ML18144A039

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-280/85-31 & 50-281/85-31.Corrective Actions:Monthly Checks Shall Be Made & Documented to Maintain Calibr of Wwvb Receiver to Std Produced by Nbs
ML18144A039
Person / Time
Site: Surry  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 11/19/1985
From: Stewart W
VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
To: Grace J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
References
85-763, NUDOCS 8512100087
Download: ML18144A039 (3)


Text

..

VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23261 November 19, 1985 W. L. STEWART VxcE PRESIDENT NUCLEAR OPERATIONS Dr. J. Nelson Grace Regional Administrator Region II U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street, Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Gentlemen:

Serial No.

NO/HLM:dn Docket Nos.

  • License Nos.85-763 50-280 50-281 DPR-32 DPR-37 We have reviewed your letter of October 22, 1985 in reference to inspect~on conducted at Surry Power Statio~~tember 9-13, 1985 reported in IE Inspection Report Nos. 50-280~d 50-281/85-31.

response to the specific violation is attached.

the and Our We have determined that no proprietary information is contained in the report. Accordingly, we have no objection to this inspection report being made a matter of public disclosure.

The information contained in the attached pages is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Very truly yours,

&~

W. L. Stewart Attachment cc:

Cw/attachment)

Mr. Steven A. Varga, Chief Operating Reactors Branch No. 1 Division of Licensing Mr. D. J. Burke NRG Resident Inspector Surry Power Station 95121ooos1 i~665~80 PDR ADOCK PDR G

'~

f...l~ol

RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION INSPECTION REPORT NOS. 50-280/85-31 and 50-281/85-31 VIOLATION Technical Specification 6.4.A.2 and D states, in part, that detailed written procedures with appropriate checkoff lists and instructions shall be.provided. for the following conditions:

calibration and testing of instruments, components, and systems involving nuclear safety of the station; and that these procedures shall be followed.

Administl!ative Procedure-84, Control of Measuring and Test Equipment (M&TE), Section 4. 3 and 4. 4, states, in part, that

  • each supervisor responsible for one or more of the devices in the M&TE Calibration Program shall: be responsible for ensuring that the devices under his control are calibrated at the frequency established
  • in the measuring and test equipment form. Additionally, the Instrument Supervisor or the supervisor of the individual performing the calibration shall maintain a maintenance history record for each device in the M&TE Calibration Program that is under the direct administrative control of the power station.

This history record shall contain, among other information, the calibration date, the next calibration due date, and whether the device rnquired adjustment.

This information is necessary to determir.. e the adequacy of the calibration frequency assigned to that device.

Contrary to the above, the licensee failed to properly document monthly calibration checks on M&TE SQC-187, WWVB Receiver Oscillator, which is the National Bureau of Standards reference for Calibrating M&TE used on safety-related components.

This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement I).

RESPONSE

(1) ADMISSION OR DENIAL OF THE ALLEGED VIOLATION The violation is correct as stated.

(2)

REASONS FOR VIOLATION The WWVB Receiver is highly visible in the CAL-LAB and checks were made almost daily to verify that the instrument was in good operating order.

These operational checks were not formally documented.

\\,

(3)

CORRECTIVE STEPS WHICH HAVE BEEN TAKEN AND THE RESULTS ACHIEVED As suggested by the manufacturer's technical manual, monthly checks shall.be made and documented to maintain calibration traceability of the WWVB receiver to the standard produced by the National Bureau of Standards.

Calibration Technicians have been instructed to perform and document on the Instrument History Sheet, the checks outlined in the manufacturer's technical manual page 3-2.

(4)

CORRECTIVE STEPS WHICH WILL-BE TAKEN TO AVOID FURTHER VIOLATIONS No further corrective action is required.

(5)

DATE WHEN FULL COMPLIANCE WILL BE ACHIEVED Full compliance was achieved on October 17, 1985.