ML20100A877
| ML20100A877 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Braidwood  |
| Issue date: | 12/13/1984 |
| From: | Farrar D COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| To: | James Keppler NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| References | |
| 9521N, NUDOCS 8503260293 | |
| Download: ML20100A877 (2) | |
Text
-
. ['
h Commonwealth Edison h
v
/ one First Nahonni PI'n Chicago Ilhnois
\\
^~
'? Addriss Reply 12 P:st Offica Box 767.
'(
/ Chicago. Illinois 60690 December 13, 1984 Mr. James G. Keppler Regional Administrator Region III U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Il 60137
Subject:
Braidwood Station Units 1 and 2 Response to Inspection Reports Nos.
50-456/84-08 and 50-457/64-08 NRC Docket Nos. 50-456 and 50-457 References (a):
R. F. Warnick letter to Cordell Reed dated June 21, 1984 (b):
D. L. Farrar letter to J. G. Keppler dated June 21, 1984 (c):
D. L. Farrar letter to J. G. Keppler dated August 16, 1984 (d):
D. L. Farrar letter to J. G. Keppler dated September 12, 1984
%ar Mr. Keppler:
Reference (b) provided the Commonwealth Edison Company t
.y-day response to Reference (a), and References (c) and (d) re vised the expected completion dates for the Items of Noncompliance in Reference (b).
Upon review of the status of our corrective actions, Commonwealth Edison has determined that a revised completion date for the secind Item of Noncompliance is necessary.
Our expected date of full compliance for the second Item of Noncompliance is now February 22, 1985.
A current status of corrective action is enclosed.
Very truly s,
&y
- E ;
+w 4
. L. Farrar G
PDR Director of Nuclear Licensing gpl Enclosure t
cc:
NRC Resident Inspector - BW J}{g gg4 I
9521N
1 Q~
m - 6 ENCLOSURE
. COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO INSPECTION REPORT 50-456/84-08 AND 50-457/84-08 ITEMS 50-456/84-08-02 AND 50-457/84-08-02 ITEM OF NONCOMPLIANCE NO. 2 STATUS OF CORRECTIVE ACTION:
Site Quality Assurance has reviewed the sixty-eight (68) deficiencies identified during the forty-four (44) onsite audits in 1980.
The results of that review are as follows:
45 items are believed to adequately address, as part of the audit closecut, the basis for accepting work performed prior to the deficiency being identified.
21 require further review to assure the acceptability of past work since it was not clearly documented.
2 items were the subject of NRC concerns and are being addressed as discussed in the respective responses.
Indications are that many of the 21 items requiring further review have been addressed by inspection programs.
Others require further review of the information before a determination can be made.
With present plans, we expect that the detailed review of information for the 21 items and any necessary corrective action will be completed by February 22, 1985.
9521N-
,