ML20140G257

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Forwards Results & Conclusions of Operational Safeguards Response Evaluation Conducted at Beaver Valley Power Stations,Unit 1 & 2 on 970331-0403.W/o Encl
ML20140G257
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley
Issue date: 06/12/1997
From: Liza Cunningham
NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned)
To: Cross J
DUQUESNE LIGHT CO.
References
TAC-M97859, TAC-M97860, NUDOCS 9706160087
Download: ML20140G257 (3)


Text

. _ -

I

/

'd#"4 C00 CAFE!UARDS INFORMATION C00 g

l

[

94 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION U

E we.:msoTo% n.c. mosas. coot

\\...../

I i

June 12,1997 Mr. J. E. Cross President Generation Group Duquesne Light Company Post Office Box 4 Shippingport, PA 15077

SUBJECT:

BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION, UNITS 1 & 2 - OPERATIONAL SAFEGUARDS RESPONSE EVALUATION (TAC NOS. M97859 & M97860)

Dear Mr. Cross:

l This letter conveys the results and conclusions of the Operational Safeguards Response l

Evaluation (OSRE) conducted by the NRC's Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation at the Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 & 2, facility from March 31 through April 3,1997.

i One purpose of the OSRE program is to evaluate a licensee's ability to respond to an external threat in a contingency by focusing on the interactions between operations and security in establishing priorities for protection of equipment and on the defensive strategies used. The OSRE also includes a safety / safeguards interface review to assure that safeguards measures do not adverse!y affect safe operation of the facility.

l The OSRE conclusions are documented in the enclosed report. This enclosure, which contains safeguards information o a type specified in 10 CFR 73.21, will not be placed in the Public Document Room, and must be protected against unauthorized disclosure.

The drills, exercises, and demonstrations observed by the team and the results of interviews conducted by the team indicated that, overall, the security force demonstrated an effective contingency response capability. The team also noted the high quality I

Enclosure contains SAFEGUARDS INFORMATIQH Upon removal of enclosure this document 10 DECONTROLLED.

d I

SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION I

{}

i 9706160087 970612

[llllllllllllll{lll'lllllll{lll 1

PDR ADOCK 05000334

...,.I, O

PDR

t.

J. E. Cross Beaver Valley Power Station Duquesne Light Company Units 1 & 2 l

l cc:

l Jay E. Silberg, Esquire Bureau of Radiation Protection Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge Pennsylvania Department of l

2300 N Street, NW.

Environmental Resources Washington, DC 20037 ATTN: Michael P. Murphy Post Office Box 2063 Director-Safety and Licensing Harrisburg, PA 17120 l

Department (BV-A) l Duquesne Light Company Mayor of the Borrough of Beaver Valley Power Station Shippingport PO Box 4 Post Offi.ce Box 3 l

Shippingport, PA 15077 Shippingport, PA 15077 Commissioner Roy H. Smith Regional Administrator, Region I West Virginia Department of Labor U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Building 3, Room 319 475 Allendale Road i

Capitol Complex King of Prussia, PA 19406 Charleston, WVA 25305 Resident Inspector Director, Utilities Department U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Public Utilities Commission Post Office Box 298 180 East Broad Street Shippingport, PA 15077 Columbus, OH 43266-0573 Director, Pennsylvania Emergency Duquesne Light Company Management Agency Beaver Valley Power Station Post Office Box 3321 PO Box 4 Harrisburg, PA 17105-3321 Shippingport, PA 15077 ATTN:

S. C. Jain, Vice President Ohio EPA-DERR Nuclear Services (BV-A)

ATTN:

Zack A. Clayton Post Office Box 1049 Columbus, OH 43266-0149 Dr. Judith Johnsrud National Energy Committee Sierra Club 433 Orlando Avenue State College, PA 16803 l

l Duquesne Light Company Beaver Valley Power Station PO Box 4 Shippingport, PA 15077 ATTN:

R. L. Grand, Division Vice President, Nuclear Operations Group and Plant Manager (BV-SOSB-7)

m A.

AaJ.

-_a__

A.

.,.+a

.a

..,a__ui 4

4-Ae a

000 SAFEEUARD2 INFORNATION cco i

~

J. Cross l and extent of operations involvement in the planning and exercising of the contingency response canability. The team also concluded that effective provisicns were in place to assure that safeguards measures did not adversely affect the safe operation of the facility.

The enclosed report does not convey any new regulatory requirement. Its findings have been considered with respect to your ability to meet the general performance objective and requirements of 10 CFR 73.55(a).

This letter affects one respondent and, therefore, is not subject to the Office of Management and Budget review under Public Law 96-511.

If you have questions concerning this evaluation, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.

Sincerely, Original signed b LeMoine J. Cunningham,yChief Safeguards Branch Division of Reactor Program Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-334 & 50-412

Enclosure:

Operational Safeguards Response Evaluation cc w/o encl: See next page Enclosure contains SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION Upon removal of enclosure this document is DECONTROLLED.

DISTRIBUTION W/ ENCLOSURE

. Docket File 50-334 & 50-412 MModes, R-l PFredrickson, R-il PSGB OSRE Beaver Valley File JCreed, R-Ill BMurray, R-IV DISTRIBUTION W/O ENCLOSURE PSGB R/F NRC PDR DRPM/F Local PDR MSlosson DBrinkman DKern, SRI DOCUMENT NAME: As\\EVRoSRE.WP2 To receive a copy of thee document, Indicate in the boa. *C" = Copy without ettechment/ enclosure "E" =

py with attachment / enclosure l

  • N' = No copy M

OFFICE PSGB:NRA C

RI l

PDWRR l By. @ %

N p

NAME DOrrik &

EKingCF JStof4^

lyCapffpfiDhb DATE 05/g/97 06/6/97 06p/97 06lp7 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY 4

s SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION

.__