ML20249B445

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 0 to Calculation C15.0.3270, Fuel Pool Cooling He E206A & E206B GIP Evaluation
ML20249B445
Person / Time
Site: Pilgrim
Issue date: 01/04/1996
From: Dyckman J, Pitts C, White T
BOSTON EDISON CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20249B442 List:
References
C15.0.3270, C15.0.3270-R, C15.0.3270-R00, NUDOCS 9806230121
Download: ML20249B445 (24)


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 0 Boston Edison CALCULATION COVER SIIEET PILGRIM NUCLEAR POWER STATION lSh 1 of 24 l CALC No C15.0.3270 REV.0 FILE NO. SR @ R-TYPE NSR O Subject Fuel Pool Cooline HE E206A & E206B GIP Evaluation Preliminary Calc. O Finalization Discipline Division Manager: N IT Due Date: //9hh Approval /s/; lh Date: Final Calc. V '/ Independent Reviewer:, /S/OMAfM6 5 RYStatementattached @ Page(s) By _LG. Dkk) nan. Date Ch'k'd U /) /. Date Agrpxl ' /S/ / /S/ U f ( l \\ This calculation evaluates the Fuel Pool Cooling IIE scismic ddequacy u(san Generic screening methodology, 1.0 Problem Statement 2.0 Summary of Results 3.0 Method of Solution 40 References 5.0 Calculation Generic Implementation Procedure Section 7.4 Evaluation Walkdown Observations Conclusion Attachments: A. Bechtel Calculation 10394-114-C7 (9 sheets) B. Independent Design Verification Record (3 sheets) C. Preliminary Evaluation Checklist (2 sheets) This design analysis DOES O, DOES NOT @ require revision to design docuruents. affected Design Documents: 4FDC IS O,IS NOT @ Required. A dafety Evaluation IS 0. IS NOT @ Required. l This design analysis DOES O, DOES NOT @ affect the piping analysis index (PAI). If the pal is affected, initiate a sevision to Calculation M561. l Minor revisions made on pages of this calculation. See next revision. l Replaces Calc No.: Voided by Calc No.: O Or Attached Memo f NESD 3.05 Rev. (9 JGD/htG5316 9806230121 990615~ PDR ADOCK 05000293 ( P PDR

Bostors Edimors CALCULATION SHEET Calculation #: C15.0.3270 Revision: 0 Date: 8/95 Prepared by: J.G. Dyckman Sheet 2 of 24 Checked by: W'DjotdfeWu SR E NSR 0 1.0 PROBLEM STATEMENT A seismic adequacy evaluation is required for the Fuel Pool Cooling Heat Exchanger E-206A and E-206B to address USI A-46 concerns. 2.0

SUMMARY

OF RESULTS The Fuel Pool Cooling Heat Exchangers E-206A and E-206B are outliers because they are flexible and do not have sufHcient capacity to meet the SPA requirement per the screening method, Section 7.4.2 of the Generic Implementation Procedure. Nevertheless, the detailed analyses presented herein shows the Fuel Pool Cooling HE's meet GlP requirements based on computed SA's, and no further action is required. 3.0 MLillOD OF SOLUTION A seismic adequacy evaluation is performed for heat exchangers using the GIP screening methodology of Section 7.4.2. Seismic demand is based on computed spectral accelerations (SA's) which include sensitivity variations (120%) recommended by Ref. 5.

4.0 REFERENCES

1. Drawings MI1-22-3, MI1 2-5, C100, C101 and Stress Isometrics 623,624,634-2,635-2,691 and 693 2. Generic Implementation Procedure, Rev. 2 3. Specification C-Il4 4. SEWS for E206A and 206B 5 EPRI NP-5228-SL, Rev.1, Vol. 4 6 BECo Calculation C15.0.1811 NESD 3.05 Rev.19 JGD/hl/95316

n--_ PREPARED BY G.W. U othmn CALC.# C\\5 0.%7_7C) {LI bn(b4c.- CHECKED BY O DATE 6 1)b [$$g REV. Sk tSHEET 3 op 1 4 E[ kaiNh.Nd34-t-A,c-toi) %@yd$( ) w-1 4 I i $3 h* D.5T....' l G = 12x\\0 _higt hd.o . tj _9.'bE' E: 29 m 43 _ i _ M 2 gs 1 h Q4 H90 0 % h/S: 2. l NB

i l a

l co -I r 3

a kI bt3 L : 2.12,.h.

1 t: 2 d S' b j ......_g.-.-.. g a sp.g - N 'l te 1 t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Comm:2-neu\\e touh) m verq reiw\\\\ 6M wd nJahedambylet. i i C E DU _b, e e m tt h eu 4 M heave #MQ 'z E.zoL A E G. M '-6'It IB> A 3 l J .a tb !l , k, L i ,J_E Ii! b gy q, u u l ~17 7 I; l [] ] hous j ^ i ?'-Il lo" j j l g l l f 7/g 4 :

l i

I l>p ml - /., A s 52, ,yy i n 11'el" A [ N e x wong EpoG.B i j 6 I l d El' l G ' 'l 'l z* Rt@ hth en kene mLTwb\\d 7 -0 i lI <e I l l m l l a %proue%s ihow ver _'d Tr shs ok, thoO e ekgonvs. ~ l l 'O euk J r E11H'-9" q prTmMTbc y j\\ htoq\\\\ mye$tS&d l I i . A-A I gg,i. 3,, snsws eW s ~ 1 L

Co.Tcd.o.~Rw PREPARED BY - d.@. t.ktWAvg m )VNf An. CHECKED BY LA S t% EDfSON nev. o DATE o o SHEET OF-IN w l .-{.p .j. f., j _ }. !.... e.. __7 5% (3 2. . -. }..1_!_L.. _...l ..i l. U.. _ _ _ L _ [... _ _ l .1-I ~ .E2.0(oA,, l ! L _ .y.., l .1. I ,i ENddE6cDi ' y d \\tA6.rA hd [as. 1 : 1 l~0se avhe_ ih Abb a t CW %". *MDI.bi/t. :_ e peti MEP.. ' 1 Lb\\t: C.!G -l ;( CMcMEct.\\ bw\\\\t% 9%_

  • to.% ; % = 1o.ud. \\cN pk \\ay 8kdf l

\\ R =,- =.H2 4

  • E 10 G G l

{' Mu' : P% x RLp 5NEph j Ay u 1 RE - I g y = 20 %h.92N16,

f. g %

in s A 6.5? k. '. _ W1 CT-E Ae, 0.%%2LtO[: Bjs &., ~ Cat +D:tc.w e-2ar'(E" )1ml 2 A. i t 2 auo -p', f \\' J N 1-I g $T T Q -7.Y E StA 26t"7 . eb-= q ~ q., gg St m ki: l0.12. k.0 \\31

G.'Sh np3 gg :. k T-b (3'3,000 (2h h) 2 4

2150 ~ sea. s po-e aElobA RB = o. cms . E 10 0 B RQ: 0.H12 steo 4 g _ M b h ('h o i b o t N n h n (.1 % ) (2.5) ( % 6 M giosa l CO P.a-Ps' l . E to b A RJ: 1.32 . E l o t_. B N: H.15 two 5

  • E10G A Po o.O H5GO.ti; ?.15 k v'o : Io.22 k

. E '?_0 0 Ib Po .H21 X 6 52: 1.75 k /v: 6.S K o m,0,,m,o,o mi 2 mo >=>

PREPARED BY d.W. VGt kg n CALC.# C \\ E D. Y l.~l D MNO '~ g g ' f* P REv. o DATE 8 u AS FEiiVEDISON SHEET 3 OF-14 [.

_4__p.h..L_

j _,i .. _ _i_._. ;_ _ ._j_ . d__!. L L- _.. MeeG j .E l _-... a _.. ..i { M _ *.L.0_t2-(oS f I O.931 _ i i I (d _: 3.9If Eto4 G j l 0% = d. P <2.t \\; ] ll oo lb N5.& 4% -.. :.l Etof A. g qot. g i i F, t (NSf t l) b = 2.1%L i l ?[.59 L k N g-3, 9 (3 gg_gp j (lD j 1 = [ bl' ds + N d h y)p =am 3Te a 7 E 2.D 6 A E2.oc B ) h > ;es, h ; q,gg u =, 7,,$ g, m VO = I'OO k* I* 2' I' Q = Gu *.1u = ino

).2.i \\

u @F + F I y 1 1 /p13 3 = \\?. 4T STe p B a = % = ?_\\2 \\b F q-ss D = \\.ou' t. = ST s = 10' < S = 12_' eent c t4f-5 2."LS-S L l 5 ]v) D ~} 'l2. ~t l b,[ Vo\\ 9 k =. 2.% X \\ 0 p \\ %.\\ 3 N"2: g P S-lb E*3-2t j sa pX ob@c d 4r Et% A. (Kec.\\ km ) s 2m g (teodh emA 04 y u( o \\ce : s sack %% "bx saA\\ be a i oW\\ \\ demst ay\\bto%n bepnc\\ 1 h vcA neb uA\\ m e wowene a Mcxvev % \\emAwre ens 3 m v. a. o s. c. o oru mo ra v>,

PREPARED BY d A3. U 4t k W u n M I C. # CHECKED BY Vr f 1A//L

aEv.

o DATE 6 tias FEsiVEDISON -oy SHEET b OF 2d 2. ! !.a..... L _ j. a - L .. 5 Ye! p 3 .) I _ l_ E f _. p. _.. !* $addke dMhu[bgutAty ~ ~ 3 h + s i ia v w a y o f -: 6 S I % 2. 8 - 6 3 ! q 3/,, l* 4' 6 v4

2. A.: 5.165 Zg_h: ?.at 1 = 2. A :, o, g o
  • iI4 e

l 7k i 1 T. kin'5)( I +3.05(.5h it .*M.m 3.015) MI l _ =, 6 51 4 316 +, Ys 4 ?.. G H,\\1. tom f f I \\ \\ t K = h4 h (4.15Y 'M.15 4 + 3ET33 A3 G 3(tugo )a,11 snes(izuo') s -:. 3 G S X 10 ' b i M 1 D sd 89,9 l-{g p: yg 2' d.h / t E 1o o A %ne it b u/4'evea3 i hW \\ cMbb \\cVM- \\M C7 Rev, o. (cG%.t c d - L t t. g e. 8 O n t w\\ t.h DC Sdp 5y at w VMW \\S. \\5Y\\1 l E 2.0 G B pt.Ath\\ GskV\\tM[@otaeN-3 I check cetK L ebbmst. rd4Lve. shs Ash 3 (u M W M uo kid WI'c h (.65R@'lo)(,1%) s i Ma = @ Ady 9-O -{.q(n.ss,ncKco (to y g):c7e'* y ) i

PREPARED BY M bMNL\\tMA CE. # 15 all s' CHECKED BY [Af ,REV. O DATE b L\\(as EDISON mz er tviL SHEET 1 OF 1 ~ .m_. ..._._..,,....I..- 4 ~ - - - _ -._R : _,._,.1 3 o 'K!.'7 2 tJ Q..i. . _ iM_ L_p ! i 4 22.2.5"j_).l--?- .t 1 _..l. i_ a l l i! i l2 T l ;.._.__ _ _ L A & s Ss. G l iw w w w,d D % e. bsT ussa\\X i 1c. eentt i 1 _ n r o a m w a ee

n. u
I

! vntou.\\wk _se#w.n . i i 1_W\\tY d 'i MM ..d i 15 'k Mio)(12koh 3N5b.thu s w b ess i g e.2 % 4 *= 3.usxe % ! : ^ 3g g(3,gg(.33q l A .e (zz.g 1 - 3.21$o' IQ n "\\)

  • h h= en.s \\%

q = 21: aa m ( sad ; ETeo (O bi e<.tb en % naVAscbscA on % pome 9eud 4 f or sq rTs es Ve<T /wav. L o% v lDb ab k Nfd C %I tNffM E2oo b \\%\\1 B s 73cH a ffp*[if5 Dewwnc\\ utec\\ew%ns B -ttal s A E lo'lo 1 Nw(NMd spec 4\\ e.4 i E206Aktb V'en / %nse. b%l

2..e 0.H M e n.t3 Hs -to %

s%)) a.o 4 con e. % -20% etoc A to E2oG B W H at o

2. H 3 o,%c.7wne

.*u ,wi uco.ro. nw.u.., g

MSPMD @V_A B WVel%V%AR CE. # W<D D CHECKED BY lA// L-nEv. o DATE B 2n 5 gissiiVEDISON yy SHEET b 2N OF 7 114 ] tt.J. LDe > 1 L. _.4, J _L'.1.f if'._ Mije.s {._ L 1 :. m _.L1 %.,.co (UMo _j_iC 1 9 p ig@l%%\\ivphn. 4Ad 1 ~ T _, I u _ _.a l l! m7 = \\.Mo. />. 2.93(EPA $M.*h_ i M n y-l j i 1 _ d L. _.._ _. l = \\. M o I c.5 GE_ \\5 h -tcho (5% -fuwt N-5 1' 0.44 e \\%nd,-ta%@%)ske\\) E-w i-E2oG B 1 4 R =.\\.9 \\- .)! 12.H'5 k EPA je 4%) 1 I _ a. _ _. _.. _ u i h.,@ C Y f. l b.H4 P., \\c\\.\\%la,-2;il- (H % ] --' \\.? \\ - i Th rotbm'-).%2f ~Vne Auvv 'ok. %y GT_P 2, p% ee.t \\%. ! lSpexh\\ 'Perh capc% se A3 ctuses %ese couco c A ctekeoL= n L. t -t5. \\oe cs ( % M W sl vo % tYs. A.s G)cv dh coup cA by c5te 2 seda n H.93 le 9-50 s eb b Me %\\ Ac.te\\.erhn (s AT % d de p.3= L eosTYdc., use CA u%on % oA99, %4s. ETexkmixhg tbswh,e_cM E 7 ob% %A d O vR \\\\eT 5 c3vt cue 4 tep%b\\c. -4 perp,er ca h L t uN c= enor ckend i GR \\.\\M * ( S Tc o n s-AA\\e s%ues / = EM E' /V ^^) = 0.5 63 tJt4 (. 2.%n)(1.6nQ b / 16 ch b'% [5.') bht = 527 ( o =g.sem(.cn,ma..sa = m & W siz.a in t ato.iooi e o ceo.u mo no vmi 6

    • C5E MN cggegg[gy h ((~"

EGiiVEDISON gg~ o nev. one IHEET OF I.N ~ i.= - i -e.[to T ,j i: .ii, q., bbt 3 k s, eS1 oftht-

8.. O CC.

b Alic YhdoGDub.y_%_TA.chWnos.2. @ 't @.*, l.. o t. l 4 v' H"{ i hG=; V d . g :_9. 9on.sc =.2Wi l-i . Il'. \\M Co,mdeTe outsN enseJe cohn base.1 / I w S L6o_As V ! aM, B. cWde. i ._. g, _4__.1..e.3go.Ay_.W.e%eevsm%, ed \\6) ki iM2 lb I(o0N6 / S D' Y

  • The%usag" f

noT coa nentbe m&\\\\el g = ecause d we 9eaesTa\\ der-e gerence. oar spr u \\comTuc-U> rien, sTA cave,y>e<t m- @ g w stA\\eck h 9 ef eA*E C g x 9 Fred notes mchdTe bsep5Tq A i'i6'J2 0 N N< b\\h nYt 3lf 4) Ar04td ^ n".. s P mA per h13 t- \\ n. T = %T2 tb aH 9 Tk c is > u p \\ M (L @ b 5tc N 3 t :. 9_h. q,9,g The qASt W<d e O 64Te. is dkh1 top $ a %eAcd n A ov4p<td b( Ji<4 9b\\\\.9 6 e \\\\.' o_ 1._ Coccbsh %e Tve\\ h\\ coo \\gME's E2ccA ord racG3 exe 6%duM\\ g elegde bc h \\tt n bu3 tocT W, be cWd c2 as co W ev3 %c cvne quwe3 weds \\occcu se. % e c> e u&At o cn n 4 m eet g%g.levdx h 59A <4.. % %M At%A Wo. sea e % g Aembt % s.3 h cqd.3 ' \\tu ) wgps, ord h s-geGT.s sw s g ns .s petO. toot ~~ B L Co. f OHM 3150 HLV. 67J1 a

CALCULATION COVER SHEET _m <m y m eg. l<- _T (NIAJ s n..A n.1 Al A.+

e., k ee, -

rite NO. voc /03 su.xCT a j b ucood fro,. Ana} u t it CALC. NO. Il 4- - C"7 a i NO. OF SHEETS l RECORD OF ISSUES NO. DESCR;PTION SY DATE CHKD DATE APPRD DATE fh Of8h (({ W$) Zfg YMat b h, V es\\

  • 0 V WO bS

/\\ A A A A ^ s+ 6,.3 .4 A b w : A%ed A s.. a.# 1 l Cis.o.ulo ( J "2-R A _,, Sr. sk.J 2 (

IpT CALCULATION SHEET -) 9 cAtc. NO. Il 4 - C"I REV.NO. O S N Ib ll,/1B IBE ORlGINATOR

k. bA, b OATE CHECKED
  • pATE U

fil acim 1 JOB NO. lb394 - ll4 rmOJECT SUBJECT SHEET NO. I Tnh educkon 1 2 A oct w ) analy s pericm.A in c lculab im - c1 A.o 3 3 Shoujcd kk Ot M-huj\\f-heh & C.b4 63C r (umt was 4 inade3=+c.. CaicJsb 11+ - ca,b. o Jm3n,J A h.& a e aL wa s,. Oset ~iuaos La s 9 his cak tu,k Ahog C Gkt u l o.bo% IIk - CL, Mt l1 us t 10 sbthm1lg h thw Oa.k & /riocli < cl rame h 12 13 (med b t-. b 'gtAthC anA Aia ta.> i Ik bL f tI 14 ALC.t fre qu,~3 J-s( N meada a Som to J oh<-c +k <. new om m. .s3sw. m em .<< eiu A.e an A be mea A a~ se imb med,d.J drome MI'- it deutball3 a u ef 21 32 tullI k (cruerda IVC C GlC ula ed M V barv) N eguent l 23 34 b kup (bcA me.bodt b dt. e rmine. Nt (Acce f r m i. k i a 25 se rega m a vm l$5 s wijk also he. fr f rvd, %est 37 o, Com e mehA mui a m.a a<h<m ,me mbu ea na A comp.4u anslat b ddum% .shubral bm vis s 3 32 rmed 6 d Oui ( AC<c abil . Thrs a nal3sts u)\\ bc {ce 33 2 eg}culahim and in calc o,} ah,*og ll 4 - G, kt o, ) 35 3e

_- _ --_ _ _- __ ___ _ J _ ___ CALCULATION SHEET SIg#,py II k

  • C7 CEV NO.

O CALC. NO. ,N /83 \\1,1b,l61 ORIGIN ATOR bMu C DATE CHECKED DATE y ID 39 k ~ 114 ( PR$ JECT t n e fe. I JOB NO. 4 SUBJECT SHEET NO-1 Refru eue i t) Bech h1 Calculahfon 10 3% - 114 - C 2., Rev. O l t) t3, Reu.O 4 Forenwlu kr .strui ad.54raiw, Roar k P EJi b i +) Pd ,m Sb, LAn;f i f<ub Ib2 4 IW g 3 Rye C=va, Ay s) Atst Manot.S.sbl Ce,n h uc k, 1" & B" Edib 2 3 4Speddw C-B6, Ret o (. SEC. En) p) '///[83 o is( -) E.c4 \\ Otavn S lo s e - sk. -c - 119 o, Rev. o 17 a) Comp a fnym Oak pt, CE600 k 18 (Fngus$ bi d to (dcAL lose - Iw -c 7 A, R eo. o p o (Fr.u An ip.s ) C 7 8, R4 v. 2o -n ai 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 1 31 32 E 33 - 3' ' 35 1 36 t - y een --ren. s -a l 1

1 CALCULATION SHEET -) 9 CALC.NO. Ilk" C REV,NO. O 11!1"7!8 3 CHECKED ~6 ATE 8 3 ORIGIN ATOR. .e DATE /DR9 4 - Il 4 b! eu JOS NO. PROJECT b $UBJECT $HEET NO-0 D fce n u e neu h\\ gs ri s 0 3 mal n%l 54 ibAnMos (Cdc fl4 -C2. ) onl k cill be. caleu}aded 1(At s ih 6 Me O a d -S egutN3 7 accel 4rab*ug O Soutini] di rec.bo w. be corueyvabws k .J o rnt 9 UI! b MfCI, in he. [- W direchog, 0 rgg 4, s{ k ) l c ui 3= g y 4 C4 Cc IP /o" 13 ' 17 '1B whggg k _ 2,4 E.I E= 2A s / o' ps ; s (1.k' ~ W \\ .) S. S ie 1 s * 9 x a, ,1. - ,,{, 3 6 rn

21 22 h + (2.4 2.9 s i b

)(S 56 i t) 9, g"f 6 A / b+ #/36 23 24 ()1A MUbib' - (#U(\\t t ?) as Z poiw k _ S. bi ~, " ( 3E t. Ne. I, l er 4)( i h3 4400 26 rys s 186. 9 Y.se s g 27 28 I

i. 2d'7 4 ' / D b 2.,0. 3 b 2.

29 so 2.~rr I.69 "-7 33 ( 33 u 35 36

p f CALCULATION SHEET d cau:. NO. II k * ( l REV.NO. O I /2!28!8) 12_/tB/ 63 CHECKED " ATE - {tA C DATE ORIGINATOR i a i [ m,EC1 y ,e m - ii s m _1 SUBJECT SHEET NO-k l Au-h a l J- %. l..J wa)

h. 4r.ndw.d b

A. colsmn lxAa med.1 -A .s y, 4 o g,s l v . "~ K 3EIJ .R st., e a' k' I = s o. s,,+ 4 6

  • 19x/o' p; 2.4. f 3, VJLsir.5 ^m A
  • 51.S h *.5 7. S i, f

n u%io'ph o u.y a. 3 io s, z o s n, -( C 2.3. c..)2 (sv r,-)* a.,. m= 5.69 c~ l .9 -] - \\, los,w % 1 1,9 s h 1

2. %

r.Ls"Y ? ) I J4. 9 he 3 b nr y 1 f* 3 \\ \\ (asa) ( zi.s r a)' 3 9 D Um$ 2_o '[. fl. 92 he 0 I'7. 8 B h w rs n3t. D s k l N E s( D5 EG __________________a

CALCULATION SHEET d Npt CALC.NO. UM~(l R EV. NO. O ORIGINATOR .e DATE

11. l1A f lL1 CHECKED

" BATE N 83 yw Y I Pd

m. NO.

so244 - n + mueCT $UIJECT SHEET NO 8 Ae, lee b d FJ. W-3 " .M 3 T-- yunnt j Hocia.Al : OBE 2.% dagi3 0.30 l S i E 5 7.' Jaytag o.43 3 Ab Verhal = c.or$ %nn poinh = G.1*/p,,d)().os ) /. /6 k Wkcol & ce. af + g E-W kia.onk1 J 4 p;d O.) t/p,J)(,so3) : o, s'a k N-s &imbi a+ 2. pid = (2.2. A/p J)(. SQ, 0.66 k oap. Gm + - n 4 - c, A, o o) a u.+< : ce so, asa coyA p,.y.m (n.dC.! 9 navnic went} ahcLkgdi 6 fan ) 3 3 k showed h regg,ecj sd 3 h NX su (ame a W(.ll udh h 9 be. JS. / 5 he wMEh to am Utg J D hd c e4ltu} ahed Va!st I t. % ht. Nest et o s vakwe ll. 9 2. h & Oc dm3 h 2.0Yo ragt, o 0 s EI g cce,} cf gh'% Oalues med huun an_ untuo ivt. r 's 3

CALCULATION SHEET d t calc. No. 11 + - C7 REv. No. O 12./2.B/ B t CHECKED 6,=, g M-!28'[$3 k b) r OATE ORIGINATOR ( rnOJECT bI eh I JOB NO. !D M k'IM- $UBJECT SHEET NO. S ? 2 N ~- bly's ( F.c N-5 scu mes Qre bh onl ) 3 3 or}~ 13 em. boad umb'in&% (%p'hr MCdt\\ 'c b .I 4 5 plu V4fhcAI loa ds. h he/i%o d'S dir (c. og 6 7 A.3 tdcA (6,U.O-t0) lo to p __ _ B 33

o. W o.66t 12 83 13 g

14 i y l.)@ ll? ( b 16 17 18 M M > T' to g 20 s 31 9 Z 22 _L.JN C 6 A_ Noh: N ck 1 is .A w ~ d A bt. pinnJ. 23 .) 0L4 o8E A Lok Reld v><b inhohus ~ a. 3 ne3 eddk b4i.$ I membe D. is 2a h 1.5 b Set cJt. l a - (_ G k< dJ ' 2s Q DL

  • 55E.

3 (nd. 2s 27 T.1. A '. Gn ,u<<. 2e 3 1.55 - 0.433 6.3 29 oBE 30 3 ' l. o fs. 31 i) 1.3 32 3'l0b 3 = /. s k 0.1f f 2.) 1.43 or 33 u 35 "I}w e ggh'on 1) goott n3 b < va) tr a % we 3e

$5 CALC.NO. Uk*b'I REV.NO. O CHECKED 'DATE I R Uk 4,/2.6,f %"I DATE oniciNATon ( PROJECT bd ei-I JOS NO. 10M + -11 + ) j SUBJECT SHEET NO-7 !1 d< d NI-LA ( 16.1814 - ll A - C l 8, Rv. 0) 2 3 r Mmbeu lo.A kip arJ Rip-i. (. loc.) toordied.43sh)

a an,

,a

5 Gew N..

Avi.) V, T M_y Ms e

1. M

+ + + i 7 O

l. M
o. 2.0

+ e li. M a O. llo 0.% 4 4 l l, '2A l g h O.53 + + + + -O-1 10 h D. 66

l. IL

+ ir.oS 8.rB it h 4 4 I S.09; 8,5'B 12 -O- , 0. b b l.16 + Js,oS B.C8

13 h

10 10 jhgg) ag e,

n k,, gy g,, g,

( gg{ (nocy[n,( f d fo,nh _ /egyg ,g 16 1/ 18 N4 tJ. Fs F~ F. M, A I h to 2. -G-2.+1 e- + + 4 + + 20 -l 4 1.41

0. 2.0 31 9

-G-

1. (. A-O.46 G-

& 22 23 24 Calc.ula Ilk "b2 3 b. O Lul al\\ members k ht 2s k MT 14 er.h lc ..Tdrall adeguak a O c.e 26 27 ana lu

  • if, agd k

a frj ( vhemhtes @,h h ja k tem t-28 2. ana yig). k cong,qh y dojes 3 ad 6, in com 4c 30 31 an ad ik cowh%s MO k h 32 b, e o ( 2' o,am.a <s % E.uat. ou A oa -, < 6 2. 35 adequa C pf f OiNS 36 o r e. o na its.

CALCULATION SHEET es[t; cuc. ~o. ii + - c, av. ~o. o so ..,, n w n .;-,. e. wa. a,.1 a c -,. u ( m o, cr p;i i .,0. uo. im+ - ii + g:_ 6 SUBJECT SHEET NO-1 2 Som b, h,b / Y % k"

  • 2.,

3 2 g l } %j o.66 k p o W ' l. l6 A s m = /s. o s x -., y Ma= 9.SbA in / ) 7 8 A,' 3.~I5 in' 9 10 I-}b k D. b 1 hai Wr amal) Ok b im chion 11 IV s 3* I le 2. J 12 13 [f *.(g a 8 8b i=* j. % g.,

k. ') l h3

/. il inE 13 by

  • b 8

16 7 b5 ki '$ .5"* ll Ok tha et. io's 16 jf. 08 k-ta J.9 l int 17 l k,. ( l 5. 06 k,, B.S 6 A -i+ +1I in *

5. 0 2. k.2,

18 19 20 $upcok habe it a e e o.u o u 21 22 C6nu ck'ow ah Node 1

23 23 25 Yo t<t
  • l. / 6 I4

\\It.<t s = 0.66 ( 26 f hIb 27 1-4 28 29 Star ti

  • (Nbh 4 b ' 6.6 k

[tatu mt a g It 307 $clb 30 31

6. b K >

h.) 6 L7, (0.bb k[ I.34 22 ( %k 3 c onnetb. is .Aeoyd as u r as as

)' EAl.CULATION SHEET V calc.NO. Il 4 ' C ~I REV. NO. D I 'DATE 8) IL/ 2_b f &l CHECKED k-Idub DATE ORIGINATOR I E Q /039 4 - ll4 bt\\jc h I JOB NO. en2 JECT $UBJECT SHEET NO-S Cemhh a+ N6Jt 6 Ts ts o M o s y V) o.6G k M a, :. O W

1. I b A 2.

34' / h,lh (b. A 3o 1 b lh ) 8.t k ske.se u$ e WAn.1 or o.L

8. B k

> l.16 k ? o k. S 6 aod\\ Dir,d m '. Tb ho/ mbi slob vbe.k ca u, d i N week lmk hex. b<- <n.Adel . Lw n at / %khi aca3 m9 4 - s x -c-1390, A. o. B cm 3 hspebr.e 4bt %J:kitabh h Mrue. ball $olegudt .E b m il lo J. b h con t } } } J 7 Mc%he b od Node 1 J me hr & D Tke shcu N d aNequae3 a ma.l y L s r ,s r 3 0 ad node l art coverec} in (= I c ulak'on JI4-C3,dev. I B i 9 ( a e 3 3

Calcuttion C15.0.3270 Attachment B Page.l. of 3_ INDEPENDENT DESIGN VERIFICATION RECORD (IDVR) I. Instructions to inQendent personnel Design Documents C15.0.3270 0 fuel Pool Coolina HE E206A & B (Document No.) (Rev.) (Document Title) Design verification should be done in accordance with ANSI N45.2.ll, Section 6, as amended by Reg. Guide 1.64, Rcv.1. Verification Methods to be used; Document (s)"Q" Level: Design review Q O Alternate or simplified calculations O FF-Q O Qualification Testins-0 Non-Q Special Instructions m h-I O& ff Div. 51anager V Date # 11. Verification Documentation: Methods Used: Design review (attach any documentation) O Alternate or simplified calculations (attach calculations) O Qualification Testing (attach Test Report) Design Document Acceptable: YES E No O If not acceptable,.3 c reasons or provide comments on Exhibit 3.06-B. In ependen Design Verif c ck com ! cted b ~ independent Reviewer Datd / d Acknowledgement of verifi:ation: I ~ U Date ' / ivision Manager 111. Resolution of conunents: Conunents resolved (See Exhibit 3.06-b): f{__ lD I Cognizan . Engineer Date \\ Action taken makes design document acceptable rL L r Pds ahnks ~ Independent Reviewer ' Date Exhibit 3.06-A Rev. 7 JGD%Lm316

Calculation _C15.0.32 70 Attachment B Pr:ge,2, of 3_ O so roaed'=aa oESioN REVIEW CHECKLIST ~ YES NO N/A 1. Where design in puts correctly selected and incorporated into the design d ocument? 2. Are assumptions necessary to perform the design adequately E described and reasonable? Where necessary, are the assumptions identified for subsequent re-verifications when the detailed design activities are completed? 3. Are the appropriate quality assurance requirements specified? 4. Are the applicable codes, standards and regulatory M requirements including issues and addenda properly identified and are their design requirements met? 5. Has applicable constmetion and operating experience been Q considered? 6. Has design interfacu with other functional units requirements been utilized? 7. Was an appropriate design method used? E j 8. Is the design document reasonable compared to the design input? 9. ! re the specified parts, egapment and processes suitable O O m for the required application?

10. Are the specified materials compatible with each other and O

E the design environmental conditions to which the material will be exposed? 'l1. Have adequate suaintenance features and requirements been specified?

12. Are accessibility and other design provisions adequate for performance of needed maintenance and repair?
13. Has adequate accessibility been provided to perform the in-service inspection expected to be required during plant lifetime?

I L Has the design properly considered radiation exposure to O E the public and plant personnel? Have ALARA considerations been addressed?

15. Are the acceptance criteria incorporated in the design documents sufficient to allow verification that design requirements have been satishetorily accomplished?
16. Have sufficient installation details and/or instructions, including specification of applicable special processes, been included in the design output?

Exhibit 3.06-B Rev. 7 samumis j

Cdculation C15.0.3270 Attachment B Page.3. cf 3_ h Bostors Edisora DESIGN REVIEW CHECKLIST (Continued) YES NO N/A

17. Have adequate pre-operational and subsequent periodic test O

requirements specified (including 1st)?

18. Are adequate handling, storage, cleaning and shipping S

I requirements specified?

19. Are adequate identification requirements specified?

l

20. Are requirements for record preparation review, approval, O

B retention, etc. adequately specified? l 21 Have all of the potentially applicable design considerations l been correctly evaluated for applicability to the specific l' case and have the a aplicable considerations been correctly i a.1d completely dea t witi.') l

22. Have the problems with this design, known from prior O

i applications, been considered and resolved? l'

23. Have relevant design basis documents such as Design

. Specifications, FSAR, Tech. Specs., and the Fire Protection . Review Report been researched and referenced in the design inputs and safety evaluation?

24. For modifications to existing components, check that the O

E original manufacturers estimated impact on the existing components that will be modified is included, or a statement indicating why tSe information could not be obtained, or was not necesary to be obtained. l

25. Are the Section 's'I Repair / Replacement Plant Requirements O

l specified (refer to NOP 83El, Nuclear Engineering i Department Work Instruction 409, or Exhibit 3.02-BB). COMMENTS RESOLUTION MINM. CO M M u/Tb tutoGP;M T7r 0 INTD VAboas CALC SG(not).$, l Submitted ,I /2!2")/hE Resolved Date Date i i Exhibit 3.o6-B Rev. 7 I kid'hkM5316

Calculati:n C15.03270 Attachment C i l Page l. of 2 _ RTYPE A9.02 PRELIMINARY EVALUATION CHECKLIST I 1. IDENTIFICATION: Document Number: C15.0.3270 Revision 0 t l l Fuel Pool Cooling HE E-206A & B GIP Evaluation t l 2. CLASSIFICATION: Yes No a. Does the proposed change involve Q listed equipment? O Yes O No b. For a new procedure, Temporary Procedure, or major revision; does the Procedure contain procedural steps or requirements in the FSAR? If yes, identify FSAR sections. N/A Oyes %No c. Is this a new procedure or Temporary Procedure that is Fire Protection Program related or a major revision that makes an existing procedure l Fire Protection Program related? l NIA l 3. PRELIMINARY EVALUATION: l O Yes @ No a. Would this modify piant characteristics or procedural steps described j in the FSAR7 If yes, identify section: t O Yes @ No b. Does this affect the design of systems, structures or components l described in the FSAR? O Yes @ No c. Does this af'- :t the function of systems, structures or components ) described in the FSAR7 O Yes- @ No d. Does this affect the method of performing the function of systems, structures or components described in the FSAR7 . O Yes @ No e. Does this indirectly affect the capability of safety related systems, structures or components Cscribed in the FSAR to perform their functions? 1 O Yes @ No f. Does this create a new test not described in the FSAR that could ) affect plant safety? Exhibit 4 t NOP83E5 Rev. 7 l Janw953is

Calculation C15.0.3270 Attachment C Page.2. of 2 _ PRELIMINARY EVALUATION CHECKLIST (Continued) O Yes @ No ' g. Would this change modify assumptions used in the accident analyses described in FSAR Chapter 147 If yes, identify sections: 0 Yes @ No h. Does this change affect the ability of a system required to achieve and maintain safe shutdown in an event of a fire? O Yes @ No I. Does this change affect a requirement of, or niajor commitment to, 10CFR50 Appendix R7 0 Yes @ No J. Does thit ' hange affect a requirement of IE Clicular 80-18 (for c Radioactive Waste Systems)? O Yes @ No k. Could this affect the function of systems or components required for compliance with the Limiting Conditions for Operation in the Technical Specifications? O Yes @ No I. In the judgment of the evaluator, is a Safety Evaluation required? If the answer to any questions in Part 3 is "Yes", then a Safety Evaluation is required prior to implementation. Check the appropriate block and provide any explanatory comments below; i 4. SAFETY EVALUATION RE IRED 7 0 Yes No s 5. PREPARED BY: iA / Principal Enaineer DATE: 8/10/95 ' " '/ Title ' Civil DM DATE: /kfD APPROVED BY Title / Exhibit 4 NOP83E5 Rev. 7 JGDM/95316 j}}