ML20141N166
| ML20141N166 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak |
| Issue date: | 02/27/1986 |
| From: | NRC - COMANCHE PEAK PROJECT (TECHNICAL REVIEW TEAM) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20141N167 | List: |
| References | |
| PROC-860227, NUDOCS 8603040435 | |
| Download: ML20141N166 (3) | |
Text
,/
/~]
COMANCiiE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM (J
ACTION PLAN ISAP TII.a.2
Title:
Joint Test Group (JTG) Approval of Test Data Revision No.
0 1
2 3
Revised to Reflect Incorporates Reflects Comments Description Original Issue NRC Comments SSER On Plan W Ac-d >
'Oh784 "Revi0"[eam[eader 1
l.a.2.S(
2's cQ /
b/cfry il0n /rS q (2 t,/tchJ 2-zi-94 oate
(/<
V /E/6)
/6 2=1 Tem C27 k
de b,h kg,[.(
'.ir.W
%,fu t0/r/lY I - t t - TC
+
oat.
i i
8603040435 860220 ADOCK 050 g 5 PDR v
i Rsvision:
3 PIga 1 of 2 I
o i
i ISAP III.a.2 Joint Test Group (JTG) Approval of Test Data 1
1.0 DESCRIPTION
OF ISSUE The NRC-TRT originally described this issue in NRC letter, D. G.
f Eisenhut to M. D. Spence, dated September 18, 1984 Enclosure 1 at j
Page 13, as follows:
l
[
~
"The TRT noted during a review of HFT completed test data that the JTG did not approve the data until after cooldown from the test. The tests are not considered complete until this approval is obtained.
In order to complete the proposed post-fueling, deferred preoperational HFT, the JTG, or a similarly qualified group, must approve the data prior to proceeding to initial criticality. The TRT did not find any document providing that TUEC is committed to do this."
l l
l 2.0 ACTION IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC The NRC-TRT originally identified the action required to resolve this issue in NRC letter, D. G. Eisenhut to M. D. Spence,-dated September 18, 1984, Enclosure 1 at Page 13, as follows:
"Accordingly, TUEC shall commit to having a JTG, or similarly qualified group, review and approve all post-fueling preoperational test results prior to declaring the system operable in accordance with the technical specifications."
and subsequently modified in the CPSES Safety Evaluation Report, Supplement No. 7 at Page J-77, as follows:
"TUEC has informed the TRT that the Station Operation Review Committee (SORC) will review deferred preoperational test data. Since the review of data obtained from the deferred preoperational tests is a function of the SORC, TUEC shall amend the FSAR to reflect their commitment to the TRT that the SORC and not the JTG will perform these reviews. This requirement, not included in the September 18, 1984 letter to TUEC, is necessary because the current version of the FSAR states that the JTG is responsible for reviewing preoperational test data."
3.0 BACKGROUND
The NRC-TRT expressed concern that formal Joint Test Group approval of the preoperational hot functional test results occurred after
[])
cooldown from operating pressure and temperature i.e., after l
proceeding through a major testing evolution. With this concern and being aware that TUEC had NRC-NRR approval to defer some L
\\
i Rsvision:
3 Pags 2 of 2 ISAP III.a.2 (Cont'd)
3.0 BACKGROUND
(Cont'd) preoperational testing into the interval between fuel loading and initial criticality, the NRC-TRT examined TUEC's FSAR commitments related to post-fuel load testing. The FSAR indicated that TUEC had committed the SORC to review and approve post-fuel load test j
results and that it was appropriately qualified to perform the review and approval. The FSAR had not specifically addressed the situation of deferred tests which were classified as l
preoperational. TUEC amended the FSAR to clarify the specific situation with preoperational tests which may be deferred beyond t
4 fuel load but prior to initial' criticality.
I 4.0 CPRT ACTION PLAN TUEC filed Amendment 54 to the CPSES FSAR on January 21, 1985 which provides the information identified as necessary by the NRC-TRT. The CPRT considers the action required of TUEC for this issue complete.
O f
4 4
-l
-