ML20005A581
| ML20005A581 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | LaSalle  |
| Issue date: | 06/16/1981 |
| From: | Norelius C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20005A572 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-373-81-17, 50-374-81-11, NUDOCS 8106300473 | |
| Download: ML20005A581 (2) | |
Text
.
1 I)
Appendix A NOTICE 01 VI0lATION Commonwealth Edison Company Docket Not 50-373 Docket No. 50-374 As a result of the inspection conducted on May 4-6, 1981, and in accordance with the Interim Enforcement Policy, 45 FR 66754 (October 7, 1980), the following violation was identified:
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion VI, states, in part, that " Measures shall be established to control the issuance of documents... including the changes thereto, which prescribe all activities af fecting quality.
These measures shall assure that documerts, including changes, are reviewed...and approved...by authorized personnel and are distributed to and used at the location where the prescribed activity is performed."
Commonwealth Edison Company Topical Report CE-1-A, " Quality Assurance Program for Nuclear Generating Stations," Revision 9, dated July 16, 1779, states in Section 6, that "A document control system will be used to assure that documents such as specifications, procedures, and drawings are reviewed for adequacy and appro~ed for release by authorized personnel. Such documents will be distributed to and used at the locations where the prescribed activity is performed. Changes to these documents will be handled similarly and will be reviewed and approved by the same organization that performed the original review and approval, unless delegated by the originating organization to another responsible organization."
Contrary to the above, during an inspection at GE in San Jose on May 6, 1981, it was identified that there was an apparent lack of measures to control the use of outdated design information at work locations. This lack of control resulted in outdated design drawings being used by a design engineer and also being referenced in the stress report.
This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement II).
8106 3004D
Commonwealth Edison Company Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are required to subeit to this office within twenty-five days of the date of this Notice a written statement or explanation in reply, including for each item of nopcompliance:
(1) corrective action taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective action to be taken to avoid further noncompliance; and (3) the date when full com-pliance will be achieved. Under the authority of Section 182 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, this response shall be submitted under oath or affirmation.
IJUN 1 6M d M,4 Date C.'E. Norelffus, Acting Director Division of Engineering and Technical Inspection i
_.