ML20199J330
| ML20199J330 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | North Anna  |
| Issue date: | 01/23/1998 |
| From: | Kansler M VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.) |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| 98-055, 98-55, GL-81-27, NUDOCS 9802050284 | |
| Download: ML20199J330 (5) | |
Text
I KM E311 H
{ ili WGINI A El.ECTRIC AND POW ER O W PANY
\\
Raciastoso, Visus N A2.ne
.,j January 23, 1998 i
y )
[ fl U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Serial No.98-055 Attention: Document Control Desk NL&OS/MAE: R0 h
Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Docket Nos.
50-338/ 339 License Nos.
NPF-4/-7 H
hl 1
Gentlemen:
d YRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY L l MORTH ANNA POWER STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 AND ISFSI BEVISIONS TO THE STATION ENlEBQJNCY PLAN - REVISION 21 j H
[
Parsuant to 10 CFR 50.54(q), attached are revisions to the North Anna Power Station U
Thesa revisions do not implement actions which decrease the
. l 1 [
- i
' l effectiveness of our Emergency Plan. The Emergency Plan continues to meet the ll1 I
standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b). Please update your manual by performing the actions o
described in Attachment 1, Tabulation of Changes.
ll 7
1 i!
a 4
Your v.tention is also directed to Attachment 2, North Anna Power Station Emergency
}
Plan Revision 21 Summary. This information is provided to facilitate your review of the ll ; y enclosed Emergency Plan revision.
j y
I if you have any questions, please contact us.
Very truly yours, l
b 1
h u 1
,h
[
i M'
ae
. Kansler Vicefjdsident - Nuclear Operations
[
Attachments l
QL j
Commitments made by this letter:
- 1. None.
=
y.m J t L
DOC 50 38 F
.~
.~
3
?
cc:.
US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (two copies)
Region 11 Atlanta Federal Center
~
61 Forsyth Street, SW,- Suita 23T85-Atlanta, Georgia 30303
- Mr. M. J. Morgat NRC Senior Resident inspector North Anna Power Station I
4 l
Serial No.98-055 NAPS Eplan Revision ATTACHMENT 1 TABULATION OF CHANGES 4
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY REVISIONS TO NORTH ANNA POWER STATION EMERGENCY PLAN Enclosed are recent revislors to the North Anna Power Station Emergency Plan. Please take the follow!ng actions in order to keep your manual updated with the most recent revisions.
REMOVE AND DESTROY EFFECTIV INSERT EFFECTIV E DATE E DATE NAPS Emergency Plan, 9-9 97 NAPS Emergency Plan, 1-23-98 Rev.20 Rev.21 Emergency Plan Privacy and Procrietarv Material has been removed. Reference Generic 1.alleLNo. 81-27.
m
b O
Serial No.98-055 NAPS Eplan Revision ATTACHMENT 2
SUMMARY
OF REVISIONS VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY REVISIONS TO NORTH ANNA POWER STATION EMERGENCY PLAN I
1.
Section 4, Table 4.1: Deletes the note prior to the list of conditions regarding addition of item 23 in North Anna Emergency Plan Revision 20, This note had indicated that a subsequent revision, following incorporation of the event into EPIP-1.01, Emergency Manager Controlling Procedure, would add the alpha-numeric designator and reorder the list in alpha numeric order. This revision moves the emergency action level condition for an Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) Facility event from item 23 to item 8, adds the alpha-numeric designator (C.12), and renumbers subsequent iterns.
2.
Section 7, Figure 7.2: Updates reference to source of information for listing of North Anna Power Station monitoring locations (the information itself did not change).
3.
Section 10.5: Changes " list" to " kit" in note prior to contents of Technical Support Center, Operational Support Center, Altemate Operational Support Center and Lccal Emergency Operations Facility emergency kits.
4.
Section 10.11:
This revision deletes the note prior to the list of Notification of Unusual Event conditions regarding addition of item 23 in North Anna Emergency Plan Revision 20. This note had indicated that a subsequent revision, following incorporation of the event into EPIP-1.01, would add the alpha-numeric desigrator and reorder the list in alpha-numeric order.
This revision moves the emergency action level condition for an Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) Facility event from item 23 to item 8 on the list of Notification of Unusual Event classification events, adds the a!pha numeric designator [C.12], and renumbers subsequent items.
This revision changes " Air Quality / Meteorological Dept." to " Virginia Power Weather Center" in 'he indication column of itern 21 on the list of Notification of Unus.
Event classification events and item 26 on the list of
,,.. ~
Alert classification events. This updates the organizational description only.
The indication itself is the same.
This revision modifies selected text in item 2 on the list of General Emergency classification events from lower to upper case to match classification procedure format, i.e., "open" to "OPEN" and "in progress" to "IN PROGRESS".
,t
- g O
Station: Emergency Plan VIRGINIA P0991R
Title:
North Anna Power Station Emergency Plan Revision Number:
Effective Date:
f -h 3-21 Revision Summary:
Revision 21 updates this entire document. Revised material includes, but is not limited to deletion of the notes prior to the list of conditions in Section 4, Table 4.1 and the list of Notification of Unusual Event conditions in Section 1011 regarding addition of hem 23 in North Anna Emergency Plan Revision 20 These notes had indicated that a subsequent revision, following incorporation of the event into EP?P-101, would add the alpha-numeric designator and reorder the list in alpha-numeric order.
C This rmsion moves the emergency action level condition for an Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) Facility event from item 23 to item 8, adds the alpha-numeric designator [C.12), and renumbers subsequent items Other revisions are minor and administrative in nature.
A, Recommended Approval
/
/-//@
Director I Nucim EmernMeparedness Date Recommended Approval:
/ N U SNSOC d/ airman Date b$
~
/A r'
Approved By:
Station Manager Date d'
g n p 3,. n ct i, e' %
A
NAEP Page 1.1 Revision 21 NORTH ANNA POWER STATION
..MERGENCJfMN V
IABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION SUBJECT PAGE NO.
I TABLE OF CONTENTS T a ble o f C o nt e n t s.......................................................................................... 1.1 NUREG-0654 Cross Referenee index.,
i.5 1.0 DEFINIT!CNE 1.0 Definitions..................................................................................................
1.2 1,1 Acronyms a nd Abbreviations......................................................................
1.4 l
2.0 SCOPE AND APPLICAQLID' 2.1 Site Specifics.........
2.2 2.2 Emergency Plan.
2.2 2.3 Nortb Anna Hydroelectric Unit..........................,.........................
2.3 4
3.0
SUMMARY
\\
3.0 Su mm a ry of Emergency Pian............................................................
3.2 4.0 EMERGENCY CONDlTIONS 4.0 Emergency conditions......
4.2 4.1 Speetrum of Postulated Accidents.
4.2 4.2. Emergency Classification System.
4.2 4.3 State and Local County Emergency Classification System.......................
4.8 4.4 Requirements for Wntten Summanes of Emergency Events.........................
4.8 5.0 - ORGANIZATIONAL. CONTROL OF EMERGENCIES 5.0 Organizational Control of Emergencies...........
5.3 5.1 Normal Station Organization.
5.4 5.2 Onsite Emergency organization.
5.4 5.3 Augmentation of Onsite Emergency Organization.....
5.13 5.4 Coordination with Participating Government Agencies.................................
5.16 g
!g k' t
/
%J
o NAEP Page i.2 Revision 21 TABLE OF CONTENTS O
6.0 EMERGENCY MEASURES 6.0 Emergency Measures..................
6.2 6.1 Activation of the Emergency Plan......................................
6.2 I
6.2 Assessment Actions.....
6.2 6.3 Protective Actions..........
6.3 6.4 Aid to Affeeted Personnel.
6.7 6.5 Offsite Support..
6.10 7.0 EMERGENCY FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT 7.0 Emergency Facilities and Equipment.....
7.3 7.1 Emergency Response Facilities..
7.3 7.2 Communications System.....
7.5 7.3 Assessment Facilities Available Onsite..
7.9 7.4 Assessment Facilities Available Offsite...
7.12 7.5 Damage Control Equipment and Suppnes...................
7.12 7.6 Early Waming System..
7.'i 3 8.0 MAINTAINING EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 8.0 Maintaining Emergency Preparedness.
8.3 8.1 Responsibility for Maintaining Emergency Preparedness..
8.3 8.2 Maintenance of the Emergency P!::n Implementing Procedures and Related Documents..
8.4 8.3 Training of Station Personnel..
8.5 84 Training Offsite Support Personnel.
8.7 8.5 Emergency Drills.
8.8 8.6 Emergency Exercises..
8.11 8.7 Testing and Maintenance of Emergency Equipment....
8.12 8.8 informing the Public...
8.14 8.9 Independent Review of the Emergency Preparedness Program................
8.15 9.0 BECOVERY 9.0 Recovery....
9.2 9.1 Recovery Methodology.
9.2 9.2 Population Exposure..
9.3 0
. _... ~ -. - - _... _ - _.
NAEP
. Page 1.3 ReviWon 21
. TABLE OF CONTENTS
[
10.0 APPENDICES
~
10.1 Letters of Agreement -
10.2 Deleted 10.3 Maps of Exclusion Area, Low Populatior, and Emergency Planning Zone' Boundaries 10.4 Listing of EPIPs -
10.5 Protective Equipment and Supplies-10.6 Deleted -
t 10.7 Supporting Plan Contact 10.8 ;.
Estimation of Evacuation Times 10.9 Radiation Emergency Plan, MCVHNCU. Virginia Power 10.10 Federal Radiological Monitoring and Assessmen' 'lenter (FRMAC) Operations Plan 10.11 initiating Conditions / Emergency Action Levels 4
E-O
. O h
.m
s NAEP Page 1.4 Revision 21 1
NORTH ANNA EMERGENCY PLAN
()/.
r" NUREG4654 CROSS REFERENCE INDEX NUREG-0654 NAEP NUREG-0654 NAEP Ref Section Section No.
Ref. Section Section No.
A.1a.
5.3 5.4 E.1 5.4, 6.0 - 6.1 A.1 b.
5.4 E. 2 6.1 A.1 c.
Figure 5.4 E. 3 6.1 A.1d.
5.0 E. 4.s thru n 6.1 A.1e.
5.2, 5.4, 5.4.5 E. 5 N/A A.2a.
N/A E. 6 6.3.1, 7.6 A.2b.
N/A E. 7 6.3.1 A. 3 5.3, Appx.10.1 A. 4 5.2, 5.3 F.1a.
5.2, 5.4.5, 7.2 F.1b.
7.2 B.1 5.1 F. i c.
7.2 B.2 5.0, 5.2 F.1 d.
7.2 B. 3 5.0 F.1 e.
5.2 B. 4 5.2.1.1 F. if.
7.2 B5 5.2, Table 5.2 F. 2 6.4.3 l
D.6 Figure 5.4 F. 3 9.7 B. 7a.
5.3.1 B. 7b.
5.3.1 G.1 8.8 B. 7c.
5.3.1 G.2 8.8 q
.t B.7d.
5.3.1 G.3a.
8.6, 7.15, CERP, 5.3.1 B. 8 5.3.2 G.3b.
7.1.5 B. 9 5.3.3, 5.4, Appx.10.1 G. 4a.
5.3.1 G. 4b.
5.3.1 G.4c.
8.8 C.1a.
5.3.1,5.4.7 G5 8.8 C. Ib.
5.4.7 C.1c.
5.4.7 H.1 7.1 C.2a.
N/A H. 2 7.1 C.2b.
CERP H. 3 7.1 C3-5.3.3 H. 4 5.2 C. 4 5.3.3 H. 5 7.3 H.Sa.
7.3.1, 7.3.3 D.1 4.2 H. Sb.
7.3.2 D. 2 4.2 H.Sc.
7.3.4 D. 3 N/A H. Sd.
7.3.5 D. 4 N/A H.6a.
7.4
.p i
1
+-
NAEP Page 1.5 Revision 21 NORTH ANNA EMERGENCY PLAN O
NUREG-0654 CROSS REFERENCE INDEX NUREG 0654 NAEP NUREG 0654 NAEP Hef Section Section No.
Ref. Section Section %
H. 6b.
7.3.2 J.10a.
Appx.10.8 H. Sc.
7.3.2 J.10b.
Appx.10.8 H.7 7 3.2 J.10c.
6.3.1 H. 8 7.3.3 J.10d.-l.
N/A H. 9 7.1.2 J.10m 6.3.1 H.10 8.7, 7. 5 J.11 N/A H.11 Appx.10.5 J.12 N/A H.12 7.1.4 K.1a -g.
6.4.1 1.1 4.2 K. 2 6.4.1 1.2 7.3 K. 3a.
5.2, 6.4
- l. 3a.
6.2 K.3b.
6.4
- 1. 3b.
6.2 K. 4 N/A
- 1. 4 6.2 K.Sa.
6.4.2
- 1. 5 7.3.3, 7.3.4 K. Sb.
6.4.2
- 1. 6 7.3.2 K.6a.
6.4.2
- 1. 7 7.3.2 K.6b.
6.4.2
- 1. 8 5.2, 7.3.2 K. Sc.
6.d.2
- 1. o 7 3.2 K. 7 6.4.2 1.10 6.3.1
- l. 11 N/A L.1 6.4 L, 2 6.4.2 J.1a.
6.3.2 L3 N/A J.1 b.
6.3.2 L. 4 6.4.3 J.1c.
6.3.2 J.1d.
6.3.2 M.1 9.1 J. 2 6.3.2 M.2 9.0 J. 3 6.3.2 M.3 9.0 J. 4 6.3.2 M.4 9.2 J. 5 6.3.2 J 6a.
6.3.3 N 1a 8.6 J.6b.
6.3.3 N 1b 8.6 J. 6c.
6.3.3 N. 2 85 J. 7 6.16.3 N.2a.
8.5.1 J. 8 6.3.1, Appx.10.8 N.2b.
8.5.2 J. 9 N/A N.2c.
8.5.3 O
j NAEP Page 1.6 Revision 21 NORTH ANNA EMERGENCY PLAN 0v-NUREG 0654 CROSS REFERENCE INDEX j
m NUREG 0654 NAEP-i-L Ref Section Section No.
i N. 2d.-
8.5.4 N. 2e.1 8.5.6 N. 2e.2 8.5.5
~ N. 3a..f.
8.5, 8.6 '
N. 4 -
8.6.5 N. 5 8.6.5 O.1 8.3 L
O.1.a 8.4.
O.1.b N/A O.2 8,4 O. 3 6.4.2 Table 8.1
- O. 4a.
8.3.3, Table 8.1 O. 4 b.
Table 8.1 O. 4c.
Table 8.1 O. 4d..
Table 8.1 O. 4e.
Table 8.1 O. 4f.
Table 8.1
' - O O. 4g.
Table 8.1 O. 4h.-
8,4, Table 8.1 O. 4i.
Table 8.1 4-O. 4.
Table 8.1 J-O. 5 8.3.3 P.1 8.3.3 P. 2 8.1 P. 3 8.1 P. 4 -
8.2.1 P. 5 -
8.2.3 P. 6
. Appx.10.1 Index P. 7 10.4 4
. P. 8 Pages i.1 i.6 P. 9 8.9 P.10 8.2.2 i
t b'*
]
i
NAEP
(
Page 1.1 Revision 21
+
NORTH ANNA POWER STATION EMERGENCY PLAN SECTION 1 DEFINITIONS P_R.d SNbitta Pace No.
1.0 Definitions....
1.2 1.1 Acronyms and Abbreviations 1.4 l
i NAEP Page 1.2 Revision 21 g
1.0 Definitions Cl Annually 12 months +/ 3 months.
i i
Biennial Occurring every two years.
e Eptfer Sectors Two 221/2' sectors flanking each side of the 221/2' primary sector.
Commonwealth of Virainia Radiolooical Emeroency Response Plan fCOVRERP)
Annex to Volume il of the Commonwealth of Virginia Emergency Operations Plan -
Peacetime Disasters.
Qgeo Dose Eauivalent (DDE) Direct extemal radiation exposure to the body (e.g., cloud shine, contamination, or direct radiation). DDE is assumed equivalent to Effective (extemal) Dose Equivalent (EDE) with respect to uniform exposure.
Qtri!! A supervised instruction period aimed at testing, developing and maintaining skills.
Effective Date Date of change; implementation date assigned by approval authority; date from which 30 day NRC submittals are required in accordance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix E.V.
Emtrgtn.p.y Any situation that may result in undue nsk to the health and tafety of the n
public and/or site personnel, or significant damage to property or equipment.
Emeraency Action Levels (EALs)
Events, such as equipment malfunctions, natcrat phenomena, radiological dose rates, etc., that may be used as thresholds for initiating V
such specific emergency measures as designating a particular class of emergency, initiating a notification procedure, or initiating a particular protective action.
Emeroency Plan Imnlementina Procedures (EPIPs)
Emergency response procedures that implement the Emergency Plan.
Emeroency Plannina Zones (EPZ):
Plume Exoosure Pathway EPZ An area delineated by an approximate ten-mile radius circle around the North Anna Power Station.
incestion Exoosure Pathway EPZ - An area delineated by an approximate fifty-mile radius circle around the North Anna Power Station with the potential of intemal exposure from the ine estion of radioactive material through the food pathway.
Exclusion Area - The area within a 5000 feet radius of the now abandoned North Anna Unit 3 containment.
Exercise - A test of the response capabilities of the Emergency Organization that permits the evaluation of training and response to a given situation. Exercises are conducted in accordance with pre-planned scenanos with defined objectives.
q v
c NAEP Page 1.3 Revision 21 iriterim A temporay or provisional emerDency response position or facility which is augmented or transferred as resources become available.
Local Counti.g3 This term shall be used to denote the Counties of Louisa, Spotsylvania, Caroline, Orange, and Hanover in the approximate ten (10) mile emergency planning zone.
Local Emeroency One,ations Facility (LEOF) - A near site facility where the Recovery Manager controls the overall emergency response.
Local Media Center (LMC) This facility provides a near site location for official media releases. The Local Media Center is in the North Anna Nuclear information C:mter.
Nearsite Within the Exclusion Area, but beyond Protected Area.
Offsite Beyond the Exclusion Area.
Onsite Within the Protected Area,(surrounded by security fence).
Doerational Suncort Center (OSC) - An hssembly area that serves as the staging location for Damage Control Teams, the Fire Team, the First Aid Team, and the Search and Rescue Team.
Primary Sector - The 221/2' sector which bounds the existing wind direction.
Projected Dose An estimated radioactive dose which affected population groups could potentially receive if no protective actions are taken.
Protected Area (PA) - A designated securit/ area around the operating units and bounded by the double security fence.
Protective Action Guides (PAGs) - The projected dose to individuals in the general population or the dose rate which warrants taking protective actions.
Eptective Actions - Those emergency measures taken before or after an uncontrolled release of radioactive matenal has becurred for the purpose of preventing or minimizing radiological exposure.
Recovery Actions Those actions taken after the emergency to restore the station as nearly as possible to its pre emergency condition.
Rem (Roentoen Eauivalent Man)
.\\ unit of radiation dose that relates exposure to the biological effects of the exposure (absorbed exposure or dose). A unit related to the tem is the millirem (mrem).1 mrem = 1/1000 rem.
Restricted Area - Any area where access is controlled for the purpose of radiation protection.
Semi-annual-Occurring cace during each of the first and last six months of the calendar year.
O
4 NAEP P ge 1.4 Revision 21 q-Hg -The Power Station proper and the 5000 foot radius exclusion area around the
'D Power Station.
Station Emeroency Manaaer(S5M)
Designated onsite individual having the responsibility and authority forimplementing the North Anna Emergency Plan.
Technical Sunoort Center A facility located adjacent to Unit 1 Control Room which will be the central control center for the onsite emergency (esponse organization after the on shift staff has been augmented.
Thyroid Committed Dose Eauivalent (CDE)- Radiation exposure to the thyroid through inhalation or ingestion of radioactive material assuming a 50 year exposure pe od from n
l
- uptake, Total Effective Dnse Eauivalent (TEDE) Ynr sum of extemal and lo9 mal dose.
1.1 Acronyms and Abbreviations Alternating Curretit AC Automatic Ringdown Line ARD Assistant Asst.
Cubic Centimeter cc Cerium Ce Committed Dose Equivalent
-p CDE
(/
CEDE Committed Effective Dose Equivalent -
Central Emergency Operations Facility CEOF Corporate Emergency Response Center CERC I
CERP Corporate Emergency Response Plan Corporat? Fmergency Response Team CERT Code of Federal Regulations CFR Charging System CH COVRERP Commonwealth of Virginia Radiological Emergency Response Plan Counts per minute cpm CR
- Control Room Cs Cesium CSD-Cold Shutdown CVCS Chemical Volume Control System DBE-Design Basis Eartnquake DC Direct Current DDE Deep Dose Equivalent DECON Decontaminate if DEPT.
Department b-
NAEP Page 1.5 Revision 21 Department of EmerDency Services (State)
DES Department of Energy DOE Emergency Administrative Director EAD Emergency Action Levels EALs EAS Emergency Alert System Emergency Core Cooling System ECCS Effective Dose Equivalent EDE For example [from Latin exempli gratia) e.g.
Emergency Maintenance Director EMD NRC Emergency Notification System ENS Emergency Operations Center EOC Emergency Operations Director EOD Emergency Operations Facility EOF Environmental Protection Agency EPA Emergency Procedures Coordinator EPC Emergency Plan implementing Procedures EPIPs Emergency Planni.m Znnes EPZs Emergency Res, se Data System ERDS Emergency Response Facility ERF Emergency Response Facility Computer System ERFCS Emergency Response Guidelines ERGS et cetera etc.
Emergency Technical Director ETD Early Warning System EWS F
Fahrenheit FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency Federal Radiological Monitoring and Assessment Center FRMAC Federal Radiohg. cal Monitonng and AIsessment Plan FRMAP Feet ft GOVT.
Govemment Gallons per minute gpm Health Physics HP Health Physics Network (Communications System)
HPN' High Radiation Sampling System HRSS HSD Hot Shutdown I
lodine O
NAEP Page 1.6 Revision 21 q
in accordance with -
s LAW
. i.e,
- That is [from Latin id est)
Inspection and Enforcement Information Notice (NRC)
IEIN -
Input / Output 1/0 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation ISFSI -
Job Demons'. ration Guide JDG Joint Public Information Center JPlc Potassium lodide Kl Kygon Kr Kilowatt KW Local Area Network LAN License Condition of Operatbn LCO Local Emergency Operations Facility LEOF Lead Federal Agency LFA Local Media Center LMC Loss of Coolant Accident LOCA 3
Liquid Waste System LW Management Counterpart Link MCL-MCV or MCVH -
Medical College of Mrginia or Medical College of Virginia Hospital Meteorologicalinformation und Dese Assessment System MIDAS M:les per hour mph Millirem per hour mR/hr Mean Sea Level MSL J
MWe Megawatt electric Megawatt thermal MWt Not apphcable N/A North Anna Emergency Plan NAEP North Anna Nuclearinformation Center NANIC North Anna Power Station NAPS NDT Nil Ductility Transition Nuclear Emergency Prepersdness NEP NRC
. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NSPEPT
. Nuclear Power Station Emergency Preparedness Training NSSC Nuclear Steam Supply System
'OBE Operating Basis Earthquake j.
ODCM.
Offsite Dose Calculation Manual
, u{~
g w
+,
w w
y.>
NAEP Page 1.7 Revision 21 Off-Premises exchange (Communications System)
OPX Operational Support Center (Onsite Operations Assembly Area)
OSC Protective Action Guides PAGs Private Branch exchange (Communications System)
PBX Package Pk.
Plus Local Support PLS Protective Measures Counterpart Link PMCL Power Operated Relief Valve PORV Pounds per square inch, psi absolute, psi guage psi, psia, psig Remote Assembly Area RAA Radiological Assessment Coordinator RAC RAD, Rad, rred -
Radiological Assessment Director, radiation or radiological depending on context Reactor Coolant Pump RCP Reactor Coolant System RCS Roentgen Equivalent Man Rem Radiological Emergency Response Plan RERP Roentgen per hour R/hr Residual Heat Removal RHR Richmond Intemational Concourse (Airport)
RIC Radiat'on monitor or Radiation Monitoring System depending on context RM,RMG Reactor Operator RO Radiation Protection Supervisor RPS Reactor Safety Counterpart Link RSCL Response Technical Manual RTM Ru Ruthenium Reador Rx Self contained breathing apparatus SCBA Station Emergency Manager SEM Station Emergency Plan SEP Safety injection St Senal number SN Station Nuclear Safety and Operating Committee SNSOC Safety Parameter Display System SPDS Senior Reactor Operator SRO Sealed Surf ace Storage Cask SSSC O
4 NAEP 4
Page 1.8 Revision 21 1
- l STA-Shift Technical Advisor
-SW Service Water system Te Tellurium T.S.
- Tec5nical Specifications TEDE Total Effective Dose Equivalent THY Thyroid 3'
' TLD' Thermoluminescent Dosimeter
-TSC Technical Support Center i=
pCi Micro (p) curie UFSAR Updated Final Safety Analysis Report UHF Ultrahigh frequency (Radio)
U.S.
- United States y
V Volt (s)
-VCU Virginia Commonwealth University
. VG' Vents Gaseous VPAP Virginia Power Administrative Procedure Xe Xenon i
X/O Chi /Q; Dilution and dispersion factor, seconds per cubic meter
(
e
--m v
w 4
r, 4
.c.
1 i
NAEP l
Page 2.1 Revision 21 i
NORTH ANNA POWER STATION EMERGENCY PLAN t
M SECTiON 2 1
SCOPE AND APPLICABILITY i
t i
i 5 U Pace No.
I 2.1 S it e S pe cifics............................................................................................
2.2 i
2.2 Emergency Plan.........
..........................................................................,2.2 2.3 Nort h Ann a Hydroelectric Unit....................................................................... 2.3 9
4 6
i p
4 s
h s
a
. A.
A :
-.e
-ee
4 NAEP Page 2.2 1
Revision 21 i
. (
2.0-Scope and Apolicability L..
2,1 SjlLSpecifics The North Anna Power Station consists of two units, each of which includes a three loop pressurtzed light water reactor, nuclear steam supply system (NSSS)-and turbine generator fumished by Westinghouse Electric Corporation. The balance of the station was designed and constructed by the Company with the assistance of its Architect / Engineer, the Stone and Webster Engineering Corporation. Each reactor unit is designed for a core power output of 2893 MWt which results in a gross electrical output of approximately 960 MWe. The units are locateo on a peninsula on the southem shore of Lake Anna in Louisa County approximately 40 miles North Northwest of Richmond, Virginia; 38 miles East of Charlottesville, Virginia; and 24 miles Southwest of Fredericksburg, Virginia. Cooling water, contained by an earthen dam structure, is obtained from the 17 m;!e long North Anna Reservoir, 2.2 Emeroency Plan -
The North Anna Power Station Emergency Plan (the Plan) describes the organization, facilities, emergency response measures, and functional interfaces with offsite agencies which can be used to respond to a broad range of defined emergencies. The organization has well defined responsibilities and specific authorities which provide for effective control and coordination of the emergency response, both onsite and offsite. The organization is augmented, as required, to address situations with the most serious potential consequences.
The Plan is formulated for compatibility with existing local, State, and Federal response organizations which may render emergency assistance. A coordinated response effort between Virginia Power and other agencies supports the mutual goals of protecting public health and safety and of minimizing damage to both public and pnvate properties, The basic purposes of the P2 n are as follows:
1)
To define 90tential types of emergencies; 2)
To estabish an organization for managing an emergency; J)
To provide measures for coping with an emergency; 4)
To provide facilities from whien to perform selected measures;
- 5).To provide for a recovery program following an emergency; and, 6)
To provkle methods for maintaining the Plan active and current.
l L>
l
(% -
, (-)
._ _ _ _ _ ___... _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _, _ ~
,m.
NAEP Page 2,3 Revision 21 Emerge ncy Plan Implemanting Procedures (EPIPs) provide instructions for xomplishing the provisions established in the Plan.
The procedures guide the classification of the emergency, provide for offsite notifications, and activation of the full response organization. They also provide tediniques for estimating tne consequences of offsite releases and making recommended Protective Action Recommendations.
2.3 North Anna Hydr @ctric Unit in addition to the North Anna Emergency Plan, Virginia Power has prepared an Emergency Action Plan applicable only to the North Anna Hydroelectric Plant. The North Anna Hydroelectric Plant, a small hydroelectric generating unit of 855KW capacity, is operated by Virginia Power and lor:ated on the North Anna River at the Lake Anna Dam (approxirr.ately 5.5 miles Southeast of the North Anna Power Station).
The North Anna Hydroelectric Plant Emergency Action Plan was prepared to conform with the provisions of Title 18 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 12, Subpart C, and was developed in consultation and cooperation with Federal, State, and local agencies responsible for public health and safety.
The action Plan includes provisions for notifying State and downstream counties that may be affected by a classified project (dam) emergency. It also sets forth procedures to be followed by station personnel to control the emergency and to notify the appropriate authorities.
In order to meet the requirements of 18 CFR Part 12, Subpart C, provisions for operation of spillway equipment concurrent with an incident at North Anna Power Station is addressed as part of this plan. Should a (nuclear) station emergency occur, the Auxiliary Operator (s) shal* remain at tne dam to ensure proper operation of spillway gates, unless contacted by Secunty or Operations to evacuate because of safety reasons.
O
i 1'
NAEP.
l' Page 3.1 Revision 21 I
NORTi JNA POWER 8TATION EMERGENCY PLAN i -.
SECTION 3 i
SUMMARY
OF EMERGENCY PLAN 3
T i.
l P_iLrl Sublect Pace No.
4 j
3.0 S umma ry of Emergen cy Pla n.............................................................
3.2 1-1 l
s-5-
d e
i U
t.:
I.
d -
4 d
J.
t d'
..c e
w
. ~, -
m #
NAEP Page 3.2 Res Sion 21 (N
3.0 Summary of Emeroency Plan 5
Types of emergencies are divided into four clacsifications which cover a broad spectrum of potential occurrences. The classifications range from a " Notification of Unusual Event", in which offsite officials are notified of an unusual condition, through " General Emergenev," in which onsite and offsite evacuation may be required and a major state of emergency exists.
This classification scheme is compatible with existing State and local plans.
An emergency response organization is established with specific duties and responsibilities defined, and points of contact between onsite and offsite supporting agencies are designated. Augmentation of the emergency organization will occur at " Alert" and higher levels, and includes activation of both station and corporate emergency response teams. Provisions for prompt notification of State, Local and Federal agencies are established and include pre-planned information which may be required for offsite agency response.
Methods and procedures orovide corrective and protective actions including evaluation of the operability of the unaffected unit. The use of protective equipment, protective action guides and exposure hmits are also pre-specified. The facilities available for assessment and management of the emergency consist of ormW and offsite response facilities, communication system 3, and portable or fixed equipment and systems for detection and measurement of those parameters causing or resulting from the emergency. Medical facilities are also availat'le.
[O A recovery program desenbes the organization and procedural approach required to re-start the affected unit. The recovery program provides guidance for relaxing protective measures that have been instituted and requires the periodic estimation of total population exposure.
The Emergency Plan and Emergency Plan implementing Procedures are reviewed annually. The Station Nuclear Safety and Operating Committee (SNSOC) shall evaluste the review ar.d may provide additional recommendations as necessary. Periodic drills and exercises involving communications, fire fighting, radiological monitoring and Health Physics activities are routinely conducted. A joint exercise involving participation by State and local response agencies will be held on even numoered years at North Anna (on odd-numbered years, the State participates at Surry) to ensure all major elements of the Plan are tested within a six year period.
Federal response agencies may also participate in these joint exarcises. Critiques of each implementation of the Plan allow for entical reviews of technique, methods, and shortcomings.
Improvements will be factored into the Plan and/or implementing Procedures through revisions.
p
)
v
NAEP Page 4.1 Revision 7.1 p-NORTH ANNA POWER STATION EMERGENCY PLAN EQTlON.4 E.tdfRGENCY CONDITIONS h
PEI Sublect Eyj A i
4.0 EmerDency Conditions...
4.2 4.1 Specirum of Postulated Accidents...............
4.2 i
4.2 Emergency Classification System...........................................................
4.2 4.3 State and Local County Emergency Classification System...
4.8 4.4 Requirements For Written Summanes of Emergency Events........................
4.8 i
O t
\\
NAEP.
Page 4.2 Revision 21
(
4.0 Emeroency Conditions The followinD Quidelines describe the criteria used by station personnelin classifyinC or determining the type of an emergency. The types of potential accidents or emergencies ca'1 be numerous and vary in magnitude, Accordingly, the classification system is wide rangcd, although flexible and straight forward. The four classifications are defined in accordance with Appendix 1 of NUREG 0654,"Cnteria for Preparation and Eva!uation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants."
The classification system is not intended to include minor deviations during normal operation.
4.1 SDectrum of Postulated Accidents The spectrum of emergencies peculiar to nuclear power stations range from accidents with r,inor implications on health and safety to the postulation of major occurrences resulting in the release of significant quantities of radioactive material. Examples of minor accidents include unplanned or uncontrolled releases of small amounts of radioactive material in excess of Technical Specification allowable limits as well as equipment malfunctions.
Major occurrences, thoug*1 not expected to take place, have been postulated for planning and design purposes because their consequences could include the potential for release of significant amounts of radioactive material. The range of conditions in Appendix 1 to NUREG 0654 and Section 15 of the North Anns Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) have been included in the classification system of this Plan.
Of the Condition IV Limiting Faults analyzed in the UFSAR, three are considered to have the potential for releasing significant amounts of radioactivity. These are the loss of coolant accident, the steam generator tube rupture accident and the fuel handling accident. The nature of these three accidents is such that a safety analysis can produce results which vary considerably in the radiological consequences. The analysis results depend on assumptions used concermng such items as the status o' pnmary coolant radioactivity conter,t, meteorological conditions, or performance of station safety systems. The UFSAR makes very conservative estimates of the consequences. The Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures are wntten in anticipation of having to contend with these worst case consequences 4.2 Ememency Classification System Emergency conditions which may develop will be categorized as one of the following emergency classifications:
1.
Notification of Unusual Event.
2.
Nert.
3.
Site Area Emergency.
4.
General Emergency.
7 N)
NAEP l
Pagg 4.3 Revision 21 The Notification of Unusual Event classificat,on requires notification of appropriate offsite support groups and station management personnel that an abnormal condition exists at the station. The purpose of this notification is to increase the awareness of key offsite support orgt.nizations and station management of a condition which can currently be managed by the onsite resources, but which could escalate to a more serious condition. The on shift operations personnel are assigned response tasks in accordance witn the pre augmentation organization responsibilities defined in Section 5 of this plan.
The Alert classification is indicative of a more serious condition which has the pote. tial for radioactive release. As a result, the Virginia Power emergency response organization is notified its augment onsite resources and activate corporate emergency response facilities.
The Site Area Emergency classification reflects conditions where some significant radiation releases arc likely or are occurnng, but where a core melt situation is not currently indicated. In this situation, there would be full mobilization in the nearsite environs of monitoring teams and associated communications. A Site Area Emergency can be declared for reasons other than radiological relases.
The General 8 Emergency classification is indicative of actual or imminent substantial core degradation or melting with the potential for loss of containment, or non radiological events which could endanger pubiic health and/or safety. Within fifteen minutes of declaring a General Emergency, predetermined protective action recommendations will be made to the State based on plant and meteorological conditions.
Tables 4.1 - 4.4 hst the initiating conditions for each emergency classification. Appendix 10.11 of this plan provides specific plant parameters for event classification, and EPIP-1.01,
" Emergency Manager Controlkng Procedure", Attachment 1, groups these conditions by event category for easy reference and identification. For each condition, specific indications available from instruments and unit operating response are defined in this EPIP to confirm that the proper thresholds have been met for dectanng a given classification.
O
NAEP Page 4 4 Revision 21 O
TABLE 4.1 INITIATING CONDITIONS' NOTIFICATION OF UNUSUAL EVENT NOTE:
The alpha numenc designator, (A.N), preceding each condition below, indicates the Emergency Action Level designator used in EPIP 1.01, Attechment 1.
I 1.
[A.9) Inability to reach required mode within technical specification limits 2,
[A.10) Failure of a safety or relief valve to close after pressure reduction, which may affect the health and safety of the oublic 3
[A.11] Unplanned loss of most or all Safety system annunciators for greater than 15 minutes 7
4.
[A.12) Loss of communications capability S.
[B.8) RCS leak rate requiring plant shutdown LAW T.S. 3.4.6.2 or 3.4.6.3 6
[B9) Pnmary to Secondary leakage greater than 1 gpm 7.
[C.11) Fuel clad damage indication 8.
[C.12] Independent Spent cuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) Facility event 9.
[E.5) Effluent release greater than ODCM allowable limit
- 10. [G.31 Major secondary line break
- 11. [H.5) Loss of offsite power or onsite AC power capability
- 12. [l 3)
Fire lasting greater than 10 minutes in Protected Area or Service Water Pump / Valve House
- 13. [J4)
Serunty threat, unauthorized attempted entry, or attempted sabotage 14 lK.10) Atreraft crash or unusual aircraft activity 15 l 'i! Train derailment within Protected Area
- 16. Ik 12, Explosion within Protected Area
- 17. [K.1J) C,isite or naarsite release of toxic or flammable liquids or Oases
- 18. [K.14) Turbine rotating component failure with no casing penetration 10 [L.8)
F.arthquane detected
- 20. IL.9)
To'nado within Protected Area or Switchyard O
- 21. [L.10) Hurncane force winds projected Psite within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />
- 22. (L.11] SO y, ar flood or low water level
- 23. [M 4) Station conditions which warrant increased ')wareness of state and/or local authonties O
NAEP Page 4.5 l
Revision 21 TABLE 4,2 INITIATING CONDITIONS: ALERT 1.
[A.5) Totalloss of function needed for un!t CSD condition 2.
[A.6) Failure of the Reactor Protection System in complete a trip which takes the Reactor Subcritical 3,
[A.7) Unplanned loss of bafety system annunciators with compensatory indicators enavailable or a transient in progress 4.
lA.8) Evacuation of Main Control Room required 5.
[B.5)
RCS leak rate limit EXCEEDED 6.
[B.6) Gross pnmary to secondary leakage 7.
[B.7) Excessive pnmary to secondary leakage with loss of offsite power B.
lC.8) Severe Fuel Clad Damage 9.
[C.9) Fuel damage accident with release of radioactivity to coa'ainment or fuel buildings 10 lC.10) Potential for fuel damage to occur dunng refueling 11, 10.3) High Containment radiation, pressure and temperature
- 12. [E.3) Effluent release greater than 10 times ODCM allowable limit
- 13. [E.4) High radiation or airbome contamination levels indicate a severe dagradation in control of radioactive matenal 14 [G2) Major secondary line break with significant pnmary to secondary leakage 15 [H.3) Loss of all offsite and onsite AC power 16 [H 4) Loss of all onsite DC power
- 17. [I.2)
Fire potentially affecting station safety systems 18- [J.3)
Ongoing Secunty compromise
- 19. [K5) Aircraft crash on the f acil ty i
20 [K6)
Explosion damage to f acility
- 21. lK.71 Entry of toxic or flammable gases or liquids into plant f acility
- 22. [K8) Turbine f ailure or missile impact 23 [K9) Missile damage to safety related equipment or structures 24
[L4)
Earthquake greater than oi equal to OBE levels 25 [L5)
Tornado sinking f acility 26 lL 6)
Hurricaa9 force winds projected onsite within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> 27
[L 7)
Flood c..ow water level near design levels 28 [M 3) Station conditions which have the potential to degrade or are actually degrading the level of safety of the station 0
NAEP Page 4.6 Revision 21 TABLE 4.3 O
lNITIATING CONDITIONS: SITE AREA EMERGENCY 1.
[A.ii Loss of function needed for unit HSD condition 2.
[A2] Failure of the Reactor Protection System to initiate and complete a required inp while at power 3.
[A.3] Inability to monitor a significant transient in progress 4.
(A 4] Evacuation of Main Control Room with contiel not established within 16 minutes 6.
[B.3] RCS leak rate limit EXCEEDED 6.
[B 4] Gross pnmary to secondary leakage with loss of offsite power 7.
[C.6] Core damage with possible loss of cootable geometry 8.
lC.7) Major fuel damage accident with radioactivity relecse to containment or fuel buildings 9.
[D2] High-high containment radiation, pressure, and temperature
- 10. [E.2] Release imminent or in progress and site boundary doses projected to exceed 0.1 Rem TEDE or 0.6 Rem Thyroid CDE
- 11. [G.1) Major secondary line break with significant primary to secondvf leakage and fuel damage indicated
- 12. [H.1) Loss of offsite and onsite AC power for more than 1's minutes 13 [H2] Loss of all onsite DC power for greater than 16 mMutes
- 14. [1.1]
Fire resulting in degradatkn of safety systems 1$ [J2]
Imminent loss of physical Station control
- 10. [K 1] Aircraft damage to vital plant systems
- 17. [K.2] Severe explosive damage 18-lK.3] Entry of toxic or flammable gases into plant vital areas other than the Control Room
- 19. [K 4] Severe missile damage to safety systems 20 [L.1)
Earthquake greater than or equal to DBE levels
- 21. [L2]
Extreme wir,as above Design Basis Conditions of 80 mph O
- 22. [L.3]
Flood or low miter level above design levels 23 [M 2] Station condliions which may warrant notification of the public near the site n
NAEP Page 4.7 Revision 2 i TABLE 4.4 INITIATING CONDITIONS: GENER.AL EMERGENCY 1.
[B.1) Loss of 2 of 3 fission product bamers with potentialloss of 3rd barrier 2.
[B.2) Fuel f ailure with steam generator tube rupture 3.
[C.1) Probable large radioactivity release initiated by LOCA with ECCS failure leading to core degradation 4.
[C2) Probable large radioactivity release initiated by loss of heat sink leading to core degradation 5.
!C.3) Probable large radioactivity release initiated by failure of protection system to bnng Rx subcntical and causing core degradation 6.
[C4) Probable large radioactivity release initiated by loss of AC power and all feedwater 7.
[C.5) Probable large radioactivity release initiated by LOCA with loss of ECCS and containment coohng 8
[D.1) Extremely high containment radiation, pressure and temperature 9
[E.1)
Release imminent or in progress and srte boundary doses projected to exceed 1.0 Rem TEDE or 5.0 Rem Thyroid CDE
- 10. lJ1)
Loss of physical Station control 11, lM.1) Any major internal or extemal events which singly or in combin1 tion cause massive damage to station facilities or may warrant evacuation of the public (1QTE The appropriate Protective Action Recommendations for the preceding conditions MUST BE provided to the State within 15 minutes following the declaration of a General Emergency.
O O
NAEP Page 4.8 Revision 21 O
4.3 State and Local County Emeroency Clastfication System The Commonwealth of Virginia Radiological Emergency Respono Plan (COVRERP) gj emergency classification systern defines two levels based on projected radiological doses resulting from the release of radioactive materials from a fixed nuclear facility. Virginia Power will provide projected radiological doses based on plant parameters ano meteorological x
conditions. Provisions are in the COVRERP for dose assessments within 50 miles of the station for the ingestion of radioactive material via the food pathway.
Thresholds used for protective action determination are based on projected doses recommended in Table 2.1 of EPA 400 R 92 001,
- Manual of Protective Action Guides and Protective Actions for Nuclear Incidents", as implemented by the Commonwealth of Virginia.
44 Reavirements For Wntten Summanes of Emeroency Events NUREG 0654, Appendix 1 establishes the guidance for providing wntlen summaries of emergency events to offsite authorities. A written summary is provided to the Co'imonwealth of Virginie Department of Emergency Services (DES) following activation of the North Anna Emergency Plan. The schedule for submitting the wntten Summary for a Notification of Unusual Event is within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> following declaration. For any other classification, the schedule for submitting the wntlen summary is within 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> following tetmination. This schedule was established with the concurrence of DES and subsequent notification to the NRC (reference Letter, Senal Number 84 302, dated 5 3184).
ov umi
NAEP Page5.1 Revision 21
? - r* g NORTH ANNA POWER STATION y;Q/
e f c
.a SECTION 6 4
e ORG AN17.ATIONAL QONTROL OF EMERGENCIES PE1 Subicci Pnoe No.
5.0 Organtzational Contr01 of Emergencies.................................................
5.3 5,1 Norm #i St ation Organiz ation........................................................
5.4 5.2 Onsite Ernergency Organization................................
54 5.2.1 Emergency Positiot, and Team Desenptions.......................................
5.5
=
5.2.1.1 St ation Emergency Manager..........................................
5.5 5.2.1.2 E me rg e n cy C omm u nicalor..........................................
5.6 5.2.1.3 Emergency Procedures Coordinator...............................
5.6 5.2.1.4 Emergency Operations Direetor...............................
5.7 5.2.1.5 Emergency Maintenance Direetor.............................
5.7 5.2.1.6 Emergency TJchnical Director..
5.7 6
5.2.1.7 Shift Technical Advisor.
5.7 5.2.1.8 Emergency Administrative Director.....
5.8 5.2.1.9 Radiological Assessment Director..............
5.8 5.2.1.10 Radiation Protection Supervisor....
5.9 5.2.1.11 Operational Support Center Director............
5.9 (OSC Director) 5.2.1.12 Maintenance Support Team..
5.9 5 2.1.13 Technical Suppor1 Team.
5.9 5 2.1.14 Chemistry Team 5.10 5.2.1.15 Administrative Support Team.
5.10 5.2.1.16 Security Team.
5.10 5.2.1.17 Dose Assessment Team.
5.11 5.2.1.18 OfIsite Monitonng Team.......
5.11 5 2.1.19 Evacuation Monitonng Team..
5.11 5.2.1.20 in. Plant Monitoring Team..
5.11 5.2.1.21 Sample Analys's Team.
5.11 5.2 1.22 Personnel Monitonng And Decontamination Team.
5.11 5.2.1.23 Onsite (Out of Plant) Monitonng Team....
5.11 O
NAEP Page5.2 Revision 21 5.2.1.24 Fi r e T e a m..............................................................
5.11 5.2.1.25 Fi rst Aid T e a m......................................................
5.12 5.2.1.26 Damage Control Team........................
5.12 5.2.1.27 Sea rch and Rescue Te am......................................
5.12 5.3 Augmentation of Onstte Emergency Organization..............................
5.13 5.3.1 CERT Notification and Response................................... -.....
5.13 5.3.1.1 E n viron me nt al Montt on ng...........................................
5.14 5.3.1.2 Logistics Support for Emergency Personnel...................
5.14 5.3.1.3 Technical Support for Planning and Re entry / Recovery Operations..
5.14 5.3.1.4 Interface with Govemmental Authorities.....................
5.14 5 3.1.5 Release of Information to News Media.........................
5.14 5.3.2 Vendor and Contractor Support...............
5.15 5.3.3 Local Services Support.
5.15 54 Coordination with Participating Govemment Agencies.............
5.16 54.1 Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Emergency Services.....
5.17 14.2 Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Health.
5.17 54.3 Additional State Agency Support.
5.18 544 Louisa County..
5.18 5.4.5 Spotsylvania. Caroline, Hanover, and Orange Counties........
5.19 54.6 Counties and Cities Within the Fifty Mile Ingestion Emergency Planning Zons 5.19 54.7 Federal Radiological Monitonng and Assessment Center (FRMAC)
Operations Plan 5.20 Table 5.1 Minimum Shift Manning Requirements.
5.21 Table 5 2 Emergency and Recovery Corporate Response Required for NL clear Station Emergencies (Alert Status And Above).
5.23 Table 5.3 Cities and Counties Within the North Anna 50 Mile Emergency Planning Zone.
5.24 Figure 5.1 Station Emergency Organization Pnor to Augmentation.........
5.25 Figure 5.2 Statiori Emergency Organization Following Augmentation.
5.26 Figure 5.3 Station to Support Group Interf ace Pnor to Augmentation of the Onsite Emergency organization.....
5.27 Figure 5 4 Station to Support Group Interface Aher LEOF Activation.
5.28 O
.J
T NAEP Page5.3 i
Revision 21 1
5.0 Omanizational Control of Ememencies An integral part of this Emergency plan is to assure that classifications of Notification of Unusual Event, Alert, Site Area Emergency, and General Emergency are consistently made in a timely manner. All employees are instructed to contact the Shift Supervisor to report any emergency. This notification and the informatbn available to the Shift Supervisor in the Control Room enable a timely classification of the emergency and subsequent actions.
The Shift Supervisor or Assistant Shift Supervisor i itia!!y acts in the capacity of the Station Emergency Manager (SEM) and takes actions as outlined in the EPIPs. If required by j
the emergency classification, or if deemed appropriate by the Station Emergency Manager, emergency response personnel will be notified and instructed to report to their emergency response locations. The Shift Supervisor is relieved as Station Emergency Manager when the Station Manager or his designated attemate reports to the station (normally to the Control Room) and is updated as to the status of the unit, the emergency actions taken, and the current status of the emergency. Following this relief, the Station Emergency Manager may relocate to the onsite Technical Support Center (TSC).
The Local Emergency Operations Facility (LEOF) is activated concurrent with the TSC.
The LEOF is staffed by station and corporate personnel, including the Recovery Manager, who j
directs the activities of this facility. Once the LEOF is staffed, the Recovery Manager becomes the liaison between the in plant emergency organization headed by the Station Emergency j
Manager and the Corporate Emergency Response Team (CERT). The Recovery Manager is responsible for ensunng the LEOF communicates emergency status to the State and local governments, directs the efforts of the offsite monitoring teams, makes radiological assessments, and recommends offsite protective measures to the State. Other duties include arranging through the CERT for dispatch of any special assistance or services requested by the station and to review, as required, news releases to the public and the media. Specific information relating to the staffing and reporting structure of the LEOF organization is provided in the Corporate Emergency Response Plan (CERP).
The Recovery Manager reports to the Corporate Response Manager who directs the activities of the CERT at the Corporate Emergency Response Center (CERC). The CERC will be activated at the ALERT or higher emergency classification. The Corporata Response Manager is a senior level company representative who is responsible to the President of the Company for the total execution of the company's emergency response effort. He has the ultimate authonty to commit company resources and set policy as part of managing the long term recovery effort. More detailed information on the composition of the CERT and their responsibilities is provided in the CERP.
p.,.
d
-,,,-,--nw,,
,e e
,e
NAEP Page54 Revision 21 5.1 Normal Station Ornanization The Station Manager is ultimately responsible for the operation of the Station. The minimum staff required to conduct Station operation is maintained at the station at all times.
For purposes of the Emergency Plan, the on-shift manning is assumed to be on back shift because the norrnal station complement of personnelis only present during regutar duty hours on scheduled work days.
The basic shift (back shift) complement of personnel is comprised of Operations, Health Physics, Chemistry, and Secunty personnel with coverage by Maintenance on designated shifts. In addition, technical / engineering support is available on all shifts from the Shift Technical Advisor (STA). Station administrative procedures provide the details of the normal station organization including reporting relationships.
5.2 Onsite Emeraency Oroanization The first hne of controlin an emergency at North Anna Power Station lies with the on.
shift personnel. The shift complement is staffed with personnel qualified to take the initial actions necessary to respond to an emergency. The organizational relationship of the on shift emergency organization prior to augmentation is shown in Figure 5.1.
Coverage by the Chemistry Team and the Damage Control Team would be provided on an as needed basis.
However, augmentation of the onsite emergency organization will specifically provide such coverage Also, personnel assigned to the Search and Rescue Team, the First Aid Team, and the Fire Team may be assigned other functions until their services are required. The capability of the on shift personnel to effectively manage an emergency is assured by th9 timely call out of supplementary emergency response personnel. The capabilities of the assigned on shift personnel are adequate to assess the condition of the affected unit (s), take initial mitigative actions in accordance with emergency operating procedures, make notifications to off site authonties, and initiate a call out of supplementary emergency response personnel as required.
The EPIPs are used to procedurally control these actions.
Should the Station Emergency Manager deem that additional emergency response personnel are needed or the emergency classification is upgraded to Aler1 or higher, he shall initiate the augmentation of the on shift Emergency Organization by instructing Station Secunty to commence callout of supplementary emergency response personnel. Table 5.1 represent the minimum number of personnel that are required to augment emergency operations and the estimated response times of these 9ersonnel.
O
NAEP Page5.5 Revision 21 O
Tho responsibilities of :he emergency response personnel assigned on shift and those who make up the augmentation crews meet the staffing functions identified in Table B 1 of NUREG 0654. The numbers of emergency response personnel designated for both the on-shift and augmentation contingents meet or exceed the guidance. Sufficient training has been provided for the on shift personnel to ensure that the response actions needed to bnng the affected unit (s) to a stable condition in preparation for the longer term recovery will be taken.
If an emergency occurs on one of the two units, the Shift Supervisor or Assistant Shift Supervisor assumes the operational responsibility for the unaffected unit, This allows the other Supervisor to assume the position of Station Emergency Manager until relieved. Figure 5.2 shows the station emergency organintion after full augmentation.
5.2.1 Emeroency Position and Team Descriptions The Stction Emergency organization, when fully implemented, will consist of at least the positions discussed below, Reporting relationships are as depicted in Figure 5.2. Additional personnel may be designated by Station Management as emergency responders providing special expertise deemed beneficial, but not mandatory, to the planned response.
The individuals assigned as interim, pnmary and attemate responders for the emergency positions will be designated by Station Management based on the technical requirements of the position.
Guidance for selection of emergency responders is provided in administrative procedures. Designated individuals will receive training in accordance with Section 8 of the North Anna Emergency Plan.
5.2,1.1 $1ation Emencency Manacer The Station Emergency Manager (SEM) has the responsibility of managing and directing emergency operations dunng the course of the emergency. The SEM tr'itially operates from the Control Room and then transitions to the Technical Support Center. The SEM ultimately reports to the Recovery Manager, once augmented. SEM responsibilities shallinclude, but not be limited to:
- 1) Classifying the emergency,
- 2) Authonzing notification to the NRC, State and local agencies of the emergency status,
- 3) Recomme. Jing protective measures,
- 4) Authonzing emergency exposure limits,
- 5) Activating emergency personnel and f acilities,
- 6) Reducing power or shutting down both reactors,
- 7) Committing company funds as necessary, p
- 8) Acquinng emergency equipment or supplies,
NAEP Page5.6 Revision 21
- 9) Ordering site evacuation,
- 10) Restncling access to the site,
- 11) Notifying company management,
- 12) Implementing work schedules, and
- 13) Directing onsite emergency activities.
Items 1 through 4 above MAY NOT BE DELEGATED. Upon activation of the LEOF, the Recovery Manager will be responsible for assuming the non.
delegatable responsibilities of notifying State and local govemments of the emergency status, and for recommending offsite protective measures to the State.
5.2.1.2 Emeroency Communicator The Emergency Communicators report to the SEM in the Control Room prior to activation of the TSC, and to the TSC after its activation. The duties of the Emergency communicators are to initially notify and periodically update the Emergency Operations Centers of the counties within the 10-mile Emergency Planning Zone, the State Department of Emergency Services (DES), and the NRC. Upon activation of the LEOF, the LEOF staff becomes responsible for notification of State and local govemments. The minimum information to be conveyed is specified in the EPIPs.
5.2.1.3 Emeroency Procedures Coordinator The Ernergency Procedures Coordinator (EPC) will report to the SEM in the Control Room and then relocates to the TSC as part of the augmentation of the on shift emergency organization.
The responsibilities of the EPC include:
1)
Assisting tne SEM in assuring all appropriate procedures and responses are initiated, 2)
Monitonng emergency action level entry conditions, 3)
Assisting the SEM in maintaining a working document of the controlling EPIP procedures and other appropriate procedures, 4)
Assisting the SEM in obtaining all procedures generated as a result of the emergency, 5)
Reviewing procedures for accuracy and completeness,and 6)
Assisting in the preparation of these documents for review by the Station Nuclear Safety and Operating Committee.
O
_ ~
i NAEP Pege5.7 Revision 21 i
O 6.2.1 A Emeroency Operahons Director The Emergency Operations Director (EOD) reports to the SEM in the Technical Support Center as part of the augmentation of the on shift emergency organization, His duties include directing the activities of Operations personnel, advising the SEM on emergency operations, and directing the development of procedures necessary for conducting emergency operations.
5.2.1.5 Emeroency Maintenance Director The Emergency Maintenance Director (EMD) reports to the SEM in the TSC as part of the augmentation of the on shift emergency organization. He directs the activities of the Maintenance Support Team. When a need for their services arises, the Damage Control Teams, will be delegated to him by the Operational Support Center Director Also, the EMD is responsible for advising the SEM on emergency maintenance activities including planring, scheduling, and material requisitioning. He coordinates the work priorities for emergency maintenance with the SEM and directs the development of procedures necessary for conducting emergency maintenance.
5.2.1.6 Emeroency Technical Director The Emergency Technical Director (ETD) reports to the SEM in the TSC as part of the augmentation of the on shift emergency organization. He directs the activities of the Technical Support Team. The Emergency Technical Director will analyze mechanical, electrical, instrumentation and control, hydraulic, thermodynamic, and reactor physics problems, and develop solutions to the problems He shall provide technical support to the SEM and assist in developing procedures necessary for conducting emergency operations and maintenance.
5.2.1,7 Shift Technical Advisor The Shift Technical Advisor (Control Room) will remain in the Control Room to advise the Shift Superv.sor or Assistant Shift Supervisor on operations activities. He also provides engineering support until tt.e Technical Support Team is staffed. Shift Technical Advisor (STA) coverage is provided on a 24-hour per day,7 days per week on shift basis to enable timely assistance in the Control Room.
5.2.1.8 Ememency Administrative Director The Emergency Administrative Director (EAD) reports to the SEM in the TSC as part of the augmentation of the on shift emergency organization. He g
directs activities of the Administrative Support Team and advises the Station
(
~.. --
,..a
.. ~.
NAEP Page5.8 Revision 21 Emergency Manager on erngency First Aid, Fire Protection, Secunty, Administrative and Logistical Support activities. He coordinates the acquisition of equipment, supplies, personnel, and other assistance needed to cope with the emergency. He also ensures that the TSC log keeper maintains a chronological record of key ever/.s.
5.2.1.9 Radioloaical Assessment Director The Radiological Assessment Director (RAD) reports to the Station Emergency Manager in the Technical Support Center after relieving the interim director w.io was the Senior Radiological Protection representative on site at the initiation of the emergency He orects the activities of the Radiation Protection Supervisor in maintaining the Radiation Protection Program on site during an emergency. He also directs the activities of the Dose Assessment Team and Offsite Monitonng Teams in determining offsite consequences of radiological releases until control is assumed by the Radiological Assessment Coordinator (RAC) of the LEOF.
Other duties of the Radiological Assessment Director are to provide the status of offsite releases to the Station Emergency Manager, to direct the activities of the Chemistry Team (following augmentation), to evaluate radiological conditions and recommend onslie and ohsite protective actions to the Station Emergency Manager, to prov!de recommendations and Health Physics coverage for onsite corrective actions, to direct decontamination efforts, and to provide advice and monitonng for evacuation of on site personnel.
5.2.1.10 Radiation Protection Supervisor
?he position of Radiation Protection Supervisor will be filled upon augmentation of the on shift emergency organization. The Radiation Protection Supervisor normally operates from the Station Health Physics office and reports to the Radiological Assessment Director. The Radiation Protection Supervisor directs the activities of the in Plant Monitonng Team, the Sample Analysis Team, the Personnel Monitonno and Decontamination Team, the Onsite (Out of Plant) Monitonns Team, and the Evacuation Monhonny Team. He will also provide radiological support, as needed, to the Fire Team, First Aid Team, Search and Rescue Team, and the Damage Control Team. Additional duties include evaluating onsite radiological conditions, ensuring that appropriate monitonng and sampling is performed, venfying that appropriate personnel monitonng is performed and personnel exposures are evaluated, and maintainmg dose records, He shall also recommend onsite protective measures
NAEP Page5.9 Revision 21 to the Radiological Assessment Director and provide him with survey results a,W sample analysis results needed for offsite dose assessment.
i 5.2.1.11 Onorational Sunoort Canter Director f0SC Director)
Upon augmentation of the onsite shift, the position of OSC Director will be manned. He will base his activities from the Operational Support Center and shall report to the Station Emergency Manager. The duties and responsibilities of the OSC Director include accounting for as well as dispatching the Fire Team, the First Aid Team, the Damage Control Team, the Search and Rescue Team, and the standby Operations personnel. He shall also coordinate the response of the above teams and personnel when directed to do so by the Station Emergency Manager or his designee.
5.2.1.12 Maintenance sunoort Team The Maintenance Support Team will operate out of the TSC or the OSC under the direction of the EMD after augmentation of the on shift emergency organization. The Maintenance Support Team plans required maintenance evolutions, develops emergency maintenance proceduret, arranges for material acquisition, and can direct the efforts of the Damage Control Teams, if activated.
5.2.1.13 Technical Suoood Team The Technical Support Team will operate out of the TSC under the direction of the ETD after augmentation of the on shift emergency organization.
The Team members include sn Operational Advisor, a Reactor Engineer, a Mechanical and an Electrical Engineer. The on-duty Shift Technical Advisor has the required training to provide technical support until the Team is fully manned.
The Team shall assist the ETO in analyzing electrical, mechanical, instrumentation and control, chemistry, reactor physics, hydraulic and thermodynamic problems and in developing solutions to the problems. The Team shall also assist in developing procedures necessary to deal with the emergency condition.
5.2.1.14 Chemistry T. nam The Chemistry Team, after augmentation, reports to the RAD / designee and operates out of the Chemi e 3rea of the Station.
The Chemistry Team.: conduct the necessary chemistry sampling and sample analysis. The Teart.
- 11 also obtain post accident liquid and gaseous samples, as directed.
./D t
)
v.
NAEP Page 5.10 Revision 21 5.2.1,15 Administrative suonort Team The Administrative Support Team will assist the Emergency Administrative Director on emergency fire protection, securtty, administrative and logistical support activities. The Team will also provide clerical and records support.
If the emergency is Security related, the Administrative Support Team Leader may report directly to the Station Emergency Manager. In a fire or first aid emergency, the Safety / Loss Prevention representative may transfer from the Administrative Support team and report directly to the Station Emergency Manager.
5.2.1.16 Security Team Tne Secunty Team reports to the EAD. The Team will maintain personnel accountabihty, provide she access control, provide station security, and activate the Local Emergency Operations Facility. The Team will also maintain haison and communications with local law enforcement agencies in accordance with procedural guidelines or when directed to do so by the Station Emergency Manager.
5.2.1.17 Dose Assessment Team This Team will operate out of the TSC under the direction of the RAD.
The Dose Assessment Team maintains contact with and transmits instructions to Offsite MonitonnD Teams, performs offsite dose assessment calculations, and provides the Radiological Assest, ment Director with offsite release calculations and dose projectior,s The Team will also assign an individual to transrnit Health Physics and environmental information to the NRC using the Health Physics Network (HPN) phone, until the LEOF is activated.
Once the LEOF is activated the Dose Assessment Team Leader will report the results of the offsite :eleases and dose projections to date to the RAC.
The Dose Assessment Team Leader will also inform the RAC of the locations of the Offsite Monitoring Teams and of the current data received from these teams.
Control of Offsite Monitonng Teams and asponsibility for making HPN notiftcations will transfer to the LEOF. The Dose Assessment Team will then provide support to the RAD regarding onsite response and interface with the LEOF.
5.2.1.18 Offsite Monitonna Teams These Teams will report to the Dose Assessment Team in the TSC or to the RAC in the LEOF, once activated. These Teams will provide offsite
_ -.~. _
NAEP Page 5.1' Revision 21 monitoring and sample collection as directed by the Dose Assessment Team or the RAC.
5.2.1.19 Evacuation Monitorino Team This Team is under the direction of Radiation Protection Supervisor and is activated at the Remote Assembly Area only if a site evacuation is ordered.
1 The duties of this Team include monitoring station personnel at the Remote Assembly Area following a sHe evacuation, collecting evacuated personnel dosimetry, and decontaminating personnel as necessary.
5.2.1.20 In olant Monitorino Team The in Plant Monitoring Team reports to the Radiation Protection Supervisor in the Station Health Physics Office. This Team will perform monitonng and sample collection inside the protected area. The team will also provide monitoring services to the Search and Rescue Team, the Damage Control Team, the Fire Team, and the First Aid Team, if required.
5.2.1.21 Samole Analysis Team The Sample Analysis Team reports to the Radiation Protection Supervisor in the Station Health Physics Office. The team shall analyze samples collected offsite as well as post accident liquid and gaseous samples.
5.2.1.22 Personnel Monitonna and Dr. contamination Tfy; This Team reports to the RPS in the 3tation HP Office. The Team will monitor personnel, decontaminate personn91, and provide monitoring services to the Search and Rescue Team, the Damt.ge Control Team, the Fire Team, and the First Aid Team,if required-5.2.1.23 Onstte (Out of Plant) Monttorino Team This Team reports to the RPS ard operates out of the Station HP Office.
The team will perform monitoring and sa nple collection within the site boundary but outside the protected area.
5.2.1.24 Fire Team The Fire Team members arriving at the Station to augment the on shift Fire Team will report to the Loss Prevention Coordinator in the OSC and rertain there until their services are needed. Uxn activatiott, the Team reports to the Loss Prevention Coordinator, Station Emergency Manager or responsible Emergency Director, as needed.
The Fan Team will combat fireT in accordance with the Station Fire Protection Program. The on shift Fire Team members with other duties will not Od
NAEP Page5.12 Revision 21 report to the OSC, but will remain in their nctmal duties unless called out to combat a fire.
5.2.1.25 First Aid Team The First Aid Team members reporting to the Station to augment the on.
shift First And Team will report to the Loss Prevention Coordinator in the OSC and remain there un'll their services are needed. Upon activation, the Team reports to the Loss Prevention Coordinator, Ctation Emergency Manager or responsible Emergency Director, as needed.
The Team will respond to first aid emerDencies in accordance with the Station Administrative Procedures and in accordance with standard first aid practices.
The on shift First Aid Team members will remain in their normal duties unless activated to respond to a first aid emergency.
5.2.1.26 Damaae control Tesin The Damage Control Team will report to the OSC Director. When their support is required, the team will report to the EMD or the responsible emergency director as needed.
The Damage Control Team will perform emergency assessment and repairs. The Team composition will be determined by the technical expertise required to address the specific problem. Personnel capable of dealing with mechanical, electncal, or instrumentation problems will be assigned to the Team.
5.2.1.27 Search and Rescue Team This Team will report to the OSC Director in the OSC until circumstances require their function to be performed. Upon activation the Team will report to the SEM, the Safety / Loss Prevention representative or the designated Emergency Director as needed.
Prior to amval of augmentary personnel, an on shift Fire Team Scene Leader will lead the Team. The Team members will be members of the Fire Team and the First Aid Team. The Search and Rescue Team will search for and rescue personnel following an explosion, a fire, or any other hazardous eve;.t. The Team can be used to locate personnel who are unaccounted for during an emergency.
O
NAEP Page 5.13 l
Revision 21 5.3 6MQ.. ation of Onsite Ememency Omanization f
The S:stion Emergency Manager has the authenty to request assistance from any organi ation which he deems necessary to mitigate the conditions causing the emergency. In t
l addition, the Station Emergency Manager may request offshe assistance in fire fightir% rescue I
services, icw enforcement, and medical support prior to augmentation of the onsite emergency organization (see Figure 5.3). The participating agencies and support service! with whom l
emergency support services have been negotiated are listed, by letters of agreement, in Appendix 10.1 of this Plan.
If conditions at the Station r3 quire an Alert or higher classification, the CERC, LEOF, TSC and OSC shall be activated. The facility activation goal for the LEOF, TSC and OSC is approximately 60 minutes. The Station Emergency Manager would normally forward information or request additional support through the Recovery Manager located in the LEOF (See Figure SA). Upon completion of the notification, the Recovery Manager would notify the Corporate Response Manager and provide recommendations conceming additional manpowe., equipment, services, and the overall participation of the Corporate Emergency Response Team (CERT).
Additional resources shall be obtained through personnel assigned to the CERT.
Those additional personnel directed to report to the site dunng the emergency shall report to either the Station Emergency Manager or Recovery Manager for assignment, as appropriate.
The Corporate Response Manager has the ultimate responsibility for directing the corporate emergency response. Corporate support would be coordinated between the Station Emergency Manager and the Recovery Manager at the LEOF. The Recovery Manager and his staff will serve as the point of contact between station personnel, the corporate emergency response staff, and govemmental authonties.
In the event that the LEOF becomes uninhabitable, the functions of the LEOF will be transferred to the Central EOF (CEOF) located in Glen Allen, Virginia.
531 CERT Notification and Response i
The EPIPs provide for notification of Corporate Secunty to activate the Corporate Emergency Response Team in the Event of an Alert, Site Area Emergency or General Emergency. This will atso activate the Corporate Emergency Response Plan as the team members report to the Corporate Emergency Response Center (CERC) in Glen Allen, Virginia. Upon activation of the LEOF, the Recovery Manager will become the haison between the Station and the CERC, He will provide recommendations conceming the corporate response based on the emergency classification.
The Corporate Emergency Response Plan establishes the necessary guidelincs for both the CERC and the LEOF to assist the station staff in managing the emergency. These O
6
-+
NAEP Page5.14 Revision 21 include the following functions which may be necessary for emergency mitigation and 4
recovery:
l 5.3.1.1 Environmentrl Mondonna i
Provisions for obtaining additional environmental monitoring personnel shall be the responsibility o' the CERT 5.3.L2 Loaistics Support for Ememency Personnel CERT Administrative Services will be responsible for all administration and logistics including accommodations, Corporate communications, purchasing, finance, commissary, sanitary, transportation, and securtty services.
5.3.1.3 Technical Support for Plannina and Re-entry / Recovery Operations Technical support for recovery and subsequent re entry would be directed by the Recovery Manager. Trained technical personnel are availsble in the areas of nuclear fuel management, water quality, air qualdy, engineering, health physics, and chemistry. Additional technical support would be obtained from Surry Power Station, A/E, and NSSS vendor. Consulting services would be obtained as necessary.
5.3.1.4 interface with Govemmental Authorities CERT management is responsible for contacting govemmental agencies when coordinating mobikzation of resources or requesting additional support.
The Local Emergency Operations Facility, once activated, serves as pnneipal point of interaction between Station and govemmental authorities once they are mobilized.
5,3.1.5 Release of information to News Media News releases shall be coordinated with the External Affairs Department. The Chief Technical Spokesperson is responsible for meeting with the news media.
Releases will be coordinated with the appropriate governmental authorities.
Onefings will be conducted at the Joint Public Information Center in the Corporate offices and the Local Media Center in the North Anna N"-tear information Center (NANIC). The Recovery Manager will review news releases for technical accuracy when the LEOF is activated. At any other time, the Corporate Office will relate newsworthy information to the media.
O
i NAEP Page f.15 Revisic'i 21 O
5.3.2 Vendor anti Contractor Suonort Support will be obtained fr;m the A/E, the NSSS vendor, end other consultants and vendors as needed to respond to the emergency and recovery operations.
Experienced personnel with in-depth expertise in Stat!on design, engineering and construction will be obtained to aid in solving critical technical problems.
j This support is normally solicited by the Corporate Response Manager or his representative. In the event of an emergency, Westinghouse (the NSSS vendor) will also be informed of the plant status. In addition, the institute of Nuclear Power Operations can be contacted to provide sources of additional support,if necessary, in addition, radiological count laboratory resources are available through the Commonwenith to respond to an emergency at the Station. These resources include thott facilities listed below.
Estimated travel times to the station are provided parenthetically; L
University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA (45 minutes)
L Virginia Commonwealth Labatories, Richmond, VA G5 minutes) 3.
Medical College of Virginia, Richmorir, VA US minutes) 4.
Newport News Shipbuilding & Dydock, Newport News, VA (31/2 hours) 5.
State Mobile Laboratory (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br />)
If required at the time of the event, additional resources can be obtained through v
purchase agreements with pnvate institutions. These agreements would not be prepared in advance, but would be negotiated on an as needeo casis.
5.3.3 latal Services Supoort Agreements have been arranged to provide fire figPting, rescue squad, medical and hospital services. Procedures for obtaining offsite services are provided in the EPlPs.
Responding rescue squads are trained in the handling, treatment, and transportation of injured personnel.
The Medical College of Virginia (MCV) has developed an Emergency Plan designed to provide medical care in the case of a radiation emergency. The MCV Radiation Emergency Plan supports the Virginia Power nuclear power stations in the case of occupational and/or major accidents, including contaminated personnel. In the event of a need for their support, a call ahead to MOV will be made to alert them to activate their Radiation Emergency Plan. A copy of the plan is maintained on file by Nuclear Emergency Preparedness Department and is incorporated into this plan by reference as Appendix 10.9 Letters of Agreement in support of the North Anna Emergency Plan are re-negotiated once every 2 years. These agreements and new agreements will be included 7V
NAEP Page5.16 Revision 21 in Appendix 10.1 at the next plan revision. Agreement letters are limited to Federal, State, Local, and volunteer organizations.
Negotiation responsibility lies with the Director Nuclear Emergency Preparedness.
5.4 Coordination with Particioatino Govemment Aoencies The State organization for response to radiological emergencies is based on normal govemmental structures and channels of communication. The Govemor, in his role as Director of Emergency Services, directs the emergency response through the State Coordinator of Emergency Services. The State Courdinator of Emergency Services coordinates the overall response, and the Department of Health provides technical advice and assistance on radiological accident assessment, protective action, radiological control, and radiological monitonng.
Responsibility for radiological emergency response.ests primarily with the elected officials of local governments. As time is a major factor in realizing the benefits of protective action in the event of a radiological emergency, certain of these actions are predetermined and agreed upon by the local goveming body and are implemented without delay upon notification of a radiological emergency.
An Insta phone (dedicated county and state ringdown loop),
continuously monitored by the Operations Shift, with extensions available in the Control Room, TSC and LEOF, is used for normal transmission of emergency notifications to these authorities (See Section 7.2.2.5). Procedures for authentication of an emergency, via the use of restricted, unpublished call-back telephone numbers, are maintained in State and local Radiological Emergency Response Plans. When notification is received, the Commonwealth of Virginia Rcdiological Emergency Response Plan is implemented and the State Department of Health initiates action to assess and evaluate the radiological situation in order to provide guidance and assistance to local governments. After the initial immediate actions, subsequent protective actions are made based on the results of the State evaluation of the radiological situation and Virginia Power recommendations State and Federal agencies provide assistance as required.
Response operations at the State level are coordinated by the Department of Emergency Services.
The State will also provide police support dunng activation of this plan. In the event of an emergency, the dispatcher at tne State Police Headquarters in Richmond, Virginia would normally be called. The first response would most likely be from police units normally based in the local area. These resources would be supplemented by additional units dispatched from other parts of the state. The State Police would also provide traffic control and additional secunty.
The State Department of Game and inland Fisheries is also part of the response to this Plan. Their role would be to assist in monitonng Lake Anna and provide knowledge of local
I NAEP Page 5.17 Revision 21 terrain. The local County Shenffs of Louisa and Spotsylvania counties also respond to this Plan.
\\
They can perform essentially the same functions as the State Police and coordinale their efforts with that organization.
in the event of an emergency, the Station will be in communicatior, with the Louisa, Spotsylvania, Orange, Hanover, and Caroline Directors of Emergency Services who have the capability of activating their Emergency Operations Centers. The Station relies upon these counties to provide assistance in the event an evacuation from the site requires a remote assembly point or for any services the counties are capable of providing to mitigate the results of the emergency.
The Station will also maintain close contact with the NRC Operations Center and/or the NRC Region ll offices in Atlanta, Georgia. This is an important function to ensure that accurate information and assessment of the emergency are available to the Federal Govemment. As a result of these communications, the NRC can best appraise their response to the emergency. In a like manner, the U.S. Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations, is available to provide radiological assista~ ice to the Station.
The Station has the responsibility to provide to supporting agencies involved in the recovery cf the facility or participating in controlling the emergency the necessary information to permit thera to use their resources it the case of the local counties, the Company provides communicatie and, when needed, training. This training takes the form of participation in drills and exercises by the county and radiological training for members of local volunteer rescue squads and fire departments. The Company and/or Station will arrange drills and exercises on a routine basis to ensure the plan is workable and to gain experience in its implementation.
The total effort of all parties involved shall be directed toward minimizing the results of an emergency and working toward the recovery of the facility with the least impact on the population at large.
54.1 Commonwealth of Viroinia Department of Emeroency Services The State Coordinator of Emergency Services coordinates the overall response operations at the State level and performs specific duties as defined in the COVRERP.
The State Emergency Operations Center is located in Richmond, Virginia.
There are local Emergency Operations Centers in Louisa and Spotsylvania Counties.
The State Department of Emergency Services (DES) will send appropnate liaison personnel to the Local Emergency Operations Facility upon activation.
54.2 Commonwealth of Verniriia Denar1 ment of Health Department of Health personnel, in coordination with the DES, provide technical advice and assistance on radiological accident assessment, protective actions, V
NAEP Page 5.18 Revision 21 radiological exposure control, an0 radiological monitoring. (See the COVRERP for more specific information )
Upon an Alert or higher classification, the State Department of Emergency Services will notify the Radiological Health Section, Department o' Health. The Department of Health will implement its response proce(bres in accordance with the COVRERP. Included in the planned response is a team sent to the Virginia Povver LEOF which provides direct interf ace between the Department of Health and the Virginia Power Radiological Assessment Coordinator.
The local county health department is the pnmary health response agency, with the State Health Department providing assistance to them as required, with emphasis on the special requirements for those individucts who are contaminated with radioactivity.
Accident assessment personnel, as part of the Radiological Emergency Response Team will operate from the State EOC.
S 4.3 Additional State Aaency Supo.Q.d Additional State organizations having possible responsibilities in a radiological emergency are listed in COVRERP, Annex l V to Volume 11, Appendix 2, Organization.
Requests for support services from these organizations will be coordinated through DES by the SEM or the Recovery Manager.
5.4.4 Louisa County The authonty and resoonsibilities of Louisa County are presented in the Louisa County Radiological Emergency Response Plan (RERP). The Louisa County Radiological Emergericy Response Plan apphes to radiological emergencies within the county and:
a.
Assigns responsibilitier, to county offices and orDaniza90ns for radiological i
l emergency response and preparedness.
b Sets forth procedures for disseminating warning of radiological emergencies to the citizens of the county.
c.
Specifies response actions :.,r specific emergency classifications.
d.
Delineates the solicies and concepts under which the county government will operate in radiological emergency response.
Upon notification from the Station Emergency Manager, the Shenff's Office will notify the County Coordinator of Emergency Services, or his designated representative, who shalt:
a.
Verify the notification from the Power Station.
b.
Initiate the key county official's alert system.
O
NAEP Page 5.19 Revision 21 c.
Initiate public waming procedures, as authorized by the appropriate State v
authority.
d.
Prepare for evacuation of people for the affected area if authonzed by the appropriate State authority.
The County Coordinator of Emergency Services or his representative will cctivate and ensure that the EOC is manned 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> per ::ay.
Once initial notifications are complete, the Station Emergency Manager or Recovery Manager provides periodic status reports to the County Coordinator of Emergency Services. These reports will include any changes in status or emergency classification. The County Sheriff's Office will serve as the local point for official communicklions within and out of the county, prior to establishmont of the County Emergency i
.ons Center (EOC). When the EOC is established, this responsibility will transferis a EOC.
5.4.5 Sootsvivania. Caroline. Hanover. and Orance Counties The authority and responsibilities of the above counties during a radiological emergency are presented in their respective RERP.
The RERPs apply to the radiological emergencies within these localities caused by events at the North Anna Power Station. The Spotsylvania, Caroline, Hanover, and Orange County RERPs are identical to the Louisa RERP. as described in Section 5.4.4 of thir Plan, except for J
information that is specific to the respective counties.
In the event of an emergency of any classification, the SEM will notify all local jurisdictions (Louisa. Spotsylvania. Caroline, Hanover, and Orange and the State) by using the insta phone loop. If the insta ph' a is out of service, regular commercial telephone will be used to r,1ake the notificatio.,s and the above localities have a system to call back to the power station and venfy the mr All local jurisdictions avide 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> per day coverage.
54.6 Counties and Cities Within the Fifty Mile inoestion Ememency Plannino Zone (EPZ)
The counties that are directly involved in the emergency plan are Louisa and Spotsylvania. These counlics are the major component of the 10 mile zone. They have emergency response functions as previously stated in this section. The counties and cities within the fifty mile EPZ are hsted in Table 5 3. In the event of an emergency, notification and coordination with these entities is the responsibility of the State Department of Emergency Services.
n v
[
NAEP Page 5.20 Revision 21 5.4.7 Federal Radioloaical Monitorina and Assessment Center (FRMAC)
Ooerations Plan The FRMAC Operations Plan provides for the coordinated management of Federal technical response adivities related to a radiological emergency. Its pnmary goals include:
Assisting the State and Lead Fedarat Agency (LFA) with personnel, equipment, and technical resources, as needed, Collecting offsite environmental radiohgical data; and.
Providing the data and related PasewMents to involved State agencies and to the LFA.
The Department of Energy (DOE), because of its history and capabilities in radiological monttonng and assessment, was assigned the responsibility in prepare for, establish, and manage the FRMAC. The FRMAC may be activated when a major radiological emergency exists, and the Federal govemment will respond when a State, other govemmental entity with junsdiction, or a regulated entity requests federal support.
The SEM, Recovery Manager or Corporate Response Manager may request FRMAC assistance (iirectly or through the NRC (LFA). The Company will provide designated facilities (space and communications equipment) for the NRC (LFA) in the LEOF It is estimated that a FRMAC Advance Party could be expected at the site within 6 to 14 hours1.62037e-4 days <br />0.00389 hours <br />2.314815e-5 weeks <br />5.327e-6 months <br /> following the order to deploy, based on the availabihty of airports near Ncith Anna. Richmond intemational Airport (RIC) is a major commercial facility and is within about an 85 minute anve from the clation. Smaller airports located within about an hour 01 the site may also be used.
Further information conceming objectives and organization is provided in the FRMAC Operations Plan (See Appendix 10.10).
O
NAEP Page 5.21 Revision 21 J
TABLE 5.1 g
MINIMUM STAFFING REQUIREMENTS FOR EMERGENCIES Aasmonet wovn Appres Me,w Funenener on 45 to f.!se M
h Emessenerime bel $
l&2, M1 Assessment ef CR Sussmann of Sengen Cecomens one thm Eweenness43401 1'
oprenonel Asseets Assenmem of Osempensi A6eeses CA Poe Omerobens Aest the Sweenaner(8RO) t' Cases heem Cooges 7t0) 3' GeneW heem 0poessor 3'
teerpees, Dwesten one CRMSC Dweete ens cones of Cm See testen Emespeaer heeneso<
18 Cents' Eme<pency Acevnes seeWesteas one C4/TEC s ste,0e ee Suopan oowr ens Emespenci cemmuneseer 3e 2
s Commengebeas MeememC r.
$vpeed of Ope <stensi (OF Management et tmeepene, meesonne Renewery heenager 1
Acceem Assessment Resources eng Recesery operanens i
madeepesi Acseem TSC40F Co ee Deee Assessme4 medoisecel Aaeseemem 18 1
s Assessment DweetermesesseseW Aseseement Caer!tineser Oa ee Co ee &vevevs C#see Meneerms Team Lesee' s
s i
t Conee Meneenas foem Meaeor 9
1 Casee Cmsee (Owe ed Dent) Seners Onsee beenegreg foem Leeeer Oesee Monsonag team Mommet 1
1 an Pent en ><ent Svevers and Rseechemetry in Pio1 Monearms Team Leese' in Pient Mennenne team 1
Memeev 1
1 1
en Pom Cnemory Chemory Team Loosee 1
Chem *stry Team Memeer i
1 Pieat $rstems CRM$C Omerosene+ 1ecnnssi bupped T A)
Ehe tecnnical Aavenor 1*
tap.aeveg hese.r one Co* wet e Acteas techneet $wesen team Memec (opersiones Aeviser) 1' TEC Caes ensinerme Hvo'eviets Technicei Swesent team Meme.#
1' TSC iectras' tecnnesi Supone 1eam Memes#
1 T&Q Mesnanisse Techasel Svemed f eem Memme' 1
Rosed one Ced'ect=e Attens OSC Mecnoncei Mammaanse DomeesCenteifeem Memmer t*
1 CSC E ocW88 Memlemage Damage Convol Team heemmer t=
1 1
OSC sastrumentaien one Cente Demepe CentrW Team Memme, 1
1 CRCSC Rae Wesse Ose<ee Demage CentrW team Memeer to 1
- ]
=J
NAEP Page 5.22 Revision 21
..pem e eciwe A ons wh=
R.e.eusa w
..e.
C=epe cm,..me,y one A.c t.
a i
i ce,s.
com-u.n,ionne team member 2
f esApteang khm Feehpneing Sve toom bembeg Se PLS' PL$
$ vet M &Rouve khnt Fest M Feet M 1eem Member 28 PLS PLS in Pom beerch one Reseve Seeech ed Reetvo team Me8'nbei M
2e See A440s8 CON'el Sne M Ihent
&# curdy one Attees Co'Wrel boognty Team Membe's see ese see Persoanei Accountammty enhm Personnet Accountamety
&ecenty team teever ese ese ese 14 0
it Numbe4 onown e*e to' 2 Und Case *ste wnn one the &vesmoor lot Assetent &hift Evpomset). ene Convol Room Operator (RO) &ne one Control Room Operator opereung me vaeheeses una Wen earn unas sa so1 anuteowa comemon. to mewmum shot es,w pu be es eenned m me Techncal Speceicahans e
the ca.orspe e in.aeny petwees by pesennes ess9aes eeer kneuens one we be euwmed by 94 sesewel personnoi when mer omve on ses Mecnen.csi and f actacol Mainionence severspe we normour be peoneed en a 1&nout por say,7 eays pee ween base Danng emer penoes the coverope wiu ne ><o.ees my pe<wnasi eu, nee ome, esues v,+i pe seen.oasi pemennei. evenne The avmoee of becu'e personnel e es speceed m one betwee kwa one e conseered as Setepvares informaten not to be reesses to Ine avbiec See r
r 1
The atietecatea PL6 stones ice Pive Loca Eveno" 2
Approve' toe me sesustmem m ev9meataten t.me lot tne mewevei was proceed na NRC lene* esief May 18 1990 3
the seae astes tot me oossen e e 6mnee to evealee Stas $40s toemer ST As or tormer $Ros Concunence tot enante to poseen tite ene removese pool vsee to stan poseen p'enees p: NRC vie nefier esies ur 221993 A#se to'e'ence VP asser. SN 024t3 ested bepiember il 1992 O
O
NAEP Page5.23 Revision 21 TABLE 5.2 EMERGENCY AND RECOVERY CORPORATE RESPONEE RE. QUIRED FOR NUCLEAR STATION EMERGENCIES (ALF.RT STATUS AND ABOVE)
Major Functional Area Available Igmeroency Position Title) gggrh in Management of Local To coordinate the 1 hr.
Emergency Operations Company's response to Facility (Recovery emergency and recovery Manager) with Federal, State and local authorities.
e Health Physics &
Report to the Recovery 1 br.
Chemistry (Radiological Manager to (.onduct Assessment Coordinator) radiological assessment ac'ivities.
Technical Support Reports to the Corporate 1 hr.
(Technical Support Emergency Response Manager)
Manager to provide technical and evaluation support.
i Plan / Design / Construction Reports to the Corporate i br.
(Plan / Design / Construct'on Emergency Response Manager)
Vanager to provide engineenng technical and vendor support in areas
- dealing with construction or design changes.
News Center interf ace Reports to the Corporate 1 hr.
(Chief Technical Emergency Response Spokesperson)
Manager to become the Company Spokesperson in any statements to the News Media.
Revision 21 TABLE 5.3 CITIES AND COUNTIES WITHIN THE NORTH ANNA 50 MILE EMERGENCY PLANNING ZONE "
ylRGINIA COUNTIES VIRGINIA CITIES 1.
Louisa 20.
Fluvanna 2.
Spotsylvania 21.
Nelson 3.
Fredericksburg 22.
Buckingham 4.
Madison 23.
Cumberland 5.
Orange 24.
Amelia 6.
City of Culpeper 25.
Powhatan 7.
Culpeper County 26.
Goochland 8.
Rt.ppahannock
- 27.
Henrico 9.
Warrenton
- 28.
City of Richmond 10.
Fauquier
- 29.
Chesterfield 11.
Pnnce William 30.
Page 12.
Stafford 31.
Greea
- 13.
Essex 32.
Rockingham 14.
Westmoreland 33.
Albemarle 15 King George 34.
Charlottesville 16.
Caroline
- 17.
King and Queen
- 18.
King William
- 19.
Hanover Within 50 miles of both Surry and North Anna That portion of the State of Maryland lying within the 50 mile zone has been excluded. (Reference NRC Letter of February 6,1981, Serial Number 100).
9
NAEP Page525 Revision 21 STATION EMERGENCY ORGAf112ATIOr1 PRIOR TO AUGMENTATION
- FIGURE 5.1 STATIOfi EMEFGErJCY MAf1AGER EMERGENCY COMMUNICATOR I
I I
I I
I
~
l Oti PtfTY SilI FT SUTEPVI S"P PADICLOGICAL DAt1 AGE FIRE CHEMISTRY SECURITY STA Ne On ASSISTAf!T AS S ESSt1Et1T cot! TROL TEAM TEAM TEAM SillfT SifrEUVISOP DIPECTOR TEAM N
~
l I
O!! - DUTY I tJ - F LAt3T OPEPATIOtlS MotJITORIllG P ERSotillEL TEAM a
SEARCII AllD FIRST AID RESCUE TEAM **
TEAM Augmented for Alert, Site Area Emergency and General Emergency.
This coverage is provided by personnel who may be assigned other functions.
This coverage may not be provided on a full time basis.
The on-duty STA provides technical support as well as operations support to the SEM until the l
Technical Support Team is activated.
l
NAEP Page 526 Revision 21 STATiOli EMERGE! ICY ORGAIJIZATION FOLLOWI!1G AUGMENTATION '
FIGURE S.2 STATION EMEPGENCY MANAGER i
FMEPGENCY EMERGENCY PROCEDUPES COMMUNICATOR COOPDINATOR I
I I
I I
I EMEPGENCY EMEPGENCY EMEPGENCY EMEPGENCY RADIOLOGICAL OSC OPEPATIONS MAINTENANCE TECilNICAL ADMINISTPATIVE ASSESSMENT DIPECTOR DIRECTOR DIRECTOR DIPECTOR DIPECTOR DIPECTOR I
I I
I I
I SHIFT MAINTENANCE TECf!NICAL ADMINI STPATIVE DOSE RADIATION FIRE SUPERVISOR SUPPORT SUPPOPT SUPPORT ASSESSMENT PRCTECTION TEAM 8
OR TEAM TEAM TEAM TEAM SUPERVISOR ASSISTANT I
I SHIFT
! OFFSITE IN-PIANT FIRST AID SUPERVISOR SECURITY TEAM MONITORING MONITORING TEAM 8
TEAMS (2)
TEAM ON-DUTY OPERATIONS PERSONNEL SAMPLE DAMAGE ANALYSIS CONTROL TEAM TEAM **, 8 ON-DUTY STA CHEMISTRY SEARCH AND TEAM PESCUE I
TEAM **, 8 ON-SITE Augmented for Alert, Site Area Emergency (OUT OF PLANT)
STANDBY and General Emergency.
MONITORING OPEPATIONS TEAM PERSONNEL,#
- This team will be activated only if circumstances f
require this function to be performed.
EVACUATION PERSONNEL Normal reporting structure is shown.
If the team MONITORING MONITORING AND is activated, control of the team will transfer TEAMS **
DECON TEAM **
to the Station Emergency Manager or appropriate Emergency Director.
O O
O
s
. - - ~.
V
%J
%./
NAEP Page527 Revision 21 STATIOil TO SUPPORT GROUP It~rERFACE PRIOR TO _ AUGt4EtJTATIOli OF Tile E!4ERGENCY ORGANIZATION FIGURE 5.3 STATION EMERGENCY MANAGER i
I I
I I
l STATIO!!
CORFORATE I.OCAL FIRE LOCAL MEDICAL LOCAL IAW OTHER EMERGEt!CY OFFICE FIGHTING RESCUE COLLEGE ENFORCEMENT SERVICES ORGANIZATION SERVICES SERVICES OF AGENCIES SEE FIGURE 5.I VIRGINIA y
NEWS MEDIA
~
NAEP Page 5.28 Revision 21 STATIOff TO SUPPORT GROUP ItJTERFACE FOLLOW I fJG LEOF ACTIVATIO!J FIGURE 5.4 COPPOPATE COPPORATE U.
S.
DEPT.
EMERGEtiCY
RESPONSE
OF ENERGY
RESPONSE
MANAGER I
(DOE)
ORGANIZATION I
I l---
INDUSTRY RECOVERY I
SUPPORT MANAGER I
I I
I l-------------------------
l -- -
UNAFFECTED I
l l
POWER STATION STATION NUCLEAR LOCAL STATE DEPT.
DIRECTOR EMElGENCY P EGt!! ATOP Y EMERGENCY OF EMEPGENCY EMERGENCY MAf1AGER COftMISSION OPEPATIONS SERVICES SERVICFS FACILITY (LOCAL GOV'T.)
g STATION BUREAU OF EMERGENCY RADIOLOGICAL OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT ORGAV4ZATION ffEALTH EMERGENCY SCHOOLS (SEF FIG. 5.2)
SERVICES
~
VIRGINIA DEPT. OF STATE SHERIFF OR SOCIAL POLICE POLICE SERVICES MEDICAL FIRE DEPT. OF COLLEGE OF DEPARTMENTS PUBLIC VIRGINIA HEALTil RESCUE DEPARTMENT SQUADS SYMBOLS:
OF GAME AND INLAND MANAGEMENT CONTROL FISiiERIES COORDINATED ASSISTANCE -----------
e G
NAEP Page 6.1 Revision 21 NORTH ANNA POWER STATION EMERGENCY PLAN SECTION 6 EMERGENCY MEASURES PJLrl Sutnect Pace No.
6.0 Emergency Measures..
6.2 6.1 Activation of th e Em erg ency Pla n.........................................................
6.2 6.2 Assessment Actions.......
6.2 6.3 Proteetive Actions.........
6.3 6.3.1 Offsite Criteria for the 10 Mile Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ).........
6.3 6.3.2 Onsite Cntena f or the Exclusion Area.........................
6.5 6.3.3 Use Onsite of Protective F.quipment and Supplies.
6.6 6.3.3.1 Respiratory Protection.
6.6 6.3.3.2 Proteetive Clothing 6.6 6.3.3.3 Thyroid Blocking Agent..
6.7 64 Aid to Affected Personnel..
6.7 6 4.1 Emergency Exposure Limits 6.7 6 4.2 Decontamination and First Aid 6.8 6 4.3 Medical Transportation 6.9 644 Medical Treatment.
6.9 6.5 Offsite Support.
6.10 Table 6.1 Radionuclides with Significant Contnbution to Dominant Exposure Modes..
6.11 Table 6.2 Representative Shielding Factors from Gamma Cloud Source..
6.12 TaNe 6.3 Representative Shielding Factors for Surface Deposited Radionuclioes..
6.13 Tab e 6 4 EPA PAG and Protective Actions for Nuclear incidents...
6.14 Table 6.5 General Emergency Offsite Protective Actions.
6.15 Figure 61 NAPS 10. Mile Emergency Planning Zone 6.16 Figure 6.2 Remote Assembly Areas.
6.17 O
l d
NAEP Page 6.2 -
Revisi:n 21 6.0 Emeroency Measures Emergency measures provide pre planned actions, methods, and criteria which guide personnel during the course of an emergency. The initial response to any emergency condition will be the activation of the Emergency Plan. After activation, the emergency organization that is formulated by activation of the Emergency Plan performs the necessary assessment activities to classify the type of emergency, if the emergency is radiological in nature, the potential consequences of the emergency will be evaluated for the necessary offsite and onsite protective actions to guard the health and safety of the population. If additional assistance is required, offsite support will be r$ quested as provided for in letters of agreements established with a vanety of govemment agencies and volunteer organizations.
6.1 Activation of the Emeroency Plan Each full time employee of the station is required to be familiar with the provisions of the Emergency Plan. Any employee, upon becoming aware of an emergency condition, shallimmediately notify the Shift Supervisor on duty unless it is apparent notification has already taken place. Upon such notification or other indications, a Shift Supervisor or Assistant Shift Supervisor assumes the responsibilities of the Station Emergency Manager. The SEM will classify the emergency, initiate the appropriate notifications and call outs, and coordinate the actions of the emergency response organization as required by the EPIPs.
Notifications will be made to the NRC as soon as possible but within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> and to State and county officials within 15 minutes after declaration of an emergency.
Dedicated communicators will be available to maintain a continuous channel of communications with the NRC and to provide regular updates to state and local officials approximately every 60 minutes, when conditions change or as otherwise agreed. The initial information provided to the NRC and State and local govemment is defined by specific report forms which are included in the EPIPs. The content of the messages have been established in conjunction with the State and local govemments and include the class of emergency, whether a release is in progress, and any recommended protective measures. Additional information will be provided as it becomes available.
a 6.2 Assessment Actions EPIP 1,01, Emergency Manager Controlling Procedure, is the procedure for emergency event categorization and classification, while EPIP 4.01, Radiological Assessment Director Controlling Procedure, provides guidance for conducting dose assessment, source term determination, atmosphenc diffusion factor determination, monitonng team activities, personnel monitonng and decontaminatinn, monitonng of O
NAEP Page 6.3 Revision 21 onsite facilities, evacuation, respiratory protection, sampling and sample analysis, and use of the MIDAS computer model.
Once the emergency classification has been determined, the appropriate EPIPs are initiated to direct the activation of the required emergency response facilibes and call out of designated emerDency response personnel. The design of the facilities and the data retrieval and monnoring capabilities provide the information needed to make timely assessments and formulate appropriate protective actions.
6.3 Protective Actions The Recovery Manager or the Station Emergency Manager (if the LEOF is not yet activated) is responsible for recommending offsite protective actions to the State. The State and local govemments are responsible for notification of the public and implementation of the appropriate protective measures.
6.3.1 Offstie Criteria for the 10 Mile Emeroency Plannino Zone (EPZ)
Dose contribution from key isotopes such as those listed in Table 6.1 (and cnalyzed in UFSAR Sections 11 and 15) are used to calculate offsite doses for comparison to protective action recommendation thresholds specified in EPIPs.
These protective action recommendations shall be no less conservative than the thresholds provided in Table 6 4. Recommended protective actions transmitted to the State consider plant conditions as well as current meteorological data such as wind direction, wind speed and stability class.
Factored into the recommendations will be the protection afforded by dwellings in the plume exposure pathway. The station will have the necessary technical data upon which to base protection factors. Representative shielding factors from gamma cloud source and for surface deposited radionuclides were based on SAND 77-1725, "Public Protection Strategies for Potential Nuclear Reactor Accidents."
(See Tables 6.2 and 6.3)
A Site Area Emergency will be declared when offsite doses are projected to exceed 0.1 Rem TEDE or 0.5 Rem Thyroid CDE. A General Emergency will be declared when offsite Protective Action Guides (PAGs) of 1.0 Rem TEDE and/or 5.0 Rem Thyroid CDE are projected to be exceeded due to a direct radiation or inhalation hazard, or when non-radiological conditions exceed General Emergency EALs. These thresholds are reflected in Table 6.4.
Protective action recommendations are required to be made to the State within 15 minutes of dectanng a General Emergency. Based on the guidance in Table 6.5, specific protective action recommendations tied to plant and O
NAEP Page 6.4 Revision 21 meteorological conditions have been included in an EPIP specifically designed i
to facilitate meeting this time requirement.
Wamings to the public within the 10-mile EPZ (Figure 6.1) will be the
~
responsibility of State and local officials who will be assisted by the State Department of Police upon request. The primary metnod of waming the public is by the use of the Early Waming System sirens. Other waming methods may i
include telephone communications, television and radio Emergency Broadcast System stations, public address systems, bull homs from patrol cars and personal contact. There are currently no hospitals, prisons, or nursing homes within the 10 mile EPZ.
It is estimated that the pnmary sector and the two buffer sectors (spanning 67 1/2') can be alerted of the emergency within 15 minutes using the Early Waming System. If evacuation is recommended, it is estimated that the 671/2' sector can be evacuated within 2 to 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />.
Evacuation zones, routes, and relocation centers have been established in the event that an evacuation is recommended. This information is published in brochures and distributed by the State. Population distribution and evacuation time estimates are maintained on file by the Nuclear Emergency Preparedness Department (reference Appendix 10.8). The existing evacuation time estimate studies will be provided to the State Department of Emergency Services following the 10 year census. At that time, the State will make the determination whether or not a new study is required for the EPZ.
Written pre planned messages intended for transmittan to the public via radio and television stations will be consistent with the classification scheme. They will be released to the media by the State or Local Coordinator of Emergency Services or his designated representative. The messages will give instruction with regard to specific actions to be trken by the occupants of the inhabited The messages will, as appropnate, give instruction on the aspects of area.
sheltenng, thyroid blocking, evacuation, the nature of the emergency, and recommended protective actions. The local govemments are charged by COVRERP with the responsibility to conduct information programs to educate their cit!Zens on:
1, Radiological hazards, 2.
Procedures for notification of a radiological emergency, 3.
Evacuation routes and assembly points, and 4.
Other protective measures.
/G k
4 4
NAEP Page 6.5 Revisi:n 21 The Commonwealth of Virginia Radiological Emergency Response Plan identifies the methods to be utilized in preventing or minimizing direct or subsequent ingestion exposure to radioactive materials deposited on the ground or other surfaces. Upon notification of a radiological emergency which may affect livestock, crops, or farmlands, the State Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services will institute a program to assess the impact upon the agriculture community. Members of that department will take samples of milk from dairy cattle in the affected area for analysis and will monitor soll, crops and farm equipment for contamination.
Follow-up action includes the disposition of radiologically contaminated materials. The local county govemment(s) has the prime responsibility for controlling affected area ingress and egress. Assistance from the State Police shall be supplied as requested by local officials.
6.3.2 Onsite Critene for the Exclusion Area The area within 5000 feet of the former North Anna Unit 3 containment is defined as the Exclusion Area for the purposes of this Plan.
Company employees, contractor personnel, occasional visitors at the site, and boaters on the reservoir and cooling lagoons may be inside the Exclusion Area. The area immediately surrounding the units which is enclosed by a secunty fence is defined as the Protected Area. The Station Emergency Manager is responsible for making the decision to evacuate the Protected Area, and will take appropnate measures in cooperation with State and local agencies for evacuation of persons in the Exclusion Area and those members of the public who may be passing through the site or within Company property. Virginia Power will also commit Company personnel and appropriate equipment (search lights, power amplified loudspeakers) to assist the Department of Game and inland Fishenes in cleanng the Exclusion Area when required.
Visitors to the Protected Area of the station are under continuous escort by personnel knowledgeable in emergency personnel accountability procedures.
Contractor personnel are also trained in personnel accountability procedures.
Onsite personnel will be immediately notified of an emergency that is initially classified as an Alert or higher event, unless doing so poses a threat to personnel safety. For example, humcane force winds, a tomado, or a security breach may dictate suspension or deferral of assembly, accountability and/or initiation of facility staffing. However, these activities would be implemented as quickly as achievable given the specific situation. Normally, alarms will be 9
NAEP Page 6.6 Revision 21 i
sounded and announcements will be made to conduct personnel accountability O
or, if necessary, a site evacuation of non essential workers. Those individuals within the Exclusion Area will be alerted by station personnel, Security, and/or-personnel from the Department of Game and inland Fisheries. In the event of an j
evacuation, radiation monitoring teams will be dispatched to the appropriate j
Remote Assembly Area.
The Station has the capability to conduct personnel accountability for i
i individuals inside the Protected Area within approximately 30 minutes using an EPIP established for this purpose. ' Visitors, non-Verginia Power workers, and Virginia Power workers with specific series security badge numbers report to the Security Building for accountability. Workers not normally in the Protected Area l
report to their supervisor who in tum accounts for his personnel.
After accountability is completed, an evaluation is made and search teams may be i
dispatched to locate any individual noted as missing or unaccounted for, if onsite evacuation is to occur, Security collects only the security badges, not the dosimetry, of all persmnel leaving the Protected Area.
Continuous l
accountability of personnelin the Protected Area not evacuating the site shall be maintained throughout the emergency. Evacuees, who may use personal vehicles, proceed to either the primary or secondary remote assembly area (See Figure 6.2). Station evacuees will be surveyed for contamination following events involving a radiological release, and decontaminated, if necessary, pnor to being released from the remote assembly area. Decontamination agents and supplies are available at the station which can be transported to the remote assembly areas to provide decontamination capabilities.
6,3.3 Use of Onsite Protective Eauipment and Sunalies 6.3.3.1 Respiratcry Protection Virginia Power has a comprehensive respiratory protection program at its nucisar stations. VPAP 2101,
- Radiation Protection Plan", establishes the Respiratory Protection Program which is implemented by HP procedures. Those individuals likely to wear respirators are given a pulmonary examination and formal classroom training on respiratory protection including a practical examination._ A
- fit test" is given before an individualis allowed to enter an area requinng respiratory protection.
6.3.3.2 Protective Clothino The station maintains an adequate inventory of protective clothing in the Clean Change Room. Contaminated clothing is washed at the station and re-1 i
~^
NAEP Page 6.7 R:visi:n 21 issued provided contamination is below established radiation criteria.
A Radiation Work Permit system is utilized whereby Radiological Protection establishes personnel protective clothing and equil, ment criteria. Such clothing may consist of cotton coveralls, hoods, cotton glove inserts, rubber gloves, plastic shoe covers, rubber shoe covers and rubber boots. Station personnel requiring access to a Radiological Control Area are given formal classroom training on how to don and remove protective clothing so as to minimize personal contamination or introduction of contamination into adjacent areas.
6.3.3.3 Thyroid Blockino Aoent The Company's Employee Services, Safety and Health Department, with the advice of its Physician Consultant has authorized the use of a thyroid blocking agent at the Station for a potential radioiodine inhalation situation. An EPIP addresses the approval process for administering the drug.
6.4 Aid to Affected Personnel The Company has made arrangements with the Medical College of Virginia (MCV), to provide medical assistance to personnel injured or exposed to radiation and/or radioactive matenal. MCV has developed its own plan for responding to the emergency.
MCV's plan establishes a specialized area of the hospital for treatment with appropriate Health Physics functions, and implements a coded system to alert hospital team members. Radiation monitonng equipment, dosimetry, and protective clothing are available at MCV.
The Station will provide and distnbute self reading and cumulative type dosimeters to all personnelinvolved in ervergency onsite response regardless of their affiliation. Dose records shall be maintained and checked throughout the emergency.
6.4.1 Emeroency Exposure Limits Emergency response personnel may, because of necessity, receive once-in-a-lifetime exposure to contamination and radiation up to the 10CFR20 annual limits, not including accumulated occupational exposure. Approval from the Station Emergency Manager is necessary for planned exposures greater than tne 10CFR20 annual limits. Under limrted circumstances, exposure levels greater than 5 times the 10CFR20 annual limits are allowed, but only on a voluntary basis to persons fully aware of the nsks involved Selection criteria for volunteer emergency workers includes consideration of these who are in good physical health, are familiar with the consequences of emergency exposure, and are not a " declared pregnant adutt*, it is preferable, though not mandatory, that volunteers be older than 45 years of age and not be a female capable of reproduction.
O
NAEP Page 6.8 Revisi:n 21 2
limorgency exposure may be authorized for such needs as removal of injured personnel, underteidng corredive odions performing assessment adions, providmg first aid, performing personnel decontamination, providing ambulance service, providmg medcol treatment, etc. Guidelines for emergency exposure limits, including life saving actions, are specified in the EPIPs. These -
p guidelines are consistent with EPA Emergency Worker and Life Saving Activity
+
{
Protective Adion Guides.
6,4.2 Decontamination and First Aid 3
' There are First Aid stations located throughout the North Anna' Power Station 4
that contain the normal complement of first aid supplies and equipment necessary to treat those injuries not involving hospitalization or professional medical services.
At least two First Aid Team members are available at all times to respond to personnelinjury. - As a minimum, the First Aid Team personnel are Multi-Media first aid trained, in addition, the following Medical facilities and services are available:
- 1. Company nurse available during normal working hours (Mon. Fri.).
l1 2, Company ambulance, j
- 3. Company designated physicians in the area.
(
- 4. Local Rescue 0 quads.
- 5. The Medical College of Virginia facilities.
L I
The Station Health Physics Procedures and EPIPs specify levels of permissible radioactive contamination for workers and equipment. Actions are i
required to be taken when levels for equipment or areas exceed the limits t
L established in the Health Physics Procedures.
Any detected - personnel l
contamination will initiate appropriate evaluation and decontamination -in i
accordance with these procedures.
The Station has onsite contamination control procedures that provide for i-access control. These procedures state the cnteria for permitting the retum of the areas and their contents to normal use.
No food supplies are grown on the site and the water supplies come from deep wells. There will be1 procedures to monitor contamination 'in areas designated Nrmissible for employees to eat and drink during the emergency and recovery phases of operations If onsita personnel are required to relocate or routinely leave the site during an emergency, the Station will provide adequate supplies for personnel c
- a
NAEP Page 6.9 Revislin 21 decontamination, clothing and means to provide for decontaminating the l
clothing. If radioiodine contamination of the skin is determined, provisions will be made to provide for decatmination as specified in the Health Physics f
Procedures, An EPIP has been developed to provide for the monitoring of vehicles and personnel at the Remote Assembly Areas (RAA). Should decontamination of vehicles or personnel be warranted Health Physics personnel can perform the task at the Station, the RAA, or if necessary, at Patrick Henry High School in Hanover County.
6.4.3 Medical Transportation A Station ambulance is available to transport contaminated injured personnel. Contaminated injured personnel will be suitably clothed or prepared to prevent the spread of contamination in the transporting vehicle.
Communication can be maintained with MCV from the station. The Station can also communicate with the ambulance by use of a Virginia Power UHF radio, and the ambulance can ccmmunicate with MCV by way of the HEAR system.
In addition, arrangements have been made with local volunteer rescue squads to transport injured contaminated personnel to the Medical College of Virginia.
Response team members have received training conceming transportation of contaminated injured individuals. A Health Physics technician, with appropriate instrumentation, would normally accompany contaminated injured personnel to MCV The approximate time to transport a patient to MCV is 75 minutes. The estimated time for local rescue squads to arrive at the station is 30 minutes.
6 4.4 Medical Treatment The MCVH/VCU Virginia Power Radiation Emergency Plan (Appendix 10.9) provides guidance for the treatment of contaminated injured personnel by qualified individuals. The Radiation Emergency Plan includes provisions to request assistance from other facilities having the capability to receive and treat injured and/or contaminated individuals. In the event the facilities at MCV become over extended, MOV may coordinate further assistance with these facilities directly or through the State Department of Health.
O O
m
. ~..
NAEP Page 6.10 Revision 21 6.5 Offstle Supagr1 l
In addition to the offshe agencies listed above, local volunteer fire departments have agreed to assist in fighting fires. A list of services and equipment is included in the Agreement Letters in Appendix 10.1.
The response time of these volunteer fire departments varies from 30 minutes to j
45 minutes, unless adverse weather conditions prevail.
Police support for an emergency is provided by State and local governments as detailed in their respective Emergency Plans.
i
?
l l
i 1
4 4
' O
NAEP Page 6.11 Revision 21 TABLE 6.1 RADIONUCLIDES WITH SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTION TO DOMINANT EXPOSURE MODES") O Radionuclides with Significant Radionuclides with Radionuclides with Contribution to Thyroid Significant Contribution to Significant Contribution to Exposure TEDE Exposure Lung Exposure (Lung only controlling when thyroid dose is reduced by iodine blocking or there is a long delay prior to releases)
Half life Half life Half Life Radionuclide (days)
Radionuclide f@.yg Radionuclide (days) 1131 8.05 l131 8.05 l-131 8.05 l132 0.0958 Te 132 3.25 l-132 0.0956 6133 0.875 Xe 133 5.28 l-133 0.875 l134 0.0366 l133 0.875 l134 0.0366 l135 0.280 Xe 135 0.384 l135 0.280 Te 132 3.25 l135
' 280 Cs-134 750 Cs-134
/50 Kr-88 0.117 Kr 88 0.117 Cs 137 11,000 Cs 137 11,000 Ru 106 365 Te-132 3.25 Ce 144 284 (1) Denved from NUREG 0654 0
_ - ~.
NAEP Page 6.12 Revision 21 TABLE 6.2
,O V
REPRESENTATIVE SHIF1 nlNG FACTORS FROM GAMMA CLOUD SOURCE i
Shielding Structure or Lotation Factor'*
Representative Range Outside 1.0 Vehicles 1.0 Wood frame house (b) 0.9 (no basement)
Basement of wood house 0.6 0.1 to 0.7"'
Masonry house (no basement) 0.6 0.4 to 0.7")
Basement of masonry house 04 0.1 to 0.5")
Large office or industrial 0.2 0.1 at 0.3'")
(a)
The ratio of the dose received inside the structure to the dose that would be received outside the structure.
(b)
A wood frame house with bnck or stone veneer is approximately equivalent to a masonry house for shielding purposes.
(c)
This range is mainly due to different wall matenals and different geometries.
(d)
The shielding factor depends on where the personnel are located within the building (e.g., the basement or an inside room)
(%
\\,_)
NAEP Page 6.13 Revision 21
' ABLE la i
REPRESENTATIVE GillELDING FACTORS FOR SURFACE DEPOSITED RADIONUCLIDES O
Representatrve Representative Structure of Location Shielding Factor #9 Range 1 m above an infinrte smooth surface 1.00 1 m above ordinary ground 0.70 047085 1 m above center of 50-ft roadways 0 $$
0406 50% decuntaminated Cars on 50-ft road Road fulli contaminated 0.5 0 4-0.7 Road 50% decontaminated 0.5 0 4-0 6 Road fully decontaminated 0.25 0.2-0 5 Trains 0 40 0.3 0.5 One-and two-story wood-frame house 0 4"'
O.2-0 5 (no basement)
One and two-story Diock and bnck 0 2*'
O.04-0 40 house (no basement)
House basement, one or two walls 0.1 *'
O 03-0.15 fully exposed One 4 tory, less than 2 ft of 0 05"'
O.03-0.07 basement walls exposed Two stones less tnan 2 ft 0 03*'
O 02-0.05 of basement, walls exposed Three.or four story structures, 5000 to 10 000 ft per floor First and second floors 0 05*'
O 01-08 Basement 0 01 0 001 0.07 i
Multistory structures. > 10.000 ft per floor Upper fioors 0 01*'
O 001 0 02 Basement 0 005*'
O 001 0 015 (a) The ratio of dose received inside the structure to the cose tnat would be received outside the structure (D) Away from doors and windows O
NAEP I
Page 6.14 I
Revisiin 21 i
TABLE 6.4 O
EPA PAG AND Ph0TECTIVE ACTIONS FOR NUCLEAR INCIDENTS"3 G
Projected exposure-1-
(Rem) to the.
General Doculation*
Recommended Adions M Comments Less than 1.0 Rom TEDEW 1.
No protective action required.
Previously recommended protective actions may be reconsidered / terminated.
- 2. State may issue an advisory to seek shelter and await furtherinstructions or to voluntarily evacuate.
3.
Monitor environmental radiation levels.
1.0 Rem TEDE*
1.
Conduct evacuation (or, for some situations, sheltering %
- O 2 Monitor environmenta!
radiation levels and adjust area for evacuation based on these levels.
3.
Control access.
(1)
EPA 400 R 92 001 (2)
State PAGs are within these limits-l (L)
These actions are recommended for planning purposes. Protective action decisions at the time of the incident must take into consideration the impact of existing constraints.
(4)
Sum of the Effective Dose Equivalent (EDE, assumed equivalent to the Deep Dose Equivalent.
DDE) resulting from exposure to extemal sources and the Committed Effected Dose Equivalent -
(CEDE) incurred from all significant inhalation pathways dunng the early phase,-
(5) -
Sneltenng may be the preferred protective action when it will provide protection equal to or greater than evacuation, based on consideration of factors such as source term charactenstics, and temporal or other site specific conditions as desc.ibed in EPA-400 R-92-001, Section 2.3.1.
O
.r~,
NAEP Page 6.15 Revision 21 TABLE 6,5 GENERAL EMERGENCY OFFSITE PROTECTIVE ACTIONSm Ev.tpj Recommended Actions A A.
CORE DEGRADATION OR SECURITY SEQUENCES:
MINIMUM:
- 1. Minimum recommendation
- Evstcuate 360',0 2 miles.
- Evacuate (townwind sectors,2 5 miles.
- Snetter dowawind sectors,5 'IO miles Sheher unaffected sectors,2 10 miles 6
- 2. With high contarament source term, Evacuate 360',0 5 miles.
pressure, or integrity chalenged Evacuate downwind sectors,5 10 miles.
Shelter unaffected sectors,5 10 miles.
B.
SIGNIFICANT RELEASE POTENTIAL
- Site Boundary projected dose Evacuate 360',0 2 miles.
exceeds 1.0 Rem TEDE or 5.0 Shelter downwind sectors,2 - 5 miles.
. Adjust per Health Physics recommendations.
O C.
MISCELLANEOUS EVENT 3 Major events which individually or in
. Shelter 360*,0 - 2 miles.
combination could cause massive Shelter downwind sectors,2 S miles.
damage to the station, or, in the judgement of the SEM, a situation exists which requires actions to protect the health and safety of the public (1)
References:
NUREG 06S4/ FEMA REP 1.. Rev 1; EPA-400-R 92 001;IEIN 83-28; RTM-92.
(2) Protective action decisions at the time of an incident must consider impact of existing conditions and constraints.
O
NAEP l
Page 6.16 Revnscn 21 l
FIGURE 6.1
. NORTH ANNA POWER STATION 10 - WLR EMERGENCY PLANNING ZONE (EPZ)
O l
L i
h 388 75*
i 11.25*
{
623 1
m e
u emol A
-tman I
b 829 N
\\ 649 4m 3
/
we 32 s.2 s- )
,,, /
2C s u
,A as2 m
sos
$2 8st
, yig 721 IGEO k
208 ab
,,) 7o,.'.F
,6 's'.2,. i
.3, 2 n.,s-m i
u
/y
.4, 08 752,J12 612 an= m 652 P
i M
(.
D su
's /*
m 2 mi' rae 15* '5i M
J vs.7s l aos O
2, i
, 5 c2./
/
c~g N
=
.oi so5.os o
(
E ne
=
f m
(l25E.75I208
~
i E25; 654 I
!6o5 m
'1ol.sIf 3
n o
9,i2 m;2 r
s s
./
I n'
u
,w g
.M
~
m 7Do 6E j
3 8,1
=
s t
,,o
/
-4./
F236.2s-l, so
, 'oi
- 3,3,,,, g, J s22 m
/
,N B
6a
(
m so i
6o5
[
yog s
' 16 65 Sot' l 213.75-l
'w f
, 146.25-612 f/}
.v J !
s ao g
ras
,, x, 1 1.
s
=
c si... s. i
.a-e
',,s O
NAEP Page 6.17 Revisten 21 FIGURE 6.2 NORTH ANNA POWER STA110N g
REMOT2 ASSEMBLY. AREAS NAPS NORTH ANNADMA SEOOPOARYREMOTE 3
ASSEMBLY AREA 5
T.652
[-
c
- g i
RT.700 RT.622 RT. 715 i RT. e68
( aE*'s RT. T3.
MINERAL M
PRSAARY REMOTE ASSEMBLY AREA l RT.656
\\
RT.54 RT. 33 RT.M PATRICK HENRY HGHSCHOOL (STATE EVACUATION EMBLY CENTER)
RT.33 PR! MARY RFMSTE AGFum Y AREA PROCEED To th*TERSECTION OF RT. 700 AND 618.
TURN LEFT ON RT. 618 AND PROCEED 0.8 MtLES TO THE ASSEMBLY AREA SECONDARY RCMM AMNm Y AREA PROCEED TO lif7ERSECTION OF RT. 700 AND 652.
TURN LEFT ON RT. 652 AND PROCEED TO RT. 622.
TURN LEFT ON RT. 622 AND PROCEED TO RT 701.
TURN LEFT ON RT. 701 AND PROCEED TO RT. 601.
TURN LEFT ON RT. 601 AND PROCEED 0.1 Mn.ES.
THE ASSEMBLY AREA is ON THE LEFT, THROUGH THE GATE. AT THE DAM.
NAEP Pcge 7.1 R2 vision 21 j
NORTH ANNA POWER STATION EMERGENCY _ PLAN SECTION 7 EMERGENCY FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT P.J.g Subieet Pace No.
7.0 Emer0ency Facilities and Equipment.........................................................
7.3 7.1 E me rg e ncy Response F a cilities...................................................................
7.3 7.1.1 C on t rol R oo m..............................................................................
7.3 7.1.2 Operational Support Center...............................
7.3 7.1.3 Technical Support C enter............................................................
7.3 7.1.4 Local Emergency Operations Facility...........................................
7.4 7.1.5 Lo cal M ed ia C e nt e r................................................................
7.4 7.1.6 Corporate Emergency Response Center and Central Emergency Operations Facitity.........
7.5 7.2 Communications Systems.....
7.5 7.2.1 Communications Systems Within the Station......
7.5 7.2.1.1 Public Address and intercom System.......
7.5 7.2.1.2 Radio Communications System (Onsite)..................
7.6 7.2.1.3 Pnvate Branch Telephone Exchange (PBX).....
7.6 7.2.1.4 Sound Powered Telephone System.
7.6 7.2.2 Offsite Communications Systems..
7.6 7.2.2.1 Commercial Telephone...
7.6 7.2.2.2 Microwave System..
7.7 7.2.2.3 Radio Communications System (Offsite)....
7.7 7.2.2.4 Dedicated NRC Communications..
7.7 7.2.2.5 Insta. phone Loop.,
7.8 7.2.3 Communications System Reliability.....
7.8 7.24 Emergency Response Facility Communications....
7.9 5
I
NAEP Page 7.2 Revisisn 21 7,3 Assessment Fa clltties Avallable Onsite...............................................................
7.9 7.3.1 S eismic Monit oring................................................................................
7.9 7.3.2 R a d iation M o r.!!oring.,................................................................
7.9 7.3.3 Met eorological Monitonng...............................................
7.11 7.3.4 Plant Process Parameter Montioring..........................................
7.11 7.3.5 Fire D e t e et ion.........................................................................
7.11 7.3.6 Post Accid e nt S a m pling..............................................................
7.12 7.4 Assessment Fa cilities Availa ble Offstte.........................................................
7.12 7.5 Damage Control Eq uipment and Supplies.......................................................
7.12 7.6 E a rl y W a ming S yst e m.......................................................................
7.13 Table 7.1 ERF Communications..
7.14 Table 7.2 Meteorological Monitonng System Parameters............................
7.16 Figure 7.1 Environmental Monitonng Locations Map......
7.17 Fagure 7.2 Environmental Monitonng Locations Listing.....................................
7.18 O
- _-=
NAEP Page 7.3 Revisi:n 21 7.0 Ememency Facilities and Eauioment A
The facilities required in the implementation of the Emergency Plan consist of the Control Room (shared for both Unit 1 and 2), the Operational Support Center (OSC), the Technical Support Center (TSC), the Local Emergency Operations Facility (LEOF), the Local Media Center (LMC), the Corporate Emergency Response Center (CERC) and the Central Emergency Operations Facility (CEOF). These facilities were designed to meet the intent of the gliidance in NUREG 0696 and the clanfication in NUREG-0737 Supplement 1.
A desenption of each is i
given below.
7.1 Ememency Resoonse Facilities 7.1.1 Control Room The Control Room of the affected unit (s) shall be the initial location for command and control of the emergency response effort. All controls and instrumentation needed to diagnose plant conditions ar,d to take immediate actions to place the affected unit (s) in a safe condition are available in the Control Room. Within the Control Room, the Station Emergency Manager has access to the information needed to classify the emergency.
Redundant communication systems are also available in the Control Room to make the required onsite and offsite notifications. The Control Room has the required shielding and ventilation system to remain habitable dunng the emergency.
Access to the Control Room shall be limited to those individuals responsible for carrying out assigned emergency response tasks plus other technical advisors, as necessary.
7.1.2 Operational Suonort Center The Maintenance Building Conference Room (pnmary) and the Unit One Emergency Switchgear Room (altemate) are designated as the Operational Support Center (OSC). Augmentmg Station operations personnel will report to the pnmaiy OSC until instructed by the Shift Supervisor /SEM to pertnrm a required emergency function. The OSC is also the designated reporting location for the Fire Team, the First Aid Team, the Damage Control Team, and the Search and Rescue Team.
7,1,3 - Technical Sucoort Center The Technical Support Center is located adjacent to Unit 1 Control Room, and its attemate locatirn is the Control Room. Emergency response personnel will assemble at the pnmary TSC unless otherwise instructed by the Station Emergency Manager.
The pnmary location contains controlled copies of selected manuals, procedures, drawings, and other documents as approved by
NAEP Page 7.4 Revision 29 the Station Nuclear Safety and Operating Committee, information about plant conditions is available via real time data displays from the Emergency Response Facility Computer System (ERFCS). Dedicated phone line communications would also be established with the Control Room to keep TSC personnel knowledgeable on current operating evolutions and to provide consuttalion and recommendations to the Control Room staff.
The construction of the facility walls and design of the ventilation system are such that the whole body and thyroid doses received by occupants of the TSC are below General Design Criteria 19 limits. Radiation monitoring equipment for making airbome particulate and direct radiation measurements is installed in the TSC.
The TSC houses the ERFCS Data Communications Processors (redundant units). The inputs from plant sensors are processed by these units and the information is transmuted to locations including the Control Room, LEOF, CERC and CEOF for display on video monitors.
7.1.4 Local Emeroency Operations Facility The station's Local Emergency Operations Facility is adjacent to the NAPS Training Facility. The LEOF is located within the Exclusion Area and includes designated work stations for Corporate, Federal and State officials who may be assembled at this location. This facility is the designated central collection point for the receipt and analysis of all field monitoring data and the coordination of sample media. Plant data is available sia an independent 1/O unit of the ERFCS which drives the CRTs in the LEOF The ERFCS provides information, through a data link, to the MIDAS computer which will be used pnmarily by the Radiological Assessment Coordinator to estimate offsite doses.
The LEOF was designed to provide a specified protection factor from gamma radiation. The facility also has a specially designed ventilation system to limit the exposure of its occupants and further assure its availability dunng an emergency. Radiation monitonng equipment for making airbome particulate and direct radiation measurements is installed in the LEOF. Should the LEOF become unavailable dunng an emergency the responsibilities assigned to the LEOF will be transferred to the backup facility known as the Corporate Emergency Operations Facility.
7.1.5 Local Media Center The Local Media Center for North Anna Power Station is located at the end of Route 700 on Virginia Power property. The facility is designated as the North Anna Nuclear Information Center in normal operation.
There are O
9 4
NAEP Page 7.5 Revision 21 dedicated _. rou1s for Viginia Power, NRC, FEMA, State, and media representatives as well as an auditorium that will accommodate 200 people, k
Provisions have been made to accommodate TV cameras, copying machines, typewnters, and other equipment needed for press conferences. Should the t.ocal Media Center b9come eninhabitable, small groups of the Media, no more
- t. ton 20, can be accommodated in the LEOF with the approval of the Recovery Manner.
7.1.6
.Qgam ate Emeroency Response Center and Central Emer3enev Ooerations Facility Space is designated for the Corporate Emergency Response Center (CERC) and the Central Emergency Operations Facility (CEOF) at the innsbrook Technical Center in Glen Allen, Virginia. The facility will be manned by members of the Corporate Emergency Response Team as defined in the Corporate Emergency Response Plan. The CERC hos access to plant data from the ERFCS via an inuependent l/O processor.
7.2 Commenications Systems The station communications system is designed to provide redundant means to communicate with all essential areas of the station associated with North Anna Units 1 and 2 and to essential locations remote from the station during normal operation and under accident conditions. Communication systems vita: to Units 1 and 2 operation and safety are designed so that failure of one component would not impair the reliability of the total communications system. This is accomplished within the Station by using diverse systems. The North Anna EPlPs and the State and local county emergency response plans define the responsibilities of designated personnel for use of the communication systems.
7.2.1 Communications Systems Within the Station The systems wnich provide for communications within the Station are discussed below.
7.2.1,1 Public Address and Intercom System A five channel public address and interram system (Gai-Tronics System)is installed in the Station. The system power is supplied from a power supply which will maintain the system in an operational condition in the event of a normal station service power failure. Zones are provided within that Station to insure operability of a major port.on of the system should eculpment in a zone become inoperctive. Loudspeaker and paging phone stations are located throughout the Station. Tea v
NAEP Page 7.6 Revision 21 coverage of the loudspeakers permits broadcasts to be heard throughout the station. In the event of an emergency, the system is used to alert Station personnel of any emergency situation and to direct emergency response actions required of on site personnel.
7.2.1.2 Radio Communications Systerp (Onsite)
An Ultra High Frequency (UHF) two.way radio trunking system is provided at the Station consisting of base stations / repeaters, mobile units installed in emergency vehicles, and hand-held portable radios.
The radio trunking system provides redundancy and independent emergency backup equipment for designated station functions.
7.2.1.3 Private Branch Telephone Exchance (PBX)
A Private Branch Telephone Exchange (PBX) is installed at the Station. The PBX switching equipment is physically located in the PBX Bullding and is connected to a commercial telephone exe.hange in Mineral, Virginia. Backup battery power is provided to maintain the system operable 6 to 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> following the loss of A.C. power.
7.2.1_4 Sound Powered Teleohone System A sound powered telephone communications system is installed which serves North Anna Units 1 and 2.
This system is a multiple channel system connecting selected operating areas of the plant.
Headsets consisting of an earphene and microphone are connected to a two wire channel for direct communication between persons in different areas. Operation of this system is not dependent on the availability of the electncal power system. During an emergency, the system would provide an attemate means of relaying messages.
7.2.2 Offsite CommunicationLSystems Those systems provided for communication between the Station and offsite are desenbed beiow:
7.2.2.1 Commercia: Telephone Commercial telephone lines are provided between the Station and a commercial telephone exchange in Mineral, Virginia. These lines are connected mto the Station PBX. In addition, lines are provided for communicetions between the Station and the commercial telephone network which are independent of the Station PBX.
O
NAEP Page 7.7 Revision 21 7.2.2.2 Microwwe System A microwave system is provided for communication between the O
Station and the General Office Phone Network and the Systems Operators Office in Richmond, Virginia.
The system provides Automatic Ringdown Phone (ARD) communication from station emergency response facilities to the State Department of Emergency Servi;es (DES), to the counties of Spotsylvania and Lousa, and to the CF.RC. It also supports ARD communications between the LEOF and the TSC.
In addition, the microwave system provides the communication link to the Early Waming System (EWS) transmitter 4
located at North Anna. Tf.e system is battery operated at alllocations la provide continuous operation upon loss of AC power.
7.2.2.3 Radio Communications System (Offstte)
The same UHF two way radio trunking system that provides onsite communications also provides for communications within a ten mile radius of the Station. During an emergency, this system will allow direct contact with Radiation Monitoring Teams, Security vehicles, and a separate channel (Talk Group) between the Secunty Central Alarm Station and the Louisa County Shertff's Department.
7.2.2.4 Dedicated NRC Communications Separate telephone lines are dedicated to the NRC and include the following:
Emergency Notification Sys'em (ENS): The ENS is the system on which initial nott5 cations, as well as ongoing infonnation about plant sys cms, status and parameters, are provided to the NRC, ENS lines are locatad in the Control Room. TSC and
- LEOF, Health Physics Network (HPN): Provides for communications a
regarding radiological and meteorological conditions, assessments, trends, and protersive measures. HPN lines are located in the TSC and LEOF.
Reactor Sa'My Counterpart Link (RSCL): Allows for intemal NRC discussionis regarding plant and equipment conditions.
RSCL lines are located in the TSC and LEOF.
O
- i
NAEP Page 7.8 j
Revision 21 Protective Measures Counterpart Unk (PMCL): Allows for the conduct of intemal NRC discussions on radiological releases, meteorological conditions, and protective measures. PMCL lines are located in the TGC and LEOF, Emergency Response Data System (ERDS) Channel: Allows transmittal of reactor parametric data from the site to the NRC.
ERDS dets is transmitted from the ERFCS computer, via modem, to the NRC Operations Center.
Management Counterpart Link (MCL): This system has been established for intemal discussions between the NRC Executive Team Director / members and the NRC Director of Site Operations or licensee management. MCL lines are located in the TSC and LEOF.
Local Area Network (LAN) Access: Provides access to the NRC local area network. Telephone jacks are provided in the TSC and LEOF for NRC LAN access.
7.2.2.5 Insta. Phone loop A County and State Ringdown Loop (Insta-Phone) has been installed that permits simultaneous telephone speaker communications from the Station to the Counties of Louisa, Spotsylvania, Orange, Caroline, and Hanover and the State DES on a 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> per day basis. This loop can be activated at the Station from the Control Room, TSC, or LEOF.
7.2.3 Communications System Reliabihty A faibre of one communication system will not affect the operation of other communications systems at the station. The communications systems within the Station have diverse power supplies. The public address, system has an emergency backup, and the sound powered phone system does not rely on any station power system Since the onsite communication systems normally will be in use, or penedically tested, equipment failure will not go unnoticed. The multiplicity of onsite communications networks ensures the availability of adequate communications. Equipment for these systems is located in different areas of the Station thus ensunng that an accident in one area of the Stction would not incapacitate all communication systems. Failure of normal power supplies will not depnve the station of offsite communication capability since, in most cases backup power is provided. Dedicated telephone lines are checked according to specified schedules.
G
NAEP Page 7.9 R: vision 21 7.2.4 Ememency Response Facility Communications The communication systems discussed above are used extensively in the Emergency response facilities. A summary of the types of communications is x
provided in Table 7.1.
7.3 Msessment Facilities Available Onsite A number of instrumentation and monitoring systems are available onsite for emergency assessments. These systems are described below, 7.3.1 Seismic MonHorino The Seismic Monitonng System is designed to detect the occurrence of an earthquake at the North Anna site, to alert the Control Room via panel it;dications and annunciation, and to provide records of the intensity, duration, and frequency of the earthquake. A combination of passive and active detection devices are locateel in the Unit 1 Containment and the Auxiliary Building. The devices sense and record acceleration and frequency in all three mutually perpendicular directions. Active sensors provide indication and recording of seismic activity in the Control Room, while passive sensors record seismic activity by etching marks on metal plates which are later retneved and evaluated.
7.3.2 Radiolooical Monitonna The installed Radiation Monitoring System (RMS) consists of process monitors and area monitors which read out and rec.ord in the Control Room. The process system continuously monitors selected lines for radioactive effluents.
The system's function is to warn personnel of increasing radiation levels, to give early waming of a system malfunction, and to record and control discharges of radioactive liquids and gases to the environment.
High range process monitors are installed to provide accurate indication of plant releases dunng and following an acciC'ent. The flow paths monitored include the ventilation vents, the process vent (part of the Gaseous Waste System), the main steam lines, and the turbine driven auxiliary feedwater pump exhaust. High range area monitors, located inside the containments, are installed to provide adddional information on core integnty dunng and after a design basis accicent.
In addition to the fixed radiation monitonng equipment, portable radiation rnonitonng catipment would be used to perform dose assessments. The equipment consists of low and high range instruments to measure gamma, alpha, bela, and neutron rcdiation. This equipment is maintained by the G
I
NhEP Page 7.10 Revision 21 Radiological Protection Department and is used on a routine bans. Portable gamma detection instrument are also dedicated for emergency kit use (See Appendix 10.5). The kits are set aside solely for emergency use and are inventoned and checked for calibration and operability on a quarterly basis.
Portable equipment is also available to take low or high volume air samples.
Battery operated air samplers can be used to colled low volume samples either onsite or offsite.
Silver Zeolite cartridges would be used for sampling 4
radioiodine with a minimum detedable activity capability of SX10 microcuries per cc. Silver Zeolite has a low retention efficiency for Xenon and therefore, interference should be minimal. Plastic bags and bottles are available to collect water, soll, foodstuffs or other samples.
Emergency Plan implementing Procedures provide the methodology for determining the magnitude of a release by three separate and independent methods: (1) using data or samples continuously obtained by the onsite Radiation Monitonng System, (2) using known inventory data for the system (s) affected and (3) obtaining offsite data from air samplers or dosimeters which are continuously in place, or taking radiation surveys and appropriate samples, and using this data to calculate releases.
Equipment designated for use in environmental surveillance such as air samplers and thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) is used to obtain offsite data. The radiological monitonng instrumentation and sampling devices used by the station meet the minimurr requirements of the NRC Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position for Environmental Radiological Monitonng Programs Two Virginia Power TLDs have been placed in each of the 16 sectors within an approximate 5 mile radius of the station for accident monitonng Eight (B) TLDs are located beyond five miles from the station and are used to establish normal background radiation levels. Further details can be found in VPAP 2103. Offsite Dose Calculation Manual". The State also has TLD monitonng points located around the Station used for verification purposes.
Dosimetry and air sampler locations within the 10 mile EPZ are shown on Figures 7.1 and 7.2.
North Anna maintains fixed laboratory equipment to support sampling analysis and monitonng. The equipment includes Multichannel Analyzers, proportional counters a tntium analyzer, whole body counters and TLD reacting processors.
O
NAEP Page 7.11 Revision 21 2
7.3.3 Meteorolonsgel Monnonna The station's Meteorciopical MonitortnD 8Feiem provides the capabihty for predicting atmospheric effluent transport and diffusion. The system consists of a primary and a backup tower, the locations of which were chosen so as to be representative of regional conditions. Instruments located at these towers i
provide data that is input to the ERFCS for use in Meteorological Information
)
and Dose Assessment System (MIDAS) operations. The data ls also transmitted to the Control Room and to the Virginia Power Weather Center at innsbrook.
Table 7.2 provides a list 6ng of the parameters measured.
The meteorological equipment was designed to meet the entena of 3
Regulatory Guide 1.23, "On Site Meteorological Programs", dated February 1972.
7.3.4 Plant Process Parameter MonMonna Installed in the Control Room are the necessary instrumentation readouts to assess station status under all conditions. Information is available from meter displays, chart recorders, annunciators, and the plant process computers to assist the operator in contending with accident conditions, in order to support the data acquisitions need of the emergency response facilities, the ERFCS has been installed. The ERFCS provides plant monitonng, data acquisition, and entical plant data in the form of real-time status displays for the purpose of making a rapid evaluation of the reactor plant's safety status.
ERFCS monitors are located in the Control Room, TSC, LEOF, CERC and CEOF. The ERFCS includes the Safety Parameter Display System (SPDS),
Emergency Response Guidelines (ERGS), process and instrument displays, and pressure temperature plant displays. Monitor displays are continuously updated by the computer systems as they collect and process parametnc data from the vanous plant sensors.
]
7.3.5 Fire Detection The Station's Fire Protection System is designed to fumish water and other extinguishing agents with the capability of extinguishing any single or probable combination of simultaneous fires that might occur, Smoke and heat detectors are utilued for fire detection resultmg in automatic fire suppression initiation and/or alarming. These systems are designed in accordance with the standards of the National Fire Protection Association.
Ti n
a-
.---.-,-,-.-,,--.m u-.,
m..w..,
y,- -.,., -,-
NAEP Page 7.12 Revision 21 7.3.6 Post Accident Samolina The sentry Heh Radiation Sampling System (HRSS) has been installed to accommocate post accident sampling requirements. The HRSS is designed to secure timely samples from the reactor coolant system, containment sump, and the containment atmosphere while minimizing exposure to the sample analysis team. The system is designed to minimize operator exposure by providing shielding, in-line dilution for coolant and gases, flushing capability, and direct connections to rad waste or the containment sump for disposal. Further design criteria were implemented for rap 6d sampling and analysis by use of directional indicating valves and system mimics to aid operator understanding of system functions.
Cooling, depressurization, and handling casks for high activity samples are also provided.
7.4 Assessment Facilities Available Offsite The facilities and equipment located at the Surry Power Station may be utilized as applicable dunng emergency conditions at the North Anna Station. Additional seismic and meteorological data would be available. Respiratory protection, portable radiation detection instrumentation, and count room and sample analysis facilities would also be made available.
Seismic data may be obtained from the National Earthquake information Service. Meteorological data can be obtained from the following sources:
DISTANCE FROM LOCATION ORGANIZATION NORTH ANNA (MILES)
Chesterfield Virginia Power 56 Wakefield, Virginia National Weather Service 82 Charlottesville Federal Aviation Administration 43 Dulles Airport National Weather Service 65 The State Health Dep.irtment has equipped a mobile laboratory with radioassay equipment to respond to radiation emergencies. This vehicle is equipped with a radio to f acilitate coordination between the State and Virginia Power's offsite monitonng teams.
7.5 Damace Control EaueDment And Supphes The Station maintains an adequate inventory of spare parts, equipment and supplies, and could rely on additional equipment and supplies from the Surry Power Station. Such equipment and supplies consist of full face respirators with proper filters or canisters, SCBA respirators, air supplied respirators, silver zeolite cartridges (radiciodine sampimg), portable survey instruments, protective clothing and auxiliary apparel, portable sampling equipment, TLDs self reading dosimeters, count room instrumentation, polyethylene bags and bottles, radiation signs and rope, radioactive O
NAEP i
Page 7,13 Revision 21 waste containers, non exchange resin (liquid waste processing), portable hand held 2-O way radios, portable lightin0 equipment, and Company-owned vehicles.
This equipment is normally ato.md either in the Health Physics office and/or warehouse to facilitate transfer to the Operational Support Center as needed.
Equipment specifically designated for emergency response is inspected and inventoned at least once a quarter. Portable survey instrumentation is calibrated in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations, and count room instrumentation is calibrated annually (source checked daily).
7.6 Early Wamino System Virginia Power has installed and is responsible for maintaining and periodically testing an Ear 1y Waming System (EWS) consisting of alrens located throughout the 10 mile t
EPZ. The purpose of this system is to ensure that essentially 100% or the population within 5 miles of the site can be alerted within 15 minutes and that essentially 100% of the population from 5 to 10 miles from the site who may not have received the initial notification can be alerted within 45 minutes. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has determined that the system satisfies the roouirements of NUREG.
0654/ FEMA. REP 1, Revision 1, and FEMA REP 10.
l The state and local govemments have ultimate responsibility for waming the public.
Should it be necessary, state and local authorttles will alert tne public within the 10 miles EPZ using attemative methods described in the COVRERP, Members of the public within the ten (10) mile EPZ shall be informed of what actions to take following activation of the EWS sirens. Upon hearing the alert, they have been instructed to turn on their radios or television sets to the Emergency Alert System (EAS) to receive further instructions. Louisa and Spotsylvania counties and the State have 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> a day capability to activate the EWS system. Messages sent out over the EAS are prepared by the State DES.
t 4
4 r
NAEP Page 7.14 Revision 29 TABLE 7.1 ERF COMMUNICATIONS Control Room 1.
ARD to TSC, OSC, Securtty System Operator, DES 2.
Insta phone Loop to State and Country EOCs 3.
Station PBX Phones 4.
Virginia Power OPX Phone (General Office Network) 5.
Radio System 6.
NRC Emergency Notification System (ENS) 7.
Commercial Phones (Independent of Station F3X) 8.
Public Address / Intercom (Gal tronics) 9.
Sound Powered System 10.
Emergency Response Data System (EROS) Channel Technical Suocort Center (TSC) 1.
ARD to Control Room, OSC, LEOF, CERC, Security, Primary Remote Assembly Area, DES 2.
Insta Phone Loop to State and County EOCs 3.
Commercial Phones (Independent of Station PBX) 4.
Radio System 5.
Station PBX Phones 6.
Virginia Power OPX Phone (General Office Network) 7.
NRC Emergency Notification System (ENS) 8.
Public Address / Intercom (Gal tronics) 9.
Sound Powered System 10.
NRC Health Physics Network (HPN) 11.
NRC Reactor Safety Counterpart Link (RSCL) 12.
NRC Protective Measures Counterpart Link (PMCL) 13.
NRC Emergency Response Data System (ERDS) Channel 14.
NRC Management Counterpart Link (MCL) 15.
NRC Local Area Network (LAN) Access Operational Sucoort Center 1.
Public Address / Intercom (Gai Tronics) 2.
Station PBX Phone 3.
ARD to TSC Control Room O
V
NAEP Page 7.15 Revision 21 Local Ememency Ocarations Facilfly (LEOM O'
1.
ARD to TSC. CERC, LMC, JPic, Pnmary Remote AssemWy Area, DES, Louisa County, Spotsylvania County 2.
Insta Phone Loop to State and County EOCs 3.
Commercial Phones (Independent of Stat.on PBX) 4.
Radio System 5.
Station PBX PhMes 6.
Wginia Power OPX Phone (General Omco Network) 7.
NRC Emergency Notification System (EN8) 8.
NRC Health Physics Network (HPN) 9.
NRC Reactor Safety Counterpart Link (RSCL) 10.
NRC Protective Measures Counterpart Link (PMCL)
{
11.
NRC Management Counterpart Link (MCL) 12.
NRC Local Area Network (LAN) Access Corporate Ememenev Resoonse Center (CERC) 1.
Virginia Power OPX Phone (Station PBX) 2.
insta Phone Loop to State and County EOCs 4.
General Offace Network Phones Local Media Center (Located in North Anna Nuclear information Center) 1.
Commercial Phones (Independent of Station PBX)
(]
2.
ARD to LEOF CERC, and JPlc Q
3.
NANIC PBX Phones 4.
Virginia Power OPX Phones (Station PBX and General Office Network) 5 Media Conferencing Network 6.
Central Office (CO) leased phone lines LeQend ARD. Automatic Ringdown DES. State Dept. of Emergency Services OPX Off Premises Exchange ENS Emergency Notification System (NRC)
PBX Pnvate Branch Exenange JPIC. Joint Public Information Center 4
fV
~..
NAEP Page 7.16 RevisGn 21 TABLE 7.2 METEOMOLOGICAL MONITORING SYSTEM PARAMETER 5'll Pnmary Tower Backuo Tower Control Rm Measurement 48 $ Meters.10.7 Meters ground 10.7 Meters.
Readout Wind Speed X
X X
X Wind Direction X X
X X
W Sigma theta X
X X
X Temperature X
X Differential Temperature X
X X
Dew Point Temperature X
Prectpttalion X
Solar Radiation X
(1)
All data available via dial up link at Meteorological Operations in Richmond, (2)
Signal from Backup Tower only.
O 4
6
NAEP Page 7.17 Revision 21 NORTH ANNA POWER STATION O
MONITORING LOCATION MAP i
R ?'5 s$ A 10 mi 6M
~
sos me 1
m m
,,3 J
si
,./
.,/)
B at u t,,, -
,u MD i
81 g
SM m
Q C
wh
/y ~?;u m
7*
w m
n 1%
r.
~
a w,/w si,
==
71:
652 o
3 P
)m 1,w
(
D i
su 2 mi f./
- 613 738
'I 208 628 Sid 738 678
+
}
}
[605 O
N u /,,
W E
"5
=
U
[
670 gg C5 6
658 U
/
2pf e
g, 7
d
'{II
,~
o
${2
,669" r
i p
601 66 yoo h
.w,'
u****
t M
u~
r, su 6
1-F
6,,
700 j so
{$*!
1 ss
.ss u9 j '"
,65 t
(w su 73, 1
9 6%
618 I
68
[
M4
{
772 1
601 1
g m
55
/
)
ro.
J
'.i.
.s
~-
715 OM Il A
3
.,e s_ ; _
v_ M 3 (7%
O " ' ' * " * " '***' * "" ' -" ' '" "' ' 2 -
f 4
NAEP Page 7.18 Revision 21 FIGURE 7.2 NORTH ANNA POWER STATION MONITORING LOCATlON Ll5TINO'
&amade Media LDGMAD Stahan r h
Emeroency Plan 15det)
EfI12I E nvronmental Beenn0 Coohng 1our N 1/33 0.06 A
i (TLDs)
Sturgeon's Creek Manna N 2/34 2.20 A
Pariang Lot -t-NNE-y35 0.24 B
Good Hope Churen NNE 406 4 96 B
Panung Let *B-NE417 0.20 C
Bopps Drwe NE W38 1.46 C
Weather Towr Fence ENE 7/30 0.36 D
Route 689 ENE440 2 43 0
Near Trsrung Facury E 9/41 0.30 E
Morfwne Glory Hs E 10/42 2.85 E
Isaand Dike ESE 11/43 0.12 F
Route 622 ESE 12/44 4.70 F
Boopy Lab SE 13/45 0 75 0
Route 701 (Dem Ertrance)
SE 14146 5 86 G
Aspen Hdes
$$E 15/47 0 93 H
Ek Creek SSE 16/46 2.33 H
NAPS Access Road 5 17/49 0 47 J
Ek Creek Church S1&50 1.55 J
NAPS Access Road SSW 1951 0 42 K
Route 610 SSW 2052 5.30 K
500KV Tower SW-2153 0 60 L
1 Route 700 SW 2254 4 36 L
NAPS Radio Towt WSW 23'55 0.38 M
Route 700 WSW 2456 1.00 M
1 South Gate of Swnchyard W 2557 0.32 N
Route 685 W 2658 1.$5 N
End of Route 685 WNW 2759 1.00 P
Route 685 WNW 2650 1 40 P
Laycown Area North Gate NW 2911 0 45 0
Lake Anna Campground NW 3052 2 54 O
81/r2 Intake NNW 31/53 0 07 R
Route 208 NNW 3254 3 43 R
Bumpass Post Office C 1/2 7.30 H
Orange. Va C 3/4 22 00 Q
Mineret. Va C 55 7.10 M
Louisa. Va C 7/8 11.54 M
Environmental NAPS Lewage Treatment P6 ant 01 0.20 C
(TLDs) and Frecenetra Hati 02 5.30 K
Aircome Mineral. Va 03 7.10 M
Partculate and Wares Crossroads 04 5 10 P
Radiodine Route 752 05 4.20 B
Sturpoon's Creek Manna 05A 3.20 A
t evy. Va 06 4 70 F
Bumpass. Va 07 7.30 H
End of Route 685 21 1.00 P
Route 700 22 1.00 M
' Aspen Hitts' 23 0.93 H
Orange. Va 24 22 00 0
- Source Document VPAP 2103. Rev 8. Attachment 21, North Anna Environmental Sernphng Locations l
9
NAEP Page 8.1 Revision 21 NORTH ANNA POWER STATlON EMERGENCY PLAN s
SECTeON S 7
MAINTAINING EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS E3Il Subject PaoeNo.
8.0 Msint aining Emergency Preparedness................................................................
8.3 i
8.1 ResponsiblHty for Maintaining Emergency Preparedness...................................
6.3 8.2 Maintenance of the Emergency Plan, Emergency Plan implementing Procedures, and Emergency Personnel Notification List......................................
8.4 8.2.1 Review of the Emergency Plan and Emergency Plan implementing Procedures......................................................................................
8.4 82.2 Review of the Emergency Personnel Notification List.............................
8.4 8.23 Distribution of Emergency Plans and implementing Procedures.............
8.5 8.3 Training of Etation Personnel............
B.5 8.3.1 Responsibilities for Maintaining Emergency Preparedness Trt.ining........
8.5 8.3.2 Nuclear Power Station General Employee and Visitor Training...............
8.6 8.3 3 Emergency Response Personnei Trsining........................................
8.6 8.3 4 Cogntiive Evaluations.....
B.7 83.5 Task Performance Evaluetions...
B.7 8.36 Training Records.
8.7 84 Training Offsite Support Personnel.
8.7 8.5 Emergency Dntis...........
8.8 8.51 Communications Drills...
8.9 8.5.2 Fite Drills..,,..
8.9 8 5.3 Medical Emergeney Dnits.
8.9 8.54 Environmental Monitonng Onlis 8.10 8.5 5 Post Accident Gampling Dnits 8.10 8.5 6 Radiological IAonitonng Dnits.
8.10 8.5.7 Combined Functional Onits...
8,10 0
~ -, -,,
NAEP Page 8.2 Revision 21 8.6 E m e rg e n cy Ex e rcise s.......................................................................................
8.11 g
8.6.1 Sch ed uling of Emergency Exercises..................................................
8.11 8.6.2 Emergency Ex ercise Content...................................................
8.11 8.6.3 Emergency Exercise Seenanos.........................................
8.11 864 Conduct of Eme rgency Exercises..................................................
8.12 8.6.5 Emergency Exercise Evaluation and Corrective Action....................
8.12 8.6.6 R e cord s of Emerg e ncy Ex e rcise.........................................................
8.12 8.7 Testing and Msintenance of Emergency Equipment..............
8.13 8.8 Informing the Public..
8.14 8g independent Review of the Emergency Preparedness Program........................
8.15 Table 81 E m e rg e n cy Pr e pa r e d n e ss T ra ining..........................................................
8.16 0
9 J
NAEP PaDe8.3 Revision 21 8.0 MAINTAINING EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS p
Virginia Power has instituted an emergency preparedness program to support development, V
maintenance and coordination of the company's emergency response capability. The Emergency Plan and associated Emergency Plan implementing Procedures, which provide specific guidance to emergency response personnel, are revised as required and reviewed at least annually m accordance with this program.
Personnel who may be required to fill emergency response positions receive initial and annual training in their functional responsibilities. Training is also provided for vanous offsite groups that have agreed to support the station response to an emergency. Dedica*ed emergency equipment is kept operational through testing in accordance with an established periodic surveillance program Penodic drills and a biennial exercise are conducted for training and to identify program strengths and weaknesses. Additionally, the emergency preparedness program provides for the issuance of public information matenal. This material provides the public with a desenption of the emergency notification process, and guidelines used to protect public health and safety in an emergency.
Independent reviews of the emergency preparedness program are also conducted.
81 RESPONSIBILITIES FOR MAINTAINING EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS The Senior Vice President. Nuclear, assigned the overall authority for maintaining emergency preparedness, has delegated the responsibility for program maintenance and implementation to the Vice President. Nuclear Operations. The Vice President. Nuclear Operations has delegated the responsibility for maintaining emergency preparedness to the Director Nuclear Emergency Preparedness and responsibility for program implementation to the Station Manager.
The pnmary responsibilities of the Director Nuclear Emergency Preparedness include:
a)
Coordinating the Company emergency preparedness program with offsite emergency response organizations b)
Coordinating Company emergency preparedness planning activities c)
Conoucting public information and media information activities d)
Coordinating emergency Onlis and exercises between Company departments and offsite agencies, and venfying that they are conducted as required; c)
Coordinating emergency preparedness progrJm reviews f)
Coordinating emergency preparedness activities between the stations and other Company departments g)
Providing support to the stations in the area of emergency preparedness h)
Obtaining letters of agreement from appropnate offsite emergency response organizations i)
Coordinating the annual review of Emergency Action Levels with State and local j)
Performing the annual review of the emergency plan and implementing procedures
NAEP Page6.4 R: vision 21 k)
Mainialaing the Emergency Plan, implementing Procedures, and other documents r stated to Emergency Preparedness I)
Verifying distnbution of copies of the Emergency Plan and implementing Procedures to persons or organizations with responsibility for implementation of the plan or procedures m)
Coordinating emergency preparedness trainin0 and verifying that it is performed n)
Verifying that required testing and maintenance of emergency equipment is performed o)
Vertfying that required emergency preparedness records are maintained and filed p)
Co>rdinating the conduct of an augmentation capability assessment at least once per calendar quarter The hierarchy for program maintenance is further outlined in VPAP.2601,
- Maintaining Emergency Preparedness".
8.2 MAINTENANCE OF THE EMERGENCY PLAN. EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTIE PROCEDURES. AND EMERGENCY PERSONNEL NOTIFICATION LIST Station documents which are required to ensure emergency preparedness include; a)
The North Anna Emergency Plan b)
The North Anna Emergency Plan implementing Procedures c)
The North Anna Emergency Personnel Notification List 8.2.1 Review of the Ememency Plan and Ememenev Plan implementina Procedures Nuclear Emergency Preparedness personnel shall review the North Anna Emergency Plan and associated implementing Procedures at least annually, certifying that they are adequate and current. Nuclear Emergency Preparedness personnel shall also review the results of independent assessments of the emergency preparedness program and entiques of exercises and drills to evaluate their impact on station emergency preparedness documents. The re.;sults of these reviews shall be reported to the Station Nuclear Safety and Operating Committee (SNSOC) and the documentation filed by Records Management SNSOC shall review proposed i sions to the Emergency Plan and tne Emergency Plan implementing Procedures and make recommendations to the Station Manager, who is responsible for their approval if a proposed revision is judged to decrease the effectiveness of these documents with respect to the requirements of 10 CFR 50 47 (b) or 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, it shall be submitted to the NRC for approval in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.54 (q) pnor to implementation 8.2.2 Re view of the Ememency Personnel Notification List Nuclear Emergency Preparedness personnel shall ensure a review of the Emergericy Personnel Notification List is performed at least quarterly, and shall ensure l
NAEP Page 8.5 Revision 21 required revisions are made. Documentation of this review shall be filed by Records Management.
'O 8.2.3 Distribution of Ememency Plans and imolementino Pr%rns in accordance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, revisions to the Emergency Plan and im,*menting Procedures shall be submitted to the NRC within 30 days following the assigned effective date. Revisions to the SEP will also be distributed to those offstte agencies requiring copies in order to perform their emergency response functions.
8.3 TRAINING OF STATION PERSONNEL i
The effectiveness of a response to a station emergency relates directly to the level of emergency preparedness maintained by station personnel. Emergency preparedness of station personnel is maintained through an integrated program that includes general onentation for all persons badged at the station and adohional detailed training for persons assigned specific emergency response functions to supplement the general orientation and normal job related training.
The pnmary objectives of this emergency preparedness training program are to:
a)
Ensure emergency response personnel maintain familiarity witfi the North Anna Emergency Plan, its implementing procedures and their functional responsibilities dunng an emergency b)
Inform emergency response personnel of their functional role and responsibilities during an emergency c)
Familianze emergency response personnel with significant changes to the North Anna Emergency Plan and its implementing procedures 83.1 BesDonsibilities for Maintainino Ememency Prenaredness Trainina To ensure that regulatory requirements and guidance for conducting emergency preparedness training are met, a Nuclear Power Station Emergency Preparedness Training (NPSEPT) Program Guide has been developed. Responsibilities for ensunng emergency preparedness training are provided as follows:
a.
The Station Manager is responsible for ensunng station personnel are tramed in accordance with the NPSEPT Program Guide, b.
Depanment supenntendents and supervisors are responsible for ensunng their personnel receive training. This includes designating individuals who may serve as pnmary, intenm or attemate emergency response personnel and ensunag they successfully complete the training specified by the NPSEPT Program Guide.
e
--en
NAEP Page 8.6 I
Revision 21 F
c.
The Director. Nuclear Emergency Preparedness is responsible for developing and scheduling training programs that meet the requirements for this plan, and for maintaining records to document the training.
d.
Nuclear Emergency Preparedness personnel other than those designated to develop training programs will independently verify that the training required by the NPSEPT Program Guide and this plan is accomplished.
8.3.2 Nuclear Power Stat 60n General Emolovee and VisHor Trainina All persons badged to enter the Protected Area unescorted receive, as part of Nuclear Power Station General Employee Training, initial classroom training and annual retraining in the following subjects:
a)
Station Policies and Procedures including,in part:
1)
Reporting abnormal conditions (e.g.. fire, first aid event, etc.)
2)
Fire and First Aid alarms and announcements 3)
Response to Fire and First Aid emergencies b)
Radiation Protection Training including basic principles of radiological safety c) limergency Preparedness Training Overview including:
1)
General scope and overview of the Emergency Plan 2)
Station Emergency Alarm and announcements 3)
Response to Station Emergency Alarm 4)
Personnel accountability 5)
Visitor control dunng an emergency 6)
Site evacuation 7)
Emergency Plan implementing Procedures 8)
Emergency organization 9)
Emergency Control Centers (Emergency Facilities)
, 10)
Emergency Action Levels As appropnate cenain stotion visttors receive training in some or all of the above subjects tri accorcance with station administrative procedures.
8.3.3 Emeroency Resnonse Personnel Trainina Personnel designated to fili intenm, pnmary or attemate emergency response positions will receive training in accordance with the NPSEPT Program Guide. This guide establishes the initial training and retralning requirements for all emergency response positions. Table 8.1 provides a listing of select emergency response positions along with an overview of the training provided. Revisions to the NPSEPT Program Guide that affect those descriptions referenced in Table 8.1 will be reflected in the next scheduled revision of this Plan. Equivalency credit for required training sessions may be e i
1
NAEP Page8.7 R: vision 21 i
awarded based on an individuals knowledge of the aubbet matter Such credit requires the approval of the Director Nucisar Emergoney Preparedness and the Station f
Manager.
8.3.4 Cannitive Evaluations Cognitive evaluations may include self critiques, group discussions, and/or f
wntten tests administered followmg complet60n of NPSEPT classroom trammg.
l Evalual' ens are normally adminisiered by the course ir.structor and may be scheduled at the end of a workshop, loaming activity, instructional unit, or a number of related units.
A minimum score of 70% is considered passing on NPSEPT wMen tests For training incorporated into regularly scheduled continuing training programs, the passinft criteria for that training program applies. Individuals fai9ng to successfully complete the j
required training within the required time interval will be relieved of their emergency 4
response assignments.
8.3.$
Task Performance Evaluations Task performance evaluations nre prescribed for individuals who must perform
[
tasks as responders which are outside of their normal day to-day rest onsibilities and may be satisfied through completion of a Job Demonstrat6on Guide (JDG), participation in an appropnate Virginia Power drill, Simulator Exercise, facility trainmg activity or included in classroom leemmg activities as part of the classroom training requirement.
l JDG evaluations are conducted by the applicable pnmary responder, team leader or mstructor and are scored on a pass / fall basis.
8.36 Trainino Records i
The Director. Nuclear Emergency Preparedness is responsible for ensunng that required emergency preparedness trainmg records are maintained. These records are mamtsined by Records Management. The required emergency preparedness training records include:
1' a)
Program Records: Atte.ndance sheets, master copies of Job Demonstration Guides, master copes of tests and answer keys, copies of instructor guides, NPSEPT Trammg Rosters and NPSEPT extensions.
b)
Trainee Records Con'pleted tasts and responder training records.
84 TRAINING OF OFFSITE SUPPORT PERSONf JEL The vanous offstte organizations which support the station during an emergency receive trainmg as part of their own emergency preparedness programs. For example, Virginia Power corporate personnel receive emergency preparedness training as part of the Corporate l
Emergency Response Plan, and the State and local govemments Conc:ct training for their i
personnel as part of their Radiological Emergency Response Plan program. However, in order lO O
NAEP Pept O O R; vision 21 to promote effective emergency response capability, the station offers site specific emergency response training on an annual basis to local offsite emergency support organizations which have agreed to provide assistance. The organizations include the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of State Police and local county sheriffs departments, volunteer fire companies, and rescue squads.
The annual training shall address the following:
a)
The basic scope of the North Anna Power Station Emergency Plan b)
Emergency classifications c)
Notification methods d)
Basic radiation protection e)
Station access procedures f)
The individual, by title, in the station emergency response organization who will direct their activities onsite g)
Definition of their support roles Training offered to local offsite support organizations will be coordinated with Station Safety and Loss Prevention or Station Secunty, as appropriate. Safriy and Loss Prevention, Secunty, and/or Nuclear Training may assist in the conduct of offsite training. Training records shall be maintained and filed by Recoids Management. These records shall include let'.?rs of invitation (or record of telephone invitation), attendance sheets, and the cumculum outline.
8.5 EMERGENCY DRitt.S As a part of maintaining emergency preparedness, penodic drills shall be conducted.
The primary objectives of onlis are to.
a)
Venfy that f acilities, equipment, and communication systems function as required b)
Demonstrate the adequacy of station procedures used dunng an emergency c)
Familianze station emergency response personnel with planned emergency response actions d)
Disclose deficiencies which may require corrective action Drills may be conducted independently, in conjunction with another drill or conducted as part of an exercise. The individual responsible for the drill shall ensure that all necessary documentation is maintained A scenano will be developed to support the conduct of each drill. The scenano should be designed to allow for open decision making (free play), if a drill is conducted in conjunction with another dnll or as part of an exercise, the dnll scenano, objectives and narrative shall be incorporated into the overall drill / exercise package. Drill packages shallinclude:
a)
Objectives of the Onli b)
Evaluation entena O
l NAEP Pago8.9-Revision 21 c)
Date and time pened of the drill d)
Participating personnel or organizations e)
A narrative summary describin0 the overall integrahon of scenario events (e.g.,
l Wmuisted casaanies, offsNe assistance, rescue of personnel, simulated activHy levelsi and deployment of monitoring teams) f)
A time schedule of the real and simulated events It is not required that all errorgency response personnel assigned a particular emergency function participate in a drill covering that fundion. State and local govemments will be allowed to participate in drills at their request. Participation by offsNe organizations may be simulated.
Drills shall be controlled and observed by individuals qualified to conduct and evaluate j
the drill. Critiques will be used to document evaluation of the drill. Defleiencies identified as a i
result of the drill evaluation will be presented to Station Management, and corrective actions will be coordinated through NEP.
Records of each drill will be maintained by Records Management and include the drill scenano package and the post drill critique, Records of drills held in conjunction with an exercise may be integrated into the emergency exercise package (i.e. scope, objectives, crttique, 4
5 etc.).
The types and frequencies of drills conducted at the station are designated below.
8.5.1 Communications Drills Communications onlis shall be conducted at least once per calendar year and shall include:
4 a)
Use of evergency communications systems between the Control Room, the
}
TSC, the LEOF, the OSC, the NRC Operations Center, the State EOC, the county EOCs, and the Onsite and Offsete Monitonng Teams j
b)
Sending, receiving and vanfication of message content 8.5.2 Fire Drills Fire drills shall be conducted in accordance with the requirements of the North Anna Fire Protection Program which mes:s the requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix R, Sec. Ill.l. Fire Bngade Training.
i 8.5 3 Medical Emeroency Dnlis Medical Emergency dnlis call be conducted at laut once por calendar year and shall incluce:
a)
A simulated contaminated inju'ed individtial b)
- Participation by a local rescue squad c)
Transport to an offsite medical facility d)
Panicipation by the offsite tredical facility 9
m-3.-
- m. - -,.
..,.,,,,,....m.;._,m..__,._-.-
._.m.,..
,,w.
.... _ -,, _.. ~,,... _. _.. _.
NAEP Page 8.10 Revision 21 8.5 A Environmental Monitorino Drills Environmental Monitonng dri!!s shall be conducted at least once per calendar year and shallinclude:
a)
Collection of water, vegetation, soll, and air samples both onsite and offsite, as appropriate b)
Analysis of the above samples c)
Use of communicattons with the monitoring teams d)
Use of the appropriate procedures for collecting and analyzing samples and recording results 8.5.5 Post Accident Samolin9 Drills Post Accident Sampling dnlis shall be conducted at least once per calendar year and shall ine'ude:
a)
Obtaining actual liquid and/or atmospheric samples using the High Radiation Sampling System b)
Analysis of the above samples c)
Use of the appropnate procedures for collecting and analyzing the samples and recording results 8.5.6 Bad!olooical Monitonna Drills Radiological Monitoring drills shall be conducted semi annually with a maximum allowable grace period not to exceed 25%, and shall include:
a)
Response to simulated elevated airt>ome and/or liquid activity levels, as appropnate b)
Response to simulated elevated area radia*. ion levels c)
Analysis nf the simulcted radiological situation using the appropnate procedures.
B.5.7 Ctmbined Functional DnIls Combined Functional onlis shall be conducted at leact once during the interval between biennial exercises and involve a combination of some of the principal functional areas of onsite emergency response capabilities, such as:
a)
Management and coordination of emergency response b)
Accident assessment c)
Protective action cecisionmaking d)
Plant system repair and corrective actions O
O
^
NAEP Page8.11 R: vision 21 8.6 EMERGENCY EXERCISES i
O An emergency exercise shall be conducted with a stated scope and objectives. The primary objectives of an emergency exercise are to:
a)
Venfy the integrated capability of the various emergency response organizations to respond to an emergency l
b)
Test a major portion of the basic elements existing within the emergency response plans and organizations c)
Demonstrate the adequacy of procedures used during an emergency d)
Provide an opportunity for emergency response personnel to dernonstrate their ability to perform planned emergency response actions e)
Disclose deficiencies which may require corrective action B.6.1 Schedulino of Ememenev Exercises An emergency exercise shall be conducted at North Anna Power Station at least once per biennium, normally on even numbered years. Emergency exercises will be setieduled to start at different times of the day with advance knowledge of the time held confidentially, At least once every 6 years, the specific exercise date should be unannounced. Additionally and at least once every 6 years, an exercise should be initiated during off hours (between 6 pm and 4 am on a weekday, or dunng a weekend).
The unannounced and/or off hours demonstration may be conducted dunng or
[O) independent of the biennial exercise.
86.2 Emeroency Exercise Content The content of exercises shall be varied from year to year such that all major elements of the state, local, and station plans are tested over a 6 year period.
Exercises shall melude.
a)
An emergency classification of at least Site Area Emergency b)
A mobilization of as many elements of the state, local, and station plans as is reasonably achievable without mandatory public participation c)
Invitation for involvement of Federal Emergency Response Agencies at least one.e every 5 years B,6.3 Ememenev Exercise scenarios Each emergency exercise shall be based on a pre planned written scenano. The overall exercise package shall address, but not be limited to:
a)
Basic performance objectives of the exercise b)
Evaluation entena used to venfy demonstration of performance objectives c)
Date, initiation time, and exercise duration d)
Participating organizations ho
NAEP Page8.12 Revisi:n 21 e)
Simulated events f)
Time schedule of the real and simulated events g)
A narrative summary describing the overall integrJtion of scenario events such as simulated causaltties, offsite assistance, rescue of personnel, use of protective equipment, simulated activity and radiation levels, and deployment of monttonng teams ri)
A desenption of the number, location, and basic duties of the facilitators I)
A desenption of the arrangem6nts made for, and advance materials to be provided to, the facilitators Advance knowledge of the scenario shall be minimized to ensure realistic participation by those involved.
8.6.4 Conduct of Ememency Exercises The emergency exercise will be initiated and supervised by designated fat litators. These facilitators shall ensure that:
a)
The information supplied to the participants is of sufficient detail to allow realistic analysis of the sim slated events and to provide a basis for rational decision making b)
The infonnation is supplied on a real time basis c)
The exercise is not 50 structured as to prevent free play and independent decision making on the part of the participants 8.6.5 Ememency Exercise Evaluation and Corrective Action Emergency exercises shall be evaluated by qualified facilitators. Facilitators shall be selected based on expertise, knowledge of the areas to be evaluated, and familianty with emergency response requirements. Personnel from federal, state, or local govemments may observe the exeretse. Specific areas to be evaluated by the f acilitators will be defined in the form of pre pr'nted critique sheets.
Critiques will be held as soon as practicable after the exercise. Cntiques s'iould be attended by exercise facilitators and key participants. Notes of entique comments shall be recorded.
Facilitators shall complete critique sheets documeliting their observations. Cntique sheets shall be submitted in accordance with the schedule established for the exercise.
Within 60 days of the exercise, a Post Exercise Critique Report shall be issued.
Identified corrective actions will then be assigned for implementation.
8.6.6 Records of Ememency Exercises The exercise scenano package and Post Exercise Crit}que are filed by Records Management.
O
__ -_ - __~
NAEP Page8.13 Revision 21 8.7 TESTING AND MAINTENANCE OF EMERGENCY EQUIPAMNT O
Emergency equipment shall be penodically tested to identify and correct deficiencies.
The specific scope and responsibilhies for performing these tests are provMed in administrative procedures. A secure container that has not been opened since the previous satisfactory check does not require an hem by hem cot.nl of Ms contents to satisfy an inventory requirement. The i
i iesting shallinclude:
a)
The contents of the emergency kits dedicated for emergency use shall be inventoned quarterly and following each use.
b)
Dedicated emergency survey in trumentation shall be inventoried and operationally checked quarterly and following each use. Calibration of dedicated emergency survey instrumentation shall be performed in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations, c)
Self contained breathing apparatus shall be inspected and operationally checked I
monthly and following use dunng an emergency, d)
State and local nngdown loop (Insta phone) extensions and the ringdown phone to the J
Sta'e EOC located at the station and LEOF shtll be operationally checked on a monthly basis. In addition NRC Emergency Notification System extensions and NRC Healt-Physics Network extensions locaiad at the station and LEOF shall be operationally checked monthly, e)
A daily operability check of the Safety Parameter Display System (SPDS)
)
f)
Every 18 months, functional and performance testing of the TSC and LEOF Ventilation system g)
Operability testing in accordance with n.anufacture's recommendations and biennial calibrations of TSC and LEOF radiation monitors h)
Weekly calibration checks of analyzers and monthly and quarterly operability testing of 1
the Post Accident Sampling System (PASS) i)
Semimonthly functional polling testing and quarterly full cycle activation and/or growl testing of the Early Waming System (EWS) 4 Y
O r.---r
..%.m --
r,,y,..-
w
- - -. -w.
,+
NAEP Page8.14 Revisi:n 21 88 INFORVING THE PUBLIC Information desenbing the emergency notification process as well as actions that should be taken in the event of an emergency shall be provided to the public on an annual basis.
Information provided to the public shall include:
a)
Educationalinformation on radiation b)
Contact points for additional information c)
Special needs of the handicapped d) initial actions following Early Waming System Activation e)
Protective actions, such as sheltenng or evacuation f)
Evacuation routes The company will coordinate its efforts with State and local authorities to ensure the public is informed by using the best means available. These means may include:
a)
Information in telephone books b)
Utillty billinsertt c)
Newspaper ads d)
Postings in public areas e)
Information in calendars distnbuted to residents The information will be distnbuted to ensure coverage with'n the 10 mile emergency planning zone.
The company shall also establish a telephone system for dealing with rumets.
"e telephone numbers will be annt.unced over the Emergency Alert System and individua s within the 10 mile emergency planning zone will be invited to call collect.
The Director. Nuclear Emergency Preparedness shall ensure that a program to acquaint the news media with the followi ig information is offered on an annual basis:
a)
Information conceming radiation c)
Points of contact for release of public information in an emergency 0
~~
NAEP Page 8.15 Revision 21 8.9 INDEPENDEhfT REVIEW O ' THE EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM An independent review of the emergency preparedness program shall be conducted at rO leest onM every 12 months in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54 (t). This review shall include:
a)
The North Anna Emergency Plan and implementing Procedures b)
Emergency Plan training c)
Emergency drills d)
Emergency exercises e)
Emergency equipment f)
Interfaces with State and local govemments g)
Required records ano occumentation This res!ew shall be conducted by a Virginia Power organization or outside consultant which has no direct responsibility for emergency preparedness.
The results of the review and recommendations for improvements shall be documented and reported to company management. The results regarding adequacy of interface between Virginia Power and State and local govemments shall be made availa'Ae to the cognizant offsite authonty. Recommendations for improvement shall be evaluated and, when appropriate, assigned for corrective action.
Th following records shall be filed by Records Management and maintained for 5 years:
a)
The review results and recommended improvements h
b)
The answers to the recommended improvements o
c)
A descttption of the corrective actions taken e
v
NAEP Page 8.16 Revision 21 TABLE 8.1 EMERGENCY PREPnREDNEES TRAINING EMERGENCY RESPONSE POSITION SCOPE OF TRAININA (see Footnotes, naxt page)
Station Emergency Manager 1,2,7,13,15 Emergency Communicator 1,3,13 Emergency Procedures Coordinator 1,2,13 Emergency Operations Directar
' 2,13,15 Emergency Maintenance Directar 1,4,6,13 Emergency Technical Director 1,6,13,15 Shift Technical Advisor 1,2,13,15 Emergency Administrative Director 1,6,7,13 Radiological Assessment Director 1,9,10,11,13,15 Radiation Protection Supervisor 1,10,11,13 Operational Support Center Director 1,4,5,13 Maintenance Support Team 1,4,6,13 Technical Support Team 1,6,13,15 Chemistry Team 1,12,13 Administrative Support Team Team Leader 1,6,8,13 Ciencal Personnel 1,6,13 Loss Prevention / Safety Personnel 1,13,14 Secunty Team 1,8,13 Dose Assessment Team 1,9,13 Sample Analysis and Monitonng Teams 1;11,13 Fire Team 1,13,14 First Aid Team 1,13,14 Damage Control Team 1,4,13 Search and Reset. Team 1,13,14 0
m
..m
NAEP Page 8.17 Revision 21 SCOPE OF TRAINING FOOTNOTES:
1.
Training provided to all emergency response personnel emphasizes: Emergency organization, emergency classification system, personnel accountability, emergency exposure limits, emergency response facilities, security access control and site evacuation process, and exposure control techniques.
i I
2.
Training provided emphasizes: Assessing emergencies, classifying emergencies, notification systems, contaminated injured personnel actions, site evacuation, emergency radiation exposure authorization, ?, site support group capabilities, and recovery.
3.
Training provided emphastzes: Notifications and reports to offsite authorities and communication l.
syrtems as appropnate for individual position assignments.
4.
Training provided emphasizes: Emergency Plan Damage Control organization, communication systems, and planning and coordination of damage control tasks.
5 Training provided emphasizes: Activation and administration of the Operational Support Center.
6.
Training provided emphasizes: Activation and administration of the Technical Support Center.
7.
Training provided emphasizes Site evacuation procedure.
8 Training p'ovided t'aphasizes: Notification of station personnel LEOF Activation, personnel accountability / evacuation, and station access control dunng an emergency. The Secunty Mpartment is responsible for the conduct of this training and for ensunng that documentation is properly m=H uned for Secunty Department personnel.
9 Training prc>ided emphasizes: Dose Assessment.
i 10.
Training provided emphasizes: Control of emergency Health Physics organizahon, emerDency exposure evaluation, and protective measures.
O I
NAEP Page8.18 Revision 31 11, Training provided emphasizes: Respiratory protection, personnel decontamination, inplant monitoring, offsite mJnitoring, monitoring of emergency Centers and remote assembly areas, contaminated injuries, and radio communications as appropriate for individual position assignments.
12.
Training provided emphasizes: Post accident samplirq and higii bvel activity sample analysis.
13.
Training provided emphasizes: Organizational interfeoss and responsibilities appropnate for individual position assignments.
14, Training provided emphasizes: Emergency organizational interfaces, search anti rescue procedures, and communications systems. Fire Team memtsrs shall also receive Fire angade training as required by the North Anna Power Station Fire Protection Program, which meets the requirements of 10CFRSO, Appendix R, and is equivalent to the State's certification program.
First Aid Team Members shall also receive training as required by station administrative procedures, which meet the requirements of the Nuclear Operations Industrial Safety and Health Accident Prevention Manual.
L 15.
Training pmvided emphasizes: Use of the Emergency Response Facility Computer System appropnate for individual position assignments.
O
NAEP Page 9.1 Revision 21 NORTHANNA POWER 1TATION EMERGENCY PLAN SECTION 9 RECOVERY epa Subject Pace No.
9.0 Recovery....................................................................................................
9.2 9.1 Recovery Methodology...
9.2 9.2 Population Exposure....
9.3 i
l NAEP l
Page 9.2 Revision 21 9.0 Recoverv
/
The recovery process will be managed by a special, designated organization composed
\\
of Virginia Power personnel.
The recovery organization is described in the Corporate Emergency Response Plan and further outlined in the EPIP specifically designed for administration of the recovery program. The basic organization may be modified, as required, to address the needs of the given situation. The Recovery Manager assumes control and direction of the recovery operation with the authority and responsibilities set forth in the Corporate Emergency Response Plan and EPIPs.
The recovery process is implemented when the Recovery Manager and the Station Emergency Manager, with concurrence of State and Federal egencies, have determined the station to be in a stable and controlled condition. Upon the determination, the Recovery Manager shall notify the NRC Operations Center, the State Emergency Operations Center, and the Local County Emergency Operations Centers that the emergency has been terminated and any required recovery has commenced.
9.1 Recoverv Methodoloov The Recovery organization will develop plans and procedures designed to address both immediate and long term actions. The necessity to maintain protective measures implemented dunng the emergency will be evaluated and, if deemed appropriate, the Recovery organizaban will recommend relaxation of the protective
[)
measures.
The following conditions shall be cons!dered appropnate for the recommendation to relax protection measures, a.
Station parameters of operation no longer indicate a potential or actual emergency exists b.
The release of radioactivity from the Station is controllable, no longer exceeds permissible levels and does not present a credible danger to the public, c.
The Station is capable of sustaining itself in a long term shutdown condition.
Because it is not possible to foresee all of the consequences of an event, specific recovery procedures may need to be wntten to address specialized requirements Where powbie. existing station procedures will be utilized in the areas of operations, maintenance and radiological controls. Any special recovery procedures will require the same review and approval process accorded other station procedures and, as such, will require the approval of the Station Nuclear Safety and Operating Committee (SNSOC).
(LJ O
NAEP Page 9.3 Revision 21 9.2 Population Exoosure Total population doses shall be periodically estimated in the affected sectors and zones utilizing population distribution data from within the emergency planning zones.
Station personnel initially determine Total Effective Dose Equivalent (TEDE) due to extemal exposure from airbome material, extemal exposure from ground deposition, and intemal exposure due to inhalation. Initial calculations are also performed for determination of Thyroid Committed Dose Equivalent (CDE) resulting from innalation of radiciodines. The methodology used is consistent with that presented in EPA-400-R 92-001, MANUAL OF PROTECTIVE ACTION GUIDES AND PROTECTIVE ACTIONS FOR NUCLEAR INCIDENTS.
Determination of total population doses will be performed utillzing the Meteorological information and Dose Assessment System (MIDAS) computer code or equivalent, and will include assessments of exposure received from (but not necessarily limited to) immersion, inhalation, ground shine, and ingestion of radioactive materials.
O O
O
NAEP Page 10.1 NORTH ANNA POWER STATION EMERGENCY PLAN SECTlON 10 APPENDICES Eg3 Sutvect 10.1 Letters of Agreement 10.2 Deleted 10.3 Maps of Exclusion Area, Low Population and Emergency Planning Zone Boundaries 10.4 Listings of EPIPs 10.5 Protective Equipment and Supplies 10.6 Deleted 10.7 Supporting Plan Contact 10.8 Estimation of Evacuation Times 10.9 Radiation Emergency Plan. MCVH/VCU - Virginia Power 10.10 Federal Radiological Monitonng and Assessment Center (FRMAC) Operations Plan 10.11 initiating Conditions / Emergency Action Leve.'s o
l
NAEP Page 10.1.1 Revision 21 Letters of Aareement Federal Agencies:
U. S. Department of Energy Field Office, Oak Ridge State Agencies:
Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Emergency Services Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Health Commonwealth of Virginia Department of State Police Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Game and inland Fisheries Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University Local Agencies:
Louisa County Administrator Louisa County Volunteer Firefighter's Association Louisa County Sheriff Emergency Medical Services Association of Louisa County (Louisa County Rescue Squad, Inc., Mineral and Louisa Units, Holly Grove Rescue Squad, Inc., and Trevilians Volunteer Fire Department, Inc.)
Spotsylvania County Shenff Spotsylvania Volunteer Fire Department, Inc.
Spotsylvania County Coordinator Orange County Shenff Orange County Administrator Caroline County Coordinator Caroline County Shenff Hanover County Administrator Hanover County Shenff 1
1
4 Dep:rtm:nt of Energy j rj Field Office, Oak Ridge NAEP
/
P.O. Box 2001 Page 10.1.2 Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-Revision 21 MAR 2 91996 Mr. M. R. Kansler Vice President - Nuclear Engineering and Services Innsbrook Technical Center 5000 Dominion Blvd.
Glen Allen, Virginia 23060 Dear Mr. Kansler.
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (DOE) RADIOLOGICAL ASSISTANCE AVAILABILITY FOR NORTH ANNA AND SURRY POWER STATIONS This letter is in response to your March 14,1996, letter requesting an updated Letter of Agreement regarding the availability of DOE Radiological Assistance. This letter will serve to update any existing letters between your organization and the DOE Oak Ridge Operations Omce (ORO), and to conform that the procedures outlined in the document entitled Guidefor Requesung Radiological Assistance that was issued in 1986 are still valid.
Based on requirements set forth in the FederalRadiologicalEmergency Response Plan, issued in November 1985, DOE ORO will provide radiological assistance for incidents that occur at your g
facility. Prior to dispatch of radiological assistance, we will consult with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and appropriate state authorities to ensure that there will not be a duplication of efTorts. The type and duration of radiological assistance provided will depend on the severity of the incident and will be limited to advice and emergency actions essential for the comrol of immediate hazards to health and safety.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at (423) 576-9725.
Sincerely,
,f
-m B'oM. Davis, Manager Emergency Management Program Omce CC:
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Region II, Regional Administrator J. J. Fowler, CC-10 J. E. Randolph, DP-23, GTN
I NAEP
(
(
Page 10.1.3
)
Revision 21 O
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
-1 Depanment of Emergency Services m w no c A o si.avron..m
- n. cam vna.a rmwoi Eo!U$U April 25,1996 Mr. Michael R.' Kansler Vice President, Nuclear Engineering and Services g g
Dear Mr. Kansler:
Reference is made to your letter of March 14,1996, regarding the need to update our Letter of Agreement in compliance with the federal criteria prescribed by NUREG 0654/ FEMA REP-1.
We have reviewed the North Anna and Surry Power Stations' emergency
's plans and ere assured that they properly interface with the state Radiological Emergency Response Plan (RERP) as well as with the local RERPs, site-specific to either power station. Upon receiving notification of a radiological accident at a l
Yrginia Power nuclear power station, state agencies and local governments will implement their Radiological Emergency Response Plans in accordance with state and local government procedures. Specifically, the Department of Emergency Services (DES) agrees to implement all or parts of the following actions in the event of a radiological emergency at either plant site:
1.
Operate the Virginia Emergency Operations Center (VEOC).
2.
Provide DES on-scene coordinator (s) to the EOF.
l 3.
Provide warning in coordination with other state and local government agencies and the nuclear facility operator.
4.
Provide emergency communications.
5.
Coordinate em3rgency response actions of federal and state agencies.
O
~
NAEP Mr. Michael R. Kansler Page 10.1 A Revision 21 Page 2 April 25,1996 6.
Notify the following federal agencies of a radiological emergency:
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) when the a.
emergency action level at a nuclear power facility is classed as an Alert and provide updated information and request assistance,11 required, when the emergency action level is classed as a Site Area Emergency or General Emergency.
b.
Federal Aviation Administration air controllers at Richmond Intemational Airport of a radiological emergency and request that aircraft be instructed to avoid affected airspace until notified otherwise.
c.
Commander, Fifth U.S. Coast Guard District of a radiological emergency at the Surry Power Station and request establishment of traffic control of boats and ships on the James River in the vicinity of the power station.
d.
Fort Eustis in the event of an incident at the Surry Power Station that could effect the health and safety of personnel stationed at this military instaliation.
7.
Notify CSX Transportation of a radiological emergency at the North Anna or Surry Power Station and request that rail service in the afiected area be discontinued temporarily.
8.
Notify the state Bureau of Radioingical Health, Department of Health immediately of all classes of accidents and incidents reported by operators of nuclear facilities.
9.
Notify the Virginia Department of Transportation to establish roadblocks and to temporarily terminate terry service between James City County and Surry County, when appropriate.
- 10. Notify other state agencies that have emergency task assignments identified in the state RERP.
O
l Mr. Michael R. Kansler NAEP Page 3 Page 10.1.5 April 25,1996 Revision 21 0
- 11. Notify the state of Maryland EOC of radiological accidents at the North Anna Power Station resulting in either a Site Area Emergency or Ger. oral Emergency. Notify the state of North Carolina EOC of radiological accidents at the Surry Power Station resulting in either a Site Area Emergency or General Emergency.
- 12. Provide public information, based on information fumished by the Department of Health and the nuclear facility operator.
- 13. Request assistance from the federal govemment in accordance with the Federal Radaological Emergency Response Plan (FRERP) and the Federal Response Plan (FRP),
in support of the emergency response actions stated above, we will, on an annual basis, perform the following missions:
1.
Assist state agencies and political subdivisions in the development, promotion, and maintenance of plans, procedures, and preparedness programs.
2.
Coordinate radiological emergency response training and conduct annual training exercises.
3.
Maintain a list of media representatives, including names and telephone numbers, and as necessary, issue news releases respective to emergency operations involving the North Anna and Surry Power Stations.
These actions are authorized by the Govemor of Virginia (Executive Order Number Nineteen (90)) and are consonant with the Commonwealth of Virginia Emergency Services and Disaster Law of 1973 (Code of Virginia, Chapter 3.2, Title 44) as amended.
Sincerely, A. E. Sla o, Jr.
I AESp/GOU/sdg O
NAEP Page 10.1.6 Revision 21 O
COMMONWEALTH of V.IRGINIA Depanment of Health OMM RANDOLPH L GORDON. M.D., M P.H.
COMMISSIONER RICHMOND, VA 23218 TOO 1800 8261120 March 21, 1996 Mr. M. R. Kansler Vice President Nuclear Engineering and Services i
Virginia Power 5000 Dominion Boulevard Glen Allen, Virginia 23060
Dear Mr. Kansler:
We are renewing our commitment to respond to any radiological emergency at either the North Anna or Surry power stations in i
accordance with the provisions of the Commonwealth of Virginia Radiological Emergency Response Plan (COVRERP).
The response of all State agencies is coordinated by the Department of Emergency Services.
If you have any questions or comments regarding these commitmunts, please contact Mr.
Leslie P.
- Foldesi, Bureau of Radiological Health, at (804) 786-5932.
Sincerel
.M Randolph L. Gordon, M.D.,
M.P.H.
State Health Commissioner 0.
V D H i,_B :,
y
$1 Ea^g'[1o.,.7 p
Revision 21 d <.4.n.,,s. i..,n.,,,.COMMONWEALTH of VIRGIN.!A
%,n...,u,u.w y,,,,
DEPARTMCNT OF STATE POLICE POB 9108 Richmond, VA 23227-0108 March 18, 1996 Mr. M.R. Kansler Vice President - Nuclear Engineering and Services Virginia Power 5000 Dominion Boulevard Glen Allen, VA 2306-
Dear Mr. Kansler:
Thank you for your letter of March 14, 1996, regarding updating our Letter of Agreement for North Anna Power Station.
We pledge our continued assistance and hereby agree to provide the following specific support to any emergency that may occur at the North Anna Power Station upon the direction of the State Office of Emergency and Energy Services.
(1) Assist local officials in disseminating warning (2) Assist in evacuation in coordination with local officials (3) Enforce access / egress provision in controlled areas in coordination with local officials (4) Provide traffic control (S) Assist to the extent possible in radiological monitoring of vehicles and personnel at traffic-control points (6) Assist with communications in a support role (7) Assist with re-entry after emergency (8) Participate in training and exercises to prepare for emergencies Sincerely, Y
3 David B. Conklin, Jr., Captain COMMANDER, DIVISION ONE DBC/jb h
Lieutenant Colonel W._ Gerald Massengill cc:
V First Sergeant Thomas A. Snead A NATIONALLY ACCREDITEo LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY TDo 1800-553 3144
NAEP
,vs> M '
Page 10.1,8 Revision 21 COMMONWEALTH of VIRGIN 1A G,or,, a,
Gowrnor Department of Game andinland Thheries Becky Norton Dunlop William L % oodfin.Jr.
Secret.ory ofNatural Resources Director March 21, 1996 Mr. M.
R.
Kansler Vice President Nuclear Engineering and Services Virginia Power 5000 Dominion Boulevard Glen Allen, Virginia 23060
Dear Mr. Kansler:
The Department of Game and Inland Fisheries remains in agreement with emergency response plans for the Surry and North Anna Power Stations.
This agency will continue to assist you in any future emergency situations as outlined in your plan to the greatest extent possible at the time any emergency might evolve, Just as we have previously agreed.
We agree to. provide the support listed in Appendix 1, Task Assignments, Virginia Radiological Emergency Response Plan.
These services, of course, will be furnished at the Surry or North Anna Power Station as directed by Emergency Services.
Sincerely, 1 \\ *y n
Larry G.
Hart Assistant Director of Boating and Facilities LGH/jee O
An Agency of the Naturst Resources Secretarist 4010 WEST BROAD STREET, P.O. BOX 11104 RICHMOND, VA 232301104 (8041369-1000 (V(TDD) Equal Opportunity Employment. Progra.ms and Facilities FAX (804) 367 9147
NAEP Page 10.1.9 Revision 21 March 22,1996 Mr. M. R. Kansler Vice President. Nuclear Engineering and Services 5000 Dominion Boulevard Glen Allen. Virginia 23060 m a er m ht! Patsiotut ses luattu leitects e v e..a %.
LETTER OF AGREEMENT NORTH ANNA AND SURRY POWER STATIONS m:0 vw.. sv
- 6 my:
The Medical College of Virginia Hospitals / Virginia counnonwealth University agrees to 5-e
- !;:95 Panicipate in the implementation of the Virguus Power RaA==a Eo-i sy Plans for the Nonh Anna and Suny Power Stations and to suppon the plans within the limits of our organizational capabilities, g.! g*n c -
n,,.jg,[..
'The Medical CoUefe of Virgima/Virguus Connnonwealth University agrees to panicipate in any plantung, trauung and drilling necessary to insure pn:paredness. We agree that upon verification of
~ " " "
an emergency at either station the following services will be provided:
- 1. Facilities to treat up to four seriously injured and radioactively contanunated patients in the s
emergency depanment.
- 2. Facilities to treat up to ten non-seriously radioactively corummmated patients in the Sanger Hall morgue area.
- 3. Hospital transponation (stretchers) to move patients from the morgue area to the emergency depanment.
- 4. Campus Police to suppon traffic control and maintain security around the treatment areas.
- 5. Central services supplies (oryFen, defibrillators, etc.) to support treatment in the morgue area.
- 6. Momtonng and counung equiprnent for the detecuan and analysis of radioactivity or radiation.
- 7. Decontammuion and other supphes necessary for the iso'.ation and treatment of radioactively contanunated patients.
These services will be available 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> a day and are outhned in greater detail in the Radiation Emergency Plan. The Radiauon Safety Section of the Office of Environmental Health and Safety is responsible for supplying the radiological suppon services neuary for the implen:entation of this plan.
S' ly, r, hhn E. ones. Ph.D.
Vice President for Health Sciences
NAEP Page 10.1.10 Revision 21 County of Louisa Post Office Box 160 (540) 967 0401 Louisa, Wginia 23093 FAX (540) 967 3411 March 25,1996 Mr. M. R. Kansler Vice President - Nuclear Engineering and Services Virginia Power 5000 Dominion Boulevard Glen Allen, Virginia 23060
Dear Mr. Kansler:
This lener is in response to your request for an updated version of the Letter of Agreement for the Nortn Anna Power Station.
l On April 19.1976, the Louisa County Board of Supervisors, by resolution, adopted the Louisa County Emergency Plan to coordinate emergency services resnonse capabilities. The County has revised its plan to comply with the regulations contained in NUREG-0654 and again in May,1985, to include the Early Warning Siren System. In March 1993, the Louisa County Board of Supervisors re adopted by resolution, the Louisa County Emergency Plan l
and all its annexes.
This lener does confirm Louisa County's agreement to provide the following services-l 1.
Operate the County's Emergency Operations Center (EOC).
l l'
2.
Coordinate the overall emergency response of the County.
3.
Serve as County point-of-contact with State and Federal agencies, and any appointed representative of Virginia Power.
4.
Early warning and public information.
5.
Coordinate radiological emergency response and training.
e NAEP Page 10.1.11 Revision 21 Should you have any questions, or need any additional infonnation, please do not hesitate to contact my office.
Sincerely yours, suA William C. Porter, Jr.
County Administrator.
WCPjr/jwb
(
i a
l 4
5 i
d t
s 4
4 N
v d
4
1 Louis', County NAEP l
Page 10,1,12 Revision 21 P.O. DOX M8 TELEPHONE Volunteer Firef'ig ters Assoctah.on o m> w.osol MDWAkl.VA nll, April.t.1996 Mr. M R. Kansler Viec Premient Nuclear Engineerms and Senices Vapuun Power 5(WNs Dommion Blvd.
Glen Allen. Vs 23060 Dear Mn Kansler.
The Louisa touun Volunteer Fuefighters Amanciation fully supports the Emergency Plan for VuF nia Power *m North i
Anna Power htsinon Tbe Associanon ucicomes the opponumty to uork with a community onented organuation such a.30ur If fue service ut oded plcese call the dispatcher at (540) 9671234 and advise of amstance needed.
%'e will suppon your effons at North Anna to the estent of our abiht3 and resources. At this tune we have sesen fire depanments m Louiu Couary, All mesen depanment* uill respond to North Anna should it become necessan. We has e mutual aid betweco all ses en depanments Mmeral Company 2 would be the fast depanment to rexpond. with Isumpa. tompan3 3. l. oui <a Company I. locust treek Compan3 5. Tresilhaos Company 6. Ilolly Grm e Company J.
and Zion Cro wroad, Compan) 7 follow top m that order. as nected
% ithm the department we hase appmsunately 105 FucrF tern and the followmy equipment:
h 7 Enemes with 750 to 1(uni pallon* ianks and 1(NMI1015(N) ppm pumps 3 % apon< with l(NN: pallon tank and 753 to 1000 ppm pumps ti1ankers with l(MN to 2(Mui pallon tanks and 750 pumps 4 Brush truels with 2(Ni pallon tanLS lor brush fues
! Acnalladder itMifoni Approximately 6(MNileet of 4 tneb supply bose Foam capabih,y on each Ennne Each Engme carnes esienniou ladders and roofladders I hah spe lims with ca cade n siem for fdtmp au bottles on site Laeb station has casende n <iem m sianon for fillmp att bottle <
1 BreathmF au comprenor m Station I capable of fdlmy 3 air bottles at once.
All trucks cre equipped with helf contained breathmp apparatus and spare bottles The abmc equipment uould be available on a a< needed basis and could respond to North Anna Power Stanon 1 he th:panment bas e tramed radiauon momionny teams with the dosimetry and meters for momtonnF radiation dunnF dnll* or an aerual emergency. A command structure is a place for all momtonny teams to uork under direction of the Louio Couan Emerpencs Operation. Lenter and base radios for commumcation The Ftre Aimaciation and all seven Fire Depanments pamgpate m the Emergenes Dnlis conducted by Vupmia Power and turnish radiation monitormy,
teams for the Counts dunnF the drills The first m Fue Depanment be, a response time of approsunatel 15 mmutes from time of dispatch The furthest Fue 3
l
G I
NAEP i.
Page 10,1,13 Revision 21 Depenment has a rupeeseimme gwy m I
ne Awacianos han a inner d posamen sipsed with abe Conan oflamme for pnwider fn senice m tbc cituses of the comme). All seven fue C ;r - 2 are pen of the aposenet The Associe ion ocasiders Varpaa Power a i
corporene cemen debe onesw sad suppens it as n would any onbar samass is the eauen, if any funber aformauem is needed please not4 the Assocation and we will help in any way possible i
l
- Sancereh, W
T lewis A. Keller, til Presulent 1
I w.
Mr. W. C. Poner a
4
'e t
5 i
I e
I i
l l
l l
l I
l
~
M i
t
., ~.
[ettrg,A.fettnUn j
SHERIFF OF L0utSA COUNTY NAEP j
LOUISA. VIRGINIA 23093 Page 10.1.14 (703) 9671m Revision 21 l
e
.....P.
Nat 0NAL SN.miPre' AssoCIAttoW Vinalwla SH.miPPs' Association MARCH 18, 1996 MR.
M. R. KANSLER VICE PRESIDENT-NUCLEAR ENGINEERING & SERVICES VIRGINIA POWER NUCLEAR EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 500 DOMINION BOULEVARD GLEN ALLEN, VIRGINIA 23060 RE:
LETTER OF AGREEMENT WITH NORTH ANNA POWER STATION DEAR MR.KANSLER:
I AM IN RECEIPT OF YOUR LETTER DATED MARCH 14, 1996, REQUESTING AN UPDATE OF OUR LETTER OF AGREEMENT.
THIS LETTER IS TO CONFIRM OUR CONTINUING AGREEMENT WITH THE PLAN, AND OUR WILLINGNESS TO PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING SERVICES:
1.
TELEPHONE & RADIO COMMUNICATION WITH THE STATION ON A TWENTY FOUR BASIS.
2.
TRAFFIC CONTROL.
3.
EVACUATION CONTROL.
4.
ASSISTANCE IN RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING 5.
POTENTIAL AVAILABILITY OF 22 SHERIFF'S VEHICLES.
6.
POTENTIAL AVAILAB:L:TY OF 22 SHERIFF'S DEPUTIES.
IF I CAN BE OF ANY FURTHER ASSISTANCE TO YOU IN THIS MATTER, PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CONTACT ME.
WITH KINDEST REGARDS. I AM SINCERELY, C. / &
E Y
( KEhTON SHERI HAK:GTK
1 l
NAEP Emergency Medical Services Page 10.1.15 Revision 21 Association oflouisa County ifM%L)
P.O. Ikm 1306 Louso. Vrgno 23093 April 5,.
1996 Mr. M. R. Kansler Vice President - Nuclear Engineering and Service 5000 Dominion Boulevard "irginie Power Glen Allen, Virginia 23060
Dear Mr. Kansler:
LETTER OF AGREEMENT VIRGINIA POWER NORTH ANNA POWER STATION This letter is an agreement between the Emergency Medical Service Association of Louise County (EMSAL) and Virginia Power regarding mutual support at the North Anna Power Station.
O EMSAL is a entity in the emergency medical services in Louisa County and is recognized as the official representative for all emergency medical service organizations within Louisa county.
EMSAL is comprised of Louisa County Rescue Squad, Inc., Holly Grove Rescue Squad, Inc., Mineral Volunteer Rescue Squad, and Trevilians Volunteer Fire Department, Inc. EMSAL provides 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> emergency medical services to Louisa County through its volunteer organizations as outlined below:
Personnel Scheduled duty crews are maintained from 1800 hours0.0208 days <br />0.5 hours <br />0.00298 weeks <br />6.849e-4 months <br /> to 0600 hours0.00694 days <br />0.167 hours <br />9.920635e-4 weeks <br />2.283e-4 months <br /> on week days.
Scheduled duty crews are maintained for weekend coverage from 1800 hours0.0208 days <br />0.5 hours <br />0.00298 weeks <br />6.849e-4 months <br /> on Friday until 0600 hours0.00694 days <br />0.167 hours <br />9.920635e-4 weeks <br />2.283e-4 months <br /> on Monday.
During week days (0600 hours0.00694 days <br />0.167 hours <br />9.920635e-4 weeks <br />2.283e-4 months <br /> until 1800 hours0.0208 days <br />0.5 hours <br />0.00298 weeks <br />6.849e-4 months <br />), Holly Grove Rescue Squad has scheduled duty crews during these hours and there are also additional rescue personnel from Louisa, Mineral, and Trevilians who are available to run (when not working or can leave work, etc.).
O 1
- - ~ -
NAEP Page 10.1.16 Revision 21 O
In situations of extreme life threatening injury or illness, medical evacuation will be provided by helicopter when available for non-contaminated patients. This will provide a higher level of patient care (pcramedic level) and a much quicker patient transport.
Ecuinmer.t Louisa County Rescue Squad, Inc., has 4 ambulances licensed as Advanced Life Support, which are located in the central part of Louisa County.
Holly Grove Rescue Squad, Inc. has 2 ambulances licensed as Advanced Life Support and an auxiliary unit (4 wheel drive pickup) equipped as a first response vehicle. These units are located in the southeastern part of Louisa County.
Trevilians Volunteer Fire Department, Inc., has 2 ambulance licensed as Advanced Life Support. These units are located in the western part of Louisa County.
Mineral Volunteer Rescue Squad, has 2 ambulances licensed as h
Advanced Life support. These units are located in central part of Louisa County.
In terms of mutual support, EMSAL will:
Fully support the North Anna Power Station Emergency Plan to the limit of our capabilities.
Note: if a mecical emergency occurs curing any training or drill exercise, the medical emergency will take precedence and the required personnel and/or equipment will respond to the medical emergency.
Respond to North Anna's emergency medical needs and relieve North Anna's ambulance crew of patient transport when possible. In the event of contaminated patients. EMSAL will only transoort if there are multiole natients recuirino transoort and North Anna's Rescue Unit is out of service or not available.
O A
f
NAEP-Page 10.1.17 Revision 21 O
%J While your financial support is greatly appreciated, our primary concern is that quality patient care be provided to the citizens and businesses of Louisa County.
Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding the mutual support described above.
sincerelyj Randall E.
E gland President 4
cc: Jack Ball i
' O
NAEP Page 10.1.18 Revision 21 Spotsylvania County Sheriff's Office
. A_. __. s
!.pD *y*
Ronald T. Knight. Sheriff Poet Office Box 124 s
Spotsylvania. Virginia 22553 v
Phone: 540 582 7119 Fax: 543582 5321 March 19,1996 Mr. M R. Kansler Vice President Nuclear Services Virgmia Power 500 Dominion Boulevard Glen Allen. Virginia 23060 Dear Mr Kansler in reference to your letter dated March 14,1996, this Department agrees to participate if and when required and to offer the followmg services 1 Teleph'one and radio communications with the station on a 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> basis
- Traffic control 3 Evaluation control 4 Potential availability of 38 Shenff s Department vehicles 5 Assist in radiological momtormg 6 Potential availability of 45 ShenfTs Department personnel if there are any other services that you require. do not hesitate to contact me.
- Smcerely, aLY b Ronald T. Knight Sheriff
NAEP Page 10.1.19 O
Revision 21 V
Members of VA. 5.F. A.
Memeen of N.F.P. A SPOTSYLVANIA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT, Inc.
P.O. Bos 146 Emergency Phoac SE2 7100 Offre of the Cheef Busmes: Phone $42 3322 Company No i SPOTSYLVANI A. VIRGINI A Company fia. 2 Company No. 4 Compens ho 3 Brokenburs. Vapnie Four Mac Fork Parnom. % strin a Phone. 582 7100 Phone: $52-7100 Phone. 582 7100 April 8,1996 w um.xner Va Preswical. Nucker Fmfinarrmg and semas Vupma Power 5000 Domuuon Bo*vud Gen Allen. VA 23060 i
Dear Mr. Kansler:
Os 1 have received your letter dated March 14,1996 indicating that it is necessary to revise our agreement with your Emergency Plan and if we will support the North Anna Power Emergen:y Plan if requested This tener is to inform you that we are in agreement with the North Anna Emergency Plan and are wdhng to support it should the occasion arise.
Accordingly, I hereby the following AGREEMENT We are in agreement with the Virginia Electric and Power Company's North Anna Power Station Emergency Plan and will respond to it within the capabilities of our orgarnzation should our services be requested.
Signa
//
Thomas W. Ossierhekt Chacf Spouyhsma Volumser Fue c,a Spouyhsana. VA 22533 SERVICES: Fire Fighting EQUIPMENT. 1993 95' Aenal/ Platform to List PERSONNEL 4 to 25 depending upon need RESPONSE TIMES 20 min from Co. 2 (Brokenburg) 30 min. from Co. I(Courthouse)
O 45 min. from Co. 4 (Four Mile Fork)
L)
Snunty nf Cyatsginanta NAEP 9
Page 10.1.20 Revision 21 Department or fare.
ve
- n" Emergency Ssevices CONNIE 8 AcoRS MARY LEE CARTER R. CHRISTIAN EUDAILEY,
BILL JONES JERRY t. LOGAN V
Director Euuirr B uA. sHALL ggggggg ((gj BENJ AMIN T. PITTS Po Box 816 RICK WoMBLE spotsvLvaNia. vmonA nss:
PHONE ($40) 682 7107 F At t540) 6824357 March 20,1996 Mr. Mi'?+ R. Kansler Vice President Nuclear Engineering Virginia Power 5000 Dominion Boulevard Glenn Allen, VA 23060 Letter of Acreement Nonh Anna Power Station h
Dear Mr. Kansler.
Within the control limits of the County of Spotsylvania and in cooperation with local, state, and federal agencies, we will provide the following:
1.
Operation of the County Emergency Operations Center (EOC) located in the Courthouse building.
2.
Coordination of the overall County Emergency Response.
3.
A point of contact for local, state, and federal agencies.
4.
Coordinstion of emergency response training, including radiological.
Please contact me if any additional information is needed.
Sincerely.
SD9 O
/
Douglas P. Boggs Emergency Services Coordinator DPB/cij L. Kimball Payne,111 County Administrator xc:
NAEP Page 10.1.21 Rev.sion 21
'w' Welham D. Spence.SheriM P.O. Box 445 (703)672 1200 Orange. Versmaa 22960 ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFP'S OFFICE 4
March 19, 1996 Mr. M.R. Kansler Virginia Power
uclear Emergency Preparedness
$U00 Dominion-Boulevard Glen Allen, Va. 23060
Dear Mr. Kansler,
This is to update our existing emergency plan letter of agreement.
We are capable of providing the following services:
1)
Receive and verify the notification of the radiological emergency.
2)
Notify key county officials and other agencies assigned a radiological emergency responsibility.
3)
Alert the public.
4)
Evacuate the public from the area affected, 5)
Traffic control.
6)
Perimeter control, in coordination with VA State Police.
7)
Operate the Sheriff's Office Communications Center.
Siperlyf',/
a s
ISheri.
'.. Spence WDS/sh 6
l ORANGE COUNTY, VIRSINtA NAEP Orrice or THe COUNTY ADMINISTRATOM Page 10.1.22 Revision 21
. s.4.ex Ganton BARIY R. Undsay Goroon, lil Buiiu 112 West Main Street Courwy Administrator Post Office Box 111 Joact C. CaocxgTT Assistant County Aoministrator Orange, Virginia 22960 Facsimile:
(540)672 3313 (540)672 1679 (540)972 1455 April 15,1996 Mr. M. R. Kansler Vice President - Nuclear Engineering and Services Virginia Power 5000 Dominion Boulevard Glen Allen, VA 23060 g
Dear Mr. Kansfer:
Thank you for your letter of March 14 requesting an update of our letter of agreement fo. North Anna Power Station.
Please be informed that we are in agreement with the plan and art.villing to participate in the emergency plan if required. We are capable of providing the follow-ing services as outlined in the current Orange County Radiological Response Plan:
1 Operate the Orange County Emergency Operations Center, 2.
Coordinate the overall emergency response of the County, 3.
Serve as the County point-of contact with appropriate state and federal agen-
- cies, 4.
Provide public information for Orange County, and 5.
Coordinate radiological emergency response training.
Please note also that our new Emergency Services Coordinator is R. Duff Green, whose address and phone number are the same as noted above. Alan B. Abt serves as Orange County's Deputy Emergency Services Coordinator, and can also be reached at the above address. For your convenience, I have attached a business card for both gentismen.
6
M. R. Kansler NAEP April 15,1996 Page 10.1.2, Revision 21 Page 2 if you have any questions or if you need any additional info.mation, please do not hesitate to give me a call.
Respectfully yours, o
Brenda Ganon Bailey County Admir5trator ec:
V. Ren Jones, Chairman, Orange County Board of Supervisors R. Duff Green, Emergency Services Coordinator Thomas J. Czelusta, County Attomey Janice C. Crockett, Assistant County Administrator File:
Chronological Correspondence Virginia Power Emergency Services c wpwmeowroocsurrenosatunAtvaustr a van O
___.m
-.m___.____
l C A R O LIN E C0UNTY NAEP Pap' 40.1.24 Reaion 21 DEPARTMENTOFFIRE& RESCUE Itager D.fWnes Daser N & W P.O. Box H7 Bowling Green, Virginia 2207 Temphme10H3Hs31 March 19,1996 Mr. M.R. Kansler Vice President - Nuclear Engineering and Services Virginia Power Company 5000 Dominion Boulevard Glen Allen. Virginia 23060
Dear Mr. Kansler:
We have received your letter indicating that it is necessary to update our previous letter of agreement conceming response to an emergency at the Nonh Anna Power Station.
This letter is to inform you that Caroline County has an obligation to panicipate in the North Anna Power Station Emergency Plan if conditions exist that require a response from surrounding jurisdictions, caroline County will attempt to provide the following sen ices, l.
Verify the notifi:ation from the power plant.
2.
Initiate the waming notincation.
3.
Perform access / egress traffic control in coordination with local law enforcement and the Department of State Police.
4.
Arrange and perform those functions necessary for the protection of individuals, properties, homes, businesses, etc., located in the endangered area (s) in cooperation with local law enforcement, the Department of State Police and other private security forces. Will attempt to restrict entry into the hot zone by pt.rsonnel not properly protected by radiation monitoring devices. Will also attempt to formulate a site plan to monitor workers / individuals entering hot zone area.
5.
Attempt to maintain trained radiological monitoring personnel to be used primarily for low level sadiological incidents involving transportation accident: or fixed site l
l NAEP i
Page 10.1.25 Revision 21 O
l emergencies. These individuals will also assist in the decontamination of response personnel and equipment when needed.
4 6.
Provide on scene fire and rescue response to transporta: ion accidents involving radioactive materials and initiate proper notification and site area warnings when necessary.
J This document represents Caroline County's continued support of the radiological protection package developed cooperatively beraasi Virginia Power. Virginia 4
Department of Emergency Services and local governments.
Sincerely, y O.
C4ea Roger D. Raines Director of Fire & Rescue t
Emergency Services Coordinator t
i I
V I
m.
r
---u
NAEP Page 10.1.26 Revision 21
~
Shrriff's (9ffirr C AROteNi CoVNO, P o Bot M poWttNC CRitN V8NCINIA224U PHONE (804) 633 5400 HOMEa c KHtNsON March 19, 1996
{
Mr. M.
P.. Kansler Vice President-Nuclear Engjneering and Services Virginia Power 5000 Dominion Boulevard Gien Allen, Virginia 23060 LETTER OF AGREEMENT NORTH ANNA POWER STATION
Dear Mr. Kansler:
This is to acknowledge your letter of March 14, 1996, requesting a revision of our agreement with your emergency h
plan as well as our intt:rition to participate in the North A:.na Emergency Plan, if requested.
Services provided by this ofijce will be as follows:
1.
Assist in warning the public.
2.
Assis: in evacuating tr.e public from affected a:eas.
3.
Traffic :ontrol wnerever feasible under existing manpower condit ens.
4.
Accers/ egress contrc1,
- r. coordination with the State Police.
5.
Re:e:ve and send messages as necessary over the VCIN systen..
6.
Provide law enforcement assistance to citizen of the cour.ty.
h': t h b e s t r?gards, I remair Sincerely yours, i
.iemer G.
ohnson Sheriff HGO:ect
=-
NAEP
?i sr -
Page 10,1.27 g,(p Revision 21 monnoor surenwoons
_ M,.
HEN 8W D$TMCT COM ADMNtSTMATOR JT ' JACK'WAMD.VCE4HAFWMN McHAMD M JOHNE.ON 8
DEPUTY COUNTY ADMNSTMATOm MEOHANICSVLLE DISTMCT TsAOTWr E EMNST STEMLNG E Mrvt$ si COUNTY ATTOMNfY ASA.AND Dt3TMCt TOM OLts e.e C>*Cw.AHOMsW Dr8TMCT YourHND[ Met HANOVER COUNTY P,o. DOM 470 Avemryu STANLEY,sq DE.AVEMDAM D STMct HANOVER. VIR3NA 2306D4410 h'$dM*y,w Harch 20, 1996 e
Mr. E. W. Harrell Vice President, Nuclear Services Virginia Power Company 5000 Dominion Boulevard Glen Allen, Virginia 23060 Re: Letter of Aareement - North Anna
Dear Mr. Harrell:
7 With regard to updating our Letter of Agreement, reference your emergency plan, Hanover will:
1)
Continue coordination of the overall emergency response of the County as prescribed in the Hanover County Radiological Emergency Responce Plan.
2)
Provide the services and operations of the County Emer-gency operations Center, the Evacuation Assembly Center, and the West Hanover Staging Area (Beaverdam Fire Station).
3)
Serve as the County point-of-contact with State and Federal agencies.
4)
Provide Public Information Services.
5)
Coordinate Radiological Emergency Response Training.
6)
Coordinate the use of Liberty Junior High School and Patrick Henry High School as Evacuation Assembly Centers for Hanover County and Louisa County, if required.
If you need any further assistance, please contact me.
(g Sincerely, 8m9 %
Aphn F. Berry Co M y Administrator
NAEP Page 10.1.28 Revision 21 op h wouRw VmGtNIA STATE $HERIFFS' ASSN NATIONAL SHERFF8' ASSN O
m v
- s OFFICE OF COLONEL V. STUART COOK SHERIFF HANOVER.VIRGWLA 23000 004 6374110 804 7304110 March 19, 1996 Mr. M. R. Kansler Vice President Nuclear Engineer mv,n Services Virginia Power 500 Dominion Boulevard Glen Allen, VA 23060 Dear Mr. Kansler I am in receipt of your letter of March 14, 1996, concerning our Letter of Agreement with Virginia Power in regards to the North Anna Power Station.
This letter will specify arrangements for the exchange of information by agencies that respond to emergencies at this site.
We understand the necessity to review this agreement every other year and submit, under the terms of the Hanover County Emergency operations Plan, the responsibilities of the Hanover County Sheriff's office in the event of an emergency.
The responsibilities are as follows:
1, warning the public 2.
assisting in evacuating the public from the affected area 3.
traffic control under exisitng manpower condi-tions, when feasible 4.
ingress / egress control in coordination with the Virginia State Police If you should have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely, Colonel V. Stuart Cook Sheriff
/1zj
I e
NAEP Page 10.2.1 j
Revision 21 I
l APPENDIX 10.2 (DELETED) 4 in i
l 1
4 4
i I
\\
e
l l
\\
NAEP Page 10.3.1 Revision 21 i
i APPENDlX 1
i 10.3 i"
MAPS OF EXCLUSION AREA, LOW POPULATION AND EMERGENCY PLANNING ZONE BOUNDARIES
}
4 4
s f
j l!O I
i i
l i
4 4
I O
~
- .7 s..
,v,..._,,..,,,-,,-,_,,c-m,--
.,_,.~,;-~__.m.-.__.
_,,~... -,..,,.
.._,.,,_,my,_,
_s.___.,_..._,_%,,,
1 1
NAEP Page 10.3.2 NORTH ANNA POWER STATION EXCLUSION AREA
- ~ **-.a g*...,*.,*,.,
.,.*,.***,,,,<o j
+
.f. -
r..
.~s6-g l :;;; y
'N j. X -
- .,-j 7
e.-
,s
.m -,
4 w -
-.g
.;g ' 'v,i,,
' d ?...
4 m
+
w+
on.
,',c gi.
p tt s,
Q~
uie
...o_.
g ; n >,,
. '
- O,. ;-
.x
.,; ~.c r s.
. /p,
-+.3.<.
- 2,,',.yy ;
- ,
' < t h.
, + :,T '
. s, -
u
.eu,
.r r
uf
'~
l s l-
^*;
3,,
l n.
.1
&f
,.. s,
'"~l}
l
, ia
~ ~m 5,
m,
(( <
~
,[ *_ m.
. g,.
~ l ;' ',,7..
.y Yh
- *.!-~
A > l un:1; 3-t' j
(
+
L' % ;
puh _ [
a4 4,y:
2 T'
,I M
,g, A,
h ?'
- y l
g SU l
t 4
.O
-f e
i.
s uns
.q O
i
- f.
. " "c
/,
'.p 4
t:s p
.-A i
3 l-f.-
.t
- 0 c.3.
-/4
/
Sae two..,
a.
d saw m A..,
e.
e l *.*.'
+
s,
..?
.*?,,.
..,******eoe*4064989***#
Sv6a4C O
4
NAEP Page 10.3.3 Revision 21 i
NORTH ANNA POWER STATION L_ OW POPULATION ZONE 10 MILE EMERGENCY PLANNING ZONE
~}
,4. --.3
\\
mi'
~
\\
J y
.. y j
~.
l
't
'i
/,.
/
~
s s
i V
/~
//
M
.N
/
m
!j'4,s lf-
%,,/
x
~
at$!\\\\\\\\
(
w
,.e.p'. - -
,. ~ -
~
1 j,;
l l
l'
~
/
I f
N t'
i
/
l
/
}
s.
)
=
j j
1 N.'
i te -
g
\\
/
j
~k,
~
g
- y
/
'y
)
I
't
/
M g
\\
/~
)l% Q ar'
,/
~
y
-i
.. /c w\\
~
w I
b' 4
NAEP Page 10.3.4 NORTH ANNA POWER STATION 50 MILE RADIUS j'
6' n
n Vf
=
\\
y
~
. [\\
.. [J s
\\
b
/
)
R
(
~
- g e
j p
m.
O
'\\
I
~
7 8
4
^^**%
1 r
l "q
Cl E
m Y;
y' x
a
.I
.r; u
J s
s
/
s s
y Js w m-
/,.
r
\\
/
g w
jp w
)
<v-g
~
~
ph i
8 Q
ci-e h'.
- y x
o
l l
1 l
i NAEP Page 10.4.1 Revision 21 APPENDIX 10.4 LISTING OF EPIPs i
O 4
h l
5 O
w-
NAEP Page 10.4.2 LIST OF EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES 1
Emeroency Control Procegurt.1 1.01 Emergency Manager Controlling Procedure 1.02 Response to Notification of Unusual Event 1.03 Response to Alert 1.04 Response to Site Area Emergency 1.05 Response to General Emergency 1.06 Protective Action Recommendations 2.
Notification Procedurgs 2.01 Notification of State and Local Govemments 2.02 Notification of NRC 2.04 Transmittal of Plant, Radiological and Emergency Status 3.
Auomentation Procedurgj 3.02 Activation of Technical Support Center 3.03 Activation of Operational Support Center 3.04 Activation of Local Emergency Operations Facility 4.
Radiolooical Monitonna and Dose Assessment Procedures 4.01 Radiological Assessment Director ContrcilinD Procedure 4.02 Radiation Protection Supervisor Controlling Procedure 4.03 Dose Assessment Controlling Procedure 4.04 Emergency Personnel Radiation Exposure 4.05 Respiratory Protection and KI Assessment 4.06 Personnel Monitonng and Decontamination 4.07 Protective Measures 4.08 initial Offsite Release Assessment 4.09 Source Term Assessment 4.10 Determination of X/O 4.13 Offsite Release Assessment with Environmental Data 4.14 Inplant Monitonng 4.15 Onsite Monitoring 4.16 Offs %e Monitoring Y
l l
l
i NAEP Page 10.4.3 Revision 21 4.3 Ememency Plan imolementina Procedures (Cont.)
4.17 Monttoring of Emergency Response Facilities 4.18 Monttonng of LEOF 4.21 Evacuation and Remote Assembly Area Monitoring 4.22 Post Accident Sampling of Containment Air 4.23 Post Accident Sampling of Roactor Coolant 4.24 Gaseous Effluent Sampling Dunng an Emergency 4.25 Liquid Effluent Sampling During an Emergency 4.26 High Level Activity Sample Analysis 4.28 TSC/LEOF Radiation Monitoring System 4.30 Use of MIDAS Class A Model 4.31 Use of MIDAS Class B Model 4.33 Health Physics Network Communicatiorc 4.34 Field Team Radio Operator Instructions 5.
Protective Action Procedures 5.01 Transportation of Contaminated injured Personnel 5.03 Personne! Accountability 5.04 Access Control 5.05 Site Evacuation 5.07 Administration of Radioprotective Drugs 5 08 Damage Control Guideline 5.09 Secunty Team Leader Controlling Procedure 6.
Recovery and Restoration Procedures 6.01 Re ent~4 Recovery Guideline O
I 4
i
g 9
NAEP Page 10.4.4 Revision 21 O
NAEP EPIP CROSS REFERENCE
- 1 NAEP SECTION NUMBER IMPLEMENTED EPIP NUMBER BY 4.1 1.01 1.05 4.2 1.04 1.05 t
4.4 1.04 1.05 5.0 1.01 5.2 1.01, 3.02,3.03, 3.04, 5.08, 5.03 5.3 2.01, 2.02, 5.09 t
5.4 2.01
. 6.1 1.01, 2.01, 2.02,4.34 i
6.2 1.01,4.01 4.03,4.06 4.18,4.22 4.27,4.30-4.34 6.3 1.01, 1.05,4.05,4.07,4.21, 5.01, 5.03 5.05, i
5.07 6.4 4.04, 4.06, 5.01 6.5 1.02 1.05, 5.09 9.0 6.01 9.2 4.08-4.14,4.16,4.28,4.30,4.31 i
!,vO I
i P
1 Because the Emergency Plan provides a broad overview of the guidelines that must be considered in mitigating an ernergency situation, a number of sections of the Plan do not appear in the cross reference, as they are not specifically activated by an EPIP, 4
~
O 4
J
..,4
_-.,w.
m w-
.+,-
l l
i NAEP Page 10.6.1
)
Reviskm 21 1
l i
I e,
APPENDIX d
I 10.5 r
t I
PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES i
s 4
.i
- i
.l l
i t
i t
i 3
I i
5
!o i~
v n
)
i r
1 i
l i
i o
v I
i J}
c-t I
1
?
a a
Ia-t
'; e-1.~
+
4
_.. ~ _ _ _ _ _ _,., ~.. _ _ _., _, _. _ _... _. -.. _...... _. _. _ - _... - _ _ -. _ _ - - -.. _.
r NAEP Page 10.5.2 l
Revision 21
[
Emeroency Kats for Offsite Monitorina Teams NOTE
- Each kit shall contain at least the follow 6ng hems:
Quantity Description i
Hand Trowei i
Foroops 6
Silver Zeolite Filter 1
Map of Orange
{
1 Map of TLD Location 1
Preselect Monitor Locdion Map 1
Map of Site Exclusion Boundary i
2 Legal Pads 2
Full face Respirators, e.g., Ultrevue or equivalent 2
Pair Rubber Boots
- 10 Envelopes 2
Pencils 2
Smears 1
Flashlight 1
Map of Louisa 1
Map of Spotsylvania O.
1 Map of Lake Anna 1
Dosimeter Charger 1
Box of Kimwipes 1
Ot. Plastic Container 3
Gallon Plastic Container 1
Package of Cotton Inserts 1
Bag (15 pair) of Rubber Gloves 2
Hoods 2
Sets of P.C.s 1
Bag assorted Bags 6
- D" Cell Batteries 1
Pk. Air Particulate Patches 2
100R Dosimeters 2
1 R Dosimeters 4
Caution Envelopes with Bag of assorted signs and bamer rope, i
4
_.,_.,~m,
._.,,_ =
c
NAEP Page 10.5.3 Revision 21 Emergency K4s TSC. 05C. ALT OSC. AND LEOF NOTE' Each kit shall contain at least the following items:
Quantity Descriotion 2
Fulbface Respirators, e.g., Uttravue or equivalent 2
Pair Rubber Boots 2
Boxes Smears 1
Dosimeter Charger i
Package Cotton Inserts 5
Pairs of Rubber Gloves 2
Hoods 2
Sets of PCs 1
ES20 with 177 (or equal) 1 RM 14 with 210 (or equal) 2 Flashlights 2 Sets Replacement Battenes for flashlight 9
O l
I
1 I
NAEP Page 10.6.1 Revision 21 i
i i
j l
APPENDIX 10.6 i
i (DELETED) i J
l 1
4
'I I
I l
i 1
l 4
i l
i i*
l j
i
.I 1
I 4
l 4
NAEP Page 10.7.1 Revision 21 O
APPENDlX 10.7 SUPPORTING PLAN CONTACT O
O
4 NAEP Page 10.7.2 Revision 21 SUPPORTING PLAN CONTACT l
r ORGANIZATION CONTACT i
Virginia Power Corporate Emergency Virginia Power Nuclear Emergency Response Plan Preparedness Department t
State Plan (C 1rnonwealth of Virginia State Department of Emergency Radiological E Argency Response Plan)
Services, Emergency Operations cenior 4
Louisa County Plan Shortffs Dispatcher Spotsylvania County Plan Shortffs Dispatcher I
1 Orange County Plan Sheriffs Dispatcher Caroline County Plan Sheriffs Dispatcher i
Hanover County Plan -
Sheriffs Dispatcher Medical College of Virginia Plan Hospital Superintendent Department of Energy. FRMAP '
Oak Ridge Operations O
l r
l O
v w v
,amn v,
we---w,r>
v,-w--,-
-e-,- - - +, - -, -e--.
<-w w
ev-e
.-,v, n
l NAEP l
Pa0e 10.8.1 Revision 21 l
O APPENDlX i
i 10.8 j
ESTIMATION OF EVACUATION TIMES (Maintained on file by Nuclear 4
?
l Emergency Preparedness Department.
i l
Available on request.)
l l
l i O 1
l l
l 4
l k
l
- O
~
I 4
a
..--.,~.,._.,-.-,_m.
........ -. -. -.. - ~. -
. _ -,. =..
l NAEP Page 10.9.1 1
Revision 21
.i
- O i
l t
APPENDIX 10.9 RADIATION EMERGENCY PLAN McVHNCU VIRGINIA POWER (Maintained on file by Nuclear Emergency Preparedness Department.
- l Available on requent.)
!O l
!.)
4 t
e
.,,.n...nn-..,.>.
_. _ _ _ - _ = _ _ - _ _. _ _ -
NAEP Page 10.10.1 R: vision 21 APPENDIX 10.10 I
FEDERAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING AND kSSESSMENT CENTER (FRM i
OPERATIONS PLAN 1
l (Maintained on file by Nuclear Emergency Preparedness Department.
Available on request.)
i i O l
l 1
l r
4
~ O e
4 m -
m.-.
_. - - _ ~. - _ _ - -
t i
NAEP-l_
Page 10.11.1 Revision 21 I
APPENDIX 10.11 l
l INITIATING CONDITIONS l
3, EMERGENCY ACTION LEVELS I
a l
I n
i I
l l
1
~
1-8 l
I P
g; j
i i;
],
-- f 1
1
?
5 1
A.
a,
1:-
i l.
.i4
-.---.e...
h
'4 w.
aer-4ese e e
-+wnei
.+-m--
e= ww--nar
.me-r-r.
-w4-.%,,4-e.
.m-4w--y..he we+-m ymine-we ewre m
_-.-._m._____.___.___._.._._..____..._--
~. _... _ _ _ _ _ -.. _ _ _ _
i NAEP l
Page 10.11.2 Revision 21 NOTIFICATION OF UNUSUAL EVENT CONDITION / APPLICABILITY INDICATION N9151 The alpha-numeric designator, [A.N), preceding each condnion/ applicability below, indicates the
]
Emergency Action Level designator used in EPIP.1.01, Attachment 1, for that particular item.
Intentional reduction in power, load or 1.
[A.9) Inabilty to reach required mode o
j within technical specification limits temperature IAW T.S. Action Statement
. HAS COMMENCED l
MODES 1,2,3 & 4 M
T.S. Action Statement time limit for mode change CANNOT BE MET 4
i 2
[A.10) Failure of a safety or relief Bf4
+
l valve to close after pressure reduction, which may affect the health and safety RCS pressure. LESS THAN of the public 2000 psig MODES 1,2,3,4 & 5 gg NOT Protection System. IN SERVICE E
Any indication afterlift or actuation that Pressurizer Safety or PORV. REMAINS i
OPEN L
M Flow. UNISOLABLE
~
Main Steam Excessive Steam Generator i
Safety, PORV or Decay Heat Release flow as indicated by rapid RCS cooldown rate l
M Main Steam pressure greater than 100 psi below setpoint of affected valve
.O
,,m..
.-,-m.
,,e.
.-c.4
,-v.......
.,.,. ~,... _ -..e-.
NAEP Page 10.11.3 Revision 21 NOTIFICATION OF UNUSUAL EVENT CONDITION / APPLICABILITY INDICATION Unplanned loss of most (>75%) or all 3.
[A.11) Unplanned loss of most or all safety system annunciators for greater annunciators on panels *A* to "K" for than 15 minutes GREATER THAN 15 minutes MODES 1,2,3 & 4 4.
[A.12] Loss of communications Station PBX phone system FAILED capability M
ALL MODES Station Gahtronics system FAILED M
Station UHF radio system FAILED 5.
[D 8) RCS leak rate requinng plant intentional reduction in power, load or a
shutdown IAW T.S. 3.4 6.2 or 3 4.6.3 temperature because the unit has entered an action statement or will MODES 1,2,3, & 4 exceed an LCO Unidentified RCS !eakage greater than 1 gpm M
identified leakage - greater than 10 gpm M
Controlled leakage to RCP Seals -
greater than 30 gpm total M
Any pressure boundary leakage -
EXISTS O
NAEP Page 10.11.4 Revision 21 NOTIFICATION OF UNUSUAL EVENT CONDITION /APPLICABfLITY INDICATION O
6.
[B.9) Primary to Secondary leakage.
Intentional reduction in power, load or greater than 1 gpm temperature because the unit har entered an action statement or will MODES 1,2,3, & 4 exceed an LCO 6NQ Primary to Secondary leakage greater than i gpm 93 N 16 monitor indicates primary to secondary leakage greater than T. S.
allowable limits 7.
[C.11) Fuel clad damage indication Intentional reduction in power, load or temperature IAW reactor coolant MODES 1. 2,3, & 4 activity T.G. Action Statement HAS COMMENCED f
LJ High Range Letdown radiation monitor 1 CH RI 128 or 2 CH RI 22S increases to greater than Hi Alarm setpoint within 30 minutes and remains for at least 15 minutes 8.
[C.12] Independent Spent Fuel Storage Verified Sealed Surface Storage Cask Installation (ISFSI) event (SSSC) seal leakage ALL MODES gg Scaled Surface Storage Cask (SSSC) dropped or mishandled i
,~
%d
NAEP Page 10.11.5 Revision 21 NOTIFICATION OF UNUSUAL EVENT CONDITIONIAPPLICABILITY INDICATION 9.
[E.5) Effluent release greater than a)
Any of the following monitors indicate ODCM allowable limit valid readings above the specified value for more than i hour.
ALL MODES Clarifier Effluent, RM-LW 111, greater than 4.8x10' cpm Discharge Canal, RM SW 130 or RM-SW 230, greater than 5.00x10' cpm Vent Vent A Kaman, RM VG 179, 5
greater than 1.83x10 pCi/sec Vent Vent B Kaman, RM VG 180, 5
greater than 1.83x10 pCl/sec Process Vent Kaman, RM GW 178, greater than 2.0x10' pCi/sec 2
b)
HP assessment (sample results or dose projections) indicates greater than ODCM allowabie limit 10.
[G 3) Major secondary line break Uncontrolled loss of secondary coolant - IN PROGRESS MODES 1,2,3, & 4 Unit main generator and both 11.
[H.5) Loss of offsite power or onsite AC power capability emergency diesel generators out of service ALL MODES 2
Loss of all 34.5 KV reserve station service buses 12.
[l.3] Fire lasting greater than 10 minutes Fire within the Protected Area or Service Water in Protected Area or Service Water Pump / Valve House which is not under control Pump / Valve House within 10 minutes after Fire Bngade -
DISPATCHED ALL MODES O
NAEP Page 10.11.6 Revision 21 NOTIFICATION OF UNUSUAL EVENT CONDITION / APPLICABILITY INDICATION 13.
p.4) Security threat, unauthorized Security Shift Supervisor has recommended attempted entry, or attempted sabotae that the Operations Shift Supervisor declare a Notification of Unusual Event LAW applicable ALL MODES Security Contingence F'an implementing Procedures 14.
[K.10] Aircraft crash or unusual aircraft Confirmed notification of aircraft crash activity within the site boundary ALL MODES QB Unusual aircraft activity in the vicinity of the site as determined by the Operations Shift Supervisor or the Security Shift Sunervisor 15.
[K 11] Train derailment within Protected Confirmeo report of train derailment within Area Protected Area ALL MODES 16.
[K 12] Explosion within Protected Area Confirmed report of unplanned explosien within Protected Area ALL MODES 17
[K.13] Onsite or nearsite release of toxic Notifcation of unplanned release of toxic or or flammable liquids or gases flammable agents which may affect safety of station personnel 4 auipment ALL MODES 18.
[K.14] Turbine rotating component Failure of turbine / generator rotating equipment failure with no casing penetration resulting tilimmediate unit shutdown MODES 1 & 2 19.
[L.8) Earthquake detected Confirmed earthquake which activates the Event Alarm on the Strong Motion ALL MODES
/ ccelerograph O
~
NAEP Page 10.11.7 Revision 21 tiOTIFICATION OF UNUSUAL EVENT CONDITION / APPLICABILITY INDICATION 20.
[L.9)Tomado within Protected Area or Tomado visually detected within Protected Switchyard Area or Switchyard ALL MODES 21,
[L.10] Hurricane force winds projected Confirmation by Virginia Power Weather onsite within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> Center that hurricane force winds (greater than 73 mph) projected onsite ALL MODES within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> 22,
[L.11] 50 year ficod or low water level Flood in the Lake Anna Reservoir with indicated level-greater than 254 feet ALL MODES MSL E
Low water levelin the Laka Anna Reservoir with indicated level less than 247 feet MSL 23.
[M.4) Station conditions which warrant Shift Surservisorjudrament that any of the increased awareness of state and/or followirg exist:
local authorities Unit shutdown is other than a controlled ALL MODES shutdown oB Unit is in an uncontrolled condition during operation 2
A condition exists which has the potential for escalation and therefore warrants notification O
l
NAEP Page 10.11.8 Revision 21 ALERT t
CONDITION / APPLICABILITY INDICATION 1.
[A.5) Totalloss of function needed for Secondary system cooling capability -
unit CSD conditim UNAVAILABLE MODES 5 & 6 M
Loss of any of the following systems:
5 Service Water Component Cooling RHR M
l RCS temperature greater than 140' F.
2.
[A.6) Failure of the Reactor Protection-Reador trip setpoint and coincidences -
System to complete a inp which takes EXCEEDED the Reactor Subcritical M
MODES 1 & 2 Automatic trip from RPS FAILED E
Manualtrip REQUIRED E
Manual trip from Control Room -
SUCCESSFUL 3
O.
NAEP Page 10.11.9 Revision 21 ALERT ggNQlTION/ APPLICABILITY INDICATION 3.
[A.7) Unplanned loss of safety system Unplanned loss of most (>75%) or all annunciators with compensatory annunciator alarms on panels "A* to "K" indicators unavailable or a transient in for GREATER THAN 15 minutes progress 6N0 MODES 1,2,3 & 4 All computer monitoring capabihty (e.g.,
plant computer, ERFCS) NOT AVAILABLE DB Significant transient INITIATED OR IN PROGRESS (e.g., reactor trip, SI, turbine runback > 25% thermal reactor power, thermal power oscillations >
10%)
4
[A 8] Evacuation of Main Control Rooni Evacuation of the Cc.1 trol Room with shutdown required control established within 15 minutes ALL MODES 5.
[B,5) RCS leak rate kmit EXCEEDED Pressurizer level cannot be maintained greater than 20% with one (1)
MODES 1,2,3, & 4 Charging /St pump in operation AND RCS iri,entory balance indicates leakage - greater than 50 gpm 6
[B.6] Gross pnmary to secondary Steam Generator Tube Rupture -IN leakage PROGRESS MODES 1,2,3, & 4 AND Safety injection REQUIRED 4
0
NAEP Page 10.11.10 Revision 21 CONDITION / APPLICABILITY LNDICATION 7,
[B.7) Excessive primary to secondary Intentional reduction in power, load or leakage with loss of offsite power temperature because the unit has entered an Action Statement or will MODES 1,2,3, & 4 exceed an LCO E
Vent Vent A Kaman Monitor, RM VG 179, greater than 1.83 x 10' Cl/sec
-Q.8 Steam Generator Blowdown monitor on
- l7ected pathway indicates greater than lx10' cpm Monitor designations:
RM-SS-122 RM SS 123 RM SS-124 RM-SS-222 RM-SS-223 O
RM SS-224 f.UQ A subsequent loss of offsite power indicated by zero volts on voltmeters for 4160V buses D, E & F.
B.
[C.8) Severe Fuel Clad Damage High Range Letdown radiation monitor 1 CH-RI-128 or 2 CH RI 228 increases MODES 1,2,3, & 4 to greater than Hi Hi Alarm setpoint within 30 minutes and remains for at least 15 minutes l
G
NAEP Page 10.19.11 Revision 21 ALERT CONDITION / APPLICABILITY INDICATION Verified accident involving damage to 9,
[C.9) Fuel damage accident with release of radioactivity to containment or fuel irradiated fuel buildings bhD ALL MODES Health Physics confirms fission product release from fuel M
Vent Vent "B" Kaman monitor, RM VG.
180, greater than 1.83 x 10' pCl/sec 10.
[C.10) Potential for fuel damage to Continuing uncontrolled decrease of water level occur during refuelir'-
in Reactor Refueling Cavity or Spent Fuel Pool MODE 6 11.
[D.3) High Containment radiation.
Containment High Range radiation pressure and temperature monitor, RM-RMS-165,-166 or RM-RMS-265,-266 greater than MODES 1,2,3. & 4 81.5 R/hr bHQ Containmen* pressure grcater than 17 psia M
Containment temperature - greater than 150 F O
4 '
NAEP Page 10.11.12 Revision 21 ALERT CONDITION / APPLICABILITY INDICATION 12.
[E.3) Effluent release greater than 10 a)
Any of the following monitors indicate times ODCM allowable limit valid readings above the specified values for greater than 15 minutes ALL MODES Clarifier Effluent, RM-LW 111, greater 5
than 4.8x10 cpm Discharge Canal, RM-SW-130 or RM-SW 230,9,'sater than 5.00x10' cpm Vent Vent A Kaman, RM-VG 179, greater than 1.83x10' Cl/sec Vent Vent B Kaman, RM-VG 180, greater than 1.83x10' Ci/sec Process Vent Kaman, RM-GW-178, greater than 2.0x10' Ci/sec 9.8 b)
HP assessment (sample results or dose p
projections) indicate greater than 10 e
times ODCM allowable limit 13.
[E 4] High radiation or airborne Valid readings on any of the following monitors contamination levels indicate a severe have increased by a factor of 1000 and remain degradation in control of radioactive for at least 15 minutes:
matenal Ventilation Vent Multi-sample gaseous ALL MODES monitor, RM VG 106, or particulate monitor, RM VG 105 Control Room Area, RMS-157 Auxiliary Building Control Area, RMS-154 Decontamination Building Area, RMS-151 Fuel Pool Bridge Area, RMS 153 g
New fuel storage Area, RM3-152 Laboratory Area, RMS-158 Sample Room Area, RMS 156 0
NAEP Page 10.11.13 Revision 21 ALERT CONDITION / APPLICABILITY INDICATION 14, iG.2) Major secondary line break with Uncontrolled $ss of secondary coolant
+
significant primary to secondary leakage IN PROGRLJS MODES 1,2,3, & 4 3
Vent Vent A Kaman Monitor, RM VG 179, greater than 1.83 x 10' Cl/sec M
Steam Generator Blowdown monitor on affected pathway indicates greater than 5
1x10 cpm Monitor designations:
RM-SS-122 RM SS 123 RM-GS-124 RM-SS-222 RM-SS-223 RM-SS 224 m
Main Steam Line High Range radiation monitor on affected pathway indicates greater than 0.14 mR/hr Monitor designations:
RM-MS-170 RM-MS 171 RM MS-172 RM-MS-270 RM MS 271 RM-MS-272 O
NAEP Page 10.11.14 Revision 21 ALERT 1
CONDITION / APPLICABILITY INDICATION 15.
[H.3] Loss of all offsite and onsite AC Ammeters for 4160V Reserve Station power Service Buses D, E, & F all indicate -
zero (0) amps ALL MODES M
Ammeters for 4160V Station Service Buses A, B, & C allindicate zero (0) amps M
Ammeters for 4160V Emergency Buses H and J both indicate - zero (0) amps 16.
[H.4] Loss of all onsite DC power All station battery voltmaters indicate -
zero (0) volts ALL MODES M
No light indication available to Reserve
+
Station Service Breakers 1501,15E1
-b and 15F1 O
17,
[1.2) Fire potentially affecting station Fire which has potential for causing a safety safety systems system not to be operable as defined by Tech.
Specs.
MODES 1,2. 3, & 4 18.
[J.3] Ongot Security compromise Security Shift Supervisor has notified the Operations Shift Supervisor of a confirmed ALL MODES unneutralized intrusion into the Protected Area 19.
. [K.5] Aircraft crash on the facihty
- Aircraft crash within the Protected Area 2
or Switchyard ALL MODES 20.
[K.6] Explosion damage to facility Unplanned explosion resulting in damage to plant structure or equipment that affects plant ALL MODES -
operations 4
NAEP Page 10.11.15 Revision 21 ALERT CONDITION / APPLICABILITY INDICATIOPJ 21.
[K.7) Entry of toxic or flammable gases Notification of uncontrolled release of toxic or or liquids into plant faelhty flammable at,ent which causes:
ALL MODES Evacuation of personnel from plant areas 6NQ Safety reisted equipment is rendered inoperabht 22.
[K.8] Turbine failure or missile impact Failure of turbine /pc.%rator rotating equipment resulting in casing penetration MODES 1 & 2 23.
[K.9) Missile damage to safety related Notification of missile impact causing damage equipment or structures to safety related equipment or structures MODliS 1,2,3, & 4 24.
[L 4] Eanhquake greater than or equal Confirmed earthquake which activates to OBE levels Event Alarm on the Strong Motion Accelerograph ALL MODES 6.NQ Alarms on ti.e Peak Shock Annunciator indicate a horizontal motion of greater than or equal to 0.06 g or a vertical motion of greater than or equal to 0.04 g 25.
(L.5] Tornado striking facihty Tomado visually detected striking structures within the Protected Area or Switchyard ALL MODES 26.
[L.6) Hurricano force wmds projected Confirmation by Virginia Power Weather onstte within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> Center that hurncane force winds (greater than 73 mph) projected onsite ALL MODES within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> O
~
NAEP Page 10.11.16 Revision 21-ALEBI CONDITION / APPLICABILITY INDICATION 27,
[L.7) Flood orlow waterlevel near Flood in the Lake Anna Reservoir with 1esign levels indicated level. greater than 263 feet MSL ALL MODES QB l
Low watar level in the Lake Anna Reservoir with indicated level. less than 245 feet MSL 28.
[M.3) Station conditions which have the Shift Supervisor / Station Emergency Manager potential to degrade or are actually judgement degrading the level of safety of the station ALL MODES E
o O
1 0
O
.--e
-m w
_ ~,
~
NAEP Page 10.11.17 Revision 21 SITE AREA EMERGENCY CONDITION / APPLICABILITY INDICATION Totalloss of the Charging /S! System 1,
[A.1) Loss of function needed for unit HSD condition QB MODES 1,2,3, & 4 Totalloss of the Main Feedwater and Auxiliary Feedwater systems Reactor trip setpoint and coincidences -
2.
[A.2] Failure of the Reactor Protection System to initiate and complete a EXCEEDED required trip while at power 6ND MODES 1 & 2 Automatic trip from RPS r" LED AND Manual trip from Control Room -
FAILED Most (>75%) or all annunciator alarms 3.
[A.3] inability to monitor a significant transient in progress on panels "A" to "K"- NOT AVAILABLE MODES 1,2,5 & 4 AN,p All computer monitoring capability (e.g.,
plant computer, ERFCS)- NOT AVAILABLE l
AND Significant transient - IN PROGRESS
+
l (e.g., reactor trip, Si actuation, turbine l
runback >25% thermal reactor power, thermal power oscillations >10%)
AND Inability to directly monitor any one of the following using Control Room indications:
Subcriticality Core Cooling l
Heat Sink a
l-Vessel Integrity l
Containment integrity 0
I i
NAEP Page 10.11.18 Revision 21 SITE AREA EMERGENCY CONDITION / APPLICABILITY INDICATION 4.
lA.4) Evacuation of Main Control Room Evacuation of the Control Room with local with control not established within 15 shutdown control not established within 15 i
minutes minutes ALL MODES 5.
[B.3] RCS leak ate limit EXCEEDED Loss of Reactor Coolant in progress and inventory balance indicates leakage -
MODES 1,2. 3, & 4 GREATER THAN 300 gpm M
Pressurizer level cannot be maintained with two (2) or more Charging /SI pumps in operation 6.
[B.4] Gross primary to secondary Steam Generator Tube Rupture -IN leakage with loss of offs!!e power PROGRESS MODES 1,2,3, & 4 63Q Safety injection REQUIRED O
=
Vent Vent A Kaman Monitor,
=
RM-VG 179, greater than 1.3 x 10' pCl/sec 9.3 Steam Generator Blowdown monitor on affected pathway indicates greater than 1x10' cpm Monitor designation:
RM-SS-122 RM-SS-123 RM-SS-124 RM-SS 222 RM-SS 223 RM-SS-224
- ND A subsequent loss of offsite power indicated by zero volts on voltmeters for 4160V buses D, E, & F O
NAEP Page 10.11.19 Revision 21 SITE AREA EMERGENCY CONDITION / APPLICABILITY INDICATION 7.
[C.6) Core damage with possible loss of a)
Fuel clad failure as indicated by any of coolable geometry the following:
RCS Specific activity greater MODES 1,. 2,3, & 4 than 60 pCi/ Dram dose equivalent 1131 E
High Range Letdown radiation j
monitor 1 CH-RI-128 or 2-CH-RI-228 greater than 1.2x10' mR/hr
)
6NQ b)
Loss of cooling as indicated by any of the following-l 5 confirmed core exit thermocouples greater than 1200 F M
Core delta T zero 2
Core detta T rapidly diverging 9
NAEP Page 10.11.20 Revision 21 SITE AREA EMERGENCY
)
CONDITION / APPLICABILITY INDICATION f
8.
[C.7) Major fuel damage accident with Waterlevelin Rx vessel during radioactivity release to containment or refueling below the top of cof e fuel buildings E
ALL MODES Water level in spent fuel pool below top of spent fuel M
Verified damage to irradiated fuel a
resulting in readings on Vent Vent *B" Kaman monitor, RM-VG 180, greater than 2.74x10' pCi/sec 9.
[D,2) High high containment radiation, Containment High Range radiation a
pressure, and temperature monitor, RM RMS 165,166 or RM-RMS 265, 266 greater than 2
MODES 1,2,3, & 4 1.88x10 R/hr M
Containment pressure greaterthan a
27.75 psia and not decreasing h
2 Containment temperature - greater than 200 F 10.
[E.2) Release imminent or in progress HP assessment indicates actual or and site boundary doses projected to projected dose at or beyond Site exceed 0.1 Rem TEDE or 0.5 Rem Boundary exceeds 0.1 Rem TEDE or Thyroid CDE 0.5 Rem Thyroid CDE ALL MODES
.(
e, n
NAEP Page 10.11.21 Revision 21 SITE AREA EMERGEN,QX CONDITIONIAPPLICABILITY INDICATION 11.
[G.1) Major secondary line break with Conditions a) and b) exist with c):
significant primary to secondary leakage and fuel damage indicated a)
Uncontrolled loss of secondary coolant
- IN PROGRESS MODES 1,2,3, & 4 6.NQ y
b)
RCS specific activity exceeds limits of T.S. Figure 3.41 M
High Range Letdown radiation monitor 1 CH-RI 128 or 2 CH RI 228 greater than Hi Alarm setpoint 6NQ c)
Vent Vent A Kaman Monitor, RM VG 179, grecLa than 6.45 x 10' pCi/sec 9
Steam Generator Blowdown monitor on affected pathway:
RM-SS-122,123 -124 RM SS 222, 223,-224 5
GREATER THAN 1x10 cpm M
Main Steam Line High Range monitor on affected pathway:
RM MS-170,171,172 RM-MS-270 271 272 GREATER THAN 12.2 mR/hr O
NAEP Page 10.11.22 Revision 21 SITE AREA EMERGENCY CONDITION / APPLICABILITY INDICATION 12.
[H.1) Loss of offsite and onsite AC The following conditions exist for greater than power for more than 15 minutes 15 minutes:
ALL MODES Ammeters for 4160V Reserve Station Service Buses D, E, & F all indicate -
zero (0) amps Ammeters for 4160V Station Service
+
Buses A, B, & C all indicate zero (0) amps Ammeters for 4160V Emergency Buses H & J both indicate - zero (0) amps 13.
[H.2] Loss of all onsite DC power for The following conditions exist for greater than greater than 15 rninutes 15 minutes:
ALL MODES All station battery voltmeters indicate zero (0) volts iv M
Nc. tight indication available to Reserve Station Ser. lce breakers 15D1,15E1 -
ar d 15F1 14.
[i.1) Fire resulting in degradation of Fire which causes major degradation of safety systems a safety system function required for protection of the public MODES 1,2, 3. & 4 M
Affected systems are caused to be NOT operable as defined by Tech. Specs.
15.
[J.2) Imminent loss of physical Station Secunty Shift Supervisor has notified the control Operations Shift Supervisor of imminent intrusion into a Vital Area ALL MODES 16.
[K.1] Aircraft damage to vital plant Aircraft crash which affects vital structures by systems impact or fire MODES 1 - 2,3, & 4
/
NAEP Page 10.11.23 Revision 21 SITE AREA EMERGENCY CONDITION / APPLICABILITY INDICATION 17.
[K.2) Severe explosive damage Explosion which results in severo degradation of any of the following systems required for safe MODES 1,2,3, & 4 shutdown:
Main / Auxiliary Feedwater System 18.
[K.3) Entry of toxic or flammable gases Uncontrolled release of toxic or into plant vital areas c'her than the flammable agents greater than life Control Room threatening or explosive limits in Vital Areas MODES 1,2,3, & 4 6.N.R Evacuation of Vital Area other than Control Room - REQUIRED 0
=
Significant degradation of plant safety systems resulting in loss of a safety system function required for protection of the public 19.
[K.4) Severe missile damage to safety Missile impact causing severe degradation of systems safety systems required for unit shutdown MODES 1,2,3, & 4 20.
[L1] Earthquake greater than or equal Confirmed earthquake which activates a
to DBE levels the Event Alarm on the Strong Motion Accelerograph ALL MODES 6.N,2 Alarms on the Peak Snock Annunciator indicate a horizontal motion of greater than c; equal to 0.12 g or a vertical motion of greater than or equal to 0.08g 21.
[L.2) Extreme winds above Design Basis Extreme winds confirmed which exceed Conditicns of 80 mph UFSAR Section 3.3.1 conditions (80 mph)
ALL MODES 8
NAEP Page 10.11.24 Revision 21 SITE AREA EMERGENCY CONDITION / APPLICABILITY INDICATION 22,
[L3) Flood orlow water level above Flood in the Lake Anna Reservoir with design levels indicated level. greater than 264 feet MSL All MODES
.QB Low water levelin the Lake Anna i
Reservoir with indicated level. less than 244 feet MSL 23.
[M.2) Station conditions which may Shift Supervisor / Station Emergency Manager warrant notification of the public near judgement the site l
ALL MODES O
s 4
k~
O
i NAEP Page 10.11.25 Revision 21 -
GENERAL EMERGENCY CONDITION / APPLICABILITY INDICATION 1,
[B.1) Loss of 2 of 3 fission product Any two of a), b) or c) exist and the third is barriers with potentialloss of 3rd imminent:
barrier a)
Fuel clad integrity failure as indicated by ALL MODES any of the following:
RCS specific activity greater than or equal to 300.0 Ci/ gram dose equivalent 1131 M
S or more core exit thermocouples greater than 1200*F M
Containment High Range Radiation Monitor, RM-RMS-165, -166 or RM-RMS 265 -266, greater 2
than 1.68x10 R/hr b)
Loss of RCS integrity as indicated by any of the following:
RCS pressure greater than 2735 psig 2
Loss of Reactor Coolant in progress c)
Loss of containment integrity as indicated by any of the following:
Containment pressure greater than 60 psia and not decreasing M
Release path to environment -
EXISTS O
NAEP Page 10.11.26 Revision 21 GENERAL EMERGENCY CONDITION / APPLICABILITY JND.19ATION 2.
[8.2) Fuel failure with steam generator Any two of a), b) or c) exists and the third is tube rupture immirient:
ALL MODES a)
Fuel clad integrity failure as indicated by any of the following:
4 RCS specific activity greater than 300 Ci/ gram dose equivalent 1131 93 5 or more core exit thermocouples greater than 1200 F M
High Range Letdown radiation 4
monitor 1 CH RI 128 or 2 CH RI-228 greater than 5.9x10* mR/hr O-b)
Steam Generator tube rupture as i
indicated by both of the following:
Si ccincidence - SATISFIED AND Steam Generator tube rupture -
IN PROGRESS c)
Loss of secondary integnty associated with ruptured steam generator pathway as indicated by any of the following:
OPEN M
Main Steam Code Safety Valve
- OPEN l
m Loss of secondary coc! ant outside containment - IN O-PROGRESS V _
NAEP Page 10.9 9.27 Revision 21 GENERAL EMERGENCY CONDITION / APPLICABILITY INDICATION 3.
[C,1) Probable larDe radioactivity Loss of reactor coolant in progress release initiated by LOCA with ECCS failure leading to core degradation 6NQ ALL MODES RCS specific activity - gret 3r than 300 pCl/ gram dose equivalent 6131 2
Containment High Range Radiation Monitor, RM-RMS-165,166 or RM-RMS-265, 266, greater than 2
1.88x10 R/hr AN_Q High or low head ECCS fluw not being delivered to the core (if expected by plant conditions) 4.
[C.2] Probable larDe radioactivity Loss of Main Feedwater system and release initiated by loss of heat sink Condensate System and Auxiliary Feedwater leading to core degradation System MGDES 1,2,3 & 4 5.
[C.3) Probable large radioactivity Rx nuclear power after a trip greater release initiated by failure of protection than 5%
system to bnng Rx subentical and causing core degradation AND ALL MODES RCS pressure greater than or equal to 2485 psig M
Containment pressure and temperature rapidly increasing 6.
[C.4] Probable large radioactivity Loss of all onsite ari offsite AC power release initiated by loss of AC power and all feedwater AND ALL MODES Turbine Driven Auxiliary Feedwater
+
Pump not operable AND Restoration of either of the above not likely within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />
l NAEP j
Page 10.11.28 Revision 21 GENERAL EMERGENCY CONDITION /APPLICABfLITY INDICATION Loss of reactor coolant in progress 7.
[C.5) Probable large radioactivity release initiated by LOCA with loss of ECCS and containment cooling g
High or low head ECCS flow not being ALL MODES delivered to the core (if expected by plant conditions)
M Containment RS sump temperature greater than 190*F and NOT decreasing M
All Quench Spray and Recirculation Spray systems - NOT OPERABLE Containment high range radiation 8.
[D.1) Extremely high containment radiation, pressure and temperature monitor, RM-RMS-1CS,166 or RM-RMS-265,2-266 indicates greater MODES 1,2,3, & 4 than 3.76 x 10 R/hr O
=
Containment pressure greater than 45 psia and not decreasir(
M Containment temperature greater than 280 F HP assessment indicates actual or 9,
[E.1) Release imminent or in progress and site boundary doses projected to projected doses at or beyond site exceed 1.0 Rem TEDE or 5.0 Rem boundary greater than 1.0 Rem TEDE Thyroid CDE or 5.0 Rem Thyroid CDE ALL MODES O
NAEP i
Page 10.11.29 Revision 21 GENERAL EMERGENCY QQ13DITION/ APPLICABILITY LNDICATION 10.
p.1] Loss of physical Station control Shift Supervisor has been informed that the security force has been neutralized ALL MODES by attack, resulting in loss of physical control of station 98 Shift Supervisor has been informed of intrusion into one or more Vital Areas which are occupied or controlled by an aggressor 11.
[M.1) Any major intemat or extemal Shift Supervisor / Station Emergency Manager events which singly or in combination judgement cause massive damage to station faci! sties or may warrant evacuation of the public ALL MODES 9
9
_ _ - - _ _ _ _ _