ML20091P385
| ML20091P385 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 06/11/1982 |
| From: | Bird W CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17198A223 | List:
|
| References | |
| CON-BOX-08, CON-BOX-8, FOIA-84-96 NUDOCS 8406130044 | |
| Download: ML20091P385 (2) | |
Text
i 5
I Midland. MI
~
s (LOCATION)
June 11, 1982 (DATE)
Walter Ross Bird
, hereby make the following I,
Charles H Weil
, who has identified himself statement to to me as an Investigator of the United States Nuclear Regulatory Coaunission.
I asks this statement freely"with no threats or promises of reward having been ande to me.
I am the Manager of the Midland Project Quality Assurance Department.
I had discussions with Mr Charles H Weil, an NRC Investigator, on June 8 and June 9, 1982 concerning the status of the installation of the structural monitoring instrumentation for the remedial soils work.
Mr Jim Brunner was present during both discussions. This statement summarizes those discussions.
At the time of the March 10, 1982 meeting in Bethesda, I had no actual knowledge of the status of completion of the' monitoring instrumentation.
It was about one week af ter that meeting that I learned what the actual progress of the installation was. Prior to this, including the March 10 meeting, I had not participated in any discussion as to the actual extent of the installation with either Midland Project Personnel or NRC Personnel.
I had no reason to discuss this subject as it was not relevant in that the subject instrumentation was to come under the Quality Program at the time of system calibration and checkout to verify it was in place and functional.
The subjequent operation of the equipment for data gathering was also to be included under the coverage of the Quality Assurance Program. I had no idea that the NRC regarded the status of completion as a major concern.
I had a perception that the status was further along than actually turned out to be the case. This was not based on any. conversation with NRC or
~
Midland Project Personnel nor was it based on any specific statement I heard in the March 10, 1982 meeting. As stated to Mr Weil on June 9, my perception was based on the knowledge that Phase II work was scheduled to begin on March 18 (my recollection of the date) and the Project had been I
working toward resolution of all open items with the staf f to support that date.
i
\\
l I
l l
j Q44840517 l
Page 1 of 2
RICES 4-96 pages.
PDR SwLr7_HE
I l
/
E l
,I knew that the instrumentation had to be in place prior to the actual h drift tunneling under the auxillary building, and that starting t e Thus without 6nder the building was one of the initial Phase II steps.
any specific knowledge of the instrumentation status other th I
the Project schedule.
been significantly along to support I
I have read the foregoing statement consisting of 2
pa ges.
l I have made any necessary corrections, and I have initialed those This statement is the truth to the best of my knowledge I
I declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing corrections.
j and belief.
is true and correct. Executed on June 11.1982 at f/ 3 A AM _.
(Dete)
(Time) nh
/W
%!" '"'d; of
- d;2",
co====r=t'o*rcT9ar 19M parna 1 noad i
19 fb at WM4&&Ma -
(Address)
Jackson, MI 49201 g,g [
gp.,,,
%ff b% 8r,w=
~ f/>uu 32.ws
.