ML20010E672
| ML20010E672 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 08/31/1981 |
| From: | Colbert W DETROIT EDISON CO. |
| To: | Kintner L Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| RTR-NUREG-0654, RTR-NUREG-654 EF2-54-538, NUDOCS 8109080130 | |
| Download: ML20010E672 (56) | |
Text
-
Detroit Edison BSE!!*
August 31, 1981 EF2 - 54,538 Mr. L. L. Kintner S
Division of Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 21 tv D
b U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission k)
S Washington, D. C. 20555
+
J
' kglY@
Dear Mr. Kintner:
References:
NRC Review Comments on Fermi 2 Emergency Plan, March 1981, dated July 6, 1981
Subject:
Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant, Unit 2 NRC Docket No. 50-341 Radiological Emergency Eesponse Plan Enclosed are the responses to the set of comments referenced above and a description of the meteorological instrumentation.
Detroit Edison presently has a consultant preparing RERP procedures, developing the scenario for the full-scale exercise in February, and developing and conducting the training program.
During this process, various areas in the RERP are being identified as requiring major revi-sions.
The program is not sufficiently developed at this time to provide adequate responses to the comments or revised pages in the plan.
In many cases the detail requested to be placed in the RERP is logically and fun-damentally-a part of the procedures.
Bo}7
/h0 8109080130 810831 WDR ADOCK 05000341 F
PDR V
Mr. L. L. Kintner August 31, 1981 EF2 - 54,538 Page 2 Our present schedule indicates that a revised RERP will be available December 15, 1981.
This is consistent with the peccedures being developed and the completion of the local jurisdictions' plans within the 10-mile EPZ.
Sincerely, W. F. Colbert Technical Director Fermi 2 Project WFC:jl Enclosure cc:
Mr. B. Little Mr. P. Psomas
Mr. L. L. Kintner August 31, 1981 EF2 - 54,538 Page 3 bec:
(w/o attachments)
T. A. Alessi E. L. Alexanderson H. O. Arora W. J. Fahrner F.
E. Gregor E.
P. Griffing A. Heidrich W.
R. Holland J. W. Honkala W.
H. Jens R. S. Lenart E. Lusis J. W. Nunley H.
Tauber R.
A. Vance H. A. Walker A. E. Wegele C. M. Johnson (GE-San Jose) bec:
(w/attachmerts)
E. F. Madsen P. A. Marquardt (3)
L.
E. Schuerman J. M. Wisniewski l
Document Control File (RERP)
J. E. Slider (NUS-Rockville) l l
l t
I I
e
NRC REVIEW COMMENTS 4
FERMI 2 RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN' A.
ASSIGNMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY (ORGANIZATIONAL' CONTROL)
A.1.C Provide a block diagram illustrating the interrelationships of State, local, Federal and private sector organizations with the Fermi Huclear Power Facility.
4 A.1.d.
Identify a specific individual by title that is in charge of the emergency responce for each organization.
A.1.e.
Describe the provisions for 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> per day emergency response manning of~ communications for offsite organizations.
A.3 Provide written letters of agreement for each offsite support organization.
These i
letters of agreement should include ccncepts of operation, specific support commitments, authorities, responsibilities, and limits.on actions of each, cc7 tractor, private organi-zation, and local ervice support group.
A.4 Provide evidence that each principal'organi-3 zation is capable of continuous (24-hour) operation for a protracted period.
i O
4
l i
upC REVIEW COMMENTS FERMI 2 RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN i
RESPONSE
A.
ASSIGNMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY (ORGANIZATIONAL CONTROL)
Items A.1.c.,
A.1.d.,
A.1.e., A.4 The planning efforts of State and local jurisdic-tions is not complete at this time.
The Emergency Services Division of the Michigan State Police is responsible under Michigan Public Act 390 (1976) for emergency planning at the State and local level.
It is anticipated that the final draft of the plans for Monroe County and the jurisdictions in Wayne County within the 10-mile EPZ will be completed in November 1981.
At that time Section A to the Fermi 2 Radiological Emergency Response Plan (RERP) will be completed.
Item A.3 L
The letters of agreement with the suppert organiza-tions_are being established.
When the Fermi 2 RERP is revised, those available at that time will be included.
t l
l i
t i
I r
s m
mw g
e,
,s---g-m.
+pe,-p ey-e.,,e.a e
e----
,p-e y,
m--
g-
,ce,.,
e,-
v r<~n,.
NRC REVIEW COMMENTS FERMI 2 RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN I
B.
ONSITE EMERGENCY ORGANIZATION B.2 Verify that the Emergency Coordinator has the authority to unilaterally initiate any emergency actions.
B.3 Describe the line of succession and identify the specific conditions for higher level officials assuming the function of Emergency Coordinator.
B.4 Clearly define the responsibilities of the Emergency Coordinator that may not be dele-I
- gated, i.e.,
the decision to notify and.to recommend protective actions to authorities responsible for offsite emergency measures.
B.5 Specify how minimum staffing requirements, as per Table B-1 of the criteria, will be established. A total augmentation plan should also be established showing the 30 and 60 minute augmentation schedule.
Augmentation plans should also address pro-4 visions for inclement weather.
B.6 Specify the interfaces between onsite func-tional areas of emergency activity, licensee headquarters, support, local services sup-port, and State and local government response organisation.
Clearly illustrate these interfaces with a block diagr am.
B.7 Identify the corporate management and admi-nistrative and technical support personnel that wil augment the plant staff.
B.9 Identify the services to be provided by local agencies.
Submit copies of the arrangements and agreements reached.
These agreements should-delineate the authorities, responsibilities and limits cn the actions of the contractor, private organization and local services support groups.
NRC REVIEW COMMENTS FERMI 2 RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN
RESPONSE
B.
Onsite Emergency Organization Item B.2 The authority of the Emergency Director will be delineated in the revised Fermi 2 RERP.
Item B.3 At the present time there are no plans for company personnel in a position above that 'f Plant o
Superintendent to assune the position of Emergency Director.
The individuals listed in Table B.2 of the RERP define the levels of succession.
Item B.4 As the Fermi 2 RERP is revised, the authorities of the Emergency Director that may not be delegated will be clearly defined.
Item B.5 Augmentation of personnel will be based on the classification of the emergency and the activation of the various Emergency Response Facilities (ERF) as determined at the time of the emergency.
Item B.5 Emergency personnel required for the ERF's will be-put on alert should the emergency progress.
A sur-vey of the personnel presently involved in the t
emergency organization indicates _that an augmen-tation schedule of 90 to 120 minutes is practical (under normal conditions) once the decision has been made to activate a specific ERF.
Many of the ini lating conditions for an unusual event do not warrant augmentation by function according to Table B-1.
It is Edison's intention to augment based on the need at the time of the emergency.
l
Item B.6 When completed, Section A will adequately respond to this item without the necessity of repetitive information.
Item B.7 Support personnel that will be required to augment the plant staff will be outlined in the supporting procedures for the plan.
Item B.9 Letters of agreement will be introduced in Section A.
NRC REVIEW COMMENTS 4'
FERMI 2 RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN C.
EMERGENCY RESPONSE SUPPORT AND RESOURCES C.1.a Identify specific persons authorized to request Federal assistance.
C.1.b.
Submit provisions for incorporating the Federal response capability into Emergency operations (i.e., Departuent of Energy).
The Plan should specify the Federal resour-ces expected for accident categories in
~ Appendix 1 of the criteria, including expected times of arrival at the site.
Specific licensee resources as needed to support the Federal response should be listed in the Plan, e.g.,
command posts, telephone lines, radio frequencies and telecommmunications centers.
4 C.2.b Specify the provisions for dispatching a representative to principal offsite govern-ment Emergency Operations Centers (EOC).
C.3 Identify available radiological laboratories and their capabilities and the response times that can be expected in an emergency _
(i.e., vendors, universities, private laboratories, etc.).
C.4 Provide a copy of the mutual aid agreement with other nuclear facilities.
i I
i
NRC REVIEW COMMENTS FERMI 2 RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN I
RESPONSE
C.
EMERGENCY RESPONSE SUPPORT AND RESOURCES Item C.1.a.
In section C.1 (p. C-1 the Emergency Director is clearly delineated as having the responsibility to request Federal assistance.
Items C.1.b. and C.1.c.
Limited Federal Assistance will be requested by the Fermi 2 Emergency Director as indicated in the letter of agreement with the DOE.
Activation of the Federal Radiological Response Plan (FRRP) falls within the province of the State.
Any l
resources required to support the FRRP would also be within the responsibility of the State.
I Item C.2.b.
Representatives will be dispatched to principal off-site EOCs as requestad by the offsite response organization.
Item C.3 Available radiological laboratories and their capa-l bilties will be specified in letters of agreement ar l
they are completed.
Item C.4.
l The mutual aid agreement will be included as a letter of agreement when it is signed by all parties.
l i
NRC REVIE ' COMMENTS FERMI 2 RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN D.
EMERGENCY CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM D.1.
Provide comprehensive parameter values and/or equipment status for all emergency action levels and initiating conditions for each emergency classification.
The information provided in Tables D1-D4 does not provide sufficient detail for evaluation.
D.3 Demonstrate that State and local organiza-tions have procedures providing for emergency actions consistent with those recommended by the FERMI nuclear facility.
NRC REVIEW COMMENTS FERMI 2 RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN
RESPONSE
i D.
EMERGENCY CLASSIFICATION SCHEME f-Tables D.' through'D.4 will be' reviewed, and where appropriate additional details will be provided.
Detailed values will be provided in the implementing procedures.
Item D.3 The responsibility for State and 1 al organizations to have procedures for emergency action levels con-sistent with those recomended in NUREG-0654/ FEMA-REP-1 lies with FEMA, the organization that reviews the t-o#faite plans.
i W
~,-y_.
-t--+--vm.e-,-
--w.
+9-v-v T Vw
- w-
-tv r v
s
- f"*
"T'Y"
"'"*V**e
NRC REVIEW COMMENTS FERMI 2 RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN E.
NOTIFICATION METHODS AND PROCEDURES E.1.
Des <cibe the procedures for message authen-tication and verification.
E.2.
Describe the provisions for followup messa-ges fecm the facility to offsite authorities.
E.6 Commit that a prompt Alerting and Notification System meeting the design objectives of NUREG-0654, Rev.
1, Arpendix 3 will be developed and in place.
The Plan should address the administrative and physi-cal means, and the'tice required to promptly notify the public of an emergency.
The Plan should commit-to the establishment of such a system and indicate when the system will be operational.
E.7 Provide for written messages. intended for the public. consistent with the licensee's classification scheme. Messages to the public giving instructions regarding speci-fic protective actions to be taken by occu-pants of affected areas should be included in the Plan.
R v
s a
NRC REVIEW COMMENTS FERMI 2 RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN 2
RESPONSE-E.
NOTIFICATION METHODS AND PROCEDURES Item E.1 and E.2 The procedures for message authentication, verifica-tion and follow-up have not been completed.
Item E.5 A study has been conducted to determine the methods for prompt notification around the Fermi 2 plant.
Emergency preparedness planning for'the jurisdic-tions within Monroe and Wayne Counties has been ini-tiated through the Emergency Services Division of
~
the Michigan State Police.
At the appropriate time, discussions on the prompt notification system will be initiated through the State Prlica ;1th these jurisdictions-within'the 10-milt EPC.
A schedule has not been established for ttis contact.
It is anticipated, however, that the g stem will be opera-tional prior to issuance of a license for power operation.
Item E.7 Written messages intended for the public with respect to the classification scheme and protective actions are the responsibility of State and local authorities, not the-licensee and as such will not be included in the plan.
Messages of this nature should be developed on a case-by-case basis since they-are highly dependent-on the emergency conditions.
Canned" messages are-of no value.
s
,__x---__a--
.~.
i NRC REVIEW COMMENTS FERMI 2 RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN 1
F.
EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS The provision for communciations as described in the Plan is insufficient to meet the objectives of the e
criteria.
The Plan should include information to a
describe:
F.1.
.1 )
Altenates for both ends of the com-munications link.
F.1.a.
2)
How State, local and other support groups will be notified 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> per day (e.g.,
town sheriff, volunteer fire fighters, local EOC volunteers).
F.2.
3)
The communications link between the facility and mobile medical support groups.
4 4
1 i
f b
NRC REVIEW COMMENTS FERMI 2 RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN
RESPONSE
F.
Emergency Commur.ications Item F.1 Alternates for the communications link are deli-neated in the RERP procedures.
Item F.1a Means of notification oi various response groups are delineated in the RERP procedures.
Item F.2 Once a person is in the ambulance and is being transported to the hospital, the communications link is between the vehicle and the hospital with which the Licensee has an agreement.
l l
l 1
I I
l l
f NRC REVIEW COMMEN-fS FERMI 2 RADIOLOGICAL EMERGFUCY RESPONSE PLAN G.
PUBLIC EDUCATION AND INFORMATION G.1.
The Public Information Program described in the Plan does not clearly define what sector of the public will receive periodic infor-mation regarding how they will be notified, what their actior.s should be in an emergency emergency, the agreed upon meant of eva-cuation verification, the location of relo-cation centere and the use of radio-protective drugs.
Further, information on provisions for the specific needs of the handicapped should be included.
Provide this information.
G.2.
Provide actual samples of the Public Information Frogram that will be distributed to the public, for review and evaluation.
G.4.c.
Describe the means and methods used by each organization for rumor control.
NRC REVIEW COMMENTS FERMI 2 HADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN
RESPONSE
G.
Public Education and Information Item G.1 Section G.1 of the Fermi 2 RERP describes the methods that will be used and the segments of the public that will receive the information.
Many of the details requested will be included in procedures and not the RERP.
Icem G.2 There is no requirement that the Licensee provide samples of the Public Information Program for review and evaluation.
Item C.4.c The means and methods for rumor control will be included in procedures.
l I
l l
~
I NRC REVIEW COMMENTS i
FERMI 2 RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN H.
EMERGENCY FACILITIES AND EQUIPMcNT 1'
l' e
Identify all acronyms used to describe plant systems.
i e
Verify that "as built" diagrams of the facility will be available for the per-sonnel in the EOF and TSC.
i e
Identify Laboratory facilities, their capabilities, and the expected backup response they may provide during an emergency.
H.1.
Specify the types of equipment available in i
the TSC, and EOF, identified in NUREG-0696, including the types and locations of com-
]
munications equipment.
This information should be detailed on a scaled drawing.
i H.2.
Specify the road distance and travel time i
between the control room for both the interim and permanent nearsite EOF.
1 H.5.a.
Provide a detailed description of the pro-cess moritors.
The description provided in l
Table H.8 does not give sufficient detail i
for evaluation.
H.5.
Provide a description of the meteorological instrumentation and procedures as identified in Appendix 2 of NUREG-0654, Rev. 1 and the provisions to obtain representative real-H.6.
time meteorological information from other,
sources.
H.9 Specify how personnel onsite during the emergency will have adequate protective equipment available to them, i.e.,
protec-tive respiratory (evices.
H.10.
Identify tha provisions for inspection, inventory, quarterly operational checks and calibration of both fixed and portable instruments and equipment (protective ~
i equipment, communication equipment, radiolo-t gical monitoring equipment and emergency supplies).
1 s
6
. -..l m
l-
NRC REVIEW COMMENTS FERMI 2 RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN
RESPONSE
H.
Emergency Facilities and Equipment o A list of abbreviations and acroynms is included in the RERP on the page before Appendix I.
This will be expanded as new mater 4a1 becomes necessary.
o Details such as the availability of "as built" drawings will appear in procedures Por the facilites.
o Laboratories are identified in Sections A and C.
Item H.1 The level of detail requested for the emergency response facilities is not available at this time.
Additional information will be provided after it becomes available.
Detroit Edison, however, is convinced that it is innaproporiate to include this information in the RERP.
Item H.2 The road distance and travel time between the control room and the EOF is not relevent to the RERP.
The EOF is located within owner controlled property and travel is over owner controlled roadways.
Item H.5.a The process control monitors are evaluated in the FSAR review process and the information provided in Table H.8 issufficient for the purposes of the RERP.
Item H.S and H.6 Meteorological instrumentation is described in Appenoix 1 to these responses.
Item H.9 Location and quantities of protective equipment are being developed and will be included in the RERP procedures.
Item H.10 The information requested in Item H.10 will be pro-vided in RERP procedures.
NRC REVIEW COMMENTS FERMI 2 RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN t
I.
ACCIDENT ASSESSMENTS I.3 Include a plot or graph indicating the rela-tionship between the containment radiation I.4.
monitor (s) reading (s) and radioactive material available for release from containment.
I.3.b.
Clearly establish methods and techniques used to determine the magnitude of a release of radioactive materials based on plant effluent monitors.
In addition, establish the relationship between effluent monitor i
readings and onsite and offiste exposures and contamination for various meteorological i
conditions.
I.6.
Describe the methodology to be used for j
determining release rates and projected j
doses if the instrumentation used for i
assessment were to go offscale or become inoperable.
I.7 Describe the capability and resources for-field monitoring within the plume exposure Emergency Planning Zone.
Methods, equip-ment, and expertise to make rapid assessments of the actual or potential magnitude and locations of any radiological hazards through the liquid or gaseous path-ways should be described.
The description should address activation criteria, means of l
notification, field team composition, transportation, communication, monitoring l
equipment, and estimated deployment times.
I.9 Describe the means for relating measured field contamination levels to dose rates for key isotopes and gross radioactivity 4
measurements.
Also describe the provisions for comparison with Protective Action Guides.
4 I.10.
Describe the,inplace arrangements for loca-tion and tracking of the airborne radioac-tive plume.
4 i
m-.
NRC REVIEW COMMENTS FERMI 2 RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN
RESPONSE
I.
Accident Assessment Items I.3, I.3.c, I.4, I.6 and I.9 The methodology for accident assessment is being developed Item I.7 The details requested in this item are under deve-lopment and will be contained in the RERP procedures.
Item I.10 The inplace arrangements for location and tracking the airborne radioactive plume will be a part of the RERP procedures for the Radiological Emergency Teams that operate in the field.
l t
l i
i i
l l
l
\\
l l
NRC REVIEW COMMENTS FERMI 2 RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN J.
PROTECTIVE RESPONSE o Table J.9 is missing from the Plan.
J.2.
Explain the basis for the adverse weather evacuation time estimates, the selection of alternative routes.and the methods of eva-cuation that will be used during inclement weather.
J.4.
Describe the provisions for. evacuation of non-essential onsite personnel, including evacuation routes, transportation and.decon-tamination capabilities.
On a diagram, show the location of decontamination facilities.
J.6.
Describe the use of radioprotective drugs by onsite personnel.
Specify who decides when they are used, by whom, and what dosage is.
Specify the amount available onsite.
J.7 Describe the recommendations for protective measures or caluculated doage rates.
Recommendaticas should be keyed to the emergency classifications and Action Levels i
described in Appendix 1 of the criteria.
Verify that as a minimum, the protective i
actions listed in Tables J.2 and J.4 will be recommended.
J.10.
Discuss the provisions for protecting the health and safety of mobility-impaired persons.
J.10.e. Describe the provisions for individual respiratory protection, protective clothing l
and the use of radioprctective drugs by onsite emergency workers.
J.10.f. Discuss provisions by State and local orga-nizations for administering radioprotective t
drugs to the general.public.
J.11.a. Submit a map showing evacuation routes.to be used by onsite and offsite personnel, which identifies relocation centers, medical faci-lities shelter. areas.
I i
2
= _ - -.
s NRC REVIEW COMMENTS
, FERMI 2 RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN i
RESPONSE
J.
Protective Response Item J.2 and J.4
)
The details of site evacuation will be included in the RERP procedures.
The location of decon-l tamination facilities has not been determined.
i 1
}
Item J.6 A position concerning the use of radioprotective
,l drugs has not been established.
Item J.7 The recommendations for protective measures that
}
will be provided to the appropriate State and local authorities are being developed as part of Section I.
j t
i l
Item J.10 Protection.of the health and safety of mobility l
impared persons outside the owner controlled pro-perty is the responsibiltiy of the State and local l
authorities and should be addressed in their plan l
procedures.
Item J.10f i
Provisions by State and local organizations for l
administering radioprotective drugs should be l
addressed in their plan procedures and are not a l-part of the Fermi 2 RERP.
Item J.11.a (Should be J.10.a) l This item is under discussion with the local govern-mental authorities through_the State Police planners.
f l
NRC REVIEW COMMENTS FERMI 2 RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN K.
RADIOLOGICAL EXPOSURE CONTROL K.2.
Specify who, besides the Emergency Director, can authorize excess exposure to personnel.
K.2.
Submit information regarding the personnel training program that will allow volunteers to make rapid decisions based upon knowlege of potential risks.
K.3.b.
Specify the methods used to ensure that dosimeters are read at appropriate frecuen-cies (specify these frequencies) and the methods used to provide for maintaining records.
K.5.a.
Specify action levels for determining the need for decontamination.
K.5.b.
Specify the means for radiological decon-tamination of emergency personnel.
K.7 Identify the locations and specify the capa-bility for decontaminating relocated onsite personnel, and providing extra clothing.
NRC REVIEW COMMENTS FERMI 2 RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN K.
Radiological Exposure Control Item K.2 e The responsibility of the Emergency Director to authorize excess personnel exposure cannot be delegated.
e The onsite radiation protection program is pre-sently under development.
Item K.3.b Methods and frequencies for dosimeter reading are specified in the RERP procedures and do not have to be detailed in the plan.
Item K.5.a, K.5.b, and K.7 Section K of the Fermi 2 RERP addresses the criteria for satisfying the noted items.
Any further details will be in RERP procedures.
NRC REVIEW COMMENTS FERMI 2 RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN L.
MEDICAL SUPPORT L.1.
Provide Letters of Agreement with appropriate hospitals (these appear to be the Seaway and University Hospitals in the current plan).
These agreement lettera should specify what services will be pro-vided by the hospital and what limits of actions will be.
L.2.
Specify what first aid treatment facilities are available onsite.
This should be accomplished by both a narrative description of the facility and a diagram showing the first aid area's relationship to the rest of the site.
L.3 Provide a Letter of Agreement with an ambu-lance service (EMTS Ambulance Service in the plan).
Specify whether a Health Physics Technician from the site will accompany the contaminated injured person (s).
Specify what type of communications will be available between the ambulance, the site and the hospital.
NRC REVIEW COMMENTS FERMI 2 RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN
RESPONSE
L.
Medical Support Item L.1 All letters of agreement when completed will be con-tained in an Appendix to the plan.
Item L.2 The first aid facilities that will be available when the plant becomes operational are being designed.
A facility presently exists in conjunction with the construction acitivity.
Item L.3 e An individual trained in body health physics moni-toring techniques will accompany the radiologi-cally contaminated person.
e Once the contaminated person is in the ambulance and being transported to the bospital, all com-munications will center at the hospital.
NRC REVIEW COMMENTS FERMI 2 RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN M.
RECOVERY AND REENTRY PLANNING AND POSTACCIDENT OPERATIONS M.1.
Describe the means by which decisions are reached to relay both onsite and offsite protective measures during the recovery period following an emergency.
M.2.
The Plan lints the positions of the indivi-duals that fill key positions but not the authority and responsibility of each.
Specify by position / title the authority and responsibilities and who will fill key posi-tions in the faiclity recovery organization.
M.3 Describe the means for informing members of the response organisations that a reco-very operation is to be initiated, and iden-tify those changes in the organizational structure that may occur.
M.4 Describe the method (s) established for periodically estimating the total population exposure.
NRC REVIEW COMMENTS FERMI 2 RAD 1OLOGICAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN
RESPONSE
M.
Recovery and Reentry Planning and Postaccident Operations Item M.1 Each emergency situation is different and the Recovery Plan should be sufficiently flexible that the organization can define criteria and methodology at the time of the recovery operation.
Item M.2 The Recovery Organization is in the process of being revised.
The specifics requested are not available.
Item M.3 The method for informing the response organizations that the recovery phase has been initiated will be contained in the general procedures for recovery.
Item M.4 The method for estimating population exposure is being developed with the accident assessment program.
1 I
NRC REVIEW COMMENTS FERMI 2 RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN N.
EXERCISES AND DRILLS N.2.a.
The communications drill frequency should be changed from annually to quarterly to con-form to the criteria in NUREG-0654, Rev.
1.
N.2.b.
Verify that f!"e drills will be conducted quarterly.
N.3 Verify that exercise and drill scenarios will be designed to allow free play for decision making.
N.3.a.
Verify that advance materials will be rro-vided to official observers.
l l
NRC REVIEW COMMENTS FERMI 2 RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN
RESPONSE
N.
Exercises and Drills Item N.2a The Michigan Emergency Preparedness Plan provides for communications with the state in the ingestion pathway.
The Licensee is not respetsible for directly contacting the state (Ohio) in the ingestion pathway.
Item N.2b As stated in NUREG-0654, Rev.
1, fire drills will be conducted in accordance with the plant technical specifications.
Item.N.3 Consideration will be given in the design of the scanarios to allow free play and opportunity for decision making.
Item N.3a RERP procedures will designate who will be provided with advance materials and the type of materials that will be received.
NRC REVIEW COMMENTS FERMI 2 RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN 0.
RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE TRAINING 0.1.
Additional information is required con-cerning the training program for personnel who will implement the radiological emergency response plan.
The description should include the specialized training and periodic retraining programs (include scope, nature and frequency) for each of the nine categories of personnel listed in Section II.O.4. of NUREG-0654, Rev.
1.
0.2.
Identify where the formal training program includes training to determine individual qualifications, and specify the minimum level of competence established for each 03 postion assigned an emergency response role.
Training and retraining programs, qualifica-tions testing and competence for State and local officials should also be included.
03 The Plan should be modified to specify that first aid personnel will be retrained and tested annually and personnel holding multi-media certifications should be recertified every two years.
e
_ _. _ - _ _ -. ~
f I
l i
NRC REVIEW COMMENTS i
FERMI ? RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN 4
4
RESPONSE
O.
Radiological Emergency Response Training h
Items 0.1, 0.2, and 0 3 i
A training program for personnel who.wil plan and/or implement Radiological emergency response plans has i
been established.
As appropriate, the program i
includes practical drills as well as formal instruc-tion.
Initial training is reinforced by annual retraining.
The radiological emergency response training for members of the onsite emergency organization will consist of formal instruction with. practical drills i
and exercises in which individuals demonstrate their ability to perform their assigned emergency func-L tions.
The directors and coordinators of the plant emergency organization are given an overview of the composite,of the various emergency response organi-zations, offsite as well as onsite, and their con-cept of operation.
They are also provided with an explanation and practical application of (by drills, i
exercises, etc.) the function and the relationship i
of each of the coordinate elements of this com-r posite.
They are provided adequate information on i
the initiating conditions and the emergency response actions for various emergency situations.
Special emphasis will be given.on notification procedures i
and communication links.
The supervision of special teams and the acquiring of proficiencies in the determination of offsite radiological doses will also be a part of the curriculum.
Personnel responsible for accident asessment, including control room shift peiaonnel and STAS, are given an overview of the total onsite emergency response organization and are provided with an explanation and application of-the function and relationship of each coordinate element.
2 j
1
.t
'tw a
y er"--
e--g.w vv g s- +-r-r
,-y==g-pr---,
,e,
-,g=pv,-.a.-m*we..w., -,
i-y-m---
er =e w e-v
- seg y +wr m rg-r -e-v
.my--py-m-
e-$wy r e w ---
-- w +,v e ce y
- geo w sm,, e rwy u w - =-
l They are provided adequate information.on initiating conditions (equipment stetus, instrument readings or parameter values) for recognizing the various emergency conditions, and the preplanned response actions for such situations.
The STAS receive spe-cialized training in transient and accident response; they are trained to recognize and diagnose a wide range of unusual conditions and accident i
situations including multiple equipment failures and human errors, complex transient responses and inade-quate core cooling.
Training for the radiological emergency teams inclu-des the operation of portable radiation survey instruments and air samp?ing equipment, air sampling techniques, contamination surveys, air activity, radiation field determinations, and dose assessment.
Quarterly drills are conducted for the fire brigade to maintain a high aroficiency in fire fighting.
Radiation safety, scourity and special hazards asso-ciated with a nuclear power plant are a part of their training.
Security Department personnel are given instructions on the emergency procedures applicable to the l
Security Department.
They are also provided a con-cept of the expected response of the major onsite and offsite response organizations.
Repair and damage control functions are handled by the maintenance personnel through their normal pro-cedures.
Tneue personnel are trained in the imple-mentaton of these procedures.
First aid training is provided to the rescue teams and to many others.
The intial training will j
qualify tLe participants for an American Red Cross First Aid certificate.
Additional annual training will be provided for the emergency treatment of con-taminated injuries and in the use of emergency rescue equipment.
Personnel holding multi-media certification will be recertified every three years.
i The emergency medical assistance program provides for the annual training of plant, ambulance and hospital personnel who may be involved directly or i
indirectly in the execution of the program. This training is oriented toward the transporting, handling and treatment of contaminated injuries.
Company physicians ~are sent to a seminar on the medical treatment for radiation injuries.
Select individuals from the licensee's headquarters are trained in radiation protection and in certain emergency procecdures to provide for the augmen-tation of the onsite emergency organization should additional trained manpower be required during an emergency.
They are also provided an overview of the various response organizations and their concept of operation. This training is provided in part by the annual exercise described in Section N.
Personnel responsible for transmis71on of emergency information and instructio.'s are instructed on net discipline, language usage and their operating pro-cedures.
Item 0.4 The licensee cannot impose training requirements on State and local personnel.
Provisions are made for firefighters and medical and ambulance services.
NRC REVIEW COMMENTS FERMI 2 RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN P.
RESPONSIBILITY FOR PLANNING EFFORT o Provide an appendix listing the schedules for installation of equipment, the type of equipment to be installed, testing dates and dates when the equipment will be operational.
P.1.
Verify that each organization shall provide for the training of individuals responsible for the planning effort.
P.3 The Plan lists the Superintendent-Nuclear Productions and the Manager-Nuclear Operations as having responsibilities for reviewing and updating the plan.
- However, it is unclear as to the identity of the Emergency Plan Coordinator.
Identify the one individual responsible for review and updating of the Plan.
P.7 Provide an appendix listing, by title, the procedures required to implement the Plan.
P.8.
Although the Plan is basically written in NUREG-0654 format, many areas of the plan pertain to more than one area of NUREG-0654; provide a cross-referenced index to all NUREG-0654 criteria.
- _. ~
i i
i l
i NRC REVIEW COMMENTS FERMI 2 RADIOLOGICAL FMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN
RESPONSE
P.
Responsibility for the Planning Efforc o The Ferr.1 2 RERP is consistent with NUREG-0654, l
?
and Edison regards it inappropriate to include the i
information in the Fermi 2 RERP.
A schedule of I
the type requested, however, is currer.tly being developed and will be provided when it is completed.
'.i I
l Item P.1
)
RERP procedures will describe the training programs provided for Licensee personnel.
1
]
Item P.3 f
The Assistant Vice President and Manager - Nuclear l
Operations has the overall responsibility for the l
RERP.
Section P.1-clearly states the respon-sibilities of the Emergency Plan Coordinator.
I Item P.7 The list of RERP procedures is presently undergoing 1
t revision and is not available.
l l
Item P.8 Detroit Edison does not have a cross-referenced index.
Because the Fermi 2 RERP closely follows the j
requirement.s of NUREG-0654, the development and i
incorporation of a cross reference is regarded to be j
unnecessary.
1
?
I
APPENDIX 1 Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant, Unit 2 NRC Docket No. 50-341 Proposed Meteorological Data Acquisition System
Meterological Data Acquisition System (MDAS)
The meteorological monitoring system on the Fermi Site present'y meets the requirements of R.G.1.23 Using the present onsite 60-meter tower, the existing metevrological sensors will be upgraded, including a temperature differentia.' network, a O gma theta signal conditioner, and a precipitation gauge capable of real-time data acquisition, and designated the primary system.
A secondary system will consist of redundant sensors mounted on the 60-meter tower that wil be inde-pendent of the primary system.
A backup system will consist of wind speed, wind direction, and sigma theta mounted at the 10-meter level of the 150-meter tower presently onsite.
Tables H-1, H-2, and H-3 indicate the parameters measured, the sen-sor descriptions, and the signal conditioners, respec-tively.
Figure H-1 shows a block diagram of the modified system.
This is subject to change as design progresses.
The 60-meter tower will have redundant power supplies.
The primary system will be fed by a line designated as Brest 5063 and the secondary system by a line designated Fermi 1.
Should the power be lost on eitheir line, an automatic throwover switch will connect the remaining energized line to the system.
The backup system will be fed by Fermi 1.
Redundant power is not supplied to this system since there are two other sources of data at the 10-meter level.
Data will be transmitted to the microprocessors located in the Fermi 2 Control Room balcony and the various users such as the Control Room, Technical Support Center, and Emergency Operations Facility by various telephone lines (overhead and underground) and micrcwave.
Figure H-2 indicates the various power lines and data links; Figure H-3 indicates the links to the micropro-cessors.
Dial-up capability for both onsite and offsite is provided at the microprocessors.
A supplemental tower system is available from the ambient air quality monitoring network around the Monroe Power Plant.
This system is malnuained by Detroit Edison's Engineering Research Department and is available by dial-up capability.
A brief description of this system is enclosed.
r
~.
EFo2-FSAR TABLE H-1 METEOROIDGICAL PARAMETERS
(
10 Meter Level Wind Speed Wind Directio.1 Air Temperature Dew Point Temperature (a)
Sigma Theta 60 Meter Level Wind Speed Wind Direction Air Temperature Sigma Theta Miscellaneous Temperature Difference Precipitation at Ground Level (a)
Pasquill Stability Classification a.
Available from the primary system g
only.
1..
4 l
4 l
l l
H-9 Amendnent 33 - Pfarch 1981
-m
% ? g. "
"*y*WT p sg,
~
EF-2-FSAR TABLE H-2 METEDROIDGICAL IONI'IORING SYSTEM SENSORS WIND SPEED SENSORS: All Levels Sensor:
Climet Instruments Model 4WS-011-1. (a) Wind speed transmitter and cup assembly Distance canstant:
5 ft maximum Threshold wind:
0.6 mph Accuracy:
11% or 0.15 mph, whichever is greater WIND DIRECTION SI!NSORS: All Levels Sensor:
Climet Instruments Model GWD-0.2-30 (a) wind direction transmitter and 1/ind vane assembly Distance constant:
1 meter maximum Damping ratio:
0.4 standard Threshold:
0.75 mph 0
Accuracy:
13 TEMPERATURE SENSORS:
10-m Level Sensor Climet Instruments Model 015-3(a) thermistor 4 nge:
-300C to +500C 0
l Linearity:
10.16 C 0
Accuracy:
10.15 C DIFFERENTIAL TEMPERA'IURE: All Levels Sensor:
Climet instrument Model 015-3(a) matched l
thermistors l
l i
Range:
-50C to +100C 0
Linearity:
10.05 C j
0 l
Accuracy:
10.05 C DEW POINT SENSOR:
Sensor:
Environmental uipment Division of EG6G, Model fil0S-M(a dew point measuring set l
0 0
-52 C to +49 C Range.
0 0 2 3 C maximum Accuracy:
Amendment 33 - March 1991 H-10
EF-2-FSAR TABLE H-2 METEOROIDGICAL MONITORING SYSTEM SENSORS (Continued)
PRECIPITATICtl SENSOR:
Sensor:
Weathertronics Incorporated Model 6020(a) electrically-heated tipping-bucket rain and snew gauge Range:
Unlimited Accuracy:
0.01 in.
Sensitivity:
0.01 in.
a.
Or equivalent.
1 l
l i
1 1
l 1
if-11 Amendment 33 - :iarch 1981 l
EF-2-FSAR TABLE H-3 METEOROLOGICAL ENI'IVRING SYSTEM SIONAL CONDITIONING SIGNAL CONDITIONER:
Primary and Secoidary Systems TRANSLA'IOR:
Climet Instruments Model 060-20 Translator (a)
Ntunber of Channels:
20 7/O Connections:
Bsrrier strip connections Voltage Outputs:
0 to 5 V Pot *er Requirernents:
115 Vac WIND SPEED PC Board:
Climet Instruments Model 05-8003-26(a)
Range:
0 to 100 mph Accuracy:
0.015% full scale WIND DIRECTION PC Board:
Climet Instruments Model 05-8019-2, PCB(a) 0 Range:
0 to 540 Accuracy:
0.05% full scale TEMPERATURE PC roard:
Climet Instruments Model 05-8004-15(a) 0 Range:
-30 C to +50 C Accu acy:
0.002% full scale DIFFERENTIAL 'IEMPERATURE PC Board:
Climet Instruments Model D8005-1(E)
C 0
-5 C to +10 C Range:
Accuracy:
C.033% full scale DEW POINT PC Board:
Climet Instruments Model 05-8004-52(a) 0 Range:
-30 C to +50 C Accuracy:
0.065% full scale PRECIPITATION:
Climet Instruments Model 05-3157-4 ( a)
Range:
0-1 in.
Accuracy:
0.001% full scale Climatronics Standard Deviation Computer (a)
SIGMA 'IHETA:
0 l
Range:
0-100 equals 0-5 V Accuracy:
+20 l
l 1
a.
Or equivalent.
t l
t l-B-12 Amendment 73 - March 1981 l-l
EF-2-FSAR
,....___ _......... O.tt_m0_,7 E_D.ISc..h.FE.AWI U 0_-W. _ _.
_t_i t a T _o u t m F. C_IL I T.Y. _ _ _ _... _ _ _ _ _ _..,
w
,,...... I 1.........
.....m...n.....
.......m....
.... l-........ ;.... j....
..........g.... g........ p...;.....,.
- 6.........._......;....
l i
i I
l.
ll!!!!!!
l I
l l
jii;I
- .ii, i,i i i, i. ' i i.
I L '-
J j
,.........t.t a c.if t.013 0.s. f t. C. M NIC........ _. O. R T C.E N T E R O.R A D.M I N.i $.f _.0.a. WU. t. 0. 4 0....
O Sy..
TR 3
l j
j l
.m.....
.m.....
1, I
i l
j j
1Ii':!l l
lIli!!ll l...............
LI i
lllllli!'i
~!
l l
j l
l
[
l
.....c.
i u
l l
l
... l I.....i i
.......... s i
s
=
\\
i l
......__.a
...__._...l t
I.
l l
ENRICO FERMI ATOMIC POWER PLANT UNIT 2 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE H-1 BLOCK DI AGR AM OF PROPOSED METEOROLOGICAL DATA ACQUISITION SYSTEM
\\w AMENDMENT 33-MARCH 1981 F
t 1
l*
l w
- _. ~.
^
2...-..-.3
/
A
/
/
\\
f LAKE ERIE s
,f' SHORE LINE
/
p..
l
- i
/
p'
/
7' O
i 1
/e
/
4 COOLING TOWERS,
l
,/
F ER?.tl 2 REACTOA BL" -'i?.G
/
~~1 GA
^0"
[ 60 METER TO.YER 4 [/
4HEL.TER oPERAvies s s u P PO RT-crNT E R
\\
1
/
e
QJ
_ TEcww icAL. s e p p o n s-f
/
CENTER
,/-
f
[ Fpgs,, (,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
I If
./
I Y
......._..J
_ g-y..._
/
% ~ E?.:1-~
s 150 PETikR TOWER SHEL*fER
/
RAIN GAGE" I
%'l-
\\
l
[#'
b 60 METER l
150 METER METEOROLOGICAL METEORCiLOGICAL l
TGVER
/ #
l TOYER q
l 14 I
i I#
I LAKE ERIE a
/[
g SHOREIINE
(
i F
/
y
/
Y
/
N.
I SITE DOUNDARY NUCt. EAR g,** N,'N.d OPER ATW:'S CENTER FIGURE H-2 i
L
- Powen suPP'.Y DETROIT EDIGON FERMI il 60-METER
- Tri.EPuour sEnviccq AND 150-MLT ER TOWER LOC ATIONS w - MitRowAVE i
f
. ; - TELEMtonc SEnv8CE-uG l
r l
%= =. -- mmo.cx--
. n. m. r-e o.
m..
- n. m m
~
e Ewaico Feam: 2.
i
)
MXH MX H BU I 5
I P
P I I
I Bd I
f
,j b
'S
's
?-
g%
f 1
f P
(
l
\\
/
t>
WutLTAR I
Or rRArsons y
CENT ER j
q,
/
15 3
M TtH
.x 3
I {
7_____
i i
l i
I l
1 l
l l
I t
i I
5"d7 t_y I
e i
e l
l t
i j
60 m.Towe,-
~
Back up 1
.... Powen sumx l
l TELEpMONE St.wsCE* ON g
g
(___
w TELEPHOMC SEMICE* uG rue. __j am MICROWAvc Fe M b
P RIM AAy 3
SEtoWOAny AAcx-up i:
B e
-- -,-,_,,,-_.,-.,,,- e
, - +,,,
+-
r o
ENRICO FERMI ATOMIC POWER PLANT, UNIT 2 K.<C DOCKET NO. 50-341 l
DETROIT EDISON COMPANY AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONITORING MONROE AREA NETWORK i
l l
c I
l l
.1 O,-
APPENDIX A DETAILS OF MONROE AREA NETWORK v
7
- w
~ - ~ - - -. - -.--
.... ~. - - - -.... ~ >
......... ~.~.
~
~ nr, e
,y %
.t..
- I
?.
t d
o f
/-3 t.'-M-
.g-.
I ek e
- n. is.,,-
s
.x s
o
' p 1. k.- /
4., oo, -
-.y nm 8i(4
- e. e
- \\ (%.3 '
- d.. ** *,. -
T
-d e
.to
-q m
- N nk g
)
,C s
ll Q
h C
f Q '* r.
/[W '-l-,- - /:'
.o..
et **
- t J
E :. :
m.
n
.u s
o
\\-\\ /~ i,-
I a
n
/
e -
p
.o e
O m c
/
j d
%.I.--g C
j n,. .s-u !.l! s e n a .C 39 1.) p o o w n. j.. t,,. 2 .e c e y> o. .e n e o a A,.i .e Y '.g . B 4 p O.'# I Q E o s, o e a = 4 % 'k ,~~,~~fh. O:s
- u..s..-
r..--.. %-s ; ;% L -... '. ~, ; +, Q
- ' *3.,, E -
w..n. p. r,.n,= n. n.. ..' % ~ ,.. /.0 +a u s' : ~,, u. ", s;n,%**. .r..<:.w.+ :..~.1 i q s ~ .:m.-f.,, -@ .p* 1 f * .o o ,.,4 gA a 'p%%m'tp. n. }. ' j *
- o s
,p ,e %.. $' O - o5 y,,.rb / s q. c > i " &:s ,;n e! - tc E..n h.p % :.- p.--) :, y n_E.. j... Q n..... x.1 g e / L. g,,,. t',.S.4 w _ _ _X.._ _. _-- . y..---_.. C6L e L..w. M. c z, o rs u. e m ..h.. w_s. v.. ->,-g y bm g W. s < * -d h:. 7 a ~. ). N -N ' b.I .',b , f... W wt R .~<..m._. . m. y ./.. m..,.,s'. s. . '.. N, m t 1 s-c z. ..<7. 9
- o. e
. y
- ..,. N.,..rz &%'
m.h;.4 ; f%g S c: - p
- v m...%
u i G z -= N fp w _. a y (. u.. s s m M,,.W.. ~,' o n.w. w.>;N,,. w w;cw.. %k M N ;N 'C,lii,d,3=8'%,1 . ".... m. p. ,Ae s ... a ~ w- .c. .. _., 3.w.y e... . v... u m.:, =er..
- ,s.:
- r..a_m..
- m g- ~s.h. q..
i m. g. = m ym c f 4.n, 3. g. .s. ,s. - ns x ^ x p cod [ lI
- ,- (. /b.,.
+4,,>h,.. h; a. 9 W..p'I k j D .[ g $U' x;x 4 a .:n... ....,.g m,ig 3 a_, M /m ..... m,. .. c. v%.... e.
- i. m.,f
. rh', y 14^.:o41.j . %
- n:r_.._,
2 2 e,m . m....x.:. %..h ./.1% .'f....... .,*~o- .. ~. s -,m Td..</ s ['n .K s *
- c m.
h~ [.NQh..,. 7,y.{f',lfk($, f,d,Y
- lkh, l
(( i,h ~ " ~ ,c A . ilnm".. : ;w % &. . g * - ',h;.,"d p'*. '.i L .,a.m vJ ..~ ', .r' uz v. ~- s.'N j ..f ;;q' i. ~. ? 3s
- I
=. s's' r. '::i:E ...#'), 4 r ed, { J' '[ 8 ns N,, N! . O t-
- %.,a'g.{yV rf...m'-
su ~ i o' j .m. gin,. %lA g gr-f 7,Ep l -t e- -5, w,-- .e e, -j... [/ p"""1., p*n -k.,,.,~ .q, ) .,.,.. w w w a- . ~r! . ~ ..p ,/ d ' '..g:::; : d..wx..:s5%.?.N . ~.. ..x.- ' [,,], j ,,(o.,j N. h 8 ~~~ i s. .g . m.. ,- 7 j i. g,. g n.; n' i y y nI.m 1' 7 ) / ~ r > ' % ***g.~{ c~s! '.m$ .w:.e-- -<.;M'4.f' ^#. "q."*-** .c -~ ~." k:,..e,-,.c'..' ; '> e .. 4 g-5 A i; *
- Y?
iI r 6 u. p 4 { fg s J. I,e,n.ec; { 4 t..-.. . y. Q._.... ~. Ic, i. o j *,. 1 y'. Mi2 .,.. v J r. ..n~. _i.,...... c- -...J ,c. ; o R +. ' " s. 4
- t',t..t
...f y: =. s !:n.,.n at n.tu9 s. a.-m ". -,p.,.. N.;. 5 ~. 3. y .L. , ;'v.s s
- 4. w -ay m.,. ;
o...,.. m %ls x.n i.3- + /- .r s: e- .. l ~. g......; = --,,,,,,,, ggg,.... ' ;j ...-.;.._......,.. $ J.: ..~ . - - s. x c. 8x .. g,{ l, s g,3,,.,. / f.,f'.?).{y !+ 9 t 7-== M ,, e f. c.,\\ . -.:. :. o ,g y ~a
- g. y.
n w: ~.. s r- '. e f i. L g,...,j g.3 ., g,. e s s.%. 8. ..,../.. e. a' (.?. -/ .s
- g 7..,.
t . w../,j:...,e -=., h " i.
- ,.t W ",,. -.,
.. 4.. ' r ~ *y,, -,. e' m.:==,on-e n & -. m;.. O= 1_,c,, g"* 3'. ..a ' ' '. 9 ~. :I v 1,- . ; a :. 'n. s
- .4s./.w.p?.
m.2 _ m a.a p,4, x. w; .;< G, w . q,I 1. .. ~. .e ,.n. m 8."w-s - k. _ m' J.,.u:',,.... p'::= s .) i .wc w. .s. e
..m._ ._. 5 m..-..- A e.s b I MONROF. AREA A IR QtiAT.!*!Y, !;TtfDY I.ocation of Amfiis nt Monitoring !;t at ionn UTM COORDINATES MASN (km) E!.EVATION SITE NAME EAST NORTil MnI (Pt ) I.ocarinn 58-941 Sterne 289.84 4624.91 590 Steron Rond Sohntation - H80 E. Sterns Rond - Erie Township . Monroe County, Michigan 58-942 Trinity 295.80 4644.39 f,2 5 Tr i n i t y !;uli it at ion 'Ifil l Fa i rv iew Dr ive - Monroe Town; hip - Monrne County, !!ichir.an 58-943 Queen 303.23 4648.44 600 Queen Substation - 6015 N. Monroe Road - Frenchtown Township - Monroe County, Michiy,nn l 58-944 Fermi 312.46 4647.53 580 Fermi Energy Center - 6400 Dixic IIwy. - Frenchtown Township - Moi, roe County, Michigan 58-945 Maybee 291.08 4653.07 635 Maybec substation - 9000 11aldwin Avenue - Maybee, Michigan - Monroe County, Michigan 58-946 Dixie 312.57 4654.00 590 9005 N. Dixie !!wy - Berlin Township - Monroe-County, i Michigan 81-947 Carpenter 279.07 4662.66 695 Carpenter substation - 770 Ideal Street - Milan, Michigan - Washtenaw County, Michigan l 58-948 Carleton 300.67 4657.94 620 Carleton Substation - 12050 Burns Road - Ash Township-t Monroe County, Michigan 82-949 Fisher 316.03 4661.04, 585 F i g.h e r substation - 18840 Woodruff Road - Gibralter, f l Michigan - Wayne County, Michigan 58-590 Harrow 341.40 4'355.10 625 llarrow Research Station - Ilarrow, Ontario - Canada l} NOTE: Fermi Met. Tower same.as 58-944 s \\
) Q DETROIT ED2 SON MONROE MONITORIWC PROGRAM INSTRUMENTATION v 5 METIIOD j MASN SAMPLING MONITOR PRINCIPLE DATE SITE NAME HEIGHT (ACL) PARAMETER MANUFACTURER MODEL OF OPERATION OPERATIONAL ) l 58-941 Sterns 16 Ft SO Mel y SA-185-2A Flame Photonetry Sept 75 2 33 Ft W/S MRI 1074 Sept 75 33 Ft W/D MRI 1074 Sept 75 14 Ft TSP Ceneral Metals Cravimetric Sept 75 58-942 Trinity 16 Ft S02 Meloy SA-185-2A Flame Photometry Sept 75 14 Ft TSP Ceneral Metala Gravinetric Sept 75 l l 58-943 Queen 16 Ft S0 Meloy SA-185-2A Flame Photometry Sept 75 2 16 Ft COH RAC 5000 Light Transmission Sept 75 l 14 Ft TSP Ceneral Metals Cravimetric Sept 75 58-944 Fermi 16 Ft SO2 Meloy SA-185-2A Flame Photometry Sept 75 Gravimetric Sept 75 14 Ft TSP Cencral Metals 58-945 Maybee 16 Ft S02 Mel y SA-185-2A Flame Photometry Sept 75 33 Ft W/S MRI 1074 Sept 75 33 Ft W/D MRI 1074 Sept 75 14 Ft TSP Ceneral Metals Cravimetric . Sept 75 58-946 Dixic 16 Ft S02 Mel y SA-185-2A - Flame Photometry Sept 75 14 Ft TSP General Metals Cravimetric Sept 75 81-947 Carpenter 16 Ft SO Mel y SA-185-2A Flame Photometry Sept 75 2 33 Ft W/S MRI 1074 Sept 75 33 Ft W/D Mn! 1074 Sept 75 14 Ft TSP Ceneral Metals Cravimetric Sept 75 58-948 Carleton 15 Ft SO2 Mel y SA-185-2A Flame Photometry Sept 75 14 Ft TSP Ceneral Metals Cravimetric Sept'75 l l 82-949 Fisher 16 Ft Sd2 Meloy SA-185-2A Flame Photometry Sept 75 14 Ft TSP Ceneral Metals Cravimetric Sept 75 j 58-950 llarrow 16 Ft SO2 Meloy SA-185-2A Flame Photometry Dec 75 l 33 Ft W/S MRI 1074 Dec 75 l 33 Ft W/D Mnl 1074 Dec 75 14 Ft TSP General Metals Cravimetric Dec 75 a
v Q DETROIT EDISON MONROE MONITORING PROGRAM INSTRUMENTATION (CONTINUED) MASN SAMPLING MONITOR PRINCIPLE DATE SITE NAME HEICllT (ACL) PARAMETER MANUFACTURER MODEL OF OPERATION OPERATIONAL 58-944 Fermi 33 Ft W/S Climet WS-011-1 jl Met. 33 Ft W/D Climet WD- 012-30 Tower 33 Ft Dew Pt. EG5G 110S-M Chilled Mirror 33 Ft Temp. Rosemount 146BB Linear Bridge - Resistance l 197 Ft W/S Climet WS-011-1 l' 197 Ft W/D Climet WD-012-30 146BB Linear Bridge - j 33-197 Ft A Temp. Rosemount Resistance ll 10 Ground Mixing Aerovironment, 300C Sound Pulse 10-79 ll. Depth Inc. lt b 's k l
- 0 -
1 .t t l ..I f ~ l 8 F F I 8 I i t. ji 8-23-79 .j.
. INS'UDIENT SPECIFICATIO!$ Meteorological Towers 58-941, 58-945, 81-947, 58-950 ~ ~ Wind Speed - MRI 1074 Starting Threshold 0.75 MMI Response Distance 18 ft. (63% recovery) Flow Coefficient 7.9 ft./ revolution Accuracy .0.25 MPli Range 125 MMI (max.). - Willd Direction - MRI 1074 StartingThtreshold 0.75 IJII Delay Distance 4 ft. (50% recovery) Damping Ratio g.5to0.6 Accuracy 2.50 Range 5400 i e e I i i i I ,,,) ..... ~.. -}}