ML20011F076
| ML20011F076 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 02/12/1990 |
| From: | Saporito T NUCLEAR ENERGY ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT |
| To: | NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP) |
| References | |
| CON-#190-9941 89-584-01-OLA, 89-584-1-OLA, OLA-4, NUDOCS 9003010035 | |
| Download: ML20011F076 (5) | |
Text
=
r e
dh.!h !.
I v
DOLKETED USNRC f
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 0 F00 22 N0:42 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL PANELr: 0f SECRETARY 00CKi:llHG e. $!iivlCE BRANCH In the Matter of
)
Docket Nos. 50-250-OLA-4
)
50-251-OLA-4 Florida Power & Light Co.
)
)
(Pressure / Temperature Limits)
(Turkey Point Nuclear Plant,
)~
Units 3 and 4)
)
ASLBP No. 89-584-01-OLA i
)
ADDENDUM TO APPEAL BRIEF COMES
- NOW, Appellants Thomas J.
- Saporito, Jr. and the i
Nuclear Energy Accountability
- Project, and hereby file this
" ADDENDUM TO APPEAL BRIEF" in the above-captioned proceeding, Appellants discovered, after a careful reading of 10 C.F.R. 2.762, that their Appeal Brief filed on February 5, 1990, was table of contents, with page references, and a table lacking a
4 of cases (alphabetically arranged), statutes, regulations, and other authorities
- cited, with references to the pages of the brief where they are cited.
WHEREFORE having discovered this oversight, Appellants would remedy this matter by filing this ADDENDUM TO APPEAL BRIEF.
BACKGROUND On February 5,
1990, Appellants filed their appeal brief pursuant to 10 C.F.R. 2.762 after taking receipt of a Memorandum and Order from the ASLB denying Appellants a Hearing and Leave to Intervene.
Appellants, not represented by counsel, filed a timely appeal brief in opposition to the aforementioned decision by the ASLB but failed to include in their appeal brief a table 9003010035 900212 PDR ADOCK 05000250 jh503 O
~
n-I-
4 e
i l
L of contents as required by 10 C.F.R. 2.762(d).
i TABLE OF CONTENTS l
I Page BACKGROUND..........................................
1 I.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE..........................
2 l
r II.
ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION 3
III. STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY.........................
4 IV.
APPELLANT'S APPEAL FROM THE JANUARY 16, 1990 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER...........................
4 V.
EXCEPTIONS TO THE FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE ASLB........................
5 r
- 1..
The ASLB failed to consider evidence supporting Intervention pursuant to 10 C.F.R. 2.714(a)(3)(d)....................
6 2.
The ASLB failed to properly consider and weigh the evidence germane to
" Good Cause"................................
7 3.
The ASLB failed to properly and fairly consider Appellant's evidence f
satisfying the third factor of 10 C.F.R. 2.714(a)(1), "The extent to which the petitioner's participation may reasonably be expected to assist in developing a sound record."
12 4.
The extent to which the petitioner's participation will broaden the issues or delay the proceeding..............
13 VI.
CONCLUSION..................................... 14 2-
i f
I TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS:
i Consumers Power Co. (Midland plant, Units 1 and 2),
9 LBP-82-63, 16 NRC 571, 577 (1982) i Houston Lighting and Power Co. (South Texas Project, Units 1 and 2), ALAB-549, 9 NRC 644, 646-47 (1979) 11 r
I' Houston Lighting and Power Co. (Allens Creek Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 1), ALAB-535, 9 NRC 377, 11 393-97 (1979)...................................
Mississippi Power & Light Co. (Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2), ALAB-704, 16 NRC 1725, 13 1730 (1982).....................................
Pennsylvanis Power and Light Co. (Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 & 2), ALAB-148, 6 AEC 642, 643 n.2 (1973); 23 NRC 165 (1986) 8 Portland General Electric Co. (Pebble Springs Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2), CLI-76-27, 7
4 NRC 610, 614-17 (1976)........................
Portland General Electric Co. (Pebble Springs Nuglear Plant, Units 1 and 2), CLI-76-27, 4 NRC 610, 11 613-614 (1976)..................................
Public Service Co. of Indiana (Marble Hill Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1 and 2), ALAB-522, 11 9 NRC 54, 56 (1979).............................
13 Shoreham, 18 NRC at 399..............................
Transnuclear, Inc. (Ten Applications for Low-Enriched Uranium Exports to EURATOM Member Nations),
CLI-77-24, 6 NRC 525 (1977), 25 NRC 116 (1987) 11 Three Mile Island, supra, 18 NRC at 333..............
7 13 23 NRC 165...........................................
3-
g
..=
l i
REGULATIONS:
Pane 10 C.F.R. 2.206......................................
9,10 10 C.F.R. 2.714(a)(1) 2,3,4,11 10 C.F.R. 2.714(a)(3)(d) 3,4,6 10 C.F.R. 2.762.......................................
2,5 10 C.F.R. 2.763......................................
1,4 10 C.F.R. 2.785......................................
5 10 C.F.R. 2.786 5
j 10 C.F.R. 50.7(e)(1) 7 42 U.S.C.
5851 8
Appellants request that the Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Panal accept this Addendum to Appeal into the record as.
Appellants have made this filing within the time requirements pursuant to 10 C.F.R. 2.762 for filing an appeal.
Additionally, Appellants request that the ASLAP consider granting Appellants discretionary intervention based on Appellant' a participation _which would reasonably be expected to assist in developing a sound record.
Respectfully submitted, e
,4 Thomas J.
Saporito, Jr.
/
.i, Executive Director, NEAP f
1 Nuclear Energy Accountability ~
L Project
/
p 1202 Sioux Street
.d Jupiter, Florida 33453
('
(407) 743-0770 Dated this 12 day of February, 1990 at Jupiter, Florida.
cc: See Service Sheet 1
0
i i
i contico U5NhC UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i
% FEB 22 A10:42 ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL PANEL f
(#!CE OF SECRETARY I
~ 00CKE itNG A $[HylCJ' l
In the Matter of
)
Docket Nos. 50-250-OLAtAANCH l
)
50-251-OLA-4 Florida Power & Light Co.
)
)
(Pressure / Temperature Limits)
(Turkey Point Nuclear Plant, )
Units 3 and 4)
)-
ASLBP No. 89-584-01-OLA
)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I
hereby certify that copies of the foregoing APPELLANT'S APPEAL FROM THE JANUARY 16, 1990 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Denying Petition to Intervene),
have been served upon the following persons by U.S. mail, first class.
Administrative Judge Administrative Judge Christine N. Kohl, Chairman Thomas S. Moore Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Atomic Safety and Board Licensing Appeal Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Reg. Comm.
Washington, D.C. 20555 Washington, D.C.
20555 t
Administrative Judge Administrative Judge Howard A. Wilber B.
Paul Cotter, Jr.
Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Chairman, Atomic Safety Board and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Reg. Comm.
Washington, D.C.
20555 Washington, D.C.
20555 Administrative Judge Administrative Judge Glenn O. Bright Jerry Harbour Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Atomic Safety and U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Licensing Board Washington, D.C. 20555 U.S. Nuclear Reg. Comm.
Washington, D.C.
20555 Jarice E. Moore, Esquire Office of the General Counsel Joette Lorion, Director U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Center /Ruclear Resp.
h Washington, D.C. 20555 7210 Rod Road, #217 Miami, Florida 33143 Harold F. Reis. Esquire Attorney for FPL Newman & Holtzinger, P.C.
1615 L Street, N.W.,
Suite 1000 Washington, D.C.
20036 By:
Dated:
Febuary 12, 1990 j
J