ML20039G629

Qualification Document Design Verification Program for Power Ascension,Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant,Unit 1, PG&E Vols 1-3

ML20039G629
Person / Time
Site:	Diablo Canyon
Issue date:	12/31/1981
From:	STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORP.
To:
Shared Package
ML16340C207	List: ML16340C206 ML20039G624 ML20039G629
References
PROC-811231, NUDOCS 8201180528
Download: ML20039G629 (200)

Text

_

6-5288671-PR26 I

QUALIFICATION DOCUMENT DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM FOR POWER ASCENSION DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT - UNIT 1 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY I

I VOLUME 1 0F 3:

CORPORATE QUALIFICATIONS I

I I

I I

I I

I STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION I

I O201180528 820113 STONE & WEBSTER I

r" " "

" e

I STONE 6 WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION 245 SUMMER STREET, BOSTON. M ASS ACHU SETTS ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE To P.O. BOX 232L. BOSTON. M A SS. 02137 W U TELEX 94 0001 DOS T O N 940977 DESIGN Ngw VORK CONSTRUCTION o

gm M N YtONS I

CMlCAGO CONS U LTt N G MOUSTON ENG5NEERING gTg~,o,.OiGO~

W A SHINGTON. O C.

December 31, 1981 l

Mr. G. A. Maneatis W.O. No. 5288671 Senior Vice President - Facilities Development I

Pacific Gas and Electric Company 77 Beale Street San Francisco, California 94106

Dear Mr. Maneatis:

I QUALIFICATION DOCUMENT DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM FOR POWER ASCENSION DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR POWER _ PLANT - UNIT 1 Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation (Stone & Webster) is pleased to provide this Qualification Document for its participation in I

the Design Verification Program for Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant -

Unit 1.

The Qualification Document has been divided into the following three volumes:

Volume 1 - Corporate Qualifications I

Volume 2 - Approach & Organization Volume 3 - Demonstration of Independence Corporate Qualifications Stone & Webster's corporate qualifications are described in Volume 1.

This includes a description of Stone c: Webster's riuclear plant design and construction experience and capabilities; its corporatc resources; reviews it has performed of the work of others on plants in the engineering, design, and construction stage; Stone & Webs te r's I

support of operating plants, particularly those designed and constructed by other Architect Engineers (AE) and its Engineering Assurance capa-bilities.

Stone & Webster has been a leader in the development of nuclear power since its participation in the effort which resulted it I

initiating the first self-sustaining nuclear chain reaction at the University of Chicago in 1942.

The Corporation has been or is involved in the engineering, design, and/or construction of over 20 nuclear units, I

including reactors furnished by all f o'ir U.S.

reactor manufacturers.

Stone & Webster has been involved in the review of work by others on plants in the engineering, design, and construction stages.

These p roj ects have included assignments for Babcock & Wilcox Company, Power I

I 1

GAM 2

December 31, 1981 Authority of the State of New York, Georgia Power Company, New Brunswick Electric Power Commission, Washington Public Power Supply System, and Houston Lighting & Power Company.

The scope of these assignments has included design, schedule, and estimate reviews.

In addition, Stone &

Webster has performed backfits, modificiations, and support activities I

for many nuclear plants, including those designed and constructed by other AEs.

Approach and Organization Volume 2 describes Stone & Webster's approach to the design verification program, the project organization, and the qualifications of I

key personnel.

Resumes of these key personnel are included in Volume 2.

At the beginning of the program o detailed program plan will be devel-oped. This program plan will include:

a.

Criteria and their bases for selecting safety-related systems to be reviewed.

b.

The selection of the safety-related systems to be reviewed.

c.

The methodology for reviewing systems which have been chosen I

for review. This will include the criteria and their bases for the selection of a suitable number and type of sample calcula-tions to verify the adequacy and accuracy of the design process and for continuing the verification based on the initial results.

Once the sample safety-related systems have been selected they I

will be analyzed in depth to determine their ability to perform their safety related functions.

This review will include a review of their design bases and sample calculations.

Upon conclusion of the verifica-tion program, a technical report will be written which will give the I

results of the verification program; describe the methodology used; and assess the basic causes of any design errors found, their significance, and their impact on facility design. During the course of the verifica-tion program semi-monthly reports will be issued which will describe the status of the program.

I An experienced and capable proj ect team, headed by Mr. F.

Sestak, Jr. as Project Manager, has been assigned to the verification program.

Mr. Sestak is Stone & Webster's Chief Power Engineer.

During the period of the design verfication program, he will be relieved of all I

other duties ar.d will be assigned full-time to the p roj ec t.

Mr. Sestak has over 26 years of experience, including 13 years of nuclear experi-ence.

This includes experience with Westinghouse Nuclear Steam Supply Systems.

Mr. Sestak will report to Mr. C. O.

Richardson, an Assistant Engineering Manager, who will be Engineering Management Sponsor for the program.

In addition to Messrs. Sestak and Richardson, senior and I

experienced personnel have been assigned to the project as Lead Engineers and Consultants.

All of these Lead Engineers will be assigned full-time to the verification program as required.

Support and staff personnel required.

The consultants will will be assigned to each discipline as I

also be used on an as-required basis.

STONE & WEBSTER

-.______J

I GAM 3

December 31, 1981 Demonstration of Independence Stone & Webster will conduct the Diablo Canyon - Unit 1 Design Verification Program in an independent mannar.

Stone & Webster has conducted an internal review of its re co rds from January 1, 1975 to December 31, 1981, a period of 7 years, to demonstrate compliance with I

l the specific independence of this program.

Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation and its affiliated companies have performed an amount of work for PG&E since 1975 which represents only a very small portion of its business.

The only work Stone & Webster has performed on the Diablo Canyon plant is in the area of emergency planning and this does not involve any design work.

Neither Stone & Webster, Inc. nor any of its subsidiaries own a beneficial interest in PG&E.

Stone & Webster's I

Employee Savings Plan and Retirement Plan are administered by banks as trustees and the Retirement Plan holds only a small amount of PG&E bonds.

Also, all key technical personnel who will be assigned to the project will be required to sign a disclosure statement as to any beneficial interest by them or their immediate family in PG&E; as to any involvement they may have had in the design of Diablo Canyon; and as to any members I

of their immediate family working for PG&E.

The signing of this dis-closure statement will be a precondition to such personnel's assignment to the project.

Stone & Webster believes that the above demonstrate the independence of Stone & Webster's participation in the design verifi-I cation program. Demonstration of Independence is more fully discussed in Volume 3.

Terms and Conditions PG&E and Stone & Webster have in force a continuing services agreement (PG&E Contract No. 5-47-81 effective March 16, 1981) which has I

been used for Emergency Preparedness Assistance and related assignments in connection with the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant.

Stone &

Webster suggests the use of this Agreement for performance of the ser-I vices outlined herein in order to accomplish the work in the most expedi-tious manner.

Stone & Webster is prepared to start work on the Design Verif-ication Program upon your authorization to proceed.

If you have any questions or need additional information please call me at (617) 973-5552 or Mr. G. L.

Koppel at (617) 973-5274 and we will respond promptly.

Very truly yours,

[,,

Md J. N. White Vice President I

n,- -..

A

6-5288671-PR27 VOLUME 1:

CORPORATE QUALIFICATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS I

1.

NUCLEAR PLANT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE l

=

2.

CORPORATE RESOURCES 3.

ASSESSMENT OF WORK OF OTHERS 4.

SUPPORT OF OPERATING PLANTS 5.

ENGINEERING ASSORANCE APPENDIX A - Stone & Webster, Incorporated 1980 Annual Report APPENDIX B - Stone & Webster Experience and Capabilities I

I I

i I

I I

I I

I I

A n, -.......

I

6-5288671-PR12 SECTION 1 NUCLEAR PLANT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation (Stone & Webster) has I

been a leader in the development of nuclear power since its participation in the effort which resulted in initiating the first self-sustaining nuclear chain reaction at the University of Chicago in 1942.

The I

Corporation's experience covers projects ranging from nuclear research facilities to heavy and light water-moderated and gas-cooled nuclear power plants.

Stone & Webster assisted in the design of the first com-mercial-scale nuclear power plant in the United States at Shippingport, Pennsylvania, and later completed such pioneering proj ects as the Army I

Package Power Reactor, the Yankee Nuclear Power Station at Rowe, Massachusetts, and the Carolinas Virginia Prototype Nuclear Power Plant at Parr Shoals, South Carolina.

For the Carolinas Virginia Plant, Stone & Webster performed engineering and construction inspection for the only commercial heavy water-moderated pressure tube reactor to be constructed in the United I

States.

This demonstration plant had a net electrical output of 17,000 kW and generated over 200 million kilowatt hours before plant retirement in 1967.

For this plant, Stone & Webster conceived and I

designed a reinforced concrete containment now in common use on nuclear plants.

Since 1968, nine large nuclear generating units have been I

designed, constructed, and placed in operation by Stone & Webster.

Currently Stone & Webster is conducting work on 6 nuclear units in varying stages of engineering, design, and construction, totaling over 15,000 MW of capacity.

These nuclear plants include reactors furnished by four U.S.

reactor manufacturers pressurized water by Babcock &

I Wilcox Company, Combustion Engineering, Inc., and Westinghouse Electric Corporation; and boiling water by General Electric Company.

Table 1-1 lists representative nuclear power projects with which Stone & Webster has been involved.

I In May 1976, Stone & Webster was the first engineer-constructor to have its standard (reference) nuclear power plant design approved by I

the NRC.

This reference plant uses the Westinghouse 1,300 MWe RESAR-41 reactor.

Since then, the NRC has issued preliminary design approvals for a Stone & Webster reference plant that uses the 1,300 MWe CESSAR-80 reactor of Combustion Engineering, Inc.,

a plant that uses the I

Westinghouse 1,200 MWe RESAR-3S reactor.

Application for a reference plant using BSAR-205 1,300 MWe reactor of Babcock & Wilcox has been submitted to the NRC.

I A

n, _ _.. _

B

6-5288671-PR12 I

RECENT NUCLEAR POWER PROJECTS Power Authority of the State of New York - James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant The Power Authority of the State of New York selected Stone &

Webster to provide design and supervisica of construction of its 821 MW I

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant, located at Nine Mile Point, near Oswego, New York.

The plant employs a boiling water reactor and commenced operation in 1975.

Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation - Nine Mile Point Unit 2 I

Stone & Webster has been selected by Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation to perform engineering, design, and construction management for a General Electric boiling water reactor plant.

Construction of the 1,100 MW station began in 1975 and commercial operation is scheduled for I

1983.

Northeast Utilities Service Company - Millstone Point - Unit 3 Stone & Webster has been selected as Engineer and Constructor of this 1,100 MW nuclear unit at the Millstone Point site on Long Island Sound.

The unit utilizes a four-loop Westinghouse pressurized water I

reactor with a General Electric turbine. The once-through cooling system uses water from Long Island Souad.

A cor.straction permit was received in 1974.

I Duquesne Light Company - Beaver Valley Units 1 and 2 I

Stone & Webster was retained by Duquesne Light Company as Engineer-Constructor for the 883 MW Unit 1 of its nuclear power plant at Shippingport, Pennsylvania.

Stone & Webster is also providing engineer-ing and construction for the 883 MW Unit 2; Unit I was placed in opera-I tion in 1976.

Both units have natural-draft cooling towers for their circulating water systems.

Long Island Lighting Company - Shoreham Power Station - Unit 1 Long Island Lighting Company selected Stone & Webster as I

Engineers and Construction Managers for Shoreham Power Station - Unit 1.

During preliminary engineering, the unit size was increased from 540 MW to 820 MW.

Intervenors' objections delayed receipt of the construction permit for this unit until April 1973.

An underwater dif fuser has been I

designed for the circulating water discharge to minimize thermal impact on Long Island Sound.

Virginia Electric and Power Company - Surry Units 1 and 2 Stone & Webster was the Engineer-Constructor for two 819 MW pressurized water nuclear units located in Surry, Virginia.

The first I

unit was placed in operation in 1972 and the second in 1973.

I 2

STONE & WEBSTER I

6-5288671-PR12 I

Virginia Electric and Power Company - North Anna Units 1, 2, and 3 VEPC0 also retained Stone & Webster as Engineer-Constructor for I

two 938 MW pressurized water nuclear units (1 and 2) to be located in Louisa County, Virginia. One additional 975 FN pressurized water reactor (Unit 3) has also been authorized.

The reactors for Units 1 and 2 are provided by Westinghouse and for Unit 3 by Babcock & Wilcox.

Construc-I tion permits for Units 1 and 2 were issued in 1971 and for Unit 3 in 1974.

I Lake Anna was created by damming the North Anna River to form a large cooling reservoir. This man-made lake over 17 miles long with over 200 miles of shoreline is now a major recreational attraction.

Provi-sions were made for flood control and flow control of the North Anna I

River.

Gulf States Utilities Company - River Bend Units 1 and 2 I

I Stone & Webster is Engineer-Constructor for two 900 MW BWR nuc!mr units to be located in North Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

A con-struction permit was received in 1975.

Maine Yankee Atomic Power Station Stone & Webster was the Engineer-Constructor for the 825 MW Maine Yankee Atomic Power Station located at Wiscasset, Maine, the largest operating nuclear power plant in New England.

The plant uses a I

Combustion Engineering pressurized water reactor and was placed in operation in 1972, New York State Electric & Gas Corporation - Units 1 and 2 Stone & Webster was engaged by New York State Electric & Gas Corporation (NYSE&G) to engineer, design, and construct a two-unit I

reference Nuclear Power Station.

This utility was the first in the nation to choose a plant with all of its principal design features preapproved by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

The twin 1,250 MW I

units were to be jointly owned by NYSE&G and Long Island Lighting Company.

Commercial operation was scheduled for 1991 for Unit 1 and 1993 for Unit 2.

The PSAR, ER and State PSC applications had been submitted in 1979 when work was stopped due to problems with state permits.

Nuclear Italiana Reattori Avanzati (NIRA) - CIRENE-Latina Prototype Plant I

NIRA selected Stone & Webster to provide engineering services and consulting in design and construction of the Nuclear Island of the I

ClRENE prototype plant.

The plant, which is fueled with natural uranium moderated with heavy water and cooled with light water, has an electric power output of 40 MW.

Stone & Webster assistance includes design review, stress analysis and pipe support design of the piping systems I

within the containment, design of radioactive waste system, conceptual design of the radioactive waste building, and review of specifications and procedures.

3 STONE & WEBSTER I

6-5288671-PR12 I

Project Management Corporat. ion - Demonstration Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactor Plant I

Late in

1975, Stone & Webster was selected by Project general construction contractor for the Management Corporation to act as nation's first large-scale Demonstration Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactor Plant.

Project Management Corporation was organized by the I

utility industry in 1972 to build and operate the LMFBR plant.

In May 1976, management control of the Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant (CRBRP) Project was transferred from PMC to the U.S. Department of Energy I

(formerly ERDA) in recognition of the Government's larger financial commitment.

The plant will be located on the Clinch River at Oak ridge, I

Tennessee.

The selection of Stone & Webster from a field of eleven competitors was gratifying since construction of the plant will be complex and the quality control requirements are demanding.

I San Diego Gas & Electric Company - Sundesert Nuclear Station I

San Diego Gas & Electric Company selected Stone & Webster early in 1975 to design and construct two nuclear units of 975 MW capacity each at its Sundesert Nuclear Station.

Each unit was designed for high seismic conditions using an innovative containment mat design to reduce I

the requirements for excessive pipe / equipment seismic restraints.

Additionally, due to lack of adequate water supply at the desert site, unique station makeup water treatment systems using agricultural waste I

water were designed and proven through pilot plant operation.

Corres-pondingly, the station was also designed for zero liquid discharge from the site.

In 1978, San Diego Gas & Electric Company cancelled further effort on the project pending satisfactory resolution of several bills passed by the California legislature which inhibited further nuclear I

power plant construction in the state.

General Public Utilities Service Corporation - Forked River Nuclear Generating Station i

Stone & Webster was selected to provide construction management services for the two-loop, 1,120 MWe Combustion Engineering pressurized I

water nuclear power plant. This unit was subsequently cancelled.

Long Island Lighting Company - Jamesport Units 1 and 2 I

Stone & Webster was selected by Long Island Lighting Company to provide engineering, design, and quality assurance services and to assist I

LILCO in the construction management of Jamesport Nuclear Power Station -

Units 1 and 2.

The unit was subsequently canceled.

I I

4 stone a wresrun I

6-5288671-PR12 l

General Atomic Company / Gas Cooled Reactor Associates In the late 1960's, Stone & Webster was chosen to prepare I

several HTGR nuclear plant designs and cost evaluations for General Atomic.

In 1968, a Balance-of-Plant design for a 1,000 MWe HTGR was completed.

In the latter half of 1969, the Corporation developed a

I Balance-of-Plant design for a 1,100 MWe HTGR unit, updating the original design, and evaluated the competitive cost position of the HTGR versus those of other types of reactors.

Stone & Webster personnel are pro-viding engineering support services on future HTGR developr..en t on a I

continuing basis for General Atomic Company and Gas Cooled Reactor Associates.

Water Reactor Design Studies In addition to the work for utilities, reports and proposals for the Atomic Energy Commission (now the NRC) have been prepared by I

Stone & Webster.

These included a 250 MW Advanced Pressurized Water Rec.ctor Study, completed jointly with Combustion Engineering in 1959; a 400 MW Spectral Shift Control Reactor Study, completed jointly with I

Babcock & Wilcox in 1961; and a 1,000 MW Pressurized Water Reactor Study, completed jointly with Westinghouse in 1963.

Conceptual designs were prepared for Allis-Chalmers for several boiling water reactors.

SPECIAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITIES Licensing Experience with NRC Stone & Webster has prepared Safety Analysis Reports, as well as Environmental Reports, for submission to the Atomic Energy Commission, now the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, as part of license applications.

This work has included coordinating the preparation of the entire project with the owner and manufacturer, the preparation of technical sections, and final editing and reproduction.

In addition, Stone & Webster has prepared technical specifi-cations for operating license applications.

These specifications cover, I

in detail, plant system descriptions, equipment descriptions, operating parameters, general maintenance and operating instructions, and other special safety and engineering features.

During hearings en both construction permit and operating license applications, Stone & Webster personnel have assisted its clients I

at these proceedings by providing information and expert testimony on siting, containment, foundation and structural design (especially related to earthquake analysis and design), engineered safeguards, auxiliary systems, and radioactive waste disposal.

Continual contacts with regulatory agencies are maintained to explore the acceptability of new nuclear concepts of safety and relia-bility and alleviate licensing concerns.

I A

,_.m._

I 6-5288671-PRi2 Radiological Emergency Response Planning Stone & Webster's Radiological Emergency Response Planning I

Group has extensive experience in the field of radiological emergency response planning (RERP).

To address the current regulatory requirements concerning emergency planning, Stone & Webster maintains a multi-disciplined staff of management, engineering, scientific, and planning personnel with demonstrated expertise in emergency plan development and implementation, radiation monitoring, meteorological assessment, com-munications, accident assessment, evacuability determination, personnel accountability, plan exercise and evaluation, personnel training, public prompt notificiation systems, and federal regulatory liaison.

Stone &

Webster's staff activities include the review of emergency planning I

activities (state, county, local, and utility) with the Nuclear Regula-tory Commission (NRC) and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

This provides the necessary background to ensure that Stone & Webster prepared plans are responsive to NRC/ FEMA requirements.

Stone & Webster I

has also analyzed the potential radiological consequences of postulated accidents for Environmental Report (ER) and Safety Analysis Report (SAR) submittals.

In addition, Stone & Webster has developed corresponding I

detailed emergency plan implementing procedures for state and local government agencies.

I Stone & Webster maintains a complete library of work aids (e.g.,

generic plans for addressing the requirements of NUREG-0654, generic Emergency Plan Implementation Procedures, incident report mes-sages, responsibility matrices, questionnaires, prepared public announce-f ments, and detailed response procedures / checklists) that have proven to l

be an invaluable time saver in the developmental phase of a RERP.

ll Through modification of these work aids, site-specific information is obtained by Stone & Webster's staf f, organized in the desired format, and E

presented along with detailed implementing proceduces as a comprehensive RERP.

Containment Design Evolution The need to contain nuclear reactors has resulted in the development of a new technology.

Stone & Webster designed a spherical I

steel shell for the Yankee Nuclear Power Station containment at Rowe, Massachusetts.

Location of the Carolinas Virginia Test Reactor (CVTR) at an existing station at Parr Shoals, South Carolina, led to the use of a steel-lined concrete structure which would serve as shielding as well as I

containment.

The success of the CVTR containment was the basis for the choice of containment in Stone & Webster's design for the Connecticut Yankee plant at Haddam, Connecticut.

This 135 ft diameter cylindrical I

structure with a hemispherical dome serves the three-fold purpose of housing, containing, and shielding the reactor.

A further advance at Connecticut Yankee was the use of engineered safeguards required to n.eet I

AEC siting criteria. These facilities include a containment spray system and an internal air recirculation and filter system.

I A

6

,,_m....

6-5288671-PR12 I

Subatmospheric Containment In designing the Surry Power Station for Virginia Electric and I

Power Company, Stone & Webster refined the Connecticut Yankee design a system we call Subatmospheric Containment.

During normal developing operation, the containment atmosphere is kept at about 9.5 psi absolute pressure. This arrangement lowers the peak accident pressure for a given I

containment volume, lowers containment cost, and allows the subsequent.

return to subatmospheric pressure within a short period of time.

Containment for Boiling Water Reactor Plants A concrete pressure suppression containment (Mark II) was I

developed for the boiling water reactors at Shoreham Nuclear Power Plant of Long Island Lighting Company and at Nine Mile Point Unit 2 of Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation.

In this containment design, the conically shaped vapor barrier and strength member are constructed and function as a unit for a boiling water reactor plant.

For subsequent projects, we participated with General Electric Company in the design of the Mark III concept which includes a secondary containment structure and cylindrical concrete dry well and suppression pool.

These are surrounded by a concrete missile shield wall and roof.

Containment Computer Program Stone & Webster has developed digital computer programs to determine containment structure design parameters (design temperature, pressure, and size) and to evaluate the performance of engineered safe-guards, following a loss-of-coolant accident.

In these programs, the I

containment and safeguard systems are optimized by studying combinations of variables, such as coolant blowdown, heat sources and sinks, metal-water rcactions, and static and dynamic engineered safeguards (particle filters, fans, sprays, and safety relief).

These programs provide an I

analytical tool for nuclear safety analysis.

Other programs are avail-able for earthquake analyses, finite difference analyses for shell structures, tornado wind analyses, and high energy impact studies.

Nuclear Engineering I

The Nuclear Technology Division provides the technical services required for analysis, design, and other tasks usually referred to as Nuclear Engineering.

These involve nuclear safety systems, radiological engineering, radiological safety, nuclear fuels, nuclear wastes, and I

emergency response planning.

Radiation Protection The Radiation Protection Group at Str.ae & Vehoter is respon-sible for the radiation shielding, protection against radicactive efflu-ent release, and accident dose calculations. This group designs shield-I ing against fission products, activated crud, and N-16 activity in I

stone & WEBSTER

6-5288671-PR12 process streams.

In 1974, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, in Regula-tory Standard Review Plan 12.3, cited the Stone & Webster topical report RP-8, " Radiation Shielding Design and Analysis Approach for Light Water Reactor Power Plants," as a guide in determining acceptability of l

shielding designs being reviewed.

In its evaluation, the NRC concluded that "the topical report RP-8 is an irepo rtant contribution in the field of radiation shielding design."

The Radiation Protection Group also calculates the dosage required to demonstrate the acceptability of the site / engineered safety I

features combination under postulated accident conditions and calculates doses from normal effluent releases to individuals at the site and to the surrounding population, I

4 In addition, the group develops the requirements and provides

(

the procurement specifications for equipment to monitor area, airborne activity, process, and effluent radiation.

An extensive set of computer programs has been developed for this work.

These programs can calculate:

the activity of a mixture of radioisotopes after various periods of buildup and decay in the reactor core, reactor coolant, and auxiliary system components; the radiation shielding for any array of point line and volume sources; and t he radia-tion levels in the primary and secondary containments, in the control room at the site boundary, and at the low population zone boundary after postulated accidents for both water and gas-cooled reactors.

Radioactive Waste Disposal Of special significance is Stone & Webster's experience in the l

areas of liquid, gaseous, and solid radioactive waste systems, boron l

W recovery systems, and reactor cavity and fuel pool purification systems.

Stone & Webster continuously has retined its designs to provide I

systems that reclaim coolant and soluble poisons, facilitate the safe disposal of radioactive waste materials, and minimize operating expenses in these areas.

Typical of this developraent effort are low pressure cascade-type waste gas handling and disposal systems, waste gas recom-i biner systems, and a two-stage liquid-treating evaporator complex to reclaim or dispose of soluble poisons or coolant.

Nuclear Auxiliary Systems The nuclear plant has many systems which support the reactor I

and the primary heat transfer system.

Stone & Webster has developed detailed designs for the following system through three generations of nuclear plants:

I Spent Fuel Pool Cooling and Purification Waste Treatment and Disposal I

Charging and Volume Control Residual Heat Removal I

A 8

._m..,_

Chemical Treating Auxiliary Cooling Coolant Makeup I

Containment Purification Sampling Leakage Rate Testing Ventilation Purging Basic Services for Nuclear Auxiliary Systems I

Instrument and Service Air Vents and Drains Service Water Engineered Safeguards Containment Air Recirculation and Filtration Containment Spray Cooling Core Deluge or Spray Safety Injection The design effort required for the above systems includes basic process work, preparation of engineering flow diagrams, system process calculations, equipment sizing, preparation of system descriptions, I

equipment and piping layout, physical arrangement of equipment within I

buildings, and the preparation of detailed purchase specifications for all equipment, piping, valves, instrumentation, and controls in accor-dance with the applicable ASME codes.

Engineering Mechanics In all nuclear power plants, special mechanical devices are needed which are not readily available on the open market.

Among these are fuel handling devices and special equipment supports.

The reactor containment presents challenges in connection with the design of liners, penetrations, and hatches.

Stone & Webster has a division of engineers with extensive experience in this specialized area of mechanical analysis and design.

They are responsible for the detailed design and stress analysis of piping and supports, steaa generatcr I

supports, steel containment vessels, steel liners for reinforced concrete containers and vessels, large equipment and personnel hatches, and other related reactor plant equipment.

Their work encompasses the preparation of specifications, the selection of fabricators, assistance to suppliers I

in the solution of fabrication problems, and assistance in supervising field erection.

I The Pipe Stres> Analysis and Support Section within the Engi-neering Mechanics Division provides a broad spectrum of services in the area of pipe stress analysis and pipe support design, in accordance with

6-5288671-PR12 I

I applicable Codes, Regulatory Guides and Client Specifications.

In addition to basic design and analysis, these services consist of staffing with qualified personnel, development of technical criteria, providing I

analytical tools, such as in-house computer facilities and codes and preparation of calculations which demonstrate system / component accepta-bility to specified requirements.

The Section also provides services related to fabrication, procurement, installation and as-built inspection of piping systems, components and supports.

Seismic Engineering An extensive background in the field of seismic engineering has been developed by Stone & Webster's engineers.

This experience was generated through the design and construction of nuclear power plants, I

fossil-tueled power stations, hydroelectric facilities, and industrial plants.

Earthquake engineers have also made a substantial contribution to the industry through membership on technical committees and publica-tion of many technical papers on seisrr,ic engineering.

Engineering Models Scale models have been prepared for many of Stone & Webster's major nuclear p roj ects.

The models have been very useful in the engi-neering, design, and construction of the plants, since they provide a visual display of the actual designs.

They also serve as additional checks against piping and equipment interferences, and in the field they aid construction planning and coordination.

The models are also useful in operator training and in des-cribing how maintenance and movement of heavy equipment can be accom-plished.

Working scale models now are constructed routinely.

Display I

models can also be prepared by our specialists.

Construction sequence models have been utilized to verify the benefits of modularized structural and mechanical subsystems.

I I

I I

10 STONE & WEBSTER

M M

M M

M M

M M

M M

M M

M M

6-5288671-PR13 TABLE l-1 STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION REPRESENTATIVE NUCLEAR POWER PROJECTS Completion Client & Location Project /Statior MW Type and Mfr.

Services Provided 1957 Alco Products Incorporated Army Package Power 2.5 Engineering e.nd Construction (AEC/U.S. Army)

Reactor 1957 Westinghouse Electric Shippingport 90 PWR-W Architect.-Engineer for Co rpora t ion /Duquesne Nuclear Plant Light Company 1960 Yankee Atomic Electric Yankee-Nuclear 185 PWR-W Engineering and Construction Company Power Station 1963 Carolinas Virginia Nuclear Prototype Nuclear 17 PWR-W Engineering, Design, and l

Power Associates, Inc.

Construction Liaison l

1968 Connecticut Yankee Atomic Connecticut Yankee 600 PWR-W Engineering and Construction l

Power Company Atomic Power Plant l

1969 Niagara Mohawk Power Nine Mile Point 590 BWR-GE Management of Construction Corporation Unit No. I 1972 Virginia Electric and Surry Power 819 PWR-W Engineering and Construction Power Company Station No. 1 1972 Maine Yankee Atomic Power Maine Yankee 825 PWR-CE Engineering and Construction Company Atomic Power Station 1973 Virginia Electric and Surry Power 819 PWR-W Engineering and Construction Power Company Station No. 2 1975 Power Authority of the Jan.es A.

821 BWR-GE Engineering and Construction State of N.Y.

FitzPatrick Management stour a wrestan 1 of 3

M M

M M

M M

M 6-5288671-PR13 TABLE 1-1 (CONT'D)

STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION REPRESENTATIVE NUCLEAR POWER PROJECTS Completion Client & Location Project / Station MW Type and Mfr.

Services Provided 1976 Duquesne Light Company Beaver Valley 1 883 PWR-W Engineering and Construction 1978 Virginia Electric and North Anna 1 938 PWR-W Engineering and Construction Power Company 1980 Virginia Electric and North Anna 2 938 PWR-W Engineering and Construction Power Company A

Duquesne Light Company Beaver Valley 2 883 PWR-W Engineering and Construction Management J

GPU Service Corporation Forked River 1 1120 PWR-CE Construction Management Gulf States Utilities River Bend 1 940 BWR-GE Engineering and Construction Company Gult States Utilities River Bend 2 940 BWR-GE Engineering and Construction Company Long Island Lighting Shoreham 1 820 BWR-GE Engineering and Construction Company Management Niagara Mohawk Power Nine Mile 1100 BWR-GE Engineering and Construction Corporation Point 2 Northeast Utilities Millst-r e 3 1100 PWR-W Engineering and Construction Service Company NOTE:

Asterisk denotes on going project.

stone & WresTER 2 of 3

M M

M 6-5288671-PR13 TABLE 1-1 (CONT'D)

STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION REPRESENTATIVE NUCLEAR POWER PROJECTS Completion Client & Location Project / Station MW Type and Mfr.

Services Provided U.S. Department of Energy Clinch River l

(formerly ERDA)

Liquid Metal Fast 350 Construction Management Breeder Reactor l

I Virginia Electric and North Anna 3 975 PWR-B&W Engineering f

Power Company STONE & WEBSTER h

3 of 3

6-5288671-PR2 SECTION 2 CORPORATE hESOURCES Staffing and Personnel Resources I

Support personnel will be assigned from appropriate divisions within Stone & Webster to assist those individuals identified in Section 2 of Volume 2.

The resource pool available to complete the required staffing includes over 6,500 engineers and designers out of a total technical staff of approximately 10,000.

Stone & Webster expects to fully staff the project with the required personnel in a timely manner.

WASHINGTON OFFICE I.

The Stone & Webster organization includes a Washington, D.C.

office.

Its primary function is to provide support services across the full spectrum oi corporate programs as they relate to federal government activities.

The professional staff in the office has expertise in the I

executive, legislative, and regulato ry activities of the federal government.

This experience and expertise is used on a continuous basis to establish and maintain liaison with pertinent federal agencies and staff, and to develop current, accurate information for all corporate offices.

FACILITIES Stone &

Webster's Headquarters and principal operations facility is located near the center of Boston's business district. This location allows ready accese to all

rail, subway, and ground transportation, and is within a 10-minute cab ride to Boston's Logan Airport.

Stone & Webster also maintains fully staf fed and functioning engineering centers in New York City; Cherry Hill, New Jersey; Denver, Colorado; and Houston, Texas.

These centers have facilities for total I

project handling.

Computer, telecopier, and other ties between Headquarters and these centers provide the rapid communication necesu.ry to Stone & Webster's operations.

COMPUTER FACILITIES I

The computer center ha an IBM 3033 MP system with 16 million bytes of storage ano an IBM 30 0 UP.

In order to provide the most economical services possible to clients this computer system is tied to an established electronic communication network in Boston, New York, I

Denver, Cherry Hill, Houston, London, Toronto, and Paris and Stone &

Webster's various construction sites.

These capabilities provide rapid, world-wide information transfer.

I I

A n_. m.._

I 6-5288671-PR2 MATERIALS AND MATERIALS PROCESSING LABORATORY Stone & Webster's Materials Engineering Division maintains a I

laboratory to provide services for projects, clients, and/or other Stone

& Webster organizations.

The following services are available in this laboratory:

Metallographic Material Processing I

Corrosion and Chemistry Nondestructive Testing Protective Coatings ACOUSTICS AND VIBRATION LABORATORY Stone & Webster maintains an advanced Acoustics and Vibration I

Laboratory containing field portable instrumentation which offers multiple chaanel signal recording and dual channel real time narrow band frequency analysis capabilities.

A full complement of transducers are available including:

accelerometers, seismic velocity

pickups, noncontact proximiter probes, load cell, optical shaft position and speed pickup, condenser microphones, and dynamic pressure.

A complete data I

acquisition and analysis system can be quickly and efficiently set up so that data are analyzed at the time of the measurements to identify the problem quickly and minimize any disruption of normal operations.

Computer modeling using advanced finite element programs developed by Stone & Webster is available to evauate structural, foundatica, or equipment changes to reduce vibration.

GE0 TECHNICAL LABORATORY An integral part of Stone & Webster's Geotechnical Division is I

a physical testing laboratory located in the basement of the Headquarters building.

The Geotechnical Laboratory is a 3,000-square ft.

area subdivided into compartments devoted to temperature, humidity, and dust control.

This complete testing capability within the Geotechnical Divi-I sion permits samples to be selected, test programs formulated, and test results reported with a minimum loss of time and a maximum understanding of the objectives and the results of the testing.

TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER Stone & Webster provides its employees with the appropriate I

resources for keeping abreast of relevant technological and management techniques.

This Center is an active participant in the Special Libraries Association.

Stone & Webster is also a member of the MIT Industrial Liaison Program.

Reports and papers published by MIT may be acquired at no charge through the Center.

B 2

stour a wrestra I

j 6-5288671-PR2 l

1 The Center can also perform computer searches in any subject area through the Department of Energy RECON, the Defense Documentation Center, System Development Co rporation ORBIT, and Lockheed DIALOG.

a l

Foreign data bases can also be tapped as a resource.

All searches are i

performed by trained Center personnel. Access is quick and accurate with documentation always presented in bibliographic format.

CONTINUINC EDUCATION DEPARTMENT i

!!g The Continuing Education Department (CED) of Stone & Webster i E Provides professional educational services that are designed to serve the i

businesses in which SWEC and its clients are engaged.

They include mana-gerial, technical, and business programs designed for career development l

and personal growth for professionals.

Approximately 136 SWEC educa-l tional courses are currently available.

CED also designs a tailor made, l

technical skills development

program, such as a

program for instrumentation specialists.

i COMPUTER GRAPHICS Stone & Webster has developed, over the past five years, an interactive graphics computer system which is one of the most advanced j

systems available today.

Using specialized

software, the system ll integrates the development of a drawing from the first design idea ts the jE finished product.

l

!I i I lI 4!I

!I

!,I 4

b

!B 3

stour a wrestra 1

6-5288671-PR3 I

SECTION 3 ASSESSMENT OF WORK OF OTHERS Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation (Stone & Webster) has I

been involved in the review of work being performed by others on power plants in the engineering, design, and construction stage. The scope of these services includes design, schedule, and estimate reviews.

The following are major examples of these projects.

Indian Point Unit No. 3 In 1974 at the request of the Power Authority of the State of New York (PASNY), Stone & Webster investigated the engineering, design, construction, permits, operations, quality assurance, scheduling, and enviromental considerations in support of PASNY's purchase of the unit from Consolidated Edison Company of New York.

Using criteria set forth in the Final Safety Analysis Report I

(FSAR), AEC Safety Evaluation Reports, the Technical Specifications, and the Environmental Report, Stone & Webster assessed the following:

1.

The physical plant including Stone & Webster's opinions as to percent completion, operability, anticipated reliability, aspects of public safety, redundant features, and overall quality of work.

2.

The ultimate successful operability of the facility, giving particular consideration to such areas as:

permits and I

licenses required by government agencies; separation criteria; possible future retrofitted hardware; equipment support criteria for piping and cable trays; outstanding " apparent I

deficiency" items set forth in AEC/NRC records; operator training, availability and qualifications; interdependence with existing units at the Indian Point site; compliance with I

applicable codes; preoperational testing program status and adequacy; and ext ernal sources of power.

3.

Estimated dates for fuel loading and operation, supported by I

Stone & Webster's observations of construction completion, the preliminary operations progress status of procedures, and a network.

I 4.

Comments and observations regarding existing nuclear fuel contracts.

(A complete evaluation of the nuclear fuel contracts was the responsibility of PASNY.)

5.

Quality assurance program adequacy and compliance thereto.

6.

Facilities shared between units and an opinion ci the degree of l

desirable separation.

I A

s,__..,_

g

i I

6-5288671-PR3 I

7.

An estimate of the cost to complete the total facility, to be verified upon receipt of supporting data f rom Arthur Young &

Company and from PASNY.

Babcock & Wilcox In April 1975, The Babcock & Wilcox Company (B&W), Lynchburg, Virginia, requested Stone & Webster to provide technical assistance for a design audit of its German subs idia ry 's (Babcock-Brown Boveri Reaktor I

GMBH - BBR) Muelheim-Kaerlich (M-K) project.

The M-K plant uses a B&W 205 MW reactor plant and is owned by the German utility Reinisch-Westfaelisches Elektrizitaetswerk AG (RWE).

The project was approxi-l mately two years into design with the first concrete pour scheduled for E

June 1975.

Stone & Webster assembled a project team, prepared a sched-ule, and defined the audit tasks.

Tlie Stone & Webster project team was instructed to review designs exclusive of the nuclear steam supply system (NSSS) and the turbine plant.

Priority was placed on any item which could adversely I

affect the forthcoming concrete pours or the plant's constructibility, maintainability, or operability.

Areas which were determined to be over designed and excessive in construction costs were also identified.

Point Lepreau Generating Station Stone & Webster has been operating in support of the New I

Brunswick Electric Power Commission at the Point Lepreau Generating Station.

A team has reviewed the Commission's compliance to applicable Canadian Standards, evaluated completed and open work items and is I

assisting in the upgrading of systems and procedures and completion of work necessary to bring the station to commercial operation.

Stone &

Webster provided engineering support to the Commission fo r the preparation of operating license documents for submittal to the AECB.

Washington Public Power Supply System (WPPSS)

Stone & Webster was engaged by WPPSS to assess the accuracy of the 1980 revised estimates for five nuclear power plants under construction.

This assessment, including the review of schedules, cost I

estimates, progress to date, and remaining work to complete the review, and culminated in both oral and written reports to the WPPSS Board of Directors.

Vogtle Nuclear Generating Station Stone & Webster was engaged by Georgia Power Company to conduct an independent review of the Vogtle Plant construction schedule.

This review included an assessment of the construction sequence, scheduling and duration of the schedule based on Stone & Webster's experience in I

nuclear plant construction.

Stone & Webster also recommended innovative construction methods which might shorten the overall schedule.

I A

a,--....

I

6-5288671-PR3 I

Astoria Generating Station - Unit No. 6.

An investigation similar to that described above for Indian Point 3 was also conducted at Astoria 6 (825 MW, oil fired), then about 50% complete, in support of PASNY's purchase of that unit from Consolidated Edison.

Subsequent to the investigation, Stoac & Webster was retained for construction management responsibility and completed the I

unit.

South Texas Project Stone & Webster has completed an estimate evaluation of the South Texas Proj ect for the Houston Lighting and Power Company.

The work included a slippage analysis of cost and scheduling delays in response to questions raised by the Texas Public Service Commission.

The final report is in the process of being written.

lI

I I

. I I

'I iI

I I

I iI A

il 3

I 6-5288671-PR14 I

SECTION 4 SUPPORT OF OPERATING PLANTS Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation (Stone & Webster) has I

been engaged in performing

backfits, modifications, and support activities to many operating nuclear plants, both those designed by Stone & Webster and those designed by other AE firms.

Table 4-1 is a partial listing of operating nuclear plants for which Stone & Webster has I

provided such services.

The following are operating nuclear plants designed by other AE firms for which Stone & Webster has provided these services:

I Pilgrim 1 Point Beach 1 and 2 I

Fort St. Vrain Cooper Salem 1 Indian Point 3 I

Oyster Creek Vermont Yankee Zion I

Ft. Calhoun Millstone 1 and 2 Prairie Island q

Monticello.

By the r.iture of the support provided by Stone & Webster to many of the above operating plants, safety-related systems designed by other AE firms are reviewed as to their design basis and function. Table 4-2 lists some of the backfits, modifications, and support activities that have been performed by Stone & Webster for various operating nuclear plants designed by other AE firms.

I I

I I

I I

A I

M M

M M

M M

M M

M M

M M

M M

M 6-5288671-PR4 TABLE 4-1 STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION PARTIAL LISTING OF MODIFICATION AND/OR RETROFIT SERVICES TO OPERATING NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Type Client & Location Project / Station and Mfr.

Services Provided Boston Edison Company Pilgrim 1 BWR-GE Continuing Service Virginia Electric and Power Surry 1 PWR-W Continuing Service Company Virginia Electric and Power Surry 2 PWR-W Continuing Service Company Virginia Electric and Power North Anna 1 PWR-W Continuing Service Company Virginia Electric and Power North Anna 2 PWR-W Continuing Service Company Power Authority of the State James A. FitzPatrick BWR-GE Continuing Service of New York Northeast Utilities Company Connecticut Yankee PWR-W Continuing Service Northeast Utilities Company Millstone 1 BWR-GE Specific Tasks Northeast Utilities Company Millstone 2 PWR-CE Specific Tasks Maine Yankee Atomic Power Maine Yankee PWR-CE Specific Tasks Company Niagara Mohawk Power Nine Mile Point Unit 1 BWR-GE Specific Tasks Corporation STONE & WEBSTER

M M

M M

M M

M M

M M

M M

M M

M M

M 6-5288671-PR6 TABLE 4-1 (Cont'd)

Type Client & Location Project / Station and Mfr.

Services Provided Nebraska Public Power Cooper BWR-GE Continuing Service District Cnr.aha Public Power Fort Calhoun PWR-CE Continuing Service District Commonwealth Edison Company Zion BWR-CE Miscellaneous Tasks Wisconsin Electric Power Point Beach 1 & 2 PWR-W Specific Tasks Company Duquesne Light Company Beaver Valley 1 PWR-W Continuing Service Northern States Power Prairie Island PWR-W Continuing Service Company Northern States Power Monticello BWR-GE Continuing Service Company Public Service of Colorado Fort St. Vrain HTGR-GA Continuing Service Public Service Electric &

Salem 1 PWR-W Miscellaneous Tasks Gas Company Power Authority of the State Indian Point 3 PWR-W Miscellaneous Tasks of New York Vermont Yankee Nuclear Vermont Yankee PWR-GE Miscellaneous Tasks Power Corp.

Jersey Central Power &

Oyster Creek BWR-GE Miscellaneous Tasks Light Co.

srons a wassran 2

6-5288671-PR28 1

TABLE 4-2 PARTIAL LISTING OF BACKFITS, MODIFICATIONS AND SUPPORT I

ACTIVITIES FOR OPERATING NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS ENGINEERED AND DESIGNED BY OTHER A/E's Client and Station Scope of Work NORTHEAST UTILITIES SERVICE COMPAhT BERLIN, CONNECTICUT Millstone 2 Addition of condensate polishing system.

Millstone 1 and 2 10CFR50 Appendix I Study.

State emergency plan for Millstone site area I

and LOCA dose calcula-tions.

BOSTON EDIS0N COMPANY I

BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS Pilgrim 1 Performing engineering I

and design and/or providing studies and support in the following areas:

Scram discharge volume Dry well temperture reduction Condenser tube sheet cathodic protection Torus inspection I

protective coating Prompt notification and I

alerting system Appendix J 1eak rete test Implementation of Appendix R fire I

protection STONE & WEBSTER

6-5288671-PR28 I

TABLE 4-2 (CONT'D)

Client and Station Scope of Work

~ I FSAR updating i

l Auto restart R.G. 1.97 assessment C0 dump test in cable spreading room Reactor building crane analysis I&E Bulletin 79-01B I

Snubber evaluation program i

recirculation nozzle shields Assisted in the evaluation of plant's health physics facili-I ties j

Assisted preparations for erection of health physics prefab struc-j ture Prepared 17 procedures as preparation for removing the main condenser tubes and the i

installation of new titanium tubes Prepared the valve testing section of the Inservice Inspection I

Program in accordance with the requirements of ASriE XI Summer Subsection IW Engineering, design, I

planning and field assistance for radwaste system modifications I

A 2

6-5288671-PR28 TABLE 4-2 (CONT'D)

Client and Station Scope of Work Engineering, design, planning, and field I

assistance for fuel pool filtration system modifications Developed procedures for spent fuel rack ceplacement Evaluation and recom-mendations for radwaste I

tank modifications Scheduled maintenance I

activities for a planned outage I

NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY Prairie Island Prepared an engineering study evaluating I

problems associated with the containment and auxiliary building I

ventilation systems.

Upon completion of the study, prepared engi-I neering modifications of the ventilation system.

OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT Fort Calhoun Provided engineering I

services for the design of a plant security system.

Provided engineering services for modifica-tions to the solid radwaste system.

Provided engineering I

modifications for upgrading the plant fire protection system.

I A

n, -........

I

6-5288671-PR28 I

TABLE 4-2 (CONT'D)

Client and Station Scope of Work Performed an engi-neering analysis of the pressurizer relief system.

Performed an engi-I neering analysis of the irradiation sample cask I

Performed a study evaluating the plant ventilation system and prepared modification recommendations.

I WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY WISCONSIN MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY Point Beach 1 & 2 Engineering, design, and planning to increase the cooling capacity of the spent fuel pool.

i 10CFR50 Appendix I Study.

1 Conceptual recommenda-l tions regarding blowdown evaporator

!g reboiler control g

system.

WISCONSIN PUBLIC SERVICE CORPORATION Kewaunee On-site evaluation of the existing spare I

parts program, and presentation of a report documenting findings and recom-mendations. A draft plan for implementing suggested improvements I

will be provided.

Emergency planning assistance.

4 stour a wa oren

6-5288671-PR28 I

TABLE 4-2 (CONT'D)

Client and Station Scope of Work NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT Cooper Completed a study to determine the feasi-bility of adding reheat capability.

Prepared a study to determine the feasi-I bility of adding a steam reboiler to provide plant auxiliary steam.

Prepared and recommended modifications for the service water system.

Prepared and recommended I

modifications to the plant fire protection CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY Palisades Station Assisted corporate I

management write a station management j

program that included t

outage planning and

[

scheduling.

Provided on-site assistance during refueling. This assistance included coordination, scheduling, expediting I

and contractor liaison.

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS M.I.T. Research Reactor Review of documentation for modification to reactor to ensure it met QA program.

I I

A n,_.........

s

6-5288671-PR28 TABLE 4-2 (CONT'D)

Client and Station Scope of Work CONSOLIDATED EDIS0N COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC.

Indian Point 2 Study of condenser tube TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY TOLEDO, OHIO Davis Besse 1 Development of Corporate Outage Management Program for I

Nuclear and Fossil Units.

Assisted in the development and imple-I mentation of a detailed outage management system at Davis Besse 1.

PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPAhT Peach Bottom Units 2 & 3 Performed a maintenance procedures audit.

YANKEE ATOMIC ELECTRIC COMPANY Vermont Yankee Prepared 75 maintenance procedures and 9 admin-I strative procedures.

Also prepared the Station Maintenance Department training procedure.

Conducted a Spare Parts Management Study.

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO.

San Onofre Performed a spare parts management system study to determine whether or l I not a computer-based l

material manageraent system was justified for g

the San Onofre Nuclear 3

Generating Station.

i I l

A 6

n, m...... _

l l

6-5288671-PR29 I

SECTION 5 ENGINEERING ASSURANCE I

The Engineering Assurance Program at Stone &

Webstet Engineering Corporation (Stone & Webster) encompasses four primary areas.

First, the establishment of management systems and controls for the conduct of engineering and design activities; second, internal monitoring (audit) activities to evaluate compliance to and the adequacy of the management systems; third, procurement assurance activities with respect to engineering service suppliers as well as the engineering and design 3

activities of hardware supplies; and fourth, implementation of the Stone & Webster Problem Report System.

For this specific project, areas one and two apply.

Standard management systems and cont;,ls are developed and maintained by Engineering Assurance (EA) Division staff groups and are communicated to Project Engineering personnel in the form of Engineering Department procedures.

These procedures are implemented by the Project engineering team af ter appropriate customizing to suit specific Project and Client requirements.

Training, in the form of lectures and I

workshops, is presented to engineering personnel by the Continuing Educatica Group of the EA Division.

The audit activities are conducted by EA Division staff personnel who are completely independent of the Project team. Audits are conducted using traditional compliance methods for verifying implementation of management systems and controls and by selected (sample) technical reviews of the engineering product as a means to judge the adequacy of the management systems.

The Engineering Assurance Program implemented for this project will be consistent with the normal approach described above with the addition of evaluation activities unique to this project.

The overall engineering assurance strategy will encompass the following:

I Development of procedures and criteria for review of work.

I Development of the normally required project procedures to supplement Stone & Webster standard procedures.

Presentation of lectures and workshops with special emphasis on I

the unique aspects of the work.

Implementation of the normal internal auditing program to monitor both che standard and the Proj ect unique activities.

stoma a was ran

r I

I Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation Stone & Webster Engineering first commercialnudear station furnace for pmducing phos-Corporation has been provid-(at Shippingport, Pennsyl-phorous; the first plant to man-I inginnovativesoluEonstoengi-vania), the first subatmospheric ufacturepenicillin by thedeep neering, design and construc-containment, the first standard vat process;and significant tion problemsin the United nuclearplantdesign to receive achievementsin commercial-States and many othercoun-approvalby the NRC, the first izing pilot-plant processes for tries for nine decades. In 1890, NRC-approved nudearquality 2-ethyl hexanol,isopropynol Stone & Websterinstalled assurance program and con-and phenol. Stone & Webster l currentgeneratorsatSaccar-oneof the nation's first direct-structionmanagementof the isan acknowledgedleaderin first U.S. prototype fast breeder the technology forethylene appa, Maine,and a related1000 reactorare allStone & Webster production, cryogenics, petro-I line. In the 1920's, Stone &

volt direct-current transmission achievements.

leum refiningand other related Having built the first dam and hydrocarbon processes.

Websterconstructed the Caribou powerhouseon the Columbia Presently,over120 different Powerhouse, the firstinstalla-Riverat RockIsland, Stone &

materialsare producedin tionin the world to operate at Websteris now managing con-domesticand foreign process 165 kv,and the Conowingo strt.ction of the second power.

plantscompleted by the Dam and Power Station, the house there. Eight horizontal Engineering Corporation.

first to operate at 280 kv.The shaft bulb-turbines, each weigh-Today, Stone & Websterengi-first twocommercial500 kv ing150 tonsand rated at neers areinvestigating the transmission systemsin Amer-54 Mva,are beinginstalled.

possibilityof tidalpowerproj-ica were also designed and con-These bulb unitsare thelargest ects at Maine's Passamaquoddy structed byStone& Webster everbuiltand the first tobe Bayand Cook'sInletin Alaska; engineers. With the advent of employedin the United States.

developing the world's first extra high voltage (EHV)and Tosolve cooling waterproblems designs fora commercialpower ultra high voltage (UHV), the in Wyoming, Stone & Webster plant that willburn coalby I companydesignedandsuper-designed and is currently man-atmospheric fluidized-bed vised construction of a 460-750 agingconstructionof thefirst combustion;assistinganItalian kvexperimentalEHVline and large powerplantin the United engineering firmin thedesign l participatedinthedesignof a States to condense exhaust of a prototype nudearplant 1,000-1,500 kv UHV facility.

steamin a completely dry-that willbe fueled by natural During World WarI, Stone &

cooled system.

uranium, moderated by heavy Websterconstructed the Hog Over the years, Stone &

water,and cooled bylight l IslandShipyard, assembled Webster's service to the process water; studying the economics ships from prefabricated com-industries has alsoinduded of high-speed fault dearing to ponentsand built a city with some noteworthy technolog-eliminate massivecircuit complete facilities for35,000 icalachievements.These breakersand permit heavier workers.

indude thedevelopment of loads onlong-range transmis-Similarlv, Stone & Webster's pyrolysis technology for ole-sionlines;and studying the nudear' projects have been fins-aromatics manufacture; feasibilityof adding solar milestonesin thedevelopment the first plant for high-density generatmg equipment to pres-of nudear power. Construction polyethylene using the Phillips ent electricalsystemsin several of the entire city of Oak Ridge, process;the first plants for regions of the United States.

Tennesseeand of the Oak Ridge alpha olefins and synthetic These varied projects areindica-electromagnetic separation ethanol;the first commercial tive of Stone & Webster's broad plant, the firstlarge-scale facil-chemi-groundwood pulp mill; capabilitiesand commitment ity for U5 production, was the first high-capacity electric to helpimprove thequalityof done by Stone & Webster.The life throughout the world.

l

l

!I

!I lI A totalengineesing capability also done significant develop-I Stone &Websterprovidestotal-areas of design, including con-ment workin many critical project services from one source.These services range tainment, transient analysis, j

g frominitialsystemplanning safeguardsand radioactive 5 throughsiteselectionandeval-waste handling. We havelarge uation, engineering, design, specialtygroups engaged in I construction,testingand start-up to finalcommercial radiation-shielding and health-

~

1 y

physics calculations, stress i

l Operation.

/

analysis and comprehensive Inallof theseserviceswecon-design review of numerous tinuously evaluateand stnve auxiliary systems supporting j

to make the most efficient use the reactorand primary heat-of new methods, processes and transfersystem.

l materials.The overriding objec-Standard plant design tiveis to complete power plants In April 1974, Stone & Webster j

e -and the many other types of was the first engineer-i g facilitieswecontracttobuild-Nuclearpower constructor to apoly to the i

on schedule, within budget Stone & Websterhas been Nuclear Regulatory Commis-and to ourclients' satisfaction.

actively engaged in nuclear sion forapprovalo'f a reference l

Stone & Websteris organized engineering, design and con-nuclear plant design.This l

and staffed so thatit canadjust struction sinceits participation standardized design is appli-l to the wishes of a wide range of in the first reactorproject at the cable toa significant numberof l clients.Wecan takeon complete University of Chicagoin 1942.potentialnudear power plant l

project responsibility-oradapt We provided the engineering sitesin the United States and toalmost any otherarrange-and basic design for the first can utilize most of thelarge I ment,renderingservicesunder commercial-scale nuclear light water reactors currently a varietyof contractual terms.

power plantin the United acceptable to the NRC under Ourprincipalassets States at Shippingport, Penn-its standardization program.

We considerour principalassets sylvania-completed in 1956.

A numberof variationsof the tobe:thegood willof pastand This work supplemented the Stone & Webster reference P ant design havei een l

presentclients;the high quality services provided by the reactor-system supplier. Since approved by the NRC.

I of ourservices;and,mostim-portantly, theintegrityand then, we have furnished engi-ability of our people.

neering, design, consulting Two 819 Mw PWR nuclear units I

and construction services for on Virginia Electric and Power many other major nuclear company's system at surry, stati$ns.

Virginia (next page)

Stone & Webster has had exten-sivelicensing experience with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. We have prepared I

overa hundred Safety Analysis i

Reports and Environmental j

1mpact Statements. We have

I I

Il I

M

.Y k e'.

, M@lM Ai g

• i%.J;;

rp e s,r JL?as fh fa 3y p/

,, p.

w s,.2

~

s ij

!M f.ggy p;iEsMp

• g

-..i :~

m

' ' ~;,[L; g f, g y a ' A k 4Il @ l k b 2 aI (l.. 'p n -::

s

-4 3

?

..~ ~ __

~.==w e M T M N ]*g G.

sw.

3

> #L

^h

..cw ai.h 7.. ' ~.

N

'M

.~

e y

. Jn

_~ --

~

^^h IE

b.,, "

g

. -ser F

a 5

D M'h

~ _

'k o

. w. m.

m i

a 4

~

{m's,

'?

o p

,3,,

3

.w

\\

M

• ._p

~ ' *

,,O "A

g,

<g.1

-s-

.4

=

-,.,'^.

,g

?'

4,

• f

,Y,,

s.

n 4v'V..

b*

4 4

c

4 Stone & Webster, Stone s mbster provides engineering, design, con-s+ruction and consultmg services to energy indus-3

{

Incorporated tnes and io comnames that eevelop and produce chemicals, pharmaceuticals, food and beverages, 1980 AnnualReport and industnal goods. The Company participates 1n oil and gas production, contract drillmg, real estate and cold storage operations Stone &Mbster is w:dely recognized for its ability to solve complex prcblems through the efforts ofits sh!1ed personnel in diverse technological and managerial disciphnes.

i i

i l

i i

l 4

l Contents 2 Chairman'sLetter 4 TheYearinReview 31 FinancialSection 44 CorporateInformation 44 DirectorsandOfficers

}

1

Tb Our Stockholders 80s opened with Stone & Webster purpose-fully positioned at the focal point of the cnicial and Employees energy issues and challenges that w111 requ1re our best problem-solving capabihties and broad experi-ence for the rest of th1s century Stone & Webster is one of a small number of fums I

capable of plaiming, engineenng and constructing the hnds of facities that will be required 1f this na-tion is to meet its energy demands in the coming l

t decades The key factors that make up the energy 4

9 1ssues-the sources, cost, rehabthty and safety of our L*

^

.g energ'f supphes, as well as protection of the envuon-ment-are paramount concerns of this nation and its people, and also closely reflect the broad scope of services Stone & Webster provides.

FinancialHighlights On January 21,1981, the Board of Duectors declared a hvo-for-one stock spht m the form of a 100% stock dividend pai able February 27,1981, to stockholders

%g~~ '

of record at the close of busmess on February 2, 1981. Accordmgly a!! per share figures and sr are amounts in this report are stated on a post-spht i

basis.

High demand for Stone & Wabster's services was re-I flected in the results for 1980, a record breahng I

year. Gross earnings last year increased to

=

,e +

, 7

$258,110,000, a gam cf $68.971,000 over 1979. Nc t in-

,p come rose to $37,214,000, or $4 97 per share, from

[

the precedmg year's $22.058.000, or $2.75 per share, l

" w A

,j of which $397,000, or $ 05 per share, resulted from j

the sale ofinvestment secunties. Eamings per share l

'N are based upon the average number of shares out-l sandmg in each year-7,488,000 m 1980 and 8,016,000 m 1979.

The regular quarterly dmdend was maintamed, and an extra dividend of 25 cents per share was paid in r

November 1980 This brought total payrnents for the i

year to $162% per share, compared with $137% in 1979.

i Further deta11s on 1980 earntngs compared with l

pnor years can be found on page 32 in Manage-i ment's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Cond1-l tion and Results of Operations.

)

Operating Highlights Power generation projects-both fossil and nuclear

-continued to be Stone & Webster Engmeenng Corporation's major field of activity 1n 1980. In addi-t 2

tion, industrial projects, many related to energy and to this geographic area. We also have increased our envuonmental needs, brought activity in this sector marketino afforts in Central and South hnerica aM to its highest level in many years. Significant acnvity contmue achvityin the procer:s field in Africa anc ne also took place in the petrochemical and other pro-Far East.

cess industries In the synthetic fuels area. our com-During the year, Stone & Webster Management Con-bined expertise in the process and energy fields sultants reorganized to position for expected growth places Stone &Vhbster in a strong position to suc-in the decade ahead. Consulting centers were cessfully compete for these projects.

strengthened in Denver, Houston and New York thus i

A part of our 1980 income was derived from retro.

providing full service to regional clients. In addition, fitung existmg nuclear plants to meet more stnngent a natonal marketing organization was formad, and safety requuements established in 1979 When we corporate headquarters was moved from New York to Boston.

have better pubhc understandmg of the relative safety of vanous forms of energy and more realistic In summary 1980 was the best year in our 91-year i

reculations, construcnon of new nuclear power gen-history We are proud of the contnbution we have err.ng stanons should resume.

made to the energy and engmeenng fields. With the continued support of our stockholders and the i

?he conversion of oH-fired electric generatmg sta~

capabihties of the thousands of members of our tions to coal also contnbuted to Stone & Webster's organization, Stone & Webster will contmue with 1980 income. Coal is an important energy resource.

confidence and integrity to perform our fuH share of Techmques we are developing to enable coal-bum-the task ahead.

mg plants to meet current clean air standards will have many applications in the years ahead The trend to coal will contmue, we beheve, because of A

/_

the ongoing need to reduce dependence on oil and

1. d' ge/g i

i because of the cost competitiveness of coal and its wide avadabihty Raymond C. Foster i

In 1980, Congress estabhshed the US. Synthetic Chairman of the Board Fuels Corporation to give financial encouragement and President to the pnvate sector in building commercial synfuel production facHities, and ambitious goals were es-tabhshed for the production of synfuels equivalent to two million barrels of oil a day by 1992= Stone & W3b.

February 18,1981 ster has the expertise to design and budd these I technologically complex projects, and has joined a number of groups that are workmg on studies for major synfuels projects that have received govern-ment fundmg.

We expect conimued emphasis in oil and gas explo-I ration and development in North America. Stone &

Vhbster has severalimportant stakes in onshore and offshore exploranon in the United States and m Canada In addition, we are active in contract drilling services in Texas. Return on these operations was excellent m 1980 On the international scene, projects from Middle Eastern governments provided major work for Stone &VAbster in 1980. The economic importance I of theregionencouragesacontmuationof attention l

3 l

~

ggygg g S tone & Webster Engineering Corporation Coal took a leadmg role m major energy projects Review awarded to Stone & webster enameenng Corpo-ration in 1980 as the nation moved to utilize its more than 400 billion tons of deposits. Coal was not only the fuel chosen for most new utthty and industnal proj-ects, but it was also the feed selected for an array of synthetic fuels plants proposed to reduce oil imports before the end of the decade.

Among new Stone & Wabster coal power projects is a two-urut station for Houston Lightmg & Power Company Each urut wtll produce about 690 mega-watts. Stone &%bbster will engmeer and design the station for firing with hgrute, a low Bru coal. Another award was for two 500-megawatt uruts proposed by Pubhc Service Company of Colorado The utihty se-lected Stone & Webster as engineer and constructcr l

and has authorized preluninary engmeeruig.

Most coal stations under design at Stone & Webster incorporate feamres of our reference fossil plant l

that should contnbute to significant increases m on-hne avai!abity We also have been concentratmg on Improvmg the performance of existing coal power l

plants across the country Through a comprehensive upgradmg program, we have been able to increase availability-in one case by a dramatic 25 percent.

As fer new plants, an exceptiona! 92 percent avail-g I

abihty was achieved in 1980 at the 330-megawatt E

Wyodak Station, a coal-fired plant in Wyommg's coal-rich, but and, Powder River Basin. Stone & %bbster E

i engineered and managed construction of this plant, g which features an innovative air-cooling system that muumizes water needs. Its owners, Black Hills Power and Light Company and Pactfic Power &

Light Company have awarded Stone & Webster the prehminary engmeering of a second air-cooled unit.

Power Plant Conversions Continue The move to convert power plants from oil to coal grew,largely due to government mandates and soaring oil prices. Stone & Webster contmued engi-neering and constructing the country's largest con-version-llSO megawatts at New England Power Company's Brayton Point Station-and received two new contracts. We will engmeer the conversion of four units, totahng S76 megawatts, at 'Ihmpa Electric Company's Gannon Station, and engtneer and con-4

{

' I struct the changeover of three units, totahng 132 i

megawatts, at Atlantic Electric Company's Deep-water Station. Two of the Atlantic Electric units

. ! cogenerate, that is, they produce steam for mdus-

. i tnal use in addition to electricity

}

y Many oil plants, however, cannot be readly con-h I

i verted. Burnmg coal-oil mixtures could be the l

" answer for some of these plants, and this concept is

. being tested. Gas-powered plants. opera'ing

%M i

throughout the Southwest, are even more difficult OS candidates for conversion. In these boilers, we are g-investigating the use of micronized coal which is l

pulvenzed as fine as talcum powder.

[

Increased coal consumption is not without its prob-o lems and protectmg air quahtyis an important concern. A task force of Stone & Webster speciahsts i

is workmg to improve scrubbers, the equipment

, which removes sulfur from stack gases, but which is costly and subject to operatmg problems. Stone &

" Webster also is aggressively pursumg new tech-nologies that hold promise for cleaner and more ef-m ficient coal power plants. One such technology that may be commercial m the near term is atmospheric

, fluidized-bed OFB) combustion. In this process, sul-fur is captured from bur rag coal wrdun the boiler, ehminating the need for scrubbers. A new AFB com-6 bustion process that could expand utthty and indus-h trial apphcation is being developed jomtly by Stone l

& Webster, Conoco Coal DeveloFment Company and an mdependent consultmg engineer. The key to 1

] this process is a circulation system that overcomes

.A several of the hmitations of current AFB boilers,in-cluding lack of response to load fluctuations and a i

[ comphcated coal feed control system. Stone & Web-

}

J ster contmues design and construction work on the countr/s two pilot plants demonsnating Cuidzed-

[ bed combustion technologies. One plant is ovmed i

i by the Department of Energy the second by the

'Ibnnessee Valley Authority l

i E Alternative Technologies Develop In adition to developmg advanced coal-burnmg y plants, Stone & Webster is working on a range of I

E alternative energy technologies. In futuristic fields, W"

l such as fusion and thermionics, we are contmuing

}

y study programs. In fields neanng commercial-

g.

g ization, such as geothermal and solar, we are s

1

&.I i

.S

designing and buildmg prototype facities. Solar i

ss/ stems capable of p7oducmg over 100 kilowatts each are being built for a high school m Massachu-setts and a shopping center in New Mexico These systems are two of the largest in the world usmg sili-con cells to convert sunlight directly mto electncity h

Stone & Webster alsc has received new contracts in ]

I the growing hydro-power and water resources a

w l

market.

}

y{

I Industries Look'Ib Replace Oil 5

k M ;u I

Like ut6 ties, industrial companies will have to Ie-

• E l

place the oil and gas that is now commonly bumed

~

[

in their boilers. Stone & Webster is studying con-l version to cheaper fuels, cogeneration, and various ways to mcrease fuel efficiency for the pulp and paper, iron and steel, chemical, petrochemical and oil refining mdustries. In 1980 we began prehminary ~

t engmeenng for the substitution of coal for oil m two boilers at Great Northern Paper Company's lar millin Maine and completed, at another Great North '

em mul, a power facihty that burns bark and other Under a coal transport contract with wood waste, savmg 400,000 barrels of oil each year.

Utah. Inc., Stone & Webster will design and build a 38-mile conveyor / rail system to hnk a Colorad mine with a proposed 400-megawatt power plant in Utah The railroad will be one of only four electnfied,

~

coal-carrying hnes in the United States.

j o

I Synfuels'Ib Help Reduce OilImports f

Congress passed the Energy Secunty Act in 1980,

']

committing the country to the production of syn-J thetic fuels equivalent to two million barrels of oil a day by 1992. There are less than ten companies in

]

the country considered to have the capabihty to de-u sian and build the super-projects regtured to meet l

this ambitious goal. Stone & Webster is one of them. ]

Wa have decades of expenence in both the power J

and process fields as well as the abity to manage large, technologically complex projects.

Stone & Webster is a member of a number of teams a that are recipients of Department of Energy fundmg for vanous synfuel studies The objective of most of 1

-6 these studies is to determine the feasibity of syn-J gd thesizing gas from coal. Others are concemed with 4cW producing ethanol from grains and solid fuels from E

P peat. Synfuels are produced primanly from coal, oil 3 shale, tar sands and biomass.

I

]

6

f!

i i Among the synfuel super-projects is one aimed at

" producing high-Btu gas and methanol egmvalent to 20.000 barrels of oil per day This has been pro-

- l posed by a group of 16 indusnies and utthties led by Northern Natural Gas Company Stone & Webster is G

., semng as architect-engineer for the project's feast-

bihty study This synthenc fuels complex would be

" built in North Dakota near hgnite deposits that would yp serve as feed for its gasifiers.

Q T.vo other major synfuels studies are with electric 1;

" utihties-Central Mame Povier Company and M

Florida Power Corporaton These studies are 3

g based on different approaches to an integrated gasification/ combined-cycle plant This type of plant

.. combines a coal gasifier with a power system thi

, sigmficantlyincreases plant efficienc'/ Coal;s pasi-

" fied and fed to gas turbmes and waste heat is recov-ered to dnve steam turbmes.

y A Nuclear Remains MajorPowerSource Nu ;1 ear power represents a significant segment of

} Arnerica'.; electrical producton. Despite the recent

-- heis ir new plant orders,we beheve nuclear power, along with coal, will contmue to be a prunary 9 source of electncity Stone & Webster is designing u and constructmg nuclear power plants across the country and a 900-megawatt project, Virgmia Elec-

' tric and Power Company's (Vepco) North Anna a Unit 2. came on hne m 1980 Another mapr ongoing nuclear project is construenon management of the Department of Energy's massive gas-centnfuge ura-l nium enrichment plant m Ohio.

Improved availabihty also is important for nuclear power. Stone & Webster has developed proprietary l

procrams aimed at keeping operating reactors on 3

hne. Our workin this area ranges from special pro)-

l

] Vepco's Surry Power Station to outage management ects such as the replacement of steam generators at l

1 support for the Davis-Besse plant of Toledo Edison

] Company and spare parts surveys for the khdland i Station of Consumers Power Company t

In related work, Stone & Webster is providng utih-ties with support services to meet new Federal regulatory requirements, many stemming from the e

accident at Three Mile Island Numerous plant mod-9 gg ifications must be made, ranging from improvement

. of control and instrumentanon systems to redesign of safety support systems. For states and municioal-2.

?'

s 27 j

J

itles, as well as utlhtles. we are p7epanng response procedures, which include pubhc warnmg and evacuation plans for use m possible nucles emergencies.

Stone & Webster also is providmg engmeenng e

assistance to Nanonal Nuclear Corpcranon Ltd. m y

j the development of a commercial fast breeder de-

[

sign for Great Bntam For the US breeder program, pp we are part of a consortium of firms completing y

design studies for a large plant, and we contmue as [

gy 1%

the construction contractor for the delayed demon-M8Il j

stration plant, the Chnch River Breeder Reactor.

Process Business ExpandsWorldwide A new process that promises to cut energy con-I sumption as much as 25 percent in mahng fuel-2 grade ethanol from grams Ms been developed by Stone & Webster This process uniquely mtegrates I

such energy-intensive steps as cochng, distillation andspent-graindrying Fuel-gradeethanol,com-monly called ethyl alcohol, is used in gasohol, which is a mixture of 10 percent ethanol and 90 percent

]

gaschne. Sold m service stations throughout the

.I United States, gasohol can extend petroleum sup-plies and provide a market for excess grains. A con "

i sortium of companies led by Mmnesota Alcohol Producers will use this energy-savmg ethanol pro-cess in a IS-milhon-gallon-per-year plant, using corn r as a feedstock, to be engmeered by Stone &

k Wabster.

In the methyl alcohol field, Stone & Webster's role m ~

a major Getty Oil Company project-a 100-milhon-o i

gallon-per-year methanol plant employing Lurgi

[

technology-was expanded m 1980 to include engi- ]

neering. procurement and construction This plant tI veill be built at Getty's Delaware iefmery I: v.C be the first methanol plant in the Uruted States to be fully 1

(

integrated with a retinerv operation.

,j Stone & Webster also began basic engmeenng on I

ethylene plant pyrolysis furnaces for Sanyo Eth Company of Japan and contmued to work on large ethylene complexes m the Repubhc of Smgapore and the People's Repubhc of China. Also, the Corpus ]

e Chnsti Petrochemical Company (CCPC) ethylene J g@,

plant was put mio production This plant, desigred M

and engineered by Stone & Webster, is one of the g

TD I

latgest ethylene units in the world and one of the E

i

.I r

f.

8

largest petrochemical complexes in the Uruted I

l

~ States. CCPC is a partnership of Champhn Petro-i chemicals, Inc., ICI Pets ochenucals Inc., and Soltex PetrechemicalsInc.

[

" Stone &Websterwdlprovidetechnicalsemcesto

, Petroliam Nasional Berbad (Petronas) for the design G

l,

~, and construction of an ammonia and urea plant to be buBt in Malaysia for the Asean group of countries, a p

.., Southeast Asia economic development group The yh

[

plant will produce 1000 metric tons of ammonia and 3

l

" 1500 metric tons of urea per day and its products wdl 1

be sold as fertihzer in Malaysia, Thadand and the

} Atlanta Gas Light Company for engineenng Phihppines Another significant new contract is with curement and construction advisory services for a j

liquefied natural gas (LNG) facihty to be budt in Georgia.

The refining industry is movmg rapidly to modify p

plants to conserve energy as well as handle heavier j

grades of crude od. Stone &Webste r has a number of new contracts in this area. One proact involves

) drotreater at an Amoco 00 Company oil re engmeenng and construction management for a hy-

] indiana Other newrefineryworkincludes th doubhng of the capacity of a Louisiana facihty owned by Calumet Refinery Company and the addition of an isomerization unit to a Texas refinery ovmed by

} Crystal Od Company Stone & Webster also will fur-nish engineermg and design services to Caltex Petroleum Corporation to replace a vacuum distil-

] lation tower for a refinery in Kurnell, Austraha, and J to modify an isomax unit for a refinery on Bahram Island in the Persiar Gulf. We also are worhng to j improve fluid catarytic cracking technology for a E Kansas refinery of 'Ibtal Petroleum Inc.

f' Projects in the Middle East and North Afnca domi-Stone & Webster Engineering Limited f

nated the business picture for Stone & Webster j

y Engineenng Limited in 1980 with assignments i

j launched or centinuing in Abu Dhabi, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Libya. The outlook for the region ap-

- pears promising as governments' five-year plans project heavy capital expenditures.

i One of the largest projects awarded during the year Je i

j was for an offshore gas processing facihty for the

{h.Q E Abu Dhabi National Oil Company-the second such 1

!l l,

tf 9

i

contract in receid years for Engineenng Limited.

The new facsiy will be part of a 10-legged, multi-i deck structure to be located in the Umm Shaif Field in the Arabian Gulf.

l In another country in the Gulf, the company success-O fully bid on a water injection P/ stem for increasing I

flow from existing oil wells and, in Saudi Arabia, we 5

are providing services on the development of fue 3

.y foam manufactunng facihties. In Libya, work contir g

yM(7 ued on the construction of the ethWene plant, utities g 1-e.V and offsite facihties for the Azzawiya Oil Refining WV Company at Ras Lanuf.

In Europe, several notable projects were in prog-ress or completed dunng the year These included the conceptual design of gas reception and pro-

• ]

cessing facihties for a United Kingdom North Sea

.]

gas field; a feasibihty study for a modular construc-tion olefin plant for Statoil in Normy; design.

engineenng, procurement and constru'-tion of g

condensate stabilization facihties for Total Oil Manne Limited at St. Fergus, Scotland, and services q for the National Nuclear Corporation Ltd. in the

'q United Kingdom.

Stone & Webster Engineenng SARL. (Pans) contin- "]

ued to provide marketing and procurement ser-J vices for overseas projects, a major one being an ethylene plant for Petkim Petrokimya of Turkey Stone & Webster Canada Limited Stone & Webster Canada Limited's 30th anniversary r

year was a period of major growth for the company due to considerable project activityin the power and process industnes The company has doubled its staffin the last two years and is in a position to handlelarcer and more complexjobs.

The power work consisted largely of pipe support

"]

and pipe stressing analysis for nuclear plants, an d

area in which the Tbronto-based company has de-veloped considerable expertise. We also worked on -]

a number of assignments for Atomic Energy of J

Canada Limited through CECO Consultants Ltd., a consortium engaged pnmarily in the nuclear y

power field and in which the Canadian company is

,j

. x..

O a partner.

ris

. W;s.

In the process area, major new projects were ob-l i?/ GD tained in 1980. One was for the revamping of a Shell 5 5

]

10

Canada refinery in Builsh Columbia to make it more energy-efficient and to handle different feedstocks.

Another process contract was for a grease manufac-l

~

will be completed in 1981. Other process work turing plant being built m Calgary Alberta,v;hich awarded by Shell Canada included waste heat l

boiler and flare-s'/ stem installadons.

In the industrial sector, several projects were car-

$11N <

j g ried out for The Algoma Steel Corporation, Limited, w?

j

,1 achent of13 years Theseprojectsincluded modi-

.tJ;jji fications to the 30"/50" rrulls, the commencement

'wa y of civil assistance for the =2 seamless tube mill l

J and other plant modifications.

{

The company remamed active internadonaEy m the

] fermentation alcohol sector with various projects

[

.A and studies underway Process design improve-i ments promise increased participation in this area-f.

Dynawest Projects Limited. the Calgary-based con-sortium of which Stone & Webster is a member, was f

} awardedanumberof assignmentsi a refinery umt foi Pa o-Canada. Dynawest activity is primanly directed at Alberta's energy sector, meluding tar sands and heavy oil development.

Stone & Webster Management consultants,Inc.

(

Stone & Webster Management Consultants. Inc.

reorganized in 1980 to position the company for j

growth m the decade ahead. This included fornung l

a national marketing organization, movmg corporate headquarters to Boston, and establishing full service consulting centers in New York, Houston and Denver.

The reorganization enables us to provide services to clients on a regional basis and simphfies ongoing recruitmg efforts y In 1980, major areas of business for Management 3 Consultants were data systems, energy manage-l ment, govemment regulation and operations management.

Data Systems The company significantly increased its profes-sional staff to assist clients m meeting the increased 9,%

i demand for efficient information handhng In addi-p tion, Management Consultants estabhshed a new f

.m group, Data Systems Consultants, spectahzing in 4.?-E computer-oriented inforrnation systems.

I}

i A

11

U EnergyManagem:nt In energy management, many of the projects cen-tered on the evaluation of fuel alternatives. These programs included overall economic study of fuel l'

j facihties and the risk involved with such operations,

~

market analysis for various types of fuel, transport of l raw matenals, and the regulatory and financial as-pects of fuels management. The Denver Consultmg Nf-Center, for example, assisted a major industnal j

I firm in estabhshing access to a reliable,long-term N[- [

}

power supply for a commercial venture in the

.j;.

l Pacific Northwest.

j Government Regulation Regulation was another major area during 1980.

The Houston Center expanded its services to energy-related industries and governmental en-l tities Former intrastate pipehne operators, needmg assistance in deahng v.ith Federal regulations as their systems became part of the interstate systems,..

were also clients.

~

The New York Center concluded a majcr project v.ith the Department of Energy in which technical and legal resource matenals were developed for use by the Department of Energy and the pubhc.

~

This effort was related to meeting the requirements of the Pubhc Utihty Regulatory Pohcies Act.

The New York Center also worked with chents on utihty rate and regulatory matters, load research pro-grams, and data fihngs to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Strategies for comphance with the Power Plant and Industrial Fuel Use Act were formulated by the Denver staff for a municipal electnc utihty Operations Management In the operations management area, the Denver

~

Center assisted the Electric Power Research Institute in documenting successful utihty apph-i l

cations of new equipment, prc, cesses and materials i

to help utihties in selecting new technologies. Also during the year, extensive marketing, financial, operational and construction manag tment reviews were picvided to a major supplier of air pollution g

q,g controlequipment.

Marketmg studies continued to be an important d/G.4 activity of Management Consultants with studies performed on nuckar instrumentation, utlhty 1

P-12

metering and heavy equipment manufacturing Management Consultants also worked with several

,, equipment manufacturersin the synfuelsindustryin

' formulating marketing strategies for their products.

Management Consultants currently is offenng ser-G vices in human resources management, including l ' 'l wage and salary studies, executile consultation, equal employment opportunity audits, productivity Gid f'

• assessment and performance improvement pro-

?lf,

grams. In the utihty area, the company is focusing on ng l

' such cntical areas as electric generation and sys-Waf4:

i

, tem planmng, gas supply studies, district heating 1

, and cogeneration.

AppraisalActivities Stone & Webster Appraisal Corporation experi-enced growth in 1980, vath the major area of activity centenng on cost segregation studies on new con-struction components to maxim!ze investment credit L opportunities. Valuation studies resulting from cor-l porate mergers and divestitures continued to repre-l

' I sent a significant portion of the company's business.

' ' The companyrendered expert testimony on valu-

} ation issues including property taxes, regulatory questions, estate and gift taxes and Federal tax

' matters concerning business combinations.

i Dunng the year Appraisal Corporanon operat2ons were expanded m eight regional centers located in Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, Cleveland, Houston, Los

Angeles,NewYorkandSt. Louis.

• Oiland Gas Operations Explorationand Production 7 l Stone & Webster's oil and gas interests are operated

' through three wholly-owned subsidiaries headquar-

., teredin Houston, Texas.

, j Enterprise Resources, Incorporated owns and op-erates oil and gas properties in Texas. A new three-year, onshore oil and gas exploration program, conducted by Enterpnse through a hmited partner-ship, vall concentrate on the Texas and Louisiana coastal areas. A similar, but smaller, three-year pro-gram was completed in 1980, with Enterprise as the

' ' generalpartner.

i San Salvador Development Company Inc. owns min-t...,9 ~

eralinterests pnmarily in Texas and New Mexico.

.f The company is a member of a group vath interests 13

in several offshore blocks Gas is being produced from one of the blocks, a drilling platform has been constructed on another block which is bemg devel-oped, and explorauon will be conducted on three other blocksin 1981.

Spruce Hills Production Company Inc. owns mter-ests in severallarge oil and gas fields m Canada.

f The company is continumg 011 and gas exploranon in va tous provmces on a hmited basis.

fh Centract Drilling

?.-

t.SE*

• Organized m late 1978,.vith first operatons out of M

g Vicana, Texas, in March 1979, Saw Dn!hng, Inc. ex-peri mced close to full capacity operanon durmg 1980 Three new ngs were put mto semce m 1980 and auther was scheduled for late January 1981 op-eraden, bnngmg Saw's fleet to 8 rigs, or double the cperating fleet at year-end 1979.

_l In adWhon to rig expansicr., Saw also added, durmg 3

1980, a full truckmg operation enabimg the company to make the majority ofits rig movos with its own trucks The truck cperadon gives Saw a distmet ad-vantage m respor dmg to customer needs as rigs are moved, on average, every20 days.

Workmg onshore in the Texas Gulf Coast area, Saw rigs completed 79 wells for independent and major oilcompanies dunng 1980.

l Commercial Cold Storage,Inc.

The year 1980 saw a trend to greater use of frozen foods by consumers and the food service industry The handhng of frozen foods fc export by custom-ers of Commercial Cold Storage was the strongest growth area in 1980. During the year. Commercial expanded its Atlanta facihties by one milhon cubic feet to meet the growing needs ofits clients. In addition, the company conducted a complete energy auit which resulted m the installation of j

a new highly efBcient engme room to power its

+

refrigeration system.

^

CY I

~

., drO

?t.'O d &

\\

J be-14

I 3

f l I I

-)

z-l f,th5 N 4 tn.y i py,y,9 41-

?

m\\,~(%%)INI ([h;e'p[,*Og %

. x4 -

~ ~~~~"~ '

.' - e f @l 93 gMj m :n l' fhhhfhhih

.. Le a nl[6$[

g/cjN"NYhf).y[h ' :

i

ca

, : 5.. ?r. p' '%.:

+

MW,s + r ' L;. n:~I,

[g) 1 g?.a;fc

[;7 fp/Zl%q) r

%p +

'.i s

h?

t:Jy j

Pr

'X_

/ ?!

j;,

=

f) 7 j'

q vsmd _

y4a 5

7~\\

f.q qqf:p) g3 g

V q

Lapp

.::Lg b

ft d

y

~. ~_

< > a l

t c. s< i g ;

M(

W

3.

,< r

• m.

sydnA WP i;'

R

' ~._ }.[

• N-b,

'. l ibm i **

s a..x-y,) a R'

?,u,iR,:, -.y J. E35% K-t_

_}

we j _..

,.my Yk.4.

r r

, ~

• re y

A q

\\,,

I w:

av h

-[.,

e

%.a

, - m s - m - -== w.

- v - m m - - - - - - - - -

v s

}. f -

4 4

/

44 G'".

j 4 4

g'

+

9/,

'*+ ^

'. ' L 's

, [ ;;;

a_:%

j a;

k b

b I

f!

j s

5 4e W

U c

tb wen

Lhgg"N.NAliMI l I

m u

jf$, 'T""'M EWy /s l$,r f.p"

. m --

Yv

.v r

A

=

+

~

a H

j H

- d.I

.,,,.- q-y,. _ _

{

D" g ' F1 3'

I a

T0Ewnd,DU*W,a in,h"~

A m _.

~a

(.

~

kt '

4 g

m) 14-f c

g i

g em y

,s

.n 1

e; aj i

~.i s

p b O T'

O[d'

- r*M.

w s.,

. -. =p ' 0 % Lg,r,!g2 0 - ?... e. p.,47 yfri.;$4..

m.

+-

..s 2-gb?ff 4

's

%:.nsd?h@i.g.Ci$.)q;hY gj "

l@

^

W^?;i..

A

-_ q yf 463;qn c

h.3+fhb r;

',y ' 5 hq

^^ h(.bhi b

,Wt

ny.; w :;nG:q; ;QgV i

y

..,y :.m' g FN f' gm y"

. ga

/,e~

t%

m; 7 4 y. q.d @?-

u pb~

.,:02 &,

Y^*

?

?

1. ,,,.9ilQyal

.mse

+

h:p W:mm::%w.v:%,.h. W;,A.&

w M -

z,.

%%Y%no

--m..

.? u -

u

gv y

s..,J m....-

$h:- le er g$R':;e??:&w-r,;%%%Qi"YC%A X

7 s (@M {$h:.

19 %Y.

.g.;;5 V

~h

/ '

.q;. N Yl;;;~f.+'

'5x-h.,ja$-h!(?hll..Y$$$hhh'h e l.,[N * $

n.

y spqe sg fr u %[]I g r{fy[ k ?g u m

= -

.2 dk kr,

- h[f wi

/*M,

[d. :.

Y.

.s~ p E gm'Z.

jfpQgqw {

4jd N

n

. 4,b,'

C Q,/

f p

+,,.

lampa Electric Company's Big Bend Power Station e, '

a V

^-

^

o I - '

~

.i

~

g The fossil-fueled power stations x

designed and or constructed l

.L.

bv SMne & \\Vebster exceed 40 S',y 's.'- [.. '..

• t.

..-1 million kilowatts in capacity.

3

• -d Installations range f rom small

" Q ; L M'].x. -

j g. : g,.... m

'.j industnal plants to large mine-ohY'." -

mouth plants which transmit

'. T '-f ~ i. '

their output to load centers over

'; '[

8 Mg4 7[f.7

~

.4gg'JG i.'[([i[..

v l (:MN4 ElIV transmission lines. Ihe

.p ' n..i

. hd M.

D: 4 0

.d[i'4 hdk* '%9'$.4 $

fuels u wed include coal, gas a nd Ifb

[NMhpl f'

(I' M

.[

distillate and residual oils, as j

w_ ' hit y:m,deAbh9% r.NM.

nj A-

.. '. c ' s

.X-well as refinerv sludge, petro-w%@:m pg, gftyy

,c-, Q$ ;

y ig

i

y g[h;[;, %.hfU h

N'

[1 g

leu m coke, blast-turnace gas (ya and manv other industrial resi-

' # #! )yp 4

dues. Recent u nits are both Q

Nu large and small, both cvcling p' g -

m Ny j

cooled and air-cooled. Some J 'V and base-load, both water-ww

a..m W. w

~

are super-critical with double

{

reheat for the most efficient performance.

Standard plant design Although prelicensing is not a factor for tossil-f uei plants. the advantages of standardi/ation (e.g., redut tion of construction 1

^4.,. '

and maintenance time. lower costs, u niversal siting, more efficient manpo "r u se, etc. )

are so significant that Stone &

Webster has developed refer-ence (standa rdized) designs for 43), NO and 9tU megawatt coal-fired plants. To reduce engi-neenng and design inpu t, basic arrangements have been devel-oped to accommodate couip-ment made by any of the three major boiler ma nu f actu rers, hot or cold precipitators, three tvpes of regenerative air pre-heaters and various Su re-moval systems. This a pproach also provides flexibility in choice of site, si/c of pa.nt and type of fuel.

k

.], u.

m - p m

oggy[:;.,s MM

.u,, agu 4

Q, t

g,* g sigzA Q f ' #:/ M a:.

.., f ":, b gss s\\ nea' u d'3m and D"""

o

,;,#-. n" a e, W

> dlh"N, D$ UDNOgde:n e

-uteg

^galNe ('I Eeneiaun u w'-

in

.hh"

g sne r d gg 1

s

- e, gP*y @@p%

i j3nts W

,a d

,;p. "Q 3~. 9 g +3,)u, :g4 11 w.A r MiA

I $ 5

,' N s 3 pge s' h\\'

.. v. '-; p %?

k II51I\\

i ; ( l 't f I't*

g.

r%

s i i

%,gs y t.

w'twe%-

d t

i

'T,.~M s* \\'

) q(.pc-al) (ss u t' t \\

3 g 3_.D i n d!O

} kVhieN\\cctr c P("

stenC N w'w

% nC' jnd t 4 3nstrus It,tj C bg dro gicttDL ["

gh a itstak 1 apat il\\ \\ 'I gtgrut nlN' 13pgUCa '

wn ue" alt

~,

- m o-s,,, v 1cene

-[ ;) teCl a n'1 m m1

<~m N

I~

p i. (t h n\\ N p(q

,g tik 'C I

,,. g g g i n CU I' ha\\cdU"

' gj bulh daw' catt,Uandrod-

. oncrete men ha-on

• carned rgcmon ma sts-th'nIIIh j ao s aro ciCi t rh +i'w n 10 C' ' 'gggpe-

",j g\\,g ge n'ludind f (ICI U

.hg dD'C}ec Th t-m m < -

g} w a\\

• M U S

< on su e ra p}c prt'4 t,-Tecoro rtormed or

.h Il\\ It\\

dirttito-m a nt\\UdC

'gq iaI ma[Y

'md crou nt u T\\ t'Y' D,elogh.alTCtt'nn F sa n t U .t s m h

• W \\ ', g s, t( T u n dath'nt'*k4 3rJIbin' maICUa gggg,h\\dD" sa m {$ Uld '

g icic antj hg draukh tud10' a na b. 'i' oI

, g,ou er oetem s,m,ptan-and

. je t,uled ' "'

1-a-u r, 4s h o,,nomu 'tu'g"~, st aherna-n o rer t-

~p :

gy 4

N

( f)

%f

' wM gr a

s

y I

I

+#;

I

%g;:-ui g

" - rew w.v.%,

,,.m 74' *#M '-hY'j'M

~

y

~ ~ ~

,w., gig;.g{g_.,

% 4, E5.3 w. w^W.'"7$. m-nswa ye e.P un:n g;w~%:,;.;l:lm9 "

x nat*29 ;&?V..$c.;p&GWBWb?&O4ht**

w n

C~

u

..,.v.*.*te y;q s77W,,3'y;{ W R.;d?#%wn #.5;gj. ;e;;ia2 &,.

M'*

...a&&'=2 2?rW% wha

,t t

,r,,

a;;A<n

.gaa.m u y

ski

?{$$$N$?$$

a ggw#"" a.Eqm.

.- n~.,-m.%av%sW,c gwgg_f=g;; -gw~m_ew,e&"

c gergh s

1. dT M O MY$YhNIbdjN2K s: ** g;%yws:aa %xpg.

sce w

~ ~_s a M 'l-P_ R

..i s

.w W-gp* g...

w;..yl;

. m g g ~:L:y -

.? F

• t-

.; y y;._s yr.,, -:

D W;:k;j hj$gx y???Py; ypn 4p

%y

% :' "kng)'j;T 'CL:hhow so

. % +,,.je n sgm ; ;.s:, e y 14Mr;;x:;t%. g

-ns

~ ~ -

@;..~

g u, s.

.y

M y y-l

.?

?

s.

. n +-.

.h i

.je /'

cw a

,-c-

i. !

n p.

=

, y[

g

'#[fte w.- _

m2 t j-h

+ '

[..

.s

'go a

[q;'y;j;g;y

.~

ll.

'rVr,,

+'

^

5 l& jiE.

.: c ; +. 3 ;

>;; q,.

g s

' k::

Y"*

~ hf i ~ l:'Y,l,s 3-i.v

\\ \\ __ __

A-'

+

c

't.s.

ig+;

l

~,

/

- i me" s

I S

[ _ %T ~~,, -

/

/ig c'

~p

<f ba

,a p.;g

/

w, ~. ^

j.

.: a

,e

\\

qq.

5

\\

_ ~ -:

+

_.[

s s

a s;

l>g c

[

v

t:

_ f;,

.4 B };-

~ ~:

\\

e

\\

r\\\\

y.' W B

)

/

.- [

i f[ ~ _

f.

l,

/d h

v p.

R ~~

's T;

[

}

.f? -

j-

.l f-

\\

=

t G/

' tf M

/fj,-

'E 6

1 I.

'We first conunercial 500 kv trans-gssion line in the United States on Virginia Electric and Power Company's system I

I Transmission systems Construction services c

r Stone & Webster has provided Stone & Webster providesa

.,Q(

engineering senices for thou-broad range of construction fy

• f A '

ke, f sandsof milesof transmission senices which can be tailored

. 14 2 lines of varying voltages and to specificclient needs.These

{ I types.Wehavecontinuously services range from fullcon-i j

participated in the develop-struction responsibility with i

l mentalphasesof transmission-ourown forces to construction system work, including the management consisting of s(J 9

design and construction super-overallplanning and control vision of a 460-750 kv experi-and supervision of othercon-f mental EHV transmission line tractors' work.

^

d thedesign of a prototype We have manv supervisorv-an 1,000-1,500 kv UHV facility.

leveland techinicalemployees 1

',^

We designed and constructed with construction experimnce, the first commercial 500 kv enabling us to provide ourcli-transmission systemin the ents with proven construction construction team reviewing I

UnitedStates-a383-mileloop competence throughout a proj_

plans for North Anna 3 and 4, two in Virginia-and designed and ect. Directed by senior man-

{7(5 Inia t iIan r units on I

p.,

j superused construction of a agers withlong and varied Company's system l

598-mile 500 kv transmission backgroundsin field construc-I linein Pennsylvania and tion, this reservoirof personnel NewJersey.

includes allgrades of supervi-I Wehaveoftenbeencalled upon sion, field engineering and to solve unusual transmission-staffsupport.

system problems,and have An integrated controlsystem designed and erected numer-forconstruction management I

oussinglespansacrosslarge gives us highly effectivecontrol bodies of water.

over the all-important elements of cost and schedule.This sys-I tem can beapplied to either force-account work orcontract j

management.

I I

I 1

I

Physicalmodels used l Environmental ' Engineering DivisiR to solve fish entrapment problems I

Qualityassurance

~

At Stone & Webster, environ-Stone & Websterplacesgreat p

mentalengineeringis totally e a emphasis on the vitalrelation-g oriented toward meeting client shipbetween qualityassurance

[Q needsin a responsible, profes-3 programs and a facility's ulti-h j

sionalmanner. Everyeffortis g

matelicensability, reliability and availability.These pro-O.

made toidentifv thebest means 3

u-to maintain an acceptablelevel gramsareorganized atStone&

of plantimpact on the environ-g Webster to provide considera-mentin ternis of cost, schedule 3

bleindependence between and overaileffect.Theinter-qualityassurancegroupsand action of engineering and a

the project groups responsible scientific personnelensures 5

for engineering, design and pragmaticsolutionsbased on construction.

engineenng realities, while The programsare founded on considering the fullextent of detailed specifications, designs n

potentialenvironmentaleffects and drawings;are canied for-Quality Assurance Department's and providing a complete, l

ward into vendors' shops non-destmctive testing laboratory documented and defensible where we document tests and impact analysis.

inspections to ensure conform-Envimnmentalengineering The backbone of environmen-ance with specificationsand For many vears, Stone &

talengineering analysisat purchase orders;and are com-Webster'h'is applied environ-Stone & Websteris a demon-pleted in the field with assur-mentalengineering and sci-strated capabilityin modeling ance of correct material flow, entificdisciplines to power of plant effects. Sophisticated material storage, erection, projects.Ourmultidisciplinary mathematicalmodelsanalyze system start-up and prelimi-Environmental Engineering field data and projected operat-nary operation.

Division combines personnel ing criteria to predict theimpact l

In 1974, Stone & Webster was with backgroundsin civil, of the plant on air, land, water a

the first engineer-constructor chemical, mechanicaland other and the socialenvironment.

I to haveits nuclear quality engineering fields with biol-Analytical toolslike these ena-E assurance program approved ogists, meteorologists, occan_

bleourexperienced personnel E

by the Atomic Energy Commis-ographers and other

-many with masters or doctoral sion, now the Nuclear Regula-professionals trained in social, degrees-to meet the demand-g, tory Commission.

naturaland physicalsciences ing requirements of our clients.

E l

to provide complete environ-mentalservices.These services 3

are available throughout a E

project, from initialsite eval-uations to engineering, con-a struction, start-up and post-E operationalassessment.

I E

I

,Iy:k'-hkOfi 3Yf.yyy,-.

'.4 p; %nSS[?q t' f :i

.s.

.. _., * +

et ilbe 1

e.e '-,

o c ' " '

g W

h ? R~ '.

4

. #py

. c;n, s,

.w F

n}

[

4 g@mm r.

W T

a! >

\\i l

~

.t l

2i A

"T b.

• W s

r,.p 5*

[-

--- Q.. 3 ] yi ; C N Q 3.4 Ca.

^

w

.m..

- +w n

.w-s u.

wy^wv'- %g.

q 3

SZ- ~ ~ % W -d%-

~ '.

- f #*'

L

_ MS.W=&;.qW,- M 4. 9~ll16 w; i%4% ls s

-,g

. _.a

--r

'p sk e jM

'fg.

k; 4

?Zg

~

fy m

-...s m

ya

-~

s 4

n 7'

?MMd'$b

+-

> r,

m.,

, w:

-p

,,u-

,f fff;{k, &

~

'?

..[,#;GK!(jf.

^iggf na

' ~~u a$

.x j

~

h t'Qg-t,yy y>A.

r

- T..

$E N I 3(( y s q

[k

. a:c, z

w

D .d$

9

• $ kN M

[Nhh"h)Q %QSfa d

a 3

qV

+

%A h, mm 6

~

n%s gG#, -

'g sup :3 3 s

)lg

.g P

.z_

y1 nab 4:.g-W5 4

n>p & '

$f, N. e.

figf Q%f%li};yy;fS.?

fr W.

y3

-a

+. _

X8; w{%$, INS $,wl 'hw$hMU.'

wr

. I.'J.:

IN[3 M i?

g s-gg 4A

/

i f

91w lt' b'

If$I y }

QY?

D.

4 W

P e

.TI

.w.

g g

_,e,

-p k;mg 2

$$ee.-

3r

x. c

,%.9

I ide Boston Edison Company's stic 7, a 600 Mw oil-fired

{ po'werplant

I i

!!I Operations services Pmject management

[~~ ]'M " 7]

Stone & Webster's Operations Stone & Webster has many l

Services Division provides an vears of experiencein manag-q;g w i

important additionaiservice ing complex projects.

y j

to clients.The primary function Each projectis organized and y

4 c of thisdivisionis toimprove carried out under theleadership

^^ac powerplant reliabilityand of one of ourlarge staffofexpe-l 3 availability.TheDivisionis rienced project managers.The

E structuredintofourinterfacing project manageris the official groups

(1) Relialiility Analysis-Company representativein

E develop!ng proceduresand dealing with theclient and,as I 3 analyticalmethodsfordesign leaderof the project team,is y

and procurement activities; responsible forcost, schedule f

(2) OperationalDesign Review-ar.d performance.

^

l feedbackfromoperatingplants; improving new designs through Effective project management

~

isachieved atStone & Webster Key team members reviewing by givingqualified professional Qss at protect management I e(3)SpecialProjects-performing ngineenng, design, procure-personnelaccurate project-ment and construction serv;ces related cost and scheduleinfor-

"E"""

forbackfitsand modifications mationin a format that permits C mPuten. zed network-based to operating powerand indus-rapid evaluation of potential trial plants-also perfo; ming problem areas.This timely

"'"" S"*"" *"

"Y" """

consultingassignmentsand information,along with e'xpe-

[;h" $ '

I outagemanagementforpower rience and judgment, enables dependinb on the extent of S

plants;(4) Plant Management ourproject supervisors t Stone & Websterproject ferrices-providing operating, make prudent decisions.

test and maintenance proce-responsibility. One, the Engi-TheStone&WebsterIntegrated neering Man'agement System dures,a computenzed man ~

Management System (SWIMS)

(EMS),is utilized for planning agementinformation system, hasbeen developed for the and controlling the headquar-a comprehensive spare parts express purposeof furnishing ters portion of the work.The program, aninserviceinspec-project managersand other second, the Construction Man-tion program and a professional executives with the typeand agement System (CMS),is traming service.

levelofinformation necessary utilized for planningand con-to plan and control project trolling the construction por-work. It was carefully designed tion of the work.CMSis effec-I to meet the needs and recog-tive on subcontracted as well nize thelimitations ofpeople-as force-account work.

specific people assigned to spe-cific tasks. Itis a comprehensive and practical system for direct-ing major projects.

I E

Baltimore Gas & ElecEc Company's substitute natural Es plant at Riverside, Manjiand I

I Inimplementing SWIMS, the SWIMS reflects significant scope forboth the headquarters input from client personnel g

and the construction portions and thereforeis tailored to E

of the workis defined in a man-satisfy client requirements. Itis ner that facilitates understand-being used on maiorStone &

3 by project personnel.Thisis ing up-to-dateinformation on 3

ing of the tasks to be performed Webster projects and is provid-done by use of a work break-project performancedirectly to E

g down structure,which divides severalof ourclients' manage-the workinto manageable work mentinformation systems.

pa sages.Workpackagesare Accurate and timely super-used to help ufine scope,esti-visory-and management-level l

mate costs. develop schedules, reports help detect significant assign responsibility, collect deviations from the project plan data on progress and eva'uate and suggest corrective action performance. One of the pri-as needed. Usingits simulation maryadvantagesof thework features, managementis able BP Chemicals Intemational's packageis thatit enables rapid to studyalternative solutions ethylene and ethanol complex at E

adjustment to changes,as they to most of the problems en_

Grangemouth, Scotland 3

areidentified.

countered. It has been used The uniqueand key feature of extensively, for example, to Process activities g

SWIMSisintegration.The sys-evaluate the effect oflimited Overtheyears,theengineering, E tem not onlyintegrates the '

cash flow on staffing and com-design and construction of headquarte'rs, construction and pletion requirements. Periodic process plantsin the areas of 3

start-up activities of the project reviews are made ofindividual petroleum refining, petro-E in a scbedularsense through projects by seniorStone &

chemicals, naturaland syn-the useof computerized CPM Webster management to ensure theticgas production and stor-a networks,but also fullyinte-effective use of SWlMS.

age, pharmaceuticals and other g grates cost and resource data SWIMSis flexible with respect chemicals hasassumed major l

so that cost, schedule and man-to both size and type of project.

importanceat Stone & Webster.

power requirements can be It can beapplied effectively to Our ProcessIndustries Group, treated as a whole.

nuclearand fossil-fuel pm'ver headquartered in New York City, with offices areund the plants,a wide variety ofindus_

trial facilities,compl'ex civil w rld,isa majorfactorin the l

works andinstitutional projects engmeenng, design and con-and certain study contracts.

struction of ethylene plants and of facilities for the refinement

,he strength of Stone &

of feedstocksinto a variety of Webster's project management energy-related products.

hesin the extensive experience a

ofits supervisory personnel, Ei optimaluseof thesepeople and theeffective planningand controltechniques fumished by SWIMS.

E I

-.r

-w,q-m-

r..w g

fv.de.tM #[4 T d.

/

I r-.,.,.,_. m n y,-

g p ; w_,

ff!k Y

r*

?j a

qq

~~~

n..

- - - - @NNYbN$$h f

4

[

^

.. ~

,m g g < m, 4;;.g w spe,,rg-y g+, %. g+ %,,d.n4 9 *GC,wd,+ y.

- m g

.s.

\\

y 2

.,:e?*w ~.. -w*e v>e rn m.u c

X*gs g',: % ~

w

""s C. % "jh*g W ~,

g Qf,f;$

4

4. s _.

• • g f>[5%:

.i E5*p.

i

..7 Q +y w-f 3. m

> ~.

2

---

A DDP-

. - _ - ^ 1____I d b

' idar-

'4 4

.g

, 7 2 # q ( r.

~

~

r y* c.

Nh

- b'- %

f

...I' m,.

ern

, :"7 '

~EN, e_

fe *.pwa;1Er

--. " A3lllE4 8118*

d

. g.-

ye-3

_w-

+

M

!M, t

-m

.!tt e._x-; p m,q g.

pc w

• -~9W c' j 3

3-yy

} t; (

&. ?

• f -

%Q

..n%.v.a%-

q g,J 1:;ae4*. j;;gy,,5b Ad SNd I

y i-7 jidd*

4:

y

-sY

-~ ',Qg g y

2,, v Y.

g y

y ks.E E

. - Mi r

A w-wt -.

m swa d'

,/

kT

[

f m.,,,

e?

z_.HahG ?S..Rijgb v,

M.

p y

h b.

h' y%pa z

. v4

,dlQ adip

• m.

t m

}t JP.f.hr 9'

p:.tQ

=m-..

- %y-er,

,y h

JdipQp N

i

~

hIkkh.2h t %,{W,ij,Q,Am%,.

MW rf. '

t+. g.;f p p:.g.% q, y

. y[

n+

.h. 2...

, zi.

.,...,fj g

, : J. '.4,

/"

g p'

y3-,{ -

g

. 7,

,;.. t.r:,

, g g'

7. A,.

r m

.., n,

(

w

/

W-

b. ;...

r,.

g

.y

~.*

.. (c.:

.~

• ,. gi% g.

e

..a..

-}

-?(

_ f.$, 4 f. v

+.

y y,,,

f~r

.g.

._o,

;uy ; _ ( A._.. -

x a

%..s. -:

n

~

,e Shell Nederland Chenne N\\' L thylene I'lant i umaces

\\1ocrduk Nethe 1.inds I

$I gl

\\s ths emphasis on energ\\

{

sat ing gnm s. In [N)th pilblL and prn aie areas - andas g B alternat1\\ e sou rces ( tenerg\\

&a h] g become increasingl\\ attractit e i

the particula n/ed t hemical 9

a engineenne skills of the Process h

lntiustnes ( 'n sui' are tot u stnc L}

on such areas as peak-shat ing w4 j7 through energ\\ -prod uct stor-illt, t t al gasitit a-(y age Jih} selhlt i

4 tion. the production of lo\\s

% 4, slll!Llr illel inim hea\\ \\ till s athl treatment of t oal for maximtim

$1 F j{

energ\\ extraction and t ompll-a ant e \\s Ith en\\ lionmental t egu la tion s

\\n mtegral. vet tlistinct1\\ c. part of the ktone & \\\\ ebster organi-b

/ation. the Process Ind ustnes M

(,rou p sha r~s in all the l'orpo-I ra ' ion's hasic strengths a nd

.J tas ilities \\t the same time it nhlkes ilse (it prtiject mal'. ape-g ment t ontrol tet hniques \\s hich g

Jre part.Jlliarl\\ sllited Iti the ticid it ser\\

. Its six basic oper-9 ating divisions -- p rocess engi-

• l neenng. project nhinagement.

7,f p n )( li re m t'n t, l'n gi nt'en n g,

i. ()nst rut tilin aihl p rt iject st'TT -

'*8 e,

it t's --- em ph l\\' a highlv et tecti \\ e,

',, i I n t e rac t1 \\ appniach that niit t inl\\ taCllitates phiblen) sti!\\ ing alk} leads tt i Ohlxinll/ed pla nt t'Illt lent \\, bu t alsti t ('n-t rlhlitt % tt 1(in -Ilnle, (in-hlld get perf orma nt c.

~

v.

.g (Illr ilt tll late. htlint' N \\\\ t'hste!

'7,f{

L anada. I td. ( l oronto) pro-t

\\IdespnictN s desigil, t'ngillet'r-me and t onstrut tion ser s a es it if tern 1t 'lta tlt in-ba sed pn it l'ss plants. Ini luding bre\\s enes as

\\\\ l'!l a s (Ilstlll(' Tit's. Itifallgradt's at ak ohol

I I

I e

I m,

l e:

7 7

i l

L.

As Y

v c

b0h

\\?

V:

p C

l

"~

y

'g e

+

Q.[

(

Y o~

k ei r.

t t

e g

y

~~

^

r f

es l

Y q M'.

w Ls-t

.i o r 4

4 set p

g l

-. E n.I EB"TlR E*

8 e

g

' - - - ^ - '

_,a w_.

Y - '

+

pycey p,;,.; n, W'

.,pqf

%; ve w p % s n

Welifer perfomiing qualificati test at 6 G position I

I System planning

' *"O Stone & Webster has an exten-E OurSystem Planning Group analyzes power-system needs

=1 sivecomputerprogramlibrary 3

. re...

t -developed over many years-and planspower-systemdevel-t*/

, f.

f consisting of hundreds of use-u e

opment foralarge numberof fulcodescoveringall technical g

electric-utilityclients.The J

disciplines, several manage-workof this group usually i mentinformation systems, precedes actualmodification or forecasting operationsand gen-l construction of powerfacilities

-and typicallyincludes the

[

~ '

eralbusinessanalvsis.

/

Welding and metallurgy preparation of a recommended E

Established to keep our engi-plan forincreasing, improving

[

_ :), neersabreastof thelatest weld-and/oradjustinggeneration

]4 ing processes,equipmeat and y

and transmission systems to materials-and to develop new l 2

4 r

meet projected future growth.

Lq

~~~g'j welding techniques-Stone &

ThePlanning Group hasaccess Webster's Welding Laboratory toalldisciplines within the computeroperatormonitoring exercisesanimportant quality Stone & Websterorganization, job flow on one of Stone & Webster's control function. It prepares including estimating and IBM 370/168 computers manualsof welding procedures l

financial-analysis functions.

and it trains construction spe-l l

Powerand transmission engi-extensivein-housecomputer cialists so theycan properly E

j neers provide costand other facilities toconduct technical supenise welding tests, stress-basic data on the characteristics and economicstudies forlarge relieving operations, radio-3 of alternativegeneration and interconnected systems, graphicinspectionsand E

transmission facilities. Contin-including studiesofload flow mechanical tests in the field.

uing contactis maintained with and stability,attemative gener-The Metallurgical Laboratory 3

manufacturingand research ation and transmission plans, supplements the Welding E

groups outside ourorganiza-insulation coordination, series-Laboratory byexamining fail-tion whoareable to supply compensated transmission ures, corrosion, graphitization, g

germaneinformation on exper-linesand subsynchronous carbide precipitation and ther-3 imental transmission systems resonance.

maleffectsin many types of forwhichactualconstruction Computerfacilities metals. Laboratory personnel a

experienceis not yet available.

The Computer Department act as consultantsin the selec-g The Planning Groupalso provides computer-related tion of metals forvarious types utilizes Stone & Webster's services toall projects, specialty of engineering applications.

I groups, divisions and depart-The Laboratory also conducts ments. Located in the Boston research on newly developed l

headquarters office, the De-alloys and theirapplications.

partment operates modern, l

j high-capacity computers, togethor with a variety of sup-porting equipment.Com-municatianlines extend to all l

officesin addition to remote construction sites.

I l

,,.3 m*-A

./ t.

f.

. t.

1 V

'.,h YA. -

2',

N, t

?

-.. ~

' ' - y

- 5

?>r

'pf:y 6

.3 p-

9..

• ~

.s

,3 r

3. *T.% g.. h..p

.s..., -.j

't

• g$

e, m

,t

/

k-4

~;

,4

~

'"(

.h 'q

~

=

J vi 9.

i'.

r

.. ~ ~,

a.

6 e

.e J

L

. M :: :[.,'- s g-T;

'm.,

, g2.

...q...- n>

~

4

.

• b

.. "yy L-

,..g,., '

J a

.fy '), f '. ' i d..

=

a

, ;~~.g p

\\"

' i J.

,7-3 7,7 3. -.,; :..-.t..p.., ;.

?

4

(.

.n e

u.-

.y..

$'...*,'.<.-' '. 'q...e -

..*l

.. L' a'in.. -

s.

d. **

Y, h y. ~ '

s s

p a

,,,s

-.4..,.

,/

,p Ms -* *

• 2 A4.,

~. -,

q

/

..-- i.'..

g..,

t,,) -

e p.4 e 3'],f, ( p 1.

- d *.. s. [-

f Rrs y

? - -

)\\ ;.i '

t s

o'.

.r.

m A

4

',S.-

(s -'

t*,

eh_

[,

%3-

.,p p

7 j

.gQ g '.- l. *,

E*.,[Q,{,g. (

.y z,.

( p' c

1. :.-

[g J'.

..l I

0 3.<.:... *i

- W'

~.%

. G :..

r,

.s e

s '

'-y..

0.

~

g..

.>

• P. W.' - *. p'*..

~

+

E 3

J,b.J

~

.y ' &,i,. %q g -

$.. : t -,

w e.

..x

.' p -

L ; j,.~ :Nfg

~

,r-3

~

y O.

'e,;* r. t.. )

l','

&'.. $h:.

i '

$Fkh.

1 (!.-

Ns T

i -

r.g.. :

p.

y l; l.....f,,-

.*g l

4,.

g

. IdN;

• C A-r Y...h..*.[. ' -

E

.s

. *4

.c y,...: s%g

}

W 4,^.:. : ' '.,

.p '.

p

. g 4

. g

.y.L ?. ~.:$ &

. ',.h.?

~ " Ni' ' h s

..n

~..

.s

..... ;..g,,'

l y fu { -

.g

~

,$. ^. $'

(j p:f.\\

~ ~.

a Ne_.

y "1J

. hh['

--[kNJ

/ - k[Y '%

. f,h),k.

' {I

,,;.,,.Y

, Pfc

.t.- $*

'5-

' il T

.'l f.4 t 9. '. A - '; W', '"* J.

P.*%)n_'~ ;...

. g.

.S,'-

~y-g 1

.e.. n.

J. b., 4

[,..*p[ ),' O d. - ' ' '

uf h.N; ?. / q,

• l',b ' '. [

g--

...M

a. -..,;, ;.*

4 4

,?._-

Y> '.

.' gr,'

".Q V3..

Q: e. %. A T yN

. ) ', '

6 j'

,.. +,

l'

,.,k-V,/ g. k,;

}'g'r,d:

)* i. ".'. # y.' ;.'.y }

• S..-_,*-

r

'.i M

r J..: * -t

,t

..,.3

. ' '.. :l 5

b....

. -e -,h..f f,' ' Y '

.,., f% h _f.,7l g

.,V.

'..,. y,f.f. '-,.'. -

)

r

. y.e 2-7....

. _ ".. g,,

n.i s.,t.,

qg..

I i : *.. :,. (F ? - *.,,. t ? P $.,~,. -

e M[* M th ;. ] E DQ hf [ : '.'[$. 'fd ' ),-$.' h.-

.M...-

l':'"

y,,, P

..',w Mk.,; L99,.Y @, Q.

i m g g. a.. c. y[ g ~ g:

fg [". A x. m[

f 2.x g.:

.y s;gp f w g g~. nan.m

.m

. 4+. s. t ae

m... m. a..

, {

x.m. ; p.w. s.c. c. :

3. g.3. j q. m.;

..y 3 gy.p..g

.w..

e,.,

'I **

.]

Y

~

lh Y

. ~

2'." W ' V. : ;.

>;-ir -

'-,:., ye ~.

~ ' >

L'.

w.'

W -....

R:Q. &g.u.

~4 f f. '.l...

• f i

%Dl,. :

?

.a[g:f.

l l

w

.~. x h.n

-,a M q

n.9. o.%.9

'Q & d: f.u-sw

.d.h 1

%:*V m

s 3,

\\-g :.p q; y

4.

. :w& #.

t y

g-y.-

.. 3.,:

s m

% s *MX,.M,..,.. ' : c. <.. e' W..4

?

,I.

8

.,wy e

, c

,f Pi a.

W' 4

-N

.5h

_ f

-> 2.H i A*'

c f-r e

c..

5

- t g,

e, 4.)

e f*

Id

9.

W D

..+, 4.

. 5

-'. ~

,. -. g g

x.

4. -

Designers constmcti model of Reference Nuclear Pl Annulus Buildi I

I Geotechnicalengineering p-m g'

Plantsare designed andlaid Stone & Websterprosidesa jj out so the complex of structures g

comprehensivearray of serv-

[

a appears pleasing to the passer,

g s

bv-so the buildings and the icesin the fields of geology, f

groundwater seepage, rock l

k' la'ndscapeare appropriate to l

mechanics, soil mechanics, soil thelocale.

dynamics,seismicityand soil In optimizing the visualimpact and rock analysis. Engineers of a project, we consider the and geologists with advanced entire spectrum ofland-usage l

trainingin thesediwiplines possibilities. Along-range plan participatein many projects is worked out with the client to frominitialsitestudies through provide a productive,useful l

designand construction to disposition of project property operationaltesting.

beyond that required for the These servicesare supplied by plantitself, theGeotechnicalDivision Community planningisof vital which has grown to be oneof importance to the success of the most diversified compo-Geotechnical Division's labora-anyindustrial project.To assess nentsof the Engineering tory facility,which offers total the socialand economicimpact Department. Its functions capability in soil testing of powerproduction, for exam-include: site exploration; field ple,on an undeveloped area, g

and laboratory testing;subsur-Architectureand Stone & Websterpreparesa E

face sampling; evaluation of community planning master plan for regionalgrowth soiland rock properties;analy-Stone & Webster recognizes as part of the processof siting g

sis of subsurfaceconditions; architecturaldesign as an essen-a power plant.There are often E

establishment of design criteria tialpartof thecomprehensive

. good reasons forlocating a for foundations, bulkheads effort to produce a power, power plantin a sparsely pop-E and cofferdams; development industrial, chemical orother ulated area.This necessitates g

of procedures for excavation, facility thatiscompatible with the provision of special hous-backfilland dredging; design its surroundings. We main-ing andlife services. Stone &

3 of earth and rock structures tain a staff of competent archi-Websteris acutely conscious g

such as dams, embankments, tects to meet our responsibilities ofits responsibility to make tunnels, caverns and canals; in this regard.They have devel-such housing and servicesas and the preparation of perti-oped a three-part program-efficient,usefuland compatible nent portionsof the reports toachievea physicalplant that as feasible. We maintain a staff required forpowerplantlicens-(1) serves ourclient efficiently, of specialists to meet this ing. Engineers from the Division (2)is a credit to thecommunity obligation.

l areassigned residentliaison in whichitislocated and (3)isa In addition,ouraffiliate, Stone duties duringconstruction of pleasant place to work.

& Webster Canada, Ltd.

large earthwork, underground The functionai treatment of (Toronto), offers services i

and foundation projects to personnelaccommodations related to planning, design and monitor actual field conditions, deservesand gets major construction of hospitals and initiate design changesas attention.

other health-care related required and ensure that geo-So we design facilities tailored projects.

l technicaldesign conceptsare to specific functions. We meld fulfilled.

client preferences with project g

and personnelcriteria. We coor-E dinate technicalspecifications with human needs.

nm.-N-e---m--:____._-,m-.m--.m---e a,_-,,

~

4[llK-.,y!agw

~

g' c

~

i

~ana y$

lwn At.~..* w1N &n

~l i

. !!usinia.

~:

Inn %

g3~

i, e.aiisc.semassismic _

?

T,5lEl8 2R W f

?

fj

..=

a@.n

.i 1

l mg,..

, ~ '..' -

M1, a

\\

[I'5,? } hY,,_i

,l f.kil 5k g)

%lWi;;&k

('

):'

g(

g-4, ~a I

g y

[

j 'N & :.

>l

,sy, y_

+

\\

3 7

y r

r I

I Engineering reports Stone & Websterappraisals Research Institute,and are Stone & Webster performs are used in public utility rate-directed toward early practical engineeringinvestigationsand makingin fair value states,in application of new concepts.

prepares reports coveringa condemnation proceedings Currentexamplesof thecom-broad spectrum of subjects, andin ad valorem and other pany's pioneering work are l

including:

tax situations-to determine theconceptualdesign of an 5

0 system planning forelectric insurable values, to assistin Atmospheric Fluidized-Bed utilities; affecting mergers and acquisi-Direct Combustion Power Gen-O peak-shaving planning for tions and to estimate financing crating Plant forDOE and the gas utilities; requirements.

North EastCoalUtilization O feasibility and commerciali-The AppraisalCorporation Pmgram (NECUP),which is 3

zation studies of alternative has completed more than 3,000 sponsored byStone& Webster R energy sources, systems and assignments, with individual and agmup of electric utility storage; values ranging from a few thou-companies.The first has the E

O evaluations of chemicaland sand to overa billion dollars.

potential forcapturing coal-E petrochemical processesand Expert testimony before courts contained sulfurin the burning projects; and various regulatory bodies pmcess,thus avoiding the need O environmentaland nuclear has been providedin support for a flue-gas scrubber.The safetyanalyses; of manyof theseappraisals.

second has thepotential for O evaluation of prospective burning a coal-derived liquid sites; fuelin direct replacement of 0 powerplant conversions for New technology petmleum fueloilas an alterna-etone & Webstersees exc.t.i mg substitute fuels; tive to converting to buming O project cost and schedule and important changes devel-solid coal.

opmg m mdustry,which need These m."8' only to mature before becom.

By part..icipatm.g m sucn proj-P """

vestigations vary ing significantimprovements fcts, Stone & Webstercan make widelyin scopeand degree of overcunent practice.Through nf rmeddecisionsaboutnew sophistication, ranging from its Corporate Development technologies and can follow soilanalysis at a plant site t Division, Stone & Webster has with the most appmpriate l

major studies thatcan effect services toits clients.

sought and obtained oppor_

an entireindustry.

tunities to participatein the Engmeenng appra.isals evaluation and development Appraisals are carried out by phases of solar power,substi-the Stone & Webster Appraisal tute fuels forpetroleum, new Corporation. In addition toits coalcombustion techniques, own staff of experienced valu-flue-gas desulfurization, energy ation engineers and appraisers, storage,high-temperature the AppraisalCorporation gas turbines, advanced nuclear utilizes technicaland financial systems, combined-cycle specialists from both the Engi-powerplants and othernew neering Corporation and technologies. Typically,the Stone & Webster Management projects aresponsored by the g

Consultants,Inc.

U.S. Department of Energy E

(DOE)or the Electric Power I

I

>: x s

,.. v

• Q-,

1. g#W i-g,"

s;m, t

+

e e

3 s

4 G A. s

- ~

s i '.

+,+-

,s

.E gff "'M

~

f*

1 s.,

.g'['

.Ay

}

jg r

u

~m w '~:'y,+

• + ~ J

,..) l'f l r

k X

s.

-+ 4,T ' * } ;,'t

,l, 4 - y

, +k~

Q

,y

-__l T

_ Q.R 4

- T

&"~

4 1M Os G '; y t

j;%-

qA._

_rtp 4

w

.3 3

x

_ x, -

t s

• ' 3;

- e

• T d ['

{

'L'&"p r_

d g.-

f l

9 g,

g m.

t's!'r".

,N*

'k

.,,,Q

Y' f'

n'y 4.

1. "'- ?' I-

' ^^'.O' [D. # $'

• e. t'3

-g

',..a

,4'e-'

_}

",. O n

o T.

4'W

,.t. (,,

ss

.A

'Y'

<:,D

+r-

., (',';M ys

.g.,e

• *'f ;

+ e' - j-

.,q-33

,,,,J

~

%y b r. ' e t

.4

'7,. -..,

4,

g.

-g a

5

1. ~

L

(

Y f

-. g.gs'3'

-rw 6h,--,1-

'N'<

k l

,.j OS g

' M'

'A h -

,,3'[' g 5gv

.3

-'q...

s 2,

,x*

1. y$',..

?

i

(" AcQ

• l$ ' - -Q q,,^ } _,

k't 1

,,')

r

,,w A'

?

.:l Q

• ?

• s

• 7 4l~~

[f,

C. W.

.m-

"-e e

s

,. ys,

s- /

.m., u.W_ _n

.f,

? < a,

y;EP, >,,

s 4 '.f..;,. ' - P7:o, N s 3

- -.i S- s t - "s i-u,w~

3 e. >_ - s {mw

+.

t m

g

.w 2

w

, m. *G,v

,s

,,, A..t.?, &y f

' t

q.-r;,

% c,. ""s..

h, :3

. i >>

_.4..

., qg y

.e 3 x"y~ ~-

, q, ;,..

+

,~.,R-

_,~

a-

- e d.s.

.-w r

, ~Q 1~

y.

9

,=+-

w1-

• n'e..

a

,h

• n,,

<t S

-::v

_.3 y

.,.n

+

.s f >,

i

w. r s'o

at

.A.'..

, ;w

.m.

wv s +

k 0;>~

~

w. ? V, l*

• Y

^

L

, W )..

m,

. ",% ;. ~D, a.,,

n l.

f~'*.,.'.

U s

. ~

s, s,..sym

,e.,m.

.e g s s _o

?k g k l

~A

,, ' }' a.f,1_'f'% ; Y,f ' ?' whQ;Q"f

• -A ? ?? ~#,\\}

,l-h Q e A,J

. L f '.

yk 6

.c

.gf

R' ;$ 'l 9: +_ -y f. -yf'.-,. ',.+

O

'.h h y ', Q an Y),Q.,, ml MG q\\@q#

,K t.m

+

- _ - ' "'-* 3,- %

.m m

_ - k 'S (er2.

~

oum

.a mgs sc.

,s s..

. m.\\ q w3' h yg-. 4#- m 4,

b.

\\.

A Y

x: Ru w'y w'mp;7[.

M

$ 1/. l' $wg.. :-,'/O-.,-,.'_h.

(.

33 f

,;"L m cs,-

m '

1, g

.m w

..yw 1

w. y^

s c

~ en N.I.

4 s 4 P7, M' "1

^ *.

iI s < 6;

• d d

?%

"fu.

-r qD

/ s,,

9c m-A <Wg m"s g.3 l a.

en:

.r

^

JL

.V 4 ; -

s s q :M a

3 f' lfY h.

p.,l

&kk

~ ;:

(Q*

a..} s

. u&

g g;

-n wa "n

.n w nn r

, tmc w Ju'

&uu.x,m y,.s oM, 7. T r u. m, ;u & n

Q -N Q a y ;;p f % Q

• W - % Q? L = yf g q >

.Q,,

_ Q

%, y,7

)R~ - 1 a

8 u

m%

(..y -y e

+J Ma..\\

x -.(w.,..,

q.-.

i

+

i s

1'% -

"- q (.

--c

.~ -p, n j'"

'7 p

s %. e - w. a. -

N

V mr Cw.g:+

v u.T t. p

,d v..

9y

.' [ m.

y v

+.

,. n f, igm.-

v

(,..

,t h

[

?

.y.'

m'

'e

%qs

,. y..

3 3

.,, % 9 ;s s) u,;

2

.,M M'

~ w:%;..

f_e q.

• 1 e

n[lv 'a[ ~ kJ, g. mp

- %. m,

& va

r. h t,,

(syy @(

s /M

..,.,.,i

+:

~.

// /

k [Y ' 4Q

• 4 j j,ya y.% Q,;'EQ,

J,"

1. w.w 4.g s.

, ' ',[;

[.:

_ &g,

}n, s ' n,%

,.,w

^; W ~ y

,n>

e.

e n.

t^

g

[

g yg i

en

-,g T

.Q e

(

<.s -"

'g' s

-3 4

vm. 9

y. ?q

,.m g--

wx

+ %.-

%c}w,QW f.f.'.g la& V 3

.'a. kk..%y f f, a:Q g}.

.pd

? Yh -_

J:,ff 3,3,p g%m l..l y :. })

fb 3

% ~_,

n u, e-

. g....

~

g; e,. w.; [

m.

..,n_ u, s

. n.

n

?e.&

,p&

g%.fy.?

.--n

)

.,..y n

}g

. & ~'. . ^ d mp, " i. : : ^ c.. + ' %:- 6,gy M$,sm.u.an b e.-. W;.b, ,x _. l m W WN&,4;p+#. y & M,.g.' c6.

• s.

sm: mw ms e+ w nw #v ? m e, m'.*..,u 3;m i _4 &. n. l wp. P-}> I r 4a #g. yu w v u+e A 4 n~, n m. > c c.m., .. m e

y

. f g +.,. - g g-we asf.~y &, N 4 4-- %a rQW)q% q.3 f c%,%_e. -% s b. W - m,. e.,,sy,%, %w,R. +]o,..,i' f. 4 g 9 -g,&.w-_G(. u,; ' ', m W T:W;y J'.xq

h,;. ~ y,,.

m.< r-

o. y - q f a. m.

7.A,.,.m w.. -e 1 s* ~- ~<, s. 3 s cyW ;y2 wA 46 %p.1. w, ,m. Q; n,u{ g Ly m. 1, ,g

v. a g; g&q o

c .s g y.~ gVg 7., rC by;.y%g %" #4, w. e a p W ;Lg. C C, 4 s y m . m . egC- ' ,m ww %, w q ., v:,w s z z e. w q;emAjm m%pqs p- _ y- ~xx w wm a W y,;mp ~ o ' Q y; +

• v,

u.~ .;w..g g.y - -h hn. [~k;pr;"e_3D dg m n. ru- %q (w4 ..Q?w #m.g w r Q. 4 %:3 ;s-u q ' en A, y7 y 9 s O. g. ke,$ .M. r hs M k,y, /5 i n m k k N.M, bhN-44 3 }.f 4,

• p ;, &Q3

'b b k $k.. il 3_k 3 [, ' %, 6 w x; - .n.g r y w~.y g.s y w n~ n. j,c

,.-v_.

m n' ' ',.7.e; y},wb. w. p. w; C j W X, > g's, y _ ~, g' W 5. ;q.g hp i y L,

n. # g>

pp q tj.w@/ * . pr ,p h:y w+ ;p

.,, t o

.f +<c, ,j f e .3 h% .T M es h ep.a b, W -c c 9 W /;. 4 w e...g. E.32 .,m w, i'. 4,.-% ye;r nfg s *w v.s .em srw ,, Q g.. 2 r. r 4 c. , 3 c;c /. h g .~,e y~ yy2 y 3; 3 3-a w ~. g, y:1 d ;.,. M W m3g> .*N c.~ g - 3 . w g-

p. y 3 y:

n.

g, p.u.n

~g-;w~t Q

g-Q..$ y [ Q lpG [ p&a g&, g n,

• o

-p4 - <3t pg c . 9_[u]y y "n gw :, w wmw X 4 w. w fv,. .]v_Q;,&, &Qf, a w +h ?n. Q %'"? .G h ig &y

• 3 3fj'Nf?

}A + @g y> m,n. t y;p. V ] f & + ' f. 2 5 's m +- wA A %n q$ 3 & a 9 r.

ew W s q

.y,f 4 a+ au -4. ry y a mcg. m wi;w- . M. b~ s g.a * ,. ~.L;;s,g? v yta, ;-. s n o~ - v: s u..,. y,n g;. p g gI py g_;;;,, - e n p. , ~

p. -

r 9,-... q.1 p-q1+ 4-

y,

py . n.n. mm_ m ; p u, ; g@yg-9.s n.3 y+ w ,.y y,@3, q ; g o ;....+ -dh% y.M'; QG M,~g@g q_ m ~p c r&g; ,... M hWM. y.f. i,.- s 7-@gn oT 7, s. sn y v w3. w 3 n

h%x. M g6M.x'.

SMt 4 $h, 1 Q W ,t.. -7 q:. i.h (~ ~ GMg - af M -4 ~ f ', w SQ/ v b r x

w..

m'S-3 y / ? J, um m v

s. pip ' 19 - * *

-T 44 F3 W.QN W 4 w n/ W'?y n w ~.W..cy & g4 -m ~* ' ',A,. k_ N k. - 7:<

• y7:;py W, nm n x7';g:M M fp @.

L t.. 8 Mg q eW 9,2. 6 ~., C.3;.' v a

• 4 g

% e, ",p[i M y W.%;4 eda J.::'.%w.h w;s s so Rw n_?.?y e "'s a-G Ap&~ W'y~ g g hr.3+ o.o+ %. 2 i 9, en g .s a ,v p

• >f:u.;s c W O m m M v@av

[. s b ,.o w , rg.

• + +

w'a,.wf. g4-O AM.. y@9 y4 d+ d!%, Q;. A T< &., 2 ty > w f %n Od W L &>T%sWM A. et t n,a@e m w w) 41 y c +n n - m r d kw; e WMwW ~g N W 8; E.. y W W M 8 A W y ?" - ..M " ww., e%m;m gg mm ex W > 4. - ' y n' . 4 1,. $j ; .q.. q.gp $ &g gyg%< 2 . p; w m:m.m #. 3 ;w, u,, a < ; #); ~ zf .g y y n7;, 3s y ,y

4. O % 2 W, n &w@~ e,x ~ y s #;~,M v u 4w%Q&&m% &[::&, wmVMS a

y_ m W4& Ma m ; +, w.s & a.mm Q. n n; TC< 4Wa m % M W e, n a, n,n ;moyhm+g a m smg&W%aw@;9CMpqbagh y ; q?M9thgwh%,mw %yW Mfp 3 g s e M 4 w -- Mi s 75 w agw > m>eann m nmy - a w ww mw,-,.- ~=

p.L a ~

3 9 y g e Q Ny , p m ~ m,n. W. wnm - < i ~ % m, %,. 4. ~' ww ww-o /';@)- w.nm&:n w manQn qc. * + x nnwa .n xmm wwu w rw u a~gny yw_ , _ v y' ym; ;. $.,,Q &w?$y max.m?, 'l;,L..-lr.x xm a n$$w$.w gn,c:$ X,l N,?,..W'W, % "N O M NT,T Y R.m.h Y &_.I~,y , e. .u w. n, - a gm .,~, 1 eM( s.y'2 . 0. tW ?$,^h<- w Th x s.. s y en s . g a. s. e s P?.)y[{'; fgq [ g'pVgW} [ ' {n'd.f,[v

f. {$l', w#3 "

.j V y,.Nyyjmppef.WQ"phgp*g $p.,f3 [- j 3,/f

a. ?,

~n .n o c .n n ky b -.T q y 9 + W~.; ~m.; ;Q.nwar 'vgn ;. nm f $, p ) r =.-[ 'N 9' V ,,t . ; a yy m&u,_erm Nqqfn ^m;n. m

x. m%,i,% y d&lg=,gigy p y-t y,k g.Qy,., ' M.gW;,.

e.. ^jp f, ~,. ri, fjp +,'- - Q-n d. ' ;) C. -{ e + r .o w s. - m.. r 4 3 r 'f h g - w.,' w ~. p. Y ^ ,.J' -[, (h I , ' 5 y 'f ' m,.y .-.. m.4 . n. s s o q t n.., J~. ..'e. w s. ,- w+ ~ -..* > a, n i &c#_ Q f:i,%

• Q*W w T d-:p-Q ti3f Wf ^* Q '

W.fP S ep p; QG.y g,,m. v.3 O 'R,Wg %.,^'<6 Q,'M N y._Q :%. s Df. .i i h a s 1 n%. , mm ct t - - r m A e.g ~';o s .h p. hf:n, Q';;jfg v '.(i -Q.4g ;Q',Uh;f Q _., Q % 4 % W K u m W W N Wi f, f Q mc f, l l ),- - a Jfh lK W W MQE* W ^'h Q Wffi }-[~y:.. hE?~f N / W,. ffL[e_^m Y 8.; y s ve c . m;Q n my m. sm. ^ .-: : p ngt.., fr

• y)

.,,....?, f H ' g:s&,,w',;,)q p q v, ~,' ; } J M o J am,.. <. M.'W%,...,.. .r ,cu g - Q y ^' f, y r J a ym,.w, y 4. e.x,. g:,. .e n.' 3 ^;;.~ g qi.,q_ .af.: sq mg ay+ oy ,s; ? ..s, ,Mh - e ,, W_., i m m. - r. s p a ,e ke %. r >;/, g,s y p -A-.y m w.w r i 1w.zm... -- - A . :J y,%= mm..:n.s%+ ,v--u o w v, : g4 s 'L ;. } _. a yg + n% n ,...s m*

Ay 1

n 2,ty 9. 3 vy J e t-- i m, f u u .c v, s - + ._ 2 3 - '.g g,, j g ' T_, J;A*3,....r.-, A.L, g. a e s An s p. i

~y

's,g g}t-. -~, k k:7 .,;,g 9 ac 1 g ..LF %_c /1}* hi,.N k ).- y _ lg,y-oj. '".v.,,:pf* y n'., 9 Y.','N"# j(y[.. o, i 'q.r g Y p <. 34 , g.:y' ' kI E 6 5Y -l' A 5 - JT,/ g3,Y '.4

• =--[.

b 3;N's f., % S -.J j.7x'7,"~ ,."8 _4 ,~ f? ,.pm' 4- j o.- g. .s nr. mg% % w,. .m b y i d H + 5 Q" [a%} \\ . -J J ' sP Y. ; >Q Q 7 t.~. ,4 p9,7.jc,( 4 i Qh'y'u ,u s sg te. yy ,e. 4

C,.r t p 4 [ 7f@t

• "g p,

,. %\\sn'? r. 9) +. : r'f L% t V 4 y ?m %.'";g&. J f,?W+>%.y % n - > ni i. e - y l w n s, . T - p-q s,;~ - T. . +,sq z r c v& y m a +,'~- ~ q" + ~ e '->V,. + > A4.,% :' :.s' " * 'N; % k s. s 'N. g'. dfs:9'% + s.,- .f SQ, y b ~&a i, M2

1. ? >.

t'y.. C q..+%. s g. F^, ' v~ 5 Ra g e n-w's !.s.. hw Q; m m%;p+ ; 6 :q n 4 ' - w2,.%ph M~::~ p.%: e, e,e W

f

.A n + d.-',,p u a s: v. + . 'w, =. m .x-4 ;-3 4 y - ,y ng.a .r y c i. 5 ...}

?Y l.k, fj

.? >. ^ 1 4. _wnm. a. g.. n m..w%: -. w. >,m1. w" ') x v w,' ~.. w,

n. : /.:ny,= m m,.~ o,. n m u r w+ a 4

m. m,e.mw W., w .a n.-y e x m.,.. g-p w p w-dx% e. n w.W -s v w +m. e, v,s,* r,. m. > av.,.4. s - w . wn a p a m a m + vm 4qi 1, ;.q.y3. w t

.-,gw$ r. w n.

m d -, <.,,:q w w 3 -wa nae ,ye. 3 o - - a /. 4 y.y g r p v .,., s a,v ,.x, ua r *i f %. m.r X ' n g Q< j, g w pw,,W y ~.. r r%, o. +3 y 3a a. .,_ w , 3 *g-9, ~e - !,@, q^2 ;, pa_- v tan . - g3 r O t g;en n w>3 .p C, e ^= W. 4~ r d-LA V. > ls,. y i ?% W s' ' ' > - -Q n, dX V l*.d g " # 9 = 4=g.; WQ,.s. yse..,m ; y &hk.M., W%,. -- y y W s A A/ W ',, ff C*'n + Qg4'@h. f M,n : k-,Mb'@h

b. v i f:hlQb yyMu,g /- w

- [fDY'b' kQ%.Y ' N&swww).5 4 g %,w)ff f.Q'A+h g 00f? h 0 5 l'?' A .y x n v..e. b ,x , 'o ',,. _ - r w m m,-. a .m - .-m v

e ;

~,; &m*w Ly y y k,l:" Q %. r.w - .A .a v am u t /m v&hJ h j % %:C. ? * ' ? h e. as -mllk~ {s.Yff NY.n", f^h ka h.$.fk$Www a%>l-.is,M...~( -,, n P :.N.% - 4 nx k f , s..... c i += ~x? ;.. ' egn g y,%n. ...%y w %n+.x,w W,, n ~ n > n~ n - w ,n x ,.e p vW y c,r z_ .. As my.1, y w r ,m m ;m. ;u n ~a n e ys ,4 gjp ..g,,, ,p$.9.,9oo _7. s pe x.,., eg;.u.v ;,-p xu. .,-.-.w., yp<. n_ ,r, uq, .w, r: J t 3...-_-_. . 4,,, p, n._. < s,., I' . m s , a c y r W"

/ '- A / # \\ l- 'j y '/ //4;- p l // 8. y . '/ / > ?'$ '[

Q-

_x:L k, A.,>- g \\ / k t ) i 5. \\\\ l l . ' ' + d h' kh c ...9-e i :7... %5; *._Q f ^ l

.uy. ;i, v,;

3~

k* /.M.., ~5:kW l g r; q [.,, ~, -e? 3 N. dl k b y-4 .N* ys g ' ~N T;;* [b M

.:1 x sg s&w

. nQrk A w b 'vjiW M. R h e hN %'5'-

• j g 1P - t re c.m 4

- -m. ,_.:zu ..~ ~. d ~ n n)annn

a..,en,

-d+

$5 $n. $ h & Y S S,'i'5k h t $ $+ Yb ?:$ Q h ? $ N W yM,sw=n=

1. fdc 14 J

++ c~ -ew 3p~~w% M n w%"a ; iqln ?9*:+ %.w n 2 rut .L b j

I I I Ourlocations OtherOffices: Affiliated Companies Stone & Websteroffersits Chicago Stone & Webster Engineering Ltd. clients complete design and Room 1704 Stone & Webster House engineering sersices from four 111 West Washington Street 230 Gray's Inn Road domesticlocations-its corpo-Chicago,IL 60602 London, WCISHA, England rate headquartersin Boston Houston S:ane & Webster Canada, Ltd. and three full-service Opera-4615 Southwest Freeway Yonge-Eglinton Centre tions Centersin Cherry Hill, Houston,TX 77027 2300YongeStreet NewJersey; Denver, Colorado; Portland Toronto, Ontario and New York City. Suite 1437 Canada, h14P 2W6 900S.W.Fifth Avenue Stone & Webster Engineering B.V. . BOSTON Portland, OR 97204 P.O. Box 199 245 Summer Street Washington 2280 AD RijswijkZH P.O. Box 2325 7315 Wisconsin Avenue The Hague,The Netherlands Boston, h1A 02107 Washington, DC 20014 Stone & Webster Espana S.A. 617-973-5111 San Diego Cuzco 1 CHERRY HILL Suite 1210, San Diego Federal AvenidadelGeneralisimo61,1 C 3 Executive Campus Buildin8 h1adrid 16, Spain P.O. Box 5200 600 B Street Cherry Hill, NJ 08034 San Diego, CA 92101 Stone & Webster hiiddle East,Inc. AbdulJalil AlFahim & Sons 609-482-3000 P.O. Box 279 DENVER Abu Dhabi United Arab Emirates P.O. Box 5406 I, Denver, CO 80217 Stone & Webster Engineering Pty., Limited 303-770-7700 39 h1artin Place NEW YORK I One Penn Plaza Sydney,2000, Australia Stone & Webster Engineering 250 West 34th Street Corporation I 212-760-2000 Hap DongTon Shin Building New York. NY 10001 108-4 Soosong-Dong, HOUSTON Chongro-Ku I P.O. Box 3546 1160 Dairy-Ashford Rd. Se ul, Korea Houston, Texu 77079 713-496-8600 I I 1

_____g 83 R ~ i 3 g I ,1 I >4 s gs 5 53 3 k-g g ra 5 i a

% w4;,, 2.3 A. ; *.,g,g ~ " e g" -, e- '. -. g... - e, .t.2-mx .9 ,,f- .f ., 3,. .,x. )n. s cr,a.:. [. - ' ,ky 8},- - ,y as s =:.i.,3., _.k ~ [.. 9}... 7 <.y . \\ .,\\,,, g-q- " f ~. '. 4.'. .. 3p - x : ;-- : .. ;a., 3 y;.. ..y .g f w;.. f..',- :-@ -'Q s 4 -. r' ,_, e y, ., (, h... )- ( A*j.

.' j

,.' t gJ - -0.;J i,. O ,s 1 m ?f R_ L Y. . ?l 5 'l-E [.[.. } g ll ~ ~ ". ~ Qh[.::J. l.L 1*l% -[ J., ' ~ i f.y l [f . g(eg ( . w. 7 q , o. }+ p

g. 4, Si e..-

. j.- p. g... W., g 3 cp ' p, i.... ' ^ .) ,r y ~ : e m3 1 [ ..[ h i k f.. I h f L 7+ , m,', a,

n.,.

g g ,g 3, s. '.,, ; g %.s...- ,5 . -+ 3, o J;y eat Ky g.g4 3 7 p Mh r ^- v y 4 y + S f V t ,.3

s ~ G; k ;,

Y. l _

1. O. "

~ ~' l, ', ' '. l.,, - y .w g ,~ 1 ~',I . : l

- i(

J 5 Aj [# l[ [-Wl J.I ..??J e w L . y.. m r. 4 l J .. -+. [ a- .c. g ,. I p 9 l i M, g* * ~' _ - './ 3 . [' m [- ,1 ... L l' '- j[ ^ i. N fj

3..f.-

w- -. ,,.: + l _. 3 {", -..[. ' ~.. r.f y; =. ? 5 - ps 4 I m, T A f._..,.ni...,. t g. .x - '" - ) c p 4.3.e

• i-a :

r,a , :I, ;.;.s - a. .. 4: f.' 3 a. '* - W v l Y r f i

• f 4

' i: Cr ;, u.. E* ? fir t l ;. + ;f *. llf _l .l: l.h t-f SN 4 ( y 'N .g:g s m ~3 h.' t_w i,m., J M h - ( p. g; ~. e ,-( ~tw ".f Y. v =

w. ;.

.y. L. '. ;.. -= f c v.. -1 19 9 ~ + =.. ", %,-p.g 8

m\\ -

. +., . W( (je

y g

u,;., y. -- ~.:.. 3g(.;.. c. ,,. 4..y. ,..,~ v x

(p2Nr.;Weh0PMcGeMeVWSETMMA"AD&%FJMAe7Ah3AMW"h"Jcema. Tin" lMhXW//a'- f -N ~ ~ ' ^ l n. ,n + s y

w..

y, m U $ ~

• y k N J[

je 7-2 'i : fg r._ t e. 4 4 m-n y ,. ; L ,e r 1

v. :

, n&o m_ -p . y %:_y.,

s 5

h, 3-4 1 1 ? 8 +, }

' ~

_ ' E.'.Q' !~ Q. ; ((',', f ,3,

~

'3G .j,, c y , ht l. - x

t. c.

~ ^ cy < Q j+, Cri:n i

• =
• w

- r > ;; y V.- s

s. s

. ry. &yfy% -' q * Ti;f .n f_ ~ i::} t ,1 Ag:-. ~. 8 g fff p g ^

• 3 Ng e

. g, ; 4Q k'w, s .- ~ Y: 4 ]~ Qy ? W yk - V' ~ .l 'g _ Q g,4 ( gg; Q c ap- -, -vem 4 m s s Te e w

• - -7TE

( 4 "... 8-[ ~ - c g. m mse y. ~

1. . g y

g "" %, v4,.: - 4 m 3 ~ r r-1 ^' 4 l'l% Q1 y/.. > ,c; bd 1N

• s s

4 n,.. m - A,~fu. L;_, ~ : y,

g V,.

,I [~" (,

• $. 5 f.

tg + ~ y;u,,_, a- ~,. - n ~ r r '... '7* >u-y e y t l Mik:b &q V iy}$ LW h p' %.. > 7J= 0 y;;;! .p> y - u a# y w . WM y\\. , Qsg g y da-

g ys C

.v . ',> > g 7-u Q& $c ' lwl}gO ',( ?ff,lw&Gqf y h yyww w mys a .g wm . -, ~ a,,,xa ~h ? o s_ #, s i-0 % y g g, p %sn_e p m.. y s 'q = yy 3 me ~mm% ulk ~ T y 6", ~ + om y h % y g ff]pej {? gi . Q g 2-T L

+ M P g

24 4 ~ a s -~ w'wm g !: w a,, ,oyv - e + q .q g7 t

s.V:;,.

e m W. Wh* E N_ f.d, ' # 9k}yjt .,. :., k, L r ~ ~ ' i ( 77.y j.y g g g f 4 r q d, 5 -W M g > @ 4 )W ~< ' p _,~ g y a nx g< &g ;g%y;, My,, q -+ m m. ,p - _ ; g. l$ ~ ~ na me n-e,7W yyyD. x ,79 O~E i

l. ' n ~

'N T'i f PMMS 'w b s y O;-. 3 9yM N x;f j4. y ; i. ht,, v ( - _ q3[, . g;f ' ' ",,g.} gjg;^.> g' g%g ! r W.-.,. e s p p- ~ i .=y' ',,w&7u' m : ;.; _3 a ;my p

g ~

g jf ' ' ' ' Q' ' ' : wm m gary; : 3 39 ^ N!> l L 1 ' fl ((l{ , ~ ~ m aa ;; > - s m av g a pl4 34 s t [. ( 'O x, hg i + , s,, , dy w+x. m m, a.s, s;;vx ac. 8 .=y a; - f r e,n Q~k%Q f + .m + .n ~ + g ~' 'N~" 4 . ' +

y' 4 JQ:5

~p q c ~ w n??e w y,dS2 x -.m . ~^ m 2ns '. ( s.

s " i s JY ;

gy r- ~~ 7 Q, " y, ., } }; ~,-. %) e + L-g.( = t 'k'+ ,,:m3;,,._ g.' ' 'j-p Q a r- ., H

1. m,.e.]7 +q

n.

v. e s ' O.r+ t r .y* }}[ j s 3 7-e g g st (4-... - M ._n ~: q-h', ( + 5 s

g. -

s-. : -1 r , y',' t,y m,,

j [;

1, N.:

s = ~ q.M s?~ T x ,y* .t .g ~ r- ",, z e .;q f;

g y qf.

' " + v.m. A 3 ps ^'.% 'w z, .-~7 = l: ? [ ., -i (e g t i

(

+. y :; r r x 1 e Q (6 /.: l1 lj [' e, 9 n: ; - y& c f i

. _ -.. ' * ' - - ^__ .a. V sT.s __V -L

• L.__'
• .____;,_,_'f-'

i y '.'M 9 ..._e' -c &.,,-:e > p'; ,%Rj ~-. e. %.. p-. e _ .s'[,'.' i ( s., ~.,.s,;r..i, D: l- ~

y. s.

.), %, ' n].Q.- v.... r g, .~..s __J._ . l -l l 't .... ~. -a =-

<r,,

t t; -. w 3 -,....se....a ,....v.. ....h.., '.'.~.;l$$$i&WhW :.. - ~ y .~ ..6 a...

f...i p.')

r 3 ($ n "*-i_ g-l' 4 .Y g g t f _f 2 c, 3,. (, ? .4 '[- ,'_C. ,l g.1. g v .q a e@ .i ./ l. / c ".L; s, 'f, j.- ~. ) .3 o - ;p y. 'g;.4. 37 e, .g" (. ^ ..;f-f, p-p na

y. y _

) n e. = ; g. f'~ ~ V. g l.,,, e,. y J~ a { -~ 3, o. ~ ' - 4 N-(47... - g D;g I-y p. WM - a : m r_. @ *', -. SA . ft' .. $< ?

l.. '

fafj!fN,kk_N h&S

f..'. ;hlhh

.#i

Wic.

.s:klb O m,. a egf. fm e. s

..., - - s rg., $, g;. yy 34_ I L.u g $,.

c e.,gn:pAq..,4 Vs aw-w

• :I j

Lr i .. f -4 , -- i e s ,. y 1,, g .g

j

.g ;.. 7 = ,*n' [v -' - : :E: Nr- !T1 m i J;K

'

lw',_yp

. J j^. c -:.f.4 - s

. n

.) :.sr =r m;% p. . d. c JMEl )r#3....l b.. ,.( l L 1 d_'_ ' 17 5 'T' : .i. . ?.. r.'. g s, ;e ; JV/ 4 W. jf,Q.

L m17g]4gggg

{}34- [f' [....

- j:g. .Q

W o.R,-Q.,.,ppn o, -g,.l{' h.,g.,: yghJS N.S, W_@_m;;q: 77 wxs;3mpqymm. n m.w w p&y 3yy;:, R,,,*.i r;& jaXMb. 7%c,,,%w - y;sn ~ g g g m?. y, ?lM. m-g fxy?, 'r n.,K, j.b,3..,=. M 9 a.$ n,,s., a n. m, cn' a .n.n n p.y>.,,y ~~ l..,, ] y ,.,m,,, , -Q "., ' g.4, j g. 9' D-n ,g*' s

y

+4 'y'g.g %4 &" 7, g j _q g, b yT[Y ,, w g g j%y g+9 ,_j_',--..,., g'g -. v _y 6, i' k ? ,-,.? p ) -e ,_ j 1-g-%# G' h i

• 2,.. q94 4 i$r M fp r.

Q 5y p 4._ j

r.,,.

'c., (47 {. y +gnq, g.-M fr y[h),' y-g a g g'[p + q ; @f p f ' yg g ?>J w 4 gp r K, y_; Wy, ' g g, y, g; ig p,. :p 4% 'm.m. 2:-y, yyc 1 n-s g ~-w a, pyy ; 3 g y 3. ~,+ p 3_ 4 g a y g s y q q yg as S bh LW lfkhIkh?h l _$ $ Y.' n ~ 4~. .,, z s, ,m e % n gm $hf hfhfJhh. Y N m m vwy cmy - pc;w W, 3 a W;;w4p A;)- pm; e p m -'r y,y., , A

Q;my_

, cs pp 3 c:3 y w-m m ye +x-w,, Q.m e -,,, c U, G,Q,C.V ' ; Q.jQeQ - + lNi,&,, Q,. ;'. s 4.y$U, 0. %,g,;p s. '., 2 jO ?,7

z.

o

• W

.a 4 :h~,,~ w... ~%. :,W - ': q /. . eb ~c u o.v, ccG+ Q' g y:.3].m_ f -Q [ g.g,..- e. a.iM* W %..,,w., f m -u i.y V. E .e. , "n w-u e gpy y}f,.. r s, 4 x . wl4 . -. er. w :_gyy: gg a_ y, [i:. c v-g ,_ :Q C,_ 9 {.f +,yc'4y. y j a.., ,,t3 n,3 xe;, u 9 + .,y 3.y ,p,._,,'t, ,g 47.,;py. 4f +..

y. g 4

x.4 I v yl f. m " 9 w; --..g.r,Q.4 7 -4 4 o < -.;q f- .k , 4 ' -,, a u.., . &s a u y f ? }w }{y w ) hl3, f.. W,#, - T' j ~f ,>a f. f if,l-(Q,',?.h h W _ r:

• 'W e,j&a

- q g e n,p 4,5 . mw.s %w m. ~ ~ v ,_.yjpM : g w _.,4pgs.s,~ m_ m q + w+.m. % g. u ;-(y q 3.. n: Q Ql-p ps , o z_

Q _ &a m-

,n-w s e m{. ' 't 5 f, ~; _ q. m,L , lm.Gb.%dy Q Hy m, NQ W i %. :. p.. m m.. ? g a s >Qe i. a ' Q;.V' ^ ~ + k rn Qu yyys sy m+plg.,s,.W q g g-y'.. v t ~ v,. m wen ap _ yi ' y,,, g*Q.s gms 'p,~r ,. -, r~ y 1,. ' y .;y u, mn s w-(s.W- %g . A;? k g w w[g.,,7 s . g 7 9. iy p'* c e.) 7 . X4 uf t-,i' 3L, 4 t h; . w&. e .':x_~ny _< f .}.. 's.1 * ' 3i n?s. r a-n'_ . t. 7, + & ~ % % A ~$ f,;, y_ ', h ! ' f rf a + Q

L. +

w n s i.h ,h m& y&.

9. *y

• l a,

7 .8 c .i. Ws.n. a y +%c _Q %p mp' - ow n .' r'- ,j - N, 5. i t' V, ? ~' s '7 '1 .,..FJ

y. w i

'l j me e s.. h ? 4.~ . :. s 1 4, i y !_.Q4 = } Md $8 gyggerABIEW IB3D E% ~ gpig@ggsasaurM 3 -= =- c ^ p. V

• 1 r

?'

+

,..5. :. g,._. 4 7 X' .a E n h4- .p s' M I ms t. 'i n i! on r. . it t l f t. s

• • 'i t' t tu uts.t rit.t t e n

n,.rsoint,, ial $ tiir u i A A t is t.r m.naa..r n, inti, r in s t r 6,. tirin th. Mr_ s t raieif o siye es#inei a u

>s, i, tit. ttu

,i s n t, 5 Ne # f timboeiPiw., (. in in* W i, t r a, P' i n t $ t i t u v I

MW- -.., \\ t ~. + ~.s( [. ; -s, 5 sqc.. -_.m K u ,K'> w--;

p.y Ny b

(~ 4-. ~ ' m. - %.c. a )n'. mx.. x _ j j.'%,2 j. kf h ^

1. a 7

e; t pj { 1 e m, t.; h, 3 - ew-

v, c; j',;s

1. ~

P % M '5 L C ~ g'#@;_. 4 >, + T:; x,,, hY ' E fl. .1]? k J:.;- . s.,.YL !S N i$w. ' ,jfhhhj ' 'g. F s EC D.urw!1Awmgy c Gymm+W_ L.7%,, p, s.. - ) - ym cL m4 vperm ygn- - - s y r ^ ' - ' * ~ - ~ * * = = = -^ - " ~ - - :Y l _Qf*. &L'+g.~ n }} 54 .%. f "h**$"- f~ ' Intnr; ;-;*~t

~3r'

• t 6%, _

E! -s- - -- ; i y~.. s..,- f

== =.- .-s, -w ~. w py a k'g

5 a

.g. Vc g_e - g g,1,. m [;~w.. g ' ' '^ ^ ^ k N - % e ~~ _I I I E I, 1 I

..y-..--.. q~ y= } .l . -g, p,. g ,4 1 1 e ) x .. 3 lt II ,.,. J'j-7 y'T i. L. i ', ' + : (j, i m.'- -l - ^ ~I, - k '., t-s .s J t1 'w

• f 1.

- (, _-l-

• '['

,, ' 'l ,a 5 ~'i

• l '

2 5 e s 'e ,3 7 '~~- - s - 2 ' 7' :

.. jg:, ~

o

9..

6 '. {f .}- xs.. - - f-' k. p l' . ) !5.l,-- r. y t kk ' ^ f; s - j' t., 3, ['4 ' M - ',~ l- .W- ..M- ' f,.. [e =g. T .h ~ E.

1.. O '

..' -. k l. ' h ' t- .3 2 .p 3

e. F " **l k

. aan _ W m.~ ~. : c j__ ' L .... ' ~. gs'

l? l

~ f- }' <a e f pi e A_ c. 1 -} ,_a '- ^ I. + ' L .%.t .,[ I t 1. L A.y ....,n .s'$;' l p.

d. '.gf 4

p ,t-j .g. ~.. <,. p. g (ty .' 1 - a %~ . = ~,s- ?. e. .\\ . N f, - p,l > - ^ -Q , l. - L. a a ei 8. 4., n. c. t S. g, p- .- ( g, ' i z B. + ' E - fas ' wr

T.

} ' l ;.,, -a - ' 'g-h '.; $.. '. '., ~ 1,, ^[ ,e }' () E y t. q n /' -: j. v 's '., ;. ei. 4 f.I l.f ; A.,,:9 f.- .'~t i f ~, . $ l_ ~ ~ l ~ y,'.- 4

• N4,.N [ "

s 'e h { . _ _,r. pr W ^ W. t' __.93 g. + ... [.. ' ' C 3. Mg Y. b

h

g* g ~ ' 1 . 7 ,m w . g.f ' .g ~ - ~ ~' ' I_' !h f , 2 '..'. - s x. .n. p . f %}}g { h W".. W /> b L F.....

_E -Q g Mi_ ~ l 7i .O = M A j td:g,_----s : L'2 ? s. m< g. q,y q. Q -,.., e 9. "d Y j [ t ut,% WP f) 3 Wy p ai L A n ,A W i

y pijp +

1

jitty,

_r J gy - = =4 I ,b- ~m_ l m E. w li!ae i Eg g = s I I R I I I Industrial companies are I k>oking for ways to replace the oil and gas they burn in Innovative constrtxtion their boilers. One conver. techniques are contin. sion project completed in I uously being developed on 1980 was this facility at a Stone & Webster protects, G eat Northern Paper Here. through the use of a Company plant in Maine. unique crane, our engi it now burns hark and other wood waste, saving I neers were able to achieve a retord tift in positioning the company 400.000 har-the reactor for a Niagara reis of oila yearin the pro-Mohawk Power Corpo-duction of electricity and ration nuclear plant. steam.

iP l l 'a n y, l-q i,iii - i .,,,,.m i '6

• * 'n

. \\ 9, -- 4 emp?' M w:: jp?bt ~% %m.4, '3 *; if=.y.v 4.lf~ - -.l! y %';c,;[ - p", hh L Q3xx ytm %q +u:,3ynff:: a, '4 .t sf; g > y %j ;in g,n g y B $ Q ] g w @W ~~p%p4 g-ge$}3 yy .a.w :-^nk nt .+.ir vw w mnp .s c n ; c% i w: m m-y, ~.y g: w; p y' g C 4 glpg g g&g d y m w:u t;.s* w w ec n,y m a m. wn m %e p& Q="ij%m a n n(w,ag&;..:'y g g; nen:kn. gEO .g _ ;}m.,Q .y" .g}: m f.. + l:[. - flL \\ ^' y t xa n w$Qg w ~ pding -:C 5 WhG iWiW *' tj* \\q: yng??fM:-Qy;fn M 'n G-J)fa:ars? Y .phir ~st f,.- 4 M, ,1 M5BWJM 'C M 3

.sL U

QF,{,h.*, o g u, s '[i,f rnet[:q bu

fd a

0 1 7 ftQ~W D}e a 2 b WQ 5paapeg? - p 3 "N - Y "dfh'O. 4Wyg ~h .?N ' y? -%es,gd$ ays _ m,w w _ MM $9k J- 'r' ~f)g [y' - S -se 4 Mik , '} -y% - 5 I i i, si a M l .._._.--.-......--......=,m.-

i..

. - mi. - eman.m. -,- m amm marm n m - a, - mia m m ennw.

-ma~m,e: xfy$ ,. p r ~, e en w a . e.w~n..-;gw+W r w:

s ? w. $+$q. 4 ll, 4 f> a e, n,, ma gw 4g.,,

a $$h ?n??$ m y:::t@b ge%3 gw$ hy/ h+byg {%f5h- ~ k p m_,? #pls'bh :$[ ;lllfj haas7%l h!kbh?Y g3. " ly -hf f eggym s,& o& y% 8i%w W,cmg,.. n; 2.,7;;s....~.m 4999 sh. n .o m.+mp,~,. #,. ,,a, g.m p ,m~.. r, ~ n,,. ~ +. b;y g$${:U='ma n,w%?$SfN N Ah>k$f$"W' INNS $..s q fb YE h.h.;$hlN '$# b.u. wag N . ~$dh.,=:y:'M M@#? ~~ 'j),g? 5? U$

S ipV ;;L?w

=

%%' ~:: - q g? .:%g :w?i pt a fp QS [ggw~ g , '8q0$hyQgq;+Wrmg fisi;a% Qy,&; 7 L ^ 9 G @gt-f e-. c rm m n?r hd-p; w@; ~ r go?!gjffRC"yn. Wyf g'o W yg6 Welid %' q. w ; g, s., m;f;Q& {ilnp n - l llJ. t ed. ~ 4 8; s u O n-

s n

ce-w-i 4.

f

'5 PY &ge%@llNm ');.c Y :,gwy s 4 yg,ggy$:35 l h$b.. U NM f k j ggp$x5 2s

4.:.

p .:Dg : s:q n ipn -3 x.:yavC;:fQ; n " s;, :; . ;y dk.h(($- h$dpf'o{;$.*pgj y;- y?gL N 5 &cl%g gr

~h

\\ Q$W$ i UMIM s ff.v-> p vw .g ., '. / (z p) $N k* . w:n h-e. t i.

• gr,.O vpq g e l

bt* I fa

4

,f.

o g L vgg ,kMO ^. ;. w.. n .c p. A >4111916 i l

e, fM

d?q

.:. s. v - M 4.. u. c

'.. 'a.. '.

f%ge -.

• ,'n-

' '. e~ g. ~ f}, y g. _ pg .,4p',g;_ A s .a. f.; ' '. ; ^ ~ ~ } ' & f , J ' [ {}[} . g m. ....., - [g.', p j -,. 3 .f 7.. L... c -.;...h. ~ ('-}. ; mg 3 -I ,, - [f 4 t - 3 g

u...

-7,., r,v* - n. s .. $s. ~ - + ~ ta .s ^p s f ';' '^ d i. t + ^h; ...fg. tie y .. ' f ~ ; f... '.

• %. ~. N - -: : ;

.~ - f. . ?l ~ ~ s _.. - il ,4 . d. g._ 4, 4 y- .+ .s f., r : '

9.

=3 ? x .'j 'y '.' l, .. #.4 y._ y-s

W

\\- '. f+ .p .+ J. +. <. ? - (( ( 1 .f -- (- q i,4 -g ,y a '. k - I 4,, ' 'T '., i " f

~

a. L.

~' j ',.- f ,s-

s

? f,. 4- -u .,.j 4 d4 ./j j - e ' _ ( } -- Q'Tj ['f. 3 l-e ' i ( [- ..[ .h1 1, [ 'i f ~ '. g* 4 '.,.

j. f,

.i' -9 A

1.

.. ~* 3i .+ \\ ' .t y ' c' , y. ( 'a l. j. , y.,.; ' g 4 .s.- .at s. s .,j. f y-i f j,.N

• i

.;A f.Y' 4 y J9 p:e,..f, g',. 9 g .' W

.Q

%..: ~. - - > ~ "? .6 x ~- - c 4 I I Major synthetic fuels prol-The contract drilling mar-ects moved closer ta reality ket. holstered by high oil as studies of large-scale and gas prices, was strong production of these fuels throughout the year. Saw continue. Stone & Webster Drilling. Inc., working is in an eucellent position mainly in the Houston to to carry out such super-Corpus Christi Gutf Coast projects. Shown here is a area drilled 79 wells-pilot plant for one of the some into fields first processes that may prove tapped in the 1930's commercial. I

+ 8 , h 't 4:; il f. ..g h t t = k ~i - 4 6.a ksi,ap ; m i;;;3 p,x d A N fs nii g' y~ -la a 1 p t

G .-s ,,-,- g am-e, + 3 A ., g,, d4- ' . h.,;. nk s g, A,% i. q t % -f- .M" ( 1 .v. ,r-3 s 3. ,;...p s a. i, ^- '( i ' '...', s. g, %, 1 - 33 c s .c y 6 f, _? $?.. 0 -\\. s - eg w y ...n . d .a A i;. [_.P.'[ ' - ~ - _y ..c-t y A,t ,3

• 4

.., [ I-j b " 6)-.: - k k f.- .). l't y." 4.. .W p '.,.,- + g. 4 g k, 4, ' g. -. eg.. 4 y,., - ,4 g 4 + D aa t. ~ e.. *- ...g j ' . 'g* q q l Q ?, 4-s. )* y.- 9,.", j~ i =,. t ' - f, j p. t. ,r .e \\,, y ( , p. 4 94 =., c W , + t ~ s., s s. %.Nf l.:, v: We ?. 3- { +. r. . ' m ~ E '. 1 s, / i '.i J .,4 + a, s 3, t 4 [h. l ? t 4,,, g g. e+- Ii,l g-.; ..~ .., i 3 ' ~' -,,.s Ay-M' fs 4 4 gl. h ' h;_- si w . g t 'n e w. 3 L .r 'g. .). )-, .q -,? q nw f,$.. ~ -t (L' .~ g a <,.. ! z,. ..,' - -r y' A'_ _= .w 1 3 + f p g. - g -,.,. t w.. W ( y ,E 1-y '.i , 4 . _.,.l54 ~% g .Y s .\\-. ~ J ,,4, . ~., e. s + ..s - a -., t, - cy p ' g. " 3 -l i* e y-1; s. f * (a);- ,r. ', ~ .,9 .&ft s m ,9 j , -t t **'.

• s

$( y.. ...; w n . '.;.'f,,3., (,.,

• 4

+ -4.

• L

%. 4 F J g< 5-t ,3 w ,..r + e) ,.h

• a.h g

~ w ? ..(j - ?' ' + M-y &.,., v ~ ^ x s t 9- * '4 A.- o l' ..f....y % a ,? 3 {.. y - S 2 4: - a. , - ) E '.,. + V1 '.' f. .'t ,%,g ! E... 4 s, e ,'L. .c, ; l ', - .<f& '? ~ 4 } r s 3 p *i 9 - ~ +.

p.,,

.2 !. V',.......%- .. +# ~. ~.,., -. - Pr odu< tion began at the Corpus Christi Petr o r henm al Company plant. one of the worlds lar gest E et hy le ne units. a s w or k g < ontinueo overwas on ettuleoe < ongdenes in the Repubbi of %ngapu e. the Pe4 yWe's Hegnshbr inf C hina. Ja pa n, t ihv a a nvi Tur k e y Otherinterna tional or o< ess work in ludeef off shor e gas pr m essing f a< ihties in the Muldte East Il t 2

• Nj y ? "

);4 W f" llk e ' ' ".,, f 4jsh. '- k ~~ ..e ., %'!l% ~4 g$ EX s %[^? $qL ?#

• v 3(

?f, ' > 0..

l. h yl

{

y. _,.

X}f; :O

?gy!fh ?b}};Ijkf 'm - N ' ;. ):cl"

c. ppa;

~l S p'y - l2,4 , 'k 3 - w*f Qif!" u .. g, 'y sa (7, Jij % $? Y --r "n, Q p .M f

-p w'

r '~-:ev w;sh- -+ m;

-,j p.

4. J N $(5) -d. 44(.s I'

s. ~', \\ t ..,.s. s j 4.. E ._l' .**i.,l ~ I ... c, T CH 'y x.' n'i .*j "? i, g.fc s.. . X_S - + 4. ), ~ ::6 {x ^ ' z. '. (n n .e l-I,Nydf PM ? ,9w > + 2;:: Yk J,3. [a,. esr ? w hk.i ' ' yp";}tj?g E ^ ; g;q ' an 5h I y I I 1 I I l 1 I

f' i .\\ A i F -(x

• 3 s

- m s. h y,", w. v g g. [5.h A 4 r &J yhi 4%, y; ' ~,Qng u hk '5 g - 'Y b ,.a kM II O.4 r r t -f.&j.sQ}gg QMyj, ',. g L ' p%, fe e - -= * '? M' -'. ; %, M. $G g[; ik j r ya + x }..,.

y. '..

Ag~

W ; /m.W;,N.

y-

u. c..,m-

' u. f , h. a s.a \\ h . hQLQ:r-:

• g fi _

I' w ( - e _ ;)

• [

g.

f. }-

'. k yy s .:. -,A %s n -.?e'.,, 4 a ^ * -#t.,7:_ '.v. - ' '. 3 f A. ...L : j - men.e.'g .. :." ~ ?. a;.n., 4 fh.,Q Q yi '. 7 0 ^ . c. *' ~ ~, g.

't,. {

v, ..s. . go _. A.. .q _e .=

..,. c

.._ y.,f.,., ~ j g V ~ ' f.f T. ' [ ' :,... - [.b ' ^ { 5

• Q ~

Y'

q 3 mm j.

c p= +- ,p 5 ) ~ ~ 4 "me- +, r' l ,; 5

k P-[

~ ag. 7' [ L 'M. 'i. l 's -l r [ i.[,, W ' ( ,J r ? a g 2 ..,+. s g. g.'> s 4 s.. J. , g ( -[ I .e ^ j YM /, ' d'.,< 4_, e, ~. m ."n.,- 5 .? ., i > .s 4 = .. ~:. 1 4 W,. 4 '.. ', ~ ', e-% ' - 0 j y. ^ r '. g. ' + +, ' - ) ^, ' e-[/,,. \\ n s Tf{:, 3 e s

9. i,,.,.

i 'g ei -7 - I i ~ 3* ,?:,. .,.y a,. - - e' - h,4. T 4,, 9r g'

3 g

a. c p gg f,:..

4 = ~ - + a.

p., w ~,

+. %, e L~_.e'~

1. 'n c;;..

. %. ' M'*f ~ .~ '.i n l. J g f. y

• 7 9

',= .. 3 .,y g - e .,s ~ ' ' ' - .q Ya., 7[. I 4 ' .l , i j <,W ' M. &1 5 t. =

1. g#

. 3, y .l.-. k ~. a 3 9 ? 2 s f' $ \\. n'*' & m# f - J i '\\. ( .x n.

- e,.

, M., ; 4 ' { _ g_.p g i . 4 s g.3 p7 c., g} - 7 - i. t. r . t

a f.,.

4 r.. 3 ;- 4 ..e - -~;. ,? n,f y 8* # ' [ l.. y I mmmmmmim 1 E.' .' f ,y; . fl 'Ms L.: pc. .x + ~- man

1, u,...

,.:. mag - i4 3 x. . 'p. + '.- a.o. j'. g

k. %. 1 5

.t e P ?. s, ',,. \\.. 5, 24

• ii

. \\ .g-e s ,- ' =,

f.,

'( .A -.,i,. - r.. ,,f' y og l / 1 t 4,. e c 'e +[ I ~' 4 __r -.i . o;, 1y _ }4., - :., 7. T.. w... v. ..s .1

... 'y

. m 1 ~ e t 4 g 1 A e '4 M, I ' $' e e - ~.-p M r . - - Y" 4., , -,. -' S-p- e s.m, n. 3 t w

• r.$ '.

Q, . l s _ l ' ~~ Y NY in e

I e !'jA I an-w r c _Mc rp yw j ~ gym t gy 4:e 4 ' 'A r > (____ fh, d sj i

hmMA, i

4 '3r c t, & kh Y m hM """M .g %p- - - .p 'E p., -" c m Mg, N [%'g+ .[ s N>*- ,ce x v-w ~ , ' %Nha-4. ( ^ w a g* w te s I *,' _, ~ N &z e I (_ .c I f,g) u r -:u { \\#[%%,[.17Aj. d'AN Y IP[ eed' y 8 Nk W.' lq. 3 ;M['s.44,[llft ],g km '3_* y, s I B B. i i

1. , pi f

f I II+

• i l >( Ii og j'jI-i 4h'

,g. 6 i e tui ,p_,gg,, , f S II t ' ' t j

• IA t.,

' h ru o I. ,,+e i

p. '. p. ?,.a ??.*

9ge % ; r-p -W%-' p. No ' % w a '. :. _ _ .. _ 7 % iw..% A. m..; ;.. _~~y.~ ; ~ 4.. :.. : ? w y/ "k -. r' m a. 'W

k. >...,...

V.. .c 4 i -- W,., v ~i ~* M a 1.' g fk k. 1 a. .'E

4. G.,.:0 k

V .) N- .'/ u ~ 3 ~ O ,,c. i.w'l u er 1. ? .y [ x +ty "..'@ l gey:,. .. ' O' c - 3, t e [ , ' ' ' - 2' .,l

[

*W.w.

} y sg.,. & ' - c,. - _ ~ . :. ? p v l_ _ l' _._.' ^E^ e

..,., i

.-

..r .q y/.. W { ~ s. ..s..,..... . ~g ; : A....

7 t).

+ny q. f4- ^ *[.f TQ'iM.ith j - T* 4 1 *. % %.l A ' (# 4.y? v. N .*' :. x.* s - 1 ' ~ L ., ) } l. .gjw [, ( O O ' m ? gk,y'$ s x "..*.'. A,..$. y_,Mf,y,,, : s- ..pfk. .1.&~.1 ~ - Nb,, ;,e $,' 7 2.. 3,- A ' g.; j, J /. 1.'. 7 T 4 7,.: y. a c,. ,,.2 , y f..f. m ,. / Q. _, y ym.'.y. ., ) .. -.~_s -:y,;. e c. y.- ,.8 n N' .,.'+.,-,'; C g: ) s. .,w .y ,,.. M. C ' ~ , ~, -q:n -~,, - ~ y. -.y.:. -a- .~ .t ,. =. - -' h h-g.

e.. '

.N,.'.'-'..-

t..k[Y k:~ '

---..s. v s (0 r + .s + 4 -s s,v. ",;. ',. ;% i .g

• - [

'p 4A' .3 J,} _. ]. .N,. f,. Y

f. i. r$th.a}m:'. 2E.

.?.., ,w-f[.(. +.

3.,..; g,.

'd 'WW !...h/ a...< 6 ". 4 p& % - m;:n 'y. : i _p. y %, (; -... " .q ..9.

g.s >.. -

,7 -c% y ...,a ~. ur, n., ..M , f %, r4,.:,_. e . +

• 'R,. ' ~

• t e-ww. -. njke

..'y ,y e.n* - n 's - - ~ =. - - s, ,,3 p .a

q,4 if'

.~ .V

g5

? .! ' _eF ~ - c.,. A ,3--'_- ,t..J .c -w-c .'s.., c. y., y m.c, '.. 1.m ~,...-.. .,.e ~ y h. f -_ p L ' 'I % ' f. ^ [' \\.l ' e f. . : Q_. g' _g s [: Yg W '. j.* T % q ' ~ I ',' 1 - ..? q-j ' rg r,. V- .(. - g Y v . c... - y, g- ' M- ' y,',. J. *

;.^.

A. - ,. cz, 3.7 [},. / , -. 3 ,p ,] u f - y. Q, ~. ; .,l - n._ ,a= s.t _.[__L ~ '. .'5 .. l- '., =. .r.. w in'.,7 ,e a

• )

'.y-',.,- i .,..... f, #,... r',., s. n,: 4. B.... 3

i.,

? : - 4y = g .) q > y. + r .3.w.,., ~ s ? ed; _p' _,.

, y. -

g.y..y a. m. g;,;,, -y = .,. ~% Q{ "\\ ,,,o v w. d r' e ;.k ~ w.: r %.^,.. , eVM ? %..s,. ' _ -t. ; u ' ;_ z g / +

/ -,

7 . I [y a Fr 4

• f' g

t', t t s /.. g. ,1* a

%g ,,.Sa-;;;z;agsgg ,ith {N l. h. g u 7 g + w z l<' ~~ hm eei m I I l l I

2 ^^.: d .e pen,"" _ _ pp h I k ', I

k h~b-.

4. F;,e,ilN"'.,qd _., r tj^i ti( Ff { s_ ef p, = I fdr s' M, I e tr y #, % oo ,),1%ryfu%E g o n Y*IY ' y ~ ;[y ~: e "+ ~ m-g.., i. !" 'C,. _ ' [ I I ~ ~

L FinancialSection ,rL IL 1 I I I I I I I I I Contents 32 Management's Discussion and Analysis of I Financial Condition and Results of Operations 33 SelectedFinancialData 33 Market and DividendInformation B 34 Consolidated Balance Sheet 36 ConsolidatedStatementof Income and Retained Earnings 37 ConsolidatedStatementof Changesin FinancialPosition 38 Summaryof Significant Accounting Pohcies 38 NotestoFinancialStatements 42 ReportofIndependent Accountants 43 Business SegmentInformation 31 J

Sad &Mster Incerpermiand S aLmes Managemsnt's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations gmLu r.xts are m ecusa I Results of Operations l 1980 ComparedWith 1973 1979 ComparedWith 1978 Consclidated gross eammgs mereased by $68.971 m 1980. Th:s Conschdated gross eammgs mcreased by $4,416 m 1979. This g increase was pnncipa!!y due to mcreases of $54.376 from our eng:- mcrease was pnncipally due to increases of $3.141 atnWutable to o g neermg and constucdon semces and $11.745 from our contact dnll-contact dn'img semces which commenc ed operatons m 1979 and mg semces. The past several years have w1 messed th:s countris $733 from our engmeenng and constucton semees The relatvel indecision m adopung an energy pohcy to overcome the countr/s sma'lincrease for engmeenng and constucton semees was pn-dependence on foreign cd However,it is apparent that coal and man!y a*ntutable to several ma;ct projects bemg completed or nuclear power contnue to be essental to the countys energy needs neanng completon m 1979 In adidon, very few new large power a addton to altemate energf sources This was reCected m our pic;ects were autenred by elecmc uthtes and some previously 5 - cpaatons for 1950 wit an increased effort on unt cmpleted nuclear authonzed projects which had been deferred had not been reac-E and fossd power plants. substantal support semces to ustes to en-tvated ncI were oter types of generatng plants substtuted. A sig-able them to meet new Federal regulatory regmements affectng m5 cant nurnber of smaller projects were undertaken in 1979. g nuclear plants and s:gm5 cant actwy a the conversion of oil fired however. smce these projects were in their early stages, they had g elecmc generatng statens to coal. Aditonal dnOng ngs were ac-htile impact on gross earrangs in 1979. qaired and placed a cperaton dunng 1980 to meet the mcre ased Operatng and general expenses mereased by $5.632 in 1979. demand for our contact dnllmg semces to the cd and gas explora-This increase was pnmanly a tr6utable to mcreases of $1,937 m ou ton mdustry All of our ngs have expenenced a high rate cf uth anon engmeenng and constucton actvites and $1,949 in our contact throughout tne year as the explcraton fer, and deve!cpment of, od dnlhng semees The ma;or pcrtion of operaung and general and gas reserves mcreased markedly dunng 1980 expenses cons:sted of salanes and related employee benett costg Earmngs from lcng-term engmeenng and constucnon contacts which mcreased by $2,370 m 1979 Because of the uncertamtes thaE are determmed on te percentage of completon method Acccrd-elecmc uthues were confronted vath durmg 1979 in planmng for mgly for an unders'arsdag of the results of operatens,:t shculd be fu*ure energy demands, which in tum caused a slowdown m the reahzed that ad;ustnents to the cngmal estmates of contact eam-demand for domestic engmeermg and coastucton semces, ther ings, or the ex'ent of progress toviard completon, are of+en reqaued was a decrease in employee tune utized daectly on projects for as work progresses under the contact and as expenence is gamed. chents and an mereased effcrt related to expaning cur worldwide even though the sccpe of the wczk requed under the contact may markenng effort This increased our overhead expense m 1979. l not change The na ure of accountng for contacts is such that reEne-FinancialCondition E ments of the estmanng process for changmg conducns and new The Corporaten beheves that the types of busmesses it is engaged developments are centnuous and charactenste of the process in reque that it mamtam a suong Enancial ccndmon. It is expected Therefore, the eammgs recogmzed on contacts a any penod are that subs'antally all c f cur current and antcipated capital expend-sub;ect to these cenitens tures, dvidend and w@ng capital requements vall be met from Operatng and general expenses mer eased by 535.508 m 1980 mtemally generated funds. This mcrease was pnmardy a'utbutable to mcreases ct $22,416 in our Inflation and ChangingPrices engmeenng and constucdon actrates and $6.020 m our contact InSanon and the related effect on changmg pnces have had an m-dnihng semces These mcreases were pnmanly related to the cer-creasmg impact on the Corpcraton m recent years Altough there respondmg mcreases in the demanc; for our semces Our actv;tes is no smgle method avadable to completely measure the impact of g consist mamly of furnishag professional engmeenng and construc-mSanon. it is antic: pated that 1he Ccrporation will complete its stud;3 non semces for wh:ch it is essental that we mamtam a large stafici cf the impact of changing pnces on its business in accordance wit highly-skilled emplofees Accoringly the major pcrtion of these Fmancial Accountag Standards Board Statement th 33. Fmancial E mcreases consisted of an merease of $15.000 m salanes and related Reportng and Changmg Pnces. and that the prescried disclosur g employee bene 5t costs. In aditon, operatng and general expenses thereunder will be presented in the Ccrporaton's Annual Report from other actrates increased by 36.650, of wh ch $ 5.277 was associ-for 1981. ated with our mar.agement censulung and appraisal semees Most l< cf this mcrease was attriutable to the recrgara:aten of our con-u sultmg actvities. mcludmg the formaton of a natonal markenng orga-i n::aten, the relocaton of corporate headquarters and the estabhshment cf regional censulung center s. 32

~e m+su incapcued ud sasews ected Financial Data i::Lv ame:rs. except ret sh re encuna me m moun,ds I I Years ended December 31, 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 1:ngmeenn;s SS Earrung and cons +ructen semces $2C8 574 $154198 $153.465 5144 497 S133,461 Contact drama semees 14 886 3,141 1 and gas imerests 6 133 5.109 4.871 4,594 3.859 )mdends and ='erest 8406 8.906 8 579 7.188 6.649 vic5:s on invermem secunnes (Ncte 1) 563 1.999 7.261 6 530 O ier 20 111 17 222 15.809 15 068 13S28 E-- Teal 5258.110 5189.139 5184,723 5178 608 3164,327 Et Inccine - $ 30.316-- - - ____ _7 5 37,214 3 22.058 5 23.026 5 31,47 7.488 122 8 015 654 8.409.034 8 806 858 7 929,826 g rage r. umber cf shares cuts:andma dunng te year (te 2) kWInc$mb per share (Uc5e 2b b 97 I2U h2.74 $3 44 $3 97 kg:dends declared per share (Notes 1 and 2) $162n $137% 31 40% $128% $1324 $1! assets $314 393 $270.712 5280,7C6 I269.596 $236 692 lr,s:m oe:m w.ra m m ecue m:em e neerei n,am.-!s ee a m r:2 2 c: < f sh.ee ri c= ner. szck a,J rer un aar.:w= rwee r-n rer> c!.e e-1 c.cd' 31 r 076 94 d n 1977c.iIl 31 c. E76 Iep+ > nn; N e v< y re s od i: Tr69 ho r.a fr r <. " r spM decLue:1 a kcmey 1% fxt.w.skn' vf 2e d Trc.uco Cmpn, s in c:nmm sucP miued' [rhLdO!S 2 M eyrye ;c3;-h inda j $2-int 7r,3 i } M 2.r,d [973 A gm f 319h 1971I72.1 m IE7 rd IS SM a 197 CPU - mW r exmr cfi-nzr1 d ;e m te me tf r e T rsro shres.;3s roccq J"$ D 'he 3Cr2.* P

I i

r lI l l prk tand DividendInformation l 3ncipal Market-New York Stock Exchange l l Sales Pnce of Dmdends Paid The Ccrporaton has contnued and may centmue, from time to l . _ _ _ ~. _._. Common Shar_es (1) _ PerShare_(1). - - tme. to purchase adcinonal shares cf es Common Stock for general 1979 12 1979 j. _. _12 ~ ccrporate purpcses on be New trk Stock Exchange. cr etermse.

ouanet _____ _ y i tm __. pigh _ _.

I" _ However. there is no asmirance that the Corpcration will cennnue to ,i 21% 2y. f. ! m75 I 34r: purchase shares cfits Cc.nmen Stock The approxima'e number of md wi 2is 22 19 14ns m' record hc!ders of Comrnor. Stock as cf December 31,1980 was ..2d 41 F. 7% ^4;;5 34rs .~. 10 300 raxn s. n. 23s sc (z m 75 l h *f GR,;G f ptv

• . p' f', -(* i y
• f,* y (,g (f,o 4_'Y ;f, z*

L k,, ^q) LM },'( pf'( { lk } y ..,ch!.+i25o n 3 i I 33

m . s m t. < I: c w:n -4. mire no Consolidated Balance Sheet rX f.: enre ou e t.= i.9 1. I I i l i m Assets l Decetrler 31, l ..-. 5 1980 197 Cunerdsses Cah

o? l"i i e I R.,

US Oc < r ' r~ Scuru s and %ni:Certieres cf Depcm

• 22 542 44 l

. ' a; 3 : 12, e AccountsEece:/ 6 E3142 65 'g' ~ i U2d'ed Chr"xs undc:r Cc maOb 43 326 39g Otu 4297 2.n,3 Tcn:Cune:.Ms_ *, 1904E4 170 i Che nTund; Held under Ccr. uct n Ccr/racn In r can24 9441 2.260 I:rcenr. A Secur: es a ccs 3 609 3 31 l w i n.s.

<ee ::,5 m i

s I' ' / l* i;fi ! [+ Pr pe ;P r!,nd Em: pax -: f&'e C) 94 als 79 rA6g rc:., 1: ,e; c 4 L-ind He:d h Pm-Je u: cc:' 8.788 e gi i Ot" b 'trd D( wd Ch ar'?u 7.753 6420 _ I I 5314 39; .?270,112

r

-rc

.-c m.

Jm - 1 I I I I w I .t __..m.

I 1 !I i i ,i f 1 m bilities and Stockholders' Equity i j i December 31, i 1980 1979 1 Current Luciaes-I i ank Lorcs 5 1,391 5 2.186 bte Payile Ckte F0 13.138 l { AccountsPayab:e 23 501 14 736 i Ort:dend Pay 2:e 2 519 2&34 deance Payments b'iChen's 41 826 42 847 .ccrued hxes 25 937 11.015 26 310 19 381 i Oter Acc_ruedLiabines___._...-___ _ - Total Current L ab$nes 134 622 92.823 i j L _ misTends Held under Cons rueden Ccn2 ac:s (per conna0 9 441 2.260 i DefenedInccme Taxes 9 191 8 294 iji :iticiders' Eqa:w l

eferted Stock i

.et s d2 m c ce empa va ne wi ) ^camcn Stock. camed at Cbies A Iand p 23 009 19.090 i /.s 29. Im m shres dil ye vee ad E E m tres c :u i: ; % "5 ?! n m T't 1; Cap ta: m Excess cf Carrimg Ce of Ccmmen St:ck LFb es A and D 11.726 16 159 213 115 187.946 Ietr:edEarrangs 253 850 223.195 Less. Ccmmen Stockin T!easur;at ccs (Notes A.J and FD 48260 26.695 l 15:ea en m73 I nE s 44454 29.171 Emp;cyee S Ock O ecnersh:p and Eesu:cted Sack P:r.s (Nc:es I and p 92 714 53.E66 - - - - - - - - ~ - 161 136 167 329 I TotalStoc:tc!ders Eqri. _. _- i i 3314 390 $270,712 r r.w; re s~r.e -ff-n 2 f r u - o- + cN r; neviM1 II l e i .,I I l . I ws

7 sw sw cs a.t:mpwa rt %tu:es Consolidated Statement of income and Retained Earnings l w!9:umu:nce mteuwcm.n:3 2c n mmes W I I Years ended December 31, 1980 1979 1978 Cross Eznmgs g Enameenna and cens*racn:n services (Ncte B) $208 574 5154.198 $153 3 Connac drCmc semces 14 886 3 141 Ot! and gas m+erests 6.133 S.109 4 Dmdonds and miems 8406 8.906 8 4 P:Ss cn mvesanent secur.nes (the D) 563 Is J e., <yr, , m ur w r:. m. o 5 :5 e in..te ; z.a in Other 20 111 17.222 IS 1 Tott! 258.110 189.139 184 Opcia:mg and Genera' Expenses 172 824 137.316 131FR4 T'1xes. Oter than Income Bues 10,449 8.423 8 ) Preman for Deptecia:Icn. DepWun and Amcrtization Obe C) 6 576 S.0lS 3. i Interes: Expense 624 507 42S Tcn11 190.473 151,261 145 i Inccme before Provis on for Income 'Ihxes 67.637 37.878 39f"J Prcmon for Inccme'Ihxes (NJe E) 30.423 1S.820 16.634 Nct Inccme (per chare' $4 97 (1979 $2 75 and 1978 $2 71) (tWe A) 37.214 22,058 23 i Re:amd Earanos at becmnmg of year. As prw:cudy rt pcred 187.946 176.822 166cc4 Ijm ad;ustment fcr acccunnng chanae (Noo L) 1 i 187.946 176 822 16S J Tcril 225.160 198.880 183 ' Dmdonds Dedared (Notes A and D) 12.045 10 934 11 )

p., snw -

+ sn a :., < - t yxv .. n n a tu n Retinod Ea nC;p 21: end of year $213.115 $187,946 $176l[ sm,em _e m e. .. rm =

• M.i v q er ci ' " "

6>T,' i 1.:' I r 'i!". I I I I 36

.. sw en t. cap u,em wu,, - nsolidated Statement of Changes in Financial Position 1;eca.wce ':ue$' l l Years er.ded December 31 1980 1979 1978 urc ct funds. tktIncome 137 214 322 CE8 $21026 - Add (deduct) rems nct requnmmhe uno cf fnt Depreconon, doplet:n and amcrnra*:n. 6 576 5 015 3 984 I De'ened mccme taw; (1 M 9) 837 1 873 1018 Pr s on mve: ent recun' es Rectnctej S c.ck P!:m (Ib s I and D I fruketvcdueof shamsissued 2 E49 197 Unxnct ::ed pcrton a' d te usued (teD c*n-1 as a reduencn a S*cckhn!d ri Emt.d (2 8191 (197) l.mcruzatn cf m.ul et va'ue c f th u s is :ed 1 233 1223 1035 I /dumm+- + fc r acccur/m7 chcc7e (!L' 3 L) (1553) Empbyce StccP Or. rsh:p P:n 1 (tk'es I raj P tinPet v:Jue of ths.res rdd 14 613 I ib'e rece,/ah!e frem Err.piric e S*ccP O en nh.p Trust (ref.ected as a reduenca m Stockhsdt r* Equcy) (14 61 P 976 921 863 I Payme /siece"ced frcm Emp:,yee Sock Ov.mersh p Trust ?' 77 v' c v 70i;i1D ~

• t;s;p,i.vJ ws os-I'p!:ca 1 n of Fund:

iddmns t; proper"/ pLr.t and equ.pmo-/ I21E23 514 542 5 6217 Dre:dends (th e D). l l Dechred 12 045 10 931 11 500 IPurch ase of cc mrncn nack fcr Treasuri (!Ena J and D (1 993) Excenncf marke za:ue ccer cc ? cf <ecunt:ns dentu ed 31637 11051 9 E93 lacrere (decreann) m mhm ants and hate _, net 1 !C2 (e20 1.954 Decn: aae m vec.rlmg cap /al Dmreano n ca: h ar.1 ca:h equria:( r t-(B EE J (16 9 8 (2 064) Inctew m accoun a recercab!e 17 37c 12 358 6477 Inciere (dwrease) m unried chuv 0 044 t9 41 D 5536 Inctea e (docreano) m c hc : cumw c.ae!, 21ES (270' 77 Increase m ncie payile (tP o D (13129 (In~rease) decrere m acccun's payab:e G 7E5 11 E18 (4,909) Decreve Gncimse) i : a lecccc pr:r, r *a by ch nta 1 C21 EfC) (1985) (1.crere) d"crere m accrund taxer (l4 922I (3 60 D B37 (5989 L483 (60S9) (Increace) decr7 ace n et+ r curn nt hip.t 546 E66 $30E96 T26 375 seycmra vA . :n p - n n, +- - Ec 37

P

1. W h or b v I r-1 <.t il s 1 u.,

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Notes to Financial Statements W. t w a ,y,. ; q.

• g e aen e w I

Basis of Consolidation.The een ndred rnraumt ner ' ur - (A) Common Stock Split l c!ude te accou :ts c f the Cc:p.c ry:cn and rJI rcisimes The ac On Jruirr 21.1951 te Ecc d cf Daectrs dec:ved a tyco fc: cr.e ccur/s c f cu:rdici s cu*n@ the Un *+ i Stres and Crad a me ccP rpht m te fcrm cf a IE </cck decnienri p,rjible Febra ar/ 2~g e c.ciuid m te ccn '. dred faumed o n :en's en te Er ; ^f f : DEI o s'ockhe:d ars c f reccid at te cbse c f buz r es ; en Febraar, g ca! ymen endc..: cn Oczber 31 tn crder to ficO o tanR r'+ v. 1951 The Decenter 31. DH ba!r ce thc. t haa been atuced to i n3 year end fin.cm!repc +ma rc Cect 'he two f:r ene sicck rph! b metermg ccmmen sha:es by f 4 4 32 872 sha:es (pce viue Il 00 per shrue) and t:ccfe:rmg I4 43 Depreciation and Depletion. Deprean n garauy e picv.ded repterm:ng te pre vi,m cf the ad1 ton 1! th;Jes 1.sruod fIcm cn a S*! afm? Imo baL T (acct;; !aMd Er ' hod [cI inCC:no ' axe ^ t '! L,ap/11 c Excess c,. C,arrymq \\,i.ue of Ccmmen m.c,c to to e t,ecun red uWal'" es c f to axes De p;e'en cf cd and gac prcp-L,emmcn S,,ccP account n, ya reforences a tho manc:.u, rta.emen.s n e:Sms picv.d yj bf We tu./ cf picdurntn :rmMd and nc'es to the,nancia! mrements yth reg ud to te numar c, s Long 'Ibrm Contracts. Inccme from !cng 'e:m er m:mg cd r hares of ccmmen st:ck re!xed pnce e.d per chace amcunts have car.riuc'i:n ccn?rtm d %nnmod en tho pc :c4 /aae cf ccmpa been retoacir Ny re" od to roCoct the uco fcr-ene scck sphi 3CU EdI3d (B) Gross Eamings from Engineering Income Taxes. Inccc 'ox cred/s (11701 m 192] I: E8 m 1973 and Construction Services 4-q.m~c,,1 q. m1 - d c, u c,,,. <q r, 7 3 C,m,.r e..m r n.,.w..

g..

...o Grccs eam'nm frcm eng:neenna and ccn"ruction mr.ncos includ ' .1 m ios um tues D< fened accme uxe:me p:~cded f:r t :ran a c $ mnces bc c nera"y cn a pe:cer/aa > cf ccmplern han f es enned on tyce. n bec F and in m me ruch as thae rch'mr deprec:aton. ency ccnn acts and the excess of re. nues ($381.933 e D81 yen en and rteI e.g m : Unir:tuvd erenmg cf the Ccrpo. $310h71 m D79 and $477338 m D75) cver d2ect consvucnon casts km,,A pN N N,in gJ 9 am3 + pup,n..,in 1_m e) cn non N rcacn s f:re. sn cut m 14 : are berg rarv ed in toc cperc':nns cd the:r-fme no prav i,c 4 ' f:r US mccme taxen Tc to ex-STIC/ CCniaC's v'im wh c Jun meo repa*nx-d the C' rprntn "ccuid ox (C) Property Plant and Equipment pect to h remrc 2 &;e ox c:e /.bch

d stmnno Oy c"a : ani Deproc:r:cn expenne vcas IS 541 f : DR134 323 fer 1973 and I3 4 g opp::ct - US mccr

• f r D78 At Decenter 31 D30 deptemacic a:Ms vie e ca:ned at 3 Income per Share. Net ine:me per rh:ce is bc Td cn to average 283 994 after d Lductna accumuNed dc preaanca number cf shrac cu tana.ng dunna % year der grec,g revoacnve Fo::cycmg is a summar/ cf prcper+y plan and eqmpment at c ffect ';10 'vcn fer-cno s'cck rp ' decLued in hnu2y D91 Decen er 31 1979_

1950 J,, ft C 1r: C. ; Eq n; : 13 147 i C' ! ! C* i t ? E U.* Gi f.Q. [ E*' 6 713 I4 v O.'. a Ev.. cd C" : U J E: 4 4 R3 49 M1 s l'r.m .1 Dr r ^7 3 l' W 1;i g I... /ccrur+ 't D r: n E + t :- ~ j k. P.D' iMl MUf d h r4 q P.,r ife rr< 'R !MW ID I I I vu ..._.a

.s Dividends Declared (F) Foreign Subsidiaries .378 te Capcrr n doc! u"d a gnrie:N dr..dend en c : Cc m The g: css ear, s c:.d net r

• cff~:e:. sui e aaanounud m Sck p<r/E.mn s"res cf con =on :ter of Ttn:ca Can-t;I20 637 aml(?6.213t repoetr.Hy :n P30 I'.6 %9.md (I2 249.te es. Inc on May 11 Die The idnd rem:ued 150 471 rh ces h: monedy m 137h nd $15 3.5 od (5112571ieTec'r; ly a 1978 The

. ~"a _1 m G_i " L' Pm t". - tL._ m.Lb=-)~" w...',nc * * "- - 5 ,e.,_ " r'."ao C "_.pmru-.o Wm.m... .u Tro.. w 4 n . n.p u... x.. n m m m a u m _ m uck and cash a to ccncuni cf 5134 a Imu cf fractnil m'eter's 1973 a:al(57293) m 1978 Inc'd d a t.. t ! css far DTS u a bs 7.cf

nod e ung.73 t e chmg"d ch !2 446 represent =7 te m u-I7154 cf E*r a& vat'NrEn4 wnn15 V cf etch $4200 terre-w ao

'.".m'."m+.... '". d b. -..a" od L. ~ -.. u c'n ". d. a n ..m., m,.., o u -n rda". d cas-h L" Mu - "m<.. x~..., +-.o. pe. A-c.. m,,.

m... c.. s.g o

u. om a v. mM m* crests A amn cf!! 933 cr ! J1 pe thue.Iep:e;entmg the

• mn:W.ng 5 b m ssnn1c.pt:

ns of'Ns f' rem trimd.uy c:cN f tho Timsco shines du The antapmM r. tu Lenef2 cf I4 90 "Ach beraine staiEe en of te rnM, ce ccer

ed ' cas reccgr.ced in 'he acccun"

t. pen :rra htcn ~f %) famn + -':.cy n

... :d a te Ccrper . 1 <., 1..._,,. tw...: s r p. z o v , n_.. p,, o.., c ..a .. 4 .) Income Taxes . p:rc - :fm meca, we s cc. n cftefc & ng (G) Retirement Plans Tt e Cc:m ty: c.i Mc t uw ; hu reu+ :: + nt p: :.s ccc+ :ma gg 373 g,3 .,.i e A 4El 0 r.. h 4. 7 [] 9 p ,6 A 4 >1 O F B Th e en, &ch 1: :.ude w % c f p::ct remce com s. w. ~-. m..- u. 4.m.% ,, in .t. ..: w.m _...,,1s, q.. m g... a.. m i.a ..t m u ,y d,' Tf,.j [6.n D -( d '..'J_ ' i dC;j 1;e' d.; ' f II e in ' { t ' *t3', i.Y;3!1;[] I4 .t t ., s - 4 m ,2 ' QCui.ry i, U3J !"'ho p'an Of f n'" & VJ U !InccipcI $ "3 .[y Jed LW,, y s3

d p r.a p.

p W nw -c 12 m as- + I.s* wi A1 E _ ;. I I

• ~

. n./ k

, $ G g 7 ? w j'd s L=-1 s.

r. .$

44 4

I, s_ _...., u o., _ ~.,.. w, q. y e a.,, _ g. w,..,_.%.. p. a.. 3

~ n m t E.l*,*,r GA,b k, A _ kr 0 4 (' e s t s 5 f. 1960 B73 1978

m.. m. u.

.. p.,,,. cu. Lpr c, o.. f.,. L _. p .- s - i in .. u uu m-.m.L < a, ps '. i.n, b. ,r 5 u.7 r 5, ..7. h.. c y. -. W y,m, .r.. a.. L.... a.,,. e - - .u. I. n +m_ ~.. a F 4-17 7c, q w.-j p.o r. 2 o. .... um e - ., G v"".m i.. a'., p a. p,.. F

ghfa, d

(' h Le b L ti ., n,- 3 2 ,. 6.. 7 T.T. 1..F'.f60 {.- m' k ('h 1 99,- pg 7 ..9 .s',.' Am 1 u a t 2 p p. I 6 i 34 .a d y- [ c g ;. l l'. n '-u a.- r 1 I! . { ;o f i( 4.g s-g i I[E.[ ', 'i.-

• i dh

^ tre( W t# repr mn fcr ircrm tax * - cf d=co*:c cpu 1 . } 3 c., m, e. m a_ o,7 c,. w.11 u.~.d d:r Jb,CJan, wm a.1 .,.. : n_ s l 1;~.n i 1 1 u. iAs.v a>+ [f 'ign "C he? [.On'l c ad ..4 I Jr k 7.!".d ( b ,hU R I ~_ l II I II I I I I I I I I I I l

1 I I (H) Commitments ad Contingencies G) Employee Stock Ownership F:w.r du E oIE $10E unim ani$1?1r and Restricted Stock Plans m.,o. 1._% c~,,,,7, a. ~,s.e. i....,, o x .m,..I m_.,.%.,,,. m.., p..,..,,.,,., w. w. O..,,., + pya.. y,p, m,.. q n_ mt~. m .m y.. L..t-y.N ssc1 h ' 4.. , 17. I l;'. s o. r.,,-,... z.,,.-a ,,,a ' '. { I,,,,, ~1. ,. eu. I .._,o. p',L - h..[ m .-......,.,..,,..b.4 4 !- ,.(,,. ... ~. 4 w a .im.......i. LI d.s M -4 .e-4 ua 6 UagA .s.1 .' h. t L. m ..p m ~3t3.y s. ~,... h.,b g<t.) <3 ~,.., g g J) t. s v .n e. > a. + a --, - .c.,p..A,

u.,.

.a..i m , ~, v u u. imu mu v .,,., m,. C.,..- g. 3 { e F. g ,, w,m.., q (o-1},3gxnbv.1 9 R ' ,g. b., - 6 ~.e o e,. g,. c ,n m~ r. <. u s ,e e s. 4.i i, ~ Jra. M' c f pmcip 1*:n'I n:!f..;ye. : P=

• ta a Mck Pmcl 4 ' e ['7'.

,! 4 [

• f -[ ' {')(]

-' i '[, i. { [ y[$ {f 4 ^ -1 C. O'cck mb Capera jptmm my ts :d ui t!.o Treawy 't 4

1. % m.y,~

T".. m.a > trm. c ' 'e c..'.m,' e, .'a ? a 'Ia b v.v .m. ~ i 'E q1g.g,p;cy

• p,*b, pT d Wf'1 M hE!h d.d h 'l N pfd a,,> 2,+. ym,n.c. w,.n.,s...,.,n.

a. y.,,,, y., } ~1 L. .a ~- m m. n c s'.. , c, %, ~ . t.. g .m s"...'.t') S.'.**p47T.,t'.i,-t { ur ' -4 C. . h.g, G, - (.S y ;. m, t .u..L -f inp,-n'u- .. _ 4 s ,t. su y. m ~ n a' f/ I'

• O.i

> ] 5 '[ # I.i, hl ) !b - E4 , t ]*p' ] 7,.. , *t k f ', Ibr'h ; QV3 3'! Ii CC 6 ~hd Cf a {[C C 7f.ly(( e t ' c,a 13 ; in r + 0 r */i1 kgf 1 c JJ t pc '

c.*

l t,j 17p ; g y d J M ('g The. t- + -.m ]Tf?COF'*.d b 3. Ut. p !u_i d. pM a

!.i. t I kl 4.,. L.

., k,.

• i " v 15 a

i > ~.4 ~,,a O d i y F <rg . tap d a",;4. ', " 4' h. > a;; , g, n y;;I; ,y,~; g g~j; s, L i 2 th [. f b f '. ' ii n L. ' s 7.J+ 'I.*, I. A $J 3 t 7 {;l,, ;q },s ,, 3 g) [{.}.] ];y p;;'g,g 75.;l_-i[+. [ 3m d +. c e j - f

Im r.d

! ra ' s ch i 7.

1 ~. J

%'mc p- +.., ,1 c. #r ow...i, %.~ w.. w i, .. a t a-s a t,~. u, ~u g,3 a-. c_c.. u m ~ c 1 r ~ f. i i T ] C;, {f {a. ] ' 4 }g a { ' {. i, f.{,; l{ 3 g. a .i l';e IL'ri ? h

• 14 wi.

.ic '^. ~} i "h t, 5, 'r,,. -. r,. t,, j t. h' ( rm b,,.m Ce r %.v.

n. c. --.y < ad U-) 1.7I t'

. a (w o.. es e ns 4 i 3 i Ai 4 on 5 4 w.h' ,w. sI b-. I',_, ,[ ) y... p-, 4 r g g , *,j f L OF g'. ~

• n d

iti s iTi f.*/ r ' * $1.1 ; ' & ? [.>. id'. .y, p, n. , o'.e qJ 4..,. t'. s. mw> r 'i b o. ., i.a% f.2c e n.. +u 1 m. i ,c.n-4 u m f.1 iSt-fI ' '"i '; I" - ) [' f ' } Cf' 8 .F i1 II' p...,.. ....s,7,1 5 l'a'"4' a, 41 i 5 'Y .b,).f.c,.Yg s' LO.> '. 4, o. y. 7.". P. f.4,f h l".* * ""t 'a' 1s t T* h w g ' (.-. , '- '.,3 ( r s. s I .A C .y 4 1 s t., 4 y ,g.,,,..., ,;J.A +.. y q,,o,., 3.,_,.,. .u,,....,y g a 1 .m. ~ t. s ,'d5*4 3 .P.e d, S e.. 7.4s I j h.s. s Q

• * *la,y.

,,1 . I s _ (-.. 4 s ,4+% d,\\' 4'.> & u 'm, k' l'W' 4 - 1 J A. _ c. .; r.,'q. _ %,,,a.mi.. T M..r ' t~. .. m m o o

• e '. ' E.

w n,p,, m. v 7ng t. h,, ,3.m,e. m>..., b c p.

m. L. q... -~l <-.,....t

, u.. .m y o q ,o isg,- u 4 n.. a e na .r' 7 ;4' i s. 2 v 4 ?U"..). I :w 1. < 1~a.- 4. 't.~ l.m.. 'l. I v .4i r .s TQ !" 7 i f 'h.f k 'lF'(- d ['.'.,;C / b [h(. CC I %7h,3 !!,3y }E.q '" thr-F'"~ v ,, a.,, p,. - l. - 4f1m..- 3 i,, c ( a;n_. L.u.L.r.1sc, -m p v,>lt - cia 3 t - at it 4 6 .l, p.. 3 7. .j p~. e k.~y , --I.c +, ,-l p. g. p a. y s,V. p. -. r n 7 4,q {~,. ;3, ;.. . p- . i 4 m} u,.1 {.;u' 'i j,m. e p > G h q-p.'3. a

1. H.

, i. f.a.. z.h-,,. t s. .r ,~ - u m .m ~ ,g,,,4.. j,, p _ Y.,L,,i 1 . q i [. 4 - l p ;, >... t. h g., r t:m,,..... '4 . o m'.I r.,,, r i. c a >..; 4 1. 3.. r 'ej DC i+ I!i 'f.f CI Ifl0 h dn '.I ' 'Cfj!M [ f, . hb < hr ; hste ts l a caded 1 d 4 4 ?O tho ;f ufeitn 591m - 4. s. <~w .., 3. . s.q. r.

• p...,,q c, u,.a. 3 t. c ~. o ~ r v

.. d ;. o r au a 4o.- ae .~ . > u a[ > 'p d p ~ d A' D1 -n d 31.l M Uthn und: t r'iT'.3 pC".10! .a. o i... .1,41.. 3. rd,o. I 3 n t. ...... a n. 1,..,. 1I ),. u 2, ai .o s c, I 't )

e um anges in Stockholders' Equity 00 Treasury Stock he fctr.r; ts an ana'yss of to chry;es a StociMders' Eqr/ f r The Ccrpc:at :n purchred 911.838 charea 471714 shares ic:d yea:s endai Decenic r 31 415 780 shutes cf:ts Ccmnv n Sicci:in D80. D79 and D78 terpec-tvely veloch vec:e ad.i d to 12 Lc'.d.ngs cf Trea.;uri riock e a cou cf E 1980 1979 1978 F ?33 637 Ill,051 and i'J E33 respectrie;y h connect:cn verh the pur-w ' 'ra:=a :f w e . + ..w m-y. _ ch va of 282 Ti0 shres a Del a pion acry noto in te a:ncunt cf Il3138 mam mo on /mt 3. D81 and t<ictn ; mietet t at 10T

.. : xi,, - w

<<an e m t ~ m,w arcen tn pnu payme < a 'C' P r5 6 + d- "8.. 4m (L) Change in Accounting for Oil and Gas Activities L & i r.:. r Fo >$d . s r.:., 7a *, The Cc:pcts:ons ed and a.u sks:Wa:ms hrte h::Rncally used " +.. te successful efb:n rnet-ed cf acccur/ ng !n D78 the Ccipo- "1 u:. > r I-itC n a p* 'd the dcCeunilir] pOhcle 1 a3 pr SCIO'd in f!ndncGI .P +. ) m. e e p. y .e, a 4 <! i i CC 4I b E. S h' BIN a UN b cN8 I-h 'D ' 5~ 48 rih:ch pnm ufyinvdied pr, ain7 defer:ed inccme taxe : rin- .e.- .r, ,e.l....,-. 1 i.m, 4 u o tr.ritM dIC:n:1 End detekpmr n! ems vch:ch are capiruzed f;r .m c. 6-T g. j p..., p,..g g.p'- db m Apr cd .,-a .l ,f CJ' AhUt 'e Td bb bp Cp hY IC p *Y t ~. N3 r' '^ cfis acccurEg chanff dm ud cci. ld ited ra i Nane 13

:-i m E:: r.....

1, Ot.m- & Tru " 4 g7g by 3}p 3.;rj cce W Mdren-M r,gnm y aiQ,ijyy1, t-4.. j s s. - 4 1, rc 1o g l t' A n [ (' f f ,h C fI N CbC ((IJYd"Yl[.6 b. !1f kC -T,.. s j ,) ' ( [ db thf M; c .C[ ne 1 J 4 t ry, Cggn+;'}g Ch3n(;A [h t ((r mg {JJ pp ! yNf 3 ?l33 ps t {t',(j? tid f i tht 2]i ": } (( p I4-b a.s 'he icnJZ ' CIO IF : m i'eIluI / il 'n D r - 1C.c vn; h.> cf C o v r.-. 3; Is e I' ?. ~4 I? ' I J,1 r 4 o . i bw .t-r w > <i t r c- '14 . k, +l,'. +i i c.4 ..L LI i 6

• } J,,

-g ? 1 2.# 4 s .W+. O O N' + p Di etcv1: eV- 'e' ~d em 14 k e. i L1. ).' j

• L N '+ ? - T1/ st D '. 5 I n j

'. d Os.r L;,Te 14 - y:r i.. : re.

• h ' :. l.,

5 p 'i:2 D i 0 e. ?.t. s q v... f O # vil;.,! ! h' : D i 1,'n'a dE 4 n t. i -. f r... Cf r.h d c.. !. M 5. r F-m.f r 4 K m i: ~ l. d.- 1-*it Ii4 Ei ! 4 Hi I{' y NL

1 Report of Independent Accountants I I (M) Business Segments l The Cciperanen.treu::h es ub tranos is p:me:pa"y enmged in To the Stockhciders and bord cf Duecmts cf pra aina pic ter.rn.i! enau a vna and ccasuucucn ser aces It fur-Sicne & Webster. Incor per red nrhos these sere:ces to crTeacancns enga 7xi m the gennranen cf V,,e h<rce exxutned the con ehda'ed ba! mee r.hoets cf Stone & Mericirt and in the devel pm. nt and prcduct m cf a,.1 far:rs c!fuei V,,ebster.Inccrpera+ed and Subs;iant 3 as of Decenter 31.1980 ch rnca's phccrnreuncis fccd and Leveras and mdun na' and 19,13 and the re,ia+ed s a oments cf tnceme and Ietamed eam-A. q' "- i"' mgs and c' ch anaes m En.mcla! pon/icn fc r each of te treo year icte on ruta :mes picv;-led 1m man IJ 6 ct ccrse'ad 1*od mcss te pened endai December,l 19._ Our exam:nancns vcete maue a c ex: c; rc:d e:nphyed !" a thcc IU, of rcec, da'ed acaets Expcrt a m accc rimce ?Th general..y accep'ed auinng standards and ac-mesa earrangs vie e aeo a. 'han,in cf couscu. a. red arcs.; eam-cering,y,'nc]uded cuch tems cf te accounung reccrda and sucl ina e./, hcugh 'he Ccipctrian has numercus cl ens rnd is nat dm G$e! Qui!!nQ prDCedules as lie CCn9dered r;eCeSSiry Q f he pendent on an / s;r. o cA',t ono cr a fe'; c,ut nts may ccn*nbu*e a CirCu!nIa'ICOs ristinual p;Inon cf to CcIpcranen s gr sn eurrannvn any cne in cur cpr':cn the af oremenncned f nanc:a! Ma f.crw the ecnsc, dxed financial pennen cf S'ene A,'emen's

y..c d:o to the sue c f n ^ r en Tnec nna ad conrauencn prcmcb c< rpa a ed and b,ubsit anes at I,>ect mber 31.19-.hn a

,,e, b a and the progresa acccmp. ched on them pc'ects m thx ye.2 1 he e .9,2 9 and me Ccrpa in:n Lid on c.wr ' m In. _.,and w;c c!nm in Ib_ v.hc ac-re a. s cf thcu epenrrens and te changos m thet-tmanc:al pon:nc coun -d f:r 11 ' l-a and 11 cf cc.nac!dawim;sacartunas te for each of te t!uee yerca a the pencd endod Decemtx.r 31,198 rpectreer/In,

' vt:e ch

• prc -dai 10 = or more of m

n ccr'nrmity virh a-nerauy acct p ed accoun*: a pnncip!"s app!..

co o':d a dor -; es.n a > In'c-c.r.:n n ;m 2 n b: re" ~ *s m che cn en pa w 43 " 3,'.. - - p~" ' d ly~ o ' COCPERS & LYEP/1 "v (N) Quarterly Financial Data OJnaudited) No v Ycrk. Februar/ 17.1981 Thef * /renta.d r t'= 0 ch t Tau &d cnutaly Sr.aned dam f r tiie ye J.; l'd;] and 1979 Fust Second D'trd Fourt IMO Ou m er Oumer Oumer Oumer Cr :- F. % FiE !O43 Ei,* [r,m e.. t, n.[7 r C,"i 4 T.- 'b l::. W ?ms sa ~ < f r 1.r ~ F, '

i 1i' 1 05

!4 First Secord Third Fourt 1979 Oum er Oum er Oumer Ou m er $44. H I, V O _ : L i_ _ 41: 1: "!s' t , i *,n C. ; l l.C ) t 5a 4 nti 7' D.. ; 3.- , p., t- ~h

i: -

c g I I I e

L,.e svasw 1xcrvece sisumes $siness SegmentInformation 3 um ana=s are m%wca F 1980 1979 1978 Icss Earrangs Obe 1) ngmeerma and consaucucn semces $210 834 $156059 $155.223 Xher 41.333 25.914 20 816 Total 252 134 181 973 176.039 radends and were - S976 6.C03 6 685 tc5ts on tvestrnent secuntes 563 1.999 Tctal moss e.unmas $258.110 $189.139 $184.723 I.rrarn Pic5 (Note 2) n7aeenng and ccr.structen seraces 5 60.935 5 30 325 $ 30.770 O'her 6 !68 5366 4.484 I'radends and m orest Teta' 67,103 35.691 35.254 5.976 6 603 6 685 Prctts on nrmstmer.t securmes 563 1V eneral corpcra*e expensos (4 617) (6 72T (3 853) (625) (507) (42 1 .terest exper se Inc.^.me bebre mccme taxes ! 67h37 $ 37 878 $ 39 660 'r5able Asets Obe 3) .ngmemnq and censncton seraces $212.613 $174 717 $183.547 O*her 65 755 49 178 35.456 I;.:nera! ccrpcra:e a rets (Nve 4) Twd 278 368 222895 219,0C3 36.022 47817 Gl,703 Twd as:+'s $314 390 $270.712 $280.706 reenTn.D"plann and Aractnzat:en ur.gmeenng and censnuc*:on seraces $ 3 564 $ 3.143 $ 2.863 3 012 l.872 1,121 O*her Total ! 6 576 $ S.015 5 3.984 Japitcd Expentives nmnwnn, and censweten serace-5 S.116 5 2 115 $ 2 376 irher 16.703 12.427 3 84 _. _ _1 Tcta'. $ 21.825 $ 14 542 5 6.217 Ie p j e, I. ad h .a.L d dI h ' J h 4 7.rv spq

. i.

. n c.q c mf. c.c.

[n _

..7., .. ! p! ",U.'. III CO ? i C. IfJ r '1,.

.tr [1m{If C i U s G r r r.e " e.e c s L.r.1-f.+ #'! '

J',.f; O I!f j d i., ( 4 i

• / j ' f;c r

.ri.f f.e.;I;' (!"Ir Cc;p !,f';n

• cy

( f b p,.. .+ '2(> . f 14 C..r p r., r I (J-l2 J

• bnX 4

.1 i I G E*-m .'. d s < p r., n ; ; : c.f : + .cr i. r !;mi : i f s te I as - ep i _ a eg- , Ed t.. $ 7" e -r s o r;<;r.r : oy ah>p m atc arm t.w. p >ra I I 43

The Stone & Webster Organization I k j-1 t e r e c cf S - Stone & Webster Canada Lhn.ited, Directors 0 5 cers r.cr rrc + r ne % r!.nat rh he 3 i r u c r.a 3 c. " gce"?' EdwardC Beeester Rximor.dC Foster l c up n .m. Y,.E 1 .o. m :;t.cvm.r.1 e T, m ,, unte x 7._., ~ ,'.].],m" g'g m icc e < L a 1 ce Wot x ! AiP dit c - Cratc.rcts c.c.- d 2. <,. u % e os ..m b,,_ rn L Brown Stone & Webster, Incorporated E 71. a" 7, _%s,_ t., ~.7~ ne e Frar&B Muh'feld cm .,. p ca. p c.Zp '12'i F*.'31).+d Pl *.#Citi .1- .4,......,,

42_

g,.' v p % cy_f F.7;3 {; yy CW., c ; f p [ g -j

u.,,

m#.tu.,... ,a m a,. _,, e m a e m tm p - w F > :.. me E6 Wdhrn M E un

fy c.w a 7uca y,. 7; u,,.

uc. c o :1 cx, ...,~ nn Ju cd mi r.d c r:ep.&i'3 E-e nr: rJ cc r - nr. H,...a,.d L L~h,n Rhnn. Canetit =ra :. p := = ; -:p w: .u to cmea u.mn ;;. b, _,e_. '1':' d- "f n W t ' t he h CM""A R VWhenand Cra h r.d &r a l E>1rcE P 3 h pi, a pw 2 Stone & Webster Engineedng Cor-Q.r.w r.mxm Enterprise Resources, Incorpo-poration fm c.mp e er ~, ,,mg rated ' - ' - 1 y' Frain E Ccnger

g de m nd e man.n r

-,-*1 4 r: e' c has T9 m.tri '"Y wm,.crvrm cc. m,edem James n EcPa ner i2 c 1,4 m.~ W 't h 3 pr eC* 3 C, i ' s i '" r-13 UI p p+ cq Rcben F Ga.,mp er c t.

u.., %..

U' ",3 e n s nf a.mta 1.n,wn. p. ,..t L. _r .s -..m n 2. a..,,

2. r,

_.,_t,n im T >rcum* .m u f o,aca t u : f m g,,yst e n ~.^" ni= v V a. O c-m cw r.~,"^",in

• W bC r;x +.. m3t.c s m1 -

'd D c'i " s TransferAgent w rh r = :t ., 4. y. m..,...m r; - pyggg (., pg.,7 m 2: r.:;.1 a c 1 L.r.a ' eNm c.s 4 ,n.mr aP w n:rCS m, wc rc.'4 AC ine Chu-,<u.,+ma a, . u z mmacr. .. r L : v. , e: w m ~ Is. -.- 4.y i g##syk Stone & Webster Management C2.an r: :ht. 9 Pn. " P* ^ 7l,"9.'N,Q-"c Consolar'n,Inc. su: ;2 em 1to : a J Pem: Grace "k' ps upn. n-py, e n. w.a SawDrilling,Inc.pm ks - m C M E v 2/c01m1 a cdf.nr.tJ9 " * " , s d e.c ri g tim; N :_ e; - - , r J cd m i P P Vih CI Sco s C] rei : r.,

pm Lc.

cTm ccn. r m. nv ;r i re ym. c/d Registrar ,..-ce j cc - 9 ocv. s < p-

sur a p un Cemmercial Cold Storage,Inc.,

~ - r,jac1, a rcac .r e-. Manubcturers Hano cer < _ m, r a ,. g.m.. q ; 7 ' ',.;2 q..c Ji John A Hooper Trust Ccmpw/ os m i am.c f a u3 . : :C c o .oc mv d :: g y y g g y g.g c yl m p., h '5 e i o >$. w$. : d ir >J d. r.Lw c f f:w h Cra !d c.r,run Ecci NA Pn Y& th Y n IES v x

Ow A m icy.

m. ~.n ~, p en LI f mi p oc+ asro e eCa_., m,ecr u s. c

1. r-

nr p a.a Ccrp r r; n pe r

-m, ,e.2 < ,4 t 1 ^ B~ I*'"W'd fc~ F, ai ar pn.xds -c i SabalCorporation h w m i en C VK- 'har.au f 0 > k.c-3 s f ! se c + c. 7 cn > :n vL.r.a f-r m an 1 c h r p y 4 d i C $ R !' p Y } C3 l,/M " c.fal fk!.da f 3:P $ Vid g fgg{ g_,,. j t *. - 3 r"..,, :"- -' ' b ",., y". ' he ns ccL.dmi o te w Stone & Webster Engineering . "" *. " ^ " %" " h41a ?hi 141M M WW t Limited,. 5 &c ir ?.rn I M t P!" tV' 1 : # '1I W Vi il w. > 236 Gny s Im F.d LataVIClXHIA b f ##d m E'MMdots cf reccid x to p -P27 m ? @h cM cfimmm en W ch 16 .o> uo., ic 4. m. .. ~ > r s v p.2 enc ! Summer Street Realty Corporation M1 v.C te en "J tm? E 'ha l M.N ;.P n:Cyc E:Na - < 1e Em &VA b e r te.; im W Prm wOrcrew ed Ee p me

• h! Le Ea -t niim kc ud1 I h.;erSv !So by tM hec J cf DJecm and it c a Ma; a.tm f:."7 mr vi exWod tat r Ace d such anrd
• r :J.:1 a v. n.c - fh Et > &

Yh m :D.- rwca S AE L ty N n: ,Vkt or.:r p.:a r*WL tehar m h h ay Em 'Pn* 3D iis rC1 Cf P'CX'/ WII* @c D II.r:7d C1P"e& r n&d to S M hcW's mi atm $ o..q )rw.s,y. -, p- I~- e j The Stone & Webster building, M uch2E &1 hhy.Q. Incorporatedm rm f r S re $ VLbcNr Ecorp:n ed 2o Sw & VA 1;'?.r MiJ'.g E:c Yed af K) hmd S*: <t!W krhNYfp p: cr.rdi 4 F cf $e avx;an ermo s ccc.psj by te Rt n+= & YklE'CI O! }.cCarti r/h be ba' ~.nm:er'od tx hers Desgn John Horney & AwmMes Inc jA .1 Photmyistey J<.% Ztw+r

5; ' Stone & Webster, Incorporated ' l 90 BroadStreet,NewYork,N.Y.10004 I t 'a '. l1 l I _.l -j I IL I = b I - I:

( 6-5288671-PR26 i QUALIFICATION DOCUMENT i DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM FOR POWER ASCENSION DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT - UNIT 1 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY I VOLUME 2 0F 3: APPROACH AND ORGANIZATION I g e.c..s.,1,e1 I I I I I I I STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION I ~ I A I

l 6-5288671-PR27 i VOLUME 2: APPROACH AND ORGANIZATION TABLE OF CONTENTS I 1. ENGINEERING A'ID DESIGN VERIFICATION APPROACH 2. PROJECT ORGANIZATION 3. FERSON7;EL QUALIFICATIONS 1 I I I I I I I I I I

I I

._........ A g

6-5288671-PRI SECTION 1 ENGINEERING AND DESIGN VERIFICATION APPROACH I DEVELOPMENT OF PROGRAM PLAN I Stone & Webster Enginetring Corporation will perform an independent design verification of safety related systems and components (fluid systems, electrical systems, I & C, shielding, etc.) in accordance with the relevant guidelines contained in ANSI N45.2.11, Section 6.3.1. I At the beginning of the design verification program a program plan will be developed which will include the following: I 1. Criteria and their bases for selecting safety-related systems to be reviewed and the selection of the safety-related systems to be reviewed. 2. Criteria and their bases for the selection of a suitable number and type of sample calculations to verify the adequacy and accuracy of the design process for the safety-related system I chosen for review under 1. above. 3. Criteria and their bases for continuing the verification based upon the results of the initial samples. The criteria defined in this program plan will be used to examine both PGLE and contractor analysis and design of safety-related systems. During the development of the program plan an intensive and systematic review will be undertaken by various technical disciplines to I determine the regulatory requirements and applicable design criteria from available station information such as: I FSAR/PSAR Environmental Report System Descriptions and Plot Plans Site Visits I Other Commitments Arrangement Drawings This review will be supplemented as required by more in-depth review by senior technical representatives for the major disciplines. Field installations will be verified as necessary. REVIEW OF PG&E SAFETY-RELATED SYSTEMS Fluid / Mechanical / Nuclear Initially, an overview on the safety-related fluid system design will be performed based on Stone & Webster's substantial I experience with the design and operation of Westinghouse-type PWR plants. The overview study will establish applicable criteria, provide a familiarization of the systems relative to Stone & Webster experience, and develop an understanding of the interrelationship, if any, between A l STONE & WEBSTER 1

6-5288671-PRI the PG&E safety-related system design work and work performed by service-related contractors. After the initial review of the PG&E designed safety-related systems, a candidate system will be selected, based on a determination of the dominant system impacting plant safety. An in-depth engineering review of this selected system will be performed. Specifically this review will establish the compliance of the system design to applicable design criteria. Consistent with the sampling plan outlined in the master description of the Design Verification Program, independent sample I calculations will be performed to verify compliance with design criteria. If errors or discrepancies are found, verification will be continued as provided in the program. Electrical and Control Systems A two step approach will be used in conducting the electrical I and control systems evaluations. The major electrical plant systems, namely the AC Bulk Power System, AC Low Voltage and Control System, and the DC System will be analyzed generically. The electrical and control I systems associated with the fluid safety systems specifically selected for review will be evaluated. Tht: proposed generic investigation for the AC and DC Systems will consist of a review of system margins, interconnection capability, normal and off-normal voltage conditions, the effects of off-site source I variations, and bus loadings, to evaluate system and equipment adequacy. In addation, the proper operation of the applied protective relaying on these systems will be verified. For the fluid systems selected for detailed review and analysis, the electrical evaluation will include: the power and control cable selection, routing and methods of termination to verify post I accident capability, rating, tray and/or conduit fill, and separation for segregation by function; the suitability and adequacy of the electrical equipment within the given system; and the electrical interface this system may have with other systems. For the fluid systems selected for detailed review and analysis, the control systems evaluation will include: the adequacy of the control strategy, instrumentation and logic to perform the intended safety function; the suitability and adequacy of the control equipment within the given system; and the control systems interface between this system and any other system.

Finally, the environmental qualification program will be I

reviewed. Electrical equipment compliance with the requirements established for Diablo Canyon 1 will be evaluated. I A n,-...... I

6-5288671-PRI I HVAC I The methodology and approach used to review fluid systems will also be applied to the design verification of the safety-related HVAC systems including associated electrical and control systems. This includes establishing the design criteria, and compliance with the I criteria by means of independent calculations and a review of design inputs. Other Safety-Related Design The overall plant design will be examined. Safety-related areas designed by PG&E or service-related contractors, not otherwise I addressed, will be reviewed consistent with the requirements of the letter (Denton to Furbush, November 19, 1981). In general the same methodology described under fluid systems review will be used, including independent sample calculations for the design verification of other safety-related areas. I Review of Non-Seismic Safety-Related Service Contracts Prior to June 1978 and After January 1978 A review will be made of Service Contracts, Diablo Canyon I Unit 1 in conjunction with R. L. Cloud Associates, to ascertain which are safety-related. The bases for selection or elimination of contracts will be documented. These safety-related contracts pertaining to systems design will be examined to select a minimum of a 10 percent sample for review of the non-seismic aspects. The selection will provide sufficient breadth, I depth, and sample size to verify the adequacy of service contract work with respect to the engineering and design. If errors or discrepancies are found in the initial samples in the selected contracts, the verification will be continued as provided in the master description of the Design Verification Program. Reporting A report that gives the results of the verification program I will be written. This will include the methodology used, an assessment of the basic causes of any design errors found, their significance, and their impact on facility design. During the course of the design verification program, semi-monthly status reports will be issued, which will include schedule status and preliminary technical results. l I 1I STONE & WESSTER 3 ,I

I 6-5288671-PR5 SECTION 2 PROJECT ORGANIZATION I Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation's (Stone & Webster) project organization for the Diablo Canyon - Unit 1 Design Verification I Program is shown in Figure 2-1. Stone & Webster will assign as Project Manager, Mr. F. Sestak, I Jr. Mr. Sestak is Chief Power Engineer for Stone & Webster. During the period of the design verification program he will be relieved of all other duties and will be assigned full time to the design verification I program. Mr. Sestak will be responsible for the technical quality of the verification program and for the performance of the work in a timely and cost-effective manner. He will assure that the project is properly organized, that it has adequate support, and that the necessary level of communications between Stone & Webster, Pacific Gas & Electric Co., and Robert L. Cloud Associates, Inc. are maintained. I Mr. Sestak will report to Mr. C. O. Richardson Jr., who will be assigned as Engineering Management Sponsor for this program. Mr. Richardson is an Assistant Engineering Manager. As Engineering Management Sponsor he will ensure that this project receives high prior-I ity and the necessary management attention to provide for its successful completion. I Lead Engineers in the various disciplines will report to Mr. Sestak. The key Lead Engineers are shown in Figure 2-1. Other Lead Engineers will be assigned +o the project as required. Each Lead I Engineer will be responsible for tic performance of work in his disci-pline in a timely and cost-effcctive manner and will be supported as required by support engineers and staff personnel. The Lead Engineers shown in Figure 2-1 will be relieved of all other duties and will be I assigned full-time to the design verification program as required. In addition to the Lead Engineers and their staff, Stone & I Webster has assigned to this proj ect a number of senior level consul-tants. They are experts in specific areas and will be used on an as-required basis. In addition to the consultants shown in Figure 2-1, cur full staff of other consultants and specialists are available for use I on an as-required basis. Resumes of the key personnel shown in Figure 2-1 are included in Section 3 of this volume. Also included in Section 3 is a table summarizing the qualifications of these key individuals. I I I A g

W M M M M M M M M m m a m ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT SPONSOR C. O. Richordson PR OJECT MANAGER F. Sestok, Jr. 4 LE AD CONTROL LEAD LE AD LE AD NUCLEAR CONSU LTANTS i SYSTEMS E LECTR IC AL POWER T ECHNOLOGY S H. Bnott ENGINEER ENGINEER ENGINEER ENGINEER W Chamt,ertain J L Coo FJ Rezendes E Henecerry J. E. Kre chting J. M. Odd o R.R Wessel _ SUPPORT J Hall ENGINEERS -STAFF FIGUR2 2 -I PROJECT ORGANIZATION DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM FOR POWER ASCENSION DI ABLO CANYON NUCLE AR POWER PL ANT - UN IT 1 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION stour a wresrum

6-5288671-PR25 I SECTION 3 I PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS Detailed resumes of each of the key project team members are I included in this section in the order listed below. A summary of the quailifications of each of these team members is given in Table 3-1. Title Name Engineering Management Sponsor C. O. Richardson Project Manager F. Sestak Jr. I Lead Electrical Engineer E. Heneberry Lead Power Engineer J. E. Krechting Lead Nuclear Technology Engineer J. M. Oddo I Lead Control Systems Engineer F. J. Rezendes Consultant S. H. Bhatt Consultant W. Chamberlain I Consultant J. L. Cook Consultant T. Fritsch Consultant J. R. Hall Consultant H. V. Redgate I Consultant R. P. Wessel From Table 3-1 it can be seen that senior level personnel, all I with many years of experience in the engineering and design of nuclear power plants, have been assigned to the Design Verification Program. For

example, Mr. F.

Sestak, Jr.

the assigned Project Manager has over 26 years of experience including 13 years of nuclear experience. This I includes experience with Westinghouse Nuclear Steam Supply Systems. The total years of experience of the key personnel assigned to the Design Verification Program varies between 14 and 37 years. They have all had experience with Westinghouse Nuclear Steam Supply Systems. Several of the assigned Lead Engineers are supervisors of specialist I groups. For example, Mr. J. M. Oddo is supervisor of the Engineered Systems and Analysis Group, and Mr. J. E. Krechting is supervisor of the Systems Engineering Group. I I I I A a, -....... I

- - - - _ _.. -. _ ~ - - - - - - - M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M 6-5288671-PR19 T. A. llI._E _3..I

SUMMARY

OF PROJECT TEAM QUAL.IFICATIONS t Years of Westinghouse Years of Years at Nuclear NSSS Title Name Experience Stone _& Webster Experience Experience 1 (Yes/No) ) Engineering Management C.O. Richardson 23 14 17 Yes Sponsor Project Manager F. Sestak, J r. 26 13 13 Yes l' l.ca<l Electrical Engineer E. Ileneberry 17 10 10 Yes I.ead Power Engineer J.E. Krechting 17 8 17 Yes I 1.ead Nuclear Technology J.M. Oddo 14 8 14 Yes Engineer 4 I. cad Control Systems F.J. Rezendes 26 11 9 Yes Engineer l l Consultant S. 11. Bha t t 19 13 10 Yes Consultant W. Chamberlain 24 14 24 Yes I Consultant J. I.. Cook 38 38 18 Yes i Consultant T. Fritsch 28 2 Yes l Consultant J. Itall 23 17 13 Yes Consultant li.V. Redgate 37 28 22 Yes i j Consultant R.P. Wessel 28 14 28 Yes l STONE & WEESTER i i

I Carl 0. Richardson, Jr. PROPOSED POSITION Engineering Management Sponsor AREA 0F ACTIVITY Ensure that the Design Verification Program receives high priority and the necessary management attention to provide for its successful completion. EDUCATION University of Massachusetts at Amherst - BSME I State University of New York at Buffalo - MBA EXPERIENCE

SUMMARY

Carl 0. Richardson, Jr., is an Assistant Engineering Manager in the Engineering Department. He is sponsor of the Power Division, Advisory I Operations Division, and Conceptual Engineering. Before his current assignment, he was Project Manager on two pressurized nuclear power plants, responsible for engineering and construction on one and support services on the other. Prior to joining Stone & Webster he was an engineer in an organization which was designing a 500 megawatt boiling water reactor nuclear power plant. Mr. Richardson has also had several years' experience as an installation and service engineer on aircraft gas turbine equipment. LICENSES AND REGISTRATIONS Professional Engineer - New York, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania I I I 6-5288671-PR6

I I DETAILED EXPERIENCE RECORD CARL 0. RICHARDSON, JR. Oct. 1980 STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION to date BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS Appointed to position of Assistant Engineering Manager Assigned to Department Sponsor of Power Division, Advisory Operations Division, and Conceptual Engineering 1980-1977 Appointed to position of Project Manager I Sept.-July Assigned as Project Manager on the following projects: Duquesne Light Company, Beaver Valley Power Station - Unit No. 2, Shippingport Borough, Beaver County, Pennsylvania Continued as Project Engineer 1977-1970 Appointed to position of Senior Power Engineer I July-July Appointed to position of Power Engineer (March 1972) Appointed to position of Power Engineer (March 1972) I Appointed to position of Mechanical Engineer (July 1970) During this period, participated in engineering and design work on the following projects: Duquesne Light Company, Beaver Valley Power Station - Unit No. 2, Shippingport Borough, Beaver County, Pennsylvania Assigned as Proj ect

Engineer, Beaver Valley Power Station - Unit No. 2, responsible for the engineering and design and the associated budget and schedule of this 850 MW pressurized water nuclear power plant.

Assigned as Assistant Proj ect Engineer, Beaver Valley Power Station - Units 1 & 2. Continued as Mechanical Engineer on Beaver Valley Power Station Unit No. 1. 6-5288671-PR6 t

COR 2 gg 1970-1968 A pointed to position of Engineer - Mechanical Division J July-Nov. (Nevember 1968) I During this period, participated in engineering and design work on the following projects: Duquesne Light Company, Beaver Valley Power Station, I Shippingport Borough, Beaver County, Pennsylvania Assigned as Mechanical Engineer responsible for the turbine plant systems of this 850 MW pressurized water nuclear plant. I Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company, Maine Yankee Atomic Power Station, Wiscasset, Maine Participated in design of turbine plant systems. Speci-I fied and selected pumps, tanks, valves, and control equipment for the turbine plant of this unit. 1968-1965 Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, Buffalo, New York Oct.-May During this period, participated in engineering and design work on the following projects: Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Town of Scriba, New York I Participated in design of all control systems for this plant: waste disposal, ventilation, reactor safeguards, I reactor auxiliaries, and turbine cycle. Specified and purchased valves, controls, and other equipment. C. R. Huntley Station, Tonawanda, New York Designed deaerator and high pressure heater steam blan-keting system and boiler feedwater intertie system to I decrease effects of oxygen and thermal shock to boiler tubes and heaters during critical periods of start-up and shutdown. Specified and purchased equipment for these systems. Oswego Steam S,tation, Oswego, New York I Albany Steam station, Albany, New York Dunkirk Steam Station, Dunkirk, New York After installation of steam blanketing and boiler feed-water intertie system at C. R. Huntley Station designed similar systems for above three stations. I 6-5288671-PR6

COR 3 1965-1961 General Electric Company, Trumbull, Connecticut May-June During this period was a Field Supervisor for the Aero-spsce and Defense Service Engineering Operation on the General Electric Company. Bell Aerosystems, Town of Wheatfield, New York Provided technical guidance and design direction for the installation of the T-58 turboshaft engine in the X-22A I VTOL aircraft. Otis Air Force Base, Massachusetts Responded to USAF problems and requests, provided trouble-shooting assistance and instructed USAF personnel in the I proper maintenance of T-58 turboshaft engines as installed in the CH-3B helicopter in an effort to improve lifeline support of USAF personnel stationed on Texas Towers off the coast of Cape Cod. Quonset Naval Air Station, Rhode Island Provided troubleshooting assistance and instructed Navy personnel in the proper maintenance of T-58 turboshaft engines as installed in HSS-2 aircraft. Sikorsky Aircraf t Corporation, Stratford, Connecticut Provided technical assistance on the production flight I line of the HSS-2 aircraft. Kaman Aircraft Company, Bloomfield, Connecticut Provided troubleshooting and technical assistance in the experimental hangar during development of the HU-2K aircraft. 1961-1969 General Electric Company, Schnectady, New York June-June During this period was a Test Engineer on the Technical Marketing program of the General Electric Company. This program consists of a series of rotating assignments at I various departments of the General Electric Company. Gas Turbine Department, Schenectady, New York Provided design, layout, and construction follow-up of facilities used to test industrial gas turbines. I 6-5288671-PR6 1

COR 4 Installation and Service Engineering Department, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Inspected G.E. equipment on subway cars at the customer

location, participated in road

tests, and provided troubleshooting assistance.

Large Steam Turbine Department, Schenectady, Ncw York I Prepared test equipment, and performed duties related to safe operation of large steam turbines, generators, and precision balance equipment. Gas Turbine Department, Schenectady, New York In charge of preparing for test and test of all size gas turbine units. Medium Steam Turbine, Generator, and Gear Department, Lynn, Massachusetts Duties were proposition design, cost analysis, and appli-cation of new manufacturing methods of existing designs. Large Steam Turbine and Generator Department, Schenectady, New York First assignment as test engineer. Duties were to parti-cipate in testing of large steam turbines and generators including balance equipment. I I E stou,. ,,,,r,,, E 6-5288671-PR6

1 I NAME Frank Sestak, Jr. PROPOSED POSITION Project Manager AREA 0F ACTIVITY Responsible for the technical quality of the design verification program and for the performance of the work in a timely manner. He will assure that the project is properly organized, that it has adequate support, and that the necessary level of communications between Stone & Webster, PG&E, and Robert L. Cloud Associates, Inc. are maintained. EDUCATION Clarkson College of Technology - Bachelor Mechanical Engineering Westinghouse Power Simulator Program - Power Operation Northeastern University - Management Development Program EXPERIENCE

SUMMARY

Mr. Sestak has 26 years' experience in operation, performance, maintenance, engineering and design of large utility electric generating units. This experience encompasses natural circulation and once-through type units fired by I coal, oil, and natural gas, and gas cooled (HTGR) and pressurized water reactors (PWR). Mr. Sestak has 13 years' experience with Stone & Webster. He is Chief Power Engineer of the Power Division. As such, he is responsible for engineering and design of fluid systems, mechanical and nuclear components, piping systems, I facilities, process systems for fossil and nuclear power plants and engineering and design of advanced power technology concepts. Prior to this assignment, Mr. Sestak worked on several nuclear projects, during I engineering, design and construction phases: As Project Engineer for a 1200 MW plant, and two 900 MW PWR plants, had overall respcnsibility for all engineering and design activities associated with licensing and construction. As Coordinating Engineer for a 900 MW PWR nuclear power plant, he was responsible for coordinating engineering efforts to resolve addi-tional design basis events imposed by the AEC, in its operating licensing stage. As Assistant Project Engineer of a 2,400 MW HTGR plant, his respon-sibilities included directing the mechanical, electrical, and control I engineering disciplines, scheduling and planning, developing PSAR Section and coordinating client, manufacturer, and Stone & Webster project and design groups. I 6-5288671-PR8

FS 2 E I Prior to his working at S&W, Mr. Sestak worked for Public Service Electric and Gas Company (New Jersey) where he had department head positions in the mainte-nance and operating departments of various generating stations. LICENSES AND REGISTRATIONS Professional Engineer - New Jersey, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Connecticut PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS ASME - Member ASME - Turbine Water Damage Prevention Committee l l 'l l I !I t i I I I i A 6-5288671-PR8 stour a wresm I

DETAILED EXPERIENCE RECORD FRANK SESTAK, JR. April 1968 STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION, BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS Jan. 1981 Power Division to date Chief Power Engineer Overall responsibility for the administration and technical direction of the Power Division in the engineering and design of fossil and nuclear power plants and advanced technology power concepts. Power Division responsibility for the administration and tech-nical direction of the Power Division in the engineering and design of nuclear and fossil power plants and advanced tech-I nology power concepts. Power Division responsibility includes the following major assignments: 1. Conceptual and detail engineering design of fluid systems. 2. Engineering of nuclear and mechanical components and systems including all specifications and technical I requirements. 3. Site and plant arrangement design including plot plans, machine arrangements, piping, and facilities. 4. Preparation of optimized heat balanced studies and diagrams for steam, water, fluid and related cooling systems. 5. Systems engineering and preparation of power fluid system descriptions and flow diagrams. 6. Preparation of power technology, economic and feasi-bility studies, and evaluation of plant systems and ccmponents. 7. Engineering of facilities components and systems, including all technical snecification requirements. 8. Engineering and design of advanced power technology I concepts including IlIFBR proj ects, atmospheric and pressurized fluidized bed combustion, solar power generation, thermionic topping and aquifer storage concepts. i STONE & WEnsTER 6-M88671-PR8 t

FS 2 1980-1977 Northeast Utilities - 1,200 MW Nuclear Power Plant Jan.-Feb. Millstone No. 3 Project Engineer Overall responsibility for the administration, coordination, and execution of all engineering and design activities associated with the licensing and building of a 1,200 MW PWR Nuclear Power Plant. 1977-1973 Wisconsin Utilities Project Feb.-Dec. Koshkonong Units Nos. I and 2 - 1,800 MW Nuclear Power Plant Project Engineer Overall responsibility for the administration, coordination, and execution of all engineering and design activities associated with the licensing and construction of a 1,800 MW (two 900 MW each) PWR nuclear power plant. A unique requirement was the development of a standard PSAR, three Site Addendums, and I three Site Environmental Reports. 1973-1973 Duquesne Light Company Nov.-April Beaver Valley - Unit No. 1 - 900 MW Nuclear Power Plant Coordinating Engineer Special assignment of coordinating engineering effort to resolve additional design ba:;is events imposed by the AEC on a 900 MW pressurized water reactor in its operating licensing stage. 1973-1972 Philadelphia Electric Company Mar.-Feb. Fulton Nos. I and_2 - 2,400 MW Nuclear Power Plant Assistant Project Engineer Responsible for the mechanical, electrical, and control engi-neering requirements associated with high temperature gas cooled (HTGR) reactor plant. The assignment also involved the pre-paration of Preliminary Safety Analysis Report (PSAR) sections. 1972-1970 New England Gas and Electric Associates Jan.-Dec. Canal Unit No. 2 - 560 MW Fossil Power Plant Lead Mechanical Engineer I Responsible for the mechanical engineering requirements for a 560 MW, 2,400 psig, 1,000/1,000F, oil-fired, cyclic type operation, steam electric generating imit. I n_. .._ A ,.,,gg,,,.,,g

FS 3 g E I 1970-1970 Control Systems Division Nov.-June Supervisor - Control Logic Directed the activities of 18 Control Engineers in the development and preparation of control logic for all major systems associated with nuclear and fossil power plants. Participated in the development of the control system for the Stone & Webster combined cycle plant. 1970-1968 Appointed Mechanical Engineer - April 1968 May-April Development of control logic diagrams for various projects (Steam Electric Units - Nuclear and Fossil) 1968-1954 PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY, NEWARK, NEW JERSEY Apr.-June 1968-1967 Plant Engineer - Sewaren Generating Station Apr.-Jan. I Responsible for the plaraing and scheduling of all phases of mechanical and electrical maintenance associated with a high pressure - high temperature, coal, oil, - Hi-vis oil and gas fired, 960 MW steam electric generating station. 1966-1965 Performance Engineer - Sewaren Generating Station Dec.-Jan. I Responsible for station and unit performance, testing, controls, and instrumentation, and feedwater chemistry of a high pressure, high temperature, steam electric generating unit. 1964-1963 Operating Engineer - Bergen Generating Station Dec.-Sept. I Directed the Operations Department of a 610 MW steam electric generating station. (Coal & Natural Gas). 1963-1961 Performance Supervisor - Sewaren Generating Station Aug.-Oct. Supervision of testing, results, controls and instrumentation, and feedwater chemistry at a 960 MW steam electric generating station. 1961-1958 Maintenance Supervisor - Marion Generating Station I Sept.-June Supervision of mechanical plant, electrical plant, and electri-cal transmission maintenance work. 1958-1956 Assistant Engineer - Marion Generating Station May-Jau. Special assignement work in the three major departments of an electric generating station (maintenance-operation performance). I 6-5288671-PR8 I

FS 4 I I 1955-1954 Cadet Engineer - General Office Newark Dec.-June Formal training program designed to introduce engineering I graduates to the various department within the company. L I I I I ! I I i I I I I I i I I l A srows a wresm 6-5288671-PR8 1 l i

l I NAME Edward F. Heneberry PROPOSED POSITION Lead Electrical Engineer AREA 0F ACTIVITY Responsible for the technical quality of the Design Verification Program in I the area of electrical engineering and for the performance of this work in a timely manner. EDUCATION Northeastern University - B.S in Electrical Engineering I Northeastern University - Graduate Courses in Power Systems Engineering Seminar on Power System Transient Stability General Electric Company EXPERIENCE

SUMMARY

Mr. Heneberry has been with Stone & Webster since 1970 and has held increasingly responsible electrical engineering positions. He was Lead Electrical Engineer on North Anna Nuclear Power Station - Units I and 2 during their engineering design and construction. Mr. Heneberry was administratively and technically responsible for all areas of electrical I engineering and design for the station at both headquarters and site offices. He also conducted upgrading studies for various electrical systems to determine the effects of revised regulatory requirements, including feasibility, cost, implementation method, and impact on construction. Since I 1980 he has been assigned to the Synthetic Fuels Group working on feasibility studies for integrated combined cycle plants and various process plants. Mr. Heneberry also has electrical engineering and design experience I associ ted with a hydroelectric generating facility. Prior to joining Stone & Webster, he was associated with the planning section of United Engineers and Constructors Inc., where he conducted engineering studies on uprating facilities, system load flows, system stability and economic evaluation. He also worked in the transmission line section on EHV and HV line design and construction. In addition, he has had I experience in electrical construction as an engineer / estimator for various commercial projects. LICENSES AND REGISTRATIONS Professional Engineer - Massachusetts, Virginia I 6-5288671-PR16 STONE & WEBSTER

I DETAILED EXPERIENCE RECORD I EDWARD F. HENEBERRY April 1970 STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION, BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS I to date Appointed to the position of Electrical Engineer - Electrical Division July 1980 Central Maine Power Company to date Lead Electrical Engineer Duties consist of feasibility study for a 480 MW Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) plant incorporating a Texaco I medium Btu gasifier with a General Electric combined cycle power plant. The study purpose is to provide engineering design and economic information to demonstrate the feasibility of I constructing and operating an IGCC plant and to compare its energy cost with that of a coal-fired boiler / steam turbine plant. Administratively and technically responsible for all areas of ' electrical engineering and design of this plant. Administrative responsibilities including supervision of electrical personnel, I preparation of budget, manpower, and schedule estimates, and coordination of the electrical effort among the participants. Technical responsibilities include direction of the engineering I and design criteria, drawings, specifications, equipment costs, and development of electrical input to final report. Edward Koppleman Project Lead Electrical Engineer Feasibility study for constructing and operating a process plant to produce a high grade solid fuel with a fuel value of 12,000 to 14,000 Btu /lb from wood waste and peat. Administratively and I technically responsible for all areas of electrical engineering and design. 1980-1970 Virginia Electric and Power Company July-June Functioned as

Support, Principal, and subsequently Lead Electrical Engineer of two 1,000 MW pressurized water reactors I

for North Anna Power Station - Unit Nos. I and 2. Administratively and technically responsible for all areas of electrical engineering and design of the above units. Administrative responsibilities included the following: direction of the Electrical Engineering Group, budget and I manpower estimates and allocations, developing and monitoring schedules. 6-5288671-PR16 srous a wresten

FH 3 Technical responsibilities included direction of engineering and I design effort (both office and field) and liaison of field-related services such as construction, checkout and test

groups, and Quality Assurance personnel.

Equipment I considerations encompassed scheduling, specification >n preparation, bid evaluation, order placement, coordination of expediting and inspection services, and monitoring of vendor's _s activities to ensure delive ry of equipment per schedule and il specification. Appointed to the position of Engineer - Electrical Division '970-1970 Public Utility District No. 1 of Chelan County une-April Assisted in engineering design of the hydroelectric station incorporating four 132 MVA units. 970-1967 JACKSON & MORELAND, DIV. U.E. AND C., BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS Central Maine Power Co. and Public Service of New Hampshire Assisted in engineering and design of 345 kV, wood H-frame, and bundled conductor transmission line. In charge of structure spotting, reviewed all prints, and assisted in compilation of I standards for construction. He had responsibility for development and use of all computer programs including those programs used for structure

spotting, pole

loading, and I

developing electrical and economic parameters of the line. Also, assisted in design of steel tower, double circuit, 115 kV and 345kV transmission line. Wellesley College Assisted in the design and construction for Wellesley College I distribution system, necessary to uprate the system from 4.8 to 13.8 kV. Public Service of New Hampshire Assisted in study of feasibility of municipalizing existing facilities of PSNH in the town of Berlin, New Hampshire. Orange and Rockland Assisted in load flow and stability studies to determine future planning requirements. I I 6-5288671-PR16 srose a wresten

I NAME John E. Krechting PROPOSED POSITION Lead Power Engineer I AREA 0F ACTIVITY Responsible for the technical quality of the design verification program in the area of power engineering and for the performance of this work in a timely manner. EDUCATION U.S. Naval Academy - B.S. in Naval Science I EXPERIENCE

SUMMARY

I Mr. Krechting joined Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation in July 1974 as a Nuclear Engineer in the Power Division. He was assigned as a Support Engineer on the Charlestown Nuclear Power Plan Project, which was in the design development and PSAR production stage. In July 1975, I Mr. Krechting was assigned as a Support Engineer to the high temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTGR) 3,000 MWt Reference II Design Study for the General Atomic Company. The six-month study developed a conceptual I reference plant design for the 3,000 MW HTGR. In January 1976, Mr. Krechting was asigned as a Nuclear Support Engineer on the Sundesert Nuclear Plant Project which was in the design development and PSAR I production state. In August 1977, Mr. Krechting was assigned as the Principal Nuclear Engineer on the North Anna Units 1 and 2 Nuclear Power Plan Project. In June 1978, Mr. Krechting was assigned as the Lead Power Engineer on the North Anna Unit 2 Nuclear Power Plant Project in the I final stages of construction in preparation for initial full load. In July 1980, Mr. Krechting was assigned as the Supervisor of the Systems Engineering Group. Prior to joining Stone & Webster, he was employed by Westinghouse Nuclear Energy Systems as a Senior Systems Engineer on the project to determine the feasibility of floating nuclear power plants. He then worked on the nuclear and reactor auxiliary systems design development for the Offshore Power Systems' floating nuclear power plants. He also has six years' experience in the operation and maintenance of U.S. Navy submarine nuclear power plants, including two years as the Chief Engineer Officer of a nuclear submarine power plant. LICENSES AND REGISTRATION Professional Engineer - Rhode Island 6-5288671-PR7 srows a wassran

l JEK 2 I I DETAILED EXPERIENCE RECORD JOHN E. KRECHTING July 1974 STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION, BOSTON, to date MASSACHUSETTS I July 1980 Power Division Staff to date Supervisor of the Systems Engineering Group Responsibilities include the following: 1. Development of Reference Nuclear Power Plant (RNPP) fluid systems cesign, including preparation and maintenance of system descriptions and P& ids. 2. Development of Reference Fossil Power Plant (RFPP) fluid systems

design, including preparation and maintenance of system descriptions and P& ids.

3. Development and maintenance of system-related Power Division technical procedures and guidelines. 4. Resolution o[ Power Division-related generic engi-neering and design problem reports and development of preferred solutions. I 1980-1978 Virginia Electric and Power Company July-June North Anna Units 1 and 2 900 MW Nuclear Power Plant Lead Power Engineer Responsibilities included the following: 1. Supervision nd acministrative control of all Power Division per'onnel assigned to the project, including nuclear, mecnanical, and building service engineers and designers. 2. Technical responsibility for the power plant's nuclear systems, secondary systems, and HVAC systems, including equipment and piping arrangements, con-formance to design codes, performance calculations, and drawings. 3. Preparation and technical adequacy of

nuclear, secondary, and HVAC equipment and process speci-fications.

4. Coordination and approval of project work performed by the Power Division staff groups. I 6-5288671-PR7 STONE & WEBSTER J

JEK 3 5. Development of engineering man-hour estimates and schedules to ensure timely completion of work. 6. Coordination of interface between the Power Division and other engineering disciplines, such as Structural, Electrical, Engineering Mechanics, and Control Divisions. 1978-1977 Virginia Electric and Power Company June-Aug. North Anna Units 1 and 2 900 MW Nuclear Power Plant Principal Nuclear Engineer 1 Responsibilities included the following: 1. Technical responsibility for the the plant's nuclear and nuclear auxiliary systems, including piping arrangements, conformance to design

codes, and preparation of design calculations.

2. Sopervision and coordination of the engineers in the nuclear group assigned to him,- including the schedul-ing of work. l 3. Responsibility for the preparation of nuclear equip-l ment specifications and purchase orders. t 1977-1976 San Diego Gas & Electric Company Aug.-Jan. 900 MW Nuclear Power Plant Nuclear Support Engineer Responsibilities included the following: 1. Coordination of the layout of the annulus building to ensure compliance with system design criteria con-formance with NRC high energy line criteria, and optimization of space utilization. 2. Development of layout requirements and PSAR write-ups for the NSSS systems, including Reactor Coolant l System, Chemical and Volume Control, Residual Heat E Removal, and Safety Injection. Liaison with the NSSS 3 vendor to resolve interface requirements. 1976-1975 General Atomic Company l Jan.-July 3,000 MW Reference II Design Study Coordinated the design of the piping and equipment arrange-ment inside containment with the goal of reducing HTGR plant costs. The various disciplines coordinated to accomplish this cost reduction included structural, pipe stress, engineered safeguards, and engineering wchanics. 6-5288671-PR7 stour a wassrun I

JEK 4 The work included development of containment structures; analysis of high energy line break (both for pipe restraint and containment design pressure determination); application of high temperature pipe stress criteria to piping arrangement; arrangement and location of pipe whip restraints. Responsible for developing pipe sizes for the major steam re' eat) and the feedwater systems (main, hot, and cold n within the constraints of pipe stress criteris, allowable I pressure drops, and maximum fluid velocities. 1975-1974 New England Power Company and Central Maine Power Company July-July 1 200 MW Nuclear Power Plant 2 Nuclear Support Engineer Responsibilities included the following: 1. Development of design criteria and implementation of those criteria for the layout and arrangement of the plant's annulus building. I 2. Development of design bases, system description, equipment specifications, and PSAR write-ups for several NSSS and reactor auxiliary systems, including Chemical and Volume Control, Residual Heat Removal, Boron Recovery, Liquid Waste, Caseous Waste, and Solid Waste. In addition, coordinated the develop-ment of the Source Term section of the PSAR and Environmental Report. 1974-1971 WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION - PWR SYSTEMS DIVISION June-Aug. AND OFFSHORE POWER SYSTEMS Senior Systems Engineer Responsible for design of reactor plant auxiliary systems (i.e., Component Cooling Water, Service Water, Spent Fuel Pool Cooling and Purification, Containment Leak Detection, Combustible Gas Control). Responsibilities included develcpment of design criteria, conformance to design codes, PSAR write-ups, system descriptions, heat balance and fluid flow calculations, and equipment specifications. Supervised the layout and arrangement of assigned systems. 1971-1965 U.S. NAVY - NUCLEAR SUBMARINE FORCE Electrical and Reactor Control Officer, Main Propulsion Assistant, Chief Engineer As Chief Engineer, responsible for the operation and maintenance of the nuclear submarine's propulsion plant. sms a wemm 6-5288671-PR7

JEK 5 Directed ship's force and coordinated shipyard work during an extensive submarine overhaul. Supervised four officers l and 35 enlisted men. l l l l l [ l I l l ,I 'I l l 6-5288671-PR7 STONE & WEBSTER

NAME John M. Oddo PROPOSED POSITION Lead Nuclear Technology Engineer AREA 0F ACTIVITY Responsible for the technical quality of the design verification program in the area of Nuclear Engineering and for the performance of this work in a timely manner. EDUCATION Fordham University - B.S. in Physics Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - M.S. in Nuclear Engineering and Science EXPERIENCE

SUMMARY

Mr. Oddo joined Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation in 5)ril l';74 as a Nuclear Engineer in the Power Division and was assigned to the I Philadelphia Electric Company, Fulton Station HTGR project. From October 1975 to April 1976, he was assigned as a Mechanical Engineer in the Operations Services Division to the Duquesne Light Company, Beaver Valley Power Station project. He was subsequently assigned as a member of a consulting team to Aerojet Nuclear in Idaho Falls, Idaho, where he participated in the development of a cost and schedule monitoring system I for reporting to ERDA, the project sponsor. From June 1976 to July 1978, he was assigned as a Nuclear Engineer in the Operations Services Division to the James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant - The Power Authority of the State of New York project. From July 1977 to May 1978, he was I assigned as a Nuclear Engineer in the Power Division to the Sundesert Nuclear Power Plant, San Diego Gas & Electric Company project. From May 1978 to July 1978, he was assigned as a Nuclear Engineer in the Power Division to the North Anna Unit 3 Nuclear Power Plant, Virginia Electric and Power Company project. From August 1978 to September 1979, Mr. Oddo was employed by United Engineers and Constructors, Inc. as a Nuclear Engineer in the Power

Division, assigned at Gas-Cooled Reactor Associates in La Jolla, California.

From September 1979 to May 1980, Mr. Oddo was assigned as an Engineer in the Power Division at San Diego, California, with responsibilities for engineering liaison and marketing to West Coast clients. From May 1980 to August 1980, Mr. Oddo was assigned as a Nuclear Engineer in the Power Division at Denver to the Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Studies Effort - Northern States Power. From September 1980 to November 1980, Mr. Oddo was assigned as a Power Engineer in the Power Division at Boston to the Engineered Safeguards Group. From November 6-5288671-PR10 STONE & WEBSTER

JMO I 1980 to May 1981, Mr. Oddo was assigned as a Nuclear Technology Engineer in the Nuclear Technology Division to the Nuclear Safety and Upgrading Group. Mr. Oddo is currently assigned as Supervisor of the Engineered Safety Systems and Analysis Group in the Nuclear Technology Division. Prior to joining Stone & Webster, Mr. Oddo was employed by the General Electric Company, Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory (KAPL) in a thermal design and performance analysis group, where he was responsible for reactor protection and safeguards analyses and testing evaluation. He was also a Certified Test Engineer at a reactor prototype. In addition, he has had experience in start-up and acceptance testing as well as reactivity monitoring during refueling. LICENSES AND REGISTRATIONS Professional Engineer - California PROFESSIONAL AITILIATIONS American Nuclear Society - Member I lI l I I 6-5288671-PR10 srous a wrestra

I I DETAILED EXPERIENCE RECORD JOHN M. ODDO Sept. 1979 STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION, BOSTON, to date MASSACHUSETTS May 1981 Nuclear Technology Division - Supervisor to date Engineered Safety Systems and Analysis Group Responsibilities include: 1. Supervision of technical and administrative activi-I ties of 20 to 30 engineers who are engaged in the functional design and analysis of nuclear power plant containments and safety systems. Additional duties include, supervision of other nuclear safety-related system studies and analyses, including nuclear power plant modifications as the result of the NRC Action Plan developed as a result of the Three Mile Island-2 accident. I' 2. Supervision of the development and documentation of computer models used in analysis of the above efforts. 3. Administration and performance of group budgets and l schedules, staffing requirements, personnel evalua-l tions, proposal preparation, and client presenta-tions. 1981-1980 Nuclear Technology Division - Nuclear Technology Engineer May-Nov. I Nuclear Safety and Upgrading Group 1. Engineering associated with responses to NRC Action a E Plan developed as a result of the Three Mile Island j accident. 2. Marketing / Proposal participation 1980-1980 Power Division - Power Engineer l l Nov.-Aug. E Engineered Safeguards Group l Responsibilities included: 1. Duquesne Light Company, Beaver Valley - Unit No. 1 Analysis of Impact of Revised LHSI System Flow on l NPSII-available and Containment Depressurization. 2. National Nuclear Corporation, Limited 6-5288671-PR10 srown a wresran

i JM0 2 I Commercial Development Fast Reactor Project - Analysis of Sodium Fires for Environmental Impact 1980-1980 Denver Operations Center - Power Division I Aug.-May Northern States Power Company Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Units 1 and 2, 520-MWe PWR Nuclear Engineer Responsible for: 1. Containmect Isolation Signal for Instrument Air-Study 2. Safety Inj ection System, Automate the Transfer to Recirculation Phase - Study 1980-1979 San Diego Engineering Office - Power Division - Engineer May-Sept. Resposibilities included: 1. Engineering liaison to West Coast clients: Helium Breeder Associates Electrical Power Research Institute - Nuclear Safety Analysis Center 2. Engineering Marketing 1979-1978 UNITED ENGINEERS AND CONSTRUCTORS, LA J0LLA, CALIFORNIA Sept.-Aug. Gas-Cooled Reactor Associates (GCRA) - 900-MW HTGR Nuclear Engineer Responsibilities included: 1. Field Office - Liaison Engineer 2. Systems Engineer - Conceptual Design - Steam Cycle A. Radioactive Liquid Waste System I B. Radioactive Solid Waste System C. Equipment and Floor Drain System D. Reactor Plant Cooling Water System E. Nuclear Service Water System F. Core Auxiliary Cooling Water System 3. Conceptual Design Status Report I 6-5288671-PR10 stone a wrestra I

JMO 3 I 1978-1974 STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION, BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS I 1978-1978 Virginia Electric and Power Company July-May North Anna Unit 3 - 938-MW PkR Nuclear Engineer Responsibilities included: 1. Containment Sump Modifications 2. Decay Heat Removal Heat Exchanc,er Vent Modifications I 1978-1977 San Diego Gas & Electric Company May-July Sundesert Plant - 1,020-MW PkR Nuclear Engineer Responsibilities included:

System Design

A. Auxiliary Feedwater and Recirculation Ssytem I B. Primary Grade Water Syste C. Combustible Gas Control System D. Aerated and Gaseious Vents and Drains Systems 1977-1976 The Power Authority of the State of New York July-June James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant - 884-MV PWR Nuclear Engineer Responsibilities included: E i l B 1. Radioactive Gaseous Waste System Modifications 2. Change Request Problem Resolution (Field Support) 3. Fuel Pool Expansion Modifications 1 1976-1976 Aerojet Nuclear - National Reactor Test Station - Idaho l May-April LOFT (Loss of Fluid Test) I Nuclear Engineer Responsibilities included: 1. Providing assistance in development of generalized cost and schedule monitoring system for reporting to I ERDA (Project Sponsor). 2. Interfacing with LOFT project technical personnel to I assist development of BASIS (Budget and Schedule Integrated System) specifically for LOFT. l A l 6-5288671-PR10 stour a wrestan L

JMO 4 I 1976-1975 Duquesne Light Company April-0ct. Beaver Valley Station - 850-MW PWR Mechanical Engineer Responsibilities included: 1. Circulating Water System Modifications 2, Filtered Water System Addition 3. Main Steam Sample Nozzles Modifications 1975-1974 Philadelphia Electric Company Oct.-April Fulton Station - 1,160-MW HTGR Nuclear Engineer Responsibilities included:

System Design

A. Core Auxiliary Cooling System B. Radioactive Solid Waste System C. Instrument and Service Air System g 1974-1968 GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, KNOLLS ATOMIC POWER LABORATORY, SCHENECTADY, NEW YORK 1974-1971 Thermal Design and Performance Analysis Responsible for analysis and documentation in support of reactor safeguards. Specific studies performed included reactor hydraulics modeling and

analysis, shipping container study for transfer of spent fuel, development of minimum pressure for critical operation restrictions, and I

analysis of reactor system behavior under transieot hydraulic and rod withdrawal accident conditions. Start-Up Acceptance Testing and Reactivity Monitoring Concurrent with thermal design and performance analysic, was responsible for coordination and immediate evaluation of initial criticality and physics acceptance testing in a construction environment aboard dockside ships at Newport I News Shipbuilding and Dry Duck Company, as well as for monitoring reactivity to assure safety during refueling at Portsmouth, New Hampshire, Naval Shipyard. 1971-1968 Operational Testing Responsible for development, performance, analysis, and reporting of tests concerned with nuclear and thermal / hydraulic reactor system performance. I 6-5288671-PR10 stour a wrenen

I NAME Frank J. Rezendes I PROPOSED POSITION Lead Control Systems Engineer AREA 0F ACTIVITY Responsible for the technical quality of the design verification program in the area of instrumentation and controls engineering, and for the performance of this work in a timely manner. EDUCATION I Southeastern Massachusetts University - Masters in Business Administra-tion Southeastern Massachusetts University - B.S. in Electrical Engineering Massachusetts Maritime Academy - B.S. in Marine Engineering EXPERIENCE SUM 1MlY Mr. Rezendes is the Supervisor of the Control Logic Group in the Control Systems Division. He supervises 15 engineers and 1 technical aide responsible for the preparation of logic diagrams and accompanying system I description of all nuclear and fossil power plant projects. Logic diagrams illustrate the engineering basis of interlocking, control and monitoring for all major equipment in a unit. System descriptions describe the design basis and also include a description of control to I facilitate an understanding of the control concept. During his career in engineering, he has served as a power plant operator and engineer aboard large ships of the U.S. Navy and Merchant Marine, and has exercised responsible leadership as a supervisor and engineering officer. His experience includes system sales, field service and check-I out of instruments and controls for large power and process control systems provided by a major manufacturer of instruments and control systems. He has also had experience as a chief engineer of a public company that produced a variety of electro-mechanical products for I government and industry. l LICENSES AND REGISTRATIONS l l Professional Engineer - Massachusetts Third Assistant Marine Engineer - Unlimited i PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS I E Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers - Member E Providence Engineering Society - Member l I I 6-828867'-'"

I DETAILED EXPERIENCE RECORD FRANK J. REZENDES I Oct. 1970 STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION, BOSTON, to date MASSACHUSETTS Appointed to the position of Supervisor, Control Logic I Group, Control Systems Division (September 1974) 1974-1973 Northeast Utilities Service Company I Sept.-Oct. Haddam Neck Power Station Assigned as Lead Control Engineer responsible for instru-mentation, control systems and data processing systems. Responsibility included the engineering design, prepara-tion of specifications, bid evaluations and selection of I all instrumentation and controls. The work also included review and approval of control logic diagrams, electrical elementary diagrams and vendors' drawings. Responsibility also included the application and supervi-sion of the station main cycle simulation to verify the satisfactory operation of system controls. 1973-1972 Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation Oct.-May Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station - Unit No. 2 I (1,100 MW-BWR) Appointed to the position of Principal Logic Engineer Responsibility also included review and approval of manufacturers' drawings and supervision of project logic I group. Duties required review of all logic diagrams with the client. l 1972-1970 Virginia Electric and Power Company l 1 May-Oct. Mt. Storm Station - Unit No. 3 (555 MW Reheat Coal-Fired) l Appointed to position of Support Logic Engineer l Responsibility included the preparation of logic diagrams and system descriptions after reviewing available design ( l and engineering data. 1970-1968 TRANSDYNE CORPORATION, BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS l Oct.-July l Systems Engineer and Chief Engineer for small 5 Served as a manufacturer of mechanical and electronic equipment including jet aircraf t simulators. I I srome a muren 6-5288671-PR20 L

I FJR 2 1968-1961 THE FOXBORO COMPANY, FOXBOR0, MASSACHUSETTS July-June Served as a Systems Sales Engineer for four years and as a I Systems Service Engineer for three years involved in field checkout and start-up of analog and digital control systems. 1961-1959 SOUTHEASTERN MASSACHUSETTS UNIVERSITY, NORTH DARTMOUTH, June-Jan. MASSACHUSETTS Full time student studying for a B.S. degree in electrical engineering. 1959-1958 EMPLOYERS LIABILITY ASSURANCE CORPORATION, BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS Served as a certified boiler, pressure vessel, elevator and machinery inspector. Also inspected commercial and industrial plant for personnel safety relating to workmen's compensation insurance. 1958-1954 U.S. MERCHANT MARINE AND U.S. NAVY Jan.-Oct. Served as a commissioned officer on large ships including an aircraft carrier. Responsibilities included supervi-sion and actual operation of power plants and maintenance of machinery and miscellaneous equipment. I I I I I srons a wresvan I 6-5288671-PR20

I NAME Satish H. Bhatt PROPOSED POSITION Consultant I AREA 0F ACTIVITY On an as-needed basis, provide the proj ect team with experience and I knowledge based on his extensive structural engineering experience. EDUCATION Gujarat University, India - B.S. in Civil Engineering Worcester Polytechnic Institute - M.S. in Structural Engineering i EXPERIENCE

SUMMARY

Mr. Bhatt is a Senior Structural Engineer with over 19 years of experi-ence in engineering, design and construction of nuclear power plants and industrial projects. He joined Stone & Webster Corporation in February 1969. For the past 8 years he has been assigned as Lead Structural Engineer on the Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit No. 2. He has overall respon-sibility for all structural, civil and architectural design work. He I directs a staff of approximately 100 engineers and designers who provide all drawings and specifications for all work relating to site development and plant structures. Prior to joining Stone & Webster Engineering Corportion, Mr. Bhatt worked as an engineer for about three years in California and three years in India. He wo-ked on civil / structural engineering and design of various projects which included mining and ore processing plants, residential and commercial buildings, and irrigation project. He has also had experience in soil mechan'is and foundation engineering. I LICENSES AND REGISTRATIONS Professional Engineer - California, Pennsylvania I 1. 6-5288671-PR11 stone a wresrum I

I DETAILED EXPERIENCE RECORD SATISH H. BHATT Feb. 1969 STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERII?G CORPORATION, BOSTON, I to date MASSACHUSETTS Appointed Senior Structural Engineer - 1976 Appointed Lead Structural Engineer - 1974 I May 1974 - Duquesne Light Company to date Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit No. 2 - 850 MW Nuclear Plant Lead Structural Engineer His responsibilities included the following: 1. Technical responsibility of all civil and structural engineering work for overall power station. 2. Planning and layout of the structures at the station. 3. Preparation and review of structural design criteria to be used for design of the structures. 4. Review of design drawings and coordination with design division in preparation of design drawings. 5. Review of specifications, shop drawings and vendor I coordination. 6. Coordination with clients and construction for developing and implementing various engineering requirements. I 7. Preparation and review of structural engineeering portion of the Safety Analysis Reports. 1974-1972 Duquesne Light Company I Beaver Valley Power Stations Unit No. 2 - 850 MW Nuclear Plant Support Engineer 1. Preparation and review of specifications, evaluation I of bids, coordination with vendors, and checking of shop drawings. 2. Review of structural desi n drawings. I i 2. k 6-5288671-PR11 STONE & WEBSTER l

I SHB 3. Preparation of structural design criteria for various structures. 4. Coordination with construction. 1969-1967 MODULUX INC., NEWARK, CALIFORNIA Feb.-Apr. I Worked as a Structural Design Engineer on engineering and designing of prefabricated steel building. He worked under a registered structural engineer in the state of I California. He was involved in the design, fabrication and installation of prefab buildings for schools, college campuses, and other residential buidlings. The buildings I wece of modular construction. The basic modules were 10' x 30' x 10' high, to 10' x 60' x 20' high modules constructed of structural steel. 1967-1966 BECHTEL CORPORATION, SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA Mar.-June Worked as an intermediate structural engineer in the Mining and Mineral Division. He worked under a registered civil engineer in the state of California. His respons-ibility included structural design and drawings of structural steel and reinforced concrete for an alumina prc: cessing plant and a copper plant. Worked on design and drawings of a concrete ore reclaim tunnel, concrete foundations for large tanks, structural steel framing for pipe supports. 1965-1963 MILITARY ENGINEERING SERVICES, INDIA I July-Nov. Worked on design and preparation of plans for various industrial and commercial building projects including estimating and cost analysis. Buildings were up to four I story structures of structural steel and reinforced concrete. I 1963-1962 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT INDIA Oct.-June Worked on surveying, design, and planning for various I civil and structural engineering works for irrigation projects. Work included structural design of concrete weirs, canal works, buildings and roads. I I 3. 6-5288671-PR11 stour a wrestan I

I I NAME William H. Chamberlain PROPOSED POSITION Consultant AREA 0F ACTIVITY On an as-needed basis, will provide the project team with experience and knowledge based upon his extensive mechanical experiences. EDUCATION U.S. Coast Guard Academy I Tri-State College - B.S. in Mechanical Engineering Univerisity of Hartford - Graduate Courses in Business Administration University of Connecticut Extension - Courses in Management Northeastern University - Management Development Program EXPERIENCE

SUMMARY

Mr. Chamberlain j oine'd Stone & Webster in 1968 as an Engineer in the Nuclear Division. He is presently an Assistant Engineering Manager. He served as Project Manager for the engineering work on Detroit Edison I Company's Enrico Fermi - Unit 2 project. He also served as Assistant Chief Engineer of the Power Division in Stone & Webster's Boston headquarters office. He served as a Senior Project Engineer for three I 850 MW nuclear units for Virginia Electric and Power Company's North Anna Power Station and as Project Engineer for two units at the station. He served -as Project Engineer during the site selection and initial engineering work on a new station study. He has supervised engineers and designers in all phases of power plant work and has been involved in cost control and schedule efforts. Mr. Chamberlain has spent over a year at Virginia Electric and Power Company's Surry plant construction site, providing responsible engineering support for construction, quality control, and startup. He has performed engineering work for systems, components, and buildings for the boron recovery system, fuel storage, I shipping, and waste purification systems. He has performed a detailed study and reported on the mechanics, equipment, routes, and costs of several methods of shipping spent reactor fuel. He has prepared reports on the effects of tornadoes on fuel pit pool water and on the economics I of building railroads for reactor sites. Prior to joining Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation, he spent 10 years with Combustion Engineering, Inco rpo ra ted, working on its pressur-ized water reactor program for the Naval Reactors Division of the ADC. He was Test Engineer during the development of fluid and control systems for the SIC prototype pressurized water reactor plant. He worked on the overall tests on the various systems and components and supervised acceptance and performance tests for this prototype plant and its support facilities. I 6-5288671-PR9

I As Test Coordinator, he worked with System and Component Engineers and outside engi.neering organizations on roethods of testing and operating the SIC plant, analyzed equipment operation problems, and made recommenda-I tions on modifications. He prepared the post-overhaul and refueling tests for use on the submarine and prototype power plants, and reviewed the refueling procedures for compatibility with plant systems. He also served on the Nuclear Safety Committee, reviewing and supervising opera-tions regarding the overall safety at the reactor test facility site for compliance with Federal regulating documents and good engineering prac-tice. Mr. Chamberlain served as Field Engineer at the shipyard for the initial testing of the submarine power plant. He was also in charge of the I reactor plant contractor's field office during subsequent overhaul and testing of the submarine plant. LICENSES AND REGISTRATIONS Professional Engineer - Massachusetts - Virginia I I I I I I I A n, _........ ,.,,,,,,1.,,,

' I DETAILED EXPERIENCE RECORD WILLIAM R. CHAMBERLAIN STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION, CHERRY HILL, NEW JERSEY 1980 Appointed Assistant Engineering Manager - 1980 I to Date STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION, BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 1968 Appointed Project Manager - 1980 to I Detroit Edison Power Company - 1980 Date Enrico Fermi Unit 2 Power Plant Appointed Assistant Chief Engineer - 1979 As Assistant Chief Engineer of the Power Division at Boston headquarters, his responsibilities included supervision of the I group in charge of system standards for Power Division work and the group responsible for advanced technology. Appointed Senior Project Engineer - 1978 As Senior Project Engineer for North Anna Units 2, 3, and 4, he supervised two project engineers for design of the remaining I three units at North Anna. Appointed Project Engineer - 1974 Appointed Assistant Project Engineer - 1972 As Assistant Project Engineer for North Anna Units 1, and 2, a Virginia Electric and Power Company two-unit station consisting of 850 MW nuclear power plants, he supervised engineers and designers in all areas of plant, engineering, and design disciplines. He provided liaison between company construction forces, subcontractor construction forces, and company design and engineering staff for technical and schedule problems. He I also served as Project Engineer during site selection, evalua-tion studies, and preliminary engineering for a proposed new four-unit station for Virginia Electric and Power Company. Appointed Senior Power Engineer - 1974 Appointed Power Engineer - 1972 During this time, he served as coordinating engineer for Surry Power Station - Virginia Electric and Power Company. He was I responsible for developing system and equipment design for a I A " - ' ' * ' ~ ' " I '-' 88-'"'

WHC 2 new combustible gas control system and procurement for installation within a restricted time schedule. He supervised engineers in

design, design modifications, and supplied I

resolutions to start-up problems. Appointed Office Engineer-In-Residence - 1970 As the Boston office engineer in residence at Surry Station construction site, he supervised engineers and provided respon-sible engineering during construction and start-up of the I station. His work areas included the reactor plant, reactor auxiliary

systems, steam plant

systems, building service facilities, and instrumentation.

Work consisted of revising I designs, making new designs, providing interpretations and resolutions of deficiencies for quality control, and acting as liaison between field forces and specialty engineering groups in the Boston office. Appointed Assistant to Nuclear Engineer - 1968 He assisted in the design of a boron recovery system, spent fuel storage building, decontamination building, and fuel handling systems for the twin 800 MW PWR station. He performed investigations and prepared a report covering technical, safety, and economic aspects of spent reactor fuel I shipping. He also prepared a report on the effects of torna-does on fuel storage pools. He edited and wrote portions of descriptions of work and assisted in the preparation of a cost estimate describing a twin 800 MW plant. COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INCORPORATED 1957 Appointed Resident Engineer - 1967 to 1968 Serving the reactor plant contractor, he was responsible for overhaul modifications and completion of refueling of the submarine reactor plant. He was also the reactor plant con-tractors' reprc entative on the three party group responsible for the start-up and testing of the reactor plant following refueling and overhaul. He was in responsible charge of field office and shift engineers. He prepared test procedures and programs for use following refueling of the land-based submarine prototype reactor plant and for the submarine reactor plant. He reviewed refueling procedures and wrote plant operating procedures for evolutions to support the refueling operation. As a member of the nuclear safety committee, he reviewed equipment design and refueling procedures for safety. Appointed Test Coordinator - 1961 6-5288671-PR9

WHC 3 He wrote tests and reports evaluating causes of operational difficulties on the land-based submarine reactor plant, turbine plant, and support facilities. He reviewed and approved all test procedures prepared by various engineering departments for safety, compatibility with the plant, and technical content. He supervised the plant operating crews and instrumentation personnel during the performance of tests on the land-based I prototype. He also provided liaison between outside engineering organizations and the staff for performance of tests sponsored by outside organizations and he instructed Navy I personnel in training programs. He also worked with the scheduling department in making optimum I use of plant time by integrating testing and training work. He served as member and secretary of the nuclear safety committee in reviewing safety aspects of all phases of operations of the reactor plant and site personnel work. He served as a member of Management's personnel performance monitoring staff. Appointed Test Engineer - 1960 He wrote reports and performed tests on modifications made on the land-based plant. Appointed Field Engineer - 1960 While working in the plant contractor's shipyard office, Mr. Chamberlain prepared procedures for the testing and operation of the reactor plant installed in the submarine. He served as shift engineer during the performance of tests and construction of reactor mechanical systems. He also evaluated tests and wrote reports. I I I 6-5288671-PR9 stour a wresren

I I NAMC John L. Cook PROPOSED POSITION Consultant AREA 0F ACTIVITY On an as-need basis, will provide the project team with experience and knowledge based on his extensive engineering mechanics experience. EDUCATION International Correspondence Schools - Mechanical Engineering Massachusetts University Extension - Engineering Drafting EXPERIENCE

SUMMARY

Mr. Cook has over 30 years of exparience as a designer, engineer, supervisor, Project Engineer, and Division Manager in the analysis of thermal, earthquake, and dynamic stresses in piping systems for large nuclear and fossil-fired power stations and chemical plants, and in the design, development, and construction of marine power plants. He had overall responsibility for layout, design, and analysis of all reactor I plant piping and machinery for the first nuclear powered surface ship, the USS Long Beach. He has conducted extensive in-house lectures in Pipe Stress Analysis for S&W's Career Development Program for young engineers, and has been responsible for staffing and training of the Pipe Stress Analysis groups for our New York and Denver Operations Center. As a member of the ASME Ad Hoc Committee on fiberglass reinforced plastic pipe, he actively participated in the writing of an approved code case I which defines the rules for design and stress analysis of fiberglass pipe to ASME Section III, Class 3, nuclear code requirements. LICENSES AND REGISTRATIONS Professional Engineer - Massachusetts PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Member - ASME Ad Hoc Committee on fiberglass reinforced plastic pipe A srous a wrutan 6-5288671-PR24

I DETAILED EXPERIENCE RECORD JOHN L. COOK I STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION DENVER, COLORADO Nov. 1980 ENGINEERING MECHANICS DIVISION to date Division Manager. Responsible for administration of division functions including personnel recruiting, salary administration, technical guidelines, and assignment of personnel. I He is also presently assigned as Project Engineer for seismic review and reanalysis of as-built piping and supports for an operating 300 MV HTGR nuclear plant. 1980-1977 Supervisor of pipe stress and supports group, responsible Oct.-June for supervision, scheduling, and evaluating all pipe stress and support work. He was also assigned as lead Engineering Mechanics Engineer for Nuclear and Fossil projects. Since being assigned to the Denver Operations Center, he has completed thermal and seismic piping analysis and I coordinated the pipe support contract on a 250 MW coal fired fossil plant. He is presently completing seismic piping, pipe support, and seismic duct support design and analysis for the containment cooling system on an operating 2 unit, 1,000 MW PWR nuclear plant. In addition, he is supervising piping and pipe support analysis for retrofit work on two operating nuclear plants. 1977-1973 ENGINEERING MECHANICS DIVISION Supervisor of Pipe Stress Analysis Group. Responsible for all pipe stress analysis in company headquarters office. Supervised implementation of the ASME Section III Nuclear I Power Code together with a new computer program for time history and fatigue analysis of piping. He conducted extensive in-house pipe stress lectures for S&W's Career I Development Program for young engineers and was responsible for staffing and training of the pipe stress analysis groups for S&W's New York and Denver Operations Centers. In addition, as a member of an ASME Ad Hoc Committee, he actively participated in the writing of an approved code case for the design and stress analysis of fiberglass pipe to ASME Section III Class 3 Nuclear Code requirements. 1973-1964 PIPE STRESS ANALYSIS GROUP Assisted in supervision, scheduling, and evaluating of pipe I stress analysis work; participated in development of new pipe stress computer program; and computed steam shock 6-5288671-PR24 sross a wassrun I l

JLC 3 I forces resulting from instantaneous closing of turbine throttle valve (turbine trip-out). Investigated special I. problems concerning pipe supports and reactions on equip-ment. This work covers all power plant prcjects and some chemical projects. He worked with computer programmers in the development of a dynamic shock analysis program for earthquake analysis of critical piping systems on both pressurized water and boiling water reactor nuclear power plants. Also, he worked with computer programmers in the development of a computer program for stress analysis of Clans I, nuclear I piping systems under the nuclear power piping code USAS B31.7. 1964-1943 BETHLEHEM STEEL COMPANY, SIIIPBUILDING DIVISION Apr.-Sept. QUINCY, MASSACilUSETTS 1964-1961 Engineer in Central Technical Department. Participated in feasibility studies for combination gas turbine and diesel power plant for advanced antisubmarine destroyer (Proj ect Seahawk). Performed piping stress analysis and made design studies for power plants in Naval and commercial vessels. Made design layouts for first pressure fired boiler to be installed in Naval vessel. Work involved field trips to Naval Boiler and Turbine Laboratory with the boiler manu-I facturer to review construction of the prototype test boiler. Work also required preliminary sizing of pipe and structures for use in design studies. 1962-1960 Engineer in Nuclear Power Section as Section llead. Respon-sible for technical adequacy of working plans for U.S.S. Long Beach nuclear propulsion plant. Responsibilities included review and approval of working plans and inspection of ship construction for compatibility with plans and specifications. Work involved supervision of 10 engineers and designers and required preparation of, and participation in, special and routine shipboard tests. 1960-1954 Designer in Nuclear Power Section in charge of 15 designers and draftsmen. Responsible for design and development of all machinery and piping in U.S.S. Long Beach reactor compartments from original feasibility studies through full scale mock-up construction to actual ship construction. Performed liaison work with Westinghouse and U.S. Navy Bureau of Ships. Also participated in development of pipe stress program for IBM 650 computer and performed stress analysis on reactor plant systems. Responsibilities included functional design of piping penetrations through secondary shielding, writing of pertinent sections of progress reports for U.S. Navy Bureau of Ships and coordination with const ruction departments in development of new fabrication and welding techniques for stainless steel piping. Security clearances include AEC "Q" n,-..... A 6-5288671-PP24

JLC 4 I clearance and Department of Defense " confidential". Promoted to Engineer in May 1960. 1954-1951 Special Draf tsmaa in Engineering Department. Participated in design studies and piping plan checking for populsion plant piping on C4SIA class cargo ships. Special problems I included requirement that layout be compatible for instal-lation of any combination of five different boilers and five different turbines with minimum of change. Also participated in dockside tests and trial trips. 1951-1950 Assigned to Knowles Atomic Power Laboratory in Schenectady, I Mar.-Oct. New York, to participate in feasibility and design studies for nuclear power plants on Submarines Nautilus (pressurized water reactor) and Sea Wolf (liquid metal cooled reactor). I 1950-1943 Dra f tsman in Engineering Department. Participated in layout and checking of piping plans for varicus Naval and commercial ships including Liners Independence and Constitution. Duties included coordination between of fice and construction aboard ship and in shops, and occasional participation in trial trips and dockside tests. I I STONE & WEBSTf.R 6-5288671-PR24

I NAME I Thomas J. Fritsch PROPOSED POSITION Consultant AREA 0F ACTIVITY On an as-needed basis will provide the project team with experience and I knowledge based upon his extensive pump background. EDUCATION I Drexel University - B.S. in Mechanical Engineering EXPERIENCE

SUMMARY

Thocas J. Fritsch is a Consulting Engineer in the Engineering Department with primary responsibility for pumps. He has over 20 years of experience I in design, development,

sales, marketing, and engineering management primarily related to centrifugal and reciprocating pumps.

As a Consulting Engineer, he works closely with all divisions and other departments to ensure that all pumping systems are properly designed, l constructed, and operated. He maintains state-of-the-art awareness and liaison with the pumping industry. Mr. Fritsch has responsibilities in the l following specific areas: l l Review and updating of master specifications and preparation of additional ones as required. Review of project systems design and specifications and assistance I to project engineers in analysis of vendor bids. Training of project engineers, staff specialists, and others as l I required to upgrade their skills in pump application, system design installation, and operation. Analysis and solution of field problems. l l Auditing vendors to assess their engineering,

design, i

manufacturing, and testing capabilities. Mr. Fritsch also provides consultation to clients on pump-related matters. PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS l American Society of Mechanical Engineers - Member Hydraulic Institute - Past Company Representative PUBLICATIONS "World's Largest Boiler Feed Pump," American Power Conference 1974 6-5288671-PR23 srows a wrestra

DETAILED EXPERIENCE RECORD THOMAS J. FRITSCH March 1979 STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION, BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS I to date Consulting Engineer WORTHINGTON PUMP CORPORATION, MOUNTAINSIDE, NEW JERSEY 1979-1977 Manager of Engineering - Taneytown, Maryland Operation I Feb.-Nov. Responsible for all pump design, product development, research, proposal and contract engineering involving engineered centrifugal pumps for the sewage treatment, pollution control, I water resources, utility, process, and general industrial markets. Also responsible for the design and construction of a 28,000 hp gas turbine drive centrifugal pump test facility located at the Taneytown, Maryland facility. 1977-1974 Manager of Engineering - Harrison, New Jersey Operation Nov.-May Responsible for all pump design, product development, research, proposal and contract engineering involving engineered centrifugal and reciprocating pumps for the utility (including N-stamp), process, Marine-Navy (including nuclear submarine), and general industrial markets. INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY, WOODCLIFF LAKES NEW JERSEY 1974-1970 Manager of Engineering - Cameron Pump Division, April-June Phillipsburg, New Jersey l Responsible for all pump design, product development research, proposal and contract engineering involving engineered centrifugal pumps for the utility (including N-stamp), Navy l (including nuclear submarine) pumps and paper, process, and l general industrial markets. The pumps for the utility market including all major services for both fossil and nuclear plants. l 1970-1965 Product Development Manager - Cameron Pump Division, May-June Phillipsburg, New Jersey Responsible for all product development programs from the l concept and economic justification through design and production and introduction to the market place. Products involved included new lines of process

pumps, vertical condensate, heater drain, and condenser circulating pumps, I

boiler and reactor field pumps, wet motor boiler circulating pumps, and Navy nuclear submarine pumps. r I l l 6-5288671-PR23 srous a wassran l

TJF 2 1965-1964 AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS INC., ALLENTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA June-Jan. Equipment Engineer in the Mechanical Fquipment Group Responsible for the preparation of specifications, evaluation of bids and vendor selection, engineering assistance to projects, plant start-up groups, and plant operators. A major project involved all the mechanical equipment for a 1,000 ton / day air separation plant located at Sparrows Point, Maryland. INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY, PHILADELPHIA SALES OFFICE 1964-1961 Sales Engineer for centrifugal and reciprocating pumps compres-Jan.-Jan. sors and condensers. Major customers included

Dupont, Hercules, Sun Ship, Sun Oil, Scott Paper, Delaware P&L.

1961-1958 Office Application Engineer Jan.-June Responsible for preparing proposals handling contracts for the above products to the major customers listed above. UNITED STATES AIR FORCE 1955-1951 Troop Carrier Pilot - Tactical Air Command Active duty. 1972-1956 Troop Carrier Pilot - Willos Grove NAS, Willow Grove, July-March Pennsylvania i Reserve duty. l i I 6-5288671-PR23 stour a wresren

NAME John R. Hall PROPOSED POSITION Consultant I AREA 0F ACTIVITY On an as-needed basis, will provide the project team with experience and knowledge based upon his extensive geotechnical experience. EDUCATION University of Florida - Ph.D. in Structural Engineering University of Florida - M.S. in Civil Engineering Syracuse University - B.S. in Civil Engineering EXPERIENCE

SUMMARY

Dr. John Hall is a Consulting Engineer at Stone & Webster. He is a former member of the faculty at the University of Michigan where he taught, conducted research, and acted as a consultant on foundation and structural vibration problems to various municipal agencies and indus-trial corporations. Specifically, his efforts have been directed toward vibration problems and dynamic analyses. He has conducted experimental I research on the properties of soils under dynamic loadings and methods of measuring dynamic soil properties. He is also a specialist in the measurement of vibrations and dynamic soil properties. While at the I University of Michigan, he developed both the undergraduate and graduate l soil mechanics laboratories and soil dynamics laboratory. He has presented numerous papers on foundation vibrations and dynamic soil-structure interaction at professional meetings and has conducted seminars on soil dynamics for several industrial organizations. Dr. Hall joined the firm of D'Appolonia in 1969 and has been associated with projects on slope stability, foundation analysis, vibrations of structures and foundations, earthquake design of buried structures and nuclear power plants. He has also been in charge of the development of instrumentation and methodology for vibration measurements, geophysical prospecting, and acoustics. Over the past several years, he has advanced the scope of D'Appolonia's services to include sound vibration problems associated with industrial facilities. Recent projects have involved the prediction and measurement of sound transmitted by subway systems to adjacent structures sensitive to sound and vibration and the de te rmi-nation of OSHA compliance criteria for computer and printing facilities. From 1974 to 1976, Dr. Hall established and managed the European Office of D'Appolonia in Brussels, Belgium. He was totally responsible for the development of a high level self-sufficient technical organization serving nuclear industry of Europe in the areas of geotechnical engi-neering, earthquake engineering and structural dynamics. 6-5288671-PR18 stour a wassran

JRH 2 Af ter returning from Europe, Dr. Hall held the position of Senior Corpo-rate Consultant and Project Manager of D' Appolonia at their headquarters in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania from 1976 until joining Stone & Webster. LICENSES AND REGISTRATIONS Registered Professional Engineer - Michigan, Pennsylvania PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS American Society of Civil Engineers International Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering Seismological Society of America Measurements Data Society of America Institute of Noise Control Engineering Soil Dynamics Committee, ASCE, Chairman (1972-74) Publications Committee, Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE (1969-74) ASTM Committee D18-9 on Soil and Rock for Engineering Purposes (1966-72) Nuclear Structures and Materials Committee, Structural Division, ASCE (1972-74) President of the Murry Woods Water Corporation (1971-72) Member of the Franklin Township Municipal Sanitary Authority (1971-74) Listed in American Men of Science PUBLICATIONS Schmertmann, J. H. and Hall, J. R. " Cohesion After Non-hydrostatic Consolidation," Transactions, ASCE, Vol. 128, Part I, 1963.

Hall, J.

R., and Richart, F. E. "Effect of Vibration Amplitude on Wave Velocity in Grannular Materials," Second Pan-American Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundations Engineering, Brazil, July 1963. Hall, J. R., and Richart, F.E. " Dissipation of Elastic Wave Energy in Granular Soils, " Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, November 1963. l I l

Chae, Y.

S.,

Hall, J.

R. and Richart, F. E. " Dynamic Pressure Distri-l bution Beneath a Vibrating Footing", Proceedings of the Sixth Interna-l tional Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Montreal, Canada, September 1965. I

Drnevich, V.

P. and Hall, J. R. " Transient Loading Tests on a Circular Footing," Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division,

ASCE, November 1966.

I Drnevich, V. P., Hall, J. R. and Richart, F. E. " Effects of Amplitude of Vibration on the Shear Modulus of Sand," Proceedings of the Symposium on Wave Propagation and Dynamic Properties of Earth Materials, Albuquerque, August 1967. l l 6-5288671-PR18 srous a wresrun

JRH 3 Hall, J. R., " Coupled Rocking and Sliding Oscillations of Rigid Circular Footings," " Proceedings of the Symposium on Wave Propagation and Dynamic Properties of Earth Materials, Albuquerque, August 1967. Kissenpfennig, J. F., Rizzo, P. C. and Hall, J. R. " Assessment of Ampli-fication/ Attenuation Effects of a Shallow Soil / Rock Layered System on the Seismic Response of Nuclear Structures," Specialist Meeting on Antiseis-mic Design of Nuclear Power Plants, Pisa, Italy, October 1972. Hall, J. R. and Morrone, A. " Soil-Structure Interaction Parameters for a Nuclear Containment Vessel," Second International Conference on Strut-tural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, Berlin, September 1973.

Furrer, H.,

K., Gabler, J. L., Jemielewski, and Hall, J. R. " Soil Ampli-I fication and Soil-Structure Interaction Study for a Nuclear Power Plant in Switzerland," Second International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, Berlin, September 1973. Kissenpfennig, J. R. and Hall, J. R. "In Situ Shear Wave Velocity Meas-urements in Soils and Rocks by Cross-Hole Method," 36th Meeting, European Asseciation of Exploration Geophysicists, Madrid, Spain, June 1974. Hall, J. R. Kissenpfennig, J. F. and Rizzo, P. C. " Continuum and Finite Element Analyses for Soil-Structure Interaction Analysis of Deeply Embedded Foundations," Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology,

London, September 1975.

Snyder, M.

D.,

Hall, J.

R. and Shaw, D. E. " Structure-Soil-Structure Interaction of Nuclear Structures, " Proceedings of the Third Interna-tional Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology,

London, September 1975.

Hall, J. R., and Kissenpfennig, J. F. "Special Topics on Soil-Structure Interaction," Proceedings of the International Seminar on: Extreme Load Conditions and Limit Analysis Procedures for Structural Reactor Safeguards and Containment Structures, Berlin, September 1975.

Hall, J.

R., and Kissenpfennig, J. F. " Soil-Structure Interaction for Nuclear Power Plant, " Proceedings of the Symposium on Earthquake Risk for Nuclear Power Plants, European Seismologic Commission, Walferdange, Luxembourg, October 20-22, 1975. Hall, J. R., " Continuum and Finite Element Techniques for Soil-Structures Interaction Analysis of Deeply Embedded Foundations," Proceedings of the CSNI Specialists' Meeting on Anti-Seismic Design of Nuclear Installations, Nuclear Energy Agency (OCDE), Paris, France, December 1-3, 1975.

Hall, J.

R. " Foundation-Structure Interaction & Current Review of the State of the Art, Session 6: Panel Presentation". Second ASCE Specialty Conference on Structural Design of Nuclear Plant Facilities, Vol. II, pp 206-222, New Orleans, Louisiana, 1975. 6-5288671-PR18 STONE & WEBSTER

JRH 4 I

Hall, J.

R., and Kissenfpennig, J. F. "Special Topics on Soii-Jtruc-ture Interaction," Nuclear Engineering and Design, Vol. 38, No. 2, August 1976. Hall, J. R., Shukla, D. K., and Kissenpfennig, J. F. " Cyclic Character-istics of Earthquake Time Histories", Transactions of the Fourth Inter-national Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, San Francisco, August 1977. Hall, J. R. Shukla, D. K. and Kissenpfennig, J. F. " Shear Stress Distri-I bution Due to Shear and Rayleigh Wave Propagation at Deep Soil Sites, " Transactions of the Fourth International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, San Francisco, August 1977.

Richart, F.

E.,

Hall, J.

R. and Woods, R. D. Vibrations of Soils and Foundations, Prentice-Hall, Book, 400 pg., 1970. PATENT " Methods and Apparatus for Forming Concrete Piles," granted March 25, 1969, No. 3434294. I I I I 6-5288671-PR18 stone a wresrrn

l I DETAILED EXPERIENCE RECORD JOHN R. HALL June 1978 STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION, I to date BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS Consulting Engineer 1978-1969 E. D'APPOLONIA CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC., June-May PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA Project Manager and Consultant 1967 GIFFELS AND ROSSETTI, INC., DETROIT, MICHIGAN Summer Design Engineer and Consultant on dynamics problems. UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 1969-1966 Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering May-Sept. 1966-1963 Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering Sept.-Sept. 1963-1962 Lecturer and Associate Research Engineer. Conducted Sept.-Sept. research in soil dynamics and established soil dynamics laboratory. UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA, GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA i ( 1960 Full-time research on soil properties. Summer 1967-1959 Teaching and Research Assistant l Aug.-Jan. l HARRISON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA l 1959 Engineering for field control on an interstate highway. Summer 1958 Rodman on a surveyors crew assigned to bridge construction Summer on an interstate highway. l WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, l PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA 1957 Structural Draftsman for plant modifications. Summer 1956 Laboratory Research Technician working with reinforced Summer plastics. 6-5288671-PR18 stour a wresten

I I NAME Howard V. Redgate PROPOSED POSITIONS Consultant AREA 0F ACTIVITY On as-needed basis, will provide the Proj ect Team with experience and knowledge based upon his extensive electrical experience. EDUCATION Northeastern University - Electrical Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology - Electrical Engineering Northeastern University - Management Development Program Boston University School of Management, B.S. EXPERIENCE

SUMMARY

Mr. Redgate is a Consulting Engineer in the Engineering Department. During his career with Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation, he has served as an Assistant Chief Electrical Engineer and also functioned as the Lead Elec-trical Engineer on a number of major power plant and industrial projects including nuclear installations. He joined Stone & Webster in April 1958 and has had more than 20 years' experience on nuclear projects as outlined by the following experience record. I As a Consulting Engineer, Mr. Redgate reports to the Director of Engineer-ing. His duties are varied in nature and works in areas of special or generic concern to the Corporation that are outside the scope of an engi-neering division. He is available for investigation of advanced technical concepts and works with utilities and manufacturers on equipment qualifi-cation and compliance with the latest licensing requirements. He also negotiates with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission regarding technical interpretations and licensing requirements for nuclear installations. As a member of the Nuclear Power Engineering Committee (NPEC), Mr. Redgate contributes to the development and publication of nuclear standards at the national level. These IEEE standards cover nuclear safety-related equipment qualifications, generating plant operation and surveillance, overall reli-ability and auxiliary power systems. LICENCES AND REGISTRATION Professional Engineer - Massachusetts 6-5288671-PR22 srows a wresran

HUR 2. PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Engineering Societies of New England Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers - Senior Member I American Institute of Electrical Engineers Nuclear Power Engineering Committee - 1973 - Present PUBLICATIONS National Electric Code - Article 500 - Hazardous Locations Translated g from English to French - 1955 Auxiliary Power Systems for Nuclear Power Plants - 1973 I I I I I l l I 6-5288671-PR22 svous a wresren

I I DETAILED EXPERIENCE RECORD HOWARD V. REDGATE Apr. 1958 STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION, BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS I to date Appointed to position of Consulting Engineer (June 1978) Appointed to position of Assistant Chief Electrical Engineer (October 1969) I 1978-1969 As Assistant Chief Electrical Engineer was responsible at a June-Oct. division level for an overall electrical review of all Stone & Webster sponsored nuclear power plant projects. This included reviewing the safety analysis

reports, engineered safety I

feature systems logic diagrams, acting as the Electrical Division licensing representative and providing division guidelines for coapliance with the latest criteria of the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. He was also responsible for continuity of electrical engineering informa-tion among all the projects and provided division assistance for engineering and equipment quality assurance. In addition, he developed for the Electrical Division policies with regard to Regulatory Guides and Branch Technical Positions I issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. La addition to serving as Electrical Engineer on specific I projects he was responsible for the specification and selection of electrical generators, distributions and transmission saitchgear, motors, power and control cable, control boards, I lighting, annunciators, communications, and associated manual and automatic controls on central power plant projects. This included factory inspection, engineering work on installation, initial operation and instruction of plant operators. He was also responsible for electrical engineering, cost and time estimates and coordination between engineering and construction forces, and worked closely with the Client's engineers for I overall electrical system stability and protection. t Also participated in the electrical and control portion of Stone & Webster's Standard Nuclear Power Plant (SWESSAR). This effort included coordination with various nuclear reactor manufacturers and review of the safety analysis report as submitted to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Division review and guidance was also provided for the follow-( ing nuclear power projects: Long Island Lighting (Shoreham) Boiling Water R3 actor l Power Authority of New York (FitzPatrick) Boiling Water Reactor Duquasne Light Company (Beaver Valley) Pressurized Water Reactor 6-5288671-PR22 svons a wresten

HVR 2. I Virginia Electric and Power Company (North Anna 1,2,3, and 4) Pressurized Water Reactor Philadelphia Electric Company (Fulton Station) Appointed Senior Electrical Engineer (December 1967) 1969-1966 Virginia Electric and Power Company Sept.-Oct. Principal Electrical Engineer during the design and construc-tion of the two-unit pressurized water reactor and turbine generator plant at Surry, Virginia. This work consisted of preparation of the electrical portion of the specification for the nuclear steam supply system and I evaluation of bids. Contributed to the preparation of the preliminary and final safety analysis reports. Attended all project meetings with the Atomic Energy Commission and assisted with the preparation of the technical specifications. Appointed Electrical Engineer (July 1962) 1966-1964 Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company I Sept.-May 600-MW Nuclear Power Plant Electrical Engineer during the design and construction of a pressurized water reactor and turbine generator plant at Haddam, Connecticut. This work consisted of preparing electrical specificatons, evaluation of bids, and recommending Purchasers for electrical equipment. Construction drawings were reviewed and issued to the field l forces. Westinghouse control and instrument diagrams were reviewed and corrected before 'aeing inco rporated into final g ,j g construction drawings. Several inspection trips were made to electrical equipment I manufacturing plants to review and approve components before ( shipment to the project. I 1964-1962 Korea Electric Company, Seoul, Korea May-June i Electrical Engineer during the rehabilitation of the Chongpyong ) Dam and Powerhouse in Chongpyong, Korea. l This work included an inspection and evaluation of the condi-tion of the existing 44 MVA generators, power transformers and l electrical control equipment. l 1 l 6-5288671-PR22 srows a wresrun I

HVR 3. I Specifications and design data were prepared for repair or replacement of equipment for installation by our field force. The entire control scheme of the plant was modified to add automatic features and to increase its reliability to a level I equivalent of a modern power plant. A program was carried out in cooperation with the Korea Elec-tric Company to train and improve the skill of the Korea technicians and operators. I Appointed to position of Engineer in Electrical Division (April 1958) 1962-1962 Jersey Central Power and Light Company I June-Jan. Proposal for 450-MW Nuclear Power Plant Preparing detailed electrical design and costs for a 450-MWe nuclear, closed cycle, pressurized water reactor, including fuel handling and waste disposal facilities. I Dec.-Oct. 1961 Virginia Electric and Power Company Automation of Water Treating Plant, Portsmouth Station Responsible for the electrical design in the automating of a I water treating plant. This included development of special control circuits, layout of control boards, material specifi-cations and insurance of compatibility with existing equipment. 1961 U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Sept.-June Report on 300-MW Advanced Design Reactor Responsible for electrical features in a spectral shift reactor (SSCR). This report consisted of electrical design, layouts, one line diagrams and estimated cost of a complete nuclear power plant including D 0 reconcentrated facilities. 2 1961 Consolidated Edison Company of New York Sept.-Jan. Proposed for 450-750 and 1,000-MW Nuclear Power Plant Responsible for electrical features in three detail.ed proposals I covering 450, 750, and 1,000-MW nuclear, closed cycle, pres-surzied water reactors. These proposals contained complete electrical layouts, wiring diagrams, transmission facilities and fixed price costs for a second unit at Indian Point. 1960 Florida West Coast Nuclear Group Dec.-Sept. Proposal for 50-MW Gas-Cooled Reactor Responsible for electrical features in a proposal for a proto-type gas-cooled reactor. I 6-5288671-PR22 srous a wresrun

I NAME Roger P. Wessel PROPOSED POSITION Consultant AREA 0F ACTIVITY I On an as-needed basis, will provide the project team with experience and knowledge based upon his extensive nuclear background. EDUCATION New York State Maritime College - B.M.E. Massachusetts Institute of Technology - Courses in Advanced Thermodynamics I and Direct Conversion of Heat to Electricity University of Connecticut - Graduate Courses in Mathematics and Heat Transfer Electric Boat Division of General Dynamics Corporation - Management Courses EXPERIENCE

SUMMARY

Mr. Wessel is a Consulting Engineer in the Engineering Department. He has broad experience in engineering, design, construction, and maintenance of major nuclear power plant projects. Mr. Wessel is presently the Proj ect Manager for the Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactor (LMFBR) Design Project, developing the engineering and preliminary design for a prototype large i breeder reactor for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI). Since September 1976, he has also been assigned as Proj ect Manager for Stone & Webster's engineering work for Babcock-Brown Boveri Reactor (BBR) GmbH in Mannheim, Germany. l l Mr. Wessel joined Stone & Webster in May 1968 as an engineer, and was involved in systems and component design and engineering work for the Beaver Valley Power Station and the Maine Yankee Atomic Power Station. From March l 1969 to December 1973, he was assigned to progressively more responsible positions on the North Anna Power Station projects, serving as Project Engineer for Units 1, 2, and 3. As such, he was responsible for all i engineering and design work for the three units. In December 1973, he was assigned as Senior Project Engineer for the design and engineering work on two 1,200 MW units for New England Electric Power Company at Charlestown, Rhode Island, and two similar units for Central Maine Power Company. In November 1974, he was appointed Assistant Chief Power Engineer, responsible for the Equipment Specialists Group, the Heat Balance Group, and the Special Studies Group of the Power Division. In April 1977, he was appointed Chief Engineer for the Engineering Mechanics Division, responsible for Stone & Webster's engineering and design activities in the areas of mechanical engineering, structural mechanics, pipe stress analysis, and pipe support design and analysis. l 6-5288671-PR17 stour a wrestra

2 j I Prior to joining Stone & Webster, Mr. Wessel was a Staff Engineer at Atomic Power Development Associates, Inc., where he carried out various engineering tasks associated with the Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant. Among these were an investigation to determine the causes for the malperformance of intermediate heat exchangers, work associated with the large and small leak sodium-water reaction program for the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC), and an investigation of modifications required to increase the reliability I of the steam generators. His sodium systems and components engineering experience started in 1954 when he worked on the design, construction, and testing of the reactor plant for the submarine SSN SEAWOLF. Mr. Wessel also has 10 years of broad experience with pressurized water reactor plants for naval submarines. He was Chief Components Engineer for deep-diving nuclear power research vehicle, and Refueling NR 1, a I Superintendent for the SSBN GEORGE WASHINGTON. His responsibilities included developing the equipment and methods for refueling all S5W type reactor plants. He was Senior Supervisor in charge of developing equipment and procedures for in place modification of the existing S1W reactor vessel as required to receive a new core configuration. Mr. Wessel was also Refueling Director for the SSN SKATE refueling and reactor plant overhaul, and was a Systems Design Engineer for the SSN SEAWOLF conversion from sodium to a pressurized water-cooled reactor plant. LICENSES AND REGISTRATIONS Professional Engiaeer - Massachusetts, Michigan, and Virginia Third Assistant Marine Engineer's License - Steam and Diesel PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS American Nuclear Society - Member ASME Advanced Reactor Committee - Member I I 6-5288671-PR17 STONE & WEasTER

I DETAILED EXPERIENCE CCORD ROGER P. WESSEL STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION, BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS Consulting Engineer Sept. 1976 Assigned as Project Manager for engineering, design and con-to date consulting work for BBR - Babcock-Brown Boveri Reactor, GmbH in Mannheim, Germany. This German engineering company is jointly owned by Babcock & Wilcox and the Brown Boveri Company and is engaged in engineering, design, and construction of nuclear power plants at Muelheim Kaerlich and other locations in Germany and Luxemburg. Nov. 1975 Assigned as Project Manager for the Liquid Metal Fast Breeder to date Reactor Design Project. Responsible for the cost, schedule, I and overall engineering performance of this project intended to develop the preliminary engineering and design for a prototype large breeder reactor for ERDA and EPRI. 1979-1977 Appointed to the position of Chief Engineer in the Engineering Mechanics Division, responsible for all engineering and design work of the Engineering Mechanics

Division, including I

mechanical engineering, structural mechanics, pipe stress analysis, and pipe support design and analysis. 1977-1974 Appointed to the position of Assistant Chief Power Engineer Apr.-Nov. Engineer in the Power Division, responsible for the Equipment Specialists Group. Heat Balance Group, Materials Handling Group, and Special Studies Group. 1974-1973 Assigned as Project Engineer for the New England Electric Nov.-Dec. Power Company, Units 1 and 2, proposed at Charlestown, Rhode I Island, and two similar units for the Central Maine Power Company proposed at Sears Island in Penobscot Bay, Maine. Responsible for all engineering and design work for four 1,200 Mwe output pressurized water reactor plants. 1973-1972 Assigned as Project Engineer for the North Anna Power Station Dec.-Sept. Units 3 and 4, two 950 Mwe pressurized water reactor plants, responsible for all engineering and design work. 1972-1971 Assigned as Project Engineer for the North Anna Power Station, Sept.-Dec. Units 1 and 2, for the Virginia Electric and Power Company, responsible for all engineering and design work for two 927 Mwe output pressurized water reactor plants. Appointed to position of Senior Nuclear Engineer in the Nuclear Division (April 1971) 6-5288671-PR17 srous a wresran

E I 1971-1970 Assigneu as Assistant Project Engineer for the North Anna Dec.-Dec. Power Station, Units 1 and 2, responsible for all aspects of structural, electricel, instrumentation, and nuclear engineering. Appointed to position of Nuclear Engineer in the Nuclear Division (March 1970) 1970-1969 Assigned as Lead Nuclear Engineer for the North Anna Power Dec.-Mar. Station, Units 1 and 2, responsible for all aspects of engineering, design and specifications for heat transport, process and safeguard systems and components of this twin-unit pressurized water reactor plant and its auxiliary systems. Appointed to postion of Engineer in the Nuclear Division (May 1968) 1969-1968 Assignments included systems and component analyses, design Mar.-May and specification work for the Beaver Valley Nuclear Power Station and the Maine Yankee Atomic Power Station. 1968-1966 ATOMIC POWER DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, INC. May-Apr. DETROIT, MICHIGAN Staff Engineer Responsibilities covered various aspects of design and analyses work concerning sodium cooled fast breeder reactor plants. Accomplishments include the design of special fuel handling equipment to remove damaged fuel from the Fermi I reactor; a study to determine the cause for the ma1 performance of the Fermi intermediate heat exchangers and a study and report recommending modifications required to increase the reliability of the Fermi steam generators. He was a member of the Committee reviewing the Fuel Handling System for the Fast Flux Test Facility. He also was responsible for proposals on the architect-engineering work for the Fast Flux Test Facility and a joint venture with the Ladish Company on the Large Sodium Valve Development Program. 1966-1954 GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, GROTON, CONNECTICUT Apr.-Sept. Employed by the Electric Boat Division in various positions and responsibilities listed below: 1966-1965 Chief Components Engineer for reactor plant mechanical Apr.-Jan. components for the NR-1 Project, a deep diving nuclear powered research vehicle. 1965-1964 General Refueling Superintendent in charge of all aspects Jan.-Apr. of SSB(N)598 GEORGE WASHINGTON reactor refueling. I 6-5288671-PR17 srous a wresten

3 1 1964-1962 Senior Supervisory Engineer in charge of S1W vessel Apr.-June modification. This work entailed the design, construction, procurement and testing of a vertical boring lathe and other machine tools, gages, and equipment required for in place modification of the existing S1W reactor vessel to receive a new core configuration. 1962 Design Proj ect Engineer doing fluid system, component and structural design, and construction work on the S5G prototype reactor plant. This work covered detail plant system and component analyses, design evaluation, and specification of site ;onstruction and installation procedures. 1961 Repair Project Engineer doing reactor plant and engine room overhaul work on various submarines. The work included writing proposals and procedures for repair and replacement work. Estimating manpower, time, and cost formed part of the I-proposal development work. Job and testing surveillance was an included responsibility. 1960 Refueling Director for the USS SKATE reactor refueling and I plant overhaul. The work concerned preparing facilities, training personnel, writing refueling procedures, preparing and restoring the ship and refueling equipment, directing subassembly refueling operations, and following up reactor plant overhaul work and reactor critical and power range testing. 1959-1956 Design Engineer, working on the power plant conversion of the USS SEAWOLF from sodium to pressurized water cooled reactor plant. During this period his responsibilities encompassed the Reactor Compartment Fresh Water

Cooling, Sea Water Cooling, Steam Generating, Plant Air, Shield Water, Plant Instrumentation, and Boiler Cooldown Systems, in addition to the shock and thermal pipe stress work for the entire plant.

1956-1954 Design Engineer, doing component and systems work on the sodium cooled reactor plant for the submarine USS SEAWOLF. The component work covered various aspects of design, procurement and testing of valves, pumps, heat exchangers, and special purpose units such as pipe shock snubbers, oxygen removal units. and compartment viewers. The systems work included detailed flow analyses and heat balances of various reactor plant systems. 6-5288671-PR17 svour a wrestra

6-5288671-PR26 1 1 QUALIFICATION DOCUMENT DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM FOR POWER ASCENSION DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT - UNIT 1 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY I VOLUME 3 0F 3: DEMONSTRATION OF INDEPENDENCE I l o m m,1,e1 I I I I I I I STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION I I A l l ~

I ' I 6-5288671-PR27 I VOLUME 3: DEMONSTRATION OF INDEPENDENCE I TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. DEMONSTRATION OF TNDEPENDENCE 2. DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS I I I I l I I I I A I

6-5282671-PR15 SECTION 1 DEMONSTRATION OF INDEPENDENCE Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation (Stone & Webster) will conduct the Diablo Canyon-Unit 1 Design Verification Program in an I independent. manner. Stone & Webster has a long standing and valued reputation which is based upon the professional integrity and independent judgment of its personnel. The Corporation's commitment to the continuation of such high ethical standards is reflected in its Code of Business Conduct which, of course, applies to the services provided for this program, as well as to any other assignment. In order to further demonstrate that the program will be performed in an independent manner, I Stone & Webster has conducted the internal review described below to meet the specific requirements for this program. Location of Offices The Design Verification Program will be managed by Stone & Webster's Headquarters office in Boston, Massachusetts and will be manned by personnel from the Boston office and, as required, from other offices which are located in Denver, Colorado; New York, New York; Cherry Hill, New Jersey; and Houston, Texas. Stone & Webster does not have an engineering and destgn office in California. Stone & Webster's Procurement Quality 4ssurance Division does have a small District Inspection Office in Artesia, California and Stone & Webster's affiliated company Stone & Webster Appraisal Corporation, has a small office in Westlake Village, California. Stone & Webster believes that the independence of the per-formance of its services will be enhanced by the remoteness of its offices from those of PG&E. There would be a diminished likelihood of outside relationships among employees of both organizations and diminished likelihood of individuals who have been employed in both organizations by virtue of having offices located in different regions of the country. The ef fectiveness of the services will not be diminished, however, because individuals will be temporarily relocated to work locally with PG&E as necessary for the accomplishment of the work in the most efficient manner. Independence of Personnel To demonstrate that the professional and technical personnel I who will be assigned to the design verification prcgram do not have potential or apparent conflicts of interest, such personnel will be required to sign the statement shown in Figure 1-1. Thus, the personnel assigned to the design verification program will indicate the following: 1. That such personnel have not engaged in any work or business involved with or related to the engineering or design of the I Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant; I STONE & WEBSTER

I 6-5288671-PR15 I 2. That neither such personnel nor any members of their immediate I families own any beneficial interest in the Pacific Gas & Electric Co.; and 3. That none of the members of their immediate family are employed by Pacific Gas & Electric Co. Immediate family is defined as spouse, children, parents and I siblings. The disclosure statements for those personnel who were available to sign them are included in Section 2 of this volume. As the other personnel shown in Figure 2-1 of Volume II return to the office from vacation and, as other key technical personnel are nominated for assignment to the project, they will be required to sign the disclosure statement as a precondition for the assignment. Business Dealings Between Stone & Webster and PG&E Stone & Webster has reviewed its records to determine what work has been performed for PG&E from January 1, 1975 to December 31, 1981. A list of these jobs is contained in Table 1-1. This work for PG&E represents a very small portion of Stone & Webster's total business. On March 16, 1981 Stone & Webster and PG&E entered into an Agreement for Consulting services. Under this agreement Stone & Webster has been providing emergency planning services to PG&E for Diablo Canyon (Stone & Webster J.O.No. 13918, subaccounts .01 to .05, in Table 1-1) These emergency planning services do not involve any design work for Diablo Canyon. This is the only work Stone & Webster has performed or is presently performing at Diablo Canyon. In addition to Stone & Webster Engineering Co rporation's business dealings with PG&E, the records have also been searched to I determine if Stone & Webster's affiliated companies, Stone & Webster Manageme2t Consultants (SWMCI) and Stone & Webster Appraisal Corporation, have performed any services for PG&E since January 1, 1975. Only one such task has been found, i.e., an audit conducted by SWMCI of PG&E load data management and analysis of their software. The funding for this task was $7,700. Holdings of PG&E Securities Stone & Webster, Inc., the parent company of Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation and its subsidiaries (including SWEC) have no I holdings of PG&E securities. The Employee Savings Plan of Stone & Webster, Incorporated and participating subsidiaries is administered by The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. as trustee. Funds may be invested in the I Employee Benefit Investment Funds, Equity Fund of the Chase Manhattan Bank which is a commingled fund. Stone & Webster exercises no direct control over the investment of such funds. The Chemical Bank, trustee for the Employee Retirement Plan of Stone & Webster, Incorporated and participating subsidiaries holds $200,000 face value bonds of PG&E First and Refunding Mortgage Series W, 3 1/8%, due December 1, 1984. This amount represents less than two tenths of one percent of the Plan assets. A I 2

I 6-5288671-PR15 In summa ry, Stone & Webster and its affiliated companies have I performed an amount of work for PG&E over the past seven years which represents only a very small portion of Stone & Webster's business. Neither Stone & Webster, Inc. nor any of its subsidiaries own a beneficial interest in PG&E. Stone & Webster's Employee Savings Plan and Retirement Plan are administered by banks as trustees and the Retirement Plan holds only a small amount of PG&E bonds. Also, all key technical I personnel who will be assigned to the project will be required to sign the attached disclosure statement (Figure 1-1). We believe that these disclosures and representations should be more than adequate to demonstrate the independence of Stone & Webster's participation in the Diablo Canyon Design Verification Program. I I E I I STONE & WEBSTER 3

6-5288671-PR15A I TABLE 1-1 WORK PERFORMED BY STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION FOR PG&E FROM JANUARY 1, 1975 TO DECEMBER 31, 1981 SWEC PG&E Job Order Contract Date of No. No. Task Descriptiori Funding 12944 and 5-66-77 March 1977 - Assist in Prep- $210,000 subaccounts December 1978 aration of Notice I .01 and.02 of Intent - Phases I, II, and III I 12955 5-23-77 Apr. 1, 1977 - Solid Waste $145,000 February 1979 Disposal Siting Study 13918 5-47-81 March 1981 - Various Emergency $360,000 Subaccounts To Date Planning Tasks .01 to.05 I I A ,, _. m.. _

I FIGURE 1 -1 Statement Regarding Potential or Apparent Conflicts of Interest I To: Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation Whereas, the undersigned employee (" Employee") understands that he or she is being considered as a participant to provide services to Pacific I Cas & Electric Company with respect to the Design Verification Program for the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant - Unit I; and Whereas, Employee understands that it is necessary that proposed participants be screened for any potential or apparent conflicts of interest with respect to this assignment; I Therefore, for the above stated purposes Employee makes the following representations to Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation: 1. Employee has not engaged in any work & business involved with or related to the engineering or design of the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant; 2. Neither Employee, nor any cembers of his or her immediate family, own any beneficial interest in the Pacific Gas & Electric I Company, including but not limited to common or preferred stock, bonds or other securities issued on behalf of the Pacific Gas & Electric Company; and 3. None of the members of Employee's immediate family are employed by Pacific Gas & Electric Company. This statement is based upon the Employce's best information and belief and any exceptions to the representations contained herein have been described on the reverse side of this document. Dated Signature I Print Name I !I ' A I

6-5288671-PR30 i SECTION 2 DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS Disclosure statements for the following individuals are provided in this section. Stone & Webster will provide statements for the rest of the project team in the near future. 1. Carl 0. Richardson 2. Frank Sestak, Jr. 3. John R. Hall 4. Thomas J. Fritsch 5. J. L. Cook 6. J. E. Krechting I A STONE & WEBSTER .... ~.

i I Statement Regarding Potential or Apparent Conflicts of Interest To: Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation Whereas, the undersigned employee (" Employee") understands that he or she is being considered as a participant to provide services to Pacific Gas & Electric Company with respect to the Design Verification Program for the'Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant - Unit I; and Whereas, Employee understands that it is necessary that proposed participants be screened for any potential or apparent conflicts of interest with respect to this assignment; Therefore, for the above stated purposes Employee makes the following representations to Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation: 1. Employee has not engaged in any work or business involved with or.related to the engineering or design of the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant; 2. Neither Employee, nor any members of his or her immediate family, own any beneficial interest in the Pacific Gas & Electric Company, including but not limited to common or preferred stock, bonds or other securities issued on behalf of the Pacific Gas & Electric Company; and 3. None of the members of Employee's immediate family are employed by. Pacific Gas & Electric Company. This statement is based upon the Employee's best information and belief and any exceptions to the representations contained herein have been described on the reverse side of this document. Dated M i 17 [ r 7 /,h. ' M I Signature W0 /Cff4L DJ dY O Print Name i e STONE & WEBSTER

I-I Statement Regarding Potential or Apparent Conflicts of Interest To: Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation Whereas, the undersigned employee (" Employee") understands that he or she is being considered as a participant to provide services to Pacific Gas & Electric Company with respect to the Design Verification Program for the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant - Unit I; and Wereas, Employee understands that it is necessary that proposed participants be screened for any potential or apparent conflicts of interest with respect to this assignment; Therefore, for the above stated purposes Employee makes the following representations to Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation: 1. Employee has not engaged in any work or business involved with or.related to the engineering or design of the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant; 2. Neither Employee, nor any members of his or her im=ediate family, own any beneficial interest in the Pacific Gas & Electric Company, including but not limited to common or preferred stock, bonds or other securities issued on behalf of the Pacific Gas & Electric Company; and 3. None of the members of E_ployee's immediate family are employed m by. Pacific Gas & Electric Company. This statement is based upon the Employee's best information and belief and any exceptions to the representations contained herein have been described on the revarse side of this document. I Dated 3 0. /fff Signature Ns O nwx smm ne. I Print Name I STONE & WEBSTER

I Statement Regarding Potential or Apparent Conflicts of Interest To: Stone & Webster Engineerin5 Corporation Whereas, the undersigned employee (" Employee") understands that he or she is being considered as a participant to provide services to Pacific Gas & Electric Company with respect to the Design Verification Program for the'Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant - Unit I; and Whereas, Employee understands that it is necessary that proposed participants be screened for any potential or apparent conflicts of interest with respect to this assignment; Therefore, for the above stated purposes Employee makes the following representations to Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation: 1. Employee has not engaged in any work or business involved with or.related to the engineering or design of the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant; 2. Neither Employee, nor any members of his or her immediate family, own any beneficial interest in the Pacific Gas & Electric Company, including but not limited to common or preferred stock, bonds or other securities issued on behalf of the Pacific Gas & Electric Ccmpany; and 3. None of the members of Employee's immediate family are employed by. Pacific Gas & Electric Company. This statement is based upon the Employee's best information ?nd belief and any exceptions to the representations contained herein have. been described on the reverse side of this document. /b 2 -N Dated ,[ Jl/ u '[ s Signature i.: L ' n -. }{/hv 4 , AL G Print Name STONE & WEBSTER

Statement Regarding Potential or Apparent Conflicts of Interest To: Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation Whereas, the undersigned e=ployee (" Employee") understands that he or she is being considered as a participant to provide services to Pacific Gas & Electric Company with respect to the Design Verification Program for the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant - Unit I; and Whereas, Employee ur ' 2rstands that it is necessary that proposed participants be screened for any potential or apparent conflicts of interest with respect to this assignment; Therefore, for the above stated purposes Employee makes the following representations to Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation: 1. Employee has not engaged in any work or business involved with or.related to the engineering or design of the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant; 2. Neither Employee, nor any members of his or her immediate family, own any beneficial interest in the Pacific Gas & Electric Company, including but not limited to common or preferred stock, bonds or other securities issued on behalf of the Pacific Gas & Electric Company; and .I 3. None of the members of Employee's i==ediate family are employed by. Pacific Gas & Electric Company. This statement is based upon the Employee's best information and belief and any exceptions to the representations contained herein have been described on the reverse side of this document. Dated bu 2f 148/ I*e /6 Signature V Tw: (l. f 5 3CH Print Name srows a wassran

I Staterxnt Pegsrding rotential or Apparent Conflicts of Interest To: Stone & Webster Ecstneering Corporation I he or Wheress, the undersigned eeployee ("E=ployce") undarstando that she in being considered as a participsnt to provid2 Gervices to Facific I cas & Electric Compny with respect to the Destgo verification Progra n for the Diablo Canyon Nacicar Pover riant - 1%it I; and Whereas, Eeployee understsads that it is necessary that proposed participants be screened for any potentisi or appsrent conflicts of totorest with respect to this assignment; therefore, f or the above atsted purposes Euployee c>skes the follovies representatie.nc to Stone & Vebster Engir,eering Corporation: 1. En.picyee har. rot engaged in any work or be.tr.:ss involved with or.related to the ensineeriw, or design of thT Diablo Canyon Wclear Faer Plant; 2. 1;ettter Employee, nor ar.y menbere of his or her inocdiate f antly, ovn any beneficisi interest in the Facific Cas & Ficctric Coepsny, includt.ng but not limited to coccon or preferred stock, bonds or other securities iseued on behalf of the Pacific Cas 6 Electric Company; and 3. t,*one of the raccabers of Ihployce's frnediate f :nily are employed by. Pacific Gas & Electric Ccmpany. Tnis statment is based upon the f'mployee's best inforn.stion and belief and any cxceptions to the reprewntations cont 41ned herein hwe been described on the reverse side of this document. Dated DE C. 3 0,j$ 81 Signature ,6 JOHH L. C oo k. __ _ Frint Haes STONE & WEBSTER

Statement Regarding Potential or Apparent Conflicts of Interest To: Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation Whereas, the undersigned employee (" Employee") understands that he or she is being considered as a participant to provide services to Pacific Gas & Electric Company with respect to the Design Verification Program for the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant - Unit I; and Whereas, Employee understands that it is necessary that proposed participants be screened for any potential or apparent conflicts of interest with respect to this assignment; Therefore, for the above stated purposes Employee makes the following representations to Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation: 1. Employee has not engaged in any work or business involved with or.related to the engineering or design of the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant; 2. Neither Employee, nor any members of his or her immediate family, own any beneficial interest in the Pacific Gas & Electric I Company, including but not limited to common or preferred stock, bonds or other securities issued on behalf of the Pacific Gas & Electric Company; and 3. None of the members of Employee's immediate family are employed by. Pacific Gas'& Electric Company. This statement is based upon the Employee's best information and belief and any exceptions to the representations contained herein have been described on the reverse side of this document. /2!?/ Dated / / Signature g V $a N A $ Wi$sCNT/J0& Print Name Stohs & WresTan

I Statement Regarding Potential or Apparent Conflicts of Interest I To: Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation Whereas, the undersigned employee (" Employee") understands that he or she is being considered as a participant to provide services to Pacific Gas & Electric Company with respect to the Design Verification Program for the'Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant - Unit I; and Whereas, Employee understands that it is necessary that proposed participants be screened for any potential or apparent conflicts of interest with respect to this assignment; Therefore, for the above stated purposes Employee makes the following representations to Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation: 1. Employee has not engaged in any work or business involved with or.related to the engineering or design of the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant; 2. Neither Employee, nor any members of his or her immediate family, own any beneficial interest in the Pacific Gas & Electric Company, including but not limited to common or preferred stock, bonds or other securities issued on behalf of the Pacific Gas & Electric Company; and 3. None of the members of Employee's immediate family are employed by. Pacific Gas & Electric Company. I This statement is based upon the Employee's best information and belief and any exceptions to the representations contained herein have been described on the reverse side of this document. Dated El Signature k N-I h,n s H H. (buATt Print Name l STONE & WEBSTER !I

Statement Regarding Potential or Apparent Conflicts of Interest To: Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation Whereas, the undersigned employee (" Employee") understands that he or she is being considered as a participant to provide services to Pacific Gas & Electric Company with respect to the Design Verification Program for the'Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant - Unit I; and Whereas, Employee understands that it is necessary that proposed participants be screened for any potential or apparent conflicts of interest with respect to this assignment; Therefore, for the above stated purposes Employee makes the following representations to Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation: 1. Employee has not engaged in any work or business involved with or.related to the engineering or design of the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant; 2. Neither Employee, nor any members of his or her immediate family, own any beneficial interest in the Pacific Gas & Electric Company, including but not limited to common or preferred stock, bonds or other securities issued on behalf of the Pacific Gas & Electric Company; and 3. None of the members of Employee's immediate family are employed by. Pacific Gas & Electric Company. This statement is based upon the Employee's best information and belief and any exceptions to the representations contained herein have been described on the reverse side of this document. Dated /O[8-i v Signature vf M ['/[ u a.,J 2//~ > c y Print Name STONE & WEBSTER

I Statement Regarding Potential or Apparent Conflicts of Interest To: Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation Whereas, the undersigned employee (" Employee") understands that he or she is heing considered as a participant to provide services to Pacific Gas & Electric Company with respect to the Design Verification Program for the'Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant - Unit I; and Whereas, Employee understands that it is necessary that proposed participants be screened for any potential or apparent conflicts of interest with respect to this assignment; Therefore, for the above stated purposes Employee makes the following representations to Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation: 1. Employee has not engaged in any work or business involved with or.related to the engineering or design of the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant; 2. Neither Employee, nor any members of his or her immediate family, own any beneficial interest in the Pacific Gas & Electric Company, including but not limited to common or preferred stock, bonds or other securities issued on behalf of the Pacific Gas & Electric Company; and 3. None of the members of Employee's immediate family are employed by. Pacific Gas & Electric Company. This statement is based upon the Employee's best information and belief and any exceptions to the representations contained herein have been described on the reverse side of this document. I l Dated l 4l N Signature b [.[, O [ottu 61. 0 300 Print Name I A s,_a....... y

Statement Regarding Potential or Apparent Conflicts of Interest To: Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation Whereas, the undersigned employee (" Employee") understands that he or she is being considered as a participant to provide services to Pacific I Gas & Electric Company with respect to the Design Verification Program for the'Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant - Unit I; and Whereas Employee understands that it is necessary that proposed participants be screened for any potential or apparent conflicts of interest with respect to this assignment; Therefore, for the above stated purposes Employee makes the following representations to Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation: 1. Employee has not engaged in any work or business involved with or.related to the engineering or design of the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant; 2. Neither Employee, nor any members of his or her immediate family, own any beneficial interest in the Pacific Gas & Electric Company, including but not limited to common or preferred stock, bonds or other securities issued on behalf of the Pacific Gas & Electric Company; and 3. None of the members of Employee's immediate family are employed by. Pacific Gas & Electric Company. This statement is based upon the Employee's best information and belief and any exceptions to the representations contained herein have been described on the reverse side of this document. Dated s [7/J. Y / 982. Signature unx 10 m U 'w' nl Y he $ffr7k 2 a Print Name A s_ a m.._ L

I Statement Regarding Potential or Apparent Conflicts of Interest I To: Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation he or Whereas, the undersigned employee (" Employee") understands that she is being considered as a participant to provide services to Pacific I Cas & Electric Company with respect to the Design Verification Program for the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant - Unit I; and Whereas, Employee understands that it is necessary that proposed conflicts of participants be screened for any potential or apparent interest with respect to this assignment; Therefore, for the above stated pt.rposes E=ployee makes the following representations to Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation: Employee has not engaged in any work or business involved with 1.or related to the engineering or design of the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant; Neither Employee, nor any members of his or her it=nediate 2.family, own any beneficial interest in the Pacific Gas & Electric I Company, including but not limited to common or preferred steck, bonds or other securities issued on behalf of the Pacific Cas & Electric Company; and None of the' members of Employce's immediate family are employed 3. by Pacific Gas & Electric Company. This statement is based upon the Employee's best information and belief l l and any exceptions to the representations contained herein have been described on the reverse side of this document. I J A /Y. f / 9 / 1 Dated Signature _Au & 47 l y-FAAdk J. REZE/OE3 I Print Name l l I A I

Statee nt Regarding Potential or Apparent Conflicts of Interest I To: Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation I Whereas, the undersigned employee (" Employee") understands that he or she is being considered as a participant to provide services to Pacific I Gas & Electric Company with respect to the Design Verification Program for the'Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant - Unit I; and Whereas, Employee understands that it is necessary that proposed participants be screened for any potential or apparent conflicts of interest with respect to this assignment; I Therefore, for the above stated purposes Employee makes the following representations to Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation: I Employee has not engaged in any work or business involved with 1. or,related to the ensineering or design of the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant; 2. Neither Employee, nor any members of his or her immediate family, own any beneficial interest in the Pacific Gas & Electric Company, including but not limited to common or preferred stock, bonds or other securith e is.ued on behalf of the Pacific Gas & Electric Company; and 3. None of the members of Employee's immediate family are employed by. Pacific Gas & Electric Company. This statement is based upon the Employee's best information and belief and any exceptions to the representations contained herein have been described on the reverse side of this document. I Dated A/J 4L$2 Signature [ 6&, I / S CC h ' /? tu'dS'>tE L. Print Name I I STONE & WESSTE A I

I s. e y *- - W H m1 ::r 1 _-- :-, r-- =w _ ci. -. x I Ie: Arima a U-~sier Em;iu% r o _o.a Iam ':"- % the =dursW empl.0- -* ("fsreierm") N4 that he er W 12 trt:a: ::;==fde:vi as a partIclesa.1 to provide marrices to M-I M 4 W.: Cry wt'l-rssspa : 09 the Da-1 v V-e t t f.-se t - n cg _.- for rhe 0121= cm m,.n=r Tc-vur T at - LI-1; M h e, bl. ye:.-3-r s tar.as 41. it i= m - ry rhar rW or w mo; enen se ei

1. c4- ~ 4 1,e 6 - =ea ter any yerentini ia wrcai. v1rb re@ect to this w1_W; I

r.w..y far the zhs erst +; purece hviom u.aks.s the In11cm.rf e, m.m i=-.s t:;: ele me L Retster Tni;;1ris+rW W7 * =: -cr.s 1. Emp)Uyte h22 "taL **"c'a- # 12 23y watk or bI**- >-> inr=1M v1 Th e.:. misted to rha *T 7 nr d*sirn cf the n* *M n canvan 4 Web-a r to er ris :r: h:ti=er 54 own var suy e af t: s cr ur 1-welate 1 2. W.ly, own s.ny la+Dafic141 in.tN in ttu Pacific Gas In Y1ef e Cr"Try, i21:-lcdi::E 1;ct 2 tot 1imitatt 1.0 * - =r M crred d bomis er u. in_t.W. tim ih c Wlf af the Turi-f-k Can 4 Flect ric c-+y;.1=i 3. Mc=e of tha - -m o af =zgloyee's -*==r+1sta f*=u y an e,rpig by_PetMc % & m ctric ew. I ' tis m I im 19 M upon tb hy.icyee's best infaret-med b1 hf w r.* s- -A 1-rcin W 'n._u Er.d say eu,., run in the: 's p'~mt s t>c s e I MTIN run r}3(= (g w as F# e4& d fhi f- /- r - w 8 WM h[ k. l / / e I A Sigt.atur / I I .-........ A l _.}}