ML20236X650
| ML20236X650 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Calvert Cliffs  |
| Issue date: | 07/28/1998 |
| From: | Craig C NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
| To: | Essig T NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9808100166 | |
| Download: ML20236X650 (21) | |
Text
~
July 28.-1998 MEMORANDUM TO: Thomts H. Essig, Acting Chief Gen:ric issues and Environmzntil Proj; cts Branch Division of Reactor Program Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM:
Claudia M. Craig, Senior Project Manager Original Signed By:
Generic issues and Environmental Projects Branch Division of Reactor Program Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY
OF CALVERT CLIFFS NUCLEAR POWER Pl. ANT (CCNPP)
ENVIRONMENTAL SCOPING MEETINGS TO SUPPORT REVIEW OF LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION On July 9,1998, members of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) held public environmental scoping meetings in Solomons, Maryland in support of the staffs review of the CCNPP license renewal application. Two sessions were held to allow maximum public participation. The formal presentations made by the NRC staff were identical at each session.
The_NRC staff presentations are included as Attachments 1 and 2. Attachment 3 is a list of attendees for the 2:00 pm session, Attachment 4 is a list of attendees for the 7:00 pm session.
The purpose of the meetings was to provide the public an opportunity to participate in the environmental scoping process and provide issues to be considered in the staffs preparation of a plant-specific supplement to the " Generic Environmental Impact Statement for LICENSE Renewal of Nuclear Power Plants" (NUREG-1437) for CCNPP. During the staffs presentations, the staff outlined the overall license renewa! process and provided a detailed presentation on the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process, the requirements of the NRC's regulations contained in 10 CFR Part 51 for license renewal, and how these processes are being implemented during the CCNPP license renewal review.
After the formal NRC staff presentations, the meeting was open for public comment. Members -
of state and local govemments, public interest groups, local community associations, the scientific community, and private citizens provided comments. Thirty-six participants provided oral comments at the meetings; several others provided written statements. A wide variety of issues were discussed including radioactive waste, the impact of the plant on the Chesapeake Bay, socioeconomic impacts of the CCNPP, emergency preparedness, and others. Both meetings were transcribed. Because of the length of each transcript, copies are not attached to this meeting summary, however, they are available on the NRC website at http:/Avww.nre gov /OPA/reporfs under the heading "What's New on This Page" or under J
" License Renewal," at the Local Public Document Room located at the Calvert County Public Library,30 Duke Street, Prince Frederick, Maryland, and at the Commission's Public Document Room located in the Gelman Building,2120 L Street, NW., Washington, OC.
Attachments: As stated.
1 ib Docket Nos. 50-317, 50-318 Distribution: See next page DOCUMENT NAME: G:\\ CMC 1\\7_9mtg. sum OFFICE PM:PGEB (A)SC:PGEB (A)BC:PGyB BC:PDLR OGC AlU NAME 4/jkdlio7 TEssig [
CGrimeh f/pBG((
DATE 7 Q8 1/p/98
'l / M /98 1/1A/98 7/O8 l.
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
'9008100166 980728 PDR ADOCK 05000317 i
1 h
p CE:
p 4
UNITED STATES y
j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 2
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20066-0001
\\g/
July 28, 1998 MEMORANDUM TO: Thomas H. Essig, Acting Chief Generic Issues and Environmental Projects Branch Division of Reactor Program Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM:
Claudia M. Craig, Senior Project Manager MO,
(
Generic issues and Environmental Projects Branch Q
Division of Reactor Program Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY
OF CALVERT CLIFFS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT (CCNPP)
ENVIRONMENTAL SCOPING MEETINGS TO SUPPORT REVIEW OF LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION On July 9,1998, members of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) held public environmental scoping meetings in Solomons, Maryland in support of the staff's review of the CCNPP license renewal application. Two sessions were held to allow maximum public participation. The fermal presentations made by the NRC staff were identical at each session.
The NRC staff presentations are included as Attachments 1 and 2. Attachment 3 is a list of Ntendees for the 2:00 pm session, Attachment 4 is a list of attendees for the 7:00 pm session.
'The purpose of the meetings was to provide the public an opportunity to participate in the environmental scoping process and provide issues to be considered in the staff's preparation of a plant-specific supplement to the " Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Power Plants" (NUREG-1437) for CCNPP. During the staff's presentations, the staff outlined the overall license renewal process and provided a detailed presentation on the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process, the requirements of the NRC's regulations contained in 10 CFR Part 51 for license renewal, and how these processes are being implemented during the CCNPP license renewal review.
After the formal NRC staff presentations, the meeting was open for public comment. Members of state and local governments, public interest groups, local community associations, the scientific community, and private citizens provided comments. Thirty-six participants provided oral comments at the meetings; several others provided written statements. A wide variety of issues were discussed including radioactive waste, the irr, pact of the plant on the Chesapeake Bay, socioeconomic impacts of the CCNPP, emergency preparedness, and others. Both meetings were transcribed. Because of the length of each transcript, copies are not attached to this meeting summary, however, they are available on the NRC website at http:/Avww.nrc. gov /OPA/ reports under the heading "What's New on This Page" or under
" License Renewal," at the Local Public Document Room located at the Calvert County Public Library,30 Duke Street, Prince Frederick, Maryland, and at the Commission's Public Document Room located in the Gelman Building,2120 L Street, NW., Wachington, DC.
Attachments: As stated i
Docket Nos. 50-317, 50-318 l
1
DISTRIBUTION: Calvert Cliffs scoping meeting summary dated July 28.1998 Central Files Docket Files Local PDR PUBLIC PGEB r/f FMiraglia JRoe DMatthews CGrimes TEssig OEDO Rill Coordinator JMoore RWeisman MZobier DMartin, OlG WMcDowell, OlG CCraig i
DSolorio KCampbell RJolly JWilson BZalcman ADromerick l
LDoerflein, Region I
' JStewart, RI BBores, Region I CSochor HBrammer CGratton RLatta j
t
\\
I I
The NRC mission is to regulate the civilian use of nuclear materials to ensure adequate protection of public health and safety, to promote the common defense and security, and to protect the environment. The NRC's authority is derived from the Atomic Energy Act of 1954. Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, as well as amendments to those acts and other legislation ir'volving security, waste and energy policies. The NRC's regulations are issue undc. Title 10 of the United States Code of FederalRegulations, or 10 CFR.
For commercial power reactors, the NRC's regulatory functions include licensing. The license is based on a set of established regulatory requirements to ensure that the design and proposed operation are safe. NRC conducts routine inspections to ensure that the plant design and operation conform to the license requirements, and enforcement actions are taken in the event that the license requirements are not being l
satisfied.
i License Renewal. The Atomic Energy Act and NRC regulations limit commercial l
power reactor licenses to 40 years, but also permit the renewal of such licenses for up to an additional 20-year perioi The 40-year term was originally selected on the basis of economic and antitrust considerations, not technical limitations, but once selected,
)
the design of several system and structural components were engineered on the basis of an expected 40-year service life. The requirements for the initial 40-year license are l
contained in 10 CFR Part 50.
I When the ftst reactors were constructed, major components were expected to last at least 40 years. Operating experience has demonstrated that the expectation was unrealistic for some major plant components such as the steam generator in a pressurized water reactor. However, research over the past decade has concluded that there are no technical limitations to plant life, since major components and structures can be replaced or refurbished. Thus, the plant life is determined primarily on economic factors.
l l
J
As a result, the NRC established regulatory requirements in 10 CFR Part 54 to provide for license renewal. The rule, which was initially issued in 1991 and amended in 1995, provides that the basis on which a plant was originally licensed remains valid after 40 years and can be carried over into a 20-year period of extended operation. A new license can be granted upon a finding by the Commission that the licensee has adequately demonstrated that plausible aging effects will be adequately managed for a defined scope of passive, long-lived systems, structures and components. In addition, the rule requires that certain time-dependent design analyses be identified and evaluated.
i l
l
\\
Calvert Cliffs is the first plant to apply for license renewal. A second renewal application for the Oconee plant in South Carolina was received on July 7,1998.
Although these licenses do not expire until 2013 or later, many utilities are interested in license renewal today, to ensure that they clearly understand what requirements will be necessary for an extended license, for future financial planning.
The licensing process consists of parallel technical and environmental reviews which will be documented in a Safety Evaluation Report for the aging management aspects of the renewal application, as well as a Supplement to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for the environmental impact review. The aging management findings will be verified by NRC inspections, and reviewed by the NRC's Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards, in accordance with the usual practices for issuance of a license.
The public can formally participate in the license renewal process in the same way that public participation was provided in the originallicensing. Toward that end, a Notice of Opportunity for a Hearing was published in the Federal Register on July 8,1998
[63 FR 36966) which provides that any person whose interest may be affected by the l
license renewal, and who wishes to participate as a party in the proceeding, may file a i
written request for a hearing and petition for leave to intervene. The NRC also will f
issue a press release about this hearing opportunity.
I
i Today's meeting is not a formal hearing, but a opportunity to gather information about i
potential cc..cerns about the environmental impacts of this licensing action in accordance with the NRC's responsibilities under the National Environmental Policy Act, as will be described in more detail. The NRC staff intends to conduct future i
Informal public meetings to keep the interested members of the public informed about the license renewal process.
l l
o PRESENTATION ENVIRONMENTAL SCOPING MEETING
- statuiory background Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant
- NEPA process LicenseRenewal Application
- License renewal environmental process July 9,1998
- Calvert clifrs license renewal review g
1 NRC MISSION WHATIS LICENSE RENEWAL?
- AtomicEnergy Act
- NRC govemed by Atomic Energy Act, Energy
> 40 yearlicense to operate Reorganization Act, National Environmental
> Allowsforrenewal Policy Act (NEPA), and other statutes
- License Renewal (10 CFR Pan 54)
> Operate up to 20 years beyond original license
- Missionis proteaion ofhealth and safety, term environmentalprotection, and common defense
> Licenserenewalapplication and security
> NRC review
- . Public panicipation b,
> Commission decision 2
4
pg A =,,
i afT) i(
d g4t s
e nin x
i*a a r
r eDg a
H' s
+
s e
^
m c
tr o
o 3
r p
t
?e n
e P
Sw yR eS e
en ly mE I
t Ri t
f o e
l T,
G a
Cv ai lp e
t A R Sa po w
u ut l
a S
e v
n E
e
+
t
+
R s
e g e ni s
pi it v
n ct oic e
sA c
i L
h h
t t
i i
w w
n n
e4 e1 i
I wc5 wc5 e nt e nt ar iar ivda vda a:
erP erP Ro Ro c
c c
c A
A
+
+
nC la we o ni eta Rc ei l
sp np i
eA cU
t 1
NEPA PROCESS NEPA PROCESS Continued l
- NEPA requires Federal agencies to use a
- Notice ofintent - notifies public of preparation systematic approach to consider environmental ofEIS impacts "ES identifies scope of EIS and
- Environmental lmpact Statement (EIS) required g;je;p for major Federal actions l
- Review-evaluates environsnentalimpacts,
- License renewal considered major federal act. ion alternatives, mitigation measures
- $b M 5
6 NEPA PROCESS PURPOSE OF SCOPING Cotitinued
- Definethe proposed action
- Issue draft EIS for public comment
- Determinethe scope of the EIS
- Issue final EIS
- Identifyand eliminate peripheralissues Identify other related Environmental
)
7 8
l l
l
d PART 51 LICENSE RENEWAL PURPOSE OF SCOPING PROCESS NRC reles goveming environmental protection Conti=d located in 10 CFR Part 51
- Identify other review or consultation processes Generic Environmental Impact Statement
- Indicate schedule (GEIS),NUREG-1437, formed basis for 1996 rule revision
- identifycooperating agencies GEIS identified and categorized impacts of license renewal; limited scope of review
- Describe EIS preparation I
GEIS categorized 92 impacts O
9 11 PART 51 LICENSE RENEWAL PART 51 LICENSE RENEWAL PROCESS PROCESS Condnued Continued Applicant for license renewal must evaluate and
- Category 1 impacts met criteria and ccnsidered generic (68 impacts) present impacts in environmental report (ER)
Category 2 issues plus new and significant
- Category 2 impacts considered plant-specific mformation (22 impacts)
NRC will use Environmental Standard Review
- 2impactsunassigned Plan (ESRP),NUREG-1555, Supplement 1 O
12 13 i
mm,
a 4
0 o
l 1
.8 i
]h.
_a
=m
.i Nz
$15a n
8 mg s
.gI n
a li ItI 1
11 ri n
n a
l
1 i
CALVERT CLIFFS l
APPLICATION NRC REVIEW
- Applicationreceived on April 10,1998
- FederalRegisterNotices regarding application
- Proposed Action -license renewal for 20 years for both um,ts of the Calven Clifts Nuclear receipt and acceptance Power Plant pl tion consists of safety and environmental
- Scope of Supplement to GEIS
> Category 1 issues
> Category 2 issues
> New and sigmficant information 1
14 15 I
1 NRC REVIEW NRC REVIEW Continued g
- Identification ofother related environmental
- Consideration of Altematives assessmentsorimpact statements
> "No action" alternative - shut down and
- Consultationprocess with other government decommission plant at end of operation agencies
> Alternativeelectric generation sources
- PacificNonhwest National Laboratory contractedto support NRC r_
~
j l
16 17
l I
l CALVERT CLIFFS REVIEW SCHEDULE Contmued
- Notice ofintent-June 10,1998 FR notice
- Supplementto GEIS to contain NRC staffs
- Scopingcommentperiod ends August 7,1998 I
recommendationregarding the environmental acceptabilityof the license renewal action
- Dran supplemait to GEIS - scheduled for March 1999
- Comment period - scheduka for 60 days f
1
- \\
- Final supplenent to GEIS - scheduled for
/-
w, y November 1999 g
18 19 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN POINT OF CONTACT -
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
- Public Participation at several points
- Agency point ofcontact: Ms. Claudia M. Craig
- Public invited to participate in scoping (this
- Documentslocated at Public Document Room meeting and written comments) and LocalPublic Document Room
> Publicinvited to comment on draR
- Provide comments:by mail, in person, or e-mail supplement to the GEIS when available 20 21
e ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT HEADINGS HEADINGS Back Up Shde B*'k U Slide
- Surface water quality, hydrology, and use P
- Aquatic ecology
- Human health
- Ground-water use and qwlity
- Socioeconomic
- Terrestrialresources
- Postulated accidents
- Threatened or endangered species
- Uranium fuel cycle and waste nanagement
- Air quality j,*
- Decommissioning
- Land use j
\\
- Environmentaljustice l
1 I
LIST OF ATTENDEES
. JULY 9,1998 CALVERT CLIFFS SCOPING MEETING j
2:00 PM SESSION i
i (Spellings may be slightly altered as it was difficult to read people's handwriting)
I
- Indicates attendees who provided oral comments i
Name Organization 1.
Paul Gunter*
Nuclear information and Research Service 2.
Villiam Richkos (not provided) 3.
James Riccio*
Public Citizen's Critical Mass Energy Project 4.
Karl R. Neddenien Baltimore Gas and Electric (BGE) 5.
Lea Johnston Maryland Public interest Research Group
{
6.
Mike Henig Virginia Power 7.
Ben Rodill Virginia Power 8.
Don Cleary Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) 9.
Steve Kerekes Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) 10.
Rich McLean State of Maryland 11.
Susan R. Guamiers BGE J
12.
Nancy Smith
- St.' Mary's County resident l
13.
Ted Ringger BGE l
14.
Hal Maurer*
Federation of Southem Calvert Communities 15.
Michael Sharon State of Maryland 16.
David Lewis Shaw Pittman 17.
Jim Bennett BGE i
18.
Jenny Weil McGraw Hill 19.'
Ruth S. Wolf
- Calvert County 20.
Peter Dunbar Power Plant Research Program 21.
George Abbe
- Academy of Natural Sciences Estuarine Research Center 22.
Jay Lounsbury*
Dunkirk Area Citizens Association j
23.
Frederick H. Hoover
- Maryland Energy Administration 24.
Raymond W. Durante Maryland Energy Authority l
25.
Dave Crozier
. Calvert Independent -
l 26.
Robert Walker Independent 27.
John Douglas Parran*
County Commissioner Candidate 28.
Robert W. Bass
- self
. 29.
B. W. Doroshuk*
BGE 30.
Sharon Haggerty D&Z 31.
Neil Haggerty BGE
. 32.
Mary Krug* '
Calvert County Commissioner 33.
Robert Keating State of Maryland Department of Natural Resources 34.
Chuck Rayburn BGE i
l l.
35.
Deb Adair*
resident / citizen 36.
Darin Adair*
resident / citizen l
37.
Jim Petro Winston & Strawn 38.
Jim Dieter _
Maryland Department of Environment /WMA 39.
Melissa Jetmore St. Mary's College l-40.
Patricia Bowles St. Mary's College 41.
Keri Russel St. Mary's College 42.
Eleanor Joseph St. Mary's College 43.
Dameka Yates St. Mary's College 44.
Betti Baueri BGE 45.
Clay Perry BGE 46.
Mike Donovan NUS Information 47.
Scott Stewart NRC-Senior Resident inspector l
48.
Gary Vine Electric Power Research institute
'49.
Jim Davis Southern Nuclear Company 50.
William F. Bowen*
Chamber of Commerce 51.
Kelly Chambers United Way 52.
Julea Bradley Tetra Tech 53.
Brenda Nuse BGE 54.
Bill Miller Duke Power 55.
Robert Gill Duke Power 56.
Terry Taylor-Allen Duke Power 57.
Lil Krupp BGE 58.
Paul A!Ien BGE 59.
Sally Douglass citizen 60.
Bob Douglass citizen 61.
Bill Johnston*
citizen 62.
John Toohes -
citizen 63.
Tom Klemm St. Mary's College l
64.
Jennifer Dill St. Mary's College 65.
Glen Besa Sierra Club 66.
Patricia Sexton St. Mary's College 67.
Todd Gleason Sierra Club 68.
Kent Marquin (not provided) 69.
Bonnie Bick* '
Sierra Club 70.
Willem Roosenburg Sierra Club 71.
Doug Walters NEl 72.
Gregory M. Cary Philadelphia Electric Company 73.
Tomas Saunchez Philadelphia Electric Company 74.
Angie Howard*
NEl 75.
Mary Jane Wilmoth National Wistleblower Center 76.
Steve Agan National Wistleblower Center 77.
Lucy Oppenheim*
Anne Arundel Peace Action 78.
Sarah Adams WMDM Radio 79.
Dennis Flowers BGE 80.
Edie Fortina (not provided) 81.
Kathryn Sutton Winston & Strawn l
l
82.
DK Staudinger Winston & Strawn 83.
Eric Van De Verg DBED 84.
Tom Roberts VNF 85.
Lynne Neal NEl 86.
Tom Wahle (not provided) 87.
Tom Rosetti*
CCNPP employee / Commissioner candidate 88.
Masahiko Kakam Japan Electric Power 89.
Larry Doerflein NRC Resident inspeuor 90.
Lyndsey Layton Washington Post 91.
Gary Hodge*
Tri-County Counsel 92.
Tom Essig NRC 93.
David Matthews NRC 94.
Melinda Malloy NRC 95.
Francis Cameron NRC 96.
Barry Zalcman NRC 97.
Claudia Craig NRC 98.
Rob Jolly NRC 99.
Cynthia Sochor NRC 100.
Kim Campbell NRC 101.
Cindy Harbaugh NRC 103.
Alex Dromerick NRC 104.
Chris Grimes NRC 105.
Jim Wilson NRC 107.
Mary Ann Parkhurst Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) 109.
Rebeka Harty PNNL 110.
Mike Scott PNNL 111.
Charlie Brandt PNNL 112.
Paul Nickens PNNL 113.
Lance Vail PNNL j
114.
Sue Blanton PNNL 115.
116.
Jeff Ward PNNL 117.
Paul Hendrickson PNNL l
l
LIST OF ATTENDEES JULY 9,1998 CALVERT CLIFFS SCOPING MEETING 7:00 PM SESSION (Spellings may be slightly altered as it was difficult to read people's handwriting)
- Indicates attendees who provided oral comments Name Qoanization 118.
Theodore Rockwell*
independent 119.
Tony Russo*
independent 120.
Tyla Mattison*
Sierra Club 121.
Chris Bedford*
Sierra Club 122.
Volvev Kluepfel Baltimore Chronicle 123.
Michael Smolek" Jefferson-Patterson Park and Museum 124.
Ed Chrzanowski BGE 125.
Willem H. Roosenburg*
Sierra Club 126.
D. Staudinger Winston & Strawn 127.
Michae! T. Moore
- Former County Commissioner 128.
Kay Dellinger*
Maryland Safe Energy Coalition 129.
Max Obuszewski Baltimore Energy Response Network 130.
Alan Freeman International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers 131.
Neil Haggerty BGE 132.
Sharon Haggerty D&Z 133.
Brian Bates (not provided) 134.
David Lewis Shaw Pittman 135.
Bette Bauerus BGE 136.
Robert Walker IND 137.
Tim Hoeg NRC 138.
S.R. Guariuere BGE l
139.
Erik Jansson*
Potomac River Association 140.
Tom Wahle (not provided) 141.
Kathryn Sutton Winston & Strawn 142.
Jim Petro Winston & Strawn l
143.
Glen Besa*
Sierra Club 144.
David Hale
- Calvert County 145.
Ralph Beedle*
NEl 146.
Dorothy Ordevein resident 147.
Doug Walters NEl 148.
Mike Henig Virginia Power 149.
Ted Ringger BGE 150.
Michael Martin
- Sierra Student Coalition of the Sierra Club 151.
Angelina M. Danford St. Mary's College 152.
Mary Cowan St. Mary's College 153.
John Gott resident 154.
Joe Mihalik (not provided) 155.
Thelma Green resident 156.
Raymond Durante (not provided) l L__-__---_--.___.
157.
William Richkus (not provided) 158.
Michael Sharon Maryland Department of Environment 159.
Bob Keating State of Maryland Department of Natural Resources 160.
Pete Dunbar Power Plant Research Program 161.
Robert Gill Duke Energy 162.
Sara Ebenreh (not provided) 163.
Jim Davis (not provided) 164.
Bill Miller Duke Energy 165.
Charles Bucy (not provided) 166.
Greg Cary Philadelphia Electric Company 167.
Rich McLean State of Maryland Department of Natural Resources 168.
Don Cleary NRC 169.
Tom Essi; NRC 170.
David Matir.ews NRC 171.
Melinda Malloy NRC 172.
Francis Cameron NRC 173.
Barry Zaleman NRC 174.
Claudia Craig NRC 175.
Rob Jolly NRC 176.
Cynthia Swhor NRC 177.
Kim Campi > ell NRC 178.
Cindy Harbaugh NRC 180.
Alex Dromerick NRC 181.
Chris Grimos NRC 182.
Jim Wilsor NRC 184.
Mary Ann Parkhurst PNNL 186.
Rebeka Harty PNNL 187.
Mike Scott PNNL 188.
Chrlie Brandt PNNL 189.
Paul Nickens PNNL 190.
Lance Vail PNNL 191.
Sue Blanton PNNL 192.
Eva Hicket PNNL 193.
Jeff Ward FNNL 194.
Paul Hendrickson PNNL 195.
B.W. Doroshek*
BGE 196.
Frederick Hoover
- Maryland Energy Administration l
l A4achment 4
a Baltimore Gas & Electric Comoany Docket Nos. 50-317, 50-318 cc:
Mr. Joseph H. Walter, Chief Engineer President Public Service Commission of Calvert County Board of Maryland Commissioners
. Engineering Division 175 Main Street 6 St Paul Centre
. Prince Frederick, Md 20678 Baltimore, MD 21202-6806
' James P. Bennett, Esquire Kristen A. Burger, Esquire -
Counsel Maryland People's Counsel Baltimore Gas and Electric Company 6 St. Paul Centre P.O. Box 1475 Suite 2101 BsMimore, MD 21203 Baltimore, MD 21202-1631 Jay E. Silberg, Esquire Patricia T. Bimie, Esquire Shaw, Pittman, Potts and Trowbridge Co-Director
. 2300 N Street, NW Maryland Safe Energy Coalition Washington, DC 20037 P.O. Box 33111 Baltimore, MD 21218 Mr. Thomas N. Pritchett, Director NRM
' Mr. Loren F. Donatell Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant NRC Technical Training Center 1650 Calvert Cl4fs Parkway 5700 Brainerd Road-Lusby, MD 20657-4702
_ chattanooga, TN 37411-4017 Resident inspector Mr. Charles H. Cruse
- c/o U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Vice President - Nuclear Energy l
Commission Baltimore Gas and Electric Company i
P.O. Box 287 Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant St. Leonard, MD 20685 1650 Cak ert Cliffs Parkway Lusby, MD 2065/-4702 Mr. Richard I. McLean, Manager Nuclear Programs Mr. Roy Denmark Power Plant Research Program Federal Activities Office l
Maryland Dept. of Natural Resources U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
' Tawes State Office Building, B3 Region ill Annapolis, MD 21401 841 Chestnut Building t' philadelphia, PA 19107 Regional Administrator, Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mr. J. Rodney Little j
i-475 Allendale Road Director and State Histon: Preservation King of Prussia, PA 19406 Officer 100 Community Place
(
Crownsville, MD 21032 j
L__________________________________________
Mr. John Wolfin Mr. Daniel L. Larcamp Supervisor - Chesapeake Bay Field Office Assistant General Counsel U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Electric Rates and Corporate Regulation 177 AdmiralCochrane Drive Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 4
Annapolis, MD 21401 888 First St., NE Washington, DC 20426 Ms. Barbara Schroeder National Marine Fisheries Service Mr. Roland G. Fletcher, Manager Office of Protected Resources Radiological Health Program 1315 East-West Highway Air and Radiation Management Silver Spring, MD 20901 Administration Maiyland Department of the Environment Merrilyn Zaw-Mon, Director 2500 Broening Highway I
Air and Radiation Management Baltimore, MD 21244 Administration Maryland Department of the Environment Doug Walters 2500 Broening Highway Nuclear Energy Institute Baltimore, MD 21244 1776 l Street, N.W.
Suite 300 H. Russel' Frisbey, Jr., Chairman Washington, DC 20006 Maryland Public Service Commission 16th Floor Bart Doroshuk 6 St. Paul Street Baltimore Gas and Ele,tric Company Baltimore, MD 21202-6806 Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant 1050 Calvert Cliffs Parkway Dorchester County Commissioners Lusby, MD 20657-4702 County Office Building P.O. Box 26 Cambridge, MD 20650 l
St. Mary's County Commissioners J
P.O. Box 653 Leonardtown, MD 20650 i
Charles County Board of County Commissioners P.O. Box B Government Building La Platta, MD 20646 Mr. David Lewis Shaw, Pittman, Potts, and Trowbridge i
2300 N Street, NW Washington, DC 20037 l
l