ML20028C291
| ML20028C291 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Clinch River |
| Issue date: | 01/31/1983 |
| From: | ENERGY, DEPT. OF |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20028C290 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8301070300 | |
| Download: ML20028C291 (47) | |
Text
_ -- ..
a
{ '. -
THE Q. ll Gi RIVER BREEDER REACTOR PL ANT 4
PREL IMINARY SAFETY AllALYSIS REPORT OiAPTER 17.0 - OUAL ITY ASSURA'.CE APPENDIX D A CESCRIPTION OF THE NUO. EAR STEAM SUPPLY '
SYSTEM (llSSS) S'JPPL IER QUAL ITY ASSURANCE PRCGRAM l
WESTil:3 HOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION ADV ANCED REACTORS DIV ISION
[
4 8301070300 830105 PDR ADOCK 05000537 A /. mend. 7 5 J r.n. 1983
CL INCH RIVER BREEDER REACTOR PL ANT A CESCRIPTION OF THE f SSS SUPPLIER (UAL ITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM TFSLE OF CO4 TENTS EffGF 110.
0.0 INTRODUCTION
17D-1 1.0 OcGENIZATION 17D-2 1.1 0:G NIZATl0"AL A9PANGEVENT 17D-2 1.2 OCGANIZATIO'!AL RESPONSIBIL ITY Af D AUTH0 PITY 170-2 1.3 Cutt IFICATION, REOUIREf>ENTS 17D-6 2.0 OU AL ITY ASST'rA? CE PROGRAt4 17D-6 2.1 POLICY 17D-5 2.2 SCOPE 170-7 2.3 PROGC A'/ ELEt/ filS 17D-7 2.4 PPOGDA?' II/PLEf>ENTATION 17D-8 3.0 DESIGN CONTROL 17D-9 3.1 DESIGN VERIFICATION 17D-13 3.2 DESIGil CHANGES 170-15 4.0 F:0CUDE!!ENT DOCU'/ENY CONTROL 17 D-15 5.0 INSTRUCTIONS. PPOCEDURES AND DRAh'INGS 17D-18 6.0 DOCU?/ENT CONTROL 17D-20 7.0 .CFJTPOL OF PU:CUASED t/ATERIAL. EOUIPf/Ef1T AND SERNICES 17 D-21 8.0 IDENTIFICATIO?! At:0 CONTROL OF l'ATERI AI S. PARTS AND 17D-24
- CO'4PO'!ENTS 9.0 C0" TROL OF SCECIAL FROCESSES 17D-24 10.0 It:S ECTIOli 170-24 17D-1 Ar.end. 7 5 J n. 1983
[
e TABLE OF C0!1 TENTS (C0!1TINUED)
PAGE I;0.
11.0 TEST CONTROL 17D-25 12.0 CONTROL OF f4EASURING Af:D TEST EOUlPMEf4T 17D-26 13.0 PANDLING. STORAGE AND SHIPPlt1G 17D-26 14.0 INSDECTION. TEST At?D OSFRATING STATUS 17D-27 15.0 NONCO' FOPMit!G f'ATERI AL S. PARTS OR CA'?"OffENTS 17D-27 16.0 COR:ECTIVE ACTIO'l 17D-28 17.0 OUALITY ASSORA.NCE EECORDS 17 D-30 18.0 1UD!TS 17D-31 ;
FIGURES 17D-1 OveralI NSSS Quality Assurance Functional Organizetton 17D-33
- 170-2 W Quality Assurance Organization for CRBRP with Princiogi 170-34 Functions 17D-3 f4ajcr Elements of the W Quality Assurance Program 17D-35 for CRBRP 170-4 r!.ajcr Elec.ents of the Rf4 and Supplier Quality Assurance 17D-36 Programs
~
TABLES 17D-1 Document Control 17D-37 17 D-2 Sumery of W Quality Assurance Procedures f or CRBRP 17D-39 17D-3 Index of W Quality Assurance Procedures to 10CFR50, 170-45 Appendix B Criteria 170-Il !.-c n d. 7 5 Jan. 1933
.' s CL IN0i RIVER BREEDER REACTOR PLH!T DESullPTION OF THE NSSS SUPPLIER ,-
6 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM
- 0. I NTRODltCTION This document describes the Quality Assurance Program conducted by Westinghouse Electric Corporation Advanced Reactors Division (ARD) in perf orming its essigned responsibility for the Nuclear Steam Supply System (NSSL) of the Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant (CRERP) Project. The Westinghouse (W) ef f ort is conducted under contracts with the Department cf Energy (CCE) and the Project Management Corporation (PMC). The PMC contract w as assi5 ned to DOE ef f ective May 1,1976.
The program described herein is based on W having been assigned execution responsibility for the quality assurance program applied to the design, prccurement, and manuf acture of structures, systems, and components of the NSSS.
Frectices described herein are those plans and actions on the part of W to assure the quality of structures, systems, and components of the CRERP NSSS within the W scope of work es defined by a portion of the contract. W delegates the execution responsibility for the design, procurement, and r.anuf acturing of NSS systems and components within the W scope of work to Reactor Manufacturers (RM) and suppliers. The contract invokes the quality assurance prcgram requirenents of RDT Standerd F2-2 (1973) with Amendments 1,2,3 and optional Amendment 4. The requirements and the execution of this
.progran complies with the requirements of 10CFR50, Appendix B, "Quahity Assur ance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants and Fuel Reprocessing Plants."
The W Quality Assurance Progran Description of Chapter 17, Appendix D of the PSAR is reviewed annually and revised as necessary to maintain currentness.
Any significant chcnges in organizational elenents are provided to the Cuner such that notification can be provided to NRC within 30 days af ter the change is announced. Any substantive changes in the accepted program description are provided to the hhC f or approval prior to implementation.
Overall responsibility is retained by W for the quality of the structures, systems, and components assigned to W, althcugh responsibility for execution of certain design, procurement, and manuf acturing activities may be dele;ated to a supplier or RM. Where execution responsibilities are delegated, the requirement to implement a W approved quality assurance progran applica!!e to the supplier or RM is imposed by contract.
W has esteoll ,ned procedures f or implementing the plans and actions described herein f or utstrir; that specific design bases, codes, and standards 3re defined, doctmented and implemenied.
The plans and cctions described in this Appendix are applicable to those saf ety-related structures, systems, and components identi tled in Sections 3.2, 7.1, and 9.13 of the PS AR.
17D-1 Ame nd. 7 5 1 sa d LQ!W
a
- 1.0 DEGAul2ATl0N 1.1 Orgenizetion Arrangement Westinghouse (W) perf orms a dual f unction in the CRSRP ProJcct, refat ning rcsponsibility for certain portions of the NSSS and overviewing activities of those portions delegated to RMs and suppliers. The overall functional organizational errangement beimeen the W and the RMS Is shown in Figure 170-1.
The W quality assurance progran f or CRBRP is described in this Appendix. The RMs, General Electric (GE) and Atomics international (AI) are under contract to Westinghouse with the contracts being administered by the W-06k Ridge office. Their respective quality assurance programs are describec in Appendix I and Appendix J, respectively, of Chapter 17 of this PSAR.
The W crganizatien responsible f or design, procurement, and manuf acture of structures, systems, and components is shown in Figures 1.4-5 and 1.4-6 of the PSAR. The responsibilities and authority of the key positions are described in Section 1.4 of the PSAR. The W-CRBRP quality assurance organization with principal f unctions identi f ied is shown in Figure 170-2.
The size of the Quality Assurance organization is determined by the complexity and quantity of systems and canpcnents to be provided, the volume of outside orders, the number of component suppliers, the degree of confidence in the QA progrun, and the quar tity of osiinistrative tasks required.
1.2 prganizational Rescenslbilltv and Authority The General f>eneger of ARD reports to the General Mer.ager, Advanced Power Systems Divisions, who is responsible f or the Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reector (LMFER) activities in the Westinghouse Electric Corporation. Thi s level of responsibility for advanced reactor programs assures appropriate attention and high priority ai the top management level. The General. Manager, Advanced Power Systems Divisions, reports to the Executive Vice Presicent, Nuclear Energy Systems (NES), who is responsible f or all nuclear power activities in Westinghouse.
The Gcncral Manager of ARD is responrlble f or all the design, development, and other activities of the Division. He provides direction and guidance to the CRERP Project Manager, and other staf f mana5ement supporting CRERP. He reviews progress being made on the Clinch River Project and makes visible to senicr corporate menagement any problens requiring special attention.
The General Manager of ARD has the overall responsibility for ARD quality assurance programs and the establishment of organizational structures f or the preparation, implementation, and monitoring of the ARD quality assurance progr ams. The General Mar.ager delegates the authority arJ the execution responsibil ity f or the W quality assurance p ogrem f or CRBRP to the CRBRP Project Manager. The General Manager of /AD reviews progress of these programs and resolves any problems requiring his action.
The fnERP Proitt_"m;_r reports to the General Manager, Advanced Reactors Division end is responsible f or discharging the tasks associated with the Westinghouse role f or the Nuclear Steam Supply System (t:SSS). The Project Manager Is responsible f or the NSSS technical Integration and prcgram 170-2 /. mend. 7 5 Jan. 1963
management, f or all technical end program planning, contract and project administration, customer llelson, and direction of all NSSS developmery, design, procurement, component f abrication, testing ef forts and the CRSRP Quality Assurance Program, in addition, he is responsible f or providing the necessary technical requirements to the Architect-Engineer (AE) re$arding USSS f acilities requirements and support, and f or providing the necessary construction IIalson f or the NSSS. He is responsible for the identification and timely resolution of project problems in the above areas. The execution responsibility within W is divided between Oak Ridge and Waltz Mill sites ;
according to systcm and component responsibility under the direction of the CR3RP Project Manager.
The Frodect Assurance f>enegar of ARD reports to the ARD General Manager ar.d is responsible f or the quality assuran:e f unctions within the Division, and The implementation of the CRERP QA Program delegated to Waltz Mill by the CRERP Project Manager. He is responsible f or establishing, malrtaining, directing, and managing all quality assurance programs at the Waltz Mill, Pennsylvania slje to meet applicable contractual requirements, and f or assurir.g that qua!!ty assurance programs are ef fcstively implemented throughout the Division. Quality assurance prcgrams describe The systems of verificaticn of ccnf err.ance to established requirements perfcrmed by individuals or groups who do not have direct responsibility for perf orming the work being verified.
The Freduct Assurance Manager of ARD reporting directly to the ARD General Manager has the organizational freedom to identify quality problems, initiate and evaluate solutions to quality problens, end verify implementation of solutions. He has no cther duties or responsibilities unrelated to Quality Assurance that would prev 6nt his f ull attention to Quality Assurance matters.
The crganizational level of reporting of the Product Assurance Manager provides a mechanism for him to bring disputes with the various crganizational disciplines to the ARD General Manager's attention f or resolution. This
- organizational structure uvolds eny compromise of product quality due to other requirements such'as schedul!ng, cost, production, and manufacfuring.
The f:9CP Ouel;tv Assurance Meneger reports to the CRBRP Froject Manager and has been delegated the authority and execution responsibility by the CRERP Project Manager f or establishing, maintaining, directing, and canaging the quality assurance program for CRBRP NSSS, and f or assuring that the quality assurance program is ef fectively executed within W, between W and the R'es, and betneen W ano W suppliers. The responsibility for implementing the QA Program is diviced between Oak Ridge and Waltz Mill according the system and component responsibilities. The CRSRP QA Manager's responsibility includes monitcring W-ARD, the RMs, and W suppliers to verify that work is perf ormed in accordance with CRERP quality assurance prograa requirerents and that products rest applicable specifications, codes, and standards, in fulfilling this as responsibility he maintains interf ace with engineering, procurement, saf ety and licensing on quality-related matters such as interf ace coordination, nonconf ccmance control, and corrective action. His responsibility also includes review and approval of engineering and prccurement documents to assure that quality rcquirements ere prcperly applied.
17D-3 Amend. 75 Jcn. 1933
He is also responsible f or assuring that W supplicrs are perf orming work in eccordance with approved supplier quality assurance programs during cceporen' design, procurement, and manufacture. This verification, is perf ormed through surveillance and audits of W supplier operations which relate to design, procurement, fabrication, testing, and shipping. The activities also include assuring that corrective actions, when necessary, have been ef f ectively impl emented.
He has the authority to disapprove drawings, specifications, other related docurents and procurement actions, to terminate work where quality requirements are not being met, and to contact the appropriate level of manecement to obtain required remedial actions to resolve quality problems at W and W supplier locations, and at the Rf4s.
Additional responsibilities include the conduct of internal and external audits which include audit planning and scheduling, selection of auditors, conduct of audits, reperting of audit f indings, and f o' loa-up f or assuring that corrective actions have been designated, implemented, and evaluated to effect audit close-cut. He is responsible f or maintaining cognizance of quality-reibTed matters within W, between W a.nd the R'4s, between the W and W suppliers, and other project participants.
Verification of conformance to established quality requirements, epplicable to W is perf ormed by W-QA personnel who do not have direct responsibility for perf orming the work being verified or by Individuals er groups trained and qustitifed in QA concepts and practices and independent of the organization perfcrming the task. -
14ajcr functions of the CRERP NSSS Quality Assurance organization include:
Progra ratic
- a. Define and coordinate the CRERP NSSS quality assurance program, and assure that the quality assurance program is implemented within the ;!
crganization.
- b. Provide interfcce coordination between the W quality assurance progra, and the Owner's quality assurance program.
- c. Assure that the execution responsibilities delegated to majcr R"s and W suppliers are defined, coordinated and !molomented,
- d. Prepare, maintain, and control the Quality Assurance Prcgram Plan f or CRBRP which cont: Ins the program description, 0;ol, and index of applicable proa; dure revisions.
- e. Assess corrective action impicmentation.
- f. Review the Corporate quality assurance policy provided by the Product Assurance f4anager of ARD, and impler.cnt those policies applicable to the CRERP quality assurance program.
- g. Recommand changes to existing procedures and review and approve propossd procedures.
17D-4 Amend. 75 Jan. 1983
Orgljtv Engineering
- a. Review and approve engineering and procurement documents and changes thereto. ,
- b. Review end approve W suppliers' and RMs quality assurance progrem documentation us required by contract.
- c. Prepare, when necessary, and review and approve quality assurance program documentation including applicable procedures.
Serveillance and Audits
- a. Maintain surveillance over W suppliers and the RMs to verify that work perf ormed is in accordance with quality requiroments.
- b. Audit c,uality assurance program execution by W, W suppliers, and RMs to verify compliance with quality rcquirements.
- c. Utilize personnel with experience developed on other prograns, including FFTF and commercial reactor plants, as necessary, in the perf ccmance of surveillance end audits.
The CRERP Quality Assurance Manager has the authority, independence, and or ganiz ati onal freedom to identi fy qual ity-rel ated probl ems, initiate and evaluate solutions to quality problens, and verify implementation of solutions. He has no othe;r duties or responsibilities unrelated to QA that wculd prevent his f ull attention to QA matters. He reports at the same c ;enizational level as the highest line manager directly responsible f or perf orming quality-related activities, and this organizational structure avoids any compromise of product quality due to other requirenents such as scheduling, costs, production, and manuf acturing. The organiz ational level of reporting of the CRBRP Quality Assurance Manager provides a rechanism for him i
to bring disputes with the various W organizational disciplines to the CRERP Froject Manager's attention f or resolution.
I I The Product Assurance Manager in the executica of his responsibility to impinnent the CRBRP QA program is also responsible, by review and approval acticns and by surveillance and audits, for assuring that W Waltz Mill 7
suppl iers f or CRSRP has established and are ef fectively implementing approved quality assurence progrens to meet contractual requirements. His responsibility also includes assurance that products meet applicable
! specifications, codes, and standards.
l The Product Assurance Managcr of ARD has the authority to disapprove drawincs, l specifications, and other related documents, and to terminate work within 4c Division and at supplier locations, where quality requirements are not being t,; e t.
Additional responsibilities include the conduct of internal and external cudits which irclude audit planning and scheduling, selection of auditors, conduct of audits, reporting of audit f indings, and f olio..-up f cc assuring that corrective actions have been designated, impi cnonted, and eval uated to ef f ect audit cl ose-out.
17D-5 /r.e n d. 7 5 i Aan, 9c83
o Verif ication of conf ormance to established quality requirements, applicable to Wal tz f4t i l is perf ormed by W personnel who do not have direct responsibility for perf orming the work being verified, or by individuals or groups _ trained and qualified in QA concepts and practices and independent of the organization perf orming the task.
He is also responsible f or the review and approval of engineering and procurement documents and changes thereto and the review and approval of Waltz 14111 suppliers quality assurance progran documentation as required by contract.
The W personnel who perf orm quality-related f unctions receive technical cod administrative directions f rom the same manager who controls their salary revlea and makes the hire / fire decisions. The W personnel who verif y quality-related f uncticns receive technical and administrative directions f rom the samc maneger who controls their salary revisa and nakes the hire / fire decisions.
1.3 Ouellfication Peceirements The Product Assurance f4anager of ARD and the CRERP Quality Assurance f4anager shall have the following minimum qualifications:
- 1. Shell have eithec a B. A. or B.S. degree or equivalent.
- 2. Shall have a minimum of 10 years experience, with at least 5 years of supervisory experience, in quality assurance, engineering, manuf acturing, and procurement, or combination thereof, essociated with nuclear f acilities or equivalent operations. A minimum of one year of this experience shall be in Quality Assurance.
- 3. Shall possess a knowledge and understanding cf applicable standards, regulations, and codes such as the AS!E Boilcr and Pressure Vessel Code. He shall have a working knowledge and understanding of quality assurance methods and their application.
4 Shall be experienced in either organizing, directing, and administer-Ing an overall progran or activity, or-a major portion of an overall program having broad scope and application.
2.0 CUALITY ASSURANCE PROGQAM 2.1 Pollev The execution of the quality assurance program complies with the Westinghouse Corporate Quality Assurance policy which requires:
"Each Nuclear Energy Systems Division is responsible to establish, documert, and implement a Quality Assurance Program which assures that saf ety-rela 1ed equipncnt, materials, and services f urnished as part of, or in support of, a fluclear Poaer Plant meet the requireccats of 10CFR50, Appeadix B.
17D-6 /. end. 7 5 Jcn. 1953
o 2.2 Scens Westinghouse has established and implbmented the Owner-approved Quality Assurance Program in accordance with the quality assurance requirements of RDT Standard F2-2 as specif ied in the contract. The execution of the program at W, and W suppliers, complies with the criteria of 10CFR50, Appendix B.
The docket date of the CRERP PSAR was April 11, 1975. Regulatory guides to be addressed prior to that date and other f actors to be considered are as follows:
(1) Regulatory Guides in Subsection V of Section 17.1 of UUREG-0800. See
- PSAR Sections 1.1, 17.0, 17.1.2.1 and the answers to Questions 411.1 and 411.2.
(2) 10 CFR Part 50, 50.55a. See PSAR Sections 17.1.2.1, 3.1, 3.2 end 7.1.
(3) 10 CFR Part 50, 50.55(e) In accordance with the quality assurance program. See PSAR Section 17A.15.1.
(4) 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix A, General Design Cr1teria 1. See PSAR Secticns 17.0.5, 17.1.2.6 an d 3.1.1.
(5) ASME BLPV Code Section Ill. See PS AR Sections 17.1.2.6 and 3.2.2.
2.3 Pregrem Elements The overall program ela$ents of the CRBRP quality assurance program are shcwn in Figure 170-4, and apply to the design, procurement, and manuf acturing of structures, systems, and components of the NSSS within the W scope of work es specif ied in contracts.
The progran controls the quality-related activities f or which W is responsible throughout the life of the project. W Quality Assurance interf aces are included in the CRBRP-W Program Control planning of specific activities, such as design reviews and preprocuratent planning. The CRBRP-W Program Cor, trol l planning stresses the need f or timely input and involvement of organizatiens responsible f or quality-related f unctions to maintain control of activities price to and during implementation. The planning emphasizes surveillance and evaluation of work activities by line management to assure prompt detection end correcticn of conditions which could have en edverse ef fect on quality.
l W, either by assignment within ARD, or by contract with RMs and W supplicrs,
! requires the establishment and implementation of a W-approved quality assurance program. The RM's and W suppliers' quality assurance programs are reviewed against the quality assurance re;uirements imposed by contract utilizing W procedures which define the dctails to be used in reviewing the quality assurance program documentation. The CRBRP quality assurance program includes the surveillance, and auditing of the R!is and the W suppliers. The rejor elements of the CRBRP quality assurance program exccuted internally by W j are shcan in Figure 17D-3.
I 17 D-7 /cend. 75 Jen. 1953
The execution responribility for a portion of the program activiiles is delega+ed by W to the RMs and the W suppliers. The RMs may pass along these activities to suppliers so that each activity can be perf ccmed by those cost qualified. The ultimate resporsibility for adequate implementation of the quality assurance programs, anc perf ormance thereto, by each RM is retained by W. The major elements of the RM and W supplier quality assurance programs are shown in Figure 17D-4. !
2.4 Procrem Inolementation W employs procedures to implement the quality assurance requiratents specified in the contracts and the criteria of 10CFR50, Appendix B. The procedures utilized are the Project Procedures (LX), Quality Methods and Procedures (QM?), Purchasing Procedures (PUR), Olvision Policies and Procedures (ACM or OPR). These procedures define the detall of how work is perf ormed, end verified by W to meet the quality requirements of the program.
Th.e 00.3RP Quality Assurance Program Plan has been issued and includes a dcist led program description with a procedure index. The specific procecures are maintained in centrolled manuals by the W crganization responsible for the act iv i ty. The CRERP Project Manager has issued a directive to all personnel who either perf orm or verif y work that compliance with the plan is nendatory.
The plan is maintained and controlled by the CDSRP Quality Assurance Manager.
The plan is reviewed at least annually and modified as necessary to keep it current and up-to-date.
Table 17D-2 presents a summary of the procedures used to implement the W qtality assurance program; and Table 17D-3 presents an index of the procedures to the criteria cf 10CFR50, Appendix B.
W perf orms quality-related f unctions to assure that W suppliers are ef fectively implacenting the W-approved quality assurance program. These f unctions are described and scheduled in verification plans which are r eviewed and updated annually if required. These plans include review and approval '
actions of supplier submittels by the cognizant engineer, Quality Assurance personnel end other organizations as required; along with pericdic surveillance and audits to verify implementation of the program. The W approval actions, prior to the initiation of any inspection and test, assures that the supplier has Icentified in the inspection and test plans, procedures, and instructions, the special equipment and environmental conditions suitable to perf orm those cperations and the prerequisites to be satisfied prior to inspecticn and test. Further assurance is provided by surveIIIence and audits conducted prior to and during inspection and test.
W determines the initial capabilities of enployees by verifying the prcfessional (both educational and employment) qualifications of all new hires in accordance with standard employment practices. Records of these veri f ications are mai ntained in the cnployee's personnel folder. The employce's con-inued proficiency and understanding of Jcb requirceents are monitored cn an on-going basis and documented annually through management assessments, w,1ch includes prof iciency testing where appropriate.
Indoctrinatica and training sessions are conducted f or all new project members. This training is accomplished in group sessions and individual discussions covering the purpose, scope, and impiccontation of quality-related 17D-8 Amend. /5 Jan. IcS3
manuals, procedures and instructions. Individual proccdurcs are addressed in training sessions involving personnel responsible f or perf orming activities ef f ecti ng qual ity. These sesslots emphasize and reiterate that the, QA Progren Plen, procedures and Instructions cre mandatory requirements which cre enf orced through the authority of the CRBRP Project flanager. Work assignments, principles and techniques involved, and responsibilities are addressed in Individual sessions with the Cognizant !'anager. Further training it given by attendance at courses given in house or at recognizad learning Institutions. Training records are maintained, and include the topic or subject of the training, attendees and date of training. The training and Indoctrination program encompasses quality assurance engineers who verif y that f unctions tolegated to suppliers and subcontractors are properly accomplished.
A list is maintained of qualified personnel who perf orm surveillance to verify acccptabil ity of product. Personnel in these job categories are qualliied to and certified as meeting specific qualification requirements or industry codes and standards which identi f y qualification requirements.
Training programs cro overviewed by W-OR Quality Assurance personnel, and status reported periodically in accordance with documented procedures.
W Quality Assurance management review meetings, held periodically to assess the implementation of W quality assurance program, include management personnel responsible f or activities covered by the CRBRP quality assurance prcgram. Acccmplir5ments, problems, and corrective actions to resolve the probl ems, including audit results, are discussed and documented.
ARD quality assurance programs, including the CRERP quality assurance program, are audited on an annual basis by the Westinghcuse Neclear Enercy Systems Quality Assurance Ca mittee. No ARD Product Assurance personnel, including the ARD Product Assurance !4anager, ere members of the audit teams. Through these activities, independent management assessments are made to determine the adequacy of the scope, impl ementation, and ef fectiveness of the CRSRP quality essurance pregram.
3.0 DESIGN CONTROL The overall plent design guicelines and majcr plant parameters to be incorporated into the design f or the CRBRP were established by the Owner.
Through contracts with the Owner, W is assigned the design control
. responsibilities f or portions of the NSSS. As such, W is responsible f or establ!shing and specifying the design criteria for each system of the NSSS within his scope of work.
The W quality assurance program has established measures to assure cf fective control of design activities. The gxecution responsibilities fer the cesign, procurement, and manuf acture, as applied to each tier of supply will be assigned by applying the appropriate program ele:ents selected f rom those shown in Figures 17D-3 and 17D-4 and are described throughout this r ec0 ion.
The measures include such activities as specifying quality requirements, selection of design verif ication methods, design change contt of , and implementation of design procedures.
17D-9 A .cnd. 7 5 Jan. 1953
The CR3RP Project Manager is responsible f or identifying the basic technical requirements, and changes thereto, to the RM, the Architect Engineer (AE), and the W f unctional grcups f or the !!SSS portion of the CRBRP. These requirements are documented, approved, and issued by the CRBRP Project Manager. - W is responsible f or preparation and control of the technical requirements identified in the Overall Plant Design Description (OPDD-10) which f orms the basis f or primary design. Based upon the technical requirements, W, the RMs and the AE perf orm the design activity necessary to meet the requirements of OPDD-10 f or their assigned responsibil ities. W procedures provide f or review, epproval, relcase, and distribution of principal design data prepared by the RMs and Interf ace control between the responsible design orgcnizations, and include controls such as (1) subcontractor and supplier QA program approval and, (2) verif icat.cn to assure development, control, and use of computer prograTs which support design or qualification of systems or components.
Design activities are perf ormed using a system in which a cognizant engineer, reporting to Project Management through a cognizant manager, has ccmplete design responsibility for the system or ccmponent assigned. W cognizant enginscrs and their managers have only W responsibilities and f unction only within the W scope of work. The cognizant engineer cbtains technical, contractual, quality assurance, saf ety, and licensing support f rom other technical and administrative f unctional organizational units. Procedures describe the methods to be used in perf orming design activities in a planned, controlled, and documented manner. Design control requirements are app!! cable to all cesign disciplines including reactor physics, seismic, stress, thermal and hydraulic analysis, radiation and accident analysis, access f or in-service inspection, maintenance and repair, and others es appropriate.
o Overall Plent Desfon Dascriotion The Overall Plent Design Description (OPDD-10), prepared and maintained by W and approved by the Owner, describes tne overall CRSRP and its f unctions. Th? s docurent presents the o/erall design requirements and incluces a description of the major design f eatures l
cf the CRBRP.
o Fvste, Design Drscriotions f The principal means to establish, describe, and control the indivicual i systems designs f ron release throug5 opera +1on of the system i s do ne through the use of " System Design Descriptions" (SDDs). SDDs are standardized and comprehensive documents that def ine each system req ui rements.
o DnJSn_.ipeci f Icat ions in certain cases, a highcr tier document is prepared to identify the specif ic design requirements f or a system of items. This document, a Design Specification, defines overall c'esign end fabrication requirements and is ccmbined with specific Equipment specif ications to define the requirer.ents of the individual items, including the detalis reqeired to provide a complete basis f or the design and constructicn of the items, j
! 17D-10 Amend. 75 Jan. 1963
o Emdp ont FrecifIcations Equipment Specifications (E-Specs) establish the requirements and conditions f or the procurement of structures, systems, and comporants based on SDD requirements. The E-Specs are comprehensive documents which def ine the design, manuf acturing, quality assurance, testing, handling, and shipping requirements. An equipment specification contains all of the requirements of a Design Specification, o Engineerina Drawings Engineering drawings are developed to meet the requirements of the SC3 and the E-Spec, to f urther identify engineering parameters, and to establish specif ic design f eatures. The design drawir.gs, with their supporting analyses, are the product of the f ormal design prccess.
When the design is approved and the component is released f or prccure..ent and manuf acture, the product and working drawings are prepared and checked f or dimensional accuracy to provide details f c-manuf ecture, assembly, and inspecticn. As-built drawings are prepared in a timely manner to accurately reflect the actual product design, o Precere-ent Documents in the f ew cases where equipment specifications or engineering drawings are not used (such as of f-the-shelf or catalog items), the specific quality requirements, tests, and acceptance standards are identif ied in the purchase order. Requirements for review of purchase crders f or application suitability are identified in Section 4.0 cf this Appendix.
o The Orerationel and Start-Uo Test Documents The executien responsibility for the construction and pre-operational test program is retained by the Owner. W in conjunction with the RMs, establish within design documents such as corstruction Test Requirements and Pre-Operational Test Specifications the constructica and preoperational test requirement. The design documents establish the prerequisites to be satisfied. ine test instrumentation accuracy, the environmental and operating condition, equipment calibration standard, personnel qualification requirements, and test results documentation and verif ication.
The level of authority for review and approval is established in Project requirements documentaticn f or all principal design documents f or structures, systems, and components. Levels cf approval are based on the tapertance of the structure, system, or component to overall plant saf ety and cperation.
Changes to design documents are approved by a Configuration Control Bcard which is representative of the same organizations whici approved the original document cr as otherwise designated by the applicant. Some changes require higher approval authority than the original cocument, as stated in procedures, based on characteristics such as cost, degradation of quality requirements, perf ccmance, ccdes and standards requirements, and changes to ref erenced standards. .
17D-11 Am:nd. 75
_ Jan._1953
The W design control responsibility includes d2 sign document review and approval, design review, and design change review and approval. W also provides coordination 1o insure adequate subcontractor input f or quality assurance program documentation, OPDD-10, Saf ety Analysis Reports, Document Control and Design Interf ace Control.
W document review and approval are perf ormed in a controlled and orderly manner in accordance with established procedures. Upon receipt of a design document, or a change thereto, the cognizant engineer perf orms a review, with other technical support as required, to verify that the originating organization has given adequate consideration to applicable requirements f or regulatory crlieria, codes and standards, quality assurance requirements, suitability of material and parts (including "off-the-shelf" items), reactcc physics, seismic, stress, thermal, hydraulic, raciation, and accident analysis; access f or in-scrvice inspection, maintenance, end repair; design adequacy, inspectabil ity, and testability, including identification of acceptance criteria. The cognizant engincer submits the document f or review and approval to his manager, the interf acing groups, Quality Assurance, Saf ety and Licensing, and Cognizant Frogram f4aragement, if appropriate.
Eech System Design Description (SDD) includes the identification of all physical (geometr i c) , f unctional, and parametric interf ace requirerents impcted by one system upon other systems. Interf ace Control Documents (ICD) are used f or convenience of pictorial or tabular presentation of interf ace data. Unique document control numbers are used to distinguish an ICD f rom similar appearing drawings and lists. When an ICD is used to present interf ece data, the ICD is ref erenced within each applicable 500. All NSSS ICDS, bef ore initial release f or project use, are reviewed and approved by W.
- laterf ace data prepared by the AE is reviewed and concurred in by each af f ected subcontractor and by W prior to approval and release by the AE.
Interf ace data prepared by the subcontractor is reviewed and concurre.d in by the AE prior to review and approval by W snd subsequent release by the originating subcontractor. W has the continuing responsibility to assure that 1
system to system Ir.terf aces are established and maintained current.
l Dissemination of werking level data is controlled by the use of " Controlled inf ormation Data Transmittals" (CinDT). This f orm is normally originated by either a subcontractor or the AE prior to formal release of principa! design data. A CinDT may be used af ter the formal release of principal design data previding an Engineering Change Preposal (ECP) is initiated and processed as I
described below and deteiled in procedu es. Cverall program confrois of CinDTs is maintained by procedures which establish the conditions whereby W approval must be obtai ned. A CinDT received by W is reviewed by the appropr late cognizant engineer. The cognizant engineer assures that the Cin:T neither changes released principal design data nor is of a nature to be considered final cssign data. The results of this review receive apprcval of the cognizant manager. The CinDT originated by W are prepared by the responsible cognizant engineer, and epproved by the cognizant manager.
Design documen;s, inclecing System Design Descriptions, Design Specif ications, Equipnent Specif icaticns, Design Drea insc, installaticn Rcquirements Docu-ent and Frecperational and Start-up Test Specif ications are reviewed,and appres ed 17D-12 Frend. 75 Jan. 1983
- o by discip Ines, such as materials, manuf acturing engineers, nuclear saf ety, quality assurance, and other disciplines as required by procedurcs price to release. These Independent reviews verify that design cocuments are prepared, reviewed, end approved in accordance with established procedures, that the documents contain the necessary quality assurance rcquirements, suoh as inspection and test requirements acceptance criteria, and the extent of '
documenting Inspecticn and test results, and that the design documents correctly incorporate design bases, conf c m to established standards, meet appropriate code and saf ety requirements, Identify inspection, test and ecceptance crlieria, contain apcropriate quality assurance requirements, and suitably apply materials, parts and processes.
Design recalroments traceability Is established through the design documents (Design Descriptions, Design Specif ication, Equipment specifications and Design Drawings) which are prepared in accordance with appropriate procccures.
These Jacuments, only, impcse design requircments and as such include all recuirements :pplicable to a system or component design. Applicable requ rements are incorporated into the design description or equipment specif ication by specif ic statement or by ref erence to other desi n5 documents.
Cocnizant engineers are restricted to use fata contained in a released design document or CinDT in treir designs. Design documents, analyses end other pertinent documents are updated as required.
Upon release of the SDDs, Design Specifications and Equipment Specifications parametric Interf aces which are identified and quantified therein are controlled by these documents. Physical, f unctional and parametric Interf aces between systems and components, both internal and external, are described by means of interface Control Documents (ICD). Additionally, engineering drawings identify dimensions having an Interf sce f unction with an identifying symbol.
3.1 Design verification During the design process, design verification is perf ormed to the extent necessary to ensure the adequacy of the design. Design adequacy is verified by use cf eITher calculational checking, design reviews, cr qualification testing, or a cctbination thereof, er appropriate. The verification method is selected based on consideration of importance to saf ety, uniqueness of design, end complexi ty.
W hcs delegated the responsibility for design verification to the subcontractor who has been assigned design responsibility for I;SSS systems and components. Design verification, including design reviews, alternate calculations, and qualification testing, is perf ormed according to Project po!!cles and requirements as def ined in subcontractor procedures. ,
Required design verification for the level of design activity accomolished is perf ormed prior To release f or procurement, manuf acture, construction, er relcese to another organization f or use in other design activities. In all cases, the design verification is to be completed prior to relying upon ihe ccmpone nt, sysicm, or structure to perf orm its f unction.
17 D-13 Amend. 75 Jen. 1953
1;here calculational checking is identified by the cognizant manager es necessary to verify a design aspect or analysis, the checking prccess is assigned to a second party not involved in the original design. Cal cul ation checking is perf ormed by comparison of the calculation results to other calculations of a similar nature or experimental results, by alternate or simpilfled calculation, er by numerical repetition of the calculations. This checking process produces documentation attesting to the extent and result cf the verification perf ormed, the method of verification, and the Identification of the verifier.
Engineering / Scientific computer programs used in design analysis are verified io provide assure that the program will provide valid results within the class of problems f or which the program is designed. Verification of the cngineering/ scientific computer programs is perf ormed under the responsibility cf the cognizant design manager, identi f ication of the engineering /scientif ic ccmputer programs used f or the design analysis are ref erenced in the final design report. Cenfiguration control of engineering / scientific computer prcgrams assures that no imprcper revisions to verified computer prcgrens are t:de which would destroy the validity of the verification. The cognizant cesign manager is responsible f or seeing that program cbstracts are mci ntai ne d, program source codes are archived and object codes are made available to the cognizant analyst.
Design reviews are systenatic studies by personnel representing a variety of disciplines to examine the various aspects of the design. Design reviews are ccnducted, in accordance with procedures, by review teams selected f or technical expertise, objectivity and independence of the design being reviewed. Inf ormation developed by the reviewers is reccrded f er evaluation and action by the cognizant engineering management organization. The design review procedure requires the cognizant engineering management organization to resolve and document all cpen items cr questions. Project schedules identify when design reviews are required.
W retains the opticn of perf orming additional design reviews. For those design reviews which W perf orms, procedures are established which assure that the review team has multiple disciplined technicil expertise in the subject cf the review, cbjectivity, and is not directly respondble f or the cesign.
Pesul ts of a design review are documented to Icentify all espects deemed acceptable, unacceptable, or needing additional design ef fort or verification.
Follow-up and corrective action is the responsibility of the cognizant engineering group.
When design verification includes qualif! cation testing, the tests are specified as part of the applicable design document. Qualification test prcgrams are conducted at adverse design conditions expected in service.
Results of qualification tests are revleaed and evaluated by the cognizant engineer.
17 D-14 Amend. 75 Jan. 1953
3.2 Design Cbences Procedures have been Implomonted to control design chenges. These.precedures require that review cnd approval of changes to design documents arg perf orr.ed by .those organizations, f or the applicability of the change, which reviewed and approved the original design document. Revisions to approved design documents are initiated by the cognizant engineer.
The proposed change is described in a change package that includes the following; o Verbatim descriptions of required changes to design documents.
o Companion changes to supporting documents, o Estimetes of the cost and schedule impacts of the change.
o A Justification of the change.
The proposed change package is routed f or review and approval te cognizant di sci pl i nes, including Quality Assurance, per procedure. When all comments are resolved, the change is ready either for release f or implementation or for transmittal to the PO for higher level authority approval.
When higher level authority approval is required as specified in procedures, such approval is requested by forwarding the change package to the I:0.
Implementation on the change can only occur subsequent to obtaining P0 epproval. The approved change is dccumented by W via the issuance of en Engineering Change Notice (ECN) signed by cognizant organizations, including Qual ity Assurance.
The control of design changes described above also apply when W delegates execution responsibility for design to suppliers.
W requires that all changes to CRSRP approved design requirements impacting W design and interf ace documentation be processed thrcugh the W change control system re;ardless cf who perf ormed the design.
Controi s f or the di stribution, col lection, stor age, and maintenance of the principal design documents, and changes thereto, are described in Section 6.0 of this Appendix.
The system to provide documentation, and actions taken to correct deficiencies that adversely af fect saf ety-related structures, systems, and components observed in the design process are described in Section 16.0 of the Appendix.
4.0 PP0002:f':NT DOCUf!ENT CONTROL Procurement is perf ormed by W in accordance with established procedures which dellr.eate the sequence of action to be acccmplished in the preparation, revlea, approval, and control cf proctrec.cnt documents. Procurement doccr.ents are originated., reviewed, and issued as def ined herein ar.d f urther detailed in Section 6.0 of this Appendix. The procedures require that changes or 17D-15 An:nd. 75 Jan. les3
Quality assurance provisions, as requirsd, are appended to the requisition to include such items as:
l o Submittal requirements pertinent to W review and acceptance of quality assurance documentation, o Reporting and disposition of deviations f rom requirements.
o Cleaning and handling requirements, o inspection and test plan submittals.
o inspection and test procedure submittals.
o Process procedure submittals, o Qeality record submittal and r utention requirements (i.e., procedure qualification, personnel qualifications, test reports) along with data required to be supplied with the shipment of hardware.
The cognizant engineer obtat tis approval of his manager and f orwards the req ui si ti on, along with supporting and ref erenced material, to technical support organizations, as necessary, and Quality Assurance f or review and appreval in accordance with procedures. W Quality Assurance provides the necessary review of the procurement package to assure that appropriate
+cchnical and quality assurance requirements are adequately and clearly stated prior to signing and datlog the appropriate block of the requisition.
Cetailed procedures are utilized to assure that quality requirements are correctly stated, inspectable, and controllable, and that adequate acceptance er rejection criteria exists. The requisition packege is then Procurement f orwarded to is Precurement f or preparation of the proposal or bid requests.
required by procedures to include all provisions of the rcquisition in the contract or purchase order. Procurement documents that are made part of the purchase order provide f or access to suppIIer f acilities and records for purpose cf audits end surveillance by W or W designated representatives, and describe metheds by which document transmittal is to be made f rom the supplier to W. The approved requisition is maintained by Precurement as evidence of approval to place an order.
If formal evaluation and/or negotiations are required as a result of bids or prcposals, these activities involve Procurement, Quality Assurance, and Engineering as appropriate to the scope of the evaluation. AutForization for piecement of the purchase order is by means of the original requisition unless:
o Either supplier response to the request f or quotetton or negotiation with the supplier result in changes to the technical requirements specif ied in the purchase requisition, o The ncgotiated costs exccad the budgeicd authorization on the purchase requisition.
o The original requisition requested proposals only.
17D-17 Ame nd. 7 5 Jan. 1953
- o If any et the above conditions exist, ihe requlstilonar prepares a Purchase Requisition Change Notice (PRCH) describing the proposed changes and documents the review and approval actions in the same manner as the original -
requi si tion.
Either on the basis of the original requisition or upon receipt of an approved PRCN changing a request f or proposal to a request f or a purchase order, Procurement prepares the purchase order and obtains the Owner approval when the dollar value exceeds a specified limit prior to antering into a contract with the supplier. Copies of released purchase orders are distributed to designated cisciplines, including W Quality Assurance who reviews the order to assure that all requirements have oeen included as specified in the requi si ti on.
Quality Assurcnce documents the review of the purchase orders by signing the ccear shect of the Qua!!ty Assurance copy of the purchase orders. These ce;Ies are reintained in the Quality Assurance files f or reference and tr aceabil i ty purposes.
Af ter order pl acement, purchase order revisions are initiated by the cognizant engineers' preparation of a PRCN. These documents are reviewed, approved, and processed in the same canner as described earlier fcr the original requisition. Procurement issues a Purchase Order Change Notice (POCN) to laplement the change. The PCCN 1s numerically identified in a sequential manner to the original purchese order and controlled by Procurement. Each POCN is an entity and normally does not supercede prior apprcved P0CNs, unless so stated therein. Copies of the POCN are distributed to designated di sci pl i nes, Inc'uding Quality Assurance, which review the POCN to assure that all r equirecents neve been included as s;ecified in the PRCN. The supp!!er eckncwledges receipt of the POCN. All approved purchase requisitions and changes are maintained by Procurement es evidence of appropriate approval.
Spare end replacement parts are ordered using the same controls as described in this section f or the original parts and components.
Quality Assurance overviews RM and W supplier precurccent activities ty =cens of p9rlodic surveillance and audits. In addition, W has the right to access to RM subcontractors' f acilities and will participate, on a selected basis, in RM audits of their suppliers.
W supplier records required to be submitted to W are collected and maintair.ed in accordance with records requirements described in Section 17.0 of this Appendix.
5.0 INSTPUCTIONS. PFOCFCURES AND DRAWINGS Westinghouse uses written procedures impiccenting the quality assurance program requirements to provide assurance that all activities af fecting quality are picnned, controlled, and documented as appropriate. The 17D-18 Amend. 75
~- - -- -
._Jen o,1953_
procedures used by W ere retained in f ormats appropriate to their applications, such as: .
- a. ARD Divisional Policy and Procedures
- b. Quality Methods and Procedures
- c. Purchasing Procedures
- d. Quality Assurance Program Description and index
- e. Project Procedures Each of the.above contains deta!!ed policies, procedures, and Instructions f or the execution of W cctivities in accordance with the approved quality assurance program. Approval and distribution of precedures end changes to those procedures are centrolled by the responsible manager. Details of measures impicmented to control preparation, review, approval, release, change, and distribution of procedures and instructions are cescribed in Section 6.0 of the Appendix.
Each prccedure is subject to review and comment by af fe .ted dicciplines, interf acing activities and the CRERP Project Manager. After resolution of comments, the procedures are approved and issued by the Cognizant Manager identified in Table 170-1. When issued, procedures are mandatory for all persenrel either perf erning or verifying quality-reicted activities f or CRBRP by written directive f rcm .the CRBRP Project Manager.
Technical and contractual inf ormation necessary to perf orm the W scope of werk and to comply with quality and quality assurance requirements f or that work, is developed, documented, and controlled through a stcndard data system.
Technical and contractual inf ormation and instructions related to design, precurement, and manuf acture of components, systems, or services are contained in documents consisting of, but not limited to:
l,
- a. System Design Descriptions, including OPDD-10
- b. Cor.por:r.t Specif ications, Codes, and Standards
- c. Process Specif ications
- d. Design Specifications l
- e. Stress Reports l
- f. Drawings and Drawing Lists I g. Purchase 0-ders and associated procurement documents j h. Control led Inf ccmation Data Transmittal s l
l 170-19 Am:nd. 75
' W
a .
The quality assurance program, as mandated by the CR3RP Project l'anager, provides that all activities af fecting quality are to be accomplished in accordance with documented instructions, procedures, and drawings and that appropriate quantitailve and qualitative means of verifying quality. are to be satisf actorily dellr.eated and included as appropriate.
6.0 DOCU?M T CONTROL The measures implemented f or document control are contained in various procedures and summarized in Table 17D-1. Documents subject to control include policy and procedure documents, technical and design documents including drawings, and procurement documents. Controls are imposed f or initial review and approval actions, release of the documents, and f or distribution of the documents to designated perscnnel who eliher perf orn or verif y qual ity-rel ated work. Revisions to these documents including field changes are reviewed and approved by organizations who approved the original dccument pricr to release and distribution.
Centrol of quality-related policies and procedures which descrite the quality essurance program is delegated by the ARD General 14anager to the department manager responsible f or their preparation, approval, and issue. Prepcration, revision, distribution, and control of procedures are established by the respcnsible department manager. Review and approval of the original issue of the procedure, and revisions thereto, are required by departments and f unctional organizational units which either interf ace with or are af fected by the procedure. Specific cetails of the control of the various policy and procedural dccuments are given in Table 17D-1. The CRBRP Quality Assurance Program Plan is prepared, maintained, and controlled by the CRBRP Quality Assurance i4anager.
Technical and design documents are controlled by require:ents in divisional and project procedures. Cegnizant engineers are responsible for preparatien of these documents and f or proposing revisions. Review and approval of the initial release is governed by a project procedure which delineates the necessary review and apprcval functions. A Document Review Checklist is used to record the review and approval of Individuals assigned a review function.
In addition to the review and approval actions f rom those organizations which have systcm interf ace responsibilities, approval is required f rom related f unctional groups, such as Saf ety and Licensing, and Quality Assurance. The review, approval, and issuance of revisions to released design documents are controlled es described in Section 3.0 of this Appendix.
The timeliness of a document change is dependent upon the document involved and tha nature of the change. ideasures used to control charges in design and procurement are discussed in Sections 3.2 and 4.0 in this Appendix, respectively. Verification that the approved changes have been properly and correctly incorporated in the respective base documents is perf orted by independent review and approval actions within W Including Quality Assurance, pricr to implecenting the change through W precurement actions. Vcrificatien is also perf orned subscquent to ihe W procurement actions by review and approval actions of W supplicr documentation by ccgnizant organization, including Qual'ty Assurance; and by surveillance and audits of W supplier 170-20 A ,cnd. 7 5 m-
o :
documentation to assure that the supplier has properly and correctly incor porated the changes in the work packages, such as instructions, procedures, working drawings and shop travelers, prior to perf orming any work.
Distribution of policy and procedures documents, and revisions thereto, are under the control of the manager responsible f or the particular procedure series (Table 17D-1). Policy and procedure documents are either distributed to authorized manual holders or to standard distribution lists with receipt acknowledgement. Distribution is controlled to assure availability of the documents, and revisions to these documents, to all ef fected perscnnel. An updated controlled table of contents is issued to af fected personnel when a revision to an instruction and procedure is issued. This mechanism provide Irmediate visibility to the user to assure that an obsolete issue is not f ollowed in either perf orming or verifying work. Holders of the various manuals are responsible to update their manuals as revised procedures are received, by inserting the revised procedure and destroying the superseded precedure. Controlled copies of tcchnical and design documents are '
cistributed to c cordance with precedures to a controlled distributien list cf ccgnizant managers and interf acing f unctional organizations. W has delegated exccution responsibility for maintaining and controlling technical and design docu ents to 1he RMs f or their assigned NSSS scope of werk. The Al- and GE-Initiated technical and design documents are taintained and controlled by the respective R"s. W raintains and controls the W initiated technical and cesign documents. W publishes a Document Status Report which lists all W and RMs technical and cesign documents, incl uding l atest revision level . This status report is periodically updated and distributed to cognizant project personnel at all locations.
The Owner maintains and controls all Licensing Documents, such as the CRBRP Preliminary Saf ety Analysis Report. The responsibility for the preparation of the NSSS portion of these Licec. sing Documents has been delegated to W. W has refaired execution responsibility for certain portions of these documents, and has celegated execution responsibility for 1he retaining portions to the RMs.
W prepares, reviews, and approves W and RM prepared portions in accordance with divisional and project procedures. W documents are submitted to the Owrer for approval, distribution, maintenance, and control.
Control of procurement documents is described in Section 4.0 of this Appendix.
7.0 CC*:TFOL OF PUPCuASED UATERIAL. EOUIPMENT AND SERVICES The W quality assurance program describes controls f or assuring that purchased material, equipment, and services conf orm to procurement document requirements. The established measures include provisions f or specification of quality requirements by the cognizant engineer, quality engineerir.g acticn, supplier survey and selection, supplier surveillance and audit, objective evidence of quality, end release of finished components. Each of these elements is controlled by implementing procedures to assure conformance of qual ity requirements. Supplier surveys are performed at the division level and documented by a survey tean consisting of procurcment, design engirecrir.g, r.anuf acturing engineering and product assurance personr.el, as appropriate to the scope of 11.0 survey or anticipated procurc ent.
17 D-21 Anend. 75 Jan. 1963
The W control of purchased matcrials and equipment begins with selection of a supplier capable of providing acceptable quality products and services. To this end, procedures provide f or use of an Ac:cptable Source List. The Acceptable Source List is a compliation of suppliers who either hav',e demonstrated capability to provide quality products or services, or have been accepted based on a survey. The W Acceptable Source List which Is reviewed, updated, and published monthly in accordance with Purchasing procedures. A supplier may be rer.oved f rom the Acceptable Source List when it has been established that the supplier's perf ormance is unsatisf actory.
The W cognizant engineer is responsible f or the control of purchased material, equipment, and services, end specifies the requirecents needed to provide the control in the purchase order. Quality Engineering action is initiated with the preparation of the purchase order which identif ies those documents which are required to be submitted by the W supplier to W for review and approval action. Submittals include such documents as:
- a. Quality assurance program documentation, including the quality verification plan,
- b. Inspection and test plan.
- c. Inspection and test procedures.
- d. Design drawings.
- e. Process procedures,.
- f. Supplier recommended disposition of Supplier Nonconfcrmance Reports, i.e. , " accept as i s," "repai r," or " modi f y," i ndicati ng that purchase orcer requirements have not been met.
Review and approval of submitted plans and procedures by the cognizant design 7
engineer and quality engineer are mandatory, with additions! review and approval by materials, manuf acturing engineering and other disciplin9s as
! appropriate.
A significant part of W surveillance activity is related to the supplier
- quality verification plan or Ir.spqction and test plan. During review of the l
supplice quality verif ication plan or inspection and test plan, precedures
! provide f or the quality engineer to identify those steps in the process and Inspection where W documented release must be obtair.ed prior to f urther processing. The documented release is by a release form signed by tne Quality Assurance representative. Quality Assurance personnel perf orm the surveillance activities identified in the W approved supplier quality verif ication plan or inspection and test plan in accordance with documented procedures. Surveillance is perf ormed on supplier receipt inspection to assure conf ermance with supplier procedures identified in the W approved supplier quality assurance program. W perf orms euciis of suppliers, as discussed in Section 18.0 of this Appendix, indeper; cont verif ications, such as radiographic film review and material o>erchecks, to assure that the st; plier certif icates of conf ormance are valid. The f requency and scope of 17D-22 Ame nd. 7 5 Jan. 1953
survelliance depends upon the complexity of the parts and components being manuf actured, the manuf acturing stage, and the supplier perf ormance. All saf ety-related components whose quality characteristics cannot be f ully verified at receiving inspection are covered by W surveillance. The degree of fle.id verif ication perf crmed by W quality assurance personnel is dependent on tha complexity of the component and the supplier's perf ormance. Special quality verification requirements including activities such as receipt inspection and documentation reviews, are established f or commerciel off-the-shel f items to assure product adequacy.
The quality release f or shipment of parts and components f rom W suppliers and RMs acting as a manuf acturer is issued by W Quality Assurance personnel.
Prior to the issuance cf the quality release, W Quality Assurance personnel perf orm the f ollowing f unctions:
o Pcview of the certificate of conf ormance, test data, and records to verify that purchase order requirements are met, o Assure that ro;uirements f or handling and shipment have been approved and impl emented, o Witness required inspections, o Revice packaging and shipping arrangements as required.
o Review data package to assure that all documentation required by the purchase order, incl uding suppl ier nonconf ormance reports, is included in the package.
o Review the data package documentation to confirm that the material, parts and components meet the purchase order requirements.
Documented evidence of the quality release for shipment is by the W Quality Assurance representative's signature on a release f orm. Authorization to ship is approved by the Cognizant Design Manager, Quality Assurance Manager, Procurement Manager, and Project Manager in accordance with prccedural requirements. A certificate of conf ormance is included with the shipment of parts and/cr components to the site. The shipment is marked to the attention of the Osr.er or his representative who perf orms the required receiving inspection in accordance with the requirements f urnished with the material and equipment. W perf orms no receiving inspection f or shipments to the CRERP site. Receiving inspection is perf ormed on shipments to Waltz MIII.
W suppliers are required, by W review and approval of supplier quality essurance prcgran documentation, to specify the control of purchased r.aterial, equipment, and services in purchase orders placed with sub-tier suppliers as appropriate f or the subcontracted material, equipment, and services.
The same contrcIs of purchase material, equipment, and services described in this section are applicable when purchase ordcrs are placed with other Westinghouse divf 31 o n s.
Spare parts and replacement parts are ordered using the same controls f or the original parts and components as described in this section.
17 D-23 Amend. 75 Jan. 1963
8.0 EENTIFICATION AND CONTHOL OF f?ATERI AL S. PMTS. AND CO'?P0f!Ef!TS W hes establ ished a system f or material, parts, and component identJ f ication.
The execution responsibilities f or the identif ication and control of materials, parts, and components in accordance with epplicable standards, specifications and drawings are delegated to suppliers.
W designates in E-specs, drawings, and other procurement documents, the identification requirements f or mater!als, parts, and components inclucing numbering system and methods. These procurement documents, imposed on the supplier by the purchase order, require that a supplier establish and implement measure to maintain identification and control of materials, parts, and ccmponents. These requirements also include considerations of proper Iccation of . lcentification markings, use of eppr ovcd marking tatcrials to preclude adverse quality ef f ects, measures f or verif icaticn of icentity to shipment, and records traceability of the material, parts, and components identification.
9.0 CONTROL OF SPECIAL PPCCESSES The centrol cf special prccesses such es welding, heet treating, nondestructive examination, cleaning, bondir.c, coating, soldering, plating and hard surf acing, is a f unction delegated to suppliers of mLterials, parts, and ccapone nts.
Procurement documents contain requirements that a suppIIer have measures f or control of special proces s.e s. In addition, purchase orders identify the speciel prccess procedures and perscnnel qualif ications which require W review and approval . Supplier procedures used to implement these measures are reviewed f or conf ermance with applicable codes, standards, specifications, or suppl ecentary rc-qui rements, and approved. Approved special process procedures and documentation of personnel qualifications are required to be identified, r.al ntai ned, and control led by the suppl ier.
The W Quality Assurance representative perf orms periodic surveillance of the W supplier's activities to verify that work was perf ccmed by qualified personnel, as requi red, in accordance with approved procedures and with the equipment which qualified the special processes.
W persennel who verify the adequecy of supplier-perf ormed nondestructive examiraticns are qualified and certified in accordance with a nondestructive testing certification program which conf orms to SNT-TC-1 A. Current files are kept of qual if ied personnel in accordance with procedures.
10.0 INSPECTION W delegates the execution responsibility for manuf acturing of parts and components, including the inspection and test of these parts and ccmponents, to suppliers in accordance with applicable codes, standards, and specif ications imposed by purchase orders. W essures ccmpliance with the 17D-24 A end. 75 Jen. 1983
t e 2quirements through periodic survolliance of supplier activities based on W-approved supplier inspection and test plans and W established vcrification hold points. Modificottons, repair and replacement parts and components are required 10 be inspected by the supplier to the same requirements lpposed by the pur chase order or to approved alternatives. Required qualifications of
- supplier inspectors are verified by surveillance.
Aporoved supplier Inspection and test plans cover characteristics such as:
o inspection planning to provide adequate control.
o Acceptance and rejection criteria.
o Metnods of Inspection, including personnel end equipment q ual i f icati ons, o inspection data documentation.
o Equi pment cal ibration.
o Verification of completion and certification of inspection.
The supplier is required to interf ace with the ASME Code Authorized Inspectcr to establish those inspections needed to meet ASME Code requirements specified by the purchase order.
11.0 TEST CONTROL The execution responsibility for ths design and f abrication (including pressure and f unctional tests) test program is delegated by ibe W to suppliers and RMs by purchase order. N is responsible for assuring that en adequate test prograr is identified and implemented f or equipment and si stems w ith i n its scope of responsibility to demonstrate that structures, systems, and compcnents will perf orm satisf actorily in service. The Identif ication of the test prcgram, the requirements theref or, and the acceptance criteria are included in design documents such as System Design Descriptions, Design Specif ications, Equipment Specif ications and Design Drawings, as apprcpriate.
Test programs are required by procurement documentation to incorporate written test procedures and plans, appropriate calibrated equipment, cr.vironmental controls and adequate test data documentation, collection, and review. Test procedures generated by suppliers are submitted f or U review and approval by engir.eering and quality assurence personnel to assure compliance with requirements. The test procedures are reviewed to assure that all preregt' sites have been specified, that adequate test instrumenistion end equipment are dellr.eated, that each test is perf ormed under suitable environmental and operating conditions, that equipment is calibrated, and that qualified personnel are used as required.
W-approved 'harges involving modification, repairs, and replacement of test Itc=s are imposed on the suppliers by purchase order change' notices.
170-25 Arend. 75 Jan. 1963
t
- I:ormally, the clicnges do not require a chenSe In 1he test specification requirements to confirm the adequacy of the original design. In the event the test specificatien requirements need to be changed, the proposed ch.anges to the test specification rcquirements are revleaed and approved by thp cognizant W organizations, including Quality Assurance and higher level authority as required by prececures, to assure that the specified changes are acceptable alternatives to conf irm design adequacy. When eithcr modification, repair ce replacement of a test item is required, the items are tested in accordance with the original requirements or approved a ternatives.
Hold points are established by W to provide f or verification of test perf ormance, as appropriate. Test methods and results are documented by the supplier and evaluofed by W 10 assure that tc-t rcquirements and ecceptrnce criteria have been satisfied.
12.0 CONTROL OF t'E ASUc LNG & TEST EOUIPh'ENT The execution responsibilities f or the control and calibration of measurir.g and test equipment in accordance with applicable codes, standards, and specifications, including labeling cr tagging, to indicate next calibration due date are delegated by purchase order to suppliers of materials, parts, and components. Specif ically, W imposes these requirements by one or more of the fclieving methods:
- 1. Application of RDT Standard F 3-2T directly
- 2. Application of RDI Standard F 3-2T by reference in RDT Standard F 2-2
- 3. Review and approval of supplier quality asstrance program documentation Verification of supplier compliance with the requirements for control and calibration of measuring and test equipment is dore through periodic surveillance of supplier activities during the manuf acturing, inspection, and testing of the materials, parts, and components and prior to quality release actions f or shipment.
13.0 PANDL ING. STORAGE AND SHIPPING The execution responsibilities f or handling, storage, and shipping in accordance with applicable codes, standards and specifications are delegated by purchase order to suppliers. Verificatien of supplier complicnce with the rc-quirements f or handling, storcge, and shipping of equipment is dor.e through 170-26 Amend. 75 W
I e periodic surveillance during the manuf acture, inspection, and testing of material, parts, and components and price to quality reicase actions f or shipment.
14.0 INSPECTION. TEST AND OPERATING STATUS The execution responsibilities f or identification of Inspection, test, and operating status in accordance with applicable codes, standards, and specifications are delegated by purchase order to suppliers. Procurement documents require that the supplier implement measures to indicate the inspection, tesi, and operating status of an i+em, and that nonconforming items are cicarly icentified to prevent inadvertent use. The supplier is rcquired to control manuf acturing and inspection status indicators, such as tags, stamps, label s, process cards, etc. , incl udi ng decl ared authority f or application ~ and removal of tags, marking labels, and stamps. Verification of supplier compliance with procedures f or identification and maintenance of inspection, test, and cperating status, and the cont. ol of nonconf orming iter.s is dor.e through periodic surveillance of supplier activities.
15.0 NCNCOWOR"INC UATERI AL S. PARTS OR CO"3ONENTS The execution responsibilities f or the identif ication, documentation, segregation, and disposition of nonconf erming materials, parts, or components are delegated to suppIIers by purchase order requirements. This responsibility also includes, as applicable, services perf ormed by suppliers (cor.puter codes, sof tware, records, etc. ). Purchase orders require suppliers to submit to W f or disposition, all Supplier Nonconf ormanco Reports (SNRs) when the nonconf ormance af fects the W-Imposed or approved attribute. The supplier recommended disposition may be either accept-as-is, conditionally accept, modify or repair. The supplier-Issued SNRs document the deviation along with the reco-mended disposition, the justification f or the reco .endation, the cause of the nonconf ormance and the recommended corrective action to prevent recurrence. Submitted nonconf ormance reports are reviewed by the ccgnizant engineer, Quality Assurance and other interf acing and technical supporting organizations as necessary to disposition the ncnconf ormance.
170-27 Amend. 75 Jan. 1933
a .
Signatures by W Quality Assurance personnel end the cognizant engir.ccr provide evidence of W review and disposition action. Documenied procedures define the level of authority, within and outside of W, required f or the review and disposition of nonconf orming materials, parts, or components. ;
i Where approval authority higher than W is required, W obtains this approval from the Owner prior to returning the SNR to the supplier with the di sposition.
Nonconf ormance reports are analyzed periodically by Quality Assurance to assess the existence of any adverse quality trends which, if roted, arc reported to the ARD General Manager by the CRERP Project Manager via Quallry Status Reports. Areas where corrective actions are required, or have been i nsti tuted, are identi f ied.
W Quality Assurance perf orms periodic surveillance to verify that supplier precedures concerning ncnconf ormances are implemented.
SNRs f or specif ic comporents and systems are evaluated by cognizant technical discipiires to assess the ef fects of nonconf ormances on Final Stress Repcrts relating to those components and systems.
Disposit;cned nonconf orr.ance reports are documented by the supplier as part of the supplier data package which is reviewed and approved by Quality Assurance representatives prior to the quality release actions described in Section 7.0 of the Appendix. The dispositioned SNRs are included in the supp11er data ,
package which also contains designated inspection records. The supplier data package is f orwarded to th'e owner with ?!.e equipment 'or his review and esses sment.
SNRs are quality records and are discussed in Section 17.0 of this Appendix.
16.0 CCCPECTIVE ACTION Precedures provide f or prompt identification, documentation, and implementation of ccrrective action to prevent recurrence of conditions adverse to qual ity. Corrective acticns result f rom def iciencies Icentif ied in one or more of the following:
o Supplier Nor. conf ormance Reports generated during the course of manufacture, inspection, and feating of NSSS components.
o Supplier and W Unusual Occurrence Reports which descrite unplanned events, including design def iciencies, having or potentially having programmatic ef f ects.
17D-28 Amend. 75 Jan.1953
o Internal and external audit reports, and Requests f or Corrective Action issued by W Quality Assurance, during 1he design process, procurement, manuf acturing, inspection, and testing of NSSS components. ,
-o Field Deviation and Disposition Reports (FDDR) related to W supplied materials, parts or components are issued by the Constructor at the time a field deficiency occurs. 1he recommended disposition action to correct the def iciency is def ined by the cognizant engincer who is responsible f or obtaining approval of the disposition from the appropriate organizations as detailed in procedures.
Supplier Nonconf ornance Reports are received and dispositioned as described in Section 15.0 of this Appendix. Ncnconf erm:nce reports indicate the cause of the def iciency and the corrective action planned by the supplier to prevent recurrence. These corrective actions are reviewed and evaluated f or ac'equacy by W bef ore disposition of the SNR. Depending upon the nature and the f requency of the nonconfornances and ccf iciencies, follow-up action is perf ormed to verify implementation of the corrective action by surveillance at the supplier f acility.
Unusual Occurrence Reports are used to report, evaluate, and implement cerrcctive action to prevent recurrence of unplanned or unusual events having programmatic significance such that it adversely af fects or potentially af f ects perf ormance, reliability, or saf ety of a reactor 4acility. The identification of the cause and corrective action cre Integral and vital elements of the report. W Quality Assurance is required by procedure to determine that the def ined corrective action is satisf actory bef ore approval of the final report.
W Internal audits, and external audits of suppliers, result in reports to the management of the audited activity. The reports identify def iciencies and request a response specifying the corrective actions and the implementetion of the ccrrective actions. The audit activities, as described in Section 18.0 cf this Appendix, provide for follow-up of the audit response, evaluation of the proposse corrective action f or adequacy, verification of the implenentation of ccrrective action, and f ormal closcout of the audit when all cpen items have been satisf actorily dispositioned.
Requests f or Corrective Action (RCAs) are generated by W Quality Assurance personnel to document nd notify either responsible W management or W supplier manegement of def iciencies and noncompliances f ound at ihe RMs and at supplier facilitics. The responsible management is required to identify either the corrective action teken, or to be taken within a specified time, and return the request to W Quality Assurance.
Ccrrective actions are recorded, evaluated, followed, compiled, and re; cried in accordance wIth procedures. A summary of significant deficiencies and noncompliances is identified monthly by the CRBRP Project Manager in the W Quality Status Report to the ARD General Manager along wIth a corrective actica status summary, audit results, and ecverse quality trend data as apprc;riate.
17D-29 Amend. 75 Jan. 1953
e .
Execution responsibilities f or identification end impiccentation of corrective action are also delegated to suppliers by purchase order requirements.
17.0 OUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS -l Procedures def ine those records which are necessary to document the quality of
!?SSS structures, systems, and components. These records are listed in the applicable W procedures along with the W organization responsible f or their col lection, rai ntenance, storage, and retrieval . When documents are declared a record they sre located and/or secured in such a manner as to prevent destruction of the records by fire, flooding, thef t, and deterioration by environmental conditions such as temperature or humidity. The records inclece, but are not limited to. documents and changes thereto, such as OFDD-10, specif ications, drawings, stress reports, procurement documents, inspection and test results, quality releases, personnel qualifications, supp!!er quality assurance documentation includinc inspection, test, and calibration procedures, results of Internal en: external audits, Owner apprcval s, nonconf ermance reports and corrective ection reports.
Cering the desicn, procurement, and manuf acture of structures, systems and cceponents, records are maintair.ed and stored at the.W in an Identifiable and retrievable manr.er and under controlled conditions. Records identified by the Owr.cr to be transf erred to the plant site, or other records storage f aci!Ity will be delivered as directed.
Procurement documents specify records which are to be supplied to W, delivered w ith products, or mai ntai ned i n the W suppliers' files.
Records requirements are imposed on W suppliers by purchase order in accordance with applicable codes, standards, and specifications. These requirements include provisions that inspection and test records contain a description of the test perf ormed, verification of work completion for manuf acturing, inspection and Test, inspection and test results, identificatien and disposition of nonconf ormances, and identification of acceptability of test results.
The supplier f urnishes the f ollowing records, as a minimum, to the purchaser.
A. Certif ications that specif ical ly identify (e.g., by the purchase order number) the purchased material or equipment and the specific procurement requirements (code, standards, specif ications, etc.) met by the items.
l B. Certifications ihat identify any procurenent requirements which have not been ret together with a description of those nonconf ormances dispositioncd " accept as is" or " repair."
Duplicate records identified by the Owner to be transferred to the plant site, or other records storage f acility, will be delivered or maintained as directed.
170-30 Amend. 75 Jan. Ics3
a These record storage f acilities provide a controlled access area f or the processing of records and provide f or the records to be available upon request. This area has f ire, water, and environmental controls that comply with the requirements and regulations covering of fice space provided f or empl oyees.
18.0 /GUS Procedures are established and Implemented f or conducting comprehensive, plenned, end periodic Internal W eudits and external audits of W suppliers and R5's to verify compliance with all aspects of the quality assurance program requirements, to determine the ef fectiveness of the program, and to assure compliance with the contractual requirements. Audit schcduling, notif ication, team selection, conduct of the audit, reporting, follow-up of audit responses, and closecut are the responsibility of Quality Assurance. Audit teams are selected by Quality Assurance management based on the members' knowledge, expertise, and experience in the area to be audited. Team leaders are responsible for preparing detailed checklists against which the audit is perferned. The audit team members, including the team leader have no direct responsibility for the area bcIng audited.
Types of audits perf err.ed are related to activity, product, non-cestructive examinations, and records. Audits are conducted to evaluate the impicmentaticn of procedures and practices in the areas of progran activities, work practices, testing, records, and other portions of the quality assurance program as ap;rcpriate to the status of the work.
Activity audits include interf ace control. Internal audits of W activities are conducted to confirm compliance with established procedures f or interf ace contr ol . Internal audits assess the ef fectiveness of the control of design interf aces between the RMs and the AE. External audits of RMs and W suppliers assure that they are conforming to their procedures in controIIIng design interfaces.
Assessment cf the implocontation and ef fectiveness of the Indoctrination and training programs is also en integral part of activity audits, either conducted at the W as internal cudits or at the W supplier and RM locations as part of cxternal audits. in both cases, the audits verify that perscnnel who l
. either perf orm or verify work are properly trained and qualified to perf crm their essigned tasks in compliance with established procedures to meet the quality assurance program requirements imposed by contract.
The salient elements of the Internal and external audit programs are:
- 1. Audits are scheduled on a regular basis and are initiated sufficier.ily
! in adsance to assure ef fective quelliy assurance program j impiccentation during design, procurement, manuf acturing, inspection, j and test.
- 2. Planning of audits results in a documented audit picn which identifics the spccif ic activities to be eudlied, the rc-quircmonts upon which -$e I cudit is based, the 1ecn ecT.bers, and team leader.
17D-31 A end. 75
- 3. Notification of the responsible management of the work activity to be audited identifying the audit plan, team members, and audit date.
This notif ication occurs at least ons month prior to the audit.
- 4. Preparation of the documented audit checklists by the audit team leader and the orientation of team members by the audit team leader prior to the audit.
- 5. Conduct of audits in accordance with the prepared checklists.
- 6. A discussion (critique) of the audit findings at the conclusion of the audit, with the management personnel responsible f or the audited -
act iv i ty.
- 7. Documentation of audit results, including critique, to the management responsible f or the work audited.
- 8. Response f rco the management responsible f or the work audited indicating corrective action taken, or to be taken, to preclude recurrence of deficiencies.
- 9. Evaluation of acequacy of the response and f olicw-up to essess implecentation of corrective action.
- 10. Reaudit of def icient areas, if necessary, and documented closecut of cpen Itens.
- 11. Analysis of audit results f or adverse quality trends which, if noted, are reported to the ARD General 14anager via the Quality Status Report Indicating olther the corrective action Implemented or proposed to be impiccented within a specified time.
Precurement documents have provisions f or access of the W and W-designated persennel to suppliers' plants f or the purpose of conducting audits.
The responsibilliy for the execution of audits is also delegated to W suppliers and the RMs by procurteent documents. W suppliers and the RMs are
' responsible f or auditing their own internal program and these of sub-ticr supplicrs. These precurement documents also provide for W participation in W supplier and the Rt.1 audits of their sub-tier suppliers.
i i
17D-32 A end. 75 Jan. 1963
f .
( 0 -
K ~g -
= -
= = m.
O .s
-o.
=<s
- = _ .
==c2 "2 w a c
.=_
C
'R -
=
-=
a e u -
a a t =
2 a $
o C W
12Ewo .-
=mu q. m.
g ,.x g
JDO4 b ~
=.
2
.c=-s CK=m-E. mm ww E =* =c <w 2
_-J.
Q a
- = o Z C "3_x
- e z = = s{ ma f g a v= om WS L bjs=c o<
1( a! o*{c{ gggg yg
= -< -
j g E ED3 -# E
< W
.o C
. ___,I 1
=
I l'
u I
Ea c
. E d C 2 EmMC o u-l -
-o:<:
u4- o
<m2 m2*e mz w I
- r
= -
l .
L
- . 3115 .
l i 170- #
l g keerd. 11 Jan. 19,,6
,-,,e.r, X..x
..-.e- - -=r,----- , - , _ - - - - , - . . ,
I l
. : .i
- o. b
~
g . w.*
J _n we a m c. ' i -
./
- O U w ., I u c3 - !
O u N & u2?
o 6
-e Y~
g g W 4 U E 7% A O 5 'I NC O * ~ "O " ~
T
- I m I i T e *O -t c --
~J $
w
> L 4 a e s ee I *
$* C se T
4 w. C G
w u g R ~ a m u 6 . ce ~
z 2g t W .,?
e "A 2
e E
c >
O w = = =
c o %* . i , *.*- 5.
- =
D "* u E an 4 == ===..-.31 cma l l l a
=<< O
=
4n2 M5 3
.. =m J .?.
C -
C
- e j C 4 6 3 31
'4
( e 3 :
r C
e a i ; 22 I $- i C' S
l
~
Ji
, < U.
, s 63 5w '. S U; e in wa = . 92 sA
- m *- e u-w u
a >w 4= i) 2
- 4. =
0,. C.,- .-
u a m Wu><<=- 2o
- 4 -
- 2
< .1 c.*a .u es c - c c =z O n. e g
. a. *C.
4*
g
' 'w 2,EIk 4 c
- q C 4u c,e(<
a ez 4 sww=4 C'.C2- Ve m
g -C C w C*b K
03 " {
>c
.,1 c ,g ,,, 2
- 1C *r C n,J.as am2 c>e w
n.<ms e cw a wE -
C4 c5= 60u. 2 u
g a
^ u-m G
v *Y E < - .$ < <a V e- 4 >
M
= <
ey Cg d w
- 3 2 e-C w r 2 O W u o a go z >- N.
a ww -3 aw -* z $
= m t- E w g I $
( = w u
u e =
. a. = _ > _
w -
.a 2, M
- o. e w p y C w m > c C W U -
O a. 4 =
c m w mmaC= b C 4 g "g - *
,,, "" =-
C., a. 2
< 7 %
2 r_' == s =<m, i i I I I
=- a
- C," & '"' W - g .T > c' SO I 7
- C Es v=2 -
c E m*2 a C d b Ewd 3 17 *==s
>=ow a
./ 4. . to-a E=>G m
2 "9 e"==9 ai 3 rE
- 0, m = e er
- =me ess- r
-
- D ~k eas.s .
6 e...s.. **
. * ' ?, *w, ;,. . . . .'
- - _ . - . - - - - . . . . _ e ka.n-.as= . - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . . - _ . - . . - . . - _ - - - - - - . _ _ _ _ _ . . - - _ _
a 1
l g . t I. 3-If 4 u
si IE u-f=-
Y Br s 35 2
', u 8
e 57 L 81 1 5 5
- I =
c e s $
E g $ } <
! . ;{
- i J 1 - !I b b i- s' I 1, $I $ *5 i Te a 1 k.i - le g t <t {l O et{ } i -' a i
- - a_as
- s1 it-i la i2l lII12 2i2.I D,ED .
~
I.gI vs : .I.}e,st.i I{ 14IaLII[i
- -~
! c i
- I . ! s. I t 2 "
- s. : :
l! $<
l 'I !!}r s t r! t [ li i i g 'll tn i ,- r ii s t;I],1 2
!i 1-3 I
' l a,15ss;!Iirf =i 1 0 F -
-o
!= i nsat =1 = 1.
}33-c48iaso[ld r ; -~
-u
.34ri: c6 C
- 1 b 5 ; !. ,;.
! ;I s c l a( a i---. } - - - . . I,6; ..giei---
aa3: =
2 a;d.ji
< [
E 5'.-'" I 2 i
3 iI a iI w=
s .l ..* -1 j i -
o=
lI yli 5 5 i'i=utiza' I lis5 .o l l
? !11 1 :dii =If 11 fJit 2 ja Et
,t gli!2 l ral'1t 8 "*
- t d
-f -
in i
- 3 3
- 4m I.21 En 1;6
- j> a( }t 12 I .i l ; i
= A e Y g :[ t. -
I[s a t c!IE sid<,
i- i . r ,g
, , 1 =3 2 cesii l I l l s l<s ----
3 - _, .{ 4.--- 3 i o
- 3. .f4 I <<<a .
=
8- 2 - n t
! j - !l . .
g2 5 2 ! - 5 2 i
1 [ t1 <i v 'l I 6 , , ; r i i :; t .
17 is}l,}'a t "
Y s
- i -- E 7
,l!j (3N!*ijz all{izia ist !.
f got j l f
- r* ! 4i4 E 3 Ali l gli a cdaal.b.6 5
i t.-
isilli.! {!2 f a! Y.! . . - . . , - - - t }i a ce zaa a aa:
a.- .
l 8155-4 17D-@ - knend. 11 Jan. 1976
$V
E f
iv a
le Er Y
Ir .
es
: i. - ,
- 1 - i g e te
--e g
- t I a j
? s 1; g<, 3
}1
- 2 i. i, - .
. -; , i i1
- I r = !g s. r 1 ,! .
~=e 4
?. e i .
-e6 ids [ !!g I1 er 3 .ll it ? 2 i t [.( .I.
1 I 3' 2
=
r -- c -
1 Ii 7 il 23 t l 54 f a: o1 t ;- CG li
-4i.t!
1
! [ 3 : ,=j s . s- s o 3,1 ff i
0 c
- 14 i=s 5
s-
=
1 J c ! d ! [ '1 =3 t 4 }i: c:.s;
,,is3-cno tc sir 3acet c*r o ..
2 o
i igi.o s . y (:;, ct.
6 r-o
'l i {g ({ d
=
{I!! !slc ;
aI j - ~ ~ . 1E - - - . . d .4,. ~ . .aJo- !igt_. m
=
8 ;r-8 1.a3${ <
I-~e , .,
- -i .
' A I I!
. f . i t l * := !.i $ Ift-1 1 }
2 J!
1 2 e m
.sts .
s - ***!.t-}1 I -
=%a v
g lj 2 i
=
11] 14
- s'
)- l i ,* 2 y1. h.gj I 'I i t IE :w:.I 3et[1 3 ** ; i I.Ijis :.1 r ]j5 ti 4 A
5:316
< t i
[ t*T i ii 't T . l 3o i t <3. ir3.{c_y- .
o
~te, agJ4c u3 9 ill! l ; :;: 4 e - - - . {--[lJ- o gg -
e o=4: asca . ou g
8-~a E 3
< : \
l1 5 j
0J ? I f e i
$i i Lt 5-i
}lie}r i;lI6ail e
4 go}Ij,s}6 t
i o
1 Y '
~E t .o I ,t t f !t5j I,li i i 51 ! .l35 [?5.:si4i I'ii11g1 (ip2 f 41 u
- {. ; j3
.t 41 :13231
-... 1s 1
-3 acd 5da -.2--43' 3.~
8155 2 h
17 0- .'.3 A,end. 11 p Jan. 197c
.r.
TN1LE 170-1 D003tDIT CDNTRG.
Preparation Review and Final Pevision Distribution Avent Res en3fbility __ConturicaSe_ .htrSYAL __EQntrol Confrof IEW1NDLW D00FL!iT.S Quality tiethods Product Af f ected groups Product Product Distribution to and Procedures Assuranco required tiy Assuranco Assurance authorized manual uanager procedure Manager Manager holders IctP Series)
Project DERP Project At tected groups (mRP (PORP Distribution to Procedures franager per checklist F'rojcet Project standard distribu-tranager Manager tion IIst. Receipt (Lx-C Series) ocknowledgod.
Div i sion Project M<ynt. Department Cencral General Distribution to Procedures Services Mgr. ftanagers Manager ttanager authorliedsnanual IM4and holdors.
Orn-Series)
Purchasing Contract Purchasi ng Mgr. Govt. Mgr. Govt. Distribution to Department Servicos Manaccrs Con tract Contr act authorized Pur-Services Services chasing Manual Procedures holdors.
Qual I ty CRDRP Atfected OtDRP OBRP - Distribution to Quality groups as Froject Project authorized manual Assuranco Proyan Plan Assurance required by ttanager Manager holders.
Manager procedure 17D-37 Amend. 75 J an. 19d3
Tr,qtt 170-1 DOOMNT @NTR(1. (Continued!
Preparation fleview and Ifnal Rrvision Distribution W r ent Ee.n onsIbl1Ity _Ceys,nt:rse_ Ancry.,L JertsroI . cynyroI Iry gCpt pys ersicetpagy gtt3 00t"J-10. SD0's, Cogniront Interf acing Cognirant Ccontrant Distributed to con-E-Srece, Enginner and af f ect ed Kmager (ksign trolled distribution Draw!rgs project and Panager list. Revision level functional status 16?nti f ied by organf rations document status required by repor t, procedures.
M M CIT _r0CL?DtIS Control of procurcinent documents is described In Section 4.0 of this appondix, e
e 170-50 Anend. 75 Jan. 1983
m . . , _ ....a.-, - m. --- m.-- - - -
- _ . __ 4.._a _ . . - .
e 1/fLE_110-2 SUMt%Y OF W QUAL ITY AS'URANT. PROEDURES INDEX .
NO. PROG [URE TITLE SUW.mY
- 1. Quality Assurance Charter Establishes the authority and def ines the duties of the W Cf51RP Quality Assuranco Department.
- 2. Quality Assurance Progre Describes the crganf rational authority and responsibilI-Description ties f or work perf ormance and verif ication In accordance with procedures Identified in a progrm Indox to assure the quality of the NSSS structures, systes, and compo-nonts within the W scope of work.
- 3. Tralning and Indoctrination Establishes the requirment and methods fcr tralning to Quality Assuranco l'rogra and Indoctrination of personnel who perf crm and verif y .
Requirm ents quality-related f unctions in accordance with quality assurwco profes.
4 Design Review Def ines the measures used f or the preparation, conduct, and documentation of design reviews with folicw-up action requirments.
- 5. Quality Status Reports and Provides the methods used f or the preparation of QA Management Rowlew periodic quality status reports and identifies the portions of the reports which are used f or QA Managment rev f ews.
- 6. Rmuest for Corrective Def ines the methods used f or requesting corrective Action action at W suppliers or within W.
- 7. Unusual Occurence Reports Estabi tshes a syste for reporting, evaluating, and defining correct!ve action relativo to unusual occurences.
- 8. Quality Levels Establishes the quality level assigned to items or item-related services +o asse e satisf actory perf ormance end saf oty.
- 9. N7D Walver Perluost Describes the method f or W to infilate a request and obtain approval for walving technical '
reilu t r men t s.
- 10. Quality Rnquirments f or Describes tho methods f or Product Assuranco l'r octer onen t revitv .md opprev.il of procurmont doctaient s.
I t
17D-39 hnend. 75 Jim. 1983
e a
LADLE _11P-2 -
SUf3MY OF W QUAL ITY ASSURfECE tm0EDUltES INDEX
- NO. PRO & DURE TITLE SUMMY
- 11. . Approval of Supplier Establishes the methods f or approval of the Quality Assurance Progrm Quality Assurance Proryms and related Documentation documentation proposed by W suppi ters to meet the quality requirments Imposed by contract f w 1hc desIDn, manuf actere, and testing of ?!SSS structures, systms, and componen t s.
- 17. Verification Hold Fotnt Establishes requirments to ensure that Progr m achievment of Contractural Quality requirments is ver t f led, including AS E Codo Roquirements for AS E code Itoms.
- 13. Supplier Request f or Describes the methods f or W suppliers to request Walvers and obtain approval to walvo contractural technical requirmonts.
14 Product Assurance actions Provides the procedure to be followed when on 'stof d Point" Verif ication perf orming hold point verification Inspections at Activities at Supplier's supplicr's f acilltles.
Facilities
- 15. Product Assurance Quality Def inos the procedure used by Product Assurance Release of Supplier shipments personnel to issue a quality release for shipments made by suppliers.
- 16. Product Assurance Surveillance To provido Instructions to Product Assurance representative when performing surveillance within W or at suppf ler f acilities to assess compilance with quality requirmonts imposed by contract.
- 17. Training and Qualification of Establishes requiroments fer training and Personnel (special processes) quallf Ication of personnel wno accept materials or who perf orm certain special process operations.
- 10. Control and Disposition Establishes the Instructions and methods used f cr
- of Honconf ormances repor ting, evaluating, and f or the dispositlon of nonconformances, including evaluation of corrective actions.
- 19. Training & Crrtification of ra.tabilt.hes the criterla for the quallfIcation and 11.ptn .trucilwo tweltwilon wrli t le..illon of Nonclosf ructivo Exam ina f f on (Ntil )
ti.tf) Per.onnul .tvrt.ontml and providos f or Instructions f cr records ref rnf lon ond rncall.
17D.10 Amand. 75 Jan. 1983
e a
Jff!F ;?D_-2 SUMWtY OF W QUALITY AS*URANT PROEDURES lNDEx NO. PROCEDURE TITLE SURIARY
- 20. Quality Assurance Audits of Details the Instructions and the measures used f or ARD Internal and ARD Supplier scheduftng, conducting, reportir.g. follow-up, and Activities clowout of quality assurance audits o' ARD Internal and ARD suppiter activities.
- 21. Cualifications of Audit Establishes the W requirments and methods f or l'er sonnel quall f Ication of personnot to perf orm quality assurance audits.
- 72. (TDRP Traceability Plant Describes the traceability system tw design requirments applicable to systms and components.
- 23. CRBRD Quality Records Plan Dofines the responsibilities for acquisition, Identifica-tlon, maintenance, and rotrieval of _ quality records.
- 74. CDDRP Conf Iguration Control Sets f orth the constitution and responsibilities of the Cont Iguration Control Board and Technical Review Doard.
- 75. 01BRP Communications Establishes ra;of rments and methods used for communicating with external organizations, and f or di st r ibut ion, and control of correspondence.
- 26. CURP Engineering Studies Describes the requirements and the measures used to establish the f ormat, contents, methods of Identi f ica ,
tion, and the control of enginoering studies.
- 27. 01B19 Calculations Provides the format, roquirments, and the measures used for iho generation and ch'ociting of design calculations.
- 78. 01DRP Rollability Progrm Establishes method to Identify reliability-related components and requirments for review and evaluation thereof.
- 29. CURP WNtD-D Documents Establishes regulrcnents f ar preparation and control of W/JtD <tocument , which prov f oo technical Inf ormaf f on, including design, construction test, and Pre-creration '
test requirments.
- 30. GTIRP Design Description Describes the methods and instructions for the crganf ra-f l on, pr epara tion, review, approval, and issuance of systms elesleyn <fescriptions and changos ihoroto.
31 CHRP Interf ace Contr of 001Incates thn system for Identif IcatIon and control of phy r,I cal inte rf aces imirmn any two or more sy ttes and/or ciegv nents.
170-41 Amend. 75 Jan. 1983
s lbfLE 11P-2 SUnvRY OF W QUAL ITY ASSURANT PRORItJRES I' DEX NO. PROCEDURE TITLE SumtPRV
- 32. mDRP Enginocring D-awings Estahl f shes revluirments and methods used f or the preparation, release, and control of ongineering drawings including roloase, revision, and f iling of
' drawings, preparation of prints and/or mferoflim, and approval of drawings prepared by W suppliers.
33 M RP Prooperational and Establishes responsibilities and requirments f or prepara-Start-up Test Specifications t i on, processing and control of start-up test spocif ica-tions and changes thereto.
34 CDRP Equlgeont Specifications Establishes methods and Instructions used f or the pr eparat ion, review, approval, release, and revisfon of equipment spectfIcations.
- 35. CMRP Design Document Review, Establishes the measures used f or controlling and Approval, and Release processing of technical and design documents for review, approval, and release.
- 36. GBRP Configuration Control Describes requirments and the prmcess for changing f ormally released W and W supplier design documentation.
- 37. GBRP Control of the DEMO Def Inos methods and requirements to control, revise, Progre verify, and record the DEMO computer progra Inputs and outputs.
- 38. GBRP Design Releases Estabi tshes the methods f or documenting completion of design phases and assuring release of appropriate doctnentation.
- 39. Drawing and Part Numbering Establishes tno system for the Identification and control of part and drawing numbering.
- 40. GDRP Doctmentation Status Proscribes the system requirments ard methods used to Systm Maintenance maintain and control design documenta tion.
41 CnDRP Doctment liold Status Def ines the requirmonts and the methods used to identify Systm Maintenanco the principal design data which is not yet reicased f cr Project use.
- 47. CDDPP Control of Shipments Providos a method f or releasing and centrollinq shipments and lenposing Installation requirments on receiving sitos.
- 43. UUffP Tleid Deviation Control Estabt Ishes the requirments f(r processing and controlling iscid devlatlons.
170-42 Amend. 75 Jan. 1903
o t
lbfLE._11h2
$Ut?WlY OF W QUAL ITY AS'URANCE TWO&DURES INDFX ,
NO. PRO & DURE TITLE
SUMMARY
- 44. CEDRP Schedule Control Def inos the ef fcrts required and the methods to ensure a systmatic approach to planning and scheduling.
- 45. Preparation of Responses to NRC Estabilshes the rasponsibilities and methods used to Cuestions on Content of Saf ety prepare f ormal re ponses f or the Owner to communicate Analysis and Environmental with NPC.
Report Material
- 46. Identification and Reporting of Establishes the requirments fcr Identi fying and reporting Substantial Saf ety Hazards, of substantial saf oty hazards, significant def iciencles, Significant Deficiencies, or and unroviewed saf ety questions.
Unreviewed Saf oty Questions
- 47. Divisional Policles and Def ines the policy, Impimentation, and responsibility for Procedures divlstonal, asiinistrative, operating, project, and departmontal policles and procedures.
- 48. Roquest for Purchase Establishes the requirments and controls exercised during the procurment cycle f or systes, structures, parts, cmponents, and f or materials or services.
- 49. Purchase Requisttlon Change Estab!Ishes the requirments and control e>ercised for Notico modif Ications to purchase requisitions.
- 50. Plant Cmponont Filing Providos a system used for organtzing, filing, and the Systree Plan retrieval of purchase order documentation.
51 Preprocurment Planning Def ines the pollcy, systems, and methods used f or prepro-cur m ent planning, review, and approval thereof.
- 52. Acceptable Source List Def f ras the system and measures used for Identifying and maintalning a list of suppliers who have demonstrated their capabilities to provido acceptable products or services.
- 53. Preparation of PUR Letters DefInos the methods and controls used to obtain approval of and Justif ication higher level authority for procurement actions. a 54 Determining Responsible Estahllshes the revluirments for determining responsible Prospective Suppliers pro .pective suppliers of materials and services and provido quidelInns f cr concluctirq surveys of potenflal suppl f ers.
- 55. Pro <!urt Assuranco Rnview Provides the metho.fe. used by Product Assurance in reviewing
.in.1 Ag.pren.it of I.ngi neer i ng and apprtwinq enellemering stocuments and revisions thercio, fu nmen t . ond if<u I sIon'.
17D-43 Amend. 75 Jan. 1983
9 3
IffLE_17N2 9]PMRY OF W QUAL ITY A55U7AN FROCEDURE INDEX NO. FROGDURE TITLE SUfHARY
- 56.
- Use of F'rocurment Estabt Ishes the method of controlIIng procurteent Aetnistrative Documentation aministrativo documents (advisory relea<es, approval and Requf recents requests).
- 57. Purchese Order / Contract Establishes the sy .tm and methods used f or organizing, File Organization f il ing, and retrioval of purchase order documentation.
.i 17D-44 Amend. 75 Jan. 1983
p A
l/fLL.111hl INDEX OF QUALITY ASSUkANCE PRO &DURES TO 10CFR50, FrENDIX D CRITERIA 10CTR50 Appendix B Criteria Criteria Title hntloc Proratfure Index No. f f rom Attachment 17D-21 I Orgar* ration 1, 2, 11 Il Quality Assuranco Program 1, 2, 3, 5, 11, 12, 17, 21, 47 t il' Design Control 4, 9, 11, 12, 13, 22, 24, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 44, 45, 55 IV Procurenent Document Control 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 56, 57 Y Instructions, Procedures & Drawings 2, 11, 47 VI Document Control 7, 11, 13, 15, 18, 22, 24, 25, 27, 29, 30, 31, 32, 34, 35, 36, 39, 40, 41, 45, 46, 55 Vil Control of Purchased Material 7, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 24, 33., 36, 42, 43, 48, 49, 51, Equipment and Services 52, 53, 54, 55, 56 Vill Idontification and Controls o' 11, 12, 31, 32, 34, 39, 48, 49 IX Control of Special Processes 11, 17, 19, 48, 49 X Inspection 11, 12, 14, 15, 48, 49 XI Test Control 11, 12, 33, 34, 48, 49 Xil Control of Moasuring & Test Equipment 11, 48, 49 X1tl Handling, Storage, and Shipping 11, 12, 34, 48, 49 XIV Inspection. Test, & Operating StatLL II , ' 2, 33, 4 8, 4 9 XV Nonconf orming Materials, Parts, or 7, 11, 10, 19, 48, 49 Components XVI Corrective Action 6, 7, 11, 16, 18, 20, 48, 49 XVil Quality Assuranco Records 11, 22, 23, 47, 48, 49, 50 XVill Audits 11, 20, 21 9
170-45 Amend. 75 Jan. In81
-