ML20057E735
| ML20057E735 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Brunswick  |
| Issue date: | 10/01/1993 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20057E732 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-324-93-33, 50-325-93-33, NUDOCS 9310130101 | |
| Download: ML20057E735 (1) | |
Text
_ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
ENCLOSURE 1 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Carolina Power and Light Company Docket Nos.:
50-325 and 50-324 Brunswick License Nos.:
DPR-71 and DPR-62 During an NRC inspection conducted on August 1 - September 3, 1993, a violation of NRC requirements was identified.
In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," the violation is listed below:
10 CFR Part 26 and Carolina Power and Light Company Procedure No.107, Screening for Level 1 Employment, Reinstatement, dated April 22, 1993, require that an employee must complete chemical testing and have their activi-ties reviewed by a supervisor for absences greater then 30 days, prior to reinstatement of unescorted access authorization.
Contrary to the above, an employee entered the protected area with unescorted access on August 2, 1993, after an absence of 47 days, at 0755 hours0.00874 days <br />0.21 hours <br />0.00125 weeks <br />2.872775e-4 months <br /> until 0834 hours0.00965 days <br />0.232 hours <br />0.00138 weeks <br />3.17337e-4 months <br />, approximately three hours prior to chemical testing. The review of activities during the employee's absence was accomplished on August 3, 1993.
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement III).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Carolina Power and Light Company is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C.
20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region II, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector at the facility that is the subject of this Notice, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice). This reply should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation:
(1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or Demand for Information may be issued as to why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken.
Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given te extending the response time.
Dated at Atlanta, Georgia this 1st day of October 1993 l
9310130101 931001 PDR ADOCK 05000324 G
PDR l
_ _ - - _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _