ML20010C342
| ML20010C342 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Byron  |
| Issue date: | 08/07/1981 |
| From: | Norelius C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20010C333 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-454-81-08, 50-454-81-8, 50-455-81-07, 50-455-81-7, NUDOCS 8108190369 | |
| Download: ML20010C342 (1) | |
Text
<
Appendix A NOTICE OF VIOLATION-Commonwealth Edison Company Dock 4 No. 50-454 Docket.'To. 50-455 As a result of the inspection conducted on July 7-10, 1981, and in accordance.-
with the Interim Enforcement Policy, 45 FR 66/54 (October 7,1980), the following violation was identified:
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XII, states, " Measures shall be established to assure that.... instruments, and other measuring and testing devices used in activities affecting quality are properly controlled, calibrated, and adjusted at specified periods to maintain accuracy within necessary limits."
Commonwealth Edison Company Topical Report CE-1-A, Revision 15, Section 12, states, in part, " Measuring and test equipment which is used... to perform the pre-oper-ational cesting..'. will be periodically calibrated or adjusted to assure that accuracy is maintained within necessary limits.
Contrary to the above, on July 9,1981, the inspectors identified that the approved calibration data, dated May 15, 1980, for the voltmetei1(located on battery charged IDC03E) which was used in obtaining data during pre-opehational test No. 2.21.10 pias out of tolerance at one of the six recorded data points. Furthermore, there was no calibration period specified for the subject meter.
The licensee's efforts to reverify the subject voltmeters calibraties on July 10, 1981, identified that the meter is now out of tolerance at several data points.
This is a Severity Level VI violation (Supplenent II).
Pursuant.to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice a written statement or ex-planation in reply, including for each item of noncompliance:
(1) corrective action taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective action to be taken to avoid further noncompliance; and (3) the date when full compliance will be acbieved.
Under the authority of Section 182 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954~, as amended, this response shall be submitted under oath or affirmation. Consideration may be given to extending your response for good cause shown.
Dated C. E. Norelius, Director Division of Engineering and Technical Inspection 8108190369 810807 DR ADOCK 05000454-PDR;