ML20210B988
| ML20210B988 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Satsop |
| Issue date: | 02/05/1986 |
| From: | Knighton G Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Crutchfield D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| CON-WNP-1387 NUDOCS 8602130076 | |
| Download: ML20210B988 (1) | |
Text
Docket No.: 50-50P 7 gg Q 1586, 7
MEMORANDUM FOR: Dennis Crutchfield, Assistant Diredtor for PWR-B Division of PWR Licensing-B FROM:
George W. Knighton, Director PWR Project Directorate No. 7 Division of PWR Licensing-B
SUBJECT:
REVIEW 0F ITT CRIflELL STIFF CLAMPS FOR WNP-3
~
Enclosed is a letter with enclosures from WPPSS, dated July 31, 1985 requesting a review of ITT Grinnel Stiff Clamps at WNP-3. WPPSS is prepared to make a presentation on this report and to respond to any questions by the staff.
Although WNP-3 is presently in a deferred status, WPPSS would like to have this review completed on an expedited schedule so that the contractual team they have put together will be available to respond to queries. They have requested a complete review by April 30, 1986; please let me know if this is acceptable and, if not, the date you could have it completed.
0/..-pol 3!0rr3 DT.
Gugs W.W@to#
George W. Knighton, Director PWR Project Directorate No. 7 Division of PWR Licensing-B Enclosures-As stated DISTRIBUTION Docket File 50-508 PBD7 Reading JLee Titichaels Filiraglia Attorney, ELD t
X 96021300760602p0G ADOCK 0500 p
p f,
PBD7[k
~
R Ti-tichaels/yt d'r ghton 2/ f/86 2/ /86 A
l
/
,f
..!y.
e g
FEB,2 s 1996 Occket ho.: 50-508 i
' APPLICANT: Washington Public Power Supply System FACILITY:
WashingtonNuclearProject(hhp-3)
SUBJECT:
MEETING
SUMMARY
ON STATUS OF ENGINEERING ASSURANCE PROGRAM AT WNP-3 BY THE WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM (WPPSS)
ON FEBRUAPY 13, 1986, BETHESDA, MARYLAND On February 13, 1986 representatives of the WPPSS presented to the NRC a status / progress report on the Engineering Assurance Program (design review) for hhp-3. The design review is one part of the Readiness Review Program. contains a list cf meeting attendees. Enclosure 2 is a set of viewgraphs that WPPSS presented.
The presentation dealt with the difficulties being encountered by WPPSS in establishing a documentation base for the plant. The reasons given for this condition are on pages 4, 5 and 6 of Enclosure 2.
These dif'iculties surfaced in the review of the first design review module, Pipir.1 and Pipe Supports.
Their plan for completing the review of the first modub is described on page 7 and 8 of Enclosure 2.
WPPSS also presented options they were considering for coniucting the design review of the remaining modules. These options and their (haracterization are presented on pages 9, 10, 11 and 12 of Enclosure 2.
The stiff discussed these options and will review the acceptability of the chosen option after it is submitted in March 1986.
04iGli;AL clGi43D BY Theodore S. Michaels, Project Manager Standardization and Special Projects Directorate Division of PWR Licensing-B
Enclosures:
As stated cc: See next page SSPD D
ED7 TMic acis/yt G-Ighton 2/27/86 2/gy/86
' g5W"d5ci 55*(go
I Mr. D. W. Mazur WPPSS Nuclear Project No. 3 Washington Public Power Supply System (WNP-3) cc:
Mr. Charles B. Brinkman, Manager Washington Nuclear Operations Combustion Engineering, Inc.
7910 Woodmont Avenue Sutie 1310 Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Nicholas S. Reynolds, Esq.
DeBevoise & Liberman 1200 Seventeenth Street l
Washington, DC 20036 G. E. Doupe, Esq.
t Washington Public Power Supply System 3000 George Washington Way Richland, Washington 99352 Mr. Nicholas D. Lewis, Chairman Energy Facility Site Cvaluation Council Mail Stop PY-11 Olympia, Washington 98505 Mr. Douglas Coleman Washington Public Power Supply System P. O. Box 1223-Elma, Washington 98541 Mr. Robert T. Dodds Resident Inspector /WPPSS 3/5 c/o U.S. Nuclear Reagulatory Commission P. O. Box 69 Elma, Washington 98541 Regional Administrator, Region V U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1450 Maria Lane Suite 210 Walnut Creek, California 94596 Mr. Eugene Rosolie, Director Coalition for Safe Power 408 Southwest Second Avenue Portland, Oregon 97204
.s
)
WNP-3 Public Meeting February 13, 1986 Atten'ees Organization d
H. B. Wang NRC/IE W. M. Hill NRC/IE E. V. Imbro NRC/IE B. K. Grimes NRC/IE G. C. Sorensen Washington Public Power Supply System R. B. Glasscock Washington Public Power Supply System G. A Block Washington Public Power Supply System T. S. Michaels NRC/NRR k
6
. Pe p 1 2/ 3/86 i
)
SUPPLY SYSTEM WNP-3 READINESS REVIEW ENGINEERING ASSURANCE PROGRAM STATUSIPROGRESS REPORT FEBRUARY 13, 1986
_/
o O
E l
2
~
Page 2 2/13/86 i
~
EAP STATUS / PROGRESS REPORT l
OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION i
i e
ORIGINAL ?LAN AND ASSunPTIONS i
's j
e INITIAL ASSESSMENT l
e RESTRUCTURE OF FIRST (PILOT)' MODULE e
OPTIONS BEIN6 CONSIDERED FOR RESTRUCTURE i
0F FUTURE MODULES l
1 OPTION 1 i
OPTION 2
-)
OPTION 3 j
e
SUMMARY
l e
NEAR-TERM SCHEDULE j
e LON6-TEhn EFFECTS I
i
i W
n en Gm
=
m-E 9%
o EN o
M w
E H
c A
X 0
2 w w
QC O >
44 e
QC A
M M to e
E A
>= w w
>=
M m
4 4 O O
M CO Q
>= w O
o G
a 2 cc E
- D w
(D J
w A
4 2
4 E >
W c
M w
3 a
X w M M
3 y H O
>= O E
W O 2 M
< ll3 w
M e
Q w
>=
E 4
>=
m Q
X w
2
>= o
>=
A W 3
m w
oc w 2
E W O
>=
-in O c4 C/3 w
O M c
c4 e
A gO Z
E O C/3 L
at M to A 3 O
m E
c4 H
- D c4 H
U E E w
2 2 to H
O w w QC
>=
0 W c4 0-Q
>= >=
U E W <
2*
to C4 W
Q 3
A 3 5
to u
w u M
C/3 M C/3 2
O m o A c C/3 LaJ M
H c
2 (4
O c <
J J C
>= Q R
Q W
A A W
W e
w
< m E
Z A A 2
>= C4 O >=
0 4
>=
D D O
w w w 4 (D U e
C/3 C/3 o
J
=J E
J X to to C/3 2
A A m W M < >=
2 M
2 E*E C4 E A GB C4 4
W O <
44 M I4 M J
c w
u to J
A w
.J Q.
W l
1 40
=J M
M 2 O C4 <
^ LaJ U J
W to CD w 2 4 w 4
M M >=
3 2 O
Z Z
>=
Z to O M
M w u H
2 W W X
(4 Z O
w M
o J
O c M >= H H
c Oc w
M w c4 Q:
M O
3 to
>= >=
w E 2 O
3 w
=8C QC O M 2
>=
M 6
>= E E <
w
>= E 2
> 0 2 0
>=
La.
CD w
>= M O (D
w w A C4 4
EER M Q A M
M 2 E E w Q O ::3 w to o
D O
>= w c Q
D 4 Q".
W Q H O O
< >= w c
>= >=
0 2 J C4 3 2
e OQ Q M w w w M
OQJ 2
to H D M (4 (D Q: 24' W
4 2
>= C4
>= 0 >
wQ ZH C/3 3
3 w 2 w 2 W W M
- =4 E
E W (D W E E O
E "3
Cat 2 E
2 >
H
< O E <
E to O w
J O
J O D 2 3 4 2 M QC 1
1 I
Z Q.
Q O U C) 3 <
U <
M w 6w Q Q >=
e e
e e
i a
Page 4 2/13/86 INITIAL ASSESSHENT HOST DOCUMENTS REVIEWED WERE DATED PRIOR TO 1983. A PERIOD ALREADY RECORDED AS HAVING DEFICIENCIES REGARDING DOCUMENTATION.
)
e REVIEWS DISCLOSED MANY ITEMS OF CONCERN.
l 1
0 HOST RELATED TO SOFTWARE (PAPERWORK). RECONFIRMING PREVIOUS AUDITS.
(E.G.. LACK OF CHECKER INITIALS. LACK OF OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE OF INTERDISCIPLINE INFORMATION EXCHANGE. ETC.)
l I
j e
MOST TECHNICAL CONCERNS WERE RELATED TO INCONSISTENCY AMONG RELATED J
DATA (I.E.
CALCULATIONS DID NOT MATCH DRAWINGS THAT DID NOT MATCH ACTUAL HARDWARE CONFIGURATIONS).
l
)
s g
W
.X
. t, CD -
W Q
O M 9%
Z W
M to LN W
a.
en w A
M Q O
2 W
W W 3
in W K K z
W W
(D W W
X X
X 6 M
M 6 s W O E
W O e'
O E
a W
we W
W X K W W
W to M 2
W U O J
> M Q
W E w en J M
A O W O
O Z M E A DC & L M
A M e W
- a. e w
3 za w
a W
W W
Q Q
Z e
2.
W M W
Q W E W X Z J D
E O
O W fn 2
4 E M 2 M
O W M Q E >
W W
m M W M X X
U 6 O O tn W
O w
2 W 4
J 2 W
M Q O A e a w
C W U A M
=
E 4
W W M O.,
ae ac a en W
D tn &
W Z
=
to M C w z Q.
W l O W E D a en z W to w
< M w 3 M y) to I W
D L&.
W 2
CD fn a X >
03 W
2 M M N O V)
M M i en W H W 3s Q w W za e
2 E (S O O E J
Q to N W X Q M w J (D 6 2 4 4 6 H
w a 3 2 W E W H
2 M 6 e u
O N
Q O
2 W w 2
W X 4 2 Z
H E M M
LD C &
W 6 W 2 M W
e 3e e M en
- 3 en E
W O
e en to >
2
= Q U 44 W G E 2 M W u 2 4 G3 in 3 X O M E W G to W W m W
to w w M E A w O E
U
> 2 W to 4 Q O w U W E
J M M M O W W
E db Q Z O E W
e w
4 3 W Z X X X 6 2
& 3
& M M
& O U e
e e
Page 6 2/13/86 i
EBASCO PIPING DESIGN PROCESS - ASME SECTION III APPROXIMATE CURRENT STATUS 6/83 - PRESENT (1/86)
DESIGN DESIGN / FIELD INPUT CHANGES I
AS BUILT I
4fLDW DIA'S, 34 REV'S _
JLOW DI A
- S,-
s j
PIPING AS BUILT l
y: DWGS CHECKING SIGN OUT R0 REV'S
, PIPING DWGS s
l
,e 8
REV'S v STRESS IS0'S I
DESIGN S/A r
AS BUILT CRITERIA v CALC R0 REV'S I
vS/A CALC
_ _ - - 3:
I S/R-A e DESIGN R0 REV'S g
~ AT BUILT l
v S/R DETAILS GRIN.
FAB DET'S R0 PIPING FAff.
, REV'S l
y 1
IS0's
PIPING l
l'FABRICATIO11 SHIPPING y
i
]
6 78 T
/
e3 N
)
g1 E
D a/
M E
P2 T
V A
O E
R R
F P
T O
P S A T N
I O
T D G
I O U T
N A E
U
(
L
.)
O D3 D
V E 8 E
E K '
E T
(
C -
L A
E E U
L D
H R D
E E
C P O
R T
(
M A
T S
E L
O S
)
G M
E N U T
N I
R O
O I
T
. I L
P E
. V I
U T
M 6
E P
O O
)
I R
(
R N
S T
E P 6
R
(
T E
O E
N S
L R
T R
N I R
A A
C A
O I
C A
I D F
I T F T
T E G
A A
A D E
O H N H
T R H
L T O T
N O T
I E C O
S T S
N E F
T N A N
U R O
N O C O
C I
I I I
O S E
T F T
D A R
S I S
W U
S E S E
N T
G U N U
I R C
N Q E Q
E U
I T
S T R
D N N N
E C T
N G I G
I A S
I I
I C R E
F S S S
N A R
E S E
A H D E D )
P C E
R N
E Z
C T C G R E I
I S I I C S R
S S S S O O
A F A E I H G
B 0 B D D W E
T AC i
2 3
e I
i Il
!i j1l j
l 1
Page 8 2/13/86 e
CONTINUE REVIEW USING EXISTING DOCUMENTATION.
e REVIEW SAMPLE OF POST '83 DESIGN TO ENSURE CATEGORY 3 ITEMS tlAVE NOT RECURRED.
j e
PREPARE DRAFT REPORT WITH UNRESOLVED ISSUES FOR PROJECT RESPONSE:
INDIVIDUAL CATEGORY l ITEMS GENERIC CATEGORY 2 ITEMS (E.G., "AS-BUILT" PROGRAM)
NO RESPONSE REQUIRED FOR CATEGORY 3 ITEMS ("FOR THE RECORD" ONLY) i 1
8 ACCEPT DISPOSITION OF CATEGORY l ITEMS.
i
)
e VERIFY THERE IS A PROCESS IN PLACE TO RESOLVE CATEGORY 2 ITEMS.
9 ISSUE FINAL MODULE REPORT.
i 4
..,-.r
.-w
.~ -- - -
5
~
to
@ CO WM
@m (J N Z
LN H
H (#3 O
M 2 W H
3 M (D W
Q 2 H
Z 2 a.
Z H O Z
(D M
C/3 C4 O 3
6 >
LaJ 2
O O O J
O H z
2 M 2 sua
(#3 2
> W e
3 P=s W 3 W ^
H 2 E O E (#3 4 Q A W
< W H U l.aJ 03 CD t/3 E
W m W 2 2
O E D E <
s M
H Q &3 M Z Q
D to
.J u W 2 LA.
3 W
A O E W A
a
& M La.
O M M J Q H Q
ca: >
A <
H <
+
k W th H L&l Qll W W I
2 M
CO M W th W D
W O H <
< E J (O E
E 3
O A J 2 O O
D E4 M &
W O 4
oc Z c CQ fn O C/"J e
W U e
LAJ 3 H (D 2 6 44 W X 2 M C M M W
< w I
> H Z
2 44 O
W (4 O (#3 C 4 LA.
m M m
M e Cn W H H
=
Q W Z Z <
A 3 L.a.J
- 2. O H H H W H U e
CO Ck: M LAJ C4
.J U >
Q 6 W M M H Co W H
oa en H E W m C/3 W <
2 W c
Z s
3 m m W O
en Cn o
e U
W >- W to M W ^
(D W to 3 to J A C)
< Z <
W Z M
<s Z
M H U M O
< E e
H U
1
> U H
A LAJ
< 2 >=
W W Q <
i CD A W CO E O Q < E
(
a Z l 2
O C/3 3 W W 4 4 Ca: c 3
W th Z
w 4 C3 J W <
H H A
O b-4 833 E O 2
0 2 CE:
I H
E M GC W J CD e i
Q.
W H <
W m W M o
&3 6 ca:
> (n W to 2 2 W m W W z
< M o Q u oo H i
t e
e e
w N
m l
4
m Og e
Mw H
H N
W m O
i i
> m 4
- 45 %
M H
A AN W H Q 4
.E J 4 W Z
M L W H
& 4 E a 4 W
4 O J W
W J
C/3 W
E o O ll3 O E N
=
W m C:3 I
Z 2 W >=
M Q W
U w Q J
4 O Z
d' 4
2 2 E H E O
W W 4 M W CL, Cr)
E A
E M
+
H O J Q CL O H Cr) 2 E J J
- C 6
W M A 4
.3 LAJ Z O O
E O a
M 4 A Q m 3 H
i Cf3 M
W O
2 W W O E
J Z H at:
CD 2 4 H Q M
U 4 M A O 2 H
M M O Z =e:
O
=
6 O A J tn 2 2 E M
4
=4:
A W
2 13.
&3 O 4 CD Q'>
CD a
- 3 M 2 2 J W M'
O M 03 M D 3 03 Cr) M O a
W O O W > H EI3 3 2:
H J W in W
D 853 E M E W LLJ O
E A Z O Qll
- C e
Z W
Cr) W 2
e H
Cr) W en 3
W CD Cr)
M Cr) E 3 H
Z M W 3
=e: O W
=4: 03 H 03 J
fn M W
W A Q
LLJ e
>= CD H cE W
- C H W (n U 2 4:
4
- 3 4 CE: W 4: =e:
Z W Cr) 2 (D
D Z H Z M
03 H CL 2 O O H W H
W 2 acC ae; W
Cn.
cn 2
J W LAJ Z Q 2 W W O O
A H U
4 CD H O Z U
E fn **
M in 2 H 4 M e Q Z (n
- 4:
W C/3 Cr) Q W CD W
>= > W CIS 2 W H M C 4 C O Cr) O E at:
C/3 H =E:
Q H O M M W H Cn B
J U
m O O 4:
O H us a
W W O A 3
O O 2 O
J K W Qll E H 2 H O
W =4: 2 O E
=W:
=4:
in O
M E fn H 2
H M 2 6 CE:
(n W Ch O
CL ae: E M 2 M M C 3 M
asC 2 0 2 O 6 2 O H
LAJ H 3 ll2 0 2 W
W A
O Cf3 H CO O
i O O W M M J
Gr.
O C/3 W
D Q A
- W M
C 2 W Cf) M Z
Z 34 CX: M Ch.
H O
HHAO e
e e
f
'1 A
Page 11 2/13/86 em OPTION 2 - AE INCORPORATES ALL APPROVED CHANGES INTO ALL RELATED DOCUMENTS:
EAP THEN SELECTS AND REVIEWS SAMPLES.
j e
WOULD SLOW EAP SCHEDULE TO ALLOW AE TO GET FAR ENOUGH AHEAD TO ALLOW SAMPLES TO BE SELECTED FROM LARGE ENOUGil POPULATIONS.
e WOULD ALLOW CONFIRMATION OF ADEQUACY OF CURRENT DESIGN AND DESIGN CHANGE PROCESS.
l l
e
Page 12 2/13/86 OPTION 3 - AE DEVELOP A DETAILED " ROAD MAP" 0F STATUS OF DESIGN. WHAT HAS BEEN COMPLETED. WHAT IS LEFT TO COMPLETE. WHERE IS IT. AND HOW TO COMBINE ALL ELEMENTS IN THE FUTURE SO AS NOT TO LOSE ANYTHING "IN THE CRACKS."
.)
e EAP WOULD THEN REVIEW DOCUMENTS "AS-IS" (TODAY)
AND RECONCILE DISCREPANCIES USING " ROAD MAP."
THIS WOULD CONFIRM DESIGN ADEQUACY AS OF THE DATE OF THE DOCUMENTS REVIEWED.
o EXPECT TO FIND MORE DISCREPANCIES THAN OTHER TWO OPTIONS.
G WOULD DEFER EAP SCHEDULE SOMEWHAT. UNTIL ROAD MAP (S) WAS DEVELOPED TilAT COVERED THE AREA BEING REVIEWED.
O b
Pag 3 13 2/13/86
SUMMARY
1.
THE PILOT (PIPING) MODULE WILL BE COMPLETED AS RESTRUCTURED.
2.
IF HISTORICAL PACKAGING IS CHOSEN. EAP CAN PROCEED NOW. AND CAN PROVIDE SIGNIFICANT CONFIRMATION OF PREVIOUS DESIGN ACTIVITY.
3.
IF INCORPORATION OF APPROVED CHANGES IS CHOSEN. EAP CAN PROCEED AFTER BRIEF DELAY. AND CAN PROVIDE BROADER CONFIRMATION.
l 4.
IF THE " ROAD MAP" OPTION IS CHOSEN. EAP WILL REVIEW AS-IS DOCUMENTATION AND RECONCILE DEFICIENCIES USING " ROAD HAP AND EXPLANATORY MEETINGS WITH AE.
O e
m.
,s d
W US O
TW H Z "k
2 &
es m W
> H C1-H H 2 M MN 03 :::3 Q
EN M O E W W
&3 H
2 W 03 W O
O H
< Z W
O 4 H
A E
e W
>C 3 <
Z
> H W
W A O
J <
M W M
O-03
> C/3 4
C/3 W M
W E
W H cz: O ca: <
u) 2
>=
A 3
Q <
a O M W
2 K
H O M
M 03 W
Z H W
W W C/3 O M Ck:
> 3 H 2
Ek: 4 M C/3 M M
< A W
W C/3 Q E
CI:
O M ::3 C/3 O
m W
4 C/3 Q H H
CI:
J W
M lll3 4 4 O
E Q 6
LAJ J O O O
W J
J M 0:
2 H C2:
O M 2 C/3 A
M M O
O 3 Z ::3 6
w O O 3
>- 2 I
E W M W
Z M C/3 O
< H >
M 2
CO W
W
- C/3 O
H W E W
C ee M
E Z A E
O H
a::
3 H u) O A
w W
W
< Ct:
O H
M Q CG Z
CD Z t
> m H
LAJ 6
Qll W O Q W
O CI: O W H
H Z L&J W N O
< H W
Z H CE: M W
w U
CM:
QC A
Q M
l C
- W u)
J W O
i n.
u) H 2
w a
Z A W O M
Z G3 O
D CD 4 M
OS 4 K O
W 03 W
e 3dll 4 H
CI3 C/3 Z Z W O Z O
H H Q.
< O Q
J A 2
M A W
J 2 O A
C/3 H
H US O E
% < W M
3 <
l-eD H M 2 v3 2 4 O 2
CD 03 O M i
M Q R M
2 2 ^
M Z A
W M O CD US H M 2 M C/3 H M 2 M
A CD U M
W H M O Ct:
M M W u) H W W W &) 6 LAJ E W W Q H Z W W Ca
- 3 W H Q Q H
< O E 4
J e
e e
e c
i I
Page 15 2/13/86 NEAR-TERM SCHEDULE (CONTINUED) e A DRAFT REPORT WILL BE PREPARED BY EARLY APRIL AND WILL INCLUDE:
A LISTING OF ITEMS. ATTRIBUTES AND DOCUMENTS REVIEWED.
ATTRIBUTES VERIFIED DURING THE REVIEW.
CONCERNS THAT REQUIRE FURTHER RESOLUTION.
COMPLIANCE OF THE DESIGN TO APPLICABLE FSAR CRITERIA.
AN OVERALL ASSESSMENT OF THE PIPING AND PIPE SUPPORT DESIGN.
DRAFT REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE TO. BUT NOT FORMALLY TRANSMITTED TO THE NRC.
e THE PROJECT WILL RESPOND TO THE DRAFT REPORT.
PROPP"ED DISPOSITIONS WILL BE EVALUATED AND APPROVED OR REJECTED BY THE REVIEW TEAM.
HUTUAL AGREEMENT ON DISPOSITIONS IS REQUIRED.
NRC IS INVITED TO MONITOR AND COMMENT ON THE DISPOSITION PROCESS.
l A FINAL REPORT WILL BE FORMALLY ISSUED TO THE NRC.
e THE SECOND R'EVIEW HODULE IS COLLECTING BASIC CIVIL / STRUCTURAL DOCUMENTS. BUT WILL NOT BE FULLY MOBIL] ZED UNTIL AN OPTION IS CHOSEN.
'h
[
A WW
>=
M G3 e cn M m n
m-Z M c
eg %
H W 2
Q. N 2
4 O W E Z W
^
t H
e H
Co
.'2" to 4
W i
CD H M
J l
H 2 2 m
m 3 M M Cn c
e i
O Qll aut O
O 2
l G3 m Qll CO CE E
w l
< Q H G3 A
CO C4 Q
A E
O c c w W
W X
i W w Qll Z
U A 2
>==
Ql:
H l
A m W W
w O
to l
M < O CD M
[:
J W m W
Z Z ^
Co J m H
O M H 2
O
=W:
J H
O 2 en to J
c M
w 2 W O
w wa H
w O m 2
2 CE cn H Q.
i G3 C4 M
W se: H O
l (4 w W
> Z l
W W CD W
m O Q W
2 C/3 J Q H
O CD
>==
=W:
W W
O =d:
O Z w J
J co W
F- =
Qll LM Z 3 m
w Cn Q.
W W
(4 H O E
J **
c H
A W
2 O
m W J w O A
t.M
-.J W M O
c Qll J CE >=
4 m >== 0 0 <
M Qll E
o < <
w E
3 w c c
' (Y.
O Q:
c3 w w w W
LM E O O cw W 2 C4 i
H Q.
H O
w Z Z c 2 4
I 3 CE H
Co H O w w w
O w O c O
M 6
-J Z
M O 2 C
Q.
H 2 w w
I O
> 2 <
W O
- =*: O c 2
I W M CE H a M w 2
O Q.
J >=
W C W w
I w
< < Co G3
[
E H J Q.
> Co H CE M l-2 m
J *e:
(4 W (4 J
l W > c W
J Z 2
CL.
J i
F-2 0
< Q H O
-.J M
i at: E J
Z 3
m cn J
M E Q: a: 2
< C4 3 M
CD O O O asC w
w w w H
M CE 6 6 J
Z O M C4 2 6 C4 m
W >
C 2 2 c.
C l
H 2 w to C
CD CD 2 w
2 Q:ll M
^ w M M <
Z W C4 M >=*
C4 f4 N O
m at: a H
w W W W <
f4 O 3 H J
CCZ l
w O
W w w 3
ca e4 J
co w c w
G3 M M ad:
E 2
m Z Ch.
Z Z w C/3 Hw Q.
H CD 1
I I
asC I
?
w W
?
9 w
f
/
,,c.
',i 4*
EB 2 61986 MEETING
SUMMARY
DISTRIBUTION
/
PBD-7 Reading JPartlow GWKnighton BGrimes ACRS (10)
EJordan Attorney, OELD GWKnighton TMichaels Project Manager NRC PARTICIPANTS
[
H. B. Wang I
W. M. Hill E. V. Imbro B. K. Grimes l
T. S. Michaels l
l l
l l
l I
1 l
bec: Applicant & Service List l
l l
e--
m-_,
jd$73
/hhmo
/ 79'sLlac h'F E
s 1
i i
4
,