ML20086C219

Indexes to Nuclear Regulatory Commission ISSUANCES.January- March 1995

ML20086C219
Person / Time
Issue date:	06/30/1995
From:	NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
To:
References
NUREG-0750, NUREG-0750-I01, NUREG-0750-V41-I01, NUREG-750, NUREG-750-I1, NUREG-750-V41-I1, NUDOCS 9507060350
Download: ML20086C219 (34)

Text

maw :..

Nh

~

h S

N @~ ' ' " ' ' '

'"'t

k.b. r..... 6 %

sh,.y

/ "' ", N O T TE N.c-U i -'I 6

.,/$. w,, Qq G.,., --

(sa k,

..s "a.

p

.v v.3 4 % s a,s.M,3.,.f.y.

].

,-,<.. ;u 5.l.,:' s'y *

,N v.

-7.

s...?'.

3'.-.O...L s '.1 % N e v + + - ' A.A ' ~ ' e. t.

;. i m M'..'?.';q, lt.% s w'n '.. - -., <

.e..w ~.

f e

l '.

qh,Y9%f h,.'"'

TJ u q.m:w

'Y'. t;;

" M. - P'g>s ; i

_gh

,,4 G'

i s 'W'

.s W r/ M n s

s.,.-.

y; t

. s.w s.

t c

?

.ek g.;.

.a q.<.

y o;

.v-

.......:... a.s.. %

...w n

,,,.. e w

- ; p.

.ie.r-

. l V.

• 7.

pg N i &.. 4.......Q.g.,,,A Qp,,f&fW ' '

,Y, I

,c.s.,

,.'.c.

W n

..... v I

r.

d.pWg 4f...,. ~, @y :.;.,y g g g,.~

3 g g, o)N --

3, t

1 9>

x,.

\\

n my v

..n

~..;

..(. 3

.;~,..

_ \\, gy.a;

'1

p ( q ':S, k 6 @y %,n% b

.v '.

p. a.. jikk - - *

...:- L,.

.; y A N

1 ^.;..d ' ; ~, 3 ' L ' ' W ~j 'I.-

j 3

a

.. _. m m.

z _ y;. 7 9.?,,

>u

=

e, y

3,.

v. y y.y_

.e J

f h j.Q [.l..f.[:'..fV.G2.,

[,

. t no

,.y y ';,.

'L..

[;Q _ [ _ ~. p ;-.._

p.;

yy:

~n~c

.n".

' L ' j..yQ )...

..:. r.[ j (.f,f., _

?.T i:b ;

g <

- 1 I. k f. &ff.. ' ;,

I N,;$)f ll'

• l.l 'IY },}

v lf '. j J'.

,.Q_

^ N.'

.;.Q 1 :

\\

.g. e,. y.

- a w, w..q w-

-,~

g. 9 y. y;+- 9%;;y g.:;g, :.: ;7.y.n;.;a g ;a.

s}.... fx;g. H, g* :w.

A 7

> g,n. 4:c..

~.m, >:3 u.

, y,..Q Q..w. :;.. c.

..,. 3. :...

.y

z.

W:.. ::' t 4:.

yp/4 e..v..

.y

.v y

,p 4

.q

. s >.,.

>.z 3

. 7

.../,,.;-

.y g.y (,,.y.m, ;..g.3. 3 o

j,

...g..

.y:..g _ (.,3..,. y.

p,

. x -,

, _ g y p._..... ;. 3; e tg, w.., s,,

3,.,; a w...mt,_4.; ;

p.

3. s,... ;..y.4. g M 3

g. ge

{ -yG,,,

i; 7.,.

y

..+...-

y.

t.,5 t g.; 3:.gp.f.,

ns,.

. w + $ m y%

~ pW l w.

%. n.a,rx. % h,t;f & _ f Yf

b. *.

.;)$$ $[ N $

f 5

u%F J

,l l.... ;.. n..$.. :,,, m.

u r

n nn, e.

~e

m. ma..

i "AMEMMMI b~.. MqQ. A,.s.Md%wgr$ $g g$ m% !

m J g u.<vm.:.,. y

,y u

u :<,

c a,.. ; v.

.ds x

w w

p 4m.

.~2 i

s y,

...v.

,(

x. 4 s

k. : '.

l

.^

g, y ;;_ w w.,,y._.s; w u,;p;,.3,.m n

h.j,pi :QQRf

~

wne~ ~ ~

n.s /y ; vg n

w

.., ypy ;. m 3

9, g.. ; 3.<

f p

p g' _:lyj;3,

.pg

?.y_

(g, hh ma nW U.S. NUCLEAR. REG, ULATORY COMIM-ISSION

' M..n 5

- p,.rve.ame.v

• g

+ j @-$ '

~ 1.....

m a NO'.'t s'.

"a M.

• .7 r i

'f y wq

..4a j

• ===,-.o i

ii y

.r p

p 9507060350 950630 t

2;g' PDR NUREC n

0750 R PDR

\\

. s

..v.

.4>.m.; ~,..,,

< n

m. n...,..,..~,.mn.-n~._,_--.-

, y **; -****m*~w-**rv*"w:~mem[b~N._Y Wwn me e a u.

k bb kIA

-M.

%. "mm.1l ~ N 1

n *-

W WsWty.Wt % e-w w W r. W-l~=-

-- ~~

~

m

• W* W:: ~.

e, w, 5k.

... x.:.

n

.. w-w

_=O Y,~ M, W *P.,c %,de%,1 ?

..e..

W

+ x % W :% "..>., W. ~.4A. 4*W ~~ -" & H --.-

l

. * *., '.......r.. J' w. *<3.p%v,.h,q. ore E.,4.mw.se%.r. 4 JA$ n.w hwe.~ e. s..,

w w.-a.

m

~

~.~..

~,.., '*

'**+4 wth.

m

7. _..

.g.,,

v. ~ J 4W.

d,d

.'?I+ 7 E6. % J.% Y.T M.'45 M ** W F W'T w.(

..k i (..

..v.'

. m m w ra n w w w-c. w w.m w a.'.

• r

. '- :.a aa

.,.:J..-.

., x.x

.mm,'~g w y..m.% nw,W ny*trW ~ ~.,..~..~,r__.,

m*

+ ' _ '.

y m

.a.

m w-Db'.'..'N$ M q b.E

' I' /'$ I - M'..,48QpH2' $3QhJ ' ",* ' 4 A' 'b

)#

I.i M

• I

1. • • A i

41 1

ff...'Q'k;.),J' Eh. ' jyt, %' - N'W l j.r J

' ~.

- a ' '

gib',d

,i j

C e.ce, d 6 ;a.au,MW4 tW,@Eur.

..a e 1

. ~

..-.m.m m

.,n n.,,

n.

...,. M,.ggumn,w.,..p..,.m.n.-.r _x..,,.,.,.,.g p R w a @ : w 4 m. e -d.v. m :w.- M...o 4r.w w..

p.,. m 4

m R b.g @-

e.g

... ~

=, %.,~n,.,. w. _. m aa m., y.as. dm gm w m+c h.~ v.

=.~..,. w

.,'.. m g. e m.

.m...,.,,.

^ ;

' = w a. m: h..a.

..p n-g

.gg m.f; y v

pmm y

c m..

.-. ~.

...g.g w - w g..

.,y

.......s.

.g../..w

.. :. c

..,3.

mmw:

o -

= = m, m.m.a_=w=.w

.. m m.:... -

br m uw.mm

e...

m~

- m..w w i

~.L.* L *II.

.?$;*.E w -.L

. M.,u i bh m._m L... %.s.g.m.,

- +. - - - ~_. -. - -_ - --.

c +w.

,n Mt;5%4/[

'h ;#..-.. m

..-..m-~-~',-

..-.-,- t %.,e

,.t-6 - *,--

s F.W-N

.id-N *iW-v:

m.wwm.;,w

-. w -

s.

&m.w <,..a n.m%.w -

.m

-w. -

_._m...-...

_. _. - NUREG--0750s wm

. w-Vol 41 No.....-4 ~= =.x M. -

m

- m _ _ _.- _..

. ww === m

.... s

..... - - ~-

t

. ~ ~ m=;m.=:==.m.= =.=_ w v.

e p

3;..

..-us _a =. - -

..: Pages 245-319.=W+.,. M.

o n

i

, l hb$

W:feide

.m~_

^.. ~,,s m, s.mu,

u r n.-

m

..... rti q #u4%,h'4 M+ p y AI'Jj4bJ# g 24.

~

p hew, 4 +w.$,mve. +.K,<.g >> g.C 7 d."'~d >v.s a.N'^< P't.e uA.% xm i

'g?4 < '-l# '

% sx + ',s%,I, si,

' M'<*

't 4, ~'a^#>% Le/ M@ y i

~ ',.,

,y,,

,t

>o

,e s,,, ~'x,,'

q ;'

LnsN ^'^)%y s

>s s

<,, ~.,

s,A, q s

+

x

+(h '> >e,* /+ Ax $ >,, a r< i. so v vac w' V ^,.4, : % 4 A> t sAdg^\\v ^ w, v2%

s<

s,.a auy % usnsn w & y;et a c 'y

', e, Q ' ~, m,5 % ' %'v),m< a '% v '~ <n t L' wp f Q l 3 x m

,,s s.

,, 3 s

,1

.s s,

.p, f4.

.,t,/,A's,; 6, t'> J

^g $ <sq Y,g ', Q ~ P. M.w g +J, '

s

,f, '. s, ' t 'f ' %",s.'^'#G+.

~t>s

~

y M^ q W

v

... 4..

,7 4

s Pa~

7p? NUCLEAR:R_E_GUI.1_ATOR.m myWsW X p,

m.

neh..

UECOMMISSIONjlSSUANCESTn9,,

" $ M*E

• NM.,

Nb 3v

- vm w.s ei 4*iWe Ma m.

/ss, '. * <

A b+U,N

+'

s

, s, 5 +* p.M j

3 Y' ' '5 V ^',s 4 va 8+>s N's f

' .,^+)

V x'-'o^

~i o y

' vt

-o^',9>

'o

>s

^,,

d() is

• Jr4* p w,.*.WEWCt s

er t, sv -

, as :# 4 / si, 3.w '

n~y

',hs s g; nJ.

O "f* ',A '< % $'',*)~+" t. #

• s M M>4:[ V'W s v

a>->"?s* >'g'; 'w v

^.. +* '2 s ', * ' ' O 9 5

% ".W

...:,#.q 1.x;.w@s f y &,.s^.,

a

's c.,

c s

A.

u*>s y

s y

,' as

,~, ~,,.,

v,

, +,q

..r a, < - o

^x

+ ""

o Cs s5,s

^

w s s

'. ~we. -,,' S',, f.,,,*,

^1

.t.(,.n.l.g. 7

.'y..N. c~.$.b4h.,m...@dhp s 8 r. J NQ* 4 **

v#*

. Auf

,p s, ',,

s%<,,f

, v,s v

4

'i-ss,4 s

gs

.s w.

~.

~

..~...+. ; u..

N ^ o > ' '"/ ? '

^' '

C'

'%'"^> h C"I I*5 'Y

> ' ,g?

s

+ '

's

., ;o s,

4 t

- -.:-c i

..c.-s..*..f x,

s s

s

. 1.; *.

4.*(

4d."

'V' s

?

2..

T'

v

?,s

< > ' ' ' " >^+ ' >

. Q. F%*eNM'*:'M'

,>1

,1

< ' <- s ' '>

c

• J

's s od

$ k$*M.'MM t'

),'

.x

>. '^

^s

• k*O

<~

'ys b }.

M r. W a:

-r s

r" ' -

v s

s y.

xt c

v y

y

^

t.Z. z-.f

v. s

• Q*

e

">p,-+

s

,,'s s

v w>

sG ss T

1. J

,5s v<.,

.s %m g, s

4,

,'t e v

s s' s,

,x,>2.s ss

^

,s s)

.ps..s j

ee>

ye_.' * ' ' ' ' '

g <,

. ~.

Qf a __ **

(

} }'

,, p j s

,o s

v

> w.-......1

< +

s x >

^, <

3

<s'^

. T;'< s 4

s v

^ f*

x s

....w sam "K"" M c G w

.P- -s%--

p as o

f s

4 a

..n e rJ4 e

s, s

./

.,-e eA er 4

' n 's v

O ' f.Wh:..-

e

+ 0 sne s

v

+

v

(

...s..

b

-> A.:2

.s s

.s...,

p#m 6

s 3 m,:@a Ll,

J^ h y' f.@.x" x ' ' t....,<^ 4 W

);.

y.

h I Ilh B.$sE:.

". T.,;"'...x.;,

(

MMlm(;Ah yEUl. 'fy" "f:VOs.J.. + i h: :'

.7 f

,a

+. ' ' *,,.

v i:.yg sgp

.,,.,.,Q

'**?

4pM::.L.G

Wy

^

F ; ; 5'O*

x s...

r MMp

.W'@w O:

Mv.f :-:

s g@d e

A

+4.:

- O.<

l 4

e e:.-

NN

.eQ "'

3 s<

^ ^

^

• *eeirt*n p q

,. m.c.,

.@.7,~,,

n

' em..s

-s.-l :p-A

, -^***M l

r WSMA'*9s-M'-' M.'1:

ss.

x '

pt N v

v: sE y

?:

) #

s..

,s.

f s..

4.

.s

.3 p '~

,s s-

'M:d v

' k. ' N.y

, 7

,E r

7, h),

,,,..S'4

.'y s.

t

.e,.

w.a

>,w.,s e g

j%&/.

4. 9

^

w 3

>,.3.-w

,s,: w.%...-

',gg w

.m.x-

.. w qv

'. I

....tsn..

p3 y

.g o 3 s :w

, j.

h:

,y' 3

~ ~ s'sm.ne w

1 s,.

97p.

3 go.0 3 g Q;,

a

• .,, ;. '..i..

  .

, c

,<'7..

g. _. qf7-.

e x

7,m

,,...u.

q w<g n v.

. ' ;. ~..:

x x

r j

r a

v.

v se

-, 3.;

,pn c

.e

,A

'N

<r

.g

v.,

<3.s L we go w ys=

y.

' {f ifM.

eri..

xx

.;@#M,%,4

\\<$

'4 %'.)'

k.

~

d

. y.2,.m p4 "

w-henh.. %ww. dab.wwk-h.<

v x

]

s 4

.s, et i sA

.wi.

(

'w

'<4**

c Qfg

]

N., E. hM. L.

• Y an. %-ever ceare e

& D D

g B

B I

' * '.~:. ; i ','**.,"**Cl f*h I

&. ??&.rw\\ *$,v m.5h.

• s r 9 w

ety ' 4e. #L s?.P f

r4*

.m.. au,1p'.'.u-xw.7.

t W.:

1'

,a.

s

-....,.n.,,w,,,,,,

w

• -.)

dk W h 1;l, E"SQt.

l.

.e yv r wew w.W. u.

. x w:.w=

cb. AL W '.h N[iG@

k rw mm v++~wwwWw,s A..

_s

_#m.. -.~ '.

9507060350 950630 "A.,, M, w %

J

.~

m..

a PDR NUREG M..._Q. g M. ~ S.s

,w-5 0750 R PDR I

4 4.~.

m.y'.a.n$k.k.kt,+E.m 5 m

?.:

J.r.s.sI.%,

.tl,.p Z. -

n

-a~

f

'Nb

• NFYkh

.h

.kh e

n. w.,. hem.g,wn m.w.nw w ~~,w v.es bw-

.v.

f.

-4 g

w,r M *..4.r d..# A. w.FO. k,kT cm.I

%mca-'

f s'

N -, -- -

3 m..

e.

T.

3 4

a;m w w h.,

w

- uim w.;n c.~ :n em-1.kT

_)

e i

b h

I

&.W%, maw +#. &9,.M.W-s.h e

t a

^

,@.yM. w+

- =- >

w 4p..m,,.r ee W 4 p u an...m,s~N v.e,n w m.=,

u-..

3, ejf. p.:c w m m m e Wis.4esesease(sett#'.dM ** *w..".~.,..s,,w=

a ufva n w.st

,-1b.6,.....-

s g@ @9 stag MMed hous 4 map.

4 %yd.M., 7y e.;M *^t- *th* $ w? *ast t j

. -, e..w ~ '... *. '..

. w e.,,. T.* e,. ~. ~. %..., y 4 om

.r*v v a w, e

~,

m-

.n.~

+

!.e.

s.W e

i Available from Superintendent of Documents U.S. Govemment Printing Office P.O. Box 37082 Washington, DC 20402-9328 A year's subscription consists of 12 softbound issues.

4 indexes, and 2-4 hardbound editions for this publication.

Single copies of tnis publication are available from National Technical Information Service r

Springfield, VA 22161 I

i 1

Errors in this publication may be reported to the Division of Freedom of information and Publications Services Office of Administration U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 (301/415-6844) y 9

-v

NUREG-0750 Vol. 41 Index 1 INDEXES TO NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ISSUANCES January - March 1995 4

l U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMfAISSION' Prepared by the Division of Freedom of information and Publications Services Office of Administration f

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

{.

Washington, DC 20555-0001 (301/415-6844) l

Foreword Digests and indexes for issuances of the Commission (CLI), the Atomic Safety :md Licensing Board Panel (LBP), the Administrative Law Judges (ALJ),

the Directors' Decisions (DD), and the Denials of Petitions for Rulemaking (DPRM) are p;csented in this document. "Ihese digests and indexes are intended to serve as a guide to the issuances.

Information elements common to the cases heard and ruled upon are:

Case name (owner (s) of facility)

Ibli text reference (volume and pag' ation) m Issuance number issues raised by appellants Legal citations (cases, regulations, and statutes)

Name of facility, Docket number Subject matter of issues and/or rulings Type of hearing (for construction permit, operating license, etc.)

Type of issuance (memorandum, order, decision, etc.).

These information elements are displayed in one or more of five separate formats arranged as follows:

1. Case Name Index The case name index is an alphabetical arrangement of the case names of the issuances. Each case name is followed by the type of hearing, the type of issuance, docket number, issuance number, and full text reference.

2. Digests and IIeaders The headers and digests are presented in issuance number order as follows:

the Commission (CLI), the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel (LBP),

tie Administrative Law Judge (ALI), the Directors' Decisions (DD), and tie Denials of Petitions for Rulemakmg (DPRM).

The header identifies the issuance by issuance number, case name, facility name, docket number, type of hearing, date of issuance, and type of issuance.

The digest is a brief narrative of an issue followed by the resolution of the issue and any legal references used in resolving the issue. If a given issuance 1

covers more than one issue, then separate digests are used for each issue and i

are designated alphabetically.

i l

l ill i

I i

i i

i i

3. Legal Citations Index

'i

[

, 'Ihis index is divided into four parts and consists of alphabetical or alpha '

numerical arrangements of Cases, Regulations, Statutes, and Others. *lhese citations am listed as given in the issuances. Changes in regulations and statutes may have 0: curred to cause changes in the number or name and/or applicability -

of the citation. It is therefore important to consider the date of the issuance.

L'Ihe references to cases, regulations, statutes, and others are generally-followed by phrases that show the application of the citation in the particular issuance. These phrases are followed by the issuance number and the full text

- reference.

4. Subject Index Subject words and/or phrases, arranged alphabetically, indicate the issues.

,/

and subjects covered in the issuances..'Ihe subject headings are followed by.

phrases that give speci6c information about the subject, as discussed in the issuances being indexed. 'Ihese phrases are followed by the issuance number and the full text reference.

5. Facility Inder I

. Ihe index consists of an alphabetical arrangement of facility names from the issuance. The name is followed by docket number, type of hearing, dr.te, i

type of issuance, issuance number, and full text reference.

i h

l I

I

.)

i ly J

--- -~

J CASE NAME INDEX ADVANCED MEDICAL SYSTEMS. INC.

MATLRIALS LICENSE RENLWAL; MEMORANDUM AND ORDLR; Docket No. 3016055-ML-Ren (ASLBP No.95-707 02-ML Ren) (Source Material bcense No M-19089-01), LBP-95-3, 41 NRC j -

195 (1995)

ALL PRESSUR171D WATLR REACTORS RE QUT3T foR ACTION. DIRECIOR'S DLCISION UNDER 10 C F.R. 6 2.206. DD-95 2, di NRC 55 (1995)

BABG)CK AND WILCOX COMPANY M A1 TRIALS LICENSE RENLWAL; !NITIAL DLCISION (Ucense Renewalt Docket No.

70 364-ML-Ren (ASLBP No. 94487-Ol MI Ren) (Materials Ucense No SNM-414L LBP 951. 41 NRC l (1995)

CURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI I

MATI RIALS LICENCE AMLNDMENT. MEMORANDUM AND ORDLR; Dmket Nos. 70-00270-MLA.

/

402278-MLA (TRUMP S Project) (Byproduct Ucense No. 24-095t b32. Special Nuclear Maienals I'

Ucense No SNM-247). CLI-951, 41 NRC 71 (19951

)^

ENTLRGY OPERATIONS, INC.

RLQUEST i-OR ACTION. DIRLCTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C F R.12.206. Docket Nos. 54313.

54368. 72-1007; DD-953. 41 NRC 62 (1995) 7 '

HYDRO RESOURCES. INC 4

MAlLRIALS LICENSE; MEMORANDUM AND ORDI R (Setung Schedule for Tihngs); Docket No.

40 8968-ML (ASLBP No 95706 01-ML). LBP-95-2. 41 NRC 38 (1995)

KENNETH G PILRCE r

LNIORCEMLNT ACTION. INTTIAL DE CISION (Vacaung Staff Order); Docket Nos. 55-30662-LA.

IA-94-007 ( ASLBP No 94494-0$LA) (Re: Prolition of Parucipanon in LJcensed Actmues);

LBP-954. 41 NRC 203 (1995)

NATIONAL INSTITUTLS Of HEALTH RIQUI ST IOR ACTION DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C F IL 6 2 206; Docket No.

e 030-01786 (bcense No. 19-0029610); DD 94-5. di NRC 227 (1995)

NORTHEAST UTIIITIIS RE QUEST TOR ACTION. DIRLCTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C f' R. 6 2.206. Dmket Nos. 50 245.

54336, 50-423. DD-95-4. 41 NRC 175 (1995) l SEQUOYAH IULLS CORPORATION a

MATERIALS LICLNSE AME.NDMLNT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docket No. 40.08027-MLA (Source Matenal Ucense No SUB-1010). C11952. 41 NRC 179 (1995) l 511 RRA NUCLEAR CORPORATION RI: QUEST IOR ACTION. DIRE ClOR'S DI CISION UNDER 10 C F R. I 2.206. Docket No6. 54313,50-36N. 72-1007. DD-953. 41 NkC 62 (1995) i STATE OF UTAH RE QUEST 1OR ACTION, DIRECTOR'S DE CISION UNDER 10 C F R. 6 2.206. DD-951, 41 NRC 43 (1995)

U S DEPARTMLNT OF LNERGY PARTIAL GRANT AND PARTIAL DE NIAL OF ITTITION FOR RULLMAKING; Docket No. PRM 60 3. DPRM-901. 41 NRC 141 (1995) i i

l 8

q i

l i

ll i

l

J 1

e i

DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF THE NUCLEAR REGt'LATORY COMMISSION CLI-95-1 CURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI. D6wket Nos. 7000270 MIA, 30-02278-MLA fTRUMP S Project) (Byproduct Lkenne.No. 24-005134 2; Special Nuclear Materials License No_

SNM 247); MATLRIALS L.lCENSE AMENDMLNT; February 28,1995; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER i

A The Comrrunion conuders appeals fiom both the Imtial Decmon and a Reconsideranon Order mued by the Presidmg Of6cer in this Subpart L procec&ng mvolving two mate tals hcense amendnrnt 1

apphcanons 6ied by the Unnerury of Missouri in those two orders. the Preu&ng Officer concluded that the University's possessmn and use of the matenals at mue were conustent with the pubhc heahh and safety, did not harm the common defense and secunty and therefore satished the requirenents of the AEA.

However, in order to decrease further the nsks associated with such possesuon and use, the Preuding Ofhcer imposed cenam ad&uonal safety condmons on the licensee B

The Unneruty appealed to the Comnussmn the Preu&ng Ofhcer's imposioon of these additmnal conatmns. The Interverxws appealed the Presidmg Ot6cer's ruhngs that the bcense anendments satished the requirenents of tir AEA, questmned lus aushunty to issue the order on raconsideranon; challenged numerous of his procedural ruhngs. and appealed his decismo to exclude three of their proffered areas of E

corwern f

C fur the most part the Comnusuon reaches the sanr conclusmns as the Presidnig Of6cer, but m m

some instances follows a hne of reasomng different from hss. The Comnussion afhrms LBP 91-31, 34 3

NRC 29 (1991). and LBP-91 M. 34 NRC 159 (1991) with certam modi 6 canons, and dereby approves the Umveruty's hcense anendrnent applicanons. subject to certain cond uons. More speci6cally, the l

Comnussmn concludes that the Preuding Of6cer had uns&cuon to assue his order on reconuderatwn:

J afhrms his conclunons regardmg all procedural usues raised on appeal as well as his decismo to exclude j

three areas of concern; concludes that the nsk of dispersion of radioactive matenal from the TRUMP-S espennents is acceptably small, and both modshes and supplenunts the hre safety conditions that the Preudmg Of6cer imposed upon the Umveruty.

D A prending officer has junsecuon to consider a umely umtion fm reconsiderstmn filed aher the i

nsuance of an minal deciuon but before the unriy fahng of appeals l

E hw the Comnusuon to grant a matenals beense or heense amendmeru, it must imd that (1) the upphcanra propowd equipnrnt and facilmes are adequate to protect health and nunamne danger to hfe or propeny; and (2) the apphcant is quahhed by trammg and expenence to use the murenal for the purpose requested m such a mainer as te protect health and nummue danger to hfe or property and to comply with i

the Commission's regulanons The nest for the grant or derual of such a hcense or anendment is not simply whether there is a deheiency or onussmo m the apphcanon 4

l f

A plamly dche ent apphcatmn calls imo queshon an apphcant's competence and bona fides -

j matters that certamly pertain to the question whether to approve the apphcanon O

NURIGs and RcFulatory Guides, by their very nature. serve merely as gu dance and cannut t

presenbe requnenents Ahhough conformance with regulakry guides will hkely result in comphance with speci6e regulatory requirenrnts nonconformance with suchFundes does nos equare to noncomphance with g

the regulauens.

j H

The Comnusuon does not require that proposed safety procedures to protect health and suimrruze danger to hfe or gwoperty be included m a matenals heense anundment apphcanon if they have already j

been subnutted to the Commission m previous apphca6 ions associated with the sane NRC heense. Secuens j

j 70 21(aO) and 30 32(a) of the Conunisuon's regulauons espressly perrtut an apphcant to incorporate

(

2 j

6 4

3 I

4 e

i s

W l

v i

e

,-n-m w,

m ---m..e ew

, _ - - -, - -, +, - - -- ~ - -- _ - - -

DIGFSTS ISSUANCI.S OF TiiE NUCLFAR REGULATORY CO%t%flSSION by reference any informatum contained in pevious apphcanons. statements, or reports filed with the Comnussion.

I A rule has retroachve effect if an act lawful at the tmr it was &me is rendered unlawful and the actor called to account for a cumpleted, now condemrrd deed in the halls of just cc. Although the issue of "retruactmty" generally anses in astuations where the government attempts to apply a statute or l^

regulatmo prior to its enactmeni date or promulgation date, the issue is logically just as relevant to situmons in which the governnent or a pany anempts to apply a 'iew regulatmn to evems that transpired prior to the regulation's effective date.

J The Comnussion &J not imend for 10 C F R Il 30 32(s) and 70 22ti) to be appbed retroacuvely so as to require the rejectmn of previously filed apphcatmas that did not contam the newly required emergrncy plan mformation.

-K A regulation shoulJ not be apphed retromeuvely if the atency in& cates a contrary iment.

L Tir rule of statutory construct on that a court is to apply the law m effect at the amie it renders its drcismn does not alter the well settled presumpoon against apphcation of die class of new statutes that woula have genuinely " retroactive" effect M

The Comnassion may igmire argunents madequately bnefed on appeal.

N.

The Comnussion's regulanons and practice do not peclude an apphcant from submittmg post-apphcatma affidavits mio the record of a materials bcensing procec&ng Such af6 dawns fall within the types of documents that the Presi&ng Ofncer has the &scretmo to allow into the reecrd pursuant to secten 21233(d). vit. *addiuor.at documentary data, informauonal matenal, or otter wnsten evidence." The Comnussmn's practice of pernatung the beennec to file such supplememal supporung endence in a Subpart G proceedmg appbes equally wc!) to a Subpart L pocee&ng.

O Afhdavits submmed dunng a heanng are explanatory matenal offered to aid in the understandmg of the underlying apphcanons, they do not consutute amendarnes to the apphcanons P

The Presidmg Ofhcer in a Subpan L proceeding has broad discretmn lo deternune the pomt at which the miervenors have been accorded snfhciem opportumty to respond to allissues of importance raised by the hcennee. If the Presiding Otheer needs mformanon to compile an adequate record, he may obtam it by poung quesuons pursuant to sectwn 2123%).

Q The Comnusuon's intent en promulgatmg Subpart L was to decrease de cost and delay for the parues and the Commisuon and to empower presi&ng of6cers to manage and control the purues' wntten subnusuons.

R Subpan L does not accord intervenors the nght to speak last regardmg the issues in a matenals hcense procce&ng. Sectmn 21233(a) of Subpart L expressly accords the Pecadmg Oincer the escrenon tmth to deternune de sequerNe m wtuch the parues present their argunwnts. documentary data. mformational mmenal. and other suppomng wntien evidence and to offer mdividual parues the opportunny to povide j

further data, matenal. and endence in response to the Preuding Ofhccr's questmns.

A Subpart L procecang saushes the Atormc Energy Act's requirenrnt for an agency heanng T

Secuan 7(c) of the Adnunistranve Procedure Act does not apply to informal hearings conducted pursuant to Subpart L. Instead. the miervenors are entitled only to sone sort of procedures for nouce, comnent. and a statenrnt of reasons for the agency acnon.

U Generahzed health safety, and environnental concerns do not rise to the level of hbeny or propeny mterests that are proaccted by the &se process clause.

Y he pames to a Subpan L proteceng have no right to require a fornud heanng Rather, the Comtmssmn alone has the authonty to require such a heanng.10 CER. I 2120%k). Under Subpan L's pniceJures. the Conumssmn will generally exercise this authonty only in situanons where the Presi& rig Officer requests pernusuon to conduct a formal adju& canon using the rules of Subpan G However. Subpart L comemplates that a preudmg of6cer would only rarely request pernussion to conduct a formal adju& canon.

W Appeals he only from unfavorable acuons by tir Presieng Ofheer, rmt from &ctum in an imual i'

decision wah which the party esagrees but which has no operahve effect X

in promulgatmg Subpan L. the Comnussmn comemplated that the Preu&ng Ofheer would base his 1

decish n on a wntien record Consequently. the Comnussion accorded the Presieng Ofhcer wide &screnon to 4 cide whether oral pesentauons are necessary to create an adequate record 10 C1 R. I 2.1235(a). The 4

i I

l l

i

DICESTS ISSUANCf.S OF THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Comnussion anucipated that, in the vast majonry of snuations, the Presi&ng Officer would run abw oral prewntatwns.

Y Panes have no fundanrtual right to cross-examinanon even in a formal Subpart G procceeng.

The Commission has nade ckar that in a Subpart L procee&ng. the responsitulity for the exanunahon of all witnesses rests with the Plessdang Of6cer, not with the parues.

Z As a general matter, the Comnussma's hcensing boards and premiang offecers have no authonty to direct the Staff in the performance of ns safety reviews.

AA Because the hcensee rather than the Staff bears the burden of proof in a heensing proceedmg.

the mkquacy of Staff's safety review is,in the fmal analysis, not deternunauve of whether the apphcation should be approved. Consequemly it would be pointiens for the presiding officer to rule upon the adequacy of Staff's review.

BB The Comnussmo innelf has the authonty to vacate bcensing acuons or ask for funher Staff review, and has exercised that authonty on appropnate occasmns.

CC The NRC Staff has no obhgatum enher to provide an explananon of its deternunauon to approve a materials hcense anendnrm apphcatum or to make hn&ngs of fact in support of that deternunapon.

DD The NRC Staff is not required to prepare a safety evaluation report pnor to approvir.g a nmierials hcense anendment apphcanon LE' Although the NRC Staff must prepare an environnrntal impact statenant (EIS) addressing any mapw action taken by the Commisuca that may sigmncamly affect the quahty of the human environnrnt (42 (J S.C. 6 4332(2)(C)(19ns); 10 C F R. Part SI). nenher NEPA nor the Comnussion's regulations require the Staff to prepare an EIS if the federal acuon's effect on the environnent is not signiAcant IT

. Although an argument that a regulatory exempuon contravenes NEPA consututes a protubited collattial attack on the regulanon at issue. a party to a Subran L procec&ng nwy file a pcunon for waiver of the bar on collateral attacks against de C mmissiori s regulabons (10 C F R.121239(b)).

1 GG 1hc Comnussma is not a tenera.n safety or occupatmnal health agency. hs responsibihty is arected to the hazards associated with nucicar matenals rather than to all questmns of hre safety at licensed facilases.

l HH The Comnussion's Subpart L procedural ragulations impose upon the intervenors the burden of j

showing that an area of concern is germane to the subject matter of the prucce&ng (10 C F R. 6 2.1205(g)).

J ie, et must fall wishin the range of matters that are properly subject to challenge m a procec&ng t

An intervenor arguing that an activny would be " inimical to the common defense and secunty"is ma hmated to argumg that the project would contravene a parucular regulatory gmdance, segulauon, statute.

or treary An intervenor is not enutled. however. to heigate this area of concern unless the spec he "comimm defense and secunty" risk anerted is reasonably related to, and would anse as a & rect result of, the specinc heense amendmems that the apphcard asks the Conurussmn to approve.

JJ Secuans 30 35ta)and 70 25(a)of the Comnussion's regulauons generally require a nwenals hcense appheant to subnut a decomnussmmng fun &ng plan if the anmune of unsealed byproduct maanal or umealed special nuclear matenal to be hcemed exceeds cenam levels. However, secuons 3035(cW2) and 70 25(c)(2) provide spenne excepuons to the requnenents of secuons 30 35(a) and 70.25(a) for any holder of a hcense inued on or before July 27,1940 Such a heensee has a choice of either (l} hhng a decomnuniumng plan on or before July 2f 1990. or (2) 6hng a Ceruhcauon of Financsal Assurance on or before that date and then tihng a decomnussiomny funding plan en its next hcense renewal apphcation.

KK If a matenals hcensee is a governmernal enuty. then sections 3035(fh4) and 70.25(fg4) &ctate the terms of its deconmusammng Cenihcatwn of financial Assurance Both of these secuens state that nnancial assurance for decomnusammng may be provided. "[i}n the case of.

State.. governnent hcenres. [by) a statenrnt of intern contaimag a cost usumate for decommissiorung or an amount based on ite Table in paragraph (d) of ttus secuon. and in&caung that funds for decomnusuoning will be obiamed when necessary" The Comnussma expressly intended that this provision apply to stare universities.

11.

The followmg techrucalissues are d seussed Accident dose esumates; Americium; Cune con.

sem (&sch>sure of); Larrgency plan (sufficiency); Energency Planning and Commurury Right-t+Know Act; Energency procedures. Energency suppon operations. Entriunnrnt of radmnuchdes; fiaancial quah-ficaimas (decomnussiomng); Fire detecuon neasures. Fire prosecuon measures. Fire suppression nrasures; Hazardous chenucals; NURLG4140. NUREG/CR 5055; Occupanonal radiauon exposures; Projected occu-5 l

DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION pational doses; Plutonium Pluromum processing and fuel fabncatmn plant; Quahncanons of heensee's staff; Radioacuve waste storage; Radiok>gical monitonng; Radiological releases; Reactor control nem stafhng'.

Regulatory Guide 1.145; Regulatory Guide 10 3, Regulatory Guide 10.5, Regulatory Guide.2.6. Regulatory

' Guide 3 66; Release of rasoactive matenals to unrestricted area; Regmrenrnt to describe cune consent of matenals in SNM heense anenditens applicatwn; Requirenrnt to desenbe weight content of materials in SNM bcense anendnrnt apphcation, Risk of dispersion of radmaciive matenals. Safety standards; Waste disposal. "TRU' wasie.

' CLI-95-2 SEQUOYAH 'UELS CORPORATION. Docket No. 404)8027-MLA (Source Material License No.

SUB 1010). MATERIALS LICENSE AMENDMENT; Mach 9,1995, MLMORANDUM AND ORDER A

The Commission considers the appeal of a heensmg board decision. LBP-93-25, 38 NRC D (1993). wiuch petsrutted the Sequoyah fuels Corporation (SFC) to withdraw its heense renewal appbcation.

and ternunawd the admsmstrauve proceedmg to progress on that apphcatmn. The Commission concludes that SI:C ed e.vt require a heense renewal to conunue hnused and prevmusly authorized decomnussiomng.

onented activstas. Accor&ngly, the Conurussmn denies the appeal and afhrms the hcensing board's order.

H The Prniding Ofhcer's functmn in a hcense renewn! proceedmg is to decide whether renewal is appropriate and, if so, to detet nune what actiunes can conimue in the renewal term.

C Pursuant to tiu former 10 C.F R 5 40 42(e) (1994), a source malerial bcense may rernaso automancally in effect beyond its expiration date to allow a hcensee to conimue decomemssioning and secunty acuvtues authonzed under the hcense. Seccon 40 42(c) has been superseded by a new automauc heense catension provision.10 C.F R. $ 40 42(c), which became ef fective in August 1994.

D The automanc hcense entennon provision under 10 C.F.R.140.42(c) may extend a keense regrdless of the nature of the source matenal remaming on site.

E The "necessary" provismn (which appears in both the former accuan 4042(e) and the new sectmn 4042(c)) samply neans that the hrruted regulatory heense extension comes into play only when decomnusuomng cannot be completed pnor to the beense's expiranon date.

F The automans heense extension provision grants the hconsee no sweeping powers, but pernuts only hnuted acuvmes related to decomnussionmg and to control of entry to restncied areas. Such actiuties also nut have been approved under the licensee's license. To implement an activity not greviously authonzed by hanse. and thus not previously subject to challenge, the hcensee must first obtain a license arrendment.

G ljeensees need only subnut the 6nal radsological survey showing that the site or area is smiable for release in accordance with NRC regulauons after decomsmssioning has been completed.

H To make a senous case for conditmns. intervenors reasonably can be held to an obhgation to offer some m&tatmn of their objecuve. The proponent of htiganon bears the burden of explaimng which direcuan the hugatmn will take.

h

. ~. ~.

e i

i i

1 DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARDS o

LBP-94 i B ABCOCK AND WILCOX COMPANY (Pennsyhania Nuclear Services Operations, Parks Town.

ship. Pennsyharuat Docket No. 70w364 Mi Ren (ASLDP No. 94687-01-ML Reni(Matenals License No.

$NM414L MATLRIALS LK'LNSE RLNEWAL; Jamsary 3.1995; INITIAL DECISION (License Renewa!)

LDP 95-2 HYDRO RESOURCES. INC (12750 Ment Dnve, Sune 1210 LBl2, Dallas, TX 75250. Docket No. 40 8968-ML ( ASLDP No. 95 70601-ML). MATLRIALS LICENSE; January 9,1995; MEMORAN.

DUM AND ORDE R (Settmg Schedule for Iihngs)

A Subpart L, by us own languaFe. demand) prec3 Mon from the outset of tmth the appheant and the petmoners The stuual petumn must ser fonb stanthng argunents and areas of concern and is extremely i

important because it shapes the course of the proceedmg i

B Under the provismns of 10 C T R. 5 2.1209 (1994) and in the interest of fairness to all potentia!

parues, the Presidmg Ofheer m a Subpart L mfortnal procecthng estabbshed a new schedule for fahng araended petmom for hearmg and smuel answers by the Apphcant and the SialI C

W1ule the NRC has for years recogmzed a uruque relauonship with Native American peoples and considered 'his spn sal status m adjudicatsve decisions and while than status is not of itself sufficient foundanon for ignonns the Cemnusson's rules, every precauuon should le taken to cru,ure that Nanve E

Amencans are not escluded from lhe proceeding simply because of igmrance of the ingredients of a legally

]

complete petmon to mienene, ciung. Puget Sound Power and Ught Co, (5kagit Nuclear Power Project.

I, Umts I and 21 ALAB 552.10 NRC 1.10 (1979) thP-903 ADVANCI D MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. (Cleveland. Ohiok Docket No. 30-16055-ML-Ren

( ASLDP No 95-70LO2 ML Ren) (Source Matenal License No. 34 19089-01); MATERIALS LICENSE l

RENEWAL; March 13.1995; MLMORANDUM AND ORDE R LDP-95-4 KLNNE1H G p1LRCE (Shorewood Ilhnois), Docket Nos 55-30662 E.A. IA 9&OO7 (ASLBP

?

a No 94-69&OSE AHRe. Prohibumn of Part cipanon in Licensed Acuvmest E.NFORCEMLNT ACTION; March 27.1995, INITIAL DLCislON (Vacasmg Staff Order)

A The Lacenung Board vacated a Staff order that had barred the defendant from workmg as a reacter operator it held that plant procedures were ambiguous and that a defendant who had made a reasonable i

interpretatmn of those procedures should not be found in violation of those procedures it also held, after j

reenattunmg factual evidence in hght of its view of procedural ambiguity, that there had been no lying to 1

or concealnent of facts from the NRC.

B When a vmlation of ambiguous plant procedures is alleged, it is appropnate to receive evidence I'

i from plant operators in order to determine how those procedures were meerpreted by them. Likewise, it is appropnate to truerpret the procedures m bght of company actions in cases of alleged vmlations of the -

same procedures. as reflected m official records ll also is apprornate io examme trammg giveu to plant operators m the neanmg of the procedures i

C lt is not appnynate to sustain un enforcement action m whnh the operator did not act willfully because he reasonably beheved he had comphed wnh plant procedures.

D When a person is charged with mipnyerty statmg under oath that he had failed to remember facts about a nretmg or conversation. it is imponant to exarrune precisely what that person was domg at the tmr and how strong others' memanes are before concludmg that he had bed L

A person may not be convicted of a conspiracy to conceal tacts from the NRC unless he had a duty to reveal those facts or that he entered mio an agreenent to conceal facts from the NRC When a station operaim reassures trainees that they may keep a certa n nvnter wnhm the control room. It is not appropnate i.

~

7 v

4 1

DIGESTS ISSUANO3 OF TifE ATO%IIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARDS to hold a reactor operator responuble for having agreed to a conunuing conspracy to conceal infornuinon just because he remained silent stule the reasserance was taking place.

F Cm! conspracy requires an agreemera to perform an illrgal act i

8

. -. m.

m

J 5

4 -

.i DIGESTS ISSUASCES OF DIRECTORS' DECISIONS s

DD-95 1 S1 ATL Of LTTAH ( Agreensent Pursuant to Secuon 274 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as Amendedr. REQULST FOR ACTION; January 26, 1995; DIREGOR'S DECISION UNDLR 10 C F R.

I 2 206 A

The Director of the Ofhee of State Programs demes the peutron subnutted pursuant to 10 C F.R 12 206 by US Ecology. Inc. (Peuuonert requesung acuan with regard to Utah's Agreement State Program.

B Peuuoner requested NRC to amnate appropnase proceedings. meludmg relevant heanngs, to suspend or revoke Utah's Agreement State status under section 274) of ste Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended

( ALAk for Utah's fiulure to reqmre state or federal gover nnrnt land owrership m regulaung the commercial disposal of low-level radmacuve waste as the Envirocare of Utah Inc The Pennoner's request was denied because the Director did not fmd that the Petitioner had raised a suffierne issue of Utah's comphance with one or more requirements of secunn 274 of the ALA or any suhontial health and safety issues to wanant the action tequested 1

DD-95-2 ALL PRLSSURIZLD WATER RLaGORS. REQULST FOR ACTION; January 26.1995; DI-(

REC 10R S DECISION UNDLR 10 C f R l 2.206

/

A The [hrector. Ot6ce of Nuclear Reactor Regubuon. has demed a peuuun hied by John Wdhs on 7

l behalf of Greenpeace Internanonal requesung that action be taken regarding all pressurized water reactors (PWRs1 curremly operaung in the Umted States The Peutioner requested that the NRC immedaalcly and r

i fully inspect all sessel head penetranons in these reactors for cracbng. pubhsh the results, shut down O

affected reacuirs and

• relicense" reactors that must be closed As Frounds for these requests, the Peutioner alleged that. !!) cenam foreign PWRs are crackmg; (2) tesung in France revealed incipient circumferennal i

ll cra.inng of some VHPs, wiuch could lead in a through-wail break in the pnmary pressure tmundary without fulhilmeni of the leak-before-break cntenon; and O) this could cause ejection of the control rod dnve mechanum, wnh resulung loss of comrvi of the reactor. The reasons for the demal are fully set forih in

'~

the Dectuon

)

B 1he NRC Staff conducts nretmgs penodically wnh affected owners groups to discuss emerging and cusung genene, technical issues rather than meeting with each indmdual hcensee.

)

C The following icchracal inue is discussed pnmary water stress corrosion crackmg in vessel head

]

penetranons D(K95 3 LNTERGY OPERATIONS.1NC ( Arkansas Nuclear One) and SILRRA NUCLEAR CORPORA-l llON Docket Nos W)l3. 50 36R. 721007 REQUEST FOR AGION; January 31, 1995; DIRECTOR'S l

Of CISION UNDLR 10 C F R l2 206 A

The Duector of the Othee of Nuclear Maienal Safety and Safeguards grants in part and denies in pan a petition subgruned pursuant so 10 C l R 5 2 206 by Mr Denms Dums, on behalf of the Wisconsin Cinzen's Uuhry Board (Petitmnert requesung acnon with regard to Arkansas Nuclear One ( ANO) operated by Entergy Operanons, Inc (Lniergy or the Licensee).

j B

Pennoner requested it at the Chairman exercise his authonty to. (1) deternune the appheabahry of 10 C I R. 672 48 to 10 CT R Subpans K and L; (2) it-=n: whettrr Entergy is in vmlation of i

any NkC regulauons regardmg use of sectmn 72 48 to make nudihcations to the VSC-24 cask for use at ANO. (3) order ANO to cease uung secuon 72 48 unul NRC deterrtunes whether or rmt it is apphcable; 3

(4) orJer Sierra Nuclear Corgwarmn to cease construenon of VSC-24 casks for use at ANO that are bemg constructed based on ANO's secuon 72 48 evaluauon.

4-I e

i 9

i.

t 1

i

+

i DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF DIRECTORS

• DECISIONS

.C With regard to the IYutioner's request for NRC so (1) determsne the apphcabihty of sechon 72 45 to 10 C.F R. Subpans K and L, and (2) deternune wtriner Entergy is in violanon of any NRC tegulauons regardmg use of secuon 72 48. the Director grants the peunon in part and determines that sectmn 72.48 is applicable to tir general hcense found an 10 C.F.R. Part 72. Subpart K, of the Comnussion's regulations and that ANO can make use of this authonty as a Subpart K bcensee in accordance with the terms and hnutauons of secuon 72 48. ~

D With regard to the IYouoner's request for NRC to (3) order ANO to cease usmg secuan 72 48 untd NRC deterrmrrs whether or not it is applicable and (4) order Sierra Nuclear Corporation to cease construction of VSC-24 casks for use at ANO, the Director finds, m accordance warh the foregoing deternunahon, that

- ANO can make use of sechon 72.48, and accor&ngly denies those poruons of the peution.

DD-95 4 NORTHEAST UTILfTIES (Millstone Nuclear Power Station) Docket Nos. 50 345, 50 336. 50-423; REQULST IOR ACTION; February 22.1995; DIRECTOR'S DLCISION UNDLR 10 C F.R. I 2.206.

A Tlw Acung Directot of the Office of Enfmcenem has denied pennons filed by Carmela V. Manen and Mananne W. Nerncio requestmg that accelerated enforcement action be taken against Nonteast Unhues (NU) The Petmoners requested that this action be taken against NU for willful violations of the employee protecunn provisions of 10 C F R. I 50.7. As grounds for their request, the Penuoners assened that they were retahated against for engaging in protected activities consistmg of raismg concerns regardmg a computer system being used in the execution of NU's fitness-fur-duty program. De reasons for the demal are fully

[

set forth in the Decmon.

DD-955 NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH, Docket No. 030-01786 (License No. 19-00296-10),

I REQUI.ST K)R ACTION; March 5,1995; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDLR 10 C F.R. 5 2.206 A

The ihrector of the Office of Nuc! car Matenal Safety and Safeguards granted m part, was unable to grant in part, atd deternuned that a pettuon dated Decen&cr 2,1993, and subnutted by the North Bethesda Congress of Citizen's Associations (Prutioner), was monted in part. He petmon requested that the Nurlear Regulatory Comnussion (NRC) take action with regard to the Nanonal Institutes of Health (NIH),

specifically that the NRC; (1) suspend Ucense Condinon 27 (formerly License Con & tion 24) of the NIH Marenals Ucense No 194X)29610 (licensek. which authunres NIH to &spose of hcensed matenals by inemeranon. pen &ng resoluuon of two regulatory mues - (a) no environmental report or environmental usessment has been completed regar&ng the mcmeration of ra&oactive waste on NIH's !!cthewla campus, and (b) these may be less than adequale monisonng to ensure that ra&oacuve effluents are withm regulatory hmits; (2) provide copies of the NRC environmental assessments and/or safety evaluations that provide the bases for (a) an execpuon from 10 C.f-R. I 20 303(d) hmars regar&ng rahoactive rnatenals discharges snio samtary sewer syssenn (License Cen&uon 21T. and (b) approval of the construccon and operanon of a low-level waste sterage facihty at NIH's Poolesville campus (License Constion 28); and (3) forward a copy of future correspondence between NRC and NIH regar&ng these maners to the Penuoner The Direchir deternuned thal because NIH permanently ceased operstme of the three mcinerators and amended the beense to delete License Condition 27. the request to suspend License Con &uon 27 was rnoot Because the NRC was run reqmred to conduct environmental assessnrnis in connection with the NIH appi, cations for suihnnry to meincraie ra&oacuve waste and for authomy to discharge radioachve matenals into s.uutary sewer systems. and because NIH was not required to submit environmental reports m comiectmn with those apphcasmns, ivuhoner's requesi for copies of such envuonnrntal assessments and reports cannot be granted.

The informanon subnutted by NIH in suppat of its applicahon for authonry to construct and operate the Poolesville low-level waste storage facahey. however, is the functional equivalent of an environmental report i

and safety eva%uon The thrector supphed the Pentmner with copics of documents submitted by NIH in wppon of License Con &uons 21,27, and 28 The Director placed lYtinoner on the disenbunon hst for all correspondence regardmg operanon of the NIH incinerators. newer &sposal knuts. and intenm radmactive waste storage beense amendments at the Poolesville facihty i

10 i

t 9

t E

I

-._.___m.

i a

i DIGEST ISSUANCE OF DECISIONS ON PETITIONS FOR RULEMAKING DPRM.951 U.S DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Docket No PRM 643, March 15,1995; PAR 11AL GRANT ANo PARTIAL DENIAL OF PETTTION FOR RULEMAKING A

The Nuclear Regulasory Conurussion (NRC) is granung in part and denying in part a peuuan for rulemaking tPRM40 3) trom the U.S Departnwns of f.ncrgy The petsuoner reqqcsted that the NRC arnend its reFulanons govermng stic preclosure operauons at a geologic repository operanons area so as to estabbsh nunencal dose crtiena for uw in idenufying tie need for engineered safety fearures and for deternunmg their adequacy in granung the pennon in part. NRC is pnyosing certain nunencal dose entena that would be applicable to two different categones of deugn-basis events. namely (t) events reasonably hkely to occur regularly, malerately frequently or one or more times before permanent closure; and (2) events that are conudered unhkely, but that r.re sufficiently credsble to marrant considerauon The peuuon is denied in part insofar as is proposed other nunrncal dose entena l

1 I

)

I l

l a

I i

I 1

1 i

1i d

1 4

l 5

I o

l l

LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX CASES Anenenn Coy Trust leasms v Jak farrell Implenrnt Co., 763 E Supp.1473, order aff'd and remanded. %7 F2d 1204. cert denied. Ilocrboom Internathmal, Inc. v Amencan Computer Trust leazmg.113 5 Ct 414,121 L Ed 338 (113 $ Q 414.121 L. Ed 2d 338) actionable element in a civil conspiracy claim. LBP-95-4, 41 NRC 218 n.50 (1995)

Anwncan Mmmg Congress v f.PA, %5 F.2J 759, 769 (9ih Cir.1992) aanded for retroactive apphcation of laws CL1-95-1. 41 NRC 102 n.22 (1995)

Anencan Nuclear Corp (Revision of Orders to Modify Source Matenals Licenses), CLl-86-23, 24 NRC 704. 708-10 (1986)

/

challenges to regulanons in NRC bcensmg proceedings; ClJ-95-l. 41 NRC 125 n,70 (IW5) wasver of bar on collateral anacks on regulatmns. CL1-95-I, 41 NRC 170 n 163 (1995)

Babcock and Wdcos (Apollo. Pennsylvania Fuel Fahncation Facihty), LBP-93-4. 37 NRC 72. 80. appeal 7

disnussed. C1193-9, 37 NRC 190 (1993)

~-'

shommg nesessary for adnussion as a party m NRC proceedmgs. LBP-95 3. 41 NRC 196 (1995)

/

Babcock and Wilcox Co. (Pennsylvama Nuclear Services Operations, Parks Township. Pennsylvaniak d

i LBP-944, 39 NHC 47. 49 (1994)

I mjury-sn. fact uandaid for adnussion as a party an informal proceedmgs. LBP-95-3, 41 NRC 196 L1995)

Bansh v Director of Revenue, 872 S W.2d 167,171 (Ma App 1994)

]

defmmon of " employer"; CLt.95-1. 41 NRC 139 (1995)

Bradicy v. School Board of Cuy of Richmond, 416 U S 6% 711, 715 & n 21 (1974) 7 retroacuse appbcanon of energency planmng regulaimns; CLI-95-1, 41 NRC 102 (1995)

J Carohna Power and Laght Co (Shearrm Harns Nuticar Power Planrk ALAB-852, 24 NRC 532. 544-45 (19x6) meight given to NURI.Gs and replatory Fundes; CL1-95-1. 41 NRC 9R (1995) y Caruhna Power and light Co (Shearon Harns Nuclear Power Plant. Units I, 2. 3. and 4k CLI-8412.11 NRC 5 34, 516 (1980, 4

authonty of presidmg otheers to direct NRC Staff m performance of us safety reviews. CLI-95-1, 41 NRC 121 (1995)

Carohna Power and taght Co (Shearon Harris Nalcar Power Plant, Umts 1. 2. 3. and 4). CLI-8412,11 NRC 514. 51617 (19%

4 Comnumon authonry to vacaic bcensmg decismns and ask for furtter NRC Staff review; C1195-1.

1 41 NRC 122 (1995)

City of West Oucago v NRC. 701 F 2d 612. 645 (7th Car. 7913) apphcabihty of due process poiccnons to generahzed heahh, safety, and environmental concerns; CLI 951. 41 NRC 118 (1995)

Cleveland Electnc illununaung Co. (Perry Nuclear Power Plani. Uma 1) LBP-92-4, 35 NRC 114.120 m

(1992) q burden on heunng requestw to estabhsh injury m fact; LBP-95-3. di NRC 197 (1995) 4 Colorado Taxpayers Unmn, Inc v. Romer. 750 F Supp. IGil, appeal disnussed. 963 F 2d 1394. cen 3

demed, i13 S Q 1360,122 L LJ 2d 739 ID Colo.1990, staaJard for findmg of fraudulent suppression of a malenal fact. LBP-954. 41 NRC 218 n 50 (1995) 4 i

~

13 5

l

LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX CASf3 '

' Commonweatrh 14ison Co (Byron Nuclear Power Station, Umts i and 2). ALAB-659.14 NRC 983, 985 (1981) appeal perux! when trial tribunal is conss&nng nwrion for reconswierstwn of appealed decision or order; CLt-951,41 NRC 95 n.10 (1995)

, Consolidated EAison Co. of New York (Indian Point, Umts I, 2. and 3), CLI-75-8, 2 NRC 173,175 (1975)

' standard for imuanon of stww cause proceedings; DD-952,41 NRC 60 (1995)

Duke Power Co. (Carawba Nuclear Sianon. Units I and 2). CLl43-19.17 NRC 1081,1045 (1983) standard for adnusuon of late-6ied contentmns; LBP-958. 41 NRC 5 a.3 (1995).

Duke Power Co (Cherokee Nuclear Station, Units I, 2, and 3). ALAB.482, 7 NRC 979. 980 (1978)

. appeals funn dsctum in an iniual decision with which tie party disagrees but which has no operative effect, CLI 95-1. 41 NRC 119 n 63 (1995)

Edhm luiernatwnal Co. (Agent for the Government of In&a on Applicauon to Export Special Nuclear Matenal), C1J 76-6. 3 NRC 563, 570 (1976), rendered moot on appeal, Natural Resources Defense Council v. NRC, 380 f12d 698 (D C. Or.1978) applicauon of juecial concepts of stan&ng in NRC procce&ngs; CLI.951, 41 NRC 165 (1995) '

Edwards' lessee v. Darby, 25 U S 02 Wheat ) 206. 210 (1827) interpretauon of amtnguous texts; LBP-954,41 NRC 212 (1995) flonda Power and Lsght Co (St, Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Unit I), ALAB-921. 30 NRC 177.186 0 989) burden of proof in maienals hcense amendment procecengs; CLI-95-1, di NRC 1210995)

Gemgia Power Co (Vogtle Electnc Generaung Plans. Units I and 2), ALAB459. 25 NRC 23 (1987) hcensms board junubcuon to impose beense constions; CLI-951, 41 NRC 94 (1995)

Georgia Iwer Co. (Vogtle Liecinc Generating Plant Uruis I and 2), CLI-9516, 38 NRC 25. 410993) issues hugnble in matenals hcense amendment procec&nF; CLI-951. 41 NRC 165 (1995)

Georgia Power Co. (Vogtle Electne Generaung Plant. Umis I and 2). LDP-93 5, 37 NRC 96 98 n.2.

aff'd, CLI-9526, 38 NRC 25 (1993) effect of pendency of section 2.206 pennon on heanng request on tmneuals hcense renewal for same licensee, LBP-95 3. 41 NRC 198 n 16 0995)

Independent U.S. Tanker owness Comnt v lewis. 690 F.2d 908. 922 23 (D C, Gr 1982) autturity to ensuture forinal heanings in materials bcense proceedmgs; C11951,41 NRC 119 (1995)

Kerr4teGee Gwp. (West Oucago Rare Larths Facihty). C1182 2,15 NRC 232. 247 256 (1982), aff'd sub nom. Gry of West Oncago v. NRC,701 F.2d 632. 64145 (7th Gr.1983) type of hearmgs required in matenals beense procecengs, CLI 95-l. 41 NRC 119 n 60 (1995)

Kerr41cGee Corp (West Chicago Rare Lanha Incihty). CtJ-82 2,15 NRC 232. 256 57 0982) apphcaluhty of due process protectmns to generahzed health, safety, and environmental concerns; Clj-951, 41 NRC 118 0995)

Kiva Construcuon and I.ngmeenng. Ine v. Internanonal fideliry lasurance Co., 749 F. Supp 753, atf'd.

%I F.2d 213 (W D LA 1990) stamt.ird for fie&ng of fraudulent suppressmn of a material fact. LBP.954. 41 NRC 218 n 50 0995) 1.andgraf v 051 film Products,114 S C 1483,1502 n 29.1503 0994) standard for retroacuve apphcanon of lawn ClJ 95),41 NRC 102 n.22 (1995)

Linklener v Walket. 381 U S. 618 0%5) retmachve apphcatmn of emergency planmng regulaimns; CLI-951. 41 NRC 102 0995)

Louinana Iwer and !)ght Co. (Waterford Sicam Electnc Starmn, Una 3). ALAB 812, 22 NRC 5, 56 I

0985) authoney of preu&ng officer to rule on adequacy of NRC Staff's safety review; CtJ 951,41 NRC 126 0 095) bur &n of pnef in matenals hcense anendnent procec&ngs; CLi 95), di NRC 1210995)

Lujan v Ivfenders of Wildhfe, 000 0 S dix), 112 S O 2130. 2136 0 992) appheaten of ju&cial concepis of standmg in NRC procceengs, CLJ-951, di NRC 165 0995)

Mathews v. f.ldndge, 424 U S 319, 335 0976) 1 factors to be a&lressed when presenung due process arguments; CLI-951. 41 NRC 118 n.57 0995) 14 I

l

LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX CASIG Metropuhran tason Co (Three Mile Island Nuckar Stauoo, Umt I). ALAB-699,16 NRC 1324,1327 (1982) junsdictmn so address monons to reopen: CLI 951, 41 NRC 93 (19951 Norihern $tates Power Co. (Pathfinder Atorruc Plant A LBP-89 30, 30 NRC 311, 314 (1989) elements for estabhshing orgamzauonal standmg; LBP-95-3, 41 NRC 201 (1995)

Paunc Gas and Electne Co (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Ibwer Plant, Units I and 2). ALAB-728,17 NRC -

777,807, revrw dechned, CLI-N3-32,18 NRC 1309 (1963; burden of proof in maicrials bcense amendmeut proceedings; CLL95-1, di NRC 121 (1995) 1%cinc Gas and Electnc Co Olomboldt Bay Power Plant, Umt 3), LBP-8120,14 NRC 101 (1981) deterral of ruhng on hcensee's request to withdraw a heense amendment request; CL1-95-2, 41 NRC 190 (1994)

Pacanc Gas and Liectne Co. (Humboldt Bay Power Plant. Umt 3), l.BP-861, 23 NRC 25 (1986) deconunisuoning plan reymrements for terminanon of a hcense renewal proceeding; CLI-952,41 NRC 190 (IW5)

Peuuon for Energency and Remedial Acuen, CLI-78-6, 7 NRC 400, 406-07 (1978). reconsideration demed. C1180L21, II NRC 707 (1980) weight given to bcensee comphance with regulatory guides; CLI 95-1, di NRC 98 (1995)

PlutadcIplue Electnc Co, (bnenck Generating Statmn, Umts I and 2). ALAB 726,17 NRC 755 (1983) junsdictmn to address monons to reopen, CLI-951, di NRC 94 (1995)

Ptuladelphia Electne Co. (Umenck Generstmg Stanon, Umts 1 and 2), ALAB 823, 22 NRC 773, 775 (1985) hcensing leard junsdicuan to impose hcense conditions; CLI-951, 41 NRC 94 (1995)

Pubhc Service Co. of New flampshire (Seabrook Stanon, Umts I and 2), CLI-89-8, 29 NRC 399. 416, reconuderanon demed. CLt-89-9. 29 NRC 423 (1989) forum for challengmg regulaimns, CLI-951, 41 NRC 171 (1995)

Pubhc Serwce Co. of Oklahoma (Black los Stanon, Umts i and 2L ALAB 573,10 NRC 775, 786-87 (1979) treainrnt of inadquately bnefed agunrnis on appeal. CL1-951, 41 NRC 132 n 81,137 n 95 (1995)

Puget Sound Ivwer and Ught Co. (Skagit Nuclear Power Project Um s I and 2L ALAD-552,10 NRC l -

10 (1979) pleadmg requirements for Native Americans in NRC pmceedings; LBP-9%2,41 NRC 40 (1995)

Puget Sound Power and Ught Co. (Skagit Nuclear Power Project. Umts 1 and 2L ALAB-559,11 NRC 162, 173 (1979)

Narsve Americans' status in NRC proceedings; LBP-952, 41 NRC 40 (1995)

Rahs v RI URL Inc., 770 L2d 1821,1827 (D C. Car 19M5) standiwd for retmacuse appheanoa of laws; CLI-95-1, di NRC 102 n 22 0995)

Robbms v. Clarke, 946 E2d 1331 (Hih Ctr 1991) standard for nndmg of fraudulent suppresuon of a maienal fact. LBP-95-4, 41 NRC 218 n 50 (1995)

Rodwell Internanonal Corp (Rodetdyne (hvismnt ALAB-925, 30 NRC 709, 716 (1989) cross-esammanon solely by preudmg officer en informal proceedings; CLI-951, di NRC 120 n 65 (1995) discovery in informal proceedings; CLI-95-1, 41 NRC 118 n.58 (1995)

Rockwell imernauen,d Corp. (Rodetdyne DmsionL ALAB-925, 30 NRC 709, 718 (1989) authonty of preudmg officers to disect NRC Staff in perforunnee of ars safety revrws: CLI-95-1,41 NRC 121 (1995) t Rockwell iniernanonal Corp (Rodesdyne Division), AIAB-925, 30 NRC 709, 72),22 (19M9L aff'd.

CLl45, 31 NRC 337 (1990) l premhng of6 err's discrecen to numage inforenal proceedings. C01-951,41 NRC 117 n 54 (1995)

Sacranento Mumcepal Vuhry thsinct (Rancho Seco Nuclear Generatmg Stauont C1192 2, 35 NRC 47. 56 0992) showmg necessary for adnussion as a party in NRC proceedmgs. LDP 953, 41 NRC 196 (1995)

{

15 I

I

i LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX CASES Safety Light Corp. (Blootrnburg Site Decontanunatmn), CLI-92-13, 36 NRC 79, 87 (1992) authoney to ensutute formal tranngs in malenals licensing procee&ngs. CLi-951, 41 NRC !!9 (1995)

Sequoyah fuels Corp. (Segunyah Uli to UF Facihty), Cue 17, 24 NRC 489, 495-98 (1986) 4 applicabilny of due process protections to genervized health, safery, and environmental concerns, CLl-95),41 NRC 118 (1995) factors to be addressed when presentmg due process stgunents; CLI-951,41 NRC 118 n 57 (1995)

Sequoyah bris Corp (Sequoyah UF to UF facihty), CLI.R6-17, 24 NRC 489. 497 n.$ (1986) 4 4

cross-exammanon in informal procee&ngs; CLI 951, 41 NRC 120 a t>5 (1995)

Sequoyah Ivels Corp., LBP 94-39, 40 NRC 314. 315y6 (1994) piemhng requererrents for heanng requests on materials hcense renewals; LBP-953,41 NRC 1%

(1995)

. pleadmg requirements on areas of concern in informal procee&ngs; LBP-953,41 NRC 199 a 17 (1995)

Southern Cahforma L& son Co. (San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Umts 2 and 3), CLI-82-II,15 NRC 1383,1384 (1982)

&screnon of presi&ng of6cer so preclude oral cross-exanunaten in informal procee&ngs; CL1-95-1, di NRC 320 (1995)

Stone v. Wdhann, 970 F.2d 100, cert. demed. !!3 S Ct. 2331,124 L. Ed 2d 243 (2d Cir 1992) source of cause of actma for conspiracy; LBP-95-4, di NRC 218 n.50 (1995)

Thorpe v. Housing Authanry of Cuy of Durham 393 U S. 268. 281-82 (l%9) retroactive apphcatum of emergency planning regulations; CLI-951, 41 NRC 102 (1995)

Tranusclear, Inc. (Export of 93.15% Entsched Uramum), CU-94-1. 39 NRC 1,5 (1994) injury-m-face standard for adnussion as a pany in informal proceedmgs; LBP 95-3. 41 NRC 196 1

(1995) insutuunnat interest in providng ttformanon to the pubhc as basis for stanares to emervene m I

informal proceedmgs; LBP-95-3, di NRC 201 -(1995)

- Transnuclear, Inc. (Ten Apphtanons for Low-Ennched Uramum Exports to EURATOM Member Nations),

CU-77 24, 6 NRC 525, 531 (1977) applicanon of ju&cial concepts of standmg m NRC procee&ngs; CU-951. 41 NRC 165 (1995) i Umesco Murrals Corp, LBP44-18. 39 NRC 369, 370 (1994)

]

pleaang reqmrenrius to estabhsh standmg to intervene in NRC proceedmgs; LBP-95-2, 41 NRC 40 (1995)

Umon of Concerned Scienusts v. NRC, 920 F.2d 50, 53 (D.C. Cir 1990) rype of heanngs required m matenals heense proceedings, CLI-9%), 41 NRC 119 n 60 (1995)

Umted States Department of Energy (Cimch River Breeder Reactor Plara), CLI-82-23.16 NRC 412 (1982),

rev'd and remanded per cunam on other grounds sub nom Natural Resources Defense Council v. NRC, WS F.2d 623 (D C. Cir.1942) i Logable comrme defense and secunty issues in matenals hcense anendment proceedmgs CLI-9%I, di NRC 165 (1995)

%rgmia Electric and Power Co. (North Anna Power Stanon, Umts I and 2L ALAB-146. 6 AEC 631 (1973) deadhne for fihng anended pentmns for heannss; LSP-952, di NRC 4041 (1995)

Washmgton Pubhc Power Supply System (WPPSS Nuclear Project No 2L ALAB-722,17 NRC 546, 548 (1983) appellme forum's afhrmaimn of lower forum's ruhng for reasons not espmsed by the lower court; CL1-951, 41 NRC 87 n 4 (1995) i Washington Pubhe Power Supply S)sicm (WPPSS Nuclear Project No. 2). DD-84-7,19 NRC 899. 924 (1984) uandard for miuanon of show cause procecengs; DD-952,41 NRC 60 (1995) 1 Zaffnn. lac. v. Umted Staies. 318 U.S 73. 78 (1941) setrmachve apphcanon of emergency plannmg regulaimns; CLI-951, 41 NRC 102 (1995)

I 16

I i

i i

4 LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX REGl'LATIONS 10 CF R. 2107 authonry of presiding officer lo allow withdrawal of matenalb hccuse renewal appheanon; CLi-95-2. 41 NRC 184 0995) 10 C F R. 2.107(a) presidmg othcer's authority u rule on request to withdraw a heense renewal apphcation; CLI-952, 41 NRC 19192 (1995) i 10 C F R. 2.206 disposal of heensed nurenals. request for aetmn on irregulannes in, Dt%95-5. 41 NRC 228 39 (1995) effect of pendency of requesar for acuon on beanng pentwn on marenals hcense renewal. LBP-953, di NRC 198 n 16 0995)

I forum for hngating untimely heanng requests, LHP-95-1, 41 NRC 6 35 0995) f I

hcensee reiahation for engloyee reporung of Jencienoes in funess for duty program; DD-95-4. 41 NRC

~

1 17 5 78 (1995)

/

modificahous to VSC-24 casic Dfi95-3, 41 NRC 6L69 0995)

{

4 stress corrosion cracMng m vessel head peneiranons, DD-952, 41 NRC 56-610995)

=

Utah Agreenent State Program, request for suspensmn of. DD-951,41 NRC 43 54 0995) 10 C F R. 2 714 standard for admissmn of late 4 led contenuuns. LBP-951. 43 NRC 5 n 3 (1995) j 10 C F R. 2.74hi)

~

scope of Comnuwon esammarmn of reenrd dunng appellate review; CLi-95-1. 41 NRC 87 0995) 7 3

10 C F.R. 2.762 retroacuve apphcanon of regulanons govermng appeals. CLI-951, 41 NRC 92 n 8 0995) i 10 C F R 2 771 diwtermn of preuding ofhcer to estend deadhne for pet tions for reconsideranon. CLI-951. 41 NRC 173 (1995)

Januhason over nutmns for reconsideranon. CLI 93-1. 41 NRC 93 OW5) 10 C f R 2 7tl6 retroacnve apphcanon of reFulations goverrung appeals; Cl.1-951, di NRC 92 n 8 0995) 10 C F R. 2.7tWbh6) appral pened when anal inbunal is considermg nouon for reconsideration of appealed decision or j.

mder; CLI 95-1, 41 NRC 95 n 10 0995) 10 C F R 2.1205 hearmg nghis on nutenals hcenw renewals. LBP-9%3. 41 NRC 1% UW5) 10 CI R 21205 a) cniena for driernunmg standmg in informal pruceedings LBP-95-3. 41 NRC 1% (1995)

]

10 C f R. 21205(c) deadhne Icr heanng requests on malenals heense apphcation; LBP.952, 4l NRC 39 0995) timely heanng requests on nutenals hcenw renewala, LBP-953. 41 NRC 200 0995) 10 C F R 2.1205 tex 1) deadhnes for heanng requests LBP.951. 41 NRC 5 (1995) 10 Cl R. 2120$(f) deadhne for answers to hearmg requests. LBP-95 2, 41 NRC 39 0995) t 4

17 4

4 1

a e'

LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX REGU!ATIONS -

Staff parucipatmn in matenals hceme renewal procecangs; LBP-95-3, 41 NRC 195 n.I, 200 n.18 (1995) to C.F.R 21205(g) burden on inservenots in Subpart L procec6ngs; CLI-951, 41 NRC 165 (1995) hugable issues in materials hcense amendment proceedings; CLI-95-1, 41 NRC 167 (1995h LBP 95 3, 41 NRC 196 (1995) 10 C F R. 21205(kXI) standard for grant of ummely heanng requests; LBP-951,41 NRC 5 (1995) 10 C F R. 2,120$(kX2) forum for hngaung unumely heanng requests LDP-951, 41 NRC 6. 32, 35 (1995) simulard for adnvssion of amended pentions containmg new concerns: LBP-951. 41 NRC 5 (1995) 10 C F R. 2.120WO escrenon of presiang otheer to allow oral presentanor.s in mformal proceeengs; CLi-951. 41 NRC 120 (1995) 10 C F R 2.1209t k) aushunty to insutute formal heanngs in matenals hcensmg proceedings; CLI-951, 41 NRC 119 (1995) auihorny to require a formal hearmg; CLI-951, 41 NRC 119 (1995) to C F R. 2.1211(b) afhdavit reqmrenent for parucipatmn by a government enuty who has failed to meet the judeial concepts of standmg. LBP-95 3, 41 NRC 201, 202 (1995) 10 C F R 2123I(d) discovery m informal procecengs CL1-951, 41 NRC 118 n 58 (1995) 10 C.F R. 21233 oral presentanons in informal pmcecengs; CU-951, 41 NRC 120 (1995) participanon by a government enuty who han failed to meet the judidal concepts of stand ng; LBP-953, di NRC 101 (1995) pleadmg requirencnts for contestmg license apphcanons; LBP 951, 41 NRC 4. 5 (1995) 10 C F.R 2.1233ta)

&scretmo of presi4ng officer to manage infoimal proceedmgs; CLI-951. 41 NRC 117 n 55 (1995) escretion of presiding officer to preclude oral cross-enanunanon in informal pnxecdmgs, CLI-951,41 NRC 120 (1995) 10 CJ R. 2.1233(c) scope of hogable issues in matenals hcense amendnrnt proceedmg; CLI-951, 41 NRC 95. % (1995) 10 C F R 21233(c). (d) pleatiing reqmrenrnia for areas of concern in mformal proceedmgs; LBP-953, 4s NRC 199 n.l?

(1995) 10 CJ R 2.1235 paraciparmn by a governnent enney who has failed to nret the judicial concepts of standing; LBP-953, 41 NRC 201 (1995) 10 C F R 2.1235(a) escretmn of presidmg ofheer lo allow oral presentanons in infarmal procee&ngs; CLi-95-1. 41 NRC 120 (1995) 10 C F R 2.1239(a) collateral attacks on regulations in hcensing proceedmgs, CLI-951, 41 NRC 370 a 163 (1995) 10 C F R. 2.1239(b) waiver of bar on collateral attacks agamst regulanons. CLI-95-1. 4l NRC 125 a 70.170 n 163 (1995) 10 CF R 21251(a) 6nahty of malerials hcense tenewat decismn. LBP-951, 41 NRC 37 (1995) 10 CI R 2.1251(d) authoney of presidmg officer to examme issues not placed in controversy; LBP 951. 41 NRC 3 (1995) scope of hugable issues in informal proceedmgs. LBP 951. 41 NRC 6 (1995) 10 C F R 21253

. retroacuve appheaten of regulanons govermng nrpeals. CLI-951. 41 NRC 92 a 8 (1995) 18

LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX Rf4L'LATIONS 10 C F R. 2.1259

. junsdicuon over tronons for recomideranon; CL1-951. 41 NRC 9) (1995) 10 C F R. 2.125Hb)

&screnon of presiding ofhcer to extend deadhne for peutions for reconsideranon; CLl-95-1,41 NRC 173 (1995) 10 C F R. Put 19 radiauon prosecuon tra ning reymrements for special nuclear matenals beenwes; CLI-951, 41 NRC 113 (1995) 10 CF R Part 20 hemis on rasanon releases from incineranon or sewage disposal of wastes; DD-95-5, 41 NRC 23), 233 (1995) pnor approval requirement for incineranon of ra&oactive wastes; DD-955, 41 NRC 232, 215 (1995) 10 CF R. 20 3(a(17) definition of unrenrncied area"; CLI-951, 41 NRC 146 n 109 (1995) 10 CF R. 20105(a) effluem radwacuve exposme hrrais for individuals; 1.BP-951, di NRC 11 (1995) 10 CF R. 20106(a) radwacuve efduent releases for Parks Township facihty; LBP 951. 41 NRC 11, 33 (1995) 10 C F R. 20 302 ir.cineration of ra&oachve waste; DD-95-5. di NRC 231 (1995) 10 CF R 20.303 sewage system duposal of ra&oarnve waste; LDP-958. 41 NRC 24 (1995) 10 C F R. 20.30 MAXI)-(3) hnuts on ra&oachve matenal dachsges into samtary sewer systems; DD95-5,41 NRC 2% (1995) 10 C F R 20 30haHc) hmets on rad.oactive matenal discharges into samtwy sewer systems. DD-95-5. 41 NRC 2% (1995) 10 C F R. 20.30hd) euepnons from knuts regarding radioactive matenal eschsges into sanitary sewer systems, DD-905.

41 NRC 2214. 235, 236 (1995) 10 C F R 20 304 land dn;mut of kiw-level rahoacuve wastes; LI4P-951, 41 NRC 13, 31 (1995) 10 C F R. 201003 ALARA standard for ra&ological releases; LBP-951. 41 NRC 12 a 7 (1995) defitunon of " byproduct material. DD-95-5. 41 NRC 230 (1995) dehmnon of "unrestncted area"; CLI 95-1. 41 NRC 146 n 109 (1995) 10 C F R. 201301(axi) environment.d assessment reqmrements for raeanon releases from incineranon of wastes; DD-955, 41 NRC 214 (1995) 10 C F R. 20 2001 restnenons on samtary sewer disposal of ra&oactive wastes. LBP-951, 41 NRC 24 (1995) 10 C F R. 20 300kaK4)

. escepuons from hmits segar&ng ra&oactive matenal dacharges into s.uutary newer syskms; DD-955, 41 NRC 235-36 0995) 10 C F R Put 20, Appenas B. Tables 2 and 3 hmits on rahanon releases from incineranon or sewage disposal of wastes; DD-95-5. 41 NRC 233-34 2 % (1995)

.l standard for acceptable ra&ological releases, basis for; LBP-95-1, 41 NRC 12 (1995) 10 C F R Part 26 i

adequacy of computer system uwd in execunon of hmess for duty program; DD-95-4. 41 NRC 175 l

(1995) i 10 C F 8t. 30 4 I

denniuon of emergency classes for matenals hcense facihnes; CLI-951,41 NRC 154 n 431 (1995) 19 I

J, I

t

i a

l l

i I

'l i

i LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX REGULATIONS i

l 10 C F R. 30 32(a) incorporanon t'y reference, m heense anendment applications, any mformanon contamed in previous apphcatuins, statertries, or repirts, filed with the Comnussion. CLi-951, 41 NRC 99 (1995) 10 CF R. 30 32(i) energency plan requirenents for marenals license amendments, CLi-95L 41 NRC 101 (1995) 10 C F R. 30 32(ixIki)

Staff evaluanon of maxinum offuse dose from rewmeh reactor accident for energency planning j

purposes; CLI-9%L 41 NRC 101 n 20 (1995) 10 Cl.R. 30.320x3) and (4) emergency planrung requirements fe umverssty research laboratory special nuclear masenals hcense; CLI 951, 41 NRC 140 (1995) 10 C F R 30J28,ix3xiii) emergency clasws for materirJs beense facihues; CLI 95-l, 41 NRC 154 n 131 (1945) 10 C F R. 30J3(aW2) and (3) standard for Comnussum approval of maienals beenses; CLI-951, 41 NRC 123 (1995) 10 C F R. 3031(a)(3) heenwe staff's quah5 canons for special nuclear natenals hcense; CLt-951. 41 NRC 10&O9. l12 (1995) 10 s'F R. 30J5(a) decomnusuoning funding requirements for matenals licenw facihues; CLI-9%I,41 NRC 169 (1995) i 10 C F R 30 35(f g4) certshcation of 6nancial assurance for deconunissiorung where licensee is a governnent ennsy; CLI-95-l, 41 NRC 169-71 (1995) 10 C.F R 40 4 (1994) definsuun of "deconumsuon* and " residual" contaminauon; CLI-952. 41 NRC 188 (1995) 10 C f R. 4042(b) nochcains and reportmg reqmreness for netomatic extension of malenals hcense; CL1-952. di NRC 184. 187 (1995) 10 C F R 40 42(c) thanges in wording of. CLI-952, 41 NRC 483 a 10 (1995) effect of heenws with respect to poswssion of Tource matenal"; CLI-902, di NRC 189 nonficanon and repcsting reqmrenrnts for automanc extenuun of matenals beense; CLI-952. 41 NRC 184.188,189 n.39 (1995) 10 Cl R. 40.42(c)

I conunuanon of bcense beyond espiranon daic to allow decomnusuoning actnines, CLI 952, 41 NRC 183. 184. 187-88 (1995) to C F R. 40421e)tl) and (2) erwerpretanon of automauc estension provision far matenals beenses. CL1-952. 41 NRC 191 (1995) 10 CF R. 4042(fX2) ternunatum of matenals hcenws; CL1-95-2. 41 NRC 188 (1995) 10 CF R 40 420NI) and (2) radiological survey reporung reqmrements for sernunanon of heenses: CLI-95 2. 41 NRC 189 n 38 (199 %

10 C F R 40 4hb) effect of heense pending agency rukng on renewal apphcanon CLI-952. 41 NRC 181,187 n 27 (1995) 10 C f.R 50 7 adequacy of computer system uwd in execunon of htness for duty program. Olk95-4. 41 NRC 175 (1995) 10 C F R. 50 34(t4 apphcabshry to resesch reactor hcense anrndment apphcatmn. CLI 951, 41 NRC 97 a 11 (1995) 10 C f R 50 59 knuts on deugn nuhticwon wnhout pnor NRC approval. DD-953, 41 NRC 68 (1995) i 20 y-

i LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX RECCIATIONS

- 10 C F R. Part 50, Appendas E n 2 at 734 (1994) emergency sluses for research reactors; CLl-951,41 NRC 154 n 131 (1995) 50 Cf R. Part 50 Appendix E. IV C emergency claues for msrar power n Yeors; CL1-951,41 NRC 154 n.131 (1995) 10 C F R Pat 51 l

environnxntal psaennent reqmrenrnts for radianon releases from tacineratmo of wastes; DD95 5, 41 NRC 234, 235 (1995)

I environrnemal impact statement requirements for matenals beenses; CLI-95-1,41 NRC 124 (1995) 10 C.F R. 51 I4(a) federal accons for wlmi environmental impact statenrnis, environmental assessments, or findings of no I

(

significam smpact are not regered, CLI-951, el NRC 124 (1995) 10 CF R. 51.20(b) heensmg acunns requinng environmem anenmem; LDP-951, 41 NRC 14 (1995) heensms acuons reqmnns environmenial im;act statements: DD-955,41 NRC 234 (1995) 10 C F R. 5120lbM7; environmemal impact statenem requirements for matenals hcenses; CLI-951,41 NRC 124,125 (1995) qualdicaimn of laboratory whose experments involve possession and use of special nuclear matenals as plutonium processing and fuel fabncauon facshty; CLl-951, 41 NRC 126 (1995) 10 C F R 5120ibil4) environmental impact assennrni reqmrenrnts for heense renewals; LBP-951, di NRC 14 (1995)

.10 Cf R. 51.21 environmenial anessmem reymrenems for radianon releases frnm meineration of wastes; DD-95-5. 41 NRC 229, 234 (1995) heensmg acuous reqmnng environnrns assessrnent: LBP 951, di NRC 14 (1995) heenung acuons that are escluded from tir reqmrenrnt for environnental impact statenents; DD-95-5, di NRC 234 (1995) 10 C F R. 51.22(a) hcenung actions that are cuckdcJ from the regarement for enviren nental impact statenents: DD-955, 41 NRC 234 (1995) 10 C F R 5122(cN14KiMav) ef fluent releases from acuvites excluded from the requirenrnt for an ennronnental impact statement; DD-905,41 NRC 234. 236 (1995) hcenung scimns that me enckded from the requiremem for ennronmemal inpact statemems; DD-955, 41 NRC 234. 235, 2% (1995) 10 C F.R. 5122(cN14)(v) ennronmental impact statenwnt requirenrnts for matenals hcenses, CL1-951, 41 NRC 124 (1995) 10 C F R. 5122(cx14xan) becnsmg acnons that me escluded innn the regmrement for ennronmemal impact statements; DD-955, 41 NRC 234, 235, 2% (1995) 10 C F R 5160th) envirtmnental repon or environnental aucunrnt requuemems for knuts 'on radaological releases from f

mcmerators; DD 95-5, di NRC 229 (1995) 10 C F R 5160ibx2Nv) ennronrnental report reqmrenrnt for masenals heense amendment appheanons; CLI-951, 41 NRC 103 (1995) 10 Cl R. 60 2 defimtion of "imponant to safety" relauve to geologic repositones; DPRM 951, 41 NRC 242 (19951 pnyosed new defmmons, DPRM 951. 41 NRC 242 (19951 10 C l-R 60 li t i

acodcot dose bmits at preclosure comrol area boumlary of geologic repoutcry; DPRM-951,41 NRC 242 (1995) 10 C f R. 60 illfai delenon of the pluase *at the tmeC DPRM-951, di NRC 242 (1995) i 21

?

i i

L.

LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX RF,GURATIONS 10 C f R. 616 caempnon from same or federal land ownership reymrement for disposal of radioactive wastes received from others. Di>951, 41 NRC 45. 47, 51 (1995) 10 C F R. 61.59 state adyuun of regulanons far land disposal of radioacuve waste; DD-951,41 NRC 45 (1995) 10 CJ R 6159(a) dupenal of radmaetne wasic received from others on pnvately owned land, DD-95-1. 41 NRC 51

- (1995) 10 Cf R. 70.4 classancarion of umversity lab as plutomum processmg plani; CL1951,41 NRC 103,104 (1995) dehmtmn of emergency classes for maienals bcense fae hties; CLi-951, 41 NRC 154 n.131 (1995) quahhcarma of latwaiory whow experiments involve possessmn and use of special nwelear materials as plutotuum processing and fuel fabncanon facabry; CLi-95-l. 41 NRC 124.125.126 (1995) 10 Cf R. 70 21(aK3) incorporatmn by reference, in hcense anrndment apphcasmns. any information contained in previous apphcations, statenrnts. or reports, fded with the Commission. CLI-95-l,41 NRC 99 (1995) 10 CF R. 70 2t(f) environmemal report reqmrements for special nuclear masenals breese apphcants; CL1-95-l. 41 NRC 104 (1995) 10 C F R, 70.22(aW4) isotope specthcarmn reymrenents for special Mclear matenals beense appheatwns; CLl-951, 41 NRC 105 (1995) 10 Cf R. 7022(aW8) safety gworedures en Part 70 hcense apphcations. CLi 95-1. 41 NRC 99.100 (1995) 10 CJ R 70 22(hMI) quah6 canon of laboratory whose expermrnes involve possession and use of special nuclear matenals as phmmium processing and fuel fabncanon facihry; CLL951,41 NRC 127 n 72 (1995) 10 C F R. 70 226) emergency plan requirenrnts for matenals hcense amendnrnts; CIL951, 41 NRC 101 (1995) emerFency planmng requuements for uruversity research laboratory special nuclear matenals hcense.

Cl l-95-1, 41 NRC 140 (1995) 10 Cl R 70 220)(3Wus) enrrgency clanes for malenals hcense fac hues; C1J-95-1. di NRC 154 n.131 (1995) 10 CJ R 70.23(aH2) hcensee staff's quahficauons for specnal nuclear malenals bcense; C11951,41 NRC 10009,112 (1995) 10 C F R. 70 23tak2), (3), and (4) stand,ud for Comnussmn approval of natenals beenses; CLi-951, 41 NRC 123 (1995) 10 C F R 70.24da) enticahty procedures in special nuclear matenals hcenw amendnrnts; CL195-1, di NRC 99 n.15 (1995) quahhcauon of laboratory whose expennents involve poswssion and use of special nuclear malenals as plutonmm processing and fuel fabncanon facihry; CLA-951, 41 NRC 127 n 72 (1995) 10 C F R. 70 25(f)t4) ceruhcanon of financial assurance for decomnussioning where hcensee is a governnent entny; CLi-951, di NRC 169-71 (1995) 10 C F R 70 31(d) comnon defense and secunty conuderanons in nutenals hcense anrndnrnt issuance. CLI-95-1, di NRC 163,164 (1995) 10 C F R. 72 48 apptwabibry to dnign modtfications to VSC 24 spent fuel storage cask; DD.953, 41 NRC 63, 69 (1995) i 12 f

I b

i 6

i

l LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX REGt!LATIONS 10 Cf R 72.48(agl) i snod Acation of spent fuci skrage cask design wattmus prior NRC approval DD 95 3, 41 NRC 64, 65-66 (1995) 10 Cf R. 72 48(aw2) luruts on mod 6cmion of spent fuel storage cask design without pnor NRC approval; DD-95-3, 41 NRC 67 (1995) 10 Cf R 72.210 apphcabihty of sectmn 72 48 to general heenses; DD-95-3. 41 NRC 65. 66 (1995) 3 10 C F R. 72 212(aX2; scope of general beense apphenbahty to cask storage of spent fuel, DD-95-3. 41 NRC 66 n 2 (1995) 10 Cf R. 72 230(a) safety analysis report requurments for design rnodi6 canons to spent fuel storage casks; Di>95 3, di I

NkC 66 n 3 (1995) 10 Cf R. 72.2)l(c) esemption to alkw design nmdificauons to VSC 24 spent fuel storage casks; DD-95 3, 4l NRC 64 (1995) 10 CJ R. 73 6(c) quahncasmn of laboratory wlmse espennents involve possession and use of special nuclear materials as pluumiurn processmg and fuel fabricauon facihty; CLI-95-1,41 NRC 127 n.72 (1995) 10 C F R.140 3(h) quahhcanon of laboratory whose espenments involve possessmn and use of special nuclear nwerials as pluromum processing and fuel fabnconon facihty; CLI-95-1,41 NRC 127 n.72 (1995) 10 C F R.150 II i

quahncatwn of laboratory whose expennents involve possession and use of special nuclear materials as plutonium processmg and fuel fabncatmn facabey: CLI-95-1. 41 NRC 127 n 72 (1995) 29 C F R.1910 2(e) dehnston of employer"; CtJ-95-1. 41 NRC 139 (1995) 40 Cf R. 26212 iderniher numbers for hazardous waste generators; LBP-95 l. 41 NRC 34 (1995) 40 Cf R. 264 Il7tc)

I control of post-closure activines on km-level radmactive waste disposal snes DD-95-1. 41 NRC 48 (1995) 49 C F R.173 425(bxi) contaner requirements for transportauon of radioactive wastes; LitP.951,41 NRC 15 (1995) i i

)

23 4

l I

i 1

i

~

.~....

I l

9 e -

IIGAL CITATIONS INDEX STATUTES 29 U.S C. 652(5) (1988) de6 muon of " employer"; CLi-951, 41 NRC 139 (1995)

Adnumstranve Procedure Act. 5 U.S C 554 (19%

discovery rights in infornul proceedings; CIJ-951, 41 NRC 118 n 58 (1995)

Adnumstranve Procedure Act, 7(c). 5 U.S C. 356(d) rebuttal by miervenors in matenals beense proceedmps. CL1-9%l. 41 NRC 115, !!7 (1995)

Atonne Energy Act. 57, 42 U S C 2077(c)(2) comnwn &fense and secunty consideranons en matenals beense unendment issuance; CLI-95-1, di NRC 161,164 (1995)

/

Atonue Energy Act 182a. 42 U S C. 2232(a) common defense and secunty conuderauons in matenals hcense anwndment hearmgs; CL1-951, 41 7

NRC 66 (1995) 4 j

Atomac Drrgy Act.189 f

hennng nghts on maienals bcense anwndments; CLI 95-1, 41 NRC 115 (1995)

(

Atonne i nergy Act. 189a. 42 U.S C 2239ta) hearmg nghts on decommissionmg actiuties. CL1-952, 41 NRC 1824 (1995)

Aronne Energy Act,189ati), 42 U.S C. 2239taki) rebuttal by mienenors in matenals hcense proceedmgs, ClJ-951,41 NRC 117 (1995) 4 Atomic Energy Act, 274J NRC renew of Agreenwnt State Programs; DD951,41 NRC 46 (1995) suspensmn of Agreenent State Pmgram, request for; DD 9%1, di NRC 44 (1995)

I Mo Const of 1945, art 9. 9 definmon of " employer"; CLI-951. 41 NRC 139 (1995)

Mo.Rev Stat 172 020 (1986)

&hmtun of " employer", CL1-951, di NRC 139 (1995)

Nanonal i nvironnwntal Pohcy Act.102(2xCA 42 U.S C. 4332(2xC) (1988) enuronmental assessment requirements for radianon releases hom incinersion of masies; DD-955, 41 NRC 234 (1995) enuronmental impact sisenwm reqmrements for rnaienals licenses, CLI-9%I 41 NRC 124 (1995)

Nuclear Waste Pohey Act. 42 U S C 10,198:a) site-specihe approvals for spent fuel shwage technologies. DD-953. 41 NRC 67 (1995)

Occupauunal Saler) and Health Act. 42 U S C. II.021(a41). (2) safety data sheets for special nutkar matenals for emerFency planmng purposes. CLI 95-1,41 NRC 139 (1995) de6niuon of " employer"; CLI 951, 41 NRC 139 (1995)

Occupannnal Safety and Health Act. 42 U S C ll.0214eK4) (2) dehnismn of " hazardous chenucals'; CL1-9%I. 41 NRC 139 (1995) a

?

15 I

i.

~... __

._ =. _.

1 IIGAL CITATIONS INDEX OtilERS 17A Ant Jur. 2d 374 6 356 interpretauon of arnbiguous texts LDP-95-4. 41 NRC 212 (1995) 17A Arn. Jur. 2d 375 5 357 consuucu<m of ambiguous contracts; LBP.954, 41 NRC 212 (1995)

Ldles and Nelson. Iederal Regulatory Process Agency Pracuce and Procedures. 5 4 IV at 107 (2d ed 9

1992) 1 authonry to insun.te formal heanngs an matenals licensmg proceedings CLl-95 l. 41 NRC I19 (1995)

Kenneth Culp Davis. AJnunastrative Law Treatise ai 6517.14 (2d ed 1979) interpreianon of anbiguous texts IBP.95 4. 41 NRC 212 (1995)

/

Kenneth Culp Davis. /dnunistrarise Law Treatise ar 324 6506 interpretanon of amtupous texts; LBP-95-4, 4! NRC 212 (1995) 7 9 Janes W Moore et al., stoore's Federal Pr.Rtice 1180.08[3} ar 59 60 & n 5,12N 12{ll at 4-67 to 4 69 (1991) f disposinon of peuuon for revew where nwuon for reconsiderauon (,f same issues is pending; CL1-95-1.

(

41 NRC 95 n 10 (1995) 2 J Sutherland. Stalutes and Sir nory Construebon 4104 at 349 (1986) 7' i

standard for retroacuve apphc.oon of laws: CLl 95-1,41 NRC 103 n 23 (1995)

M

~

N f

a i

l 1

I i

I E

4 5

t 27 l

j j

i i

i i

+

.m.

]

i a

SUlijECT INDEX 1

AD)UDICATORY BOARDS authonry over Staff action. CLI-95-1, 41 NRC 71 (1995) junsdicuon to consider motions for reconsideration. CL1-95-1. 41 NRC 71 (1995)

Alf! DAVITS post-apphcauon subnussion l>y nutenals license appheant, CLI-951, 41 NRC 71 (1995)

AGRLIMENT STATE PROGRAMS NRC revww requurnrnts, DD-95-1, 41 NRC 43 (1995) j AMENDMENT OF RtGULATIONS preciosure openitions av geologic repository; DPRM-9%I. 41 NRC 241 11995)

AMERIC1UM curic content. disclosure of. CLI-951. 41 NRC 71 (1995)

ATOMIC LNIRGY ACT y

comrron defense and secunty conuderaimns in rnatenals hcense anendment issuance; CL1-95-1, 41 7

NRC 71 (1995) hennng rights arul requirenwnes on maternis beenses. CLI-951. 41 NRC 71 (1995) d safety findings. CLI 951, 41 NRC 71 (1995)

HRIE FS. APPLLI,A76 inadequaues m. CLI-9%) 41 NRC 71 (1995)

CIVIL CONSPIRACY

- r l

standard for convichon of.1 BP 9%4. 41 NRC 201 (1995)

I CROSS-LXAMINATION parties' nght to: CLi-951. 41 NRC 71 (19ug)

Di COMMISSIONING effect of nutenals beense beyond espirauen to allow for. CL1-9%2. 41 NRC !?9 (1995) l heanng nghis on. CL195-2. 41 NRC 179 (1995) nmienals beene venewal for. CLI 952. 41 NRC 179 (1995) l DiCOMMISSIONING IUNDING PLANS materials license amenderwrit applicant's resporaub'htees. CLl-9%1. 41 NRC 71 (1995) i DEMGN spent fuel uorage casks. DD-94-3. 41 NRC 62 (1995)

DLSIGN-BASIS LVENTS l

prolope repmitones. DPRM-9%I. 41 NRC 241 (1995)

DUL PROCLSS opimrtunny for response. CLI-9%I. 41 NRC 71 (1995)

EMIRGENCY PLANS rnaienals hcensees. CLI-9%I 41 NRC 71 (1995) rencarch laboratores. CL1-vs.t. 41 NRC 71 (1995)

LMPIDYI LS. LICLNSEE quahficatums of. CLi 95-l. 41 NRC 71 (1995)

LNIORCE MLNT ACllONS violaimn of plara procedures.1 HP 95-4. 41 NRC 203 (1995)

LNGINLFRLD SAILT) ILATURES numental dme cniena for use m identif>mg need fx; DPRM-951, 41 NRC 241 (1995) i-29 i

i l

l

SUBJECT INDEX LNVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Staff obliganon to prepare, CU-951,41 NRC 71 (1995)

LNVIRONMLNTAL ASSESSMINI incmcrauon of bcensed maienals, need for; DD-95-5, 41 NRC 227 (1995) requirenrns: for matenals hcense renewals; LBP-951, 41 NRC 1 (1995)

Staff obhgaturn to prepase; CU 951,41 NRC 78 (1995)

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATLMLNTS requerenrnes for numerials license renewals; LBP-951, 41 NRC 1 (1995)

Staff obhganon to prepare: CLI 95-1, di NRC 71 (1995)

LNVIRONMLN'!AL REPORTS incmeranon of hcensed nmienals, need for: DD 955. 41 NRC 227 (1995)

' LVIDENCE dancretton of preskimg officer in adnusunn of. CLI 951, 41 NRC 71 (1995) retmttal. C11951. 41 NRC 71 (1995)

' LXLMf"TIONS from Part 61, standard for grant of. DIA9%I,41 NRC 43 (1995) i l'INANCIAL QUALHICATIONS matenals beense apphcants; CLI.951. 41 NRC 71 (1995)

I7RL detection, protection, and suppression nrasures at research reactor; CLI-951 JI NRC 71 (1995) rmhunuchde hihalanon dose levels, C1195-1,41 NRC 71 (1995)

ITTNf3S FOR DlfrY PROGRAM coenputer program adequacy; DD-954, 41 NRC 175 (1995)

GENI.RAL LICI.NSES deugn nodificanons to spent fuel storage casks; DD-953,41 NRC 62 (1995)

GLOLOGIC RLPOSTIORIES preclosure operations at; DPRM-951,41 NRC 241 (1991)

HEARING RLQUESTS amended, contauung new areas of concerns; L.BP-951, 4i NRC I (1995) amendnrnt of, LBP-952. 41 NRC.4 (1995) answers to; LDP-952. 41 NRC 38 (1995) deadhnen for fihng; LBP-9tl. 41 NRC l (1995) pleading reqmrements fur; i.BP-9%I, di NRC 1 (1995) piemhng requirenrnis on m4 enals hcense renewals; LBP-953, 41 NRC 195 (1995) unamely, standard for grant of; LBP-951, di NRC I (1995)

HLARING RIGHTS -

decomnussiomng acuvines. CLI 95-2, 41 NRC 179 (1995) matenals hcense renewals. LBP-953, 41 NRC 195 (1995)

IlOUSLKLEPING adequacy for prevennon of raholopcal releases from Parks Township facihry. LBP-951,41 NRC 1 (1995)

INCINERATION radioacuve waste dispos.) by, DD-95-5. di NRC 227 (1995)

INI'ORMAL PROCLLDINGS hearmg procedures; CLI 95-l. 41 NRC 71 (1995) oral presentations in; CLl-951. di NRC 78 (19951 plemhng requirenrnis in; LBP-951, 41 NRC 1 (1995t LBP-9%2. 41 NRC 38 (1995)

INTERVLNTION Nauve Anrncans, LBP-95-2, 41 NRC 38 (1995) presubng officer's suihunty; l BP-94 2. 41 NRC 33 (19951 Subpart L pleading reqmrenrnts.1.BP 95-2, 4! NRC 38 (1995)

JURISDK'flON monons for reconudnatmn. CL19FI, di NRC 71 (1995)

T t

8 I

I i

4 I

l

u a

SUBJECT INDEX mt%

IJABHJTY renrdaatum arai correenvc nrasum - mung to radioachve releases fiem wasic dnponal sne; DD-95-1, di NRC C (1995; LK1N50 RENI W.tL condinons on waharswal of applaatmn for. C1.!-95 2. As NRC 179 (1995)

I ICINSILS

?jr NRC commuruution with; DIA95-2. 41 NRC 55 (1995)

[

retaliatmo agiunu miusileblowers 90 95-4 41 NRC 175 (1995)

MANAGLMLNT COMPETINCE denunstration of l.BP-95-1. 41 NHC a (1995)

MATI.RIA13 LICENil AMLNDMLNi APPLICATIONS deficiencica as andgnior of appheani's competence; CLf-95-1,41 NRC 71 (1995)

MATIRIALS LICf NSL AMENDMI.NTS dsommnswmq fundmg phm requirements; CLI-95-1. 41 NRC 71 (1995) standard fw grant of. C1.195-1, di NRC 71 (1995)

M ATI RIALS LIC'.NSL APPLICATIONS safety pnwedures subnuned wnh. Ct.l-95-1. 41 NRC 71 (1995)

M ATI RIALS LICI.NSL PROCTE. DINGS lingable issues m. LDP 95 3, 41 NRC 195 fl995)

M ATI RIA13 LICLh RiMWAL decommissioning acticies ClJ 95-2. 41 NRC 179 (1999) effect of pen &ncy of 2 206 petitmns on heanng requests on. I BP-95-141 NRC 195 (1995) environmental aucunrru requirements. LitP 951. 41 NRC 1 (1995) posseamma oi rauhoactive maienals for manufacture of nwheally related devices. LDP-903. 41 NRC 195 ll995)

MATIRIA13 LICLNSLS brunng righth on. CL) 95-l, di NRC 71 (1995) in situ leach uramum numog operanons. LBP-95-2 el NRC M (1995)

Part 30. staustard for grain of. CII 951. 41 NRC 71 (1999)

Part 70. standard for grarn nf. Cij 951, 41 NRC 71 (1995)

MLSRLPRI ST.NT AllON smgwyr stancesent under oath because of faslure to renumber facts; l.DP-95-4. 41 NRC 203 (1995)

MONTIORING radmuctne ef fluents. DD 45-5. di NRC 227 (1995)

NAllONAL f_NVIRONh11NI AL POLICY ACT environnrnial ampact staienrne requirements for matenals beense amendrrrnts. CLt-95-1, 41 FRC 71 (1995)

NATIVE AMLRICANS intervennon in NRC proceedmFs. LBP-95 2, di NRC 38 (1995)

NRC RIV!LW Agreenent htate Progranu. DD-95-1. 41 NRC 41 (19451 NRC $ TAIT board authonty over acimns of. CLl-95-1. 41 NRC 71 (1995) obhgauun lo esplmn &ternunainms and snake fmdmgs of fact. CLI 951, 41 NRC 71 (1995) safety c>aluanon rePiwt. CL1-95-l. 41 NRC 71 (1995) safety ressem. weigtu given to a&quacy et Cll 901, 41 NRC 71 (1995)

NUCLI.AR NON-PROllilRATION cond&rasmns in maienals heeme v. rndnent usumwe, 0L1901. 41 NRC 71 (1995)

NUCll AR klGULATORY COMM15SION commumcanon wnh luenwes. Di>95 2. 41 NRC 55 (1995:

PLtriONIt!M radimsmeg and cune content desc enn. CLI 95-L 41 NRC 71 (1995) m l

31

l SUBJECT INDEX PRLSIDING Of*1CERS aurtuwity m Subps L proceedmgs; LBP-952,41 NRC 3811995)

[.

authurtry to exanuue issues not placed in controversy; LDP-950 41 NRC 10995) authority to manage proceedings; CLi-95-1, di NRC 710995) i I

discretma in aJnnssma of evidence; CL1-951, 41 NRC 710995) exanunatmn of witnesses; CLi-95-1, 41 NRC 71 18995) functmn in heense renewal proceedang; CLI-952. 41 NRC 179 (1995)

Junsdictma to consider nucons for reconsiderstmn; CLI-94-1,41 NRC 710995) resp <msibihty for record dewlopment ClJ-951,41 NRC 710995) z PRESSURIZED WATLR REA(TORS t

stress corrouan cracking in wisel head penetratmas; DD-952,41 NRC 55 0995)

PROOr, BURDLN OF bcensee's. in heensing proceedmgs. CLI-95-1, 41 NRC 710995)

RADIATION DOSE nunencal ikise enteria for une in idenufymg need for mgmeered safety femures; DPRM 951, 41 NRC 241 0 995)

RADIATION EXPOSURE occupauonal, ClJ-95-1, 41 NRC 71 (1995)

RADIOAlilVE EITIULITTS ducharges anto samtary sewers; DD 955, 41 NRC 227 0995)

RADIOAdlVE WASTE i

storage at research teactor; CLI-951. di NRC 710995)

RADIOACTIVE WASTL SITE mmed-out area, mtegnty of. LEP-951, di NRC I (1995)

RADIOACTIVE WASTE II)W LEVEL dup > sal on pnyme land. DIA951, 41 NRC 43 0995) land dnposal requirenents, l.BP 951, 41 NRC I 0999) sewage system requirenrnts; IEP-951, 41 NRC 10995) storage facihty approval; DD-955. 41 NRC 227 0995)

RADIOL 10lCAL DOSE accident enunuues, CLI-951,41 NRC 710995)

RADIOLOGICAL LXPOSURE individual htmts from anborne and I qmd effluents; LDP-95-1, 41 NRC i 0995)

RADIOll)GICAL RELEASLS j

stamt.ud for deternumng acceptable levels of. LDP-951, 41 NRC 1 (1995) threat from Parks Townslup fa,:ahry. LBP-95-1, 41 NRC I 0995) mater nugranon pathway; LDP-951. 41 NRC 10995)

RADIONUClJDLS inhalanon dose levels from release dunng a hre; CL1-951,41 NRC 710995)

RLACTOR CONTROL RODS tmsposiemnmg of, LBP-95-4. 41 NRC 203 0995)

REAGOR OPf RATORS prtenbnum of pwticipmma in bcensed actmnes; IEP 9%4, 41 NRC 203 (1995)

RLCONSIDLRATION junsdictmn over nunons for; CLI-941, 41 NRC 710095)

RLGULAllONS coll.ncral attack on; C1J-9%l. 41 NRC 7109956 interpretanon of 10 C F R 40424ck CLI-9N2, di NRC 179 0995) retroacaw apphcalmn of. CLI 95 I, 41 NRC 710999)

RIGULATORY GUIDLS weight given to nonconformance wnh, Clj 9F1, 41 NRC 710995)

RLSLARCH REACIORS deiection protection, and suppresuon nrasures; CLI 95-1. 41 NRC 710995) 32 l

l

v 3

i r,

I SUIUECT INDEX f

emergency plans; Ct19SI,41 NRC 71 (1995)

RUtIS OF PRACTICL

' adnusubihty of evidence; CLI-951, 41 NRC 71 (1995) burden of proof an hcensn.g puccedings; CLI 951, 41 NRC 71 (1995) condstmra on mahdrawal of bcense renewal apphcanon; C1195-2. 41 NRC 179 (1995) hcenw renewal poceedmgs; CLl 952, di NRC 179 (1995) ural pesentations in informal pmceedings. CL1951, 41 NRC 71 (1995) l Subpart L heanns pmcedures; Ct1951,41 NRC ?] (1995)

{

wasver of rules or regulaimns; C1195-1. 41 NRC 71 (1995)

SAFLT'l LVALUATION REPORT Staff obhgarmn to pepare; CLl 951, di NRC 78 (1945)

SHOWCAUSL PR(X.ILDINGS hugation of unurrely heanns requests in; LBP-951, 41 NRC 109+5) staudard for iruttanon of, DD-952,41 NRC 55 (1995)

SOURCE MATLRIALS LICENSE l

cffect beyond expirauon date to allow decommissioning and occunty actinues; CLI-952, di NRC 179 (1995)

SPLCIAL NUCLLAR MATIRIAIJi descrapsma of cune content an heenne apphcanons; CLI-951,41 NRC 710995)

SPENT IULL STORAGE CASKS VSC-24 design nmdahcations; DD-953, di NRC 62 (1995)

STANDING 10 INTERVLNL enjury.indact requirenrnt for; LDP-953. 41 NRC 195 (1995) insutunonal interest in poviding mformanon to the pubhc as basis for; LDP 953. 41 NRC 195 (1995) organuaramal, elemems for esuibbshmg; LDP-953, 41 NRC 195 0995) pleading requnenents in anformal proceedmgs; LDP-952. 41 NRC 38 0995)

STRESS CORROSION CRACKifJG reactor vessel head penetrations; DIK952, 41 NRC 55 (1995)

SUBPART L PROCIIDINGS authonty of puudmg officer. LBP 952, 41 NRC 38 (1995) scope of heigable issues. L11P-95 L 41 NRC 10995)

TRANSPORTATION coni.uner requirernents kw imhoar'.sve wasics; LDP 951. 41 NRC 1 (1995) radmactive manies, offute coniarmnanon from. LBP-95-1, 41 NRC 10995)

VIOLATIONS plant pocedures, penalty for; LBP-954, 41 NRC 203 0995 j

WASTL DISPOSAL ancurratmo of radioactive matenals. DD-955, di NRC 227 0995) pnvase land. 19951,41 NRC 43 0995) tranuname etenrnts; C11951,41 NRC 710995) l WASTL DISPOSAL SITES conimi of post-closure actiunes on. DD-951, 41 NkC 41 (1995) habihty fur radmacuve releases Imm. Dr1901, 41 NRC 43 0995)

WASTL RADIOACTIVE offsite contanunaimn from transportation of, I BP 9%I. di NRC 10995)

WHISTLt 81 OWf RS horiace retahatum against. DD-904. 41 NRC 175 0999)

WIINI.SS1S prestamp raftscer's esanununon of. CLI 951. 41 NRC 710995) t i

i 1

b

_. ~....

i 1

l 9

A FACl!.ITY INDEX ARK ANSAS NUC11AR ONE; Dmket Nos. 54 313, 50 368, 72-1007 REQUEST IOR ACTION. January 31, 1994 DIRE CTOR'S DICISION UNDER 10 C.F R 0 2 206; DD 95-3. 41 NRC 62 (1995)

MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWLR ST AllON. Docket Nos $4245. 50-336. 50-423 RIQUI ST IOR ACTION, February 22, 1995. DIRECTOR'S DLCISION UNDLR 10 C F k i2.206; DD-95 4. 41 NRC 175 (1995)

P!;NNSYLVANIA NUCLEAR SIRVICLS OPlkATIONS. Parks Township, Pennsylvania; DxLet No.

7436441L ken MAllRI ALS llCLNSE RINEW AL; January 3,1995; INITIAL DICISION (Lacenw Renewal);

LI P 45-1, 41 NRC 1 (1995) b

/

=

/.

i r

I

,I r

i l

i I

1 1

s e

4 i

h, e

i 35 il l

1 s

1 i

i r

'n--,

c.,~,

, _ _