ML20134P304
| ML20134P304 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | River Bend  |
| Issue date: | 05/13/1985 |
| From: | Denise R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Crutchfield D, Novak T Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20132C450 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-85-511 NUDOCS 8509060236 | |
| Download: ML20134P304 (14) | |
See also: IR 05000429/2005003
Text
._. .__ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
.
.
'
'
/* " N,
UNITED STATES
d
- I-
/p
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
g
4
,
kb
l
REGloN tv
k
611 RYAN PL ATA DRIVE. SUITE 1000
%,
,J
ARilNGToN TEX AS 7tM1
E;Y 1 J 1985
i
MEMORAtiDUM FOR: Dennis M. Crutchfield, Assistant Director for Safety
Assessment, Division of Licensing
Thomas M. Novak, Assistant Director for Licensing,
Division of Licensing
FROM:
Richard P. Denise. Director, Division of Reactor Safety and
Projects
SUBJECT:
FINAL DRAFT OF TFE RIVER BEr.D UNIT 1 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
This provides information on the Region IV review of the final draf t technical
specifications for River Eend.
It is forwarded as requested by your letter of
April 19, 1935.
A Region IV team inspection was concucted from April 29 through May 3,1985.
The results of this inspection were that some 25 items were identified, which
appear to be under 14RR cognizance. These are documented in the attached
inspection report forms. Except for the attached, no additional items were
identified wnich we feel require action on your part. There were, however,
over 300 items related to the licensee's implementing procedures. These will
be documented in Inspection Report 50-458/85-35.
Although our inspection of the draf t technical specifications was prim'artly
directed toward the licensees readiness to implement them, we did review the
technical specifications for cbvious discrepancies between them, the Safety
Evaluation Report (NUREG-0989, including Supplement 1), ano the Final Safety
Analysis Report (through Amendment 17). There were no problems fcund in this
area, which are not already noted in the attached report forms.
AO&
FCi Richard P. Denise, Director
'
Division of Reactor Safety and
l
Projects
Attachments:
As stated
l
e509060236 850820
$TT
5-511
{
I
--_-_ -
1
.
l
'
'
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: Y,[.[.2 g /
PAGE NO.: 3 /# d -d'6
TS REQUIREMENT:
- mde
wn//r o/cm _/ wet ed.u; <It
7m~ J wh
mand /u o,X-wM im&& '
o
!
u
a
o
LIC. PROCEDURE NO :
ISSUE DATE:
REY.:
T!TLE:
'
YES
M
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
e/
Is installed system consistent with TS?
v
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
u
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
_
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS:
d!) / revs $n nw cmu'b enWimm:s1Y, a)Ai2 J
w&1 snud'<.G wm L%Zz/was< ourt sumr4
_ owwM d&c-
? Usui n . EM
AvchsekowAa J M A o aso/- Ad
% 4 & kLakt'l." PusO4.s.63.# 6 %
&"gh n.1
STATUS OF ITEM Mf"0P0i '
- MdY
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
A/N n
75 w
A
d
INSPECTOR (S):
FOLLOWUP ACTION:
INSPECTION REPORT S0-458/
YES
-
i
NO
Were problems corrected?
'
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM
OPEN
CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT S0-458/
PAGE NO.:
.
\\ .
'
TECHiilCAL SPECIFICATION REvlEW DATA SHEET
'
TS PARA: 3/9. 8. /, /
PAGE NO.:
J/v 8 7 f
TS REQUIREMENT:
W. LP /, /. S . /, 9
Cyg a f Aj af.c, _. g c j,/ a'id ef,g,,,jo,
s
i
g
tti J5's,si euet p t,
J' meutAt
ef, .
A t// f4 tN~m /rcZe/ Offe 484 E '
s4Jdm
.4-
( ,.w en ds ea's./
av)
' ~
LIC.PROCEDUREk0.:
ISSUE DATE:
REY.:
'
TITLE:
(zu atinL J . cote )
'
'
"
YES
NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
/
Is installed system consistent with TS?
/
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
t/
editorial)?
Does procedure carry cut TS requirement?
A//f
Does the procecure walkdown indicate that it should
M
'
work as written?
Has licensee ccmpleted procedure walkdown?
N/#
REMARKS: (d Ys RECundCN E Ai7
$;YATES
330 MW
FCA WW LCAO fcA 06 1
Ad6
ixsreao er THE
cceeer
(AMAM~7L Y ) }/ 3o
i<'cJ
,.
f: \\
fwjelie 1
%.7P-30 9 - o60 7
mm JA weMuei /e oef.Ai,)
/
r
\\
h
Div* 3 & &@afor . l'eY u'o (mf en mn udef 7~r revitich)
Y30 Pr:s~dh a E & < / as ef Au 2-
n d ens $ fI uf'
Y
STATUS OF ITEM
h
CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS". WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
(TYrcm wJ xd deu / /rettda a- wAuE n/& f
'
.kJ ~7~s 6WW' (d Nx<. mv& Nyre el- teeh ntyI spa 6L %
& _LP1&Cu
Cf Auf e a
.u._
P n e: .
'
'
[at aZh e/_. .1 !
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: #'^ ###~f[N ISSUE DATE:
REV.:
'
TITLE:
Did I ( osa 2)
Lm d dy]d PM / l'CC E Leb afrA ~ref
'
'
YES
g
/
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
Is i'.istalled system consistent with TS?
/_
Are there any problems with the TS (f actual or
Pos[J/7
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
- /,4
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
g4
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
N/,4
REMARKS: (t T N v ec ce <4..r- x ba
df v ed
/%
E%f ,
4. ' 6e u 63r
f1.\\ TC
E J ei
t_ s c 9.
y<aca
STATUS OF ITEM
hPEfD)
CLOSED
FOR "0PEhs", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
@ L e we
LOe
prevalu a
@ An defenkt
c er'ehen JG ho%
/J/2 6
ANw w
INSPECTOR (S):
CsC,/h e' lad
FOLLOWUP ACTION:
INSPECTION REPORT S0-458/
'
YES
g
'
Were problems corrected?
4
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM
OPEN
CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ ff- H
PAGE NO.:
.-
. _ . -
.
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION OATA CONTINUATION SHEET
TS PARA: 3/4/.2./.I
PAGE No.: 3/h'E-9,8-8
,
t/: E . /. / . 2 . 'f' I 3
LC-QvuC-Mstr :
~
13. Verifying that the following diesel generator lockout features
-
prevent diesel generator starting only v. hen required:
.
a)
For Diesel Generators IA and 18:
'
'
1)
Diesel control panel loss or control power.
2)
Starting air pressure belcw 50 psi.
-
3)
Stop solenoid energi:ed.
4)
Diesel in the maintenance mode (includes barring device
engaged).
!
5)
Overspeed trip device actuated.
-
'
6)
Generator backup protection lockout relay tripped.
b)
For Diesel Generater IC:
'
1)
Diesel generator lockout relays not reset.
'
2)
Diesel engine mode switch not in "AUT0" position.
3)
Diesel generator output breaker closed before start of
diesel.
4)
" Diesel generator output breaker in racked-out position.
5)
" Diesel generator regulator mode switch not in "AUT0"
position.
. _ _ .
6)
Insufficient starting air pressure.
7)
Loss of de power to diesel generator controls.
-yr
JA M '+) k d 5)
de set el:%teti
bloc g dQ
apaufr e
Er m ceawsn.e M w'a * howeve HM
,
2( (
-+hs fee.b'd
ud epNsh ej tiu d M' .
--
[d(WOM)
i n dc c, a.1 e e, n
p%W
.
,
6 hf
i E
-t4_r.
G
to
o bu r v o-
e on
$
vg
net J.t
-0. c 4
D w a d.u d;r k
c.c vd c, (
vc e sw .
T kL.
het
.n
, tk.c
W.
locked s
For e % gte
,
.
n cm .
O
'f),c d 5)
C.fj' & )
c/n '2 fahd
lcckc A
i
'
a. mA c+cd
em +% m L w d u e'ai a-a', tuita ae si e ,N
i
.i
,.i
-
f
,
u c. m d s'i A
% %
(7)
%.a.
"T~C
&
v cp-L cen en w,
d n c'
$ cc 3 a.4T cudh 7
al.w Gc.bh.J7" % A
w
s Jab.,1 h .a.e .;f . r4.c di k . M "e<-<, w,K W
'
focfe a's !
INSPECTION P.EPORT 50-6 F/ PT-U
PAGE NO.:
,
_
_ - -
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
T5 PARA: J/f. 85
PAGE NO.:
N B-/7 T4m p-21
2
-
-
2
,
TS REQUIREMENT:
_.
.
_
%
.
^
ISSUE DATE:
REV.:
"
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:
e
F
TITLE:
YES
M
%
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and T5?
is installed system consistent with T5?
F/p
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
M
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out T5 requirement?
F//7
Does the procedare walkdown indicate that it should
@
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
//[f
t
REMARKS:
/.
feviewer ew'i see ,' t e m ec c/ 4e ta lea n . the ut*.s ar /
fr% e
4 er% ,
e e a /ta La% ela r e .
69s
suri b
a,e ef-s/ w
L ose en Led .u!tleE de < en4 Ll
da e, - N4 is Ar. 4e , w i$ .,
3 -2 / .
r% E4e r{a L~ m N in
,,, g,
n r~!e d.
2.
/% rray
,a a <a
e.I
s'
b. I
Ins b4x s ere et ? or- skoatel ,'f 1,,
eith.,
C OPDM
CLOSED
STATUS OF ITEM
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
.
(D ##c msst re seld
@ NM
m es > ur< e ef s Mc~ ed
Ih5PECTOR(5):
K. h. W 4ed
FOLLOWUP ACTION:
INSPECTION REPORT 50 458/
YES
g
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems.iden'tified?
STATUS OF ITEM
OPEN
CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (5):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 7 5 "3 J
PAGE NO.:
_
__
--
.
'
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: J/v.P V. /
PAGE NO.: 3/4 E-24 ( 4
TS REQUIREMENT:
V P. V /. a 4-/ 4i Ckckel N re,%
G@ i ,., r f
7
&4im con suc4w ove" L vru s4 prvhMa
.l e det; dwn isTaste 3.1,y. t-I
GbA be eltnoa k M o n N bit.
REY.:
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:
-
ISSUE DATE:
-
TITLE:
alu t e n +i 4 v e h%
sbeef
"
'
YES
g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
N
Is installed system consistent with TS7
y
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
/
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
y
Coes the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
a/A
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
,/
REMARKS:
1 Proce n re vlu
- ~ -:Gsc a .t
riss/sen
r.r n i
ud cca p/efeef.
.
'
(s) -r.s
c a.Aa:ss
+v ocam ekn e ef errev-s
m u k , e a. A
ca,.,ov ,A
os
.,.ay 2-2 Y
4. 2. 4. 2
s A o J/ $ O. r. v. /
'
m
STATUS OF ITEM
@
CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST D0 WHAT BY WHEN?
cho".S & "(d ,
aAc us
1A
frem
fe:<.
2.
,
w r e es duar (2 ) (3 )
A or cu % (d
i
,
co rr ec.% TS .' _ .
'
an c.
+e
INSPECTOR (S):
C c. H er f.uc/c
FOLLOWUP ACTION:
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES
g
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM
OPEN
CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ Ff-ac
PAGE NO.:
.
.
i
.
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 3M. 8. Y 2
PAGE NO.: MY t-73
TS REQUIREMENT:
V. P. V. 7 . 4
Sc C. CtA f A va h 54 d h
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: p/"-fat-deo ISSUE DATE:
4'-2 v- # r'
REY.:
/
TITLE:
EFA CL M
CeIlm/A
YES
JLO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
NM
Is installed system consistent with TS?
NM
/
p ,, 3 , A
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
-
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
v/4
,
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
y/,s
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
a 4 ^.-
N eqig
REMARKS l') T S
P'y f"
</E W 2 b./ d .2
ca
(Ba 'a
V.u.
ALL )
(A un
wo a n-ur '1)
'
STATUS OF ITEM
CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
,
b!K ?Mf m)
75
-
- -
.
.
INSPECTOR (5):
C.C. Ptu s ud
FOLLOWUP ACTION:
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES
JLO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM
OPEN
CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
)
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ J f-7f
PAGE NO.:
..
. . _ _ _ - - -
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA:
4.1 2 C.J. A
PAGE NO.:
)/Y 7 -V
TS REQUIREMENT:
Ve rify minimum S A h
coun+- Ya k clavirut
"
'
Pw I
u,, tca daus
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:
ST/-ow- * l
ISSUE DATE:
7/Av/1Y
REV.:
O
TITLE:
Co;Iv
0,v,c hk,
ton
I
/
'
'
-
YES
g
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
Nur Ventt: rte
Is installed system consistent with TS?
A/vr estwyr
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
X
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
/(
'
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
NOT VE4tFIM
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
X
REMARKS: CD TS a.Ilvwi covaYr~afer less Ybn 0,'1 CFi. ThT5 if
Cod *er v hs Nit!t (rere der foron4m t ] b rvelft t
&
YC4i"(Lrt
!a N t
,P ro t e ] * r t
STATUS OF ITEM
h
CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
'
(p Nitet mas + corrut rs
& ktplica ns h usf inLVrmft lu ftrf
,
INSPECTOR (S):
OctIf h. [owerr
FOLLOWUP ACTION:
INSPECTION REPORT S0-458/
YES
g
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM
OPEN
CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (5):
INSPECTION REPORT S0-458/_7 5-if
PAGE NO.:
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4.10. l
PAGE NO.: 3/4
/O-/
TS REQUIREMENT: THE THERMAL
POWER AHO REACTCR Co0LANT TEMPERATVRE
SHALL BE VERIFtEn
Te BE
Wr1MIM THE LittitTS
AT L6A67 MCf Pt'R
HOUR DURING
!.0 W FCu)6R
PHY5f(S
TESTS.
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: 579 053 704 ISSUE DATE:
l-Il- F5
REV.:
0
9
TITLE:
~rt hff L H DL f isc f(LlT:S (Ah l r:-
S YSTC rr.
trr.ctF ^*dfr
</t h f u it- T <r;
c# .e4 Lo v> H Jct; p ysics - TedT
YES
N0
O
J.Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
2.Is installed system consistent with TS?
N4
t44
3,Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
/
editorial)?
/
4.Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
'
F.Does the procedure walkdown indicate th'at it should
/
work as written?
6.Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
/
REMARKS: 0 EU V6 ILL f ul( R(QJIPltff t476 S MVLD th C L f)Cl
Rf 00lf t rAf_ra T F of
'p
st an t,
tocENsto 41Rt.~cw c; o atR rc cprocpuy (Jou:vnto rarrece cf 74
. . . -
S cx:LL SicCC lS ff6Sfa1 cud WFiftFS C M PL'f NrE
cia 74 f_
b 'S!CS it s' l'
n ,. u rr. :,. a n ms-ajerEn, vnreegn
c :;)- f boo
G. STeF 74 - en 5:)co
S~tF 75 - nitt 7: CEfwf Hw D 067FtN THE F rtl.L p),UE P
STATUS OF ITEM
OPEN
CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
.
?. N E C
PE C QNC1L6
EY
FUf L LyC
?
LICE NCEE
?& C WC t LL
(Y
(vfl
LOAD
INSPECTOR (5):
D uJi /;H T D. CHAM 66 elf- N
FOLLOWUP ACTION: INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES
g
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM
OPEN
CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/7f-33
PAGE NO.:
l
l
.
'
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 4 10.2
PAGE NO.: 3/4 10-2
TS REQUIREMENT:
tWEN 7"6
(E ONNC E
c 0N 57F A NT5 IMO.r M D CN CcrJTR L
R(D (.40?S FY "Hi
COC S
PRE
BYDA5REn
\\!ERIFY : [htt GN TratihTicp1
'
SHLET)
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: 57P-500-0705 ISSUE DATE:
1 02 75
REY.:
0
'n
TITLE:
f c0 st0vE rnt w e r ir i
- t-
- -f d Rfc5 6 EYFAss(t reR m s Tiric.
. ..
.
.
,7,
1 Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
r4
2 Is installed system consistent with TS?
NA
NL
1 Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
/
editorial)?
A Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
/
E Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
/
work as written?
ry ;
6. Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
/
REMARKS: @) ACTV/,L F60 00 sit 4a5 AFC RECORC60 AND VERIFirO
90r F6'#ff0
, ,7mt0N
L trW75 AFE Nei
NOIC ATE D
f :,. ; 4.10 2 .1
WMt d,E n - of
(mien F0DS
FF orf
100 $
Pio DEsSm
w576 A o M
75*2
STATUS OF ITEM
OPEN
CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST DO WHAT BY WHEN?
D N f.C
P E.C ON C I LL
BY
FML
LMC
CA) L I C E N S EC
f E C Ar:(n(
Ev c if L (.0f D
INSPECTOR (S):
D vli f. P -~
D.
6H5tM EALAIN
FOLLOWUP ACTION:
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES
NO
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM
OPEN
CLOSED
REPARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 7 5- 35
PAGE NO.:
- - - -
_
. .
__
'
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA:
4, .[ 0. 3
PAGE NO.:
3/4 10-3
TS REQUIREMENT:
WlTHir4
30 MNUT65 PRIOR 70 AND A7 L6A57 CNc6
CER
.I 2
Mot R 5
DuRlnG
THF
OF
A
6H!ITDOWN
I
MARGfN D6r/10NSTRn'isorJ t'ERIFY THAT * (SLE Cor1TINuhTIcr4 6HEET)
'
'
i
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: 57f 050-360 l ISSUE DATE:
2-is- U
REV.:
0
- ,
TITLE:
S H 07 000)N M A F(,lN
Offf 0N578[7(OrJ
'
YES
M
.
l. Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS7
r, (
Nb
2. Is installed system consistent with TS?
tc
e4
2. Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
/
editorial)?
4,Does precedure carry out TS requirement?
h
5.Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
/
work as written?
6.Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
/
REMARKS: h CATASr(67 2
or
STP- 059- 2 001
Rf Wr M0 WH !c W ' N vo w E S
(Vd Fw t on
'l
TE C Pr3 4 L SCE CI T ' cC % 4.10,3 - EDIToM COMMEMS DC 4
.ir.t E T 2 Sl[7I0 tl (l$c) Se%LC E F ~ r.
' ~-t
C :t C;~ rt fu ts i . Evt ter cete;E:c
3.1.4.2 "O)f c7 c'J II'
!
ftc 5;uirecres
5* Ao sit-(
a S h e w tr 5fc estse a d
'
- -a it :w:cy
9. c.-r it
<E w.E E ; af iet r)wr ricewtpl Srpff
. . .
STATUS OF ITEM
OPEN
CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
,
5, MGC
ff(nn(ILd
f1
f t)E L LOAD
A.
LIC6rdFF
ff (dt ' c 'LE
fY
FVLL
l Of D
'
$, l.l C E NSE L
Pi c m c stE
EY
F'J6L
L.nf D
INSPECTOR (S):
Dv)l?!J 7
D,
C FW:6CFditJ
FOLLOWUP ACTION:
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES
g
!l
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM
OPEN
CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (5):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 75-3r
PAGE NO.:
l
l
--
..
-
, _ - - -
_. , . -
- - _ .
- - - _ -
- _ _ _
___
.
.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
TS PARA: 3/'t 4.1. A /
PAGE NO.:
) /y 3 -l /
'
TS REQUIREMENT:
durad cS8'k ,th<.4ntl Notb ul tn *,*
C)ta n nel calibra N
vyt NHVn3
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.:
EP-09 -v(v ISSUE DATE:
1/t /1 r
REY.:
o
TITLE:
,
'
YES
NO
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
%
[@
Is installed system consistent with TS?
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
editorial)?
l
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
.
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
t/
REMARKS:
C Bf nof t (a) in Tabk 8(,3,1 1 -I
for enor&als'.sifia+ido
c % el F.r nt%I +est
is
con festee ud
eres h e n'a n sse d n %
2) The cLecl fu *c+ ion = l 4taf Fvr je4va/ M Nafitn o f m . i. 56
line Tsc l*$ ion
cetn h t f Cr h im ed u l h oef neefvs i f-) ' breem e<
ines4 develoy
p ro ceA vre s for ana i< s4w le'-s e 'iss la h'm
+ttlps, &
G. Q
'
'
'
INSPECTOR (S):
bs (1. 4cn e e #-
FOLLOWUP ACTION:
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES
N0
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM
OPEN
CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (S):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 'Pi- U
PAGE NO.:
.
.
TECHNICAL SPEClf! CATION REVIEW DATA SHEET
'
TS PARA: .3/y,93,4.)
PAGE NO.: 3/y 3 -11
TS REQUIREMENT:
C hann e.l check . chu el Funchn ul +e3 ' and
f
C.h q n n e l
cclT bn.W e n
0 ,r e r Noni
LIC. PROCEDURE NO.: STF4581MI
ISSUE DATE:
>/n/fy
REV.:
0
TITLE: # 545 -tWA' Vend kafe, lenf -6 W, La,de t, , W, 6, Lt.<l I,c4a..el G fh#3
'
(6 4-Notl 4j 6 M-#6Pl 4) 0>t-NAT) A )
'
YES
M
Is there any difference between FSAR/SER and TS?
N/A
Is installed system consistent with TS?
F/A
Are there any problems with the TS (factual or
./
editorial)?
Does procedure carry out TS requirement?
Does the procedure walkdown indicate that it should
//A
work as written?
Has licensee completed procedure walkdown?
REMARKS:
d 75 Tale 7. 3,14 ,Tdp fvnb l.4.
S yed fig i - 5ff.5 int.4cr " 5 %
be"k.-VS.S inde)! L) fewdert ,es wriffen , don neh spesh i l & cleand
fvac%I +ts4 si rtwied h % red sresfhd's N . 'true eJN - M t'-
'
"
"
nalkd
L>wn.
STATUS OF ITEM
6PhD
CLOSED
FOR "0 PENS", WHO MUST 00 WHAT BY WHEN?
TS Urruhl%
YMo?re). LTc r a s t st0 & n% selem e d
perichYfy
e
'
'
'
r epie e -,e.h
d' 4e <Lew I s,r en A'c a M
INSPECTOR (S):
W.fl.AcantY
FOLLOWUP ACTION:
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/
YES
M
Were problems corrected?
Were any other problems identified?
STATUS OF ITEM
OPEN
CLOSED
REMARKS:
INSPECTOR (5):
INSPECTION REPORT 50-458/ 85-3f
PAGE NO.: