ML17277A535
| ML17277A535 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Columbia  |
| Issue date: | 02/07/1983 |
| From: | WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17277A534 | List: |
| References | |
| RTR-NUREG-0892, RTR-NUREG-892 1.5.1, NUDOCS 8304080407 | |
| Download: ML17277A535 (21) | |
Text
WASHINGTON PUBLIC POSER SUPPLY SYSTEM PLANTPiioc
'fgQlgpo ~O PROCEDURE NUMBER
+1.5el VOLUMENAME APP O
DATE 02/0//83 1
ADMINISTRATIVE OCEDURES SECTION
- 1. 5 TESTING TITLE
+1.5 el TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION SURVEILLANCE TESTING PROGRA" 1.5.1.1
~Pur oee Plant Surveillance requirements to satisfy Plant Technical Specifications are requirements...
relating to test, calibra'tion, or inspection to assure that the necessary quality of systems and components is main-
~
tained, that facility operation will be within the, safety limits, and that the limiting conditions of operation will be met'...
per 10CFR5O.>6C(S).
The NlP-2 Program for'reparation, implementation, control and documenta-tion to satisfy these surveillance requirements is described in this procedure and will be controlled in accordance with it.
A flow chart showing ma)or activities is included as Attachment l.
1.5.1.2 Pro ram Res onsibilit The Technical Department Reactor Engineering Supervisor has overall responsibility for the initial coordination of the Technical Specifi-
'cations as well as maintenance of the docuttent throughout plant life and "provide-the'intbrface with the
- NRC, Thy Reactor Engineering Supervisor will assign a Technicial Specification Testing Coordinator to schedule surveillance testing+ activities for the plant.
In addition, the Coor-
'inator will be responsible for identify'ing surveillance tests which must be performed and work with each Department to determine responsibility for testing.
Each Department Manager will subsequently assign the re-sponsibility for procedure preparation and testing activities within the Department.
1.5.1.3 Surveillance Procedure Format The procedure format as described in the following paragraphs applies to each Department's surveillance procedures except as noted.
+ Surveillance Testing, calibrations or inspections will hereafter be referred to as surveillance testing or testing.
83040804Q7 830323 PDR ADOCK 05000397 E
PDR WP 597 R1 PROCEDURE NUMBER 1.5.1 REVISION NUMBER PAGE NUMBER 1.5.1-1 of 17
J t
l I
A.
Title and Cover Sheet Attachment II is a typical procedure cover sheet to be used by Operations in performing surveillances.
Likewise, Attachments III, IV, V, and VI are cover sheets to be used by IK, Maintenance, Health. Physics/Chemistry and Technical in performing surveillance activities.
The first Comments Section will be completed by the person perform-ing the test and/or hiR Foreman, and used to record significant observations made during the performance of the test and any anoma-lies which were observed.
In addition, its testing is performed for any reason other than routin'e surveillance (i.e., if a system is tested because a redundant system is out of service or if testing is required prior to entering a subsequent mode of operation), this fact should be noted in the Comment Section.
This will assist in audits and reconstruction of surveillance histories.
(Each person whose initials are recorded in the procedure section shall sign the cover sheet.)
The second Comments Section is reserved for the assigned reviewer as described in 1.5.1.5.A.
This section will describe the overall re-sults of the test and the disposition of the test results including any followup or corrective action which may be necessary.
(Since the IK cover sheet only includes one comment section, all comments will be made in that section and certified at the end to identify the comtmntator.)
B.
~Pur oee The Purpose Section of the surveillance procedure specifically references the Technical Specification surveillance section(s).
satisfied by the test and describes the Technical Specification operational condition during which performance of the test is re-quired.. Further elaboration on the intent of the test is optional.
This section should enumerate each individual Technical Specifica-tion surveillance covered by the procedure.
C. ~Kit This section lists. only those tasks that are always required to be done or specific conditions that are required to be done prior to performance of the surveillance procedure.
Prerequisites for manda-tory conditions are required to have a signature blank for the per-son verifying compliance with the prerequisite.
Some typical prerequisites which should be considered are:
'l.
Assure that no other testing is in progress, that in con)unc-tion with this test, could cause a full scram.
WP.59 PROCEOURE NUMBER 1.5.1 REVISION NUMBER PAGE NUMBER 1.5.1-2 of 17
20
~
0 Establish ccmwnications between the testing area and the Con-trol Room when required.
r Prepare an RWP for use, if necessary.
D.
Limitations and Precautions This section is intended to provide general and specific caution/
guidance statements relative to the procedure context.
This should not preclude inclusion of limitations or precautions in the body of the procedure as necessary to avoid risk to plant operation or plant personnel safety at the appropriate procedural step.
Materials Tools and Test E ui ment This section lists all materials, tools and temporary test equipment which may be required.
The manufacturer's model number, nam<
and range (if appropriate) shall be recorded as well as calibration void date as applicable.
(For IhC testing, a bl@nk space is available on the cover sheet to record test equipment data.)
F.
Procedure G.
This section is the step by step instructioris for performing the.
surveillance test.
Each step requires a blank where either the per-former's initials or appropriate data is recorded.
-Where appli-
- cable, the Technical Specification parameter values are noted directly below the data blank.
The data blank is labeled with the appropriate parameter units.
Example:
Step 4 - Record pump flow (F1001) gpm Technical Specification 6,350 GPM If applicable, each test procedure should conclude with a system restoration section and sign off.
Acce tance Criteria The specific criterion for each step shall be easily discernible.
This will facilitate evaluating whether the step can be signed off.
Documentation The completed test results shall be stored in the plant file in accordance with 1.5.1.8.
Attachments (Attachments are listed individually. If none, so state.)
WP.S9S PROCEDURE NUMBER 1.5.1 REVISION NUMBER PAGE NUMBER 1.5.1 3 of'7
S 4
J I
'I L
I
~ ~
\\
l 1.5.1.4. Test Pert'orman The responsibility for performing surveillance tests will be assigned in the following manner for each Department:
Operations - Shift Manager assigns Control Room Supervisor Maintenance (IAC) - Supervisor assigns Foreman Maintenance - Supervisor assigns Foreman HP/Chemistry - Supervisor assigns Foreman Technical - Sup rvisor assigns Staff Engineer Routine surveillances which do not necessitate an individual procedure will be accomplished and documented via shift, daily, weekly or monthly logs as appropriate.
These logs will be submitted to POC via procedure for approval prior to implemntation.
All other Technical Specification surveillances will be performed in accordance with Volume 7 procedures.
During the operation of plant equipment while performing a test, the Control Room Operator assicped to perform the test or support another Department in testing, will dispatch an Equipment Operator(s) to the equipment location.
The Operator will be responsible for verifying correct operation of the equipm nt by local observations/adjustments (e.q., verifies proper lubrication and/or cooling flow monitors for unusual noises, etc.).
For all.Departments other than HP/Chemistry, the Shift Manager's approval and signature on the cover sheet will be required immediately prior to test initiation. If, during the performance of a test, it becomes apparent that the test may be interrupted and/or completion of the test may be delayed, the Shift Manager shall be notified.
The test performer should pay particular attention to critical steps and precautions in the procedure which, if performed incorrectly, could scram the plant, result in a group isolation, damage equipment or involve per-sonnel risk. If the step is not clearly understood or if the procedure is believed to be in error, the test performer should seek the assistance of the Shift Manager.
In addition, any test results found to be outside those designated in the procedure or any abnormal circumstances that prevent completion of the procedure shall be denoted in the "Commonts" section of the cover sheet.
Any work request issued as a result of the test shall be referenced in the comments section.
Except under certain specific situations, the test procedure should be monitored at the test location.
'P 596 PROCEDURE NUMBER 1.5.1 REVISION NUMBER PAGE NUMBER 1.5.1-4 of 17
J I
[
)
I
~
e
~
Upon co-pletion of the testing, the equipment or 'system should be returned to its normal status unless the Shift.Manager approves an alter-nate alignment or arrangement.
In this case, a brief description of the final system conditions will be included in the comment section and the Shift Manager will initial thus signifying approval.
Prior to forwarding the test results for final review and approval, the test performer and the Shift Manager or appropriate foreman responsible for the testing should verify that all blanks have been properly coto-'leted and that any significant observations made during the test are
'recorded.
In addition, the Shift Manager will perform a review to deter-,
mine the applicability for a potential reportable occurrence report (PPM 1.10.1) and/or take any action required by the Technical Specifications and complete a
NCR per Reference B describing the results.
The foreman shall immediately notify his supervisor upon discovering a reportable I-.
potentially reportable occurence.
1.5.1.5 A.
Test Results Review Review 8 The De rtment Per formin The Test Completed surveillance tests shall be reviewed for completeness and accuracy within each Department as follows:
Operations
'elief Day Shift Manager
'aintenance (IKC)
-IAC Supervtsor or alternate Maintenance 8'/Chemistry Technical.
Supervisor or alternate Supervisor or alternate Reactor Engineer Supervisor/Plant Engineering supervisor or alternate This review must be completed during the next work day.following the test.
The reviewer is responsible for all followup and corrective actions as follows:
-l.
If an item has been omitted, he will investigate to determine if.it was actually ommitted or ifit was performed but not signed off.
2.
He will review the test results against acceptance criteria to assure that Technical Specification requirements are met, and, ifnot, follow the action requirements in'he Technical Speci-fications.
3.
If an item appears to be in error, he wQ.1 investigate to determine if correct information is available.
WP.598 PROCEDURE NUMBER 1.5.1 REVISION NUMBER PAGE NUMBER 1.5.1-5 of 17
~
4.
He will determine if the
". st or a portion of it aust be repeat'ed.
If so, he will initiate action and provide specified directions regarding the deficiencies or omissions of the original test.
5.
He Will perform a review to determine the applicability for a potential reportable occurrence report (PPM 1.10.1) and license event report (Reference E of PPM 1.10.1).
- 6. ¹ will initiate any changes to the procedure which are recomnended to facilitate testing.
7.
He will forward the test results to the Records Management along with the completed task card.
B.
Technical De artment Review After completion of the test, a copy of the test data will be trans-mitted to the Technical Department Manager.
Test results will be reviewed and evaluated against Technical Specifications and trends by Technical Department Staff.
Pmp test data will'be analyzed within 96 hours0.00111 days <br />0.0267 hours <br />1.587302e-4 weeks <br />3.6528e-5 months <br /> of testing.
In addition, key parameters which are critical to plant availability and safety will be recorded and evaluated to assist in predicting equipment operating trends.
Based on this review, the Technical Department will recommend and initiate preventive maintenance to reverse. any negative trends.
An evaluation will be made to determine if the maintenance can be per-formed with the plant on-line or alternately, ifit can be delayed until the next scheduled outage.'lso, any maintenance performed which could effect equipment performance will be evaluated to deter-mine if retesting or new component reference data is required.
1.5'.1.6
~Re ortin In addition, to preparing a
nonconformance report, reports to regulatory authorities will be performed in accordance with References D and F. Ver-bal Reports to the NRC that are required within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> will be performed by the Duty Shift Manager following consultation with the Plant Manager or designated representative.
The Technical Department Compliance Engineer will be responsible for preparation and submittal of the routine as well as the non-routine written reports required by Technical Specification Section 6.0.
This will include the monthly and annual operating reports, LER's, and the 30 day written reports required for abnormal operating events.
In addition to the'ormal operating reports the Compliance Engineer will prepare the startup reports required following initial,plant startup and those following significant plant/fuel cycle modifications that would affect:
a) power level, b) nuclear, thermal, or hydraulic performance c) a change in fuel cycle design or. a different fuel supplier.
WP 598 PROCEDURE NUMBER REVISION NUMBER 1.5.1 PAGE NUMBER 1.5.1-6 of 17
~
~
I l
l
A';
Tem orar Revisions Temporary changes to the Volume.7 Surveillance Procedures are, made in accordance with PPM 1.2.3, as a deviation to the existing proce-dure.
Such changes are allowed, provided that:
1.'he intent of the original procedure is not altered.
2.
The change is approved by two members of the Plant Management Staff, at least one of whom holds a Senior Reactor Operator's License on the unit affected.
The change is documented, reviewed by POC and approved by tl'=
~
Plant Manager within 14 days of implementation.
1.5.1.8 Docunentation Stora e and Retention Upon completion of a test, tPe results will be sent to the Record Storage Facility in the WNP-2 Plant Files (Service Building).
Test results will be filed in accordance'ith PPM 1.6.4.
Each Department submitting test results will be required to fillmjt a Document Guide to document the management parameters.
All Volume 7 pro-cedures will be classified as Surveillance Procedures, Volume 7.
Stor-age of all Volume 7 test results will generally-be the same.
Exceptions'o this include the requirement to store all records of inservice inspec-tions, all reactor tests and experments, and all records of the service lives including any associated installation and maintenance records of all hydraulic and mechanical snubbers included in Tables 3.7.5-1
- and, 3.7.5-2 of the Technical Specification for the duration of the plant operating license.
All other surveillance test data (Volume 7) must be retained for at least 5 years.
All special processed records such as radiographs, photographs, negatives, etc. will be retained in hard copy form.
In addition to the record copy file, equipment history files containing vital data on plant equipment'will be maintained.
Pertinent information
~
on equipment operating histories and trends gathered from surveillance testing will be placed in this file at the discretion of the cognizant Technical Department Engineer.
(It should be noted that this file is a working file for the convenience of the plant staff and is not intended to serve as a second source for the surveillance test record copy.)
1.5.1.9 Surveillance Test Schedulin (See the Surveillance Testing Flow Chart included as Attachment 1)
WP SQB PROCEOURE NUMBER 1.5.1 REVISION NUMBER PAGE NUMBER 1.5.1-'7 of 17
~
~
A.
Schedule Maintet."nce S stem (SMS)
A master schedule for surveillance testing required at a frequency greater than daily, will be prepared to cover a f'ive year period by the Testing Coordinator.
This schedule will be incorporated into the Scheduled Maintenance System (SMS).
On a monthly basis, the Maintenance Planner and Scheduler will furnish each Department Man-ager with a schedule (SMS cards) of surveillance tests which must be performed in the next month.
On a daily basis, the Maintenance Planner and Scheduler will also notify and provide 'each Department Manager with a copy of any tests which are listed on the backlog report.
(Report of those tests which have not been documented complete. )
B.
Data In ut to SMS Each Department Manager will be responsible for inputting surveil-lance procedure data to SMS in accordance with PPM 10.1.5, upon POC approval of the test procedure.
Attachment VII is a copy of a sample task card similar to those which will be issued on a monthly basis.
In addition, to the surveillance task card, each Department Manager can receive a surveillance schedule report for all depart-mental tests required during the period.
This report is available from the Maintenance Planner and Scheduler upon request.
Since SMS was originally developed to provide information input for individual pieces of equipment, the input for surveillance tests must be tailored to meet the computer code requirements; As a re-sult, certain fields may not be applicable and will either be left blank or marked N/A.
An example of this is the equipment informa-tion which does not appear in Attachment VII since the test covers a
multitude of plant equipment.
As applicable, surveillance testing will be performed on a "fixed anniversary" basis.
Thus the test due date will be provided along with, a late date calculated by computer which takes previous test completion dates into account.
Although a grace period of 25K of the test frequency is allowed (except for certain isolated cases especially 4.6.1.2.L and 4.6.1.3.b.l),
any 3 consecutive tests must be performed within 3.25 times the test frequency.
Failure to meet these requirements will result in a Technical Specification viola-tion.
Actual test frequency will be based on Technical Specifica-tion requirements and listed in SMS and the Surveillance Listing (1.5.1.9.G).
In order to avoid violations, each department will perform testing on the due date, thus saving the margin for unforeseen circumst'ances or for special test scheduling which may be necessary to maintain a
high plant availability.
As previously mentioned, a daily backlog report will be issued to each Department Manager as indication of any testing which has not been reported as completed by return of the surveillance task card.
WP.598 PROCEOURE NUMBER REVISION NUMBER 1.5.1 PAGE NUMBER 1.5.1-8 of 17
C.
Initial Test hedulin Prior to plant startup, the Testing Coordinator will develop a
master schedule for surveillance cesting in con)unction with each department.
This schedule will attempt to schedule tests in a logi-cal order over the given periods.
By utilizing a f'ixed anniversary scheduling system, the testing sequence should remain the same thoughout plant life.
This schedule will be refined as conditions change and operating experience is acquired.
D.
Test Cce letion Notification Upon completion of a test, 'each department must review and approve the test results in accordance with 1.5.1.5 and submit these results to the plant file for storage.
The surveillance task card will n.;i be returned to the Maintenance Planner and Scheduler until the docu-.
mentation has been placed in the plant files.
Any special r-suits or conditions following the test shall be noted on the card ia the
emarks colure. If gC.notification to witness the test (denoted by QC prior to task card distribution) is not received, the QC/Test Section should be marked N/A.
E.
E ui ment Maintenance and Retest F.
If equipment maintenance and/or retesting are required as a result of the initial test results, SMS will not be used.
Each Department Manager is responsible for scheduling any retesting that may be re-quired.
SMS will continue to carry testing based on the fixed anni-versary date.
~IUt I
The SMS System will be used to identify any plant testing which can be performed during plaraed or unplanned outages.
The Testing Coor-dinator will request an SMS report by department, by operating mode (i.e.; refueling) and a listing of those tests which can only be performed while the plant is shutdown will be provided to each Department Manager.
G.
Surveillance Listin In addition to the monthly distribution of task cards and listing of surveillances, a cross reference index containing all Technical Specification surveillances, procedure
- numbers, responsible depart-
- ments, operating mode under which the test can be run and frequency
~
of testing will be available.
This listing will be maintained in the computer and has the capability to sort on any column heading.
Thus an immediate method of identifying by procedure how each sur; veillance is performed is available from the Testing Coordinator.
WP-598 PROCEDURE NUMBER REVISION NUMBER 1.5.1 PAGE NUMBER 1.5.1-9 of 17
H.
Fiocedure Numberin A procedure numbering system utilizing the Technical'Specification surveillance numbers with the prefix 7 in front will be utilized.
For inputting into SMS, the procedure for TS 4.5.1 would be TSS-PN-7.4.5.1 with TSS-PN signifying. Technical Specification Sur-veillance Procedure Number.
For those procedures which cover more than one surveillance requirement, the procedure should be numbered after the most predominant surveillance requirement included and all other applicable procedures included in the task d scription (see Attachment VII).
The Testing Coordinator will provide assistance in procedure numbering.
I, 1.5.1.10 Technical Direction The Technical Department will provide technical direction for interpret-ing surveillance requirements, testing methods or plans and test schedul-ing. upon request.
1.5.1.11 References A.
PPM 1.2.3, Use of Plant Procedures B.
PPM 1.3.12, Plant Nonconformance C.
D.
F.
PPM 1.6.4, WNP-2 Plant and Satellite Files Contents and Structure PPM 1.10.1, Reportable Events and Occurrences Required by Regulatory Agencies IR PPM 10.1.5, Scheduled Maintenance System PPM 1.10.2, Routine or Periodic Reports Required By Regulatory Agencies 1.5.1.12 Attachments A.
B., Surveillance Testing Flow Chart Attachment II VI, Testing Procedure Cover Sheets for Operations, Maintenance (IAC), Maintenance, Health Physics/Chemistry, and Tech-nical C.
Attachment VII, Surveillance Task Card (sample)
WP.59B PROCEOURE NUMBER 1.5.1 REVISION NUMBER PAGE NUMBER 1.5.1-10 of 17
SNVEILLANCE TESTING FLOH CHART cs ng Coordinator identifies and assigns surveillance, testing respm-sibilltles to ecch dc attmcnt ar Hanager assigns procedure preparation ufthfn dc rtmcnt approval b
f0C Hans ger provides SHS input data to the Naintenance Pfdmcr and Schedular and Testing Coordfnator n pence Plamer and Surveill Scheckder Program inputs to implemented SHS ntenance Pfamer and Schedular provldcs daily Backlog Rcport for each Department Ham r
Na ntenanCe Plamer and Schedular provides a
surveillance schedule rc-port for the fofloving month to Plant Adsin-istratlon-lfcatl Achfnfstrati on provides a
copy of the latest approved pro cec4re to the applfcable department for use during testi ll D0Om0
~C
~
D Vl
~
2
~C Cl m
C 02 M 2 C3 0
Ul
~
7 v C I
3
&~ Pl D
O ch r
n Hanager assigns testing to the rvisor level rv sors assign tests vithin the cs r
forser performs test and collects ovf rc vices data col pro vfdcs re-su'ts to the Super-vfsor cs ng na r
develops the over-all survcfllance tcsti schedule rv Sor reVfevs tCSt results results mncceptable Results Acceptable ot y
t nagcr an as applicable:
1)
Foffoc TS Action Rc adrcmcnts 2)
Prepares HHR 3)
Asthorfze Report a)
Prepare a PotenLfaliy Reportable Occurrence Rcport 5)
Prepare an RCR fn ac-'ordance with PPH 1.3:12 n
Plamcr and Schedular provides conthly surveillance requirements vfs task cards to each dc artmen r
ta and campleted task card to Records Hanage-aent ance Engineer pre-pare reports to bc filed with AC ca Department Rcviev the test results and trend equipment rforcLsncc tdS HL1 agcmcnt re-produce test results en9 provide a copy to tre Te:hnical Department.'ile the original f~
olmt Files and returr the Car-pleted tasc card tc th.
Nafntenanc lame-e Scncduier sfgnifrfng test cas-olctco.
cela ca Department caintafns sumaary re suits in the equipment his-to file
I I
I I
TESTING OCEDURE COVER SHEET - OPERATI WASHINGTONPUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM PLANT PROCEDURES MANUAL WNP-2 PROCEDURE NUMBER APPROVED DATE VOLUMENAME SECTION TITLE SLRVEILLMlCE PROCEDNK (SECTION TITLE)
(FROCEDURE TITLE)
Permission to Perform Test:
Shift Manager Time Date Test Performed B:
Test Satis factor NCR Issued I
I Yes I
I No Test Com leted and Reviewed;.
Control Room Operator Shift Manager Time Date Work Request Issued Comments:
I I Yes Assigned Reviewer Comments:
Re e
Day Sh Manager Date R
uirement for which Test Performed:
Tech Spec Weekly I
Monthly I
I Quarterly I
Annually I
Increased Frequency I
I Post Maintenance I
I 18 Mo I
I WP S97 R1 PROCEDURE NUMBER 1.5.1 REVISION NUMBER PAGE NUMBER 1.5.1-12 of 17
TESTING PR)URE COVER SHEET - IIAINTENANCIIC)
%ASHINGTON PUBLIC POSER SUPPLY SYSTEM PLANT PhOCEDURES MANUAL WNP-PROCEOURE NUMBER APPROVEO DATE VOLUMENAME SECTION TITLE SLRVEILLANCE PROCEDURES (SECTION TITLE)
(PROCEDURE TITLE)
Channel Calibration Procedure For:
E.
P.
NUMBER ACCURACY SETPOINT TECH SPEC L~IT MANUFACTURER MODEL PERMISSION TO FROCEED WITH TEST r
Sh t Manager Test Satisfactory I
I Yes Procedure Completed FROM)URE COMPLETED thti. fh' I
No IhC Foreman Sh Manager Cal. Void Date DATE Tested By Date Foreman Date Reviewed By Date TIME NCR Issued I
I Yes I
I No DATE NCR COMMENT:
R uirement for which Test Performed:
Tech Spec Weekly I
I Monthly I
I Quarterly I
I Annually 'I I
. Increased Frequency I
I Post Maintenance I
I 18 Mo I.
WP.S97 R1 PROCEDURE NUMBER 1.5.1'EVISION NUMBER PACE NUMBER 1.5.1-13 of 17
I I
~
TESTING EDURE COVER SHEET - MAINTENA WASHINGTONPUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM PLANT PROCEDURES MANUAL WNP.
PROCEOURE NUMBER APPROVEO OATE VOLUMENAME
- SECTION, TITLE SLRVEILLANCE PROCEDURES (SECTION TITLE)
(PROCEDURE TITLE)
Permission To Perform Test Shi t Manager Time Date Test Performed By:
= Date Results Satisfactory I
I Yes I
I No S gno NCR Issued I
I Yes Test Completed Comments:
I I
No
. Sh t Manager Work Request Issued Assigned Reviewer Comments:
I Yes,
-I I
No Nuoher Date
-R uirements for which Test Performed:
Tech Spec Weekly I
I Monthly I
I Quarterly I
I Annually.
I I
Increased Frequency I
I Post Maintenance I
I 18 Mo I
I WP.597 Rl i PROCEOUR M
1.5.1 VISION NUMBE R PAGE NUMBER 1.5.1-14 of 17.
~
~
I TESTING PRPURE COVER SHEET - HP/CHEHISTI WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM PLANT PIiOCEDURES MANUAL WIVP-PROCEDURE NUMBER APPROVED DATE VOLUMENAME SECTION TITLE SLRVEILLANCE PROCEDURE (SECTION TITLE)
(FROCEDLRE TITLE)
Permission To Perform Test Test Performed By:
S ift Manager Date Results Satisfactory I,
I I
Yes I
No NCR Issued I
I Yes I
I No Test Completed Sh t Manager Comments:
Work Request Issued Assicped Reviewer Comments:
I Yes 1
I No Number Date R
uirement for which Test Performed:
0 Tech Spec Weekly I
I Monthly I
I quarterly I
Annually l
I Increased Frequency I
I Post Maintenance I
I
~
18 Mo I
I
'P.597 R1 PROCEDURE NUMBER, 1.5.1 REVISION NUMBER PAGE NUMBER 1.5.1-15 of 17
TESTING PR DURE COVER SHEET - TECHNICAL V
~
WASHINGTONPUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM PLANT PROCES VRES MANUAL WNP-PROCEOURE NUMBER APPROVEO DATE VOLUMENAME SECTION TITLE SLRVEILLANCE PROCEDURES (SECTION TITLE)
(FROCEDLRE TITLE)
Permission To Perform Test Test Performed 8y:
Sh t Manager
'I Time Date Date Results Satisfactory
=
I I Yes I No S gno NCR Issued I
I Yes Test Com'pleted Comments:
I I
No Shi t Manager Work Request Issued Assigned Reviewer Comments:
I I Yes Number Date R
uirement for which Test Performed:
Tech Spec Weekly I
I
. Monthly I
I Quarterly I
Annually 1
Increased Frequency I
I Post Maintenance I
I 18 Mo I
I WP.S97 R1 PROCEOURE N MB 1.5.1 R
ISION NUMBER PAGE NUMBER 1.5.1-16 of 17
g 1
~
~ e
~
SURVEILLANCE TASK CARD (Sample)
SURVEILLANCE DUE:
1/13/83 PMID: AA3772 2-TSS-FN-7.4.5.1.B. 1 TASK ID:Ol LATE:
2/ 5/83
. TRANS:
6 PLANT CON)ITION POWER OPERATIONS 123456780 PRTY:
1 PRNT:.12/15/82 LOC:
QCLASS:
FREG:92 DAY FA CLR/REQ:
YES EQUIPMENT DESC:-
TASK DESC:
ECCS DIV 1 OPERABILITY TEST, INCLUDING TS 4.5.1.B.2 (INCLUDE ALI TECH SPEC SURVEILLANCE CONVERED BY THIS PROCEDURE AND ANY OThER PERTINENT INFORMATION.)
PROC/REF:
RWP REQ:
SERIAL:
S
~
~
~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
QC/TEST:
0 YES TECH SPEC:
YES
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
~ ~
~
~ ~ ~ ~
~
~ (MFG EQUIP:
N/A FUNCTIONAL TFST SYS:
REF:
).......(REL/CRAFT:
, )..........
COMPLETION DATE:
/
/
OPERATI{"lS SS APVL:
EMP h NO:
REMARKS:
RESCHEDULE DATE:
-~/
/
SUPR SIG:
HOURS:
CLR/NO:
Attachment VII IMP.59 6 PROCEOURE NUMBER 1.5.1 REVISION NUMBER PAGE NUMBER 1 5 1-17 of 17