ML20011A794

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Addl Info Re Reliability of Auxiliary Feedwater Sys,Supplementing 810918 Response to FSAR Question 010.53
ML20011A794
Person / Time
Site: Byron, Braidwood  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 10/27/1981
From: Tramm T
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To: Harold Denton
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
RTR-NUREG-0611, RTR-NUREG-611 NUDOCS 8111030222
Download: ML20011A794 (6)


Text

/

Commonwealth Edison s

/

) ona First National Pitza Chicigo, libnois I,

7 Address Reply to: Pos' Off ce Box 767

\\s

,/ Chicago Illinois 60690 October 27, 1981 Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director thf <

Of fice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

~

  1. 9, s g

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comraission d[

/l C

Washington, DC 20555 UL j

}

  • Noyog 7gg $l\\

I Suoject:

Byron Station Units 1 and 2

      • ge %,,

Braidwood Station Units 1 and 2 Y

[

Responses to FSAR Questions e.

3l h. M NRC Docket Nos. 50-454, 50-455,

' /

50-456 and 50-457 Reference (a):

September 18, 1981, letter from T. R.

Tramm to H.

R. Denton.

Dear Mr. Denton:

Tnis is to provide additional information regarding the reliability of the Byron /Braidwood auxiliary feedwater system.

It supplements the response to FSAR questions 010.53 provided in reference (a).

Attachment A to this letter presents revised reliability estimates for the Byron /Braidwood auxiliary feedwater system.

These revised estimates incorporate the data and methodology of NUREG-0611 to conform with the requirements of SRP Section 10.4.9, Rev. 2 (July 1981).

One (1) signed original and fif ty-nine (59) copies of this letter and the attachment are provided for your use.

Please address further quesions regarding this matter to this of fice.

Very truly yours, Yb p

T. R.

Tramm Nuclear Licensing Administrator I

QoO cc:

Ioannis Papazoglou, Brookhaven Nat'l Lab.

5 1m

/ [

2766N 9111030222 011027 PDR ADOCK 05000454 A

PDR

ATTACHMENT A Recalculation of Byron /Braidwood Auxiliary Feedwater System Using Methods and Data in NUREG-0611 and NUREG-0635 Summary of Results Assuming statistical independent estimates, the unreliability for the Byron /Braidwood (B/B) auxiliary feedwater system ( AFWS) was calculated using methods and data presented in NUREG-0611 and NUREG-0635.

The results are as follows:

Unreliability per Demand Initiating Reliability Block Fault Tree Event Diagram (RBD)

(STADIC-II Code)

LMFW(I) 3.4E-6 3.0E-6 LOOP (2) 9.0E-5 8.9E-5 LOAC(3 1.lE-2 1.2E-2 The acceptable range per NUREG-0800 (Rev. 2 - July 1981), Section 10.4.9 is 10-4 to 10-5 per demand.

The LMFW and LOOP initiating events are cithin these acceptable limits.

Discussion NUREG-0800, Rev. 2 - July 1981, Section 10.4.9 states "an acceptable AFWS should have an unreliability in the range of 10-4 to 10-5 per demand based on an analysis using methods and data presented in NUREG-0611 and NUREG-0635."

The key words are " data presented in NUREG-0611 and.

NUREG-0635."

This places definite bounds to the analysis.

The Byron Units 1 and 2, Auxiliary Feedwater System Reliability Analysis Report, GA-C16444, (henceforth ref erred to as "the report") was perf ormed before NUREG-0800 was issued.

The unreliabilities estimated in the report are based on the following assumptions, which are over and above the NUREG-0800 ground-rules:

1.

Automatic start, only, because of the NRC " hands-off" policy for the first 30 minutes.

2.

addition of a. motor breaker or motor starter for each motor cperated component.

(1)LMFW - Loss of main feedwater

.(2) LOOP - Loss of off site power (3)LOAC - Loss of AC power

c-1 E

i Recalculation'of B/B AFWS Page 2 3.

A f ailure to start on demand of the diesel driven AFW pump of 1 X 10-2 (including local controls).

4.

Addition of the diesel / generator failure to start on demand (3 X 10-2 for the LOOP-initiating event.

Table 2.1. (Page 2-4) and Table 4.3 (Page 4-14) in the report reflect the above assumption.

The bottom set of values.on Table 4.3-are based on-the assumption of automatic start with manual backup.

Elimination of the added assumptions 1 through 4 above, which are over and above those of NUREG-0611 and NUREG-0635, and recalculation of the unreliability or unavailability have resulted in the values shown on Table l~and Table 2.

Figure 1 presents the uncertainty curve for the t-three initiating events.

1 i

0 h

I l

t 4

0829b

~...

.. ~..

Table 1 0611 Data Ctatistical Independent Estimate (from RBD*)

Unavailability (I) of. AFS to start & provide AFW to > 2 SG's per. emand Frequency j

per year Initiating Event Hardware.

Test Maint.

Human Error I per demand I per year.

3

'MFW l.0E-6 1.8E-9 2.4E-6 2.8 E-10 3.4E-6 1.0E-5

.02 LOOP 2.8E-5 5.0E-8

6. 2 E-5 2.4E-9 9.0E-5 1.8E-6 5X10 '

LOAC

.5.5E-3 1.0E-8 5.8 E-3

2. 9E-7 1.lE-2 5.5E -

II.7E-5 7

4

  • RBD - Reliability Block Diagram & Manual'. Calculation

/

}

4 y

4 u

i I

Table 2 0611 Data (Media Values)(from Fault Tree *)

3 Independent Random Failures Init. Event Event Freq./Yr A per demand A per year

-l

-6

-6 A

LMFW 3

3.0x10 9.5x10

-5

-6 LOOP

.02 8.9x10 1.5x10

-2

-6 LOAC 5x10 1.2x10 5.7x10 With Common Cause Failures Init. Event Event Freq./Yr I per demand A per year

-5

-5 LMFW 3

1.7x10 5.1x10

-6 LOOP

.02 4.3x10 7.5x10

-2

-6 LOAC 5x10 1.2x10 5.8h t 'l 4

i

  • "STADIC - II" Code (Ref. 11 in Report)

~

'\\

l

BYRON /BRAIDUOOD AFS c

o 1.0 s.

1 n

P I

LMFW L

4 I

i 4

M 0.8-j LOOP 4

e N

I LOAC i.

T A

I R

t y 0. 6 -

'g I

-c

~

(A, -

I.

U n

g

0. 4 -

s I

D

'g I

I, S

g T

j R 0. 2 --

\\

I B

\\

n U

\\.

T i )iiim I 0.0

-8, i i i ii,,, 7, isiim) 6i i iiiml 5i iiiim) 4i i s iiiail-i i i iimj'2

-1

-3 N

10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 UNAVAILABILITY PER DEMAND Pigure 1

.