ML20076A815
| ML20076A815 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Robinson  |
| Issue date: | 08/15/1983 |
| From: | Trowbridge G CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO., SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE |
| To: | |
| References | |
| 83-484-03LA, 83-484-3LA, ISSUANCES-OLA, NUDOCS 8308180342 | |
| Download: ML20076A815 (7) | |
Text
_
d August 15, 1983 00CKETED USHRC UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
'83 AUG 17 A10:55 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 0FFICE CF SECRLIA:
00CKEilNG & SEPv;r BRANC4 BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of
)
)
CAROLINA POWER & LIC'iT COMPANY
)
Docket No. 50-261-OLA
)
(H. B.
Robinson Steam Electric
)
ASLBP No. 83-484-03LA Plant, Unit 2)
)
STATUS REPORT j
In accordance with the Board's Memorandum and Order dated April 12, 1983, as modified by the Board's Order dated July 21, 1983, Applicant files the following status report.
The report has been read to and approved by NRC Staff counsel and the representative of the Hartsville Group.
1.
Additional need for discovery.
l l
All parties have filed their first sets of interroga-tories.
Hartsville Group filed sets of follow-on interrogatories with Applicant and with the Staff on August 1, 1983.
Neither Applicant nor the Staff filed follow-on interrogatories with the t
Hartsville Group.
1
{DRADOCK8308280342 830815 03000261 PDR TSD3
The Staff filed answers to the Hartsville Group's first set of interrogatories on July 7, 1983.
Applicant filed answers to most of the Hartsville Group's first set of inter-rogatories and objected to others on June 30, 1983.
The interrogatories to which Applicant objected are the subject of a motion to compel by the Hartsville Group dated July 11, 1983, to which Applicant will respond by August 15, 1983.
Applicant's responses to the Hartsville Group follow-on inter-rogatories are due August 18, 1983, and Staff responses are due August 22, 1983.
It is possible that either Applicant or the Staff may request short extensions of time for answering the follow-on interrogatories.
Hartsville Group filed answers to the Applicant's and Staff's first sets of interrogatories on June 27, 1983.
The parties have not presently identified any need for further discovery.
However, in accordance with the dis-covery schedules agreed upon by the parties and contained in the Board's Memorandum and Order dated April 12, 1983, further discovery may be had (a) on the basis of timely discovery re-quests based on significant new information not previously available, (b) by agreement of the affected parties, or (c) by order of the Board for good cause shown.
2.
Estimated time for completion of discovery.
Dates for completion of responses to presently out-I standing discovery requests are as indicated under the preceding
}
item.
The parties do not presently anticipate that further l
discovery will delay the hearing schedule proposed below.
3.
Unresolved procedural matters.
The only unresolved procedural matter at present is i
i the disposition of the Hartsville Group's motion to compel l
referred to in item (1) above.
1 4.
Need for an intermediate prehearing conference.
f The parties do not presently see the need for an intermediate prehearing conference.
l l
S.
Recommended dates for:
i (a)
Motions for summary disposition.
None of the l
parties presently anticipates filing a motion for summary dis-l position and no date for such motions is-therefore proposed.
i... -,.
(b)
Final prehearing conference.
The parties pro-pose a final prehearing conference approximately 15 days after the issuance of the Staff SER or DES, whichever is later.
The Staff's present target dates for the issuance of the DES, SER and FES are September 1, 1983, September 30, 1983, and November 10, 1983, respectively.
(c)
Prefiled direct testimony.
The parties propose that the date for filing prefiled direct testimony be set 15 days prior to the commencement of the evidentiary hearing.
(d)
Commencement of hearing.
The parties propose that the evidentiary hearing commence approximately 35 days after the issuance of the FES.
Respectfully submitted, y
e SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE
-44 m
MGeo[geF. Tbwbridg P.C.
Dated: August 15, 1983 -_______-_ __-___- _ _ ___-__-_- -
August 15, 1983 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of
)
)
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
)
Docket No. 50-261-OLA
)
(H.
B.
Robinson Steam Electric
)
ASLBP No. 83-484-03LA Plant, Unit 2)
)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of a " Status Report,"
dated August 15, 1983, were served upon those parties on the attached Service List by deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid, this 15th day of August, 1983.
bl JJ Ybeo[geF. Trowbridge,[C.
e i
Dated: August 15, 1983 l
l
l UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of
)
)
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
)
Docket No. 50-261-OLA
)
(H.
B.
Robinson Steam Electric
)
ASLBP No. 83-484-03LA Plant, Unit 2)
)
SERVICE LIST Administrative Judge Morton B.
Margulies Chairman, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Administrative Judge Jerry R. Kline Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Administrative Judge David L. Hetrick Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Professor of Nuclear Engineering University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona 85721 Docketing & Service Section (3)
Office of the Secretary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Myron Karman, Esquire Office of Executive Legal Director U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 B. A. Matthews Hartsville Group P. O. Box 1089 Hartsville, South Carolina 29550
Dr. John C.
Ruoff P. O. Box 96 Jenkinsville, South Carolina 29065 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Samantha Francis Flynn, Esq.
Carolina Power & Light Company P. O. Box 1551 Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 t
l l
.