ML17221A320

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Forwards Safety Evaluation Re Util Confirmatory Reanalysis Associated W/Steam Line Break for Facility.Results of Reanalysis Acceptable.All Outstanding Issues Associated W/ Safety Evaluation in Support of Amend 63 Considered Closed
ML17221A320
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/05/1987
From: Tourigny E
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Woody C
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
Shared Package
ML17221A321 List:
References
TAC-61216, NUDOCS 8708190049
Download: ML17221A320 (3)


Text

August 5, 1987 Docket No. 50-335 DISTRIBUTION T~:j L. L t NRC POR ACRS (10)

Local PDR Gray file PD22 Reading S. Varga G. Lainas Mr. C. 0.

Woody Group Vice President Nuclear Energy Florida Power and Light Company P.O.

Box 14000 Juno Beach, Florida 33408 D. Miller E. Tourigny OGC-Bethesda

Dear Mr. Woody:

E. Jordan J. Partlow

SUBJECT:

STEAM LINE BREAK REANALYSIS (TAC NO. 61216)

The staff has completed its review of your confirmatory reanalysis associated with steam line break for the St. Lucie Plant, Unit No. 1.

The analysis was submitted by letter dated November 8, 1985, as supplemented July 16, 1986, in response to the staff's safety evaluation of March 1, 1984, supporting Amend-ment No. 63.

The staff finds that the results of the reanalysis are acceptable, and the safety evaluation is enclosed.

Based upon the above, all outstanding issues associated with the staff's safety evaluation in support of Amendment No.

63 are now considered resolved.

Sincerely, It should be noted that there were two other items that required resolution, as detailed in the staff's safety evaluation in support of Amendment No. 63.

Item one dealt with License Condition 2.C.(4) which reads "Prior to reaching 38,000 MWD/MTU peak assembly, the licensee must use an approved method to show that Combustion Engineering fuel will not experience creep collapse unless the new Exxon Corporation methodology has been approved for use by the staff and its results are valid for Cycle 6."

You have satisfied this condition as documented in a staff letter and safety evaluation forwarded to you on February 19, 1985.

Item two dealt with written confirmation that the worst assumption regarding single failure, including no single failure, for the loss of coolant accident was considered.

Your letter of October 25, 1984 provided this confirmation.

Enclosure:

As stated E.

G. Tourigny, Project Manager Project Directorate II-2 Division of Reactor Projects-I/II cc w/enclosure:

See next page L:

2 PM6lfff-2 D

r ETourigny:bg 7

/87 7/g)/87 s7osz9oozs s7osos PDR ADOCK 05000335 p

PDR L)

D:

LRubenst in 0/S-/87

II If

Mr. C, 0.

Woody Florida Power 8 Light Company St. Lucie Plant CC:

Mr. Jack Shreve Office of the Public Counsel Room 4, Holland Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304 Resident Inspector c/o U.S.

NRC 7585 S.

Hwy AIA Jensen

Beach, Florida 34957 State Planning 8 Development Clearinghouse Office of Planning 5 Budget Executive Office of the Governor The Capitol Building Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Harold F. Reis, fsq.

Newman 5 Holtzinger 1615 L Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20036 Norman A. Coll, Esq.

McCarthy, Steel, Hector and Davis 14th Floor, First National Bank Building Miami, Florida 33131 Administrator Department of Environmental Regulation Power Plant Siting Section State of Florida 2600 Blair Stone Road Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Mr. Weldon B. Lewis, County Administrator St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Avenue, Room 104 Fort Pierce, Florida 33450 Jacob Daniel Nash Office of Radiation Control Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 1317 Winewood Blvd.

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700 Regional Administrator, Region II U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Executive Director for Operations 101 Marietta Street N.W., Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323

'r

. Charles B. Brinkman, Manager Washington - Nuclear Operations

...,,Combustion Engineering, Inc.,'

7910; Woodmont Avenue

Bethesda, Maryland 20814 t

~ ~

t