ML20198F251
| ML20198F251 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Brunswick  |
| Issue date: | 11/12/1985 |
| From: | Zech G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE) |
| To: | Utley E CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20198F255 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8511140304 | |
| Download: ML20198F251 (3) | |
See also: IR 05000324/1985026
Text
_
neo
i
?
jo,,
b-
}
UNITES STATES
'
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
-
o
g
j
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20556
"s ...../
j
November 12, 1985
.
'
Docket No. 50-325/324:85-26
O
/
/
Mr. E. E. Utley
- e'
.
Executive Vice President
-Y,
Carolina Power and Light Company
Post"Jffice Box 1551
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
'
Gentlemen:
,
SUBJECT:
INSPECTION NO, 50-325/324:85-26
'
Enclosed is the report of the team inspection conoicteddy Mr. G. T. Hubbard
'e
and other NRC representatives on August 12-16, 1985'at the Brunswick Steam
Electric Plant, Units 1 and 2 of activities authorizM by NRC License Nos.
DPR-71 and OPR-62.
The team's findings were discussed wjth Mr. A. B. Cutter
and members of your staff at the conclpion of the inspection.
The inspection
reviewed your implementation of a program as required by 10 CFR E0.49 for
establishing'and maintaining the qualification of electric equip * ment within
the scope of 10 CFR 50.49.
The inspection also included evaluations of the
implementation of equipment qualification corrective action commitments made
as a result of the December 20, 1982 Safety Evaluation Report (SER) and the
August 6, 1982 Franklin Research Center Technical Evaluation Reports (TERs).
Within this area, the inspection consisted of examinations of selected
procedures and records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the
inspectors.
'
,
o
,
,
'
The inspection determined that you have implemented a program to meet the require- \\
ments of 10 CFR 50.49 and your corrective action commitments relative to SER/TER
deficiencies except for certain deficiercies which are described in-the attached.
inspection report.
Four deficiencies dn your program implementation, summarized '
in Appendix A, are classified as Potential Enforcement / Unresolved Items, and
..
~
will be referret. to the NRC Region II office for further action. '7hese include "
failure to incorporate EQ naintenance requirements in plant maintenanca procedures
and to demonstrate that;the qualified status of Unit 210 C5R 50A9 equipment
was being maintained; failure to establish a replacement equipment program that
assures procurement of replacerent 10 CFR 50.49 equipment meets appropriate
qualification upgrade requiremeyts of 10 CFR 50.49; failure to include Rockbestos
coaxial cable on the EQ list; anG;1ailure to establish the qualification of
Rockbestos Firewall III cable. *Seven other deficiencies are classified as open
items.
Your corrective actions concerning these itens will be reviewed during
a future NRC inspection.
Details of the deficiencies are discussed in the
enclosed inspection report.
.
G
K 05000324
s
t \\
l
_
g
.
.
. Carolina Power and Light Company
-2-
November 12, 1985
- Your corrective actions regarding the identified deficiencies should not be
delayed pending either a future NRC inspection or further action by the NRC
Region II office.
We are available to discuss any questions you-have concerning this inspection.
Sincerely,
ORIGINAL $$NED BY:
GARY G. ZECH
Gary G. Zech, Chief
Vendor Program Branch
Division of Quality Assurance, Vendor
and Technical Training Center Programs
Office of Inspection and Enforcement
Enclosures:
1.
Appendix A
2.
Inspection Report No. 50-325/324:85-26
DISJRIBUTION:
JCS/NRCPDR
VPB Reading
DQAVT Reading
RVollmer
BGrimes
GHolahan
JHannon
RKarsch
RLaGrange
UPotapovs
GHubbard
Region II docket room
AHerdt, RII
TConlan, RII
RWilson
VPB:DQAVT
SC P :DQAVT
8:0QAVT
AB:DL
C/ B:DE
GHubbard: sam UP
povs
GGZech
iolahan
LaGrange
ypee
vowee
pa n,g
p g
10
es
egion II
Qeg
II
D R:D VT
ferdt
B
'mes
Tg2g (TConlonff!Bf
'K
8'
.
.
APPENDIX A
,
Potential Enforcement / Unresolved Items
As a result of the special equipment qualification (EQ) inspection on
August 12-16, 1985 the following items have been referred to NRC Region II
as Potential Enforcement / Unresolved Items (paragraph references are to
detailed portions of the inspection report).
1.
Contrary to Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50, Brunswick,
Steam Electric Plant (BSEP) had not established plant maintenance
procedures which incorporated EQ maintenance requirements identified
on EQ Maintenance Summary sheets nor had BSEP reviewed EQ maintenance
requirements to demonstrate that the qualified status of Unit 2
10 CFR 50.49 equipment was being maintained.
(Paragraph 4.A.(4),
Item 50-325/324:85-26-05)
2.
Contrary to paragraph (1) of 10 CFR 50.49, the electric equipment
replacement program established by BSEP permits the replacement of
10 CFR 50.49 equipment procured after February 22,,1983 without
assuring compliance with replacement equipment upgrade requirements.
(Paragraph 4.A.(2), Item 50-325/324:85-26-04)
Contra'y to paragraph (d) of 10 CFR 50.49, BSEP had not included
3.
r
Rockbestos coaxial cable on its EQ list.
(Paragraph 4.0.(4), Item
50-325/324:85-26-10.)
4.
Contrary to paragraph (f) of 10 CFR 50.49, BSEP had not adequately
demonstrated and/or documented the qualification of Rockbestos
Firewall III cable.
(Paragraph 4.D.(5), Item 50-325/324:85-26-11)
_