ML18346A024

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
E-Mail from R. Monteforte to C. Allen OP-100 Drawing Question
ML18346A024
Person / Time
Site: USA/9185/B(U)-96
Issue date: 12/11/2018
From: Monteforte R
- No Known Affiliation
To: William Allen
Spent Fuel Licensing Branch
Allen W
References
Download: ML18346A024 (2)


Text

From:

RON MONTEFORTE To:

Allen, William

Subject:

[External_Sender] RE: Re: OP-100 Drawing Question Date:

Tuesday, December 11, 2018 3:53:43 PM

Chris, It does. The line item for Section 1.3, General Arrangement Drawings; Drawing OP100-1A Rev. 3 and 4 should say Drawing IR50-1A, Rev 3, Drawing IR50-1A, Rev 4, addeddust cap and shipping plug part numbers.
Thanks, Ron On December 11, 2018 at 12:19 PM "Allen, William" <William.Allen@nrc.gov>

wrote:

That information helps. Please confirm that the Summary of Changes attached to this e-mail contains a typographical error. Thanks.

From: RON MONTEFORTE [1]

Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2018 3:06 PM To: Allen, William <William.Allen@nrc.gov>

Subject:

[External_Sender] Re: OP-100 Drawing Question

Hi Chris,

The dust cap and shipping plug part numbers were clarified on drawing IR50-1A, Rev 5, Items 8 and 18. The IR50 isn't a Type B container, just an OP100 payload, so the drawings are included in the OP100 SAR. There is no OP100-1A drawing.

Please let me know if this helps.

Thanks, Ron On December 11, 2018 at 11:22 AM "Allen, William"

<William.Allen@nrc.gov> wrote:

When you submitted your application for the OP-100 back in 2017, a change was identified to the general arrangement drawings. The change indicated that dust cap and shipping plug part numbers were added to drawing OP100-1A. This change caused the drawing revision number to increase from three to four.

I cant find a drawing OP100-1A listed in either Rev. 6 of the OP-100 SAR or the OP-100 CoC. Can you clarify?

Im working to finalize the concurrence package to issue the OP-100 CoC amendment, but I need an answer to this question before I can get the package into concurrence.

Thanks, Chris