ML20148C067

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Insp Rept 50-309/97-01 on 970126-0315.No Violations Noted.Inspector Noted Three Specific Actions Which Reflect Improved Safety Focus & Four Violations in Insp Rept 50-309/96-19.Violations Discussed at 970311 Conference
ML20148C067
Person / Time
Site: Maine Yankee
Issue date: 05/02/1997
From: Hehl C
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: Sellman M
Maine Yankee
Shared Package
ML20148C073 List:
References
50-309-97-01, 50-309-97-1, EA-97-147, NUDOCS 9705150018
Download: ML20148C067 (4)


See also: IR 05000309/1997001

Text

-

.

.

.

-.

.- -

.

.

.

_

_ _

.

.

May 2,1997

EA No: 97-147

,

'

Mr. Michael B. Sellman

President

,

Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company

329 Bath Road

Brunswick, Maine 04011

l

SUBJECT: NRC INTEGRATED INSPECTIOh REPORT 50-309/97-01

l

Dear Mr. Sellman:

On March 15,1997, the NRC completed an inspection at your Maine Yankee (MY) reactor

facility. The inspectors met with Messrs M. Meisner, R. Blackmore and others of your staff

l

l

at an exit meeting held on April 2,1997. The enclosed report presents the results of this

'

seven week inspection.

Our inspectors noted three specific actions / decisions by MY which reflect an improved

safety focus. They are: the decision to replace, rather than repair, the leaking and

susceptible fuel assemblies; the assessment of operator workarounds potentially impacting

operators and the related commitment to no workarounds for startup; the initiation of action

to review, consolidate, and reduce the maintenance and engineering backlogs.

However, the inspectors identified four apparent violations of NRC requirements which are

additional examples of apparent violations noted in NRC Inspection Report 50-309/96-16

which were discussed during the pre-decisional enforcement conference of March 11,

1997. The PCCW and SCCW pump were not qualified for a harsh environment that may

result in the turbine building, this is an apparent violation of 10 CFR 50.49. The installation

of a 1000 gallon propane tar.k near the service water pump building and the installation of a

temporary drain hose on a spent fuel pool system pipe, both without a safety analysis, were

further examples of apparent violations related to the implementation of 10 CFR 50.59.

The f ailure to promptly assess the operability of the service water system and implement

necessary corrective actions following an engineering evaluation was another example of

failure to implement adequate corrective actions in a timely manner, an apparent violation of

/

10 CFH 50i Appendix B, Criterion XVI. The design vulnerability of the ventilation system in . J

the circulating pump house could have challenged service water system operability in cold

weather. These violations will be processed with those discussed at the pre-decisional

7,

enforcement conference of March 11,1997. At the enforcement conference of March 11, N/

1997 and the exit meeting of April 2,1997 you agreed that no additional conference would

be needed for these four apparent violations and your written corrective actions should be

addressed in response to our future correspondence in this regard.

9705150018 970502

"

PDR

ADOCK 05000309

0

PDR

(

.

_. _

- . _ _

Michael B. Sellman

>

Maine Yankee Atomic Power Co.

-2-

.

4

Additionally, the inspectors observed poor performance indicating informality in operations

,

during shutdown conditions. This was reflected by two spills of refueling water storage

tank water during testing and the movement of an incorrect fuel bundle in the spent fuel

pool. The former example reflects a lack of inquisitiveness when the first spill occurred and

r

the later example reflected inattention to detail on adhering to procedures, but we are

j.

crediting you for self identification and good corrective actions for this later case.

1

Also during the period, a four person team conducted an inspection of your controls in

identifying, resolving and preventing problems - a significant problem as noted in the

Independent Safety Assessment Report (ISAT) report. This review focused on the new

learning process, management of maintenance and engineering backlogs, operator

workarounds, vertical audits of safety systems, and off-site safety review committee

performance. The learning process reflected a low threshold high volume process but

weaknesses were noted. Because of only recent use of this process, the inspectors could

not assess the overall effectiveness of the learning process. Actions associated with the

maintenance and engineering backlogs were good but weaknesses were still noted. The

vertical system audits were thorough for the scope of review, but there was a reduced

scope and the resolution of operability concerns were not timely. Actions associated with

operator workarounds and off-site safety review committee performance were good with a

focus on safety principles.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and

its enclosures will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room. No response is required to

this report.

Sincerely,

,

/

ha'rlisW H'ehl, Director

Division of Reactor Projects

Docket No:

50-309

License No:

DRP-36

Enclosures:

1.

NRC Inspection Report No. 60-309/97-01

2.

Enforcement Conference Handout / Slides, March 11,1997

3.

Transcripts of Enforcement Conference, (Condensed Format and Normal Format)

i

I

Michael B. Sellman

Maine Yankee Atomic Power Co.

3-

-

cc w/ encl:

G. Leitch, Vice President, Operations

M. Meisner, Vice President, Licensing and Regulatory Compliance

B. Hinkley, Acting Vice President, Engineering

J. M. Block, Attorney at Law

P. L. Anderson, Project Manager (Yankee Atomic Electrit: Company)

R. Blackmore, Plant Manager

L. Diehl, Manager of Public and Governmental Affairs

J. A. Riteher, Attorney (Ropes and Gray)

P. Dostie, State Nuclear Safety inspector

P. Brann, Assistant Attorney General

U. Vanags, State Nuclear Safety Advisor

C. Brinkman, Combustion Engineering, Inc.

W. D. Meinert, Nuclear Engineer

First Selectmen of Wiscasset

Maine State Planning Officer - Nuclear Safety Advisor

State of Maine, SLO Designee

State Planning Officer - Executive Department

Friends of the Coast

i

1

1

!

i

,

!

I

i

l

1

i

-m_

_

.___._._._.m

_ . _ . _ . . . _ _ . _ - . .

+

,,

Michael B. Sei man

t

Mair e Yankee Atomic Power Co.

-4-

i

,

I

Distribution w/ encl:

1

Rogion i Docket Room (with concurrences)

I

Nuclear Safety information Center (NSIC)

)

PUBLIC

'

NRC Resident inspector

D. Screnci, PAO

W. Axelson, DRA

OE (2)

R. Conte, DRP

H. Eichenholz, DRP

D. Beard, DRP

Distribution w/enci (VIA E MAIL):

W. Dean, OEDO

S. Varga, Director,1/11, DRPE, NRR

D. Dorman, LPM, NRR

M. Callahan, OCA

R. Correia, NRR

- D. Taylor, NRR

D. Screnci, PAO

l

'

N. Sheehan, PAO

Inspection Program Branch, NRR (IPAS)

.

Te receive e cer F of thle Elecument,inslicate jn the ben: "C" * Copy without ettechment/ enclosure

"E' = Copy with attachment / enclosure

  • N* = No copy

OFFICE

Rl/DRS

gl

Rl/DRS

,l

Rl/DRP

ll

Rl/DRP

l

n

NAME

RRasmusseng

JYerokun [fM

RConte /pf

WhfW

'

DATE

T/g97

W

04Dj/97 J ~ # "

04/ t.4/97

OfTg)07

'

-

'

OFFICIAL RECORD COPYpg

-

-

'

)