ML20198K798
| ML20198K798 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Millstone  |
| Issue date: | 01/12/1998 |
| From: | AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20198K786 | List: |
| References | |
| PP-03, PP-3, NUDOCS 9801150102 | |
| Download: ML20198K798 (36) | |
Text
'
c.
, E3 l
. PARSONS PP-03 g
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 ICAVP PROJECT PROCEDURES
Title:
Process Review, CMP Horizontal Slice REVISION 4
//9[9e Prepared by:
h/a m
Date:
Approved by:
hk Date:
///
97 nap, Company Quality Program Approved by:
ma' d M' /
Date: / /2/9['
Project Dire"ctor REVISION HISTORY REVISION DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION O
04/03/97 Procedure Initiation 1
06/09/97 incorporation of NRC Comments 2
06/26/97 incorporation of NRC Comments 3
06/26/97 incorporation of Sample Plan Approved by NRC 1/9 98 Sample Plan Revision 4
/
h 0$
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 ICAVP pp.03 gj su PROJECT PROCEDURES
> PARSONS i
TilLE:
PROCESS REVIEW, CMP HORIZONTAL SLICE REVISION: 4 DATE: 1/P/98 PAGE 2 OF 18 LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES PareNa Revision No.
Pare Na Bevision No.
1 4
Art. A - 2 4
2 4
Art. A - 3 3
3 3
Att. A - 4 3
4 3
A tt. A - 5 4
5 3
A tt. A - 6 4
6 3
Att. A 7 4
7 3
Art. A - 8 4
8 3
A tt. A - 9 4
9 3
Art. A - 10 4
10 3
Art. A - 11 3
11 3
Att.A-12 3
12 3
Att. A - 13 3
13 3
Att.A-14 3
14 3
Art.A-15 3
13 3
Art. B - 1 3
16 3
Att.B-2 3
17 3
Art. B - 3 3
18 3
Att. C - 1 3
Art. A - 1 3
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 P U RP O S E..
....................... 3 2.0 D EFINITI O NS..
...... 3 3.0 P R E RE Q U IS IT ES....
............. 5 4.0 PROCEDURE
.5 OVERVIEW.,.
.. 5 GLOBAL PROCESS COVTROLS:
.7 4.1 GATHER DATA AND DEFINE THE MODEL STRUCTURE.......
.7 4.2 PREPARE THE CHANGE PROCESS MODEL.,.
..I1 l
4.3 PROVIDE INPUT TO THE SYSTEM REVIEW PREPARATION...
. 12 4.4 SELECT THE CMP llORIZONTA! SLICE SAMPLE.,..
.. 13 4.5 PERFO' ' THE CMP HORIZONTAL SLICE REVIEW...
. 15 4.6 CliOOSE ADDITIONAL SAMPLES...
.16 4.7 PREPARE REPORT.
. 17 5.0 RE F E REN CES................
_....... I 8 I
- ATTACllMENT A
,9 V
ATTACHMENT H ATTACHMENT C
MILLSTONE UNIT dICAVP PP-03 gj
, y PROJECT PROCEDURES
- PARSONS TITLE:
PROCESS REVIEW, CMP HORIZONTAL SUCE
()
PEVISION: 3 DATE: 09/22/97 PAGE 4 OF is LJ Current Li smingBasis (CLBk t
The set of NRC requirements applicable to a specific plant and a licensee's written commitments for ensuring compliance with and operation within appl: cable NRC requirements and the plant-specific design basis (including all modifications and additions to such commifinents over the life of the license) that are docketed and in effect. The CLB includes the NRC regulations contained in 10 CFR Parts 2,19,20,21,26,30,40,50,51,54,55,70,72,73,100 and appendices thereto; orders, license conditions; exemptions; and technical specifications. It also includes the plant specific design-basis information defmed ir.10 CFR 50.2 as documented in the most recent fmal safety analysis report (FSAR) as required by 10 CFR 50.71 and the licersing correspondeme such as licensee responses to NRC Bulletins, generic letters, and enforcement actions, as well as licentec commitments documented in NRC safety evaluations or licensee event reports.'
Encineerine Desien Bases DBt The set of design constraints that are not included in the Licensing Basis but are implemented to p
achieve certain economics of operation, maintenance, procurement, installation, or constmetion.
'\\'J Such as:
Information which describes a system, structure, or cornponent Operating values or parameters which are not reference bounds for design Information which identifies functions important for economic, maintenance, installation, or other non-safety function of design basis systenu. structures, or components Information and operating values describing the functions of non-safety systenu Calculations, descriptions, and other " outputs" 8 10 CFR 54.3 (a) l L]
l l
1
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 ICAVP pP-03 g
m PROJECT PROCEDURES
> PARSONS TITLE:
PROCESS REVIEW, CMP HORIZONTAL SUCE U
REVISION: 3 DATE: 09/22/97 PAGE 5 OF 18 3.0 PREREQUISITES 1.
Process modeling PC network and software installed and tested.
2.
Tier 1, SVSR Generie Checklist prepared prior to beginning procedure Section 4.5,
" Perform the CMP Horizontal Slice Resiew".
4.0 PROCEDURE Overview:
his effort will verify the adequacy of the Millstone Unit 2 CMP to identify and correct deficiencies associated with past change processe, examples of past changes are to be reviewed.
This is a technical review of changes to the facility design or change of the characteristics, procedures, or practices for maintaining, operating, testing, and training on safety or risk significant systems, structures and components " w rmine if:
f%Q (1) the changes to the plant conditions meet the wouit design and licensing basis documentation, (2) design and plant irformation contained in databases and documents are accurate md consistent with the plant, (3) the design and licensing basis requirements have been translated into op: rating, maintenance, and testing procedures, (4) the performance of systems / components has been verified through testing, and (5) CMP corrective actions have adequately identified a corrective action for the deficiency associated with the examples of past changes selected for resiew.
He review looks at the results of various change processes within change contrd, document control, information management, and assessment and equipment monitoring. It compares the results of various change processes against design and licensing bases, and physically verifies some of the results against actual plant configuration.
,F
,/
V r
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 ICAVP pp.03 gj s
s PROJECT PROCEDURES PARSONS TITLE:
PROCESS REVIEW, CMP HORIZONTAL SLICE O
V REVISION: 3 DATE: 09/22/97 PAGE 6 OF 18 In preparation for performing the CMP Horizontal Slice Review and the System Vertical Slice Review identified in PP-01, NNECo procedures are reviewed and a process model prepared to identify how various changes are performed and controlled, the organizations involved, titles of various documents, and where documents and information can be found. This is done to efficiently and consistently familiari7e the ICAVP team members with what they will be resiewing and the organizations and documents they will need to consider.
Exhibit 1 is an illustrative summary of the Tier 3 Process.
o v
~
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 ICAVP pP-03 g
as PROJECT PROCEDURES PARSONS TITLE: ~
PROCESS REVIEW, CMP HORIZCNTAL SUCE
,~/T V
REVISION: 3 DATEt 09/22/9/ _
PAGE 7 OF 18 Global Process Controls:
Communications with NNECo and the NRC are controlled through the Millstone Unit 2 ICAVP Conununication Plan.
Project administration items are controlled through the Millstone Unit 2 ICAVP Project Administration Manual, (PAM)
Team members will document the review on inspection area checklists. The team's documentation should be such that a qualified individual could trace the inspection results back to the documents used.
4.1 GATIIER DATA AND DEFINE TIIE MODEL STRUCTURE Fesources
.O
\\"/
Group Lead Process Model Lead Process Model Software PC Action 4.1.1 Identify and obtain documents that provide descriptions of:
1) programs, processes, and controlling procedures and policy used to change th-facility design or change the characteristics, procedures, or practices for maintaining, operating, testing, and training on safety or risk sigisficant systems, structures, and components,-
2) interfacing processes that can impact the licensing and engineering design basis documents, 3) organizational structures that perform the process aethities and, I
4) the information systems that support the process activities.
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 ICAVP PP-03 l
i ja, E
PROJECT PROCEDURES
> PARSONS TITLE:
PROCESS REVIEW, CMP HORIZONTAL SLICE ry C
REVISION: 3 DATE: 09/22/97 PAGE 8 OF 18 i
r The documents needed may address:
r Change Control-Plant EaulmentGtructures C
Major and Minor plant modifications e
1 Post modification installatiot. testing e
Control and incorporation cifield changes
=
Jumper, lified lead, anu bypass control Set point changes e
Temporary or Emergency Changes
'EWR with use as is disposition 1
Daign controlincluding e
Design inputs, design development, review / approval Identification and evaluation of cumulative effects e
electricalloads e
e heat loads O
structuralloads e
hydraulics e
Verification / tracking of design assumptions to closure Piocess for determining if an activity is maintenance or a modification.
e Procurement and control of equipment for modifications Evaluation, procurement and control of replacement and spare parts Conuncreialgrade pas dedication e
Equipment /part equivalency and substitution Change Control - Design, License, Procedure Documents Design and licensing document change control e
D Specification preparation and resision e
Drawing revision not associated with a Modification Development and change control of plant maintenance and operations procedures Interface with design modifications Maintenance and Operations initiated changes not associated with an equipmes.t modification Development of Design Basis Document (s)(DBD) e
(]
Vendor manual update / changes
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 ICAVP PP-03 g
es.
PROJECT PROCEDURES
> PARSONS TITLE:
PROCESS REVIEW, CMP HORIZONTAL SUCE (3
C)
REVISION: 3 DATE: 09/22/97 PAGE 9 OF 18 Information and Records Management Document Control
]
e Drawing control
=
Control room drawing updates e
Tracking and identification ofin progress or planned changes Engineering design software changes e
Information Systems software design changes e
Database information change control e
Assessment and Equipment Monitoring Surveillance testing e
ISI/IST, ASME Section XI repair and replacement e
NCR with use as is disposition e
4.1.2 Establish a list of the various changes and change control procedures that the team experience
/nv) indicates should be considered for the initial process model. The list is to include a procedure title, the procedure identification number, date, and revision.
NOTE Generic information can be bulk loaded into the modeling software as documentation is obtained on the utilitics' procedures, organizational structure, and information systems. For example:
Organization / resource titles e
Information system titles, i.e. databases, work flow systems, etc.
e Process controls, i.e, procedure titles and numbers, regulations, etc.
Bulk loading data prior to starting the model development, helps to ensure uniform usage of data information in the model and reduces model cleanup later, q
! V 1
e
g MILLSTON,E UNIT 2 ICAVP PP-03 a
PROJECT PROCEDURES
- PARSONS TITLE:
PROCESS REYlEW, CMP HORIZONTAL SLICE
,mq)
REVISION: 3 DATE: 09/22/97 PAGE 10 OF 18 I
4.1.3 Review the utility's configuration manageraent program documentation to obtain an understandmg of:
the organizations that assess the conditions and decide whether change processes e
need to be implementa the procedures used to control these changes.
e the organizations that perform me changes.
4.1.4 Develop the initial model structure. Based on the review of the utility's documentation and the experience of the Process Model Lead, decide on a initial model structure that will communicate how various Millstone Unit 2 changes are performed and controlled, the organizations invohtd, titles of various documents, and where documen's and infomtation can be found.
1 I
Action Output List of the various changes and change control procedures Bulk loaded process data Process documentation to be used in developing the model
- i O
(j s
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 ICAVP PP-03 gj 1
sg -
PROJECT PROCEDURES
> PARSONS TITLE:
PROCESS REVIEW, CMP HORIZONTAL SUCE
(}/
{
REYlSION: 3 DATE: 09/22/97 PAGE 11 OF 18 4.2 '
PREPARE Tile CIIANGE PROCESS MODEL NOTE ne initial process model will serve as input to preparation efforts for the CMP Horizontal Slice Review and the System Vertical Slice Review (SVSR) to help familiarize the team on where design and licensing basis information can be found, the kinds of documentation produced by Millstone Unit 2, the organization (s) responsible for various parts of the change process, and a general understanding of the kinds of change processes that exist at Millstone Unit 2.
Resources Group Lead, (Tier 1&3) p Process Model Lead V
Process Modeler(s)
Process Model Software PC Action 4.2.1 Prepare the process model based on the utility's procedure dwaments and the model structure identified by the level 0 diagram. The model is expe-ted to be one or two levels of decomposition illustrating the process at a high level. The model should communicate how various Millstone Unit 2 changes are performed and controlled, the organizations involved, titles of various documents, and where documents and information can be found.
He Tier I and Tier 3 Group Leads are to specify which procedures to be included in the initial model based on the need to prepare significant numbers ofindisiduals f>r -
conducting the Millstone Unit 2 ICAVP reviews. For example, a procedure will not be included in the model if only one or two individuals need to become familiar with it. One or two people can simply read the procedure and there is no need to prepare a model for D'
efficient and consistent communication.
(G By reviewing the utility's procedures the Process Modeler will attempt to identify and
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 ICAVP PP-03 g
Eg PROJECT PROCEDURES
-PARSONS TITLE:
PROCESS REVIEW, CMP HORIZONTAL SLICE r3V REVISION: 3 DATE: 09/22/97 PAGE 12 OF 18 diagram the following information with a 4-dimensional modeling technique:
Activities a description of the work step.
People, Tools, and liardware/ Software Supports - people (iob titic) and things used to perform the activities.
Information/ Product Flo.y - information and documents that input to an actisity and the output as the result of the activity. This includes forms, reports, design documents, test results, data sources, data norage, etc.
Controls - those things that specify when an activity is perfonned, how it is to be performed, or the acceptable quality level. Typical controls include regulations, quality assurance requirements, industry standards, procedures, company goals, management directives, best practices, corporate culture, experience, etc.
g he source of the information used to develop the models is to be documented as part of 4.2.2 V
the model, including title, identifying numbers, and revisia, or date.
4.2.5 he model should identify unclear information, or areas of potential concern regarding what the procedure may produce. This information is an indicator of areas that the ICAVP team members should be aware of while performing their resiews.
Action Output Millstone Unit 2 Change Process Model 4.3 PROVIDE INPUT TO TIIE SYSTEM REVIEW PREPARATION Resot.tces Process Model Lead Process Modeler(s)
Process Model Software PC
,_l (u
~
~
MILLSTONE NIT 2 ICAVP PP-03 gj a
PROJECT PROCEDURES
> PARSONS TITLE:
PROCESS REVIEW, CMP HORIZONTAL SLICE o()
REVISION: 3 DATE: 09/22/97 FAGE 13 OF 18 Artion 4.3.1 Provide input to preparation efforts for the System Vertical Slice Review (SVSR) to help familiarize the teams with:
the kinds of change processes that exist at Millstone Unit 2, where design and licensing basis information can be found, the information Jystems used and its data base (s).
e the kind of documentation that should exist on past change actisities, the organization responsible for various parts of the char.ge process.
e His infonnation will be :enveyed to the System Review teams through use of the process models, and verbal transfer of process experience gained during the modeling effort.
4.3.2 Provide input to the SVSR teams on unclear information, or areas of potential concern regarding what the procedure may produce.
Action Output nU Transfer ofinformation to the System Review teams to be used in preparation for conducting their technical revient 4,4 SELECT TIIE CMP llORIZONTAL SLICE SAMPLE Examples of Millstone Unit 2 past changes to facility design, documentation, and information systems and examples of current procedures and data will be selected for review. The review is a horizontal slice across systems not selected for the ICAVP vertical slice.
Attachment A, Sample Identification For Tier 3 Process Review contains the sample identification and sample specification that is to be used in selecting and obtaining the items for review NOTE The NNECo CMP system reviews are being completed in 2 batches. The ICAVP Tier 3 process review will conduct sampling and evaluation in two phases. Phase I will select examples from the first CMP completed batch of systems. Phase 2 will select examples from the second CMP
(]
completed batch of systems. This will ensure the sampling population includes CMP systems from both batches. Attachment A identifies the total sample size for the combination of phase 1 and 2.
j'{ ' t MILLSTONE UNIT 2 ICAVP -
pp.03 g
A PROJECT PROCEDURES
> PARSONS TITLE:
PliOCESS REVIEW, CMP HORIZONTAL SUCE
/-
1 (f
REVISION: 3 DATE: O/22/97 PAGE 14 OF 18 Esmtssa Group Lead Technical Resiewers Project Management Action 4.4.1 Only CMP scope systems are to be considered for the sample. The : ample for the CMP Horizontal Slice Review will consist of change examples outside of the selected ICAVP systems for the System Wdeal Slice Review (SVSR).
4.4.2 The sample is to be selected based on the personnel experience of the review team of whue problems may be encountered, past industry typical problem areas, and the following criteria:
Cross section of age - To casure the review int:ludes changes produced under different revisions of procedures, the selected review saruple will, where possible, consist of examples that span the period since the plant began commercial operation on August 1,1975. Fxamples will be selected from four f
time periods of approximately five year intervals.
Cross section of discipline - experience indicates that different organizations or groups within an organization utilize different processes for the same paedures. Therefore, the selected review sample will consist of examples from difTerent engineering disciplines, (e.g. Mechanical, Electrical, I&C and Cisil/
Structural) or different plant groups, (e.g. Operation and Maintenance departments.
Cross-section of types - ofequipment, procedures, or documents as applicab'e.
4.4.3 Based on the requiremen:s of Attachment A, choose and obtain samples for resiew.
Action Output 4
CMP Horizontal Review sample OV
m
~
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 ICAVP pp.03 g
PROJECT PROCEDURES a
> PARSONS TITLE: -
PROCESS REVIEW, CMP HORIZONTAL SUCE
()3 f
REVISION: 3 DATE: 9/J/97 PAGE 15 OF 18 4.5
- PERFORM THE CMP IlORIZONTAL SLICE REVIEW Resources Group Lead Technicalleids Technical Reviewers NOTE
%e intent of the CMP Horizontal Slice R-view is not an evaluation of change procedures utal in the past, but rather a review to determine the effectiveness of the Millstone Unit 2 CMP to identify and correct design or licensing basis deficiencies that may have resulted from the ineffectiveness of past change processes. *Ihis is a "out.come" based comparison of the current conditions versus the current design and licensing basis.
The inspection will be performed on a sample of past changes to facility design, documentation, and Mformation systems and examples of current procedures and data. De review will look for:
nL ).
unrecognized modifications to the plant departures from the plant licensing or design basis documents e
acceptable doctunentation of the results of the change and its basis.
e Action 1.
4.5.1 The Review Team prepares a specific review checklist for each inspection area by drawing from the applicable SVSR generic checklists, the SVSR Source Book of Additional Requirements, and professional experience.
4.5.2 In accordance with Attachment B, Tier 3 Review Package Checklist Guidance and Attachment C, Tier 3 Review Package Traveler, review documentation and perform walkdowns as necessa y to determine if plant configuration has been properly maintained.
4.5.3.
Obtain NNECo CMP findings / corrective actions documents associated with the areas of inspection.
N 4.5.4 Reviewers will document conferences with NNECo personnel in accordance with the
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 ICAVP PP-03 g
m PROJECT PROCEDURES
- PARSONS TITLE:
Pl10 CESS REVIEW, CHP HORIZONTAL SLICE m
Q REVISION: 3 DATE: 9/22/97 PAGE 16 OF 18 Communications Plan.
4.5,5 As working questins are identified during the review, they are to be documented for furthe: investigation.
4.5,6 _ Working questions are to be followed up to determine that either 1) upon obtaining further information, no problem exists, or 2) it is a discrepancy with a documented basis, or 3) it -
e,an not be resolved at this time.
4.5.7 Discrepancies are to be communicated to raanagement for evaluation, and distribution m accordance with procedure PP-07.
Action Outnut CMP llorbntal Review results f]
CMP Horizontal Review documentation 4.6 CllOOSE ADDITIONAL SAMPLES Resources Group Lead Technical Lead Technical Reviewers Project Management Action 4.6.1 If the CMP liarizontal Slice Review discovers valid discrepancies, the NRC may request an expansion of the inspection sample. The sample may be expanded when it will facilitate determination of whether a valid discrepancy is an isolated mistake or is an indication of a systematic problem.
,q 4.6.2 If the decision is to increase the sample size retum to step 4.4 to select specific change U
items to be added to the CMP liorizontal Slice Review and proceed to perform the
g M!LLSTONE UNIT 2 ICAVP PP-03 s
PROJECT PROCEDURES
> PARSONS
,cy TITLE:
PROCESS REVIEW, CMP HORIZONTAL SUCE
. REVISION: 3 DATE: 9/22/97 PAGE 17 OF 18 additional reviews.
Artion outout increased sample size 4,7 PREPARE REPORT Resources Group lead Technical Lead (s)
Technical Reviewers PC Action l
1 4.7,1 Collect the results and prepare a report for each change process inspection area.
4.7.2 Prepare a final report of the Tier 3 activities and conclusions. He report is to consist of, as a minimum:
input to an executive sununary e
a summary description of the methods used e
a summary of the CMP Horizontal Slice Review results including:
e
- dentification of the examples selected for review e
review results for each of the inspection areas identification of any discrepancies e
corrective action review results e
N)g 4.7.3 Support internal ICAVP reviews as necessary.
1
~
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 ICAVP PP-03 PROJECT PROCEDURES
, gggg3 TITLE:
PROCESS REVIEW, Cn4P HORIZONTAL SUCE HEVISION: 3 DATE: 9/22/97 PAGE 18 OF 18 4.7.4 Review and cornment as needed en NNEco response to Discrepancy Reports 4.7.5 Resolve comments and finalir.c the report for issue.
Action Output Final Report Proi>xt backup documentation
5.0 REFERENCES
" Guide For Operational Configuration Management Program", DOE STD 103 93 O
h O
O AARSONS POWER d
PP-03 ATTACHMENT A SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION FOR TIER 3 PROCESS REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 ICAVP O
-Passess reme -
PP43, Attadtment A Rnision 3 Page 1 of 15
t
' TABLE OF CONTENTS t
t
-_..._..__3 m y.inrRo uctioN 1.1. COwnoVRAnow MAN AOEMEin ParNCiras............................................................. -............................ 3 1.2.INsncnONAREAs................................................................m..............................................................4 1.3. S AM ru SncinCADON/IDENURCADON................................................................................................ $
l
- 2. ENGINEERING
.~,
6 i
2.1. 5ET?OINT CHANOr.s.......
..........................................................................................................7 2.2. SrecinCATION REvislON (NOT AsBOCIATED %TDI A MODinCAMON).........m.......
...... 8 2.3. DRAWINO RtvisiONs, (NOT As90C1ATED %TMi A MODinCATION)..................................................................... 8 2.4. CAtrV!ADONs Revision: (NOT A&sOCIATED % Tnt A MODInCADON).............................................................. 8 2.5. LICr.Ns !NO DOCUMTRT Cli ANOEs..............................................~.............................................................. 9 2.6. NON.CONPORMANCE Rr PORT ( (1st As 1s).........................................m.........m.....
....................9 2.7. ENotNEEnrNO WORK REQUEST........................................................-..........................
=...........9 2.8. VENDOR TECHNICA1. INFORM ADON UPDATLs.....m.....m.................
.....m.........
... 10
- 3. PARTS PROCUREMENT / SUPPLY...
m...m
~. ~
..m....~
..mm.....
11 3.1. COM M ERCI A1. O RADE DE DICATION................................................m..................
I1 m......................................
3.2. EQUIVAENCY SUltsTmmON........................................................................................... l................... 1 I 3.3 MASTER EQUIPMENT PARTS List (MEPL)...............................m....................................
............. I 1
- 4. OPERATIONS & MAINTEN ANCE.....
I 2 4.1. PROC EDURI S AMP 1.E S EMCTION.....................................................................................
..... 12 4.2. ASME SrcnON XI RLPAIR AND RErt.ACEMENT.........................................................
..................14 4.3. TEMPORARY CHANOEs. INCL.UDINO JUMPER. UrrED 1.EAD, AND BYPASS CONTROL,............................................ ] 4 4.4. EM ER O ENCY CllANO Es..m.................................................
.....................................................I$
I t
+
r i
b'o}.
- resen, um -
PP-03. Attachment A Revision 4 l Page 2 of 15
h I.
INTHODUCTION v
Dy sampling past changes to the plant or design documents, Tier 3 of the Millstone Unit 2 ICAVP will wrify the adequacy of the Millstone Unit 2 Configuration Management Plan (CMP) to identify and correct design and configuration management defici'ncies. This document identifies the sample for the review and its basis for each of the inspection areas, 1.1.
Configuration Management Principles Co'tfiguration Management, (CM) is the effective control of a facility's as-built configuration and operation to ensure compliance with approved and/or accepted teclutical requirements and governing criteria in order to meet safety and operating goals.
The class: cal principles of CM are Identification, Control, Verification, and St a Accounting:
Identihcation/13aseline. This includes both the selection of the items, (structees, systems, e
components, and computer software) that will be subject to CM, and selection of the docu; entation wbh.h describes its functional and physical characteristics.
v Change Control. The process by which changes to the configuration items are accomplished.
e This indudes approval of changes, rnision to documentation when the change implementation is complete, and document rnision distribution.
Verification. The substantiation that:
e configuration changes either satisfy the original design requirements or comply with approved revisions to those requirements, or the resultant configuration changes are completed and in compliance with the approved change.
This principle also includes resolu' ion of conflicts between documents and actual field conditions.
Status Accounting. This addresses the tracking and reporting of the currei.t configuration hems and any in-process changes thereto.
n()
- PAR 60R8 POWER -
PP 03, Attachment A Revision 3 Page 3 of 15
~
L) 1.2, inspection Areas Implementadon of the above principles of CM is typically the responsibility of functional areas such as Engineering Operations & Maintenance, end Parts Procurement / Supply. The Tier 3 inspections will look at the results of change procuses in each of these three func00nal areas to determine the adequacy of the Millstone Unit 2 Configuration Managememt Plan,(CMP) to identify and conect design and configuradon managernent deficiencies.
To L:complish the objecdve of the Tier 3 inspection, specific inspection aruis have been identified for resiew as noted below:
ENGINEEIGNG
- 1) Setpoint changes
- 2) Specification Revision (not asaociated with a modification)
- 3) Drawing Revisions (not associated with a modification)
- 4) Calculadons Revisions (not associated with a modification)
- 9) Licensing Document Changes
'w '
- 6) Non-Conformance Report (use as is) f
)
- 7) Engineering Work Request
- 8) Vendor Technical Information Updates PARTS PROCUREMENT / SUPPLY
- 2) Equivalency Substitution
- 3) Master Equipment Parts List (MEPL)
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE
- 1) Resisions to Operadons & Maintenance ProcMures
- 2) ISI/IST, ASME Section XI Repair and Replacement
- 3) Temporary Changes, including jumper, lified lead, s.sd bypass control
(
- 4) Emergency changes The information in this document is organized by functional area and associated inspection.ueas.
,m Exhibit 1 is a summary of the number of items contained in the Tier 3 sample,
)
~ " " " * " * " -
p Revision 3 14e 4 of 15
1 pd hbibit 1. Summary of Sample l laapection Area Sample Number
[
Engineeries/Uccasing Dtcoments Setpoint Changes j
3peeltication Revisions 32 Drawing Revisions 32 Calculadon Revisions No additional Tier 3 sample beyond Tier 1&2 Licensing Document Changes 25 Non<enformance Reports,(NCR) 32 Engineering Work Request. (EWR) 32 Vendot TechnicalInformation N/A. Willreview Corrective Action Paris Prwurement, Substitution, Dedicating Commercial Orade Dedications 32 Equivalency Substitutions 32 Master Eyulpment Parts Lists 32 Operations and Malatenance Revisions to Procedures 70 procedure changes ASME Section XI Repair / Replacement 20 Temporary Changes / Jumper. Lifted Lead 23 Emergency Changes No population has been identified.
1.3.
Sample Specification / identification Based on the sample specification identified in this document, Parsont v al select Ml!! stone Unit 2 documents and data and perform its review in accordance wit's procedure PP 03.
Several of the inspection area samples will be comprised of changes representing a cross section of time frames when the change occurred. Four time periods of approximately 5 year since 1975 will be used as follows:
1, 1975 1981 2.
1982 1986 3.
1987 1991 4
1992 1997
' Nc4c: If examples do not exist or are not retrievable for a particular time period, additional samples from o'.her time periods do not need to be selected to' maintain the total sample size for the inspection area. An increase in sample size of a particular area will be considered by the NRC based on the review of the initial 4
sample.
f^s Q-
-Passessrouet -
' 1 PP 03, Attachment A Revision 4 page 5 of 15 y-.,4 m
w~
-w---
--w.7-,
Since 1973 many of the Millstone processes have changed names. This document identifies the change n
processes based m the current information available. Should further imestigation identify different or additional avnes for the same type of change pro, ss, the Tier 3 sample will include those items.
When selecting a sample, the % flowing criteria will apply to all of the inspection areas:
Select items categorlied as Safety Related and/or Rhk Significant.
Select from systems not chosen for Tier I resiew, Select items within the systems completed by NNEto,(if applicable).
e Select changes that have technical significance, e g. do not select trivial, or editorial changes.
Experience with past industry problem areas, ardor vendors will be used w hen selecting between speJ1c items that meet the above criteria.
When possible, select items which complement Tier i or Tier 2 inspections and will proside a more complete imtstigation.
Since the CMP syst:rn te Wews are being completed by NNECo in 2 batches, the ICAVP Tier 3 process review will conduct sampling and evaluation in two phases. Phase I will select examples from the first CMP completed batch of systems. Phase 2 will select examples from the second CMP comp!cted batch of l
systems. This will ensure the sampling population includes CMP systems from both batches This docmnent identifies the total sample slic for the combination of both Phase I and 2 r.
(
Choose samples for each of the resiew aren below. The number of sample selected and obtained may escced the sample slic identified below in order to ensure enoogh non trivial samples are available for review.
2, ENGINEERING The Engineering functional area portion of the Tier 3 process review will inspect the following:
Setpoint changes Specification Revisions (not associated with a modification) e Drawing Revisions (not associated with a modificadon)
Calculations Revisions (not associated with a modification) 1,1 censing Document Changes Non-Conformance Reports (use as is)
I Engineering Work Requests e
Vendor Technical Information Updates e
l/ )
- ransonsrswin -
r PP-03, Attachment A Revision 4 l Page 6 of 15 t
. ~
.= -
' T6er 3 mill toview spec 6Acetion tovisions, drewing revisions, and calculations tevisions not me l with a -
a e"
moddication to the physical plant. A review of modincations and the changes to engineering documents associated I
with a moddication is part of the Tier 1 scope of work, 2.1.
Setpoint changes Sample leenthncation a The samplefor Afillstone Unit 2 setpoint changes was originally based on NNECo
~
crec$ cation SP ST EE 329 which stated that various departments, (approximately 10) contml d$soent t) pes ofsetpoints. in on attempt to sample processes controlled by dferent organtations over time, the original sample consisted oftwo setroint changesfor each ofthe 10 contmiling departmentsfor each ofthe
+ four 3 year time periods since 1973, resulting in a sample sise of 80. This sample wasI.ased on an i
assumption that setpoint.s could be ident$ed by organisation. nis was notpossible however. After some research, Parsons came to the conclusion that Spectfcation SP ST EE 329, "The Use and Contml of Afaster Setpointindex" does not contain actual setpoint data andis not a document that Afillstone engineering or I&Cpersonnel use to control setroints. This conclusion was reirgforced by the hitlistone Unit 2 PI 2) ngineering Self4ssessment of the Setpoint Control Program.
i Since Afillstone Unit 2 does not have a master setpoint list, the sample will be based on setroint change pmcess examples, Serpoint changes athitllstone Unit 2 have been controlled by two dgerence types of processes, i.e. the mod @ cation process and the Setpoint Change Record (SCR) process. De Tier 3 scope
(
ofreview does not include the mod @ cation process because Der I will be reviewing a large number of
\\
mod @ cations, (i.e. all mod @cutions to the selected systems including setpoints accomplished via the mod @ cation process). Since Tier 1 will be performing an extensive review ofmod@ cations and control of d
mod @ cations, Der 3 will review additionalsetroint changes performed by the SCR process. ne Der 3
- sample will be those setpoints changesperformed under the Serpoint Change Record, (SCR) process, NGP
. 3,16.
t Sample Specification ne SCR process was used during the 19931996 timeframe. According to the Afillstone SCR log, 33 setroints were changed, ofwhich 4 were on safety-rstatedinstruments. Parsons' IC4 l'P review ofsetroint changes would consist of the Tier i review ofall setpoint changes done via the 1
modification pwcess on thefour selected systems, plus a Tier 3 review ofsafet>welated SCRs.
Sample. De Der 3 sample will consist ofthefour sefety-relatedSCRs and one setpoint change done via the PDRC mod @ cation ymcess that was completedprior to the ident@ cation ofthe problems associated with the selection ofthe originalsample.
i i
i 0
PP-03. Attachment A l
Revision 4 l i
Page 7 of 15 y
a e-rd 4
r'y T'Tt egoa*-
y1I-rTfW--'%
+kW'+=sTvg?'
- Cs+
=>
v w-9
-4mi 1-v--qr--'"-f 7'--
M'
i e
2,2, Spec 66 cation Revialons (not associated with a modi 6 cation)
(]
Sample identencaties. Specifications are controlled by the engineering disciplines, Mechanical.
Electrical, I & C, and Chil/ Structural. Sprincations in each disciphne are further dnided into Standard f
Design Specincations and Project Specific Specifications. Examples will be selected for each discipline for both speclAcetion typs, over different time periods with a cross section of specifications generated by NNEco, the NSSS vendor, and the original plant desi l1 AE.
t Sample Speelfleation. Specification t.hanges will be identified through the change control <*ocument process, primarily the Design Change Notice (DCN).
Saemple. Two (2) specifications from each contsolling discipline, (one Project Specific specifications and one Design Star.dard epeelfications) for the four 5 year periods, Total sample size is 32 speelficationr, 2,3, Drawing Revisions,(not associated with a modiGcation)
Sasopic Ident'fication. Drawings are contsolled by the engineering disciplines, Mechanical, Electrical, 1 A C, and Chil/ Structural. Examples will be selected for each discipline over different time periods. The sample will look for a cross section of drawing types within each discipline including upper tier drawings, (PAID, electrical one line, etc.) and lower tier drawings, (isometrics, terminal connections, etc.) Drawing revisions have been implemented through Design Change Notices (DCN), and Vault Drawing Changes (VDC).
Sample Specification. Changes to design drawings will be reviewed through the change control document process, primarily the Design Change Notice (DCN), Vault Drawing Changes (VDC), and Drawing Discrepancy Information Sheets, etc.,
Sample - Two (2) drawing change oocuments from each controlling discipline, for the four 5 year periods.
Total sample size is 32 drawing chanp documents, 2A, Calculations Revisions (not associated with a modiilcation)
Sannple identification. The ICAl'P, (Der 1, 2, and 3). has obtainedfor review over 1330Mtlistone Unit 2 calculations to date, and addotional calculations will be requested. Due to scheduling the diferent Tier activities, Der I and 2 review ofcalculations has preceded Tier 3 sampling ofcalculations. The Tier i and
. 2 calculations under review span the timeframefwm originaldesign to current, andinclude all dtsciplines. An initial screening ofthe Tier 3 phase 1 calculation sample, (27 calculations) has revealed the same programmatic results : hat has been seen by Der ) and 2 reviews tl'ith such a large number of calculations to be reviewed by Tier i and 2, reviewing the original Der 3 sample sise of 64 calculations
(*;.
- nossairam -
v PP 03, Attachment A Revision 4 l Page 8 of 15 1
l uvuld not add any significant value to the IC4 iP efort or change the conclusions the IC4 iT may reach a
conceming calcularwns.
U i
Sample Spechticathen The lCUT calculation review will consist ofDe sampler selected by Der 1 and 2.
No additional sample will be reviewed by Der 3 beyond the,'nitial screening of 27 phase 1 samples and one calculation review uhich has already been completed 2.5.
Licensing Document Changes Sample identification FS AR changes, Technical Specificadon changes, and License Amendments make i
up the population for this area. Both Technical Specificadon changes and License Amendments receive detailed NRC review. Therefore the ICAVP review will concentrate on FS AR Changes.
Sample Specification - Select examples frorr FSAR Change Requests and Technical Specificatl>n Change Request. f> elect examples from different sections or chapters of the documents.
Sample Fht (5) FSAR changes, for the four 5 year periods will be selected. One (1) Technical Specification for the four 5 year periods. Total sample size is 25 licensing documents.
2.6, Non Conformance Reports ( use as is)
Sample Identificatloa - Non-Conformance Reports (NCR) are disposidoned by controlling disciplines, Mechanical, Electrical, ! & C, and Chil/ Structural. Examples of significant NCRs will be selected for t.ach discipline over different time periods.
v Sample Specification - Select from NCR dispositioned as "use as is".
Sample Two NCR from each controlling discipline, for the four 5 year periods. Total sample size is 32.
1.7.
Engineering Work Requests Sample Identification - Engineering Work Requests (EWR), previously called Project Authorizadons (PA), are responded to by controlling disciplines, Mechanical, Electrical,1 & C, and Civil /Stmetural.
Examples will be selected for each discipline over different time periods.
Sample Specification - EWRs do not have a specific disposition of"use as is". EWRs were not established to be a change control mechanism The focus of the EWPJPA sample will be on EWRs and pas that have not been implemented but, if implemented, would have addressed recurring problems or
. minimized operator work around.
Sample Two (2) EWR/ pas from each controlling discipline, for the four 5 year periods, Total sample size is 32 BWRs/ pas.
p)
-ressesrama-
't
~
PP 03, Attachment A Resision 4 l Page 9 of 15
2.8.
Vendor TechnicalInforenation Updates Saanpie 86eetification De samplefor Afilistone Unit 2 Venk T:rkicallqformation Updates originally spec @ed 12 vendor manucis to be selectedpom the key safety related components ident@ed as part of Afillstone Unit 2 response la Generic latter 90-03. The purpose ofreviewing these samples was to determine tf the Afillstone Unit 2 OfP adequately identi)ed:
- 1) any conflguration management de)ciencies associated with past vendor manual update processes, and
- 2) any deficiencies in meeting the requirements ofGeneric Letter 90-03.
In preparationfor sampling the Afillstone Unit 2 Vendor Equipment TechnicalInformation Program, (1ETIP), Parscns reviewed Afillstone 's response to GL 90-03, obtained a copy ofthe Afilistone Un!! 2 key sqfety-related components list, reviewed a NRCInspection Report that addressed the NU corporate VETIP, and read Afillstone 's OiP selfassessment. (f.e. PI 21 VETl? Unit 2 Engineering SelfAssessment Report).
F A NRCInspection Report on CY, 96 20), ti.at addressed the status ofthe NU corporate iETIPprogram concluded that the program, as ofAlarch 28,1996, had been suspended by a line supervisor and that very hmited vendor contact had been made in 1994 and 1993.
ne Afillstone Unit 2 OfP Pl.21 assessmentfound:
1.
VETIP does not conform to its licensing basis.
2.
There is no Unit 2 iETIP program manual or implementing procedure.
t 3.
There is no Unit 2 program owner and no stq$ngfor the pogr.sm 4.
The Key Sqfety Related Equipment Listfor Unit 2 has not been approved 3.
There is no efective linkage betu ren VETIP and other NUprograms 6.
There is no VETIP training 7,
Unit 2 Vendor Technical Afanuals, (ITAf) have not been validated O.
8.
Since the FTAfs are not validated, the plant procedures require val!.iation.
Thefindmgs ofthe Afillstone Unit 2 OfP Indicate a broad brcakdown of the iETIP. Derefore it wouldbe oflittle valuefor Parsons to review 12 vendor manuals to resolve Vthe OfP was complete in determining the adequacy ofIETIP. Such a review would simply come to a similar conclubn that the program does not conform to its regulatwy requirements.
Snaple 5pecification. Tier 3 will review the Afillstone Unit 2 iETIP corrective action. De extent ofthe iETIP review will be Ident$rd by the NRC based on Afilistone Unit 2 proposed corrective actions and the l
schedulefor completing the corrective actions in combination with planned NRC inspection activities in the area of VETIP.
h
-(G
- PARSONS POWER -
PP-03, Attachment A Revision 4 Page 10 of 15
~
I y
(
3.
PARTS PROCUREMENT / SUPPLY The Parts Procurement / Supply functional area portion of the Tier 3 process miew will inspect the following:
. Commercial Grade Dedication Equivalency Substitution I
e Master Equipment Parts List (MEPL)
+
3.1.
- Commercial Grade Dedication f
Sample Identification A cross section of equipment types and age of the Commercial Grade Dedh 'lon package will be included to review dedication evaluations performed by different disciplines. Qualificata.c L of a commercial grade part for use in a safety related system is accomplished by testing critical characteristics, or a combination of testing and taking credit for.nomrJ9 dom of a Vendor's quality program. Thample will address both of these cases. Commercial grade dedication programs started in the late 1980's. The sample will include a cross section of dedication evaluations performed aAer its implementation at Millstone Unit 2.
Sample Specification - Select from a list of Commercial Grade Dedication packages or parts.
t' Sample 32 Samples. A cross section of the four disciplines spanning the time from when a comincreial grade dedication program was in effect.
3.2, Equival ' icy Substitution Sample identification A cross section of equipment and part types and age of the equivalency evaluation will be included to sample different disciplines and historical processes used in performing the equivalency evaluations.
Sample Specification - Select from a listing of the equivalency evaluations. Currently, the equivalency subtritution evaluation is xing performed via a item Equivalency Evaluation, (IEE). Prior to Nov,1996 LEE's were walled RIE's, and prior to 1995 three separate Unit 2 lists were maintained (PEG, TSE, and PSE).
Sample 32 Equivalency Evaluations.
3.3. ' Mester Equipment Parts List (MEPL)"
Sample Identification Safety classification of con.ponents and parts are documented in a MEPL Determination.~ The results of this determination are captured in tne Production Main:enance Management O
V System, (PMMS), the primary database for Millstone maintenance methities. This miew will focus on the
-reassesreuut-PP43, Attachment A Revision 3 Page !I of 15 -
r.-
a
(
)
appopriateness of changes to component classification in regards to the sequiremems of the licensee's Appendix B Quality Assurance Program, i.e., changes from Quality ("Q") to Non-Quality ("non Q").
Since the MEPL is a foundation for key configuration management areas, (e.g. procurement, maintenance, etc.) the sample will be selected in order to determine if accurate information is available for these aethities.
Sample Speelfleation - Samples of classifications down grades, (i.e. Quality "Q" to Non-Quality "non Q') will be selected from the MEPL change log for review of the MEPL Determination. Samples of classification upgrades,, (i.e. Non-Quality "non Q" to Quality "Q") will be selected from the MEPL change log for seriew against PMMS quality indicators.
Sample. 32 samples (two each for each of the four disciplines frmu cach of the four time periods.)
4.
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE The Operations & Maintenance functional area portion of the Tier 3 process review will inspect the following:
e Revisions to Procedures Operation Procedures Abnormal Operating Proedures m
('v)
Emergency Operating Procedures Surveillance Procedures
- Inseniec Testing Procedures Insenice Inspection Procedures Maintenance Procedtees ASME Section XI Repair and Replacement Temporary Changes, including jumper, lifted lead, and bypass control Emergency changes e
4.1.
Procedure Sample Selection Sample Identification - The scope of the review of procedure changes extends back to initial operation. A review of prios procedure changes that have been superseded, (i.e. the change is no longer part of the current procedure) is not necessary. Because it may not be possible to find changes to procedu. u that date back to initial operations, this will not be a determining factor in selection. The sample size will be based on the below guidance with a consideration (at least in a qualitative manner) of the risk significance of the procedure. In selecting each of the examples, the engineeringjudgment of the reviewers will be used to assess change significance. The thoroughness of the review of each change example will be conunensurate
(~}
with its technical significance.
J
- PAssess P9 Wit -
PP-03, Attachment A Resision 3 Page 12 of 15
l
,A
/
Operations Procedures-t A minianum of four operations procedures will be seixted and all of the changes to these procedures will be reviewed. The number o(procedures miewed will be increased, as necessary, to craure at least 10 F
signincant changes are reviewed. (The engine: ring judgment of the Reviewer will be used to assess the l
signincance of a procedure change.)
Absormal Operating Procedures A minimum of four abnormal operating procedures will be selected and all of the changes to tiene procedures will be rniewed. The number os procedures rniewed will be increased, as necessary, to ensure at least 10 significant changes are reviewed. (The engineering judgment of the Reviewer w"I be used to assess the signincance of a procedure change.)
Emergency Operating Procedures.
A minimum of four emergency operating procedures will be selected and all of the changes to these procedures w1tl be miewed. The number of procedures rniewed will be increased, as necessary, to ensura i
at least 10 significant changes are miewed. ('Ihe engineeringjudgment of the Rniewer will be used to assess the significance of a procedure change.)
Surveillance Procedures.
A minimum of four surveillance procedures will be selected and all of the changes to these procedures will be rniewed. The number of procedures reviewed will be increased, as necessary, to ensure at least 10 significant changes are reviewed. (The engineering judgment of the Rniewer will be used to assess tie significance of a piocedure change.)
Insenice Testing Procedures.
A minimum of four insenice testing procedures will be selected and all of the changes to these procedures will be reviewed. The nmber of procedures reviewed will be increased, as necessary, to ensure at least 10 significant changes are rniewed. (The engineeringjudgment of the Roie er will be used to assess the significance of a procedure change.)
Insenice Inspection Procedures.
A minimum of four inseniet inspection procedures will be selected and all of the changes to these i
procedures will be miewed. The number of pmcedures miewed will be inc: eased, as necessary, to ensure k
at least 10 significant changes are miewed. (The engineering judgment of the Rniewer will be used to assess the significance of a procedure change.)
1
. (M M
- ressnesen -
PP-03, Attachment A Rnision 3 Page 13 of l$
x
5 e*
Malatemance Procedures.
A minimum of four malatenance procedures will be selected and all of the changes to these procedures will he iniewed. The number of procedures rniewed will be increased, as necessary, to ensure at least 10 significant changes are reviewel (Ib engineerLg judgment of the Reviewer will be used to assess the significance of a procedure change.)
4,2.
'ASME Section XI Repair and Replacement Sample Identifieation. The Millstone Unit 2 ISI/IST Program complies with the requirements for nuclear power plar,t components contained in the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section XI,1980 Edition up to and including the 1981 Winter Addenda except where relief has been specifically granted by the CNRC. Implementatien of the ISI/IST program is controlled by its own set of controls and procdures.
Sample Speelfication. This review will be directed towards repairs, replacernents, and modifications made' under the ASME Section XI program. The initial sample will consist of five significant examples from i
cach of the identifled time periods for components currently installed. The sample will (if possible) include examples of the following major component types:
p pumps e
e vahts y
pipisg (including in line components) e piping supports e
pressure vessels e
Consideration will be given to include examples of code cases, relief, or other doiations from the Section XI requirements Sample. Samples will be obtained from each of the four time periods, for each of the component types for a total of 20 examples.
4.3, Temporary Changes, including jumper, lifted lead, and bypass control Sample Identifiention - The sample will encompass temporary changes not controlled by approved work procedures, e.g. Instrument calibration procedures, surveillance test procedures, etc.. The sample will contain a cross section of temporary change types and length of time installed.
The sample will be drawn from the list of safety-related and/or risk sigrdficant systems outside the Tier i systems.
. (3 V
-rassessmai-PP-03, Attachment A Revision 3 Page 14 of 15
O c.
(a)
The f.amples will be selected from currently installed temporary alterations and from those that have been removed or made into permanent changes (those that have been closed).
Sample Specificattoo - Use the Jumper Device index Sheets to identify existing jurnpers/ temporary changes. In addition to the sampie selected, the review will include review of any undocumented temporary changes observed during walk downs associated with the ICAVP.
Sample-5 examples of currently installed temporary alterations and 4 examples for each year of the preceding five years for the closed temporary alterations, total sample size of 25 temporary alterations.
4.4.
Emergency changes Some nuclear utilities have a special process for emergency changes to procedures that specifies the controls and the organizational positions that can be used in a streamlined process to make changes that can not wait for normal processing. No procedure of this type has been identified specific to emergency changes for Millstone Unit 2 different from the normal change processes. Should such a procedure be identified, a sarnple plan will be developed.
I L..J
,/-
- PAR 4888 P9WiA -
PP43, Attachment A Revision 3 Page 15 of 15
0 O
re-o3 ArrACiiuEur a TIER 3 Review Package Checklist Guidance General he Review Package is romprised of the following scctions:
Review Package Travekt e Review Sample (s)
Review Checklist Attachment (s)
,e Rejkrence Documents
%e Der J Brvtew Package Traveler, (Attachment C to PP 03) is used by Tier 3 Rniewers to documer.t package con;ents, provide a Tier 3 Package Identifier for document control purposes, and to identify the responsible package reviewer, in addition, the review package traveler includes a statement on the final status of the review and a summary of discrepancies, if warranted.
%e Der J Review Change Sample (s) are those documents or packages of documents within a Review Area being reviewed for conformance to licensing and daign basis requirements.
Review Checklist Attachments includes the checklista, or other docencntation containing requirements, criteria, and/or questions that the reviewer uses during the rniew. This attachment documents the review.
Reference Documents includes infonnation that the review is based on u well as support documentation.
Ob Review Package Traveler The Tier 3 Review Package Traveler is comprise ( of three parts covering package responsibility, package contents /ruiew results, and review and approval Agnatures. Each part of the checklist is aquired to be completed (None or Non Applicable statene are permitted in Part A and B).
Ruiew Area.Part Al The Reviewer is responsible for specifying the Review Area of the package. Resiewi areas are described in PP 03 and represent broad rniew assignments that may include multiple documents and review objectives within one Change Example, in addition the Reviewer enters the Tier 3 Package Identifier.
Rniew R929mibility. Part A2 he Reviewers name and the start date of the rniew is entered in Section A2 Contents. Part A3 De identification and selecion of review samples will be done in accordance with Attachment A to PP 03.
De Rniewer enters the NNECo Identifier and description or t'tle of the sample item. A single Review Package Traveler may be used for multiple sample items within a review area. De NNECo Change Example Identifier is the specific procedure or document to be reviewed.
V.
Nessusreuse PP-03, Attachmt.it B Revision 3 Pane I of 3
. ~.,
I f
Review Raoults. Part B f
De Reviewer summarises the overall review results as a function ofidentified discrepancies.
i Diweg "= in regards to requirements are noted only. Discrepancy details are handled by PP 07, t
Si=e s. Part C e
1
%e Review Package is Completed by the Reviewer, Reviewed by an individual assigned by the Tier 3 Group lead, and Approved by the Group Lead.
Review Checklist Attachment t
Channe Samole Requirem-ea/ Criteria Lists '
~.
De reviewer includes as attachments, lists, checklists, or other documentation containing t
requirements, criteria, and/or questions that the resiewer will use during the review. Resiew requirements, criteria, and/or questions will exist as Resiew Package Attachments and may be p
developed prior to the commencement of the review or developed aAer the formal review has begun. De attachments may augmented as the review is conducted.
The attachments will normally be formatted u a series of questions requiring yes, no, or non-
)
- applicable determinations. However, the format is at the discretion of the reviewer and nuy be t
developed in whatever format necessary to expedite an efficient but thon d review. The i
questions, requirements, and/or criteria may be drawn from the Tier 1 checklists, the Tier 1 PI t
,O. -
Sourcebook, or developed separately by the reviewer, 7
Mown Amalgnments.
Change Examples that require verification of physical plant status will be confirmed by Walkdowns conducted by Tier 3 personnel or site office personnel. Such assignments _will be summarized in Review Package Attachments. Walkdown assignments for validation and/or verification of requirements will also be detailed and explained in the attachment. Walkdowns requested for information purposes only are not required to be listed.
Components and Databr.se Resiew Summarv
. Specific components and databases reviewed during the review that play a material role in the determination of the review results are required to be documented in the Resiew Package -
Attachments l Corferences Summary information specific to the Change Example obtained through a conference will also be summartaed in the Review Package Attachments. (All conferences will be conducted in
< awh with the ICAVP Communication Plan)
[
reassespeau
- PP-03, Attachment B Revision 3 Paee 2 of 3 4
~
c
7
="
4 c.
- - ; -l
, E' :
Sunmary Comments
~lhe review at Idnaer option may enter comments concerning the resiew The Review Package Attachments will afford comments that provide additional infh, e@ gl's revas, or provide the details of the Reviewer's professional opinion regardics the review.
~ Refoew.ce Deemments
, Documents and/or references used during the review that play a material role in the determination of the review results are itemised on Package A*=" "s. Copies of references are included in the package at the discretion of the Reviewer.
r l}
~,
L
[
Possuersum PP-03, Attuhment B :-
Revision 3:
V Paa~e 3 of 3 :
L:
iD
~
,.s
~
(3);
PP-03 ATTACllMENT C i
/
TIER 3 Review Package Traveler 7AHT A - Packane Content Tier 3 Packare identifier:
A1 Review Area:
Change Example :
A2 Review Responsibility deviewer: l l Date: l l
A3 Contents: NNECo Change Examples [ List each example separately)
Document / Package # and Description Document / Package # and Description f
H - Review Results The results of the review were satisfactory. No di;crepancies noted.
The review resulted in discrepancies summarized below and dt. scribed in the appropriate sections of the Review Documen'.ation Attachments. Discreoancies have been forwarded for disposition via PP.07.
Discrepancy Summary:
C-Slanatures:
Completed by:
Date:
(Mesiew r)
Reviewed by:
Date:
( As assigned )
Approved by:
Date:
(Tier 3 lead or Tier 3 Designee)
?%
D ressesroms PP-03, Attachment C i-Revision 3 Dage1of1
~.