ML20147D034
| ML20147D034 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Catawba  |
| Issue date: | 01/11/1988 |
| From: | Brownlee V NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20147D004 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-413-87-42, NUDOCS 8801200038 | |
| Download: ML20147D034 (2) | |
See also: IR 07100126/2012025
Text
.
-
-
... -
.
.
.
'
.
,
ENCLOSURE 1
Duke Power Company
Dotht t.
50-413
Catawba 1
l*;erse No. NPF-35
During the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection conducted on
November 26, 1987 - December 25, 1987, a ,iolation of NRC requirements was
identified.
In accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and P:ocedure
for NRC Enforcement Actions",10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1987), the violation
is listed below:
Technical Specification 4.8.1.1.3 requires that all diesel generator
failures, valid or non-valid, be reported in a Special Report to the
Commission pursuant w Specification 6.9.2 within 30 days.
Technical Specification 6.8.1 requires that written procedures shall
be established, implemented, and maintained covering the applicable
procedures recommended in Aopendix A to Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 2.
Operations Management Procedure 2-28, Revision 11, Diesel Generator
Logbook, section 3.3 requires that each diesel generator start attempt be
classified as either a Valid Success, Valid Failure, Invalid Test or
Invalid Failure.
Contrary to the above, on November 13, 1987, the licensee failed to
properly classify start attempt number 548 on Diesel Generator 1A as
an Invalid Failure and therefore failed to report the . event to the
Ccmmission in a Special Report within 30 days.
This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement I).
-
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Duke Power Company is hereby
required to submit a 'ritten statement or explanation to the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, ATTN. Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555, with a copy to
the Regional Administrator, Region II, and a copy to tha NRC Resident Inspector
within thirty (30) days of the date oi the letter transmitting this Notice.
This reply should be c'early marked as a "Reply to a Notice of Violation" and
should include for each violation: (1) admission or denial of the violation,
(2) the reason for the violation if admitted, (3) the corrective steps which
,
have been taken and the results achieved, (4) the ccreective steps which w'll
be taken to avoid further violations, and (5) the date when full compliance
I
will be achieved. Where good cause is sheer
consideration will a giver,
'
.
i
l
38
13
segi$$ocw
eDR
G
i
i
_
. _
_ . .
-
_
_ _
_ . _ - .
-
.
-.
-
-. ....
..
.
. _ . .
..
.
.-
_
,
l
.
.
-
.
..
.,
,
-Duke power Company
2
Docket No. 50-413
Catawba 1
License No. NPF-35
[
extending the .esponse time.
If an adequate reply is not received within the
time specified in this Notice, an order may be issued to show cause why the
license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked or why such other action
as may be proper should not bc :.aken.
FOR THE NUCi. EAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
v$' cts
/
4
L/A4
Vi'rgi l
.
3rownTee, Chief
Reacto Projects Branch 3
Division of Reactor Projects
Dated at Atlanta
Ge
jan.orgia
i
this 11 day of
1988
l
j
_
+-