ML20094K459

Monthly Operating Rept for Feb 1992 for Ano,Unit 2

ML20094K459
Person / Time
Site:	Arkansas Nuclear
Issue date:	02/29/1992
From:	Whitt M ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To:
Shared Package
ML20094K457	List: 2CAN039202, Forwards Monthly Operating Rept for Feb 1992 for Ano,Unit 2 & Revised Monthly Operating Rept for Jan 1992 for Unit 2 ML20094K459 ML20094K463
References
NUDOCS 9203200352
Download: ML20094K459 (5)

Text

r. --

OPERATING DATA REPORT DOCKET NO:

50-3_68 DATE:

March 2 ul_992 COMPl.ETED llY:tiuS._WhRt TEl.EPil0NE :

{$01] 964-5560 QPERATING STATUS 1.

Unit Names M y an Nuclear Ono - Unit 2 2.

Reporting iN* tM ;

[ojgua ryj-29n1992 3.

Licensed The hwor (MWt):

2 815 3

4.

Nameplato Rm t s0rons MWo):

942.57 5.

Design Electsacal R ting (Not MWo):

91 2 6.

Maximum Dopondable Capacity (Gross MWo):

897 7.

Marinum Dependablo Capacity (Not HWo):

858 i

8.

If Changos Occur in Capacity Ratings (items Number 3 Through 7) Sinco Last Report. Givo Reasons:

9.

Power' Loyal To Which Restricted.

If Any (Nat HWo): Nono 10..

Reasons For Rost rictions.

If Any:

Ncno t

MONTil YR-TO-DATE CUMULATIVE 11.

Ilours in Reporting.Porlod....

596,0 1,440.0 104,$92.0-12.

Number of flours Reactor was Critical.....................

696.0 1,440.0 79,417.0 13.

Reactor Reservo Shutdown i-llours........................

0.0 0.0 0.0 14 Ilours Generator On-Lino 696.0 1,440.0 77,627.2 15.

Unit Reservo Shutdown flours 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.

Gross Thermal Energy Generated

( M W il )........................ -

1,956,849.0 4,049,383.0 204,308.491.0 17..

Gross Electrical Energy Gonorated (HWil) 651,130.0 1,347,425.0 67,200,256.0 18.

Not Electrical Energy 622,916.0 1,289,125.0 63,916,938.0 i

Generated (MWil) 19.

Unit Servico Factor..........

100.0 100.0 74.2 20.

Unit Aval. lability Factor.....

100.0 100.0 74.2 21.

.. Unit Capacity Factor (Using HDC.Not)-..........

104.3-104.3 71.2 22.

Unit Capacity Factor (Using DEC'Not)..............

98.1 98.2 67.0 23.

Unit Forced Outage Rate-......

0.0 0.0 11.6 24.

Shutdowns Scheduled Over Noxt 6 Honths (Type, Date, and Duration of Each):

' Hone 4

25.

If Shut. Down At End of Report Parlod._ Estimated Date of Startup:

26. -

Units in Test-Status (Prior to Commercial Operation):

~

Forecast Achieved INITIAL CRITICALITY 12/jL5/ 78

-INITIAL ELECTRICITY 12/_26/78_

7 COMMERCIAL OPERATION OE26/_80 9203200352 920316 PDR ADOCK.05000368 R

PDR

J AVERAGE DAILY UNIT POWER LEVEL DOCKET Not 50-368 I

UNIT:

Two DATE:

dj[cl L2 1992 2

COMPLETEb IlY: H. S. WhMt TELEPil0NE:

150_Q_964-5560 HONTil February._1992 DAY AVERAGE 11AILY POWER 1.EVEL (HWe-Not)

{

i 1..............

894 2..............

895 t

3..............

895 l

'4..............

895

'5..............

896 i

6..............

896 7..............

895 8..............

897 9.............. -897 10.............

897 11.............

895 12.............

895 13.............

896 j'

893 15.............

895 16............. 896-17.............

894

-18............. -894 19.............

895 20............. -895 21.............

895

)

12.

4..........- 894 23.............

893 24.............

894

-l 25.............

896 26.............

896 27......'....... 895 28.............

894-29............. 896 AVOS:

895 INSTRUCTION On-this format. list the averago daily unit power.lovel in MWo-Net for each day in reporting month. Computo to the nearest wholo megawatt.

3

t L

)

HONTitLY Ol'ERATING REl' ORT l

OPERATING StiMHARY L

1EllRUARY, 1992 j

UNIT TWO Y

Unit Two operated the entiro month of February at 100% full power.

i t

i 5

L b

t

?

f f

E t

eaa..

,.r,--

,,,,,,, 4 a nn,._

,._,,,,_,.,,,.c,n_,,,,_,,,,,,,,,_,,_,...,.,,,,,,,,,_,,,.,.m

.,,,-,,,,,,,r.,

,.,n,,.,k.,.-.

!L!Iiji((;[I

i :.

ts e

e G

v c

E 0

i n

R 2

6 t

e U

o 9 5

cor N

w 9 t

5 et r e(

T 1

t r~

u s

e i

4 rnc nase e

t

. h 6

ooe ot nl c

i 2 W 9 CiR i aei r

8 n

t tDcF u

. )

&ct c

i o

6 U h 3

c S 1

A n ufL)

S O

r 0

e e

ro R

0 N a

. 5 s

v t

rE e

5AM M (

u e

snoL m

a r

nof(

a C

P Ii S

t st Y

- at r B

reo Gaep I

OE

u. NE t

ph e n

t eSR t

NMA uO e

i r i

i. N

t. H n 'e bPyt) b 1

LP od i

rn2 1,

ATEPE po h rt e2 tITMT mC xonv0 oNAOF o

6 EfEE1 5

E DUDCT C

m m

e 'e a

n t

. r o

sd mcni S

yo aS ot E

SC r

i c EO cct u I

Si ad T

t ue C

l l anR U

e

aami r

D2 e

duuotd e' E9 s

t onnt nah R9 nt r haauoot 1

eno ttMACLO R

cep e-EY i ve 3 w123459 WR LER OA PU

)

)

R n

n DB i

i NE AF

'r a

a l

l o

p n

p SR t

x o

x NO f

c E

i E

WF oga

( t t&n

(

O ne s

c o

wRT diR ee igi' r

ot rT rnt o

vO ht n u

ti a r)

P t uw l r snnern itSE eho io eiivEi R

MSD a

R ami a

T Fe ratll I

c yT x a a p N

t ngr Ernx U

nanor t oE enit oesi(

n mel at sit o

pt el annar s

ninuureire a

ouif gecmeh e

s q a e e pi d pt R

aEMRROLAOO e-2 RABCDE FG5 1

no) is t r au ro uH D(

de 2

l e

du n

ed v

ce T

rh oc FS e

FS 1

ta D

I N

o O

N N

l d;j jijjtI!l{4 i

! :I +

}4

DATI. :

l'eb r ua r y, 1992 REl'UELING INI'ORMATION 1.

Name of facility:

Arianatts_Eunjear one - Unit 2 2.

Scheduled dato for next refueling shutdown.

August 15,_1992._

3.

Scheduled dato for t estart following ref ueling. OctoberAl232 4.

Will refueling or resumption of operat ion thereaf ter require a technical specification change or other license amendment?

If answer is yes, what, in general, will there be?

If answer is no, has the reload funi design and core configuration been reviewed by your Plant Safety Review Cornrnit tee to determine whether any unroviewed safety questions are associated with the coro reload (Kni. 10 C1'R Section 50.59)?

Ur@nownt _Tij!L ycle 10 Enload is current ly_being_nlarmed._

C S.

Scheduled date(s) for submitting proposed licensing action and supporting information.

Hay, 1992 11 r eclu i r ed_*_

6.

4mportant licensing considerations associated with refueling, e.g.,

new or dif forent fuel design or supplier, unreviewed design or performance analysis methods, significant changes in fuel design, new operating procedures.

None 7.

The nurnber of fuel assemblics (a) in the core and (b) in the spent fuci storage pool, a)

_177 b) (tB9 J the sizn of 8.

The present licensed spnnt fuel pool storage capacity any increase in licensed storago capacity that has been requested or in planned, in nurnber of fuel assemblics, present 988 increase sizo by a 9

The projected date of the last refueling that can bn discharged to the spent fuel pool assuming the present licensed capacity.

DATE.

1996 (Loss of fullcore offload capability)

• Date change due to recovery of unusable cell locations, i

.