to a company that
was not specifically licensed by the NRC to receive the material, contrary to the requirements of
Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 150.20(b)(3), as documented in the
Enclosure. In addition, the NRC determined that the apparent violation was not the result of
willfulness.
The circumstances surrounding the apparent violation, the significance of the issue, and the
need for lasting and effective corrective action were discussed with you during a telephonic exit
on January 20, 2023.
Before the NRC makes its enforcement decision, we are providing you an opportunity to:
(1) respond in writing to the apparent violation addressed in the inspection report within 30 days
of the date of this letter; (2) request a predecisional enforcement conference (PEC); or
(3) request alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mediation. If a PEC is held, it will be open for
public observation and the NRC may issue a press release to announce the time and date of
the conference. Please contact Dr. Lizette Roldán-Otero, Chief, Materials Inspection Branch,
at 817-200-1455 or Lizette.Roldan-Otero@nrc.gov within 10 days of the date of this letter to
J. Swindell
2
notify the NRC of your intended response to either provide a written response, participate in a
PEC, or pursue ADR. A PEC should be held within 30 days and an ADR session within 45 days
of the date of this letter.
If you choose to provide a written response, it should be clearly marked as a Response to
Apparent Violation, NRC Inspection Report 150-00041/2021-001; EA-22-051 and should
include: (1) the reason for the apparent violation or, if contested, the basis for disputing the
apparent violation; (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved;
(3) the corrective steps that will be taken; and (4) the date when full compliance will be
achieved. Your response may reference or include previously docketed correspondence if the
correspondence adequately addresses the required response. Your response should be sent to
the Director, Division of Radiological Safety and Security, NRC Region IV, 1600 E. Lamar Blvd.,
Arlington, Texas, 76011-4511, and emailed to R4Enforcement@nrc.gov. If an adequate
response is not received within 30 days of the date of this letter or an extension of time has not
been granted by the NRC, the NRC will proceed with its enforcement decision or schedule a
PEC.
If you choose to request a PEC, the conference will afford you the opportunity to provide your
perspective on these matters and any other information that you believe the NRC should take
into consideration before making an enforcement decision. The decision to hold a PEC does not
mean that the NRC has determined that a violation has occurred or that enforcement action will
be taken. This conference would be conducted to obtain information to assist the NRC in
making an enforcement decision.
The topics discussed during the conference may include information to determine whether a
violation occurred, information to determine the significance of a violation, information related to
the identification of a violation, and information related to any corrective actions taken or
planned. In presenting your corrective actions, you should be aware that the promptness and
comprehensiveness of your actions will be considered in assessing any civil penalty for the
apparent violation. The guidance in NRC Information Notice 96-28, Suggested Guidance
Relating to Development and Implementation of Corrective Action, may be helpful in preparing
your response (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession
No. ML061240509).
In lieu of a PEC or written response, you may request ADR with the NRC in an attempt to
resolve this issue. Alternative dispute resolution is a general term encompassing various
techniques for resolving conflicts using a neutral third party. The technique that the NRC
employs is mediation. Mediation is a voluntary, informal process in which a trained neutral
mediator works with parties to help them reach resolution. If the parties agree to use ADR, they
select a mutually agreeable neutral mediator who has no stake in the outcome and no power to
make decisions. Mediation gives parties an opportunity to discuss issues, clear up
misunderstandings, be creative, find areas of agreement, and reach a final resolution of the
issues.
Additional information concerning the NRCs ADR program can be obtained at
http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/regulatory/enforcement/adr.html as well as NRC brochure
NUREG/BR-0317, Enforcement Alternative Dispute Resolution Program Revision 2, ADAMS
Accession No. ML18122A101. The Institute on Conflict Resolution at Cornell University has
agreed to facilitate the NRCs program as a neutral third party. Please contact the Institute on
Conflict Resolution at 877-733-9415 within 10 days of the date of this letter if you are interested
in pursuing resolution of this issue through ADR.
J. Swindell
3
In addition, please be advised that the number and characterization of apparent violations
described in the Enclosure may change as a result of further NRC review. You will be advised
by separate correspondence of the results of our deliberations on this matter.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs Agency Rules of Practice and Procedure,
a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response, if you choose to provide one, will be
made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or in the
NRCs ADAMS, accessible from the NRCs website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-
rm/adams.html. However, you should be aware that all final NRC documents, including the final
Office of Investigations report, are official agency records and may be made available to the
public under the Freedom of Information Act and subject to redaction of certain information in
accordance with the Freedom of Information Act. To the extent possible, your response should
not include any personal privacy or proprietary information so that it can be made available to
the public without redaction.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Dr. Lizette Roldán-Otero of my
staff at 817-200-1455.
Sincerely,
Mary C. Muessle, Director
Division of Radiological Safety and Security
Docket No.: 150-00041
License No.: General License
pursuant to 10 CFR 150.20
Enclosure:
NRC Inspection Report 150-00041/2021-001
cc w/Enclosure:
Debra Shults, Director
Division of Radiological Health
TN Dept of Environment and Conservation
William R. Snodgrass Tennessee Tower-15th Floor
312 Rosa L. Parks Avenue
Nashville, TN 37243
debra.shults@tn.gov
Signed by Muessle, Mary
on 02/02/23
SUNSI Review:
ADAMS:
Non-Publicly Available Non-Sensitive
Keyword:
By: ACR
Yes No
Publicly Available
Sensitive
OFFICE
ACES:ES
BC:MIB
ACES:TL
RIV: RC
NAME
ARoberts
LRoldanOtero
JGroom
DCylkowski
CRiveraDiaz
SIGNATURE
/RA/ E
/RA/ E
/RA/ E
/RA/ E
/RA/ E
DATE
12/06/22
12/19/22
12/12/22
12/13/22
01/09/23
OFFICE
D: DRSS
NAME
MBurgess
TSteinfeldt
MMuessle
SIGNATURE
/RA/ E
/NLO/ E
/RA/
DATE
12/27/22
01/06/23
2/2/2023
Enclosure
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION IV
Docket:
150-00041
License:
General License pursuant to 10 CFR 150.20
Report:
150-00041/2021-001
EA No:
Licensee:
Radiation Safety Services, LLC
Exit Meeting Date:
January 20, 2023
Inspector:
Health Physicist, Materials Inspection Branch
Division of Radiological Safety and Security, Region IV
Approved by:
Lizette Roldán-Otero, PhD
Chief, Materials Inspection Branch
Division of Radiological Safety and Security, Region IV
Attachment:
Additional Information
2
SUMMARY
Radiation Safety Services, LLC (RSS)
Investigation Report 4-2021-010
NRC Inspection Report 150-00041/2021-001
On or about April 12, 2021, during a remote inspection of the Buckskin Mining Company, a coal
plant authorized to possess and use fixed gauges at their facility outside of Gillette, Wyoming,
an NRC Health Physicist identified that RSS, a Tennessee licensee working under reciprocity in
NRC jurisdiction (Wyoming), transferred two cesium-137 sealed sources of byproduct material
to an entity not authorized to possess it at that time. Radiation Safety Services, LLC transferred
approximately 10.7 millicuries of cesium-137 to an NRC licensee in Idaho that was licensed to
perform service provider activities, but the license only authorized work to be performed at client
facilities and did not authorize possession of the materials.
APPARENT VIOLATION
Based on the results of an NRC investigation completed on May 27, 2022, one apparent
violation of NRC requirements was identified. The apparent violation is listed below:
10 CFR 150.20(a)(1) states, in part, that provided that the provisions of 10 CFR 150.20(b)
have been met, any person who holds a specific license from an Agreement State is granted
a general license to conduct the same activity in non-Agreement States.
10 CFR 150.20(b)(3) requires, in part, that any person engaging in activities in
non-Agreement States under a general license shall not transfer or dispose of radioactive
material possessed or used under the general license, except by transfer to a person who is
specifically licensed by the Commission to receive this material.
10 CFR 30.41(c) requires, in part, that before transferring byproduct material to a specific
licensee of the Commission, the licensee transferring the material shall verify that the
transferees license authorizes the receipt of the type, form, and quantity of byproduct
material to be transferred.
Contrary to the above, on May 20, 2020, RSS, a general licensee under 10 CFR 150.20,
transferred radioactive material to a person who was not specifically licensed by the
Commission to receive the material. Specifically, while engaging in activities under a general
license in Gillette, Wyoming, RSS transferred byproduct material, two cesium-137 sealed
sources, and failed to adequately verify that the license of the transferee authorized the
receipt of the byproduct material transferred. (150-00041-2021-001-01)
Attachment
Additional Information
PARTIAL LIST OF PERSONS CONTACTED
Joshua Swindell, Radiation Safety Officer
INSPECTION PROCEDURES USED
N/A - NRC Investigation Only
ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED
Opened
150-00041/2021-001-01
Transferred radioactive material to a person who was not
specifically licensed by the Commission to receive the
material. 10 CFR 150.20(b)(3)
Closed
None
Discussed
None