ML17297B567

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Summary of 820316-19 Site Visit by Caseload Forecast Panel to Assess Const Progress for Each Unit.Fuel Load Dates for Units 1 & 2 Will Be Later than Projected Dates
ML17297B567
Person / Time
Site: Palo Verde  Arizona Public Service icon.png
Issue date: 06/11/1982
From: Licitra E
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8206210012
Download: ML17297B567 (17)


Text

gpss RKgy 1p0

~p 1~

cv 0

jgg&

+>>*w" UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 UN ff 1982 ACKET NOS.

50-528/529/530 APPLICANT:

Arizona Public Service FACILITY:

Palo Verde, Units 1, 2 and 3

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF SITE VISIT BY CASELOAD FORECAST PANEL On March 16-19, 1982, the Caseload Forecast Panel conducted a visit of the Palo Verde plant site to assess construction progress for each of the three units.

(A previous visit was conducted in October 1980 for Unit 1 only.)

The visit initially included a presentation of construction status by the applicant (the Agenda is shown in Enclosure

1) on the morning of March. 16.

The attendees for that presentation are listed in Enclosure 2.

An exit interview was conducted on the morning of March 19 following a tour of the

'construction site the previous days.

The attendees for that meeting are listed in Enclosure 3.

A sumary of the Panel visit is presented below.

~Summar The applicant made a presentation on the status of construction for all three units.

The presentation covered each of the Agenda items shown in Enclosure l.

At the meeting, the applicant continued to project fuel load dates of November

1982, November 1983 and November 1985 for Units 1, 2 and 3, respectively.

However, the applicant stated that it was in the process of reassessing its schedule to integrate the construction activities and the testing and startup phases into an overall schedule.

The applicant expected to complete this assessment in a few weeks.

After the presentation, we toured the facilities for each of the units.

As a result of the presentation and the tour, we learned the following:

Unit 1

As of February 1982, overall construction was about 96Ã complete.

Cable installation was about 95% complete, while terminations were about 79%

complete.

Construction activities were still in progress in the control room.

Of the 563 subsystems in the plant, 218 had been transferred from construction to prerequisite testing.

Only one of the systems had been released to startup (for preoperational testing).

The total number of procedures required for fuel load are 614 (includes 268 preoperational tests).

Of these, 198 were approved for use, 287 were prepared and in the review cycle, 65 were in preparation, and preparation of the remaining 64 was not yet started.

Only one of the 268 preoperational tests had been completed.

DES IG?1ATED ORXGH/AL Cert'+'fed By po 820b2i00i2 820bii PDR ADDCK 05000528

.'. A.,PDR

eo f

~

Meeting Summary Dist.

See attached The startup test group was still staffing up and was at the 79K level.

(The same group will be used for star tup testing of Units 2 and 3).

Units 2 and 3

As of February 1982, overall construction was about 805 and 35K complete for Units 2 and 3, respectively.

The construction phase for each of the two units (2 and 3) was approximately on schedule (ahead in some areas and behind in others).

Since the same startup group will be used on all three units, and the first two units are scheduled a year apart, any delay in Unit 1 preoperational testing would also affect the schedule for Unit 2.

Exit Interview At the exit interview, we informed the applicant that we would made an assessment of the status of construction afte~ returning to Bethesda and then present the results to NRR management.

We would then inform the app'Iicant of our findings.

Subse uent Actions After returning to Bethesda, we performed an assessment of the status of construc-tion and informed NRR management of our findings.

Based on this assessment, we concluded that the fuel load dates for Units 1 and 2 would be later than the applicant's projected dates.

This conclusion was based primari'1y on the status of the preoperational test program which normally has taken about two years to complete on other plants.

For Unit 3, we concur with the applicant's projected fuel load date.

Upon completion of our assessment, we verbally informed the applicant of our findings.

On April 22, 1982, the President of APS announced at the stockholders annual meeting that the schedule for Unit 1 will slip by a few months.

He added that the precise length of the slip would not be known until an in-depth review is completed in July 1982.

Current NRR policy provides for a management meeting between NRR and an applicant when there is a difference between the applicant's and the staff's projected fuel load date, in order to get a better understanding of the jlifference.

In keeping with this policy, and in light of the recently announced slip in the Unit 1 fuel load date by the applicant, a management meeting of this type will be arranged.

h

Enclosures:

E. A. Licitra, Project Manager Licensing Branch No.

3 Division of Licensing ut

/82 OFFICE)

SURNAME)

DA'TEf>

2.

thee J

~ ~ 0 ~ t uu ~ ~ ~ t

~

~

3.

Nee cc; See

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

ing Attendees March 1 6, 19 2

fng"A't'te'nde'esMar'ch'l 5;"0

'2'ext page

~ T ~

0 To ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~

~ ~

~

DL:LB¹3 ELicitra:ph 5/ 4/

/82

~

~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~ ~ ~

1 5/

2 DL:

RTe sco

(/ ~/82 NRC FORM 318110/801 NRCM 0240 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY 6 U FO: 198~29.824

I fl Er 8

R

Hr. E.

E.

Van Brunt, Jr.

Vice President

- Wuclear Projects Arizona Public Service Company P. 0.

Box 21666

Phoenix, Arizona 85036 PALO YEROE CC:

Arthur C. Gehr, Esq.

Snell

& Wilmer 3100 Valley Center

Phoenix, Arizona 85073 Charles S. Pierson Assistant Attorney General 200 State Capitol 1700 West Washington Phoenix, Arizona 85007 Charles R. Kocher, Esq., Assistant Counsel James A. Beoletto, Esq.

Southern California Edison Company P. 0.

Box 800

Rosemead, California 91770 margaret Walker

'I Deputy Director of Energy Programs Economic Planning and Development Office 1700 West Washington Phoenix, Arizona 85007 tlr. Rand L. Greenfield Assistant Attorney General Bataan memorial Building Santa Fe, Hew Mexico 87503 Resident Inspector Palo Verde/NPS U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P. 0.

Box 21324 Phoenix, Arizona 85001 tls. Patricia Lee Hourihan 6413 S. 26th Street

Phoenix, Arizona 85040

ENCLOS 1

PALO VERDE UNITS 1, 2, AND 3 CASELOAD FORECAST PANEL SITE VISIT MEETING AGENDA l.

Overview of project construction schedule including progress and major milestones completed, current problems, and any anticipated problem areas that may impact the current projected fuel load dates for each unit.

2.

Detailed review and current status of design and engineering effort (by major discipline) including any potential problems that may arise from necessary rework for each unit.

3.

Detailed review and current status of procurement activities including valves, pipe, instruments,

cable, major components, etc. for each unit.

4.

Actual and proposed craft work force (by major craft), craft availability, productivity, potential labor negotiations and problems for each unit.

5.

Detailed review and current status of all large and small bore pipe hangers, restraints, snubbers, etc., including design, rework, procurement, fabrication, delivery, and installation for each unit.

6.

Detailed review of project schedule identifying critical path items, near critical items, amount of float for various activities, the current critical path to fuel loading, methods of implementation of corrective action for any activities with negative float, and provisions for contingencies for each unit.

The estimated project percent construction complete as of February 28, 1982 for each unit.

7.

Detailed review and current status of bulk quantities including current estimated quantities, quantities installed to date, quantities scheduled to date, current percent complete for

each, actual versus forecast installation rates, and basis for figures for each unit.

(a)

Concrete (CY)

(b)

Process Pipe (LF)

Large Bore Pipe (2 1/2" and larger)

Small Bore Pipe (2" and smaller)

(c)

Yard Pipe (LF)

(d)

Large Bore Pipe Hangers, Restraints, Snubbers (ea)

'I

(e)

Small Bore Pipe Hangers, Restraints (ea)

(f)

Cable Tray (LF)

(g)

Total Conduit (LF)

(h)

Total Exposed Metal Conduit (LF)

(i)

Cable (LF)

Power Control Security Instrumentation Plant Lighting (j)

Terminations (ea)

Power Control Security Instrumentation Plant Lighting (k)

Electrical Circuits (ea)

Power Control Security (1)

Instrumentation (ea) 8.

Detailed review and current status of preparation of preop and acceptance test procedures, integration of preop and acceptance test activities with construction

schedule, system turnover schedule, preop and acceptance tests
schedule, current and proposed preop and acceptance tests program manpower for each unit.

(a)

Total number of procedures required for fuel load.

(b)

Number of draft procedures not started.

(c)

Number of draft procedures being written.

d Number of procedures approved.

e Number of procedures in review.

(f)

Total number of preop and acceptance tests required for fuel load.

(g)

Number of preop and acceptance tests completed.

(h)

Number of preop and acceptance tests currently in progress.

(i)

Number of systems turned over to start-up.

I 4 ~

9.

Detailed discussion of potential schedular influence due to changes attributed to NUREG-0737 and other recent licensing requirements and status for each unit.

10.

Discussion of schedular impact, if any, regarding potential deficiencies reported in accordance with 10 CFR 50.55(e) for each unit.

11.

Financial commitments to complete Units 1, 2, and 3.

12.

Overview of current construction management organization and activities incorporating each unit.

13.

Site tour and observation of construction activities for each unit.

2

)

CLOSURE 2

LIST OF ATTENDEES March 16, 1982 NRC W. Lovelace

f. Licitra L. Vorderbrueggen G. Johns,ton APS E.

E.

Van Brunt G.

C. Andognini D. McLane D. Stewart D. Fasnacht S. Saunders J.

Roedel W. Quinn R. Badsgard J.

Vorees Bechtel B. Bingham W. Stubblefield J.

Zerucha S. Wilkening

i CLOSURE 3

LIST OF ATTENDEES March 19, 1982 NRC W. Lovelace E. Licitra APS S. Frost J.

Vorees W. McLane D. Fasnacht W. Hartley E.

Van Brunt J. Allen F. Gowers G.

Reeves C.

Boyd Bechtel S. Wilkening

I

MEETING

SUMMARY

DISTRIBUTION Document Control: 50-528(529/530)

NRC PDR Local PDR NSIC TERA LB¹3 File IJLee MLicitra LDewey ISE Regional Administrator, Region I NRC

Participants:

ll. Lovelace E. Licitra L. Vorderbrueggen G. Johnston cc:

Service List (Palo Verde)

~ y