ML20154E376
| ML20154E376 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 05/06/1988 |
| From: | Mccleskey K HUNTON & WILLIAMS, LONG ISLAND LIGHTING CO. |
| To: | Johnson W, Kohl C, Rosenthal A NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20154E381 | List: |
| References | |
| CON-#288-6296 LBP-88-02, LBP-88-2, OL-5, NUDOCS 8805200197 | |
| Download: ML20154E376 (1) | |
Text
_ _ _ - _ _
HUNToN & WILLIAMS ~0LKEiED n
UWRC 707 rAST MAIN Statti P.O. Som 1535 Ricnwoxn. V morwsA eoeg ggy.9 p g l3g[ mo ea== an=ws
- 000 *t=asetwa=44 a.t=ws.
s mas meto. c scose t Lee i.e a e o.
78LE*=o aaca.es-isoo TttspwoNE 804 788 5200 man amasa. ww=v v.
d 3. Jt i AP Y ons ma=
Gast wooi=4.amafonte TELEX 68442S8 gFl[h mgrRvi[.,f 4
sowans
=ono6m',Na U0CK o,,*;,= g*,,,,,,,,,
= aasw BR me.-3=..oa...s. s e o.
me.
..........o00 May 6, 1988
==='na*
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,4,,,.,,,
easo c u.noas oao
. o.o....
Feafaa. wmq saia ta030 Tgk Pmo=E G 43743 me. ons,o....... oo 24566.300001 nos =o o...c,cias...o.,...
Christine N. Kohl, Chairman Alan S.
Rosenthal Dr. W. Reed Johnson Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Fifth Floor (North Tower)
Eatt-West Towers 4350 East-West Highway Bethesda, Maryland 20814 1
LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY r
(Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1) i Docket No. 50-322-OL-5 l
Dear Administrative Law Judges:
Enclosed is LILCO's Motion for Leave to File a Reply Drief, and the accompanying Reply, to Intervenors' and NRC Staff's Oppo-sition to LILCO's Appeal from LBP-88-2.
The motion and brief are being filed promptly after receipt by LILCO of the Staff's brief on Tuesday, May 3, 1988.
Since the Staff had previously urged the Licensing Board to find a number of fundamental flaws in the LILCO Plan as a result of the February 13, 1986 exercise, LILCO believed it in the inter 3st of judicial efficiency to await the Staf f's brief and file a single reply ':o both the Intervenors and the Staff.
Since the Staff in its brief supports major portions of LILCO's appeal, LILCO seeks leave t.o reply only to those as-pects of the Staff's brief that disagtee with LILCO's March 14 brief.
Last evening, LILCO received by telecopier Intervenors' Motion for Leave to Respond to the NRC Staff 3rief.
LILCO does not oppose that motion, provided LILCO's motion for leave to file the enclosed reply brief is granted.
Yours truly, 88052 g % $$ o 22 PDR DR Ka hy
.B.
cCleskey G
Enclosures
-